pre14a
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to
Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment
No. )
Filed by the
Registrant þ
Filed by a Party other than the
Registrant o
Check the appropriate box:
þ Preliminary
Proxy Statement
o Confidential,
for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by
Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
o Definitive
Proxy Statement
o Definitive
Additional Materials
o Soliciting
Material Pursuant to
§240.14a-12
Becton, Dickinson and Company
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the
Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
|
|
þ
|
No fee required.
|
|
o
|
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act
Rules 14a-6(i)(1)
and 0-11.
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
|
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed
pursuant to Exchange Act
Rule 0-11
(set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and
state how it was determined):
|
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
|
|
|
|
|
o
|
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
|
|
|
o |
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by
Exchange Act
Rule 0-11(a)(2)
and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid
previously. Identify the previous filing by registration
statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its
filing.
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Amount Previously Paid:
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
|
Preliminary
Copy
Becton, Dickinson and Company
1 Becton Drive
Franklin Lakes, New Jersey 07417-1880
www.bd.com
December , 2009
Dear Fellow Shareholders:
You are cordially invited to attend the 2010 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Becton,
Dickinson and Company (BD) to be held at 1:00 p.m. EST on Tuesday, February 2, 2010 at the Hilton
Short Hills, 41 John F. Kennedy Parkway, Short Hills, New Jersey. You will find directions to the
meeting on the back cover of the accompanying proxy statement.
The notice of meeting and proxy statement describe the matters to be acted upon at the
meeting. We also will report on matters of interest to BD shareholders.
Your vote is important. Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting in person, we
encourage you to vote so that your shares will be represented and voted at the meeting. You may
vote by proxy on the internet or by telephone, or by completing and mailing the enclosed proxy card
in the return envelope provided. You may also vote in person at the Annual Meeting.
Thank you for your continued support of BD.
Sincerely,
E
dward J.
Ludwig
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
Becton, Dickinson and Company
1 Becton Drive
Franklin Lakes, New Jersey 07417-1880
December , 2009
The 2010 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Becton, Dickinson and Company (BD) will be held
as follows:
|
|
|
DATE:
|
|
Tuesday, February 2, 2010 |
TIME:
|
|
1:00 p.m. EST |
LOCATION:
|
|
Hilton Short Hills |
|
|
41 John F. Kennedy Parkway |
|
|
Short Hills, New Jersey |
PURPOSE:
|
|
To consider and act upon the following proposals: |
|
|
1. The election as directors of the eight nominees named in the attached proxy statement for
a one-year term; |
|
|
2. The ratification of the selection of the independent registered public accounting firm; |
|
|
3. Approval of an amendment to BDs By-Laws to permit holders of at least 25% of the voting
power of the outstanding capital stock to call a special meeting of shareholders; |
|
|
4. Approval of an amendment to the 2004 Employee and Director Equity-Based Compensation Plan; |
|
|
5. Approval of material terms of performance goals; |
|
|
6. A shareholder proposal relating to majority voting; |
|
|
7. A shareholder proposal relating to cumulative voting; and |
|
|
8. Such other business as may properly come before the meeting. |
Shares represented by properly executed proxies will be voted in accordance with the
instructions specified therein. Shares represented by proxies that are not limited to the contrary
will be voted for the election as directors of the persons nominated in the accompanying proxy
statement (Proposal 1), for Proposals 2, 3, 4 and 5, and against Proposals 6 and 7.
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the 2010 Annual Meeting of
Shareholders to be held on February 2, 2010. BDs proxy statement and 2009 Annual Report, which
includes consolidated financial statements, are available at www.bd.com/investors/.
Shareholders of record at the close of business on December 11, 2009 will be entitled to
attend and vote at the meeting.
By order of the Board of Directors,
Dean J. Paranicas
Vice President, Corporate Secretary and Public Policy
It is important that your shares be represented and voted,
whether or not you plan to attend the meeting.
YOU CAN VOTE BY PROXY OR SUBMIT VOTING INSTRUCTIONS IN
ONE OF THREE WAYS:
1. |
|
VIA THE INTERNET: |
|
|
Visit the website noted on your proxy/voting instruction card. |
|
2. |
|
BY TELEPHONE: |
|
|
Use the toll-free telephone number noted on your proxy/voting instruction card. |
|
3. |
|
BY MAIL: |
|
|
Promptly return your signed and dated proxy/voting instruction card in the enclosed envelope. |
Table of Contents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
|
63 |
|
APPENDICES |
|
|
A-1 |
|
|
|
|
A-1 |
|
|
|
|
B-1 |
|
|
|
Back Cover |
PROXY STATEMENT
2010 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
Tuesday, February 2, 2010
BECTON, DICKINSON AND COMPANY
1 Becton Drive
Franklin Lakes, New Jersey 07417-1880
GENERAL INFORMATION
Proxy Solicitation
These proxy materials are being mailed or otherwise sent to shareholders of Becton, Dickinson
and Company (BD) on or about December , 2009 in connection with the solicitation of proxies by
the Board of Directors for BDs Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the 2010 Annual Meeting) to be
held at 1:00 p.m. EST on Tuesday, February 2, 2010 at the Hilton Short Hills, 41 John F. Kennedy
Parkway, Short Hills, New Jersey. Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials
for the 2010 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on February 2, 2010. This proxy statement
and BDs 2009 Annual Report (the 2009 Annual Report) are also available at www.bd.com/investors/.
Directors, officers and other BD associates also may solicit proxies by telephone or
otherwise. Brokers and other nominees will be requested to solicit proxies or authorizations from
beneficial owners and will be reimbursed for their reasonable expenses. BD has retained MacKenzie
Partners, Inc. to assist in soliciting proxies for a fee not to exceed $20,000 plus expenses. The
cost of soliciting proxies will be borne by BD.
Shareholders Entitled to Vote; Attendance at the Meeting
Shareholders of record at the close of business on December 11, 2009 are entitled to notice of
and to vote at the meeting. As of such date, there were xxx,xxx,xxx shares of BD common stock
outstanding, each entitled to one vote.
If your shares are held in the name of a bank, broker or other holder of record (also known as
street name) and you wish to attend the meeting, you must present proof of ownership as of the
record date, such as a current bank or brokerage account statement, to be admitted. BD also may
request appropriate identification as a condition of admission.
Quorum; Required Vote
The holders of a majority of the shares entitled to vote at the meeting must be present in
person or represented by proxy to constitute a quorum. Abstentions and shares that brokers have the
authority to vote in the absence of timely instructions from the beneficial owners are treated as
present for the purposes of determining a quorum.
Directors are elected by a plurality of the votes cast at the meeting (Proposal 1). Under New
Jersey law, abstentions and broker non-votes will not be counted as votes cast and, accordingly,
will have no effect on the outcome of the vote for directors. Under BDs Corporate Governance
Principles (the Principles), any nominee for director who receives a greater number of votes
withheld than votes for is required to offer to submit his or her resignation from the Board
following the shareholder vote. The Board will consider what action is to be taken with respect to
the same. We will publicly disclose the Boards decision. A more detailed description of these
procedures is contained on page 14 under the heading Corporate GovernanceSignificant Governance
PracticesVoting for Directors and in the Principles, which are available on BDs website at
www.bd.com/investors/corporate_governance/. Printed copies of the Principles may be obtained,
without charge, by contacting the Corporate Secretary, BD, 1 Becton Drive, Franklin Lakes, New
Jersey 07417-1880, phone 1-201-847-6800.
Approval of Proposals 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the
votes cast at the meeting. Under New Jersey law, in determining whether any of these proposals has
received the requisite number of affirmative votes, abstentions and shares (if any) for which
brokers do not have the authority to vote in the absence of instructions from beneficial owners
(broker non-votes) will not be counted as votes cast, and, accordingly, will not affect the
outcome of the vote. Proposals 2 and 3 are discretionary items and New York Stock Exchange
(NYSE) member brokers that do not receive instructions on how to vote may cast those votes in
their discretion.
How to Vote
Shareholders of record may attend and cast their votes at the meeting. In addition,
shareholders of record may cast their vote by proxy and participants in the BD plans described
below may submit their voting instructions by:
|
(1) |
|
using the internet and voting at the website listed on the enclosed
proxy/voting instruction card (the proxy card); |
|
|
(2) |
|
using the toll-free telephone number listed on the enclosed proxy card; or |
|
|
(3) |
|
signing, completing and returning the enclosed proxy card in the enclosed postage-paid envelope. |
Votes cast through the internet and telephone voting procedures are authenticated by use of a
personal identification number. This procedure allows shareholders to appoint a proxy, and the
various plan participants to provide voting instructions, and to confirm that their actions have
been properly recorded. Specific instructions to be followed are set forth on the enclosed proxy
card. If you vote through the internet or by telephone, you do not need to return your proxy card.
In order to be timely processed, voting instructions submitted by participants in BDs Global Share
Investment Program (GSIP) must be received by
12:00 p.m. EST on January 27, 2010, and voting
instructions submitted by participants in all other BD plans must be received by 12:00 p.m. EST on
January 29, 2010. All proxies submitted through the internet or by telephone must be received
by 11:00 a.m. EST on February 2, 2010.
If you are the beneficial owner of shares held in street name, you have the right to direct
your bank, broker or other nominee on how to vote your shares by using the voting instruction form
provided to you by them, or by following their instructions for voting through the internet or by
telephone. In the alternative, you may vote in person at the meeting if you obtain a valid proxy
from your bank, broker or other nominee and present it at the meeting.
Savings Incentive Plan (SIP)
Participants in SIP may instruct the SIP trustee how to vote all shares of BD common stock
allocated to their SIP accounts. The SIP trustee will vote the SIP shares for which it has not
received instructions in the same proportion as the SIP shares for which it has received
instructions.
Participants in Other Plans
Participants in the Savings Incentive Plan of Med-Safe Systems, Inc., a wholly-owned
subsidiary of BD (the Med-Safe Plan), may instruct the Med-Safe Plans trustee how to vote all
shares of BD common stock allocated to their accounts. The Med-Safe Plans trustee will vote shares
for which it has not received instructions in the same proportion as the shares for which it has
received instructions.
Participants in BDs Deferred Compensation and Retirement Benefit Restoration Plan (DCP),
the 1996 Directors Deferral Plan (DDP), and GSIP (if so provided under the terms of the local
country GSIP plan) may provide voting instructions for all shares of BD common stock allocated to
that persons plan account.
Proxies representing shares of BD common stock held of record also will serve as proxies for
shares held under the Direct Stock Purchase Plan sponsored and administered by Computershare Trust
Company, N.A. and any shares of BD common stock allocated to participants accounts under the plans
mentioned above, if the registrations are the same. Separate mailings will be made for shares not
held under the same registrations.
Revocation of Proxies
A proxy given by a shareholder of record may be revoked at any time before it is voted by
sending written notice of revocation to the Corporate Secretary of BD at the address set forth
above, by delivering a proxy (by one of the methods described above under the heading How to
Vote) bearing a later date, or by voting in person at the meeting. Participants in the plans
described above may revoke their voting instructions by delivering new voting instructions by one
of the methods described above under the heading How to Vote.
If you are the beneficial owner of shares held in street name, you may submit new voting
instructions in the manner provided by your bank or broker or other nominee, or you may vote in
person at the 2010 Annual Meeting in the manner described above under the heading How to Vote.
Other Matters
The Board of Directors is not aware of any matters to be presented at the meeting other than
those set forth in the accompanying notice. If any other matters properly come before the meeting,
the persons named in the proxy will vote on such matters in accordance with their best judgment.
2
Multiple BD shareholders who share an address may receive only one copy of this proxy
statement and the 2009 Annual Report from their bank, broker or other nominee, unless contrary
instructions are received. We will deliver promptly a separate copy of this proxy statement and the
2009 Annual Report to any BD shareholder who resides at a shared address, to which a single copy of
the documents was delivered, if the shareholder makes a request by contacting the Corporate
Secretary, BD, 1 Becton Drive, Franklin Lakes, New Jersey 07417-1880, phone 1-201-847-6800.
Beneficial owners sharing an address who are receiving multiple copies of this proxy statement and
the 2009 Annual Report and who wish to receive a single copy of each at the same address in the
future will need to contact their bank, broker or other nominee.
OWNERSHIP OF BD COMMON STOCK
Securities Owned by Certain Beneficial Owners
The following table sets forth as of September 30, 2009, information concerning those persons
known to BD to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of BDs outstanding common stock. This
information is as reported by such persons in their filings with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC). No changes in these holdings have come to BDs attention since September 30,
2009. BD is not aware of any other beneficial owner of more than 5% of its common stock.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nature of |
|
|
|
|
Name and Address of |
|
Beneficial |
|
|
Percent of |
|
Beneficial Owner |
|
Ownership |
|
|
Class |
|
|
State Street
Corporation State Street Bank and Trust Company, Trustee State
Street Financial Center
One Lincoln Street
Boston, MA 02111 |
|
|
13,819,337 |
(1) |
|
|
5.8 |
% |
|
AXA
Financial, Inc. |
|
|
12,709,098 |
(2) |
|
|
5.2 |
% |
1290 Avenue
of the Americas
New York, NY 10104 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes shared investment power with respect to these
shares, and sole voting power with respect to 8,566,444 of these
shares, and shared voting power with respect to 5,252,893 of these
shares. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes sole investment power with respect to these shares,
and sole voting power with respect to 9,548,303 of these shares. |
Securities Owned by Directors and Management
The table on the following page sets forth as of November 30, 2009 information concerning the
beneficial ownership of BD common stock by (i) each director, (ii) the executive officers named in
the Summary Compensation Table on page 35, and (iii) all directors and executive officers as a
group. In general, beneficial ownership includes those shares that a director or executive
officer has the power to vote or transfer, including shares that may be acquired under outstanding
equity compensation awards or otherwise within 60 days of such date.
No individual director or executive officer owns more than 1% of the outstanding BD common
stock. Together, the directors and executive officers, as a group, own approximately 1.4% of the
outstanding BD common stock as of November 30, 2009. Except as indicated in the footnotes to the
table, each person has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares he or she
beneficially owns.
3
BD COMMON STOCK
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount and Nature of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beneficial Ownership |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Owned |
|
Shares That May Be |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Directly and |
|
Acquired within |
|
Total Shares |
|
Percentage of |
Name |
|
Indirectly(1) |
|
60 days(2) |
|
Beneficially Owned |
|
Class |
Basil L. Anderson |
|
|
5,362 |
|
|
|
10,702 |
|
|
|
16,064 |
|
|
|
|
* |
Henry P. Becton, Jr. (3) |
|
|
768,542 |
|
|
|
24,382 |
|
|
|
792,924 |
|
|
|
|
* |
John R. Considine |
|
|
133,636 |
|
|
|
181,229 |
|
|
|
314,865 |
|
|
|
|
* |
Edward F. DeGraan |
|
|
7,678 |
|
|
|
14,279 |
|
|
|
21,957 |
|
|
|
|
* |
David V. Elkins |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Vincent A. Forlenza |
|
|
70,486 |
|
|
|
250,748 |
|
|
|
321,234 |
|
|
|
|
* |
Claire M. Fraser-Liggett |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
5,282 |
|
|
|
5,282 |
|
|
|
|
* |
William A. Kozy |
|
|
69,249 |
|
|
|
192,437 |
|
|
|
261,686 |
|
|
|
|
* |
Marshall O. Larsen |
|
|
1,376 |
|
|
|
3,653 |
|
|
|
5,029 |
|
|
|
|
* |
Edward J. Ludwig |
|
|
247,769 |
|
|
|
821,111 |
|
|
|
1,068,880 |
|
|
|
|
* |
Adel A.F. Mahmoud |
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
5,282 |
|
|
|
5,392 |
|
|
|
|
* |
Gary A. Mecklenburg |
|
|
3,157 |
|
|
|
10,702 |
|
|
|
13,859 |
|
|
|
|
* |
Cathy E. Minehan |
|
|
4,000 |
|
|
|
3,653 |
|
|
|
7,653 |
|
|
|
|
* |
James F. Orr |
|
|
11,437 |
|
|
|
14,279 |
|
|
|
25,716 |
|
|
|
|
* |
Willard J. Overlock, Jr. |
|
|
22,461 |
|
|
|
19,387 |
|
|
|
41,848 |
|
|
|
|
* |
Bertram L. Scott |
|
|
7,236 |
|
|
|
17,060 |
|
|
|
24,296 |
|
|
|
|
* |
Alfred Sommer |
|
|
12,407 |
|
|
|
16,340 |
|
|
|
28,747 |
|
|
|
|
* |
Directors and executive officers as a group (23 persons) |
|
|
1,506,160 |
|
|
|
1,915,608 |
|
|
|
3,421,768 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
% |
|
|
|
* |
|
Represents less than 1% of the outstanding BD common stock. |
|
(1) |
|
Includes shares held directly, and, with respect to executive officers, indirect interests in
BD common stock held under the SIP and the DCP, and, with respect to the non-management
directors, indirect interests in BD common stock held under the DDP. Additional information
on certain of these plans appears on pages 56-57. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes shares under outstanding stock options or stock appreciation rights that are
exercisable or become exercisable within 60 days. Also includes, with respect to those
executive officers who are retirement-eligible (Messrs. Ludwig, Considine, Forlenza and Kozy),
shares issuable under restricted stock units upon retirement (with performance-based units
being included at their target payout amounts). Also includes, with respect to each
non-management director, shares issuable under restricted stock units upon the directors
termination of service on the Board, as more fully described in Non-Management Directors
CompensationEquity-Based Compensation on page 11. |
|
(3) |
|
Includes 738,015 shares held by trusts of which Mr. Becton is a co-trustee with shared
investment and voting power or held by a limited liability company owned by one of such
trusts. Does not include 36,988 shares owned by Mr. Bectons spouse, or 109,412 shares held in
trusts for the benefit of his children, and as to each of which he disclaims beneficial
ownership. |
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires BDs directors and executive
officers to file initial reports of their ownership of BDs equity securities and reports of
changes in such ownership with the SEC and the NYSE. Directors and executive officers are required
by SEC regulations to furnish BD with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file with respect to
BD securities. Based solely on a review of copies of such forms and written representations from
BDs directors and executive officers, BD believes that, for the period from October 1, 2008
through September 30, 2009, all of its directors and executive officers were in compliance with the
disclosure requirements of Section 16(a), except that (i) a report on Form 4 on behalf of Henry P.
Becton, Jr. for the sale of shares through a trust of which he is co-trustee was inadvertently
filed one day late, and (ii) a report on Form 3 on behalf of William A. Tozzi, who re-assumed the
role of principal accounting officer effective September 22, 2009, was inadvertently filed one week
late.
4
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR EACH OF THE
NOMINEES NAMED IN PROPOSAL 1.
Proposal 1. ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
At the 2009 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the 2009 Annual Meeting), the shareholders
approved an amendment to BDs Restated Certificate of Incorporation to declassify the Board and
provide for the annual election of the Board. The declassification is being phased so that those
directors elected at the 2009 Annual Meeting and those continuing directors whose current terms
expire at the 2010 Annual Meeting are eligible for election for
one-year terms at the 2010 Annual Meeting. Those
continuing directors whose current terms expire at the 2011 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the
2011 Annual Meeting) will serve the remainder of their terms, and will be eligible, together with
the other directors, to stand for reelection for a one-year term beginning with the 2011 Annual
Meeting.
The Board accordingly nominates for election Henry P. Becton, Jr., Edward F. DeGraan, Claire
M. Fraser-Liggett, Edward J. Ludwig, Adel A.F. Mahmoud, James F. Orr, Willard J. Overlock, Jr. and
Bertram L. Scott to serve for a term of one year and until their successors have been elected and
qualified.
All of the nominees for election have consented to being named in this proxy statement and to
serve if elected. Presented below is biographical information for each of the nominees and the
other directors continuing in office.
NOMINEES FOR DIRECTOR
Term to Expire 2011
Henry P. Becton, Jr., 66, has been a
director since 1987. He is Vice
Chairman of the Board of Trustees of
WGBH Educational Foundation, a producer
and broadcaster of public television
and radio programs and books and other
educational materials. He served as
President of WGBH Educational
Foundation from 1984 to October 2007.
Mr. Becton also is a director of Belo
Corporation, Public Radio International
and the PBS Foundation, the Chairman of the Board of the
Association of Public Television
Stations, and a director/trustee of
various DWS mutual funds.
Edward F. DeGraan, 66, has been a
director since 2003. In 2006, he
retired as Vice Chairman Gillette of
the Procter & Gamble Company, a
manufacturer of consumer products.
Prior thereto, he was Vice Chairman of
The Gillette Company, and served as its
President and Chief Operating Officer
from July 2000 until November 2003. He
served as Acting Chief Executive
Officer of Gillette from October 2000
to February 2001. Mr. DeGraan also is a
director of Amica Mutual Insurance
Company and a Senior Advisor of
Centerview Partners, L.P.
Claire M. Fraser-Liggett, Ph.D, 54, has
been a director since 2006. She is
Director of the Institute for Genome
Sciences and a Professor of Medicine at
the University of Maryland School of
Medicine in Baltimore, Maryland. From
1998 to April 2007, she served as
President and Director of The Institute
for Genomic Research, a not-for-profit
center dedicated to deciphering and
analyzing genomes.
5
Edward J. Ludwig, 58, is Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer of BD, and has
been a director since 1999. Effective
January 1, 2009, Mr. Ludwig was
succeeded as President (a position he
had held since May1999) by Vincent A.
Forlenza, and Mr. Ludwig remained
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer,
positions he has held since February
2002 and January 2000, respectively.
Mr. Ludwig also is a director of Aetna
Inc., a member of the Board of Trustees
of the College of the Holy Cross, a
member of the Board of Governors of the
Hackensack (NJ) University Medical
Center, and a member of the Board of
Directors and former Chairman of the
Advanced Medical Technology Association
(AdvaMed), an international medical
technology trade association.
Adel A.F. Mahmoud, M.D., Ph.D, 68, has
been a director since 2006. In 2006,
Dr. Mahmoud retired as Chief Medical
Advisor, Vaccines and Infectious
Diseases and member of the Management
Committee of Merck & Co., Inc., a
pharmaceutical company. From 1999 to
2005, he served as President, Merck
Vaccines and member of the Management
Committee. In January 2007, he joined
Princeton University as Professor,
Department of Molecular Biology and the
Woodrow Wilson School of Public and
International Affairs. Dr. Mahmoud also
is a director of Sanaria, Inc., a
malaria vaccine development
organization.
James F. Orr, 64, has been a director
since 2000. In 2007, he retired as
Chairman of the Board of Convergys
Corporation, a provider of customer
management, employee care and
outsourced billing services. Prior
thereto, he served as Convergys Chief
Executive Officer from 1998 until his
retirement from that position in April
2007, and also as its President from
1998 to 2005. Mr. Orr also is a
director of Ohio National Financial
Services, Inc.
Willard J. Overlock, Jr., 63, has been
a director since 1999. He retired in
1996 as a partner in Goldman, Sachs &
Co., where he served as a member of its
management committee, and retains the
title of Senior Director to The Goldman
Sachs Group, Inc. Mr. Overlock also is
an advisor to the Parthenon Group, a
special partner with Cue Ball Group,
and a trustee of Rockefeller
University.
Bertram L. Scott, 58, has been a
director since 2002. Mr. Scott is
Executive Vice President of TIAA-CREF,
a position he has held since joining
that organization in November 2000. He
also served as President and Chief
Executive Officer of TIAA-CREF Life
Insurance Company from 2000 to June
2007.
The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR each of the nominees for director.
6
CONTINUING DIRECTORS
Term to Expire 2011
Basil L. Anderson, 64, has been a director since 2004. From
2001 to 2006, he served as Vice Chairman of Staples, Inc., a
supplier of office products. Prior thereto, he was Executive
Vice President Finance and Chief Financial Officer of
Campbell Soup Company. Mr. Anderson also is a director of CRA
International, Inc. (until January 28, 2010) and of Hasbro,
Inc., Moodys Corporation and Staples, Inc.
Marshall O. Larsen, 61, has been a director since 2007. He is
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Goodrich
Corporation, a supplier of systems and services to the
aerospace and defense industry. Mr. Larsen also is a director
of Lowes Companies, Inc., and a member of The Business
Council.
Gary A. Mecklenburg, 63, has been a director since 2004. In
2006, he retired as President and Chief Executive Officer of
Northwestern Memorial HealthCare, the parent corporation of
Northwestern Memorial Hospital, an office he held since 1986.
He also served as President and Chief Executive Officer of
Northwestern Memorial Hospital from 1985 to 2002. He is
currently an Executive Partner of Waud Capital Partners,
L.L.C., a private equity investment firm.
Cathy E. Minehan, 62, has been a director since 2007. She
retired as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Federal
Reserve Bank of Boston in July 2007, a position she held since
1994. She also served on the Federal Open Market Committee from
1994 until her retirement. Ms. Minehan also is a director of
Visa Inc., MassMutual Financial Group, and MITRE Corporation;
she is chair of the board of trustees of the Massachusetts
General Hospital, and a trustee of the University of Rochester.
She also serves on several business groups in Boston and chairs
the Massachusetts Governors Council of Economic Advisors.
Alfred Sommer, M.D., M.H.S., 67, has been a director since
1998. He is Professor of International Health, Epidemiology,
and Ophthalmology at The Johns Hopkins University (JHU)
Bloomberg School of Public Health (the Bloomberg School) and
the JHU School of Medicine. He is Dean Emeritus of the
Bloomberg School, having served as Dean from 1990 to 2005. He
is a member of the National Academy of Sciences and the
Institute of Medicine. He is a recipient of the Albert Lasker
Award for Medical Research. Dr. Sommer also is a director of T.
Rowe Price Group, Inc., and Chairman of the Board of Directors
of The Albert and Mary Lasker Foundation.
7
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
The Board and Committees of the Board
BD is governed by a Board of Directors that currently consists of 13 members, 12 of whom have
been determined by the Board to be independent. The Board has established five Committees: the
Executive Committee, the Audit Committee, the Compensation and Benefits Committee, the Corporate
and Scientific Affairs Committee, and the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee. All
Committees meet regularly, except for the Executive Committee, which meets only as necessary.
Committee meetings may be called by the Committee chair, the Chairman of the Board or a majority of
Committee members. The Board has adopted a written charter for each of the Committees that are
posted on BDs website at www.bd.com/investors/corporate_governance/. Printed copies of these
charters, BDs 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K, and BDs reports and statements filed with or
furnished to the SEC, may be obtained, without charge, by contacting the Corporate Secretary, BD, 1
Becton Drive, Franklin Lakes, New Jersey 07417-1880, telephone 201-847-6800.
Committee Membership and Function
Set forth below is a summary description of each of the Boards operating Committees.
AUDIT COMMITTEE
Function
|
|
|
Retains and reviews the qualifications, independence and performance of BDs
registered public accounting firm (the independent auditors). |
|
|
|
|
Reviews BDs public financial disclosures, financial statements and accounting
principles, policies and practices; the scope and results of the annual audit by the
independent auditors; BDs internal audit process; and the effectiveness of BDs
internal control over financial reporting. |
|
|
|
|
Reviews BDs guidelines and policies relating to enterprise risk assessment and
risk management, and managements plan for risk mitigation or remediation. |
|
|
|
|
Oversees compliance with legal and regulatory requirements. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Members
|
|
Basil L. Anderson Chair |
|
|
|
|
Marshall O. Larsen |
|
|
|
|
Gary A. Mecklenburg |
|
|
|
|
Cathy E. Minehan |
|
|
|
|
James F. Orr |
|
|
|
|
Bertram L. Scott |
The Board has determined that the members of the Audit Committee meet the independence and
financial literacy and expertise requirements of the NYSE. The Board also has determined that each
of Messrs. Anderson, Larsen, Orr and Scott, and Ms. Minehan, qualifies as an audit committee
financial expert under the rules of the SEC.
The Audit Committee meets separately with the internal and external auditors to ensure full
and frank communications with the Audit Committee.
8
COMPENSATION AND BENEFITS COMMITTEE
Function
|
|
|
Reviews BDs compensation and benefits policies, recommends to the independent
members of the Board for their approval the compensation of the Chief Executive
Officer, and approves the compensation of BDs other executive officers. |
|
|
|
|
Approves all employment, severance and change of control agreements of BD with
executive officers. |
|
|
|
|
Serves as the granting and administrative committee for BDs equity
compensation plans. |
|
|
|
|
Oversees the administration of certain BD benefit plans. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Members
|
|
Edward F. DeGraan Chair |
|
|
|
|
Basil L. Anderson |
|
|
|
|
Marshall O. Larsen |
|
|
|
|
James F. Orr |
|
|
|
|
Willard J. Overlock, Jr. |
|
|
|
|
Bertram L. Scott |
The Board has determined that each member of the Compensation and Benefits Committee meets the
independence requirements of the NYSE.
The Compensation and Benefits Committee oversees the compensation program for the named
executive officers listed in the Summary Compensation Table on page 35 and for BDs other executive
officers. The Compensation and Benefits Committee may not delegate these responsibilities to
another Committee, individual director or member of management.
Role of Management
The Compensation and Benefits Committees meetings are typically attended by BDs Chief
Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Senior Vice President Human Resources and others,
who support the Compensation and Benefits Committee in fulfilling its responsibilities. The
Compensation and Benefits Committee considers managements views relating to compensation matters,
including overall compensation levels and the performance metrics and targets for BDs
performance-based compensation. Management also provides information (which is reviewed by our
Internal Audit Department) to assist the Committee in determining the extent to which performance
targets have been achieved. This includes any recommended adjustments to BDs operating results
when assessing BDs performance. The Chief Executive Officer and Senior Vice President Human
Resources also work with the Committee chair in establishing meeting agendas.
The Compensation and Benefits Committee meets in executive session with no members of
management present for part of each of its regular meetings. The
Compensation Committee also meets in executive session considering
compensation decisions regarding our executive officers.
Role of the Independent Advisor
The Compensation and Benefits Committee is also assisted in fulfilling its responsibilities by
its independent advisor, Towers Perrin. Towers Perrin is engaged by, and reports directly to, the
Compensation and Benefits Committee. Towers Perrin reviews all materials prepared for the
Compensation and Benefits Committee by management, prepares additional materials as may be
requested by the Compensation and Benefits Committee, and attends all Compensation and Benefits
Committee meetings. In its advisory role, among other things, Towers Perrin assists the
Compensation and Benefits Committee in the design and implementation of BDs compensation program.
This includes assisting the Compensation and Benefits Committee in selecting the key elements to
include in the program, the targeted payments for each element, and the establishment of
performance targets. Towers Perrin also makes recommendations to the Compensation and Benefits
Committee regarding the compensation of BDs Chief Executive Officer.
Towers Perrin also conducts an annual review of the compensation practices of select peer
companies. Based on this review, Towers Perrin advises the Compensation and Benefits Committee with
respect to the competitiveness of BDs compensation program in comparison to industry practices,
and identifies any trends in executive compensation. During fiscal year 2009, Towers Perrin was
not engaged to perform any services for BD. The Compensation and Benefits Committee has adopted a
policy prohibiting Towers Perrin from providing any services to BD without the Compensation and
Benefits Committees prior approval, and has expressed its intention that such approval will be
given only in exceptional cases.
9
Setting Compensation
At the end of each fiscal year, the Board conducts a review of the Chief Executive Officers
performance. As part of this process, the Chief Executive Officer provides a self-assessment
report. At the following Board meeting, the Board sets the compensation of the Chief Executive
Officer, after considering its assessment of the Chief Executive Officers performance, market
comparison data and the recommendations of the Compensation and Benefits Committee. This
determination is made in executive session, in consultation with Towers Perrin. Neither the Chief
Executive Officer nor any other members of management are present during this session. The Chief
Executive Officer does not play a role in determining his own compensation.
The Compensation and Benefits Committee is responsible for determining the compensation of
BDs other executive officers. The Chief Executive Officer, in consultation with the Senior Vice
President Human Resources, reviews the performance of the other executive officers with the
Compensation and Benefits Committee and presents compensation recommendations for its
consideration. The Compensation and Benefits Committee determines the compensation for these
executives, in consultation with Towers Perrin, after considering the Chief Executive Officers
recommendations, market comparison data regarding compensation levels among peer companies and the
views of Towers Perrin. All decisions regarding the compensation of BDs other executive officers
are made in executive session.
The Board has delegated responsibility for formulating recommendations regarding
non-management director compensation to the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, which is
discussed below.
CORPORATE AND SCIENTIFIC AFFAIRS COMMITTEE
Function
|
|
|
Oversees BDs policies, practices and procedures impacting BDs image and
reputation and its standing as a responsible corporate citizen, including, without
limitation, issues relating to communications with BDs key stakeholders; employment
practices; community relations; environmental, health and safety matters; customer
relations; ethics and enterprise compliance; and political contributions. |
|
|
|
|
Oversees BDs research and development activities. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Members
|
|
Alfred Sommer Chair |
|
|
|
|
Henry P. Becton, Jr. |
|
|
|
|
Claire M. Fraser-Liggett |
|
|
|
|
Adel A.F. Mahmoud |
|
|
|
|
Gary A. Mecklenburg |
|
|
|
|
Cathy E. Minehan |
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND NOMINATING COMMITTEE
Function
|
|
|
Identifies and recommends candidates for election as directors to the Board. |
|
|
|
|
Reviews the composition, organization, structure and function of the Board and
its Committees, as well as the performance and compensation of non-management
directors. |
|
|
|
|
Monitors BDs corporate governance and Board practices, and oversees the
Boards self-evaluation process. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Members
|
|
Henry P. Becton, Jr. Chair |
|
|
|
|
Edward F. DeGraan |
|
|
|
|
Claire M. Fraser-Liggett |
|
|
|
|
Adel A.F. Mahmoud |
|
|
|
|
Willard J. Overlock, Jr. |
|
|
|
|
Alfred Sommer |
The Board has determined that each member of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee
meets the independence requirements of the NYSE. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee
also reviews the compensation program for the non-management directors and makes recommendations to
the Board regarding their compensation, and may not delegate these responsibilities to another
Committee, individual director or member of management. The Corporate Governance and Nominating
Committee has retained Towers Perrin as an independent advisor for this purpose. Towers Perrins
responsibilities include providing assistance in developing an appropriate non-management director compensation peer group; generating market comparison data on the elements and levels of
non-management director
10
compensation at peer companies; tracking trends in non-management director
compensation practices; and advising the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee regarding
the components and levels of non-management director
compensation. Executive officers do not play any role in either determining or recommending
non-management director compensation.
Board, Committee and Annual Meeting Attendance
The Board and its Committees held the following number of meetings during fiscal year 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
Board |
|
|
8 |
|
Audit Committee |
|
|
12 |
|
Compensation and Benefits Committee |
|
|
7 |
|
Corporate and Scientific Affairs Committee |
|
|
5 |
|
Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee |
|
|
7 |
|
The Executive Committee did not meet during fiscal year 2009.
Each director attended 75% or more of the total number of the meetings of the Board and the
Committees on which he or she served during fiscal year 2009. BDs Board held six regular meetings
during fiscal year 2009, and BDs non-management directors met in executive session at each of
these regular meetings.
The Board has adopted a policy pursuant to which directors are expected to attend the Annual
Meeting in the absence of a scheduling conflict or other valid reason. All but one of the directors
then in office attended BDs 2009 Annual Meeting.
Non-Management Directors Compensation
The Board believes that providing competitive compensation is necessary to attract and retain
qualified non-management directors. The key elements of BDs non-management director compensation
are a cash retainer, equity-based compensation, and Committee chair fees. Of the base compensation
paid to the non-management directors (not including Committee chair fees), approximately two-thirds
currently is equity-based compensation that directors will be required to retain until they
complete their service on the Board. See Corporate GovernanceSignificant Governance
PracticesEquity Ownership by Directors on page 15. This retention feature serves to better align
the interests of the directors and BD shareholders and ensure compliance with the director share
ownership guidelines discussed below. Following a review of non-management directors
compensation, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee did not recommend any changes for
the period commencing following the 2010 Annual Meeting. Mr. Ludwig does not receive compensation
related to his service as a director. Mr. Considine did not receive compensation related to his
service as a director during the period he served as such in fiscal years 2008-09.
Cash Retainer
Each non-management director currently receives an annual cash retainer of $75,000 for
services as a director.
Equity-Based Compensation
Each non-management director elected at, or continuing as a director after, an Annual Meeting
is granted restricted stock units valued at $150,000. Newly-elected directors receive a grant pro
rated from the effective date of their election to the next Annual Meeting. The restricted stock
units are valued using the same methodology used for the most recent annual grant of time-vested
restricted stock units to BDs executive officers. The shares of BD common stock underlying the
restricted stock units are not issuable until a directors separation from the Board.
Committee Chair Fees
An annual fee of $6,500 is paid to each Committee chair, except that the fee for the Audit
Committee chair is $10,000 in recognition of the Audit Committees responsibilities. An annual feel
of $10,000 is paid to the Lead Director. Directors do not receive meeting fees.
Other Arrangements
BD reimburses non-management directors for travel and other business expenses incurred in the
performance of their services for BD. Directors may travel on BD aircraft in connection with such
activities, and, on limited occasions, spouses of directors have joined them on such flights. No
compensation is attributed to the director since the aggregate incremental costs are minimal. In
the event directors utilize other private aircraft, they are reimbursed for the incremental cost
thereof. Directors
11
are also reimbursed for attending director education courses. BD occasionally
invites spouses of directors to Board-related business events, for which they are reimbursed their
travel expenses.
Directors are eligible, on the same basis as BD employees, to participate in BDs Matching
Gift Program, pursuant to which BD matches contributions made by a director or employee to
qualifying nonprofit organizations. The annual aggregate limit was $5,000 in calendar year 2009.
The following table sets forth the compensation received by the non-management directors
during fiscal year 2009.
Fiscal Year 2009 Non-Management Directors Compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees earned |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
or |
|
Stock |
|
Option |
|
All Other |
|
|
Name |
|
paid in cash(1) |
|
Awards(2) |
|
Awards (2) |
|
Compensation(3) |
|
Total |
Basil L. Anderson |
|
$ |
83,333 |
|
|
$ |
141,796 |
|
|
$ |
3,121 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
228,250 |
|
Henry P. Becton, Jr. |
|
|
89,833 |
|
|
|
204,310 |
|
|
|
3,121 |
|
|
|
3,295 |
|
|
|
300,559 |
|
Edward F. DeGraan |
|
|
79,833 |
|
|
|
204,310 |
|
|
|
3,121 |
|
|
|
2,500 |
|
|
|
288,764 |
|
Claire M. Fraser-Liggett |
|
|
73,333 |
|
|
|
162,375 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
235,708 |
|
Marshall O. Larsen |
|
|
73,333 |
|
|
|
141,796 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
215,129 |
|
Adel A.F. Mahmoud |
|
|
73,333 |
|
|
|
204,310 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
277,643 |
|
Gary A. Mecklenburg |
|
|
73,333 |
|
|
|
141,796 |
|
|
|
3,121 |
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
228,250 |
|
Cathy E. Minehan |
|
|
73,333 |
|
|
|
141,796 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
215,129 |
|
James F. Orr |
|
|
73,333 |
|
|
|
204,310 |
|
|
|
3,121 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
280,764 |
|
Willard J. Overlock, Jr. |
|
|
73,333 |
|
|
|
185,756 |
|
|
|
3,121 |
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
267,210 |
|
Bertram L. Scott |
|
|
73,333 |
|
|
|
185,756 |
|
|
|
3,121 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
262,210 |
|
Alfred Sommer |
|
|
79,833 |
|
|
|
141,796 |
|
|
|
3,121 |
|
|
|
4,500 |
|
|
|
229,250 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents cash fees earned for services rendered in fiscal year 2009. |
|
(2) |
|
The amounts shown in the Stock Awards and Option Awards columns above reflect the amounts
expensed for the fiscal year under SFAS No. 123(R) for all outstanding stock awards (i.e.,
restricted stock units) and option awards held by the named director, including awards made in
prior fiscal years. Stock awards granted prior to 2009 are expensed over the balance of a directors
three-year term at the time of grant. For example, a directors first grant following his or
her election is expensed over the entire three-year term, the second grant is expensed over
two years, and the third grant is expensed over one year. Any grants issued at the 2009 Annual
Meeting and thereafter to directors will be expensed over a one-year term. Option awards granted prior to 2009 are expensed over the four-year vesting period of each award. For a description
of the methodology and assumptions used by us in arriving at the amounts reflected in these
columns, see the notes to the consolidated financial statements contained in
our Annual Reports on Form 10-K for the years ended September 30, 2009, 2008, 2007, 2006 and
2005, respectively. Listed below are the SFAS No. 123(R) fair values of the stock awards
granted to the named non-management directors in fiscal year 2009 and the aggregate
outstanding stock awards and option awards held by each non-management director at the end of
fiscal year 2009. Stock options have not been issued to non-management directors since the
2005 Annual Meeting. |
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Awards |
|
Option Awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at |
|
Outstanding at |
|
|
Stock |
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
Name |
|
Awards |
|
2009 |
|
2009 |
Basil L. Anderson |
|
$ |
147,821 |
|
|
|
8,542 |
|
|
|
2,160 |
|
Henry P. Becton, Jr. |
|
|
147,821 |
|
|
|
9,843 |
|
|
|
14,539 |
|
Edward F. DeGraan |
|
|
147,821 |
|
|
|
9,843 |
|
|
|
4,436 |
|
Claire M. Fraser-Liggett |
|
|
147,821 |
|
|
|
5,282 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Marshall O. Larsen |
|
|
147,821 |
|
|
|
3,653 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Adel A.F. Mahmoud |
|
|
147,821 |
|
|
|
5,282 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Gary A. Mecklenburg |
|
|
147,821 |
|
|
|
8,542 |
|
|
|
2,160 |
|
Cathy E. Minehan |
|
|
147,821 |
|
|
|
3,653 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
James F. Orr |
|
|
147,821 |
|
|
|
9,843 |
|
|
|
4,436 |
|
Willard J. Overlock, Jr. |
|
|
147,821 |
|
|
|
9,843 |
|
|
|
14,539 |
|
Bertram L. Scott |
|
|
147,821 |
|
|
|
9,843 |
|
|
|
7,217 |
|
Alfred Sommer |
|
|
147,821 |
|
|
|
9,843 |
|
|
|
6,497 |
|
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Amounts shown represent matching gifts paid or payable to charitable organizations with
respect to contributions made by the named director during fiscal year 2009 under BDs
Matching Gift Program, which is more fully discussed on page 11 under Other Arrangements.
Mr. Mecklenburgs matching gifts include $5,000 with respect to a gift made in a prior year
that was processed in fiscal year 2009. |
Directors Deferral Plan
Directors may defer receipt of, in an unfunded cash account or a BD common stock account, all
or part of their annual cash retainer and other cash fees pursuant to the provisions of the 1996
Directors Deferral Plan. Directors may also defer receipt of shares issuable to them under their
restricted stock units upon leaving the Board. A general description of the 1996 Directors
Deferral Plan appears on page 57.
Communication with Directors
Shareholders or other interested parties wishing to communicate with the Board, the
non-management directors or any individual director (including complaints or concerns regarding
accounting, internal accounting controls or audit matters) may do so by contacting the Lead
Director either:
|
|
|
by mail, addressed to BD Lead Director, P.O. Box 264, Franklin Lakes, New
Jersey 07417-0264; |
|
|
|
|
by calling the BD Ethics Help Line, an independent toll-free service, at
1-800-821-5452 (available seven days a week, 24 hours a day; callers from outside North
America should use AT&T Direct to reach AT&T in the U.S. and then dial the above
toll-free number); or |
|
|
|
|
by email to ethics_office@bd.com. |
All communications will be kept confidential and promptly forwarded to the Lead Director, who
shall in turn forward them promptly to the appropriate director(s). Such items as are unrelated to
a directors duties and responsibilities as a Board member may be excluded by the Director of
Corporate Security, including, without limitation, solicitations and advertisements; junk mail;
product-related communications; job referral materials such as resumes; surveys; and material that
is determined to be illegal or otherwise inappropriate. The director(s) to whom such information is
addressed is informed that the information has been removed, and that it will be made available to
such director(s) upon request.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Corporate Governance Principles
BDs commitment to good corporate governance is embodied in its Corporate Governance
Principles (the Principles). The Principles, originally adopted in 2001, set forth the Boards
views and practices regarding a number of governance topics, and the Corporate Governance and
Nominating Committee regularly assesses BDs corporate governance practices in light of emerging
practices. The Principles cover a wide array of subject areas, including voting for directors; the
designation of a Lead Director to represent non-management directors; relationships between
directors and BD; annual evaluations of the Chief Executive Officer, the Board, its Committees, and
(when they stand for re-election) individual directors; conflicts of interest; and charitable
contributions to entities affiliated with BDs executive officers and directors, each of which is
discussed below, along with other significant governance practices.
13
Significant Governance Practices
Described below are some of the significant corporate governance practices that have been
instituted by the BD Board.
Annual Election of Directors
As
more fully discussed on page 5, we recently amended our Certificate of Incorporation to
provide for the annual election of directors.
Recovery of Compensation
The Board has adopted a policy that enables BD to recover incentive compensation paid to a
Leadership Team member based on BDs financial results if such results are later restated as a
result of such members misconduct, including, but not limited to, fraud or knowing illegal
conduct. This policy also grants the Board the ability to recover from members of the Leadership
Team who were not involved in such misconduct the amount by which any incentive compensation payout
exceeded the amount they would have been paid based on the restated results. BDs compensation
recovery policy is available on BDs website at www.bd.com/investors/corporate_governance/.
Equity Grant Dating
During fiscal year 2006, BD reviewed its established equity-granting practices and confirmed
that no option backdating had occurred, and that its practices regarding the issuance of equity
grants effectively guard against the backdating of awards. In September 2006, the Compensation and
Benefits Committee adopted a comprehensive policy that incorporated BDs existing practices and
added a provision intended to ensure that the timing of public announcements does not affect the
valuation of an equity grant. BDs equity grant dating policy is available on BDs website at
www.bd.com/investors/corporate_governance/.
Voting for Directors
The Board has adopted a Principle that provides that any nominee in an uncontested election
who receives more votes withheld from his or her election than votes for his or her election
must offer to submit his or her resignation following the shareholder vote (the Director
Resignation Policy). The Board believes this structure allows BD to maintain a stable Board of
experienced and knowledgeable directors while evaluating an appropriate response to shareholder
dissatisfaction. Consideration of all relevant factors on a case-by-case basis pursuant to the
Director Resignation Policy gives the Board flexibility and enables it to avoid undesirable and
disruptive governance consequences. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee will
consider and recommend to the Board whether to accept the resignation offer. The other independent
directors will decide the action to take with respect to the offer of resignation within 90 days
following the shareholder vote. The Boards decision will be disclosed in a report on a Form 8-K
filed by BD with the SEC within four business days following the decision. Any director who offers
to submit his or her resignation pursuant to this provision will not participate in the
deliberations of either the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee or the Board. The
complete terms of this policy are included in the Principles.
Annual Report of Charitable Contributions
In furtherance of BDs commitment to good governance and disclosure practices, BDs charitable
contributions or pledges in an aggregate amount of $50,000 or more (not including contributions
under BDs Matching Gift Program) to entities affiliated with BDs directors, executive officers,
and their families must be approved by the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee. BD posts
on its website, at www.bd.com/investors/corporate_governance/, an Annual Report of Charitable
Contributions (the Contributions Report) listing all such contributions and pledges made by BD
during the preceding fiscal year in an amount of $10,000 or more. The Contributions Report, which
BD has voluntarily issued since 2002, includes a discussion of BDs contributions philosophy and
the alignment of BDs philanthropic activities with its philosophy, together with additional
information about each contribution or pledge.
Enterprise Compliance
Under the oversight of the Corporate and Scientific Affairs Committee, BDs enterprise
compliance function is aimed at ensuring that BD is effective at preventing and detecting
violations of the many laws, regulations and policies affecting its business (Enterprise
Compliance), and that BD continuously encourages lawful and ethical conduct. Launched in fiscal
year 2005, Enterprise Compliance supplements the various compliance and ethics functions that were
already in place at BD, and seeks to ensure better coordination and effectiveness through program
design, prevention, and promotion of an organizational culture of compliance. A Compliance
Committee comprised of members of senior management oversees the activities of the Chief Compliance
Officer. Another key element of this program is training. Courses offered include a global
computer-based compliance training program focused on BDs Business Conduct and Compliance Guide,
as well as other courses covering various compliance topics such as antitrust, anti-bribery,
conflicts of interest, financial integrity, industry marketing codes and information security.
14
In order to align BDs risk and compliance activities currently overseen by the Corporate and
Scientific Affairs Committee (including Enterprise Compliance) with the Audit Committees oversight
of Enterprise Risk Management discussed below, the Board is considering consolidating in the Audit Committee these oversight
responsibilities. Oversight of other aspects of certain of these activities would be transferred
from the Corporate and Scientific Affairs Committee to the Board.
Enterprise Risk Management
Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) is a company-wide initiative that involves the Board,
management and BD associates in an integrated effort to identify, assess and manage risks that may
affect BDs ability to execute on its corporate strategy and fulfill its business objectives. BDs
ERM activities entail the identification, prioritization and assessment of a broad range of risks
(e.g., financial, operational, business, reputational, governance and managerial), and the
formulation of plans to mitigate their effects.
Equity Ownership by Directors
The Board believes that directors should hold meaningful equity ownership positions in BD. To
that end, the compensation structure for non-management directors was changed during fiscal year
2006 to eliminate stock options and issue in their place restricted stock units that would not be
distributable until a director completes his or her service on the Board. The accumulation of these
equity interests will help to better align the interests of the non-management directors with
shareholders. Under the Boards share ownership guidelines, each non-management director is
required to own shares of common stock (which includes restricted stock units) valued at 50% of the
amount obtained by multiplying the annual cash retainer by the number of years the director has
served. Each non-management director who has served for at least one full year currently owns
shares in an amount sufficient to comply with these guidelines.
Lead Director
The Principles provide for a Lead Director whenever the Chairman is not an independent
director. The Lead Director presides over executive sessions of the non-management directors;
together with the Chair of the Compensation and Benefits Committee, coordinates the evaluation of
the Chief Executive Officer by the non-management directors; helps set Board agendas and meeting
Schedules; and serves as a liaison between the non-management directors and the Chief Executive
Officer. The Lead Director also serves as a contact person to facilitate communications between
BDs employees, shareholders and other constituents and the non-management directors. The Corporate
Governance and Nominating Committee annually reviews the designation of the Lead Director. BDs
current Lead Director is Henry P. Becton, Jr.
Director Independence/Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
Under the NYSE rules and the Principles, a director is deemed not to be independent if the
director has a direct or indirect material relationship with BD (other than his or her relationship
as a director). The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee annually reviews the independence
of all directors and reports its findings to the full Board. To assist in this review, the Board
has adopted director independence guidelines (Independence Guidelines) that are contained in
Principle No. 7. The Independence Guidelines set forth certain types of relationships between BD
and directors and their immediate family members, or entities with which they are affiliated, that
the Board, in its judgment, has deemed to be either material or immaterial for purposes of
assessing a directors independence. In the event a director has any relationship with BD that is
not addressed in the Independence Guidelines, the independent members of the Board review the facts
and circumstances to determine whether such relationship is material.
The Board has determined that the following directors are independent under the Independence
Guidelines: Basil L. Anderson, Henry P. Becton, Jr., Edward F. DeGraan, Claire M. Fraser-Liggett,
Marshall O. Larsen, Adel A.F. Mahmoud, Gary A. Mecklenburg, Cathy E. Minehan, James F. Orr, Willard
J. Overlock, Jr., Bertram L. Scott and Alfred Sommer. Edward J. Ludwig is an employee of BD, and,
therefore, is not independent under the NYSE rules and the Principles. During the portion of
fiscal year 2009 that John R. Considine served as a director, he also was not independent under the
NYSE rules and the Principles because he was an employee of BD.
In determining that each of the non-management directors is independent, the Board considered
that, at various times over the previous three years, BD entered into transactions or had other
dealings in the ordinary course of business with organizations with which certain directors or
their immediate family members are, or were during such three-year period, affiliated (referred to
as a director-affiliated organization). Such affiliations included service by the director or an
immediate family member as an officer, employee, adjunct faculty member or governing or advisory
board member of such organizations.
In conducting its review, the Board determined that, in each instance, the amount paid to, or
received from, the director-affiliated organization was below the levels that would impair a
directors independence under the Independence Guidelines. In addition, in most instances, the
director played no active role in the director-affiliated organizations relationship with BD, and,
in some instances, the relationship involved a unit of such organization other than the one with
which the
15
director has been involved. Accordingly, the Board determined that none of these
relationships was material or conflicted with BDs interests, or impaired the relevant directors
independence or judgment.
The types of transactions with director-affiliated organizations considered by the Board in
this respect consisted of payments related to the purchase or sale of products and/or services, the
licensing of intellectual property rights or other activities (in the cases of Messrs. Anderson,
Becton, Larsen, Mecklenburg, Overlock and Scott, Drs. Fraser-Liggett, Mahmoud and Sommer, and Ms.
Minehan) and charitable contributions (in the cases of Mr. Overlock and Drs. Fraser-Liggett and
Sommer).
This independence review is one of several established policies and procedures through which
the Board (through the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee) may review transactions and
relationships between BD and its directors, executive officers, or their family members, and
organizations with which they are affiliated. In November 2006, the Board supplemented these
policies and procedures with a new written policy (the Policy) covering related person
transactions involving more than $120,000 per year where a director, executive officer or
shareholder owning more than 5% of BDs stock (excluding certain passive investors) or their
immediate family members, has, or will have, a material interest, regardless of whether the
transaction impacts a directors independence. The Policy is available on BDs website at
www.bd.com/investors/corporate_governance/. The Policy excludes specified transactions including
certain charitable contributions, transactions available to employees generally, and
indemnification and advancement of certain expenses. The Corporate Governance and Nominating
Committee is responsible for the review and approval or ratification of transactions subject to the
Policy. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee will approve or ratify only those
transactions that it determines in its business judgment are fair and reasonable to BD and in (or
not inconsistent with) the best interests of BD and its stockholders, and do not impact the
directors independence when relevant. With the exception of BDs relationship with Goldman, Sachs
& Co. and affiliated entities discussed below, none of the transactions reviewed in connection with
the independence of the non-management directors that occurred during fiscal year 2009 were subject
to approval or ratification under the Policy because the $120,000 threshold was not exceeded and/or
the interest of the director was not material.
The Committee considered under the Policy the fact that Cathy E. Minehans husband holds a
senior management position as a managing director at Goldman, Sachs & Co. (Goldman Sachs), which,
together with affiliated entities (collectively Goldman
Sachs), has provided investment banking
and certain financial services to BD. BDs relationship with Goldman Sachs predated Ms. Minehans
election to the Board, and her husband has played no role in the transactions between Goldman Sachs
and BD. Based upon its review, the Committee approved the provision of such services by Goldman
Sachs to BD, for which BD paid a total of approximately $3.3 million during fiscal year 2009, which
was far below the level that would have impaired Ms. Minehans independence.
BD
also engaged several shareholders (or their affiliated operating units) holding 5% or more of BD common
stock during fiscal year 2009 for various financial services. Fees paid were as
follows: Barclays Global Investors, NA: $868,000 (banking services and investment management of
various pension plan and Savings Incentive Plan funds); and State Street Bank and Trust Company,
Trustee: $568,000 (banking services and investment management of various Savings Incentive Plan
funds). These transactions are not required to be approved under the Policy since
these entities are considered passive investors in BD.
Board Evaluation
Each year the Board evaluates its performance and effectiveness. As part of this process, each
director completes a Board Evaluation Form to provide feedback on specific aspects of the Boards
role, organization and meetings. The collective ratings and comments are then presented by the
Chair of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee to the full Board. As part of the
evaluation, the Board assesses the progress in the areas targeted for improvement a year earlier,
and develops recommendations to enhance the Boards effectiveness over the next year. The Boards
evaluation covers many areas (a complete list is available on BDs website at
www.bd.com/investors/corporate_governance). Additionally, each Board Committee conducts an annual
self-evaluation of its performance through a similar process.
Director Nomination Process
The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee reviews the skills, characteristics and
experience of potential candidates for election to the Board and recommends nominees for director
to the full Board for approval. The assessment of the overall composition of the Board encompasses
considerations of diversity, age, skills, international background, and significant experience and
prominence in areas of importance to BD.
It is the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committees policy to consider referrals of
prospective nominees for the Board from other Board members and management, as well as shareholders
and other external sources such as retained executive search firms. The Corporate Governance and
Nominating Committee utilizes the same criteria for evaluating candidates irrespective of their
source.
16
To recommend a candidate for consideration, a shareholder should submit a written statement of
the qualifications of the proposed nominee, including full name and address, to the Corporate
Secretary, BD, 1 Becton Drive, Franklin Lakes, New Jersey 07417-1880.
The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee believes that any nominee must meet the
following minimum qualifications:
|
|
|
Candidates should be persons of high integrity who possess independence,
forthrightness, inquisitiveness, good judgment and strong analytical skills. |
|
|
|
|
Candidates should demonstrate a commitment to devote the time required for
Board duties including, but not limited to, attendance at meetings. |
|
|
|
|
Candidates should possess a team-oriented ethic and be committed to the
interests of all shareholders as opposed to those of any particular constituency. |
When considering director candidates, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee will
seek individuals with backgrounds and qualities that, when combined with those of BDs other
directors, provide a blend of skills and experience that will further enhance the Boards
effectiveness. From time-to-time, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee has retained an
executive search firm to assist it in its efforts to identify and evaluate potential director
candidates.
The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee assesses the characteristics and performance
of incumbent director nominees against the above criteria as well, and, to the extent applicable,
considers the impact of any change in the principal occupations of such directors during the last
year. Upon completion of the individual director evaluation process, the Corporate Governance and
Nominating Committee reports its conclusions and recommendations for nominations to the Board.
Business Conduct and Compliance Guide
BD maintains a Business Conduct and Compliance Guide (the Guide), which was adopted by the
Board in 1995. The Guide is a code of conduct and ethics applicable to all directors, officers and
employees of BD, including its Chief Executive Officer and its Chief Financial Officer, principal
accounting officer and other senior financial officers. It sets forth BDs policies and
expectations on a number of topics, including conflicts of interest, confidentiality, compliance
with laws (including insider trading laws), preservation and use of BDs assets, and business
ethics. The Guide also sets forth procedures for the communicating and handling of any potential
conflict of interest (or the appearance of any conflict of interest) involving directors or
executive officers, and for the confidential communication and handling of issues regarding
accounting, internal controls and auditing matters.
Since 1995, BD has also maintained an Ethics Help Line telephone number (the Help Line) for
BD associates as a means of raising concerns or seeking advice. The Help Line is serviced by an
independent contractor and is available to all associates worldwide, 7 days a week, 24 hours a day.
Translation services are also available to associates. Associates using the Help Line may choose to
remain anonymous and all inquiries are kept confidential to the extent practicable in connection
with investigation of an inquiry. All Help Line inquiries are forwarded to BDs Chief Ethics
Officer for investigation. Any matters reported to the Chief Ethics Officer, whether through the
Help Line or otherwise, involving accounting, internal control or audit matters, or any fraud
involving management or persons who have a significant role in BDs internal controls, are reported
directly to the Audit Committee.
The Chief Ethics Officer leads the BD Ethics Office, a unit within BD that administers BDs
Ethics program. In addition to the Help Line, the Ethics program provides for broad communication
of BDs Core Values, associate education regarding the Guide and its requirements, and ethics
training sessions. BDs Core Values are:
|
|
|
We do what is right |
|
|
|
|
We always seek to improve |
|
|
|
|
We accept personal responsibility |
|
|
|
|
We treat each other with respect |
Any waivers from any provisions of the Guide for executive officers and directors would be
promptly disclosed to shareholders. In addition, certain amendments to the Guide, as well as any
waivers from certain provisions of the Guide relating to BDs Chief Executive Officer, Chief
Financial Officer or principal accounting officer would be posted at the website address set forth
below.
The Guide is posted on BDs website at www.bd.com/investors/corporate_governance/. Printed
copies of the Guide may be obtained, without charge, by contacting the Corporate Secretary, BD, 1
Becton Drive, Franklin Lakes, New Jersey 07417-1880, phone 1-201-847-6800.
17
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
The following is a discussion of our executive compensation program and compensation decisions
made with respect to Edward J. Ludwig, our Chief Executive Officer (referred to as our CEO), and
the other executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table
on page 35. We refer to our
CEO and these other executive officers as the named executive officers.
The following discussion includes statements regarding performance targets in the limited
context of our executive compensation program. These targets are not statements of managements
expectations of our future results or other guidance. Investors should not evaluate these targets
in any other context.
All references to years are references to BDs fiscal year, which ends on September 30, unless
otherwise noted.
Executive Summary
Overview of 2009 operating performance
2009 was a challenging year for most of our industry and for BD as well. As is more fully
described in the Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations section of our 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K, the global recession weakened the
growth in demand for our products, and the significant strengthening of the U.S. dollar against
other world currencies adversely affected our reported results. Despite this very difficult
environment, BD delivered strong operating performance in 2009. Highlights of BDs performance
include:
|
|
|
Revenues Despite adverse changes in foreign currency exchange rates and weakened
customer demand, we were able to increase our reported revenues 1% from 2008 (which
reflects a 4% unfavorable impact from foreign currency translation). |
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share Through productivity improvements and disciplined expense
management, our reported diluted earnings per share from continuing operations
increased 11%. |
|
|
|
|
Cash Flow We generated about $1.7 billion of net cash flow from operations, and
returned about $867 million to our shareholders through dividends and share
repurchases. |
|
|
|
|
R&D Despite the economic challenges BD faced, we continued to invest in research
and development to position BD for long-term growth. |
While BD delivered strong operating performance during 2009, we expect the challenging
economic environment to continue in 2010. In response, management has, among other things, put in
place company-wide cost control measures. It was within the context of our 2009 performance and
our outlook for 2010 that the Compensation and Benefits Committee (the Compensation Committee)
reviewed its compensation decisions and made certain changes to our program for 2010, as discussed
in more detail in this Compensation Discussion and Analysis.
Effect of 2009 performance on compensation
Our adjusted diluted earnings per share from continuing operations for 2009 exceeded the
target goal set under our Performance Incentive Plan (PIP), our annual cash incentive award plan.
In recognition of BD managements efforts to maintain BDs profitability in 2009 in spite of the
challenging economic environment, the Compensation Committee made a PIP award to our CEO of 117% of
his target award, and made PIP awards to our other named executive officers ranging from 100% to
118% of their target awards. The efforts of our named executive officers were also rewarded
through the equity-based compensation awards discussed later in this Compensation Discussion and
Analysis.
At
the same time, the lower revenue growth BD experienced in 2009
contributed to a below-target payout of the Performance Units covering the 2007-2009 performance cycle. These Performance
Units paid out at 77% of the share target.
In sum, we believe the elements of our program designed to link pay to performance and align
the interests of our executives and BDs shareholders worked as intended. The success of our
executives in maintaining BDs profitability in 2009 resulted in the PIP and equity awards
described above. Conversely, the below-target revenue results over the three-year performance
cycle ending with 2009 resulted in below target Performance Unit payouts. In addition, equity
compensation awards aligned the interests of our named executive officers with our shareholders, as
the decline in stock price our shareholders have experienced since September 2008 lowered the value
of our executives unvested awards.
18
Actions taken with respect to 2010 compensation
The Compensation Committee reviewed our compensation program in light of the current economic
climate and our corporate-wide cost control efforts, and also considered ways in which to increase
the link between pay and performance. As part of this review, consideration was given to the
continued need to attract and retain executives to lead BDs future growth, and the importance of
maintaining a degree of consistency in our compensation practices. As a result of this review, the
following actions were taken for 2010:
Base Salaries
|
|
|
Salaries for our named executive officers for calendar year 2010 have been
frozen at calendar year 2009 levels. |
Changes to Performance Incentive Plan
|
|
|
We added a revenue target with a 25% weighting to the existing earnings per
share target to determine funding available for awards under our PIP. |
|
|
|
|
The threshold performance needed for the funding of PIP awards was raised from
80% to 90% of target performance. |
|
|
|
|
Performance at target will only result in funding for awards at 60% of the
individual target awards set for our named executive officers and other executive
officers, subject to the Compensation Committees discretion to make adjustments,
upward or downward, based on individual performance. |
Changes to equity compensation
|
|
|
Equity-based compensation awards to our executive officers will consist solely
of stock appreciation rights (SARs) and Performance Units in order to increase
the portion of their compensation that is performance-based. |
|
|
|
|
The revenue target for Performance Units awarded in November 2009 was set at 7%,
compared to 8.5% for the prior grant, while the return on invested capital target
was raised from 31% to 32%. The change to the revenue growth target more
appropriately reflects the growth trends in the segments in which we operate. |
The Compensation Committee believes that these actions are responsive to current economic
conditions and are consistent with the objectives of both our executive compensation program and
our cost-control efforts. The Compensation Committee will continue to monitor our program to
ensure that it is consistent with BDs objectives, provides appropriate incentives to management
and remains competitive with our industry.
Objectives of our executive compensation program
An understanding of our executive compensation program begins with the objectives the program
is intended to serve. These include:
Offering competitive compensation. We seek to offer a compensation package that is
competitive with the compensation offered by peer companies and helps us attract and retain our
executives.
Linking rewards to performance. We seek to implement a pay-for-performance philosophy by
tying a significant portion of executive compensation to the achievement of financial and other
goals of BD and an executives contributions to the achievement of those goals.
Aligning the interests of our executives and shareholders. We seek to align the interests of
our executives with those of our shareholders through equity-based compensation and share ownership
guidelines.
The process for setting executive compensation
The role of the Compensation and Benefits Committee, its consultant and management
The Compensation Committee oversees the compensation program for the named executive officers
and our other executive officers. The Compensation Committee is assisted in fulfilling its
responsibilities by its independent consultant, Towers Perrin, and BDs senior management.
Additional information about our process for setting executive compensation, including the role of
Towers Perrin and management, may be found on pages 9-10.
The Compensation Committee has established a policy whereby BD will not engage Towers Perrin
to perform any services. In accordance with this policy, BD did not engage Towers Perrin to
perform any services in 2009. From-time-to-
19
time, BD purchases general off-the-shelf salary
surveys published by Towers Perrin for certain countries outside the U.S., for which BD paid approximately $10,000 in 2009. The Compensation Committee does not believe that
the purchase of these surveys is inconsistent with its policy or impairs the independence of Towers
Perrin in any way.
The use of market comparison data
The Compensation Committee uses information on the compensation practices of select peer
companies in setting executive compensation. This review is done with respect to both the
structure of our program and target compensation levels.
The peer group used by the Compensation Committee consists of the publicly-traded healthcare
companies listed below. This group is referred to as the Comparison Group. These companies were
chosen by the Compensation Committee after considering the recommendations of Towers Perrin and
management. The companies in this group were selected because they have significant lines of
business that are similar to BDs. The Compensation Committee believes that reference to the
Comparison Group is appropriate when reviewing BDs compensation program because it believes we
compete with these companies for executive talent. Information on the pay practices of the
Comparison Group is provided by Towers Perrin to the extent such information is available.
|
|
|
Agilent Technologies, Inc.
|
|
Hospira, Inc. |
Alcon, Inc.
|
|
Medtronic, Inc. |
Allergan, Inc.
|
|
PerkinElmer, Inc. |
C.R. Bard, Inc.
|
|
St. Jude Medical, Inc. |
Baxter International Inc.
|
|
Stryker Corporation |
Beckman Coulter, Inc.
|
|
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. |
Boston Scientific Corporation
|
|
Zimmer Holdings, Inc. |
Covidien, Ltd. |
|
|
The table below sets forth revenue and market capitalization information regarding the
Comparison Group:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue (in millions) |
|
Market Capitalization |
|
|
Twelve months ended |
|
on September 30, 2009 |
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
(in millions) |
25th Percentile |
|
$ |
3,826 |
|
|
$ |
8,638 |
|
Median |
|
$ |
4,795 |
|
|
$ |
15,962 |
|
75th Percentile |
|
$ |
9,043 |
|
|
$ |
19,888 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BD |
|
$ |
7,161 |
|
|
$ |
16,536 |
|
Percentile Rank |
|
|
67 |
% |
|
|
53 |
% |
Towers Perrin conducts an annual comparison of our executive compensation structure and
practices to those of the Comparison Group. Based on its review in 2009, Towers Perrin concluded
that the structure of BDs compensation program is competitive with industry practices and
consistent with the program objectives described above.
Market comparison data is also used in setting target compensation levels for each of the key
elements of our program (salary, annual cash incentive award and equity compensation) and for the
combined total of these elements. The Compensation Committee seeks to determine for each key
element the prevailing competitive range of target compensation among the Comparison Group based on
publicly-available information, with the intent that the mid-point of the range be the 50th
percentile of the Comparison Group. The Compensation Committee then seeks to target each key
element of compensation within this competitive range, assuming payout of performance-based
compensation at target. An executives actual compensation may be more or less than the target
amount set by the Compensation Committee based on the individuals and BDs performance, changes in
our stock price and other factors.
Setting compensation targets based on market comparison data is intended to ensure that our
compensation practices remain competitive. Because each compensation element is targeted to be
within a competitive range, compensation decisions made with respect to one element of compensation
do not affect decisions made with respect to other elements. It is also for this reason that no
specific formula is used to determine the allocation between cash and equity compensation, although
it is the Compensation Committees intent that equity compensation represent the largest percentage
of overall target compensation. In addition, because a named executive officers compensation
target is set by reference to persons with similar duties at these other companies, the
Compensation Committee does not establish any fixed relationship between the compensation of the
CEO and that of any other named executive officer.
20
The use of tally sheets
From time-to-time, the Compensation Committee reviews a summary report, or tally sheet,
prepared by management for each named executive officer. The tally sheet includes:
|
|
|
total annual compensation, including salary, annual cash incentive award, equity-based
compensation, perquisites, pension benefit accruals and other compensation; |
|
|
|
|
current holdings of BD common stock, and the total value of unexercised or unvested
equity compensation awards; |
|
|
|
|
total accrued benefits under BDs pension, savings and deferred compensation plans; and |
|
|
|
|
amounts payable upon termination of employment under various circumstances, including
retirement or a change of control. |
The Compensation Committee uses tally sheets to estimate the total annual compensation of the
named executive officers, provide perspective on the wealth they have accumulated under our program
in terms of prior equity grants and plan accruals, review the retentive value of plan benefits and
prior equity awards, consider any changes to our program that may be appropriate (including the mix
of compensation elements), and provide additional context for their compensation decisions.
While the Compensation Committee considers the wealth accumulation of our executives, this
did not affect the Compensation Committees compensation decisions for fiscal year 2009. This
reflects the Compensation Committees view that, consistent with the goals of our program,
compensation decisions should be based primarily on the executives performance and the market
value of his services, and post-retirement benefits should properly reflect years of service. In
this regard, the Compensation Committee is mindful that reducing an executives compensation based
on the value of past compensation or accrued benefits could weaken the competitiveness of our
compensation program and make it more difficult to attract and retain executive talent. Reducing
an executives compensation based on the value of prior equity awards, which is dependent on the
creation of shareholder value, could also unfairly penalize the executive for our past performance.
Moreover, the value of previously-granted equity awards is subject to fluctuation based on market
conditions and may not be a true indication of the value the executive will realize.
21
The structure of our compensation program
The key elements of our program
For 2009, the key elements of our executive compensation program were base salary, an annual
cash incentive award under our PIP and long-term equity-based compensation. These elements are
summarized in the table below:
|
|
|
|
|
Component |
|
Description |
|
Purpose |
Base Salary
|
|
Fixed cash
compensation based
on the executives
performance, scope
of responsibilities
and experience, and
competitive pay
practices.
|
|
Provide a fixed,
baseline level of
compensation that is
not contingent upon
BDs performance. |
|
|
|
|
|
Annual incentive award
|
|
Cash payment tied to
BDs performance
during the fiscal
year.
|
|
Reward achieving or
exceeding annual
performance
objectives and
individual
contributions to
BDs performance. |
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term Equity
Compensation: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
Appreciation Rights
(SARs)
|
|
Right to receive,
upon exercise,
shares equal in
value to the
difference between
exercise price and
current market
price.
|
|
Increase executive
ownership, promote
executive retention,
align compensation
with the achievement
of long-term
performance
objectives and
reward the creation
of shareholder
value. |
|
|
|
|
|
Performance Units
|
|
Performance-based
restricted stock
units. Amount of
payout is tied to
BDs performance
over three-year
performance period. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time-Vested
Units
(TVUs)
|
|
Restricted stock
unit that vests
three years after
grant (as discussed
later, TVUs will be
phased out in 2010). |
|
|
The Compensation Committee chose this combination of cash and equity compensation to further
the objectives of our executive compensation program. Based on prevailing market practices, the
Committee believes it needs to provide a mix of salary, annual cash incentive and equity
compensation awards in order to provide a competitive compensation package. In addition, the
Committee seeks to promote our pay-for-performance philosophy by making a significant portion of
target compensation at-risk. The Compensation Committee believes it accomplishes this goal by
linking pay levels to both our short-term performance (through PIP awards) and long-term
performance (through Performance Units and SARs). Finally, a significant portion of total
compensation is provided through equity compensation awards that align the interests of the named
executive officers with our shareholders and promote executive retention. Equity-based awards will
continue to be an important aspect of our program in this difficult economic environment, since
their value is tied to the creation of stockholder value.
Our pay-for-performance approach
No specific formula is used to determine the allocation between performance-based and fixed
compensation. However, BDs emphasis on pay-for-performance resulted in performance-based
compensation representing a significant portion of total target compensation in 2009, ranging from
61% to 70% of total target compensation of our named executive officers (excluding Mr. Elkins).
The table below shows the portion of total target compensation (salary, PIP awards and equity
compensation) that consisted of performance-based compensation (PIP awards, Performance Units and
SARs) for the officers listed. The table is based on PIP award targets and the SFAS No. 123(R)
value of their equity compensation awards used for financial reporting. Because this table is
based on target amounts and involves equity compensation, actual amounts received (and the
percentage of total compensation coming from performance-based compensation) may differ based on
performance and BDs stock price. For purposes of this table, we do not treat TVUs as
performance-based compensation, since their payout is not tied to performance objectives or
increases in BDs stock price. Our Chief Financial Officer, David V. Elkins, who joined BD on
22
December 1, 2008, is not included in the table below, since he did not receive any SARs or
Performance Units during 2009, and it was agreed that he would receive a minimum PIP award at least equal to his target award
as part of his committee-approved initial compensation plan, which is described in detail under
Other Compensation Matters on page 29. Other than as described in that section, beginning in 2010,
Mr. Elkins compensation will include the same performance elements as the other named executive
officers.
Fiscal Year 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Based |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
as Percentage |
|
|
FY 2009 |
|
FY 2009 |
|
Total Target |
|
|
|
|
|
of |
|
|
Target PIP |
|
Performance Unit/ |
|
Performance-Based |
|
Total Target |
|
Total Target |
Name |
|
Award |
|
SAR Awards |
|
Compensation |
|
Compensation |
|
Compensation |
Edward J. Ludwig |
|
$ |
1,284,000 |
|
|
$ |
3,552,057 |
|
|
$ |
4,836,057 |
|
|
$ |
6,882,120 |
|
|
|
70 |
% |
John R. Considine |
|
|
519,704 |
|
|
|
1,028,541 |
|
|
|
1,548,245 |
|
|
|
2,523,809 |
|
|
|
61 |
% |
Vincent A. Forlenza |
|
|
556,504 |
|
|
|
1,235,504 |
|
|
|
1,764,662 |
|
|
|
2,726,700 |
|
|
|
65 |
% |
William A. Kozy |
|
|
397,008 |
|
|
|
855,571 |
|
|
|
1,252,579 |
|
|
|
2,054,858 |
|
|
|
61 |
% |
As is discussed later in this Compensation Discussion and Analysis, beginning in 2010, equity
compensation awards to our executive officers will consist solely of SARs and Performance Units.
This will increase the amount of total target compensation that is performance-based.
Our risk analysis of performance-based compensation
While a significant portion of our executive compensation plan is performance-based, we do not
believe that our program encourages excessive or unnecessary risk-taking. While risk-taking is a
necessary part of growing a business, the Compensation Committee has focused on aligning BDs
compensation policies with the long-term interests of BD and avoiding short-term rewards for
management decisions that could pose long-term risks to BD, as follows:
|
|
|
Limits on PIP awards. The compensation of our named executive officers is not
overly-weighted toward short-term incentives. For instance, our CEOs target PIP award in
2009 was about 19% of his total target compensation. Moreover, PIP awards are capped at
200% of an executives target award to protect against disproportionately large short-term
incentives, and the Compensation Committee has broad discretion in determining the size of
PIP awards based on those factors it deems appropriate, including whether an executive has
caused BD to incur unnecessary or excessive risk. |
|
|
|
|
Share ownership guidelines. Our share ownership guidelines require the named executive
officers to hold a certain amount of BD stock. This ensures that each executive will have
a significant amount of personal wealth tied to long-term holdings in BD stock. |
|
|
|
|
Use of Long-term Incentive Compensation. The largest percentage of target compensation
is equity-based long-term incentive compensation that vests over a period of years. This
vesting period encourages our executives to focus on sustaining BDs long-term performance.
These grants are also made annually, so executives always have unvested awards that could
decrease significantly in value if our business is not managed for the long term. |
|
|
|
|
Use of Performance Units. A significant portion of long-term incentive compensation
consists of Performance Units. Performance Unit payouts are tied to how BD performs on
specific measures over a three-year period, which focuses management on sustaining BDs
long-term performance. These awards also have overlapping performance periods, so any
risks taken to increase the payout under one award could jeopardize the potential payouts
under other awards. To further ensure that there is not a significant incentive for
unnecessary risk-taking, we cap the payout of these awards at 200% of target. |
|
|
|
|
Limit on SARs. SARs have value only if our stock price increases and have no limits on
the amount that can be realized from the award. This arguably could encourage executives
to take risks intended to result in short-term increases in stock price. However, this
risk is mitigated by limiting the portion of equity compensation, and, therefore, of total
target compensation, that consists of SARs. This risk is also mitigated by our share
ownership guidelines and by requiring that the named executive officers hold 75% of the
net, after-tax shares received on exercise for one year. We also issue SARs along with
restricted stock units, the value of which would be at-risk if decisions focused on
short-term results hurt BDs long-term performance. |
23
|
|
|
Performance Metrics. We use a variety of performance metrics (earnings per share,
revenue growth and return on invested capital) that we believe correlate to long-term
creation of shareholder value and that are affected by management decisions. None of our
performance measures are tied to BDs stock price. |
In sum, our program is structured so that a considerable amount of wealth of our executives is
tied to the long-term health of BD, we avoid the type of disproportionately large short-term
incentives that could encourage executives to take risks that may not be in BDs long-term interests, and we provide incentives to manage for long-term
performance. We believe this combination of factors encourages our executives to manage BD in a
prudent manner.
How our PIP and equity compensation are administered
PIP
The PIP provides an opportunity to receive an annual cash incentive award to reward the named
executive officers for BDs performance for the fiscal year and their contribution to that
performance, as part of our pay-for-performance philosophy. The Compensation Committee believes
that providing an annual cash incentive opportunity is an important part of our pay-for-performance
philosophy and allows use to provide a competitive executive compensation program.
Target awards. Target annual incentive awards for the named executive officers are set each
fiscal year, based on job responsibilities. These targets are expressed as a percentage of base
salary. For 2009, PIP award targets for the named executive officers were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Target Award as % of Salary |
Edward J. Ludwig |
|
|
120 |
% |
David V. Elkins |
|
|
70 |
% |
John R. Considine |
|
|
75 |
% |
Vincent A. Forlenza |
|
|
85 |
% |
William A. Kozy |
|
|
70 |
% |
The Compensation Committee increased Mr. Forlenzas target award from 70% for 2008 to 85% for
2009 in connection with his election as BDs President.
Actual PIP awards may range from zero to 200% of the named executive officers target award,
based on BDs and the individuals performance. However, it was agreed with Mr. Elkins that he
would receive a minimum PIP award at least equal to his target PIP award for 2009 in connection
with his joining BD. The Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal
Year 2009 table on page 38 shows the range of possible awards under the PIP for 2009.
Named executive officers are eligible to receive payment of PIP awards, within the range
described above, only if BD first meets a baseline performance target established by the
Compensation Committee. For 2009, the performance target was based on
BDs net income.
Achievement of the baseline performance target results in an allocation of the maximum PIP award
that may be paid to a named executive officer (200% of target). The Compensation Committee has the
discretion (and has historically exercised this discretion) to reduce the amount of the award based
on such factors as the Compensation Committee deems appropriate.
The factors the Compensation Committee considers when setting PIP awards are the funding
available for awards (described below) and the named executive officers performance during the
year. CEO performance is measured by his progress against the performance goals for the year that
are established by the Board. With respect to the other named executive officers, the CEO provides
an assessment to the Compensation Committee of how those executive officers performed against their
performance objectives relating to the businesses or functions which they oversee. In each case,
the performance objectives for a named executive officer involve a combination of quantitative and
qualitative goals. However, no specific formula or weighting of individual performance objectives
is used to determine an executive officers PIP award, nor is the achievement of any particular
performance objective a condition to receiving an award. Instead, the Compensation Committee uses
its business judgment to determine the appropriate PIP award to recognize BDs performance and the
executives contribution.
Funding for PIP awards. For associates in our corporate functions, the amount of funding
available for PIP awards is based on BDs overall results, while funding for associates in our
business units is based on both BDs results and the results of that unit. The amount of funding
available for PIP awards to the named executive officers is based solely on BDs results. These
awards are made from a pool that is funded based on a formula. The amount of available funding
depends on how well BD performs during the year compared to the performance target set by the
Compensation Committee. Performance that exceeds our goals for the year results in additional
available funds for awards, while performance that falls short of our expectations results in less
funding. For 2009, the Compensation Committee set a diluted earnings per share from continuing
24
operations (referred to as EPS) target. EPS is used since it is the primary basis on which we set
our performance expectations for the year, and we believe consistent EPS growth leads to long-term
shareholder value.
In applying the funding formula, the Compensation Committee has the discretion to make
adjustments when examining BDs operating results to account for events that occurred during the
year. These include, among other things, the effect of acquisitions and divestitures as well as
items that are not considered part of our ordinary operations (such as losses or gains on
litigation settlements). The Compensation Committee uses its discretion in this manner to ensure
that management makes decisions based on what is in the best interest of BD and not the possible
effects on its compensation. This discretion is also used to ensure that our executives are not
unfairly harmed, and do not unfairly benefit, from these types of events.
The following table shows the formula for overall PIP funding for 2009:
|
|
|
Performance Level |
|
Funding Level |
Below 80% of performance target
|
|
No funding |
At 80% of performance target
|
|
50% funding of target awards |
Every 1% increase between 80% and 100% of performance target
|
|
An additional 2.5% of funding |
At 100% of performance target
|
|
100% funding of target awards |
Every 1% increase above 100% of performance target
|
|
An additional 5% of funding (to a maximum of 150%) |
Since individual PIP awards are determined in the discretion of the Compensation Committee,
actual PIP awards to the named executive officers, as a percentage of their award targets, may be
different than the overall funding percentage under the PIP.
Change to performance target and funding formula for 2010. The Compensation Committee has
made certain changes to the PIP funding formula for 2010. First, a revenue target was added to the
existing EPS target to determine funding available for PIP awards. This revenue target will carry
a 25% weighting in determining the payout pool, and the EPS target will be weighted 75%. The
revenue target will be set based on BDs business plan for the fiscal year. Revenues will be
measured after eliminating the effects of foreign currency translation so that only the impact of
improved performance is considered. This change emphasizes BDs goal of increasing revenue growth.
Certain
other changes were made to the formula. These include raising the threshold performance
level required for the funding of PIP awards from 80% to 90% of target performance. The formula
was also temporarily changed, as part of our cost control measures, so that meeting target performance will only result in funding for awards at 60%
of target for our named executive officers and other executive officers (although the Compensation
Committee retains the discretion to adjust such awards upward or downward based on individual
performance). The Compensation Committee intends to revisit this change next year in light of
the economic conditions at that time.
Equity-Based Compensation
An integral part of our compensation program is long-term equity-based compensation. The
awards made to the named executive officers in 2009 consisted of SARs, Performance Units and TVUs.
A description of each type of award begins on page 39.
Changes to mix of equity-based compensation awards in 2009 and 2010. The Compensation
Committee uses a mix of different equity compensation awards to promote the objectives of our
program. Performance Units are intended to focus the named executive officers on sustained
performance, and can provide value to the executives for the achievement of long-term goals
regardless of movements in our stock price. SARs are intended to reward the executives for the
creation of shareholder value over the term of the award. Because they are equity-based,
Performance Units, SARs and TVUs also align the interests of our executives with our shareholders.
Moreover, since they are subject to vesting over a period of years, they help promote executive
retention.
In prior years, we had issued restricted stock units to our named executive officers that did
not vest until one year after retirement (referred to as Career Shares). In 2009, the named
executive officers were issued TVUs with a three-year vesting schedule in place of Career Shares.
The Compensation Committee made this change after reviewing the compensation practices of the
Comparison Group and determining that the use of Career Shares was not in line with prevailing
practices. This change also simplified our executive compensation program by making awards granted
to our named executive officers the same as those granted to the other members of the BD Leadership
Team. TVUs are also assigned a higher value than Career Shares, due to their shorter vesting
period. As a result, this change resulted in fewer units being awarded to provide the same award
value.
25
Beginning with grants made in 2010, equity compensation awards to our named executive officers
and other members of senior management will consist solely of SARs and Performance Units. This
change was made to increase the link of performance and the creation of shareholder value with
executive compensation.
How awards are determined. The Compensation Committee does not issue a targeted number of
SARs or units to the named executive officers. Instead, the Compensation Committee sets an amount,
in dollar value, to be granted to each named executive officer, based on market comparison data and
individual performance. For grants made in 2009, the named executive officers were granted SARs
and Performance Units, each having an estimated value on the date of grant equal to approximately
40% of the total award value, and TVUs for the remaining 20% of the award. We use a Black-Scholes
option valuation model to value SARs and the BD stock price to value Performance Units and TVUs.
Prior to the grants in 2009, we valued awards using the BD stock price on the grant date.
However, there was a significant decline in the BD stock price during the beginning of 2009. As a
result, the Compensation Committee determined that using the grant date stock price to value the
2009 grants would result in awards that, in absolute number, would be notably larger than in prior
years.
Accordingly, the Compensation Committee decided to use an average closing stock price (using
the closing BD stock price on the grant date and the last trading day of each of the three
preceding months) to estimate the value of the SARs and units granted to our CEO and other
executive officers. This resulted in the Compensation Committee using a share price of $74.89
instead of the grant date closing price of $62.50. This change resulted in fewer SARs and units
being granted to the named executive officers than would have been granted using the prior
methodology. The closing price on the date of grant was used to value awards to associates who are
not executive officers.
For the equity compensation awards granted in 2010 (discussed on page
28), the Compensation
Committee used the average closing BD stock price for the 20 trading days preceding the grant date
to determine the BD stock price used to value awards. The Compensation Committee believes that
this practice reduces the effects of stock price volatility on the number of awards. It also
reduces the possibility of grantees being harmed by or benefiting from short-term movements in our
stock price.
The estimated values of equity compensation awards are determined as of the grant date, and
are not predictive of the value that will be ultimately realized from the awards. Such value will
depend on a number of factors, including our operating performance and our stock price.
Performance Unit targets. The performance measures used for the Performance Units are revenue
growth and return on invested capital (which we refer to as ROIC). For grants made in 2009,
revenue growth is weighted 60% and ROIC is weighted 40%. For the grants made in 2010, revenue
growth is weighted 70% and ROIC is weighted 30%. Revenue and ROIC targets for Performance Units
are based on BDs business plan at the time of the grant and what the Compensation Committee
believes is a reasonable range of performance over the performance period, as well as growth trends
in the segments in which we operate. The Compensation Committees goal is to set challenging but
achievable goals.
We use revenue growth as a performance metric because it is directly tied to our long-term
growth strategy of focusing on products that provide greater benefits to patients, healthcare
workers and researchers. Revenue growth is measured after eliminating the effect of foreign
currency translation so that only the impact of improved performance is counted. ROIC is used to
motivate our executives to continue BDs returns at their recent levels and maintain our balance
sheet strength. The Compensation Committee believes sustained performance in revenue growth and
ROIC will lead to long-term value for our shareholders.
Performance Unit awards are given a share target. A grid
determines the actual number of
shares that will be issued upon vesting, based on how BDs performance compares to the performance
targets. The number of shares issued can range anywhere from zero (if BD fails to meet the minimum
performance threshold for both revenue growth and ROIC) to 200% of the share target (if BD meets
the maximum payout threshold for both revenue growth and ROIC). In applying the grid, the
Compensation Committee has the discretion to make adjustments when examining BDs operating results to account
for events that occur during the performance period.
As with PIP awards, the Compensation Committee establishes a baseline performance target for
the Performance Units, which establishes a maximum award payout if the target is met. The
Compensation Committee has the discretion (and has historically exercised this discretion) to
reduce the amount of the award based on the revenue and ROIC grid discussed above. For purposes of
this proxy statement, when discussing performance measures for Performance Units, we refer to the
revenue and ROIC targets.
26
Compensation Actions
Below is a discussion of compensation actions taken with respect to the named executive
officers.
Salary adjustments
The base salaries of the named executive officers are reviewed each November, and any
adjustments go into effect on January 1 of the following year.
2009 Salaries. Mr. Ludwigs base salary for calendar year 2009 was maintained at $1,070,000,
the same salary in effect for calendar year 2008, because the Compensation Committee believed Mr.
Ludwigs salary was consistent with competitive pay practices.
In November 2008, we announced that Vincent A. Forlenza was elected as President of BD,
effective January 1, 2009. In connection with his election, Mr. Forlenzas salary was increased
from $545,000 to $650,000. Salary increases were also approved for the other named executive
officers ranging from 3.6% to 5.5%, consistent with increases at BD generally and with market
comparison data.
David V. Elkins became our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer on December 1,
2008. In connection with his election, the Compensation Committee approved a base salary for Mr.
Elkins of $500,000.
2010 Salaries. In light of the current economic conditions and based on managements
recommendation, our named executive officers did not receive any salary increase for calendar year
2010. The Compensation Committee believes that the current salaries of the named executive
officers remain within the target range of compensation, consistent with our objective of providing
competitive compensation to our executives.
PIP awards
For 2009, the performance target under the PIP was EPS of $4.82. This target is the midpoint
of the EPS range we initially provided to investors as earnings guidance for 2009, adjusted for the
divestiture of our home healthcare business that took place in 2009. The EPS target represents a
9% increase over our reported 2008 earnings from continuing operations. Without the adjustment for
the home healthcare divestiture, the target would represent an 11% increase over reported 2008
earnings.
Our reported EPS for 2009 was $4.92. In reviewing BDs performance against the target, the
Compensation Committee exercised its discretion to eliminate the $0.11 charge incurred in
connection with the pending settlement of certain antitrust class action suits and the $0.08 gain
relating to various tax settlements. As a result, 2009 EPS was adjusted by a net $0.03 to $4.95.
This represented approximately 103% of the performance target, and resulted in available PIP
funding of 113% of target awards. The Compensation Committee adjusted for the litigation charge because it
believed the decision to enter the settlement was in BDs best interests and that it was not
appropriate to reduce available PIP funding because of the adverse effect of this settlement on our
earnings. The gain on the tax settlements was eliminated because this is not considered part of
our ordinary operations and would have resulted in an increase in PIP funding that was not related
to our performance. BDs EPS for the year also included a $0.26 gain, as compared to a budget for
the year of $0.32, relating to our hedging activities, which offset, in part, unfavorable foreign
currency translation. Hedging gains of this magnitude are unusual for BD, and resulted from the
extraordinary volatility in exchange rates that occurred in 2009. However, because it was
budgeted, the Compensation Committee did not adjust EPS for this item when calculating funding for
PIP awards.
The table below sets forth the PIP awards made to the named executive officers for 2009. These
awards are also set forth in the Summary Compensation Table on page
35 under the heading Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Target Incentive |
|
Actual Incentive |
|
Award as |
Name |
|
Award |
|
Award |
|
% of Target |
Edward J. Ludwig |
|
$ |
1,284,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,500,000 |
|
|
|
117 |
% |
David V. Elkins |
|
|
350,000 |
|
|
|
350,000 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
John R. Considine |
|
|
519,704 |
|
|
|
600,000 |
|
|
|
115 |
% |
Vincent A. Forlenza |
|
|
529,158 |
|
|
|
625,000 |
|
|
|
118 |
% |
William A. Kozy |
|
|
397,008 |
|
|
|
470,000 |
|
|
|
118 |
% |
27
The PIP awards made to the named executive officers range between 100% and 118% and were
generally in line with the available PIP funding of 113%. The Compensation Committee elected to
set Mr. Elkins award at his target because he is only in his first year at BD. The Compensation
Committee believes that these awards are within the range of compensation targeted by the
Compensation Committee, based on market comparison data.
The PIP awards granted to the named executive officers recognize the collective efforts of
BDs management in responding to the challenging economic environment BD faced in 2009 and
maintaining BDs profitability without sacrificing investment in BDs growth opportunities. In
setting these awards, the Compensation Committee also noted that each of the named executive
officers had met or exceeded their performance objectives for the year.
Equity-Based Compensation Awards
Awards made in 2009. In November 2008, the Compensation Committee made the equity compensation
awards to Messrs. Ludwig, Considine, Forlenza and Kozy reflected in the Grants of Plan-Based
Awards in Fiscal Year 2009 table on page 38. These awards were made with respect to 2008
performance. However, these awards are reflected in the Summary Compensation Table and other
tables for 2009, as required by the SEC proxy statement rules, since they were awarded during the
2009 fiscal year.
The total value of the awards to Messrs. Ludwig and Kozy represented decreases of
approximately 10% from their prior year award, while the total value of the award to Mr. Considine
represented a decrease of approximately 16%. These decreases resulted in part from the change in
methodology used by the Compensation Committee to value these awards,
as described on page 26. The award to Mr. Forlenza represented an increase of approximately 30% over his prior year award, in
recognition of his election as President of BD, effective January 1, 2009. The Compensation
Committee believes that these grants were within the target range of compensation, based on market
comparison data.
The Performance Units included in these awards cover the fiscal year 2009-2011 performance
period. The following table sets forth the minimum performance thresholds, target performance and
maximum payout thresholds for these awards:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance |
|
Target |
|
Maximum Payout |
Performance Measure |
|
Threshold(1) |
|
Performance |
|
Threshold(2) |
Revenue Growth |
|
|
5.5 |
% |
|
|
8.5 |
% |
|
|
12.5 |
% |
ROIC |
|
|
27 |
% |
|
|
31 |
% |
|
|
34 |
% |
Awards made in 2010. In November 2009, the Compensation Committee made the equity compensation
awards to the named executive officers reflected on page 38 with respect to fiscal year 2009
performance. The total value of the award to Mr. Ludwig remained at substantially the same level
as his 2008 grant. The awards made to Messrs. Considine and Forlenza represented increases of 31%
from their prior year award, while the award to Mr. Kozy represented an increase of approximately
39%. These increases were made in response to market comparison data and were intended to maintain
the equity compensation of these individuals in the competitive range targeted by the Compensation
Committee. The Compensation Committee believes that the grants made to BDs named executive
officers are within the target range of compensation.
The Performance Units included in these awards cover the fiscal year 2010-2012 performance
period. The table below shows the minimum performance thresholds, target performance and maximum
payout thresholds for these awards.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance |
|
Target |
|
Maximum Payout |
Performance Measure |
|
Threshold(1) |
|
Performance |
|
Threshold(2) |
Revenue Growth |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
11 |
% |
ROIC |
|
|
28 |
% |
|
|
32 |
% |
|
|
35 |
% |
As was stated earlier, we set revenue growth and ROIC targets for Performance Units based on
BDs business plan and what it considers a reasonable range of performance over the performance
period. In making these awards, the Compensation Committee deemed it appropriate to lower the
revenue growth target from the prior years grant. The Compensation Committee believes this
three-year revenue target is a challenging goal for management given the current economic climate
and its expected effect on BDs near-term results. At the same time, the Compensation Committee
raised the threshold performance for ROIC based on BDs past performance with respect to this
metric.
28
Payout of prior Performance Unit awards
2006-2008 performance period
In November 2008, Performance Units awarded in fiscal year 2006 vested. These awards covered
the fiscal year 2006-2008 performance period. The payout of these awards is reflected in the
Option Exercises and Stock Vested in Fiscal Year 2009
table on page 43. The performance targets
for these Performance Units were 7.5% average annual revenue growth (foreign currency neutral) and
30% average ROIC.
Average annual revenue growth and average ROIC over the performance period were approximately
7.8% and 31.8%, respectively. In applying the payout grid, the Compensation Committee used its
discretion to adjust reported revenue growth to take into account acquisitions and divestitures
that had the net effect of inflating revenue growth. This resulted in a downward adjustment of
revenue growth for the performance period from 7.8% to 7.3%. The Compensation Committee also
adjusted ROIC for the period to eliminate the effects of the income resulting from an insurance
settlement, the non-cash in-process research and development charges incurred in connection with
our acquisitions of GeneOhm Sciences, Inc., TriPath Imaging, Inc. and Plasso Technology, Ltd., and the costs associated with the exit from our blood
glucose monitoring business. However, these items offset each other and resulted in no adjustment
to ROIC for the period. The Committee adjusted ROIC for the insurance settlement because it was
not considered part of our ordinary operations and would have, standing alone, resulted in an
increase in ROIC that was not related to the performance of our business. The adverse effect on
ROIC resulting from the charges relating to our acquisitions and blood glucose monitoring business
was eliminated because these actions were taken in support of our long-term strategy, and the
Compensation Committee did not believe it was appropriate to reduce the Performance Unit payouts as
a result of these actions. Based on the adjustment to revenue growth, the share payout of the
awards was adjusted downward from 122% to 115% of the share target.
2007-2009 performance period
In November 2009, Performance Units awarded covering the fiscal year 2007-2009 performance
period vested. The performance targets for these Performance Units were 9% average annual revenue
growth (foreign currency neutral) and 30% average ROIC.
Average annual revenue growth and average ROIC over the performance period were approximately
6.4% and 31.8%, respectively. In applying the payout grid, the Compensation Committee used its
discretion to adjust reported revenue growth to take into account acquisitions and divestitures
(including the divestiture of our Home Healthcare business) that had the net effect of inflating
revenue growth for the period. This resulted in a downward adjustment of revenue growth for the
performance period from 6.4% to 6.1%. The Compensation Committee also adjusted ROIC for the period
to eliminate the effects of the in-process research and development charges incurred in connection
with the TriPath and Plasso acquisitions for the reasons discussed earlier. ROIC was further
adjusted to eliminate the effect of the charge relating to the pending settlement of certain
antitrust cases. The Compensation Committee thought it appropriate to adjust for this settlement
since it was determined that the settlement was in BDs best interests, and the Compensation
Committee did not want Performance Unit payouts to be reduced as a result. These adjustments
reduced ROIC for the period from 31.8% to 31.7%. Based on the adjustments to revenue growth and
ROIC, the share payout of the awards was adjusted downward from 83% to 77% of the share target.
Other Compensation Actions
In connection with his election as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer,
effective December 1, 2008, David V. Elkins received a sign-on payment of $220,000 and sign-on
award of 5,285 TVUs. Mr. Elkins was also given a salary of $500,000, and was guaranteed a minimum
$350,000 PIP award for 2009, which was his target. We also provided Mr. Elkins financial
assistance with his relocation to New Jersey, and will compensate him for any taxes payable as a
result of such assistance. Mr. Elkins will also receive an additional $250,000 payment in January
2010 to compensate for the forfeiture of equity awards he had previously received from his former
employer. In order to attract and retain qualified executives, sign-on packages are sometimes
needed to compensate candidates for any compensation they may lose by leaving their current
employer, and to mitigate the risk associated with a job change, particularly for persons at senior
level positions. These terms were the result of negotiations between BD and Mr. Elkins in
connection with his recruitment, and were approved by the Compensation Committee as a reasonable
inducement for Mr. Elkins to join BD.
29
Other benefits under our executive compensation program
Company transportation
The Compensation Committee encourages Mr. Ludwig to use BD aircraft for his personal and
business travel, in order to make more efficient use of his travel time and mitigate business
continuity risk. BD and Mr. Ludwig have entered into a time-sharing arrangement, under which Mr.
Ludwig makes payments to BD for his personal use of BD aircraft. For 2009, Mr. Ludwigs time-share
payments totaled $209,094. These payments covered all of the incremental costs relating to Mr.
Ludwigs personal flights. Additional information on the time-sharing arrangement is set forth in
the notes to the Summary Compensation Table on page 35.
Deferred compensation
Our Deferred Compensation and Retirement Benefit Restoration Plan is an unfunded, nonqualified
plan that, among other things, allows the named executive officers and other eligible associates to
defer receipt of cash compensation and shares issuable under certain equity compensation awards.
This gives eligible associates the opportunity to defer compensation on a pre-tax basis in addition
to what is allowed under our tax-qualified 401(k) plan. The table on
page 46 shows activity in the deferral accounts of the named executive officers during 2009. We do not provide any
guaranteed earnings on amounts deferred by the named executive officers. Earnings on these accounts
are based on their individual investment selections. The plan is offered to our eligible
associates as part of a competitive compensation program.
BD provides matching contributions on deferred cash compensation under the plan. BD matches
75% of the first 6% of salary and PIP award deferred by a participant under the plan and our 401(k)
plan combined. These matching contributions are made to the extent the total salary and PIP award
from which a participant makes contributions to both plans do not exceed three times the limit for
qualified plans (which was $735,000 in calendar year 2009).
Pension benefits
We offer retirement benefits for all of our associates. Because the Internal Revenue Code
limits the maximum annual benefit that may be paid to an individual under our qualified retirement
plan, we provide additional benefits through our non-qualified Deferred Compensation and Retirement
Benefit Restoration Plan. Together, these plans are designed to provide a market-competitive level
of income replacement for our retirement-eligible associates, reduce associate turnover and
contribute towards providing a competitive compensation package to our executives. A more complete
description of our pension benefits begins on page 43. The named executive officers participate in
these plans on the same basis as all eligible associates.
Change of control agreements
We have an agreement with each of the named executive officers relating to their employment
following a change of control. This agreement provides the executive with continued employment for
a period of two years following a change of control of BD. It also provides certain benefits to
the executive in the event his employment is terminated during this period. Generally, these
benefits include a severance payment equal to two times (in the case of Mr. Elkins) or three times
(in the case of the other named executive officers) the executives salary and PIP award, certain
pension benefits, continued welfare plan benefits and outplacement services. More complete
descriptions of the terms and potential payouts of our change of control agreements are found
beginning on page 47.
General purpose. Our change of control agreements are intended to retain the executives and
provide continuity of management in the event of an actual or threatened change of control of BD.
These change of control benefits are reviewed from time-to-time by the Compensation Committee to
ensure that they are consistent with our compensation objectives and policies. Based on
information provided by Towers Perrin, change of control arrangements are used by a substantial
majority of the companies in the Comparison Group, and the terms of our agreements, including the
severance multiple, are intended to be consistent with the prevailing practices at those companies.
The Compensation Committee believes the benefits provided under these agreements are appropriate
and are consistent with our objective of attracting and retaining highly-qualified executives.
In setting the potential payments under these agreements, the Compensation Committee does not
consider the wealth accumulation of the named executive officers, because the Compensation
Committee believes these agreements are important in protecting shareholder interests in the event
of an actual or threatened change of control. In addition, while salary and PIP decisions affect
the potential payouts under these agreements, this did not affect the Compensation Committees
decision-making. The Compensation Committee does not believe it is appropriate to base salary and
PIP decisions on the potential effect they may have under change of control agreements that may
never be triggered.
Triggering events. Our agreements contain what is known as a double trigger that is,
there must be a change of control of BD and a termination of the executives employment in order
for any payments to be made. The termination can be either an actual termination or a
constructive termination. A constructive termination occurs when a named executive
30
officers
duties are materially reduced, the executive is required to relocate beyond a certain distance, or
the executives compensation is reduced. We opted for a double-trigger, rather than providing
for severance payments solely on the basis of a change of control, since this is more consistent
with the purpose of encouraging the continued employment of the executive in the event of a change
of control.
Gross-up
payments. As is discussed on page 48, if the payments made to a
named executive officer on account of his termination exceed certain amounts, BD may not be able to deduct the
payments for federal income tax purposes and the named executive officer could be subject to a 20%
excise tax on such payments. The excise tax is in addition to the executives regular payroll and
income taxes. To offset the effect of the excise tax, we will make a gross-up payment to a named
executive officer to reimburse him for the excise tax. In this way, the executive retains the same
amount that he would have retained had the excise tax not been imposed. We provide for these
payments because they allow an executive to recognize the full intended economic benefit of his
agreement and eliminate unintended disparities between executives that the excise tax can
arbitrarily impose, owing to the particular structure of this tax provision.
Other change of control provisions
Upon a change of control, all equity compensation awards issued under our plans will
immediately vest. This accelerated vesting occurs for all employees, not just the named executive
officers. Unlike the double trigger under the change of control agreements discussed above, no termination of employment is required for the
accelerated vesting of the awards. This single-trigger vesting provides our employees with the
same opportunity as our shareholders to realize the value created by the transaction. Based on
information provided by Towers Perrin, the Compensation Committee believes that these accelerated
vesting provisions are consistent with market practices.
Significant policies and additional information regarding executive compensation
Recovery of prior compensation
The Board of Directors has adopted a policy that gives the Board the discretion to require a
member of the BD Leadership Team to reimburse BD for any PIP award or Performance Unit payout that
was based on financial results that were subsequently restated as a result of such members
misconduct. The Board also has the discretion to cancel any equity compensation awards (or recover
payouts under such awards) that were granted to such person with respect to the restated period,
and require the person to reimburse BD for any profits realized on any sale of BD stock occurring
after the public issuance of the financial statements that were subsequently restated. The BD
Leadership Team consists of 43 members of senior management, and includes the named executive
officers.
The policy also gives the Board the authority to require those members of the BD Leadership
Team who were not involved in the misconduct to reimburse BD in the amount by which their PIP award
or Performance Unit payouts exceeded the amount they would have received based on the restated
results.
The terms of the policy have been incorporated into the PIP and the terms of our equity
compensation awards. The policy can be found on BDs website at
www.bd.com/investors/corporate_governance/.
Share retention and ownership guidelines
In order to
increase executive share ownership and promote a long-term
perspective toward managing our business, we have adopted share retention and ownership guidelines for the named
executive officers and other members of the BD Leadership Team. Under the guidelines, these
associates are expected to retain, in shares of BD stock, 75% of the net, after-tax gain or the
net, after-tax shares realized under equity compensation awards granted after the adoption of the
guidelines in July 2004, until the person achieves and maintains a significant ownership position,
which is expressed as a multiple of salary as follows:
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
5 times salary |
President
|
|
5 times salary |
Other Executive Officers (9 persons)
|
|
3 times salary |
Other BD Leadership Team Members (32 persons)
|
|
1 times salary |
The Compensation Committee annually reviews the shareholdings of the persons subject to these
guidelines. Shares held directly, shares held indirectly through our benefit plans (including our
401(k) plan and Deferred Compensation and Retirement Benefit Restoration Plan), Career Shares and
TVUs are included in determining a persons share ownership. Stock options and SARs (whether
vested or unvested) and unvested Performance Units are not included. Each of the named executive
officers has holdings in BD stock in excess of his ownership requirement.
31
The named executive officers are required to hold 75% of the net, after-tax shares received
upon exercise of their SARs for a period of one year following exercise. This is in addition to
any requirements they may have under our share retention and ownership guidelines.
Our insider trading policy expressly prohibits our associates from engaging in options, puts,
calls or other transactions that are intended to hedge against the economic risk of owning BD
shares. This policy can be found on BDs website at www.bd.com/investors/corporate_governance/.
Timing of equity awards
The Compensation Committee has adopted a policy on the granting of equity compensation awards
(which can be found on BDs website at www.bd.com/investors/corporate_governance/). The policy prohibits the
backdating of any equity grant, and requires our annual equity compensation awards and any
off-cycle awards approved by our CEO to be made on fixed dates. The policy also prohibits
manipulating the timing of either the public release of information or the grant of an award in
order to increase the value of the award. Under the policy, the exercise price of any stock option
or SAR award will be the closing price of BD stock on the grant date.
Tax and accounting considerations
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code precludes BD from taking a federal income tax
deduction for compensation paid in excess of $1 million to a named executive officer (other than
our Chief Financial Officer). This limitation does not apply, however, to performance-based compensation, including SARs, stock options,
Performance Units and PIP awards. Salary and TVUs do not constitute performance-based
compensation and are subject to the limitations of Section 162(m).
While the Compensation Committee generally attempts to preserve the deductibility of
compensation paid to the named executive officers, the Compensation Committee believes the primary
purpose of our compensation program is to support BDs strategy and the long-term interests of our
shareholders. Therefore, the Compensation Committee maintains the flexibility to award
compensation that may be subject to the limits of Section 162(m) if doing so furthers the
objectives of our executive compensation program. In recognition of the limits under Section
162(m), the TVUs granted to the named executive officers in 2009 contain a provision that gives the
Compensation Committee the authority to require the deferral of any shares issuable under a TVU if
the deduction for such shares would be limited under Section 162(m). In addition, the Compensation
Committee used its authority under the terms of the November 2003 Performance Unit grant to require
Mr. Ludwig to defer the receipt of shares that were otherwise payable to him under this grant in
November 2008. These shares are required to be deferred until such time as the deduction for the
payment of the shares will not be limited under Section 162(m).
We account for stock-based compensation in accordance with SFAS No. 123(R). SFAS No. 123(R)
requires us to recognize compensation expense relating to share-based payments (such as SARs and
restricted stock units) in our financial statements. The adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) and the
recognition of this expense have not caused us to limit or significantly alter the equity
compensation element of our program. This is because we believe equity compensation is needed to
provide a competitive executive compensation program and fulfills important program objectives. We
did, however, switch from issuing stock options to stock-settled SARs following the adoption of
SFAS No. 123(R), since both types of awards result in the recognition of compensation expense and
we believed that stock-settled SARs would result in less shareholder dilution. We would consider
the effect under SFAS No. 123(R) of any proposed change to the equity compensation element of our
program.
32
REPORT OF THE COMPENSATION AND BENEFITS COMMITTEE
The primary objective of the BD compensation program is to fully support the strategic
business goal of delivering superior long-term shareholder returns through sustained revenue
growth, EPS growth and return on capital. As such, we intend to ensure a high degree of alignment
between pay and the long-term value and financial soundness of BD. The Compensation and Benefits
Committee of the Board of Directors (the Committee) has established the following compensation
principles to meet this objective:
|
|
|
Linking rewards to performance |
|
o |
|
We maintain a pay-for-performance philosophy based on actual performance
as against clear, measurable company performance targets, particularly those metrics
which support the creation of long-term shareholder value. |
|
|
|
Delivering superior business and financial results |
|
o |
|
Performance targets are set to reward executives for achieving
outstanding short and long-term results in line with our objective of enhancing
long-term shareholder value. In setting short-term goals and in rewarding
performance, we will take care to ensure that we do not create incentives to take
inappropriate risks. |
|
|
|
Offering a competitive compensation structure |
|
o |
|
We have established and intend to maintain a competitive structure that
supports the recruitment and retention of high-performance executives, essential to
driving the business results required to execute our strategy and create long-term
value for shareholders. This structure is determined by evaluating peer group data
which is provided and analyzed by the Committees independent consultant,
Towers-Perrin. |
|
|
|
Aligning the interests of executives and shareholders |
|
o |
|
Through equity-based compensation and equity ownership guidelines for
executives, we seek to align the interests of executives with those of the companys
shareholders. This represents the largest portion of our compensation structure. |
|
|
|
Maintaining a transparent compensation structure |
|
o |
|
The Committee strives to provide absolute transparency to executives,
employees and shareholders of all aspects of BDs compensation and benefits
structure. This includes disclosure of performance targets, payout formulas and
details of other earned benefits. |
|
|
|
Maintaining Committee independence |
|
o |
|
The Committee is made up exclusively of independent directors and
utilizes an independent compensation consultant, Towers Perrin, which, by Committee
policy, is prohibited from performing any services for BD or its management without
the Committees prior approval. |
|
|
|
Retaining prerogative to adjust programs |
|
o |
|
The Committee retains the prerogative to change or modify compensation
and benefit programs to reflect prevailing economic, market or company financial
conditions. |
33
The Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis with
management, and based on such review and discussions, has recommended to the Board of Directors
that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in BDs Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended September 30, 2009 and in this proxy statement.
COMPENSATION AND BENEFITS COMMITTEE
Edward F. DeGraan Chair
Basil L. Anderson
Marshall O. Larsen
James F. Orr
Willard J. Overlock, Jr.
Bertram L. Scott
34
COMPENSATION OF NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
The following table shows the compensation provided by BD to each of the named executive
officers in fiscal year 2009.
2009 SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and Nonqualified |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Equity |
|
Deferred |
|
All |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock |
|
Option |
|
Incentive Plan |
|
Compensation |
|
Other |
|
|
Name and |
|
|
|
|
|
Salary |
|
|
|
|
|
Awards |
|
Awards |
|
Compensation |
|
Earnings |
|
Compensation |
|
|
Principal Position |
|
Year |
|
(1) |
|
Bonus |
|
(2) |
|
(2) |
|
(3) |
|
(4) |
|
(5) |
|
Total |
Edward J. Ludwig |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
$ |
1,070,000 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
$ |
1,999,501 |
|
|
$ |
1,599,932 |
|
|
$ |
1,500,000 |
|
|
$ |
2,918,894 |
|
|
$ |
33,055 |
|
|
$ |
9,121,382 |
|
Chairman and Chief |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
1,059,846 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
2,995,948 |
|
|
|
1,918,861 |
|
|
|
1,526,179 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
14,280 |
|
|
|
7,515,114 |
|
Executive Officer |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
1,030,000 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
2,961,445 |
|
|
|
2,192,651 |
|
|
|
1,400,000 |
|
|
|
448,171 |
|
|
|
19,160 |
|
|
|
8,051,427 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David V. Elkins
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (6) |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
413,462 |
|
|
$ |
220,000 |
(7) |
|
|
91,014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
350,000 |
|
|
|
13,697 |
|
|
|
78,381 |
|
|
|
1,166,554 |
|
|
John R. Considine |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
692,939 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
597,319 |
|
|
|
463,291 |
|
|
|
600,000 |
|
|
|
595,256 |
|
|
|
32,464 |
|
|
|
2,981,269 |
|
Vice Chairman |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
667,162 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
955,656 |
|
|
|
599,476 |
|
|
|
675,000 |
|
|
|
223,992 |
|
|
|
11,061 |
|
|
|
3,132,347 |
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
643,951 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1,025,692 |
|
|
|
745,676 |
|
|
|
670,000 |
|
|
|
159,518 |
|
|
|
7,313 |
|
|
|
3,252,150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vincent A. Forlenza |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
622,538 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
627,889 |
|
|
|
556,504 |
|
|
|
625,000 |
|
|
|
1,108,180 |
|
|
|
36,202 |
|
|
|
3,576,313 |
|
President |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
538,654 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
975,762 |
|
|
|
838,634 |
|
|
|
625,000 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
39,587 |
|
|
|
3,017,637 |
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
510,170 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
847,415 |
|
|
|
589,719 |
|
|
|
585,000 |
|
|
|
203,258 |
|
|
|
7,299 |
|
|
|
2,742,861 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
William A. Kozy |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
567,154 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
479,190 |
|
|
|
385,383 |
|
|
|
470,000 |
|
|
|
1,213,906 |
|
|
|
35,446 |
|
|
|
3,151,079 |
|
Executive Vice
President |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
538,654 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
725,842 |
|
|
|
465,383 |
|
|
|
470,000 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
14,040 |
|
|
|
2,213,919 |
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
509,162 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
855,536 |
|
|
|
666,355 |
|
|
|
425,000 |
|
|
|
201,468 |
|
|
|
7,520 |
|
|
|
2,665,041 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Salary. BDs fiscal year ends September 30. The amounts shown in the Salary column reflect
three months of salary at one calendar year rate and nine months at the following calendar
year rate. |
|
(2) |
|
Stock Awards and Option Awards. The amounts shown in the Stock Awards and Option Awards
columns reflect the amounts expensed for the fiscal year under SFAS No. 123(R) for all
outstanding stock awards (restricted stock units) and option awards (stock options and stock
appreciation rights) held by the named executive officer (disregarding estimated forfeitures),
including awards made in prior fiscal years. For a description of the methodology and
assumptions used by us in arriving at the amounts reflected in these columns, see the notes to
the consolidated financial statements contained in our Annual Reports on Form 10-K for the
years ended September 30, 2009, 2008, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Information
regarding the SFAS No. 123(R) fair values of the stock awards and option awards granted to the
named executive officers in fiscal year 2009 is set forth in the Grants of Plan-Based Awards
in Fiscal Year 2009 table on page 38. |
|
(3) |
|
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation. Includes the cash amounts earned under BDs
Performance Incentive Plan. These amounts are paid in January of the fiscal year following
the year in which they are earned, unless deferred at the election of the named executive
officer. |
|
(4) |
|
Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings. |
35
PensionAmounts shown are the aggregate changes in the actuarial present value of
accumulated benefits under our defined benefit pension plans (including our restoration plan).
These amounts represent the difference between the present value of accumulated pension benefits
at normal retirement age at the beginning and end of the fiscal year. A decrease in present
value is shown in the above table as 0. Information regarding the named executive officers
accumulated benefits under our pension plans is on page 44.
Deferred CompensationEarnings on nonqualified deferred compensation are not included in
this column, since no named executive officer earned above-market or preferential earnings on
nonqualified deferred compensation during the fiscal years shown. Information on the named
executive officers deferred compensation accounts is on page 46.
(5) |
|
All Other Compensation. Amounts shown for fiscal year 2009 include the following: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edward J. Ludwig |
|
|
David V. Elkins |
|
|
John R. Considine |
|
|
Vincent A. Forlenza |
|
|
William A. Kozy |
|
Matching
contributions under
plans |
|
$ |
31,725 |
|
|
$ |
10,385 |
|
|
$ |
31,725 |
|
|
$ |
31,725 |
|
|
$ |
31,725 |
|
Use of corporate
transportation |
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax reimbursements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,791 |
|
|
|
3,114 |
|
Relocation Benefits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
67,996 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term life insurance |
|
|
1,130 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
739 |
|
|
|
686 |
|
|
|
607 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
33,055 |
|
|
$ |
78,381 |
|
|
$ |
32,464 |
|
|
$ |
36,202 |
|
|
$ |
35,446 |
|
The following is a description of these benefits:
|
|
|
Matching Contributions Under Plans The amounts shown reflect matching contributions
made by BD pursuant to our 401(k) plan and deferred compensation plan. |
|
|
|
|
Use of Corporate Transportation The amount shown for Mr. Ludwig is the value
attributed to his personal use of corporate transportation. Pursuant to a policy adopted
by the Board of Directors, Mr. Ludwig is encouraged to use BD aircraft for his personal and
business travel. The value of Mr. Ludwigs personal use of BD aircraft is equal to the
incremental variable costs incurred by BD in connection with his flights that are not
reimbursed by Mr. Ludwig. These variable costs include fuel, trip-related maintenance,
crew travel expenses, on-board catering and landing and parking fees. Since BD aircraft
are used predominantly for business purposes, we do not include fixed costs that do not
change in amount based on usage, such as depreciation and pilot salaries. |
|
|
|
|
BD and Mr. Ludwig have entered into a time-sharing arrangement under which Mr. Ludwig makes
time-share payments to BD for his personal use of BD aircraft. The payments are for the
maximum amount permitted by Federal Aviation Administration regulations without subjecting
BD to regulation as a charter carrier. Mr. Ludwig made total payments of $209,094 under
this arrangement for personal flights taken in fiscal year 2009, which more than covered all
of the variable costs incurred by BD in connection with these flights. Accordingly, no
value has been attributed to his use of corporate aircraft in the Summary Compensation
Table. |
|
|
|
|
BD also makes available a driver and BD-leased car to Mr. Ludwig on occasion for commuting
to and from work. The incremental costs incurred by BD in connection with this
transportation are fuel charges and any other variable costs related to such use. Since
BD-leased cars are used predominantly for business purposes, we have not included fixed
costs, such as driver salaries, which do not change based on usage. |
|
|
|
|
Mr. Ludwig is responsible for the payment of any tax on any income imputed to him as a
result of his use of corporate transportation. |
|
|
|
|
Tax Reimbursements Mr. Kozy, a resident of New Jersey, spent a portion of his time
in California in connection with his oversight of our BD Biosciences business segment. As
a result, part of Mr. Kozys income may be treated as being earned in California for
California state tax purposes. BD reimburses Mr. Kozy for any incremental state tax
liability incurred by him as a result of being subject to California taxation. The same
arrangement is in effect for Mr. Forlenza with respect to the period that he served as
President of BD Biosciences. |
|
|
|
|
Relocation Benefits In connection with his election as an executive officer, we
extended certain relocation benefits to Mr. Elkins. These include a monthly housing
allowance and reimbursement for travel and other costs. The monthly rental allowance is
$3,250 per month, which will be paid until Mr. Elkins purchases a residence or May 2010, |
36
|
|
|
whichever is earlier. BD also pays any related taxes that may be payable by Mr. Elkins on
his relocation benefits. For 2009, tax reimbursements paid to Mr. Elkins were $27,046. |
|
|
|
|
Term Life Insurance BD provides incremental term life insurance benefits to the
named executive officers beyond those provided to BD associates generally. The amounts
shown reflect the dollar value of the insurance premiums paid by BD for this incremental
insurance. |
(6) |
|
Mr. Elkins was elected to his position effective December 1, 2008. |
|
(7) |
|
Represents amount paid as a sign-on bonus at the commencement of Mr. Elkins employment. |
37
INFORMATION REGARDING PLAN AWARDS IN FISCAL YEAR 2009
Set forth below is information regarding awards provided to the named executive officers in
fiscal year 2009. The non-equity incentive awards were made under the BD Performance Incentive
Plan. The equity-based awards were made under BDs 2004 Employee and Director Equity-Based
Compensation Plan.
Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal Year 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Other |
|
All Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock |
|
Option |
|
Exercise |
|
Grant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Possible Payouts |
|
Estimated Future Payouts |
|
Awards: |
|
Awards: |
|
or Base |
|
Date Fair |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under Non-Equity Incentive |
|
Under Equity Incentive |
|
Number |
|
Number of |
|
Price of |
|
Value of |
|
|
Award |
|
|
|
|
|
Plan Awards(2) |
|
Plan Awards(3) |
|
of Shares |
|
Securities |
|
Option |
|
Stock and |
|
|
Type |
|
Grant |
|
Threshold |
|
Target |
|
Maximum |
|
Threshold |
|
Target |
|
Maximum |
|
of Stock |
|
Underlying |
|
Awards |
|
Option |
Name |
|
(1) |
|
Date |
|
($) |
|
($) |
|
($) |
|
(#) |
|
(#) |
|
(#) |
|
or Units (4) |
|
Options |
|
($/Sh) (5) |
|
Awards (6) |
Edward J. Ludwig |
|
PIP |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
$ |
642,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,284,000 |
|
|
$ |
2,568,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PU |
|
|
11/25/08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
312 |
|
|
|
31,234 |
|
|
|
62,468 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,904,250 |
|
|
|
TVU |
|
|
11/25/08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,617 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
976,063 |
|
|
|
SAR |
|
|
11/25/08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99,313 |
|
|
$ |
62.50 |
|
|
|
1,599,932 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David V. Elkins |
|
PIP |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A(7) |
|
|
|
350,000 |
|
|
|
700,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TVU |
|
|
12/01/08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,285 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
327,829 |
|
|
John R. Considine |
|
PIP |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
259,852 |
|
|
|
519,704 |
|
|
|
1,039,408 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PU |
|
|
11/25/08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
9,044 |
|
|
|
18,088 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,130,500 |
|
|
|
TVU |
|
|
11/25/08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,522 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
282,625 |
|
|
|
SAR |
|
|
11/25/08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,758 |
|
|
$ |
62.50 |
|
|
|
463,291 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vincent A. Forlenza |
|
PIP |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
264,579 |
|
|
|
529,158 |
|
|
|
1,058,316 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PU |
|
|
11/25/08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
10,864 |
|
|
|
21,728 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,358,000 |
|
|
|
TVU |
|
|
11/25/08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,432 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
339,500 |
|
|
|
SAR |
|
|
11/25/08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,544 |
|
|
$ |
62.50 |
|
|
|
556,504 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
William A. Kozy |
|
PIP |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
198,504 |
|
|
|
397,008 |
|
|
|
794,016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PU |
|
|
11/25/08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
7,523 |
|
|
|
15,046 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
940,376 |
|
|
|
TVU |
|
|
11/25/08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,762 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
235,125 |
|
|
|
SAR |
|
|
11/25/08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,922 |
|
|
$ |
62.50 |
|
|
|
385,383 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Award Type: |
|
|
|
PIP = Performance Incentive Plan
PU = Performance Unit
TVU = Time Vested Unit
SAR = Stock Appreciation Right |
|
(2) |
|
The amounts shown represent the range of possible dollar payouts the named executive officers
could have earned under the BD Performance Incentive Plan for fiscal year 2009. Actual
payments under the Performance Incentive Plan for fiscal year 2009 are reflected in the
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation column of the
Summary Compensation Table on page 35. The amount in the Threshold column assumes BD achieved the minimum performance level,
resulting in |
38
|
|
Performance Incentive Plan funding of 50% of target, and that the named executive officer
received an award equal to 50% of his award target. |
|
(3) |
|
The amounts shown represent the range of potential payouts, expressed in number of shares,
under the Performance Unit awards. The amount in the Threshold column shows the number of
shares that will be paid out assuming BD achieves the minimum performance level that would
result in a payment of shares. The payout amounts shown in the above table do not reflect
shares that may be issued pursuant to dividend equivalent rights. |
|
(4) |
|
The amounts shown do not reflect shares that may be issued pursuant to dividend equivalent
rights. |
|
(5) |
|
The exercise price is the closing price of BD common stock on the date of grant, as reported
on the New York Stock Exchange. |
|
(6) |
|
The amounts shown in this column reflect the grant date fair value of the awards under SFAS
No. 123(R) used by BD for financial statement reporting purposes (disregarding estimated
forfeitures), assuming the Performance Units pay out at their maximum payout. For a
discussion of the assumptions made by us in arriving at the grant date fair value of these
awards, see note 13 to the consolidated financial statements that are included in our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2009. |
|
(7) |
|
As part of his agreement to join BD, it was agreed that Mr. Elkins would receive a minimum
PIP award for 2009 of $350,000. |
Description of Awards
The following is a description of the awards listed in the above table.
Performance Incentive Plan
The BD Performance Incentive Plan provides an opportunity for annual cash incentive payments
to the named executive officers and other eligible associates. A more detailed discussion of the
Performance Incentive Plan and the performance objectives established under the Performance
Incentive Plan for fiscal year 2009 appears in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of
this proxy statement. Total awards to BDs executive officers may not, in the absence of special
circumstances, exceed 3% of our reported after-tax net income for the fiscal year.
Equity-Based Compensation Awards
Performance Units. Performance Units are performance-based restricted stock units
that vest three years after grant. The potential payouts under these awards range anywhere from
zero to 200% of the awards share target. The actual payout is based on BDs performance against
the performance targets over the three-year performance period covering fiscal years 2009-2011.
The performance targets include 8.5% average annual revenue growth (after excluding the effects of
foreign currency translation) and average return on invested capital of 31% over the performance
period. The Performance Units are issued in tandem with dividend equivalent rights (see below).
Time Vested Units. A Time Vested Unit is a restricted stock unit that represents the
right to receive one share of BD common stock upon vesting. Time Vested Units vest three years
after grant. Time Vested Units are issued in tandem with dividend equivalent rights (see below).
Stock Appreciation Rights (SARs). A SAR represents the right to receive, upon
exercise, shares of BD common stock equal in value to the difference between the market price of BD
common stock at the time of exercise and the exercise price. These grants have a ten-year term,
and become exercisable in four equal annual installments, beginning one year following the grant
date. The named executive officers are required to hold 75% of the net, after-tax shares received
upon exercise of the SARs for a period of one year following exercise.
Dividend Equivalent Rights. Performance Units and Time Vested Units are issued in
tandem with dividend equivalent rights. Under these rights, the holder is credited with additional
restricted stock units each time BD pays a dividend. Dividend equivalents accrue on these awards
at the same rate as dividends are paid on outstanding shares of BD stock. The accrued units are
paid only if the underlying award vests. The value of the dividend equivalent rights is included
in the amounts shown in the Stock Awards column of the Summary Compensation Table.
Change of Control. Performance Units, Time Vested Units and SARs fully vest upon a
change of control (see Accelerated Vesting of Equity-Based Compensation Awards Upon a Change of
Control on page 49).
39
INFORMATION REGARDING EQUITY-BASED COMPENSATION
AWARDS IN FISCAL YEAR 2010
The applicable rules of the SEC require us to provide information regarding equity-based
compensation paid in fiscal year 2009. We are supplementally providing the information below
regarding equity-based compensation provided to the named executive officers in November 2009
(fiscal year 2010) under the 2004 Employee and Director Equity-Based Compensation Plan. The value
of these awards is not reflected in the Summary Compensation Table on
page 35, the Grants of
Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal Year 2009 table on page 38 or the Outstanding Equity Awards at 2009
Fiscal Year-End table on page 41, because they were granted following the end of fiscal year 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Future Payouts Under |
|
Awards: |
|
Exercise or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity |
|
Number of |
|
Base Price of |
|
Grant Date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive Plan Awards(2) |
|
Securities |
|
Option |
|
Fair Value of |
|
|
Award |
|
Grant |
|
Threshold |
|
Target |
|
Maximum |
|
Underlying |
|
Awards |
|
Stock and |
Name |
|
Type(1) |
|
Date |
|
(#) |
|
(#) |
|
(#) |
|
Options |
|
($/Sh)(4) |
|
Option Awards(5) |
Edward J. Ludwig |
|
PU |
|
|
11/24/09 |
|
|
|
387 |
|
|
|
38,689 |
|
|
|
77,378 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,852,098 |
|
|
|
SAR |
|
|
11/24/09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150,540 |
|
|
$ |
75.63 |
|
|
|
1,750,366 |
|
David V. Elkins |
|
PU SAR |
|
|
11/24/09 11/24/09 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
8,441 |
|
|
|
16,882 |
|
|
|
32,845 |
|
|
$ |
75.63 |
|
|
|
1,276,786 600,078 |
|
John R. Considine |
|
PU |
|
|
11/24/09 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
11,712 |
|
|
|
23,424 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,771,557 |
|
|
|
SAR |
|
|
11/24/09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,573 |
|
|
$ |
75.63 |
|
|
|
832,619 |
|
Vincent A. Forlenza |
|
PU |
|
|
11/24/09 |
|
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
14,069 |
|
|
|
28,138 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,128,076 |
|
|
|
SAR |
|
|
11/24/09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,742 |
|
|
$ |
75.63 |
|
|
|
1,000,136 |
|
William A. Kozy |
|
PU |
|
|
11/24/09 |
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
10,340 |
|
|
|
20,680 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,564,028 |
|
|
|
SAR |
|
|
11/24/09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,235 |
|
|
$ |
75.63 |
|
|
|
735,093 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Award Type: |
|
|
|
PU = Performance Unit
SAR = Stock Appreciation Right |
|
(2) |
|
The amounts shown represent the range of potential payouts, expressed in number of
shares, to the named executive officers under the Performance Unit awards. The amounts
shown do not reflect the shares that may be issued pursuant to dividend equivalent rights. |
|
(3) |
|
The amounts shown do not reflect the shares that may be issued pursuant to dividend
equivalent rights. |
|
(4) |
|
The exercise price is the closing price of BD common stock on the date of grant, as
reported on the New York Stock Exchange. |
|
(5) |
|
The amounts shown in this column reflect the grant date fair value of the awards used
by BD for financial statement reporting purposes. These amounts assume that the
Performance Units will be paid at their maximum payout. The fair value of these awards was
determined using the same methodology used to determine the fair value of the awards
granted in fiscal year 2009. To determine the fair value of the SARs listed above, the
following assumptions were used: dividend yield: 2.19%; volatility: 28%; risk-free rate of
return: 2.87%; and expected life: 6.5 years. |
The performance targets under the Performance Units include 7% average annual revenue growth
(after excluding the effects of foreign currency translation) and average return on invested
capital of 32%, over the three-year period covering fiscal years 2010-2012. The maximum payout of
these awards is 200% of share target.
40
OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS
The following table sets forth the outstanding equity awards held by the named executive
officers at the end of fiscal year 2009.
Outstanding Equity Awards at 2009 Fiscal Year-End
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Awards |
|
Stock Awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity |
|
Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive Plan |
|
Incentive Plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards: |
|
Awards: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market |
|
Number of |
|
Market or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
Value of |
|
Unearned |
|
Payout Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities |
|
Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares or |
|
Shares or |
|
Shares, Units |
|
of Unearned |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underlying |
|
Underlying |
|
Option |
|
|
|
|
|
Units of |
|
Units of |
|
or Other |
|
Shares, Units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unexercised |
|
Unexercised |
|
Exercise |
|
Option |
|
Stock That |
|
Stock That |
|
Rights That |
|
or Other Rights |
|
|
Grant |
|
Options |
|
Options |
|
Price |
|
Expiration |
|
Have Not |
|
Have Not |
|
Have Not |
|
That Have Not |
Name |
|
Date |
|
Exercisable(1) |
|
Unexercisable(1) |
|
($/Sh) |
|
Date |
|
Vested(2) |
|
Vested(3) |
|
Vested(4) |
|
Vested(3) |
Edward J. Ludwig
|
|
|
11/27/2001 |
|
|
|
65,000 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
$ |
32.49 |
|
|
|
11/27/2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11/25/2002 |
|
|
|
220,000 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
$ |
29.99 |
|
|
|
11/25/2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11/24/2003 |
|
|
|
98,961 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
$ |
38.78 |
|
|
|
11/24/2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11/23/2004 |
|
|
|
76,409 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
$ |
54.41 |
|
|
|
11/23/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11/21/2005 |
|
|
|
65,112 |
|
|
|
21,707 |
|
|
$ |
59.16 |
|
|
|
11/21/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11/21/2006 |
|
|
|
39,290 |
|
|
|
39,290 |
|
|
$ |
71.72 |
|
|
|
11/21/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11/20/2007 |
|
|
|
18,757 |
|
|
|
56,272 |
|
|
$ |
84.33 |
|
|
|
11/20/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11/25/2008 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
99,313 |
|
|
$ |
62.50 |
|
|
|
11/25/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Various |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111,008 |
|
|
$ |
7,742,808 |
|
|
|
75,384 |
|
|
$ |
5,258,034 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David V. Elkins |
|
|
12/1/2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,387 |
|
|
|
375,743 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John R. Considine |
|
|
11/24/2003 |
|
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
$ |
38.78 |
|
|
|
11/24/2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11/23/2004 |
|
|
|
30,564 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
$ |
54.41 |
|
|
|
11/23/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11/21/2005 |
|
|
|
21,117 |
|
|
|
7,040 |
|
|
$ |
59.16 |
|
|
|
11/21/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11/21/2006 |
|
|
|
12,768 |
|
|
|
12,771 |
|
|
$ |
71.72 |
|
|
|
11/21/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11/20/2007 |
|
|
|
5,814 |
|
|
|
17,445 |
|
|
$ |
84.33 |
|
|
|
11/20/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11/25/2008 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
28,758 |
|
|
$ |
62.50 |
|
|
|
11/25/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Various |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,950 |
|
|
|
2,437,763 |
|
|
|
23,013 |
|
|
|
1,605,157 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vincent A.
Forlenza |
|
|
11/27/2001 |
|
|
|
58,000 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
$ |
32.49 |
|
|
|
11/27/2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11/25/2002 |
|
|
|
45,000 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
$ |
29.99 |
|
|
|
11/25/2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11/24/2003 |
|
|
|
26,000 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
$ |
38.78 |
|
|
|
11/24/2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11/23/2004 |
|
|
|
22,923 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
$ |
54.41 |
|
|
|
11/23/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11/21/2005 |
|
|
|
15,837 |
|
|
|
5,281 |
|
|
$ |
59.16 |
|
|
|
11/21/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11/21/2006 |
|
|
|
9,036 |
|
|
|
9,037 |
|
|
$ |
71.72 |
|
|
|
11/21/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11/20/2007 |
|
|
|
4,539 |
|
|
|
13,618 |
|
|
$ |
84.33 |
|
|
|
11/20/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11/25/2008 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
34,544 |
|
|
$ |
62.50 |
|
|
|
11/25/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Various |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,268 |
|
|
|
2,250,693 |
|
|
|
21,377 |
|
|
|
1,491,046 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Awards |
|
Stock Awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity |
|
Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive Plan |
|
Incentive Plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards: |
|
Awards: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market |
|
Number of |
|
Market or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
Value of |
|
Unearned |
|
Payout Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities |
|
Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares or |
|
Shares or |
|
Shares, Units |
|
of Unearned |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underlying |
|
Underlying |
|
Option |
|
|
|
|
|
Units of |
|
Units of |
|
or Other |
|
Shares, Units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unexercised |
|
Unexercised |
|
Exercise |
|
Option |
|
Stock That |
|
Stock That |
|
Rights That |
|
or Other Rights |
|
|
Grant |
|
Options |
|
Options |
|
Price |
|
Expiration |
|
Have Not |
|
Have Not |
|
Have Not |
|
That Have Not |
Name |
|
Date |
|
Exercisable(1) |
|
Unexercisable(1) |
|
($/Sh) |
|
Date |
|
Vested(2) |
|
Vested(3) |
|
Vested(4) |
|
Vested(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
William A. Kozy |
|
|
11/25/2002 |
|
|
|
41,666 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
$ |
29.99 |
|
|
|
11/25/2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11/24/2003 |
|
|
|
26,000 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
$ |
38.78 |
|
|
|
11/24/2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11/23/2004 |
|
|
|
22,923 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
$ |
54.41 |
|
|
|
11/23/2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11/21/2005 |
|
|
|
15,837 |
|
|
|
5,281 |
|
|
$ |
59.16 |
|
|
|
11/21/2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11/21/2006 |
|
|
|
9,036 |
|
|
|
9,037 |
|
|
$ |
71.72 |
|
|
|
11/21/2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11/20/2007 |
|
|
|
4,539 |
|
|
|
13,618 |
|
|
$ |
84.33 |
|
|
|
11/20/2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11/25/2008 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
23,922 |
|
|
$ |
62.50 |
|
|
|
11/25/2018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Various |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,022 |
|
|
|
2,442,785 |
|
|
|
17,972 |
|
|
|
1,253,547 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Stock options and SARs are included in these columns. Stock options and SARs become
exercisable in four equal annual installments, beginning one year following the date of grant. |
|
|
|
Set forth below is the value of the unexercised vested options and SARs held by named executive
officers at the end of fiscal year 2009. The value represents the difference between $69.75, the
closing price of BD common stock on September 30, 2009, and the exercise price of each
unexercised vested option or SAR held by the named executive officer. These values may not
reflect the value actually realized by the named executive officers. |
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Value of Vested Options and SARs |
Edward J. Ludwig |
|
$ |
16,096,393 |
|
John R. Considine |
|
|
1,931,586 |
|
Vincent A. Forlenza |
|
|
5,275,062 |
|
William A. Kozy |
|
|
2,981,422 |
|
|
|
|
(2) |
|
The amounts shown in this column represent grants of Time
Vested Units granted in fiscal year 2009 and other previous restricted
stock unit awards that are not performance-based. The Time Vested Units vest three years
after grant. The other awards vest at, or one year following, the retirement of the named
executive officer. |
|
(3) |
|
Market value has been calculated by multiplying the number of unvested units by $69.75, the
closing price of BD common stock on September 30, 2009. These values may not reflect the
value actually realized by the named executive officers. |
|
(4) |
|
The amounts in this column represent the Performance Unit awards shown below. The amounts
shown for the Performance Units that vested in November 2009 are actual payout amounts
(including shares accumulating under dividend equivalent rights). All other amounts shown
reflect the target shares issuable under the awards. The actual number of shares issued will
be based on BDs performance over the applicable performance period. |
For Mr. Ludwig:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Date |
|
Number of Shares Issuable |
|
Performance Period |
|
Vesting Date |
|
11/21/2006 |
|
|
|
19,645 |
|
|
Fiscal years 2007-2009 |
|
|
11/21/2009 |
|
|
11/20/2007 |
|
|
|
23,907 |
|
|
Fiscal years 2008-2010 |
|
|
11/20/2010 |
|
|
11/25/2008 |
|
|
|
31,832 |
|
|
Fiscal years 2009-2011 |
|
|
11/28/2011 |
|
For Mr. Considine:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Date |
|
Number of Shares Issuable |
|
Performance Period |
|
Vesting Date |
|
11/21/2006 |
|
|
|
6,385 |
|
|
Fiscal years 2007-2009 |
|
|
11/21/2009 |
|
|
11/20/2007 |
|
|
|
7,411 |
|
|
Fiscal years 2008-2010 |
|
|
11/20/2010 |
|
|
11/25/2008 |
|
|
|
9,217 |
|
|
Fiscal years 2009-2011 |
|
|
11/28/2011 |
|
42
For Mr. Forlenza:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Date |
|
Number of Shares Issuable |
|
Performance Period |
|
Vesting Date |
|
11/21/2006 |
|
|
|
4,519 |
|
|
Fiscal years 2007-2009 |
|
|
11/21/2009 |
|
|
11/20/2007 |
|
|
|
5,786 |
|
|
Fiscal years 2008-2010 |
|
|
11/20/2010 |
|
|
11/25/2008 |
|
|
|
11,072 |
|
|
Fiscal years 2009-2011 |
|
|
11/28/2011 |
|
For Mr.Kozy:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Date |
|
Number of Shares Issuable |
|
Performance Period |
|
Vesting Date |
|
11/21/2006 |
|
|
|
4,519 |
|
|
Fiscal years 2007-2009 |
|
|
11/21/2009 |
|
|
11/20/2007 |
|
|
|
5,786 |
|
|
Fiscal years 2008-2010 |
|
|
11/20/2010 |
|
|
11/25/2008 |
|
|
|
7,667 |
|
|
Fiscal years 2009-2011 |
|
|
11/28/2011 |
|
STOCK OPTION EXERCISES AND VESTING OF STOCK UNITS
The following table contains information relating to the exercise of stock options and vesting
of Performance Units during fiscal year 2009.
Option Exercises and Stock Vested in Fiscal Year 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Awards |
|
Stock Awards |
|
|
Number of |
|
Value |
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
Shares Acquired |
|
Realized on |
|
Shares Acquired |
|
Value Realized |
Name |
|
on Exercise |
|
Exercise(1) |
|
on Vesting(2) |
|
on Vesting(3) |
Edward J. Ludwig |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
32,729 |
|
|
$ |
2,000,724 |
|
John R. Considine |
|
|
90,000 |
|
|
$ |
3,953,700 |
|
|
|
10,616 |
|
|
|
648,956 |
|
Vincent A. Forlenza |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
7,962 |
|
|
|
486,717 |
|
William A. Kozy |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
7,962 |
|
|
|
486,717 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents the difference between the exercise price of the stock options and the fair market
value of BD common stock at exercise. |
|
(2) |
|
Shows the shares (including dividend equivalent rights) distributed in November 2008 under
Performance Units that covered the fiscal year 2006-2008 performance period. |
|
(3) |
|
Based on the closing price of BD stock of $61.13 on the vesting date. |
OTHER COMPENSATION
Retirement Plan
General. BDs Retirement Plan is a non-contributory defined benefit plan that provides for
normal retirement at age 65 and permits earlier retirement in certain cases. The Retirement Plan
is generally available to all active full-time and part-time BD associates.
The Retirement Plan provides benefits on either a final average pay basis or on a cash
balance basis. Under final average pay, benefits are based upon an associates years of service
and compensation for the five consecutive calendar years that produce the highest average annual
compensation. The covered compensation includes salary, commissions and PIP awards. Under cash
balance, an associate is provide an account that is increased by pay credits based on compensation,
age and service, and interest credits based on the rate prescribed by the plan. The benefits for
all associates joining BD after April 1, 2007 are calculated in accordance with the cash balance
provisions of the Retirement Plan. Messrs. Ludwig, Considine, Forlenza and Kozy participate under
the final average pay provisions of the plan, while Mr. Elkins participates under the cash balance
provisions.
The Retirement Plan is integrated with Social Security, which means that BD provides a higher
pension benefit with respect to an associates compensation that exceeds the Social Security wage
base than on compensation that is subject to the Social Security tax. This feature of the
Retirement Plan accounts for the fact that Social Security benefits will not be paid to the
associate with respect to compensation that exceeds the Social Security wage base.
43
Deferred Compensation and Retirement Benefit Restoration Plan. The Internal Revenue Code
limits the maximum annual benefit that may be paid to any individual under the Retirement Plan and
the amount of compensation that may be recognized in calculating these benefits. BD makes
supplemental payments to its Deferred Compensation and Retirement Benefit Restoration Plan to
offset any reductions in benefits that result from these limitations. BDs obligations to pay
retirement benefits under the Deferred Compensation and Retirement Benefit Restoration Plan are
funded through a trust. The trust is currently secured by a letter of credit. The trustee is
required to draw on the letter of credit, up to specified limits, following a change of control of
BD (as defined in the trust agreement).
Supplemental Agreement. Mr. Considine has a supplemental agreement with BD under which he is
entitled to receive an annual supplemental pension benefit (payable as a single life annuity) based
on his age at termination, ranging from $116,109 (for termination at age 59) to $300,958 (for
termination at age 70). Under a separate agreement, Mr. Considine is entitled to participate in the
BD retiree medical plan following termination of his employment for any reason. Mr. Considine has
announced his retirement from BD, effective December 31, 2009.
Estimated Benefits. The following table shows the lump sum actuarial present value of
accumulated retirement benefits payable under our plans at normal retirement age, assuming benefits
payable as a single life annuity. For a description of the other assumptions used in calculating
the present value of these benefits, see Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements contained
in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2009.
PENSION BENEFITS AT 2009 FISCAL YEAR-END
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of years |
|
Present value of |
Name |
|
Plan name |
|
credited service |
|
accumulated benefit |
Edward J. Ludwig |
|
Retirement Plan |
|
|
30 |
|
|
$ |
654,034 |
|
|
|
Restoration Plan |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
7,160,015 |
|
David V. Elkins |
|
Retirement Plan |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
9,124 |
|
|
|
Restoration Plan |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
4,573 |
|
John R. Considine |
|
Retirement Plan |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
227,024 |
|
|
|
Restoration Plan |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
1,079,313 |
|
|
|
Supplemental |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
891,972 |
|
Vincent A. Forlenza |
|
Retirement Plan |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
589,935 |
|
|
|
Restoration Plan |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
2,075,308 |
|
William A. Kozy |
|
Retirement Plan |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
763,713 |
|
|
|
Restoration Plan |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
2,445,261 |
|
Amounts shown are not subject to any further deduction for Social Security benefits or other
offsets. Associates may elect to receive a lifetime pension or the actuarial value of their
retirement benefits in a lump sum, as described below.
Calculation of Benefits
Final Average Pay Provisions. The monthly pension benefit payable in cases of
retirement at normal retirement age under the final average pay provisions of the Retirement Plan
is calculated using the following formula:
(1% of average final covered compensation, plus 1.5% of average final excess compensation)
multiplied by years and months of credited service
For purposes of the formula, average final covered compensation is generally the portion of
an associates covered compensation subject to Social Security tax, and average final excess
compensation is the portion that is not subject to such tax.
Cash Balance Provisions. Each month, an associates cash balance account is credited
in an amount equal to a percentage of the associates total compensation for the month (generally,
salary and other forms of regular compensation, including commissions and PIP awards). Such
percentage is calculated as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Age plus years of Credited Service |
|
|
as of the upcoming December 31 |
|
Credit Percentage |
Less than 40 |
|
|
3 |
% |
40-49 |
|
|
4 |
% |
50-59 |
|
|
5 |
% |
60-69 |
|
|
6 |
% |
70 or more |
|
|
7 |
% |
44
In addition, each month the associates account is credited with interest. The rate used is
determined based on the 30-year U.S. Treasury rates.
Early Retirement. Early retirement is available for an associate who has reached age 55 and
has at least 10 years of vesting service. Messrs. Ludwig, Forlenza and Kozy are currently eligible
for early retirement under the plans. As a result of his supplemental agreement, Mr. Considine is
eligible for early retirement under the Deferred Compensation and Retirement Benefit Restoration
Plan.
Under the final average pay provisions of the Retirement Plan, an associates pension benefit
is reduced by 4/10 of 1% (0.004) for each month that the associate receives benefits before the
earlier of (i) age 65 or (ii) the date the associates age plus years of credited service would
have equaled 85 had his or her employment continued. For example, if an associate were to retire at
age 63 with 22 years of service, the associates benefit would not be reduced, because the sum of
the associates age and service equals 85.
Under the cash balance provisions, the amount of the associates benefit will be the
associates account balance on the early retirement date. The associate may elect to begin payment
of the account balance on the early retirement date or delay payment until the normal retirement
date.
Form of Benefit. Participants may elect to receive their benefits in various forms.
Participants may select a single life annuity, in which pension payments will be payable only
during the associates lifetime. Associates may also elect to receive their benefits in a single
lump sum payment. Under the final average pay provision, this lump sum is actuarially equivalent
to the benefit payable under the single life annuity option. Under the cash balance provisions,
the lump sum is equal to the associates account balance.
Married participants may select a joint and survivor annuity option. Under this option, the
associate receives a reduced benefit during his or her lifetime and upon death, the associates
spouse will receive monthly payments for the remainder of the spouses lifetime. The associate can
choose a continuation benefit of 50%, 75% or 100% of the amount that was paid to the associate. The
degree to which the pension benefit is reduced depends upon the age difference of the associate and
the spouse, and on the percentage of the continuation benefit that is selected.
Associates may also select a guaranteed payment option. This option allows an associate to
receive monthly income for life. The associate chooses a designated number of guaranteed monthly
payments (either a 60-month minimum guarantee or a 120-month minimum guarantee). If the associate
dies before receiving all of the minimum payments, the associates beneficiary will receive the
balance of the payments. If this option is selected, the single life annuity otherwise payable is
reduced to cover the cost of the guarantee. The amount of the reduction is 3% if the 60-month
option is chosen, and 7% if the 120-month option is chosen.
Deferred Compensation
Cash Deferrals. The BD Deferred Compensation and Retirement Benefit Restoration Plan is a
nonqualified plan that allows an associate with an annual salary of $100,000 or more to defer
receipt of up to 75% of salary and/or up to 100% of the associates Performance Incentive Plan
award until the date or dates elected by the associate. The amounts deferred are invested in shares
of BD common stock or in accounts that mirror the gains and/or losses of several different
publicly-available investment funds, based on the investment selections of the participants. The
investment risk is borne solely by the participant. Participants are entitled to change their
investment elections at any time with respect to prior deferrals, future deferrals or both. The plan
does not offer any above-market or preferential rates of return to the named executive officers.
The investment options available to participants may be changed by BD at any time.
Deferral of Equity Awards. The plan also allows associates to defer receipt of up to 100% of
the shares issuable under their restricted stock unit awards. These deferred shares are allocated
to the participants BD stock account and must stay in such account until they are distributed.
Withdrawals and Distributions. A participant may elect to receive deferred amounts either
while they are still employed at BD or following termination of employment. A participant may elect
to receive distributions in installments or in a lump sum. Except in the case of an unforeseen
emergency, a participant may not withdraw deferred funds prior to their scheduled distribution
date.
Matching Contributions. BD provides matching contribution credits on cash amounts deferred
under the plan. These credits are made in the January following the fiscal year in which the
compensation was deferred. BD matches 75% of the first 6% of salary and Performance Incentive Plan
award deferred by a participant under the plan and our 401(k) plan combined. Matching contributions
are made to the extent the total cash compensation from which a participant makes contributions to
both plans does not exceed three times the limit for qualified plans ($735,000 in calendar year
2009). Matching contributions are credited in the year following the
year in which the deferred cash contribution would have been paid.
Unfunded Liability. The plan is not funded by BD, and BD is not required to make any
contributions to the plan. BD has unrestricted use of any amounts deferred by participants.
Participants have an unsecured contractual commitment from BD to
45
pay the amounts due under the plan. When such payments are due, the cash and/or stock will be
distributed from BDs general assets. BD has purchased corporate-owned life insurance that mirrors
the returns on funds contributed to the plan to substantially offset this liability.
Account Information. The following table sets forth information regarding activity during
fiscal year 2009 in the plan accounts maintained by the named executive officers.
NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION IN FISCAL YEAR 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive contributions |
|
Registrant contributions |
|
Aggregate gains (losses) |
|
Aggregate balance |
Name(1) |
|
in last fiscal year(2) |
|
in last fiscal year |
|
in last fiscal year |
|
at last fiscal year-end |
Edward J. Ludwig |
|
$ |
1,078,098 |
|
|
$ |
20,700 |
|
|
|
($852,908 |
) |
|
$ |
9,888,221 |
|
John R. Considine |
|
|
525,651 |
|
|
|
20,700 |
|
|
|
(766,261 |
) |
|
|
7,530,358 |
|
Vincent A. Forlenza |
|
|
79,820 |
|
|
|
20,700 |
|
|
|
24,004 |
|
|
|
506,836 |
|
William A. Kozy |
|
|
84,915 |
|
|
|
20,700 |
|
|
|
30,812 |
|
|
|
568,314 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
David V. Elkins did not participate in the plan during 2009. |
|
(2) |
|
The following amounts are reported as compensation in the fiscal year 2009 Salary column of
the Summary Compensation Table appearing on page 35: Mr. Ludwig $74,077; Mr. Considine -
$204,775; Mr. Forlenza $42,320; and Mr. Kozy $56,715. The remaining contributions shown
for the named executive officers relate to the deferral of fiscal year 2008 Performance
Incentive Plan awards and/or shares of BD stock distributable under Performance Unit
awards that vested in fiscal year 2007 and were paid in installments
through fiscal year 2009. |
Additional Arrangements
All associates of BD, including the named executive officers, are eligible to participate in
BDs Matching Gift Program, pursuant to which BD matches up to $5,000 of contributions that are
made to qualifying nonprofit organizations.
46
PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT OR CHANGE OF CONTROL
Payments Upon Termination of Employment
The table below sets forth estimated payments and benefits that would be paid by BD to each
named executive officer as a result of the named executive officers termination of employment
under various scenarios. The amounts shown assume termination of employment on September 30, 2009.
However, the actual amounts that would be paid to the named executive officers under each scenario
can only be determined at the time of termination.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination |
|
Termination |
|
|
|
|
|
Termination |
|
|
|
|
following a |
|
due to |
|
Termination |
|
due to |
|
Termination |
Name |
|
change of control(1) |
|
retirement(2) |
|
without cause(3) |
|
disability(4) |
|
due to death(5) |
Edward J. Ludwig |
|
$ |
25,347,760 |
|
|
$ |
26,860,647 |
|
|
$ |
27,464,493 |
|
|
$ |
27,247,201 |
|
|
$ |
28,071,386 |
|
David V. Elkins |
|
|
2,242,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
633,281 |
|
|
|
375,743 |
|
|
|
1,375,743 |
|
John R. Considine |
|
|
9,244,738 |
|
|
|
6,914,717 |
|
|
|
7,261,179 |
|
|
|
7,040,337 |
|
|
|
8,164,794 |
|
Vincent A. Forlenza |
|
|
10,852,272 |
|
|
|
9,411,139 |
|
|
|
10,014,524 |
|
|
|
9,500,001 |
|
|
|
9,450,845 |
|
William A. Kozy |
|
|
10,584,441 |
|
|
|
9,938,650 |
|
|
|
10,544,804 |
|
|
|
10,027,511 |
|
|
|
9,613,035 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes amounts under change of control employment agreements (which are described below).
Does not include the accelerated vesting of equity-based compensation awards that occurs upon
a change of control (see table below). Because Messrs. Ludwig, Considine, Forlenza and Kozy
are retirement-eligible, also included for them are early retirement benefits under our
pension plans, assuming payout as a lump sum, in the following amounts: Mr. Ludwig -
$15,237,915; Mr. Considine $3,278,680; Mr. Forlenza $6,095,170; and Mr. Kozy $6,573,581. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes early retirement benefits under our pension plans, assuming payout as a lump sum. A
description of the payout options under our pension plans is on page
44. Also includes the
accelerated vesting of equity-based compensation awards upon retirement, including Career
Shares held by the named executive officers, even though the Career Shares do not vest and
settle until the first anniversary of retirement. The amounts shown reflect the pro rata
amount of Performance Units earned as of September 30, 2009. The amount included for the
Performance Units reflect the awards that vested in November 2009 at their actual payout and
all other Performance Units at their target payout. Mr. Elkins is not currently eligible for
retirement under our plans. |
|
(3) |
|
Includes the accelerated vesting of equity-based compensation awards, including the pro rata
amount of Performance Units earned as of September 30, 2009, with Performance Units that
vested in November 2009 shown at their actual payout and all other Performance Units at their
target payout. Also includes outplacement services (with an assumed maximum cost of
$100,000), health and welfare benefits and severance benefits. U.S. associates are entitled
to severance equal to two weeks salary for each year of service (assuming the associate
grants a general release to BD), subject to a maximum payment limit (which was $490,000 in
2009). Since Messrs. Ludwig, Considine, Forlenza and Kozy are retirement-eligible, also
included for them are early retirement benefits under our pension plans, assuming payout as a
lump sum. |
|
(4) |
|
Includes the accelerated vesting of equity-based compensation awards upon termination of
employment due to disability. Since Messrs. Ludwig, Considine, Forlenza and Kozy are
retirement-eligible, also included for them are early retirement benefits under our pension
plans, assuming payout as a lump sum. |
|
(5) |
|
Includes the accelerated vesting of equity-based compensation awards upon death, life
insurance benefits equal to two times base salary, and, for
Messrs. Ludwig, Considine, Forlenza and Kozy, the lump sum payment of benefits under
the Deferred Compensation and Retirement Benefit Restoration Plan. |
The amounts shown in the above table do not include deferred compensation to which the named
executive officers would be entitled upon termination, which is shown
on page 46. The amounts shown
also do not include the value of vested stock options and SARs held by the named executive officers
as of September 30, 2009. The value of these vested options and
SARs appears on page 42.
Payments Upon Termination Following a Change of Control
BD has an agreement with each of the named executive officers that provides for the continued
employment of the executive for a period of two years following a change of control of BD. These
agreements are designed to retain the named executive officers and provide continuity of management
in the event of an actual or threatened change of control of BD. The following is a summary of the
key terms of the agreements, and is not intended to be a complete description of their terms.
47
The agreement provides that BD will continue to employ the named executive officer for two
years following a change of control, and that, during this period, the executives position and
responsibilities at BD will be the same in all material respects with those prior to the change of
control. The agreement also provides for minimum salary, annual cash incentive payment and other
benefits during this two-year period. Change of control is defined under the agreement generally
as:
|
|
|
the acquisition by any person or group of 25% or more of the outstanding BD common
stock; |
|
|
|
|
the incumbent members of the Board ceasing to constitute at least a majority of the
Board; |
|
|
|
|
certain business combinations; and |
|
|
|
|
shareholder approval of the liquidation or dissolution of BD. |
The agreement also provides that in the event the named executive officer is terminated without
cause, or the executive terminates his employment for good reason, during the two years
following a change of control, the executive would receive:
|
|
|
a pro rata PIP award for the year of termination based on the higher of
(i) the executives average cash incentive payment for the last three fiscal years prior to
termination, and (ii) his target cash incentive payment for the year in which the
termination occurs (the greater of the two being referred to herein as the Highest
Incentive Payment); |
|
|
|
|
a lump sum severance payment equal to three times (or two times in the case of Mr.
Elkins) the sum of the executives annual salary and the Highest Incentive Payment; |
|
|
|
|
a lump sum payment equal to the present value of the increased pension benefits the
executive would have received had he remained employed for an additional three years (or
two years in the case of Mr. Elkins) following termination; |
|
|
|
|
continuation of the executives welfare benefits (reduced to the extent provided by any
subsequent employer) for a period of three years (or two years in the case of Mr. Elkins);
and |
|
|
|
|
outplacement services, subject to a limit on the cost to BD of $100,000. |
Cause is generally defined as the willful and continued failure of the executive to
substantially perform his duties, or illegal conduct or gross misconduct that is materially
injurious to BD. Good reason is generally defined to include (i) any significant change in the
executives position or responsibilities, (ii) the failure of BD to pay any compensation called for
by the agreement, or (iii) certain relocations of the executive.
Under the agreement, if any payments or distributions made by BD to the named executive
officer as a result of a change of control would be subject to the excise tax imposed by the
Internal Revenue Code, BD will make an additional gross-up payment to the executive. As a result
of this gross-up, the named executive officer would retain the same amount, net of all taxes,
that he would have retained had the excise tax not been triggered. This gross-up provision applies
to any payments or distributions resulting from the change of control, including the accelerated
vesting of equity awards discussed below. However, if such payments and distributions do not exceed
110% of the level that triggers the excise tax, the payments will be reduced to the extent
necessary in order to avoid the need for any gross-up payment.
The following table sets forth the estimated benefits each named executive officer would
receive under his agreement in the event he was terminated without cause or terminated his
employment for good reason following a change of control. The table assumes a termination date of
September 30, 2009. These estimates are based on salary rates in effect as of September 30, 2009,
and use the average cash incentive payment of the named executive officers for the last three
fiscal years as the Highest Incentive Payment. No gross-up payment would have been required with
respect to the payment of these benefits.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Highest |
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive |
|
Severance |
|
Retirement |
|
Welfare |
|
Outplacement |
|
|
Name |
|
Payment |
|
Payment |
|
Benefits |
|
Benefits |
|
Services |
|
Total |
Edward J. Ludwig |
|
$ |
1,358,726 |
|
|
$ |
7,286,178 |
|
|
$ |
1,328,941 |
|
|
$ |
36,000 |
|
|
$ |
100,000 |
|
|
$ |
10,109,845 |
|
David V. Elkins |
|
|
350,000 |
|
|
|
1,700,000 |
|
|
|
68,000 |
|
|
|
24,000 |
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
2,242,000 |
|
John R. Considine |
|
|
615,000 |
|
|
|
3,945,000 |
|
|
|
1,270,058 |
|
|
|
36,000 |
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
5,966,058 |
|
Vincent A. Forlenza |
|
|
529,157 |
|
|
|
3,537,471 |
|
|
|
554,474 |
|
|
|
36,000 |
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
4,757,102 |
|
William A. Kozy |
|
|
411,667 |
|
|
|
2,960,001 |
|
|
|
503,192 |
|
|
|
36,000 |
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
4,010,860 |
|
48
Accelerated Vesting of Equity-Based Compensation Awards Upon a Change of Control
Upon a change of control, as defined in our equity-based compensation plans, all unvested
options and SARs will become fully vested and exercisable, and all restricted stock units,
including Career Shares and Performance Units, will become fully vested and payable (with
Performance Units being payable at their target amount). This accelerated vesting occurs with
respect to all equity-based compensation awards granted by BD, and not just those granted to the
named executive officers. In addition, no termination of employment is required to trigger this
acceleration.
The following table sets forth the value to the named executive officers of the accelerated
vesting of their unvested equity-based compensation awards, assuming a change of control of BD on
September 30, 2009. The BD common stock closing price of $69.75 on September 30, 2009 is used for
purposes of these calculations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
units that are not |
|
Performance |
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
performance-based |
|
Units |
|
Options/SARs |
|
Total |
Edward J. Ludwig |
|
$ |
7,742,808 |
|
|
$ |
5,667,257 |
|
|
$ |
950,005 |
|
|
$ |
14,360,070 |
|
David V. Elkins |
|
|
375,743 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
375,743 |
|
John R. Considine |
|
|
2,437,763 |
|
|
|
1,738,170 |
|
|
|
283,084 |
|
|
|
4,459,017 |
|
Vincent A. Forlenza |
|
|
2,250,693 |
|
|
|
1,585,139 |
|
|
|
306,396 |
|
|
|
4,142,228 |
|
William A. Kozy |
|
|
2,442,785 |
|
|
|
1,347,640 |
|
|
|
229,387 |
|
|
|
4,019,812 |
|
The value of unvested restricted stock units is calculated by multiplying the shares
distributable by $69.75. The value of unvested options and SARs equals the difference between the
exercise price of each option or SAR and $69.75.
Equity-Based Compensation Upon Termination
Upon a named executive officers retirement:
|
o |
|
all unvested options and SARs held by the named executive officer would become fully
exercisable for their remaining term; |
|
|
o |
|
all Career Shares, TVUs and other time-vested units held by the named executive officer
would vest at, or on the first anniversary of, retirement; and |
|
|
o |
|
all Performance Units held by the named executive officer would vest pro rata based on
the amount of the vesting period that had elapsed. The payments would be made after the
end of the applicable performance periods and would be based on BDs actual performance for
those periods, rather than award targets. |
Upon a named executive officers termination due to involuntary termination:
|
o |
|
the named executive officer would be entitled to exercise the stock options and SARs
held by him for three months following termination, but only to the extent they were vested
at the time of termination; |
|
|
o |
|
all Career Shares, TVUs and other time-vested units held by the named executive officer
would fully vest; and |
|
|
o |
|
all Performance Units held by the named executive officer would vest pro rata based on
the amount of the vesting period that had elapsed. The payments would be made after the
end of the applicable performance periods and would be based on BDs actual performance for
those periods, rather than award targets. |
Upon a named executive officers termination due to death or disability:
|
o |
|
all unvested options and SARs held by the named executive officer would become fully
exercisable for their remaining term; |
|
|
o |
|
all Career Shares, TVUs and other time-vested units held by the named executive officer
would fully vest; and |
|
|
o |
|
all Performance Units held by the named executive officer would vest pro rata based on
the amount of the vesting period that has elapsed. The named executive officers payment
would be based on award targets. |
49
Proposal 2. RATIFICATION OF SELECTION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM
Ernst & Young LLP (E&Y) has been selected by the Audit Committee of the Board to audit the
accounts of BD and its subsidiaries for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2010. A representative
of E&Y will attend the 2010 Annual Meeting to respond to appropriate questions and will have the
opportunity to make a statement.
Listed below are the fees billed to BD by E&Y for services rendered during fiscal years 2009
and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Audit Fees |
|
$ |
7,491,000 |
|
|
$ |
7,680,000 |
|
|
Audit Fees
include fees
associated with the
annual audit of
BDs consolidated
financial
statements, reviews
of BDs quarterly
reports on Form
10-Q, registration
statements filed
with foreign
regulatory bodies,
and statutory
audits required
internationally. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Audit Related Fees |
|
$ |
1,039,000 |
|
|
|
132,000 |
|
|
Audit Related
Fees consist of
assurance and
related services
that are reasonably
related to the
performance of the
audit or interim
financial statement
review and are not
reported under
Audit Fees. The
services for fees
disclosed in this
category include
benefit plan audits
and other audit
services requested
by management,
which are in
addition to the
scope of the
financial statement
audit. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax Fees |
|
$ |
209,000 |
|
|
|
317,000 |
|
|
Tax Fees includes
tax compliance,
assistance with tax
audits, tax advice
and tax planning. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Other Fees |
|
$ |
15,000 |
|
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
All Other Fees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
8,754,000 |
|
|
$ |
8,135,000 |
|
|
|
A substantial portion of the professional services fees for the years ended September 30, 2009
and 2008 are denominated in a currency other than U.S. dollars. The increase in fees is due
primarily to inflation in combination with the foreign exchange impact of the weakening U.S.
dollar.
Pre-Approval of Audit and Non-Audit Services
The Audit Committee is responsible for appointing BDs independent registered public
accounting firm (the independent auditors) and approving the terms of the independent auditors
services. The Audit Committee has established a policy for the pre-approval of all audit and
permissible non-audit services to be provided by the independent auditors, as described below.
Audit Services. Under the policy, the Audit Committee will appoint BDs independent
auditors each fiscal year and pre-approve the engagement of the independent auditors for the audit
services to be provided.
Non-Audit Services. In accordance with the policy, the Audit Committee has established
detailed pre-approved categories of non-audit services that may be performed by the independent
auditors during the fiscal year, subject to the dollar limitations set by the Audit Committee. The
Audit Committee has also delegated to the Chair of the Audit Committee the authority to approve
additional non-audit services to be performed by the independent auditors, subject to certain
dollar limitations, and that the full Audit Committee is informed of each service. All other
non-audit services are required to be pre-approved by the entire Audit Committee.
The Audit Committee believes that the provision of the non-audit services described above by
E&Y is consistent with maintaining the independence of E&Y.
The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR Proposal 2. If ratification is withheld, the
Audit Committee will reconsider its selection.
50
REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE
The Audit Committee reviews BDs financial reporting process on behalf of the Board of
Directors. Management has the primary responsibility for the financial statements and the reporting
process, including the system of internal controls. The independent auditors are responsible for
performing an independent audit of the Companys consolidated financial statements in accordance
with generally accepted auditing standards and to issue a report thereon. The Committee monitors
these processes.
In this context, the Committee met and held discussions with management and the independent
auditors. Management represented to the Committee that the Companys consolidated financial
statements were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States, and the Committee reviewed and discussed the consolidated financial statements with
management and the independent auditors. The Committee also discussed with the independent auditors
the matters required to be discussed by the statement on Auditing Standards No. 61 (Codification of
Statements on Auditing Standards, AU 380), as amended, as adopted by the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board in Rule 3200T.
In addition, the Committee discussed with the independent auditors the auditors independence
from BD and its management, and the independent auditors provided to the Committee the written
disclosures and the letter pursuant to the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board regarding the independent auditors communications with the Committee concerning
independence. The Committee discussed with BDs internal and independent auditors the overall scope
and plans for their respective audits. The Committee met with the internal and independent
auditors, with and without management present, to discuss the results of their examinations, their
evaluations of BDs internal controls, and the overall quality of BDs financial reporting.
Management has also reviewed with the Audit Committee its report on the effectiveness of BDs
internal control over financial reporting. The Audit Committee also received the report from the
independent auditors on BDs internal control over financial reporting.
Based on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Committee recommended to the Board
of Directors, and the Board has approved, that the audited financial statements be included in the
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009, for filing with
the Securities and Exchange Commission.
AUDIT COMMITTEE
Basil L. Anderson, Chair
Marshall O. Larsen
Gary A. Mecklenburg
Cathy E. Minehan
James F. Orr
Bertram L. Scott
51
Proposal 3. APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO BY-LAWS
The Board of Directors recommends approval of an amendment to Article II, Section 2.C of BDs
By-Laws that would allow holders of at least 25% of the voting power
of BDs outstanding capital stock to call a
special meeting of shareholders. Currently, only the Board of Directors, the Chairman of the
Board, the Chief Executive Officer or the President may call a special meeting of BDs
shareholders. Last year, BDs shareholders approved a shareholder proposal that requested BD to
amend its By-Laws to allow holders of 10% to call such meetings. The Board is now asking
shareholders to consider adopting a 25% threshold instead, for the reasons discussed below.
The Board believes that establishing an ownership threshold of 25% in order to request a
special meeting strikes a reasonable balance between enhancing shareholder rights and protecting
against the risk of a small minority of shareholders calling an unlimited number of special
meetings that would be disruptive to our business and impose unnecessary costs and expense on BD.
The 25% threshold is also consistent with thresholds adopted by other large public companies
incorporated in New Jersey. In addition, if the holders of less than 25% of BDs common stock
believe a special meeting should be called, under the New Jersey corporation law, the holders of
10% or more of BDs common stock have the right to have a court call a special shareholders meeting
upon a showing of good cause.
The proposed amended text of Article II, Section 2.C of BDs By-Laws, including the
requirements and procedures for calling a special meeting of shareholders, is attached as Appendix
A to this proxy statement.
To be approved, Proposal 3 must receive For votes from at least a majority of the votes cast
on the proposal. The amendment would be effective upon approval by BDs shareholders.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR PROPOSAL 3.
52
|
|
|
Proposal 4. |
|
AMENDMENT TO THE 2004 EMPLOYEE AND DIRECTOR
EQUITY-BASED COMPENSATION PLAN |
Our
2004 Director and Employee Equity-Based Compensation Plan (the
Plan) is used for awards of
equity-based compensation. As is described elsewhere in this proxy statement, equity-based
compensation is a significant element of our overall compensation program. Equity-based
compensation serves to align the interests of our executives and other employees with those of BDs
shareholders, to encourage the achievement of important performance goals, and to attract, reward
and retain individuals at all levels of BDs organization that are important to BDs future.
Proposed Amendment
As
of November 30, 2009, 1,332,148 shares remained available for the issuance of awards under
the Plan. We do not believe these remaining shares are sufficient to continue using equity-based
compensation as an element of our compensation program. Accordingly, the Board of Directors has
approved an amendment to Section 5 of the Plan to increase the shares available for awards by 7.2
million shares, from 18 million to 25.2 million, subject to shareholder approval of the amendment.
The amendment also provides that, following
shareholder approval only 4,200,000 of the shares available under the Plan may be
used for full-value awards. Full value awards are any type of awards other than stock options
and stock appreciation rights (SARs). This would include, for instance, Performance Units and
Time-Vested Restricted Stock Units.
To the extent any outstanding award granted under the Plan is canceled or expires, the shares
subject to the award will become available again for issuance. Also, shares underlying awards
issued in assumption of, or substitution for, awards issued by a company acquired by BD (referred
to as Substitute Awards) will not reduce the number of shares remaining available for issuance
under the Plan.
If this amendment is not approved, the proposed additional shares will not become available
for issuance under the Plan, but the Plan will otherwise remain in effect.
Material Terms of the Plan
The following is a summary of the material features of the Plan. A copy of the Plan as
proposed to be amended is attached to this proxy statement as Appendix B.
Eligibility and Participation
Any employee of BD, including any officer or employee-director, is eligible to receive awards
under the Plan. Additionally, any holder of an outstanding equity-based award issued by a company
acquired by BD may be granted a Substitute Award under the Plan. BD had approximately 29,000
employees as of September 30, 2009. Non-management directors of BD are also eligible to
participate in the Plan. There are currently 12 non-management members of the Board of Directors.
No participant may receive stock options and SARs under the Plan in any calendar year relating to
more than 250,000 shares of BD common stock, subject to adjustment as discussed below.
Administration of the Plan
The Plan is administered by the Compensation and Benefits Committee of the BD Board of
Directors (referred to herein as the Compensation Committee). The Compensation Committee has,
among other powers, the authority to interpret and construe any provision of the Plan, to adopt
rules and regulations for administering the Plan, and to perform other acts relating to the Plan.
The Compensation Committee also has the discretion to delegate any administrative responsibilities
under the Plan. Decisions of the Compensation Committee are final and binding on all parties. The
Compensation Committee has the sole discretion to grant to eligible participants one or more equity
awards and to determine the type, number or amount of any award to be granted.
Awards
General. Awards are granted for no cash consideration, or for minimal cash consideration if
required by applicable law. Awards may provide that upon their exercise, the holder will receive
cash, stock, other securities, other awards, other property or any combination thereof. Shares of
stock deliverable under the plan may consist, in whole or in part, of authorized and unissued
shares or treasury shares. No awards may be granted under the Plan after February 11, 2014.
Exercise Price. Except in the case of Substitute Awards, the exercise price of any stock
option or SAR, and the purchase price of any security that may be purchased under any other award,
will not be less than 100% of the fair market value of the stock or other security on the date of
grant. The Compensation Committee may not amend an award to reduce its exercise,
53
grant or purchase price (a repricing), or cancel an outstanding stock option or SAR and
replace it with a new award with a lower exercise price, except for adjustments in connection with
stock splits and other events, as described below. The closing price of BD common stock on December
1, 2009 was $76.00.
Exercise of Award; Form of Consideration. The Compensation Committee determines the times at
which options and other purchase rights may be exercised, and the methods by which payment of the
purchase price may be made. No loans are extended by BD to any participant in connection with the
exercise of an award (although BD is permitted to maintain or establish broker-assisted cashless
exercise programs for stock options).
Stock Options and Stock Appreciation Rights. The duration of stock options and SARs granted
under the Plan is established by the Compensation Committee, but may not exceed ten years. The
Compensation Committee may impose a vesting schedule on stock options and SARs. Unless otherwise
provided by the Compensation Committee, employee stock options and SARs:
|
|
|
are exercisable following termination of employment without cause for three months, to
the extent such awards were exercisable at the time of termination; |
|
|
|
|
become fully vested upon retirement, death and disability, and otherwise remain in
effect in accordance with their terms; and |
|
|
|
|
otherwise lapse upon termination of employment. |
Stock options granted under the Plan may be incentive stock options (ISOs), which afford
certain favorable tax treatment for the holder, or nonqualified stock options (NQSOs). See
Tax Consequences below.
Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units. The Compensation Committee may impose
restrictions on restricted stock and restricted stock units, in its discretion. Upon death,
disability, retirement or termination without cause, all restrictions on restricted stock and
restricted stock units will no longer apply. In all other cases of termination of employment during
the restriction period, all restricted stock and restricted stock units will be forfeited.
Performance Units. Performance units vest upon the attainment of performance goals established
by the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee establishes the performance criteria, the
length of the performance period and the form and time of payment of the award. Upon retirement or
involuntary termination without cause during the performance period, a holder of performance units
will receive a pro rata portion of the amount otherwise payable under the award. In all other cases
of termination of employment during the performance period, the rights of the holder will be as
determined by the Compensation Committee.
Other Stock-Based Awards. The Compensation Committee may establish the terms and conditions of
other stock-based awards, such as dividend equivalent rights.
Performance-Based Compensation Awards. Awards (other than stock options and SARs) to certain
senior executives will, if the Compensation Committee intends any such award to qualify as
performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, become earned
and payable only if pre-established targets relating to one or more of the following performance
measures are achieved during a performance period or periods, as determined by the Compensation
Committee: (i) Return on Net Assets, (ii) Revenue Growth, (iii) Return on Common Equity, (iv) Total
Shareholder Return, (v) Earnings Per Share, (vi) Net Revenue Per Employee, (vii) Market Share,
(viii) Return on Invested Capital or (ix) Net Income (each as defined in the plan). Such targets
may relate to BD as a whole, or to one or more units of BD, and may be measured over such periods,
as the Compensation Committee determines. The maximum number of shares that may be earned by an
executive pursuant to any such performance-based award is 150,000 shares.
Certain Adjustments. If a recapitalization, stock split or other event (including those
described in Section 5(e) of the Plan) affects the BD common stock in a way that an adjustment is
required to preserve the value of outstanding awards and prevent dilution or enlargement of the
benefits intended to be made available under the plan, the Compensation Committee will adjust, as
it determines equitable: (i) the number and type of shares (or other securities or property)
available for awards, (ii) the number and type of shares (or other securities or property) subject
to outstanding awards, and (iii) the grant, purchase or exercise price with respect to any award.
The Compensation Committee may not take any other action to reduce the exercise, grant or purchase
price of any award as established at the time of grant.
Transferability. Awards granted under the Plan are not transferable other than by will or the
laws of descent and distribution, except as otherwise provided by the Compensation Committee.
However, in no event may an award be transferred by a participant for value. Except to the extent a
transfer is permitted, an award is exercisable during a participants lifetime only by the
participant or by the participants guardian or legal representative.
54
Deferral
Recipients of awards have the right to defer the receipt of any or all of the shares
deliverable upon settlement of an award in accordance with the terms and conditions of BDs
deferral plans described previously in this proxy statement.
Change in Control
Unless otherwise specified by the Compensation Committee, upon a change in control (as defined
in the Plan), all awards issued under the Plan will become fully vested and exercisable, and any
restrictions applicable to any award will lapse.
Amendment and Termination
The Board of Directors may amend, discontinue or terminate the Plan or any portion of the Plan
at any time. Shareholder approval may also be required by New York Stock Exchange, tax or
regulatory requirements for certain amendments.
New Plan Benefits
The issuance of any awards under the Plan will be at the discretion of the Compensation
Committee. Therefore, it is not possible to determine the amount or form of any award that will be
granted to any individual in the future. The table below sets forth the awards that were provided
under the plan during the 2009 fiscal year. For information regarding grants made to date in
fiscal year 2010 to the named executive officers, please refer to
page 40.
Becton, Dickinson and Company
2004 Employee and Director Equity-Based Compensation Plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Appreciation |
|
Performance |
|
Restricted |
Name and Position |
|
Rights |
|
Units |
|
Stock Units(1) |
Edward J.
Ludwig,
Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer |
|
|
99,313 |
|
|
|
31,234 |
|
|
|
15,617 |
|
David V.
Elkins,
Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
5,285 |
|
John R.
Considine,
Vice Chairman |
|
|
28,758 |
|
|
|
9,044 |
|
|
|
4,522 |
|
Vincent A.
Forlenza,
President |
|
|
34,544 |
|
|
|
10,864 |
|
|
|
5,432 |
|
William A.
Kozy,
Executive Vice President |
|
|
23,922 |
|
|
|
7,523 |
|
|
|
3,762 |
|
All executive officers as a group |
|
|
272,464 |
|
|
|
85,689 |
|
|
|
46,608 |
|
All non-employee directors as a group |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
24,036 |
|
BD employees other than executive
officers, as a group |
|
|
1,748,831 |
|
|
|
550,164 |
|
|
|
547,153 |
|
Tax Matters
The following is a brief summary of the principal income tax consequences under current
federal income tax laws relating to awards under the plan. This summary is not intended to be
exhaustive, and, among other things, does not describe state, local or foreign income and other tax
consequences.
Non-Qualified Stock Options and Stock Appreciation Rights. An optionee or SAR recipient will
not recognize any taxable income upon the grant of an NQSO or SAR and BD will not be entitled to a
tax deduction with respect to the grant of an NQSO or SAR. Upon exercise of an NQSO or SAR, the
excess of the fair market value of the underlying shares of BD common stock on the exercise date
over the option exercise price will be taxable as compensation income to the grantee and will be
subject to applicable withholding taxes. BD will generally be entitled to a tax deduction at such
time in the amount of such compensation income. The grantees tax basis for the shares received
pursuant to the exercise of an NQSO or SAR will equal the sum of the compensation income recognized
and the exercise price. In the event of a sale of shares received upon the exercise of an NQSO or
SAR, any appreciation or depreciation after the exercise date generally will be taxed as capital
gain or loss and will be long-term capital gain or loss if the holding period for such shares is
more than one year.
Incentive Stock Options. An optionee will not recognize any taxable income at the time of
grant or exercise of an ISO while an employee (or within three months after termination of
employment), and BD will not be entitled to a tax deduction with respect to such grant or exercise.
Exercise of an ISO may, however, give rise to taxable compensation income subject to applicable
withholding taxes, and a tax deduction to BD, if the ISO is not exercised while the optionee is
employed by BD or within three months after termination of employment, or if the optionee
subsequently engages in a disqualifying disposition,
55
as described below. Also, the excess of the fair market value of the underlying shares on the
date of exercise over the exercise price will be an item of income for purposes of the optionees
alternative minimum tax. A sale or exchange by an optionee of shares acquired upon the exercise of
an ISO more than one year after the transfer of the shares to such optionee and more than two years
after the date of grant of the ISO will result in any difference between the net sale proceeds and
the exercise price being treated as long-term capital gain (or loss) to the optionee. If such sale
or exchange takes place within two years after the date of grant of the ISO or within one year from
the date of transfer of the ISO shares to the optionee, such sale or exchange will generally
constitute a disqualifying disposition of such shares that will have the following results: any
excess of (i) the lesser of (a) the fair market value of the shares at the time of exercise of the
ISO and (b) the amount realized on such disqualifying disposition of the shares, over (ii) the
option exercise price of such shares, will be ordinary income to the optionee, and BD will be
entitled to a tax deduction in the amount of such income. Any further gain or loss after the date
of exercise generally will qualify as capital gain or loss and will not result in any deduction by
BD.
Restricted Stock. A grantee will not recognize any income upon the receipt of restricted stock
unless the holder elects under Section 83(b) of the Code, within thirty days of such receipt, to
recognize ordinary income in an amount equal to the fair market value of the restricted stock at
the time of receipt, less any amount paid for the shares. If restricted stock for which a Section
83(b) election has been made is subsequently forfeited, the holder will not be able to recover any
taxes that were paid as a result of such election. If the election is not made, the holder will
generally recognize ordinary income, on the date that the restrictions to which the restricted
stock is subject are removed, in an amount equal to the fair market value of such shares on such
date, less any amount paid for the shares. At the time the holder recognizes ordinary income, BD
generally will be entitled to a deduction in the same amount. Generally, upon a sale or other
disposition of restricted stock with respect to which the holder has recognized ordinary income (
i.e. , a Section 83(b) election was previously made or the restrictions were previously removed),
the holder will recognize capital gain or loss in an amount equal to the difference between the
amount realized on such sale or other disposition and the holders basis in such shares. Such gain
or loss will be long-term capital gain or loss if the holding period for such shares is more than
one year.
Restricted Stock Units and Performance Units. The grant of an Award of restricted stock units
or performance units will not result in income for the grantee or in a tax deduction for BD. Upon
the settlement of such an Award, the grantee will recognize ordinary income equal to the aggregate
value of the payment received, and BD generally will be entitled to a tax deduction in the same
amount.
Equity Compensation Plan Information
The following table provides certain information as of September 30, 2009 regarding BDs
equity compensation plans.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
(b) |
|
(c) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
remaining available for |
|
|
Number of securities |
|
Weighted-average |
|
future issuance under |
|
|
to be issued upon |
|
exercise price of |
|
equity compensation |
|
|
exercise of |
|
outstanding |
|
plans |
|
|
outstanding options, |
|
options, warrants |
|
(excluding securities |
Plan Category |
|
warrants and rights |
|
and rights(1) |
|
reflected in column (a)) |
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders |
|
|
17,954,206 |
(2) |
|
$ |
50.20 |
|
|
|
4,507,886 |
(3) |
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders |
|
|
2,102,977 |
(4) |
|
$ |
32.85 |
|
|
|
0 |
(5) |
Total |
|
|
20,057,183 |
|
|
$ |
50.15 |
|
|
|
4,507,886 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Shares issuable pursuant to outstanding awards of performance units
and restricted stock units under the BD 2004 Employee and Director
Equity-Based Compensation Plan (the 2004 Plan) and the BD Stock
Award Plan, as well as shares issuable under BDs 1996 Directors
Deferral Plan, Deferred Compensation and Retirement Benefit
Restoration Plan and Global Share Investment Program (GSIP), are not
included in the calculation of weighted-average exercise price, as
there is no exercise price for these shares. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes (i) 14,761,738 shares issuable under outstanding stock
options and stock appreciation rights and (ii) 3,192,468 shares
distributable under performance unit awards and restricted stock unit
awards granted under the 2004 Plan and Stock Award Plan (with
performance unit awards listed at target payout amounts). |
|
(3) |
|
Includes 4,295,402 shares available for issuance under the 2004 Plan,
and 212,484 shares available for issuance under the 1994 Restricted
Stock Plan for Non-Employee Directors. |
|
(4) |
|
Includes 45,254 shares issuable pursuant to outstanding stock options
granted under BDs Non-Employee Directors 2000 Stock Option Plan. Also
includes 86,643 shares issuable under BDs 1996 Directors Deferral
Plan, 557,235 shares issuable under BDs Deferred Compensation and
Retirement Benefit Restoration Plan, and 1,413,845 shares issuable
under the GSIP, based on participant account balances as of September
30, 2009. |
|
(5) |
|
Does not include shares issuable under the 1996 Directors Deferral
Plan, the Deferred Compensation and Retirement Benefit Restoration
Plan or the GSIP. There are no limits on the number of shares issuable
under these plans, and the number of shares that may become issuable
will depend on future elections made by plan participants. |
56
Deferred Compensation and Retirement Benefit Restoration Plan. Information regarding the
Deferred Compensation and Retirement Benefit Restoration Plan can be
found beginning on page 44 of
this proxy statement. The shares held in the plan as of September 30, 2009 include 196,518 shares
acquired by participants through cash deferrals and 360,717 shares deferred under participants
equity-based compensation awards. In the event a participant elects to have cash compensation
deferred in a BD common stock account, the participants account is credited with a number of
shares based on the prevailing market price of the BD common stock. The cash deferred by the
participant is used to purchase the shares of BD common stock on the open market, which are then
held in a trust.
Global Share Investment Program. BD maintains a Global Share Investment Program (GSIP) for
its non-U.S. employees in certain jurisdictions outside of the U.S. The purpose of the GSIP is to
provide non-U.S. employees with a means of saving on a regular and long-term basis and acquiring a
beneficial interest in BD common stock. Participants may contribute a portion of their base pay,
through payroll deductions, to the GSIP for their account. BD provides matching funds of up to 3%
of the participants base pay through contributions to the participants plan account, which
contributions are immediately vested. Employee contributions to the GSIP are invested in shares of
BD common stock. These contributions are used to purchase the shares of BD common stock on the open
market, which are then held in a trust.
A participant may withdraw the vested portion of the participants account, although such
withdrawals must be in the form of a cash payment if the participant is employed by BD at the time
of withdrawal. Following termination of service, withdrawals will be paid in either cash or shares,
at the election of the participant.
Non-Employee Directors 2000 Stock Option Plan. Directors formerly received grants of
non-qualified stock options under the Non-Employee Directors 2000 Stock Option Plan (the Directors
Stock Option Plan), which provided for the granting of non-qualified stock options at each Annual
Meeting to each non-employee director elected at or continuing to serve after such meeting. Options
are no longer granted under the Directors Stock Option Plan. The exercise price of stock options
granted under the Directors Stock Option Plan was the fair market value of the BD common stock on the date of grant. Each
option granted under the Directors Stock Option Plan has a term of 10 years from its date of grant. The options granted
under the Directors Stock Option Plan have vesting periods of three to four years, depending on the year of grant. In the
event of a tender offer for more than 25% of the outstanding common stock, or a change in control
of BD (as defined in the plan), all outstanding options under the Directors Stock Option Plan become immediately vested
and exercisable.
1996
Directors Deferral Plan. The 1996 Directors Deferral
Plan (the Directors Deferral Plan) allows non-management
directors to defer receipt, in an unfunded cash account or a BD common stock account, of all or
part of their annual retainer and other cash fees. In the event a director elects to have fees
deferred in a BD common stock account, the directors account is credited with a number of shares
based on the prevailing market price of the BD common stock on the due date of such payment. The
cash fees deferred by the director are used to purchase the shares of BD common stock on the open
market, which are then held in a trust. The number of shares credited to the BD common stock
accounts of participants is adjusted periodically to reflect the payment and reinvestment of
dividends on the common stock. Participants may elect to have amounts held in a cash account
converted into a BD common stock account. The Directors Deferral
Plan is not qualified, and participants have an
unsecured contractual commitment of BD to pay the amounts due under the Directors Deferral
Plan. When such payments
are due, the cash and/or common stock will be distributed from BDs general assets.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR PROPOSAL 4.
Proposal 5. APPROVAL OF MATERIAL TERMS OF PERFORMANCE GOALS
BD is seeking shareholder approval of the material terms of performance goals under the
Performance Incentive Plan (referred to as the PIP). Shareholder approval of such terms would
preserve BDs ability to deduct compensation associated with future awards made under the plan to
certain executives.
Background
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code limits the deductions a publicly-held company can
claim for compensation in excess of $1 million paid in a given year to its chief executive officer
and its three other most highly-compensated executive officers (other than the chief financial
officer) (these officers are generally referred to as the covered employees). Performance-based
compensation that meets certain requirements is not counted against the $1 million deductibility
cap. Awards under the PIP (referred to as Awards) qualify as performance-based compensation
since the payment of the Award is subject to the achievement during a performance period of the
performance goals selected by the Compensation and Benefits Committee (referred to herein as the
Compensation Committee). The Compensation Committee
retains the discretion to set the level of performance for a given performance measure under
the PIP. For Awards to qualify as performance-based compensation, the shareholders must approve
the material terms of the performance goals every five years.
57
At the 2005 Annual Meeting held on February 1, 2005, shareholders approved the PIP, including
the material terms of performance goals to be used by the Compensation Committee for awarding
payments. The Board is again requesting shareholder approval of the material terms of performance
goals under the plan to enable BD to continue to make Awards that will qualify as performance-based
compensation for which it may receive income tax deductions.
Employees affected
The BD associates whose compensation would be subject to the performance goals are the members
of the BD Leadership Team. The BD Leadership Team consists of 43 members of senior management, and
includes the named executive officers listed in the Summary
Compensation Table on page 35. Although
federal tax laws only limit deductibility for compensation paid to the covered employees mentioned
above, we may apply the performance goals to all members of the BD Leadership Team so that, in the
event any of them becomes a covered employee during the year, such Award will be deductible as
performance-based compensation.
Performance goals
Awards will, if the Compensation Committee intends any such Award to qualify as
performance-based compensation under Section 162(m), become earned and payable only if
pre-established targets relating to one or more of the following performance measures are achieved
during a performance period or periods, as determined by the Compensation Committee: (i) Return on
Net Assets, (ii) Revenue Growth, (iii) Return on Common Equity, (iv) Total Shareholder Return, (v)
Earnings Per Share, (vi) Net Revenue Per Employee, (vii) Market Share, (viii) Return on Invested
Capital, or (ix) Net Income. Each of these performance measures is defined below.
Return On Net Assets for a period means net income less preferred stock dividends divided by
the difference of average total assets less average non-debt liabilities, with average defined as
the sum of assets or liabilities at the beginning and ending of the period divided by two.
Revenue Growth means the percentage change in revenue (as defined in Statement of Financial
Accounting Concepts No. 6, published by the Financial Accounting Standards Board) from one period
to another.
Return On Common Equity for a period means net income less preferred stock dividends divided
by total shareholders equity, less amounts, if any, attributable to preferred stock.
Total Shareholder Return means the sum of the appreciation in the Companys stock price and
dividends paid on the common stock of the Company over a given period of time.
Earnings Per Share means earnings per share calculated in accordance with U.S. Generally
Accepted Accounting Principles.
Net Revenue Per Employee in a period means net revenue divided by the average number of
employees of the Company, with average defined as the sum of the number of employees at the
beginning and ending of the period divided by two.
Market Share means the percent of sales of the total available market in an industry,
product line or product attained by the Company or one of its business units during a time period.
Return on Invested Capital for a period means earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation
and amortization divided by the difference of total assets less non-interest bearing current
liabilities.
Net Income means net income calculated in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles.
Maximum Award amounts
The maximum Award that may be earned by and payable to a member of the BD Leadership Team
pursuant to the PIP with respect to a fiscal year is $3,000,000.
Other
material terms of the PIP
Types of Awards. The PIP authorizes the payment of lump sum cash incentive payments to
eligible employees of BD and its subsidiaries.
Eligibility. Exempt employees of BD and its subsidiaries at certain management levels or with
certain responsibilities (referred to herein as Eligible Employees) are eligible to participate
in the PIP. Persons promoted or newly hired to an eligible position may be considered for a pro
rata Award. Non-management directors are not eligible to participate in the PIP.
Awards to the Chief Executive Officer are approved by the Board of Directors. Awards to BDs
other executive officers and other members of senior management are approved by the Compensation
Committee. All other Awards are made
58
under the PIP at the discretion of the Performance Incentive
Committee (discussed below). In addition, the total Awards paid to BDs executive officers for any
fiscal year may not, barring special circumstances, as determined by the Compensation Committee,
exceed 3% of BDs reported after-tax net income for such fiscal year. As of September 30, 2009,
approximately 3,652 persons were eligible to participate in the PIP.
Administration. In general, the PIP is administered by the Performance Incentive Committee,
which consists of at least three BD associates, including the Chief Executive Officer and other
senior executives designated by the Chief Executive Officer. With respect to participation in the
PIP by executive officers and other members of senior management, however, the PIP is also
administered by the Compensation Committee.
Terms of Awards. Awards under the PIP are expressed as a percentage of an Eligible Employees
base salary. Target award amounts range from 3% to 120% of an Eligible Employees base salary.
Awards become payable following the close of the fiscal year for which they are awarded.
Awards are tied to BDs overall performance, as well as the performance of the Eligible
Employee and, for certain associates, of his or her business unit, region or country, or function.
Accordingly, an Eligible Employee may receive less or more than the Eligible Employees target
incentive payment. Each fiscal year, the Compensation Committee establishes performance objectives
for BD under the PIP, while the Performance Incentive Committee sets certain financial and
operational objectives for each business unit, region or country, and function.
Awards are made from a pool that is funded based on BDs performance against the BD
performance target or targets established by the Compensation Committee. For more information, see
Funding for PIP awards on page 24.
After the funding level for the Award pool has been established, the Performance Incentive
Committee determines performance ratings for each business unit, region or country, and function.
These performance ratings determine the amount of the overall Award pool that will be allocated for
the payment of Awards to Eligible Employees within those units, regions, countries or functions.
Termination of Employment. Upon termination of employment during a fiscal year, an Eligible
Employee will be eligible to receive an Award with respect to the portion of the fiscal year that
the person was employed with BD.
Term of the PIP. The PIP has no termination date, and will remain in effect until terminated
by the Board of Directors.
Withholding. All payments of cash under the PIP will be subject to withholding of all
applicable federal, state, local or other taxes, as determined by BD.
Amendment or Termination. The PIP may be amended or terminated by the Board of Directors at
any time, without a vote of security holders. Such amendments may increase the cost of the PIP to
BD or alter the allocation of the benefits under the PIP as between the Eligible Employees. No such
amendment, however, may increase the amount of an award to a senior executive that is intended to
qualify as qualified performance-based compensation.
New PIP Benefits. Future grants of Awards that may be made to Eligible Employees are subject
to the discretion of the Performance Incentive Committee and the Compensation Committee, as
described above, and, therefore, are not determinable at this time.
The following table reflects the Awards that were granted under the PIP for fiscal 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
Name and Position |
|
Award |
Edward J. Ludwig, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
|
$ |
1,500,000 |
|
David V. Elkins, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer |
|
|
350,000 |
|
John R. Considine, Vice Chairman |
|
|
600,000 |
|
Vincent A. Forlenza, President |
|
|
625,000 |
|
William A. Kozy, Executive Vice President |
|
|
470,000 |
|
All executive officers as a group |
|
|
5,200,000 |
|
BD employees other than executive officers, as a group |
|
|
80,800,000 |
|
59
The following table reflects the Award targets that have been established with respect to
Awards to be granted under the PIP for fiscal 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
Name and Position (1) |
|
% of Base Salary |
Edward J. Ludwig, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
120 |
% |
David V. Elkins, Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer |
|
|
70 |
% |
Vincent A. Forlenza, President |
|
|
85 |
% |
William A.
Kozy, Executive Vice President |
|
|
70 |
% |
All executive officers as a group |
|
|
45-120 |
% |
BD employees other than executive officers, as a group |
|
|
3%-45 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
John R. Considine has announced his retirement from BD, effective December 31, 2009. |
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR PROPOSAL 5.
Proposal 6. SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL ON MAJORITY VOTING
Mr. Gerald R. Armstrong, 910 Sixteenth Street, No. 412, Denver,
Colorado 80202-2917, owner of 35.413909 shares of BD common stock,
has informed BD that he plans to introduce the following proposal
at the meeting:
RESOLUTION
That the shareholders of BECTON, DICKINSON AND COMPANY, request its
Board of Directors to adopt a amendment to our company bylaws,
specifying that the election of our directors shall be decided by a
majority of the votes cast, with a plurality vote standard to be
used in those director elections where the number of nominees
exceeds the number of directors to be elected.
STATEMENT
It is noted that the Securities and Exchange Commission has stated
there is a substantive distinction between a bylaw and a policy and,
this proposal seeks a specific bylaw provision.
In order to provide shareholders a meaningful role in director
elections, our companys director election vote standard should be
changed to a majority-vote standard. A majority-vote standard would
require that a nominee receive a majority of the votes cast in order
to be elected to our board.
This standard is particularly well-suited for the vast majority of
director elections in which only board of directors nominated
candidates are on the ballot. This standard in board elections
could establish a challenging vote standard for board nominees and
improve the performance of the individuals as well as the entire
board. Currently, director nominees could be elected, or
re-elected, with only a plurality and the proponent of this proposal
believes that a majority vote requirement would create a greater
demand for improved performance and accountability.
The Council of Institutional Investors www.cii.org, whose members
had $3,000,000,000,000 invested, recommended adoption of this topic.
The Council sent letters asking the 1,500 largest U.S. corporations
to comply with the Councils policy and adopt this topic. Leading
proxy advisory firms also recommended voting in favor of this
proposed topic.
If you agree, please join me in voting FOR this proposal. Thank you.
* * *
60
BOARD OF DIRECTORS RESPONSE
The Board of Directors recommends a vote AGAINST Proposal 6 for the following reasons:
The Board has been following this issue and recognizes that majority voting in director
elections continues to receive considerable attention and has been the subject of significant
public debate. While a number of companies have adopted this standard in uncontested director
elections, the Board believes it would not be in the best interests of BD or its shareholders at
this time to amend BDs By-Laws to provide for the election of directors in uncontested director
elections by a majority of votes cast. The issues raised by majority voting are significant and
would introduce risks into BDs effective corporate governance structure while not necessarily
improving the Boards performance or its accountability to BDs shareholders, as suggested by the
proponent. In the Boards view, before this standard can be further considered, these issues need
to be more fully addressed and clarified.
In addition, it would be imprudent to consider moving to a majority vote standard without
having fully assessed the impact of the New York Stock Exchanges (NYSE) recently-adopted broker
discretionary voting rule, which will prohibit brokers from voting shareholder customers shares in
a director election when the shareholder customers have provided no direction to the broker. Since
this will be the first election cycle in which this new NYSE rule will be in effect, it is
difficult to predict the consequences for companies that have adopted a majority vote standard for
uncontested director elections, although it is expected that the likely result will be a reduction
in the total number of shares voted for directors. By posing the risk of significantly reducing
the number of votes cast, this new NYSE rule may allow a minority of shares or a single-issue
activist to defeat the election of a director or group of directors, resulting in an outcome that
may be unfair to the majority of shareholders or inconsistent with BDs long-term goals.
The Board believes that BDs current plurality vote standard, coupled with its resignation
policy for a director who receives a majority withhold vote (the Director Resignation Policy),
which is contained in BDs Corporate Governance Principles (which are located at
www.bd.com/investors/corporate_governance/), continues to promote the best interests of BDs
shareholders and effectively addresses the concerns expressed in this proposal. Like many other
public companies, BD uses the plurality vote standard to elect directors. Under this standard,
which is authorized under New Jersey law, nominees who receive the most affirmative votes are
elected to the Board. Plurality voting ensures that all open positions are filled at each
election. Under majority voting, a failed election may occur in an uncontested election where a
board nominee does not receive a majority of the votes cast. As a result, the Board could be faced
with a potentially large number of vacancies at one time. In addition to losing experienced and
knowledgeable directors, such a result could adversely affect BDs ability to comply with
applicable NYSE or Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) requirements regarding the number of
independent directors and financial experts.
In contrast, BDs current plurality vote standard and corporate governance structure, under
which shareholders may express dissatisfaction with the Board by withholding votes for certain
directors or by proposing nominees to the Board, accomplishes the primary objective of this
proposal, and allows BD to maintain a stable Board of experienced and knowledgeable directors while
evaluating an appropriate response to shareholder dissatisfaction. Consideration of all relevant
factors on a case-by-case basis pursuant to the Director Resignation Policy, rather than the
uncertainty that could result from the implementation of a majority vote standard, gives the Board
flexibility and enables it to avoid such undesirable and disruptive governance consequences.
Pursuant to the Director Resignation Policy, any director nominee in an uncontested election who
receives a greater number of votes withheld than votes for his or her election shall offer to
submit his or her resignation from the Board, and the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee
will consider all of the relevant facts and circumstances and recommend to the Board the action to
be taken with respect to such offer of resignation.
Implementation of this proposal also could significantly increase the influence of special
interest shareholder groups whose interests and agendas may differ from those of BDs shareholders
generally. It could enable such shareholder groups to promote vote no campaigns against one or
more of the Boards director nominees, forcing BD to incur additional solicitation costs (in terms
of both financial expense and management and Board focus) for routine elections, which, in the
Boards view, is not the best utilization of BDs resources. Further, a vote no campaign would
need to mobilize only a minority of BDs shareholders to achieve against votes from a majority of
the votes cast. Consequently, a minority of BDs shares outstanding effectively could act to
defeat a directors election. The Board believes that such factors do not reinforce a longer-term
focus among directors that is in the best interests of BDs shareholders.
The proponent also suggests this proposal is necessary to make the directors more accountable
to BDs shareholders. The Board is committed to accountability to BDs shareholders and believes
the current plurality vote system maintains such accountability, as is evidenced by the rigorous
process by which the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee identifies and recommends
director nominees to the Board (which includes affording shareholders an opportunity to suggest
candidates), and BDs strong corporate governance practices are calculated to increase the
transparency and accountability of BDs leadership to its shareholders. These include:
61
|
|
|
The designation of a Lead Director; |
|
|
|
|
Evaluations of the Chief Executive Officer and the Board; |
|
|
|
|
Conflicts of interest and ethics compliance; |
|
|
|
|
The expiration without renewal or replacement of BDs shareholder rights plan (poison
pill); |
|
|
|
|
The Director Resignation Policy; and |
|
|
|
|
Approval by the shareholders at the 2009 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the 2009
Annual Meeting) of a Board proposal to amend BDs Restated Certificate of Incorporation
whereby all directors standing for election from and after the 2009 Annual Meeting would
be elected to one-year terms. |
The Board is fully committed to strong corporate governance and it is the Boards fiduciary
duty to act in the best interests of BDs shareholders. However, in the Boards view, this
proposal would not necessarily enhance the ability of shareholders to impact the outcome of
director elections, nor would it influence director accountability. The Board therefore does not
believe that this proposal is in the best interests of BD or its shareholders at this time.
The Board will continue to follow the debate about majority voting and monitor developments,
and, if appropriate and in the best interests of BDs shareholders, will take further action to
maintain its commitment to high standards of corporate governance. At the present time, however,
the Board believes it would be unwise to alter its plurality-based director election process, which
the Board believes has served BD well to date, until the concerns about majority voting have been
more fully addressed, thereby allowing a more balanced assessment of this standard.
ACCORDINGLY, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE AGAINST PROPOSAL 6.
Proposal 7. SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL ON CUMULATIVE VOTING
Mrs. Evelyn Y. Davis, Watergate Office Building, 2600 Virginia
Avenue N.W., Suite 215, Washington, DC 20037, owner of 800 shares
of BD common stock, has informed BD that she plans to introduce the
following proposal at the meeting:
RESOLVED: That the stockholders of Becton Dickinson, assembled in Annual
Meeting in person and by proxy, hereby request the Board of Directors to take
the necessary steps to provide for cumulative voting in the election of
directors, which means each stockholder shall be entitled to as many votes as
shall equal the number of shares he or she owns multiplied by the number of
directors to be elected, and he or she may cast all of such votes for a
single candidate, or any two or more of them as he or she may see fit.
REASONS: Many states have mandatory cumulative voting, so do National Banks.
In addition, many corporations have adopted cumulative voting.
Last year the owners of 80,170,748 shares, representing approximately 43.1%
of shares voting, voted FOR this proposal.
If you AGREE, please mark your proxy FOR this resolution.
* * *
BOARD OF DIRECTORS RESPONSE
The Board of Directors recommends a vote AGAINST Proposal 7 for the following reasons:
This proposal has been submitted at the past 13 annual meetings and has been rejected by our
shareholders each time.
The Board, like most S&P 500 companies, continues to believe that directors should be elected
through a system that assures that directors will represent the interests of all shareholders, not
just those of particular groups. Cumulative voting could enable individual shareholders or groups
of shareholders with less than a majority of the shares to pool their votes to elect directors
concerned with advancing the positions of the group responsible for their election, rather than the
positions that are in the best interests of BD and of all of our shareholders. In addition, the
support by directors of the special interests of the constituencies that elected them could create
partisanship and divisiveness among Board members and impair the Boards ability to operate
effectively as a governing body, to the detriment of all BD shareholders. For these reasons,
cumulative voting also may interfere with the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committees
ongoing efforts to develop and
62
maintain a Board possessing the wide range of skills, characteristics and experience, and a
team-oriented ethic, necessary to best serve all shareholders interests.
The Board believes that BDs current system of electing directors, with each share entitled to
one vote for each nominee, will continue to work successfully in the future, as it has in the past.
The Board consists predominantly of independent, non-management directors, and the Board committee
responsible for identifying and recommending qualified individuals for director consists solely of
independent, non-management directors. This ensures that the Board will continue to exercise
independent judgment and remain accountable to all BD shareholders, rather than to a particular
group.
The Board also believes that cumulative voting is unnecessary in light of BDs strong
corporate governance practices that help ensure that the Board will maintain an independent
perspective. BDs Corporate Governance Principles demonstrate the many ways in which the Board and
the Company are responsive and accountable to all of BDs shareholders on an ongoing basis. These
provisions cover a wide array of subject areas, including: the designation of a Lead Director;
evaluations of the Chief Executive Officer and the Board; procedures to address situations where
director nominees fail to receive a majority affirmative vote in an uncontested election; conflicts
of interest and ethics compliance; the expiration without renewal or replacement of BDs
shareholder rights plan (poison pill); and certain disclosure practices. In addition, at the
2009 Annual Meeting, the shareholders approved an amendment to BDs Certificate of Incorporation,
pursuant to which all directors standing for election from and after the 2009 Annual Meeting would
be elected to one-year terms.
ACCORDINGLY, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE AGAINST PROPOSAL 7.
SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS OR DIRECTOR NOMINATIONS FOR 2011 ANNUAL MEETING
Any proposal that a shareholder wishes to submit for inclusion in BDs proxy materials for the
2011 Annual Meeting pursuant to SEC Rule 14a-8 must be received by BD not later than August 24,
2010. Notice of any other proposal or director nomination that a shareholder wishes to propose for
consideration at the 2011 Annual Meeting pursuant to BDs By-Laws must be delivered to BD not
earlier than October 5, 2010, and not later than November 4, 2010. Such other proposal or director
nomination also must satisfy the information and other requirements specified in BDs By-Laws,
which are available on BDs website at www.bd.com/investors/corporate_governance/. Any shareholder
proposal or director nomination submitted to BD in connection with the 2011 Annual Meeting should
be addressed to: Corporate Secretary, BD, 1 Becton Drive, Franklin Lakes, New Jersey 07417-1880.
63
APPENDIX A
PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO BDS BY-LAWS
C. SPECIAL MEETINGS. (a) Special meetings of the shareholders may be called by the Board of
Directors or by the Chairman of the Board or by the Chief Executive Officer or by the President,
and shall be called by the Chairman of the Board or by the Chief Executive Officer or by the
President upon written request of a majority of the Directors then in office, which request shall
state the time, place and purpose of the meeting. Subject to the other provisions of this Section
2.C, a special meeting of shareholders shall be called by the Secretary at the written request (a
Special Meeting Request) of holders of record of at least 25% of the voting power of the
outstanding capital stock of the Company entitled to vote on the matter or matters to be brought
before the proposed special meeting. Such Special Meeting Request must be made in proper written
form as specified in subsection (b) of this Section 2.C. This Section 2.C is the exclusive means
by which a shareholder may nominate persons for election to the Board of Directors and/or present
other business at a special meeting of shareholders.
(b) A Special Meeting Request to the Secretary must be delivered to or mailed and received at the
principal executive offices of the Company, and shall be signed by each shareholder, or a duly
authorized agent of such shareholder, requesting the special meeting. To be in proper written
form, a Special Meeting Request must set forth (i) all the information required under subsection
(c)(i) and/or (ii) of Article II, Section 2.D of these By-Laws, as applicable, with respect to the
nominations or other business proposed to be brought before such special meeting; (ii) all of the
information required to be set forth in a shareholders notice under subsections (c)(iii) through
(ix) of Article II, Section 2.D of these By-Laws with respect to each shareholder requesting such
meeting; (iii) all information relating to each such shareholder that would be required to be
disclosed in connection with the shareholders solicitation of proxies for the election of
directors in an election contest (even if an election contest is not involved), and all
information, whether or not relating to such shareholder, that would otherwise be required in
connection with the shareholders solicitation of proxies with respect to the matters proposed to
be acted upon at the meeting, in each case pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended; (iv) an acknowledgment by such shareholder that any disposition of shares
of common stock of the Company held of record by such shareholder as of the date of delivery of the
Special Meeting Request and prior to the record date for the special meeting of shareholders
requested by such shareholder shall constitute a revocation of such request with respect to such
shares.
(c) The Secretary shall (as promptly as practicable but in no event more than ten days
following delivery of a Special Meeting Request that complies with subsection (b) of this Section
2.C) determine whether the request has been made by shareholders owning and holding, in the
aggregate, the number of shares necessary to request a special meeting pursuant to this Section
2.C. Upon the Secretarys finding that holders of the requisite number of shares have made the
request, the Board shall determine (as promptly as practicable but in no event more than ten days
following the date of the Secretarys finding), with the advice of counsel, whether the request is
valid under the criteria set forth in subsection (d) of this Section 2.C, and if the request is
determined to be valid shall proceed to fix a date, time and place for the meeting, which date
shall be not more than 90 days after the receipt of the Special Meeting Request. Subject to the
preceding sentence, in fixing a date and time for a special meeting pursuant to a Special Meeting
Request, the Board of Directors may consider such factors as it deems relevant within the good
faith exercise of business judgment, including, without limitation, the nature of the matters to be
considered, the facts and circumstances surrounding any request for meeting and any plan of the
Board of Directors to call an annual meeting or a special meeting, and nothing herein will limit
the power of the Board of Directors or the chair appointed for any annual or special meeting in
respect of the conduct of any such meeting.
(d) Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this Section 2.C, a special meeting requested
by shareholders shall not be held if: (i) an annual or special meeting of shareholders that
included an identical or substantially similar item of business (Similar Business) (as determined
in good faith by the Board of Directors) was held not more than 120 days before the Special Meeting
Request was received by the Secretary; (ii) the Board of Directors has called or calls for an
annual or special meeting of shareholders to be held within 90 days after the Special Meeting
Request is received by the Secretary and the Board of Directors determines in good faith that the
business to be conducted at such meeting includes the Similar Business. For purposes of this
Section 2.C, the election of directors shall be deemed to be Similar Business with respect to all
items of business involving the election or removal of directors, changing the size of the Board of
Directors and filling of vacancies and/or newly created directorships resulting from any increase
in the authorized number of directors; or (iii) the Special Meeting Request relates to an item of
business that is not a proper subject for shareholder action under applicable law.
(e) A shareholder may revoke a Special Meeting Request at any time by written revocation
delivered to the Secretary, and if, following such revocation, there are outstanding un-revoked
requests from shareholders holding less than the requisite number of shares of common stock
entitling such shareholders to request the calling of a special meeting in accordance with this
Section 2.C, the Board of Directors may, in its discretion, cancel the special meeting. If none of
the shareholders who submitted the Special Meeting Request appears or sends a duly authorized agent
to present the business to be presented for consideration that was specified in the Special Meeting
Request, the Company need not present such business for a vote at such special meeting.
(f) Business conducted at a special meeting requested by shareholders shall be limited to the
matters described in the applicable Special Meeting Request and set forth in the applicable notice
of meeting, provided that nothing herein shall prohibit the Board of Directors from submitting
additional matters to the shareholders at any such special meeting requested by shareholders.
A-1
APPENDIX B
BECTON, DICKINSON AND COMPANY
2004 EMPLOYEE AND DIRECTOR EQUITY-BASED
COMPENSATION PLAN
As Amended and Restated as of November 24, 2009
Section 1. Purpose.
The purpose of the Becton, Dickinson and Company 2004 Employee and Director Equity-Based
Compensation Plan is to provide an incentive to employees of the Company and its subsidiaries to
achieve long-range goals, to aid in attracting and retaining employees and directors of outstanding
ability and to closely align their interests with those of shareholders.
Section 2. Definition.
As used in the Plan, the following terms shall have the meanings set forth below:
(a) Affiliate shall mean (i) any entity that, directly or indirectly, is controlled by the
Company and (ii) any entity in which the Company has a significant equity interest, in either case
as determined by the Committee.
(b) Award shall mean any Option, Stock Appreciation Right, award of Restricted Stock,
Restricted Stock Unit, Performance Unit or Other Stock-Based Award granted under the Plan.
(c) Award Agreement shall mean any written agreement, contract or other instrument or
document evidencing any Award granted under the Plan, which may, but need not, be executed or
acknowledged by a Participant.
(d) Board shall mean the board of directors of the Company.
(e) Cause shall mean (i) the willful and continued failure of a Participant to perform
substantially the Participants duties with the Company or any Affiliate (other than any such
failure resulting from incapacity due to physical or mental illness), or (ii) the willful engaging
by the Participant in illegal conduct or gross misconduct that is materially and demonstrably
injurious to the Company. No act, or failure to act, on the part of the Participant shall be
considered willful unless it is done, or omitted to be done, by the Participant in bad faith or
without the reasonable belief that the Participants action or omission was in the best interest of
the Company.
(f) Change in Control means
(i) the acquisition by any individual, entity or group (within the meaning of Section
13(d)(3) or 14(d)(2) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act))
(a Person) of beneficial ownership (within the meaning of Rule 13d-3 promulgated under the
Exchange Act) of 25% or more of either (A) the then-outstanding shares of common stock of the
Company (the Outstanding Company Common Stock) or (B) the combined voting power of the
then-outstanding voting securities of the Company entitled to vote generally in the election
of directors (the Outstanding Company Voting Securities); provided, however, that, for
purposes of this Section 2(f), the following acquisitions shall not constitute a Change in
Control: (i) any acquisition directly from the Company; (ii) any acquisition by the Company,
or (iii) any acquisition by any employee
B-1
benefit plan (or related trust) sponsored or maintained by the Company or any affiliated
company, (iv) any acquisition by any corporation pursuant to a transaction that complies with
Section 2(f)(iii)(A), Section 2(f)(iii)(B) and Section 2(f)(iii)(C), or (v) any acquisition
that the Board determines, in good faith, was inadvertent, if the acquiring Person divests as
promptly as practicable a sufficient amount of the Outstanding Company Common Stock and/or the
Outstanding Company Voting Securities, as applicable, to reverse such acquisition of 25% or
more thereof;
(ii) individuals who, as of the day after the effective time of this Plan, constitute the
Board (the Incumbent Board) cease for any reason to constitute at least a majority of the
Board; provided, however, that any individual becoming a director subsequent to such time
whose election, or nomination for election as a director by the Companys shareholders, was
approved by a vote of at least a majority of the directors then comprising the Incumbent Board
shall be considered as though such individual were a member of the Incumbent Board, but
excluding, for this purpose, any such individual whose initial assumption of office occurs as
a result of an actual or threatened election contest with respect to the election or removal
of directors or other actual or threatened solicitation of proxies or consent by or on behalf
of a Person other than the Board;
(iii) consummation of a reorganization, merger, consolidation or sale or other
disposition of all or subsequently all of the assets of the Company (a Business
Combination), in each case, unless, following such Business Combination, (A) all or
substantially all of the individuals and entities that were the beneficial owners of the
Outstanding Company Common Stock and the Outstanding Company Voting Securities immediately
prior to such Business Combination beneficially own, directly or indirectly, more than 60% of
the then-outstanding shares of common stock and the combined voting power of the
then-outstanding voting securities entitled to vote generally in the election of directors, as
the case may be, of the corporation resulting from such Business Combination (including,
without limitation, a corporation that, as a result of such transaction, owns the Company or
all or substantially all of the Companys assets either directly or through one or more
subsidiaries) in substantially the same proportions as their ownership immediately prior to
such Business Combination of the Outstanding Company Common Stock and the Outstanding Company
Voting Securities, as the case may be, (B) no Person (excluding any corporation resulting from
such Business Combination or any employee benefit plan (or related trust) of the Company or
such corporation resulting from such Business Combination) beneficially owns, directly or
indirectly, 25% or more of, respectively, the then-outstanding shares of common stock of the
corporation resulting from such Business Combination or the combined voting power of the
then-outstanding voting securities of such corporation, except to the extent that such
ownership existed prior to the Business Combination, and (C) at least a majority of the
members of the board of directors of the corporation resulting from such Business Combination
were members of the Incumbent Board at the time of the execution of the initial agreement or
of the action of the Board providing for such Business Combination; or
(iv) approval by the shareholders of the Company of a complete liquidation or dissolution
of the Company.
(g) Code shall mean the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended from time to time.
B-2
(h) Committee shall mean the Compensation and Benefits Committee of the Board or such other
committee as may be designated by the Board.
(i) Company shall mean Becton, Dickinson and Company.
(j) Disability shall mean a Participants disability as determined in accordance with a
disability insurance program maintained by the Company.
(j) 409A Disability shall mean a Disability that qualifies as a total disability as defined
below and determined in a manner consistent with Code Section 409A and the regulations thereunder:
The Participant is unable to engage in any substantial gainful activity by reason of any
medically determinable physical or mental impairment that can be expected to result in death or can
be expected to last for a continuous period of not less than 12 months.
A Participant will be deemed to have suffered a 409A Disability if determined to be totally
disabled by the Social Security Administration. In addition, the Participant will be deemed to
have suffered a 409A Disability if determined to be disabled in accordance with a disability
insurance program maintained by the Company, provided that the definition of disability applied
under such disability insurance program complies with the requirements of Code Section 409A and the
regulations thereunder.
(k) Earnings Per Share shall mean earnings per share calculated in accordance with U.S.
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.
(l) Executive Group shall mean every person who is expected by the Committee to be both (i)
a covered employee as defined in Section 162(m) of the Code as of the end of the taxable year in
which payment of the Award may be deducted by the Company, and (ii) the recipient of compensation
of more than $1,000,000 for that taxable year.
(m) Fair Market Value shall mean, with respect to any property (including, without
limitation, any Shares or other securities) the fair market value of such property determined by
such methods or procedures as shall be established from time to time by the Committee.
(n) Incentive Stock Option shall mean an option representing the right to purchase Shares
from the Company, granted under and in accordance with the terms of Section 6, that meets the
requirements of Section 422 of the Code, or any successor provision thereto.
(o) Market Share shall mean the percent of sales of the total available market in an
industry, product line or product attained by the Company or one of its business units during a
time period.
(p) Net Income shall mean net income calculated in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles.
(q) Net Revenue Per Employee in a period shall mean net revenue divided by the average
number of employees of the Company, with average defined as the sum of the number of employees at
the beginning and ending of the period divided by two.
(r) Non-Qualified Stock Option shall mean an option representing the right to purchase
Shares from the Company, granted under and in accordance with the terms of Section 6, that is not
an Incentive Stock Option.
B-3
(s) Option shall mean an Incentive Stock Option or a Non-Qualified Stock Option.
(t) Other Stock-Based Award shall mean any right granted under Section 9.
(u) Participant shall mean an individual granted an Award under the Plan.
(v) Performance Unit shall mean any right granted under Section 8.
(w) Restricted Stock shall mean any Share granted under Section 7.
(x) Restricted Stock Unit shall mean a contractual right granted under Section 7 that is
denominated in Shares. Each Unit represents a right to receive the value of one Share (or a
percentage of such value, which percentage may be higher than 100%) upon the terms and conditions
set forth in the Plan and the applicable Award Agreement. Awards of Restricted Stock Units may
include, without limitation, the right to receive dividend equivalents.
(y) Retirement shall mean a Separation from Service after attainment of retirement as
specified in the applicable terms of an Award.
(z) Return On Common Equity for a period shall mean net income less preferred stock
dividends divided by total shareholders equity, less amounts, if any, attributable to preferred
stock.
(aa) Return on Invested Capital for a period shall mean earnings before interest, taxes,
depreciation and amortization divided by the difference of total assets less non-interest bearing
current liabilities.
(bb) Return On Net Assets for a period shall mean net income less preferred stock dividends
divided by the difference of average total assets less average non-debt liabilities, with average
defined as the sum of assets or liabilities at the beginning and ending of the period divided by
two.
(cc) Revenue Growth shall mean the percentage change in revenue (as defined in Statement of
Financial Accounting Concepts No. 6, published by the Financial Accounting Standards Board) from
one period to another.
(dd) Plan shall mean this Becton, Dickinson and Company 2004 Employee and Director
Equity-Based Compensation Plan.
(ee) Separation from Service shall mean a termination of employment or other separation from
service from the Company, as described in Code Section 409A and the regulations thereunder,
including, but not limited to a termination by reason of Retirement or involuntary termination
without Cause, but excluding any such termination where there is a simultaneous re-employment by
the Company.
(ff) Shares shall mean shares of the common stock of the Company, $1.00 par value.
(gg) Specified Employee shall mean a Participant who is deemed to be a specified employee in
accordance with procedures adopted by the Company that reflect the requirements of Code Section
409A(2)(B)(i) and the guidance thereunder.
(hh) Stock Appreciation Right shall mean a right to receive a payment, in cash and/or
Shares, as determined by the Committee, equal in value to the excess of the Fair Market Value of a
Share at the time the Stock Appreciation Right is exercised over the exercise price of the Stock
Appreciation Right.
B-4
(ii) Substitute Awards shall mean Awards granted in assumption of, or in substitution for,
outstanding awards previously granted by a company acquired by the Company or with which the
Company combines.
(jj) Total Shareholder Return shall mean the sum of the appreciation in the Companys stock
price and dividends paid on the common stock of the Company over a given period of time.
Section 3. Eligibility.
(a) Any individual who is employed by (including any officer), or who serves as a member of
the board of directors of, the Company or any Affiliate shall be eligible to be selected to receive
an Award under the Plan.
(b) An individual who has agreed to accept employment by the Company or an Affiliate shall be
deemed to be eligible for Awards hereunder as of the date of such agreement.
(c) Holders of options and other types of Awards granted by a company acquired by the Company
or with which the Company combines are eligible for grant of Substitute Awards hereunder.
Section 4. Administration.
(a) The Plan shall be administered by the Committee. The Committee shall be appointed by the
Board and shall consist of not less than three directors, each of whom shall be independent, within
the meaning of and to the extent required by applicable rulings and interpretations of the New York
Stock Exchange and the Securities and Exchange Commission, and each of whom shall be a
Non-Employee Director, as defined from time to time for purposes of Section 16 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and the rules promulgated thereunder. The Board may designate one or more
directors as alternate members of the Committee who may replace any absent or disqualified member
at any meeting of the Committee. The Committee may issue rules and regulations for administration
of the Plan. It shall meet at such times and places as it may determine. A majority of the members
of the Committee shall constitute a quorum.
(b) Subject to the terms of the Plan and applicable law, the Committee shall have full power
and authority to: (i) designate Participants; (ii) determine the type or types of Awards (including
Substitute Awards) to be granted to each Participant under the Plan; (iii) determine the number of
Shares to be covered by (or with respect to which payments, rights, or other matters are to be
calculated in connection with) Awards; (iv) determine the terms and conditions of any Award; (v)
determine whether, to what extent, and under what circumstances Awards may be settled or exercised
in cash, Shares, other securities, other Awards, or other property, or canceled, forfeited or
suspended, and the method or methods by which Awards may be settled, exercised, canceled, forfeited
or suspended; (vi) determine whether, to what extent, and under what circumstances cash, Shares,
other securities, other Awards, other property, and other amounts payable with respect to an Award
under the Plan shall be deferred either automatically or at the election of the holder thereof or
of the Committee; (vii) interpret and administer the Plan and any instrument or agreement relating
to, or Award made under, the Plan; (viii) establish, amend, suspend or waive such rules and
regulations and appoint such agents as it shall deem appropriate for the proper administration of
the Plan; (ix) determine whether and to what extent Awards should comply or continue to comply with
any requirement of statute or regulation; and (x) make any other determination and take any other
action that the Committee deems necessary or desirable for the administration of the Plan.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Plan will be interpreted and
B-5
administered by the Committee in a manner that is consistent with the requirements of Code
Section 409A to allow for tax deferral thereunder, and the Committee shall take no action hereunder
that would result in a violation of Code Section 409A.
(c) All decisions of the Committee shall be final, conclusive and binding upon all parties,
including the Company, the stockholders and the Participants.
Section 5. Shares Available For Awards.
(a) The number of Shares available for issuance under the Plan is 25,200,000 shares, subject
to adjustment as provided below. Notwithstanding the foregoing and subject to adjustment as
provided in Section 5(e), (i) no Participant may receive Options and Stock Appreciation Rights
under the Plan in any calendar year that relate to more than 250,000 Shares, (ii) the maximum
number of Shares with respect to which unrestricted Awards (either as to vesting, performance or
otherwise) may be made to employees under the Plan is 450,000 Shares, and (iii) the maximum number
of Shares that may be issued with respect to any Awards granted on or after February 2, 2009, other
than Awards of Options or Stock Appreciation Rights, shall be
4,200,000.
(b) If, after the effective date of the Plan, any Shares covered by an Award other than a
Substitute Award, or to which such an Award relates, are forfeited, or if such an Award otherwise
terminates without the delivery of Shares or of other consideration, then the Shares covered by
such Award, or to which such Award relates, to the extent of any such forfeiture or termination,
shall again be, or shall become, available for issuance under the Plan, except as otherwise
provided in Section 5(f).
(c) In the event that any Option or other Award granted hereunder (other than a Substitute
Award) is exercised through the delivery of Shares, or in the event that withholding tax
liabilities arising from such Option or Award are satisfied by the withholding of Shares by the
Company, the number of Shares available for Awards under the Plan shall be increased by the number
of Shares so surrendered or withheld. Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Section 5(c) will not
apply to any such surrender or withholding of Shares occurring on or after November 21, 2006.
(d) Any Shares delivered pursuant to an Award may consist, in whole or in part, of authorized
and unissued Shares or of treasury Shares.
(e) In the event that any dividend or other distribution (whether in the form of cash, Shares,
other securities, or other property), recapitalization, stock split, reverse stock split,
reorganization, merger, consolidation, split-up, spin-off, combination, repurchase or exchange of
Shares or other securities of the Company, issuance of warrants or other rights to purchase Shares
or other securities of the Company, or other similar corporate transaction or event affects the
Shares such that an adjustment is required in order to preserve the value of issued and outstanding
Awards and to prevent diminution or enlargement of the benefits or potential benefits intended to
be made available under the Plan, then the Committee shall, in such manner as it may deem
equitable, adjust any or all of (i) the number and type of Shares (or other securities or property)
which thereafter may be made the subject of Awards, including the aggregate and individual limits
specified in Section 5(a), (ii) the number and type of Shares (or other securities or property)
subject to outstanding Awards, and (iii) the grant, purchase, or exercise price with respect to any
Award or, if deemed appropriate, make provision for a cash
B-6
payment to the holder of an outstanding Award; provided, however, that the number of Shares
subject to any Award denominated in Shares shall always be a whole number.
(f) Shares underlying Substitute Awards shall not reduce the number of Shares remaining
available for issuance under the Plan.
(g) Upon the exercise of any Stock Appreciation Rights, the greater of (i) the number of
shares subject to the Stock Appreciation Rights so exercised, and (ii) the number of Shares, if
any, that are issued in connection with such exercise, shall be deducted from the number of Shares
available for issuance under the Plan.
Section 6. Options and Stock Appreciation Rights.
The Committee is hereby authorized to grant Options and Stock Appreciation Rights to
Participants with the following terms and conditions and with such additional terms and conditions,
in either case not inconsistent with the provisions of the Plan, as the Committee shall determine:
(a) The exercise price per Share under an Option or Stock Appreciation Right shall be
determined by the Committee; provided, however, that, except in the case of Substitute Awards, such
exercise price shall not be less than the Fair Market Value of a Share on the date of grant of such
Option or Stock Appreciation Right. The exercise price of a Substitute Award may be less than the
Fair Market Value of a Share on the date of grant to the extent necessary for the value of
Substitute Award to be substantially equivalent to the value of the award with respect to which the
Substitute Award is issued, as determined by the Committee.
(b) The term of each Option and Stock Appreciation Right shall be fixed by the Committee but
shall not exceed 10 years from the date of grant thereof.
(c) The Committee shall determine the time or times at which an Option or Stock Appreciation
Right may be exercised in whole or in part, and, with respect to Options, the method or methods by
which, and the form or forms, including, without limitation, cash, Shares, other Awards, or other
property, or any combination thereof, having a Fair Market Value on the exercise date equal to the
relevant exercise price, in which, payment of the exercise price with respect thereto may be made
or deemed to have been made.
(d) The terms of any Incentive Stock Option granted under the Plan shall comply in all
respects with the provisions of Section 422 of the Code, or any successor provision thereto, and
any regulations promulgated thereunder.
(e) Section 10 sets forth certain additional provisions that shall apply to Options and Stock
Appreciation Rights.
Section 7. Restricted Stock And Restricted Stock Units.
(a) The Committee is hereby authorized to grant Awards of Restricted Stock and Restricted
Stock Units to Participants.
(b) Shares of Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units shall be subject to such
restrictions as the Committee may impose (including, without limitation, any limitation on the
right to vote a Share of Restricted Stock or the right to receive any dividend or other right or
property), which restrictions may lapse separately or in combination at such time or times, in such
installments or otherwise, as the Committee may deem appropriate; provided, that if the vesting
conditions applicable to an Award of Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Units to an
B-7
employee of the Company relate exclusively to the passage of time and continued employment,
such time period shall consist of not less than thirty-six (36) months. In the event the vesting
of any Award of Restricted Stock is subject to the achievement of performance goals, the
performance period relating to such Award shall be at least twelve (12) months. Any Award of
Restricted Stock Units for which vesting is conditioned upon the achievement of performance goals
shall be considered an award of Performance Units under Section 8.
(c) Any share of Restricted Stock granted under the Plan may be evidenced in such manner as
the Committee may deem appropriate including, without limitation, book-entry registration or
issuance of a stock certificate or certificates. In the event any stock certificate is issued in
respect of shares of Restricted Stock granted under the Plan, such certificate shall be registered
in the name of the Participant and shall bear an appropriate legend referring to the terms,
conditions, and restrictions applicable to such Restricted Stock.
(d) Upon a Participants (i) Separation from Service on account of Retirement, death,
Disability or involuntary termination without Cause, any and all remaining restrictions with
respect to Shares of Restricted Stock granted to the Participant shall lapse, and (ii) voluntary
termination or involuntary termination with Cause, all Shares of Restricted Stock held by the
Participant shall be forfeited as of the date of termination.
(e) Notwithstanding anything contained herein to the contrary, upon a Participants:
(i) Separation from Service on account of Retirement, involuntary termination without Cause,
or Disability any and all remaining restrictions with respect to Restricted Stock Units granted to
the Participant shall lapse and the Participant shall receive any amounts otherwise payable with
respect to such Restricted Stock Units as soon as administratively practicable thereafter (or at
such later distribution date as may be set by the Committee at the time of the Award or in any
amendment thereto), except that, for amounts subject to Code Section 409A, in the case of a
Participant who is a Specified Employee, the payment of such amounts that are made on account of
the Specified Employees Separation from Service shall not be made prior to the earlier of (A) the
first day of the seventh month following the Participants Separation from Service (without regard
to whether the Participant is reemployed on that date) or (B) death;
(ii) death, any and all remaining restrictions with respect to Restricted Stock Units granted
to the Participant shall lapse and the Participants beneficiary shall receive any amounts
otherwise payable with respect to such Restricted Stock Units as soon as administratively
practicable thereafter; and
(iii) voluntary termination or involuntary termination with Cause, all Restricted Stock Units
held by the Participant shall be forfeited as of the date of termination.
Section 8. Performance Units.
(a) The Committee is hereby authorized to grant Performance Units to Participants.
(b) Subject to the terms of the Plan, a Performance Unit granted under the Plan (i) may be
denominated or payable in cash, Shares (including, without limitation, Restricted Stock), other
securities, other Awards, or other property and (ii) shall confer on the holder thereof rights
valued as determined by the Committee and payable to, or exercisable by, the holder of the
Performance Unit, in whole or in part, upon the achievement of such performance goals during such
performance periods as the Committee shall establish. Subject to the terms of the Plan, the
performance goals to be achieved during any performance period, the length of any performance
B-8
period, the amount of any Performance Unit granted and the amount of any payment or transfer
to be made pursuant to any Performance Unit shall be determined by the Committee; provided, that
the performance period relating to any Award of Performance Units shall be at least twelve (12)
months.
(c) Notwithstanding anything contained herein to the contrary, upon a Participants:
(i) Separation from Service on account of Retirement or involuntary termination without Cause
prior to the expiration of any performance period applicable to a Performance Unit granted to the
Participant, the Participant shall be entitled to receive, following the expiration of such
performance period, a pro-rata portion of any amounts otherwise payable with respect to, or a
pro-rata right to exercise, the Performance Unit;
(ii) death or 409A Disability prior to the expiration of any performance period applicable to
a Performance Unit granted to the Participant, the Participant or the Participants beneficiary
shall receive upon such event a partial payment with respect to, or a partial right to exercise,
such Performance Unit as determined by the Committee in its discretion;
(iii) Separation from Service on account of Disability (other than a 409A Disability) prior to
the expiration for any performance period applicable to a Performance Unit granted to the
Participant, the Participant shall be entitled to receive, following the expiration of such
performance period, a partial payment with respect to, or a partial right to exercise, such
Performance Unit as determined by the Committee in its discretion; and
(iv) voluntary termination or involuntary termination with Cause, all Performance Units held
by the Participant shall be canceled as of the date of termination.
Section 9. Other Stock-Based Awards.
The Committee is hereby authorized to grant to Participants such other Awards (including,
without limitation, rights to dividends and dividend equivalents) that are denominated or payable
in, valued in whole or in part by reference to, or otherwise based on or related to, Shares
(including, without limitation, securities convertible into Shares) as are deemed by the Committee
to be consistent with the purposes of the Plan (provided that no rights to dividends and dividend
equivalents shall be granted in tandem with an Award of Options or Stock Appreciation Rights).
Subject to the terms of the Plan, the Committee shall determine the terms and conditions of such
Awards. Shares or other securities delivered pursuant to a purchase right granted under this
Section 9 shall be purchased for such consideration, which may be paid by such method or methods
and in such form or forms, including, without limitation, cash, Shares, other securities, other
Awards, or other property, or any combination thereof, as the Committee shall determine, the value
of which consideration, as established by the Committee, shall, except in the case of Substitute
Awards, not be less than the Fair Market Value of such Shares or other securities as of the date
such purchase right is granted. Additional terms applicable to certain Other Stock-Based Awards
are set forth in Section 10. To the extent that any Other Stock-Based Awards granted by the
Committee are subject to Code Section 409A as nonqualified deferred compensation, such Other
Stock-Based Awards shall be subject to terms and conditions that comply with the requirements of
Code Section 409A to avoid adverse tax consequences under Code Section 409A.
B-9
Section 10. Effect Of Termination On Certain Awards.
Except as otherwise provided by the Committee at the time an Option or Stock Appreciation
Right is granted or in any amendment thereto, if a Participant ceases to be employed by, or serve
as a non-employee director of, the Company or any Affiliate, then:
(a) if termination is for Cause, all Options and Stock Appreciation Rights held by the
Participant shall be canceled as of the date of termination;
(b) if termination is voluntary or involuntary without Cause, the Participant may exercise
each Option or Stock Appreciation Right held by the Participant within three months after such
termination (but not after the expiration date of such Award) to the extent such Award was
exercisable pursuant to its terms at the date of termination; provided, however, if the Participant
should die within three months after such termination, each Option or Stock Appreciation Right held
by the Participant may be exercised by the Participants estate, or by any person who acquires the
right to exercise by reason of the Participants death, at any time within a period of one year
after death (but not after the expiration date of the Award) to the extent such Award was
exercisable pursuant to its terms at the date of termination;
(c) if termination is (i) by reason of Retirement (or alternatively, in the case of a
non-employee director, at a time when the Participant has served for five full years or more and
has attained the age of sixty), or (ii) by reason of a Disability, each Option or Stock
Appreciation Right held by the Participant shall, at the date or Retirement or Disability, become
exercisable to the extent of the total number of shares subject to the Option or Stock Appreciation
Right, irrespective of the extent to which such Award would otherwise have been exercisable
pursuant to the terms of the Award at the date of Retirement or Disability, and shall otherwise
remain in full force and effect in accordance with its terms;
(d) if termination is by reason of the death of the Participant, each Option or Stock
Appreciation Right held by the Participant may be exercised by the Participants estate, or by any
person who acquires the right to exercise such Award by reason of the Participants death, to the
extent of the total number of shares subject to the Award, irrespective of the extent to which such
Award would have otherwise been exercisable pursuant to the terms of the Award at the date of
death, and such Award shall otherwise remain in full force and effect in accordance with its terms.
Section 11. General Provisions Applicable To Awards.
(a) Awards shall be granted for no cash consideration or for such minimal cash consideration
as may be required by applicable law.
(b) Awards may, in the discretion of the Committee, be granted either alone or in addition to
or in tandem with any other Award. Awards granted in addition to or in tandem with other Awards may
be granted either at the same time as or at a different time from the grant of such other Awards or
awards.
(c) Subject to the terms of the Plan, payments or transfers to be made by the Company upon the
grant, exercise or payment of an Award may be made in such form or forms as the Committee shall
determine including, without limitation, cash, Shares, other securities, other Awards, or other
property, or any combination thereof, and may be made in a single payment or transfer, in
installments, or on a deferred basis, in each case in accordance with rules and procedures
established by the Committee. Such rules and procedures may include, without
B-10
limitation, provisions for the payment or crediting of reasonable interest on installment or
deferred payments or the grant or crediting of dividend equivalents in respect of installment or
deferred payments. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in no event shall the Company extend any loan to
any Participant in connection with the exercise of an Award; provided, however, that nothing
contained herein shall prohibit the Company from maintaining or establishing any broker-assisted
cashless exercise program.
(d) Unless the Committee shall otherwise determine, no Award and no right under any Award
shall be assignable, alienable, saleable or transferable by a Participant otherwise than by will or
by the laws of descent and distribution. In no event may an Award be transferred by a Participant
for value. Each Award, and each right under any Award, shall be exercisable during the
Participants lifetime only by the Participant or, if permissible under applicable law, by the
Participants guardian or legal representative. The provisions of this paragraph shall not apply to
any Award which has been fully exercised, earned or paid, as the case may be, and shall not
preclude forfeiture of an Award in accordance with the terms thereof.
(e) All certificates for Shares or other securities delivered under the Plan pursuant to any
Award or the exercise thereof shall be subject to such stop transfer orders and other restrictions
as the Committee may deem advisable under the Plan or the rules, regulations, and other
requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission, any stock exchange upon which such Shares
or other securities are then listed, and any applicable Federal or state securities laws, and the
Committee may cause a legend or legends to be put on any such certificates to make appropriate
reference to such restrictions.
(f) Every Award (other than an Option or Stock Appreciation Right) to a member of the
Executive Group shall, if the Committee intends that such Award should constitute qualified
performance-based compensation for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Code, include a
pre-established formula, such that payment, retention or vesting of the Award is subject to the
achievement during a performance period or periods, as determined by the Committee, of a level or
levels, as determined by the Committee, of one or more of the following performance measures: (i)
Return on Net Assets, (ii) Revenue Growth, (iii) Return on Common Equity, (iv) Total Shareholder
Return, (v) Earnings Per Share, (vi) Net Revenue Per Employee (vii) Market Share, (viii) Return on
Invested Capital, or (ix) Net Income. For any Award subject to any such pre-established formula, no
more than 150,000 Shares can be paid in satisfaction of such Award to any Participant, subject to
adjustment as provided in Section 5(e). Notwithstanding any provision of this Plan to the contrary,
the Committee shall not be authorized to increase the amount payable under any Award to which this
Section 11(f) applies upon attainment of such pre-established formula.
(g) Unless specifically provided to the contrary in any Award Agreement, upon a Change in
Control, all Awards shall become fully vested and exercisable, and any restrictions applicable to
any Award shall automatically lapse. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any Awards that are otherwise
subject to Code Section 409A shall not be distributed or payable upon a Change in Control unless
the Change in Control otherwise meets the requirements for a change in the ownership or effective
control of the Company or in the ownership of a substantial portion of the assets of the Company
within the meaning of Code Section 409A and the regulations and other guidance promulgated
thereunder; instead such Awards shall be distributed or payable in accordance with the Awards
applicable terms.
(h) Non-employee Directors of the Company shall be entitled to defer the receipt of any Shares
that may become issuable to them under any Award in accordance with the terms of the
B-11
1996 Directors Deferral Plan, as the same may be hereinafter amended, or any other plan that
may be established by the Company that provides for the deferred receipt of such Shares.
(i) Employees of the Company shall be entitled to defer the receipt of any Shares that may
become issuable to them under any Award in accordance with the terms of the Deferred Compensation
and Retirement Benefit Restoration Plan, as the same may be hereinafter amended, or any other plan
that may be established by the Company that provides for the deferred receipt of such Shares.
Section 12. Amendments And Termination.
(a) Except to the extent prohibited by applicable law and unless otherwise expressly provided
in an Award Agreement or in the Plan, the Board may amend, alter, suspend, discontinue, or
terminate the Plan or any portion thereof at any time; provided, however, that no such amendment,
alteration, suspension, discontinuation or termination shall be made without (i) shareholder
approval (A) if the effect thereof is to increase the number of Shares available for issuance under
the Plan or to expand the class of persons eligible to participate in the Plan or (B) if such
approval is necessary to comply with any tax or regulatory requirement for which or with which the
Board deems it necessary or desirable to qualify or comply or (ii) the consent of the affected
Participant, if such action would adversely affect the rights of such Participant under any
outstanding Award. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, the Committee may amend the
Plan in such manner as may be necessary to enable the Plan to achieve its stated purposes in any
jurisdiction outside the United States in a tax-efficient manner and in compliance with local rules
and regulations. In all events, no termination or amendment shall be made in a manner that is
inconsistent with the requirements under Code Section 409A to allow for tax deferral.
(b) The Committee may waive any conditions or rights under, amend any terms of, or amend,
alter, suspend, discontinue or terminate, any Award theretofore granted, prospectively or
retroactively, without the consent of any relevant Participant or holder or beneficiary of an
Award, provided, however, that no such action shall impair the rights of any affected Participant
or holder or beneficiary under any Award theretofore granted under the Plan; and provided further
that, except as provided in Section 5(e), no such action shall reduce the exercise price, grant
price or purchase price of any Award established at the time of grant thereof and provided further,
that the Committees authority under this Section 12(b) is limited in the case of Awards subject to
Section 11(f), as set forth in Section 11(f) and provided further, that the Committee may not act
under this Section 12(b) in a way that is inconsistent with the requirements under Code Section
409A to allow for tax deferral. In no event shall an outstanding Option or Stock Appreciation
Right be cancelled and replaced with a new Option or Stock Appreciation Right with a lower exercise
price, without approval of the Companys shareholders, except as provided in Section 5(e).
(c) Except as noted in Section 11(f), the Committee shall be authorized to make adjustments in
the terms and conditions of, and the criteria included in, Awards in recognition of events
(including, without limitation, the events described in Section 5(e)) affecting the Company, or the
financial statements of the Company, or of changes in applicable laws, regulations or accounting
principles, whenever the Committee determines that such adjustments are appropriate in order to
prevent dilution or enlargement of the benefits or potential benefits intended to be made available
under the Plan.
B-12
(d) Any provision of the Plan or any Award Agreement to the contrary notwithstanding, in
connection with a Business Combination, the Committee may cause any Award granted hereunder to be
canceled in consideration of a cash payment or alternative Award made to the holder of such
canceled Award equal in value to the Fair Market Value of such canceled Award.
(e) The Committee may correct any defect, supply any omission, or reconcile any inconsistency
in the Plan or any Award in the manner and to the extent it shall deem desirable to carry the Plan
into effect or to otherwise comply with the requirements of Code Section 409A so as to avoid
adverse tax consequences under Code Section 409A.
Section 13. Miscellaneous.
(a) No employee, Participant or other person shall have any claim to be granted any Award
under the Plan, and there is no obligation for uniformity of treatment of employees, Participants,
or holders or beneficiaries of Awards under the Plan. The terms and conditions of Awards need not
be the same with respect to each recipient.
(b) The Committee may delegate to one or more officers or managers of the Company, or a
committee of such officers or managers, the authority, subject to such terms and limitations as the
Committee shall determine, to grant Awards to, or to cancel, modify, waive rights with respect to,
alter, discontinue, suspend or terminate Awards held by, employees who are not officers or
directors of the Company for purposes of Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; provided, however, that any delegation to management shall conform with the requirements
of the corporate law of New Jersey and with the requirements, if any, of the New York Stock
Exchange, in either case as in effect from time to time.
(c) The Company shall be authorized to withhold from any Award granted or any payment due or
transfer made under any Award or under the Plan or from any compensation or other amount owing to a
Participant the amount (in cash, Shares, other securities, other Awards, or other property) of
withholding taxes due in respect of an Award, its exercise, or any payment or transfer under such
Award or under the Plan and to take such other action (including, without limitation, providing for
elective payment of such amounts in cash, Shares, other securities, other Awards or other property
by the Participant) as may be necessary in the opinion of the Company to satisfy all obligations
for the payment of such taxes.
(d) Nothing contained in the Plan shall prevent the Company from adopting or continuing in
effect other or additional compensation arrangements, and such arrangements may be either generally
applicable or applicable only in specific cases.
(e) The grant of an Award shall not be construed as giving a Participant the right to be
retained in the employ of the Company or any Affiliate. Further, the Company or the applicable
Affiliate may at any time dismiss a Participant from employment, free from any liability, or any
claim under the Plan, unless otherwise expressly provided in the Plan or in any Award Agreement or
in any other agreement binding the parties. The receipt of any Award under the Plan is not intended
to confer any rights on the receiving Participant except as set forth in such Award.
(f) If any provision of the Plan or any Award is or becomes or is deemed to be invalid,
illegal, or unenforceable in any jurisdiction, or as to any person or Award, or would disqualify
the Plan or any Award under any law deemed applicable by the Committee, such provision shall be
construed or deemed amended to conform to applicable laws, or if it cannot be so construed or
deemed amended without, in the determination of the Committee, materially altering the intent
B-13
of the Plan or the Award, such provision shall be stricken as to such jurisdiction, person or
Award, and the remainder of the Plan and any such Award shall remain in full force and effect.
(g) Neither the Plan nor any Award shall create or be construed to create a trust or separate
fund of any kind or a fiduciary relationship between the Company and a Participant or any other
person. To the extent that any person acquires a right to receive payments from the Company
pursuant to an Award, such right shall be no greater than the right of any unsecured general
creditor of the Company.
(h) No fractional Shares shall be issued or delivered pursuant to the Plan or any Award, and
the Committee shall determine whether cash, other securities or other property shall be paid or
transferred in lieu of any fractional Shares, or whether such fractional Shares or any rights
thereto shall be canceled, terminated or otherwise eliminated.
Section 14. Effective Date Of Plan.
The Plan shall be effective as of the date of its approval by the stockholders of the Company.
Section 15. Term Of The Plan.
No Award shall be granted under the Plan after the tenth anniversary of the effective date.
However, unless otherwise expressly provided in the Plan or in an applicable Award Agreement, any
Award theretofore granted may extend beyond such date, and the authority of the Committee to amend,
alter, adjust, suspend, discontinue, or terminate any such Award, or to waive any conditions or
rights under any such Award, and the authority of the Board to amend the Plan, shall extend beyond
such date.
B-14
DIRECTIONS TO
THE HILTON SHORT HILLS
FROM MANHATTAN
Lincoln or Holland Tunnel to NJ
Tpk to Exit 14. Continue on Rte. 78
West approx. 5 miles to Exit 48,
Rte. 24 West. Take Exit 7C...* *
FROM BROOKLYN
Take Rte. 278/Belt Pkwy West to
Verrazano Narrows Bridge.
Continue to the Goethals Bridge to
the NJ Tpk. North. Take Exit 14.
Continue on Rte. 78 West approx.
5 miles to Exit 48, Rte. 24 West.
Take Exit 7C...* *
FROM NEWARK AIRPORT
Take Rte. 78 West approx. 5 miles
to Exit 48, Rte. 24 West. Take
Exit 7C...* *
FROM THE NJ TURNPIKE
Take to Exit 14. Continue on Rte. 78 West approx. 5 miles to Exit 48, Rte. 24 West. Take Exit
7C...* *
FROM NORTH EASTERN
LONG ISLAND
Take Throgs Neck or Whitestone Bridge off the Cross Island Pkwy. After toll, take GW Bridge to Rte.
80 West to the Garden State Pkwy South, to Exit 142 to Rte. 78 West. OR Take GW Bridge to the NJ
Tpk South to Exit 14. Continue on Rte. 78 West approx. 5 miles to Exit 48, Rte. 24 West. Take Exit
7C...* *
FROM TAPPAN ZEE BRIDGE
Follow signs to NY Thruway; continue to Garden State Pkwy South. Take Exit 142 to Rte. 78 West.
Continue to Exit 48, Rte. 24 West. Take Exit 7C...* *
FROM THE GARDEN STATE PARKWAY SOUTHBOUND
Take Exit 142 to Rte. 78 West, Continue to Exit 48, Rte. 24 West. Take Exit 7C...* *
FROM THE GARDEN STATE PARKWAY NORTHBOUND
Take Exit 142 to Rte. 78 West. Take first Exit, marked Hillside/Rte. 78 West. Take Rte. 78 West
and continue to Exit 48, Rte. 24 West. Take Exit 7C...* *
* * FROM EXIT 7C, JFK PARKWAY, LIVINGSTON/CALDWELL -
THE MALL AT SHORT HILLS WILL BE ON YOUR RIGHT. MAKE A LEFT AT THE SECOND TRAFFIC LIGHT THEN MAKE AN
IMMEDIATE LEFT INTO HOTEL DRIVEWAY.
FROM ROUTE 287 SOUTHBOUND
Take Exit 37, Rte. 24 East; continue to Exit 7, Summit/Livingston and follow signs for JFK
Parkway and Mall at Short Hills; make a left at second traffic light, then make an immediate left
into the Hotel driveway.
FROM ROUTE 280 WESTBOUND
Take Exit 5A, Livingston Avenue/Roseland. Continue on Livingston Avenue approx. 4 miles through
Livingston; cross South Orange Avenue, name will change to JFK Parkway. Continue on JFK Parkway;
Hotel is approx. 1.5 miles down on right, opposite Mall at Short Hills.
Preliminary
Copy
Electronic Voting Instructions You can vote by Internet or telephone! Available 24 hours a day, 7
days a week! Instead of mailing your proxy, you may choose one of the two voting methods outlined
below to vote your proxy. VALIDATION DETAILS ARE LOCATED BELOW IN THE TITLE BAR. Voting
instructions submitted by GSIP participants must be received by 12:00 p.m., EST, on January 28,
2010. Voting instructions submitted by all other BD plan participants must be received by 12:00
p.m., EST, on January 29, 2010. All proxies submitted must be received by 11:00 a.m., EST, on
February 2, 2010. Vote by Internet Log on to the Internet and go to www.investorvote.com/BDX Follow
the steps outlined on the secured website. Vote by telephone Within the USA, US territories &
Canada, call toll free 1-800-652-VOTE (8683) on a touch tone telephone. There is NO CHARGE to you
for the call. Outside the USA, US territories & Canada, call 1-781-575-2300 on a touch tone
telephone. Standard rates will apply. Follow the instructions provided by the recorded message
Using a black ink pen, mark your votes with an X as shown in this example. Please do not write
outside the designated areas Annual Meeting Proxy Card YOU DO NOT VOTE VIA THE INTERNET OR
TELEPHONE, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED
ENVELOPE Proposals The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR all the nominees listed, FOR
Proposals 2, 3, 4 and 5 and AGAINST Proposals 6 and 7 Election of Directors: For Withhold For
Withhold For Withhold 01 Henry P. Becton, Jr. 04 Edward J. Ludwig 02 Edward F. DeGraan 03 -
Claire M. Fraser-Liggett 1. Election of Directors: For Withhold For Withhold For Withhold 6.
Majority Voting. 7. Cumulative voting. 07 Willard J. Overlock, Jr. 05 Adel A.F. Mahmoud 06 -
James F. Orr 08 Bertram L. Scott Non-Voting Items A Proposals The Board of Directors recommends a
vote FOR all the nominees listed, FOR Proposals 2, 3, 4 and 5 and AGAINST Proposals 6 and 7. For
Against Abstain 2. Ratification of selection of independent registered public accounting firm. 4.
Amendment to the 2004 Employee and Director Equity- Based Compensation Plan. For Against Abstain 3.
Approval of an amendment to BDs By-Laws to permit holders of at least 25% of the voting power of
the outstanding voting securities to call a special meeting of shareholders. 5. Approval of
material terms of performance goals. Meeting Attendance Mark the box to the right if you plan to
attend the Annual Meeting. Authorized Signatures This section must be completed for your vote to be
counted. Date and Sign Below Please sign exactly as name(s) appears hereon. Joint owners should
each sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, corporate officer, trustee, guardian,
custodian, or other representative capacity, please give full title. Date (mm/dd/yyyy) Please print
date below. Signature 1 Please keep signature within the box. Signature 2 Please keep signature
within the box. |
Proxy Solicited on Behalf of the Board of Directors for the Annual Meeting on February 2, 2010 The
undersigned hereby appoints Edward J. Ludwig, David V. Elkins, Jeffrey S. Sherman and Dean J.
Paranicas, and any of them, with full power of substitution, proxies to attend the Annual Meeting
of Shareholders of the Company to be held at 1:00 p.m. EST on Tuesday, February 2, 2010 at the
Hilton Short Hills, 21 John F. Kennedy Parkway, Short Hills, New Jersey, and any adjournment
thereof, and to vote all shares of the common stock of the Company which the undersigned is
entitled to vote upon each of the matters referred to in this proxy and, in their discretion, upon
such other matters as may properly come before the meeting. This card constitutes voting
instructions to the respective trustees for any shares of common stock allocated to the undersigned
under the Companys 1996 Directors Deferral Plan (DDP), the Companys Deferred Compensation and
Retirement Benefit Restoration Plan (DCP), The Med-Safe Systems, Inc. Savings Incentive Plan (the
Med-Safe Plan) and, when so provided, under the Companys Global Share Investment Program
(GSIP), and also constitutes voting instructions to the trustees for a proportionate number of
shares of common stock in the DDP, DCP, the Med-Safe Plan and GSIP for which voting instructions
have not been received. This card also constitutes voting instructions to the trustee for any
shares of common stock allocated to the undersigned under the Companys Savings Incentive Plan
(SIP). Shares for which no voting instructions have been received by the SIP trustee will be
voted in the same proportion as those for which timely instructions have been received. You are
encouraged to specify your choices by marking the appropriate boxes, SEE REVERSE SIDE, but you need
not mark any boxes if you wish to vote in accordance with the Board of Directors recommendations.
If you do not vote by telephone or over the internet, please sign and return this card using the
enclosed envelope. (Items to be voted appear on reverse side.) Proxy / Voting Instruction Card
BECTON, DICKINSON AND COMPANY Dear Shareholder: Becton, Dickinson and Company (BD) encourages you
to take advantage of convenient ways by which you can vote your shares. You can vote your shares 24
hours a day, 7 days a week, using either a touch-tone telephone or through the Internet. If you
choose to vote your shares by telephone or through the Internet, there is no need to mail back your
proxy/voting instruction card. To vote your shares electronically, please have this voting form in
hand and follow the instructions outlined on the reverse side. Your telephone or internet vote
authorizes the proxies named on the below proxy/voting instruction card in the same manner as if
you marked, signed, dated and returned the proxy/voting instruction card. Again, if you choose to
vote telephonically or through the Internet, there is no need to mail back your proxy/voting
instruction card. Your vote is important. Thank you for voting. IF YOU DO NOT VOTE VIA THE
INTERNET OR TELEPHONE, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE
ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. |