e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For
the transition period from to
Commission file number 1-11953
Willbros Group, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Republic of Panama
(Jurisdiction of incorporation)
|
|
98-0160660
(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) |
Plaza 2000 Building
50th Street, 8th Floor
P.O. Box 0816-01098
Panama, Republic of Panama
Telephone No.: +50-7-213-0947
(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including
area code, of principal executive offices of registrant)
NOT APPLICABLE
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ Noo
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in
Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer
þ
|
|
Accelerated filer
o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o Noþ
The number of shares of the registrants Common Stock, $.05 par value, outstanding as of
October 31, 2008 was 39,199,222.
WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
FORM 10-Q
FOR QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
2
WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
ASSETS |
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
127,552 |
|
|
$ |
92,886 |
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $1,217 and $1,108 |
|
|
266,985 |
|
|
|
251,746 |
|
Contract cost and recognized income not yet billed |
|
|
81,815 |
|
|
|
49,233 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
14,683 |
|
|
|
7,555 |
|
Parts and supplies inventories |
|
|
3,381 |
|
|
|
2,902 |
|
Assets held for sale |
|
|
13,607 |
|
|
|
|
|
Assets of discontinued operations |
|
|
2,673 |
|
|
|
3,211 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
510,696 |
|
|
|
407,533 |
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation
of $118,032 and $97,268 |
|
|
159,186 |
|
|
|
159,766 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
143,653 |
|
|
|
143,241 |
|
Other intangible assets |
|
|
42,378 |
|
|
|
50,206 |
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
|
7,227 |
|
|
|
7,769 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
7,882 |
|
|
|
10,898 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
871,022 |
|
|
$ |
779,413 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of capital lease obligations |
|
$ |
12,880 |
|
|
$ |
12,132 |
|
Notes payable and current portion of other long-term debt |
|
|
4,275 |
|
|
|
1,040 |
|
Current portion of government obligations |
|
|
6,575 |
|
|
|
8,075 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
200,200 |
|
|
|
156,342 |
|
Contract billings in excess of cost and recognized income |
|
|
21,943 |
|
|
|
22,868 |
|
Accrued income taxes |
|
|
1,131 |
|
|
|
4,750 |
|
Liabilities of discontinued operations |
|
|
637 |
|
|
|
978 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
247,641 |
|
|
|
206,185 |
|
|
2.75% convertible senior notes |
|
|
59,357 |
|
|
|
68,000 |
|
6.5% senior convertible notes |
|
|
32,050 |
|
|
|
32,050 |
|
Capital lease obligations |
|
|
36,683 |
|
|
|
39,090 |
|
Long-term portion of government obligations |
|
|
13,150 |
|
|
|
24,225 |
|
Other long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
|
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
9,345 |
|
|
|
6,879 |
|
Long-term liability for unrecognized tax benefits |
|
|
6,154 |
|
|
|
6,612 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
404,617 |
|
|
|
383,312 |
|
|
Contingencies and commitments (Note 12) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A preferred stock, par value $.01 per share, 1,000,000
shares authorized, none issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, par value $.05 per share, 70,000,000 shares
authorized; 39,570,886 shares issued (38,276,545 at
December 31, 2007) |
|
|
1,978 |
|
|
|
1,913 |
|
Capital in excess of par value |
|
|
575,591 |
|
|
|
556,223 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(114,664 |
) |
|
|
(175,936 |
) |
Treasury stock at cost, 372,803 shares (222,839 at
December 31, 2007) |
|
|
(8,084 |
) |
|
|
(3,298 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
11,584 |
|
|
|
17,199 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
466,405 |
|
|
|
396,101 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
871,022 |
|
|
$ |
779,413 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Contract revenue |
|
$ |
490,651 |
|
|
$ |
246,716 |
|
|
$ |
1,450,002 |
|
|
$ |
610,168 |
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract |
|
|
430,192 |
|
|
|
212,237 |
|
|
|
1,256,680 |
|
|
|
550,995 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
2,586 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,828 |
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative |
|
|
29,138 |
|
|
|
17,757 |
|
|
|
85,939 |
|
|
|
43,313 |
|
Government fines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
461,916 |
|
|
|
227,994 |
|
|
|
1,350,447 |
|
|
|
616,308 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
28,735 |
|
|
|
18,722 |
|
|
|
99,555 |
|
|
|
(6,140 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
799 |
|
|
|
1,029 |
|
|
|
2,592 |
|
|
|
4,433 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(2,484 |
) |
|
|
(2,071 |
) |
|
|
(7,671 |
) |
|
|
(6,552 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
(1,327 |
) |
|
|
204 |
|
|
|
(2,019 |
) |
Loss on early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,375 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,627 |
) |
|
|
(2,369 |
) |
|
|
(4,875 |
) |
|
|
(19,513 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
before income taxes |
|
|
27,108 |
|
|
|
16,353 |
|
|
|
94,680 |
|
|
|
(25,653 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
8,057 |
|
|
|
6,081 |
|
|
|
36,450 |
|
|
|
7,793 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) from continuing
operations |
|
|
19,051 |
|
|
|
10,272 |
|
|
|
58,230 |
|
|
|
(33,446 |
) |
Income (loss) from discontinued operations
net of provision for income taxes |
|
|
1,219 |
|
|
|
(9,126 |
) |
|
|
3,042 |
|
|
|
(21,494 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
20,270 |
|
|
$ |
1,146 |
|
|
$ |
61,272 |
|
|
$ |
(54,940 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic income (loss) per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.50 |
|
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
|
$ |
1.52 |
|
|
$ |
(1.22 |
) |
Income (loss) from discontinued operations |
|
|
0.03 |
|
|
|
(0.32 |
) |
|
|
0.08 |
|
|
|
(0.78 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
0.53 |
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
1.60 |
|
|
$ |
(2.00 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted income (loss) per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.46 |
|
|
$ |
0.32 |
|
|
$ |
1.41 |
|
|
$ |
(1.22 |
) |
Income (loss) from discontinued operations |
|
|
0.03 |
|
|
|
(0.26 |
) |
|
|
0.07 |
|
|
|
(0.78 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
0.49 |
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
1.48 |
|
|
$ |
(2.00 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares
outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
38,313,997 |
|
|
|
28,804,907 |
|
|
|
38,236,508 |
|
|
|
27,421,927 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
43,803,235 |
|
|
|
34,844,482 |
|
|
|
43,864,307 |
|
|
|
27,421,927 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehen- |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Excess of |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
sive Income |
|
|
Stockholders |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Par Value |
|
|
Par Value |
|
|
Deficit |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
(Loss) |
|
|
Equity |
|
Balance, December 31, 2007 |
|
|
38,276,545 |
|
|
$ |
1,913 |
|
|
$ |
556,223 |
|
|
$ |
(175,936 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,298 |
) |
|
$ |
17,199 |
|
|
$ |
396,101 |
|
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61,272 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61,272 |
|
Foreign currency
translation adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,615 |
) |
|
|
(5,615 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive
income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,657 |
|
Deferred compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,080 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,080 |
|
Deferred compensation tax
benefit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,277 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,277 |
|
Deferred restricted stock rights
issuance |
|
|
225,000 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock grants |
|
|
552,159 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vesting of restricted
stock rights |
|
|
20,269 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to treasury stock,
vesting and forfeitures
of restricted stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,786 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,786 |
) |
Exercise of stock options |
|
|
53,000 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
681 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
684 |
|
Additional costs of public offering |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(251 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(251 |
) |
Stock issued on conversion of
2.75% convertible senior notes |
|
|
443,913 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
8,621 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,643 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, September 30, 2008 |
|
|
39,570,886 |
|
|
$ |
1,978 |
|
|
$ |
575,591 |
|
|
$ |
(114,664 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,084 |
) |
|
$ |
11,584 |
|
|
$ |
466,405 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
61,272 |
|
|
$ |
(54,940 |
) |
Reconciliation of net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Income) loss from discontinued operations |
|
|
(3,042 |
) |
|
|
21,494 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
33,988 |
|
|
|
13,223 |
|
Amortization of deferred compensation, net |
|
|
7,080 |
|
|
|
3,010 |
|
Amortization of debt issuance costs |
|
|
1,189 |
|
|
|
1,557 |
|
Deferred compensation tax benefit |
|
|
(3,277 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax provision |
|
|
6,885 |
|
|
|
1,063 |
|
Loss (gain) on sales of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
206 |
|
|
|
(716 |
) |
Provision for bad debts |
|
|
1,215 |
|
|
|
181 |
|
Equity in joint ventures |
|
|
(123 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Government fines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,000 |
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,375 |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
(19,931 |
) |
|
|
(36,923 |
) |
Contract cost and recognized income not yet billed |
|
|
(35,405 |
) |
|
|
(15,226 |
) |
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
5,706 |
|
|
|
11,239 |
|
Parts and supplies inventories |
|
|
(512 |
) |
|
|
(704 |
) |
Other assets |
|
|
758 |
|
|
|
(879 |
) |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
45,188 |
|
|
|
3,466 |
|
Contract billings in excess of cost and recognized income |
|
|
(783 |
) |
|
|
(6,772 |
) |
Accrued income taxes |
|
|
(3,590 |
) |
|
|
608 |
|
Long-term liability for unrecognized tax benefits |
|
|
(330 |
) |
|
|
315 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by (used in) operating activities of continuing
operations |
|
|
96,494 |
|
|
|
(22,629 |
) |
Cash provided by operating activities of
discontinued operations |
|
|
3,531 |
|
|
|
2,980 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
|
|
100,025 |
|
|
|
(19,649 |
) |
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(28,122 |
) |
|
|
(15,890 |
) |
Rebates from purchases of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
1,915 |
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sales of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
1,418 |
|
|
|
1,428 |
|
Acquisition of subsidiaries |
|
|
846 |
|
|
|
(24,154 |
) |
Proceeds from the sale of discontinued operations, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
105,568 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by (used in) investing activities of continuing
operations |
|
|
(23,943 |
) |
|
|
66,952 |
|
Cash used in investing activities of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
|
(23,943 |
) |
|
|
66,952 |
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments on capital leases |
|
|
(17,550 |
) |
|
|
(7,507 |
) |
Payments of government fines |
|
|
(12,575 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Repayment of notes payable |
|
|
(9,550 |
) |
|
|
(8,665 |
) |
Acquisition of treasury stock |
|
|
(4,786 |
) |
|
|
(513 |
) |
Deferred compensation tax benefit |
|
|
3,277 |
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
|
|
684 |
|
|
|
1,519 |
|
Additional costs of public offering of common stock |
|
|
(251 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Costs of debt issues |
|
|
(166 |
) |
|
|
(286 |
) |
Loss on early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,993 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash used in financing activities of continuing operations |
|
|
(40,917 |
) |
|
|
(28,445 |
) |
Cash used in financing activities of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(40,917 |
) |
|
|
(28,445 |
) |
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(499 |
) |
|
|
2,208 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by all activities |
|
|
34,666 |
|
|
|
21,066 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
92,886 |
|
|
|
37,643 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
127,552 |
|
|
$ |
58,709 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest (including discontinued operations) |
|
$ |
6,287 |
|
|
$ |
5,659 |
|
Cash paid for income taxes (including discontinued operations) |
|
$ |
34,651 |
|
|
$ |
8,438 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental non-cash investing and financing transactions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equipment and property obtained by capital leases |
|
$ |
17,863 |
|
|
$ |
29,780 |
|
Prepaid insurance obtained by note payable |
|
$ |
12,754 |
|
|
$ |
10,051 |
|
Common stock issued for conversion of 2.75% convertible senior notes |
|
$ |
8,643 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Deposit applied to capital lease obligation |
|
$ |
1,432 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Deferred government obligation payments |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
32,300 |
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
7
WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
1. The Company and Basis of Presentation
Willbros Group, Inc., a Republic of Panama corporation, and all of its majority-owned
subsidiaries (the Company, Willbros or WGI) is an independent international contractor
serving the oil, gas and power industries; government entities; and the refinery and petrochemical
industries. The Companys principal markets for continuing operations are the United States, Canada
and Oman. The Company obtains its work through competitive bidding and through negotiations with
prospective clients. Contract values may range from several thousand dollars to several hundred
million dollars and contract durations range from a few weeks to more than two years.
The accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2007, which has been
derived from audited consolidated financial statements, and the unaudited interim Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements as of September 30, 2008, have been prepared pursuant to the
rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Accordingly, certain
information and note disclosures normally included in annual financial statements prepared in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted pursuant to
those rules and regulations. The Company believes the presentations and disclosures herein are
adequate to make the information not misleading. Certain prior period amounts have been
reclassified to be consistent with current presentation. These unaudited Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with the Companys December 31, 2007 audited
Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto contained in the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.
In the opinion of management, the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
reflect all adjustments necessary to present fairly the financial position as of September 30,
2008, the results of operations and cash flows of the Company for all interim periods presented,
and stockholders equity for the nine months ended September 30, 2008.
The Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements include certain estimates and assumptions by
management. These estimates and assumptions relate to the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities at the date of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and the reported amounts
of revenue and expense during the periods. Significant items subject to such estimates and
assumptions include the carrying amount of property, plant and equipment, goodwill and parts and
supplies inventories; quantification of amounts recorded for contingencies, tax accruals and
certain other accrued liabilities; valuation allowances for accounts receivable and deferred income
tax assets; and revenue recognition under the percentage-of-completion method of accounting,
including estimates of progress toward completion and estimates of gross profit or loss accrual on
contracts in progress. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and other
assumptions that it believes relevant under the circumstances. Actual results could differ from
those estimates.
As discussed in Note 13 Discontinuance of Operations, Asset Disposals, and Transition
Services Agreement, the Company has disposed of certain assets and operations that are together
classified as discontinued operations (collectively the Discontinued Operations). Accordingly,
these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements reflect these operations as discontinued
operations in all periods presented. The disclosures in the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements relate to continuing operations except as otherwise indicated.
As of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively, the Company had $9,492 and
$2,686 of cash and cash equivalents committed to specific project uses.
2. New Accounting Pronouncements
SFAS No. 157
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statements of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS No. 157). SFAS No. 157
applies to other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements and is
effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and
interim periods within those fiscal years. On January 1, 2008, the Company adopted the provisions
of SFAS No. 157 related to financial assets and liabilities and to nonfinancial assets and
liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis. The adoption of this accounting
pronouncement did not result in a material impact to the consolidated financial statements.
In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) Financial Accounting Standard
157-1, Application of FASB Statement No. 157 to FASB Statement No. 13 and Other Accounting
Pronouncements That Address Fair Value Measurements for Purposes of Lease Classification or
Measurement under Statement 13, which removes certain leasing transactions from the scope of SFAS
No. 157, and FSP Financial Accounting Standard 157-2, Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157,
which defers the effective date of SFAS No. 157 for one year for certain nonfinancial assets and
nonfinancial liabilities, except those that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the
financial statements on a recurring basis.
In October 2008, the FASB also issued FSP SFAS 157-3, Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset When the Market for
That Asset is Not Actvie, which clarifies the application of SFAS No. 157 in an inactive market and illustrates how an
entity would determine fair value when the market for a financial asset is not active.
Beginning January 1, 2009, the Company will adopt the
provisions for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities that are not required or permitted
to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis, which include those measured at fair value in
goodwill impairment testing, indefinite-lived intangible assets measured at fair value for
impairment assessment, nonfinancial long-lived assets measured at fair value for impairment
assessment, asset retirement obligations initially measured at fair value, and those initially
measured at fair value in a business
8
WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
2. New Accounting Pronouncements (continued)
combination. The Company is currently assessing the impact the adoption of this pronouncement will
have on its financial statements. The Company does not expect the provisions of SFAS No. 157
related to these items to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
SFAS No. 159
In February 2007, the FASB released Statements of Financial Accounting Standards No. 159, The
Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (SFAS No. 159), which is
effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. SFAS No. 159 permits entities to
choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. SFAS No. 159 is
effective for the Companys fiscal year ending December 31, 2008. The Company does not expect to
use the fair value option for any financial assets and financial liabilities that are not currently
recorded at fair value.
SFAS No. 141-R
In December 2007, the FASB released Statements of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141-R,
Business Combinations (SFAS No. 141R). SFAS No. 141R applies prospectively to business
combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual
reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008, which are business combinations in the
year ending December 31, 2009 for the Company. Early adoption is prohibited. SFAS No. 141R
establishes principles and requirements for how an acquirer recognizes and measures in its
financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, any non-controlling
interest and the goodwill acquired. Additionally, transaction costs that are currently capitalized
under current accounting guidance will be required to be expensed as incurred under SFAS No. 141R.
SFAS No. 141R also establishes disclosure requirements which will enable users to evaluate the
nature and financial effects of the business combination.
SFAS No. 160
In December 2007, the FASB released Statements of Financial Accounting Standards No. 160,
Non-controlling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements an amendment of ARB No. 51
(SFAS No. 160). SFAS No. 160 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those
fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2008. Early adoption is prohibited. SFAS No. 160
establishes reporting requirements that provide sufficient disclosure that clearly identify and
distinguish between the interests of non-controlling owners and the interest of the parent. The
Company is currently assessing the impact the adoption of this pronouncement will have on its
financial statements.
FSP No. APB 14-1
In May 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. APB 14-1, Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments
That May Be Settled in Cash upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash Settlement). This FSP
clarifies that convertible debt instruments that may be settled in cash upon conversion (including
partial cash settlement) are not addressed by APB Opinion No. 14. Additionally, this FSP specifies
that issuers of such instruments should separately account for the liability and equity components
in a manner that will reflect the entitys nonconvertible debt borrowing rate when interest cost is
recognized in subsequent periods. This statement is effective for financial statements issued for
fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years.
Early adoption is prohibited. The Company is currently assessing the impact the adoption of this
pronouncement will have on its financial statements.
FSP No. FAS 142-3
In April 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 142-3, Determination of the Useful Life of
Intangible Assets. This FSP amends the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or
extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under FASB
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142 (SFAS No. 142). The intent of this FSP is to
improve the consistency between the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS No.
142, the period of expected cash flows used to measure the fair value of the asset under SFAS No.
141R and other U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. This statement is effective for
financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008 and interim periods
within those fiscal years. Early adoption is prohibited. The Company is currently assessing the
impact the adoption of this pronouncement will have on its financial statements.
3. Contracts in Progress
Contract cost and recognized income not yet billed on uncompleted contracts arise when
recorded revenues for a contract exceed the amounts billed under the terms of the contracts.
Contract billings in excess of cost and recognized income arise when billed amounts exceed revenues
recorded. Amounts are billable to customers upon various measures of performance, including
achievement of certain milestones, completion of specified units or completion of the contract.
Also included in contract cost and recognized income not yet billed on uncompleted contracts are
amounts the Company seeks to collect from customers for change orders approved in scope but not for
price associated with that scope change (unapproved change orders). Revenue for these amounts is
recorded equal to the lesser of the expected revenue or cost incurred when realization of price
approval is probable. Estimating revenues from unapproved change
9
WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
3. Contracts in Progress (continued)
orders involve the use of estimates, and it is reasonably possible that revisions to the estimated
recoverable amounts of recorded unapproved change orders may be made in the near-term. If the
Company does not successfully resolve these matters, a reduction in revenues may be required to
amounts that have been previously recorded.
Contract cost and recognized income not yet billed and related amounts billed as of September
30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Cost incurred on contracts in progress |
|
$ |
1,088,970 |
|
|
$ |
720,799 |
|
Recognized income |
|
|
140,789 |
|
|
|
74,228 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,229,759 |
|
|
|
795,027 |
|
Progress billings and advance payments |
|
|
(1,169,887 |
) |
|
|
(768,662 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
59,872 |
|
|
$ |
26,365 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract cost and recognized income not yet billed |
|
$ |
81,815 |
|
|
$ |
49,233 |
|
Contract billings in excess of cost and recognized income |
|
|
(21,943 |
) |
|
|
(22,868 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
59,872 |
|
|
$ |
26,365 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract cost and recognized income not yet billed includes $340 and $86 at September 30,
2008, and December 31, 2007, respectively, on completed contracts.
4. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the nine months ended September 30, 2008,
by business segment, are detailed below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Upstream |
|
|
Downstream |
|
|
|
|
|
|
O&G |
|
|
O&G |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Balance as of December 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
12,818 |
|
|
$ |
130,423 |
|
|
$ |
143,241 |
|
Purchase price adjustments |
|
|
(581 |
) |
|
|
1,095 |
|
|
|
514 |
|
Translation adjustments and other |
|
|
(102 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(102 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of September 30, 2008 |
|
$ |
12,135 |
|
|
$ |
131,518 |
|
|
$ |
143,653 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The purchase price adjustments in the table above are due to changes in the estimated fair
value assigned to the assets and liabilities acquired and contractual
working capital adjustments made during the one year estimation
period following the consummation of the transaction.
The Companys intangible assets as of September 30, 2008 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Relationships |
|
|
Backlog |
|
|
Total |
|
Gross carrying amount |
|
$ |
40,500 |
|
|
$ |
10,500 |
|
|
$ |
51,000 |
|
Less: accumulated amortization |
|
|
(2,791 |
) |
|
|
(5,831 |
) |
|
|
(8,622 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total amortizable intangible assets, net |
|
$ |
37,709 |
|
|
$ |
4,669 |
|
|
$ |
42,378 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average remaining amortization period |
|
11.3 yrs |
| |
0.7 yrs |
|
|
|
|
|
These amortizable intangible assets are included in the assets of the Companys Downstream O&G
segment. Intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful
lives, which range from 1.5 to 12.1 years.
10
WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
4. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (continued)
Amortization expense included in net income for the three and nine months ended September 30,
2008 was $2,586 and $7,828, respectively. Estimated amortization expense for the remainder of 2008
and each of the subsequent five years and thereafter is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal year: |
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
$ |
2,588 |
|
2009 |
|
|
6,268 |
|
2010 |
|
|
3,352 |
|
2011 |
|
|
3,352 |
|
2012 |
|
|
3,352 |
|
2013 |
|
|
3,352 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
20,114 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total amortization |
|
$ |
42,378 |
|
|
|
|
|
5. Government Obligations
Government obligations represent amounts due to government entities, specifically the United
States Department of Justice (DOJ) and the SEC, in final settlement of the investigations
involving violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (the FCPA) and violations of the
Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These investigations stem primarily
from the Companys former operations in Bolivia, Ecuador and Nigeria. In May 2008, the Company
reached final agreements with the DOJ and the SEC to settle their investigations. As previously
disclosed the agreements provided for an aggregate payment of $32,300. The Company will pay $22,000
in fines to the DOJ related to the FCPA violations, consisting of $10,000 paid on signing and
$4,000 annually for three years thereafter, with no interest due on unpaid amounts. The Company
will pay $10,300 to the SEC, consisting of $8,900 of profit disgorgement and $1,400 of pre-judgment
interest, payable in four equal installments of $2,575 with the first installment paid on signing
and annually for three years thereafter. Post-judgment interest will be payable on the outstanding
$7,725.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, $12,575 of the aggregate obligation was
relieved, which consisted of the initial $10,000 payment to the DOJ and the first installment of
$2,575 to the SEC, inclusive of all pre-judgment interest.
The remaining aggregate obligation of $19,725 has been classified on the Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets as $6,575 in Current portion of government obligations and $13,150 in
Long-term portion of government obligations. This division is based on payment terms that provide
for three remaining equal installments of $2,575 and $4,000 to the SEC and DOJ, respectively.
6. Long-term Debt
Long-term debt as of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Capital lease obligations |
|
$ |
49,563 |
|
|
$ |
51,222 |
|
2.75% convertible senior notes |
|
|
59,357 |
|
|
|
68,000 |
|
6.5% senior convertible notes |
|
|
32,050 |
|
|
|
32,050 |
|
Other long-term debt |
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
99 |
|
2007 Credit Facility |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt |
|
|
141,019 |
|
|
|
151,371 |
|
Less: current portion |
|
|
(12,929 |
) |
|
|
(12,197 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, net |
|
$ |
128,090 |
|
|
$ |
139,174 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 Credit Facility
On November 20, 2007, the Company entered into a new credit agreement (the Credit Agreement),
among Willbros USA, Inc., a subsidiary of the Company (WUSA), as borrower, the Company and
certain of its subsidiaries as guarantors (collectively, the Loan Parties), and a group of
lenders (the Lenders) led by Calyon New York Branch (Calyon). The Credit Agreement provides
for a new three-year senior secured $150,000 revolving credit facility due 2010 (the 2007 Credit
Facility). The Company has the option, subject to obtaining commitment from one or more lenders
and Calyons consent, to increase the size of the 2007 Credit Facility to $200,000 within the first
two years of the closing date of the 2007 Credit Facility. The Company is able to utilize
100 percent of the 2007 Credit Facility to obtain performance letters of credit and 33.3 percent of
the facility for cash advances for general corporate purposes
11
WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
6. Long-term Debt (continued)
and financial letters of credit. The 2007 Credit Facility is secured by substantially all of the
assets of the Company, including those of the Loan Parties, as well as a pledge of 100 percent of
the equity interests of WUSA and each of the Companys other subsidiaries that are Loan Parties.
The 2007 Credit Facility replaced the Companys existing three-year $100,000 senior secured
synthetic credit facility, which was scheduled to expire in October 2009.
Unamortized debt issuance costs associated with the 2007 Credit Facility total $1,088 and
$1,302 and are included in other assets at September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007, respectively.
These costs are being amortized to interest expense over the three-year term of the Credit
Facility ending October 2010.
The 2007 Credit Facility also requires compliance with the following financial covenants:
|
|
|
A minimum net worth in an amount of not less than the sum of $223,819 plus 50 percent of
consolidated net income earned in each fiscal quarter ended after September 30, 2008 plus
adjustments for certain equity transactions; |
|
|
|
|
A maximum leverage ratio of 2.25 to 1.00 for the fiscal quarter ending September 30,
2008 and one fiscal quarter thereafter and a maximum leverage ratio of 2.00 to 1.00 for
each fiscal quarter ending after December 31, 2008; |
|
|
|
|
A minimum fixed charge coverage ratio of not less than 3.25 to 1.00 for the fiscal
quarter ending September 30, 2008 and one fiscal quarter thereafter and a fixed charge
ratio of not less than 3.50 to 1.00 for each fiscal quarter ending after December 31, 2008;
and |
|
|
|
|
If the Companys liquidity during any fiscal quarter falls below $35,000, a maximum
capital expenditure ratio of 1.50 to 1.00 (cost of assets added through purchase or capital
lease) for such fiscal quarter and for each of the three quarters thereafter. |
If these covenants are violated, it would be considered an event of default entitling the
lenders to terminate the remaining commitment, call all outstanding letters of credit, and
accelerate payment of any principal and interest outstanding. At September 30, 2008, the Company
was in compliance with all of these covenants.
As of September 30, 2008, there were no borrowings outstanding under the 2007 Credit Facility
and there were $34,010 in outstanding performance letters of credit consisting of $33,887 issued
for projects in continuing operations and $123 issued for projects related to Discontinued
Operations.
6.5% Senior Convertible Notes
On December 22, 2005, the Company entered into a purchase agreement (the Purchase Agreement)
for a private placement of $65,000 aggregate principal amount of its 6.5% Senior Convertible Notes
due 2012 (the 6.5% Notes). The private placement closed on December 23, 2005. During the first
quarter of 2006, the initial purchasers of the 6.5% Notes exercised their options to purchase an
additional $19,500 aggregate principal amount of the 6.5% Notes. Collectively, the primary offering
and the purchase option of the 6.5% Notes totaled $84,500. The net proceeds of the offering were
used to retire existing indebtedness and provide additional liquidity to support working capital
needs.
The 6.5% Notes are governed by an indenture, dated December 23, 2005, that was entered into by
and among the Company, as issuer, WUSA, as guarantor and The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation,
as Trustee (the Indenture), and were issued under the Purchase Agreement by and among the Company
and the initial purchasers of the 6.5% Notes (the Purchasers), in a transaction exempt from the
registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act). The
6.5% Notes are convertible into shares of the Companys stock and these underlying shares have been
registered with the SEC. The resale of the 6.5% Notes, however, has not been registered with the
SEC.
The 6.5% Notes are convertible into shares of the Companys common stock at a conversion rate
of 56.9606 shares of common stock per $1,000 principal amount of notes (representing a conversion
price of approximately $17.56 per share resulting in 1,825,587 shares at September 30, 2008),
subject to adjustment in certain circumstances. The 6.5% Notes are general senior unsecured
obligations. Interest is due semi-annually on June 15 and December 15.
As of September 30, 2008, $32,050 of aggregate principal amount of the 6.5% Notes remains
outstanding. Unamortized debt issuance costs of $1,546 and $1,819 associated with the 6.5% Notes
are included in other assets at September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively, and are
being amortized over the seven-year period ending December 2012.
A covenant in the indenture for the 6.5% Notes prohibits the Company from incurring any
additional indebtedness if its consolidated leverage ratio exceeds 4.00 to 1.00. As of September
30, 2008, this covenant would not have precluded the Company from borrowing under the 2007 Credit
Facility.
12
WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
6. Long-term Debt (continued)
2.75% Convertible Senior Notes
On March 12, 2004, the Company completed a primary offering of $60,000 of 2.75% Convertible
Senior Notes (the 2.75% Notes). On April 13, 2004, the initial purchasers of the 2.75% Notes
exercised their option to purchase an additional $10,000 aggregate principal amount of the notes.
Collectively, the primary offering and purchase option of the 2.75% Notes totaled $70,000. The
2.75% Notes are general senior unsecured obligations. Interest is paid semi-annually on March 15
and September 15 and payments began on September 15, 2004.
The holders of the 2.75% Notes may, under certain circumstances, convert the notes into shares
of the Companys common stock at an initial conversion ratio of 51.3611 shares of common stock per
$1,000 principal amount of notes (representing a conversion price of approximately $19.47 per share
resulting in 3,048,641 shares at September 30, 2008 subject to adjustment in certain
circumstances).
On March 20, 2008, a holder exercised its right to convert, converting $8,643 in aggregate
principal amount of the 2.75% Notes into 443,913 shares of the Companys common stock. In
connection with the conversion, the Company expensed a proportionate amount of its debt issuance
costs resulting in additional period interest of $187.
Unamortized debt issuance costs of $1,074 and $1,610 associated with the 2.75% Notes are
included in other assets at September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively, and are being
amortized over the seven-year period ending March 2011.
Capital Leases
The Company has entered into multiple capital lease agreements to acquire construction
equipment and automobiles. In aggregate, these leases have interest rates ranging from 4.30% to
8.26% and have typical terms of at least 30 months.
Assets held under capital leases at September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 are summarized
below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Construction equipment |
|
$ |
60,413 |
|
|
$ |
56,171 |
|
Autos, trucks and trailers |
|
|
4,458 |
|
|
|
4,282 |
|
Furniture and office equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
535 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets held under capital lease |
|
|
64,871 |
|
|
|
60,988 |
|
Less: accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(14,968 |
) |
|
|
(9,251 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets under capital lease |
|
$ |
49,903 |
|
|
$ |
51,737 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7. Income (Loss) Per Share
Basic income (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted
average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted income (loss) per share is
based on the weighted average number of shares outstanding during each period plus the assumed
exercise of potentially dilutive stock options and warrants, conversion of convertible debt, and
vesting of restricted stock and restricted stock rights less the number of treasury shares assumed
to be purchased using the average market price of the Companys stock for each of the periods
presented. The Companys convertible notes, except when anti-dilutive, are included in the
calculation of diluted income per share under the if-converted method. Additionally, diluted
income per share for continuing operations is calculated excluding interest expense and
amortization of debt issuance costs associated with the convertible notes since these notes are
treated as if converted into common stock.
13
WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
7. Income (Loss) Per Share (continued)
Basic and diluted income (loss) from continuing operations per common share for the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 are computed as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Net income (loss) from continuing operations (numerator
for basic calculation) |
|
$ |
19,051 |
|
|
$ |
10,272 |
|
|
$ |
58,230 |
|
|
$ |
(33,446 |
) |
Add: Interest and debt issuance costs amortization
associated with convertible notes |
|
|
1,129 |
|
|
|
780 |
|
|
|
3,642 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) from continuing operations applicable
to common shares (numerator for diluted calculation) |
|
$ |
20,180 |
|
|
$ |
11,052 |
|
|
$ |
61,872 |
|
|
$ |
(33,446 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares
outstanding for basic income (loss) per share |
|
|
38,313,997 |
|
|
|
28,804,907 |
|
|
|
38,236,508 |
|
|
|
27,421,927 |
|
Weighted average number of potentially dilutive
common shares outstanding |
|
|
5,489,238 |
|
|
|
6,039,575 |
|
|
|
5,627,799 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares
outstanding for diluted income (loss) per share |
|
|
43,803,235 |
|
|
|
34,844,482 |
|
|
|
43,864,307 |
|
|
|
27,421,927 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) per common share from continuing
operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.50 |
|
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
|
$ |
1.52 |
|
|
$ |
(1.22 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.46 |
|
|
$ |
0.32 |
|
|
$ |
1.41 |
|
|
$ |
(1.22 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company incurred net losses for the nine months ended September 30, 2007, and has
therefore excluded the securities listed below from the computation of diluted loss per share, as
the effect would be anti-dilutive:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
2.75% Convertible senior notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,595,277 |
|
6.5% Senior convertible notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,825,589 |
|
Stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
686,750 |
|
Warrants to purchase common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
558,354 |
|
Restricted stock and restricted stock rights |
|
|
|
|
|
|
612,637 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,278,607 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force Issue 04-8, The Effect of Contingently
Convertible Instruments on Diluted Earnings per Share, the 5,420,866 shares issuable upon
conversion of both the 6.5% Notes and the 2.75% Notes would have been included in diluted earnings
per share if those securities are dilutive, regardless of whether the
conversion prices of $17.56
and $19.47, respectively, have been met.
8. Segment Information
The Companys segments are strategic business units that are managed separately as each has
different operational requirements and strategies. With the acquisition of InServ on November 20,
2007, the Company redefined its operating segments based on industry segments served. The
operating segments the Company now manages by and reports on are: Upstream O&G, Downstream O&G and
Engineering. These segments operate primarily in the United States, Canada and Oman. Management
evaluates the performance of each operating segment based on operating income. The Companys
corporate operations include the general, administrative and financing functions of the
organization. The costs of these functions are allocated between the three operating segments.
There were no material inter-segment revenues in the periods presented.
14
WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
8. Segment Information (continued)
The following tables reflect the Companys reconciliation of segment operating results to net
income (loss) in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2008 and 2007:
For the three months ended September 30, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Upstream |
|
|
Downstream |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
O&G |
|
|
O&G |
|
|
Engineering |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
342,064 |
|
|
$ |
86,249 |
|
|
$ |
62,338 |
|
|
$ |
490,651 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
325,036 |
|
|
|
81,526 |
|
|
|
55,354 |
|
|
|
461,916 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
17,028 |
|
|
$ |
4,723 |
|
|
$ |
6,984 |
|
|
|
28,735 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other expense, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,627 |
) |
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,057 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income from continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,051 |
|
Income from discontinued operations net of
provision for income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,219 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
20,270 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended September 30, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Upstream |
|
|
Downstream |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
O&G |
|
|
O&G |
|
|
Engineering |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
196,554 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
50,162 |
|
|
$ |
246,716 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
183,121 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,873 |
|
|
|
229,994 |
|
Government fines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
13,433 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,289 |
|
|
|
18,722 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other expense, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,369 |
) |
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,081 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income from continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,272 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations net of
provision for income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,126 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,146 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the nine months ended September 30, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Upstream |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
O&G |
|
|
Downstream O&G |
|
|
Engineering |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
982,836 |
|
|
$ |
278,995 |
|
|
$ |
188,171 |
|
|
$ |
1,450,002 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
925,044 |
|
|
|
260,223 |
|
|
|
165,180 |
|
|
|
1,350,447 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
57,792 |
|
|
$ |
18,772 |
|
|
$ |
22,991 |
|
|
|
99,555 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other expense, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,875 |
) |
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,450 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income from continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,230 |
|
Income from discontinued operations net of
provision for income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,042 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
61,272 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
8. Segment Information (continued)
For the nine months ended September 30, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Upstream |
|
|
Downstream |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
O&G |
|
|
O&G |
|
|
Engineering |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
482,104 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
128,064 |
|
|
$ |
610,168 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
475,743 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
118,565 |
|
|
|
594,308 |
|
Government fines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
$ |
6,361 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
9,499 |
|
|
|
(6,140 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other expense, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,513 |
) |
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,793 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss from continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(33,446 |
) |
Loss from discontinued operations net of
provision for income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21,494 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(54,940 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets by segment as of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 are presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
30, 2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Upstream O&G |
|
$ |
423,661 |
|
|
$ |
369,255 |
|
Downstream O&G |
|
|
138,914 |
|
|
|
123,707 |
|
Engineering |
|
|
51,352 |
|
|
|
50,286 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
254,422 |
|
|
|
232,954 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
2,673 |
|
|
|
3,211 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment assets |
|
$ |
871,022 |
|
|
$ |
779,413 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9. Stockholders Equity
The information contained in this note pertains to continuing and discontinued operations.
Stockholder Rights Plan
On April 1, 1999, the Company adopted a Stockholder Rights Plan and declared a distribution of
one Preferred Share Purchase Right (Right) on each outstanding share of the Companys common
stock. The distribution was made on April 15, 1999 to stockholders of record on that date. The
Rights expire on April 14, 2009.
The Rights are exercisable only if a person or group acquires 15 percent or more of the
Companys common stock or announces a tender offer the consummation of which would result in
ownership by a person or group of 15 percent or more of the common stock. Each Right entitles
stockholders to buy one one-thousandth of a share of a series of junior participating preferred
stock at an exercise price of $30.00 per share.
If the Company is acquired in a merger or other business combination transaction after a
person or group has acquired 15 percent or more of the Companys outstanding common stock, each
Right entitles its holder to purchase, at the Rights then-current exercise price, a number of
acquiring companys common shares having a market value of twice such price. In addition, if a
person or group acquires 15 percent or more of the Companys outstanding common stock, each Right
entitles its holder (other than such person or members of such group) to purchase, at the Rights
then-current exercise price, a number of the Companys common shares having a market value of twice
such price.
Prior to the acquisition by a person or group of beneficial ownership of 15 percent or more of
the Companys common stock, the Rights are redeemable for one-half cent per Right at the option of
the Companys Board of Directors.
Stock Ownership Plans
During May 1996, the Company established the Willbros Group, Inc. 1996 Stock Plan (the 1996
Plan) with 1,125,000 shares of common stock authorized for issuance to provide for awards to key
employees of the Company, and the Willbros Group, Inc. Director Stock Plan (the Director Plan)
with 125,000 shares of common stock authorized for issuance to provide for the grant of stock
options to non-employee directors. The number of shares authorized for issuance under the 1996 Plan
and the Director Plan was increased to 4,825,000 and 225,000, respectively, by stockholder
approval. The Director Plan expired August 16, 2006. In August 2006, the Company established the
2006 Director Restricted Stock Plan (the 2006 Director Plan) with 50,000 shares authorized for
issuance to grant shares of restricted stock and restricted stock rights to non-employee directors.
The number of shares authorized for issuance under the 2006 Director Plan was increased to 250,000
by stockholder approval.
16
WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
9. Stockholders Equity (continued)
Restricted stock and restricted stock rights, also described collectively as restricted stock
units (RSUs), and options granted under the 1996 Plan vest generally over a three to four year
period. Options granted under the Director Plan are fully vested. Restricted stock and restricted
stock rights granted under the 2006 Director Plan vest one year after the date of grant. At
September 30, 2008, the 1996 Plan had 783,447 shares and the 2006 Director Plan had 217,875 shares
available for grant. Of the shares available at September 30, 2008, 150,000 shares in the 1996
Stock Plan are reserved for future grants required under employment agreements. Certain provisions
allow for accelerated vesting based on increases of share prices and on eligible retirement.
Compensation expense of $0 and $35, respectively, for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and
2007 and $0 and $19 for each of the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 was recognized
due to accelerated vesting of RSUs due to retirements and separation from the Company.
The Company follows the fair value recognition provisions of FASB Statements of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 123R, Share Based Payment (SFAS No. 123R) using the modified
prospective application method. Under this method, compensation cost recognized in the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 includes the applicable amounts of: (a) compensation
expense of all share-based payments granted prior to, but not yet vested as of, January 1, 2006
(based on the grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with the original provisions of SFAS
No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation), and (b) compensation cost for all share-based
payments granted subsequent to January 1, 2006 (based on the grant-date fair value estimated in
accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123R). The Company determines the fair value of stock
options as of its grant date using the Black-Scholes valuation method.
Share-based compensation related to RSUs is recorded based on the Companys stock price as of
the grant date. Expense from both stock options and RSUs totaled $2,596 and $1,088, respectively,
for the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 and $7,080 and $3,010, respectively, for the
nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007.
No options were granted during the three or nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007.
Stock option activity for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 consists of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Options |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
Outstanding at January 1, 2008 |
|
|
418,750 |
|
|
$ |
14.96 |
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
53,000 |
|
|
|
12.90 |
|
Forfeited or expired |
|
|
31,000 |
|
|
|
13.36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2008 |
|
|
334,750 |
|
|
$ |
15.44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at September 30, 2008 |
|
|
228,916 |
|
|
$ |
14.07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2008, the aggregate intrinsic value of stock options outstanding and stock
options exercisable was $3,715 and $2,849, respectively. The weighted average remaining contractual
term of outstanding options is 5.97 years and the weighted average remaining contractual term of
the exercisable options is 5.19 years at September 30, 2008. The total intrinsic value of options
exercised during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 was $1,284 and $1,491,
respectively.
The total fair value of options vested during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and
2007 was $112 and $229, respectively, and $112 and $88 for each of the three months ended September
30, 2008 and 2007.
The Companys non-vested options at September 30, 2008 and the changes in non-vested options
during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Grant- |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Date Fair Value |
|
Nonvested, January 1, 2008 |
|
|
130,834 |
|
|
$ |
6.86 |
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested |
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
|
7.44 |
|
Forfeited or expired |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
5.65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested, September 30, 2008 |
|
|
105,834 |
|
|
$ |
6.89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
9. Stockholders Equity (continued)
The Companys RSU activity and related information for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Average Grant- |
|
|
|
RSUs |
|
|
Date Fair Value |
|
Outstanding at January 1, 2008 |
|
|
548,688 |
|
|
$ |
20.89 |
|
Granted |
|
|
635,314 |
|
|
|
38.24 |
|
Vested |
|
|
145,489 |
|
|
|
20.30 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
81,879 |
|
|
|
27.84 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding September 30, 2008 |
|
|
956,634 |
|
|
$ |
31.91 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The total fair value of RSUs vested during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007
was $2,953 and $1,855, respectively.
As of September 30, 2008, there was a total of $24,717 of unrecognized compensation cost, net
of estimated forfeitures, related to all non-vested share-based compensation arrangements granted
under the Companys stock ownership plans. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted
average period of 2.29 years.
Warrants to Purchase Common Stock
On October 27, 2006, the Company completed a private placement of equity to certain accredited
investors pursuant to which the Company issued and sold 3,722,360 shares of the Companys common
stock resulting in net proceeds of $48,748. In conjunction with the private placement, the Company
also issued warrants to purchase an additional 558,354 shares of the Companys common stock. Each
warrant is exercisable, in whole or in part, until 60 months from the date of issuance. A warrant
holder may elect to exercise the warrant by delivery of payment to the Company at the exercise
price of $19.03 per share, or pursuant to a cashless exercise as provided in the warrant agreement.
The fair value of the warrants was $3,423 on the date of the grant, as calculated using the
Black-Scholes option-pricing model. There were 536,925 and 558,354 warrants outstanding at
September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
10. Income Taxes
For interim financial reporting, the Company records the tax provision based on its estimate
of the effective tax rate for the year. The Company has revised its annual estimated effective
income tax rate from 42.0 percent to 38.5 percent during the three months ended September 30, 2008.
The reduction in the effective income tax rate is primarily attributed to tax positions taken in
connection with the deductibility of costs associated with certain contracts. The
Company continues to refine its corporate structure and its overall tax strategy to increase tax
efficiency.
11. Foreign Exchange Risk
The Company attempts to negotiate contracts that provide for payment in U.S. dollars, but it
may be required to take all or a portion of payment under a contract in another currency. To
mitigate non-U.S. currency exchange risk, the Company seeks to match anticipated non-U.S. currency
revenue with expenses in the same currency whenever possible. To the extent it is unable to match
non-U.S. currency revenue with expenses in the same currency, the Company may use forward
contracts, options or other common hedging techniques in the same non-U.S. currencies. The Company
had no derivative financial instruments to hedge currency risk at September 30, 2008 or December
31, 2007.
12. Contingencies, Commitments and Other Circumstances
Commitments
Resolution of criminal and regulatory matters
In May 2008, the previously disclosed agreement in principle with the United States Department
of Justice (the DOJ) and Willbros Group, Inc. (WGI), and its subsidiary, Willbros
International, Inc. (WII), to settle the DOJs investigation into violations of the Foreign
Corrupt Practices Act of 1977, as amended (the FCPA), reached final approval by the DOJ. The
terms of the final agreement are included in a Deferred Prosecution Agreement (the DPA), more
fully described below, which along with a six count criminal Information (the Information), was
filed in the United States District Court, Southern District of Texas, Houston Division (the
Court). When the requirements of the DPA are satisfied, the DOJ will dismiss the Information.
Also in May 2008, a final agreement was reached by the Company with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the SEC) to resolve the SECs investigation into violations of the FCPA, the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act), and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended (the
18
WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
12. Contingencies, Commitments and Other Circumstances (continued)
Exchange Act). The final settlement with the SEC has been entered and approved by the Court.
These investigations stemmed primarily from the Companys former operations in Bolivia, Ecuador and
Nigeria.
As described more fully below, the settlements together will require the Company to pay, over
approximately three years, a total of $32,300 in penalties and disgorgement of profits, plus
post-judgment interest on $7,725 of that amount. In addition, WGI and WII will, for a period of
approximately three years, each be subject to the DPA with the DOJ. Finally, the Company will be
subject to a permanent injunction barring future violations of certain provisions of the federal
securities laws.
More specifically, the terms of the final settlement agreement concluded by WGI and WII on May
14, 2008 with the DOJ include the following:
|
|
|
The six counts include conspiracy to violate the FCPA, violations of the FCPAs
anti-bribery provisions and violations of the FCPAs books-and-records provisions. WGI and
WII face prosecution by the DOJ for the charges contained in the Information, and possibly
other charges as well, if they fail to comply with the DPA. |
|
|
|
|
The DPA requires, for the three-year term of the DPA, continued full cooperation with
the DOJ in its investigation; continued implementation of a compliance and ethics program
to prevent and detect violations of the FCPA and other anti-corruption laws; and continued
review of existing internal controls, policies and procedures in order to ensure that WGI
and WII maintain adequate controls and a rigorous anti-corruption compliance code. |
|
|
|
|
The DPA also requires WGI and WII, at their expense, to engage an independent monitor
for three years to assess and make recommendations about their compliance with the DPA. The
independent monitor selection process is now underway with the DOJ having taken under
consideration the candidate proposed by the Company. |
|
|
|
|
Provided that WGI and WII comply with the DPA, the DOJ has agreed not to prosecute WGI
or WII based on the conduct described in the DPA and to move to dismiss the Information
after three years. |
|
|
|
|
As part of the DPA, the Company will pay $22,000 in fines in four installments,
consisting of the $10,000 payment made at signing on May 14, 2008, and $4,000 annually for
three years thereafter, with no interest due on the unpaid amounts. |
With respect to the final settlement agreement concluded by the Company on May 14, 2008 with
the SEC:
|
|
|
The SEC filed in the Court a Complaint (the SEC Complaint) and a proposed Agreed Final
Judgment against the Company (the Judgment). Without admitting or denying the allegations
in the SEC Complaint, the Company consented to the filing of the SEC Complaint and entry of
the Judgment to resolve the SECs investigation. The SEC Complaint alleges civil violations
of the FCPAs anti-bribery provisions, the FCPAs books-and-records and internal control
provisions and various antifraud provisions of the Securities Act and the Exchange Act.
Since approved by the Court, the Judgment now permanently enjoins the Company from
violating the FCPAs anti-bribery, books-and-records, and internal control provisions and
certain antifraud provisions of the Securities Act and the Exchange Act. |
|
|
|
|
The Judgment requires the Company to pay $8,900 for disgorgement of profits and $1,400
of pre-judgment interest. The disgorgement and pre-judgment interest are payable in four
equal installments of $2,575, first on signing, and annually for three years thereafter.
The first payment was made at signing on May 14, 2008. Post-judgment interest will be
payable on the outstanding balance of $7,725. In January 2008, the Company deposited the
first installment payment of $2,575 into an escrow account, as required by the SEC. |
Failure by the Company to comply with the terms and conditions of either the DOJ or the SEC
settlement could result in resumed prosecution and other regulatory sanctions.
In addition, the Company previously disclosed that the Office of Foreign Assets Control
(OFAC) was investigating allegations of violations of the Sudanese Sanctions Regulations
occurring during October 2003. The Company voluntarily reported this matter to OFAC and also has
reported to OFAC corrective measures and improvements to the Companys OFAC compliance program.
OFAC and Willbros USA, Inc. have agreed in principle to settle the allegations pursuant to which
the Company will pay a total civil penalty not to exceed $30.
Other
In addition to the matters discussed above, the Company is party to a number of other legal
proceedings. Management believes that the nature and number of these proceedings are typical for a
firm of similar size engaged in a similar type of business and that none of these proceedings is
material to the Companys financial position. See Note 13 Discontinuance of Operations, Asset
Disposals and Transition Services Agreement for discussion of commitments and contingencies
associated with Discontinued Operations.
19
WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
12. Contingencies, Commitments and Other Circumstances (continued)
From time to time, the Company enters into commercial commitments, usually in the form of
commercial and standby letters of credit, surety bonds and financial guarantees. Contracts with the
Companys customers may require the Company to secure letters of credit or surety bonds with regard
to the Companys performance of contracted services. In such cases, the commitments can be called
upon in the event of failure to perform contracted services. Likewise, contracts may allow the
Company to issue letters of credit or surety bonds in lieu of contract retention provisions, where
the client withholds a percentage of the contract value until project completion or expiration of a
warranty period. Retention commitments can be called upon in the event of warranty or project
completion issues, as prescribed in the contracts. At September 30, 2008, the Company had
approximately $33,974 of letters of credit related to continuing operations and $123 of letters of
credit related to Discontinued Operations in Nigeria. These amounts represent the maximum amount of
payments the Company could be required to make if these letters of credit are drawn upon.
Additionally, the Company issues surety bonds customarily required by commercial terms on
construction projects. At September 30, 2008, the Company had bonds outstanding, primarily
performance bonds, valued at $463,228 related to continuing operations. These amounts represent the
bond penalty amount of future payments the Company could be required to make if the Company fails
to perform its obligations under such contracts. The performance bonds do not have a stated
expiration date; rather, each is released when the contract is accepted by the owner. The Companys
maximum exposure as it relates to the value of the bonds outstanding is lowered on each bonded
project as the cost to complete is reduced. As of September 30, 2008, no liability has been
recognized for letters of credit or surety bonds, other than $13 recorded as the fair value of the
letters of credit outstanding for the Nigeria operations. See Note 13 Discontinuance of
Operations, Asset Disposals, and Transition Services Agreement for further discussion of these
letters of credit.
Other Circumstances
Operations outside the United States may be subject to certain risks, which ordinarily would
not be expected to exist in the United States, including foreign currency restrictions, extreme
exchange rate fluctuations, expropriation of assets, civil uprisings and riots, war, unanticipated
taxes including income taxes, excise duties, import taxes, export taxes, sales taxes or other
governmental assessments, availability of suitable personnel and equipment, termination of existing
contracts and leases, government instability and legal systems of decrees, laws, regulations,
interpretations and court decisions which are not always fully developed and which may be
retroactively applied. Management is not presently aware of any events of the type described in the
countries in which it operates that would have a material effect on the financial statements, and
have not been provided for in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Based upon the advice of local advisors in the various work countries concerning the
interpretation of the laws, practices and customs of the countries in which it operates, management
believes the Company follows the current practices in those countries and as applicable under the
FCPA. However, because of the nature of these potential risks, there can be no assurance that the
Company may not be adversely affected by them in the future.
The Company insures substantially all of its equipment in countries outside the United States
against certain political risks and terrorism through political risk insurance coverage that
contains a 20 percent co-insurance provision. The Company has the usual liability of contractors
for the completion of contracts and the warranty of its work. Where work is performed through a
joint venture, the Company also has possible liability for the contract completion and warranty
responsibilities of its joint venture partners. In addition, the Company acts as prime contractor
on a majority of the projects it undertakes and is normally responsible for the performance of the
entire project, including subcontract work. Management is not aware of any material exposure
related thereto which has not been provided for in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements.
Certain post-contract completion audits and reviews are periodically conducted by clients
and/or government entities. While there can be no assurance that claims will not be received as a
result of such audits and reviews, management does not believe a legitimate basis exists for any
material claims. At present, it is not possible for management to estimate the likelihood of such
claims being asserted or, if asserted, the amount or nature or ultimate disposition thereof.
13. Discontinuance of Operations, Asset Disposals, and Transition Services Agreement
Strategic Decisions
In 2006, the Company announced that it intended to sell its assets and operations in Nigeria
and classified these operations as Discontinued Operations. The net assets and net liabilities
related to the Discontinued Operations are shown on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as Assets of
discontinued operations and Liabilities of discontinued operations, respectively. The results of
the Discontinued Operations are shown on the Consolidated Statements of Operations as Income
(loss) from discontinued operations, net of provision for income taxes for all periods presented.
20
WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
13. Discontinuance of Operations, Asset Disposals, and Transition Services Agreement (continued)
Nigeria Assets and Nigeria-Based Operations
Share Purchase Agreement
On February 7, 2007, the Company sold its Nigeria assets and Nigeria-based operations in West
Africa to Ascot Offshore Nigeria Limited (Ascot), a Nigerian oilfield services company, for total
consideration of $155,250 (the Purchase Price). The sale was pursuant to a Share Purchase
Agreement by and between the Company and Ascot dated as of February 7, 2007 (the Agreement),
providing for the purchase by Ascot of all of the share capital of WG Nigeria Holdings Limited
(WGNHL), the holding company for Willbros West Africa, Inc. (WWAI), Willbros (Nigeria) Limited,
Willbros (Offshore) Nigeria Limited and WG Nigeria Equipment Limited.
In connection with the sale of its Nigeria assets and operations, the Company and its
subsidiary WII entered into an indemnity agreement with Ascot and Berkeley Group plc (Berkeley),
the parent company of Ascot (the Indemnity Agreement), pursuant to which Ascot and Berkeley will
indemnify the Company and WII for any obligations incurred by the Company or WII in connection with
the parent company guarantees (the Guarantees) that the Company and WII previously issued and
maintained on behalf of certain former subsidiaries now owned by Ascot under certain working
contracts between the subsidiaries and their customers. Either the Company, WII or both may be
contractually obligated, in varying degrees, under the Guarantees to perform or cause to be
performed work related to several ongoing projects. Among the Guarantees covered by the Indemnity
Agreement are five contracts under which the Company estimates that, at February 7, 2007, there was
aggregate remaining contract revenue, excluding any additional claim revenue, of $352,107 and
aggregate estimated cost to complete of $293,562. At the February 7, 2007 sale date, one of the
contracts covered by the Guarantees was estimated to be in a loss position with an accrual for such
loss of $33,157. The associated liability was included in the liabilities acquired by Ascot and
Berkeley.
In early 2008, the Company received its first notification asserting various rights under one
of the outstanding parent guarantees. On February 1, 2008, WWAI, the Ascot company performing the
West African Gas Pipeline (WAGP) contract, received a letter from West African Gas Pipeline
Company Limited (WAPCo), the owner of WAGP, wherein WAPCo gave written notice alleging that WWAI
was in default under the WAGP contract, as amended, and giving WWAI a brief cure period to remedy
the alleged default. We understand that WWAI responded by denying being in breach of its WAGP
contract obligations, and apparently also advised WAPCo that WWAI ...requires a further $55
million, without which it will not be able to complete the work which it had previously undertaken
to perform. The Company understands that, on February 27, 2008, WAPCo terminated the WAGP contract
for the alleged continuing non-performance of WWAI.
Also, on February 1, 2008, the Company received a letter from WAPCo reminding the Company of
its parent guarantee on the WAGP contract and requesting that we remedy WWAIs default under that
contract, as amended. On previous occasions, the Company has advised WAPCo that, for a variety of
legal, contractual, and other reasons, it did not consider the prior WAGP contract parent guarantee
to have continued application, and the Company reiterated that position to WAPCo in the Companys
response to its February 1, 2008 letter. WAPCo disputes the Companys position that it is no longer
bound by the terms of the Companys prior parent guarantee of the WAGP contract and has reserved
all its rights in that regard. Currently, the WAGP project is at a stand still for a variety of
technical and commercial issues unrelated to WAPCos termination of the WAGP contract.
The Company anticipates that this potential dispute with WAPCo may result in a lengthy
arbitration proceeding between WAPCo and WWAI in the London Court of International Arbitration to
determine the validity of the alleged default notice issued by WAPCo to WWAI, including any
resulting damage award, in combination with a lawsuit between WAPCo and the Company in the English
Courts under English law to determine the enforceability, in whole or in part, of the Companys
parent guarantee, which the Company expects to be a lengthy process.
The Company currently has no employees working in Nigeria and we have no intention of
returning to Nigeria. If ultimately it is determined by an English Court that the Company is
liable, in whole or in part, for damages that WAPCo may establish against WWAI for WWAIs alleged
non-performance of the WAGP contract, or if WAPCo is able to establish liability against the
Company directly under parent company guarantee, and, in either case, are unable to enforce rights
under the indemnity agreement entered into with Ascot in connection with the WAGP contract, the
Company may experience substantial losses. However, at this time, the Company cannot predict the
outcome of any arbitration or litigation which may ensue in this developing WAGP contract dispute,
or be certain of the degree to which the indemnity agreement given in our favor by Ascot will
protect the Company. Based upon current knowledge of the relevant facts and circumstances, the
Company does not expect that the outcome of the potential dispute will have a material adverse
effect on our financial condition or results of operations.
21
WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
13. Discontinuance of Operations, Asset Disposals, and Transition Services Agreement (continued)
Letters of Credit
At the time of the February 7, 2007 sale of its Nigeria assets and operations, the Company had
four letters of credit outstanding totaling $20,322 associated with Discontinued Operations (the
Discontinued LCs). In accordance with FASB Interpretation No. 45, Guarantors Accounting and
Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others (FIN 45),
a liability was recognized for $1,575 related to the letters of credit. This liability is released
as each of the Discontinued LCs is released or expires and the Company is relieved of its risk
related to the Discontinued LCs. As of September 30, 2008 only one of the Discontinued LCs remains
issued and outstanding. This Discontinued LC in the amount of $123 is scheduled to expire on
February 28, 2009. During the three months ended September 30, 2008, two Discontinued LCs in the
aggregate amount of $19,759 expired resulting in the release of the associated liability and
recognition of $1,543 of additional cumulative gain on the sale of Nigeria assets and operations.
The fair value of the remaining Discontinued LC is $13 and will also result in positive impact to
the cumulative gain on sale when and if it is released.
Transition Services Agreement
Concurrent with the Nigeria sale, the Company entered into a two-year Transition Services
Agreement (TSA) with Ascot. Under the agreement, the Company was primarily providing labor in the
form of seconded employees to work under the direction of Ascot along with specifically defined
work orders for services generally covered in the TSA. Ascot agreed to reimburse the Company for
these services. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, these reimbursable contract
costs totaled approximately $664 and $3,227, respectively. Both the Company and Ascot have been
working to shift the transition services provided by the Company to
services directly secured by
Ascot. That effort is substantially complete in that the Company has no employees still seconded to
Ascot working in West Africa generally, or Nigeria specifically; however, the Company continues to
provide minimal transition services from the U.S.
Residual Equipment in Nigeria
In conjunction with the TSA, the Company has made available certain equipment to Ascot for use
in Nigeria and at times, in Benin, Togo, and Ghana. This equipment was not sold to Ascot under the
Agreement. The Company has not resolved with Ascot the rental rates for this equipment. Therefore,
we have not recorded a receivable related to the use of the equipment, but have incurred and
recorded all necessary depreciation and holding costs. Due to business and legal conditions in
Nigeria, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $1,542 related to this equipment located in
Nigeria in the fourth quarter of 2007. The Companys net book value for the equipment in West
Africa at September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 was $641 and $1,205, respectively. This
equipment is comprised primarily of construction equipment, rolling stock, and generator sets. The
Company is in the process of redeploying this equipment for use in Oman.
Insurance Recovery
During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, income from Discontinued Operations consisted
of two pre-Nigeria sale insurance claim recoveries of $850 and $2,154 for events of loss the
Company suffered prior to the sale of its Nigeria operations.
22
WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
13. Discontinuance of Operations, Asset Disposals, and Transition Services Agreement (continued)
Results of Discontinued Operations
Condensed Statements of Operations of the Discontinued Operations for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued |
|
|
|
Nigeria |
|
|
Nigeria TSA |
|
|
Operations |
|
Contract revenue |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
418 |
|
|
$ |
418 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract |
|
|
|
|
|
|
665 |
|
|
|
665 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(246 |
) |
|
|
(259 |
) |
Other income (expense) |
|
|
1,486 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
1,483 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
1,473 |
|
|
|
(249 |
) |
|
|
1,224 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
1,473 |
|
|
$ |
(254 |
) |
|
$ |
1,219 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued |
|
|
|
Nigeria |
|
|
Nigeria TSA |
|
|
Operations |
|
Contract revenue |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,825 |
|
|
$ |
4,825 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,868 |
|
|
|
4,868 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
124 |
|
Profit disgorgement |
|
|
10,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss |
|
|
(10,300 |
) |
|
|
(167 |
) |
|
|
(10,467 |
) |
Other income |
|
|
1,441 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
1,495 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes |
|
|
(8,859 |
) |
|
|
(113 |
) |
|
|
(8,972 |
) |
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(8,859 |
) |
|
$ |
(267 |
) |
|
$ |
(9,126 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued |
|
|
|
Nigeria |
|
|
Nigeria TSA |
|
|
Operations |
|
Contract revenue |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,087 |
|
|
$ |
2,087 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,195 |
|
|
|
3,195 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(1,140 |
) |
|
|
(1,153 |
) |
Other income (expense) |
|
|
4,393 |
|
|
|
(178 |
) |
|
|
4,215 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
4,380 |
|
|
|
(1,318 |
) |
|
|
3,062 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
4,380 |
|
|
$ |
(1,338 |
) |
|
$ |
3,042 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
13. Discontinuance of Operations, Asset Disposals, and Transition Services Agreement (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued |
|
|
|
Nigeria(1) |
|
|
Nigeria TSA |
|
|
Operations |
|
Contract revenue |
|
$ |
30,046 |
|
|
$ |
21,906 |
|
|
$ |
51,952 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract |
|
|
34,360 |
|
|
|
21,016 |
|
|
|
55,376 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
3,472 |
|
|
|
566 |
|
|
|
4,038 |
|
Profit disgorgement |
|
|
10,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
(18,086 |
) |
|
|
324 |
|
|
|
(17,762 |
) |
Other income (expense) |
|
|
(1,946 |
) |
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
(1,891 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
(20,032 |
) |
|
|
379 |
|
|
|
(19,653 |
) |
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
1,092 |
|
|
|
749 |
|
|
|
1,841 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(21,124 |
) |
|
$ |
(370 |
) |
|
$ |
(21,494 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Reflects operations through February 7, 2007. |
Financial Position of Discontinued Operations
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets of the Discontinued Operations are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
309 |
|
|
$ |
211 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
960 |
|
|
|
296 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
879 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
1,399 |
|
|
|
1,386 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
641 |
|
|
|
1,205 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
633 |
|
|
|
620 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
|
2,673 |
|
|
|
3,211 |
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
637 |
|
|
|
978 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
637 |
|
|
|
978 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets of discontinued operations |
|
$ |
2,036 |
|
|
$ |
2,233 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (In
thousands, except share and per share amounts or unless otherwise noted)
OVERVIEW
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the unaudited Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007,
included in Item 1 of this Form 10-Q, and the Consolidated Financial Statements and Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, including Critical
Accounting Policies, included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2007.
Business
We are a provider of energy services to global end markets serving the oil and gas, refinery,
petrochemical and power industries. Our services, which include engineering, procurement and
construction (which when performed together we refer to as EPC) turnaround, maintenance and other
specialty services, are critical to the ongoing expansion and operation of energy infrastructure.
Within the global energy market, we specialize in designing, constructing, upgrading and repairing
midstream infrastructure such as pipelines, compressor stations and related facilities for onshore
and coastal locations as well as downstream facilities, such as refineries. We also provide
specialty turnaround services, tank services, heater services, construction services and safety
services and fabricate specialty items for hydrocarbon processing units. We provide, from time to
time, asset development and participate in the ownership and operations as an extension of our
portfolio of industry services. We place particular emphasis on achieving the best risk-adjusted
returns. Depending upon market conditions, we may work in developing countries and we believe our
experience gives us a competitive advantage in frontier areas where experience in dealing with
project logistics is an important consideration for project award and execution. We also believe
our engineering, planning and project management expertise, as it relates to optimizing the
structure and execution of a project, provides us with competitive advantages in the markets we
serve.
We are a top tier, global pipeline contractor to the hydrocarbon pipeline market, having
performed work in 59 countries and constructed over 200,000 kilometers of pipelines in our history.
We complement our pipeline market expertise with our service offerings to the downstream
hydrocarbon processing market providing integrated solutions for turnaround, maintenance and
capital projects for the refining and petrochemical industries. We have performed these downstream
services for 60 of 149 refineries in the United States. We offer our clients full asset lifecycle
services and in some cases we provide the entire scope of services for a project, from front-end
engineering and design to procurement, construction, commissioning and ongoing facility operations
and maintenance. With over 100 years of expertise in the global energy infrastructure market, our
full asset lifecycle services are utilized by major pipeline transportation companies, exploration,
production and refining companies and government entities worldwide.
Segments
Our business is organized into three segments: Upstream oil and gas (O&G), Downstream O&G
and Engineering. We can support our clients needs related to EPC projects or ongoing operations
and maintenance services through any of our segments.
Upstream O&G
We provide our expertise, including systems, personnel and equipment, to construct and replace
large-diameter cross-country pipelines; fabricate engineered structures, process modules and
facilities; and construct oil and gas production facilities, pump stations, flow stations, gas
compressor stations, gas processing facilities, gathering lines and related facilities. We also
provide certain specialty services to increase our equipment and personnel utilization. We
currently provide these services in the United States, Canada, and Oman, and with our international
experience can enter (or re-enter) individual country markets if and as conditions there are
attractive to us and present an attractive risk-adjusted return.
Downstream O&G
We provide integrated, full-service specialty construction, turnaround, repair and maintenance
services to the downstream energy infrastructure market, which consists primarily of refineries and
petrochemical facilities. We are one of four major contractors in the United States that provides
services for the overhaul of high-utilization fluid catalytic cracking units, the primary
gasoline-producing unit in refineries. These catalytic cracking units, which operate continuously
for long periods of time, are typically overhauled on a three to five-year cycle. We also provide
similar turnaround services for other refinery process units, as well as specialty services. We
design, manufacture and install process heaters for the refining industry. We also provide
maintenance and construction services for the American Petroleum Institute storage tank market. We
provide these services primarily in the United States, but our experience includes international
projects and we are exploring opportunities to expand this offering to other locations with
attractive risk-adjusted returns.
25
Engineering
We specialize in providing a broad array of engineering, project management, pipeline
integrity and field services.
Our engineering services cover from front-end engineering design and feasibility analysis to
detailed design to assist our clients in conceptualizing, evaluating, designing, routing,
permitting and managing the construction or expansion of pipelines, compressor stations, pump
stations, fuel storage facilities, field gathering facilities and production facilities. In
addition, we provide a full range of pipeline management and maintenance services, program
engineering services including managing and performing our clients annual engineering programs,
project management and field services including acquiring and administering right-of-way
acquisition for projects, environmental services, site surveying and mapping.
Changing Business Environment
Tightening credit markets have resulted in a worldwide credit crisis that has triggered
substantial uncertainty with respect to the funding of capital expenditures by our customers.
Prices for oil and natural gas have fallen approximately 50 percent from their highs in mid-summer
2008. These changes have impacted general business conditions and reduced visibility for certain
aspects of our business. However, our backlog is over $1 billion as of September 30, 2008 and
provides visibility into the third quarter of 2009 for our mainline U.S. pipeline construction
unit. While we have evidence that certain prospects may be delayed, we believe none of our
contracts in backlog are at risk.
We continue to shift our business from being primarily a construction company to a company
that provides more diversified services. Our model benefits from recurring maintenance expenditures
and life cycle improvements necessary to maintain and operate complex hydrocarbon transportation
and refining facilities.
Although we are not immune to the current financial and economic events, we are well
positioned with our service offerings and geographic locations to take advantage of our markets as
further detailed below:
|
|
|
Our U. S. mainline pipeline and facilities construction businesses are well positioned
to take advantage of the development of new sources of natural gas supply which require new
infrastructure to monetize these investments. These new sources of supply include the new
shale plays such as Haynesville, Fayetteville, Marcellus and others. |
|
|
|
|
We are positioned to build the take away pipelines from the significant development and
investments made in the Canadian oil sands. |
|
|
|
|
In the Canadian oil sands, our maintenance and fabrication businesses are service
offerings that are required to operate the facilities even in the current financial
environment. |
|
|
|
|
Our diversified Downstream O&G service offering is focused on asset life extension and
maintenance projects for the process industries, which can be robust even in the current
business environment. |
|
|
|
|
Our EPC offering is unique to our space and allows us to earn more revenue per engineer
and to qualify for larger projects, leveraging our revenue and increasing earnings
opportunities. |
|
|
|
|
Our past experience and brand name provides us access to international markets. |
|
|
|
|
And finally, we have strengthened our financial position. Our strong balance sheet and
operating cash flow should allow us to effectively operate our business and to take
advantage of the potential opportunities that may occur during a period of change like we
are currently experiencing. |
During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, our continuing operations provided $96,494 of
cash. Our September 30, 2008 cash and cash equivalents balance was $127,552 and we have increased
our working capital $61,904 to $261,019 from $199,115 at December 31, 2007. Our operations are not
dependent on external short-term funding and we have not utilized the cash borrowing base available
under our revolving credit facility during 2008. We believe that our strong balance sheet will
provide us opportunities to pursue our strategy as discussed in the following section.
Strategy
We work diligently to increase stockholder value by leveraging our competitive strengths to
focus on profitability and risk mitigation in the changing global energy infrastructure market and
to position ourselves for sustained long-term earnings growth.
Focus on Managing Risk.
We have implemented a core set of business practices and policies which have fundamentally
improved our risk profile. We have implemented our risk management policy by exiting higher risk
countries, focusing our activity on higher margin opportunities in lower risk countries,
diversifying our service offerings and end markets, practicing rigorous financial management and
managing contract execution risk. Risk management is emphasized throughout all levels of the
organization and covers all aspects of a project from strategic planning and bidding to contract
management and financial reporting.
|
|
|
Safety first culture. Our core values emphasize safety as the foremost value in our
culture and safety is the driver for all other values. Our focus is on 100 percent
involvement by all employees in providing a safe accident-free workplace. This core value
demands that 100 percent of our employees, from executive
management to field labor, be trained in our safety first culture and safety-first
performance at every level in the organization. Every action must meet our safety criteria. |
26
|
|
|
Focus resources in markets with the highest risk-adjusted return. We believe North
America currently offers us the highest risk-adjusted returns and the majority of our
resources are focused on this region. For the third quarter of 2008, we earned 94.8
percent of our revenue in North America. However, we continue to seek international
opportunities which can provide superior risk-adjusted returns and believe our extensive
international experience is a competitive advantage. We believe that markets in North
Africa and the Middle East, where we also have substantial experience, may offer attractive
opportunities for us in the future given mid and long-term industry trends. |
|
|
|
|
Maintain a conservative contract portfolio. Our current contract portfolio is composed
of 88.4 percent cost-reimbursable work which provides for a more equitable allocation of
risk between us and our customers. We
intend to maintain a balanced risk-to-reward portfolio. |
|
|
|
|
Ethical business practices. We demand that all of our employees and representatives
conduct our business in accordance with the highest ethical standardsin compliance with
applicable laws, rules and regulations, with honesty and integrity, and in a manner which
demonstrates respect for others. |
Leverage Industry Position and Reputation into a Broader Service Offering.
We believe the global energy infrastructure market will continue to provide opportunities;
however, the current business environment will require increased focus on projects with a high
probability of moving forward in the near term. We believe our core capabilities can be expanded
beyond the global energy infrastructure market and we are selectively evaluating these prospects.
Our established platform and track record positions us to capitalize on these opportunities by
leveraging our expertise into a broader range of related service offerings. We intend to leverage
our project management, engineering and construction skills to establish additional service
offerings, such as instrumentation and electrical services, turbo-machinery services, environmental
services and pipeline system integrity services.
Additionally, we intend to pursue selective strategic acquisitions to complement our organic
expansion strategies and to minimize our cyclical dependence on the large-diameter cross-country
pipeline construction market. For example, in 2007, we completed two acquisitions that expanded our
service offerings as well as the regions where we effectively deliver those services. Our November
2007 acquisition of Integrated Service Company LLC (InServ), complemented our service offerings
in the midstream market while our July 2007 acquisition of Midwest significantly enhanced our
presence in Western Canada, including the growing oil sands regions.
Maintain Financial Flexibility.
As we continue to grow and diversify our service offerings we must possess the financial
flexibility to meet material, equipment and personnel needs to support our project commitments. We
view financial strength and flexibility as a fundamental requirement to fulfilling our strategy. As
of September 30, 2008, we had cash and cash equivalents of $127,552 and $50,000 of unutilized cash
borrowing capacity under our revolving credit facility to address our current capital requirements
with no short-term borrowings or commercial paper outstanding. For the nine months ended September
30, 2008, we increased our working capital position, for continuing operations, by $61,904 (31.1
percent) to $261,019 from $199,115 at December 31, 2007. We continue to focus on surety bonds in
lieu of letters of credit as performance security for the completion of our projects thereby
replacing the relatively high-cost letters of credit with lower cost surety bonding. In addition,
our $150,000 senior secured revolving credit facility (the 2007 Credit Facility) provides us
additional financial flexibility to pursue our growth strategy. The combination of our strong cash
position, the availability of our 2007 Credit Facility, and our working capital position will allow
us to focus on the highest return projects available during uncertain economic times as well as
pursue our strategy of diversification as opportunities present themselves. The limited
availability of credit in the market has not affected our credit facility; nor do we believe that
it will impact our ability to access surety bonding in the future.
Leverage Core Service Expertise into Additional Full EPC Contracts.
Our core expertise and service offerings allow us to provide our customers with a single
source EPC solution which creates greater efficiencies to the benefit of both our customers and our
company. In performing integrated EPC contracts, we establish ourselves as overall project managers
from the earliest stages of project inception and are therefore better able to efficiently
determine the design, permitting, procurement and construction sequence for a project in connection
with making engineering decisions. Our customers benefit from a more seamless execution; while for
us, these contracts often yield higher profit margins on the engineering and construction
components of the contract compared to stand-alone contracts for similar services. Additionally,
this contract structure allows us to deploy our resources more efficiently and capture the
engineering, procurement and construction components of these projects.
Financial Summary
Third Quarter Results and Financial Position
For the three months ended September 30, 2008, we achieved net income from continuing
operations of $19,051 or $0.50 per basic share and $0.46 per diluted share on revenue of $490,651.
This compares to net income from continuing operations of $10,272 or $0.36 per basic and $0.32 per
diluted share on revenue of $246,716 for the three months ended September 30, 2007.
27
Revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2008 increased $243,935 (98.9 percent) to
$490,651 from $246,716 during the same period in 2007. Following are the key components of the
increase in revenue:
|
|
|
Revenue earned on pipeline construction and EPC projects in the United States; and |
|
|
|
|
Revenue of $86,249 in 2008 from the Downstream O&G segment derived from our acquisition
of InServ in November 2007. |
Operating income for the three months ended September 30, 2008 increased $10,013 (53.5
percent) to $28,735 from $18,722 during the same period in 2007. The favorable operating income
results were driven primarily by increased revenue. Operating margin decreased 1.7 percent to 5.9
percent in 2008 from 7.6 percent in 2007. The operating margin decrease was driven by lower
contract margin, the inclusion of intangible amortization resulting
from the InServ acquisition, and partially offset by lower general
and administrative (G&A) expense as a percent of revenue.
Other non-operating, net expense for the three months ended September 30, 2008 decreased $742
(31.3 percent) to $1,627 from $2,369 during the same period in 2007. The decrease in net expense is
primarily a result of a $1,071 charge recorded in third quarter of 2007 related to a non-recurring
legal settlement offset by an increase in interest expense of $413.
The provision for income taxes for the three months ended September 30, 2008 increased $1,976
to $8,057 on income from continuing operations before income taxes of $27,108 (an effective tax
rate of 29.7 percent) as compared to a provision for income taxes of $6,081 on income from
continuing operations before income taxes of $16,353 (an effective tax rate of 37.2 percent) during
the same period in 2007. The increase in the provision for income taxes is due to improved
operating results in the U.S., thereby generating more taxable income in third quarter of 2008 as
compared to the third quarter of 2007. The increase was partially mitigated by a downward revision
and related third quarter catch-up adjustment of the estimated 2008 effective tax rate for the year from 42.0 percent to 38.5 percent. The
reduction in the 2008 estimated effective tax rate is primarily attributed to tax positions taken
in connection with costs associated with certain contracts and the deductibility of these costs.
We continue to refine our corporate structure and its overall tax strategy to increase tax
efficiency.
Working capital as of September 30, 2008, for continuing operations, increased $61,904 (31.1
percent) to $261,019 from $199,115 at December 31, 2007. The increase in working capital was
primarily driven by positive cash flow of $31,135 generated from continuing operations during the
nine months ended September 30, 2008. Working capital increased
$13,607 due to the reclassification of property, plant and equipment
to assets held for
sale. This is related to a facility in Canada that was formerly classified as property, plant and
equipment and is currently being held for sale with an expected closing date by year-end.
Additionally, working capital accounts that generally trend with the increase of project activity
increased $5,367, net. These accounts include accounts receivable, contract costs and income not
yet billed, inventory, accounts payable and accrued liabilities and contract billings in excess of
cost and recognized income. We also had an increase of $7,128 in prepaid expenses primarily due to
the timing of our umbrella and general liability insurance policy renewal.
Our debt to equity ratio as of September 30, 2008, decreased to 0.31:1 from 0.38:1 at December
31, 2007. Our aggregate outstanding debt has decreased $7,101 to $145,245 at September 30, 2008
from $152,346 at December 31, 2007, while we have significantly increased our stockholders equity
$70,304 to $466,405 at September 30, 2008 from $396,101 at December 31, 2007.
Other Financial Measures
Backlog
In our industry, backlog is considered an indicator of potential future performance because it
represents a portion of the future revenue stream. Our strategy is focused on backlog additions and
capturing quality backlog with margins commensurate with the risks associated with a given project.
Backlog consists of anticipated revenue from the uncompleted portions of existing contracts
and contracts whose award is reasonably assured. At September 30, 2008, total backlog from
continuing operations decreased $266,997 (20.5 percent) to $1,038,444 from $1,305,441 at December
31, 2007. There was no backlog for discontinued operations at September 30, 2008 and December 31,
2007, respectively. We consider the composition of our backlog between fixed-price and cost
reimbursable contracts just as important as the overall growth of backlog. Cost reimbursable
contracts comprised 88.4 percent of backlog at September 30, 2008 versus 74.9 percent of backlog at
December 31, 2007. We expect that approximately $441,688 or approximately 43.0 percent, of our
existing total backlog at September 30, 2008 will be recognized in revenue during the remainder of
2008.
We believe the backlog figures are firm, subject only to the cancellation and modification
provisions contained in various contracts. Historically, a substantial amount of our revenue in a
given year has not been in our backlog at the beginning of that year. Additionally, due to the
short duration of many jobs, revenue associated with jobs performed within a reporting period will
not be reflected in quarterly backlog reports. We generate revenue from numerous sources, including
contracts of long or short duration entered into during a year as well as from various contractual
processes, including change orders, extra work, variations in the scope of work and the effect of
escalation or currency fluctuation formulas. These revenue sources are not added to backlog until
realization is assured.
28
The following tables show our backlog by operating segment and geographic location as of
September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
Operating Segment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Upstream
O&G |
|
$ |
795,103 |
|
|
|
76.5 |
% |
|
$ |
941,301 |
|
|
|
72.1 |
% |
Downstream O&G |
|
|
178,249 |
|
|
|
17.2 |
% |
|
|
199,646 |
|
|
|
15.3 |
% |
Engineering |
|
|
65,092 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
% |
|
|
164,494 |
|
|
|
12.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total, continuing operations |
|
|
1,038,444 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
1,305,441 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total backlog |
|
$ |
1,038,444 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,305,441 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
Geographic Region |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States |
|
$ |
778,153 |
|
|
|
74.9 |
% |
|
$ |
1,014,351 |
|
|
|
77.7 |
% |
Canada |
|
|
206,411 |
|
|
|
19.9 |
% |
|
|
215,527 |
|
|
|
16.5 |
% |
Oman |
|
|
53,880 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
% |
|
|
75,563 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total backlog |
|
$ |
1,038,444 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
1,305,441 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA from Continuing Operations
Earnings before net interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) is a
non-GAAP measure that we use as a part of our overall assessment of financial performance between
accounting periods. We believe that EBITDA is used by the financial community as a method of
measuring our performance and of evaluating the market value of companies considered to be in
businesses similar to ours.
A reconciliation of EBITDA from continuing operations to GAAP financial information follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Net income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
$ |
19,051 |
|
|
$ |
10,272 |
|
|
$ |
58,230 |
|
|
$ |
(33,446 |
) |
Interest, net |
|
|
1,685 |
|
|
|
1,042 |
|
|
|
5,079 |
|
|
|
2,119 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
8,057 |
|
|
|
6,081 |
|
|
|
36,450 |
|
|
|
7,793 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
11,201 |
|
|
|
5,457 |
|
|
|
33,988 |
|
|
|
13,223 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA |
|
$ |
39,994 |
|
|
$ |
22,852 |
|
|
$ |
133,747 |
|
|
$ |
(10,311 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA from continuing operations for the three months ended September 30, 2008 increased
$17,142 (75.0 percent) to $39,994 from $22,852 during the same period in 2007. The increase in
EBITDA during the three months ended September 30, 2008, is primarily a result of increased net
income and depreciation and amortization. The primary cause of the increased net income is
increased contract income of $28,859 (excluding depreciation) resulting from the growth of our
project activity level and the execution of those projects. The increase in contract income
(excluding depreciation) is partially offset by a decrease in contract margin of 2.0 percentage
points to 13.8 percent during the three months ended September 30, 2008, from 15.8 percent during
the same period in 2007. The increase in depreciation and amortization is primarily a result of our
increased capital additions and capital expenditures incurred to support the growth of our business
and project activity levels. Additionally, the three months ended 2008 include $2,586 of
amortization of intangible assets related to our acquisition of InServ in the fourth quarter of
2007. These increases in contract income and depreciation/amortization expense are partially offset
by an increase in G&A of $11,102 (excluding depreciation).
EBITDA from continuing operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 increased
$144,058 (1,397.1 percent) to $133,747 from $(10,311) during the same period in 2007. The increase
in EBITDA during the nine months ended September 30, 2008, is primarily a result of increased net
income, provision for income taxes and depreciation and amortization. The primary factor driving
increased net income is increased contract income of $145,526 (excluding depreciation) resulting
from the growth of our project activity level and the execution of those projects. The increase in
contract income (excluding depreciation) reflects an increase in contract margin of 3.5 percentage
points to 14.8 percent during the nine months ended September 30, 2008, from 11.4 percent during
the same period in 2007. The $28,657 increase in the provision for income taxes is primarily due to
our improved operating results in the U.S. thereby resulting in more taxable income in the nine
months ended 2008. The increase in depreciation and amortization is primarily a result of capital
additions and capital expenditures in late 2007 and through the nine months ended 2008 to
support the growth of our business and project activity levels. Additionally, the nine months ended
September 30, 2008, include $7,828 of amortization of intangible assets related to our acquisition
of InServ in the fourth quarter of 2007.
29
These increases are partially offset by an increase in G&A
of $41,066 (excluding depreciation). Also affecting EBITDA during the nine months ended September
30, 2008 were two significant non-recurring charges of $22,000 for government fines and
$15,375 for the loss on early extinguishment of debt.
Discontinued Operations
In 2006, we announced our intention to sell our assets and operations in Nigeria, which led to
its classification as discontinued operations (Discontinued Operations). Furthermore, we sold our
Nigeria assets and operations on February 7, 2007 to Ascot Offshore Nigeria Limited (Ascot)
pursuant to a Share Purchase Agreement by and between us and Ascot (the Agreement).
For the three months ended September 30, 2008, the income from Discontinued Operations was
$1,219 or $0.03 per basic and diluted share. This compares to a loss from Discontinued Operations
of $9,126 or $0.32 per basic and $0.26 per diluted share for the three months ended September 30,
2007. For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, income from Discontinued Operations was $3,042
or $0.08 per basic share and $0.07 per diluted share compared to a loss of $21,494 or $0.78 per
basic and diluted share for the nine months ended September 30, 2007.
Transition Services Agreement
Concurrent with the sale of our Nigeria assets and Nigeria-based operations, we entered into a
two-year Transition Services Agreement (TSA) with Ascot. Under the TSA, we were primarily
providing equipment and labor in the form of seconded employees to work under the direction of
Ascot. Ascot agreed to reimburse the Company for the seconded employee transition services costs.
We have been working with Ascot to shift the transition services provided by the Company to direct
services secured by Ascot. That effort is substantially complete in that we currently have no
employees seconded to Ascot working in West Africa generally, or Nigeria specifically; however, the
Company has one employee that continues to provide minimal services from the U.S.
As previously discussed, we have made available certain equipment to Ascot for its use. This
equipment was not sold to Ascot under the Agreement. Due to business and legal conditions in
Nigeria, we recorded an impairment charge of $1,542 related to this equipment in the fourth quarter
of 2007. Our remaining net book value for this equipment at September 30, 2008 was $641. This
equipment is comprised primarily of construction equipment, rolling stock, and generator sets. The
Company is in the process of redeploying this equipment for use in Oman.
Ascots continued willingness and ability to perform our former projects in West Africa
continue to be important factors to further reducing our risk profile in Nigeria and elsewhere in
West Africa. There can be no assurance that we will be successful, if the need arises, in enforcing
our indemnity rights against Ascot and Berkeley Group, plc (Berkeley), the parent company of
Ascot.
We are aware of one potential dispute related to our former projects in West Africa,
specifically the West African Gas Pipeline (WAGP) contract. It is our understanding that Ascot
and the West African Gas Pipeline Company Limited (WAPCo) are currently involved in a potential
dispute. This dispute may result in a lengthy arbitration proceeding between WAPCo and the Ascot
owned entity Willbros West Africa, Inc. (WWAI) in the London Court of International Arbitration
to determine the validity of the alleged default notice issued by WAPCo to WWAI, including any
resulting damage award, in combination with a lawsuit between WAPCo and us in the English Courts
under English law to determine the enforceability, in whole or in part, of our parent guarantee,
which we expect to be a lengthy process.
If ultimately it is determined by an English Court that we are liable, in whole or in part,
for damages that WAPCo may establish against WWAI for WWAIs alleged non-performance of the WAGP
contract, or if WAPCo is able to establish liability against the Company directly under our parent
company guarantee, and, in either case, we are unable to enforce our rights under the indemnity
agreement entered into with Ascot in connection with the WAGP contract, we may experience
substantial losses. However, management cannot, at this time, predict the outcome of any
arbitration or litigation which may ensue in this developing WAGP contract dispute, or be certain
of the degree to which the indemnity agreement given in our favor by Ascot will protect the
Company. Based upon our current knowledge of the relevant facts and circumstances, we do not expect
that the outcome of the dispute will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or
results of operations.
Additional financial disclosures on Discontinued Operations are provided in Note 13 -
Discontinuance of Operations, Asset Disposals, and Transition Services Agreement.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Our contract revenue and contract costs are significantly impacted by the capital budgets of
our clients and the timing and location of development projects in the oil, gas and power
industries worldwide. Contract revenue and cost vary by country from year-to-year as the result of:
(a) entering and exiting work countries; (b) the execution of new contract awards; (c) the
completion of contracts; and (d) the overall level of demand for our services.
Our ability to be successful in obtaining and executing contracts can be affected by the
relative strength or weakness of the U.S. dollar compared to the currencies of our competitors, our
clients and our work locations.
30
Three Months Ended September 30, 2008 Compared to Three Months Ended September 30, 2007
Contract Revenue
For the three months ended September 30, 2008, contract revenue increased $243,935 (98.9
percent) to $490,651 from $246,716 during the same period in 2007. The increase is primarily due to
revenue growth across all segments as well as the acquisition of InServ in November of 2007. A
quarter-to-quarter comparison of revenue is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
Change |
|
Upstream O&G |
|
$ |
342,064 |
|
|
$ |
196,554 |
|
|
$ |
145,510 |
|
|
|
74.0 |
% |
Downstream O&G |
|
|
86,249 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
86,249 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Engineering |
|
|
62,338 |
|
|
|
50,162 |
|
|
|
12,176 |
|
|
|
24.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
490,651 |
|
|
$ |
246,716 |
|
|
$ |
243,935 |
|
|
|
98.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Upstream O&G revenue increased $145,510 (74.0 percent) to $342,064 from $196,554 in 2007.
This favorable result consisted of increases in the U.S. of $137,307 (129.0 percent), Canada of
$6,820 (10.1 percent) and Oman of $1,383 (6.1 percent). In the U.S., revenue increased primarily
due to $62,231 of revenue earned on two new major pipeline projects which began in the latter part
of 2007, $70,855 of revenue earned on a large EPC project in 2008, along with revenue from several
new smaller projects in 2008. In Canada, the increase was primarily due to approximately $20,883 of
work related to a new pipeline project in 2008, partially offset by a decrease related to 2007
projects now completed.
Downstream O&G revenue was $86,249 for the three months ended September 30, 2008. There is no
revenue in the 2007 comparable period as this revenue is the product of our acquisition of InServ
in November 2007. Downstream O&G revenue consists of $30,650 from construction services, $14,080
from construction and turnaround work, $23,368 from field services, $10,676 from tank services, and
$7,475 from fabrication work.
Engineering revenue increased $12,176 (24.3 percent) to $62,338 from $50,162 in 2007. The
increase in revenue is a result of increased demand for our pipeline and facility engineering
services. The volume and size of projects performed in 2008 were significantly greater than in
2007. This increased activity level is reflected in the Engineering September 30, 2008 headcount of
657, up 14.5 percent over the same period in 2007, while maintaining very high utilization. In
addition, the increased demand has resulted in significantly higher field service activity relating
to right-of-way, environmental, and surveying.
Operating Income
For the three months ended September 30, 2008, operating income increased $12,013 to $28,735
from $16,722 during the same period in 2007. A quarter-to-quarter comparison of operating income is
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Margin % |
|
|
2007(1) |
|
|
Margin % |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
Change |
|
Upstream O&G |
|
$ |
17,028 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
$ |
13,433 |
|
|
|
6.8 |
% |
|
$ |
3,595 |
|
|
|
26.8 |
% |
Downstream O&G |
|
|
4,723 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
% |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
4,723 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Engineering |
|
|
6,984 |
|
|
|
11.2 |
% |
|
|
3,289 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
% |
|
|
3,695 |
|
|
|
112.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
28,735 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
% |
|
$ |
16,722 |
|
|
|
6.8 |
% |
|
$ |
12,013 |
|
|
|
71.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
This table does not reflect a reduction in government fines of $2,000 in 2007 which
is included in consolidated operating results. Government fines were characterized as a Corporate
expense and are not allocated to the reporting segments. |
Upstream O&G operating income increased $3,595 to $17,028 from $13,433 in 2007. The increase
in operating income was a result of previously discussed revenue increases, which resulted in a
26.2 percent increase in contract income. Overall, contract margins for Upstream O&G decreased,
driven by a decrease in the U.S. where two major pipeline projects were at a lower margin
percentage than projects during the same period in 2007. Contributing
to our operating income was a net
gain of approximately $3,000 resulting from discrete construction
material procurement and disposition activities
that we entered into in the third quarter. Offsetting the contract income increase was an
increase in G&A expense of $3,355 as a result of increases in manpower and other costs required to
support the 74.0 percent increase in revenue.
Downstream O&G operating income was $4,723 for the three months ended September 30, 2008.
There is no operating income in the 2007 comparable period as the Downstream O&G operating results
are the product of our acquisition of InServ in November 2007. Operating income was negatively
impacted $2,586 (3.0 percent) by the amortization of other intangible assets.
Engineering operating income increased $3,695 (112.3 percent) to $6,984 from $3,289 in 2007.
The increase in operating income was primarily a result of strong demand for engineering services
enabling high utilization and
increased headcount while maintaining solid margins and leveraging G&A expenses.
31
Non-Operating Items
Provision for income taxes increased $1,976 to $8,057 from $6,081 in 2007. During the three
months ended September 30, 2008, we recognized $8,057 of income tax expense on income from
continuing operations before income taxes of $27,108 (an effective tax rate of 29.7 percent) as
compared to income tax expense of $6,081 on income from continuing operations before income taxes
of $16,353 (an effective tax rate of 37.2 percent) during the same period in 2007. The increase in
the provision for income taxes is due to improved operating results, thereby generating more
taxable income in the three months ended 2008 as compared to 2007. The circumstances that gave rise
to the higher effective tax rate on lower income in 2007 was primarily due to expenses in Panama
that received no tax benefit and the tax position taken on certain contract costs in 2008.
For interim financial reporting, we record the tax provision based on an estimate of the
effective tax rate for the year. During the three months ended September 30, 2008, we revised our
annual estimated effective income tax rate from 42.0 percent to 38.5 percent. The reduction in the
effective income tax rate is primarily attributed to tax positions taken in connection with costs
associated with certain contracts and the deductibility of those costs. We continue to refine our
corporate structure and overall tax strategy to increase tax efficiency.
Discontinued Operations
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes increased $10,345 (113.4 percent) to
$1,219 of income from a loss of $9,126 during the same period in 2007. During the three months
ended September 30, 2008, income from Discontinued Operations was primarily a result of $1,543 of
additional cumulative gain on the sale of Nigeria assets and operations. The recognition of this
gain in the current period is due to a reserve taken at the date of the sale for the fair value of
issued letters of credit for Nigeria projects. As those letters of credit expire or are released,
the liability or reserve is relieved resulting in additional income. Two letters of credit totaling
$19,759 expired in August 2008. The loss incurred during the same period in 2007 was due to a
$10,300 government fine related to profit disgorgement assessed in the third quarter of 2007.
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007
Contract Revenue
For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, contract revenue increased $839,834 (137.6
percent) to $1,450,002 from $610,168 during the same period in 2007. The increase is primarily due
to revenue growth across all segments as well as the acquisition of InServ in November of 2007. A
period-to-period comparison of revenue is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
Change |
|
Upstream O&G |
|
$ |
982,836 |
|
|
$ |
482,104 |
|
|
$ |
500,732 |
|
|
|
103.9 |
% |
Downstream O&G |
|
|
278,995 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
278,995 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Engineering |
|
|
188,171 |
|
|
|
128,064 |
|
|
|
60,107 |
|
|
|
46.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,450,002 |
|
|
$ |
610,168 |
|
|
$ |
839,834 |
|
|
|
137.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Upstream O&G revenue increased $500,732 (103.9 percent) to $982,836 from $482,104 in 2007.
This favorable result consisted of increases in the U.S. of $408,757 (162.2 percent), Canada of
$88,298 (53.0 percent) and Oman of $3,679 (5.8 percent). In the U.S., revenue increased primarily
because of $341,102 earned on two new major pipeline projects which began in the latter part of
2007 along with revenue from several new smaller projects. In Canada, the increase was primarily
due to approximately $95,015 of work related to our new pipeline division. In Oman, the increase
was primarily from a contract for oilfield construction services.
Downstream O&G revenue was $278,995 for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. There is no
revenue in the 2007 comparable period as this revenue is the product of our acquisition on InServ
in November 2007. Downstream O&G revenue consists of $93,217 from construction services, $63,735
from field services, $48,845 from construction and turnaround work, $48,675 from tank services, and
$24,523 from fabrication work.
Engineering revenue increased $60,107 (46.9 percent) to $188,171 from $128,064 in 2007. The
increase in revenue is a result of increased demand for pipeline and facility engineering services.
The volume and size of projects performed in 2008 were significantly greater than in 2007. This
increased activity level is reflected in the Engineering September 30, 2008 headcount of 657, up
14.5 percent over the same period in 2007, while maintaining very high utilization. In addition,
the increased demand has resulted in significantly higher field service activity relating to
right-of-way, environmental, and surveying.
32
Operating Income
For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, operating income increased $83,695 (527.7
percent) to $99,555 from $15,860 during the same period in 2007. A period-to-period comparison of
operating income is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Margin % |
|
|
2007(1) |
|
|
Margin % |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
Change |
|
Upstream O&G |
|
$ |
57,792 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
% |
|
$ |
6,361 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
% |
|
$ |
51,431 |
|
|
|
808.5 |
% |
Downstream O&G |
|
|
18,772 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
% |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
18,772 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Engineering |
|
|
22,991 |
|
|
|
12.2 |
% |
|
|
9,499 |
|
|
|
7.4 |
% |
|
|
13,492 |
|
|
|
142.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
99,555 |
|
|
|
6.9 |
% |
|
$ |
15,860 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
% |
|
$ |
83,695 |
|
|
|
527.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
This table does not reflect government fines of $22,000 in 2007 which is included in
consolidated operating results. Government fines were characterized as a Corporate expense and are
not allocated to the reporting segments. |
Upstream O&G operating income increased $51,431 (808.5 percent) to $57,792 from $6,361 in
2007. The increase in operating income was a result of previously discussed revenue increases,
which resulted in a 167.2 percent increase in contract income. Overall, contract margins for
Upstream O&G increased, with the most significant increase occurring in the U.S. where in 2007
severe weather impacted several lump sum projects. Contributing to our operating income was a net gain
of approximately $3,000 resulting from discrete construction material
procurement and disposition activities that
we entered into in the third quarter. Offsetting the contract income increase was an increase
in G&A expense of $14,990 as a result of increases in manpower and other costs required to support
the 103.9 percent increase in revenue.
Downstream O&G operating income was $18,772 for the nine months ended September 30, 2008.
There is no operating income in the 2007 comparable period as the Downstream O&G operating results
are the product of our acquisition of InServ in November 2007. Operating income was negatively
impacted $7,828 (2.8 percent) by the amortization of other intangible assets.
Engineering operating income increased $13,492 (142.0 percent) to $22,991 from $9,499 in 2007.
The increase in operating income was primarily a result of strong demand for engineering services
enabling high utilization and increased headcount while maintaining solid margins and leveraging
G&A expenses.
Non-Operating Items
Interest, net expense increased $2,960 (139.7 percent) to $5,079 from $2,119 in 2007. The
increase in net expense is primarily a result of $1,841 of decreased interest income earned on cash
and cash equivalents. Additionally, interest expense increased $1,119 primarily due to increased
capital lease obligations due to significant additions of capital equipment obtained through
capital leases throughout late 2007 and 2008, partially offset by reduced interest expense as a
result of the conversion of $63,093 in aggregate principal amount of the 2.75% and 6.5% senior
convertible notes in 2007 and 2008.
Loss on early extinguishment of debt decreased $15,375 (100.0 percent) to $0 in 2008. The
loss on early extinguishment of debt recorded in 2007 is directly attributable to the induced
conversion of approximately $52,450 of aggregate principal amount of our 6.5% Notes in which the
entire loss was recognized during the second quarter of 2007.
Provision for income taxes increased $28,657 to $36,450 from $7,793 in 2007. During the nine
months ended September 30, 2008, we recognized $36,450 of income tax expense on income from
continuing operations before income taxes of $94,680 (an effective tax rate of 38.5 percent) as
compared to income tax expense of $7,793 on a loss from continuing operations before income taxes
of $25,653 during the same period in 2007. The increase in the provision for income taxes is due to
improved operating results; thereby generating more taxable income in the nine months ended 2008 as
compared to 2007. The circumstances that resulted in recording a tax provision on losses during the
nine months ended 2007 were primarily due to expenses in Panama that received no tax benefit. These
charges include the $22,000 government fine and $15,375 loss on early extinguishment of debt.
Discontinued Operations
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes increased $24,536 (114.2 percent) to
income of $3,042 from a loss of $21,494 during the same period in 2007. Income during the nine
months ended September 30, 2008, consists of two pre-Nigeria sale insurance claim recoveries of
$850 and $2,154 for events of loss the Company suffered prior to the sale of its Nigeria
operations. Additionally, we have recognized $1,543 of additional cumulative gain on the sale of
Nigeria assets and operations in 2008. The additional gain is the result of an aggregate amount of
$19,759 of letters of credit expiring, for which the fair value of $1,543 of the letters of credit
was reserved against the gain at the sale date. The income from the insurance recovery and
additional gain on sale are partially offset by the net expenses of the TSA. The loss incurred
during the same period in 2007 was primarily from 38 days of Nigeria operations prior to
its sale on February 7, 2007 and the government fine of $10,300 related to profit disgorgement
recognized in the third quarter of 2007. During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, cash
provided by operating activities of Discontinued Operations increased $551 (18.5 percent) to cash
provided of $3,531 from $2,980 during the same period in 2007.
33
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Our objective in financing our business is to maintain adequate financial resources and access
to additional liquidity. During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, the results of our
operations were our principal sources of funding. We anticipate that cash on hand, future cash
flows from operations and the availability of our revolving credit facility will be sufficient to
fund our working capital and capital expenditure requirement in the near term. However, we are
reviewing all opportunities, including accessing the public markets to the extent that market
conditions and other factors permit, to pursue business expansion opportunities including potential
acquisitions. Our capital planning process is focused on utilizing cash in ways that enhance the
value of our company. During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, we used cash from operations
to fund working capital needs and certain capital expenditures.
Cash Flows
Cash flows provided by (used in) continuing operations by type of activity were as follows for
the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
Operating activities |
|
$ |
96,494 |
|
|
$ |
(22,629 |
) |
Investing activities |
|
|
(23,943 |
) |
|
|
66,952 |
|
Financing activities |
|
|
(40,917 |
) |
|
|
(28,445 |
) |
Statements of cash flows for entities with international operations that use the local
currency as the functional currency exclude the effects of the changes in foreign currency exchange
rates that occur during any given period, as these are non-cash charges. As a result, changes
reflected in certain accounts on the consolidated condensed statements of cash flows may not
reflect the changes in corresponding accounts on the consolidated condensed balance sheets.
Operating Activities
Operating activities of continuing operations provided $96,494 of cash in the nine months
ended September 30, 2008, as compared to cash used of $22,629 in same period in 2007. Cash provided
in operating activities increased $119,123 primarily due to:
|
|
|
an increase in net income from continuing operations of $91,676 to $58,230 of income
during the nine months ended September 30, 2008, as compared to a loss from continuing
operations of $33,446 in the same period in 2007; |
|
|
|
|
an increase in cash flow from the change in working capital accounts of $35,977. The
increase in cash flow from working capital accounts is primarily attributable the change in
working capital accounts that generally trend with project activity levels. These include
accounts receivable, contract cost and recognized income not yet billed, inventory,
accounts payable and accrued liabilities and contract billings in excess of cost and
recognized income. The increase associated with these working capital accounts are
partially offset by the cash flow associated with prepaid expenses and accrued income
taxes; and |
|
|
|
|
a decrease in non-cash charges of $8,530. This decrease is primarily attributable to the
non-recurring $22,000 government fine and $15,375 loss on early extinguishment of debt
recognized during the nine months ended 2008. This decrease is partially offset by
increased depreciation and amortization of $20,765 and increased deferred compensation
expense of $4,070. The increase in depreciation is reflective of the significant amount of
capital additions to support the growth of our business and project activity level.
Additionally, $7,828 of amortization of intangible assets is included in the nine months
ended 2008 which were acquired in the acquisition on InServ in the fourth quarter of 2007.
The increase in deferred compensation amortization is primarily a result of significant
restricted stock awards granted in 2008. |
Investing Activities
Investing activities of continuing operations used $23,943 of cash in the nine months ended
September 30, 2008, compared to providing $66,952 during the same period in 2007. Cash flows from
investing activities decreased $90,895 primarily due to:
|
|
|
disposition of discontinued operations in the nine months ended September 30, 2007,
which provided $105,568 of cash as compared to no dispositions in the same period in 2008; |
|
|
|
|
acquisition of a subsidiary in the nine months ended September 30, 2007, which used cash
of $24,154 as compared to $846 of cash provided (working capital adjustment net of
additional acquisition costs) during the same period in 2008; and |
|
|
|
purchases of property, plant, and equipment during the nine months ended September 30,
2008 used $28,122 of cash compared to $15,890 during the same period in 2007, an increase
of $12,232. These purchases consisted primarily of construction equipment to support our
increased project activity. |
34
Financing Activities
Financing activities of continuing operations used $40,917 of cash in the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 compared to $28,445 in the same period in 2007. Cash flows from financing
activities decreased $12,472 primarily due to:
|
|
|
repayments of capital lease obligations during the nine months ended September 30, 2008
of $17,550 as compared to $7,507. We have accelerated repayment and retired certain capital
lease obligations early as a part of our financial flexibility and financial management
strategy; |
|
|
|
|
repayments of $12,575 of government fines during the nine months ended September 30,
2008 as compared to no repayments during the same period in 2007; and |
|
|
|
|
the two previous increased cash outflows in 2008 are partially offset by a non-recurring
cash use in 2007 of $12,993. This amount relates to the cash used in inducing the
conversion of part of our 6.5% senior convertible notes in 2007. No similar inducement has
occurred in 2008. |
Additional Sources of Capital
Assets
Held for Sale
In July 2008, we decided to sell one of our fabrication facilities in Edmonton, Alberta,
Canada. We will use the proceeds from this sale to support our fabrication and cross-country
pipeline businesses in Canada as well as fund the acquisition of assets to support our operations
growth in North America. We anticipate the sale of the facility in Canada will close before
year-end.
2007 Credit Facility
Concurrent with our public offering and the InServ acquisition on November 20, 2007, we
replaced our synthetic credit facility with a $150,000 senior secured revolving credit facility
that can be increased to $200,000 with approval of the administrative agent. The entire facility is
available for performance letters of credit and 33 percent of the facility is available for cash
borrowings and financial letters of credit.
Capital Requirements
During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, continuing operations provided cash of
$31,135. We believe that our improved financial results, combined with our financial flexibility
and financial management will ensure sufficient cash to meet our capital requirements. We will
continue to evaluate capital leases as a means to acquire equipment such that we maintain financial
flexibility and whenever favorable rates are available. As such, we are focused on the following
significant capital requirements:
|
|
|
providing working capital for projects in process and those scheduled to begin; |
|
|
|
|
procuring construction equipment; |
|
|
|
|
pursuing additional acquisitions that will allow us to expand our service offering; and |
|
|
|
|
making installment payments to the government related to fines and profit disgorgement. |
We believe that we will be able to support our ongoing working capital needs through our cash
on hand, our operating cash flows and the availability of the cash borrowings under the 2007 Credit
Facility, although we may be required to access the capital markets in the event we complete any
significant acquisitions.
Contractual Obligations
As of September 30, 2008, we have $91,407 of outstanding debt related to the convertible
notes. In addition, we have entered into various capital leases of construction equipment and
property resulting in aggregate capital lease obligations of $49,563 at September 30, 2008. We have
acquired a note to finance insurance premiums in the amount of $12,754 which had a balance of
$4,227 at September 30, 2008. We have an aggregate amount of $19,725 of government obligations.
These obligations are due in three equal annual installments beginning in 2009.
Other contractual obligations and commercial commitments, as detailed in our annual report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, did not materially change except for payments made
in the normal course of business.
NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
See Note 2 New Accounting Pronouncements in the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements
included in this Form 10-Q for a summary of recently issued accounting standards.
35
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Form 10-Q includes forward-looking statements. All statements, other than statements of
historical facts, included or incorporated by reference in this Form 10-Q that address activities,
events or developments which we expect or anticipate will or may occur in the future, including
such things as future capital expenditures (including the amount and nature thereof), oil, gas, gas
liquids and power prices, demand for our services, the amount and nature of future investments by
governments, expansion and other development trends of the energy industry, business strategy,
expansion and growth of our business and operations, the outcome of government investigations and
legal proceedings and other such matters are forward-looking statements. These forward-looking
statements are based on assumptions and analyses we made in light of our experience and our
perception of historical trends, current conditions and expected future developments as well as
other factors we believe are appropriate under the circumstances. However, whether actual results
and developments will conform to our expectations and predictions is subject to a number of risks
and uncertainties. As a result, actual results could differ materially from our expectations.
Factors that could cause actual results to differ from those contemplated by our forward-looking
statements include, but are not limited to, the following:
|
|
|
curtailment of capital expenditures in the oil, gas, power, refining and petrochemical
industries; |
|
|
|
|
cancellation of projects, in whole or in part; |
|
|
|
|
the consequences we may encounter if the terms and conditions of our final settlements
with the DOJ and the SEC are not complied with, including the imposition of civil or
criminal fines, penalties, enhanced monitoring arrangements, or other sanctions that might
be imposed by the DOJ and SEC; |
|
|
|
|
the occurrence during the course of our operations of accidents and injuries to our
personnel, as well as to third parties, that negatively affect our safety record, which is
a factor used by many clients to pre-qualify and otherwise award work to contractors in our
industry; |
|
|
|
|
the commencement by foreign governmental authorities of investigations into the actions
of our current and former employees, and the determination that such actions constituted
violations of foreign law; |
|
|
|
|
difficulties we may encounter in connection with the previous sale and disposition of
our Nigeria assets and Nigeria based operations, including without limitation, obtaining
indemnification for any losses we may experience if, due to the non-performance of Ascot,
claims are made against any parent company guarantees we provided and which remained in
place, in varying degrees, subsequent to the closing; |
|
|
|
|
the dishonesty of employees and/or other representatives or their refusal to abide by
applicable laws and our established policies and rules; |
|
|
|
|
adverse weather conditions not anticipated in bids and estimates; |
|
|
|
|
project cost overruns, unforeseen schedule delays, and the application of liquidated
damages; |
|
|
|
|
failing to realize cost recoveries from projects completed or in progress within a
reasonable period after completion of the relevant project; |
|
|
|
|
inability to hire and retain sufficient skilled labor to execute our current work, our
work in backlog and future work we have not yet been awarded; |
|
|
|
|
inability to execute cost-reimbursable projects within the target cost, thus eroding
contract margin but not contract income on the project; |
|
|
|
|
political or social circumstances impeding the progress of our work and increasing the
cost of performance; |
|
|
|
|
failure to obtain the timely award of one or more projects; |
|
|
|
|
inability to identify and acquire suitable acquisition targets on reasonable terms; |
|
|
|
|
inability to obtain adequate financing; |
|
|
|
|
inability to obtain sufficient surety bonds or letters of credit; |
|
|
|
|
loss of the services of key management personnel; |
|
|
|
|
the demand for energy moderating or diminishing; |
36
|
|
|
downturns in general economic, market or business conditions in our target markets; |
|
|
|
|
changes in the effective tax rate in countries where our work will be performed; |
|
|
|
|
changes in applicable laws or regulations, or changed interpretations thereof; |
|
|
|
|
changes in the scope of our expected insurance coverage; |
|
|
|
|
inability to manage insurable risk at an affordable cost; |
|
|
|
|
the occurrence of the risk factors included elsewhere in this Form 10-Q or in our other
reports and filings with the SEC; and |
|
|
|
|
other factors, most of which are beyond our control. |
Consequently, all of the forward-looking statements made in the this Form 10-Q are qualified
by these cautionary statements and there can be no assurance that the actual results or
developments we anticipate will be realized or, even if substantially realized, that they will have
the consequences for, or effects on, our business or operations that we anticipate today. We assume
no obligation to update publicly any such forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new
information, future events or otherwise. For a more complete description of the circumstances
surrounding the actions of our current and former employees, see the Risk Factors included in the
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.
Unless the context otherwise requires, all references in this Form 10-Q to Willbros, the
Company, we, us and our refer to Willbros Group, Inc., its consolidated subsidiaries and
their predecessors.
37
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Our primary market risk is our exposure to changes in non-U.S. currency exchange rates. We
attempt to negotiate contracts which provide for payment in U.S. dollars, but we may be required to
take all or a portion of payment under a contract in another currency. To mitigate non-U.S.
currency exchange risk, we seek to match anticipated non-U.S. currency revenue with expenses in the
same currency whenever possible. To the extent we are unable to match non-U.S. currency revenue
with expenses in the same currency, we may use forward contracts, options or other common hedging
techniques in the same non-U.S. currencies. We had no forward contracts or options at September 30,
2008 and 2007 or during the nine months then ended.
The carrying amounts for cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, notes payable and
accounts payable, and accrued liabilities shown in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
approximate fair value at September 30, 2008, due to the generally short maturities of these items.
At September 30, 2008, our investments were primarily in short-term dollar denominated bank
deposits with maturities of a few days, or in longer-term deposits where funds can be withdrawn on
demand without penalty. We have the ability and expect to hold our investments to maturity.
Our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to our long-term
debt. At September 30, 2008, our only indebtedness subject to variable interest rates is certain
capital lease obligations.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
(a) Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be
disclosed by us in reports filed or submitted under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
(the Exchange Act), is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods
specified in the SECs rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without
limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed
under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including the principal
executive and financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure. There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any system of disclosure
controls and procedures, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or
overriding of the controls and procedures. Accordingly, even effective disclosure controls and
procedures can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving their control objectives.
Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule
13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of September 30, 2008. Based on this evaluation, our
management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, concluded that, as
of September 30, 2008 the disclosure controls and procedures are effective in alerting them on a
timely basis to material information required to be included in our filings with the Securities and
Exchange Commission.
(b) Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
During the quarter ended September 30, 2008, there were no changes in our internal control
over financial reporting that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect,
our internal control over financial reporting.
38
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
For information regarding legal proceedings, see Item 3. Legal Proceedings of our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, and Note 12 Contingencies, Commitments
and Other Circumstances of our Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 1 of
Part I of this Form 10-Q, which information from Note 12 as to legal proceedings is incorporated by
reference herein.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Except as set forth below, there have been no material changes in risk factors involving us
from those previously disclosed in Item 1A of Part I in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2007 and in Item 1A of Part II of our Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,
2008.
Our business is highly dependent upon the level of capital expenditures by oil, gas and power
companies on infrastructure.
Our revenue and cash flow are primarily dependent upon major engineering and construction
projects. The availability of these types of projects is dependent upon the economic condition of
the oil, gas and power industries, specifically, the level of capital expenditures of oil, gas and
power companies on infrastructure. The current credit crisis and related turmoil in the global
financial system, including the capital markets, as well as a general economic downturn or
recession in North America and/or globally, may have an adverse impact on the level of capital
expenditures of oil, gas and power companies and/or their ability to finance these expenditures.
Our failure to obtain major projects, the delay in awards of major projects, the cancellation of
major projects or delays in completion of contracts are factors that could result in the
under-utilization of our resources, which would have an adverse impact on our revenue and cash
flow. There are numerous factors beyond our control that influence the level of capital
expenditures of oil, gas and power companies, including:
|
|
|
current and projected oil, gas and power prices as well as refining margins; |
|
|
|
|
the demand for electricity; |
|
|
|
|
the abilities of oil, gas and power companies to generate, access and deploy
capital; |
|
|
|
|
exploration, production and transportation costs; |
|
|
|
|
the discovery rate of new oil and gas reserves; |
|
|
|
|
the sale and expiration dates of oil and gas leases and concessions; |
|
|
|
|
regulatory restraints on the rates that power companies may charge their customers; |
|
|
|
|
local and international political and economic conditions; |
|
|
|
|
the ability or willingness of host country government entities to fund their
budgetary commitments; and |
|
|
|
|
technological advances. |
We may continue to experience losses associated with our prior Nigeria based operations.
In February 2007, we completed the sale of our Nigerian operations. In August 2007, we and our
subsidiary, Willbros International Services (Nigeria) Limited, entered into a Global Settlement
Agreement with Ascot Offshore Nigeria Limited (Ascot), the purchaser of our Nigerian operations
and Berkeley Group Plc, the purchasers parent company. Among the other matters, the Global
Settlement Agreement provided for the payment of an amount in full and final settlement of all
disputes between Ascot and Willbros (the Company) related to the working capital adjustment to
the closing purchase price under the February 2007 share purchase agreement. In connection with the
sale of our Nigerian operations, we also entered into a Transition Services Agreement, and Ascot
delivered a promissory note in favor of the Company.
The Global Settlement Agreement provided for a settlement in the amount of $25.0 million, the
amount by which we and Ascot agreed to adjust the closing purchase price downward (the Settlement
Amount). Under the Global Settlement Agreement, we retained approximately $13.9 million of the
Settlement Amount and credited this amount to the account of Ascot for amounts which were due to
the Company under the Transition Services Agreement and promissory note. Our payment of the balance
of the Settlement Amount settled (a) any and all obligations and disputes between Ascot and the
Company in relation to the adjustment to the closing purchase price under the share purchase
agreement and (b) all of the parties respective rights and obligations under the indemnification
provisions of the share purchase agreement, except as provided in the Global Settlement Agreement.
39
As part consideration for the parties agreement on the Settlement Amount, Ascot obtained from
a non-Nigerian
bank supplemental backstop letters of credit totaling approximately $20.3 million, which
backstopped corresponding letter of credit obligations that we had under various contracts taken
over by Ascot. During the three months ended September 30, 2008, substantially all of our letters
of credit related to our former operations in Nigeria expired, with only one $123,000 letter of
credit still outstanding.
We may, however, continue to experience losses or incur expenses subsequent to the sale and
disposition of our operations and the Global Settlement Agreement. In particular:
|
|
|
The same difficulties which led to our leaving Nigeria continue to exist for Ascot,
as well as additional challenges, including various financial difficulties that we
understand Ascot may from time to time be experiencing. Accordingly, Ascots continued
willingness and ability to perform our former projects in West Africa continue to be
important factors to further reducing our risk profile in Nigeria and elsewhere in West
Africa. |
|
|
|
|
We issued parent company guarantees to our former clients in connection with the
performance of some of our contracts in Nigeria and nearby West Africa locations.
Although Ascot is now responsible for completing these projects, our parent company
guarantees may remain in force in varying degrees until the projects are completed.
Indemnities are in place pursuant to which Ascot and its parent company are obligated
to indemnify the Company for any losses we incur on these parent company guarantees.
However, we can provide no assurance that we will be successful in enforcing our
indemnity rights. The guarantees include five projects under which we estimated that,
at February 7, 2007, there was aggregate remaining contract revenue of approximately
$352.1 million and aggregate cost to complete of approximately $293.6 million. |
|
|
|
|
In early 2008, we received our first notification asserting various rights under one
of our outstanding parent guarantees. On February 1, 2008, WWAI, the Ascot company
performing the West African Gas Pipeline (WAGP) contract, received a letter from West
African Gas Pipeline Company Limited (WAPCo), the owner of WAGP, wherein WAPCo gave
written notice alleging that WWAI was in default under the WAGP contract, as amended,
and giving WWAI a brief cure period to remedy the alleged default. We understand that
WWAI responded by denying being in breach of its WAGP contract obligations, and
apparently also advised WAPCo that WWAI ...requires a further $55 million, without
which it will not be able to complete the work which it had previously undertaken to
perform. We understand that, on February 27, 2008, WAPCo terminated the WAGP contract
for the alleged continuing non-performance of WWAI. |
|
|
|
|
Also, on February 1, 2008, we received a letter from WAPCo reminding us of our parent
guarantee on the WAGP contract and requesting that we remedy WWAIs default under that
contract, as amended. On previous occasions, we have advised WAPCo that, for a variety of
legal, contractual, and other reasons, we did not consider our prior WAGP contract parent
guarantee to have continued application, and we reiterated that position to WAPCo in our
response to its February 1, 2008 letter. WAPCo disputes our position that we are no
longer bound by the terms of our prior parent guarantee of the WAGP contract and has
reserved all its rights in that regard. Currently, the WAGP project is at a stand still
for a variety of technical and commercial issues unrelated to WAPCos termination of the
WAGP contract. |
|
|
|
|
We anticipate that this potential dispute with WAPCo may result in a lengthy arbitration
proceeding between WAPCo and WWAI in the London Court of International Arbitration to
determine the validity of the alleged default notice issued by WAPCo to WWAI, including
any resulting damage award, in combination with a lawsuit between WAPCo and us in the
English Courts under English law to determine the enforceability, in whole or in part, of
our parent guarantee, which we expect to be a lengthy process. |
|
|
|
|
We currently have no employees working in Nigeria and we have no intention of returning
to Nigeria. If ultimately it is determined by an English Court that we are liable, in
whole or in part, for damages that WAPCo may establish against WWAI for WWAIs alleged
non-performance of the WAGP contract, or if WAPCo is able to establish liability against
the Company directly under our parent company guarantee, and, in either case, we are
unable to enforce our rights under the indemnity agreement entered into with Ascot in
connection with the WAGP contract, we may experience substantial losses. However,
management cannot, at this time, predict the outcome of any arbitration or litigation
which may ensue in this developing WAGP contract dispute, or be certain of the degree to
which the indemnity agreement given in our favor by Ascot will protect the Company. Based
upon our current knowledge of the relevant facts and circumstances, we do not expect that
the outcome of the potential dispute will have a material adverse effect on our financial
condition or results of operations. |
Our common stock, which is listed on the New York Stock Exchange, has from time to time experienced
significant price and volume fluctuations. These fluctuations are likely to continue in the future,
and you may not be able to resell your shares of common stock at or above the purchase price paid
by you.
40
The market price of our common stock may change significantly in response to various factors
and events beyond our control, including the following:
|
|
|
the risk factors described in this Form 10-Q and in our other reports and filings
with the SEC; |
|
|
|
|
a shortfall in operating revenue or net income from that expected by securities
analysts and investors; |
|
|
|
|
changes in securities analysts estimates of our financial performance or the
financial performance of our competitors or companies in our industry generally; |
|
|
|
|
general conditions in our customers industries; and |
|
|
|
|
general conditions in the securities markets. |
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
The following table provides information about purchases of our common stock by us during the
quarter ended September 30, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number |
|
|
Maximum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Shares |
|
|
Number (or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased as |
|
|
Approximate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part of |
|
|
Dollar Value) of |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Publicly |
|
|
Shares That May |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Average Price |
|
|
Announced |
|
|
Yet Be Purchased |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Paid Per |
|
|
Plans or |
|
|
Under the Plans |
|
|
|
Purchased (1) |
|
|
Share (2) |
|
|
Programs |
|
|
or Programs |
|
July 1, 2008 July 31, 2008 |
|
|
78,750 |
|
|
$ |
43.54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 1, 2008 August 31, 2008 |
|
|
3,246 |
|
|
|
42.38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 1, 2008 September 30, 2008 |
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
30.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
82,233 |
|
|
$ |
43.46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Shares of common stock acquired from certain of our officers and key employees under
the share withholding provisions of our 1996 Stock Plan for the payment of taxes associated with
the vesting of shares of restricted stock or delivery of shares underlying vested restricted stock
rights granted under such plan. |
|
(2) |
|
The price paid per common share represents the closing sales price of a share of our
common stock, as reported in the New York Stock Exchange composite transactions, on the day
that the stock was acquired by us. |
Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities
Not applicable.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
Not applicable.
Item 5. Other Information
Not applicable.
Item 6. Exhibits
The following documents are included as exhibits to this Form 10-Q. Those exhibits below
incorporated by reference herein are indicated as such by the information supplied in the
parenthetical thereafter. If no parenthetical appears after an exhibit, such exhibit is filed
herewith.
|
31.1 |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
31.2 |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
32.1 |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
32.2 |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
41
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
|
|
Date: November 5, 2008 |
By: |
/s/ Van A. Welch
|
|
|
|
Van A. Welch |
|
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal
Accounting Officer) |
|
|
42
EXHIBIT INDEX
The following documents are included as exhibits to this Form 10-Q. Those exhibits below
incorporated by reference herein are indicated as such by the information supplied in the
parenthetical thereafter. If no parenthetical appears after an exhibit, such exhibit is filed
herewith.
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
43