e10vq
united states
securities and exchange commission
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
quarterly report pursuant to section 13 or 15(d) of
the securities exchange act of 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended November 28, 2008
or
|
|
|
o |
|
transition report pursuant to section 13 or 15(d) of
the securities exchange act of 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File No. 0-12867
3COM CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
94-2605794 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
350 Campus Drive |
|
|
Marlborough, Massachusetts
|
|
01752 |
|
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (508) 323-1000
Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report: N/A
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer,
or non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting Company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
(Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large Accelerated Filer þ
|
|
Accelerated Filer o
|
|
Non-Accelerated Filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
(Do not check is a smaller reporting company)
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No
þ
As of December 26, 2008, 386,760,766 shares of the registrants common stock were outstanding.
3COM CORPORATION
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED NOVEMBER 28, 2008
TABLE OF CONTENTS
We use a 52 or 53 week fiscal year ending on the Friday nearest to May 31, with each fiscal quarter
ending on the Friday generally nearest August 31, November 30 and February 28. For presentation
purposes, the periods are shown as ending on August 31, November 30, February 28 and May 31, as
applicable. Our China legal entity follows a calendar year basis of reporting and therefore
results for our China-based sales segment is consolidated on a two-month time lag.
3Com, the 3Com logo, Digital Vaccine, IntelliJack, NBX, OfficeConnect, TippingPoint, TippingPoint
Technologies and VCX are registered trademarks and H3C and VCX are trademarks of 3Com Corporation
or one of its wholly owned subsidiaries. Other product and brand names may be trademarks or
registered trademarks of their respective owners.
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements made pursuant to the safe
harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking
statements include, without limitation, statements regarding the following aspects of our business:
stock repurchase program; China-based sales region strategy, growth, dependence, expected
benefits, tax rate, sales from China, and resources needed to comply with Sarbanes-Oxley and manage
operations; impact of recent accounting regulations; expected annual amortization expense;
environment for enterprise networking equipment; global economic slowdown; challenges relating to
sales growth; trends and goals for segments and regions; pursuit of termination fee; supply of
components; research and development focus; execution of our strategy; strategic product and
technology development plans; goal of sustaining profitability; dependence on China; ability to
satisfy cash requirements for at least the next twelve months; restructuring activities and
expected charges to be incurred; expected cost savings from restructuring activities and
integration; potential acquisitions and strategic relationships; future contractual obligations;
recovery of deferred tax assets and balance of unrecognized tax benefits; reserves; market risk;
outsourcing; competition and pricing pressures; expectation regarding base interest rates; impact
of foreign currency fluctuations; belief regarding meritorious defenses to litigation claims and
effect of litigation; and you can identify these and other forward-looking statements by the use of
words such as may, can, should, expects, plans, anticipates, believes, estimates,
predicts, intends, continue, or the negative of such terms, or other comparable terminology.
Forward-looking statements also include the assumptions underlying or relating to any
forward-looking statements.
Actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements
as a result of various factors,
including those set forth under Part II Item 1A Risk Factors. All forward-looking statements
included in this document are based on our assessment of information available to us at the time
this report is filed. We have no intent, and disclaim any obligation, to update any
forward-looking statements.
In this Form 10-Q we refer to the Peoples Republic of China as China or the PRC.
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
3COM CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
November 30, |
|
|
November 30, |
|
(In thousands, except per share data) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Sales |
|
$ |
354,562 |
|
|
$ |
317,801 |
|
|
$ |
697,212 |
|
|
$ |
637,235 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
154,770 |
|
|
|
165,681 |
|
|
|
307,793 |
|
|
|
336,179 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
199,792 |
|
|
|
152,120 |
|
|
|
389,419 |
|
|
|
301,056 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses (income): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing |
|
|
88,620 |
|
|
|
80,785 |
|
|
|
174,902 |
|
|
|
155,189 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
47,854 |
|
|
|
52,199 |
|
|
|
93,601 |
|
|
|
104,509 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
31,352 |
|
|
|
31,060 |
|
|
|
58,406 |
|
|
|
52,538 |
|
Amortization |
|
|
25,060 |
|
|
|
26,260 |
|
|
|
50,224 |
|
|
|
52,266 |
|
Patent dispute resolution |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(70,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Restructuring charges |
|
|
2,504 |
|
|
|
3,147 |
|
|
|
4,501 |
|
|
|
3,572 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses, net |
|
|
195,390 |
|
|
|
193,451 |
|
|
|
311,634 |
|
|
|
368,074 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
4,402 |
|
|
|
(41,331 |
) |
|
|
77,785 |
|
|
|
(67,018 |
) |
Interest expense, net |
|
|
(547 |
) |
|
|
(3,966 |
) |
|
|
(1,798 |
) |
|
|
(7,533 |
) |
Other income, net |
|
|
15,899 |
|
|
|
10,343 |
|
|
|
28,770 |
|
|
|
22,754 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
19,754 |
|
|
|
(34,954 |
) |
|
|
104,757 |
|
|
|
(51,797 |
) |
Income tax provision |
|
|
(6,884 |
) |
|
|
(670 |
) |
|
|
(12,050 |
) |
|
|
(2,481 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
12,870 |
|
|
$ |
(35,624 |
) |
|
$ |
92,707 |
|
|
$ |
(54,278 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted net income (loss) per share |
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
(0.09 |
) |
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
|
$ |
(0.14 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in computing per share amounts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
394,036 |
|
|
|
398,989 |
|
|
|
398,462 |
|
|
|
398,015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
395,245 |
|
|
|
398,989 |
|
|
|
399,658 |
|
|
|
398,015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
1
3COM CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 30, |
|
|
May 31, |
|
(In thousands, except per share data) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2008 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and equivalents |
|
$ |
460,787 |
|
|
$ |
503,644 |
|
Notes receivable |
|
|
113,338 |
|
|
|
65,116 |
|
Accounts receivable, less allowance
for doubtful accounts of $13,245 and
$12,253, respectively |
|
|
131,151 |
|
|
|
116,281 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
111,478 |
|
|
|
90,831 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
35,092 |
|
|
|
34,033 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
851,846 |
|
|
|
809,905 |
|
Property and equipment, less accumulated
depreciation and amortization of $194,016
and $205,835, respectively |
|
|
49,187 |
|
|
|
54,314 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
609,297 |
|
|
|
609,297 |
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
227,971 |
|
|
|
278,385 |
|
Deposits and other assets |
|
|
19,966 |
|
|
|
23,229 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,758,267 |
|
|
$ |
1,775,130 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
86,386 |
|
|
$ |
90,280 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
48,000 |
|
|
|
48,000 |
|
Accrued liabilities and other |
|
|
378,900 |
|
|
|
366,181 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
513,286 |
|
|
|
504,461 |
|
Deferred taxes and long-term obligations |
|
|
23,122 |
|
|
|
22,367 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
165,000 |
|
|
|
253,000 |
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value,
10,000 shares authorized; none
outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 990,000
shares authorized; shares issued:
386,750 and 405,656, respectively |
|
|
2,318,036 |
|
|
|
2,353,688 |
|
Retained deficit |
|
|
(1,312,539 |
) |
|
|
(1,405,247 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
51,362 |
|
|
|
46,861 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
1,056,859 |
|
|
|
995,302 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
1,758,267 |
|
|
$ |
1,775,130 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
2
3COM CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
November 30, |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
92,707 |
|
|
$ |
(54,278 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to cash
provided by (used in) operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
65,113 |
|
|
|
69,279 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
12,080 |
|
|
|
9,868 |
|
Loss on property and equipment disposals |
|
|
891 |
|
|
|
155 |
|
Gain on investments, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(185 |
) |
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(2,521 |
) |
|
|
(1,234 |
) |
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts and notes receivable |
|
|
(63,970 |
) |
|
|
(10,418 |
) |
Inventories |
|
|
(25,478 |
) |
|
|
16,863 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
1,056 |
|
|
|
113 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
(14,642 |
) |
Other liabilities |
|
|
16,152 |
|
|
|
(68,080 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
|
|
96,093 |
|
|
|
(52,559 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from maturities and sales of investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
442 |
|
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
(11,425 |
) |
|
|
(9,746 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment |
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
864 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(11,275 |
) |
|
|
(8,440 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuances of common stock |
|
|
2,848 |
|
|
|
5,656 |
|
Repurchases of common stock |
|
|
(50,574 |
) |
|
|
(1,322 |
) |
Repayment of long term debt |
|
|
(88,000 |
) |
|
|
(94,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(135,726 |
) |
|
|
(89,666 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and equivalents |
|
|
8,051 |
|
|
|
10,591 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in cash and equivalents during period |
|
|
(42,857 |
) |
|
|
(140,074 |
) |
Cash and equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
503,644 |
|
|
|
559,217 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
460,787 |
|
|
$ |
419,143 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
3COM CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
NOTE 1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules
and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. In the opinion of management, these
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include all adjustments necessary for a fair
presentation of our financial position as of November 28, 2008 and May 30, 2008, our results of
operations for the three and six months ended November 28, 2008 and November 30, 2007 and our cash
flows for the six months ended November 28, 2008 and November 30, 2007.
We use a 52 or 53 week fiscal year ending on the Friday nearest to May 31. For convenience, the
condensed consolidated financial statements have been shown as ending on the last day of the
calendar month. Accordingly, the three and six months shown as ended November 30, 2008 actually
ended on November 28, 2008, the three and six months shown as ended November 30, 2007 ended on
November 30, 2007, and the balance sheet presented as of May 31, 2008 actually as of May 30, 2008.
The results of operations for the three and six months ended November 30, 2008 may not be
indicative of the results to be expected for the fiscal year ending May 29, 2009 or any other
future periods. These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction
with the consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto included in our Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended May 30, 2008.
Recently issued accounting pronouncements
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141R, Business Combinations to improve reporting
and to create greater consistency in the accounting and financial reporting of business
combinations. The standard requires the acquiring entity in a business combination to recognize
all (and only) the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the transaction; establishes the
acquisition-date fair value as the measurement objective for all assets acquired and liabilities
assumed; and requires the acquirer to disclose to investors and other users all of the information
they need to evaluate and understand the nature and financial effect of the business combination.
SFAS No. 141R applies prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on
or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15,
2008, with the exception of the accounting for valuation allowances on deferred taxes and acquired
tax contingencies. SFAS No. 141R amends SFAS 109, such that adjustments made to valuation
allowances on deferred income taxes and acquired income tax contingencies associated with
acquisitions that closed prior to the effective date of SFAS No. 141R would apply the provisions of
SFAS No. 141R. An entity may not apply SFAS No. 141R before that date. Given that SFAS No. 141R
relates to prospective and not historical business combinations, the Company cannot currently
determine the potential effects adoption of SFAS No. 141R may have on its consolidated financial
statements.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements to improve the relevance, comparability, and transparency of financial information
provided to investors by requiring all entities to report noncontrolling (minority) interests in
subsidiaries in the same way as required in the consolidated financial statements. Moreover, SFAS
No. 160 eliminates the diversity that currently exists in accounting for transactions between an
entity and non-controlling interests by requiring that they be treated as equity transactions.
SFAS No. 160 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years,
beginning on or after December 15, 2008. Earlier adoption is prohibited. The Company is currently
evaluating whether the adoption of SFAS No. 160 will have an effect on its consolidated financial
position, results of operations or cash flows.
In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. SFAS 157-2, Effective Date of FASB
Statement No. 157, which provides a one-year deferral of the effective date of FAS No. 157 for
non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities, except those that are recognized or disclosed
in the financial statements at fair value at least annually. Effective June 1, 2008, we adopted the
provisions of SFAS No. 157 with respect to our financial assets and liabilities recorded at fair
value. We have not yet determined the impact, if any, of the portion of SFAS No. 157, for which
the implementation has been deferred, will have on our consolidated financial position, results of
operations or cash flow.
4
On March 19, 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities an Amendment of FASB Statement 133. (SFAS 161). SFAS No. 161 enhances
required disclosures regarding derivatives and hedging activities, including enhanced disclosures
regarding how: (a) an entity uses derivative instruments; (b) derivative instruments and related
hedged items are accounted for under FASB Statement No.133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments
and Hedging Activities; and (c) derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entitys
financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. SFAS No. 161 is effective for fiscal
years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008. The Company has currently not
determined the potential effects on the consolidated financial statements, if any.
In April 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) FAS No. 142-3, Determination of the
Useful Life of Intangible Assets (FSP FAS No. 142-3). FSP FAS No. 142-3 amends the factors that
should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful
life of a recognized intangible asset under FAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
(FAS No. 142). The intent of FSP FAS No. 142-3 is to improve the consistency between the useful
life of a recognized intangible asset under FAS No. 142 and the period of expected cash flows used
to measure the fair value of the asset under FAS No. 141R Business Combinations, and other U.S.
generally accepted accounting principles. FSP FAS No. 142-3 is effective for financial statements
issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. We are currently evaluating the
potential impact of FSP FAS No. 142-3 on our consolidated results of operations and financial
position.
In May 2008, the FASB Statement No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles (SFAS No. 162). SFAS No. 162 identifies the sources of accounting principles and the
framework for selecting the principles used in the preparation of financial statements of
nongovernmental entities that are presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles (the GAAP hierarchy). SFAS No. 162 will become effective 60 days following the SECs
approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board amendments to AU Section 411, The
Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity With Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. We do not
currently expect the adoption of SFAS No. 162 to have a material effect on our consolidated results
of operations and financial position.
In October 2008, the FASB issued FSP 157-3 Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset When
the Market for That Asset Is Not Active (FSP 157-3). FSP 157-3 clarifies the application of SFAS
No. 157 in a market that is not active, and addresses application issues such as the use of
internal assumptions when relevant observable data does not exist, the use of observable market
information when the market is not active, and the use of market quotes when assessing the
relevance of observable and unobservable data. FSP 157-3 is effective for all periods presented in
accordance with SFAS No. 157. The adoption of FSP 157-3 did not have a significant impact on our
consolidated financial statements or the fair values of our financial assets and liabilities.
NOTE 2. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
In order to determine the fair value of stock options and employee stock purchase plan shares, we
use the Black-Scholes option pricing model and apply the single-option valuation approach to the
stock option valuation. In order to determine the fair value of restricted stock awards and
restricted stock units we use the closing market price of 3Com common stock on the date of grant.
We recognize stock-based compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service
period of time-based vesting awards for stock options, restricted stock awards, restricted stock
units, and the employee stock purchase plan. For unvested stock options outstanding as of May 31,
2006, we continue to recognize stock-based compensation expense using the accelerated amortization
method prescribed in FASB Interpretation No. 28, Accounting for Stock Appreciation Rights and
Other Variable Stock Option or Award Plans.
As of November 30, 2008, total unrecognized stock-based compensation expense relating to unvested
employee stock options, restricted stock awards, restricted stock units and employee stock purchase
plan, adjusted for estimated forfeitures, was $15.6 million, $5.4 million, $15.5 million and $0.5
million, respectively. These amounts are expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period
of 2.5 years for stock options, 2.1 years for restricted stock awards, 2.1 years for restricted
stock units and 0.3 years for employee stock purchase plan. If actual forfeitures differ from
current estimates, total unrecognized stock-based compensation expense will be adjusted for future
changes in estimated forfeitures.
5
Stock-based compensation recognized and disclosed is based on the Black-Scholes option pricing
model for estimating the fair value of options granted under the companys equity incentive plans.
The Black-Scholes option pricing model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of
traded options that have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. Option valuation
models require the input of highly subjective assumptions, including the expected stock price
volatility. The underlying weighted-average assumptions used in the Black-Scholes model and the
resulting estimates of fair value per share were as follows for options granted during the three
and six months ended November 30, 2008 and November 30, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
Three Months |
|
Six Months |
|
Six Months |
|
|
Ended |
|
Ended |
|
Ended |
|
Ended |
|
|
November 30, |
|
November 30, |
|
November 30, |
|
November 30, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
|
|
Employee stock options: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Volatility |
|
|
52.1 |
% |
|
|
42.9 |
% |
|
|
51.3 |
% |
|
|
40.5 |
% |
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
2.5 |
% |
|
|
3.9 |
% |
|
|
2.6 |
% |
|
|
4.7 |
% |
Dividend yield |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
Expected life (years) |
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value per option |
|
$ |
1.02 |
|
|
$ |
1.46 |
|
|
$ |
1.02 |
|
|
$ |
1.49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock awards: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average grant date fair value |
|
$ |
2.22 |
|
|
$ |
3.67 |
|
|
$ |
2.22 |
|
|
$ |
3.90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock units: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average grant date fair value |
|
$ |
2.20 |
|
|
$ |
3.71 |
|
|
$ |
2.34 |
|
|
$ |
3.72 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee Stock Purchase Plan: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Volatility |
|
|
77.7 |
% |
|
|
61.1 |
% |
|
|
77.7 |
% |
|
|
61.1 |
% |
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
1.2 |
% |
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
|
1.2 |
% |
|
|
4.0 |
% |
Dividend yield |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
Expected life (years) |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value per option |
|
$ |
0.90 |
|
|
$ |
1.60 |
|
|
$ |
0.90 |
|
|
$ |
1.60 |
|
The following table presents stock-based compensation expense included in the accompanying
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
Three Months |
|
Six Months |
|
Six Months |
|
|
Ended November |
|
Ended November |
|
Ended November |
|
Ended November |
|
|
30, 2008 |
|
30, 2007 |
|
30, 2008 |
|
30, 2007 |
Cost of sales |
|
$ |
562 |
|
|
$ |
523 |
|
|
$ |
1,320 |
|
|
$ |
907 |
|
Sales and marketing |
|
|
1,613 |
|
|
|
1,418 |
|
|
|
3,371 |
|
|
|
2,393 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
893 |
|
|
|
973 |
|
|
|
1,777 |
|
|
|
1,694 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
2,570 |
|
|
|
3,092 |
|
|
|
5,612 |
|
|
|
4,874 |
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation
expense before tax |
|
$ |
5,638 |
|
|
$ |
6,006 |
|
|
$ |
12,080 |
|
|
$ |
9,868 |
|
|
|
|
6
Stock Options. As of November 30, 2008, our outstanding stock options as a percentage of
outstanding shares were approximately 8.6 percent. Stock option activity for the six months ended
November 30, 2008, was as follows (shares in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
exercise |
|
|
|
shares |
|
|
price |
|
Outstanding May 31, 2008 |
|
|
43,925 |
|
|
$ |
4.98 |
|
Granted |
|
|
1,286 |
|
|
|
2.27 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
(792 |
) |
|
|
1.61 |
|
Cancelled |
|
|
(11,100 |
) |
|
|
5.17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding November 30, 2008 |
|
|
33,319 |
|
|
$ |
4.89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of November 30, 2008, there were approximately 22.0 million options exercisable with a
weighted-average exercise price of $5.70 per share. By comparison, there were approximately 25.9
million options exercisable as of November 30, 2007 with a weighted-average exercise price of $5.86
per share.
During the six months ended November 30, 2008 approximately 0.8 million options were exercised at
an aggregate intrinsic value of $0.5 million. The exercise intrinsic value above is calculated as
the difference between the market value on the exercise date and the exercise price of the options.
The closing market value as of November 28, 2008 was $2.01 per share as reported by the NASDAQ
Global Select Market. The aggregate intrinsic value of options outstanding and options exercisable
as of November 30, 2008 was $1.2 million and $1.2 million, respectively. The aggregate options
outstanding and options exercisable intrinsic value is calculated for options that are in-the-money
as the difference between the market value as of November 28, 2008 and the exercise price of the
options.
Options outstanding that are vested and expected to vest as of November 30, 2008 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
average |
|
Remaining |
|
Aggregate |
|
|
Shares |
|
Grant-Date |
|
Contractual |
|
Intrinsic Value |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Fair Value |
|
Life (in years) |
|
(in thousands) |
Vested and expected
to vest at November
30, 2008 |
|
|
29,336 |
|
|
$ |
5.12 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
$ |
1,240 |
|
Restricted Stock Awards. Restricted stock award activity during the six months ended November 30,
2008 was as follows (shares in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
average |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Grant-Date |
|
|
|
(unvested) |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Outstanding May 31, 2008 |
|
|
3,095 |
|
|
$ |
3.43 |
|
Granted |
|
|
325 |
|
|
|
2.28 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(592 |
) |
|
|
3.95 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(430 |
) |
|
|
3.82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding November 30, 2008 |
|
|
2,398 |
|
|
$ |
3.07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the six months ended November 30, 2008 approximately 0.6 million restricted awards with an
aggregate fair value of $1.2 million became vested. Total aggregate intrinsic value of restricted
stock awards outstanding as of November 30, 2008 was $4.8 million.
7
Restricted Stock Units. Restricted stock unit activity during the six months ended November 30,
2008 was as follows (shares in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
(unvested) |
Outstanding May 31, 2008 |
|
|
5,744 |
|
Granted |
|
|
4,630 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(1,463 |
) |
Forfeited |
|
|
(882 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding November 30, 2008 |
|
|
8,029 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The weighted average exercise price for all restricted stock units for all periods was $0.00. Total
aggregate intrinsic value of restricted stock units outstanding at November 30, 2008 was $16.1
million.
During the six months ended November 30, 2008 approximately 1.5 million restricted stock units with
an aggregate intrinsic value of $3.0 million became vested.
Employee Stock Purchase Plan. We have an employee stock purchase plan (ESPP) under which eligible
employees may authorize payroll deductions of up to ten percent of their compensation, as defined,
to purchase common stock at a price of 85 percent of the lower of the fair market value as of the
beginning or the end of the six-month offering period. We recognized $0.6 million of stock-based
compensation expense related to the ESPP in the six months ended November 30, 2008. Employee stock
purchases generally occur only in the quarters ended November 30 and May 31.
NOTE 3: FAIR VALUE
Fair Value Hierarchy
SFAS No. 157 establishes a fair value hierarchy that requires an entity to maximize the use of
observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. Observable
inputs are obtained from independent sources and can be validated by a third party, whereas
unobservable inputs reflect assumptions regarding what a third party would use in pricing an asset
or liability. A financial instruments categorization within the fair value hierarchy is based upon
the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. SFAS No. 157
establishes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:
Level 1 Observable inputs that reflect quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or
liabilities in active markets.
Level 2 Include other inputs that are directly or indirectly observable in the marketplace.
Level 3 Unobservable inputs which are supported by little or no market activity.
The fair value hierarchy also requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and
minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value.
In accordance with SFAS 157, we measure our cash equivalents at fair value and are classified
within Level 1 or Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. The classification has been determined based
on the manner in which we value our cash equivalents, primarily using quoted market prices or
alternative pricing sources and models utilizing market observable inputs.
8
Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
Assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis consisted of the following types of instruments
and were reported as cash equivalents as of November 30, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in Active |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Markets for |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identical |
|
|
Observable |
|
|
Unobservable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Instruments |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
Total |
|
(In thousands) |
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
|
Balance |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash equivalents: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time deposits |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
299,292 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
299,292 |
|
Money market fund deposits |
|
|
151,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
151,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets measured at fair value |
|
$ |
151,300 |
|
|
$ |
299,292 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
450,592 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 4. REALTEK PATENT DISPUTE RESOLUTION
On July 11, 2008, 3Com Corporation and Realtek Semiconductor Corp. (the Realtek Group) entered
into three agreements which document the resolution of a several-year-long patent litigation
between the parties and provide for the non-exclusive license by 3Com to the Realtek Group of
certain patents and related network interface technology for license fees totaling $70 million,
all of which was received in the three months ended August 31, 2008.
The basic agreement between 3Com and the Realtek Group documents the resolution of the litigation
between the parties and provides for the dismissal of the lawsuit and mutual releases between the
parties.
Under the terms of the agreements, the payments are non-refundable and the Company has no future
performance obligations, apart from certain customary covenants not to sue Realtek, its customers
or its suppliers on the licensed technology, and non-material notice and tax assistance
obligations. Accordingly the $70.0 million was recognized as income in the first quarter of
fiscal 2009 in the operating expense (income) section of the Consolidated Statement of
Operations.
NOTE 5. RESTRUCTURING CHARGES
In recent fiscal years, we have undertaken several initiatives involving significant changes in our
business strategy and cost structure.
In fiscal 2004, we continued a broad restructuring of our business to enhance the focus and cost
effectiveness of our segments in serving their respective markets. These restructuring efforts
continued through fiscal 2009. We took the following specific actions in fiscal 2004 through 2009
(the Fiscal 2004 2009 Actions):
|
|
|
reduced our workforce; and |
|
|
|
|
continued efforts to consolidate and dispose of excess facilities |
Restructuring charges related to these various initiatives resulted in a charge of $2.5 million in
the second quarter of fiscal 2009 and a net charge of $3.1 million in the second quarter of fiscal
2008. Net restructuring charges in the second quarter of fiscal 2009 consisted of $1.3 million for
severance and outplacement costs and $1.2 million for facilities-related charges. The net
restructuring charge in the second quarter of fiscal 2008 resulted from severance, outplacement and
other costs of $2.4 million and $0.7 million for facilities-related charges. Restructuring charges
for the first six months of fiscal 2009 were $4.5 million, and restructuring charges for the first
six months of fiscal 2008 were $3.6 million.
Accrued liabilities associated with restructuring charges totaled $2.4 million as of November 30,
2008 and are included in the caption Accrued liabilities and other in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets. These liabilities are classified as current because we expect to
satisfy such liabilities in cash within the next 12 months.
9
Fiscal 2008 and 2009 Actions
Activity and liability balances related to the fiscal 2008 and 2009 restructuring actions, which
were all approved by management as part of the fiscal 2008 corporate restructuring plan, are as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Separation |
|
|
Facilities-related |
|
|
Restructuring |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expense |
|
|
Charges |
|
|
Costs |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance as of May 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
687 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
687 |
|
|
Provisions |
|
|
3,128 |
|
|
|
1,263 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
4,443 |
|
Payments and non-cash charges |
|
|
(3,143 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
|
(3,195 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of November 30,
2008 |
|
$ |
672 |
|
|
$ |
1,263 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,935 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee separation expense includes severance pay, outplacement services, medical and other
related benefits. Through November 30, 2008, the total reduction in workforce associated with
actions initiated during fiscal 2008 included approximately 114 employees who had
been separated and approximately 8 employees who had
been notified but not yet worked their last day. In addition, during
the six months ended November 30,
2008, the reduction in workforce was extended with actions initiated in fiscal 2009 to include
approximately 63 employees who had been
separated and approximately 8 employees who had been
notified but not yet worked their last day. The expense associated with restructuring actions is
recognized as severed employees are terminated or over the remaining service period following their
notification of termination. Facilities-related charges relate to vacating part of our Marlborough
facility for which we ceased use during the second quarter of fiscal 2009.
We expect to complete any remaining activities related to these actions during the coming twelve
months.
Fiscal 2004 through 2007 Actions
Activity and liability balances related to the fiscal 2004 2007 restructuring actions are as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee |
|
|
Facilities- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Separation |
|
|
related |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expense |
|
|
Charges |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance as of May 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
28 |
|
|
$ |
687 |
|
|
$ |
715 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provisions (benefits) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
Payments and non-cash charges |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
(341 |
) |
|
|
(330 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of November 30, 2008 |
|
$ |
30 |
|
|
$ |
413 |
|
|
$ |
443 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee separation expense includes severance pay, outplacement services, medical and other
related benefits. Facilities-related charges related to revised future lease obligations.
We expect to complete any remaining activities related to these actions during the coming twelve
months.
NOTE 6. INCOME TAXES
The Company provides for income taxes during interim periods based on our estimate of the effective
tax rate for the year. Discrete items and changes in our estimate of the annual effective tax rate
are recorded in the period in which they occur. The Company recognizes interest and penalties
related to uncertain tax positions in income tax expense.
10
As of November 30, 2008, we had unrecognized tax benefits, including interest and penalties, of
$23.4 million, all of which, if recognized, would affect our effective tax rate. This balance
represents an increase of $5.1 million over the balance at the end of our last fiscal year. The
amount of the increase in the second quarter was $1.3 million. The increase from the last day of
our last fiscal year is due to the recording of approximately $6.5 million related to new uncertain
tax positions, partially offset by settlement of previous positions and lapsing of the statute of
limitations for tax audits in certain jurisdictions. As of November 30, 2008, the accrued interest
and penalties related to uncertain tax positions was $2.9 million and $0.4 million, respectively,
which have been recorded within the balance of unrecognized tax benefits.
During the three months ended August 31, 2008, we effectively settled the examination of a Hong
Kong subsidiarys returns for fiscal years 2000 to 2002. As a result of this settlement, we
recognized previously unrecognized tax benefits of $1.4 million.
We estimate that the balance of unrecognized tax benefits will decrease by approximately $3.4
million over the next twelve months as a result of the expiration of various statutes of
limitations.
NOTE 7. COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
The components of comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
November 30, |
|
|
November, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
12,870 |
|
|
$ |
(35,624 |
) |
|
$ |
92,707 |
|
|
$ |
(54,278 |
) |
Other comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized loss on investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(210 |
) |
Change in accumulated translation
adjustments |
|
|
(3,184 |
) |
|
|
7,622 |
|
|
|
4,501 |
|
|
|
14,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income (loss) |
|
$ |
9,686 |
|
|
$ |
(28,002 |
) |
|
$ |
97,208 |
|
|
$ |
(40,238 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 8. NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE
The following represents a reconciliation from basic earnings (loss) per common share to diluted
earnings (loss) per common share. Stock options and restricted stock (awards and units) of 32.5
million and 10.1 million, respectively, were outstanding at November 30, 2008 but were not included
in the computation of diluted earnings (loss) per share because they were antidilutive. Stock
options and restricted stock (awards and units) of 48.2 million and 2.3 million, respectively, were
outstanding at November 30, 2007, but were not included in the computation of diluted earnings
(loss) per share because they were antidilutive.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
November 30, |
|
|
November 30, |
|
(in thousands except per share data) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Determination of shares: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
394,036 |
|
|
|
398,989 |
|
|
|
398,462 |
|
|
|
398,015 |
|
Assumed conversion of dilutive stock
options and restricted stock (awards
and units) |
|
|
1,209 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,196 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
395,245 |
|
|
|
398,989 |
|
|
|
399,658 |
|
|
|
398,015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share |
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
(0.09 |
) |
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
|
$ |
(0.14 |
) |
Diluted earnings (loss) per share |
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
(0.09 |
) |
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
|
$ |
(0.14 |
) |
11
NOTE 9. INVENTORIES
The components of inventories are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 30, |
|
|
May 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Finished goods |
|
$ |
86,513 |
|
|
$ |
62,055 |
|
Work-in-process |
|
|
4,101 |
|
|
|
6,119 |
|
Raw materials |
|
|
20,864 |
|
|
|
22,657 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
111,478 |
|
|
$ |
90,831 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 10. INTANGIBLE ASSETS, NET
Intangible assets consist of (in thousands, except for weighted average remaining life):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life |
|
Gross |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Net |
|
|
Life |
|
Gross |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Net |
|
Existing technology |
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
$ |
380,979 |
|
|
$ |
(231,480 |
) |
|
$ |
149,499 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
$ |
380,254 |
|
|
$ |
(198,682 |
) |
|
$ |
181,572 |
|
Trademark |
|
NA |
|
|
|
55,502 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,502 |
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
55,502 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,502 |
|
Huawei non-compete |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
33,016 |
|
|
|
(33,016 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
33,650 |
|
|
|
(22,072 |
) |
|
|
11,578 |
|
OEM agreement |
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
24,813 |
|
|
|
(11,909 |
) |
|
|
12,904 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
24,844 |
|
|
|
(7,947 |
) |
|
|
16,897 |
|
Maintenance agreements |
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
19,000 |
|
|
|
(12,140 |
) |
|
|
6,860 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
19,000 |
|
|
|
(10,556 |
) |
|
|
8,444 |
|
Other |
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
22,195 |
|
|
|
(18,989 |
) |
|
|
3,206 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
22,176 |
|
|
|
(17,784 |
) |
|
|
4,392 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
535,505 |
|
|
$ |
(307,534 |
) |
|
$ |
227,971 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
535,426 |
|
|
$ |
(257,041 |
) |
|
$ |
278,385 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the six months ended November 30, 2008, our gross intangible assets increased by $0.1 million
due to the appreciation on the Renminbi affecting the value of certain intangible assets tied to
our China legal entity. These intangible assets have a weighted-average useful life of
approximately 3.2 years and are amortized on a straight-line basis over there remaining useful
lives.
NOTE 11. ACCRUED WARRANTY
Most products are sold with varying lengths of limited warranty ranging from 90 days to limited
lifetime. Allowances for estimated warranty obligations are recorded as part of cost of sales in
the period of sale, and are based on historical experience related to product failure rates and
actual warranty costs incurred during the applicable warranty period . Also, on an ongoing basis,
we assess the adequacy of our allowances related to warranty obligations recorded in previous
periods and may adjust the balances to reflect actual experience or changes in future expectations.
The following table summarizes the activity in the allowance for estimated warranty costs for the
six months ended November 30, 2008 and 2007 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
November 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Accrued warranty, beginning of period |
|
$ |
36,897 |
|
|
$ |
40,596 |
|
Cost of warranty claims processed during the period |
|
|
(16,148 |
) |
|
|
(21,377 |
) |
Provision for warranties related to products sold during the period |
|
|
13,302 |
|
|
|
20,699 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued warranty, end of period |
|
$ |
34,051 |
|
|
$ |
39,918 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
NOTE 12. LONG-TERM DEBT
On May 25, 2007, our subsidiary H3C Holdings Limited (Borrower) entered into an amended and
restated credit agreement with various lenders, including Goldman Sachs Credit Partners L.P., as
Mandated Lead Arranger, Bookrunner, Administrative Agent and Syndication Agent, and Industrial and
Commercial Bank of China (Asia) Limited, as Collateral Agent (the Credit Agreement). Under the
original credit agreement, the Borrower borrowed $430 million in the form of a senior secured term
loan in two tranches (Tranche A and Tranche B) to finance a portion of the purchase price for
3Coms acquisition of 49 percent of H3C Technologies Co., Limited, or H3C. The Borrower and its
subsidiaries are referred to collectively as the H3C Group.
Interest on borrowings is payable semi-annually on March 28 and September 28, and commenced on
September 28, 2007. Interest is accrued at LIBOR, plus an applicable margin. The applicable LIBOR
rate at November 30, 2008 was 3.70% and, based on the credit spread mandated by the Credit
Agreement, the effective interest rate for Tranche A is 5.45% while the effective interest rate for
Tranche B is 6.70%. On December 4, 2008, the quarterly interest rate on the Tranche A debt
decreased by 25 basis points to 5.20% due to the favorable leverage ratio for the preceding
quarter.
The Borrowers principal asset is 100 percent of the shares of H3C Technologies Co., Limited.
Covenants and other restrictions under the Credit Agreement apply to the H3C Group. Required
payments under the loan are generally expected to be serviced by cash flows from the H3C Group and
the loan is secured by assets at the H3C level.
Borrowings under the Credit Agreement may be prepaid in whole or in part without premium or
penalty. The Borrower will be required to make mandatory prepayments using net proceeds from H3C
Group (i) asset sales, (ii) insurance proceeds and (iii) equity offerings or debt incurrence. In
addition, to the extent there exists excess cash flow as defined under the Credit Agreement, the
Borrower will be required to make annual prepayments. Any excess cash flow amounts not required to
prepay the loan may be distributed to and used by the Company outside of the H3C Group, provided
certain conditions are met.
H3C and all other existing and future subsidiaries of the Borrower (other than PRC subsidiaries or
small excluded subsidiaries) will guarantee all obligations under the loans and are referred to
as Guarantors. The loan obligations are secured by (1) first priority security interests in all
assets of the Borrower and the Guarantors, including their bank accounts, and (2) a first priority
security interest in 100 percent of the capital stock of the Borrower and H3C and the PRC
subsidiaries of H3C.
The Borrower must maintain a minimum debt service coverage, minimum interest coverage, maximum
capital expenditures and a maximum total leverage ratio. Negative covenants restrict, among other
things, (i) the incurrence of indebtedness by the Borrower and its subsidiaries, (ii) the making of
dividends and distributions to the Company outside of the H3C Group, (iii) the ability to make
investments including in new subsidiaries, (iv) the ability to undertake mergers and acquisitions
and (v) sales of assets. As of November 30, 2008, the H3C Groups net assets were $764.1 million
and are subject to these dividend restrictions. Also, cash dividends from the PRC subsidiaries to
H3C, and H3C to the Borrower, will be subject to restricted use pending payment of principal,
interest and excess cash flow prepayments. Standard events of default apply.
Remaining payments of the $213 million principal are due as follows on September 28, of each year
as follows, (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calendar year |
|
3Com fiscal year |
|
Tranche A |
|
Tranche B |
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
|
$ |
46,000 |
|
|
$ |
2,000 |
|
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
|
|
46,000 |
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
2011 |
|
2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
2012 |
|
2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
97,000 |
|
Accrued interest at November 30, 2008 related to the long-term debt was $0.1 million.
As of November 28, 2008, we were in compliance with all of our debt covenants.
On September 26, 2008, in addition to our regular principal payment the Company made a voluntary
prepayment of $40.0 million of principal, for which the Company did not incur a penalty. The
prepayment was applied to reduce our fiscal year 2013 Tranche B principal balance. The Company
also made an interest payment of $7.7 million on September 26, 2008.
13
NOTE 13. SEGMENT INFORMATION
In the prior fiscal year we reported H3C, Data and Voice Business Unit (DVBU), TippingPoint
Security business (TippingPoint) and Corporate as segments. In the first quarter of fiscal 2009,
we realigned the manner in which we manage our business and internal reporting, and based on the
information provided to our chief operating decision-maker (CODM) for purposes of making decisions
about allocating resources and assessing performance, we have two primary businesses, our
Networking business and TippingPoint Security business. Accordingly, our previously reported
segment information has been restated to reflect our new operating and reporting structure. Our
Networking business consists of the following sales regions as operating segments: China-based,
Asia Pacific excluding China (APR), Europe Middle East and Africa (EMEA), Latin America (LAT), and
North America (NA) regions. The APR, EMEA, LAT and NA operating segments have been aggregated given
their similar economic characteristics, products, customers and processes, and have been
consolidated as one reportable segment, Rest of World. The China-based sales region does not meet
the aggregation criteria at this time.
The China-based and Rest of World reporting segments benefit from shared support services on a
world-wide basis. The costs associated with providing these shared central functions are not
allocated to the China-based and Rest of World reporting segments and instead are reported and
disclosed under the caption Central Functions. Central Functions consist of indirect cost of
sales, such as supply chain operations expenses, and centralized operating expenses, such as
research and development, indirect sales and marketing, and general and administrative support.
Management evaluates the China-based sales region and the Rest of World sales region performance
based on segment contribution profit. Segment contribution profit for these regions is defined as
gross profit (as defined in the next sentence) less segment direct sales and marketing expenses.
Gross profit for these regions is defined as sales less standard cost of sales. Our TippingPoint
Security business segment is measured on segment profit (loss). Gross profit for the TippingPoint
segment is defined as sales less cost of sales. This measure includes all operating costs except
those items included in Eliminations and Other. Eliminations and other include intercompany sales
eliminations, stock-based compensation expense, amortization of intangible assets, restructuring in
all periods as well as purchase accounting inventory related adjustments and Realtek patent dispute
resolution where applicable.
Summarized financial information of our results of operations by segment for the three and six
months ended November 30, 2008 and 2007 is as follows.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three
Months Ended November 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
Networking Business |
|
|
TippingPoint |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Security |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rest of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
World |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
China-based |
|
|
Sales |
|
|
Central |
|
|
Tipping |
|
|
Eliminations/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Sales Region |
|
|
Region |
|
|
Functions |
|
|
Point |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
Sales |
|
$ |
199,815 |
|
|
$ |
125,688 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
31,016 |
|
|
$ |
(1,957 |
) |
|
|
a |
|
|
$ |
354,562 |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
131,901 |
|
|
|
71,861 |
|
|
|
(24,405 |
) |
|
|
20,997 |
|
|
|
(562 |
) |
|
|
b |
|
|
|
199,792 |
|
Direct sales & marketing expenses |
|
|
36,513 |
|
|
|
25,742 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,218 |
|
|
|
1,613 |
|
|
|
b |
|
|
|
75,086 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment
contribution profit (loss) |
|
|
95,388 |
|
|
|
46,119 |
|
|
|
(24,405 |
) |
|
|
9,779 |
|
|
|
(2,175 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
124,706 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78,336 |
|
|
|
10,141 |
|
|
|
31,827 |
|
|
|
c |
|
|
|
120,304 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment loss |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(362 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,402 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended November 30, 2007 |
|
|
|
Networking Business |
|
|
TippingPoint |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Security |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rest of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
World |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
China-based |
|
|
Sales |
|
|
Central |
|
|
Tipping |
|
|
Eliminations/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales Region |
|
|
Region |
|
|
Functions |
|
|
Point |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
Sales |
|
$ |
154,418 |
|
|
$ |
138,572 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
25,785 |
|
|
$ |
(974 |
) |
|
|
a |
|
|
$ |
317,801 |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
96,175 |
|
|
|
75,316 |
|
|
|
(30,793 |
) |
|
|
17,536 |
|
|
|
(6,114 |
) |
|
|
b |
|
|
|
152,120 |
|
Direct sales & marketing expenses |
|
|
30,671 |
|
|
|
23,544 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,756 |
|
|
|
1,418 |
|
|
|
b |
|
|
|
65,389 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment contribution profit (loss) |
|
|
65,504 |
|
|
|
51,772 |
|
|
|
(30,793 |
) |
|
|
7,780 |
|
|
|
(7,532 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
86,731 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79,757 |
|
|
|
7,233 |
|
|
|
41,072 |
|
|
|
c |
|
|
|
128,062 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment profit |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
547 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(41,331 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended November 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
Networking Business |
|
|
TippingPoint |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Security |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rest of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
World |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
China-based |
|
|
Sales |
|
|
Central |
|
|
Tipping |
|
|
Eliminations/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Sales Region |
|
|
Region |
|
|
Functions |
|
|
Point |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
Sales |
|
$ |
375,212 |
|
|
$ |
266,002 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
59,215 |
|
|
$ |
(3,217 |
) |
|
|
a |
|
|
$ |
697,212 |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
247,428 |
|
|
|
154,114 |
|
|
|
(51,381 |
) |
|
|
40,578 |
|
|
|
(1,320 |
) |
|
|
b |
|
|
|
389,419 |
|
Direct sales & marketing expenses |
|
|
69,613 |
|
|
|
53,894 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,591 |
|
|
|
3,371 |
|
|
|
b |
|
|
|
147,469 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment contribution profit (loss) |
|
|
177,815 |
|
|
|
100,220 |
|
|
|
(51,381 |
) |
|
|
19,987 |
|
|
|
(4,691 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
241,950 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
151,199 |
|
|
|
20,052 |
|
|
|
(7,086 |
) |
|
|
c |
|
|
|
164,165 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment loss |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(65 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
77,785 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six
Months Ended November 30, 2007 |
|
|
|
Networking Business |
|
|
TippingPoint |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Security |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rest of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
World |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
China-based |
|
|
Sales |
|
|
Central |
|
|
Tipping |
|
|
Eliminations/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales Region |
|
|
Region |
|
|
Functions |
|
|
Point |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
Sales |
|
$ |
310,452 |
|
|
$ |
276,504 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
51,253 |
|
|
$ |
(974 |
) |
|
|
a |
|
|
$ |
637,235 |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
190,184 |
|
|
|
150,754 |
|
|
|
(62,018 |
) |
|
|
34,162 |
|
|
|
(12,026 |
) |
|
|
b |
|
|
|
301,056 |
|
Direct sales & marketing expenses |
|
|
56,495 |
|
|
|
46,631 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,849 |
|
|
|
2,393 |
|
|
|
b |
|
|
|
124,368 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment contribution profit (loss) |
|
|
133,689 |
|
|
|
104,123 |
|
|
|
(62,018 |
) |
|
|
15,313 |
|
|
|
(14,419 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
176,688 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
158,379 |
|
|
|
15,320 |
|
|
|
70,007 |
|
|
|
c |
|
|
|
243,706 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment loss |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(7 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(67,018 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
a |
|
Represents eliminations for inter-company revenue between Networking and TippingPoint
during the respective periods. |
|
b |
|
Includes stock based compensation in all periods and purchase accounting inventory
related adjustments in the three and six months ended November 30, 2007. |
|
c |
|
Includes stock based compensation, amortization, and restructuring in all periods plus
Realtek patent dispute resolution in the six months ended November 30, 2008 and
acquisition related expenses in the three and six months ended November 30, 2007. |
As of November 30, 2008 assets of our TippingPoint segment were $232.7
million. We do not allocate assets between our China-based sales region, our Rest of World
sales region and our Central Functions. Assets
associated with this group in the aggregate are $1,525.6 million as of November 30, 2008.
Certain product groups accounted for a significant portion of our sales. The security product
group is sold by both our Networking and TippingPoint Security businesses. Sales from these product
groups as a percentage of total sales for the respective periods are as follows (in thousands,
except percentages):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
November 30, |
|
|
November 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Networking equipment |
|
$ |
289,584 |
|
|
|
82 |
% |
|
$ |
256,129 |
|
|
|
81 |
% |
|
$ |
572,047 |
|
|
|
82 |
% |
|
$ |
518,729 |
|
|
|
81 |
% |
Security |
|
|
42,790 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
35,062 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
79,129 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
66,545 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
Voice |
|
|
10,515 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
16,657 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
23,345 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
32,978 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
Services |
|
|
11,673 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
9,953 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
22,691 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
18,983 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
354,562 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
317,801 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
697,212 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
637,235 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 14. GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
Sales by geographic region are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended November 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended November 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
China |
|
$ |
192,851 |
|
|
$ |
143,107 |
|
|
$ |
360,378 |
|
|
$ |
289,861 |
|
Europe, Middle East, and Africa |
|
|
58,989 |
|
|
|
73,209 |
|
|
|
128,366 |
|
|
|
142,871 |
|
North America |
|
|
49,130 |
|
|
|
52,589 |
|
|
|
101,161 |
|
|
|
112,607 |
|
Asia Pacific (except China) |
|
|
27,188 |
|
|
|
25,865 |
|
|
|
57,297 |
|
|
|
49,247 |
|
Latin and South America |
|
|
26,404 |
|
|
|
23,031 |
|
|
|
50,010 |
|
|
|
42,649 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
354,562 |
|
|
$ |
317,801 |
|
|
$ |
697,212 |
|
|
$ |
637,235 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All non-Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) partner sales are reported in geographic categories
based on the location of the end customer. Sales to OEM partners are included in the geographic
categories based upon the hub locations of the OEM partners.
NOTE 15. LITIGATION
We are a party to lawsuits in the normal course of our business. Litigation can be expensive and
disruptive to normal business operations. Moreover, the results of complex legal proceedings are
difficult to predict and the outcome of claims against the Company described below are uncertain.
We believe that we have meritorious defenses in the matters set forth below in which we are named
as a defendant. An unfavorable resolution of the lawsuits in which we are defendants as described
below, could adversely affect our business, financial position, results of operations, or cash
flow. The Company does not believe that the ultimate disposition of these matters will have a
material adverse effect on the Companys financial position.
On December 5, 2001, TippingPoint and two of its current and former officers and directors, as well
as the managing underwriters in TippingPoints initial public offering, were named as defendants in
a purported class action lawsuit filed in the United States District Court for the Southern
District of New York. The lawsuit, which is part of a consolidated action
16
that includes over 300
similar actions, is captioned In re Initial Public Offering Securities Litigation, Brian Levey vs.
TippingPoint Technologies, Inc., et al. (Civil Action Number 01-CV-10976). The principal
allegation in the lawsuit is that
the defendants participated in a scheme to manipulate the initial public offering and subsequent
market price of TippingPoints stock (and the stock of other public companies) by knowingly
assisting the underwriters requirement that certain of their customers had to purchase stock in a
specific initial public offering as a condition to being allocated shares in the initial public
offerings of other companies. In relation to TippingPoint, the purported plaintiff class for the
lawsuit is comprised of all persons who purchased TippingPoint stock from March 17, 2000 through
December 6, 2000. The suit seeks rescission of the purchase prices paid by purchasers of shares of
TippingPoint common stock. On September 10, 2002, TippingPoints counsel and counsel for the
plaintiffs entered into an agreement pursuant to which the plaintiffs dismissed, without prejudice,
TippingPoints former and current officers and directors from the lawsuit. In May 2003, a
memorandum of understanding was executed by counsel for the plaintiffs, the issuer-defendants and
their insurers setting forth the terms of a settlement that would result in the termination of all
claims brought by the plaintiffs against the issuer-defendants and the individual defendants named
in the lawsuit. In August 2003, TippingPoints Board of Directors approved the settlement terms
described in the memorandum of understanding. In May 2004, TippingPoint signed a settlement
agreement on behalf of itself and its current and former directors and officers with the
plaintiffs. This settlement agreement formalizes the previously approved terms of the memorandum
of understanding and, subject to certain conditions, provides for the complete dismissal, with
prejudice, of all claims against TippingPoint and its current and former directors and officers.
Any direct financial impact of the settlement is expected to be borne by TippingPoints insurers.
On August 31, 2005, the District Court issued its preliminary approval of the settlement terms.
The settlement remains subject to numerous conditions, including final approval by the District
Court. On December 5, 2006, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held that the
District Court erred in granting class-action status to six focus cases of the consolidated class
action lawsuits that comprise the action. The impact of this decision on the settlement is
uncertain. The Plaintiffs petitioned the Second Circuit to hear this case en banc, but the appeals
court rejected the petition. The matter was referred back to the District Court and, on May 30,
2007, the Plaintiffs orally moved for certification of the class in the consolidated class actions.
The District Court has not ruled on this motion. If the settlement does not occur for any reason
and the litigation against TippingPoint continues, we intend to defend this action vigorously, but
cannot make any predictions about the outcome. To the extent necessary, we will seek
indemnification and/or contribution from the underwriters in TippingPoints initial public offering
pursuant to its underwriting agreement with the underwriters. However, there can be no assurance
that indemnification or contribution will be available to TippingPoint or enforceable against the
underwriters.
On December 22, 2006, Australias Commonwealth Scientific and Research Organization (CSIRO) filed
suit in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (Tyler Division) against
several manufacturers and suppliers of wireless products, including 3Com, seeking money damages and
injunctive relief. CSIRO alleges that the manufacture, use, and sale of wireless products
compliant with the IEEE 802.11(a), 802.11(g), or draft 802.11(n) wireless standards infringes on
CSIROs patent, U.S. Patent No. 5,487,069. On March 9, 2007, 3Com filed its Answer, denying
infringement and claiming invalidity and unenforceability of the CSIRO patent, among other
defenses. A Markman Opinion, wherein disputed terms in CSIROs patent are construed by the Court,
issued on August 14, 2008. The case is now advancing towards trial. Trial is scheduled to
commence April 13, 2009. The majority of 3Coms wireless products are supplied to the Company
under OEM Purchase and Development Agreements that impose substantial intellectual property
indemnifications obligations upon 3Coms suppliers. However, there can be no assurance that
indemnification will be available and we cannot make any predictions as to the outcome of this
litigation, but intend to vigorously defend the matter.
On July 31, 2008, the Company filed a lawsuit in the Delaware Chancery Court against Diamond
II Holdings, Inc., an entity controlled by affiliates of Bain Capital Partners, LLC. The lawsuit
seeks interpretation and enforcement of the provisions of the Merger Agreement and Plan of Merger
by among 3Com, Diamond II Holdings, Inc., and Diamond II Acquisition Corp., dated as of September
28, 2007. The litigation is in furtherance of our efforts to enforce the provisions of the
now-terminated Merger Agreement related to the termination fee. 3Com cannot assure you it will be
able to collect this fee.
NOTE 16. STOCK REPURCHASE PROGRAM
On September 24, 2008, our board of directors authorized a stock repurchase program of up to $100
million, effective for one year. Stock repurchases under this program may be made through
open-market and privately negotiated transactions at times and in such amounts as management deems
appropriate. The timing and actual number of shares repurchased will depend on a variety of
factors including price, corporate and regulatory requirements and other market conditions. The
stock repurchase program may be limited or terminated at any time without prior notice.
During the three months ended November 30, 2008 the Company repurchased approximately $50.0 million
of common stock under the authorized stock repurchase program. We purchased approximately 21.3
million shares at an average price of
17
$2.35 per share, including commission costs of $0.03 per
share. The repurchased shares have been retired and have been recorded as a reduction of common
stock within stockholders equity at November 30, 2008. We currently have suspended further
purchases of stock under this plan, although we are authorized to repurchase the remaining $50 million of
common stock under the authorized stock program and may do so at any time without prior notice.
NOTE 17. SUBSEQUENT EVENT
On December 30, 2008 our H3C subsidiary, which operates our China-based business, renewed the lease
for its Hangzhou, China headquarters. The lease is for a three-year term from January 1, 2009
through and including December 31, 2011. Under the terms of the lease agreement with landlord
Huawei Technologies, H3C will pay rent of approximately RMB 34,003,653 (or USD 5 million) per year
for space totaling approximately 738,369 square feet. H3C will also pay a property management fee
under a separate agreement. The facility will be used for headquarters functions as well as
general administrative office uses and activities such as research and development, manufacturing,
storage, sales and training. H3C has the option to renew the lease at the end of the term provided
the parties agree on terms and Huawei intends to use the property as a leased property. H3C may
terminate the lease at any time with six months prior written notice to Huawei and a penalty
payment of two months rent. Huawei is a significant customer of H3C.
|
|
|
ITEM 2. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
INTRODUCTION
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the condensed consolidated financial
statements and the related notes that appear elsewhere in this document.
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
We provide secure, converged networking solutions, as well as maintenance and support services, for
enterprises and public sector organizations of all sizes. Headquartered in Marlborough,
Massachusetts, we have worldwide operations, including sales, marketing, research and development,
and customer service and support capabilities.
We have undergone significant change in recent years, including:
|
§ |
|
Significant changes to our executive leadership; |
|
|
§ |
|
The formation and subsequent 100 percent acquisition of our China-based subsidiary; |
|
|
§ |
|
Financing a portion of the purchase price for our acquisition of H3C by entering
into a $430 million senior secured credit agreement; |
|
|
§ |
|
Restructuring activities, which included outsourcing of information technology,
certain manufacturing activities in our Networking business, significant headcount
reductions in other functions, and selling excess facilities; |
|
|
§ |
|
Integration activities following our H3C acquisition, including in our research
and development and supply chain organizations; and |
|
|
§ |
|
Changing our reporting segments to align with the way we manage our business. |
Our products and services can generally be classified in the following categories:
|
§ |
|
Networking; |
|
|
§ |
|
Security; |
|
|
§ |
|
Voice; and |
|
|
§ |
|
Services. |
We have introduced multiple new products targeted at the small, medium and large enterprise
markets, including modular and multi-service switches and routers; converged IP solutions such as
voice, video and surveillance; security; and unified switching solutions. Our recent product
introductions and future product strategy are designed to offer a compelling value proposition to
our customers, by leveraging open platform technology with options to integrate best-of-breed
application solutions directly into their networks.
18
Business Environment and Future Trends
We operate today in a rapidly changing business environment due to the severe credit and adverse
market conditions in many of the worlds economies. The current global financial crisis has led to
significant business slowdowns around the world. It is therefore increasingly difficult to predict
future business conditions in the market for enterprise networking equipment. Our business is
highly dependent on the Chinese economy, an economy that has experienced strong growth in recent
years. While we believe that China may be less affected than other regions by the global economic
slowdown, it has only recently begun to experience the effects of the downturn, and it is therefore
difficult to predict the ultimate impact on our China business. Outside of China, we expect the
challenging business environment to continue in the foreseeable future, particularly in the fully
developed North American and Western European markets. We also expect to experience longer sales cycles.
Our strategy to address these adverse business conditions is to market our solutions as providing
exceptional quality for a good value and to remain competitive in the enterprise market. At the
same time, we recognize that global spending on networking products and solutions is likely to be
under significant pressure in the coming months, and well into 2009.
Networking industry analysts and participants differ widely in their assessments concerning the
prospects for mid to long-term industry growth, especially in light of the current weakness in many
of the major global economies. Industry factors and trends also present significant challenges in
the medium-term. Such factors and trends include:
|
§ |
|
Intense competition in the market for higher end, enterprise core
routing and switching products; and |
|
|
§ |
|
Aggressive product pricing by competitors targeted at gaining share in
market segments where we have had a strong position historically, such
as the small to medium-sized enterprise market. |
We believe that long-term success in this environment requires us to (1) be a global technology
leader, (2) increase our revenue and take market share from competitors outside of China, (3)
increase and sustain our profitability and (4) increase our generation of cash from operations.
Technology Strategy
We believe our principal research and development base in Beijing, China provides a strong
foundation for our global product development. Our strategy involves continuing our tradition of
innovation, using China as a home market to introduce new products in the networking equipment
industry and related markets and providing leading solutions for global markets.
Revenue and Market Share Goals
We believe that our differentiated, comprehensive product portfolio which provides end-to-end IP
solutions based on open standards offers a compelling value proposition for customers, particularly
in the current economic environment.
Our intention is to leverage our global footprint to more effectively sell these products. A key
element of our strategy is to increasingly focus on direct-touch sales to larger enterprise and
government accounts in all of our regions.
We hope to achieve our goal of revenue growth by executing on three region-centric growth
strategies as follows:
|
|
|
China In China, we have been successful in direct-touch sales to enterprise and
government customers, and selling our offerings to the carrier market through our Huawei
OEM relationship. We do, however, expect declining sales to Huawei. To maintain a
leadership position in China, we intend to increase our focus on direct-touch sales as well
as pursue other channels into the carrier market. We believe that growing market share in
China will be more challenging than in the past given that we already have a significant
enterprise networking market share in China. We also intend to continue to introduce
innovative new product offerings in the China market, such IP video surveillance and
storage, which may offer additional growth opportunities. |
Our strategy involves leveraging our significant China-based engineering team and strong brand
of networking
solutions designed for enterprise and government accounts into greater success in markets
outside of China, as
further described below.
19
|
|
|
Emerging markets outside of China - We expect to target growth opportunities outside of
China in other developing markets. We believe that our successful penetration of the
Chinese market has positioned us to grow sales in developing markets generally. |
|
|
|
|
Developed global markets - Our ability to achieve our goal of sales growth in developed
markets depends to a substantial degree on our ability to take market share from our
competitors. Our strategy is to focus on larger enterprise and government accounts and to
implement this strategy we intend to increase go to market resources to address this
opportunity. Our initiatives include increasing enterprise sales by offering these
customers our comprehensive end to end solutions and highlighting our products price to
performance value proposition and energy efficiency. |
Profitability and Cash Generation Objectives
We believe that our long-term success is also dependent on our ability to increase our overall
profit and cash generation. We believe that by continuing to deliver on the integration of our
worldwide operations we can achieve further operational efficiencies which will allow us to support
our continued investment in sales and marketing that we require to grow our business. We may also
continue to require certain targeted investments in the integration of our business infrastructure
designed to drive more profitable near and long-term growth. Integration has involved, and is
expected to continue to involve, consolidation, streamlining and aligning our product line
management, research and development and supply chain activities, among others.
For our TippingPoint business we plan to focus on growing its top line and improving operational
efficiency and segment profitability.
Segment Reporting
In the prior fiscal year we reported H3C, Data and Voice Business Unit (DVBU), TippingPoint
Security business (TippingPoint) and Corporate as segments. In the first quarter of fiscal 2009,
we realigned the manner in which we manage our business and internal reporting and based on the
information provided to our chief operating decision-maker (CODM) for purposes of making decisions
about allocating resources and assessing performance, we have two primary businesses, our
Networking business and TippingPoint Security business. Accordingly, our previously reported
segment information has been restated to reflect our new operating and reporting structure. Our
Networking business consists of the following sales regions as operating segments: China-based,
Asia Pacific excluding China (APR), Europe Middle East and Africa (EMEA), Latin America (LAT), and
North America (NA) regions. The APR, EMEA, LAT and NA operating segments have been aggregated given
their similar economic characteristics, products, customers and processes, and have been
consolidated as one reportable segment, Rest of World. The China-based region does not meet the
aggregation criteria at this time.
The China-based and Rest of World operating segments benefit from shared support services on a
world-wide basis. The costs associated with providing these shared support services are not
allocated to the China-based and Rest of World operating segments and instead are reported and
disclosed under the caption Central Functions. Central Functions consist of indirect cost of
sales, such as supply chain operations expenses, and centralized operating expenses, such as
research and development, indirect sales and marketing, and general and administrative support.
20
Summary of Three Months Ended November 30, 2008 Financial Performance
|
§ |
|
Our sales in the three months ended November 30, 2008 were $354.6 million, compared to
sales of $317.8 million in the three months ended November 20, 2007, an increase of $36.8
million, or 11.6 percent. |
|
|
§ |
|
Our gross margin improved to 56.3 percent in the three months ended November 30, 2008
from 47.9 percent in the three months ended November 30, 2007. |
|
|
§ |
|
Our operating expenses (income) in the three months ended November 30, 2008 were $195.4
million, compared to $193.5 million in the three months ended November 30, 2007, a net
increase of $1.9 million, or 1.0 percent. |
|
|
§ |
|
Our net income in the three months ended November 30, 2008 was $12.9 million, compared
to a net loss of $35.6 million in the three months ended November 30, 2007. |
|
|
§ |
|
Our balance sheet contains cash and equivalents of $460.8 million as of November 30,
2008, compared to cash and equivalents of $503.6 million at the end of fiscal 2008. The
balance sheet also includes debt of $213 million with $48 million classified as a current
liability as of November 30, 2008 compared with debt of $301 million with $48 million
classified as a current liability at the end of fiscal 2008. |
Summary of Six Months Ended November 30, 2008 Financial Performance
|
§ |
|
Our sales in the six months ended November 30, 2008 were $697.2 million, compared to
sales of $637.2 million in the six months ended November 20, 2007, an increase of $60.0
million, or 9.4 percent. |
|
|
§ |
|
Our gross margin improved to 55.9 percent in the six months ended November 30, 2008
from 47.2 percent in the six months ended November 30, 2007. |
|
|
§ |
|
Our operating expenses (income) in the six months ended November 30, 2008 were $311.6
million, compared to $368.1 million in the six months ended November 30, 2007, a net
decrease of $56.5 million, or 15.3 percent. Included in the six months ended November 30,
2008 operating expenses (income) is $70.0 million of income related to the Realtek patent
dispute resolution. |
|
|
§ |
|
Our net income in the six months ended November 30, 2008 was $92.7 million, compared
to a net loss of $54.3 million in the six months ended November 30, 2007. Included in the
six months ended November 30, 2008 net income is $70.0 million of income related to the
Realtek patent dispute resolution. |
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Our critical accounting policies are described in Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended May 31, 2008. There have been no significant changes to these policies during the six months
ended November 30, 2008. These policies continue to be those that we feel are most important to a
readers ability to understand our financial results.
21
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 2008 AND 2007
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the percentage of total sales
represented by the line items reflected in our condensed consolidated statements of operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
November 30 |
|
November 30 |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
Sales |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Cost of sales |
|
|
43.7 |
|
|
|
52.1 |
|
|
|
44.1 |
|
|
|
52.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit margin |
|
|
56.3 |
|
|
|
47.9 |
|
|
|
55.9 |
|
|
|
47.2 |
|
Operating expenses (income): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing |
|
|
25.0 |
|
|
|
25.4 |
|
|
|
25.1 |
|
|
|
24.4 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
13.5 |
|
|
|
16.4 |
|
|
|
13.4 |
|
|
|
16.4 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
|
9.8 |
|
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
8.2 |
|
Amortization |
|
|
7.1 |
|
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
|
8.2 |
|
Realtek patent resolution |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Restructuring charges |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses, net |
|
|
55.1 |
|
|
|
60.9 |
|
|
|
44.7 |
|
|
|
57.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
(13.0 |
) |
|
|
11.2 |
|
|
|
(10.5 |
) |
Interest expense, net |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
Other income, net |
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
(11.0 |
) |
|
|
15.0 |
|
|
|
(8.1 |
) |
Income tax provision |
|
|
(1.9 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(1.7 |
) |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
3.6 |
% |
|
|
(11.2 |
)% |
|
|
13.3 |
% |
|
|
(8.5 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales
Consolidated sales for the three and six months ended November 30, 2008 and 2007 by segment were as
follows (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
November 30, |
|
November 30, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
|
|
China-based sales region |
|
$ |
199.8 |
|
|
$ |
154.5 |
|
|
$ |
375.2 |
|
|
$ |
310.5 |
|
Rest of World sales region |
|
|
125.7 |
|
|
|
138.5 |
|
|
|
266.0 |
|
|
|
276.4 |
|
TippingPoint security business |
|
|
31.0 |
|
|
|
25.8 |
|
|
|
59.2 |
|
|
|
51.3 |
|
Eliminations and other |
|
|
(1.9 |
) |
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
(3.2 |
) |
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
|
Consolidated sales |
|
$ |
354.6 |
|
|
$ |
317.8 |
|
|
$ |
697.2 |
|
|
$ |
637.2 |
|
|
|
|
Sales in our China-based sales region increased $45.3 million, or 29.4 percent, in the three months
ended November 30, 2008 and increased $64.7 million, or 20.9 percent in the six months ended
November 30, 2008 compared to the same periods in the previous fiscal year. The increase in sales
in the three and six months ended November 30, 2008 is primarily attributable to increased
direct-touch sales in China as well as higher sales to Huawei, and to a lesser extent appreciation
on the Renminbi.
Sales in our Rest of World sales region decreased $12.8 million, or 9.3 percent, in the three
months ended November 30, 2008 and decreased $10.4 million, or 3.8 percent in the six months ended
November 30, 2008 compared to the same periods in the previous fiscal year. The decrease in sales
in the three and six months ended November 30, 2008 is primarily attributable to decreased sales in
Western Europe and the United States due to adverse business conditions relating to the global
economic crisis. These decreases were partially offset by increased sales in our LAT and APR
regions where our project business and sales to larger enterprise and government accounts has
gained some traction.
Sales in our TippingPoint security business increased $5.2 million, or 20.3 percent, in the three
months ended November 30, 2008 and increased $7.9 million, or 15.5 percent in the six months ended
November 30, 2008 compared to the same periods in the previous fiscal year. The increase in sales
in the three and six months ended November 30, 2008 is primarily attributable to an increase in
large account sales and increased maintenance revenue.
22
Eliminations and other increased by $0.9 million in the three months ended November 30, 2008 and
increased $2.2 million in the six months ended November 30, 2008 compared to the same period in the
previous fiscal year. This increase in both periods is primarily due to increased sales from our
TippingPoint segment to our Rest of World sales region.
Consolidated revenues increased by $36.8 million, or 11.6 percent, in the three months ended
November 30, 2008 and increased by $60.0 million, or 9.4 percent, in the six months ended November
30, 2008 compared to the same period in the previous fiscal year.
Sales by major product categories are as follows (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
November 30 |
|
November 30 |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
Networking |
|
$ |
289.6 |
|
|
|
82 |
% |
|
$ |
256.1 |
|
|
|
81 |
% |
|
$ |
572.1 |
|
|
|
82 |
% |
|
$ |
518.7 |
|
|
|
81 |
% |
Security |
|
|
42.8 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
35.1 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
79.1 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
66.5 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
Voice |
|
|
10.5 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
16.7 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
23.3 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
33.0 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
Services |
|
|
11.7 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
9.9 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
22.7 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
19.0 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
354.6 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
317.8 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
697.2 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
637.2 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Networking revenue includes sales of our Layer 2 and Layer 3 stackable 10/100/1000 managed
switching lines, our modular switching lines, routers, IP storage and our small to medium-sized
enterprise market products. Sales of our networking products increased $33.5 million or 13.1
percent in the three months ended November 30, 2008 and increased $53.4 million or 10.3 percent in
the six months ended November 30, 2008 compared to the same period in the previous fiscal year.
The increase in the three and six months ended November 30, 2008 is primarily attributable to
increased direct-touch sales in China as well as sales to Huawei, and to a lesser extent
appreciation of the Renminbi, partially offset by decreased sales in Western Europe and North
America due to adverse business conditions relating to the global economic crisis.
Security revenue includes our TippingPoint products and services, as well as other security
products, such as our embedded firewall, or EFW and virtual private network, or VPN, products.
Sales of our security products increased $7.7 million or 21.9 percent in the three months ended
November 30, 2008 and $12.6 million, or 18.9 percent for the six months ended November 30, 2008
compared to the same period in the previous fiscal year. The increase in the three and six months
ended November 30, 2008 is primarily driven by increased sales of our TippingPoint products in our
North American region due to a large sales transaction in the second quarter, increased maintenance
revenue, and a slight increase in sales of security products in our China-based sales region.
Voice revenue includes our VCX and NBX® voice-over-internet protocol, or VoIP, product lines, as
well as voice gateway offerings. Sales of our Voice products decreased $6.2 million or 36.9
percent in the three months ended November 30, 2008 and $9.7 million, or 29.2 percent, in the six
months ended November 30, 2008 compared to the same period in the previous fiscal year. The
decrease in the three months ended November 30, 2008 is primarily due to decreased sales in our
North America and LAT regions. The decrease in the six months ended November 30, 2008 is primarily
related to decreased sales in our North America region.
Services revenue includes professional services and maintenance contracts, excluding TippingPoint
maintenance which is included in security revenue. Services revenue increased $1.8 million or 18.2
percent in the three months ended November 30, 2008 and $3.7 million, or 19.5 percent, in the six
months ended November 30, 2008 compared to the same period in the previous fiscal year. The
increase in the three and six months ended November 30, 2008 was driven primarily by increased
service sales tied to growth in our networking business.
23
Gross Margin
Gross margin for the three and six months ended November 30, 2008 and 2007 by segment was as
follows (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
November 30, |
|
November 30, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
Networking business |
|
|
54.9 |
% |
|
|
45.9 |
% |
|
|
54.6 |
% |
|
|
47.5 |
% |
TippingPoint security business |
|
|
67.5 |
% |
|
|
68.0 |
% |
|
|
68.5 |
% |
|
|
66.7 |
% |
Consolidated margin |
|
|
56.3 |
% |
|
|
47.9 |
% |
|
|
55.9 |
% |
|
|
47.2 |
% |
Gross margin in our Networking business improved 9.0 points to 54.9 percent in the three months
ended November 30, 2008 from 45.9 percent, and 7.1 points to 54.6 percent in the six months ended
November 30, 2008 from 47.5 percent in the same periods in the previous fiscal year. The
improvement in gross profit margin for the three and six months ended November 30, 2008 is
attributable to a change in product mix as well as reduced costs. The reduced costs primarily
relate to a change in our customer service delivery model. During the year we changed from an
outsourced service provider in the year ago period to a more cost effective hybrid model involving
the use of both outsourced and in-house resources. The current period also reflects the absence of
the costs incurred in connection with this transition.
Gross margin in our TippingPoint security business decreased 0.5 points to 67.5 percent in the
three months ended November 30, 2008 from 68.0 percent in the same period of the previous fiscal
year. In the six months ended November 30, 2008 gross margin increased 1.8 points to 68.5 percent
from 66.7 percent in the same period of the previous fiscal year. The decline in the three months
ended November 30, 2008 is explained by a change in product mix, partially offset by cost
reductions. The increase in the six months ended November 30, 2008 was due primarily to support
cost reductions from continued improved product quality, partially offset by a change in product
mix.
Gross margin on a consolidated basis increased 8.4 points to 56.3 percent in the three months ended
November 30, 2008 from 47.9 percent, and 8.7 percent to 55.9 percent in the six months ended
November 30, 2008 from 47.2 in the same period in the previous fiscal year. This increase in the
three and six months ended November 30, 2008 is due principally to the items discussed above, as
well as the absence of purchase accounting related adjustments in the current period that were
present in the same period of the previous fiscal year.
Operating Expenses (Income)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 30, |
|
|
Change |
|
|
November 30, |
|
|
Change |
|
(dollars in millions) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
Sales and marketing |
|
$ |
88.6 |
|
|
$ |
80.8 |
|
|
$ |
7.8 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
|
$ |
174.9 |
|
|
$ |
155.2 |
|
|
$ |
19.7 |
|
|
|
13 |
% |
Research and development |
|
|
47.9 |
|
|
|
52.2 |
|
|
|
( 4.3 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
)% |
|
|
93.6 |
|
|
|
104.5 |
|
|
|
(10.9 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
)% |
General and administrative |
|
|
31.3 |
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
58.4 |
|
|
|
52.5 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
Amortization |
|
|
25.1 |
|
|
|
26.3 |
|
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
)% |
|
|
50.2 |
|
|
|
52.3 |
|
|
|
(2.1 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
)% |
Patent dispute resolution |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
(70.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(70.0 |
) |
|
|
* |
|
Restructuring |
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
(19 |
)% |
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
195.4 |
|
|
$ |
193.5 |
|
|
$ |
1.9 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
$ |
311.6 |
|
|
$ |
368.1 |
|
|
$ |
(56.5 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
- percentage calculation not meaningful. |
Sales and Marketing. The most significant factors in the increase in the three and six months
ended November 30, 2008 compared to the same periods in fiscal 2008 was the increased investment in
our direct-touch sales force in our China-based sales region and in our EMEA region as well as
increased compensation expense.
Research and Development. The most significant factor contributing to the decrease in the three
and six months ended November 30, 2008 compared to the same period in fiscal 2008 was continued
savings from integration of research and development in all regions in our Networking business,
partially offset by increased compensation expense.
24
General and Administrative. The most significant factor in the increase in the three and six
months ended November 30, 2008 compared to the same periods in fiscal 2008 was increased legal
costs resulting from ongoing litigation matters, increased compensation expense and increased
depreciation expense. These increases were mostly offset by of the absence in the current period
of acquisition related costs from the terminated acquisition by affiliates of Bain Capital Partners
in the same period of the prior fiscal year.
Amortization. Amortization decreased $1.2 million and $2.1 million in the three and six months
ended November 30, 2008, respectively, when compared to the previous fiscal year due to one of our
intangible assets becoming fully depreciated in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008.
Patent dispute resolution.
The Company and Realtek Group reached an agreement with respect to certain networking
technologies of the Company that resolved a long-standing patent dispute between the companies.
Under the terms of the agreement, Realtek paid the Company $70.0 million, all of which was
received in the three months ended August 31, 2008.
The Company recognized the full $70.0 million as operating income in the first quarter of fiscal
2009.
Restructuring Charges
Net restructuring charges in the three months ended November 30, 2008 consisted of $1.3 million for
severance and outplacement costs and $1.2 million for facilities-related charges. Net restructuring
charges in the six months ended November 30, 2008 consisted of $3.2 million for severance and
outplacement costs and $1.3 million for facilities-related charges.
Net restructuring charges in the three months ended November 30, 2007 resulted from severance,
outplacement and other costs of $2.4 million and $0.7 million for facilities-related charges. Net
restructuring charges in the six months ended November 30, 2007 resulted from severance,
outplacement and other costs of $3.3 million and $0.3 million for facilities-related charges.
See Note 5 to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for a more detailed discussion of
restructuring charges.
Interest Expense, Net
In the three and six months ended November 30, 2008, the Company incurred $0.5 million and $1.8
million, respectively, in net interest expense, versus net interest expense of $4.0 million and
$7.5 million in same periods of the prior fiscal year. The decrease in interest expense is
primarily due to the decreased principal balance of our long term debt due to scheduled and
voluntary payments of principal, coupled with a lower LIBOR rate on the loan, as well as increased
interest income earned on an increased average balance of cash and notes receivable.
Other Income, Net
Other income, net was $15.9 million in the three months ended November 30, 2008, an increase of
$5.6 million compared to the three months ended November 30, 2007. Other income, net was $28.8
million in the six months ended November 30, 2008, an increase of $6.0 million compared to the six
months ended November 30, 2007. The increase in the three and six months ended November 30, 2008
was primarily due to an increase in an operating subsidy under a program run by the Chinese VAT
authorities in the form of a partial refund of VAT taxes collected by our H3C legal entity from
purchasers of software products. This increase was also driven by net foreign currency gains in the
current period. The VAT payments are taken into income on a cash basis when actually received. The
timing of the receipt of VAT refunds, and the continuation of the program, are subject to the
discretion of the Chinese VAT authorities.
25
Income Tax Provision
Our income tax provision was $6.9 million for the three months ended November 30, 2008, an increase
of $6.2 million when compared to the corresponding period in the previous fiscal year. In the
corresponding period we had a favorable final resolution on an insurance settlement that resulted
in a release of $1.6 million of tax provisions as well as a discrete benefit of $0.5 million
related to refunds of state taxes for prior periods. The remainder of the income tax provision for
the corresponding quarter and all of the provision for the current period was the result of
providing for taxes in certain foreign jurisdictions at various statutory rates.
Our income tax provision was $12.1 million for the six months ended November 30, 2008, an increase
of
$9.6 million when compared to the corresponding period in the previous fiscal year. In the
corresponding period we had a favorable final resolution on an insurance settlement that resulted
in a release of $1.6 million of tax provisions as well as a discrete benefit of $0.5 million
related to refunds of state taxes for prior periods. The remainder of the income tax provision for
the corresponding period and all of the provision for the current period was the result of
providing for taxes in certain foreign jurisdictions at various statutory rates.
Net Income (Loss)
Our net income in the three months ended November 30, 2008 was $12.9 million, a $48.5 million
improvement from a net loss of $35.6 million in the previous fiscal period. The improvement was
primarily driven by increased sales, and decreased cost of sales due to integration efforts and a
change from an outsourced service provider in the year ago period to a hybrid of outsourced and
in-house performance of services to our customers, partially offset by increased sales and
marketing expenses. Our net income in the six months ended November 30, 2008 was $92.7 million, a
$147.0 million improvement from a net loss of $54.3 million in the previous fiscal period. The
improvement was primarily driven by our Realtek patent dispute resolution of $70.0 million, as well
as increased sales, and decreased cost of sales due to integration efforts and a change from an
outsourced service provider in the year ago period to a hybrid of outsourced and in-house
performance of services to our customers, partially offset by increased sales and marketing
expenses.
Segment Analysis (tables in thousands)
The results of our regional Networking segments, Central Functions, and our TippingPoint Security
business as our CODM reviews their profitability are presented below.
China-based sales region:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
November 30, |
|
|
November 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Sales |
|
$ |
199,815 |
|
|
$ |
154,418 |
|
|
$ |
375,212 |
|
|
$ |
310,452 |
|
Gross profit (a) |
|
|
131,901 |
|
|
|
96,175 |
|
|
|
247,428 |
|
|
|
190,184 |
|
Direct sales and marketing expenses |
|
|
36,513 |
|
|
|
30,671 |
|
|
|
69,613 |
|
|
|
56,495 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment contribution profit |
|
$ |
95,388 |
|
|
$ |
65,504 |
|
|
$ |
177,815 |
|
|
$ |
133,689 |
|
Segment contribution profit in the three months ended November 30, 2008 increased $29.9 million to
$95.4 million when compared to the same period of the prior fiscal year. Segment contribution
profit in the six months ended November 30, 2008 increased $44.3 million to $178.0 million when
compared to the same period of the prior fiscal year. Segment contribution profit is standard
profit less segment direct sales and marketing expenses. The increase in the three and six months
ended November 30, 2008 was primarily driven by increased sales and improved product sales mix,
partially offset by increased direct sales and marketing expenses due to increased investment in
our direct-touch sales force.
a Gross profit is defined for this region as standard margin, which is sales less standard
cost of sales.
26
Rest of World sales region:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
November 30, |
|
|
November 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Sales |
|
$ |
125,688 |
|
|
$ |
138,572 |
|
|
$ |
266,002 |
|
|
$ |
276,504 |
|
Gross profit (a) |
|
|
71,861 |
|
|
|
75,316 |
|
|
|
154,114 |
|
|
|
150,754 |
|
Direct sales and marketing expenses |
|
|
25,742 |
|
|
|
23,544 |
|
|
|
53,894 |
|
|
|
46,631 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment contribution profit |
|
$ |
46,119 |
|
|
$ |
51,772 |
|
|
$ |
100,220 |
|
|
$ |
104,123 |
|
Segment contribution profit in the three months ended November 30, 2008 decreased $5.7 million to
$46.1 million when compared to the same period of the prior fiscal year. Segment contribution
profit in the six months ended November 30, 2008 decreased $5.1 million to $99.0 million when
compared to the same period of the prior fiscal year. Segment contribution profit is standard
profit less segment direct sales and marketing expenses. The decrease in the three and six months
ended November 30, 2008 primarily relates to decreased sales in our EMEA and North America regions
due to the weakening of the global economy as well as increased direct sales and marketing expenses
in our EMEA region as we continue to invest in our direct touch sales force.
a Gross profit is defined for this region as standard margin, which is sales less standard
cost of sales.
Central Functions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
November 30, |
|
|
November 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Gross profit (a) |
|
$ |
(24,405 |
) |
|
$ |
(30,793 |
) |
|
$ |
(51,381 |
) |
|
$ |
(62,018 |
) |
Operating expenses |
|
|
78,336 |
|
|
|
79,757 |
|
|
|
151,199 |
|
|
|
158,379 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
$ |
102,741 |
|
|
$ |
110,550 |
|
|
$ |
202,580 |
|
|
$ |
220,397 |
|
Total costs and expenses in the three months ended November 30, 2008 decreased $7.8 million to
$102.7 million when compared to the same period of the prior fiscal year. Total costs and expenses
in the six months ended November 30, 2008 decreased $18.9 million to $201.5 million when compared
to the same period of the prior fiscal year. Total expenses include supply chain costs and
operating expenses exclusive of those items contained in Eliminations and Other. The decrease in
the three and six months ended November 30, 2008 was due primarily to a change from an outsourced
service provider for customer service activities in the year ago period to a hybrid model,
involving the use of both outsourced and in-house resources in the delivery of customer services in
the current period, as well as the absence of costs incurred in the prior year period associated
with switching our service model. In addition we continued to realize savings from integration of
research and development in all regions in our Networking business, partially offset by increased
costs to support the multi-national expansion of our business.
a Gross profit represents indirect cost of sales, such as supply chain operations expenses;
these costs not allocated to the sales regions.
TippingPoint Security business:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
November 30, |
|
|
November 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Sales |
|
$ |
31,016 |
|
|
$ |
25,785 |
|
|
$ |
59,215 |
|
|
$ |
51,253 |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
20,997 |
|
|
|
17,536 |
|
|
|
40,578 |
|
|
|
34,162 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
21,359 |
|
|
|
16,989 |
|
|
|
40,643 |
|
|
|
34,169 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment (loss) profit |
|
$ |
(362 |
) |
|
$ |
547 |
|
|
$ |
(65 |
) |
|
$ |
(7 |
) |
27
TippingPoint segment loss in the three months ended November 30, 2008 was $0.4 million compared to
segment profit of $0.5 million in the same period of the prior fiscal year. TippingPoint segment
loss in the six months ended November 30, 2008 remained flat when compared to the same period of
the prior fiscal year. Segment profit is gross profit less operating expenses, exclusive of those
items contained in Eliminations and Other. The decrease in the three months ended November 30, 2008
was due to a $0.7 million charge related to a retention plan bonus for the TippingPoint employees. The
six months ended November 30, 2008 remained relatively flat when compared to the prior period
primarily due to support cost reductions from continued improved product quality, and favorable
product sales mix, offset by increased operating expenses and a $0.7 million charge related to a
retention plan bonus for the TippingPoint employees.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Cash and equivalents as of November 30, 2008 were $460.8 million, a decrease of $42.8 million
compared to the balance of $503.6 million as of May 31, 2008. The following table shows the major
components of our condensed consolidated statements of cash flows for the six months ended November
30, 2008 and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
November 30, |
|
(In millions) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Cash and equivalents, beginning of period |
|
$ |
503.6 |
|
|
$ |
559.2 |
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
|
|
96.1 |
|
|
|
(52.6 |
) |
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(11.3 |
) |
|
|
(8.4 |
) |
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(135.7 |
) |
|
|
(89.7 |
) |
Currency impact on cash |
|
|
8.1 |
|
|
|
10.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
460.8 |
|
|
$ |
419.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities was $96.1 million in the six months ended November 30,
2008, primarily reflecting our net income of $92.7 million as adjusted for non-cash expenses of
$65.1 million of depreciation and amortization and $12.1 million of stock-based compensation,
partially offset by changes in assets and liabilities. Included in the $92.7 million is $70.0
million from the Realtek patent dispute resolution, all of which was collected during the period.
This cash collection was partially offset by approximately $10.0 million of legal fees that were
accrued in the prior fiscal year and paid in the first quarter of fiscal 2009. Changes in assets
and liabilities resulted in a net use of cash of $72.2 million, with accounts and notes receivable
increasing $63.5 million and inventory increasing $25.5 million partially offset by an increase in
other liabilities of $15.5 million.
Net cash used in investing activities was $11.3 million for the six months ended November 30, 2008,
resulting primarily from outflows related to purchases of property and equipment.
On September 24, 2008, our board of directors authorized a stock repurchase program of up to $100
million, effective for one year. The timing and actual number of shares repurchased will depend on
a variety of factors and we cannot determine at this time the amount of cash we will use under this
program. As stated below, we have already purchased approximately half of the authorized amount
under this program. We currently have suspended further purchases of stock under this plan,
although we are authorized to repurchase the remaining $50 million of common stock under the
authorized stock program and may do so at any time without prior notice.
Net cash used in financing activities was $135.7 million in the six months ended November 30, 2008.
During the six months ended November 30, 2008, we made a principal payment of $88.0 million
related to our long term debt, $40 million of which was a voluntary prepayment. In addition, we
repurchased $50.6 million of shares of stock, of which $50 million was part of our stock repurchase
program discussed above. This was partially offset by proceeds of $2.8 million from issuances of
our common stock upon exercise of stock options.
With respect to our debt payment obligations for the next year, we are required to make interest
payments in March and September 2009 and a $48 million principal payment in September 2009.
As of November 30, 2008, bank-issued standby letters of credit and guarantees totaled $6.5 million,
including $5.5 million relating to potential foreign tax, custom, and duty assessments.
We currently have no material capital expenditure purchase commitments other than ordinary course
purchases of computer hardware, software and leasehold improvements.
28
On December 30, 2008 our H3C subsidiary, which operates our China-based business, renewed the lease
for its Hangzhou, China headquarters, effective January 1, 2009. The lease is for a three-year
term from January 1, 2009 through and including December 31, 2011. Under the terms of the lease
agreement with landlord Huawei Technologies, H3C will pay rent of approximately RMB 34,003,653 (or
USD 5 million) per year.
Given the tight global credit environment, we intend to monitor our discretionary cash expenditures
as a prudent cash management measure.
We currently believe that our existing cash and cash equivalents will be sufficient to satisfy our
anticipated cash requirements for at least the next 12 months.
EFFECTS OF RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141R, Business Combinations to improve reporting and
to create greater consistency in the accounting and financial reporting of business combinations.
The standard requires the acquiring entity in a business combination to recognize all (and only)
the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the transaction; establishes the acquisition-date
fair value as the measurement objective for all assets acquired and liabilities assumed; and
requires the acquirer to disclose to investors and other users all of the information they need to
evaluate and understand the nature and financial effect of the business combination. SFAS No. 141R
applies prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the
beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008, with the
exception of the accounting for valuation allowances on deferred taxes and acquired tax
contingencies. SFAS No. 141R amends SFAS 109, such that adjustments made to valuation allowances on
deferred income taxes and acquired income tax contingencies associated with acquisitions that
closed prior to the effective date of SFAS No. 141R would apply the provisions of SFAS No. 141R. An
entity may not apply SFAS No. 141R before that date. Given that SFAS No. 141R relates to
prospective and not historical business combinations, the Company cannot currently determine the
potential effects adoption of SFAS No. 141R may have on its consolidated financial statements.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements to improve the relevance, comparability, and transparency of financial information
provided to investors by requiring all entities to report noncontrolling (minority) interests in
subsidiaries in the same way as required in the consolidated financial statements. Moreover, SFAS
No. 160 eliminates the diversity that currently exists in accounting for transactions between an
entity and noncontrolling interests by requiring that they be treated as equity transactions. SFAS
No. 160 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on
or after December 15, 2008. Earlier adoption is prohibited. The Company is currently evaluating
whether the adoption of SFAS No. 160 will have an effect on its consolidated financial position,
results of operations or cash flows.
In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. SFAS 157-2, Effective Date of FASB
Statement No. 157, which provides a one-year deferral of the effective date of FAS No. 157 for
non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities, except those that are recognized or disclosed
in the financial statements at fair value at least annually. Effective June 1, 2008, we adopted the
provisions of SFAS No. 157 with respect to our financial assets and liabilities recorded at fair
value. We have not yet determined the impact, if any, of the portion of SFAS No. 157, for which
the implementation has been deferred, will have on our consolidated financial position, results of
operations or cash flow.
On March 19, 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities an Amendment of FASB Statement 133. (SFAS 161). SFAS No. 161 enhances
required disclosures regarding derivatives and hedging activities, including enhanced disclosures
regarding how: (a) an entity uses derivative instruments; (b) derivative instruments and related
hedged items are accounted for under FASB Statement No.133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments
and Hedging Activities; and (c) derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entitys
financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. SFAS No. 161 is effective for fiscal
years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008. The Company has currently not
determined the potential effects on the consolidated financial statements, if any.
29
In April 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) FAS No. 142-3, Determination of the
Useful Life of Intangible Assets (FSP FAS No. 142-3). FSP FAS No. 142-3 amends the factors that
should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful
life of a recognized intangible asset under FAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
(FAS No. 142). The intent of FSP FAS No. 142-3 is to improve the consistency between the useful
life of a recognized intangible asset under FAS No. 142 and the period of expected cash flows used
to measure the fair value of the asset under FAS No. 141R Business Combinations, and other U.S.
generally accepted accounting principles. FSP FAS No. 142-3 is effective for financial statements
issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. We are currently evaluating the
potential impact of FSP FAS No. 142-3 on our consolidated results of operations and financial
position.
In May 2008, the FASB Statement No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles (SFAS No. 162). SFAS No. 162 identifies the sources of accounting principles and the
framework for selecting the principles used in the preparation of financial statements of
nongovernmental entities that are presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles (the GAAP hierarchy). SFAS No. 162 will become effective 60 days following the SECs
approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board amendments to AU Section 411, The
Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity With Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. We do not
currently expect the adoption of SFAS No. 162 to have a material effect on our consolidated results
of operations and financial position.
In October 2008, the FASB issued FSP 157-3 Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset When
the Market for That Asset Is Not Active (FSP 157-3). FSP 157-3 clarifies the application of SFAS
No. 157 in a market that is not active, and addresses application issues such as the use of
internal assumptions when relevant observable data does not exist, the use of observable market
information when the market is not active, and the use of market quotes when assessing the
relevance of observable and unobservable data. FSP 157-3 is effective for all periods presented in
accordance with SFAS No. 157. The adoption of FSP 157-3 did not have a significant impact on our
consolidated financial statements or the fair values of our financial assets and liabilities.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We no longer hold any marketable equity traded securities as of November 28, 2008.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Our management carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our
Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure
controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this Form 10-Q pursuant to Exchange
Act Rule 13a-15(b). Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief
Financial Officer concluded that, as of November 28, 2008, our disclosure controls and procedures
were effective.
The term disclosure controls and procedures, as defined under the Exchange Act, means controls
and other procedures of an issuer that are designed to ensure that information required to be
disclosed by the issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded,
processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange
Commissions rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation,
controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by an issuer
in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to
the issuers management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or
persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure.
There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the three months ended November 28, 2008 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The information set forth in Note 15 to the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements is incorporated by reference herein.
30
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
Risk factors may affect our future business and results. The matters discussed below could cause
our future results to
materially differ from past results or those described in forward-looking statements and could have
a material adverse effect
on our business, financial condition, results of operations and stock price.
Risks Related to Historical Losses, Financial Condition and Substantial Indebtedness
While we earned a profit in the first and second quarters of our 2009 fiscal year, we have incurred
significant net losses in recent fiscal periods, including $228.8 million for the fiscal year ended
May 30, 2008, and we may not be able to sustain or increase this profitability in the future.
While we returned to profitability in the first half of our 2009 fiscal year, we have incurred
significant net losses for many years prior and cannot provide assurance that we will be able to
sustain this profitability, or, if sustained, increase it. We face a number of challenges that
have affected our operating results during the current and past several fiscal years.
Specifically, we have experienced, and may continue to experience, the following:
|
|
|
declining sales in certain regions due to price competition and reduced incoming order
rate; |
|
|
|
|
operating expenses that, as a percentage of sales, have exceeded our desired financial
model; |
|
|
|
|
significant senior leadership and other management changes; |
|
|
|
|
significant non-cash accounting charges; |
|
|
|
|
increased sales and marketing expense as part of a strategy to help grow our market
share; |
|
|
|
|
disruptions and expenses resulting from our workforce reductions and employee attrition;
and |
|
|
|
|
interest expense resulting from our senior secured loan. |
In addition, we face a difficult business
environment due to the current global economic slowdown including, among other things, longer sales cycles.
To sustain profitability, we must maintain or increase our sales, and if we cannot do that, we may
need to further reduce costs. As we have implemented significant cost reduction programs over the
last several years including H3C integration savings, it may be difficult to make significant
further cost reductions without in turn impacting our sales. Future restructuring activity could
also make it more difficult for us to address all of our legal and regulatory obligations in an
effective manner, which could lead to penalties. In addition, we may choose to reinvest some or
all of our realized cost savings in future growth opportunities or in our worldwide integration
efforts. Any of these events or occurrences will likely cause our expense levels to continue to be
at levels above our desired model.
If we cannot overcome these challenges, reduce our expenses and/or increase our revenue, and
perform well during the current economic slowdown we may not be able to sustain profitability.
Our substantial debt could adversely affect our financial condition; and the related debt service
obligations may adversely affect our cash flow and ability to invest in and grow our businesses.
We now have, and for the foreseeable future will continue to have, a significant amount of
indebtedness. As of November 28, 2008, our total debt balance was $213 million, of which $48
million is due within one year and was classified as a current liability. In addition, despite
current debt levels, the terms of our indebtedness allow us or our subsidiaries to incur more debt,
subject to certain limitations.
31
While our senior secured loan is outstanding, we will have annual principal obligations of between
approximately $20 million and $97 million. The interest rate on this loan is floating based on the
LIBOR rate; accordingly, if the LIBOR rate is increased, interest amounts could be higher. The
maturity date on this loan is September 28, 2012. We intend to fulfill our debt service
obligations primarily from cash generated by our China-based segment operations, if any, and, to
the extent necessary, from parent-level cash and investments. Because we anticipate that a
substantial portion of the cash generated by our operations will be used to service this loan
during its term, such funds will not be available to use in future operations, or investing in our
businesses. Further, a significant portion of the excess cash flow generated by our China-based
segment, if any, must be used annually to prepay principal on the loan. The foregoing may
adversely impact our ability to expand our businesses or make other investments. In addition, if
we are unable to generate sufficient cash to meet these obligations and must instead use our
existing cash or investments, we may have to reduce, curtail or terminate other activities of our
businesses.
Our indebtedness could have significant negative consequences to us. For example, it could:
|
|
|
increase our vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions; |
|
|
|
|
limit our ability to obtain additional financing; |
|
|
|
|
require the dedication of a substantial portion of any cash flow from operations to the
payment of principal of, and interest on, our indebtedness, thereby reducing the
availability of such cash flow to fund growth, working capital, capital expenditures and
other general corporate purposes; |
|
|
|
|
limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and our
industry; and |
|
|
|
|
place us at a competitive disadvantage relative to our competitors with less debt. |
The restrictions imposed by the terms of our senior secured loan facility could adversely impact
our ability to grow our China business.
Covenants in the agreements governing our senior secured loan materially restrict our H3C
subsidiarys operations based in China, including H3Cs ability to incur debt, pay dividends, make
certain investments and payments, make acquisitions of other businesses and encumber or dispose of
assets. These negative covenants restrict our flexibility in operating our China business. In
addition, in the event H3Cs financial results do not meet our plans, the failure to comply with
the financial covenants contained in the loan agreements could lead to a default. Our lenders may
attempt to call defaults for violations of financial covenants (or other items, even if the
underlying financial performance of H3C is satisfactory) in an effort to extract waiver or consent
fees from us or to force a refinancing. A default and acceleration under one debt instrument or
other contract may also trigger cross-acceleration under other debt instruments or other
agreements, if any. An event of default, if not cured or waived, could have a material adverse
effect on us because the lenders will be able to accelerate all outstanding amounts under the loan
or foreclose on the collateral (which consists primarily of the assets of our H3C subsidiary and
could involve the lenders taking control over H3C). Any of these actions would likely result in a
material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.
Risks Related to China-based Sales region and Dependence Thereon
We are significantly dependent on our China-based segment; if it is not successful we will likely
experience a material adverse impact to our business, business prospects and operating results.
For the fiscal quarter ended November 28, 2008, our China-based sales region accounted for
approximately 56 percent of our consolidated revenue. Our China-based sales region is subject to
specific risks relating to its ability to:
|
|
|
maintain a leading position in the networking equipment market in China; |
|
|
|
|
build profitable operations in other emerging markets throughout the world, but
particularly in the Asia Pacific region; |
|
|
|
|
offer new and innovative products and services to attract and retain a larger customer
base; |
|
|
|
|
increase awareness of the H3C brand and continue to develop customer loyalty; |
|
|
|
|
respond to rapidly changing competitive market conditions, including those presented by
the current global economic slowdown to the extent it affects China and other parts of the
Asia Pacific region; |
|
|
|
|
respond to changes in the regulatory environment; |
|
|
|
|
manage risks associated with intellectual property rights, particularly in China; |
|
|
|
|
maintain effective control of costs and expenses; and |
|
|
|
|
attract, retain and motivate qualified personnel. |
32
In addition, China has begun to feel the effects of the current global economic slowdown.
In China, we face competition from domestic Chinese industry participants, and as a foreign-owned
business, may not be as successful in selling to Chinese customers, particularly those in the
public sector, to the extent that such customers favor Chinese-owned competitors.
We expect that a significant portion of our sales will continue to be derived from our China-based
sales region for the foreseeable future. As a result, our business, financial condition and
results of operations are to a significant degree subject to economic, political, legal and social
developments and other events in China and surrounding areas. We discuss risks related to the PRC
in further detail below. In addition, because we already have a significant percentage of the
market share in China for enterprise networking products (and together with Cisco represent a
substantial portion of that market), our opportunities to grow market share in China are more
limited than in the past. Our China-based sales region has experienced growth in recent periods
in part due to the growth in Chinas technology industry, which may not be representative of future
growth or be sustainable. We cannot therefore assure you that our China-based sales regions
historical financial information is indicative of its future operating results or future financial
performance, or that its profitability will be sustained.
Given the significance of our China-based sales region to our financial results, if it is not
successful, our business will likely be adversely affected.
We are dependent on Huawei Technologies, or Huawei, as a significant customer; if, as expected,
Huawei reduces its business with us, it could materially adversely affect our business results.
We derive a material portion of our sales from Huawei, which formerly held a significant investment
in our H3C subsidiary. In the three months ended November 28, 2008, which includes results from
our legal entity H3Cs September 30, 2008 quarter, Huawei accounted for approximately 32 percent of
the revenue for our China-based sales region and approximately 18 percent of our consolidated
revenue. Huaweis percentage of our China-based sales regions revenues has been trending downward
from 46 percent during the 3 months ended November 30, 2006, to the current level, and we expect
this downward trend to continue. We further expect that Huawei will in the future reduce its
business with us and, accordingly, that its purchases in absolute dollars will decrease. Huawei
does not have any minimum purchase requirements under our existing OEM agreement, which expires in
November 2010. In sum, we risk the possibility that Huawei sources products from another vendor or
internally develops these products. If any of these risks occur, it will likely have an adverse
impact on our sales and business performance. In order to minimize any adverse impact on our
results from any decreased sales to Huawei that may occur, we will need to successfully execute on
our sales strategies. If we are not successful in these efforts, the risks described above may be
heightened.
We must execute on a global strategy to leverage the benefits of our H3C acquisition, including
significant integration activities; if we are not successful in these efforts, our business will
suffer.
Our acquisition of H3C, which significantly increased the size, scope and complexity of 3Com,
continues to present unique challenges that we must address. H3Cs business (essentially what we
now refer to as our China-based sales region) is largely based in the PRC. Accordingly,
significant cultural, language, business process and other differences exist between our
China-based sales region and our Rest of World business. We may experience business disruption as
management and other personnel focus on global management activities and integration matters.
Depending on the decisions we make on various strategic alternatives available to us, we may
develop new or adjusted product development initiatives, go-to-market strategies, branding tactics,
unified back office, supply chain and IT systems, streamlined engineering efforts or other
strategies that maximize the potential of the integrated company. Integration activities may
require substantial investment and significant time and effort of our management and other
personnel. We have undertaken substantial integration activity, and expect to continue to do so.
If we are not successful in executing these integration strategies, our business might be
substantially harmed.
33
If we cannot continue to increase our Rest of World segments sales of H3C branded or sourced
products outside of China, and generate additional success in selling to larger enterprise and
government accounts outside of China, we will likely find it increasingly difficult to grow our
overall business.
We believe that increasing our Rest of World segments sales of H3C branded or sourced products is
very important to 3Coms global growth opportunities and ultimately to our consolidated growth.
Our current strategy involves increased direct-touch sales and marketing of our end-to-end
networking solutions to larger enterprise and government accounts outside of China. These sales
involve longer sales cycles, and involve intense competition from larger industry participants many
of whom possess a significantly larger market share and installed base than us. If we fail in
these efforts, our business will suffer.
Risk Related to Personnel
Our success is dependent on continuing to hire and retain qualified managers and other personnel,
including at our China-based sales segment, and reducing senior management turnover; if we are not
successful in attracting and retaining these individuals, our business will suffer.
Competition for qualified employees is intense. If we fail to attract, hire, or retain qualified
personnel, our business will be harmed. We have experienced significant turnover in our senior
management team in the last several years and we may continue to experience change at this level.
If we cannot retain qualified senior managers and provide stability in the senior management team
to enable them to work together for an extended period of time, our business may not succeed.
The senior management team at our China-based sales segment has been highly effective. We need to
continue to incentivize and retain China-based management. We cannot be sure that we will be
successful in these efforts. If we are not successful, our China-based sales region may suffer,
which, in turn, will have a material adverse impact on our consolidated business. Many of these
senior managers, and other key China-based employees, originally worked for Huawei prior to the
inception of our former joint venture in China. Subject to non-competition agreements with us (if
applicable), these employees could return to work for Huawei at any time. Huawei is not subject to
any non-solicitation obligations with respect to us. Further, former Huawei employees employed by
us may retain financial interests in Huawei.
Risks Related to Competition
Intense competition in the market for networking solutions could prevent us from increasing revenue
and profitability.
The market for networking solutions is intensely competitive. In particular, Cisco maintains a
dominant position in this market and several of its products compete directly with our products.
Ciscos substantial resources and market dominance have enabled it to reduce prices on its products
within a short period of time following the introduction of these products, which typically causes
its competitors to reduce prices and, therefore, the margins and the overall profitability of its
competitors. Purchasers of networking solutions may choose Ciscos products because of its broader
product line and strong reputation in the networking market. In addition, Cisco may have
developed, or could in the future develop, new technologies that directly compete with our products
or render our products obsolete. We cannot provide assurance that we will be able to compete
successfully against Cisco, currently the leading provider in the networking market.
We also compete with several other significant companies in the networking industry. Some of our
current and potential competitors have greater market leverage, longer operating histories, greater
financial, technical, sales, marketing and other resources, more name recognition and larger
installed customer bases. Additionally, we may face competition from unknown companies and
emerging technologies that may offer new networking solutions. Furthermore, a number of these
competitors may merge or form strategic relationships that would enable them to apply greater
resources and sales coverage than we can, and to offer, or bring to market earlier, products that
are superior to ours in terms of features, quality, pricing or a combination of these and other
factors.
In order to remain competitive, we must, among other things, invest significant resources in
developing new products with superior performance at lower prices than our competitors, enhance our
current products and maintain customer satisfaction. In addition, we must make certain our sales
and marketing capabilities allow us to compete effectively against our competitors. If we fail to
do so, our products may not compete favorably with those of our competitors and our revenue and
profitability could suffer.
34
Our competition with Huawei in the enterprise networking market could have a material adverse
effect on our sales and our results of operations; now that the contractual non-compete period has
expired, Huawei can increase its level of competition, which increased competition would likely
materially and adversely affect our business.
As Huawei expands its operations, offerings and markets, there could be increasing instances where
we compete directly with Huawei in the enterprise networking market. As a significant customer of
our China-based segment, Huawei has had, and continues to have, access to H3C products for resale.
This access enhances Huaweis current ability to compete directly with us both in China and in the
rest of the world. In addition, Huaweis obligation not to offer or sell enterprise class, and
small-to-medium size business (or SMB), routers and switches that are competitive with H3C products
has recently expired. Accordingly, we are now subject to the risk of increased competition from
Huawei. Any such increase could materially harm our results of operations. More specifically,
Huawei may now offer and sell its own enterprise or SMB routers and switches, or resell products
that it sources from our competitors. If Huawei chooses to increase its competition with us, or if
we do not compete favorably with Huawei, it is likely that our business results, particularly in
the Asia Pacific region and specifically in China, will be materially and negatively affected.
In addition, Huawei maintains a strong presence within China and the Asia Pacific region and has
significant resources with which to compete within the networking industry, including ownership of
the assets of Harbour Networks, a China-based competitor that possesses enterprise networking
products and technology. In sum, we risk the possibility that Huawei sources products from another
vendor or internally develops these products. We cannot predict whether Huawei will compete with
us. If competition from Huawei increases, our business will likely suffer.
Risks Related to Business and Technology Strategy
Our industry is characterized by a short product life cycle, and we may not be successful at
identifying and responding to new and emerging market, technology and product opportunities, or at
responding quickly enough to technologies or markets that are in decline.
The enterprise networking industry in which we compete is characterized by rapid changes in
technology and customer requirements and evolving industry standards. As a result, our success
depends on:
|
|
|
the convergence of technologies, such as voice, data and video on single, secure
networks; |
|
|
|
|
the timely adoption and market acceptance of industry standards, and timely resolution
of conflicting U.S. and international industry standards; and |
|
|
|
|
our ability to influence the development of emerging industry standards and to introduce
new and enhanced products that are compatible with such standards. |
Slow market acceptance of new technologies, products, or industry standards could adversely affect
our sales or overall results of operations. In addition, if our technology is not included in an
industry standard on a timely basis or if we fail to achieve timely certification of compliance to
industry standards for our products, our sales of such products or our overall results of
operations could be adversely affected.
Our success also depends on our ability to do the following:
|
|
|
identify new market and product opportunities; |
|
|
|
|
predict which technologies and markets will see declining demand; |
|
|
|
|
develop and introduce new products and solutions in a timely manner; |
|
|
|
|
gain market acceptance of new products and solutions, including in targeted emerging
markets; and |
|
|
|
|
rapidly and efficiently transition our customers from older to newer enterprise
networking technologies. |
Accordingly, our business would suffer if any of the following occurs:
|
|
|
there is a delay in introducing new products; |
|
|
|
|
we lose certain channels of distribution or key partners; |
|
|
|
|
our products do not satisfy customers in terms of features, functionality or quality; or |
|
|
|
|
our products cost more to produce than we expect. |
35
Because we will continue to rely on original design manufacturers to assist in product design of
some of our products, we may not be able to respond to emerging technology trends through the
design and production of new products as well as if we were working independently. We rely on our
large research and development base in Beijing, China to develop most of our new technologies,
products and solutions. These engineers are focused on developing products for worldwide markets,
including customer requirements for the developed world as well as for the China market. These
markets may have different products features and customer requirements, and we must develop product
solutions that satisfy our customers on a worldwide basis. If we are not successful at these
efforts, our business will suffer.
We expect to utilize strategic relationships and other alliances as key elements in our strategy.
If we are not successful in forming these partnerships or if they are not successful, our ability
to achieve our growth and profitability goals could be adversely affected.
We have existing strategic partners and expect to evaluate other possible strategic relationships,
including joint ventures and other types of alliances. We may increase our reliance on such
strategic relationships to broaden our sales channels, complement internal development of new
technologies and enhancement of existing products, and exploit perceived market opportunities.
If we fail to form the number and quality of strategic relationships that we desire, or if such
strategic relationships are not successful, we could suffer missed market opportunities, channel
conflicts, delays in product development or delivery or other operational difficulties. Further,
if third parties acquire our strategic partners or if our competitors enter into successful
strategic relationships, we may face increased competition. Any of these difficulties could have
an adverse effect on our future sales and results of operations.
Outsourcing functions and operations may fail to reduce cost and may disrupt our operations.
Our efforts to decrease cost and improve efficiency may involve contracting with other companies to
perform functions or operations that, in the past, we have performed ourselves. For example, we
now rely on outside vendors to meet the majority of our manufacturing and logistics needs as well
as a significant portion of our IT needs. Additionally, we outsource certain functions for
technical support and product return services. If we do not provide our customers with a high
quality of service, we risk losing customers and/or increasing our support costs.
Although we believe that outsourcing will result in lower costs and increased efficiencies, this
may not be the case. Because these third parties may not be as responsive to our needs as we would
be ourselves, outsourcing increases the risk of disruption to our operations. In addition, our
agreements with these third parties sometimes include substantial penalties for terminating such
agreements early or failing to maintain minimum service levels. Because we cannot always predict
how long we will need the services or how much of the services we will use, we may have to pay
these penalties or incur costs if our business conditions change.
We focus on enterprise networking, and our results of operations may fluctuate based on factors
related entirely to conditions in this market.
Our focus on enterprise networking may cause increased sensitivity to the business risks associated
specifically with the enterprise networking market and our ability to execute successfully on our
strategies to provide superior solutions for larger and multi-site enterprise environments. To be
successful in the enterprise networking market, we will need to be perceived by decision making
officers of large enterprises as committed for the long-term to the high-end networking business.
Also, expansion of sales to large enterprises may be disruptive in a variety of ways, such as
adding larger systems integrators that may raise channel conflict issues with existing distributors
or value-added resellers, or a perception of diminished focus on the small and medium enterprise
market.
We strive to be increasingly successful in direct-touch sales for larger enterprise and government
accounts in all geographic regions. Such efforts will likely require a greater investment in sales
and marketing, as well as the provision and maintenance of a global service organization that can
respond to these customers. The sales cycle is also generally longer for these types of sales when
compared to our small-and-medium-size enterprise business. This is particularly true during the
current global economic slowdown. If we are not successful in these efforts, our business growth
will suffer.
36
Risks Related to Operations and Distribution Channels
A significant portion of our sales is derived from a small number of distributors. If any of these
partners reduces its business with us, our business could be adversely affected.
We distribute many of our products through two-tier distribution channels that include distributors
and value added resellers, or VARs. In some instances, we also use a system integrator. A
significant portion of our sales is concentrated among a few distributors; our two largest
distributors accounted for a combined 14 percent of our consolidated revenue for the three months
ended November 28, 2008. If either of these distributors reduces its business with us, our sales
and overall results of operations could be adversely affected.
We depend on distributors who maintain inventories of our products. If the distributors reduce
their inventories of our products, our sales could be adversely affected.
We work closely with our distributors to monitor channel inventory levels and ensure that
appropriate levels of products are available to resellers and end users. Our target range for
channel inventory levels is between three and five weeks of supply on hand at our distributors.
Partners with a below-average inventory level may incur stock outs that would adversely impact
our sales. Our distribution agreements typically provide that our distributors may cancel their
orders on short notice with little or no penalty. If our channel partners reduce their levels of
inventory of our products, our sales would be negatively impacted during the period of change.
If we are unable to successfully develop relationships with system integrators, service providers,
and enterprise VARs, our sales may be negatively affected.
As part of our sales strategy, we are targeting system integrators, or SIs, service providers, or
SPs, and enterprise value-added resellers, or eVARs. In addition to specialized technical
expertise, SIs, SPs and eVARs typically offer sophisticated services capabilities that are
frequently desired by larger enterprise customers. In order to expand our distribution channel to
include resellers with such capabilities, we must be able to provide effective support to these
resellers. If our sales, marketing or services capabilities are not sufficiently robust to provide
effective support to such SIs, SPs, and eVARs, we may not be successful in expanding our
distribution model and current SI, SP, and eVAR partners may terminate their relationships with us,
which would adversely impact our sales and overall results of operations.
We may pursue acquisitions of other companies that, if not successful, could adversely affect our
business, financial position and results of operations.
In the future, we may pursue acquisitions of companies to enhance our existing capabilities. There
can be no assurances that acquisitions we might consummate will be successful. If we pursue an
acquisition but are not successful in completing it, or if we complete an acquisition but are not
successful in integrating the acquired companys technology, employees, products or operations
successfully, our business, financial position or results of operations could be adversely
affected.
We may be unable to manage our supply chain successfully, which would adversely impact our sales,
gross margin and profitability.
Current business conditions and operational challenges in managing our supply chain affect our
business in a number of ways:
|
|
|
our ability to accurately forecast demand is diminished; |
|
|
|
|
our reliance on, and long-term arrangements with, third-party manufacturers places much
of the supply chain process out of our direct control and heightens the need for accurate
forecasting and reduces our ability to transition quickly to alternative supply chain
strategies; and |
|
|
|
|
we may experience disruptions to our logistics. |
37
We cannot be certain that in the future our suppliers, particularly those who are also in active
competition with us, will be able or willing to meet our demand for components in a timely and
cost-effective manner. There has been a trend toward consolidation of vendors of electronic
components. Our reliance on a smaller number of vendors and the inability to quickly switch
vendors increases the risk of logistics disruptions, unfavorable price fluctuations, or disruptions
in supply, particularly in a supply-constrained environment. Supplies of certain key components
have become tighter as industry demand for such components has increased. If the resulting
increase in component costs and time necessary to obtain these components persists, we may
experience an adverse impact to gross margin.
If overall demand for our products or the mix of demand for our products is significantly different
from our expectations, we may face inadequate or excess component supply or inadequate or excess
manufacturing capacity. This would result in orders for products that could not be manufactured in
a timely manner, or a buildup of inventory that could not easily be sold. Either of these
situations could adversely affect our market share, sales, and results of operations or financial
position.
The inability of any contract manufacturer to meet our cost, quality or performance standards could
adversely affect our sales and overall results from operations.
The cost, quality, performance, and availability of contract manufacturing operations are and will
be essential to the successful production and sale of many of our products. We may not be able to
provide contract manufacturers with product volumes that are high enough to achieve sufficient cost
savings. If shipments fall below forecasted levels, we may incur increased costs or be required to
take ownership of inventory. In addition, a significant component of maintaining cost
competitiveness is the ability of our contract manufacturers to adjust their own costs and
manufacturing infrastructure to compensate for possible adverse exchange rate movements. To the
extent that the contract manufacturers are unable to do so, and we are unable to procure
alternative product supplies, then our own competitiveness and results of operations could be
adversely impacted.
In portions of our business we have implemented a program with our manufacturing partners to ship
products directly from regional shipping centers to customers. Through this program, we are
relying on these partners to fill customer orders in a timely manner. This program may not yield
the efficiencies that we expect, which would negatively impact our results of operations. Any
disruptions to on time delivery to customers would adversely impact our sales and overall results
of operations.
Risks Related to our Operations in the Peoples Republic of China
Chinas governmental and regulatory reforms and changing economic environment may impact our
ability to do business in China.
As a result of the historic reforms of the past several decades, multiple government bodies are
involved in regulating and administrating affairs in the enterprise networking industry in China.
These government agencies have broad discretion and authority over all aspects of the networking,
telecommunications and information technology industry in China; accordingly their decisions may
impact our ability to do business in China. Any of the following changes in Chinas political and
economic conditions and governmental policies could have a substantial impact on our business:
|
|
|
the promulgation of new laws and regulations and the interpretation of those laws and
regulations; |
|
|
|
|
enforcement and application of rules and regulations by the Chinese government; |
|
|
|
|
the introduction of measures to control inflation or stimulate growth; or |
|
|
|
|
any actions that limit our ability to develop, manufacture, import or sell our products
in China, or to finance and operate our business in China. |
Due to our dependence on China, if China were to experience a broad and prolonged economic
slowdown, our results of operations would suffer. China has recently begun to feel the effects of
the global economic slowdown, and government efforts to restore growth rates may not be effective.
The Chinese government has also from time-to-time implemented certain measures to control the pace
of economic growth. Such measures may cause a decrease in the level of economic activity in China,
which in turn could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
38
Uncertainties with respect to the Chinese legal system may adversely affect us.
We conduct our business in China primarily through H3C Technologies Co., Limited, a Hong Kong
entity which in turn owns several Chinese entities. These entities are generally subject to laws
and regulations applicable to foreign investment in China. In addition, there are uncertainties
regarding the interpretation and enforcement of laws, rules and policies in China. Because many
laws and regulations are relatively new and the Chinese legal system is still evolving, the
interpretations of many laws, regulations and rules are not always uniform. Moreover, the
interpretation of statutes and regulations may be subject to government policies reflecting
domestic political changes. Finally, enforcement of existing laws or contracts based on existing
law may be uncertain, and it may be difficult to obtain swift and equitable enforcement, or to
obtain enforcement of a judgment by a court of another jurisdiction. Any litigation in China may
be protracted and result in substantial costs and diversion of resources and managements
attention.
If PRC tax benefits available to us in China are reduced or repealed, our business could suffer.
Effective January 1, 2008, a new corporate income tax rate of 25 percent (phased-in over time for
certain companies) applies to companies subject to income tax in China. Companies which benefited
from preferential tax rates and rulings under the previous Chinese tax law can continue to enjoy
those concessions, subject to transitional rules. In our case, our principal operating subsidiary
in China (H3C) was entitled to tax concessions which began in 2004. These concessions exempted H3C
from the PRC income tax for 2004 and 2005 and entitle it to a 50 percent reduction in income tax in
2006-2008. (H3C maintains a calendar fiscal year end.) Accordingly, calendar 2008 will be the
final year of the 50 percent reduction. Although the regular rate under the new tax law is 25
percent, the new tax law also provides for a reduced tax rate of 15 percent for companies which
qualify as new and high technology enterprises. Based on the regulations, we believe that our
H3C subsidiary in China will qualify for this reduced rate. The application and approval for a
Hangzhou, PRC-based company like H3C is a two-stage process. First, an enterprise must apply to
the Science and Technology Department of Zhejiang Province to be approved within the framework of
the new legislation. Second, the enterprise must apply to the local tax office to have the
applicable rate confirmed at 15%. We received the approval from the Science and Technology
Department of Zhejiang Province in October 2008 but we have not yet obtained the confirmation from
the local tax office.
Under our existing 50 percent reduction concession, our statutory income tax rate in China is
expected to be 9% for 2008. This is the last year of the concession. It should be noted, however,
that the final determination of our 2008 statutory income tax rate in China is subject to approval
by the local tax office and we expect them to consider the complex rules concerning existing
concessions under the transition rules in granting this approval. Thereafter, assuming we qualify
for the reduced rate for new and high technology companies, our rate will be 15%. If we do not
qualify for the reduced rate, our rate is expected to be 20% for 2009, 22% for 2010, 24% for 2011
and 25% thereafter. Dividends declared and paid by our Chinese subsidiary are currently subject to
a 5% withholding tax discussed in the next risk factor.
If we are not entitled to new and high technology enterprise treatment under this new law (due to
the publication of new regulations or the interpretation of existing law or regulation or
otherwise), if other tax benefits we currently enjoy are withdrawn or reduced, or if new taxes are
introduced which have not applied to us before, there would likely be a resulting increase to our
statutory tax rates in the PRC. Increases to tax rates in the PRC, where we are profitable, could
adversely affect our results of operations and cash flow.
Our H3C subsidiary is subject to restrictions on paying dividends and making other payments to us.
Chinese regulations currently permit payment of dividends only out of accumulated profits, as
determined in accordance with Chinese accounting standards and regulations. Our principal operating
entity in China is required to set aside a portion of its after-tax profits currently 10 percent
up to 50% of paid-in capital according to Chinese accounting standards and regulations to fund
certain reserves. The Chinese government also imposes controls on the conversion of Renminbi into
foreign currencies and the remittance of currencies out of China. We may experience difficulties
in completing the administrative procedures necessary to obtain and remit foreign currency. These
restrictions may in the future limit our ability to receive dividends or repatriate funds from
China. In addition, the credit agreement governing our senior secured loan also imposes
significant restrictions on our ability to dividend or make other payments to our other segments.
Finally, the new PRC tax law, effective January 1, 2008, imposes a withholding tax on certain
payments by entities resident in PRC to entities outside of the PRC (including Hong Kong).
Regulations have now been issued which confirm that this withholding tax will apply to dividends
and other distributions made by our subsidiary in China. Consequently, all distributions of
earnings realized from 2008 onwards from our PRC subsidiaries to our subsidiary in Hong Kong will
be subject to this withholding tax at a rate of 5%. Our main PRC subsidiary generates the cash used
to pay principal and interest
39
on our H3C loan (through
dividend flows from the PRC to Hong Kong and then to the Cayman Islands). Accordingly, we will in
the future be required to earn proportionately higher profits in the PRC to service principal and
interest on our loan, or be forced to fund any deficiencies from cash generated from other
geographies.
We are subject to risks relating to currency rate fluctuations and exchange controls and we do not
hedge this risk in China.
Approximately 52 percent of our sales and a portion of our costs are denominated in Renminbi, the
Chinese currency. At the same time, our senior secured bank loan which we intend to service and
repay primarily through cash flow from our China-based operations is denominated in US dollars.
In July 2005, China uncoupled the Renminbi from the U.S. dollar and let it float in a narrow band
against a basket of foreign currencies. The Renminbi could appreciate or depreciate relative to
the U.S. dollar. Any movement of the Renminbi may materially and adversely affect our cash flows,
revenues, operating results and financial position, and may make it more difficult for us to
service our U.S. dollar-denominated senior secured bank loan. More specifically, if the Renminbi
appreciates in value as compared with the U.S. dollar, our reported revenues will derive a
beneficial increase due to currency translation; and if the Renminbi depreciates, our revenues will
suffer due to such depreciation. This currency translation impacts our expenses as well, but to a
lesser degree. In recent periods, we have benefited from the currency translation of Renminbi, but
our results may in the future be harmed by it.
Our sales around the world are generally denominated in Renminbi (in China) and in US Dollars (in
the rest of the world). We use those two currencies to price our products and generally do not
accept local currencies as payment for product. When we sell our products in countries outside of
China and the U.S. to customers in countries whose currencies have been devalued against the
Renminbi or the US Dollar, the currency fluctuation causes the cost of our products to these
customers to be higher. We generally do not provide currency exchange risk protection to our
customers. For these reasons, when the Renminbi or US Dollar is stronger against local currencies,
we may experience delayed or cancelled purchases or general business softness in the relevant
region.
We do not currently hedge the currency risk in China through foreign exchange forward contracts or
otherwise and China employs currency controls restricting Renminbi conversion, limiting our ability
to engage in currency hedging activities in China. Various foreign exchange controls are
applicable to us in China, and such restrictions may in the future make it difficult for H3C or us
to repatriate earnings, which could have an adverse effect on our cash flows and financial
position.
Risks Related to Intellectual Property
If our products contain undetected software or hardware errors, we could incur significant
unexpected expenses and could lose sales.
High technology products sometimes contain undetected software or hardware errors when new products
or new versions or updates of existing products are released to the marketplace. Undetected errors
could result in higher than expected warranty and service costs and expenses, and the recording of
an accrual for related anticipated expenses. From time to time, such errors or component failures
could be found in new or existing products after the commencement of commercial shipments. These
problems may have a material adverse effect on our business by causing us to incur significant
warranty and repair costs, diverting the attention of our engineering personnel from new product
development efforts, delaying the recognition of revenue and causing significant customer relations
problems. Further, if products are not accepted by customers due to such defects, and such returns
exceed the amount we accrued for defect returns based on our historical experience, our operating
results would be adversely affected.
Our products must successfully interoperate with products from other vendors. As a result, when
problems occur in a network, it may be difficult to identify the sources of these problems. The
occurrence of hardware and software errors, whether or not caused by our products, could result in
the delay or loss of market acceptance of our products and any necessary revisions may cause us to
incur significant expenses. The occurrence of any such problems would likely have a material
adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.
40
We may need to engage in complex and costly litigation in order to protect, maintain or enforce our
intellectual property rights; in some jurisdictions, such as China, our rights may not be as strong
as the rights we enjoy in the U.S.
Whether we are defending the assertion of intellectual property rights against us, or asserting our
intellectual property rights against others, intellectual property litigation can be complex,
costly, protracted, and highly disruptive to business operations because it may divert the
attention and energies of management and key technical personnel. Further, plaintiffs in
intellectual property cases often seek injunctive relief and the measures of damages in
intellectual property litigation are complex and often subjective and uncertain. In addition, such
litigation may subject us to counterclaims or other retaliatory actions that could increase its
costs, complexity, uncertainty and disruption to the business. Thus, the existence of this type of
litigation, or any adverse determinations related to such litigation, could subject us to
significant liabilities and costs. Any one of these factors could adversely affect our sales, gross
margin, overall results of operations, cash flow or financial position.
In addition, the legal systems of many foreign countries do not protect or honor intellectual
property rights to the same extent as the legal system of the United States. For example, in
China, the legal system in general, and the intellectual property regime in particular, are still
in the development stage. It may be very difficult, time-consuming and costly for us to attempt to
enforce our intellectual property rights in these jurisdictions.
We may not be able to defend ourselves successfully against claims that we are infringing the
intellectual property rights of others.
Many of our competitors, such as telecommunications, networking, and computer equipment
manufacturers, have large intellectual property portfolios, including patents that may cover
technologies that are relevant to our business. In addition, many smaller companies, universities,
and individual inventors have obtained or applied for patents in areas of technology that may
relate to our business. The industries in which we operate continue to be aggressive in assertion,
licensing, and litigation of patents and other intellectual property rights. It is very expensive
to defend claims of patent infringement and we expect over time to incur significant time and
expense to defend our portfolio.
In the course of our business, we receive claims of infringement or otherwise become aware of
potentially relevant patents or other intellectual property rights held by other parties. We
evaluate the validity and applicability of these intellectual property rights, and determine in
each case whether to negotiate licenses or cross-licenses to incorporate or use the proprietary
technologies, protocols, or specifications in our products, and whether we have rights of
indemnification against our suppliers, strategic partners or licensors. If we are unable to obtain
and maintain licenses on favorable terms for intellectual property rights required for the
manufacture, sale, and use of our products, particularly those that must comply with industry
standard protocols and specifications to be commercially viable, our financial position or results
of operations could be adversely affected. In addition, if we are alleged to infringe the
intellectual property rights of others, we could be required to seek licenses from others or be
prevented from manufacturing or selling our products, which could cause disruptions to our
operations or the markets in which we compete. Finally, even if we have indemnification rights in
respect of such allegations of infringement from our suppliers, strategic partners or licensors, we
may not be able to recover our losses under those indemnity rights.
Our open source strategy subjects us to additional intellectual property risks, such as less
control over development of certain technology that forms a part of this strategy and a higher
likelihood of litigation.
Many of our networking products use open source software, or OSS, licenses. The underlying source
code for OSS is generally made available to the general public with either relaxed or no
intellectual property restrictions. This allows users to create user-generated software content
through either incremental individual effort, or collaboration. The use of OSS means that for such
software we do not exercise control over many aspects of the development of the open source
technology. For example, the vast majority of programmers developing OSS used by us are neither
our employees nor contractors. Therefore, we cannot predict whether further developments and
enhancements to OSS selected by us would be available. Furthermore, rival OSS applications often
compete for market share. Should our choice of application fail to compete favorably, its OSS
development may wane or stop. In addition, OSS has few technological barriers to entry by new
competitors and it may be relatively easy for new competitors, who may have greater resources than
us, to enter our markets and compete with us. Also, because OSS is often compiled from multiple
components developed by numerous independent parties and usually comes as is and without
indemnification, OSS is more vulnerable to third party intellectual property infringement claims.
Finally, some of the more prominent OSS licenses, such as the GNU General Public License, are the
subject of litigation. It is possible that a court could hold such licenses to be unenforceable or
someone could assert a claim for proprietary rights in a program developed and distributed under
them. Any ruling by a court that these licenses are not
41
enforceable or that open source components
of our product offerings may not be liberally copied, modified or distributed may have the effect
of
preventing us from selling or developing all or a portion of our products. If any of the foregoing
occurred, it could cause a material adverse impact on our business.
Risks Related to the Trading Market
Fluctuations in our operating results and other factors may contribute to volatility in the market
price of our stock.
Historically, our stock price has experienced volatility. We expect that our stock price may
continue to experience volatility in the future due to a variety of potential factors such as:
|
|
|
fluctuations in our quarterly results of operations and cash flow; |
|
|
|
|
changes in our cash and equivalents and short term investment balances; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to execute on our strategic plan, including, without limitation, our H3C
integration activities; |
|
|
|
|
general economic conditions, such as the current global economic slowdown; |
|
|
|
|
variations between our actual financial results and published analysts expectations;
and |
|
|
|
|
announcements by our competitors or significant customers. |
For example, we experienced a decrease in our stock price around the same time that our proposed
acquisition to be acquired by an entity controlled by affiliates of Bain Capital Partners, or
Newco, was terminated. More specifically, on March 20, 2008, an affiliate of Bain Capital
Partners, LLC sent a letter to us purporting to terminate our merger agreement dated September 28,
2007, or the Merger Agreement. We terminated the Merger Agreement, by letters dated April 25, 2008
and April 29, 2008, as a result of Newcos failure to consummate the merger in accordance with the
Merger Agreement. As previously disclosed, we have filed a lawsuit seeking payment of the $66
million termination fee from Newco under the Merger Agreement. We cannot assure you that we will
be able to collect all or any portion of the termination fee, or that our efforts will not result
in adverse consequences to us.
In addition, over the past several years, the stock market has experienced significant price and
volume fluctuations that have affected the stock prices of many technology companies. These
factors, as well as general economic and political conditions or investors concerns regarding the
credibility of corporate financial statements and the accounting profession, may have a material
adverse affect on the market price of our stock in the future. For example, many companies have
recently experienced sharp decreases and/or downward pressure on their stock prices as a result of
the current global economic downturn.
We may be required to record additional significant charges to earnings if our goodwill or
intangible assets become impaired.
Under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, we review our amortizable
intangible assets, trademark and goodwill for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate the
carrying value may not be recoverable. Goodwill is tested for impairment at least annually. The
carrying value of our goodwill or amortizable assets may not be recoverable due to factors such as
reduced estimates of future cash flows and
slower growth rates in our industry or in any of our business units. Estimates of future cash
flows are based on an updated long-term financial outlook of our operations. However, actual
performance in the near-term or long-term could be materially different from these forecasts, which
could impact future estimates. For example, if one of our business units does not meet its
near-term and longer-term forecasts, the goodwill assigned to the business unit could be impaired.
Similarly, a significant decline in our stock price and/or market capitalization may result in
goodwill impairment for one or more business units. We may be required to record a charge to
earnings in our financial statements during a period in which an impairment of our goodwill or
amortizable intangible assets is determined to exist, which may negatively impact our results of
operations. For example, in the three-month period ended May 30, 2008, we took a charge of $158.0
million relating to impairment of the goodwill of our TippingPoint segment.
42
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
The following table summarizes repurchases of our stock, including shares surrendered to satisfy
tax withholding obligations, in the quarter ended November 30, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
|
Approximate Dollar |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased |
|
|
Value of Shares |
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
Average |
|
|
as Part of Publicly |
|
|
that May Yet Be |
|
|
|
of Shares |
|
|
Price Paid |
|
|
Announced Plans |
|
|
Purchased Under the |
|
Period |
|
Purchased |
|
|
per Share |
|
|
or Programs(1) |
|
|
Plans or Programs |
|
August 30, 2008
through September
26, 2008 |
|
|
175,775 |
(2) |
|
$ |
2.21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
100,000,000 |
|
September 27, 2008
through October 24,
2008 |
|
|
17,180,738 |
(2) |
|
|
2.32 |
|
|
|
17,174,830 |
|
|
|
60,142,965 |
|
October 25, 2008
through November
28, 2008 |
|
|
4,213,025 |
(2) |
|
|
2.46 |
|
|
|
4,089,600 |
|
|
|
50,046,813 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
21,569,538 |
|
|
$ |
2.35 |
|
|
|
21,264,430 |
|
|
$ |
50,046,813 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
On September 24, 2008, our Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase program providing
for repurchases of up to $100.0 million through September 23, 2009. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes shares surrendered to us to satisfy tax withholding obligations that arose upon the
vesting of restricted stock awards and units of 175,775 in September 2008, 5,908 in October
2008 and 123,425 in November 2008. |
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
(a) |
|
The Annual Meeting of Stockholders was held on September 24, 2008 in
Beijing, China. |
|
(b) |
|
Each of the persons named in the Proxy Statement as a nominee for
director was elected and the proposals listed below were approved. The
following are the voting results of the proposals: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proposal I |
|
For |
|
Withheld |
To elect four Class II
Directors to the Board of
Directors for a
two-year term. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eric A. Benhamou |
|
|
292,857,367 |
|
|
|
61,763,527 |
|
Gary T. DiCamillo |
|
|
276,509,534 |
|
|
|
78,111,360 |
|
James R. Long |
|
|
313,453,251 |
|
|
|
41,167,643 |
|
Ronald A. Sege |
|
|
323,567,732 |
|
|
|
31,053,162 |
|
Other Directors whose term of office as a director continued after the meeting were
Robert Mao and Dominique Trempont. Kathleen Cote and David Ho were appointed to the
Board of Directors after the meeting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proposal II |
|
For |
|
Against |
|
Abstain |
Amendment to 2003 Stock Plan: |
|
192,688,447 |
|
|
|
66,686,493 |
|
|
|
1,118,430 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proposal III |
|
For |
|
Against |
|
Abstain |
Amendment to 1984 Stock Plan: |
|
236,735,687 |
|
|
|
22,668,708 |
|
|
|
1,088,975 |
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proposal IV |
|
|
For |
|
|
Against |
|
|
Abstain |
Ratification of the
appointment of Deloitte
& Touche LLP as the
Companys independent
auditors for the fiscal
year ending May, 2009: |
|
|
346,756,203 |
|
|
|
6,244,413 |
|
|
|
1,667,196 |
|
|
Proposal V |
|
|
For |
|
|
Against |
|
|
Abstain |
Stockholder Proposal
A
Performance-Based
Options: |
|
|
138,234,318 |
|
|
|
118,082,146 |
|
|
|
4,223,825 |
|
|
Proposal VI |
|
|
For |
|
|
Against |
|
|
Abstain |
Stockholder Proposal B
Declassification of
Board: |
|
|
215,425,500 |
|
|
|
44,306,130 |
|
|
|
808,659 |
|
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
Not applicable.
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
Incorporated by Reference |
|
Filed |
|
Number |
|
Exhibit Description |
|
Form |
|
File No. |
|
Exhibit |
|
Filing Date |
|
Herewith |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
Master Separation and Distribution Agreement between the |
|
10-Q |
|
002-92053 |
|
2.1 |
|
4/4/00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Registrant and Palm, Inc. effective as of December 13, 1999 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
Indemnification and Insurance Matters Agreement between the |
|
10-Q |
|
002-92053 |
|
2.11 |
|
4/4/00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Registrant and Palm, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated December 13, 2004, by and |
|
8-K |
|
000-12867 |
|
2.1 |
|
12/16/04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
among the Registrant, Topaz Acquisition Corporation and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TippingPoint Technologies, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
Securities Purchase Agreement by and among 3Com Corporation, 3Com |
|
8-K/A |
|
000-12867 |
|
2.1 |
|
3/30/06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Technologies, Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. and Shenzen Huawei |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment & Holding Co., Ltd., dated as of October 28, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
Stock Purchase Agreement by and between Shenzhen Huawei Investment |
|
8-K |
|
000-12867 |
|
10.1 |
|
12/27/06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
& Holding Co., Ltd. and 3Com Technologies, dated as of December |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger by and among 3Com Corporation, |
|
8-K/A |
|
000-12867 |
|
2.1 |
|
9/28/07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diamond II Holdings Inc. and Diamond II Acquisition Corp., dated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 28, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
Corrected Certificate of Merger filed to correct an error in the |
|
10-Q |
|
002-92053 |
|
3.4 |
|
10/8/99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certificate of Merger |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
Registrants Bylaws, as amended on December 10, 2008 |
|
8-K |
|
000-12867 |
|
3.1 |
|
12/16/08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
Certificate of Designation of Rights, Preferences and Privileges |
|
10-Q |
|
000-12867 |
|
3.6 |
|
10/11/01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Series A Participating Preferred Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
Incorporated by Reference |
|
Filed |
|
Number |
|
Exhibit Description |
|
Form |
|
File No. |
|
Exhibit |
|
Filing Date |
|
Herewith |
|
|
4.1 |
|
Third Amended and Restated Preferred Shares Rights Agreement, |
|
8-A/A |
|
000-12867 |
|
4.1 |
|
11/27/02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
dated as of November 4, 2002 (Rights Agreement) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
Amendment No. 1 to Rights Agreement, dated as of September 28, 2007 |
|
8-K |
|
000-12867 |
|
4.1 |
|
9/28/07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
3Com Corporation 2003 Stock Plan, as amended and restated |
|
8-K |
|
000-12867 |
|
10.2 |
|
1/6/09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
effective January 1, 2009* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
Amended and Restated 3Com Corporation 1984 Employee Stock Purchase |
|
8-K |
|
000-12867 |
|
10.2 |
|
9/24/08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan, as approved by stockholders on September 24, 2008 (Beijing, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
China-time)* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
Certification of Principal Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
Certification of Principal Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan |
45
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
3Com Corporation
(Registrant)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: January 7, 2009 |
By: |
/s/ Jay Zager
|
|
|
|
Jay Zager |
|
|
|
Executive Vice President, Finance and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and
Accounting Officer and a duly authorized
officer of the registrant) |
|
46
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
Incorporated by Reference |
|
Filed |
|
Number |
|
Exhibit Description |
|
Form |
|
File No. |
|
Exhibit |
|
Filing Date |
|
Herewith |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
Master Separation and Distribution Agreement between the |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Registrant and Palm, Inc. effective as of December 13, 1999 |
|
10-Q |
|
002-92053 |
|
2.1 |
|
4/4/00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
Indemnification and Insurance Matters Agreement between the |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Registrant and Palm, Inc. |
|
10-Q |
|
002-92053 |
|
2.11 |
|
4/4/00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated December 13, 2004, by and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
among the Registrant, Topaz Acquisition Corporation and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TippingPoint Technologies, Inc. |
|
8-K |
|
000-12867 |
|
2.1 |
|
12/16/04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
Securities Purchase Agreement by and among 3Com Corporation, 3Com |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Technologies, Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. and Shenzen Huawei |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment & Holding Co., Ltd., dated as of October 28, 2005 |
|
8-K/A |
|
000-12867 |
|
2.1 |
|
3/30/06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
Stock Purchase Agreement by and between Shenzhen Huawei Investment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
& Holding Co., Ltd. and 3Com Technologies, dated as of December |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22, 2006 |
|
8-K |
|
000-12867 |
|
10.1 |
|
12/27/06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger by and among 3Com Corporation, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diamond II Holdings Inc. and Diamond II Acquisition Corp., dated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 28, 2007 |
|
8-K/A |
|
000-12867 |
|
2.1 |
|
9/28/07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
Corrected Certificate of Merger filed to correct an error in the |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certificate of Merger |
|
10-Q |
|
002-92053 |
|
3.4 |
|
10/8/99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
Registrant's Bylaws, as amended on December 10, 2008 |
|
8-K |
|
000-12867 |
|
3.1 |
|
12/16/08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
Certificate of Designation of Rights, Preferences and Privileges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Series A Participating Preferred Stock |
|
10-Q |
|
000-12867 |
|
3.6 |
|
10/11/01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
Third Amended and Restated Preferred Shares Rights Agreement, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
dated as of November 4, 2002 (Rights Agreement) |
|
8-A/A |
|
000-12867 |
|
4.1 |
|
11/27/02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
Amendment No. 1 to Rights Agreement, dated as of September 28, 2007 |
|
8-K |
|
000-12867 |
|
4.1 |
|
9/28/07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
3Com Corporation 2003 Stock Plan, as amended and restated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
effective January 1, 2009* |
|
8-K |
|
000-12867 |
|
10.2 |
|
1/6/09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
Amended and Restated 3Com Corporation 1984 Employee Stock Purchase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan, as approved by stockholders on September 24, 2008 (Beijing, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
China-time)* |
|
8-K |
|
000-12867 |
|
10.2 |
|
9/24/08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
Certification of Principal Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
Certification of Principal Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan |
47