PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

DATA I/O CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

1

DATA I/O CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(UNAUDITED)

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

2

DATA I/O CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(UNAUDITED)

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

3

DATA I/O CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(UNAUDITED)

NOTE 1 - FINANCIAL STATEMENT PREPARATION

Data I/O prepared the financial statements as of June 30, 2008 and 2007, according to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). These statements are unaudited but, in the opinion of management, include all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments and accruals) necessary to present fairly the results for the periods presented. The balance sheet at December 31, 2007 has been derived from the audited financial statements at that date. We have condensed or omitted certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America according to such SEC rules and regulations. Operating results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2008. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the annual audited financial statements and the accompanying notes included in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.

Revenue Recognition

Data I/O recognizes revenue at the time of shipment. When arrangements include multiple elements, we use objective evidence of fair value to allocate revenue to the elements pursuant to EITF 00-21, “Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables,” and recognize revenue when the criteria for revenue recognition have been met for each element according to SAB 104, “Revenue Recognition.” The amount of revenue recognized is affected by our judgments as to the collectibility of the transaction or whether an arrangement includes multiple elements and if so, whether specific objective evidence of fair value exists for those elements.

Installation that is considered perfunctory includes any installation that can be performed by other parties, such as distributors, other vendors, or in most cases the customers themselves. This takes into account the complexity, skill, and training needed as well as customer expectations regarding installation. The revenue related to products requiring installation that is perfunctory is recognized at the time of shipment provided that persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, shipment has occurred, the price is fixed or determinable, and collectibility is reasonably assured. We measure the standalone fair value of the product versus the service installation value component by the amount paid to independent representative service groups or the amount of additional discount given to independent distributors to provide the service installation.

We record revenue from the sale of service and update contracts as deferred revenue and we recognize it on a straight-line basis over the contractual period, which is typically one year. We establish a reserve for sales returns based on historical trends in product returns and estimates for new items. We have a stated return policy that customers can return standard products for any reason within 30 days after delivery, provided that the returned product is received in its original condition, including all packaging materials, for a refund of the price paid less a restocking charge of 30% of the total amount invoiced for the product returned, unless such restocking charge is waived in writing by Data I/O.

Data I/O’s software products are not normally sold separately from sales of programming systems. However, on those occasions where we sell software separately, we recognize revenue when a sales agreement exists, when delivery has occurred, when the fee is fixed or determinable, and when collection is probable.

Stock-Based Compensation Expense

On January 1, 2006, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment,” (“SFAS 123(R)”) and the Securities and Exchange Commission issued Staff Accounting Bulleting No. 107 (“SAB 107”) requiring the measurement and recognition of compensation expense for all share-based payment awards, including employee stock options, stock awards, and employee stock purchases, based on estimated fair values on the grant dates. The Company adopted SFAS 123(R) using the modified prospective method, which required the application of the accounting standard as of January 1, 2006. Total share-based compensation for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 was $106,000 and $200,000, respectively. Total share-based compensation for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 was $70,000 and $153,000, respectively.

Income Tax

The Company adopted the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” (“FIN 48”) on January 1, 2007. FIN 48 clarifies the accounting and disclosure for uncertainty in income taxes by prescribing the minimum recognition threshold a tax position is required to meet before being recognized in the financial statements. It also provides guidance on derecognition, measurement, classification, interest and penalties, accounting for interim

4

periods, disclosure and transition, and clearly scopes income taxes out of Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 5, “Accounting for Contingencies.”

Historically, the Company has not incurred any interest or penalties associated with tax matters and no interest or penalties were recognized during the three and six months ended June 30, 2008. However, the Company has adopted a policy whereby amounts related to interest and penalties associated with tax matters are classified as general and administrative expense when incurred.

The Company has incurred net operating losses in certain past years. The Company continues to maintain a valuation allowance for the full amount of the net deferred tax asset balance associated with its net operating losses as sufficient uncertainty exists regarding its ability to realize such tax assets in the future. There was $66,000 of unrecognized tax benefits related to uncertain tax positions as of June 30, 2008. The Company expects the amount of the net deferred tax asset balance and full valuation allowance in future periods to decrease if we have future net income or increase if we incur future net operating losses.

Tax years that remain open for examination include 2004, 2005, 2006, and 2007 in the United States of America. In addition, tax years from 1999 to 2003 may be subject to examination in the event that the Company utilizes the NOL’s or other carry forwards from those years in its current or future year tax return.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157,Fair Value Measurements (“SFAS 157”). SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework and gives guidance regarding the methods used for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) 157-2,Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157, which delays the effective date of SFAS 157 for all nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually). SFAS 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years. We are required to adopt SFAS 157 in the first quarter of 2009; FSP 157-2 delays the effective date for certain items to the first quarter of 2010  We are evaluating the impact of adopting SFAS 157 on our financial statements.

In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities.” This Statement permits entities to elect to measure certain financial instruments and other items at fair value through earnings. The fair value option may be applied on an instrument by instrument basis, is irrevocable and is applied only to entire instruments. SFAS 159 requires additional financial statement presentation and disclosure requirements for those entities that elect to adopt the standard and is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The implementation of this standard relating to the assets and liabilities carried at fair value on a recurring basis did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 141(Revised 2007), “Business Combinations” (“Statement. No. 141R”), which establishes principles and requirements for the reporting entity in a business combination, including recognition and measurement in the financial statements of the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any non-controlling interest in the acquiree. This statement also establishes disclosure requirements to enable financial statement users to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business combination. Statement No. 141R applies prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years. We have not yet evaluated the effect the adoption of Statement No. 141R could have on our consolidated financial statements, if any.

NOTE 2 - RECLASSIFICATIONS

Certain prior period balances may have been reclassified to conform to the presentation used in the current period.

5

NOTE 3 - INVENTORIES

Inventories consisted of the following components (in thousands):

NOTE 4 – PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, NET

Property and equipment consisted of the following components (in thousands):

NOTE 5 – BUSINESS RESTRUCTURING

During 2007, we continued our restructuring activities during the first and second quarters, to further improve our operating results and the effectiveness of our sales and marketing organization and sales channels. During the first quarter of 2007, we recorded restructuring charges of approximately $200,000 primarily related to severance charges. During the second quarter of 2007, we recorded an additional $632,000 of restructuring charges. These actions included re-engineering some internal processes, integrating some activities, transferring some activities to our lower cost base of operations in China, reducing resources applied to declining legacy products, moving some engineering positions to production, reducing the number of taxable entities, outsourcing some functions such as payroll, combining some positions, eliminating some functions, and shifting some responsibilities and resources to our channels. During the third quarter of 2007, we recorded a net expense reversal of $107,000 comprised of $54,000 of additional expense, primarily relating to facilities, and a reversal of $161,000 of previously accrued severance primarily because certain employees who had been scheduled for termination had their termination notice rescinded. At June 30, 2008, we have completed the previously planned restructuring actions with no remaining amounts accrued.

An analysis of the restructuring is as follows (in thousands):

6

NOTE 6 – OTHER ACCRUED LIABILITIES

Other accrued liabilities consisted of the following components (in thousands):

The changes in Data I/O’s product warranty liability are as follows (in thousands):

NOTE 7 – OPERATING LEASE AND OTHER COMMITMENTS

Data I/O has purchase obligations for inventory and production costs as well as other obligations such as capital expenditures, service contracts, marketing, and development agreements. Arrangements are considered purchase obligations if a contract specifies all significant terms, including fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased, a pricing structure and approximate timing of the transaction. Most arrangements are cancelable without a significant penalty, and with short notice, typically less than 90 days. At June 30, 2008, the purchase and other obligations totaled $956,000. Data I/O has commitments under non-cancelable operating leases and other agreements, primarily for factory and office space, with initial or remaining terms of one year or more as follows:

Future annual lease payments at June 30, 2008 (in thousands):

NOTE 8 – CONTINGENCIES

As of June 30, 2008, Data I/O was not a party to any legal proceedings, the adverse outcome of which in management’s opinion, individually or in the aggregate, would have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial position except as described below.

7

On January 22, 2008, our former landlord, (now known as Rowley Properties, Inc.), filed a Complaint in the Superior Court of Washington for King County (No. 08-2-03518-2 SEA) against Data I/O, Robert/Barbara Hiester and Steven/Jane Doe Hiester. The claims against Data I/O include breach of agreement, waste, and an environmental remediation claim for contribution under RCW 70.105D.080. No claim amount is specified in the Complaint. The claims relate to a former circuit board fabrication business that Data I/O operated from 1978 to October 1988. We sold that business to Circuit Partners whose officers and principal shareholders were Robert and Barbara Heister. As stated in Data I/O’s 1988 10-K: “An environmental and regulatory compliance audit was performed prior to the sale, per the guidelines of the Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Ace (“Cercla/Superfund”) Section 107. Audit results indicated no heavy metals or volatile organics in excess of existing or proposed Washington State or federal remedial action levels.” We are in the very early stages of investigating and responding to this claim and have engaged counsel to represent us on this matter. We filed an Answer to the Complaint on March 12, 2008. At this time, we are not able to determine the probable outcome of this legal proceeding or if it will have an adverse effect on the results of operations or financial position of Data I/O. We intend to defend this claim vigorously and are in the process of determining the insurance coverage for this claim.

NOTE 9 – LONG-TERM DEBT

On September 27, 2006, the Company entered into a five year capital lease agreement in the amount of $591,145. The imputed interest rate is 7.69%.

At June 30, 2008 scheduled maturities of the capital lease obligation for the years ending December 31 are as follows (in thousands):

NOTE 10 – EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE

Basic earnings (loss) per share is calculated based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during each period. Diluted earnings per share is calculated based on these same weighted average shares outstanding plus the effect of potential shares issuable upon assumed exercise of stock options based on the treasury stock method. Potential shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options are excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share to the extent their effect would be antidilutive.

8

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share (in thousands, except per share data):

The computation for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 excludes 93,247 and 148,835 options, respectively, to purchase common stock as their effect is anitdilutive. The computation for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 excludes 1,056,855 to purchase common stock as the effect of their inclusion was anitdilutive.

NOTE 11 – SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION

The impact on our results of operations of recording share-based compensation for the three and six month period ended June 30, 2008 and June 30, 2007 are as follows (in thousands):

The fair value of share-based awards for employee stock options was estimated using the Black-Scholes valuation model. The following weighted average assumptions were used to calculate the fair value of stock options granted during the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007: At June 30, 2008, there remained $859.000 of unamortized expected future compensation expense associated with unvested option grants and restricted stock awards, with a remaining weighted average amortization period of 2.7 years.

9

NOTE 12 – COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 and June 30, 2007 total comprehensive income (loss) was comprised of the following (in thousands):

NOTE 13 – PATENT SALE

On March 18, 2008, the Company completed the sale of selected patents and patent applications to Leannoux Properties AG L.L.C. Net proceeds were approximately $3.3 million with a net gain of approximately $2.1 million.

NOTE 14 – FOREIGN CURRENCY TRANSLATION AND DERIVATIVES

Data I/O translates assets and liabilities of foreign subsidiaries at the exchange rate on the balance sheet date. We translate revenues, costs and expenses of foreign subsidiaries at average rates of exchange prevailing during the year. We charge our translation adjustments resulting from this process to other comprehensive income (a component of stockholders’ equity), net of taxes. Realized and unrealized gains and losses resulting from the effects of changes in exchange rates on assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are included in non-operating expense as foreign currency transaction gains and losses.

Data I/O accounts for its hedging activities in accordance with SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivatives and Hedging Activities.” This statement establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments and requires recognition of derivatives as assets or liabilities in the statement of financial position and measurement of those instruments at fair value.

Data I/O utilizes forward foreign exchange contracts to reduce the impact of foreign currency exchange rate risks where natural hedging strategies cannot be effectively employed. All hedging instruments held by us are fair value hedges. Generally, these contracts have maturities less than one year and requireus to exchange foreign currencies for U.S. dollars at maturity. At June 30, 2008, we had a notional value of approximately $463,345 in four foreign exchange contracts outstanding. We recorded the estimated loss in fair value as a non-operating expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 of $7,247 and $21,545, respectively and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 of $3,243 and $13,268, respectively. The Euro rates range from 1.5330 to 1.5848, with the hedges all scheduled to be due within the next quarter and with the value at the due dates of $461,397.

Data I/O does not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for trading purposes. The purpose of our hedging activities is to reduce the risk that the valuation of the underlying assets, liabilities and firm commitments will be adversely affected by changes in exchange rates. Our derivative activities do not create foreign currency exchange rate risk because fluctuations in the value of the instruments used for hedging purposes are offset by fluctuations in the value of the underlying exposures being hedged.

10

Item 2.   Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

General

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. This Act provides a “safe harbor” for forward-looking statements to encourage companies to provide prospective information about themselves as long as they identify these statements as forward-looking and provide meaningful cautionary statements identifying important factors that could cause actual results to differ from the projected results. All statements other than statements of historical fact made in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are forward-looking. In particular, statements herein regarding industry prospects or trends; expected revenues; expected level of expense; future results of operations, restructuring implications; breakeven point, or financial position; changes in gross margin; integration of acquired products and operations; market acceptance of our newly introduced or upgraded products; development, introduction and shipment of new products; and any other guidance on future periods are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements reflect management’s current expectations and are inherently uncertain. Although Data I/O believes that the expectations reflected in these forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance, achievements, or other future events. Moreover, neither Data I/O nor anyone else assumes responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of these forward-looking statements. Data I/O is under no duty to update any of these forward-looking statements after the date of this report. The reader should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. The discussions above and in the section in Item 1A. Risk Factors “Cautionary Factors That May Affect Future Results” in the Company’s Annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 describe some, but not all, of the factors that could cause these differences.

OVERVIEW

Our primary goal is to manage the business to achieve our target financial model, while developing and enhancing products to drive revenue and earnings growth. Our challenge continues to be operating in a seasonal, cyclical, and challenging industry environment, while positioning Data I/O to take advantage of any growth in capital spending and growth in market segments, as well as any opportunities to improve programming processes or performance. In 2008, we experienced a typical seasonally weak first quarter for orders, but had the highest amount of orders in the past eight years during the second quarter of 2008 totaling $8.8 million. We anticipate that demand for programming capacity may continue to improve in 2008, in part based on third party forecasted increased 2008 capacity for certain manufacturing segments, and market growth for the flash market, and for certain target customer segments. Tempering this view is the current economic uncertainty regarding forecast business in certain geographic and customer segments.

Following our losses during the first two quarters of 2007, we decided to take additional expense reductions to lower our expected quarterly revenue breakeven point to below $5.3 million when fully implemented during 2007. During the fourth quarter of 2007, we successfully completed these actions consisting of a combination of margin improvements and expense reductions. We have taken actions to improve the effectiveness of our sales and marketing organization. We have reduced expenses by reducing personnel costs, re-engineering some internal processes, and transferring some activities to our lower cost base of operations in China. At June 30, 2008, all restructure actions have been completed with no remaining amount accrued. The financial business model our restructuring actions targeted was to achieve gross margins around 60% with operating expenses of 45% delivering an operating income of 15%.

We are continuing our efforts to balance increasing costs and strategic investments in our business with the level of demand and mix of business we expect. We are focusing our research and development efforts in our strategic growth markets, namely new programming technology, and automated programming systems for the manufacturing environment, particularly the new flash media duplication system on the FLX500 desktop automated programming system, and extending the capabilities and support for our FlashCORE architecture and the ProLINE-RoadRunner and PS families. We are also continuing to implement our new applications innovation strategy such as our secure data management initiative. This strategy provides complete solutions to target customer’s business problems. These solutions will expand beyond what we have considered as products in the past. These solutions will have a larger software element, may involve third-party components, and in many cases, will be developed to address a specific customer’s requirements. We believe by adding these features to our strategic product platforms, we will be able to set ourselves apart from other product suppliers and elevate our relationships with our customers.

Our customer focus has been on strategic high volume manufacturers in key market segments - wireless, automotive, industrial controls and programming centers - supporting NAND Flash and microcontrollers on our newer products to gain new accounts and to break into new markets, such as microcontrollers for the automotive market. We continue to address the effectiveness of our sales and marketing organization and sales channels. So far during 2008, we added three new channels and expect that we will continue to add sales channels throughout the year to provide greater and more effective sales coverage globally. We continue our efforts to partner with the semiconductor manufacturers to better serve our mutual customers and members of the Preferred Partnership Program. The

11

Preferred Partnership Program formalizes our mutual support relationship and is designed to increase collaboration between the semi conductor vendor and Data I/O to better serve customers.

On March 18, 2008, the Company completed the sale of selected patents and patent applications to Leannoux Properties AG L.L.C. Net proceeds were approximately $3.3 million with a net gain of approximately $2.1 million.

BUSINESS RESTRUCTURING

In 2007, we continued our restructuring activities in view of the declining revenues and gross margins during the first and second quarters of 2007, to further improve our operating results and our effectiveness of the sales and marketing organization and sales channels. During the first quarter of 2007, we recorded restructuring charges of approximately $200,000 primarily related to severance charges. During the second quarter of 2007, we recorded an additional $632,000 of restructuring charges. These actions included reengineering some internal processes, integration of some activities, transferring some activities to our lower cost base of operations in China, reducing resources applied to declining legacy products, moving some engineering positions to production, reducing the number of taxable entities, outsourcing some functions such as payroll, combining some positions, eliminating some functions, and shifting some responsibilities and resources to our channels. During the third quarter of 2007, we recorded a net expense reversal of $107,000 comprised of $54,000 of additional expense, primarily relating to facilities, and a reversal of $161,000 of previously accrued severance primarily due to certain employees who had been scheduled for termination had their termination notice rescinded. At June 30, 2008, we have completed the previously planned restructuring actions with no remaining amounts accrued.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICY JUDGMENTS AND ESTIMATES

The Company’s critical accounting policies are disclosed in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 and have not materially changed as of June 30, 2008.

Results of Operations

NET SALES

The revenue increase of $2.2 million for the second quarter of 2008 compared to the second quarter of 2007 is primarily due to higher sales of our automated systems especially the ProLINE-RoadRunner family products, as well as our aftermarket adapters. We also experienced increased sales of the FlashPAK. Offsetting these increases in part was a decrease in our PS Series, reflecting a decline in sales to programming centers. We experienced higher sales particularly in the wireless segment. During the second quarter of 2008, we achieved our highest level in eight years for orders booked totaling $8.8 million. The backlog of orders totaled $2.5 million at the end of the second quarter of 2008, a slight increase compared with the backlog amount at June 30, 2007 of $2.4 million.

During the second quarter of 2008, sales in the United States increased approximately 17% compared to the same period in 2007, reflecting the increased orders for the ProLINE-RoadRunner during the second quarter of 2008. International sales for the second

12

quarter of 2008 increased by approximately 45% compared to the same period in 2007 primarily due to a 67% increase in sales in Asia, particularly in China. Order bookings increased approximately 22% in Asia in the second quarter of 2008 compared to the same period in 2007. This success we are experiencing in Asia provides confirmation that the changes we made during 2007 to our Asian channels and management are proving effective. Sales in Europe during the second quarter of 2008 increased 12% with order bookings in Europe increasing 47% compared to the same period last year. During the second quarter of 2008, we revitalized our sales organization through additions of key personnel in the Americas and also added new sales channels and expect to add additional sales channels throughout the year to provide greater and more effective sales globally.

Typically we have experienced higher seasonal sales in the second half of the year. As noted above, sales were particularly strong during the second quarter and with a $2.5 million ending backlog, we believe we are well positioned going into the third quarter. We introduced and delivered our new extra-large format version of our highly successful ProLINE-RoadRunner to support special requirements of our automotive electronics customers. The opportunity in the automotive business is tied to increasing functionality across all models independent of overall production and annual model changes. With our new solutions for this sector, we believe that this business should grow for us in 2008.

For the first six months of 2008 compared to the same period of 2007, sales increased by approximately 20% in the areas mentioned above for the quarter, as well as an increase in FLX500 sales. Sales in the United Stated decreased approximately 6% reflecting the weaker United States first quarter sales and what we believe to be a continued shift to international markets of manufacturing capacity related demand and continued decline of sales of legacy product related business. We experienced a significant increase of 42% in Asia sales for the first half of 2008 compared to 2007 reflecting the actions taken to add new Asian sales management and address channel coverage.

GROSS MARGIN

Gross margins during the second quarter of 2008 increased in both dollars and as a percentage of sales compared to the second quarter of 2007. The overall gross margin increase in dollars and as a percentage of sales was primarily due to the higher sales volume of approximately $1.4 million and a favorable product mix of approximately $250,000, as well as less unfavorable operations variances. The overall gross margin percentage increase also relates to restructuring actions taken during 2007 which lowered factory costs and provided savings from transferring our adapter production to China. We also increased prices on certain products where we had demonstrated substantial improvements in customer value and increased sales of our support contracts. Partially offsetting the favorable operations variance comparisons were higher excess inventory obsolescence charges of $120,000, as well as higher used system refurbishing costs, higher freight, and euro denominated costs. We expect to continue to focus on achieving our 60% target gross margin and improving our inventory investment turnover through a focused initiative on improving factory controls and operating ratios.

For the first six months of 2008 compared to the same period of 2007, the higher gross margin dollars and gross margin as a percentage of sales are due to the same factors as those described for the second quarter of 2008. For the first six months of 2008 there were $145,000 of favorable operations variances and $116,000 of favorable labor and overhead spending.

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

Research and development (“R&D”) spending for the second quarter of 2008 compared to the second quarter of 2007 decreased by approximately $120,000 primarily due to the restructure actions and the re-engineering of internal processes. R&D as a percentage of net sales decreased in part due to the increase in sales for the second quarter of 2008.

R&D spending for the first six months of 2008 compared to the first six months of 2007 also decreased by approximately $390,000 due primarily to the same factors mentioned above.

13

SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE

Selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) expenses increased approximately $260,000 for the second quarter of 2008 compared to the second quarter of 2007 due primarily due to an accrual of $300,000 for anticipated bonus payments for 2008 and increased sales commissions on the higher sales volume.

During the first six months of 2008 compared with the same period in 2007, SG&A expense decreased approximately $250,000 primarily due to a decrease in net personnel of approximately $410,000 related to the 2007 restructure, as well as decreased marketing costs of approximately $112,000, decreased professional service costs of approximately $46,000, and decreased channel expenses of approximately $44,000. Offsetting these decreased amounts in part was $398,000 of accrued bonuses for 2008 where none were accrued for in 2007.

INTEREST

Interest income increased during the second quarter of 2008 and for the first six months of 2008 compared to the same period in 2007 due to the increase in cash balance amounts invested during the quarter. Interest expense decreased in the second quarter of 2008 and the first six months of 2008 compared to the same period in 2007 due to the lower balance on the equipment capital lease.

INCOME TAXES

Income tax expense recorded for the second quarter of 2008 and 2007 resulted from foreign and state taxes. The tax effective rate differed from the statutory tax rate primarily due to the effect of valuation allowances and state taxes. Data I/O has a valuation allowance of $8,640,557 as of June 30, 2008. Our deferred tax assets and valuation allowance were reduced by $66,000 associated with the requirements of FIN 48 accounting for uncertain tax positions.

14

Financial Condition

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

At June 30, 2008, Data I/O’s principal sources of liquidity consisted of existing cash and cash equivalents. Our working capital increased by $4,291,000 from December 31, 2007 and our current ratio increased from 3.5 at December 31, 2007 to 4.1 at June 30, 2008.

Our cash and cash equivalents increased by approximately $3 million during the six months ended June, 2008 primarily due to the cash received in association with the patent sale and a gain of approximately $2.1 million. Cash provided by operations primarily included a $1.5 million increase in accounts receivable due to late sales during the quarter.

We expect that we will continue to make capital expenditures to support our business and we anticipate that present working capital will be sufficient to meet our operating requirements throughout at least the next twelve months. Capital expenditures are expected to be funded by existing and internally generated funds or lease financing.

As a result of our significant product development, customer support, international expansion and selling and marketing efforts, we have required substantial working capital to fund our operations. Over the last few years, we restructured our operations to lower our costs and operating expenditures in some geographic regions, while investing in other regions, and to lower the level of revenue required for our net income breakeven point, to preserve our cash position and to focus on profitable operations. We believe that we have sufficient working capital available under our operating plan to fund our operations and capital requirements through at least the next one year period. Any substantial inability to achieve our current business plan could have a material adverse impact on our financial position, liquidity, or results of operations and may require us to reduce expenditures and/or seek additional financing.

LONG-TERM DEBT

During the third quarter of 2006, the Company entered into a five year capital lease agreement in the amount of $591,145. The lease was used to fund new equipment and installation associated with our move to the new facility in July of 2006. See Note 9, “Long-Term Debt.”

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

Except as noted above in Note 7, “Operating Lease and Other Commitments”, Data I/O had no off-balance sheet arrangements.

RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157,Fair Value Measurements (“SFAS 157”). SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework and gives guidance regarding the methods used for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) 157-2,Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157, which delays the effective date of SFAS 157 for all nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually). SFAS 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years. We are required to adopt SFAS 157 in the first quarter of 2009; FSP 157-2 delays the effective date for certain items to the first quarter of 2010  We are evaluating the impact of adopting SFAS 157 on our financial statements.

In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities.” This Statement permits entities to elect to measure certain financial instruments and other items at fair value through earnings. The fair value option may be applied on an instrument by instrument basis, is irrevocable and is applied only to entire instruments. SFAS 159 requires additional financial statement presentation and disclosure requirements for those entities that elect to adopt the standard and is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The implementation of this standard relating to the assets and liabilities carried at fair value on a recurring basis did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

15

In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 141(Revised 2007), “Business Combinations” (“Statement. No. 141R”), which establishes principles and requirements for the reporting entity in a business combination, including recognition and measurement in the financial statements of the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any non-controlling interest in the acquiree. This statement also establishes disclosure requirements to enable financial statement users to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business combination. Statement No. 141R applies prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years. We have not yet evaluated the effect the adoption of Statement No. 141R could have on our consolidated financial statements, if any.

Item 3.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Not applicable.

Item 4.  Controls and Procedures

(a) Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures.

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, Data I/O evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and Rule 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this report (the “Evaluation Date”). Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of the Evaluation Date, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable level of assurance. Disclosure Controls are controls and procedures designed to reasonably assure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure Controls are also designed to reasonably assure that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including the CEO and CFO, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

(b) Changes in internal controls.

There were no changes made in our internal controls during the period covered by this report that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.  Legal Proceedings

As of June 30, 2008, Data I/O was not a party to any legal proceedings, the adverse outcome of which in management’s opinion, individually or in the aggregate, would have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial position except as described below.

On January 22, 2008, our former landlord, (now known as Rowley Properties, Inc.), filed a Complaint in the Superior Court of Washington for King County (No. 08-2-03518-2 SEA) against Data I/O, Robert/Barbara Hiester and Steven/Jane Doe Hiester. The claims against Data I/O include breach of agreement, waste, and an environmental remediation claim for contribution under RCW 70.105D.080. No claim amount is specified in the Complaint. The claims relate to a former circuit board fabrication business that Data I/O operated from 1978 to October 1988. We sold that business to Circuit Partners whose officers and principal shareholders were Robert and Barbara Heister. As stated in Data I/O’s 1988 10-K: “An environmental and regulatory compliance audit was performed prior to the sale, per the guidelines of the Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Ace (“Cercla/Superfund”) Section 107. Audit results indicated no heavy metals or volatile organics in excess of existing or proposed Washington State or federal remedial action levels.” We are in the very early stages of investigating and responding to this claim and have engaged counsel to represent us on this matter. We filed an Answer to the Complaint on March 12, 2008. At this time, we are not able to determine the probable outcome of this legal proceeding or if it will have an adverse effect on the results of operations or financial position of Data I/O. We intend to defend this claim vigorously and are in the process of determining the insurance coverage for this claim.

16

Item 1A.  Risk Factors

In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the factors discussed in Part I, “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, which could materially affect our business, financial condition or future results. The risks described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K are not the only risks facing our Company. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and/or operating results. There are no material changes to the Risk Factors described in our Annual Report.

Item 2.  Changes in Securities, Use of Proceeds and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

None

Item 3.  Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None

Item 4.  Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

At our Annual Meeting of Shareholders held on May 19, 2008, there were present in person or by proxy the holders of 8,044,695 (91.56%) shares of Common Stock of Data I/O thereby constituting a quorum. The following are the matters approved and the voting results:

Item 5.  Other Information

None

Item 6.  Exhibits

The following list is a subset of the list of exhibits described below and contains all compensatory plans, contracts or arrangements in which any director or executive officer of Data I/O is a participant, unless the method of allocation of benefits thereunder is the same for management and non-management participants:

17

18

19

20

21

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

22