e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2011
or
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Commission File No. 1-14771
MICROFINANCIAL INCORPORATED
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Massachusetts
|
|
04-2962824 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
incorporation or organization) |
|
|
16 New England Executive Park, Suite 200, Burlington, MA 01803
(Address of principal executive offices)
(781) 994-4800
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. þ Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). þ
Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definition of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act (check one).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company þ |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). o Yes þ No
As of October 31, 2011, 14,257,324 shares of the registrants common stock were outstanding.
MICROFINANCIAL INCORPORATED
TABLE OF CONTENTS
MICROFINANCIAL INCORPORATED
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
1,647 |
|
|
$ |
1,528 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
1,058 |
|
|
|
753 |
|
Net investment in leases: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables due in installments |
|
|
195,964 |
|
|
|
191,067 |
|
Estimated residual value |
|
|
22,870 |
|
|
|
21,832 |
|
Initial direct costs |
|
|
1,404 |
|
|
|
1,490 |
|
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advance lease payments and deposits |
|
|
(3,595 |
) |
|
|
(3,479 |
) |
Unearned income |
|
|
(59,291 |
) |
|
|
(59,245 |
) |
Allowance for credit losses |
|
|
(13,188 |
) |
|
|
(13,132 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment in leases |
|
|
144,164 |
|
|
|
138,533 |
|
Investment in rental contracts, net |
|
|
860 |
|
|
|
461 |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
2,020 |
|
|
|
800 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
1,214 |
|
|
|
1,530 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
150,963 |
|
|
$ |
143,605 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving line of credit |
|
$ |
60,527 |
|
|
$ |
62,650 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
2,382 |
|
|
|
2,435 |
|
Capital lease obligation |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
Dividends payable |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
3,068 |
|
|
|
1,375 |
|
Income taxes
payable |
|
|
321 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
10,453 |
|
|
|
7,627 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
76,770 |
|
|
|
74,118 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $.01 par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized;
no shares issued at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.01 par value; 25,000,000 shares authorized;
14,257,324 and 14,231,933 shares issued at September 30, 2011 and December
31, 2010, respectively |
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
142 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
46,692 |
|
|
|
46,475 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
27,358 |
|
|
|
22,870 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
74,193 |
|
|
|
69,487 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
150,963 |
|
|
$ |
143,605 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements
3
MICROFINANCIAL INCORPORATED
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income on financing leases |
|
$ |
9,306 |
|
|
$ |
8,790 |
|
|
$ |
27,543 |
|
|
$ |
25,421 |
|
Rental income |
|
|
2,192 |
|
|
|
1,917 |
|
|
|
6,271 |
|
|
|
5,795 |
|
Income on service contracts |
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
308 |
|
|
|
397 |
|
Loss and damage waiver fees |
|
|
1,241 |
|
|
|
1,154 |
|
|
|
3,662 |
|
|
|
3,377 |
|
Service fees and other |
|
|
935 |
|
|
|
912 |
|
|
|
2,798 |
|
|
|
2,846 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
13,771 |
|
|
|
12,897 |
|
|
|
40,582 |
|
|
|
37,836 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
3,900 |
|
|
|
3,356 |
|
|
|
11,890 |
|
|
|
10,167 |
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
4,517 |
|
|
|
4,969 |
|
|
|
13,520 |
|
|
|
17,462 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
873 |
|
|
|
731 |
|
|
|
2,337 |
|
|
|
1,633 |
|
Interest |
|
|
700 |
|
|
|
743 |
|
|
|
2,043 |
|
|
|
2,439 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses |
|
|
9,990 |
|
|
|
9,799 |
|
|
|
29,790 |
|
|
|
31,701 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision for income taxes |
|
|
3,781 |
|
|
|
3,098 |
|
|
|
10,792 |
|
|
|
6,135 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
1,456 |
|
|
|
1,192 |
|
|
|
4,155 |
|
|
|
2,363 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
2,325 |
|
|
$ |
1,906 |
|
|
$ |
6,637 |
|
|
$ |
3,772 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share basic |
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
$ |
0.47 |
|
|
$ |
0.26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share diluted |
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
$ |
0.46 |
|
|
$ |
0.26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
14,253,702 |
|
|
|
14,263,726 |
|
|
|
14,244,074 |
|
|
|
14,235,086 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
14,538,910 |
|
|
|
14,492,842 |
|
|
|
14,513,708 |
|
|
|
14,454,201 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements
4
MICROFINANCIAL INCORPORATED
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Paid-in |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Stockholders |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Equity |
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2009 |
|
|
14,174,326 |
|
|
$ |
142 |
|
|
$ |
46,197 |
|
|
$ |
20,426 |
|
|
$ |
66,765 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock issued for deferred compensation |
|
|
88,269 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
295 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
295 |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
112 |
|
Amortization of unearned compensation |
|
|
3,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
Stock repurchase program |
|
|
(34,412 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(139 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(139 |
) |
Common stock dividends ($0.20 per
share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,852 |
) |
|
|
(2,852 |
) |
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,296 |
|
|
|
5,296 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2010 |
|
|
14,231,933 |
|
|
$ |
142 |
|
|
$ |
46,475 |
|
|
$ |
22,870 |
|
|
$ |
69,487 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock issued for deferred compensation |
|
|
77,274 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
354 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
355 |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
103 |
|
Stock repurchase program |
|
|
(51,883 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(240 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(240 |
) |
Common stock dividends ($0.15 per
share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,149 |
) |
|
|
(2,149 |
) |
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,637 |
|
|
|
6,637 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2011 |
|
|
14,257,324 |
|
|
$ |
143 |
|
|
$ |
46,692 |
|
|
$ |
27,358 |
|
|
$ |
74,193 |
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements
5
MICROFINANCIAL INCORPORATED
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOW
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash received from customers |
|
$ |
79,414 |
|
|
$ |
69,054 |
|
Cash paid to suppliers and employees |
|
|
(13,962 |
) |
|
|
(11,980 |
) |
Income taxes paid |
|
|
(675 |
) |
|
|
(960 |
) |
Interest paid |
|
|
(1,844 |
) |
|
|
(1,919 |
) |
Interest received |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
62,934 |
|
|
|
54,196 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in lease and rental contracts |
|
|
(56,367 |
) |
|
|
(58,120 |
) |
Investment in direct costs |
|
|
(760 |
) |
|
|
(853 |
) |
Investment in property and equipment |
|
|
(804 |
) |
|
|
(114 |
) |
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(57,931 |
) |
|
|
(59,087 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from secured debt |
|
|
76,394 |
|
|
|
75,678 |
|
Repayment of secured debt |
|
|
(78,517 |
) |
|
|
(67,629 |
) |
Payments of debt closing costs |
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
|
(711 |
) |
Increase in restricted cash |
|
|
(305 |
) |
|
|
(139 |
) |
Repayment of capital lease obligations |
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
(50 |
) |
Repurchase of common stock |
|
|
(240 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Payment of dividends |
|
|
(2,139 |
) |
|
|
(2,134 |
) |
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
|
|
(4,884 |
) |
|
|
5,015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
124 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
1,528 |
|
|
|
391 |
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
1,647 |
|
|
$ |
515 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciliation of net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
6,637 |
|
|
$ |
3,772 |
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of unearned income, net of initial direct costs |
|
|
(27,543 |
) |
|
|
(25,421 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
2,337 |
|
|
|
1,633 |
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
13,520 |
|
|
|
17,462 |
|
Recovery of equipment cost and residual value |
|
|
63,214 |
|
|
|
54,144 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
93 |
|
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current taxes payable |
|
|
321 |
|
|
|
454 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
2,826 |
|
|
|
949 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
316 |
|
|
|
112 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
301 |
|
|
|
420 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
902 |
|
|
|
578 |
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
62,934 |
|
|
$ |
54,196 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of property and equipment through lease incentives |
|
$ |
791 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Fair market value of stock issued for compensation |
|
$ |
354 |
|
|
$ |
296 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements
6
MICROFINANCIAL INCORPORATED
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
A. Nature of Business
MicroFinancial Incorporated (referred to as MicroFinancial, we, us or our) operates
primarily through its wholly-owned subsidiaries, TimePayment Corp. and LeaseComm Corporation.
TimePayment is a specialized commercial finance company that leases and rents microticket
equipment and provides other financing services. LeaseComm started originating leases in January
1986 and in October 2002 suspended virtually all originations due to an interruption in financing.
TimePayment commenced originating leases in July 2004. The average amount financed by TimePayment
during 2010 was approximately $5,800 compared to the 2011 year to date average of $6,000.
LeaseComm historically financed contracts of approximately $1,900. We primarily source our
originations through a nationwide network of independent equipment vendors, sales organizations and
other dealer-based origination networks. We fund our operations through cash provided by operating
activities and borrowings under our revolving line of credit.
B. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and the
rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission for interim financial statements.
Accordingly, our interim statements do not include all of the information and disclosures required
for our annual financial statements. In the opinion of our management, the condensed consolidated
financial statements contain all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments,
considered necessary for a fair presentation of these interim results. These financial statements
should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and notes included in our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. The results for the nine months
ended September 30, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the
full year ending December 31, 2011.
The balance sheet at December 31, 2010 has been derived from the audited financial statements
included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
Allowance for Credit Losses and Credit Quality
We maintain an allowance for credit losses on our investment in leases, service contracts and
rental contracts at an amount that we believe is sufficient to provide adequate protection against
losses in our portfolio. Given the nature of the microticket market and the individual size of
each transaction, we do not have a formal credit review committee to review individual
transactions. Rather, we developed a sophisticated, multi-tiered pricing model and have automated
the credit scoring, approval and collection processes. We believe that with the proper pricing
model, we can grant credit to a wide range of applicants provided we have priced appropriately for
the associated risk. As a result of approving a wide range of credits, we experience a relatively
high level of delinquency and write-offs in our portfolio. We periodically review the credit
scoring and approval process to ensure that the automated system is making appropriate credit
decisions. Contracts in our portfolio are not re-graded subsequent to the initial extension of
credit and the allowance is not allocated to specific contracts. Rather, we view the contracts as
having common characteristics and maintain a general allowance against our entire portfolio
utilizing historical collection statistics and an assessment of current credit risk in the
portfolio as the basis for the amount.
We have adopted a consistent, systematic procedure for establishing and maintaining an
appropriate allowance for credit losses for our microticket transactions. We estimate the
likelihood of credit losses net of recoveries in the portfolio at each reporting period based upon
a combination of the lessees bureau reported credit score at lease inception and the current
delinquency status of the account. In addition to these elements, we also consider other
relevant factors including general economic trends, trends in delinquencies and credit losses,
static pool analysis of our portfolio, trends in recoveries made on charged off accounts, and other
relevant factors which might affect the performance of our portfolio. This combination of
historical experience, credit scores, delinquency levels, trends in credit losses, and the review
of current factors provide the basis for our analysis of the adequacy of the allowance for credit
losses. We take charge-offs against our receivables when such receivables are deemed
uncollectible. In
7
MICROFINANCIAL INCORPORATED
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
general a receivable is uncollectable when it is 360 days past due or earlier,
if other adverse events occur with respect to an account. Historically, the typical monthly
payment under our microticket leases has been small and as a result, our experience is that lessees
will pay past due amounts later in the process because of the relatively small amount necessary to
bring an account current.
In 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update
(ASU) 2010-20, Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for
Credit Losses requiring us to provide detailed disclosures about the nature of credit risk
inherent in our financing receivables, how we analyze that risk in estimating our allowance for
credit losses, and the changes in the allowance for credit losses.
We segregate our lease portfolio between TimePayment Corp. and LeaseComm Corp. to perform the
calculation and analysis of the allowance for credit losses. Each subsidiary consists of a single
portfolio segment which we refer to as microticket equipment. We take charge-offs against our
receivables when such receivables are deemed uncollectible. None of our receivables are placed on
nonaccrual status as they are charged off when deemed uncollectible.
A summary of the activity in our allowance for credit losses is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Allowance for credit losses, beginning |
|
$ |
13,132 |
|
|
$ |
13,856 |
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
13,520 |
|
|
|
17,462 |
|
Charge-offs |
|
|
(17,227 |
) |
|
|
(21,598 |
) |
Recoveries |
|
|
3,763 |
|
|
|
3,273 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for credit losses, ending |
|
$ |
13,188 |
|
|
$ |
12,993 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table reconciles the activity in the allowance for credit losses by portfolio
segment at September 30, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LeaseComm |
|
|
TimePayment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Microticket |
|
|
Microticket |
|
|
|
|
|
|
equipment |
|
|
equipment |
|
|
Total |
|
Allowance for Credit Losses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance |
|
$ |
231 |
|
|
$ |
12,901 |
|
|
$ |
13,132 |
|
Charge-offs |
|
|
(551 |
) |
|
|
(16,676 |
) |
|
|
(17,227 |
) |
Recoveries |
|
|
917 |
|
|
|
2,846 |
|
|
|
3,763 |
|
Provisions (credits) |
|
|
(430 |
) |
|
|
13,950 |
|
|
|
13,520 |
|
|
|
|
Ending balance |
|
$ |
167 |
|
|
$ |
13,021 |
|
|
$ |
13,188 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance: Individually
evaluated for impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance: Collectively
evaluated for impairment |
|
|
167 |
|
|
|
13,021 |
|
|
|
13,188 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance: Contracts
acquired with deteriorated
credit quality |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing Receivables: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance |
|
|
368 |
|
|
|
156,984 |
|
|
|
157,352 |
(1) |
Ending balance: Individually
evaluated for impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance: Collectively
evaluated for impairment |
|
|
368 |
|
|
|
156,984 |
|
|
|
157,352 |
(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance: Contracts
acquired with deteriorated credit quality |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Total financing receivables include net investment in leases. For purposes of
asset quality and allowance calculations, the allowance for credit losses is
excluded. |
8
MICROFINANCIAL INCORPORATED
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
Each period the provision for credit losses in the income statement results from the
combination of an estimate by management of credit losses that occurred during the current period
and the ongoing adjustment of prior estimates of losses occurring in prior periods.
To serve as a basis for making this provision, we maintain an internally developed
proprietary scoring model that considers several factors including the lessees bureau reported
credit score at lease inception. We also consider other relevant factors including general
economic trends, trends in delinquencies and credit losses, static pool analysis of our
portfolio, trends in recoveries made on charged off accounts, and other relevant factors which
might affect the performance of our portfolio. The combination of historical experience, credit
scores, delinquency levels, trends in credit losses, and the review of current factors provide
the basis for our analysis of the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses.
We assign internal risk ratings for all lessees and determine the credit worthiness of each
lease based upon this internally developed proprietary scoring model. The LeaseComm portfolio is
evaluated in total with a reserve of 50% of the outstanding amount greater than 90 days plus 25%
of the amount outstanding from 1 to 89 days as that portfolio is decreasing. For the TimePayment
portfolio, the scoring model generates one of nine acceptable risk ratings based upon the credit
worthiness of each lease or it rejects the lease application. The scores are assigned at lease
inception and these scores are maintained over the lease term regardless of payment performance.
To facilitate review and reporting, management aggregates these nine scores into one of three
categories with similar risk profiles and delinquency characteristics identified as Gold, Silver
or Bronze.
|
|
|
Leases assigned a Gold rating represent those transactions which exhibit the highest
rating based on our internal credit risk scoring model. They are considered of sufficient
quality to preclude an otherwise adverse rating. Gold rated leases are typically
represented by lessees with high bureau reported credit scores at lease inception or are
supported by established businesses for those transactions which are not personally
guaranteed by the lessee. |
|
|
|
|
Leases assigned a Silver rating fall in the middle range of the nine acceptable
scores generated by the scoring model. These transactions possess a reasonable amount of
risk based on their profile and may exhibit vulnerability to deterioration if adverse
factors are encountered. These accounts typically demonstrate adequate coverage but
warrant a higher level of monitoring by management to ensure that weaknesses do not
advance. |
|
|
|
|
A Bronze rating applies to leases at the lower end of the nine acceptable scores
generated by the scoring model whereby the lessee may have difficulty meeting the lease
obligation if adverse factors are
encountered. Bronze rated transactions typically have lower reported credit scores at
lease inception and will typically have other less desirable credit attributes. |
The following table presents the aging of the recorded investment in leases as of September
30, 2011, by our internally graded score:
9
MICROFINANCIAL INCORPORATED
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
Past Due |
|
|
Total |
|
TimePayment Corp. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grade |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gold |
|
$ |
47,133 |
|
|
$ |
3,747 |
|
|
$ |
50,880 |
|
Silver |
|
|
80,155 |
|
|
|
18,811 |
|
|
|
98,966 |
|
Bronze |
|
|
4,752 |
|
|
|
2,386 |
|
|
|
7,138 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
132,040 |
|
|
|
24,944 |
|
|
|
156,984 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LeaseComm |
|
|
169 |
|
|
|
199 |
|
|
|
368 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
132,209 |
|
|
$ |
25,143 |
|
|
$ |
157,352 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents the aged analysis of past due financing receivables by our
internally developed proprietary scoring model in leases as of September 30, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 to 60 |
|
|
61 to 90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
days |
|
|
days |
|
|
Over 90 Days |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Over 90 Days |
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
Past Due |
|
|
Past Due |
|
|
Past Due |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Accruing |
|
LeaseComm: |
|
$ |
169 |
|
|
$ |
9 |
|
|
$ |
7 |
|
|
$ |
183 |
|
|
$ |
368 |
|
|
$ |
183 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TimePayment Corp. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gold |
|
|
47,133 |
|
|
|
1,292 |
|
|
|
751 |
|
|
|
1,704 |
|
|
|
50,880 |
|
|
|
1,704 |
|
Silver |
|
|
80,155 |
|
|
|
2,299 |
|
|
|
2,670 |
|
|
|
13,842 |
|
|
|
98,966 |
|
|
|
13,842 |
|
Bronze |
|
|
4,752 |
|
|
|
305 |
|
|
|
217 |
|
|
|
1,864 |
|
|
|
7,138 |
|
|
|
1,864 |
|
|
|
|
TimePayment Corp.
subtotal |
|
|
132,040 |
|
|
|
3,896 |
|
|
|
3,638 |
|
|
|
17,410 |
|
|
|
156,984 |
|
|
|
17,410 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
132,209 |
|
|
$ |
3,905 |
|
|
$ |
3,645 |
|
|
$ |
17,593 |
|
|
$ |
157,352 |
|
|
$ |
17,593 |
|
|
|
|
Percent of Total
Financing
Receivables |
|
|
84.0 |
% |
|
|
2.5 |
% |
|
|
2.3 |
% |
|
|
11.2 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
11.2 |
% |
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
For financial instruments including cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts
payable, the revolving line of credit, and other liabilities, we believe that the carrying amount
approximates fair value. The fair value of the revolving line of credit is calculated based on
incremental borrowing rates currently available on loans with similar terms and maturities. The
fair value of our revolving line of credit at September 30, 2011 approximates its carrying value.
Net Income Per Share
Basic net income per common share is computed based on the weighted-average number of common
shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net income per common share gives effect to all
potentially dilutive common shares outstanding during the period. The computation of diluted net
income per share does not assume the issuance of common shares that would have an antidilutive
effect on net income per common share. For the three months ended September 30, 2011, 409,305
options were excluded from the computation of diluted net income per share because their effect was
antidilutive. For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, 409,305 options were excluded from the
computation of diluted net income per share
10
MICROFINANCIAL INCORPORATED
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
because their effect was antidilutive. For the three
months ended September 30, 2010, 499,305 options were excluded from the computation of diluted net
income per share because their effect was antidilutive. For the nine months ended September 30,
2010, 849,305 options were excluded from the computation of diluted net income per share because
their effect was antidilutive.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
2,325 |
|
|
$ |
1,906 |
|
|
$ |
6,637 |
|
|
$ |
3,772 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
14,253,702 |
|
|
|
14,263,726 |
|
|
|
14,244,074 |
|
|
|
14,235,086 |
|
Dilutive effect of common stock
options, warrants and restricted stock |
|
|
285,208 |
|
|
|
229,116 |
|
|
|
269,634 |
|
|
|
219,115 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in computation of net income
per common share diluted |
|
|
14,538,910 |
|
|
|
14,492,842 |
|
|
|
14,513,708 |
|
|
|
14,454,201 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share basic |
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
$ |
0.47 |
|
|
$ |
0.26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share diluted |
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
$ |
0.46 |
|
|
$ |
0.26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-Based Employee Compensation
Under our 2008 Equity Incentive Plan, we reserved 1,000,000 shares of common stock for
issuance. In February 2011, under our 2008 Equity Incentive Plan the Compensation and Benefits
Committee of our Board of Directors granted 33,044 restricted stock units to our executive
officers. The restricted stock units vest over five years at 25% annually beginning on the second
anniversary of the grant date. The restricted stock units were valued on the date of grant and the
fair value of these awards was $4.11 per share. For the nine months ended September 30, 2011 the
expense related to these units is $18,000.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, 90,000 options originally granted to members
of the Board of Directors in February 2001 expired. During the nine months ended September 30,
2010, 350,000 options originally granted to members of the Board of Directors in February of 2000
expired. There were no options granted or exercised during the nine months ended September 30,
2011.
The following summarizes stock option activity for the nine months ended September 30, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Price Per Share |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2010 |
|
|
908,028 |
|
|
$ |
1.585 to $13.10 |
|
|
$ |
5.07 |
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired |
|
|
(90,000 |
) |
|
$ |
13.10 |
|
|
$ |
13.10 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2011 |
|
|
818,028 |
|
|
$ |
1.585 to $6.70 |
|
|
$ |
4.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In February 2011, we granted our non-employee directors a total of 51,642 shares of stock with
immediate vesting and a fair value of $4.11 per share, for a total grant date fair value of
$212,000, in accordance with our director compensation policy.
In July 2011, we granted our non-employee directors a total of 25,632 shares of stock with
immediate vesting and a fair value of $5.54 per share, for a total grant date value of $142,000, in
accordance with our director compensation policy.
11
MICROFINANCIAL INCORPORATED
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
The following table summarizes unvested restricted stock activity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Stock |
|
|
Restricted Stock |
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
Units Number |
|
|
|
of Shares |
|
|
of Shares |
|
Non-vested at December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,518 |
|
Granted |
|
|
77,274 |
|
|
|
33,044 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(77,274 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested at September 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
66,562 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the three months ended September 30, 2011, amortized compensation expense related to
the restricted stock units was $12,000. During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, amortized
compensation expense related to the restricted stock units was $34,000.
Information relating to our outstanding stock options at September 30, 2011 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
Price |
|
Shares |
|
|
Life (Years) |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Value |
|
$ 6.70 |
|
|
235,000 |
|
|
|
0.41 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
6.70 |
|
|
|
235,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
1.59 |
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
|
1.16 |
|
|
|
602 |
|
|
|
1.59 |
|
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
|
602 |
|
5.77 |
|
|
31,923 |
|
|
|
5.42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.77 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.85 |
|
|
142,382 |
|
|
|
6.33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.85 |
|
|
|
71,191 |
|
|
|
|
|
2.30 |
|
|
258,723 |
|
|
|
7.42 |
|
|
|
854 |
|
|
|
2.30 |
|
|
|
64,681 |
|
|
|
213 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
818,028 |
|
|
|
3.99 |
|
|
$ |
1,456 |
|
|
|
4.56 |
|
|
|
520,872 |
|
|
$ |
815 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, the total share based compensation
cost recognized was $35,000 and $32,000, respectively. During the nine months ended September 30,
2011 and 2010, the total share based employee compensation cost recognized was $103,000 and
$93,000, respectively.
Dividends
On January 21, 2011 we declared a dividend of $0.05 per share payable on February 15, 2011 to
stockholders of record on February 1, 2011.
On April 21, 2011, we declared a dividend of $0.05 per share payable on May 13, 2011 to
stockholders of record on May 2, 2011.
On July 21, 2011, we declared a dividend of $0.05 per share payable on August 15, 2011 to
stockholders of record on August 1, 2011.
On October 25, 2011, we declared a dividend of $0.06 per share payable on November 15, 2011 to
stockholders of record on November 4, 2011.
12
MICROFINANCIAL INCORPORATED
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include demand deposits with various commercial banks and highly
liquid investments with maturities of three months or less when acquired. Cash equivalents are
stated at cost, which approximates market value.
Concentration of Credit Risk
We deposit our cash and invest in short-term investments primarily through national commercial
banks. Deposits in excess of amounts insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC)
are exposed to loss in the event of nonperformance by the institution. The Company maintains cash
deposits in excess of the FDIC insurance coverage.
C. Revolving line of credit
On August 2, 2007, we entered into a three-year revolving line of credit with a bank syndicate
led by Sovereign Bank (Sovereign) based on qualified TimePayment lease receivables. The total
commitment under the facility was originally $30 million, and was subsequently increased to $60
million in July 2008, to $85 million in February 2009, and to $100 million in July 2010.
Outstanding borrowings are collateralized by eligible lease contracts and a security interest in
all of our other assets. Prior to the July 2010 amendment, outstanding borrowings bore interest at
Prime plus 1.75% or at a London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus 3.75%, in each case subject
to a minimum rate of 5.00%. Following the July 2010 amendment, outstanding borrowings bore
interest at Prime plus 1.25% or LIBOR plus 3.25%, without being subject to any minimum rate.
Under the terms of the facility, loans are Prime Rate Loans, unless we elect LIBOR Loans. If a
LIBOR Loan is not renewed at maturity it automatically converts to a Prime Rate Loan.
In October 2011, we signed an amendment that further reduced the borrowing rate to Prime plus
0.75% or LIBOR plus 2.75%. As a part this amendment, the leverage ratio that the Company agrees
not to exceed was lowered from 4.0 to 1 to 3.5 to 1 and the maturity date of the facility was
extended to August 2, 2014. At our option upon maturity, the unpaid principal balance may be
converted to a six-month term loan. The amendment has an effective date of September 30, 2011.
At September 30, 2011, $57.0 million of our loans were LIBOR loans and $3.5 million of our
loans were Prime Rate Loans. The interest rate on our loans at September 30, 2011 was between 3.5%
and 4.5%. The amount available on our revolving line of credit at September 30, 2011 was $39.5
million. The revolving line of credit has financial covenants that we must comply with to obtain
funding and avoid an event of default. As of September 30, 2011, we were in compliance with all
covenants under the revolving line of credit.
D. Commitments and Contingencies
Legal Matters
We are involved from time to time in litigation incidental to the conduct of our business.
Although we do not expect that the outcome of any of these matters, individually or collectively,
will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations, litigation
is inherently unpredictable. Therefore, judgments could be rendered, or settlements entered, that
could adversely affect our operating results or cash flows in a particular period. We routinely
assess all of our litigation and threatened litigation as to the probability of ultimately
incurring a liability, and record our best estimate of the ultimate loss in situations where we
access the likelihood of loss as probable.
13
MICROFINANCIAL INCORPORATED
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
Lease Commitments
We accept lease applications on a daily basis and, as a result, we have a pipeline of
applications that have been approved, where a lease has not been originated. Our commitment to
lend does not become binding until all of the steps in the lease origination process have been
completed, including the receipt of the lease, supporting documentation and verification with the
lessee. Since we fund on the same day a lease is verified, we have no outstanding commitments to
lend.
Stock Repurchase
On August 10, 2010, our Board of Directors approved a common stock repurchase program under
which we are authorized to purchase up to 250,000 of our outstanding shares from time to time. The
repurchases may take place in either the open market or through block trades. The repurchase
program will be funded by our working capital and may be suspended or discontinued at anytime.
During the first quarter of fiscal year 2011 we repurchased and retired 51,883 shares of
our common stock under our stock buyback program. We did not repurchase any shares of our
common stock during the second and third quarters of fiscal year 2011.
E. Subsequent Events
We have evaluated all events or transactions that occurred through the date on which we issued
these financial statements. Other than the declaration of dividend and amendment of our line of
credit as previously discussed, we did not have any material subsequent events that impacted our
consolidated financial statements.
In October 2011 we signed an amendment to our revolving line of credit reducing the interest
rate payable and extending the maturity date, among other things. See Note C to these unaudited
consolidated financial statements.
F. Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-06, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures.
This update provides amendments to FASB 820-10 Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures that
require new disclosures as follows:
|
|
|
Transfers in and out of Levels 1 and 2. A reporting entry should disclose separately the
amounts of significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements
and describe the reasons for the transfers. |
|
|
|
|
Activity in level 3 fair value measurements |
|
|
|
|
A reporting entity should provide fair value measurement disclosures for each class of
assets and liabilities. |
In the reconciliation for fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs (Level
3), a reporting entity should present separately information about purchases, sales, issuances, and
settlements (that is, on a gross basis rather than as one net number). The new disclosures and
clarifications of existing disclosures are effective for interim and annual reporting periods
beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances,
and settlements in the rollforward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. Those
disclosures are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010, and for interim
periods within those fiscal years. We adopted the provisions of ASU 2010-6 which are required for
the current year and the adoption did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial
position or results of operations.
In July 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-20, Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Financing
Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses. This guidance expands the disclosures pertaining
to the credit quality of loans and should provide users of the financial statements with a better
overall understanding of the credit risk in the loan portfolio. This guidance is effective for
interim and annual periods ending after December 15, 2010. We
adopted the required provisions of ASU
2010-20 during the year ended December 31, 2010. In connection with the adoption of ASU 2010-20
certain additional disclosure are required for reporting periods ending after December 31, 2010,
related to the activity within the Companys portfolio segments. These disclosures have been
included in these notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
14
ITEM 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Introduction
The following information should be read in conjunction with our condensed consolidated
financial statements and notes thereto in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report and with
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contained in
our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
Forward-Looking Information
Statements in this document that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements made
pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. In
addition, words such as believes, anticipates, expects, and similar expressions are intended
to identify forward-looking statements. We caution that a number of important factors could cause
actual results to differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statements made by
us or on our behalf. Such statements contain a number of risks and uncertainties, including but not
limited to: our need for financing in order to originate leases and contracts; our dependence on
point-of-sale authorization systems and expansion into new markets; our significant capital
requirements; risks associated with economic downturns including the higher delinquency rates
associated with such downturns; higher interest rates; intense competition; changes in our
regulatory environment; the availability of qualified personnel, and risks associated with
acquisitions. Readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which reflect
our view only as of the date hereof. We undertake no obligation to publicly revise these
forward-looking statements to reflect subsequent events or circumstances. We cannot assure that we
will be able to anticipate or respond timely to changes which could adversely affect our operating
results. Results of operations in any past period should not be considered indicative of results
to be expected in future periods. Fluctuations in operating results may result in fluctuations in
the price of our common stock. Statements relating to past dividend payments or our current
dividend policy should not be construed as a guarantee that any future dividends will be paid. For
a more complete description of the prominent risks and uncertainties inherent in our business, see
the risk factors included in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K and other documents we file
from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Overview
We are a specialized commercial finance company that provides microticket equipment leasing
and other financing services. The average amount financed by TimePayment during 2010 was
approximately $5,800 compared to the 2011 year to date average of $6,000. LeaseComm historically
financed contracts of approximately $1,900, and no longer originates leases. Our existing
portfolio consists of business equipment leased or rented primarily to small commercial
enterprises.
We finance the funding of our leases and contracts primarily through cash provided by
operating activities and our revolving line of credit. On August 2, 2007, we entered into a
three-year line of credit with Sovereign Bank based on qualified TimePayment lease receivables.
The total commitment under the facility was originally $30 million, and was subsequently increased
to $60 million in July 2008, to $85 million in February 2009, and to $100 million in July 2010.
Outstanding borrowings are collateralized by eligible lease contracts and a security interest in
all of our other assets. Prior to the July 2010 amendment, outstanding borrowings bore interest at
Prime plus 1.75% or at LIBOR plus 3.75%, in each case subject to a minimum rate of 5%. Following
the July 2010 amendment, outstanding borrowings bore interest at Prime plus 1.25% or LIBOR plus
3.25%, without being subject to any minimum rate. Under the terms of the facility, loans are Prime
Rate Loans, unless we elect LIBOR Loans. If a LIBOR Loan is not renewed at maturity it
automatically coverts to a Prime Rate Loan.
In October 2011 we signed an amendment that further reduced the interest rate to Prime plus
0.75% or LIBOR plus 2.75%. As part this amendment, the maturity date of the facility was extended
to August 2, 2014. At the same time, the leverage ratio we agreed not to exceed was lowered from
4:1 to 3.5:1. At our option upon maturity, the unpaid principal balance may be converted to a
six-month term loan. The amendment has an effective date of September 30, 2011.
15
In a typical lease transaction, we originate a lease through a nationwide network of equipment
vendors, independent sales organizations and brokers. Upon our approval of a lease application and
verification that the lessee has received the equipment and signed the lease, we pay the dealer for
the cost of the equipment, plus the dealers profit margin.
Substantially all leases originated or acquired by us are non-cancelable. During the term of
the lease, we are scheduled to receive payments sufficient to cover our borrowing costs and the
cost of the underlying equipment and provide us with an appropriate profit. We pass along some of
the costs of our leases and contracts by charging late fees, prepayment penalties, loss and damage
waiver fees and other service fees, when applicable. Collection fees are imposed based on our
estimate of the costs of collection. The loss and damage waiver fees are charged if a customer
fails to provide proof of insurance and are reasonably related to the cost of replacing the lost or
damaged equipment or product. The initial non-cancelable term of the lease is equal to or less than
the equipments estimated economic life and often provides us with additional revenues based on the
residual value of the equipment at the end of the lease. Initial terms of the leases in our
portfolio generally range from 12 to 60 months, with an average initial term of 45 months as of
December 31, 2010.
Critical Accounting Policies
Our significant accounting policies are more fully described in Note B to the condensed
consolidated financial statements included in this Quarterly Report and in Note B to the
consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2010 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain accounting policies
are particularly important to the portrayal of our consolidated financial position and results of
operations. These policies require the application of significant judgment by us and as a result,
are subject to an inherent degree of uncertainty. In applying these policies, we make estimates
and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and
the related disclosures. We base our estimates and judgments on historical experience, terms of
existing contracts, observance of trends in the industry, information obtained from dealers and
other sources, and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable and appropriate
under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the
carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual
results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
Our critical accounting policies, including revenue recognition, maintaining the allowance for
credit losses, determining provisions for income taxes, and accounting for share-based compensation
are each discussed in more detail in our Annual Report on Form 10-K. We have reviewed and
determined that those policies remain our critical accounting policies and we did not make any
changes in those policies during the nine months ended September 30, 2011.
Results of Operations Three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to the three months ended
September 30, 2010
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Income on financing leases |
|
$ |
9,306 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
% |
|
$ |
8,790 |
|
Rental income |
|
|
2,192 |
|
|
|
14.3 |
|
|
|
1,917 |
|
Income on service contracts |
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
(21.8 |
) |
|
|
124 |
|
Loss and damage waiver fees |
|
|
1,241 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
1,154 |
|
Service fees and other income |
|
|
935 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
912 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
13,771 |
|
|
|
6.8 |
% |
|
$ |
12,897 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
Our lease contracts are accounted for as financing leases. At origination, we record the
gross lease receivable, the estimated residual value of the leased equipment, initial direct costs
incurred and the unearned lease income. Unearned lease income is the amount by which the gross
lease receivable plus the estimated residual value exceeds the cost of the equipment. Unearned
lease income and initial direct costs incurred are amortized over the related lease term using the
interest method. Other revenues such as loss and damage waiver fees, service fees relating to the
leases and contracts, and rental revenues are recognized as they are earned.
Total revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2011 were $13.8 million, an increase
of $0.9 million, or 6.8%, from the three months ended September 30, 2010. The overall increase was
due to an increase of $0.5 million in income on financing leases and an increase of $0.3 million in
rental income. Other revenue components increased by $0.1 million. The increase in income on
financing leases is a result of the continued growth in new lease originations. The increase in
rental income is a result of TimePayment lease contracts coming to term and converting to rental
status offset by the attrition of LeaseComm rental contracts.
Selling, General and Administrative
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
$ |
3,900 |
|
|
|
16.2 |
% |
|
$ |
3,356 |
|
As a percent of revenue |
|
|
28.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
26.0 |
% |
Our selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses include costs of maintaining
corporate functions including accounting, finance, collections, legal, human resources, sales and
underwriting, and information systems. SG&A expenses also include service fees and other marketing
costs associated with our portfolio of leases and rental contracts. For the three months ended
September 30, 2011, SG&A expenses increased by $0.5 million over the same period in the prior year.
The increase is primarily due to increases in compensation related expenses as a result of
increases in employee head count as well as increased rent expense associated with our new
California office location. Headcount as of September 30, 2011 was 133 as compared to 111 at the
same period in 2010.
Provision for Credit Losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
$ |
4,517 |
|
|
|
(9.1) |
% |
|
$ |
4,969 |
|
As a percent of revenue |
|
|
32.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
38.5 |
% |
We maintain an allowance for credit losses on our investment in leases, service contracts
and rental contracts at an amount that we believe is sufficient to provide adequate protection
against losses in our portfolio. Our provision for credit losses decreased by $0.5 million, or
9.1%, for the three months ended September 30, 2011, as compared to the three months ended
September 30, 2010, while net charge-offs decreased by 21.9% to $4.2 million. The 90-day
delinquent lease payments receivable on an exposure basis decreased by 1.6% to $19.6 million at
September 30, 2011 compared to $19.9 million at September 30, 2010. The decrease in the provision
reflects improvements in delinquency levels and reductions in the level of net charge-offs in the
lease portfolio.
Depreciation and Amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Depreciation fixed assets |
|
$ |
134 |
|
|
|
(56.6) |
% |
|
$ |
309 |
|
Depreciation rental equipment |
|
|
739 |
|
|
|
75.1 |
|
|
|
422 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total depreciation and amortization |
|
$ |
873 |
|
|
|
19.4 |
% |
|
$ |
731 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percent of revenue |
|
|
6.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.7 |
% |
17
Depreciation and amortization expense consists of depreciation on fixed assets and rental
equipment, and the amortization of service contracts. Fixed assets are recorded at cost and
depreciated over their expected useful lives. Certain rental contracts are originated as a result
of the renewal provisions of our lease agreements where at the end of lease term, the customer may
elect to continue to rent the equipment on a month-to-month basis. The rental equipment is
recorded at its residual value and depreciated over a term of 12 months. This term represents the
estimated life of a previously leased piece of equipment and is based upon our historical
experience. In the event the contract terminates prior to the end of the 12 month period, the
remaining net book value is expensed.
Depreciation expense on rental contracts increased by $0.3 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2011, as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2010. The increase in
depreciation is due to an increase in the TimePayment lease contracts coming to term and converting
to rentals. Depreciation of property and equipment decreased by $0.2 million for the three months
ended September 30, 2011, as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2010 primarily due to
the abandonment of a proposed software platform and the related depreciation of costs capitalized
in connection with that project in 2010.
Interest Expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Interest |
|
$ |
700 |
|
|
|
(5.8) |
% |
|
$ |
743 |
|
As a percent of revenue |
|
|
5.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.8 |
% |
We pay interest on borrowings under our revolving line of credit. Interest expense
decreased by $43,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2011, as compared to the three months
ended September 30, 2010. Interest expense remained relatively flat as increases in the amounts
outstanding under our revolving line of credit were offset by reductions in the interest rate being
charged as our line of credit since July 2010, is no longer subject to a minimum rate. At
September 30, 2011, the outstanding balance under our revolving line of credit was $60.5 million
compared to a balance of $60.0 million at September 30, 2010.
Provision for Income Taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
$ |
1,456 |
|
|
|
22.1 |
% |
|
$ |
1,192 |
|
As a percent of revenue |
|
|
10.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.2 |
% |
As a percent of income before taxes |
|
|
38.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
38.5 |
% |
The provision for income taxes, deferred tax assets and liabilities and any necessary
valuation allowance recorded against net deferred tax assets, involves summarizing temporary
differences resulting from the different treatment of items, such as leases, for tax and accounting
purposes. These differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are recorded on
the balance sheet. We then assess the likelihood that deferred tax assets will be recovered from
future taxable income or tax carry-back availability and to the extent we believe recovery is more
likely than not, a valuation allowance is unnecessary. The provision for income taxes increased by
$264,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2011, as compared to the three months ended
September 30, 2010. This increase resulted primarily from the $683,000 increase in pre-tax income
for the three months ended September 30, 2011 as compared to the three months ended September 30,
2010.
As of September 30, 2011 we had a liability of $17,000 for unrecognized tax benefits and a
liability of $4,000 for accrued interest and penalties related to various state income tax matters.
Of these amounts, approximately $14,000 would impact our effective tax rate after a $7,000 federal
tax benefit for state income taxes. It is reasonably possible that the total amount of
unrecognized tax benefits may change significantly within the next 12 months; however at this time
we are unable to estimate the change.
Our federal income tax returns are subject to examination for tax years ended on or after
December 31, 2008 and our state income tax returns are subject to examination for tax years ended
on or after December 31, 2007.
18
Other Operating Data
Dealer funding was $19.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011, an increase of
$271,000 or 1.4%, compared to the three months ended September 30, 2010. We continue to
concentrate on our business development efforts, which include increasing the size of our vendor
base and sourcing a larger number of applications from those vendors. Receivables due in
installments, estimated residual values, net investment in service contracts and net investment in
rental contracts increased from $218.9 million at June 30, 2011 to $221.8 million at September 30,
2011. Net cash provided by operating activities increased by $2.0 million, or 10.2%, to $21.2
million during the three months ended September 30, 2011 as compared to the three months ended
September 30, 2010.
Results of Operations Nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to the nine months ended
September 30, 2010
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Income on financing leases |
|
$ |
27,543 |
|
|
|
8.3 |
% |
|
$ |
25,421 |
|
Rental income |
|
|
6,271 |
|
|
|
8.2 |
|
|
|
5,795 |
|
Income on service contracts |
|
|
308 |
|
|
|
(22.4 |
) |
|
|
397 |
|
Loss and damage waiver fees |
|
|
3,662 |
|
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
3,377 |
|
Service fees and other income |
|
|
2,798 |
|
|
|
(1.7 |
) |
|
|
2,846 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
40,582 |
|
|
|
7.3 |
% |
|
$ |
37,836 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 were $40.6 million, an
increase of $2.7 million, or 7.3%, from the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The overall
increase was due to an increase of $2.1 million in income on financing leases, an increase of $0.4
million in rental income, and a $0.2 million increase in fees and other income partially offset by
a decrease of $89,000 in income on service contracts. The increase in income on financing leases
is a result of the continued growth in our lease portfolio. The increase in rental income is the
result of TimePayment lease contracts coming to term and converting to rentals offset by attrition
of LeaseComm rental contracts. Service contract revenue continues to decline since we have not
been actively funding new service contracts.
Selling, General and Administrative
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
$ |
11,890 |
|
|
|
16.9 |
% |
|
$ |
10,167 |
|
As a percent of revenue |
|
|
29.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
26.9 |
% |
Our selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses include costs of maintaining
corporate functions including accounting, finance, collections, legal, human resources, sales and
underwriting, and information systems. SG&A expenses also include service fees and other marketing
costs associated with our portfolio of leases and rental contracts. SG&A expenses increased by
$1.7 for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, as compared to the nine months ended September
30, 2010. The increase was primarily driven by increases in payroll and payroll taxes of
$945,000, an increase in employee benefits of $359,000 and an increase of $192,000 in rent expense
associated with the opening of our California office.
Provision for Credit Losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
$ |
13,520 |
|
|
|
(22.6 |
)% |
|
$ |
17,462 |
|
As a percent of revenue |
|
|
33.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
46.2 |
% |
19
We maintain an allowance for credit losses on our investment in leases, service contracts
and rental contracts at an amount that we believe is sufficient to provide adequate protection
against losses in our portfolio. Our provision for credit losses decreased by $3.9 million, or
22.6%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, as compared to the nine months ended September
30, 2010, while net charge-offs decreased by 26.5% to $13.5 million. The 90-day delinquent lease
payments receivable on an exposure basis decreased by 1.6% to $19.6 million at September 30, 2011
compared to $19.9 million at September 30, 2010. The decrease in the provision for credit losses
reflects an improvement in delinquency levels and reduction in charge off levels which is partially
offset by the growth in receivables associated with the new lease originations.
Depreciation and Amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Depreciation fixed assets |
|
$ |
375 |
|
|
|
(30.0 |
)% |
|
$ |
536 |
|
Depreciation rental equipment |
|
|
1,962 |
|
|
|
78.9 |
|
|
|
1,097 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total depreciation and amortization |
|
$ |
2,337 |
|
|
|
43.1 |
% |
|
$ |
1,633 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percent of revenue |
|
|
5.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.3 |
% |
Depreciation and amortization expense consists of depreciation on fixed assets and rental
equipment, and the amortization of service contracts. Fixed assets are recorded at cost and
depreciated over their expected useful lives. Certain rental contracts are originated as a result
of the renewal provisions of our lease agreements where at the end of lease term, the customer may
elect to continue to rent the leased equipment on a month-to-month basis. The rental equipment is
recorded at its residual value and depreciated over a term of 12 months. This term represents the
estimated life of a previously leased piece of equipment and is based upon our historical
experience. In the event the contract terminates prior to the end of the 12 month period, the
remaining net book value is expensed.
Depreciation expense on rental contracts increased by $0.9 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2011, as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The increase in
depreciation is due primarily to the increase in the number of TimePayment lease contracts coming
to term and converting to rentals. Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment
decreased by $161,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, as compared to the nine months
ended September 30, 2010 primarily due to the abandonment of a proposed software platform and the
related depreciation of costs capitalized in connection with that project in 2010.
Interest Expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Interest |
|
$ |
2,043 |
|
|
|
(16.2 |
)% |
|
$ |
2,439 |
|
As a percent of revenue |
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.4 |
% |
We pay interest on borrowings under our revolving line of credit. Interest expense
decreased by $0.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, as compared to the nine
months ended September 30, 2010. This decrease resulted primarily from reductions in the interest
rate being charged as our line of credit since July 2010, is no longer subject to a minimum rate.
At September 30, 2011, the outstanding balance under our revolving line of credit was $60.5 million
compared to $60.0 million, at September 30, 2010.
Provision for Income Taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
$ |
4,155 |
|
|
|
75.8 |
% |
|
$ |
2,363 |
|
As a percent of revenue |
|
|
10.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.2 |
% |
As a percent of income before taxes |
|
|
38.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
38.5 |
% |
20
The provision for income taxes, deferred tax assets and liabilities and any necessary
valuation allowance recorded against net deferred tax assets, involves summarizing temporary
differences resulting from the different treatment of items, such as leases, for tax and accounting
purposes. These differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are recorded on
the balance sheet. We then assess the likelihood that deferred tax assets will be recovered from
future taxable income or tax carry-back availability and to the extent we believe recovery is more
likely than not, a valuation allowance is unnecessary. The provision for income taxes increased by
$1.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, as compared to the nine months ended
September 30, 2010. This increase resulted primarily from the $4.7 million increase in pre-tax
income.
As of December 31, 2010, we had a liability of $15,000 for unrecognized tax benefits and a
liability of $6,000 for accrued interest and penalties related to various state income tax matters.
As of September 30, 2011 we had a liability of $17,000 for unrecognized tax benefits and a
liability of $4,000 for accrued interest and penalties. Of these amounts, approximately $14,000
would impact our effective tax rate after a $7,000 federal tax benefit for state income taxes. The
change in the unrecognized tax benefit relates to the closing of an audit and the opening of a new
one. It is reasonably possible that the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits may change
significantly within the next 12 months; however, at this time we are unable to estimate the
change.
Our federal income tax returns are subject to examination for tax years ended on or after
December 31, 2008 and our state income tax returns are subject to examination for tax years ended
on or after December 31, 2007.
Other Operating Data
Dealer funding was $56.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, representing a
decrease of $1.7 million or 2.9%, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2010. We
continue to concentrate on our business development efforts, which include increasing the size of
our vendor base and sourcing a larger number of applications from those vendors. Receivables due
in installments, estimated residual values, net investments in service contracts and investment in
rental contracts increased from $215.7 million at December 31, 2010 to $221.8 million at September
30, 2011. Net cash provided by operating activities increased by $8.7 million, or 16.1%, to $62.9
million during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 as compared to the nine months ended
September 30, 2010.
Exposure to Credit Losses
The amounts in the table below represent the balance of delinquent receivables on an exposure
basis for all leases, rental contracts, and service contracts in our portfolio. An exposure basis
aging classifies the entire receivable based on the invoice that is the most delinquent. For
example, in the case of a rental or service contract, if a receivable is 90 days past due, all
amounts billed and unpaid are placed in the over 90 days past due category. In the case of lease
receivables, where the minimum contractual obligation of the lessee is booked as a receivable at
the inception of the lease, if a receivable is 90 days past due, the entire receivable, including
all amounts billed and unpaid as well as the minimum contractual obligation yet to be billed, will
be placed in the over 90 days past due category.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
September 30, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
Current |
|
$ |
167,040 |
|
|
|
85.3 |
% |
|
$ |
160,674 |
|
|
|
84.1 |
% |
31-60 days past due |
|
|
4,926 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
6,142 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
61-90 days past due |
|
|
4,373 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
4,369 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
Over 90 days past due |
|
|
19,625 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
19,882 |
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross receivables due in installments |
|
$ |
195,964 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
191,067 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liquidity and Capital Resources
General
Our lease and finance business is capital-intensive and requires access to substantial credit
to fund lease originations. Since inception, we have funded our operations primarily through
borrowings under our credit
21
facilities, on-balance sheet securitizations, the issuance of subordinated debt, free cash
flow and our initial public offering completed in February 1999. We will continue to require
significant additional capital to maintain and expand our funding of leases and contracts, as well
as to fund any future acquisitions of leasing companies or portfolios. In the near term, we expect
to finance our business utilizing the cash on hand and our revolving line of credit which matures
in August 2014. Additionally, our uses of cash include the payment of interest and principal on
borrowings, selling, general and administrative expenses, income taxes and capital expenditures.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, our primary sources of liquidity were
cash provided by operating activities and borrowings on our revolving line of credit. We generated
cash flow from operations of $62.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared
to $54.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. At September 30, 2011, we had
approximately $60.5 million outstanding under our revolving credit facility and had available
borrowing capacity of approximately $39.5 million as described below.
We used net cash in investing activities of $57.9 million during the nine months ended
September 30, 2011 and $59.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. Investing
activities primarily relate to the origination of leases and the increase in cash used is
consistent with our focused and targeted sales and marketing effort.
Net cash used in financing activities was $4.9 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2011 and net cash provided by financing activities was $5.0 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010. Financing activities primarily consist of the borrowings and repayments under
our revolving line of credit and dividend payments.
The maturity date of our revolving line of credit is August 2014, at which time the
outstanding loan balance plus interest becomes due and payable. At our option upon maturity, the
unpaid principal balance may be converted to a six-month term loan.
Borrowings
We utilize our credit facility to fund the origination and acquisition of leases that satisfy
the eligibility requirements established pursuant to the facility. Borrowings outstanding consist
of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2011 |
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum |
|
|
Amounts |
|
Interest |
|
Unused |
|
Facility |
|
Amounts |
|
Interest |
|
Unused |
|
Facility |
(dollars in 000) |
|
Outstanding |
|
Rate |
|
Capacity |
|
Amount |
|
Outstanding |
|
Rate |
|
Capacity |
|
Amount |
Revolving credit facility
(1)
|
|
$ |
60,527 |
|
|
3.53%-4.50%
|
|
$ |
39,473 |
|
|
$ |
100,000 |
|
|
$ |
62,650 |
|
|
3.52%-4.50%
|
|
$ |
37,350 |
|
|
$ |
100,000 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The unused capacity is subject to the borrowing base formula. |
On August 2, 2007, we entered into a three-year revolving line of credit with a bank
syndicate led by Sovereign Bank (Sovereign) based on qualified TimePayment lease receivables.
The total commitment under the facility was originally $30 million, and was subsequently increased
to $60 million in July 2008, to $85 million in February 2009, and to $100 million in July 2010.
Outstanding borrowings are collateralized by eligible lease contracts and a security interest in
all of our other assets. Prior to the July 2010 amendment, outstanding borrowings bore interest
at Prime plus 1.75% or at a London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus 3.75%, in each case
subject to a minimum rate of 5.00%. Following the July 2010 amendment, outstanding borrowings bore
interest at Prime plus 1.25% or LIBOR plus 3.25%, without being subject to any minimum rate. In
October 2011 we signed an amendment that further reduced the interest rate to Prime plus 0.75% or
LIBOR plus 2.75. Under the terms of the facility, loans are Prime Rate Loans, unless we elect
LIBOR Loans. If a LIBOR Loan is not renewed at maturity it automatically converts to a Prime Rate
Loan. As a part of the October 2011 amendment, the maturity date of the facility was extended to
August 2, 2014. At our option upon maturity, the unpaid principal balance may be converted to a
six-month term loan. At September 30, 2011, $57.0 million of our loans were LIBOR Loans and $3.5
million of our loans were Prime Rate Loans. The interest rate on the revolving line of credit was
between 3.53% and 4.5% at September 30, 2011. As of September 30, 2011, the qualified lease
receivables eligible under the borrowing base exceeded the $100 million revolving line of credit.
22
Dividends
On October 25, 2011, we declared a dividend of $0.06 per share payable on November 15, 2011 to
stockholders of record on November 4, 2011. On July 21, 2011, we declared a dividend of $0.05 per
share payable on August 15, 2011 to shareholders of record on August 1, 2011. On April 21, 2011,
we declared a dividend of $0.05 per share payable on May 13, 2011 to stockholders of record on May
2, 2011. On January 21, 2011 we declared a dividend of $0.05 per share payable on February 15,
2011 to stockholders of record on February 1, 2011.
On
January 22, 2010, we declared a dividend of $0.05per share payable on February 15, 2010
to shareholders of record on February 1, 2010. On April 20, 2010, we declared a dividend of $0.05
per share payable on May 14, 2010 to shareholders of record on May 3, 2010. On July 19, 2010, we
declared a dividend of $0.05 per share payable on August 13, 2010 to shareholders of record on
July 29, 2010
Future dividend payments are subject to ongoing review and evaluation by our Board of
Directors. The decision as to the amount and timing of future dividends, if any, will be made in
light of our financial condition, capital requirements and growth plans, as well as our external
financing arrangements and any other factors our Board of Directors may deem relevant. We can give
no assurance as to the amount and timing of future dividends.
Share repurchases
On August 10, 2010, our Board of Directors approved a common stock repurchase program under
which we are authorized to purchase up to 250,000 of our outstanding shares from time to time. The
repurchases may take place in either the open market or through block trades. The repurchase
program will be funded by our working capital and may be suspended or discontinued at anytime.
During the quarter ended March 31, 2011 we repurchased and retired 51,883 shares of our common
stock under our stock buyback program, at a total cost of $240,000. During the quarters ended
September 30, 2011 and June 30, 2011 we did not repurchase any shares.
Contractual Obligations and Lease Commitments
Contractual Obligations
We have entered into various agreements, such as debt and operating lease agreements that
require future payments. During the nine months ended September 30, 2011 we borrowed $76.4 million
against our revolving line of credit and repaid $78.5 million. The $60.5 million of outstanding
borrowings as of September 30, 2011 will be repaid by the application of TimePayment receipts and
other payments to our outstanding balance.
Our future minimum cash lease payments under non-cancelable operating leases are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
2014 |
|
|
2015 |
|
|
Thereafter |
|
Operating lease obligations |
|
$ |
139 |
|
|
$ |
622 |
|
|
$ |
644 |
|
|
$ |
638 |
|
|
$ |
595 |
|
|
$ |
1,587 |
|
Lease Commitments
We accept lease applications on a daily basis and have a pipeline of applications that have
been approved, where a lease has not been originated. Our commitment to lend does not become
binding until all of the steps in the lease origination process have been completed, including but
not limited to the receipt of a complete and accurate lease document, all required supporting
information and successful verification with the lessee. Since we fund on the same day a lease is
successfully verified, we have no firm outstanding commitments to lend.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
See Note F of the notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for a
discussion of the impact of recent accounting pronouncements.
23
ITEM 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
The following discussion about our risk management activities includes forward-looking
statements that involve risk and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially from those
projected in the forward-looking statements. In the normal course of operations, we also face risks
that are either non-financial or non-quantifiable. Such risks principally include credit risk and
legal risk, and are not represented in the analysis that follows.
The implicit yield on all of our leases and contracts is on a fixed interest rate basis due to
the leases and contracts having scheduled payments that are fixed at the time of origination. When
we originate or acquire leases or contracts, we base our pricing in part on the spread we expect to
achieve between the implicit yield on each lease or contract and the effective interest rate we
expect to incur in financing such lease or contract through our credit facility. Increases in
interest rates during the term of each lease or contract could narrow or eliminate the spread, or
result in a negative spread.
Given the relatively short average life of our leases and contracts, our goal is to maintain a
blend of fixed and variable interest rate obligations which limits our interest rate risk. As of
September 30, 2011, we had repaid all of our fixed-rate debt and had $60.5 million of outstanding
variable interest rate obligations under our revolving line of credit.
Our revolving line of credit bears interest at rates which fluctuate with changes in the Prime
Rate or LIBOR; therefore, our interest expense is sensitive to changes in market interest rates.
The effect of a 10% adverse change in market interest rates, sustained for one year, on our
interest expense would be immaterial.
We maintain an investment portfolio in accordance with our investment policy guidelines. The
primary objectives of the investment guidelines are to preserve capital, maintain sufficient
liquidity to meet our operating needs, and to maximize return. We minimize investment risk by
limiting the amount invested in any single security and by focusing on conservative investment
choices with short terms and high credit quality standards. We do not use derivative financial
instruments or invest for speculative trading purposes.
ITEM 4. Controls and Procedures
Disclosure controls and procedures: As of the end of the period covered by this report, we
carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management,
including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the
design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to the Exchange Act Rule
13a-15. Based upon the evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective. Disclosure controls and
procedures are controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be
disclosed in our reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange
Commissions rules and forms.
Internal controls over financial reporting: During the fiscal quarter ended September 30,
2011, no changes were made in our internal control over financial reporting that materially
affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting.
24
Part II Other Information
ITEM 1. Legal Proceedings
We are involved from time to time in litigation incidental to the conduct of our business.
Although we do not expect that the outcome of any of these matters, individually or collectively,
will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations, litigation
is inherently unpredictable. Therefore, judgments could be rendered, or settlements entered, that
could adversely affect our operating results or cash flows in a particular period. We routinely
assess all of our litigation and threatened litigation as to the probability of ultimately
incurring a liability, and record our best estimate of the ultimate loss in situations where we
assess the likelihood of loss as probable.
ITEM 1A. Risk Factors
For a discussion of the material risks that we face relating to our business, financial
performance and industry, as well as other risks that an investor in our common stock may face, see
the factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2010. The risks described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K and elsewhere
in this report are not the only risks we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently
known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial may also materially adversely affect our
business, financial condition or operating results.
ITEM 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
During the quarter ended September 30, 2011 we did not repurchase any shares of our common
stock under our stock buyback program.
25
ITEM 6. Exhibits
(a) Exhibits index
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Restated Articles of Organization, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1
in the Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-1, No. 333-56639, filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on June 9, 1998). |
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Restated Bylaws, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 in the
Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on March 28, 2007). |
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Agreement and Amendment No. 3, dated October 12, 2011, to Amended and Restated Credit
Agreement dated July 28, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 in the
Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 18, 2011). |
|
|
|
31.1*
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
31.2*
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.1*
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.2*
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
101**
|
|
The following materials from the Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended September 30, 2011, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting
Language); (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010,
(ii) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income for the three and six months ended
September 30, 2011 and 2010, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Equity as of
September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, (iv) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash
Flows for the six months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, (iv) Condensed Consolidated
Statements of Stockholders Equity as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 and 2009
and (v) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, tagged as blocks of text. |
|
|
|
* |
|
Filed herewith |
|
** |
|
Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, these interactive data files are deemed not filed or
part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, are deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise are not subject to liability
under those sections |
26
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
MicroFinancial Incorporated
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Richard F. Latour
|
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ James R. Jackson Jr.
|
|
|
|
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: November 14, 2011
27