BAKKEN RESOURCES, INC. POS-AM TO THE S-1 REGISTRATION STATEMENT 12/29/10


As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 29, 2010


REGISTRATION NO. 333-157564



UNITED STATES  

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

---------------------------------------------

POST EFFECTIVE AMENDMENT NO. 1

TO

FORM S-1

Registration Statement

Under the Securities Act of 1934


[briposam_122910apg002.gif]

BAKKEN RESOURCES, INC.

(Name of small business issuer in its charter)


NEVADA

5045

29-2973652

(State or Jurisdiction of

(Primary Standard Industrial

(IRS Employer

Incorporation or Organization)

Classification Code Number)

Identification No.)


1425 Birch Ave., Suite A, Helena, MT 59601; (406) 442-9444

(Address and telephone number of principal executive offices and principal place of business)


Copies of All Communications to:

Val M. Holms

1425 Birch Ave., Suite A

Helena, MT 59601

(406) 442-9444

 (Name, address and telephone number of agent for service)


Approximate date of proposed sale to the public:

From time to time after this Registration Statement becomes effective.





If any of the securities being registered on this Form are to be offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, other than securities offered only in connection with dividend or interest reinvestment plans, check the following box. [X]


If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. [  ]


If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. [  ]






If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. [  ]


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):


Large accelerated filer [  ]  

Accelerated filer [  ]

Non-accelerated filer [  ]

Smaller reporting company [X]

 

CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE


Title of each class of securities to be registered

Amount

 to be registered (1)

Proposed maximum

offering price

per share (2)

Proposed maximum aggregate

offering price

Amount of registration

 Fee

Common Stock

5,557,500

$0.25

$1,389,375

$7.28

(1)

All 5,557,500 shares registered pursuant to this registration statement are to be offered by the selling security holders.

(2)

Estimated solely for purposes of calculating the registration fee in accordance with Rule 457(c) and Rule 457(g) under the Securities Act, using the sales price of the common stock in a private placement offering which initially closed on November 26, 2010



THE REGISTRANT HEREBY AMENDS THIS REGISTRATION STATEMENT ON SUCH DATE OR DATES AS MAY BE NECESSARY TO DELAY ITS EFFECTIVE DATE UNTIL THE REGISTRANT SHALL FILE A FURTHER AMENDMENT WHICH SPECIFICALLY STATES THAT THIS REGISTRATION STATEMENT SHALL THEREAFTER BECOME EFFECTIVE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 8(a) OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 OR UNTIL THE REGISTRATION STATEMENT SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE ON SUCH DATE AS THE COMMISSION, ACTING PURSUANT TO SAID SECTION 8(a), MAY DETERMINE.


 




 

PART I - INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS      Registration No. 333-157564



The information in this prospectus is not complete and may be changed.  These securities may not be sold until the registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is effective.  This prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities and is not soliciting an offer to buy these securities in any state where the offer or sale is not permitted.


SUBJECT TO COMPLETION, DATED DECEMBER 29, 2010

 


PRELIMINARY PROSPECTUS

[briposam_122910apg004.gif]

BAKKEN RESOURCES, INC.

5,557,500 Shares of Common Stock



This prospectus relates to 5,557,500 shares of our common stock, 3,307,500 shares from non-affiliates and 2,250,000 shares from affiliates, which may be offered by the selling security holders identified in this prospectus for their own account.  Our shares of common stock are quoted on the Over the Counter Bulletin Board (OTCBB) and the common stock may be offered from time to time by the selling stockholders through ordinary brokerage transactions in the over-the-counter markets, in negotiated private transactions or otherwise, at market prices prevailing at the time of sale or at negotiated prices and in other ways as described in the “Plan of Distribution.”


This offering is not an underwritten offering.  The securities will be offered for sale by the selling security holders identified in this prospectus in accordance with the methods and terms described in the section of this prospectus entitled “Plan of Distribution.” We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of the shares by these selling security holders.


Our common stock is currently quoted on the OTCBB exchange under the symbol BKKN.  On June 10, 2010, we undertook a three for one forward stock split.  All share numbers in this registration statement are post split.  We completed an offering on October 2, 2008, selling 5,557,500 common shares at a price of $0.10 per share.  The offering price may not reflect the market price of our shares after the offering.  The last price per share of our common stock at which we issued shares in a private placement on November 26, 2010 was $0.25.  



THE PURCHASE OF OUR COMMON STOCK INVOLVES A HIGH DEGREE OF RISK. (SEE “RISK FACTORS” COMMENCING ON PAGE 4 FOR A DISCUSSION OF CERTAIN FACTORS THAT SHOULD BE CONSIDERED BY PROSPECTIVE INVESTORS.)


NEITHER THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION NOR ANY STATE SECURITIES COMMISSION HAS APPROVED OR DISAPPROVED OF THESE SECURITIES OR DETERMINED IF THIS PROSPECTUS IS TRUTHFUL OR COMPLETE. ANY REPRESENTATION TO THE CONTRARY IS A CRIMINAL OFFENSE.


THE INFORMATION IN THIS PROSPECTUS IS NOT COMPLETE AND MAY BE CHANGED.  WE MAY NOT SELL THESE SECURITIES UNTIL THE REGISTRATION STATEMENT FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION IS EFFECTIVE. THIS PROSPECTUS IS NOT AN OFFER TO SELL THESE SECURITIES AND IT IS NOT SOLICITING AN OFFER TO BUY THESE SECURITIES IN ANY STATE WHERE THE OFFER OR SALE IS NOT PERMITTED.


WE HAVE NOT AUTHORIZED ANY DEALER, SALESPERSON OR OTHER PERSON TO GIVE ANY INFORMATION OR REPRESENT ANYTHING NOT CONTAINED IN THIS PROSPECTUS. YOU SHOULD NOT RELY ON ANY UNAUTHORIZED INFORMATION. THIS PROSPECTUS DOES NOT OFFER TO SELL OR BUY ANY SHARES IN ANY JURISDICTION IN WHICH IT IS UNLAWFUL. THE INFORMATION IN THIS PROSPECTUS IS CURRENT AS OF THE DATE ON THE COVER.



The date of this Prospectus is December 29, 2010



- 1 -







TABLE OF CONTENTS

PAGES

PART I – INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS

1

ITEM 3.  PROSPECTUS SUMMARY

3

 A.  THE OFFERING

4

 B.  RISK FACTORS

4

ITEM 4.  USE OF PROCEEDS

14

IREM 5.  DETERMINATION OF OFFERING PRICE

14

ITEM 6.  DILUTION

14

ITEM 7.  SELLING SECURITY HOLDERS

14

ITEM 8.  PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION

16

ITEM 9.  DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES TO BE REGISTERED

18

ITEM 10.  INTERESTS OF NAMED EXPERTS AND COUNSEL

20

ITEM 11.  INFORMATION WITH RESPECT TO THE REGISTRANT

20

A.  BUSINESS OF BAKKEN RESOURCES, INC.

20

B.  DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY

32

C.  LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

32

D. MARKET PRICE OF AND DIVDENDS ON THE REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

32

E.  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

34

F.  SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

58

G.  SUPPLEMENTARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION

58

H.  MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATION

58

I.  CHANGES IN, AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH, ACCOUNTANTS ON

ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

67

J.  QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

64

K.  DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT, PROMOTERS AND CONTROL PERSONS

64

L.  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

67

M.  SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

68

N.  TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PERSONS, PROMOTERS AND

CERTAIN CONTROL PERSONS

69

ITEM 11A. MATERIAL CHANGES

70

ITEM 12.    INCORPORATION OF CERTAIN INFORMATION BY REFERENCE

70

ITEM 12A.  DISCLOSURE OF SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION POSITION ON INDEMNIFICATION FOR SECURITIES ACT LIABILITIES.

70

PART II – INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS

73

ITEM 13.   OTHER EXPENSES OF ISSUANCE AND DISTRIBUTION

73

ITEM 14.   INDEMNIFICATION OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS

73

ITEM 15.   RECENT SALES OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES

75

ITEM 16.   EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

76

ITEM 17.   UNDERTAKINGS

77

SIGNATURES

79




- 2 -







ITEM 3.  PROSPECTUS SUMMARY


Bakken Resources, Inc.


Our Company


When the company was incorporated on June 6, 2008, under the laws of the State of Nevada, Bakken Resources, Inc. (“BRI”) (formerly “Multisys Language Solutions, Inc.”) was organized to distribute interactive multimedia language education software developed by Strokes International AG., an Austria based software company in the Great China Region including the People’s Republic of China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of PRC, Macao Special Administrative Region of PRC, and Taiwan pursuant to an exclusive Software Reseller Agreement (“Software Reseller Agreement”) via an independent third party software distribution company in the territory.  .


From the inception of our company in June 2008 to September 30, 2010, we only generated $7,692 of revenues from our language education software distribution and sales business, while incurring a loss of approximately $140,842.  Because we were unable to develop our interactive multimedia language education business into a financially viable business, the board of directors decided to redirect our business and to acquire oil and gas rights via an option to purchase certain oil and gas rights from Holms Energy, LLC, (“Holms Energy”), a private Nevada company.  On June 11, 2010, BRI and Multisys Acquisition, Inc., (“Multisys Acquisition”) its wholly-owned Nevada subsidiary, entered into that certain Option to Purchase Assets Agreement between Holms Energy and Multisys Acquisition, pursuant to which Holms Energy agreed to grant Multisys Acquisition an option to purchase certain oil and gas production royalty rights on land in North Dakota.  To exercise its rights under the Asset Purchase Agreement on November 26, 2010, BRI completed the minimum private placement contingency and BRI paid Holms Energy $100,000, issued forty million (40,000,000) shares of common stock to them, and granted them a 5% overriding royalty on all revenue generated for ten years from the gas and oil production royalty rights purchased from Holms Energy.


On November 26, 2010, we completed an initial closing of a private placement in the amount of $1,545,000 that issued 6,180,000 shares at $0.25 per share and 3,090,000 three-year warrants exercisable for 3,090,000 shares at $.50 per share, callable at $0.01 per share at any time after November 26, 2011, if the underlying shares are registered, and the common stock trades for 20 consecutive trading days at an average closing sales price of $0.75 or more,.  We concurrently exercised the option with Holms Energy and executed an Asset Purchase Agreement by and between BRI, Holms Energy, and Multisys Acquisition in order to acquire certain interests in mineral rights and assets from Holms Energy.  Upon entering the acquisition of assets, the members of Holms Energy controlled approximately 76.2% of our 52,477,500 outstanding shares of common stock.  Concurrently with the acquisition closing with Holms Energy, we abandoned and are currently attempting to sell our prior business.  Effective December 10, 2010, our original name changed to Bakken Resources, Inc.


 On December 1, 2010, after the closing of the Asset Purchase Agreement transaction with Holms Energy, LLC, our board of directors elected the following persons, who were nominees of Holms Energy, as members of the board of directors of BRI: Val M. Holms, Kent L. Jensen, Karen S. Midtlyng, David E. Boleneus, and Frank H. Blair.  The biographical information concerning these elected directors is included in Item 11, Section “K” below.  Subsequently, also on December 1, 2010, the following officers and directors of BRI resigned their positions at BRI: Janelle Edington, Director, President and Chief Executive Officer; Raymond Kuh, Director, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer; Christopher Wetzel, Director and Vice President.  On December 1, 2010, the new board of directors appointed the following executive officers:  Val M. Holms, President and Chief Executive Officer; Kent L. Jensen, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer; and Karen S. Midtlyng, Secretary.  The biographical information concerning these appointed executive officers is included in Item 11, Section “K” below.


Effective December 27, 2010, Kent L. Jensen resigned as a Director, Treasurer, and Chief Financial Officer of Bakken Resources, Inc.  There were no disagreements between the resigning officer and director and any of our remaining officers or directors regarding the operations, policies, or practices of our company.  Effective December 27, 2010, two of our existing officers were appointed to new offices; Val M. Holms was appointed as Interim Chief Financial Officer and Karen S. Midtlyng was appointed Interim Treasurer by the Board of Directors until such time as the Board of Directors identifies a replacement for Mr. Jensen.  


The net proceeds of the recently completed private placement were primarily used to exercise the option to purchase Holms oil and gas rights, and the remaining funds will be used for working capital, payment of referral fees, to acquire mineral rights and interests in existing oil and gas leases from other third parties, to participate in joint venture drilling programs primarily in Eastern Montana, Western North and South Dakota, with primary interest in the Bakken Formation, and for other general corporate purposes of BRI.




- 3 -






We will focus on evolving into a growth-orientated independent energy company engaged in the acquisition, exploration, exploitation, and development of oil and natural gas properties; focusing our activities mainly in the Williston Basin, a large sedimentary basin in eastern Montana, Western North and South Dakota, and Southern Saskatchewan known for its rich deposits of petroleum and potash  Through the recent acquisition from Holms, BRI owns certain mineral rights underlying approximately 6,000 acres located approximately 8 miles southeast of Williston, ND.


Operations


We plan to structure our operations in such a way as to keep our capital expenditures and administrative expenses to a minimum.  Overhead and staff will be kept to a minimum and the majority of operational duties will be outsourced to consultants and independent contractors.  We currently have two full-time employees, and we expect to eventually hire one to three more employees, commensurate with the development of our business.  We believe that most operational responsibilities can be handled by the officers and directors, and through the working partnerships of other consultants.  Two of our officers will draw salaries in the future, Val M. Holms, our President and CEO, and Karen Midtlyng, our Secretary.  Our other officers and directors may be retained on an as needed basis and will be paid an hourly rate of to be determined by the Board and reimbursed any out of pocket expenses.


Our offices are located at: 1425 Birch Ave., Suite A, Helena, MT 59601.  Our phone number is (406) 442-9444.


A. THE OFFERING


We are registering shares of our common stock for sale by the selling security holders identified in the section of this prospectus entitled “Selling Security Holders.”


Securities offered by Selling shareholder(s)

5,557,500 shares of common stock

Offering price

$0.25 per share

Shares outstanding prior to the offering

52,477,500 shares of common stock

Shares to be outstanding after the offering

52,477,500 shares of common stock

Use of proceeds

We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of the common stock by the selling shareholder.


We are bearing all costs relating to the registration of the common stock, including offering costs, filing fees, printing costs, legal fees, accounting fees, and transfer agent fees, which are estimated at $40,000.  The selling shareholders, however, will pay any commissions or other fees payable to brokers or dealers in connection with any sale of the common stock.


We paid the expenses of the offering because we were seeking to (i) become a reporting company with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "1934 Act"); and (ii) enable our common stock to be traded on the OTC Bulletin Board.  We believed that the registration of the resale of shares on behalf of our existing shareholder might facilitate the development of a public market in our common stock for trading on the OTC Bulletin Board.  We have registered our securities under Section 12(g) of the 1934 Act.


Number of Shares Being Offered


This prospectus covers the resale by the selling stockholders named in this prospectus of up to 5,557,500 shares of our common stock.  The offered shares were acquired by the selling stockholders in private placement transactions, which were exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933.  Our shares of common stock are quoted on the OTCBB and the common stock may be offered from time to time by the selling stockholders through ordinary brokerage transactions in the over-the-counter markets, in negotiated private transactions or otherwise, at market prices prevailing at the time of sale or at negotiated prices and in other ways as described in the “Plan of Distribution.”  Our common has been quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board since July 29, 2009.  Please see the Plan of Distribution section at in this prospectus for a detailed explanation of how the common shares may be sold.


B. RISK FACTORS


Risks Associated with Our Business


We will be a reorganized start-up company.  


We are reorganized to engage in a new and different business.  Our newly reorganized business is still deemed to be a start-up company that has generated very limited revenue in the amount of $7,692 since its inception.  We expect to incur significant operating losses for the foreseeable future, and there can be no assurance that we will be able to validate and to market products or



- 4 -






services in the future that will generate revenues or that any revenues generated will be sufficient for us to become profitable or thereafter maintain profitability.


The global financial crisis may significantly impact our business and financial condition for the foreseeable future.


The continued credit crisis and related turmoil in the global financial system may adversely impact our business and our financial condition, and we may face challenges if conditions in the financial markets do not improve.  Our ability to access the capital markets may be restricted at a time when we would like, or need, to raise financing, which could have an impact on our flexibility to react to changing economic and business conditions.  The economic situation could have an impact on the Holms Property Lessees upon whom we are dependent for drilling wells on property rights where we own mineral rights, causing them to fail to meet their drilling obligations to us.  We believe that The Holms Property Lessees, the multiple operators of the Holms property, are adequately funded to meet its drilling requirements pursuant to the terms and conditions of the 14 mineral leases executed in 2003 and 2004, an amended in 2008.


We may be unable to obtain additional capital or generate production royalty income that we will require to implement our business plan, which could restrict our ability to grow.


We expect that our current capital and our other existing resources will be sufficient only to provide a limited amount of working capital, and the potential of production royalty revenues generated from the Holms Property located in McKenzie County, the state of North Dakota, of which there is no assurance, may not be sufficient to fund both our continuing operations and our planned growth.  We may require additional capital to continue to operate our business beyond the initial phase of development and to further expand our exploration and development programs to additional properties.  We may be unable to obtain additional capital required and if we are able to secure additional capital, it may not be pursuant to terms deemed to be favorable to BRI and its shareholders.


Future acquisitions and future exploration, development, production and marketing activities, as well as our administrative requirements (such as salaries, insurance expenses and general overhead expenses, as well as legal compliance costs and accounting expenses) may require a substantial amount of additional capital and cash flow.


We may pursue sources of additional capital through various financing transactions or arrangements, including joint venturing of projects, debt financing, equity financing or other means.  We may not be successful in locating suitable financing transactions in the time period required or at all, and we may not obtain the capital we require by other means.  If we do not succeed in raising additional capital, our resources may not be sufficient to fund our planned operations going forward.


Any additional capital raised through the sale of equity may dilute the ownership percentage of our stockholders.  This could also result in a decrease in the fair market value of our equity securities because our assets would be owned by a larger pool of outstanding equity.  The terms of securities we issue in future capital transactions may be more favorable to our new investors, and may include preferences, superior voting rights and the issuance of other derivative securities, and issuances of incentive awards under equity employee incentive plans, which may have a further dilutive effect.


Our ability to obtain needed financing may be impaired by such factors as the capital markets (both generally and in the oil and gas industry in particular), our status as a new enterprise without a significant demonstrated operating history, production royalty revenue from the Holms property, currently our only oil and natural gas property and prices of oil and natural gas on the commodities markets (which will impact the amount of asset-based financing available to us) and/or the loss of key management.  Further, if oil and/or natural gas prices on the commodities markets decline, our revenues from the anticipated royalties will decrease and such decreased revenues may increase our requirements for capital.  If the amount of capital we are able to raise from financing activities, together with our revenues from operations, is not sufficient to satisfy our capital needs (even to the extent that we reduce our operations), we may be required to cease our operations.


We may incur substantial costs in pursuing future capital financing, including investment banking fees, legal fees, accounting fees, securities law compliance fees, printing and distribution expenses and other costs.  We may also be required to recognize non-cash expenses in connection with certain securities we may issue, such as convertible notes, which may adversely impact our financial condition.


We have no previous operating history in the oil and gas industry, which may raise substantial doubt as to our ability to successfully develop profitable business operations.


We have a limited operating history.  Our business operations must be considered in light of the risks, expenses, and difficulties frequently encountered in establishing a business in the oil and natural gas industries.  Neither BRI nor the entity we are acquiring the mineral rights from have generated any revenues to date and there are no producing Bakken Formation wells on the Holms property.  BRI has been primarily focused on fund raising activities for the express purpose of acquiring certain mineral rights



- 5 -






from Holms Energy, LLC.  There is nothing at this time on which to base an assumption that our business operations will prove to be successful in the long-term.  Our future operating results will depend on many factors, including:


  

our ability to raise adequate working capital;

  

success of the development and exploration program conducted by the Holms Property Lessees on our property;

  

demand for natural gas and oil;

  

the level of our competition;

  

our ability to attract and maintain key management and employees; and

  

the ability of the Holms Property Lessees to efficiently explore, develop and produce sufficient quantities of marketable natural gas or oil in a highly competitive and speculative environment while maintaining quality and controlling costs.


To achieve profitable operations in the future, we are primarily dependent upon the Holms Property Lessees, as the operator of the Holms Property, to successfully execute on the factors stated above, along with continuing to develop strategies and relationships to enhance our revenue by financially participating and investing in various drilling programs with third parties.  Despite their best efforts, our Lessees may not be successful in their exploration or development efforts or obtain required regulatory approvals on the property where BRI is entitled to a production royalty.  There is a possibility that some, or all, of the wells to be drilled on the subject property may never produce natural gas or oil.


We will be highly dependent on our current Officers and Directors.


Val M. Holms is our Chief Executive Officer, Interim Chief Financial Officer, and President.  The loss of  Mr. Holms, upon whose knowledge, leadership, and technical expertise we shall be relying on in the future, would harm our ability to execute our new business plan.


Our success will depend heavily upon the future contributions of Val M. Holms, whose knowledge, leadership, and technical expertise would be difficult to replace, and on our ability to retain and attract technical and professional personal.  If we were to lose his services, our ability to execute our new business plan would be harmed and we may be forced to cease operations until such time as we could hire a suitable replacement for them.  Mr. Holms and Ms. Midtlyng, our Secretary, will enter into employment agreements with BRI; however, they may terminate their employment with BRI at any time.


Our proposed post-reorganization management team does not have extensive experience in public company matters, which could impair our ability to comply with legal and regulatory requirements.


Our new management team has had limited public company management experience or responsibilities, which could impair our ability to comply with legal and regulatory requirements such as the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and applicable federal securities laws, including filing required reports and other information required on a timely basis.  It may be expensive to implement and effect programs and policies in an effective and timely manner that adequately respond to increased legal, regulatory compliance and reporting requirements imposed by such laws and regulations, and we may not have the resources to do so.  Our failure to comply with such laws and regulations could lead to the imposition of fines and penalties and further result in the deterioration of our business and decreased value of our stock.


Our lack of diversification will increase the risk of an investment in BRI, and our financial condition and results of operations may deteriorate if we fail to diversify.


Our new business focus initially is on the oil and gas industry on the Holms Property, a single property located in McKenzie County, North Dakota.  Larger companies have the ability to manage their risk by diversification.  However, we will lack diversification, in terms of both the nature and geographic scope of our business.  As a result, we will likely be impacted more acutely by factors affecting our industry or the regions in which we operate than we would if our business were more diversified, enhancing our risk profile.  If we cannot diversify or expand our operations, our financial condition and results of operations could deteriorate.  Initially, we are solely dependent on the expertise of the Holms Property Lessees as the operator of our property.


No current production from the Bakken Formation on the Holms Property.


The Holms Property currently has two commercial wells that are economically marginal and produce from the Mission Canyon Formation.  There have been no wells drilled to the Bakken Formation anywhere on the Holms property.  In the event the proposed nine wells scheduled to be drilled before the end of 2011 are not successful and no production royalty is paid, in all likelihood BRI will run out of capital and become insolvent in the event it is not in position to raise additional capital.


Strategic relationships upon which we may rely are subject to change, which may diminish our ability to conduct our operations.




- 6 -






Our ability to successfully acquire additional properties, to participate in drilling opportunities, and to identify and enter into commercial arrangements with other third party companies will depend on developing and maintaining close working relationships with industry participants and on our ability to select and evaluate suitable properties and to consummate transactions in a highly competitive environment.  These realities are subject to change and may impair our ability to grow.


To continue to develop our business, we will endeavor to use the business relationships of our the new management to identify, screen, and enter into strategic relationships, which may take the form of joint ventures with other private parties and contractual arrangements with other operating oil and gas exploration companies.  We may not be able to establish these strategic relationships, or if established, we may not be able to maintain them.  Even if we are able to engage in joint venture and enter into strategic investment relationships with existing operators, they may not be pursuant to terms and conditions that are favorable to us.  In addition, the dynamics of our relationships with strategic partners may require us to incur expenses or undertake activities we would not otherwise be inclined to in order to fulfill our obligations to these partners or maintain our relationships.  If our strategic relationships are not established or maintained, our business prospects may be limited, which could diminish our ability to conduct our operations.


Competition in obtaining rights to explore and develop oil and gas reserves and for our Lessee to market any future production may impair our business.


The oil and gas industry is highly competitive.  Other oil and gas companies may seek to acquire oil and gas leases and other properties and services we will need to operate our business in the areas in which we expect to operate.  This competition is increasingly intense as prices of oil and natural gas on the commodities markets have increased in recent years.  Additionally, other companies engaged in our line of business may compete with us from time to time in obtaining capital from investors.  Competitors include larger companies which, in particular, may have access to greater resources, may be more successful in the recruitment and retention of qualified employees and may conduct their own refining and petroleum marketing operations, which may give them a competitive advantage.  In addition, actual or potential competitors may be strengthened through the acquisition of additional assets and interests.  If we are unable to compete effectively or adequately respond to competitive pressures, this inability may materially adversely affect our results of operation and financial condition.


We may not be able to effectively manage our growth, which may harm our profitability.


Our strategy envisions expanding our business based primarily on anticipated future production royalty income, which there is no assurance of receiving.  If we fail to effectively manage our growth, our financial results could be adversely affected.  Growth may place a strain on our management systems and resources.  We must continue to refine and expand our business capabilities, our systems and processes and our access to financing sources.  As we grow, we must continue to hire, train, supervise, and manage new employees.  We cannot assure that we will be able to:


  

meet our capital needs;

  

expand our systems effectively or efficiently or in a timely manner;

  

allocate our human resources optimally;

  

identify and hire qualified employees or retain valued employees; or

  

incorporate effectively the components of any business that we may acquire in our effort to achieve growth.


If we are unable to manage our growth, our operations and our financial results could be adversely affected by inefficiency, which could diminish our profitability.


Risks Related To Oil and Gas Industry


Oil and natural gas prices are very volatile.  A protracted period of oil and natural gas prices below the prices in effect at December 2, 2010 may adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.


The oil and gas markets are very volatile, and we cannot predict future oil and natural gas prices.  The price we receive for our oil and natural gas production heavily influences our revenue, profitability, access to capital and future rate of growth.  The prices we receive for our production and the levels of our production depend on numerous factors beyond our control.  These factors include, but are not limited to, the following:


  

changes in global supply and demand for oil and gas;

  

the actions of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries;

  

the price and quantity of imports of foreign oil and gas;

  

political and economic conditions, including embargoes, in oil-producing countries or affecting other oil-producing activity;



- 7 -





 

  

the level of global oil and gas exploration and production activity;

  

the level of global oil and gas inventories;

  

weather conditions;

  

technological advances affecting energy consumption;

  

domestic and foreign governmental regulations;

  

proximity and capacity of oil and gas pipelines and other transportation facilities;

  

the price and availability of competitors supplies of oil and gas in captive market areas; and

  

the price and availability of alternative fuels.


Furthermore, the recent worldwide financial and credit crisis has reduced the availability of liquidity and credit to fund the continuation and expansion of industrial business operations worldwide. The shortage of liquidity and credit combined with recent substantial losses in worldwide equity markets has lead to a worldwide economic recession.  The slowdown in economic activity caused by such recession has reduced worldwide demand for energy and resulted in lower oil and natural gas prices.


Lower oil and natural gas prices will decrease our revenues, but also may reduce the amount of oil and natural gas that the Holms Property Lessees can produce economically and therefore potentially lower our anticipated production royalty income.  A substantial or extended decline in oil or natural gas prices may result in impairments of our proved oil and gas property, if it reaches production, of which there is no assurance and may materially and adversely affect our future business, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity or ability to finance planned capital expenditures.  To the extent commodity prices received from production are insufficient to fund planned capital expenditures, we will be required to reduce spending or borrow any such shortfall.  Lower oil and natural gas prices may also reduce BRI’s ability to establish a borrowing base under a credit agreement, which is determined at the discretion of the lenders based on the collateral value of any proved reserves.


Drilling for and producing oil and natural gas are high risk activities with many uncertainties that could adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.


Initially, our future success will depend on the success of our development, exploitation, production, and exploration activities conducted by the Holms Property Lessees as our operator on the Holms Property.  Oil and natural gas exploration and production activities are subject to numerous risks beyond our control; including the risk that drilling will not result in commercially viable oil or natural gas production.  Our decisions to participate in drilling projects, purchase mineral rights, explore, develop or otherwise exploit prospects or properties will depend in part on the evaluation of data obtained through geophysical and geological analyses, production data and engineering studies, the results of which are often inconclusive or subject to varying interpretations.  The cost of drilling, completing, and operating wells is often uncertain before drilling commences.  Overruns in budgeted expenditures are common risks that can make a particular project uneconomical.  Further, many factors may curtail, delay or cancel drilling, including the following:


 

delays imposed by or resulting from compliance with regulatory requirements;

 

pressure or irregularities in geological formations;

 

shortages of or delays in obtaining qualified personnel or equipment, including drilling rigs and CO2;

 

equipment failures or accidents; and

 

adverse weather conditions, such as freezing temperatures, hurricanes and storms.


Exploration for oil and gas is risky and may not be commercially successful, and the advanced technologies to be used by the Holms Property Lessees cannot eliminate exploration risk, which could impair our ability to generate revenues from our production royalty income.


Our future success will depend on the success of exploratory drilling conducted by the Holms Property Lessees on our Holms property.  Oil and gas exploration involves a high degree of risk.  These risks are more acute in the early stages of exploration.  Our ability to produce revenue and our resulting financial performance are significantly affected by the prices we receive for oil and natural gas produced from wells on our acreage, if any.  Especially in recent years, the prices at which oil and natural gas trade in the open market have experienced significant volatility, and will likely continue to fluctuate in the foreseeable future due to a variety of influences including, but not limited to, the following:


  

domestic and foreign demand for oil and natural gas by both refineries and end users;

  

the introduction of alternative forms of fuel to replace or compete with oil and natural gas;

  

domestic and foreign reserves and supply of oil and natural gas;

  

competitive measures implemented by our competitors and domestic and foreign governmental bodies;

  

political climates in nations that traditionally produce and export significant quantities of oil and natural gas (including military and other conflicts in the Middle East and surrounding geographic region) and regulations and tariffs imposed by exporting and importing nations;



- 8 -





 

 

weather conditions; and

  

domestic and foreign economic volatility and stability.


Expenditures on exploration on our acreage may not result in new discoveries of oil or natural gas in commercially viable quantities.  It is difficult to project the costs of implementing exploratory horizontal drilling programs on our acreage due to the inherent uncertainties of drilling in unknown formations, the costs associated with encountering various drilling conditions, such as over-pressured zones and tools lost in the hole, and changes in drilling plans and locations as a result of prior exploratory wells or additional seismic data and interpretations thereof.


Even when used and properly interpreted, three-dimensional (3-D) seismic data and visualization techniques only assist geoscientists in identifying subsurface structures and hydrocarbon indicators.  They do not allow the interpreter to know conclusively if hydrocarbons are present or economically producible.  In addition, the use of three-dimensional (3-D) seismic data becomes less reliable when used at increasing depths.  The Holms Property Lessees could incur losses as a result of expenditures on unsuccessful wells on our acreage.  If exploration costs exceed estimates, or if exploration efforts do not produce results which meet expectations of our operator, exploration efforts may not be commercially successful, which could adversely impact the Holms Property Lessees’ ability to generate revenues from operations on our acreage.


The Holms Property Lessees may not be able to develop oil and gas reserves on an economically viable basis on our acreage.


If the Holms Property Lessees succeed in discovering oil and/or natural gas reserves, we cannot be assured that these reserves will be capable of long-term sustainable production levels or in sufficient quantities to be commercially viable.  On a long-term basis, our viability depends on the Holms Property Lessees’ ability to find or acquire, develop and commercially produce additional oil and natural gas reserves on our acreage.  Our future revenue will depend not only on the Holms Property Lessees ability to develop our acreage, but also on our ability to identify and acquire additional suitable producing properties or prospects, to find markets for the oil and natural gas if we can develop a prospect and to effectively distribute any production into our markets.


Future oil and gas exploration may involve unprofitable efforts, not only from dry wells, but from holes that are productive but do not produce sufficient net revenues to return a profit after drilling, operating and other costs.  Completion of a well does not assure a profit on the investment or recovery of drilling, completion, and operating costs.  In addition, drilling hazards or environmental damage could greatly increase the cost of operations, and various field operating conditions may adversely affect the production from successful wells.  These conditions include delays in obtaining governmental approvals or consents, shut-downs of connected wells resulting from extreme weather conditions, problems in storage and distribution and adverse geological and mechanical conditions.  While we will endeavor to effectively manage these conditions, we cannot be assured of doing so optimally, and we will not be able to eliminate them completely in any case.  Therefore, these conditions could diminish our revenue and cash flow levels and result in the impairment of our oil and natural gas interests.


Drilling new wells could result in new liabilities, which could endanger our interests in our properties and assets.


There are risks associated with the drilling of oil and natural gas wells, including encountering unexpected formations or pressures, premature declines of reservoirs, blow-outs, craterings, sour gas releases, fires, and spills, among others.  The occurrence of any of these events could significantly reduce our revenues or cause substantial losses, impairing our future operating results.  We may become subject to liability for pollution, blow-outs, or other hazards.  We intend to evaluate the possible need and ability to obtain insurance with respect to these hazards; however, such insurance might be unavailable, too costly of difficult to secure, or have limitations on liability that may not be sufficient to cover the full extent of such liabilities.  The payment of such liabilities could reduce the funds available to us or could, in an extreme case, result in a total loss of our properties and assets.  Moreover, we may not be able to maintain adequate insurance in the future at rates that are considered reasonable.  Oil and natural gas production operations are also subject to all the risks typically associated with such operations, including premature decline of reservoirs and the invasion of water into producing formations.


Environmental risks may adversely affect our business.


All phases of the oil and gas business present environmental risks and hazards and are subject to environmental regulation pursuant to a variety of federal, state and municipal laws and regulations.  Environmental legislation provides for, among other things, restrictions and prohibitions on spills, releases or emissions of various substances produced in association with oil and gas operations.  The legislation also requires that wells and facility sites be operated, maintained, abandoned and reclaimed to the satisfaction of applicable regulatory authorities.  Compliance with such legislation can require significant expenditures and a breach may result in the imposition of fines and penalties, some of which may be material.  Environmental legislation is evolving in a manner we expect may result in stricter standards and enforcement, larger fines and liability and potentially increased capital expenditures and operating costs.  The discharge of oil, natural gas, or other pollutants into the air, soil or water may give rise to liabilities to governments and third parties and may require us to incur costs to remedy such discharge.



- 9 -





 

The application of environmental laws to our business may cause us to curtail our production or increase the costs of our production, development or exploration activities.


Our business will suffer if we cannot obtain or maintain necessary licenses.


The Holms Property Lessees’ proposed exploration and drilling operations on the Holms property will require licenses, permits, bonds, and in some cases renewals of licenses and permits from various governmental authorities.  The Holms Property Lessees’ ability to obtain, sustain, or renew such licenses and permits on acceptable terms is subject to change in regulations and policies and to the discretion of the applicable governments, among other factors.  The Holms Property Lessees’ inability to obtain, or our loss of or denial of extension of, any of these licenses or permits could hamper our ability to produce revenues from our operations.


Our Lessee will rely on technology to conduct its business and its technology could become ineffective or obsolete.


The Holms Property Lessees will rely on exploration technology, including geographic and seismic analysis techniques and economic models, to develop reserve estimates and to guide exploration, development and production activities on our acreage.  The Holms Property Lessees will be required to continually enhance and update its technology to maintain its efficacy and to avoid obsolescence.  The costs of doing so may be substantial, and may be higher than the costs anticipate by the Holms Property Lessees for technology maintenance and development.  If the Holms Property Lessees is unable to maintain the efficacy of their technology, their ability to manage their business and to compete may be impaired.  Further, even if we are able to maintain technical effectiveness, the technology utilized by the Holms Property Lessees may not be the most efficient means of reaching their objectives, in which case we, as Lessors, may incur lower production royalty income.  


Risk Relating to the Ownership of Bakken Resources, Inc. Common Stock


Risks Relating to Low Priced Stocks


Although our Common Stock is approved for trading on the OTC Bulletin Board, there has only been little, if any, trading activity in the stock.  Accordingly, there is no history on which to estimate the future trading price range of the Common Stock.  If the Common Stock trades below $5.00 per share, trading in the Common Stock will be subject to the requirements of certain rules promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), which require additional disclosure by broker-dealers in connection with any trades involving a stock defined as a penny stock (generally, any non-FINRA equity security that has a market price share of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions).  Such rules require the delivery, prior to any penny stock transaction, of a disclosure schedule explaining the penny stock market and the risks associated therewith and impose various sales practice requirements on broker-dealers who sell penny stocks to persons other than established customers and accredited investors (generally defined as an investor with a net worth in excess of $1,000,000 or annual income exceeding $200,000 individually or $300,000 together with a spouse).  For these types of transactions, the broker-dealer must make a special suitability determination for the purchaser and have received the purchaser’s written consent to the transaction prior to the sale.  The broker-dealer also must disclose the commissions payable to the broker-dealer, current bid and offer quotations for the penny stock and, if the broker-dealer is the sole market-maker, the broker-dealer must disclose this fact and the broker-dealer’s presumed control over the market.  Such information must be provided to the customer orally or in writing before or with the written confirmation of trade sent to the customer.  Monthly statements must be sent disclosing recent price information for the penny stock held in the account and information on the limited market in penny stocks.  The additional burdens imposed upon broker-dealers by such requirements could discourage broker-dealers from effecting transactions in the Common Stock which could severely limit the market liquidity of the Common Stock and the ability of holders of the Common Stock to sell it.

Because we were a “shell company”, investors in our company will not be able to utilize Rule 144 to sell their shares until at least one year after we cease to be a shell company, but will have to rely on our maintaining an effective registration statement to allow for resale of their shares.

The Shares issued to investors in BRI cannot be sold pursuant to Rule 144 promulgated under the Securities Act until one year after BRI ceases to be a shell company.  In general, under Rule 144 as currently in effect, a person (or persons whose shares are aggregated) who has beneficially owned restricted securities shares for at least six months, including persons who may be deemed “affiliates” of BRI, as that term is defined under the Securities Act, would be entitled to sell within any three month period a number of shares that does not exceed the greater of 1% of the then outstanding shares or the average weekly trading volume of shares during the four calendar weeks preceding such sale.  Sales under Rule 144 are also subject to certain manner-of-sale provisions, notice requirements and the availability of current public information about BRI.  A person who has not been an affiliate of BRI at any time during the three months preceding a sale, and who has beneficially owned his shares for at least one year, would be entitled under Rule 144 to sell such shares without regard to any volume limitations under Rule 144.



- 10 -






Bakken Resources, Inc. was a shell company prior to completing the oil and gas asset acquisition described herein and has removed its status as a shell company by filing a periodic report on Form 8-K on December 2, 2010, and therefore its shareholders may not currently utilize Rule 144 to sell their shares.  Rule 144 is not available for sales of shares of companies that are or have been “shell companies” except under certain conditions.  Shareholders are able to utilize Rule 144 one year after removing its status as as shell company, assuming it files the documents it is required to file as a reporting company.  Investors in BRI whose shares have been registered in an effective and current registration statement will be able to sell their shares pursuant to said registration statement.  They will not be able to rely on Rule 144 to sell their shares during the one year period after removing the status as a shell company if the registration statement’s effectiveness is not maintained on a temporary or permanent basis.

Limitation on Liability of Directors and Officers


Our Articles of Incorporation includes provisions to eliminate, to the fullest extent permitted by Nevada General Corporation Law as in effect from time to time, the personal liability of directors of BRI for monetary damages arising from a breach of their fiduciary duties as directors.  The Articles of Incorporation also includes provisions to the effect that we shall, to the maximum extent permitted from time to time under the law of the State of Nevada, indemnify any director or officer.  In addition, our bylaws require us to indemnify, to the fullest extent permitted by law, any director, officer, employee or agent of BRI for acts which such person reasonably believes are not in violation of our corporate purposes as set forth in the Articles of Incorporation.

Potential Issuance of Additional Common and Preferred Stock


We are authorized to issue up to 100,000,000 shares of Common Stock.  To the extent of such authorization, the board of directors of BRI will have the ability, without seeking stockholder approval, to issue additional shares of Common Stock in the future for such consideration as the board of directors may consider sufficient.  The issuance of additional Common Stock in the future will reduce the proportionate ownership and voting power of the Common Stock offered hereby.  We are also authorized to issue up to 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, the rights and preferences of which may be designated in series by the board of directors.  To the extent of such authorization, such designations may be made without stockholder approval.  The designation and issuance of series of preferred stock in the future would create additional securities which would have dividend and liquidation preferences over the currently outstanding Common Stock.  In addition, the ability to issue any future class or series of preferred stock could impede a non-negotiated change in control and thereby prevent stockholders from obtaining a premium for their Common Stock.  See “Description of Registrant’s Securities to be Registered.”


Currently Not Approved for Trading on the DTC System


The Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation, through its subsidiary DTC, provides electronic clearing, transfer, settlement and information services for Pink Sheet and over-the-counter stocks.  As of this date, we have not been approved for electronic trading using the DTC system.  We will make application for electronic trading as soon as possible.


No Assurance of a Liquid Public Market for Securities


Although our shares of Common Stock are currently eligible for quotation on the OTC Bulletin Board and the Pink Sheets, there has been no significant market in such stock.  There has been no long term established public trading market for the Common Stock hereto, and there can be no assurance that a regular and established market will be developed and maintained for the securities in the future.  There can also be no assurance as to the depth or liquidity of any market for the Common Stock or the prices at which holders may be able to sell the shares.


Volatility of Stock Prices


In the event that a public market for our Common Stock is created, market prices for the Common Stock will be influenced by many factors and will be subject to significant fluctuations in response to variations in operating results of BRI and other factors such as investor perceptions of BRI, supply and demand, interest rates, general economic conditions and those specific to the industry, developments with regard to BRI’s activities, future financial condition and management.


The market price of our common stock is, and is likely to continue to be, highly volatile and subject to wide fluctuations


The market price of our common stock is likely to continue to be highly volatile and could be subject to wide fluctuations in response to a number of factors, some of which are beyond our control, including:


  

dilution caused by our issuance of additional shares of common stock and other forms of equity securities, which we expect to make in connection with future capital financings to fund our operations and growth, to attract and retain valuable personnel and in connection with future strategic partnerships with other companies;



- 11 -





 

  

announcements of new acquisitions, reserve discoveries or other business initiatives by our competitors;

  

our ability to take advantage of new acquisitions, reserve discoveries or other business initiatives;

  

fluctuations in revenue from our oil and gas business as new reserves come to market;

  

changes in the market for oil and natural gas commodities and/or in the capital markets generally;

  

changes in the demand for oil and natural gas, including changes resulting from the introduction or expansion of alternative fuels;

  

quarterly variations in our revenues and operating expenses;

  

changes in the valuation of similarly situated companies, both in our industry and in other industries;

  

changes in analysts estimates affecting our company, our competitors and/or our industry;

  

changes in the accounting methods used in or otherwise affecting our industry;

  

additions and departures of key personnel;

  

announcements of technological innovations or new products available to the oil and gas industry;

  

announcements by relevant governments pertaining to incentives for alternative energy development programs;

  

fluctuations in interest rates and the availability of capital in the capital markets; and

  

significant sales of our common stock, including sales by selling stockholders following the registration of shares under a prospectus.


These and other factors are largely beyond our control, and the impact of these risks, singly or in the aggregate, may result in material adverse changes to the market price of our common stock and/or our results of operations and financial condition.


Our operating results may fluctuate significantly, and these fluctuations may cause the price of our common stock to decline.


Our operating results will likely vary in the future primarily as the result of fluctuations in of our production royalty, assuming commercial oil and gas is discovered on the Holms property.  Our revenues and operating expenses, expenses that we incur regarding investments in participation of drilling programs with other partners, the prices of oil and natural gas in the commodities markets and other factors.  If our results of operations do not meet the expectations of current or potential investors, the price of our common stock may decline.


Stockholders will experience dilution upon the exercise of options.


On June 10, 2008, our Board of Directors also adopted the 2008 Equity Incentive Plan, pursuant to which we may issue up to 1,000,000 shares of our common stock either upon exercise of stock options granted under such plan or through restricted stock awards under such plan.  If the holders of outstanding options exercise those options or our Compensation Committee determines to grant restricted stock awards under our incentive plan, stockholders may experience dilution in the net tangible book value of our common stock.  Further, the sale or availability for sale of the underlying shares in the marketplace could depress our stock price.  On June 16, 2010, the Board authorized an increase to the number of shares that could be issued pursuant to the 2008 Equity Incentive Plan from 1,000,000 to 5,000,000 shares of common stock subject to majority shareholder consent, which was given on November 12, 2010.


We do not expect to pay dividends in the foreseeable future.


We do not intend to declare dividends for the foreseeable future, as we anticipate that we will reinvest any future earnings in the development and growth of our business.  Therefore, investors will not receive any funds unless they sell their common stock, and stockholders may be unable to sell their shares on favorable terms or at all.  Investors cannot be assured of a positive return on investment or that they will not lose the entire amount of their investment in our common stock and warrants.


Risks Related To Our Industry


Estimates of oil and natural gas reserves that we make may be inaccurate and our actual revenues may be lower than our financial projections.


In the event commercial wells are drilled on our property, of which there is no assurance, we will make estimates of oil and natural gas reserves, upon which we will base our financial projections. We will make these reserve estimates using various assumptions, including assumptions as to oil and natural gas prices, drilling and operating expenses, capital expenditures, taxes and availability of funds. Some of these assumptions are inherently subjective, and the accuracy of our reserve estimates relies in part on the ability of our management team, engineers, outside consultants and other advisors to make accurate assumptions. Economic factors beyond our control, such as interest rates, will also impact the value of our reserves. The process of estimating oil and natural gas reserves is complex, and will require us to use significant decisions and assumptions in the evaluation of available geological, geophysical, engineering and economic data for each property. As a result, our reserve estimates will be inherently imprecise. Actual future production, oil and natural gas prices, revenues, taxes, development expenditures, operating expenses and quantities of



- 12 -






recoverable oil and natural gas reserves may vary substantially from those we estimate. If actual production results vary substantially from our reserve estimates, this could materially reduce our revenues and result in the impairment of our oil and natural gas interests.


Our inability to obtain necessary facilities could hamper our operations.


Oil and gas exploration and development activities are dependent on the availability of drilling and related equipment, transportation, power and technical support in the particular areas where these activities will be conducted, and our access to these facilities by the Lessee of our property may be limited. To the extent that our Lessee conducts activities on our property which may be considered in a remote area, needed facilities may not be proximate to our operations, which will increase expenses. Demand for such limited equipment and other facilities or access restrictions may affect the availability of such equipment to our Lessees and may delay exploration and development activities on our property. The quality and reliability of necessary facilities may also be unpredictable and we may be required to make efforts to standardize our facilities, which may entail unanticipated costs and delays. Shortages and/or the unavailability of necessary equipment or other facilities will impair our Lessee’s activities, either by delaying our activities, increasing our costs or otherwise.


We may have difficulty distributing our production, which could harm our financial condition.


In order to sell the oil and natural gas that our Lessees may be able to produce, they will have to make arrangements for storage and distribution to the market. They will rely on local infrastructure and the availability of transportation for storage and shipment of our products, but infrastructure development and storage and transportation facilities may be insufficient for our needs at commercially acceptable terms in the immediate area of our leases.  This could be particularly problematic to the extent that our operations are conducted in remote areas that are difficult to access, such as areas that are distant from shipping and/or pipeline facilities. These factors may affect our Lessees’ ability to explore and develop our property and to store and transport oil and natural gas production and may increase expenses.


Furthermore, weather conditions or natural disasters, actions by companies doing business in one or more of the areas where our property is located.  Labor disputes may impair the distribution of oil and/or natural gas and in turn diminish our financial condition or ability to generate royalty income, if commercial wells are drilled and completed on our property, of which there is no assurance.


Increases in our operating expenses will impact our operating results and financial condition.


Exploration, development, production, marketing (including distribution costs) and regulatory compliance costs (including taxes) will substantially impact the net revenues we derive from the oil and natural gas that may be produce on our property. These costs are subject to fluctuations and variation in different locales in which we will operate, and we may not be able to predict or control these costs. If these costs exceed our expectations, this may adversely affect our results of operations.


Our insurance may be inadequate to cover liabilities we may incur.


Our Lessees’ involvement in the exploration for and development of oil and gas properties may result in them becoming subject to liability for pollution, blow-outs, property damage, personal injury or other hazards.  Although we expect to obtain general business insurance in accordance with industry standards to address such risks, such insurance has limitations on liability that may not be sufficient to cover the full extent of such liabilities.  In addition, such risks may not, in all circumstances, be insurable or, in certain circumstances, we may choose not to obtain insurance to protect against specific risks due to the high premiums associated with such insurance or for other reasons. The payment of such uninsured liabilities would reduce the funds available to us. If we suffer a significant event or occurrence that is not fully insured, or if the insurer of such event is not solvent, we could be required to divert funds from capital investment or other uses towards covering our liability for such events.


Challenges to our properties may impact our financial condition.


Title to oil and gas interests is often not capable of conclusive determination without incurring substantial expense. While we intend to make appropriate inquiries into the title of properties and other development rights we acquire, title defects may exist. In addition, we may be unable to obtain adequate insurance for title defects, on a commercially reasonable basis or at all. If title defects do exist, it is possible that we may lose all or a portion of our right, title and interests in and to the properties to which the title defects relate.


If our property rights are reduced, our Lessees’ ability to conduct our exploration, development and production activities may be impaired.




- 13 -






ITEM 4.  USE OF PROCEEDS

The shares of common stock offered by this prospectus are being registered for the account of the selling stockholders named in this prospectus. As a result, all proceeds from the sales of the common stock will go to the selling stockholders and we will not receive any proceeds from the resale of the common stock by the selling stockholders.  We will, however, incur all costs associated with this registration statement and prospectus.  Our company estimates the total costs that will be incurred by our company in connection with the registration statement and prospectus will be approximately $20,000.


ITEM 5.  DETERMINATION OF OFFERING PRICE

Our shares of common stock are quoted on the OTCBB and the common stock may be offered from time to time by the selling stockholders through ordinary brokerage transactions in the over-the-counter markets, in negotiated private transactions or otherwise, at market prices prevailing at the time of sale or at negotiated prices and in other ways as described in the “Plan of Distribution.” The offering price of $0.25 per share has been determined arbitrarily and does not have any relationship to any established criteria of value, such as book value or earning per share.  Additionally, because we have no significant operating history and have not generated any material revenue to date, the price of the common stock is not based on past earnings, nor is the price of the common stock indicative of the current market value of the assets owned by us.  No valuation or appraisal has been prepared for our business and potential business expansion.


ITEM 6.  DILUTION


The common stock to be sold by the selling stockholders is 5,557,500 shares of common stock that are currently issued and outstanding.  Accordingly, there will be no dilution to our existing stockholders.


ITEM 7.  SELLING SECURITY HOLDERS


This prospectus covers the offer and sale by the selling security holders of up to 5,557,500 shares of our common stock out of the currently outstanding 52,477,500 shares.  Except as listed below, none of the selling security holders had a material relationship with us within the past three years.


The table below sets forth information concerning the resale of the shares of common stock by the selling security holders. We will not receive any proceeds from the resale of common stock selling security holders. The number and percentage of shares beneficially owned is determined in accordance with Rule 13d-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information is not necessarily indicative of beneficial ownership for any other purpose.  Under such rule, beneficial ownership includes any shares as to which the selling security holder has sole or shared voting power or investment power and also any shares the selling security holder has the right to acquire within 60 days.



- 14 -





 

Selling Security Holder (1)

Shares Owned (Number

and Percentage) Before Offering (2)

Shares to
register

Shares Owned (Number and Percentage) After Offering (3)

Janelle Edington (4)

1,500,000

2.9

%

1,500,000

%

Christopher Wetzel(5)

375,000

0.7

%

375,000

%

Raymond Kuh (6)

375,000

0.7

%

375,000

%

Manuel P. Graiwer

300,000

0.6

%

300,000

%

Marisa Graiwer

300,000

0.6

%

300,000

%

Stuart Graiwer

300,000

0.6

%

300,000

%

Annette Marie Perini

300,000

0.6

%

300,000

%

Deana Ruggieri

300,000

0.6

%

300,000

%

Sherry Edington (7)

300,000

0.6

%

300,000

%

Jerod Edington (8)

300,000

0.6

%

300,000

%

Timothy Kuh (9)

300,000

0.6

%

300,000

%

McKinley Romero

150,000

0.3

%

150,000

%

Tracie Wetzel (10)

150,000

0.3

%

150,000

%

Scott B. Kubiszewski

15,000

0.03

%

15,000

%

Rita Berger

15,000

0.03

%

15,000

%

Manuel Andrew Lujan III

15,000

0.03

%

15,000

%

Sam Yousefian

15,000

0.03

%

15,000

%

Chris Cohn

15,000

0.03

%

15,000

%

Robert E. Andrews

15,000

0.03

%

15,000

%

Dylan Christenson Conroy

15,000

0.03

%

15,000

%

Steven D. Meyer

15,000

0.03

%

15,000

%

Shannon & Rob Rand

15,000

0.03

%

15,000

%

Kathy Phillips

15,000

0.03

%

15,000

%

Hispanic TV Resources, Inc. Inc.

30,000

0.03

%

30,000

%

Buenpaso Prods., Inc.

30,000

0.03

%

30,000

%

Franco Prods., Inc.

30,000

0.03

%

30,000

%

Franco Enterprises, Inc.

30,000

0.03

%

30,000

%

Kenneth Graiwer

30,000

0.03

%

30,000

%

Alyson Graiwer

30,000

0.03

%

30,000

%

Cain Van de Water

15,000

0.03

%

15,000

%

Anthony Dedmond

15,000

0.03

%

15,000

%

Sarah Anderson

15,000

0.03

%

15,000

%

Susan Troyer

15,000

0.03

%

15,000

%

Sherry Proctor

15,000

0.03

%

15,000

%

Thomas Walsh

22,500

0.03

%

22,500

%

Edward Zimmerman III

15,000

0.03

%

15,000

%

Frank Cholaj

22,500

0.03

%

22,500

%

David J. McIver

22,500

0.03

%

22,500

%

Jennifer Edington (11)

15,000

0.03

%

15,000

%

Tammy Curley

15,000

0.03

%

15,000

%

Kyle Carlson

15,000

0.03

%

15,000

%

Nicholas Evald Torokvei

15,000

0.03

%

15,000

%

Amy Pandya Jones

15,000

0.03

%

15,000

%

Kyle R. Drexel

15,000

0.03

%

15,000

%

Ramsina Lazar Soccoccio

15,000

0.03

%

15,000

%

Elizabeth Durand

15,000

0.03

%

15,000

%

Totals

5,557,500

10.6

%

5,557,500

%


(1)

Other than the founders and former officers and directors of BRI, Janelle Edington, Chris Wetzel and Raymond Kuh who were issued their shares at $0.00033 per share on June 10, 2008, the respective selling security holders acquired their respective shares by way of private placement pursuant to subscription agreements that were entered into between our company and the respective selling stockholders between September 2, 2008, and October 2, 2008. We issued an aggregate of 3,307,500 common shares to those selling security holders at an offering price of $0.033 per share for gross offering proceeds of $110,250.  



- 15 -






 

 

 

(2)

As required by SEC rules, the number of shares in the table includes shares which can be purchased within 60 days, or, shares with respect to which a person may obtain voting power or investment power within 60 days.

 

 

(3)

These amounts are estimates. Assumes all of the shares of common stock offered are sold.  Based on 52,477,500 common shares issued and outstanding on December 29, 2010.

 

 

(4)

Janelle Edington is the former President and Chief Executive Officer of BRI and former member of the board of directors.

 

 

(5)

Christopher Wetzel is a former Vice President of BRI and a former member of the board of directors.

 

 

(6)

Raymond Kuh is the former Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary of BRI and is a former member of the board of directors.

 

 

(7)

Sherry Edington is the mother of Janelle Edington, former CEO , President, and Director

 

 

(8)

Jerod Edington is a brother of Janelle Edington, former CEO , President, and Director

 

 

(9)

Timothy Kuh is a brother of Raymond Kuh, former CFO , Treasurer, Secretary, and Director

 

 

(10)

Tracie Wetzel is the sister-in-Law of Christopher Wetzel, former Vice President and Director

 

 

(11)

Jennifer Edington is the sister-in-law of Janelle Edington, former CEO , President, and Director

We may require the selling security holder to suspend the sales of the securities offered by this prospectus upon the occurrence of any event that makes any statement in this prospectus or the related registration statement untrue in any material respect or that requires the changing of statements in these documents in order to make statements in those documents not misleading.


ITEM 8.  PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION


The selling stockholders may, from time to time, sell all or a portion of the shares of common stock on any market upon which the common stock may be quoted, in privately negotiated transactions or otherwise.  BRI’s common stock was listed on the OTC Bulletin Board of the National Association of Securities Dealers (“NASD”) on July 29, 2009, under the symbol “MLTX” and that symbol changed to “BKKN” on December 17, 2010.  There is currently no established “public market” for shares of our common stock.  No assurance can be given that any market for our common stock will develop or be maintained.  Our shares of common stock are quoted on the OTCBB and the common stock may be offered from time to time by the selling stockholders through ordinary brokerage transactions in the over-the-counter markets, in negotiated private transactions or otherwise, at market prices prevailing at the time of sale or at negotiated prices and in other ways as described in the “Plan of Distribution.”.  Our company, however, cannot provide our investors with any assurance that our common stock will be traded indefinitely on the OTC Bulletin Board or on any other exchange. The shares of common stock may be sold by the selling stockholders by one or more of the following methods, without limitation:


 

1.

block trades in which the broker or dealer so engaged will attempt to sell the shares of common stock as agent but may position and resell a portion of the block as principal to facilitate the transaction;

 

 

 

 

2.

purchases by broker or dealer as principal and resale by the broker or dealer for its account pursuant to this prospectus;

 

 

 

 

3.

an exchange distribution in accordance with the rules of the exchange or quotation system;

 

 

 

 

4.

ordinary brokerage transactions and transactions in which the broker solicits purchasers;

 

 

 

 

5.

privately negotiated transactions; and

 

 

 

 

6.

a combination of any aforementioned methods of sale.

The shares may also be sold in compliance with the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Rule 144.



- 16 -




 

In the event of the transfer by any selling stockholder of his or her shares to any pledgee, donee or other transferee, we will amend this prospectus and the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part by the filing of a post-effective amendment in order to have the pledgee, donee or other transferee in place of the selling stockholder who has transferred his or her shares.

In effecting sales, brokers and dealers engaged by the selling stockholders may arrange for other brokers or dealers to participate. Brokers or dealers may receive commissions or discounts from the selling stockholders or, if any of the broker-dealers act as an agent for the purchaser of such shares, from the purchaser in amounts to be negotiated which are not expected to exceed those customary in the types of transactions involved. Broker-dealers may agree with the selling stockholders to sell a specified number of the shares of common stock at a stipulated price per share. Such an agreement may also require the broker-dealer to purchase as principal any unsold shares of common stock at the price required to fulfill the broker-dealer commitment to the selling stockholders if such broker-dealer is unable to sell the shares on behalf of the selling stockholders. Broker-dealers who acquire shares of common stock as principal may thereafter resell the shares of common stock from time to time in transactions which may involve block transactions and sales to and through other broker-dealers, including transactions of the nature described above. Such sales by a broker-dealer could be at prices and on terms then prevailing at the time of sale, at prices related to the then-current market price or in negotiated transactions. In connection with such resales, the broker-dealer may pay to or receive from the purchasers of the shares, commissions as described above.

The selling stockholders and any broker-dealers or agents that participate with the selling stockholders in the sale of the shares of common stock may be deemed to be “underwriters” within the meaning of the Securities Act of 1933 in connection with these sales.  The selling stockholders who are affiliates of BRI shall be deemed “underwriters” within the meaning of the Securities Act of 1933 in connection with these sales.  In that event, any commissions received by the broker-dealers or agents and any profit on the resale of the shares of common stock purchased by them may be deemed to be underwriting commissions or discounts under the Securities Act of 1933 .

From time to time, the selling stockholders may pledge their shares of common stock pursuant to the margin provisions of their customer agreements with their brokers. Upon a default by a selling stockholder, the broker may offer and sell the pledged shares of common stock from time to time. Upon a sale of the shares of common stock, the selling stockholders intend to comply with the prospectus delivery requirements, under the Securities Act of 1933, by delivering a prospectus to each purchaser in the transaction. We intend to file any amendments or other necessary documents in compliance with the Securities Act of 1933 which may be required in the event any selling stockholder defaults under any customer agreement with brokers.

To the extent required under the Securities Act of 1933 , a post effective amendment to this registration statement will be filed, disclosing, the name of any broker-dealers, the number of shares of common stock involved, the price at which the common stock is to be sold, the commissions paid or discounts or concessions allowed to such broker-dealers, where applicable, that such broker-dealers did not conduct any investigation to verify the information set out in this prospectus and other facts material to the transaction. In addition, a post-effective amendment to this Registration Statement will be filed to include any additional or changed material information with respect to the plan of distribution not previously disclosed herein.

We and the selling stockholders will be subject to applicable provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the rules and regulations under it, including, without limitation, Rule 10b-5 and, insofar as the selling stockholders are distribution participants and we, under certain circumstances, may be a distribution participant, under Regulation M.

The anti-manipulation provisions of Regulation M under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 will apply to purchases and sales of shares of common stock by the selling stockholders, and there are restrictions on market-making activities by persons engaged in the distribution of the shares. Under Regulation M, a selling stockholder or its agents may not bid for, purchase, or attempt to induce any person to bid for or purchase, shares of our common stock while they are distributing shares covered by this prospectus. Accordingly, the selling stockholder is not permitted to cover short sales by purchasing shares while the distribution is taking place. We will advise the selling stockholders that if a particular offer of common stock is to be made on terms materially different from the information set forth in this Plan of Distribution, then a post-effective amendment to the accompanying registration statement must be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. All of the foregoing may affect the marketability of the common stock.

All expenses of the registration statement and prospectus including, but not limited to, legal, accounting, printing and mailing fees are and will be borne by us. Any commissions, discounts or other fees payable to brokers or dealers in connection with any sale of the shares of common stock will be borne by the selling stockholders, the purchasers participating in such transaction, or both.


Sales Pursuant to Rule 144


Any shares of common stock covered by this prospectus, which qualify for sale pursuant to Rule 144 under the Securities Act, as amended, may be sold under Rule 144 rather than pursuant to this prospectus.




- 17 -






Regulation M


We plan to advise the selling shareholders that the anti-manipulation rules of Regulation M under the Exchange Act may apply to sales of shares in the market and to the activities of the selling security holders and their affiliates.  Regulation M under the Exchange Act prohibits, with certain exceptions, participants in a distribution from bidding for, or purchasing for an account in which the participant has a beneficial interest, any of the securities that are the subject of the distribution.  Accordingly, the selling shareholders are not permitted to cover short sales by purchasing shares while the distribution it taking place.  Regulation M also governs bids and purchases made in order to stabilize the price of a security in connection with a distribution of the security. In addition, we will make copies of this prospectus available to the selling security holder for the purpose of satisfying the prospectus delivery requirements of the Securities Act.


State Securities Laws


Under the securities laws of some states, the shares may be sold in such states only through registered or licensed brokers or dealers.  In addition, in some states the common shares may not be sold unless the shares have been registered or qualified for sale in the state or an exemption from registration or qualification is available and is complied with.  The resale shares will be sold only through registered or licensed brokers or dealers if required under applicable state securities laws. In addition, in certain states, the resale shares may not be sold unless they have been registered or qualified for sale in the applicable state or an exemption from the registration or qualification requirement is available and is complied with.


Expenses of Registration


We are bearing substantially all costs relating to the registration of the shares of common stock offered hereby.  These expenses are estimated to be $20,000, including, but not limited to, legal, accounting, printing and mailing fees. The selling shareholders, however, will pay any commissions or other fees payable to brokers or dealers in connection with any sale of such shares common stock.


ITEM 9.  DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES TO BE REGISTERED


We are authorized to issue 100,000,000 shares of common stock and 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock with a par value of $0.001.  Currently there are 5,557,500 shares of common stock, par value $0.001 being registered of the 52,477,500 total outstanding, and no shares of preferred stock outstanding.  BRI affected a three-for-one forward stock split on June 10, 2010.


Each stockholder is entitled to receive the dividends as may be declared by our board of directors out of funds legally available for dividends and, in the event of liquidation, to share pro rata in any distribution of our assets after payment of liabilities. Our board of directors is not obligated to declare a dividend.  Any future dividends will be subject to the discretion of our board of directors and will depend upon, among other things, future earnings, the operating and financial condition of our company, its capital requirements, general business conditions and other pertinent factors. It is not anticipated that dividends will be paid in the foreseeable future.


There are no provisions in our Articles of Incorporation or our By-laws that would delay, defer or prevent a change in control of our company.


The following statements do not purport to be complete and are qualified in their entirety by reference to the detailed provisions of BRI’s Articles of Incorporation and bylaws, copies of which will be furnished to prospective investors upon written request.


Common Stock


Our articles of incorporation authorize the issuance of 100,000,000 shares of common stock, $0.001 par value per share, of which 52,477,500 shares were outstanding as of December 13, 2010.  We are authorized to issue 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, $0.001 par value per share.  Each share of Common Stock is entitled to one vote with respect to the election of any director or any other matter upon which stockholders are required or permitted to vote.  Holders of common stock have no cumulative voting rights.  Holders of shares of common stock are entitled to share ratably in dividends, if any, as may be declared, from time to time by the board of directors in its discretion, from funds legally available to be distributed.  In the event of a liquidation, dissolution, or winding up of BRI, the holders of shares of common stock are entitled to share pro rata all assets remaining after payment in full of all liabilities.  Holders of common stock have no preemptive rights to purchase our common stock.  There are no conversion rights or redemption or sinking fund provisions with respect to the common stock.  All of the outstanding shares of common stock are validly issued, fully paid and non-assessable.



- 18 -




 


Preferred Stock


We are authorized to issue up to 10,000,000 shares of $0.01 par value Preferred Stock, of which no shares are currently issued or outstanding.  Under our Articles of Incorporation, the board of directors will have the power, without further action by the holders of the Common Stock, to designate the relative rights and preferences of the preferred stock, and to issue the preferred stock in one or more series as designated by the board of directors.  The designation of rights and preferences could include preferences as to liquidation, redemption and conversion rights, voting rights, dividends or other preferences, any of which may be dilutive of the interest of the holders of the Common Stock or the preferred stock of any other series.  The issuance of preferred stock may have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in control of BRI without further stockholder action and may adversely affect the rights and powers, including voting rights, of the holders of Common Stock.  In certain circumstances, the issuance of preferred stock could depress the market price of our Common Stock.  The board of directors effects a designation of each series of preferred stock by filing with the Nevada Secretary of State a Certificate of Designation defining the rights and preferences of each such series.  Documents so filed are matters of public record and may be examined in accordance with procedures of the Nevada Secretary of State, or copies thereof may be obtained from BRI.


Warrants


As of December 29, 2010, there were warrants outstanding to purchase 3,780,000 shares of our common stock; 1) 300,000 at an exercise price of $.033 per share may be exercised any time prior to their expiration on June 11, 2011; 2) 70,000 at a price of $.50 per share may be exercised any time prior to their expiration on November 1, 2013, but callable at $0.01 per share at any time after November 1, 2011 if the underlying shares are registered and the common stock trades for 20 consecutive trading days at an average closing sales price of $.75 or more; 3) 320,000 at an exercise price of $.25 per share that may be exercised any time prior to their expiration on November 26, 2013; 4) 3,090,000 at an exercise price of $.50 per share that may be exercised any time prior to their expiration on November 26, 2013, but callable at $0.01 per share at any time after November 26, 2011 if the underlying shares are registered and the common stock trades for 20 consecutive trading days at an average closing sales price of $.75 or more.


Nevada Laws


The Nevada Business Corporation Law contains a provision governing “Acquisition of Controlling Interest.”  This law provides generally that any person or entity that acquires 20% or more of the outstanding voting shares of a publicly-held Nevada corporation in the secondary public or private market may be denied voting rights with respect to the acquired shares, unless a majority of the disinterested stockholders of the corporation elects to restore such voting rights in whole or in part.  The control share acquisition act provides that a person or entity acquires “control shares” whenever it acquires shares that, but for the operation of the control share acquisition act, would bring its voting power within any of the following three ranges:


 

1.

20 to 33 1/3%,

 

2.

33 1/3 to 50%, or

 

3.

more than 50%.


A “control share acquisition” is generally defined as the direct or indirect acquisition of either ownership or voting power associated with issued and outstanding control shares.  The stockholders or board of directors of a corporation may elect to exempt the stock of the corporation from the provisions of the control share acquisition act through adoption of a provision to that effect in the articles of incorporation or bylaws of the corporation.  Our articles of incorporation and bylaws do not exempt our common stock from the control share acquisition act.


The control share acquisition act is applicable only to shares of “Issuing Corporations” as defined by the act.  An Issuing Corporation is a Nevada corporation, which;


 

1.

has 200 or more stockholders, with at least 100 of such stockholders being both stockholders of record and residents of Nevada; and

 

2.

does business in Nevada directly or through an affiliated corporation.


At this time, we do not have 100 stockholders of record resident of Nevada.  Therefore, the provisions of the control share acquisition act do not apply to acquisitions of our shares and will not until such time as these requirements have been met.  At such time as they may apply to us, the provisions of the control share acquisition act may discourage companies or persons interested in acquiring a significant interest in or control of BRI, regardless of whether such acquisition may be in the interest of our stockholders.




- 19 -






The Nevada “Combination with Interested Stockholders Statute” may also have an effect of delaying or making it more difficult to effect a change in control of BRI.   This statute prevents an “interested stockholder” and a resident domestic Nevada corporation from entering into a “combination,” unless certain conditions are met.  The statute defines “combination” to include any merger or consolidation with an “interested stockholder,” or any sale, lease, exchange, mortgage, pledge, transfer or other disposition, in one transaction or a series of transactions with an “interested stockholder” having;


 

1.

an aggregate market value equal to 5 percent or more of the aggregate market value of the assets of the corporation;

 

2.

an aggregate market value equal to 5 percent or more of the aggregate market value of all outstanding shares of the corporation; or

 

3.

representing 10 percent or more of the earning power or net income of the corporation.


An “interested stockholder” means the beneficial owner of 10 percent or more of the voting shares of a resident domestic corporation, or an affiliate or associate thereof.  A corporation affected by the statute may not engage in a “combination” within three years after the interested stockholder acquires its shares unless the combination or purchase is approved by the board of directors before the interested stockholder acquired such shares.  If approval is not obtained, then after the expiration of the three-year period, the business combination may be consummated with the approval of the board of directors or a majority of the voting power held by disinterested stockholders, or if the consideration to be paid by the interested stockholder is at least equal to the highest of;


 

1.

the highest price per share paid by the interested stockholder within the three years immediately preceding the date of the announcement of the combination or in the transaction in which he became an interested stockholder, whichever is higher;

 

2.

the market value per common share on the date of announcement of the combination or the date the interested stockholder acquired the shares, whichever is higher; or

 

3.

if higher for the holders of preferred stock, the highest liquidation value of the preferred stock.


ITEM 10.  INTERESTS OF NAMED EXPERTS AND COUNSEL

No expert or counsel named in this prospectus as having prepared or certified any part of this prospectus or having given an opinion upon the validity of the securities being registered or upon other legal matters in connection with the registration or offering of the common stock was employed on a contingency basis or had, or is to receive, in connection with the offering, a substantial interest, directly or indirectly, in the registrant or any of its parents or subsidiaries.  Nor was any such person connected with the registrant or any of its parents, subsidiaries as a promoter, managing or principal underwriter, voting trustee, director, officer or employee.


The financial statements of our company included in this registration statement have been audited by Li & Company, PC, to the extent and for the period set forth in their report appearing elsewhere in the registration statement and prospectus, and are included in reliance upon such report given upon the authority of said firm as experts in auditing and accounting.  Michael Espey, Esq., of 318 18th Ave. E. Seattle, WA 98112 is our independent legal counsel, has provided an opinion on the validity of the shares of our common stock that are the subject of this prospectus.


ITEM 11.  INFORMATION WITH RESPECT TO THE REGISTRANT


A.  BUSINESS OF BAKKEN RESOURCES, INC.


Our Company


Since our formation on June 6, 2008, under the laws of the State of Nevada, Bakken Resources, Inc. (“BRI”) (formerly “Multisys Language Solutions, Inc.”) was organized to distribute interactive multimedia language education software developed by Strokes International AG., an Austria based software company in the Great China Region including the People’s Republic of China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of PRC, Macao Special Administrative Region of PRC, and Taiwan pursuant to an exclusive Software Reseller Agreement (“Software Reseller Agreement”) via an independent third party software distribution company in the territory.  We funded our initial working capital needs through a private placement offering of common stock in September 2008 with gross proceeds of $109,250.


Since our inception to September 30, 2010, we have only generated approximately $7,692 of revenues from our distribution and sales business, while incurring a loss of approximately $140,842.  Because we were unable to develop our interactive multimedia language education business into a financially viable business, the board of directors decided to redirect our business and to acquire oil and gas rights via an option to purchase certain oil and gas rights from Holms Energy, LLC, (“Holms Energy”), a private Nevada company.  On June 11, 2010, BRI and Multisys Acquisition, Inc., (“Multisys Acquisition”) its wholly-owned Nevada subsidiary,



- 20 -






entered into that certain Option to Purchase Assets Agreement between Holms Energy and Multisys Acquisition, pursuant to which Holms Energy agreed to grant Multisys Acquisition an option to purchase certain oil and gas production royalty rights on land in North Dakota.  To exercise its rights under the Asset Purchase Agreement on November 26, 2010, BRI completed the minimum private placement contingency and BRI paid Holms Energy $100,000, issued forty million (40,000,000) shares of common stock to them, and granted them a 5% overriding royalty on all revenue generated from the gas and oil production royalty rights for ten years purchased from Holms Energy.


On November 26, 2010, we completed an initial closing of a private placement in the amount of $1,545,000 that issued 6,180,000 shares at $0.25 per share and 3,090,000 three-year warrants exercisable for 3,090,000 shares at $.50 per share, callable at $0.01 per share at any time after November 26, 2011, if the underlying shares are registered, and the common stock trades for 20 consecutive trading days at an average closing sales price of $0.75 or more,.  We concurrently exercised the option with Holms Energy and executed an Asset Purchase Agreement by and between BRI, Holms Energy, and Multisys Acquisition in order to acquire certain interests in mineral rights and assets from Holms Energy.  Upon entering the acquisition of assets, the members of Holms Energy controlled approximately 76.2% of our 52,477,500 outstanding shares of common stock.  Concurrently with the acquisition closing with Holms Energy, we abandoned and are currently attempting to sell our prior business.  Effective December 10, 2010, our original name changed to Bakken Resources, Inc.


 On December 1, 2010, after the closing of the Asset Purchase Agreement transaction with Holms Energy, LLC, our board of directors elected the following persons, who were nominees of Holms Energy, as members of the board of directors of BRI: Val M. Holms, Kent L. Jensen, Karen S. Midtlyng, David E. Boleneus, and Frank H. Blair.  The biographical information concerning these elected directors is included in Item 11, Section “K” below.  Subsequently, also on December 1, 2010, the following officers and directors of BRI resigned their positions at BRI: Janelle Edington, Director, President and Chief Executive Officer; Raymond Kuh, Director, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer; Christopher Wetzel, Director and Vice President.  On December 1, 2010, the new board of directors appointed the following executive officers:  Val M. Holms, President and Chief Executive Officer; Kent L. Jensen, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer; and Karen S. Midtlyng, Secretary.  The biographical information concerning these appointed executive officers is included in Item 11, Section “K” below.


Effective December 27, 2010, Kent L. Jensen resigned as a Director, Treasurer, and Chief Financial Officer of Bakken Resources, Inc.  There were no disagreements between the resigning officer and director and any of our remaining officers or directors regarding the operations, policies, or practices of our company.  Effective December 27, 2010, two of our existing officers were appointed to new offices; Val M. Holms was appointed as interim Chief Financial Officer and Karen S. Midtlyng was appointed interim Treasurer by the Board of Directors until such time as the Board of Directors identifies a replacement for Mr. Jensen.  


The net proceeds of the recently completed private placement were primarily used to exercise the option to purchase Holms oil and gas rights, and the remaining funds will be used for working capital, payment of referral fees, to acquire mineral rights and interests in existing oil and gas leases from other third parties, to participate in joint venture drilling programs primarily in Eastern Montana, Western North and South Dakota, with primary interest in the Bakken Formation, and for other general corporate purposes of BRI.


We will focus on evolving into a growth-orientated, newly reorganized, early stage, independent energy company engaged in the acquisition, exploration, exploitation, and development of oil and natural gas properties; focusing our activities exclusively in the Williston Basin, a large sedimentary basin in eastern Montana, western North and South Dakota and southern Saskatchewan known for its rich deposits of petroleum and potash  Through the recent acquisition from Holms, BRI owns certain mineral rights underlying approximately 6,000 acres located approximately 8 miles southeast of Williston, ND.


Operations


We plan to structure our operations in such a way as to keep our capital expenditures and administrative expenses to a minimum.  Overhead and staff will be kept to a minimum and the majority of operational duties will be outsourced to consultants and independent contractors.  We currently have two full-time employees, and we expect to eventually hire one to three more employees, commensurate with the development of our business.  We believe that most operational responsibilities can be handled by the officers and directors, and through the working partnerships of other consultants.  Two of our officers will draw salaries in the future, Val M. Holms, our President and CEO, and Karen Midtlyng, our Secretary.  Our other officers and directors may be retained on an as needed basis and will be paid an hourly rate of to be determined by the Board and reimbursed any out of pocket expenses.


Our offices are located at: 1425 Birch Ave., Suite A, Helena, MT 59601.  Our phone number is (406) 442-9444.




- 21 -






ACQUISITION OF ASSETS


Asset Purchase Agreement


On June 11, 2010, Bakken Resources, Inc. (BRI), Multisys Acquisition, and Holms Energy, LLC entered into an Option to Purchase Assets Agreement, pursuant to which Holms Energy agreed to grant Multisys Acquisition an option to exercise an Asset Purchase Agreement to assign all right, title, and interest of specific Holms Energy owned assets to Multisys Acquisition, with Holms Energy members holding a controlling interest in BRI as a result of the exercise of the option.  The option was exercised on November 26, 2010 and the Asset Purchase Agreement was entered into on November 26, 2010 by paying the consideration to Holms Energy detailed in the Asset Purchase Agreement.  Under the Asset Purchase Agreement, Multisys Acquisition paid Holms Energy $100,000, issued Holms Energy 40,000,000 shares of restricted common stock, and granted to Holms Energy a 5% overriding royalty on all revenue generated from the Holms Property for ten years from the date of the acquisition closing.  With the issuance of the 40,000,000 shares to the Holms Energy members, they own a controlling interest in BRI.  Holms Energy disburses 40,000,000 shares to its members on a ratable ownership basis.


The Asset Purchase Agreement related to the acquisition of:  1) certain Holms energy mineral rights in oil and gas rights on approximately 6,000 gross acres and 1,600 net mineral acres of land located in McKenzie County, 8 miles southeast of Williston, North Dakota (the “Holms Property”); 2) potential production royalty income from wells to be drilled on the property whose mineral rights are owned by Holms Energy; and 3) the transfer of all right, title and interest to an Option to Purchase the Greenfield Mineral Rights entered into between Holms Energy and Rocky and Evenette Greenfield dated June 18, 2010 related to purchasing additional mineral rights and production royalty income on the Holms Property for One Million Six Hundred Forty Nine Thousand ($1,649,000) Dollars (the “Greenfield Option”) (altogether the (“Asset Acquisition’).  The Greenfield Option was subsequently exercised by Holms Energy on November 12, 2010, and those Greenfield Mineral Rights were acquired by Multisys Acquisition through the Asset Purchase Agreement with Holms Energy.  Holms Energy exercised the Greenfield option and executed the Asset Purchase Agreement on the Greenfield Mineral Rights on November 12, 2010 using $385,000 of a $485,000 one month non-interest bearing loan from BRI to complete the initial payment of $400,000, of which $15,000 was already paid by Holms Energy.  The collateral for the loan was the Greenfield Mineral Rights.  Under the terms of the loan from BRI to Holms Energy, Holms Energy, in conjunction with the entry into the Asset Purchase Agreement on November 26, 2010, assigned the Greenfield mineral rights to Multisys Acquisition in exchange for forgiveness of $385,000 of the loan.  The other $100,000 of the loan was to be applied to the Asset Purchase Agreement between BRI and Holms Energy, and on November 26, 2010, that $100,000 was applied to the Asset Purchase Agreement and the loan was forgiven.  After exercise of the option and executing the asset purchase agreement with Holms Energy, Multisys Acquisition will purchase the gas and oil production royalty rights of Rocky and Evenette Greenfield for an aggregate of $1,249,000 plus interest as follows:  installment payments in the amount of $120,000 per year plus interest at 5% per annum for 8 years and a balloon payment in the amount of $299,000.  


Securities issued to the members of Holms Energy are “restricted securities” that cannot be immediately publicly traded, whereas the registered shares of the publicly held company can be publicly tradable.  This liquidity difference is a distinct advantage to the pre-acquisition of stockholders of BRI over the Holms Energy stockholders.


Change of Control of Bakken Resources, Inc.


After the closing of the Asset Purchase Agreement on November 26, 2010 which involved, in part, the issuance of 40 million (40,000,000) shares of BRI common stock to Holms Energy, which will be broken down and subsequently transferred to the members of Holms Energy at their discretion.  The members of Holms Energy beneficially hold in aggregate approximately 76.2% of the outstanding shares of common stock of BRI after the issuance of 6,180,000 shares to investors in the BRI private placement offering completed with an initial closing on November 26, 2010.  The pre-private placement stockholders of BRI, who held 6,297,500 shares of common stock, experienced very substantial dilution as a result of the issuance of the shares by BRI to Holms Energy, and became minority shareholders in BRI.  After the closing of the transaction, based on an informal agreement in place, the current directors of BRI appointed the nominees designated by Holms Energy, LLC as members of the board of directors of BRI on December 1, 2010.  Subsequently, the current officers and directors of BRI resigned their positions at BRI, clearing the way for the appointment of new executive officers by the new board of directors of BRI.  Pursuant to the authorization from BRI stockholders for the amendment of the articles of incorporation of BRI at a special meeting of stockholders, BRI changed its corporate name from Multisys Language Solutions, Inc. on December 10, 2010 to reflect its new business focus.


Holms Assets


Holms Energy, LLC owned oil and gas rights equal to a 5.66% average landowner royalty interest related to the Holms Property, approximately 6,000 gross acres and 3,000 net mineral acres of land located in McKenzie County, 8 miles southeast of Williston, North Dakota.  There are 14 separate and original mineral leases executed between Val M. and Mari P. Holms (the managing members of Holms Energy, LLC) and from two other owners of mineral rights on the Holms Property, Rocky and Evenette



- 22 -






Greenfield, and a third party, pursuant to 14 separate mineral leases granted or amended between September 9, 2009 and December 10, 2009, whereby: 1) Oasis Petroleum, Inc., 2) Brigham Resources, and 3) Texon L.P. (collectively “Holms Property Lessees”) purchased the rights to explore, drill and develop oil and gas on the Holms Property.  Oasis Petroleum, Inc., pursuant to the terms and conditions of the leases, is required to drill nine wells in the Holms Property Bakken Formation before December 31, 2011 in order to retain the leases and keep them in good standing.


The Holms Energy mineral rights constitute the right to 5.66% of the oil and gas production (~6 out of 100 barrels produced from the Holms Property by any of the Holms Property Lessees).  Val M. and Mari P. Holms assigned their Holms Mineral Rights to Toll Reserve Consortium, Inc., who in turn transferred the same rights to Holms Energy in June 2010, subject to the existing 14 mineral leases granted to the Holms Property Lessees.  This includes the rights to potential oil and gas revenue from production royalties from the surface down to and including the oil shale bearing Bakken Formation, in the event commercial gas and oil is discovered by any of the Holms Property Lessees.  Holms Energy entered into an option agreement with Rocky and Evenette Greenfield to purchase 50% of 1/3 (1/6th total) of the mineral rights pertaining to the Holms property, which drilling rights were previously granted to the Holms Property Lessees pursuant to a lease agreement between the parties granted to the Holms Property Lessees.  Holms Energy exercised the option with the Greenfields on November 12, 2010 and entered into an asset purchase agreement with them on that day for purchasing 2.83% of their interest.  This interest was passed to BRI upon the entering of BRI into the Asset Purchase Agreement with Holms Energy.


In general, our lease agreements stipulate that the original three mineral owners, on a collective basis will receive a 17% production royalty, or 5.66% each.  Val M. Holms and his spouse, Mari P. Holms, owned 5.66% until BRI acquired all interest in those production royalty interest, the Greenfields owned 5.66% and now own 2.83% after BRI acquired the other 2.83% from Holms Energy, and a private third party continues to own the other 5.66%.  BRI now owns a total of 8.5% production royalty interest.  The landowner royalty interest is the revenue royalty paid by the contracted oil drilling company (Oasis Petroleum for example) on whatever oil and gas revenue they generate from the particular lease.  If Oasis Petroleum generates $100,000 in oil and gas revenue from acreage subject to the BRI landowner royalty of 8.5%, BRI would receive in royalty payments of $8,500.  Pursuant to the 5% overriding royalty interest on all oil and gas revenue received by BRI from the assets purchased from Holms Energy, Holms Energy would receive a 5% royalty payment of $425 from BRI.


Once a well is drilled and production established, of which there is no assurance, the well is considered “held by production,” meaning the lease continues as long as oil is being produced.  Other locations within the drilling unit created for a well may also be drilled at any time with no time limit as long as the lease is held by production.  The vast majority of our mineral rights, option to purchase mineral rights and ownership in leases acquired from Holms Energy remain in good standing pursuant to the terms and conditions of the existing leases with the Holms Property Lessees.  We believe that given the pace of drilling in the recent period there should be no instances in which the drilling obligations of the Holms Property Lessees pertaining to our leases will not be completed on a timely basis.  We believe that the Holms Property Lessees will be able to accomplish their goals related to the terms and condition of the leases granted to them.


To date no wells have been drilled into the Bakken Formation on the Holms Property and no oil and gas production royalty income has been generated from the Bakken Formation on the Holms Property.  We do not and will not own any physical real estate.  All of our mineral rights that comprise our acreage positions are established using industry-standard terms that have been established and engrained in the oil and gas industry for many years.  The leases were originally granted by Val M. and Mari Holms.  Val M. Holms is the current majority owner of BRI.


Oasis Petroleum, Inc. received approval for seven spacing units to drill wells in the Bakken Formation that encompass part of Holms’ Property.  BRI owns an average 8.5% royalty on all oil and gas produced on the 3,000 net mineral acres.  We believe that we are able to create value via strategic acreage acquisitions and convert that value, or portion thereof, into production by utilizing and investing with experienced industry partners specializing in the specific areas of interest.


Description of Property


There are 14 independent executed oil leases on various parcels of land constituting the Holms Property which are not all contiguous.  The original mineral rights were owned by Val M. Holms, Evenette Greenfield, and a third party, each owning an undivided 33 1/3% interest.  Each of the three mineral rights owners have executed the 14 leases with three oil companies.  The average "landowner’s royalty" for the 14 leases is approximately 17%, so each of the three owners has a beneficial net ownership interest in the royalty income from all oil and gas produced equal to 5.66%.  In this case one of the three owners, Val and Mari Holms, have assigned all right, title and interest to their mineral rights to Holms Energy, LLC.  Holms Energy then acquired an option to purchase an undivided 50% interest of the mineral rights owned by Rocky and Evenette Greenfield (another 2.83%).  Holms Energy exercised the option and entered into an asset purchase agreement on November 12, 2010 with the Greenfields, therefore, Holms conveyed its rights under the option with BRI and BRI became the owner of the 2.83% Greenfield interest.




- 23 -






Pursuant to the North Dakota Oil and Gas Commission, long radius deep horizontal multi-stage fracking wells in the Bakken Formation must be permitted in spacing unit of not less than 1,240 acres (two sections), each section containing 640 acres.  The spacing units have to be approved and permitted in advance of drilling by the North Dakota Oil and Gas Commission.  When a horizontal well is drilled in the area where the subject property is located, they typically drill down about 8,000 vertical feet and then utilize directional drilling to flatten the hole to 90 degrees and drill horizontally down the oil and gas producing formation.  Horizontal directional drilling provides more contact area to the oil bearing formation than a typical vertical well.  This method of drilling is referred to as an enhanced oil recovery method.


There are currently two producing oil and gas wells and one shut-in well on the Holms Property.  These wells are currently producing on a limited basis from the Mission Canyon Formation.  These wells were drilled in the 1980’s and the mineral rights and production royalties from the Mission Canyon Formation have been retained by the mineral owners.  Holms Energy’s and the Greenfield’s interests in this formation were not subject to or part of the Options to Purchase or the Asset Purchase Agreements.  It is assumed that the current Holms property lessees are not interested in conducting any additional exploration or drilling in the Mission Canyon Formation because of this historically small production from this formation, which is several thousand feet above the Bakken Formation.  In the event the existing Lessees drill to the Bakken Formation any production royalties will inure to the benefit BRI.


Some of our acreage is subject to joint venture and drilling agreements between Oasis Petroleum, Inc. and Continental Resources, Inc.  Oasis and Continental filed jointly for and were granted approval for one spacing unit, Brigham Resources, Inc. received approval for one spacing unit and Oasis Petroleum, Inc. received approval for six allowances by the North Dakota Oil and Gas Commission to drill eight wells in the Bakken Formation, which a portion of the Holms Property has been included in each of the eight approved spacing units.


Description of Oil Leases


As described in detail in the following table entitled Description of Property and Leases, there are 14 oil and gas leases with three different oil companies involving the Holms Property, with Oasis Petroleum having 11 leases, Brigham Resources 2 leases and 1 lease with Texon L.P.  Each of Holms Energy, Rocky and Evenette Greenfield, and third party have entered into leases with the three oil companies..  The leases have lease periods of between 3 and 8 years with starting dates from March 2003 to December 2009.  All but three of the leases have landowner royalties payable by the oil company lessees on gross proceeds from oil and gas production of 17%, with each of the three landowners having rights to 5.66% of the royalty.



- 24 -




DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY AND LEASES

Legal

Lease

Gross

Net

Original

Current

Total

Royalty

Greenfield

Percentage

Holms

TOTAL

Drilling

Description

Period

Acres

Acres

Leasee

Leasee

 Percentage

to BRI

Percentage

To BRI

Commitment

151N, R100W, Sec 5: Lots 3, 4, S1/2NW4,  SW4 NE4,  W2SE4

12/10/09-12/10/12

280.8

23.5

Armstrong

Armstrong

17%

2.833%

5.666%

8.499%

YES

152N, R100W Sec 29: NE, N2NW

11/24/08-11/24/11

800

83.92

Empire Oil

Oasis Petroleum

17%

2.833%

5.666%

8.499%

YES

152N, R101W, Sec 24: SW

"

 

 

Empire Oil

Oasis Petroleum

17%

2.833%

5.666%

8.499%

 

152N, R101W, Sec 25: NWNE, S2NE, N2NW, SENW, NESW, N2SE, SESE

"

 

 

Empire Oil

Oasis Petroleum

17%

2.833%

5.666%

8.499%

 

152N, R100W, Sec 22: W2, SE

7/14/08-7/14/11

480

104.38

Empire Oil

Oasis Petroleum

17%

2.833%

5.666%

8.499%

YES

152N, R100W, Sec 7: Lot 1, Lot 2, E2NW4, NE4

3/1/05-3/1/12

307.08

100.91

Sundance

Oasis Petroleum

17.5%

2.833%

5.666%

8.499%

 

152N, R100W, Sec 17: W2SW

9/9/03-9/9/11

2227.22

491.81

Empire Oil

Oasis Petroleum

17%

2.833%

5.666%

8.499%

YES

152N, R100W, Sec 19: Lots 1, 2, E2NW, NE

"

 

 

Empire Oil

Oasis Petroleum

17%

2.833%

5.666%

8.499%

 

152N, R100W, Sec:7: Lots 3(33.63), 4(33.59), E2SW, SE Plus all accretions and riparian rights

 

 

Empire Oil

Oasis Petroleum

17%

2.833%

5.666%

8.499%

 

152N, R100W, Sec 20 All

"

 

 

Empire Oil

Oasis Petroleum

17%

2.833%

5.666%

8.499%

 

152N, R100W, Sec 21 All

"

 

 

Empire Oil

Oasis Petroleum

17%

2.833%

5.666%

8.499%

 

152N, R101W, Sec 24: SW4

BEERS WELL P & A

160.68

4.06

Empire Oil

Oasis Petroleum

17%

0.05%

0.10%

0.15%

No

152N, R101W, Sec 26: SW4

4/8/08-4/8/11

153.68

4.62

Diamond Res.

Bringham

17%

2.833%

5.666%

8.499%

YES

152N, R101W, Sec 35: E2NE4, SW4NE4, SE4NW4

Lyle Well  P & A

640

9.62

Oasis

Bringham

12.50%

0.05%

0.10%

0.15%

No

152N, R100W, Sec 8: NW4NW4, S2NW4, SW4, S2SE4

7/29/08-7/29/13

1003.1

329.59

Empire Oil

Oasis Petroleum

17%

2.833%

5.666%

8.499%

YES

152N, R100W, Sec 9: Lots 1,2,3,4 SW4NW4, SW4, S2SE4

"

 

 

Empire Oil

Oasis Petroleum

17%

2.833%

5.666%

8.499%

 

152N, R100W, Sec 10: Lots 2,3,4 S2SW4

"

 

 

Empire Oil

Oasis Petroleum

17%

2.833%

5.666%

8.499%

 

152N, R100W, Sec 15: NE4NW4

"

 

 

Empire Oil

Oasis Petroleum

17%

2.833%

5.666%

8.499%

 

152N, R101W, Sec 1: SE4SE4

"

 

 

Empire Oil

Oasis Petroleum

17%

2.833%

5.666%

8.499%

 

152N R100W, Sec 18: Lot 1 NENW, N2NE

5/21/09-5/21/12

393.63

102.67

Empire Oil

Oasis Petroleum

17%

2.833%

5.666%

8.499%

Yes

152N, R101W, Sec 13: NW, N2NE

"

 

 

Empire Oil

Oasis Petroleum

17%

2.833%

5.666%

8.499%

 

152N, R100W, Sec 23: W2SW

7/14/08-7/14/11

80

19.63

Empire Oil

Oasis Petroleum

17%

2.833%

5.666%

8.499%

YES

152N, R100W, Sec 31: Lot 1, 2, 3, 4, E2W2, E2

7/14/08-7/14/11

858.08

167.11

Empire Oil

Oasis Petroleum

17%

2.833%

5.666%

8.499%

YES

152N, R100W, Sec 32: W2W2, NENW, NESW

"

 

 

Empire Oil

Oasis Petroleum

17%

2.833%

5.666%

8.499%

 

152N, R100W, Sec 5: SWSW

7/14/08-7/14/13

193.38

63.54

Empire Oil

Oasis Petroleum

17%

2.833%

5.666%

8.499%

YES

152N, R100W, Sec 6: Lot 14 S2SE4, SE4SW4

"

 

 

Empire Oil

Oasis Petroleum

17%

2.833%

5.666%

8.499%

 

152N, R101W, Sec 12 E2NE, E2SE

Lindvig HBP

160

53.33

Empire Oil

Oasis Petroleum

15.00%

0.650%

1.30%

1.950%

No

151N, R100W, Sec 5: SWSW

Bratcher Forthun HBP

400.08

23.35

Murphy Oil

Texon L.P.

12.50%

1.015%

2.03%

3.045%

 

152N, R100W, Sec 30 (all of it)

Schmitz HBP

163.38

13.63

Bill Barrett

Oasis Petroleum

17%

0.500%

1.00%

1.500%

 

151N, R100W, Sec 6, Lots 2, 3, SENW, SWNE

NOT LEASED

80

53.33

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1649

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


The column “Total Royalty Percentage” is the total royalty to be paid out by the relevant oil company from the revenue of a particular lease.  “The Greenfield Percentage to BRI” column represents 50% of the Greenfield landowner royalty interest that will be acquired by BRI, which is paid out as a percentage in royalty of total oil and gas revenue.  The “Holms Percentage” column is the Holms Energy landowner royalty interest that BRI will acquire as a percentage in royalty of total revenue.  The “TOTAL to BRI” is the combined interest to be acquired by BRI composed of the 50% of the Greenfield landowner royalty interest and 100% of the Holms Energy landowner royalty interest.



- 25 -




Geology


The Williston Basin is a large intracratonic sedimentary basin in eastern Montana, western North and South Dakota and southern Saskatchewan known for its rich deposits of petroleum and potash.  The basin is a geologic structural basin but not a topographic depression; it is transected by the Missouri River. The oval-shaped depression extends approximately 475 miles (764 km) north-south and 300 miles (480 km) east-west.


[briposam_122910apg006.gif]


The Bakken Formation is an oil-bearing stratum covering parts of Montana, North Dakota, and Saskatchewan.  Oil was first produced from the Bakken more than 50 years ago. Production was mainly from a few vertical wells until the 1980’s when horizontal or directional drilling technology became available.  Only recently after the intensive application of horizontal wells combined with hydraulic fracturing technology did production really accelerate.  The Bakken is one of many hydrocarbon producing formations in the Williston Basin, a sedimentary basin covering parts of three states and two provinces.  The total layer of sediments in the basin can be up to 15,000 ft. thick, and within that, the Bakken itself reaches a maximum of 150 feet.  The Bakken Shale is the largest oil find in the history of the U.S. according to the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). However, in April 2008 a report from the State of North Dakota estimated that of the 167 billion barrels of oil in place in the North Dakota portion of the Bakken Formation, 2.1 billion barrels were technically recoverable.  Technically recoverable oil must also be contrasted with economically recoverable oil meaning the amount of producible reserves of oil that will give a reasonable return on investment.  The volume of economically recoverable reserves will change as oil price, cost of wells and other factors vary.  [The number of wells drilled in the North Dakota Bakken jumped from 300 in 2006 to 457 in 2007 and oil production increased 229% from 2.2 million barrels to 7.4 million barrels in 2007.]


Deposition of sediments began in the Williston area during Cambrian time, but subsidence and basin filling were most intense during the Ordovician, Silurian and Devonian Periods, when thick accumulations of limestone and dolomite, with lesser thicknesses of sandstones, siltstones, shales, and evaporates were laid down approximately 350 to 417 million years ago.  Subsidence continued on a reduced scale into the Mississippian and was largely ended by the Pennsylvanian time. Regional subsidence returned during the Mesozoic Era, although total sediment thicknesses were much less than during the Paleozoic.  Near the end of the Cretaceous period, tectonic activity during the Laramide Orogeny rejuvenated several basement structures in the Williston Basin to produce anticlines that serve as oil traps today.




- 26 -






[briposam_122910apg008.gif]


Isopach map, total Middle Member, Bakken Formation.  The Holms Property is located

in the immediate area at the tip of the arrow originating from the 60 feet Isopach Interval.



The Bakken Shale in the Williston Basin is over 11,000 ft. deep at the center of the formation and rises to 3,100 ft. on the edges of the basin.  The Bakken Formation is composed of three distinct members.  The first layer averages twenty three feet in depth and consists of blackish marine shale.  The second member runs from 30 ft. to 80 ft. and composed of interbedded limestone, siltstone, sandstone and dolomite.  The bottom member is a dark black marine shale that averages 10 ft. to 30 ft. in thickness.  All three formations that make up the Bakken are rich in an organic material called Kerogen.  When Kerogen is heated (thermogenic processes) or broken down by organic means (biogenic processes), natural gas and oil are created.  The Bakken Formation is capped by a very thick limestone formation called the Lodgepole.  It is because of this limestone cap that there is so much gas and oil trapped in the shale horizons.  The Bakken Formation is what is considered a thermally mature deposit and the oil from the Bakken has a 41 specific gravity and is deemed to be commercially high grade crude oil.


Horizontal Drilling


Horizontal or directional drilling has revolutionized the way the oil and gas wells are being drilled in the Williston Basin.  The reason that horizontal drilling is changing the oil and gas business is that a well drilled sideways through a formation that contains oil and gas will produce many more times that of a vertical well.  A vertical well will only penetrate a limited area of the productive zone, whereas a well drilled horizontally may penetrate up to 10,000’ of the zone.  This also means that previously tight shale formations such as the Bakken Formation can result in prolific production.


The Bakken Formation has poor porosity which reduces the ability of the gas and oil to flow out of this horizon.  Recently, horizontal drilling of lateral holes combined with hydraulic fracturing (“fracking”) has resulted in substantial production from thick formations that have poor porosity.  Porosity and the permeability of the oil shale rock can vary widely and unpredictably over short distances, thus dry wells can be found next to prolific wells with little explanation geologically.


Fracking is a procedure whereby packers (plugs) are set every 250’ to 300’ and up to ten 2,000 horsepower hydraulic pumps deliver high pressure fluids that contain a high percentage of round ceramic beads are utilized as propellant and keep the fissures and fractures open along the bedding-planes that are created by the high pressure fluids.  The fissures and channels created by the high



- 27 -






pressure fluid and held open by the ceramic beads that are left behind; provide a pathway to allow the gas and oil to flow into the drill hole.

 

Two new technologies are currently being used to enhance horizontal drilling: 1) log while drilling (LWD); and 2) drill string radar (DST).  LWD uses long sensors which read gamma radiation given off by the formation, which provides real time information to the drillers and this information is gathered and assists drillers to drill in the optimum sections of the formation.  DST provides information to the driller on the surface as to what direction and angel the well is being drilled.  The combination of the two technologies greatly assists keeping the drill bit in the optimum location within the Bakken Formation.


[briposam_122910apg010.gif]

Example of Horizontal Drilling



Location of Mineral Rights Acquired by BRI



TOWNSHIP 151 NORTH, RANGE 100 WEST


Section 6:

 Lots 2, 3; SW1/4 NE1/4, SE1/4, NWI/4, NW1/4 SE1/4, SE1/4, SE1/4


TOWNSHIP 152 NORTH, RANGE 100 WEST


Section 5:

SW1/4 SW1/4

Section 6:

S1/2 SE1/4, SE1/4 SW1/4, Lot 14

Section 7:

Lots 1,2,3,4; E1I2SW1I4, E1I2, E1I2NW1I4

Section 8:

SE 1/4 SE 114, SW1I4, W1/2NWlf4,SE 114NW1I4, SW1I4SE1I4

Section 9:

Lots 1,2,3,4; SW 1I4NW1I4, NE 1/4SW1I4, SW1I4SE 114,

Sl12SW1I4, NW1/4SWl/4, SE1/4 SE1/4

Section 10:

Lots 2, 3,4; S 1/2 SW1/4

Section 15:

NE 1/4 NW1/4

Section 17:

NE 1/4, E1/2 NW1/4, NW1/4 NW1/4, N1/2SW1/4 NW1/4, SE

1/4, E1/2- SW1/4, S1/2 SW1/4, NW1/4, W1/2 SW1/4

Section 18:

N1/2 NE1/4, NE1/4 NW1/4, Lot 1

Section 20:

All

Section 21:

All

Section 22:

W /2 W1/2, SE1/4 SW1/4, NE1/4 SE1/4, 81/2, SE1/4, NE1/4

SW1/4 NW1/4 SE1/4, E1/2NWl/4

Section 23:

W1/2SWl/4

Section 29:

NE1/4, N1/2NW1/4

Section 30:

Lots 3,4; El/2SWl/4, W1/2SE 1/4



- 28 -






Section 31:

Lots 1,2,3,4; E1/2W1/2, E1/2

Section 32:

SE 1/4NW1/4, W1/2W1/2, NE 1/4SW ¼


TOWNSHIP 152 NORTH, RANGE 101 WEST


Section 1:

SE 1/4SE 1/4

Section 12:

SE1/4NE1/4, E1/2SE1/4, NE1/4NE1/4

Section 13:

N1/2NE1/4, NW1/4

Section 24:

SW1/4

Section 25:

NW 1/4NE 1/4, S1/2NE 1/4, N1/2NW 1/4, SE1/4NW1/4, NE 1/4SW

1/4, N1/2SE1/4, SE1/4SE1/4

Section 26:

SE 1/4

Section 35:

NE 1/4NE 1/4, S1/2NE 1/4, SE 1/4NW1/4



[briposam_122910apg012.gif]


Mineral rights locations designated in yellow above.

(Note:  Blue Dot in the Middle of the Map Represents a Commercial

Horizontal Bakken Well Drilled in May of 2010 by Oasis Energy, Inc.)


Leaseholds


Currently, we own 50% of 6,000 +/- acres of total net leasehold in Williston Basin, ND.  Of these leaseholds, all acres are undeveloped.  We plan to develop this acreage with our contracted Joint Venture partners.


Reserves


We are unable to accurately estimate reserves until production comes on line, of which there is no assurance.


Production


We currently have no production


Well Data


We have not drilled any wells since our inception.


Purpose of the Acquisition


The fundamentals of the decision to enter into the Option to Purchase Assets Agreement with Holms Energy were based largely on the fact that the sales and marketing effort of the language software in China did not meet the expectations of our board of



- 29 -






directors and they felt they had a fiduciary responsibility to attempt to do something meaningful for the benefit of the BRI shareholders.  While none of the members of our board of directors have any experience in the oil and gas business, there was overwhelming evidence and data provided to the members of the board by Holms Energy that there existed a very real possibility that substantial oil and gas reserves could exist on the subject property.  This was based on the fact that there are a number of commercial wells in the immediate vicinity of the Holms property and on seismic studies confirming the presence of the Bakken Formation underlying the property conducted by the North Dakota Geological Survey.  The other main factor considered by our board was that the property had been leased to Oasis Petroleum, a well respected exploration company that specializes in drilling programs in the Bakken formation which is listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the stock symbol OAS-NYSE, and that Oasis Petroleum was under contract to drill a minimum of nine wells before the end of 2011.  Our board of directors evaluated the economic impact to BRI if all or a portion of these wells were commercially viable.  The data used to make this informal evaluation was predicated on production levels of oil and gas wells surrounding the subject property.  Many of these surrounding wells had initial tested production in excess of 3,000 barrels of oil equivalent per day.  It was the opinion of the board of directors, that a minority interest in a company that received a royalty interest revenue from just one commercial oil well out of nine possible wells exceeded the potential from any sales and marketing program in China.


The other factor that contributed to this decision to take a minority interest in a company in a different industry was related to the fact that the Board had not been successful in generating any interest in securing additional funding to supporting additional sales and marketing efforts of its language software in China.


Another factor was the fact that BRI was out of operating capital and they saw an opportunity that was in the best interest of the shareholders to turn control over to a new management team that would bring cash and assets into BRI.


The directors also were of the opinion that there is a reasonably good chance that the price of oil will appreciate in the future and there would be more interest in the investment community in an oil and gas company than a software company


In the final analysis the board of directors deemed it a better opportunity for the shareholders to have a minority position in an oil company that owns mineral rights in a strategic location in a known area of substantial oil production, as compared to the economic potential for its original sales and marketing program for language software in mainland China.


Governmental Regulations


The Holms Property Lessees’ operations are subject to various rules, regulations and limitations impacting the oil and natural gas exploration and production industry as whole.  These rules, regulations and limitations can indirectly impact Bakken.


Regulation of Oil and Natural Gas Production. Oil and natural gas exploration, production and related operations, when developed, are subject to extensive rules and regulations promulgated by federal, state and local authorities and agencies.  For example, the state of North Dakota requires permits for exploration drilling, operation of commercial wells, submission of several reports concerning operations of wells and imposes other requirements relating to the production of oil and natural gas.  North Dakota may also have statutes or regulations addressing conservation matters, including provisions for the unitization or pooling of oil and natural gas properties, the establishment of maximum rates of production from wells, and the regulation of spacing, plugging and abandonment of such wells.  Failure to comply with any such rules and regulations by the Holms Property Lessees and could result in substantial penalties.  The regulatory burden on the oil and gas industry will most likely increase the cost of doing business and may affect our potential for profitability.  Although we believe that our Lessee will stay in compliance with all applicable laws and regulations, because such rules and regulations are frequently amended or reinterpreted, we are unable to predict the future cost or impact of complying with such laws.  Significant expenditures may be required to comply with governmental laws and regulations and may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.


Environmental Matters


Our operations and properties are subject to extensive and changing federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to environmental protection, including the generation, storage, handling, emission, transportation and discharge of materials into the environment, and relating to safety and health.  The recent trend in environmental legislation and regulation generally is toward stricter standards, and this trend will likely continue.  These laws and regulations may:

 

require the acquisition of a permit or other authorization before construction or drilling commences and for certain other activities;

limit or prohibit construction, drilling and other activities on certain lands lying within wilderness and other protected areas; and

impose substantial liabilities for pollution resulting from its operations.



- 30 -




 


The permits required for our operations may be subject to revocation, modification and renewal by issuing authorities.  Governmental authorities have the power to enforce their regulations, and violations are subject to fines or injunctions, or both.  In the opinion of management, we are in substantial compliance with current applicable environmental laws and regulations, and have no material commitments for capital expenditures to comply with existing environmental requirements.  Nevertheless, changes in existing environmental laws and regulations or in interpretations thereof could have a significant impact on BRI, as well as the oil and natural gas industry in general.


The Comprehensive Environmental, Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (“CERCLA”) and comparable state statutes impose strict, joint and several liabilities on owners and operators of sites and on persons who disposed of or arranged for the disposal of “hazardous substances” found at such sites.  It is not uncommon for the neighboring landowners and other third parties to file claims for personal injury and property damage allegedly caused by the hazardous substances released into the environment.  The Federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (“RCRA”) and comparable state statutes govern the disposal of “solid waste” and “hazardous waste” and authorize the imposition of substantial fines and penalties for noncompliance.  Although CERCLA currently excludes petroleum from its definition of “hazardous substance,” state laws affecting our operations may impose clean-up liability relating to petroleum and petroleum related products.  In addition, although RCRA classifies certain oil field wastes as “non-hazardous,” such exploration and production wastes could be reclassified as hazardous wastes thereby making such wastes subject to more stringent handling and disposal requirements.


The Endangered Species Act (“ESA”) seeks to ensure that activities do not jeopardize endangered or threatened animal, fish and plant species, nor destroy or modify the critical habitat of such species.  Under ESA, exploration and production operations, as well as actions by federal agencies, may not significantly impair or jeopardize the species or its habitat.  ESA provides for criminal penalties for willful violations of the Act.  Other statutes that provide protection to animal and plant species and that may apply to our operations include, but are not necessarily limited to, the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act, the Fishery Conservation and Management Act, the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and the National Historic Preservation Act.  Although we believe that our operations will be in substantial compliance with such statutes, any change in these statutes or any reclassification of a species as endangered could subject BRI to significant expenses to modify our operations or could force BRI to discontinue certain operations altogether.


Competition


The oil and natural gas industry is intensely competitive, and we compete with numerous other oil and gas exploration and production companies.  Many of these companies have substantially greater resources than we have.  Not only do they explore for and produce oil and natural gas, but many also carry on midstream and refining operations and market petroleum and other products on a regional, national or worldwide basis.  The operations of other companies may be able to pay more for exploratory prospects and productive oil and natural gas properties.  They may also have more resources to define, evaluate, bid for and purchase a greater number of properties and prospects than our financial or human resources permit.


Our larger or integrated competitors may have the resources to be better able to absorb the burden of existing, and any changes to federal, state, and local laws and regulations more easily than we can, which would adversely affect our competitive position.  Our ability to discover reserves and acquire additional properties in the future will be dependent upon our ability and resources to evaluate and select suitable properties and to consummate transactions in this highly competitive environment.  In addition, we may be at a disadvantage in producing oil and natural gas properties and bidding for exploratory prospects, because we have fewer financial and human resources than other companies in our industry.  Should a larger and better financed company decide to directly compete with us, and be successful in its efforts, our business could be adversely affected.


Marketing and Customers


The market for oil and natural gas that we will produce depends on factors beyond our control, including the extent of domestic production and imports of oil and natural gas, the proximity and capacity of natural gas pipelines and other transportation facilities, demand for oil and natural gas, the marketing of competitive fuels and the effects of state and federal regulation.  The oil and gas industry also competes with other industries in supplying the energy and fuel requirements of industrial, commercial and individual consumers.

Our Production Royalties derived from oil and gas production from the Holms Property are expected to be sold by The Holms Property Lessees at prices tied to the spot oil markets.  If any gas is produced from wells drilled on property that we own the mineral rights will have limited market value because there are limited gas gathering lines available in the immediate area and only a percentage of gas produce will be purchased.  We will be required to rely on The Holms Property Lessees to market and sell any future gas production.



- 31 -







Employees


We currently have two full-time employees; Val Holms, President and Chief Executive Officer; and Karen Midtlyng, Secretary and Director.  Our newly appointed executives are expected to enter into employment agreements in the near future.  The former Chief Financial Officer, Kent L. Jensen, was planned to initially work on a part-time basis and was to be paid an hourly fee for services rendered to BRI, but no employment agreement or compensation arrangement was in place.  Kent L. Jensen was appointed as a successor Director on December 1, 2010 and subsequently designated by the Board of Directors to be the Treasurer and CFO of BRI.  Effective December 27, 2010, Kent L. Jensen resigned as a Director, Treasurer, and Chief Financial Officer.  There were no disagreements between the resigning officer and director and any of our remaining officers or directors regarding the operations, policies, or practices of our company.  Effective December 27, 2010, two of our existing officers were appointed to new offices; Val M. Holms was appointed as Interim Chief Financial Officer and Karen S. Midtlyng was appointed Interim Treasurer by the Board of Directors until such time as the Board of Directors identifies a replacement for Mr. Jensen.  The Board of Directors will undertake to find a replacement for Mr. Jensen at the earliest possible time.  BRI will employ a number of outside consultants on an as needed basis and execute private consulting agreements with these outside consultants.  As drilling production activities continue to increase by the Holms Property Lessees, and if revenue from production royalties develops as anticipated and increases, we may hire additional technical, operational or administrative personnel as appropriate.  We are using and will continue to use the services of independent consultants and contractors to perform various professional services.  We believe that this use of third-party service providers may enhance our ability to contain general and administrative expenses.


B.  DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY


Office Locations


As of December 1, 2010, BRI has entered into a one-year office lease, renewable for up to five years, for a 2,175 square foot executive office at 1425 Birch Ave., Suite A, Helena, MT 59601, for a monthly charge of $1,600 for the first year; $1,800 second year; $2,000 third year; $2,200 fourth year; and $2,400 fifth year.


C.  LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

We know of no material, existing or pending legal proceedings against our company, nor are we involved as a plaintiff in any material proceeding or pending litigation. There are no proceedings in which any of our directors, officers or affiliates, or any registered or beneficial shareholder, is an adverse party or has a material interest adverse to our interest.  Michael Espey, Esq. will pass upon certain matters relating to the legality of the common stock offered hereby for us.


D.  MARKET PRICE OF AND DIVDENDS ON THE REGISTRANT’S

COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS


Market Information


BRI’s common stock was been quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board of the National Association of Securities Dealers (“NASD”) since July 29, 2009, under the symbol “MLTX”, and that symbol will change to “BKKN” on December 17, 2010.  There is currently no established “public market” for shares of our common stock.  No assurance can be given that any market for our common stock will develop or be maintained.


For any market that develops for our common stock, the sale of “restricted securities” (common stock) pursuant to Rule 144 of the Securities and Exchange Commission by members of management or any other person to whom any such securities were issued or may be issued in the future may have a substantial adverse impact on any such public market.  Present members of management and shareholders at December 2, 2010 when BRI ceased to be a “shell” company, will satisfy the one year holding period of Rule 144 for public sales of their respective holdings in accordance with Rule 144 on December 2, 2011.  See the caption “Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities”, of this Item, below.  A minimum holding period of one year is required for resales under Rule 144 for shareholders of former shell companies, along with other pertinent provisions, including publicly available information concerning BRI; limitations on the volume of restricted securities which can be sold in any ninety (90) day period; the requirement of unsolicited broker’s transactions; and the filing of a Notice of Sale on Form 144.


There has been no quoted bid or offer price for the shares of common stock of BRI for the quarterly periods from July 1, 2009 through September 30, 2010.



- 32 -







Holders


The number of record holders of BRI’s common stock as of the date of this Report is approximately 78.


Dividends


The payment of dividends is subject to the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend, among other things, upon our earnings, our capital requirements, our financial condition, and other relevant factors. We have not paid or declared any dividends upon our common stock since our inception and, by reason of our present financial status and our contemplated financial requirements, we do not anticipate paying any dividends upon our common stock in the foreseeable future.


We have never declared or paid any cash dividends. We currently do not intend to pay cash dividends in the foreseeable future on the shares of common stock. We intend to reinvest any earnings in the development and expansion of our business. Any cash dividends in the future to common stockholders will be payable when, as and if declared by our Board of Directors, based upon the Board’s assessment of:


 

our financial condition;

 

earnings;

 

need for funds;

 

capital requirements;

 

prior claims of preferred stock to the extent issued and outstanding; and

 

other factors, including any applicable laws.


Therefore, there can be no assurance that any dividends on the common stock will ever be paid.


Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans


Stock Option Plan


The Board of Directors approved the Stock Option Plan on November 3, 2008 and then on June 16, 2010, authorized an increase in the total common stock, $.001 par value, available in the Corporation's 2008 Non-Qualified Stock Option and Stock Appreciation Rights Plan from one million (1,000,000) shares to five million (5,000,000) shares, to be granted to officers, directors, consultants, advisors, and other key employees of BRI and its subsidiaries.  This was ratified by the shareholders on November 12, 2010.  The total number of options that can be granted under the plan will not exceed 5,000,000 shares.  Non-qualified stock options will be granted by the Board of Directors with an option price not less than the fair market value of the shares of common stock to which the non-qualified stock option relates on the date of grant.  In no event may the option price with respect to an incentive stock option granted under the stock option plan be less than the fair market value of such common stock.


Each option granted under the stock option plan will be assigned a time period for exercising not to exceed ten years after the date of the grant. Certain other restrictions will apply in connection with this plan when some awards may be exercised.  This plan is intended to encourage directors, officers, employees and consultants to acquire ownership of common stock. The opportunity so provided is intended to foster in participants a strong incentive to put forth maximum effort for BRI’s continued success and growth, to aid in retaining individuals who put forth such effort, and to assist in attracting the best available individuals to BRI in the future.


The following table sets forth information about the common stock available for issuance under compensatory plans and arrangements as of December 29, 2010.


 

(a)

(b)

(c)

Plan Category

Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants, and rights.

Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants, and rights

Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a))

Equity compensation plan

approved by security holders

0

$0

5,000,000

Total

3,780,000

$.447

5,000,000




- 33 -






E.  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



BAKKEN RESOURCES, INC.

(FORMERLY MULTISYS LANGUAGE SOLUTIONS, INC.)

(A Development Stage Company)

December 31, 2009 and 2008

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

35

Balance Sheets for December 31, 2009 and 2008

 

36

Statements of Operations for the Year Ended December 31, 2009 and  for the Period from June 6, 2008 (Inception) through December 31, 2008 and for the Period from June 6, 2008 (Inception) through December 31, 2009

 

37

Statement of Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit) for the Period from June 6, 2008 (Inception) through December 31, 2009

 

38

Statements of Cash Flows for the Year Ended December 31, 2009, for the Period from June 6, 2008 (Inception) through December 31, 2008 and for the Period from June 6, 2008 (Inception) through December 31, 2009

 

38

Notes to the Financial Statements

 

40 to 49

Consolidated Financial Statements for the Interim Period Ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 (Unaudited)

 

50 to 57



- 34 -






 


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of

Bakken Resources, Inc.

(Formerly Multisys Language Solutions, Inc.)

(A development stage company)

Las Vegas, Nevada


We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Bakken Resources, Inc. (formerly Multisys Language Solutions, Inc.) (a development stage company) (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 and the related statements of operations, stockholders’ equity (deficit) and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2009, for the period from June 6, 2008 (inception) through December 31, 2008 and for the period from June 6, 2008 (inception) through December 31, 2009.  These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.


We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).  Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement.  The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting.  Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.  Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.  An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.  We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.


In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the period for the year ended December 31, 2009, for the period from June 6, 2008 (inception) through December 31, 2008 and for the period from June 6, 2008 (inception) through December 31, 2009 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.


The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern.  As discussed in Note 3 to the financial statements, the Company had a deficit accumulated during the development stage at December 31, 2009, a net loss and cash used in operations for the year ended December 31, 2009, respectively, with no revenues during the period.  These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regards to these matters are also described in Note 3.  The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.




/s/Li & Company, PC

Li & Company, PC



Skillman, New Jersey

April 5, 2010

(Except as to Note 8 which was as of June 10, 2010)



- 35 -







BAKKEN RESOURCES, INC.  

(FORMERLY MULTISYS LANGUAGE SOLUTIONS, INC.)

 (A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

 BALANCE SHEETS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December

31, 2009

 

 

December

31, 2008

 ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 CURRENT ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash

 

3,855 

 

25,349 

 

Accounts receivable

 

2,036 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Total Current Assets

 

5,891 

 

 

25,349 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 SOFTWARE RESELLER AGREEMENT

 

 

 

 

 

 

Software Reseller Agreement

 

10,000 

 

 

10,000 

 

Accumulated Amortization

 

(1,583)

 

 

(583)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 SOFTWARE RESELLER AGREEMENT, net

 

8,417 

 

 

9,417 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

          Total Assets

14,308 

 

34,766 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)

 

 

 

 

 

 CURRENT LIABILITIES:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts payable

 

3,919 

 

 

Royalty payable

 

102 

 

 

 

Accrued expenses

 

6,732 

 

 

10,675 

 

Note payable – officer

 

6,500 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Current Liabilities

17,253 

 

10,675 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Preferred stock, $.001 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 none issued or outstanding

 

 

 

 

 Common stock, $.001 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 5,557,500 shares issued and outstanding

 

5,558 

 

 

5,558 

 

 Additional paid-in capital

 

105,442 

 

 

105,442 

 

 Deficit accumulated during the development stage

 

(113,945)

 

 

(86,909)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Total Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)

 

(2,945)

 

 

24,091 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)

14,308 

 

34,766 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 See accompanying notes to the financial statements.



- 36 -







BAKKEN RESOURCES, INC.

(FORMERLY MULTISYS LANGUAGE SOLUTIONS, INC.)

 (A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

 STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For the Period from

 

 

For the Period from

 

 

 

 

 

For the Year

 

 

June 6, 2008

 

 

June 6, 2008

 

 

 

 

 

Ended

 

 

(Inception) through

 

 

(Inception) through

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2009

 

 

December 31, 2008

 

 

December 31, 2009

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 REVENUES EARNED

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 DURING THE DEVELOPMENT STAGE

 

$

3,684 

 

$

 

$

3,684 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 OPERATING EXPRENSES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Distribution and advertising

 

 

 

 

60,000 

 

 

60,000 

 

 Amortization

 

 

1,000 

 

 

583 

 

 

1,583 

 

 Officer’s compensation

 

 

6,000 

 

 

9,000 

 

 

15,000 

 

 Professional fees

 

 

23,004 

 

 

14,142 

 

 

37,146 

 

 Royalty  

 

 

184 

 

 

 

 

184 

 

 General and administrative expenses

 

 

499 

 

 

3,184 

 

 

3,683 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Total Expenses

 

 

30,687 

 

 

86,909 

 

 

117,596 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 LOSS FROM OPERATIONS

 

 

(27,003)

 

 

(86,909)

 

 

(113,912)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 OTHER (INCOME) EXPENSES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Interest expense

 

 

33 

 

 

 

 

33 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Total other (income) expenses

 

 

33 

 

 

 

 

33 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 LOSS BEFORE TAXES  

 

 

(27,036)

 

 

(86,909)

 

 

(113,945)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 INCOME TAXES  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 NET LOSS

 

$

(27,036)

 

$

(86,909)

 

$

(113,945)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 NET LOSS PER COMMON SHARE

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 - BASIC AND DILUTED:

 

$

(0.00)

 

$

(0.02)

 

$

(0.02)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Weighted common shares outstanding

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 - basic and diluted

 

 

5,557,500 

 

 

3,658,677

 

 

4,866,114 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 See accompanying notes to the financial statements.



- 37 -







BAKKEN RESOURCES, INC.

(FORMERLY MULTISYS LANGUAGE SOLUTIONS, INC.)

 (A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

 STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)  

For the Period from June 6, 2008 (inception) through December 31, 2009

 

 

 

 

 

Common stock,

$.001 par value

 

Additional

Paid-in

 

Deficit

Accumulated

during the

Development

 

Accumulated

Other

Comprehensive

 

Total

Stockholders’

Equity

 

 

 

 

Shares

 

Amount

 

Capital

 

Stage

 

Income

 

(Deficit)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance – June 6, 2008 (Inception)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Issuance of common stock for cash

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 upon formation at $0.0003 per share

1,500,000 

 

1,500 

 

(1,000)

 

 

 

 

 

500 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Issuance of common stock for cash

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 in August 2008 at $0.0003per share

750,000 

 

750 

 

(500)

 

 

 

 

 

250 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Issuance of common stock for cash

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 in September 2008 at $0.0333 per share

3,277,500 

 

3,278 

 

105,972

 

 

 

 

 

109,250 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Issuance of common stock for cash

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 in October, 2008 at $0.0333 per share

30,000 

 

30 

 

970 

 

 

 

 

 

1,000 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net loss

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(86,909)

 

 

 

(86,909)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance – December 31, 2008

 

5,557,500 

 

5.558 

 

105,442 

 

(86,909)

 

 

24,091 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net loss

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(27,036)

 

 

 

(27,036)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance – December 31, 2009

 

5,557,500 

5,558 

105,442 

(113,945)

(2,945)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 See accompanying notes to the financial statements.



- 38 -







BAKKEN RESOURCES, INC.

(FORMERLY MULTISYS LANGUAGE SOLUTIONS, INC.)

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For the

Period from

 

 

For the Period from

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

June 6, 2008

 

 

June 6, 2008

 

 

 

 

 

For the

Year Ended

 

 

(Inception) through

 

 

(Inception) through

 

 

 

 

 

December

31, 2009

 

 

December

31, 2008

 

 

December

31, 2009

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Net Loss

 

$

(27,036)

 

 

(86,909)

 

$

(113,945)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 used in operating activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amortization expense

 

 

1,000 

 

 

583 

 

 

1,583 

 

 Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Accounts receivable

 

 

(2,036)

 

 

 

 

(2,036)

 

 

 Accounts payable

 

 

3,919 

 

 

 

 

3,919 

 

 

 Royalty payable

 

 

102 

 

 

 

 

 

102 

 

 

 Accrued expenses  

 

 

(3,975)

 

 

10,675 

 

 

6,700 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 NET CASH USED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES

 

 

(28,026)

 

 

(75,651)

 

 

(103,677)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Purchase of Software Reseller Agreement

 

 

 

 

(10,000)

 

 

(10,000)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 NET CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES

 

 

 

 

(10,000)

 

 

(10,000)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from related party note payable

 

 

6,532 

 

 

 

 

6,532 

 

Proceeds from sale of common stock

 

 

 

 

111,000 

 

 

111,000 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 NET CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES

 

 

6,532 

 

 

111,000 

 

 

117,532 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 NET CHANGE IN CASH

 

 

(21,494)

 

 

25,349 

 

 

3,855 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Cash at beginning of period

 

 

25,349 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Cash at end of period

 

$

3,855 

 

$

25,349 

 

$

3,855 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOWS INFORMATION:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest paid

 

$

33 

 

$

 

$

33 

 

Taxes paid

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 See accompanying notes to the financial statements.



- 39 -






Bakken Resources, Inc.

(Formerly Multisys Language Solutions, Inc.)

(A Development Stage Company)

December 31, 2009 and 2008

Notes to the Financial Statements



NOTE 1 – ORGANIZATION AND OPERATIONS


Bakken Resources, Inc. (formerly Multisys Language Solutions, Inc.) (a development stage company) (“BRI” or the “Company”) was incorporated on June 6, 2008 under the laws of the State of Nevada.  The Company intends to distribute interactive multimedia language education software developed by Strokes International AG., an Austria based software company in the Great China Region including the People’s Republic of China (“PRC”), Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of PRC (“Hong Kong SAR”), Macao Special Administrative Region of PRC (“Macao SAR”) and Taiwan (“Territory”) pursuant to an exclusive Software Reseller Agreement (“Software Reseller Agreement”) via an independent third party software distribution company in the Territory.


NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES


Basis of presentation


The accompanying financial statements and related notes have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP).  


Development stage company


The Company is a development stage company as defined by section 915-10-20 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification.  Although the Company has recognized some nominal amount of revenues since inception, the Company is still devoting substantially all of its efforts on establishing the business and its planned principal operations have not commenced.  All losses accumulated since inception have been considered as part of the Company’s development stage activities.


Reclassification


Certain amounts in the prior period financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.   These reclassifications had no effect on reported losses.


Use of estimates


The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.  Actual results could differ from those estimates.


Cash equivalents


The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents.


Software reseller agreement


The Company has adopted the guidelines as set out in paragraph 350-30-25-3 and paragraph 350-30-35-6 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for the Software Reseller Agreement.  Under the requirements as set out in paragraph 350-30-25-3 and paragraph 350-30-35-6 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, the Company amortizes the costs of the acquired Software Reseller Agreement over its estimate useful life of ten (10) years.  Upon becoming fully amortized, the related cost and accumulated amortization are removed from the accounts.


Impairment of long-lived assets




- 40 -






The Company follows paragraph 360-10-35-17 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for its long-lived assets.  The Company’s long-lived assets, which include the software reseller agreement, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.


The Company assesses the recoverability of its long-lived assets by comparing the projected undiscounted net cash flows associated with the related long-lived asset or group of long-lived assets over their remaining estimated useful lives against their respective carrying amounts.  Impairment, if any, is based on the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of those assets.  Fair value is generally determined using the asset’s expected future discounted cash flows or market value, if readily determinable.  If long-lived assets are determined to be recoverable, but the newly determined remaining estimated useful lives are shorter than originally estimated, the net book values of the long-lived assets are depreciated over the newly determined remaining estimated useful lives.  The Company determined that there were no impairments of long-lived assets at December 31, 2009.


Fair value of financial instruments


The Company follows paragraph 825-10-50-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for disclosures about fair value of its financial instruments and has adopted paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to measure the fair value of its financial instruments.  Paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. To increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and related disclosures, paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification establishes a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three (3) broad levels.  The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs.  The three (3) levels of fair value hierarchy defined by paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification are described below:


Level 1

 

Quoted market prices available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date.

 

 

 

Level 2

 

Pricing inputs other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable   as of the reporting date.

 

 

 

Level 3

 

Pricing inputs that are generally observable inputs and not corroborated by market data.


The carrying amounts of financial assets and liabilities, such as cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable, royalty payable, and accrued expenses, approximate their fair values because of the short maturity of these instruments.


The Company does not have any assets or liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring or a non-recurring basis, consequently, the Company did not have any fair value adjustments for assets and liabilities measured at fair value at December 31, 2009 or 2008, nor gains or losses are reported in the statement of operations that are attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to those assets and liabilities still held at the reporting date for the year ended December 31, 2009, 2008 or for the period from June 6, 2008 (inception) through December 31, 2009.


Revenue recognition


The Company follows the guidance of paragraph 605-10-S99-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for revenue recognition.  The Company recognizes revenue when it is realized or realizable and earned.  The Company considers revenue realized or realizable and earned when all of the following criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) the product has been shipped or the services have been rendered to the customer, (iii) the sales price is fixed or determinable, and (iv) collectability is reasonably assured.  The Company will derive royalties from distribution of interactive multimedia language education software sold by an independent third party distributor assigned by the Company in the Territory.  The Company entered into a Sales and Marketing Agreement (“Sales Agreement”) with Xiamen Eurotech Intelligence Commercial & Trading Co., Ltd. (“Xiamen”).  Pursuant to the Sales Agreement, Xiamen will pay the Company $4.00 (equivalent to RMB27.38 using the currency exchange rate at December 31, 2008) for each unit of language education software sold by Xiamen in the Territory.  The royalty is calculated on a quarterly basis, and a royalty report detailing the total number of units sold by Xiamen during the reporting period at the applicable royalty rate of $4.000 per unit sold as well as the royalty payment is due within thirty (30) days after the last day of the reporting period.  The Company recognizes revenues upon receipts of the royalty report.  If the Company determines that collection of



- 41 -






the royalty is not reasonably assured, the Company defers the fee and recognizes revenue at the time collection becomes reasonably assured, which is generally upon receipt of cash.


Stock-based compensation for obtaining employee services


The Company accounted for its stock based compensation under the recognition and measurement principles of the fair value recognition provisions of paragraph 718-10-30-3 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification using the modified prospective method for transactions in which the Company obtains employee services in share-based payment transactions.  All transactions in which goods or services are the consideration received for the issuance of equity instruments are accounted for based on the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instrument issued, whichever is more reliably measurable.  The measurement date used to determine the fair value of the equity instrument issued is the earlier of the date on which the third-party performance is complete or the date on which it is probable that performance will occur.


The fair value of options, if any, is estimated on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing valuation model.  The ranges of assumptions for inputs are as follows:


-

The Company uses historical data to estimate employee termination behavior.  The expected life of options granted is derived from paragraph 718-10-S99-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification and represents the period of time the options are expected to be outstanding.

-

The expected volatility is based on a combination of the historical volatility of the comparable companies’ stock over the contractual life of the options.

-

The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant for periods within the contractual life of the option.

-

The expected dividend yield is based on the Company’s current dividend yield as the best estimate of projected dividend yield for periods within the contractual life of the option.


The Company’s policy is to recognize compensation cost for awards with only service conditions and a graded vesting schedule on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for the entire award, if any.  Additionally, the Company’s policy is to issue new shares of common stock to satisfy stock option exercises.


The Company’s board of directors approved the adoption of the “2008 Non-Qualified Stock Option and Stock Appreciation Rights Plan” by unanimous consent on June 6, 2008.  This plan was initiated to encourage and enable officers, directors, consultants, advisors and other key employees of the Company to acquire and retain a proprietary interest in the Company by ownership of its common stock.  1,000,000 of the authorized shares of the Company’s common stock may be subject to, or issued pursuant to, the terms of the plan.

 

The Board of Directors did not grant the issuance of any non-statutory stock options from the Company’s 2008 Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan for the year ended December 31, 2009 or the period from June 6, 2008 (inception) through December 31, 2008.


Equity instruments issued to parties other than employees for acquiring goods or services


The Company accounted for instruments issued to parties other than employees for acquiring goods or services under the recognition and measurement principles of the fair value recognition provisions of section 505-50-30 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification(“FASB ASC Section 505-50-30”).  Pursuant to FASB ASC Section 505-50-30, all transactions in which goods or services are the consideration received for the issuance of equity instruments are accounted for based on the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instrument issued, whichever is more reliably measurable.  The measurement date used to determine the fair value of the equity instrument issued is the earlier of the date on which the third-party performance is complete or the date on which it is probable that performance will occur.


The fair value of the warrants is estimated on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing valuation model.  The ranges of assumptions for inputs are as follows:


-

The expected life of warrants granted is derived from paragraph 718-10-S99-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification and represents the period of time the warrants are expected to be outstanding.

-

The expected volatility is based on a combination of the historical volatility of the comparable companies’ stock over the contractual life of the warrants.



- 42 -









-

The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant for periods within the contractual life of the warrants.

-

The expected dividend yield is based on the Company’s current dividend yield as the best estimate of projected dividend yield for periods within the contractual life of the warrants.


Income tax


The Company accounts for income taxes under paragraph 710-10-30-2 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification.  Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are determined based upon differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse.  Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance to the extent management concludes it is more likely than not that the assets will not be realized.  Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the statements of operations in the period that includes the enactment date.


The Company adopted the provisions of paragraph 740-10-25-13 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification.  Paragraph 740-10-25-13.addresses the determination of whether tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements.  Under paragraph 740-10-25-13, the Company may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position.  The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent (50%) likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement.  Paragraph 740-10-25-13 also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties on income taxes, accounting in interim periods and requires increased disclosures.  The Company had no material adjustments to its liabilities for unrecognized income tax benefits according to the provisions of paragraph 740-10-25-13.


Net loss per common share


Net loss per common share is computed pursuant to paragraph 260-10-45-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification.  Basic net loss per share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period.  Diluted net loss per share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of shares of common stock and potentially outstanding shares of common stock during each period to reflect the potential dilution that could occur from common shares issuable through stock warrants.


The following table shows the weighted-average number of potentially outstanding dilutive shares excluded from the diluted net loss per share calculation for the year ended December 31, 2009 and for the period from June 6, 2008 (inception) through December 31, 2008 as they were anti-dilutive:


 

 

 

Weighted average number of

potentially outstanding dilutive shares

 

 

 

 

For the

Year Ended

December 31, 2009

 

 

For the Period from June 6, 2008 (inception) to December 31, 2008

 

Warrants issued on June 11, 2008 in connection with the Company’s June 11, 2008 acquisition of the software reseller agreement with an exercise price of $0.03 per share and expiring three (3) years from the date of issuance

 

 

 

300,000 

 

 

 

300,000 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total potentially outstanding dilutive shares

 

 

 

300,000 

 

 

 

300,000 

 


Recently issued accounting pronouncements


In June 2003, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) adopted final rules under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Section 404”), as amended by SEC Release No. 33-9072 on October 13, 2009.  Under the provisions of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, public companies and their independent auditors are each required to report to the public on the effectiveness of a company’s internal controls.  The smallest public companies with a public float below $75 million have been given extra time to design, implement and document these internal controls before their auditors are required to attest to the effectiveness of these



- 43 -






controls.  This extension of time will expire beginning with the annual reports of companies with fiscal years ending on or after June 15, 2010.  Commencing with its annual report for the fiscal year ending December 31 2010, the Company will be required to include a report of management on its internal control over financial reporting. The internal control report must include a statement


-

Of management’s responsibility for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over its financial reporting;

-

Of management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting as of year end; and

-

Of the framework used by management to evaluate the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.


Furthermore, it is required to file the auditor’s attestation report separately on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting on whether it believes that the Company has maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting.


In June 2009, the FASB approved the “FASB Accounting Standards Codification” (the “Codification”) as the single source of authoritative nongovernmental U.S. GAAP to be launched on July 1, 2009.  The Codification does not change current U.S. GAAP, but is intended to simplify user access to all authoritative U.S. GAAP by providing all the authoritative literature related to a particular topic in one place.  All existing accounting standard documents will be superseded and all other accounting literature not included in the Codification will be considered non-authoritative. The Codification is effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009.


In August 2009, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-04 “Accounting for Redeemable Equity Instruments – Amendment to Section 480-10-S99” which represents an update to section 480-10-S99, distinguishing liabilities from equity, per EITF Topic D-98, Classification and Measurement of Redeemable Securities.  The Company does not expect the adoption of this update to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.


In August 2009, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-05 “Fair Value Measurement and Disclosures Topic 820 – Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value”, which provides amendments to subtopic 820-10, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures – Overall, for the fair value measurement of liabilities.  This update provides clarification that in circumstances in which a quoted price in an active market for the identical liability is not available, a reporting entity is required to measure fair value using one or more of the following techniques: 1. A valuation technique that uses: a. The quoted price of the identical liability when traded as an asset b. Quoted prices for similar liabilities or similar liabilities when traded as assets. 2. Another valuation technique that is consistent with the principles of topic 820; two examples would be an income approach, such as a present value technique, or a market approach, such as a technique that is based on the amount at the measurement date that the reporting entity would pay to transfer the identical liability or would receive to enter into the identical liability. The amendments in this update also clarify that when estimating the fair value of a liability, a reporting entity is not required to include a separate input or adjustment to other inputs relating to the existence of a restriction that prevents the transfer of the liability. The amendments in this update also clarify that both a quoted price in an active market for the identical liability when traded as an asset in an active market when no adjustments to the quoted price of the asset are required are Level 1 fair value measurements.  The Company does not expect the adoption of this update to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.


In September 2009, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-08 “Earnings Per Share – Amendments to Section 260-10-S99”,which represents technical corrections to topic 260-10-S99, Earnings per share, based on EITF Topic D-53, Computation of Earnings Per Share for a Period that includes a Redemption or an Induced Conversion of a Portion of a Class of Preferred Stock and EITF Topic D-42, The Effect of the Calculation of Earnings per Share for the Redemption or Induced Conversion of Preferred Stock. The Company does not expect the adoption of this update to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.


In September 2009, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-09 “Accounting for Investments-Equity Method and Joint Ventures and Accounting for Equity-Based Payments to Non-Employees”.  This update represents a correction to Section 323-10-S99-4, Accounting by an Investor for Stock-Based Compensation Granted to Employees of an Equity Method Investee. Additionally, it adds observer comment Accounting Recognition for Certain Transactions Involving Equity Instruments Granted to Other Than Employees to the Codification. The Company does not expect the adoption to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.


In September 2009, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-12 “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures Topic 820 – Investment in Certain Entities That Calculate Net Assets Value Per Share (or Its Equivalent)”, which provides amendments to Subtopic 820-10, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures-Overall, for the fair value measurement of



- 44 -






investments in certain entities that calculate net asset value per share (or its equivalent). The amendments in this update permit, as a practical expedient, a reporting entity to measure the fair value of an investment that is within the scope of the amendments in this update on the basis of the net asset value per share of the investment (or its equivalent) if the net asset value of the investment (or its equivalent) is calculated in a manner consistent with the measurement principles of Topic 946 as of the reporting entity’s measurement date, including measurement of all or substantially all of the underlying investments of the investee in accordance with Topic 820. The amendments in this update also require disclosures by major category of investment about the attributes of investments within the scope of the amendments in this update, such as the nature of any restrictions on the investor’s ability to redeem its investments at the measurement date, any unfunded commitments (for example, a contractual commitment by the investor to invest a specified amount of additional capital at a future date to fund investments that will be make by the investee), and the investment strategies of the investees. The major category of investment is required to be determined on the basis of the nature and risks of the investment in a manner consistent with the guidance for major security types in U.S. GAAP on investments in debt and equity securities in paragraph 320-10-50-1B. The disclosures are required for all investments within the scope of the amendments in this update regardless of whether the fair value of the investment is measured using the practical expedient. The Company does not expect the adoption to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.


In January 2010, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-01 “Equity Topic 505 – Accounting for Distributions to Shareholders with Components of Stock and Cash”, which clarify that the stock portion of a distribution to shareholders that allows them to elect to receive cash or stock with a potential limitation on the total amount of cash that all shareholders can elect to receive in the aggregate is considered a share issuance that is reflected in EPS prospectively and is not a stock dividend for purposes of applying Topics 505 and 260 (Equity and Earnings Per Share (“EPS”)).  Those distributions should be accounted for and included in EPS calculations in accordance with paragraphs 480-10-25- 14 and 260-10-45-45 through 45-47 of the FASB Accounting Standards codification.  The amendments in this Update also provide a technical correction to the Accounting Standards Codification.  The correction moves guidance that was previously included in the Overview and Background Section to the definition of a stock dividend in the Master Glossary.  That guidance indicates that a stock dividend takes nothing from the property of the corporation and adds nothing to the interests of the stockholders.  It also indicates that the proportional interest of each shareholder remains the same, and is a key factor to consider in determining whether a distribution is a stock dividend.


In January 2010, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-02 “Consolidation Topic 810 – Accounting and Reporting for Decreases in Ownership of a Subsidiary – a Scope Clarification”, which provides amendments to Subtopic 810-10 and related guidance within U.S. GAAP to clarify that the scope of the decrease in ownership provisions of the Subtopic and related guidance applies to the following:


1.

A subsidiary or group of assets that is a business or nonprofit activity

2.

A subsidiary that is a business or nonprofit activity that is transferred to an equity method investee or joint venture

3.

An exchange of a group of assets that constitutes a business or nonprofit activity for a noncontrolling interest in an entity (including an equity method investee or joint venture).


The amendments in this Update also clarify that the decrease in ownership guidance in Subtopic 810-10 does not apply to the following transactions even if they involve businesses:


1.

Sales of in substance real estate.  Entities should apply the sale of real estate guidance in Subtopics 360-20 (Property, Plant, and Equipment) and 976-605 (Retail/Land) to such transactions.

2.

Conveyances of oil and gas mineral rights.  Entities should apply the mineral property conveyance and related transactions guidance in Subtopic 932-360 (Oil and Gas-Property, Plant, and Equipment) to such transactions.


If a decrease in ownership occurs in a subsidiary that is not a business or nonprofit activity, an entity first needs to consider whether the substance of the transaction causing the decrease in ownership is addressed in other U.S. GAAP, such as transfers of financial assets, revenue recognition, exchanges of nonmonetary assets, sales of in substance real estate, or conveyances of oil and gas mineral rights, and apply that guidance as applicable. If no other guidance exists, an entity should apply the guidance in Subtopic 810-10.


Management does not believe that any other recently issued, but not yet effective accounting pronouncements, if adopted, would have a material effect on the accompanying consolidated financial statements.




- 45 -






NOTE 3 – GOING CONCERN


As reflected in the accompanying financial statements, the Company had a deficit accumulated during the development stage of $113,945 at December 31, 2009 and had a net loss of $27,036 and cash used in operations of $28,026 for the year ended December 31, 2009, respectively, with nominal amount of revenues since inception.


While the Company is attempting to commence operations and generate sufficient revenues, the Company’s cash position may not be significant enough to support the Company’s daily operations.  Management intends to raise additional funds by way of a public or private offering.  Management believes that the actions presently being taken to further implement its business plan and generate sufficient  revenues provide the opportunity for the Company to continue as a going concern.  While the Company believes in the viability of its strategy to generate sufficient revenues and in its ability to raise additional funds, there can be no assurances to that effect.  The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent upon the Company’s ability to further implement its business plan and generate revenues.


The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.


NOTE 4 – SOFTWARE RESELLER AGREEMENT


On June 11, 2008, the Company acquired an exclusive Software Reseller Agreement (“Software Reseller Agreement”) for the People’s Republic of China (“PRC”) to market an interactive multimedia language education software package.  The Software Reseller Agreement was originally granted by Strokes International AG to Peter Schmid, an individual, who later sold and conveyed his legal interest in the Software Reseller Agreement to Bakken Resources, Inc.  The Company purchased the Software Reseller Agreement in consideration of (i) $10,000 in cash and (ii) a warrant to purchase 300,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at $0.033 per share expiring three (3) year from the date of the issuance, and (iii) a royalty equal to 4% of all revenue received from the sale of all language education software sold in the PRC.  Pursuant to the Software Reseller Agreement the Company is required to pay Strokes International AG (“Strokes”) 40% of the suggested retail price on each unit sold.


The fair value of warrant grant estimated on the date of grant uses the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions:


 

 

 

 

June 11, 2008

 

 

 

 

Risk-free interest rate

 

 

 

 

 

3.16%

 

Dividend yield

 

 

 

 

 

0.00%

 

Expected volatility

 

 

 

 

 

0.00%

 

Expected option life (year)

 

 

 

 

 

3.00

 


The warrant to purchase 300,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at $0.033 per share was valued at its fair market value at the date of issuance, using the Black-Scholes valuation model, of nil.


On June 23, 2008, the Company entered into an Exclusive Marketing and Distribution Agreement (“Distribution Agreement”) with Xiamen Eurotech Intelligence Commercial & Trading Co., Ltd. (“Xiamen”), effective July 1, 2008 for a term of one and a half years expiring on December 31, 2009 with automatic renewal if Xiamen achieves defined objectives of the sales.  Pursuant to the Distribution Agreement, Xiamen assumed the underlying financial obligations of the Software Reseller Agreement and will directly remit proceeds from the sale of Language Education Software to Strokes.  Under the terms and conditions of the Resellers Agreement the Company agreed to sell three different interactive multimedia language education software programs for the following Net Retail Prices (NRP): (1) 385 RMB for the beginners program; (2) 556 RMB for the intermediate program; and (3) 726 RMB for the advanced program.  Since the products will be produced in the PRC by Xiamen, the costs for production, duplication, packaging, printing and marketing expenses in the amount of 45 RMB for the beginners program, 55 RMB for the intermediate program, and 65 RMB for the advanced program will be deducted from the NRP before calculating 40% of the NRP payable to Strokes.  Xiamen retains 60% of the NRP to cover all operating costs and will pay the Company $4.00 (equivalent to RMB27.38 using the currency exchange rate at December 31, 2008) for each unit of language education software sold by XIAM in the Territory.




- 46 -






Software reseller agreement at cost at December 31, 2009 and 2008 consisted of the following:


 

 

December 31, 2009

 

 

December 31, 2008

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Software reseller agreement

 

$

10,0000

 

 

$

10,000

 

Accumulated amortization

 

 

(1,583

)

 

 

(583

)

 

 

$

8,667

 

 

$

9,417

 



Amortization expense


Amortization expense for the year ended December 31, 2009 and for the period from June 6, 2008 (inception) through December 31, 2008 was $1,000 and $583 respectively.  Amortization expense for the next five years is $1,000 per year.


NOTE 5 – STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY


Common stock


The Company sold 1,500,000 shares of common stock at $0.0033 to the president, CEO and Chairwoman of the Board of the Directors for $500 in cash in June, 2008 upon its formation.  


In August, 2008 the Company sold 750,000 shares at $0.0033 to two (2) officers and directors for $250 in cash.


In September, 2008, the Company sold 3,277,500 shares of common stock at $0.0333 per share to 41 individuals for $109,250 in cash.


In October, 2008, the Company sold 30,000 shares of common stock at $0.0333 per share to one individual for $1,000 in cash.


Stock options


The Company’s board of directors approved the adoption of the “2008 Non-Qualified Stock Option and Stock Appreciation Rights Plan” by unanimous consent on June 6, 2008.  This plan was initiated to encourage and enable officers, directors, consultants, advisors and other key employees of the Company to acquire and retain a proprietary interest in the Company by ownership of its common stock.  1,000,000 of the authorized shares of the Company’s common stock may be subject to, or issued pursuant to, the terms of the plan.


The Board of Directors had not approved or granted any non-statutory stock options from the Company’s 2008 Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan for the year ending December 31, 2009 or the period from June 6, 2008 (inception) through December 31, 2008.


Warrants


In connection with the entry into the Software Reseller Agreement, the Company issued a warrant to purchase 300,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at $0.033 per share expiring three (3) year from the date of the issuance, all of which has been earned upon issuance.  The fair value of these warrants granted, estimated on the date of grant, was nil at the date of grant, using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions:

 

Expected warrant life (year)

 

 

 

 

 

 

3.00

 

Expected volatility

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.00%

 

Risk-free interest rate

 

 

 

 

 

 

3.16%

 

Dividend yield

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.00%

 




- 47 -






The table below summarizes the Company’s warrants activity for the period from June 6, 2008 (inception) through December 31, 2009:


 

Number of

Warrant

 Shares

 

Exercise Price

 Range

Per Share

 

Weighted

 Average Exercise Price

 

Fair Value at Date of Issuance

 

Aggregate

Intrinsic

Value

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, June 6, 2008

 

-

 

 

 

$

-

 

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

 

$

-

 

Granted

 

100,000

 

 

 

 

0.10

 

 

 

 

0.10

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

-

 

Canceled

 

-

 

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

-

 

Exercised

 

-

 

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

-

 

Expired

 

-

 

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, December 31, 2008

 

100,000

 

 

 

$

0.10

 

 

 

$

0.10

 

 

$

-

 

 

 

$

-

 

Granted

 

-

 

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

-

 

Canceled

 

-

 

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

-

 

Exercised

 

-

 

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

-

 

Expired

 

-

 

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, December 31, 2009

 

100,000

 

 

 

$

0.10

 

 

 

$

0.10

 

 

$

-

 

 

 

$

-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Earned and exercisable, December 31, 2009

 

100,000

 

 

 

$

0.10

 

 

 

$

0.10

 

 

$

-

 

 

 

$

-

 

Unvested, December 31, 2009

 

-

 

 

 

$

0.10

 

 

 

$

0.10

 

 

$

-

 

 

 

$

-

 



The following table summarizes information concerning outstanding and exercisable warrants as of December 31, 2009:


 

 

Warrants Outstanding

 

Warrants Exercisable

 

Range of Exercise Prices

 

Number Outstanding

 

Average Remaining Contractual Life  (in years)

 

Weighted Average Exercise Price

 

Number Exercisable

 

Average Remaining Contractual Life  (in years)

 

Weighted Average Exercise Price

 

$0.033

 

 

300,000

 

 

1.50

 

$

0.033

 

 

300,000

 

 

1.50

 

$

0.033

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$0.033

 

 

300,000

 

 

1.50

 

$

0.033

 

 

300,000

 

 

1.50

 

$

0.033

 



NOTE 6 – INCOME TAXES


Deferred tax assets


At December 31, 2009, the Company had net operating loss (“NOL”) carry–forwards for Federal income tax purposes of $113,945 that may be offset against future taxable income through 2029.  No tax benefit has been reported with respect to these net operating loss carry-forwards in the accompanying financial statements because the Company believes that the realization of the Company’s net deferred tax assets of approximately $38,741 was not considered more likely than not and accordingly, the potential tax benefits of the net loss carry-forwards are fully offset by a valuation allowance of $38,741.


Deferred tax assets consist primarily of the tax effect of NOL carry-forwards.  The Company has provided a full valuation allowance on the deferred tax assets because of the uncertainty regarding its realizability.  The valuation allowance increased approximately $9,192 and $29,549 for the year ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.




- 48 -






Components of deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 are as follows:


 

 

December 31, 2009

 

 

December 31, 2008

 

Net deferred tax assets – Non-current:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Expected income tax benefit from NOL carry-forwards

 

$

38,741

 

 

 

29,549

 

Less valuation allowance

 

 

(38,741

)

 

 

(29,549

)

Deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowance

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 


Income taxes in the statements of operations


A reconciliation of the federal statutory income tax rate and the effective income tax rate as a percentage of income before income taxes is as follows:


 

 

For the Year Ended

December 31, 2009

 

 

For the Period from June 6, 2008 (inception) through December 31, 2008

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Federal statutory income tax rate

 

 

34.0

%

 

 

34.0

%

Change in valuation allowance on net operating loss carry-forwards

 

 

(34.0

)%

 

 

(34.0

)%

Effective income tax rate

 

 

0.0

%

 

 

0.0

%



NOTE 7 – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS


Note payable – officer


On November 9, 2009, the Company entered into a promissory note with the President, Chief Executive Officer and Director, whereby the President made a loan to the Company in the amount of $6,500 for a period of One Hundred Eighty (180) days.  The promissory note bears interest at 6% per annum, and matures on May 8, 2010.


Consulting services provided by and compensation booked to officer


Consulting services provided by and compensation booked to the President, Chief Executive Officer and Director were $6,000 and $9,000 for the year ended December 31, 2009 and for the period from June 6, 2008 (inception) through December 31, 2008, respectively.


Free office space from the President, Chief Executive Officer and Director


The Company has been provided office space at no cost by the President, Chief Executive Officer and Director.  The management determined that such cost is nominal and did not recognize rent expense in its financial statements.


NOTE 8 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS


The Company has evaluated all events that occurred after the balance sheet date of December 31, 2009 through March 22, 2010, the date when the financial statements were issued to determine if they must be reported.  The Management of the Company determined that there were certain reportable subsequent events to be disclosed as follows:


On June 10, 2010, the Company effectuated a 3 for 1 forward split of its common stock. All share and per share data herein have been retroactively restated to reflect this 3 for 1 forward stock split.



- 49 -






Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements for the Interim Period Ended September 30, 2010 and 2009



Bakken Resources, Inc.

(Formerly Multisys Language Solutions, Inc.)

(A Development Stage Company)

Index to Consolidated Financial Statements


Contents                                                                                                                                                                                                                        Page(s)



Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 30, 2010 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2009


Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, and for the Period from June 6, 2008 (Inception) through September 30, 2010 (Unaudited)  


Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit) for the Period from June 6, 2008 (Inception) through September 30, 2010 (Unaudited)


Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, and for the Period from June 6, 2008 (Inception) through September 30, 2010 (Unaudited)


Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)


51


52



53



54



55 to 57





- 50 -





BAKKEN RESOURCES, INC.

(FORMERLY MULTISYS LANGUAGE SOLUTIONS, INC.)

 (A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

 CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

September 30,

2010

(Unaudited)

 

 

December 31,

2009

ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

CURRENT ASSETS:

 

 

 

 

 

  Cash

$

375,288 

 

3,855 

  Accounts receivable

 

4,008 

 

 

2,036 

    Total Current Assets

 

379,296 

 

 

5,891 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Software reseller agreement, net of accumulated

 

 

 

 

 

  amortization of $2,333 and $1,583, respectively

 

7,667 

 

 

8,417 

 

 

 

 

 

 

      Total Assets

$

386,963 

 

14,308 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT

 

 

 

 

 

CURRENT LIABILITIES:

 

 

 

 

 

  Accounts payable

$

14,909 

 

3,919 

  Accrued expenses

 

378,896 

 

 

6,834 

  Note payable – officer

 

13,000 

 

 

6,500 

Total Current Liabilities

 

406,805 

 

 

17,253 

 

 

 

 

 

 

STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT:

 

 

 

 

 

Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized,

 

 

 

 

 

  none issued and outstanding

 

 

 

Common stock, $0.001 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized,

 

 

 

 

 

  6,157,500 and 5,557,500 shares issued and outstanding,

 

 

 

 

 

  respectively

 

6,158 

 

 

5,558 

Additional paid-in capital

 

114,842 

 

 

105,442 

Deficit accumulated during the development stage

 

(140,842)

 

 

(113,945)

  Total Stockholders’ Deficit

 

(19,842)

 

 

(2,945)

 

 

 

 

 

 

    Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Deficit

$

386,963 

 

14,308 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.



- 51 -








BAKKEN RESOURCES, INC.

(FORMERLY MULTISYSS LANGUAGE SOLUTIONS, INC.)

 (A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

 CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

 (UNAUDITED)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

June 6, 2008

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Inception)

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

 

Nine Months Ended

 

 

through

 

 

September 30,

 

 

September 30,

 

 

September 30,

 

 

2010

 

 

2009

 

 

2010

 

 

2009

 

 

2010

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 REVENUES EARNED DURING

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   THE DEVELOPMENT STAGE

$

 

$

1,648 

 

4,008 

 

$

1,648 

 

$

7,692 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

OPERATING EXPENSES:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  Distribution and advertising

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

60,000 

  Amortization

 

250 

 

 

250 

 

 

750 

 

 

750 

 

 

2,333 

  Professional fees

 

10,872 

 

 

2,556 

 

 

28,231 

 

 

19,419 

 

 

80,377 

  Royalty  

 

 

 

82 

 

 

200 

 

 

82 

 

 

384 

  General and administrative expenses

 

268 

 

 

45 

 

 

1,396 

 

 

1,479 

 

 

5,079 

    Total Operating Expenses

 

11,390 

 

 

2,933 

 

 

30,577 

 

 

21,730 

 

 

148,173 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 LOSS FROM OPERATIONS

 

(11,390)

 

 

(1,285)

 

 

(26,569)

 

 

(20,082)

 

 

(140,481)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 OTHER EXPENSES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  Interest expense

 

131 

 

 

 

 

328 

 

 

 

 

361 

    Total other expenses

 

131 

 

 

 

 

328 

 

 

 

 

361 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 NET LOSS

$

(11,521)

 

$

(1,285)

 

(26,897)

 

$

(20,082)

 

$

(140,842)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 NET LOSS PER COMMON SHARE

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  - BASIC AND DILUTED

$

(0.00)

 

$

(0.00)

 

(0.00)

 

$

(0.00)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Weighted average common shares outstanding

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  - basic and diluted

 

6,157,500 

 

 

5,557,500 

 

 

5,924,533 

 

 

5,557,500 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements. 




- 52 -







BAKKEN RESOURCES, INC.  

(FORMERLY MULTISYS LANGUAGE SOLUTIONS, INC.)

 (A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

 CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)  

June 6, 2008 (Inception) through September 30, 2010

 (Unaudited)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deficit

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

Additional

 

during the

 

Stockholders’

 

 

Common stock

 

Paid-in

 

Development

 

Equity

 

 

Shares

 

Amount

 

Capital

 

Stage

 

 (Deficit)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balances – June 6, 2008 (Inception)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Issuance of common stock for cash

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  upon formation at $0.0003 per share

 

1,500,000 

 

1,500 

 

(1,000)

 

 

500 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Issuance of common stock for cash

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  in August 2008 at $0.0003 per share

 

750,000 

 

750 

 

(500)

 

 

250 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Issuance of common stock for cash

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  in September 2008 at $0.0333 per share

 

3,277,500 

 

3,278 

 

105,972 

 

 

109,250 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Issuance of common stock for cash

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  in October 2008 at $0.0333 per share

 

30,000 

 

30 

 

970 

 

 

1,000 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Net loss

 

 

 

 

(86,909)

 

(86,909)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balances – December 31, 2008

 

5,557,500 

 

5,558 

 

105,442 

 

(86,909)

 

24,091 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Net loss

 

 

 

 

(27,036)

 

(27,036)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balances – December 31, 2009

 

5,557,500 

 

5,558 

 

105,442 

 

(113,945)

 

(2,945)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Issuance of common stock for cash

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  in April 2010 at $0.0167 per share

 

600,000 

 

600 

 

9,400 

 

 

10,000 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Net loss

 

 

 

 

(26,897)

 

(26,897)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balances – September 30, 2010

 

6,157,500 

6,158 

114,842 

(140,842)

(19,842)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.






- 53 -







BAKKEN RESOURCES, INC.

(FORMERLY MULTISYS LANGUAGE SOLUTIONS, INC.)

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(UNAUDITED)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

June 6, 2008

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Inception)

 

 

Nine Months Ended

 

 

through

 

 

September 30,

 

 

September 30,

 

 

2010

 

 

2009

 

 

2010

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  Net Loss

$

(26,897)

 

$

(20,082)

 

(140,842)

  Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    used in operating activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    Amortization expense

 

750 

 

 

750 

 

 

2,333 

    Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

      Accounts receivable

 

(1,972)

 

 

(1,648)

 

 

(4,008)

      Accounts payable

 

10,990 

 

 

3,951 

 

 

14,909 

      Accrued expenses

 

(2,938)

 

 

(8,293)

 

 

3,896 

NET CASH USED IN OPERATING ACTIVITIES

 

(20,067)

 

 

(25,322)

 

 

(123,712)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  Purchase of Software Reseller Agreement

 

 

 

 

 

(10,000)

NET CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES

 

 

 

 

 

(10,000)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  Proceeds from related party note payable

 

15,000 

 

 

 

 

21,500 

  Repayment of related party note payable

 

(8,500)

 

 

 

 

(8,500)

  Proceeds received from common stock subscribed

 

375,000 

 

 

 

 

375,000 

  Proceeds from sale of common stock

 

10,000 

 

 

 

 

121,000 

NET CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES

 

391,500 

 

 

 

 

509,000 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NET CHANGE IN CASH

 

371,433 

 

 

(25,322)

 

 

375,288 

Cash at beginning of period

 

3,855 

 

 

25,349 

 

 

Cash at end of period

$

375,288 

 

$

27 

 

375,288 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF

CASH FLOWS INFORMATION:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  Interest paid

$

164 

 

$

 

164 

  Taxes paid

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.




- 54 -






Bakken Resources, Inc.

(Formerly Multisys Language Solutions, Inc.)

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)



NOTE 1 – ORGANIZATION AND OPERATIONS


Bakken Resources, Inc. (formerly Multisys Language Solutions, Inc.) (a development stage company) (“BRI” or the “Company”) was incorporated on June 6, 2008 in the State of Nevada.  The Company intends to distribute interactive multimedia language education software developed by Strokes International AG., an Austria based software company in the Great China Region including the People’s Republic of China (“PRC”), Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of PRC (“Hong Kong SAR”), Macao Special Administrative Region of PRC (“Macao SAR”) and Taiwan (“Territory”) pursuant to an exclusive Software Reseller Agreement (“Software Reseller Agreement”) via an independent third party software distribution company in the Territory.


On June 10, 2010, the Company effectuated a 3 for 1 forward split of its outstanding common stock.  The record date for the stock split was June 24, 2010. Each outstanding share of common stock was converted into three shares. All share and per share amounts herein have been retroactively restated to reflect this stock split.


Formation of Multisys Acquisition, Inc.


On June 3, 2010, the Company formed a wholly owned subsidiary, Multisys Acquisition, Inc. under the laws of the State of Nevada.  For the quarter ending September 30, 2010, Multisys Acquisition, Inc. was inactive.



NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES


Basis of presentation


The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements and related notes have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission to Form 10-Q and Article 8 of Regulation S-X.  These unaudited interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2009 and notes thereto contained in the information as part of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on April 7, 2010. Notes to the consolidated financial statements which would substantially duplicate the disclosure contained in the audited financial statements for fiscal 2009 as reported in the Form 10-K have been omitted. In the opinion of management, the unaudited interim consolidated financial statements furnished reflect all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) which are necessary to present fairly the financial position and the results of operations for the interim periods presented herein.  Unaudited interim results are not necessarily indicative of the results for the full year.  


Reclassification


Certain amounts in the prior period consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.



NOTE 3 – GOING CONCERN


As reflected in the accompanying consolidated financial statements, the Company had a working capital deficit of $27,509 and deficit accumulated during the development stage of $140,842 at September 30, 2010. In addition, the Company incurred a net loss of $26,897 and net cash used in operations of $20,067 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, with nominal amount of revenues since inception. These conditions raise substantial doubt as to the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.


While the Company is attempting to commence operations and generate sufficient revenues, the Company’s cash position may not be significant enough to support the Company’s daily operations.  Management intends to raise additional funds by way of a public or private offering.  Management believes that the actions presently being taken to further implement its business plan and generate sufficient  revenues provide the opportunity for the Company to continue as a going concern.  While the Company believes in the viability of its strategy to generate sufficient revenues and in its ability to raise additional funds, there can be no assurances to



- 55 -






that effect.  The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent upon the Company’s ability to further implement its business plan and generate revenues.


The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.



NOTE 4 – OPTION TO PURCHASE ASSET AGREEMENT


On June 21, 2010 Holms Energy, LLC granted Multisys Acquisition, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of BRI an option to purchase certain assets.  Such assets are related to certain interests in oil and gas rights on acreage located in McKenzie County, North Dakota (Holms Property), and potential production royalty income from wells to be drilled on the Holms Property whose mineral rights are owned by Holms Energy, LLC, and the transfer of all right, title and interest to an Option to Purchase Mineral Rights Agreement related to purchasing additional mineral rights and production royalty income on the Holms Property from a third party for One Million Six Hundred Forty Nine Thousand ($1,649,000) Dollars.  The option may be exercised to purchase the mineral rights assets by the issuance of 40 million shares of common stock by BRI and the payment of $100,000.  The exercise of the option by BRI will also involve a change of control of BRI pursuant to which members of Holms Energy, LLC, will become the majority shareholders of BRI and the board of directors and management of BRI will be replaced by nominees of Holms.  


If both the offering and the execution of the Asset Purchase Agreement are not completed by August 31, 2010, all funds held will be returned to the investors in the private placement, and the Option to Purchase Asset Agreement will be void.   The expiration date of the Option to Purchase Asset Agreement and the Option to Purchase Mineral Rights Agreement were extended by both parties to November 15, 2010. The current private placement offering has been extended by the Company’s board of directors to November 15, 2010.



NOTE 5 – STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY


Common stock


On April 16, 2010, the Company sold 600,000 common shares to one individual for $10,000 in cash.


On June 28, 2010, the Company initiated a private placement of a minimum of 3,000,000 units and a maximum of 5,000,000 units of its restricted common stock at $0.50 per Unit.  Each Unit consists of two shares of common stock and one common stock purchase warrant that is exercisable at $0.50 per share for a period of three years.  No Units will be sold unless the Company receives and accepts subscriptions for at least 3,000,000 Units on or before November 15, 2010.  All subscription funds will be held in a special account pending the closing of a proposed Asset Purchase Agreement between Multisys Acquisition, Inc. and Holms Energy, LLC. (see Note 4).  During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Company received subscriptions for an aggregate of $375,000.


Common Stock Options


On June 25, 2010, the Company increased the total common stock, available in the Company’s 2008 Non-Qualified Stock Option and Stock Appreciation Rights Plan from one million (1,000,000) shares to five million (5,000,000) shares.


As of September 30, 2010, no common stock options have been granted.


Common Stock Warrants:


As of  September 30, 2010, the Company has 300,000 common stock warrants outstanding. The 300,000 warrants are exercisable as of  September 30, 2010, have an exercise price of $0.033 and expire June 11, 2011. No common stock warrants were granted, exercised or cancelled during the nine months ended September 30, 2010.



- 56 -






NOTE 6 – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS


Note payable – officer


On November 9, 2009, the Company borrowed $6,500 from its President, Chief Executive Officer and Director. The note is unsecured, matures May 8, 2010 and bears interest at 6% per annum. On April 2, 2010, the note was repaid in full.


On May 28, 2010, the Company borrowed $15,000 from its President, Chief Executive Officer and Director. The note is unsecured, matures November 23, 2010 and bears interest at 6% per annum. The Company made a partial repayment of $2,000 on June 8, 2010 leaving $13,000 outstanding at September 30, 2010.  


Consulting services provided by and compensation booked to officer


Consulting services provided by and compensation booked to the President, Chief Executive Officer and Director were $0 and $6,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.


Free office space from the President, Chief Executive Officer and Director


The Company has been provided office space at no cost by the President, Chief Executive Officer and Director.  The management determined that such cost is nominal and did not recognize rent expense in its consolidated financial statements.


 

NOTE 7 –SUBSEQUENT EVENTS


On November 1, 2010, the Company sold 140,000 common shares at $0.25 per share or $35,000, with 70,000 total warrant shares attached that are exercisable at $.50 per share for three years from the date of the sale, to two accredited investors, one for $10,000 and the other for $25,000.  In conjunction with the private placement, there were no fees, commissions, or professional fees for services payable.  


On November 2, 2010, the Company repaid the $13,000 note and accrued interest of $339 owed to its President, Chief Executive Officer and Director.




- 57 -






F.  SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA


The following summary financial and other data should be read in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation,” beginning on page 58 and the financial statements and related notes of Bakken Resources, Inc., appearing in this Prospectus beginning on page 34. The selected financial data was derived from our audited financial statements at December 31, 2008 and 2009, and for the period from June 6, 2008 (inception), through December 31, 2009.


Balance Sheets Data

 

September 30,

2010

(Unaudited)

 

December 31, 2009

 

December 31,

2008

Cash

 

375,288

 

3,855 

 

25,349 

Software Reseller Agreement, net

 

 

7,667 

 

 

8,417 

 

 

9,417 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total assets

 

386,963 

 

14,308 

 

34,766 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total current liabilities

 

406,805 

 

17,253 

 

10,675 

Stockholders’ equity (deficit)

 

 

(19,842)

 

 

(2,945)

 

 

24,091 

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity (deficit)

 

386,963 

 

14,308 

 

34,766 




Selected Statements of

Operations Data:

 





For the

nine months ended

September 30, 2010

(Unaudited)

 



For the Year ended

December 31, 2009

 

For the Period from June 6, 2008 (inception) through

December 31, 2008

Net Revenue

 

$         4,008 

 

$       3,684 

 

$               - 

Distribution and marketing

 

$                 - 

 

$               - 

 

$     60,000 

General and administrative

 

$         1,396 

 

$          499 

 

$       3,184 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net Loss

 

$     (11,521)

 

$   (27,036)

 

$   (86,909)

Net Loss Per Common Share

 

$         (0.00)

 

$       (0.01)

 

$       (0.07)



G.  SUPPLEMENTARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION


None.


H.  MANAGEMENT DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATION

 

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT FOR FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS


THIS INFORMATION FROM OUR PROSPECTUS CONTAINS “FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS” WITHIN THE MEANING OF THE PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995 AND INVOLVES A HIGH DEGREE OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY. ALL STATEMENTS, OTHER THAN STATEMENTS OF HISTORICAL FACTS, INCLUDED IN OR INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE INTO THIS PROSPECTUS ARE FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS. IN ADDITION, WHEN USED IN THIS DOCUMENT, THE WORDS “ANTICIPATE,” “ESTIMATE,” “PROJECT,” AND SIMILAR EXPRESSIONS ARE INTENDED TO IDENTIFY FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS. OUR ACTUAL RESULTS MAY DIFFER MATERIALLY FROM THOSE PROJECTED IN THE FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS DUE TO RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES THAT EXIST IN OUR OPERATIONS. THESE FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN RISKS, UNCERTAINTIES AND ASSUMPTIONS INCLUDING AMONG OTHERS, THE RISK THAT OUR PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS WILL NOT PROVE SUCCESSFUL, THAT WE WILL NOT BE ABLE TO OBTAIN FINANCING TO COMPLETE ANY FUTURE PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT, THAT OUR PRODUCTS WILL NOT PROVE COMPETITVE IN THEIR MARKETS. THESE RISKS AND OTHERS ARE MORE FULLY DESCRIBED IN OUR MOST RECENT 10-K ANNUAL REPORT. SHOULD ONE OR MORE OF THESE



- 58 -






RISKS OR UNCERTAINTIES MATERIALIZE, OR SHOULD UNDERLYING ASSUMPTIONS PROVE INCORRECT, ACTUAL RESULTS MAY VARY MATERIALLY FROM THOSE ANTICIPATED, ESTIMATED OR PROJECTED.


ALTHOUGH WE BELIEVE THAT THE EXPECTATIONS INCLUDED IN SUCH FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS ARE REASONABLE, WE CANNOT GIVE ANY ASSURANCES THAT THESE EXPECTATIONS WILL PROVE TO BE CORRECT. WE UNDERTAKE NO OBLIGATION TO PUBLICLY RELEASE THE RESULT OF ANY REVISIONS TO SUCH FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS THAT MAY BE MADE TO REFLECT EVENTS OR CIRCUMSTANCES AFTER THE DATE HEREOF OR TO REFLECT THE OCCURRENCE OF UNANTICIPATED EVENTS.


The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto appearing in Item 9.01.


General


Bakken Resources, Inc. (“BRI”) (formerly Multisys Language Solutions, Inc.), a Nevada corporation based in Las Vegas, Nevada, was incorporated on June 6, 2008 for the purpose of distributing interactive multimedia language education software developed by Strokes International AG., an Austria based software company in the Great China Region including the People’s Republic of China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of PRC,  Macao Special Administrative Region of PRC, and Taiwan pursuant to an exclusive software reseller agreement via an independent third party software distribution company in the Territory.  We funded our initial working capital needs through a private placement offering of common stock in September 2008 with gross proceeds of $109,250.

Since commencement of operations in 2008, our efforts to date have been principally devoted to organization, initial capitalization, business development, identifying a marketing partner in China, preparing a comprehensive business and operating plan, evaluating, with our exclusive marketing agent in China, the market in China to which to market language education software and supporting the efforts of our exclusive marketing agent in China to distribute and sell software.  Our business has not, however, achieved any significant success.  Since our inception to September 30, 2010, we have only generated approximately $7,692 of revenues from our distribution and sales business, while incurring a loss of approximately $140,842 since inception.  


Option on Assets of Holms Energy, LLC


Because we were unable to develop our interactive multimedia language education business into a financially viable business, the board of directors decided to redirect our business and to acquire oil and gas rights via an option to purchase certain oil and gas rights from Holms Energy, LLC, a Nevada company.  On June 21, 2010, BRI, Multisys Acquisition, Inc. (a wholly owned subsidiary of BRI), and Holms Energy, LLC entered into an Option to Purchase Assets Agreement, pursuant to which Holms Energy, LLC agreed to grant Multisys Acquisition an option to purchase certain oil and gas production royalty rights on land in North Dakota.  The option was to terminate on November 30, 2010, as a result of extensions granted to the options that originally expired on August 31, 2010,  Multisys Acquisition exercised the option on November 26, 2010 and exercised its rights under the Asset Purchase Agreement, whereby Multisys Acquisition paid Holms Energy, LLC $100,000 and BRI issued forty million (40,000,000) shares of common stock to Holms Energy, LLC and granted Holms Energy, LLC a 5% overriding royalty on all revenue generated from the gas and oil production royalty rights for ten years purchased from Holms Energy, LLC.  


As a result of the issuance of the shares, the members of Holms Energy, LLC hold controlling interest in BRI.  The oil and gas production royalty rights purchased from Holms Energy, LLC included:  1) oil and gas rights equal to approximately 6% landowner royalty interest related to approximately 6,000 gross acres and 1,600 net mineral acres of land located in McKenzie County, 8 miles southeast of Williston, North Dakota owned by Holms Energy, LLC;  2) Greenfield Mineral Rights, as described below, purchased by Holms Energy, LLC from and Rocky and Evenette Greenfield and assigned to Multisys Acquisition in exchange for forgiveness of $385,000 of a $485,000 promissory note from BRI to Holms Energy, LLC: and 3) the transfer of all right, title and interest in a total of 14 leases, 12 leases with Oasis Petroleum, Inc. (OAS-NYSE), one lease with Diamond Resources, Inc, which was subsequently sold to Brigham Resources, Inc. and one lease with Texon LP.


Option on Greenfield Mineral Rights Assets


Holms Energy, LLC entered into an option agreement, dated June 18, 2010, with Rocky and Evenette Greenfield to purchase 2.33% of the oil and gas production (3 out of 100 barrels produced from the Holms Property by any of the Holms Property Lessees) from the Holms property.  Holms Energy exercised this option on November 12, 2010 using $385,000 of a $485,000 loan from BRI to exercise the Option to Purchase and complete the initial payment of $400,000.  Under the terms of the loan from BRI to Holms Energy, Holms Energy, in conjunction with the entry into the Asset Purchase Agreement on November 26, 2010, the Greenfield Mineral Rights were assigned by Holms Energy to BRI in exchange for forgiveness of the loan.  After executing the Asset



- 59 -






Purchase Agreement with Holms Energy and paying the $400,000 down payment, Multisys Acquisition will now purchase the gas and oil production royalty rights of Rocky and Evenette Greenfield for an aggregate of $1,249,000 plus interest as follows:  installment payments in the amount of $120,000 per year plus interest at 5% per annum for 8 years and a balloon payment in the amount of $299,000.


Holms Assets


Holms Energy, LLC owned oil and gas rights equal to a 5.66% average landowner royalty interest related to approximately 6,000 gross acres and 1,600 net mineral acres of land located in McKenzie County, 8 miles southeast of Williston, North Dakota (the “Holms Property”).  There are 14 separate and original mineral leases executed between Val M. and Mari P. Holms (the managing members of Holms Energy, LLC) and from two other owners of mineral rights on the Holms Property, Rocky and Evenette Greenfield and third party, pursuant to 14 separate mineral leases granted or amended between September 9, 2009 and December 10, 2009, whereby: 1) Oasis Petroleum, Inc., 2) Brigham Resources, and 3) Texon L.P. (collectively “Holms Property Lessees”) purchased the rights to explore, drill and develop oil and gas on the Holms Property.  Oasis Petroleum, Inc., pursuant to the terms and conditions of the leases are required to drill 9 wells in the Bakken Formation before December 31, 2011 in order to retain the leases and keep them in good standing.  The Holms mineral rights constitute the right to 5.66% of the oil and gas production (6 out of 100 barrels produced from the Holms Property by any of the Holms Property Lessees).  Val M. and Mari P. Holms assigned their Holms Mineral Rights to Toll Reserve Consortium, Inc., who in turn transferred the same rights to Holms Energy, LLC in June 2010, subject to the existing 14 mineral leases granted to the Holms Property Lessees.  The leases were then assigned to BRI upon the execution of the Asset Purchase Agreement on November 26, 2010.  This includes the rights to potential oil and gas revenue from production royalties from the surface down to and including the oil shale bearing Bakken Formation, in the event commercial gas and oil is discovered by any of the Holms Property Lessees.  To date no Bakken Formation wells have been drilled on the Holms property and no Bakken Formation oil and gas production royalty income has been generated.


Royalty


After the acquisition of the Holms Energy mineral rights assets and 50% of the Greenfield landowner royalty interest, BRI now owns an 8.5% average landowner royalty interest, composed of a 5.66% average landowner royalty interest acquired  from the Holms Energy and a 2.83% average landowner royalty interest acquired by Holms Energy from the Greenfields originally.  The landowner royalty interest is the revenue royalty paid by the contracted oil drilling company (Oasis Petroleum for example) on whatever oil and gas revenue they generate from the particular lease.  If Oasis Petroleum generates $100,000 in oil and gas revenue from acreage subject to the BRI landowner royalty of 8.5%, BRI would receive in royalty payments of $8,500.  Pursuant to the 5% overriding royalty interest on all oil and gas revenue received by BRI from the assets purchased from Holms Energy, Holms Energy would receive a 5% royalty payment of $425 from BRI.


Subsequent Events


On November 26, 2010, we closed a private placement of $1,545,000, selling 3,090,000 units consisting of two shares each and one warrant share as described in the Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities Section below, and concurrently exercised the option and executed the acquisition agreement for said interests in mineral rights from Holms.  The acquisition agreement provided that, effective November 26, 2010, Holms assigned certain mineral interest rights to us for the consideration of 40,000,000 shares of our restricted common stock, payment of $100,000, and a ten year 5% royalty on the rights in exchange for certain mineral interest rights controlled by Holms Energy.  Upon entering the acquisition of assets, the members of Holms beneficially controlled approximately 76.2% of our outstanding shares of common stock.  Concurrently with the acquisition closing with Holms, we have abandoned and are trying to sell our prior business.  The exercise of the option by Multisys Acquisition involved a change of control of BRI to which members of Holms Energy, LLC, became the majority shareholders of BRI and the board of directors and management of BRI was replaced by nominees of Holms Energy.  The original name of our corporation, Multisys Language Solutions, Inc. was changed to Bakken Resources, Inc. pursuant to board of directors and stockholder approval, and a certificate of amendment of articles of incorporation was filed with the State of Nevada on November 29, 2010 and deemed effective on December 10, 2010.


The net proceeds of the recently completed private placement were primarily used to exercise the option to purchase Holms oil and gas rights, and will be used for working capital, to acquire mineral rights and interests in existing mineral leases from other third parties, to participate in joint venture drilling programs primarily in Eastern Montana, as well as Western, North, and South Dakota, with primary interest in the Bakken and Sanish Three Forks Formations, and for other general corporate purposes of BRI.


Results of Operations




- 60 -






Since BRI was formed on June 6, 2008, it has earned only $7,692 in revenue and has incurred a net loss of $140,842 for the period from June 6, 2008 (inception) through September 30, 2010.  $4,008 was earned during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 based on the sale of 992 units of the language education software products in China, compared to $1,648 earned for the nine months ended September 30, 2009.


For the period from June 6, 2008 (inception) through September 30, 2010, we incurred $60,000 in distribution and advertising expenses and $5,079 in general and administrative expenses.  The $60,000 in distribution and advertising was paid in September of 2008 to Xiamen, our exclusive marketing agent in China, and we did not have any additional distribution and advertising expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 or the nine months ended September 30, 2010.  Our general and administrative costs decreased slightly from $1,479 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, to $1,396 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010.  This decrease was attributable to lower banking fees.


The following tables provide selected financial data about our company as of September 30, 2010, December 31, 2009, and December 31, 2008.


Balance Sheets Data

 

September 30,

2010

(Unaudited)

 

December 31, 2009

 

December 31,

2008

Cash

 

375,288

 

3,855 

 

25,349 

Software Reseller Agreement, net

 

 

7,667 

 

 

8,417 

 

 

9,417 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total assets

 

386,963 

 

14,308 

 

34,766 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total current liabilities

 

406,805 

 

17,253 

 

10,675 

Stockholders’ equity (deficit)

 

 

(19,842)

 

 

(2,945)

 

 

24,091 

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity (deficit)

 

386,963 

 

14,308 

 

34,766 




Selected Statements of

Operations Data:

 





For the

nine months ended

September 31, 2010

(Unaudited)

 



For the Fiscal

Year ended

December 31, 2009

 

For the Period from June 6, 2008 (inception) through December 31, 2008

Net Revenue

 

$         4,008 

 

$       3,684 

 

$               - 

Distribution and marketing

 

$                 - 

 

$               - 

 

$     60,000 

General and administrative

 

$         1,396 

 

$          499 

 

$       3,184 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net Loss

 

$     (11,521)

 

$   (27,036)

 

$   (86,909)

Net Loss Per Common Share

 

$         (0.00)

 

$       (0.01)

 

$       (0.07)



Our cash in the bank at September 30, 2010 was $375,288.  $375,000 of this being held within the our special project account and we released the funds for company use on November 26, 2010, when our private placement initially closed and certain benchmarks were hit regarding the private placement, in accordance with the Option to Purchase Assets Agreement and Asset Purchase Agreement, and the Holms Energy, LLC, acquisition of assets was entered into upon authorization of majority shareholder vote in support.  Net cash provided by financing activities since June 8, 2008 (inception) through September 30, 2010 was $509,000, from the sale of our common stock, proceeds received for subscriptions under the private placement and a related party note payable.


Net cash used in operating activities for the period from June 6, 2008 (inception) through September 30, 2010, was $123,712.  For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, our total operating expenses were $30,577 as compared to $21,730 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, which increase is wholly attributable to increased professional fees.  We do not presently expect our expenses to increase or decrease in next twelve months.  Our material financial obligations include our public reporting expenses, transfer agent fees, bank fees, and other recurring fees.  



- 61 -







In its report on our December 31, 2009 audited financial statements, our auditors expressed an opinion that there is substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.  Our financial statements do not include any adjustments that may result from the outcome of this uncertainty.  We have been in the developmental stage and have had revenues of only $7,692 since inception.  For the period from June 8, 2008 (inception) through September 30, 2010, we realized a net loss of $140,842.  Our continuation as a going concern is dependent upon including our ability to raise additional capital and to generate positive cash flows.


Liquidity and Capital Resources


As of September 30, 2010 we had cash or cash equivalents of $375,288, of which only $288 was available to us for current expenses until our proposed transaction with Holms Energy closed.  Our recent rate of use of cash in our operations over the last nine months has been approximately $3,000 per month.  Subsequent to September 30, 20019, as described in the Note 7 Subsequent Events section of our financial statement notes, BRI raised $35,000 through the sale of it securities in two private transactions.  We also completed an initial closing of a private placement of $1,545,000 on November 26, 2010.  Given our recent rate of use of cash in our operations we have sufficient capital to carry on operations for the next year.  Our long term capital requirements and the adequacy of our available funds will depend on many factors, including the reporting company costs, public relations fees, and operating expenses, among others.


Net cash provided by financing activities for the period from June 6, 2008 (inception), through September 30, 2010, was $509,000.  This funding came from 43 investors in an offering of common stock at $0.033 per share totaling $110,250 that ended in October of 2008, $750 from our three officers for common stock at $0.0003 per share, a private common stock sale of 600,000 common shares for $10,000 on April 16, 2010, borrowings of $21,500 on related party notes payable of which $8,500 was paid back, and subscriptions received under the private placement totaling $375,000


On June 28, 2010, we initiated a private placement of a minimum of 3,000,000 units and a maximum of 5,000,000 units of its restricted common stock at $0.50 per Unit.  Each Unit consists of two shares of common stock and one common stock purchase warrant that is exercisable at $.50 per share for a period of three years.  No Units were to be sold unless we received subscriptions for at least 3,000,000 Units on or before November 30, 2010, unless negotiated otherwise by the parties.  All subscription funds were held in a special account pending the closing of a proposed Asset Purchase Agreement between Multisys Acquisition, Inc., the wholly owned subsidiary of BRI and Holms Energy.  During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, we received subscriptions totaling $375,000.  Subsequently this private placement completed an initial closing on November 26, 2010, when BRI issued 6,180,000 shares of our restricted common stock to 25 accredited investors and three non-accredited investors, at $.25 per share.   The gross proceeds from the private placement offering were $1,545,000.


Liquidity is a measure of a company’s ability to meet potential cash requirements.  We have historically met our capital requirements through the issuance of stock and by borrowings.  In the future, we anticipate we will be able to provide the necessary liquidity we need by the revenues generated from the sales of our oil reserves in our existing properties, however, if we do not generate sufficient sales revenues we will continue to finance our operations through equity and/or debt financings.


The following table summarizes total current assets, total current liabilities and working capital at September 30, 2010.


 

 

September 30,

 

 

 

2010

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current Assets

 

$

386,963

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current Liabilities

 

$

406,805

 

 

 

 

 

 

Working Capital

 

$

(19,842

)


*As of the closing of our private placement on

November 26, 2010 our Working Capital is Positive.


Satisfaction of our cash obligations for the next 12 months.


A critical component of our operating plan impacting our continued existence is the ability to obtain additional capital through additional equity and/or debt financing and JV drilling partnerships.  We do not anticipate enough positive internal operating cash flow until such time as we can generate substantial revenues, which may take the several months to fully realize.  In



- 62 -






the event we cannot obtain the necessary capital to pursue our strategic plan, we may have to cease or significantly curtail our operations. This would materially impact our ability to continue operations.  However, due to our low overhead, we are not dependant on new capital if we do not wish to accelerate our drilling programs and/or buy up working interests in potential wells during the next 12 months.


Since inception, we have financed cash flow requirements through debt financing and issuance of common stock for cash and services. As we expand operational activities, we may continue to experience net negative cash flows from operations, pending receipt of sales or development fees, and will be required to obtain additional financing to fund operations through common stock offerings and debt borrowings to the extent necessary to provide working capital.


Based on our current proposed plans and assumptions, we anticipate that the net proceeds of the recently completed private placement will only be sufficient to fund our operations and capital requirements for approximately 12 months.  Accordingly, we will have to either (i) obtain additional debt or equity financing during the next 12-month period in order to fund its working capital needs, or (ii) begin to derive income from its mineral rights.  See “Risk Factors – Need For Additional Funding.”


Over the next twelve months we believe that existing capital and anticipated funds from operations will be sufficient to sustain current operations and planned expansion.  We may seek additional capital in the future to fund growth and expansion through additional equity or debt financing or credit facilities.  No assurance can be made that such financing would be available, and if available it may take either the form of debt or equity.  In either case, the financing could have a negative impact on our financial condition and our Stockholders.


We anticipate incurring operating losses over the next six months.  Our lack of operating history makes predictions of future operating results difficult to ascertain. Our prospects must be considered in light of the risks, expenses, and difficulties frequently encountered by companies in their early stage of development, particularly companies in the oil and gas exploration industry.  Such risks include, but are not limited to, an evolving and unpredictable business model and the management of growth.  To address these risks we must, among other things, implement and successfully execute our business and marketing strategy, respond to competitive developments, and attract, retain and motivate qualified personnel.  There can be no assurance that we will be successful in addressing such risks, and the failure to do so can have a material adverse effect on our business prospects, financial condition and results of operations.


Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates.


This discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based on our financial statements that have been prepared under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.  The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires our management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could materially differ from those estimates.   All significant accounting policies have been disclosed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 filed with the SEC on Form 10-K.  Our critical accounting policies are:


Use of estimates


The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.


Intangible Assets


BRI’s intangible assets are composed of an exclusive Software Reseller Agreement with Strokes International AG and a Sales and Marketing Agreement with Xiamen Eurotech Intelligence Commercial & Trading Co.


Revenue Recognition  


BRI follows the guidance of paragraph 605-10-S99-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for revenue recognition.  BRI recognizes revenue when it is realized or realizable and earned.  BRI considers revenue realized or realizable and earned when all of the following criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) the product has been shipped or the services have been rendered to the customer, (iii) the sales price is fixed or determinable,



- 63 -






and (iv) collectability is reasonably assured.  BRI will derive royalties from distribution of interactive multimedia language education software sold by an independent third party distributor assigned by BRI in the Territory.  BRI entered into a Sales and Marketing Agreement (“Sales Agreement”) with Xiamen Eurotech Intelligence Commercial & Trading Co., Ltd. (“Xiamen”).  Pursuant to the Sales Agreement, Xiamen will pay the BRI $4.00 (equivalent to ~27 RMB using the currency exchange rate of today’s date) for each unit of language education software sold by Xiamen in the Territory.  The royalty is calculated on a quarterly basis, and a royalty report detailing the total number of units sold by Xiamen during the reporting period at the applicable royalty rate of $4.000 per unit sold as well as the royalty payment is due within thirty (30) days after the last day of the reporting period.  BRI recognizes revenues upon receipts of the royalty report.  If BRI determines that collection of the royalty is not reasonably assured, BRI defers the fee and recognizes revenue at the time collection becomes reasonably assured, which is generally upon receipt of cash.


Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure of Market Risk


We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and are not required to provide the information under this item.


I.  CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS
ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE


None


K.  DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, PROMOTERS AND CONTROL PERSONS


The members of our board of directors serve for one year terms and are elected at the next annual meeting of stockholders, or until their successors have been elected. The officers serve at the pleasure of the board of directors.


Pursuant to the acquisition of Holms Energy’s assets, some members of Holms Energy became the officers and directors of BRI effective upon closing of the acquisition agreement.


The following table sets forth the persons that became the directors and executive officers of BRI on December 2, 2010.  The previous directors of BRI appointed the nominees designated by Holms Energy as members of the board of directors of BRI.  Subsequently, the current officers and directors of BRI resigned their positions at BRI, clearing the way for the appointment of new executive officers by the new board of directors of BRI.  Directors are elected for a period of one year and thereafter serve until the next annual meeting at which their successors are duly elected by the stockholders.  Officers and other employees serve at the will of the board of directors and hold office until their death, resignation or removal from office.


Name

Age

Position

 Val M. Holms

63

Chief Executive Officer, Interim Chief financial Officer, President and Director

 Karen S. Midtlyng

52

Secretary, Interim Treasurer, and Director

 David E. Boleneus

63

Director

 Frank H. Blair

74

Director


Effective December 27, 2010, Kent L. Jensen resigned as a Director, Treasurer, and Chief Financial Officer of Bakken Resources, Inc.  There were no disagreements between the resigning officer and director and any of our remaining officers or directors regarding the operations, policies, or practices of our company.  Effective December 27, 2010, two of our existing officers were appointed to new offices; Val M. Holms was appointed as Interim Chief Financial Officer and Karen S. Midtlyng was appointed Interim Treasurer by the Board of Directors until such time as the Board of Directors identifies a replacement for Mr. Jensen.  


Family Relationships


There are no family relationships among our directors or officers


Business Experience



- 64 -







The following is a brief account of the education and business experience of each director and executive officer during at least the past five years, indicating each person’s business experience, principal occupation during the period, and the name and principal business of the organization by which they were employed of those directors and the key members of the management team who became the officers, directors, and key employees of the BRI on December 1, 2010 after the Asset Acquisition:


Val M. Holms – 63, President, Chief Executive Officer, Interim Chief Financial Officer, and Director.  After being honorably discharged from the United States Marine Corps, 4th Force Recognizance Division in Viet Nam in 1969, he was the founder, sole owner and operator of Holms Building Services, Inc., a licensed general contracting company based in Missoula, Montana until 1984.  Beginning in 1971 until the present, Mr. Holms has been a private investor, a part time independent land man, organized several oil and gas limited partnerships, purchased and sold mineral leases, and arranged various oil and gas joint ventures in Montana, Oklahoma, Texas, and North Dakota .  From 1984 to 1988, he attended Rhema bible Institute and received a Bachelor degree in Theology.  From 1983 to 2010, Mr. Holms and his wife owned the Tra Ho Sutra Kenpo Karate School in Helena, MT.  Mr. Holms and his wife Mari Holms are the managing members of Holms Energy, LLC.


Karen S. Midtlyng – 52, Secretary, Interim Treasurer, and Director.  Ms. Midtlyng has an associate degree from the University of Montana, Helena College of Technology.  From 1978 to 2005, she was employed by U.S. Geological Survey (U.S.G.S.), Water Science Center, Helena, MT, and during her 27 years with the U.S.G.S. she performed a wide variety of duties.  Examples of her duties, responsibilities, and accomplishments during her employment by the U.S.G.S. included: 1) start to finish production of U.S.G.S. scientific reports, fact sheets and electronic documents; 2) preparation of all final copy for publication for the Montana Water Science Center; 3) training which consisted of expanded duties and studies at the U.S.G.S. National Training Center where she completed in online technical editing courses, online English/Grammar editing and methods for preparation of national publications; 4) Co-authoring of several U.S.G.S. publications; and 5) service as the Editorial Assistant for the U.S.G.S. in Helena.  From 2005 to present, she has been engaged as an independent consultant in providing services for small business in the Helena area where she assists in the establishing and implementation of business processes.


Frank H. Blair – 74, Director.  Mr. Blair received a Bachelor of Science degree in 1958 from Oregon State University.  Mr. Blair is a Certified Professional Geologist, CPG, Number: 03517, and certified by the state of Idaho, Number: 414.  He is a member of the American Institute of Professional Geologists and a Honorary Life Member of Northwest Mining Association & Society of Mining Engineers.  From 1964 to 1974, he was managing geologist for Freeport Exploration Company and evaluated mineral deposits in the Northwest and oil and gas projects for Freeport Oil Company in the states of Colorado and Wyoming.  From 1974 through 1994, Mr. Blair offered a wide variety of geological services and operated at F.H. Blair & Associates.  During this period Mr. Blair had contracts with; 1) The Anschutz Corporation, which was a combination of oil, gas and mineral exploration; 2) Placer Dome, Inc.; 3) Puget Sound Energy; 4) Earth Resources, Inc.; 4) Pegasus Exploration, Inc.; 5) Agnico-Eagle (USA); 6) Bunker Hill Corp; 7) Gulf Resources, Inc.; 8) Fremont Mining Co.; 9) Canadian Superior; and 10) numerous small to mid-sized mineral and oil exploration companies.  From 1995 to 1997 Mr. Blair managed a 500 square mile concession for Minerea Yamana, Inc, based in Asuncion, Paraguay.  From 1997 to present, Mr. Blair has owned and operated Blair Exploration Associates (BLEXAS) based in Spokane, WA.  BLEXAS specializes in resource management, and formulating and implementing exploration projects in North and South America.  The primary targets of the exploration program are base metals and precious metals, which resulted in the discovery of the first lode gold deposit discovered in Paraguay.


David E. Boleneus – 63, Director.  Mr. Boleneus received his Bachelor of Science in Geology and Certificate in Geographical Information Systems (GIS) from Eastern Washington University.  He earned a Master of Science degree in Geology from Louisiana State University.  He also earned his Masters of Business Administration from the University of Phoenix in Denver, Colorado.  He is proficient in geohydrology, geophysics, Spanish, and computer (GIS) mapping.  Mr. Boleneus' professional experience includes working as a Petroleum geologist in Denver, Colorado, at Sohio Petroleum Co. (Standard Oil Company of Ohio) from 1980 to 1985.  From 1985 to 1996, he was a mining engineer in Denver, Colorado, with the U.S. Bureau of Mines.  From 1997 to early 2007, Mr. Boleneus served as a Research Scientist at the U.S. Geological Survey.  From early 2007 to the present, Mr. Boleneus has been a consultant for InfoMine, Inc., based in Spokane, Washington concerning mining and milling cost engineering, and economic analysis of mining operations.  At the beginning of 2007 through the present, he has been the owner of HydroImaging, Inc. based in Spokane, Washington, which consults on electrical geophysics, mine cost engineering.  Mr. Boleneus has authored over 100 professional reports including: in-house reports, staff reports, technical presentations, and industry publications.


Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings


To our knowledge, during the past five years, no present director or executive officer of our company: (1) filed a petition under the federal bankruptcy laws or any state insolvency law, nor had a receiver, fiscal agent, or similar officer appointed by a court for the business or present of such a person, or any partnership in which he was a general partner at or within two years before



- 65 -






the time of such filing, or any corporation or business association of which he was an executive officer within two years before the time of such filing; (2) was convicted in a criminal proceeding or named subject of a pending criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and other minor offenses); (3) was the subject of any order, judgment or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any court of competent jurisdiction, permanently or temporarily enjoining him from or otherwise limiting the following activities: (i) acting as a futures commission merchant, introducing broker, commodity trading advisor, commodity pool operator, floor broker, leverage transaction merchant, associated person of any of the foregoing, or as an investment advisor, underwriter, broker or dealer in securities, or as an affiliated person, director of any investment company, or engaging in or continuing any conduct or practice in connection with such activity; (ii) engaging in any type of business practice; (iii) engaging in any activity in connection with the purchase or sale of any security or commodity or in connection with any violation of federal or state securities laws or federal commodity laws; (4) was the subject of any order, judgment or decree, n ot subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any federal or state authority barring, suspending or otherwise limiting for more than 60 days the right of such person to engage in any activity described above under this Item, or to be associated with persons engaged in any such activity; (5) was found by a court of competent jurisdiction in a civil action or by the Securities and Exchange Commission to have violated any federal or state securities law and the judgment was not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated; (6) was found by a court of competent jurisdiction in a civil action or by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to have violated any federal commodities law, and the judgment in such civil action or finding by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission has not been subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated.


Limitation of Liability of Directors


Pursuant to the Nevada General Corporation Law, our Articles of Incorporation exclude personal liability for our Directors for monetary damages based upon any violation of their fiduciary duties as Directors, except as to liability for any breach of the duty of loyalty, acts or omissions not in good faith or which involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law, or any transaction from which a Director receives an improper personal benefit. This exclusion of liability does not limit any right which a Director may have to be indemnified and does not affect any Director’s liability under federal or applicable state securities laws. We have agreed to indemnify our directors against expenses, judgments, and amounts paid in settlement in connection with any claim against a Director if he acted in good faith and in a manner he believed to be in our best interests.


Election of Directors and Officers


Directors are elected to serve until the next annual meeting of stockholders and until their successors have been elected and qualified. Officers are appointed to serve until the meeting of the Board of Directors following the next annual meeting of stockholders and until their successors have been elected and qualified.


No Executive Officer or Director of the Corporation has been the subject of any Order, Judgment, or Decree of any Court of competent jurisdiction, or any regulatory agency permanently or temporarily enjoining, barring suspending or otherwise limiting him from acting as an investment advisor, underwriter, broker or dealer in the securities industry, or as an affiliated person, director or employee of an investment company, bank, savings and loan association, or insurance company or from engaging in or continuing any conduct or practice in connection with any such activity or in connection with the purchase or sale of any securities.


No Executive Officer or Director of the Corporation has been convicted in any criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations) or is the subject of a criminal proceeding which is currently pending.


No Executive Officer or Director of the Corporation is the subject of any pending legal proceedings.


Audit Committee and Financial Expert


We do not have an Audit Committee, our directors perform some of the same functions of an Audit Committee, such as: recommending a firm of independent certified public accountants to audit the annual financial statements; reviewing the independent auditors independence, the financial statements and their audit report; and reviewing management’s administration of the system of internal accounting controls. BRI does currently have a written audit committee charter.


We have no financial expert.  We believe the cost related to retaining a financial expert at this time is prohibitive. Further, because of our start-up operations and financial experience of our officers, we believe the services of a financial expert are not warranted.


Code of Business Conduct and Ethics




- 66 -






A code of ethics relates to written standards that are reasonably designed to deter wrongdoing and to promote:


 

(1)

Honest and ethical conduct, including the ethical handling of actual or apparent conflicts of interest between personal and professional relationships;

 

(2)

Full, fair, accurate, timely and understandable disclosure in reports and documents that are filed with, or submitted to, the Commission and in other public communications made by an issuer;

 

(3)

Compliance with applicable governmental laws, rules and regulations;

 

(4)

The prompt internal reporting of violations of the code to an appropriate person or persons identified in the code; and

 

(5)

Accountability for adherence to the code.


We have adopted a corporate code of ethics that applies to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions.


Nominating Committee


We do not have a Nominating Committee or Nominating Committee Charter.  Our board of directors perform some of the functions associated with a Nominating Committee. We have elected not to have a Nominating Committee in that we have only one current director and have never received a stockholder nomination for additional directors.


L.  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION


Summary Compensation Table


The table below sets forth the aggregate annual and long-term compensation paid by us since inception on June 6, 2008, through the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, and the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, to our Chief Executive Officer (the “Named Executive Officer”). Other than as set forth below, no executive officer’s salary and bonus exceeded $100,000 for the fiscal year 2009.


Name and

Principal

Position

(a)

 




Year

(b)

 

 

 

 

Salary

($)

(c)

 

 

 

 

Bonus

($)

(d)

 

 

 

Stock

Awards

($)

(e)

 

 

 

Option Awards

($)

(f)

 

 

Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation

($)

(g)

 

Change in

Pension

Value and

Nonqualified

Deferred

Compensation

Earnings

($)

(h)

 

 

All other Compensation

($)

(i)

 

 

 

Total

($)

(j)

 

Janelle Edington

Pres. & CEO, Dir.

 



2008

 

 


4,000

 

 


0

 

 


0

 

 


0

 

 0

 

 

 -


 

 0


 

 


4,000

 

 

 

2009

 

6,000

 

0

 

0

 

0

 

 0

 

 

 -


0

 

6,000

 


B. Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table


Janelle Edington was our former President and CEO serving from inception until November 2010.  Janelle Edington did not enter into formal written employment agreement with Multisys Language Solutions.  Janelle Edington entered into a consulting agreement of $1,000 per month beginning September 2008, and it was terminated after June of 2009 because of financial conditions of our company.


C. Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End


None of our named executive officers have been granted any equity compensation, including option grants as of December 13, 2010.  


Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End


There have been no options awards or equity awards given to any executive officers of BRI since inception on June 6, 2008, through the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, and the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009.



- 67 -







D. Compensation of Directors


No compensation was paid to directors for their director services during the fiscal year ending December 31, 2009.


Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation


We have not constituted a compensation committee.  During our fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, Raymond Kuh, Janelle Edington and Christopher Wetzel participated in deliberations of the board of directors concerning executive compensation, although Janelle Edington did not vote on resolutions arising from such deliberations concerning her compensation arrangements.


M.  SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT


The following table presents information, to the best of our knowledge, about the beneficial ownership of our common stock on December 2, 2010, held by our directors and executive officers and by those persons known to beneficially own more than 5% of our capital stock.  The percentage of beneficial ownership for the following table is based on 52,477,500 shares of common stock outstanding as of December 2, 2010.


Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission and does not necessarily indicate beneficial ownership for any other purpose. Under these rules, beneficial ownership includes those shares of common stock over which the stockholder has sole or shared voting or investment power. It also includes (unless footnoted) shares of common stock that the stockholder has a right to acquire within 60 days after December 2, 2010 through the exercise of any option, warrant or other right. The percentage ownership of the outstanding common stock, however, is based on the assumption, expressly required by the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, that only the person or entity whose ownership is being reported has converted options or warrants into shares of our common stock.


Name of Beneficial Owner (1)

 

Number of Shares

 

Percent of Outstanding Shares of Common Stock (2)

Val M. Holms-

CEO, Interim CFO, President,

and Director

 

20,000,000 (3)

 

38.1%

Kent L. Jensen-

Former CFO, Treasurer, and Director

(resigned December 27, 2010)

 

 250,000 (4)

 

0.5%

Karen S. Midtlyng- Secretary,

Interim Treasurer, Director

 

 2,250,000 (5)

 

4.3%

David E. Boleneus- Director

 

250,000 (6)

 

0.5%

Frank H. Blair- Director

 

250,000 (7)

 

0.5%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1.

as used in this table, “beneficial ownership” means the sole or shared power to vote, or to direct the voting of, a security, or the sole or shared investment power with respect to a security (i.e., the power to dispose of, or to direct the disposition of, a security).  The address of each person is care of BRI.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2.

Figures are rounded to the nearest tenth of a percent.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3.

Includes 20,000,000 shares held directly

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4.

Includes 250,000 shares held directly

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5.

Includes 2,250,00 shares held directly

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6.

Includes 250,000 shares held directly

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7.

Includes 250,000 shares held directly

 





- 68 -






Change in Control

We are unaware of any contract, or other arrangement or provision of our Articles or By-laws, the operation of which may at a subsequent date result in a change of control of our company.


N.  CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE


Transactions With Related Persons, Promoters, and Certain Control Persons


On June 10, 2008, an aggregate of 2,250,000 shares of common stock were purchased to our founders at $0.00033 shares per share for aggregate gross proceeds of $2,250, as follows: 1,500,000 shares of common stock were issued to Janelle Edington, our former President and CEO, 375,000 shares were issued to Christopher Wetzel, former Vice President and director, and 375,000 shares were issued to Raymond Kuh, CFO, former Treasurer, Secretary and director.


On November 9, 2009, we borrowed $6,500 from our former President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director, Janelle Edington.  The note was unsecured, matured May 8, 2010 and bore interest at 6% per annum. On April 2, 2010, the note was repaid in full.


On May 28, 2010, we borrowed $15,000 from our former President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director, Janelle Edington.  The note was unsecured and matured November 23, 2010 and bore interest at 7% per annum.  We made a partial repayment of $2,000 on June 8, 2010, and payment on the remaining balance of $13,000 in principal outstanding on November 2, 2010, and repayment of accrued interest of $338.78 on November 5, 2010.


On November 12, 2010, the Officers were paid for services rendered on their work related to the acquisition of assets.  Janelle Edington received $6,000, Raymond Kuh received $2,000 and Christopher Wetzel received $2,000.


We acquired the Bakken leasehold interest from Holms Energy, LLC, for a total payment of $100,000 plus 40,000,000 shares of our restricted common stock, plus 5% royalty for 10 years on the Holms Property.  The closing of this transaction was also concluded on November 26, 2010.  Holms Energy, LLC, is managed and controlled by Val M. Holms, our current President, CEO, and a director, and his wife Mari P. Holms.  We believe that the terms and conditions of this transaction were no less favorable than those which would have been obtained from an unrelated third party.


Promoters and Certain Control Persons


The promoters of our company were Janelle Edington, Raymond Kuh, and Christopher Wetzel, our former officers and directors.  They received nothing of value in return for being a promoter.  The promoters did purchase shares of common stock for a price equal to the $.0033 par value on June 10, 2008.


Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance.


Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires our directors and executive officers, and persons who own more than ten percent of our common stock, to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission initial reports of ownership and reports of changes of ownership of our common stock.  Officers, directors and greater than ten percent stockholders are required by SEC regulation to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.  We have no knowledge that, as of the date of this filing, our directors, executive officers, and persons who own more than ten percent of our common stock, have not filed an initial Form 3, Form 4 current report, or an annual Form 5 in a timely manner.


Director Independence


Our Board of Directors has determined that none of our five directors are currently “independent directors” as that term is defined in Rule 4200(a)(15 ) of the Marketplace Rules of the National Association of Securities Dealers.  We are not presently required to have independent directors.  If we ever become a listed issuer whose securities are listed on a national securities exchange or on an automated inter-dealer quotation system of a national securities association, which has independent director requirements, we intend to comply with all applicable requirements relating to director independence.


Board Meetings and Committees; Annual Meeting Attendance


We held our 2009 Annual Meeting on March 16, 2010.  Two directors, Janelle Edington and Christopher Wetzel, attended in person and the other officer, Raymond Kuh, attended telephonically.  Only one action by unanimous written consent was taken



- 69 -






by the board of directors in 2009.  We held our 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders on June 21, 2010, one director, Janelle Edington, attended in person and the other officers, Raymond Kuh and Christopher Wetzel attended telephonically.  BRI has not constituted any board committees.


BRI does not have a policy with regard to board members’ attendance at annual meetings of security holders.


Nominating Committee.


BRI does not have a nominating committee.  The full board of directors performs the functions of a nominating committee.  We are a development stage company with minimal revenues from operations, few employees, and with a lack of sufficient capital resources to attract new directors.  Our three former directors, Janelle Edington, Raymond Kuh and Christopher Wetzel, served since BRI was incorporated.  These three former directors appointed five directors on December 1, 2010, and the three former directors subsequently resigned leaving the five new directors as the only remaining directors on the board.  The five new directors have not participated in the consideration of new director nominees, but would do so if such nomination was to occur.  Effective December 27, 2010, Kent L. Jensen resigned as a Director, Treasurer, and Chief Financial Officer of Bakken Resources, Inc.  There were no disagreements between the resigning officer and director and any of our remaining officers or directors regarding the operations, policies, or practices of our company.  Effective December 27, 2010, two of our existing officers were appointed to new offices; Val M. Holms was appointed as interim Chief Financial Officer and Karen S. Midtlyng was appointed interim Treasurer by the Board of Directors until such time as the Board of Directors identifies a replacement for Mr. Jensen.  There are currently four remaining directors.


Audit Committee, Audit Committee Financial Expert


We are not a “listed company” under SEC rules and are therefore not required to have an audit committee comprised of independent directors.  As we are a development stage company with minimal revenues from operations, few employees, and relatively simple financial statements, as of December 31, 2009 we had not constituted any board committees, including an audit committee.  In January 2009, we adopted charters for an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee, and a Corporate Governance and Directors Nominating Committee, but will not have these committees until we have the resources to do so.  We do not have an audit committee financial expert who is an outside director.  As our business grows and our financial statements become more complicated, we intend to seek an outside director who can qualify as an audit committee financial expert.


Shareholder Communications


We have not provided a formal process related to stockholder communications with our board of directors.  We have stated in our proxy material that any stockholder who desires to contact our board of directors or specific members of the board may do so by writing to: The Board of Directors, Bakken Resources, Inc., 1425 Birch Ave., Suite A, Helena, MT 59601.  We do not have a formal process for stockholder communication with our board of directors because we are currently a small company with very limited financial resources.  We expect to expand our corporate governance measures once we have increased financial resources.


Transfer Agent


Empire Stock Transfer, 1859 Whitney Mesa Drive, Henderson, Nevada 89104, currently serves as the independent transfer agent and registrar for the our outstanding securities.  The transfer agent’s telephone number is (702) 818-5893.


ITEM 11A.  MATERIAL CHANGES


None Applicable


IITEM 12.  INCORPORATION OF CERTAIN INFORMATION BY REFERENCE


None Applicable


ITEM 12A.  DISCLOSURE OF SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION POSITION ON INDEMNIFICATION FOR SECURITIES ACT LIABILITIES

Our By-laws provide we shall indemnify any director, officer, employee or agent of our company, or any person serving in any such capacity of any other entity or enterprise at our request, against any and all legal expenses, including attorney’s fees, claims and or liabilities arising out of any action, suit or proceeding, except an action by or in the right of our company. We may, but are not required, to indemnify any person where such person acted in good faith and in a manner reasonably believed to be or



- 70 -






not opposed to the best interests of our company and, with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, where there was not reasonable cause to believe the conduct was unlawful. The termination of any action, suit or proceeding by judgment, order or settlement or conviction, shall not, of itself, create a presumption that the person did not act in good faith and in a manner reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of our company, and that, with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, there was reasonable cause to believe that the conduct was unlawful.

Indemnification will be made by us only when authorized in the specific case and upon a determination that indemnification is proper by (i) the stockholders, (ii) a majority vote of a quorum of the board of directors, consisting of directors who were not parties to the action, suit or proceeding, or (iii) independent legal counsel in a written legal opinion, if a quorum of disinterested directors so orders or if a quorum of disinterested directors cannot be obtained.

Expenses incurred in defending any action, suite or proceeding may be paid by our company in advance of the final disposition, when authorized by our board of directors, upon receipt of any undertaking by or on behalf of the person defending to repay such advances if indemnification is not ultimately available under the indemnification provisions of our By-laws.

Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of our company under Nevada law or otherwise, our company has been advised that the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission is that such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act of 1933 and is, therefore, unenforceable.


CAUTIONARY NOTICE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS


This prospectus, any supplement to this prospectus and the documents incorporated by reference include “forward-looking statements.” To the extent that the information presented in this prospectus discusses financial projections, information or expectations about our business plans, results of operations, products or markets, or otherwise makes statements about future events, such statements are forward-looking. Such forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of words such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “might,” “would,” “intends,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “projects,” “forecasts,” “expects,” “plans,” and “proposes.” Although we believe that the expectations reflected in these forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, there are a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from such forward-looking statements. These include, among others, the cautionary statements in the “Risk Factors” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis and Plan of Operation” sections of this prospectus. These cautionary statements identify important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements. When considering forward-looking statements in this prospectus, you should keep in mind the cautionary statements in the “Risk Factors” section above and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation” section below, and other sections of this prospectus.


The statements contained in this Registration Statement that are not purely historical are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, including, without limitation, statements regarding our expectations, objectives, anticipations, plans, hopes, beliefs, intentions or strategies regarding the future.


All forward-looking statements included in this document are based on information available to us on the date hereof, and we assume no obligation to update any such forward-looking statements. It is important to note that our actual results could differ materially from those included in such forward-looking statements. For a more detailed explanation of such risks, please see “Risk Factors” below. Such risks, as well as such other risks and uncertainties as are detailed in our SEC reports and filings for a discussion of the factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the forward- looking statements.


The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and the notes included in this prospectus and the section entitled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation” included in this prospectus.




- 71 -






WHERE YOU CAN FIND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION


We have not previously been subject to the reporting requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission.  We have filed with the Commission a registration statement on Form S-1 under the Securities Act with respect to the shares offered hereby.  This prospectus does not contain all of the information set forth in the registration statement and the exhibits and schedules thereto. For further information with respect to our securities and us you should review the registration statement and the exhibits and schedules thereto. Statements made in this prospectus regarding the contents of any contract or document filed as an exhibit to the registration statement are not necessarily complete. You should review the copy of such contract or document so filed.


You can inspect the registration statement and the exhibits and the schedules thereto filed with the commission, without charge, at the office of the Commission at Judiciary Plaza, 100 F Street, NE, Washington, D.C. 20549. You can also obtain copies of these materials from the public reference section of the commission at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, D.C. 20549, at prescribed rates. You can obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The Commission maintains a web site on the Internet that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the Commission at WWW.SEC.GOV.


REPORTS TO STOCKHOLDERS


Upon the effectiveness of this registration statement, we will be subject to limited periodic reporting obligations  We will be obligated to file annual reports on Form 10-K containing audited financial statements certified by independent public accountants following the end of each fiscal year, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q containing unaudited financial information for the first three quarters of each fiscal year following the end of such fiscal quarter, and current reports on Form 8-K shortly after the occurrence of certain material events.  We will not be subject to the proxy rules, short swing profit rules or certain other securities regulations under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.


LEGAL MATTERS


Certain legal matters relating to the validity of the securities offered by this prospectus will be passed upon for Bakken Resource, Inc. by Michael R. Espey, Esq. of 318 18th Ave. E. Seattle, WA 98112, who is our independent legal counsel.


DEALER PROSPECTUS DELIVERY OBLIGATION


Until ______________________________ (90 days after the effective date of this offering), all dealers that effect transactions in these securities, whether or not participating in this offering, may be required to deliver a prospectus. This is in addition to the dealers' obligation to deliver a prospectus when acting as underwriters and with respect to their unsold allotments or subscriptions.



- 72 -






PART II - INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS


ITEM 13.  OTHER EXPENSES OF ISSUANCE AND DISTRIBUTION


The expenses to be paid by us in connection with the securities being registered are as follows:


ITEM

 

 

AMOUNT

SEC registration fee (1)

 

$

7.28

Legal fees and expenses (1)

 

 

5,000

Accounting fees and expenses (1)

 

 

10,000

Transfer Agent & Registrar fees (1)

 

 

2,500

Miscellaneous (1)

 

 

2,500

 

 

 

 

Total Estimated Expenses

 

$

20,007

(1)Estimated expenses


ITEM 14.  INDEMNIFICATION OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS


The Registrant has authority under Section 78.7502 of the Nevada Business Corporation Act to indemnify its directors and officers to the extent provided for in such statute. The Registrant’s Bylaws provide that the Registrant may insure, shall indemnify and shall advance expenses on behalf of our officers and directors to the fullest extent not prohibited by law. We are also a party to indemnification agreements with each of our directors and officers. The Registrant has also agreed to indemnify the selling shareholders named in the Registration Statement against certain liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act.


The bylaws of the registrant provide that, to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, the registrant shall indemnify any person who is a party or otherwise involved in any proceeding by reason of the fact that such person is or was a director or officer of the registrant or was serving at the request of the registrant.


The registrant has not purchased insurance against costs, which may be incurred by it pursuant to the foregoing provisions of its certificate of incorporation and bylaws, nor does it insure its officers and directors against liabilities incurred by them in the discharge of their functions as such officers and directors.

Nevada corporation law provides that:

- a corporation may indemnify any person who was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending or completed action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative, except an action by or in the right of the corporation, by reason of the fact that he is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of the corporation, or is or was serving at the request of the corporation as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise, against expenses, including attorneys’ fees, judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by him in connection with the action, suit or proceeding if he acted in good faith and in a manner which he reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation, and, with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe his conduct was unlawful;

- a corporation may indemnify any person who was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending or completed action or suit by or in the right of the corporation to procure a judgment in its favor by reason of the fact that he is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of the corporation, or is or was serving at the request of the corporation as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise against expenses, including amounts paid in settlement and attorneys’ fees actually and reasonably incurred by him in connection with the defense or settlement of the action or suit if he acted in good faith and in a manner which he reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation. Indemnification may not be made for any claim, issue or matter as to which such a person has been adjudged by a court of competent jurisdiction, after exhaustion of all appeals therefrom, to be liable to the corporation or for amounts paid in settlement to the corporation, unless and only to the extent that the court in which the action or suit was brought or other court of competent jurisdiction determines upon application that in view of all the circumstances of the case, the person is fairly and reasonably entitled to indemnity for such expenses as the court deems proper; and

- to the extent that a director, officer, employee or agent of a corporation has been successful on the merits or otherwise in defense of any action, suit or proceeding, or in defense of any claim, issue or matter therein, the



- 73 -






corporation shall indemnify him against expenses, including attorneys’ fees, actually and reasonably incurred by him in connection with the defense.

We may make any discretionary indemnification only as authorized in the specific case upon a determination that indemnification of the director, officer, employee or agent is proper in the circumstances. The determination must be made:

- by our stockholders;

- by our board of directors by majority vote of a quorum consisting of directors who were not parties to the action, suit or proceeding;

- if a majority vote of a quorum consisting of directors who were not parties to the action, suit or proceeding so orders, by independent legal counsel in a written opinion;

- if a quorum consisting of directors who were not parties to the action, suit or proceeding cannot be obtained, by independent legal counsel in a written opinion; or

- by court order.

Our By-laws provide we shall indemnify any director, officer, employee or agent of our company, or any person serving in any such capacity of any other entity or enterprise at our request, against any and all legal expenses, including attorney’s fees, claims and or liabilities arising out of any action, suit or proceeding, except an action by or in the right of our company. We may, but are not required, to indemnify any person where such person acted in good faith and in a manner reasonably believed to be or not opposed to the best interests of our company and, with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, where there was not reasonable cause to believe the conduct was unlawful. The termination of any action, suit or proceeding by judgment, order or settlement or conviction, shall not, of itself, create a presumption that the person did not act in good faith and in a manner reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of our company, and that, with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, there was reasonable cause to believe that the conduct was unlawful.

Indemnification will be made by us only when authorized in the specific case and upon a determination that indemnification is proper by (i) the stockholders, (ii) a majority vote of a quorum of the board of directors, consisting of directors who were not parties to the action, suit or proceeding, or (iii) independent legal counsel in a written legal opinion, if a quorum of disinterested directors so orders or if a quorum of disinterested directors cannot be obtained.

Expenses incurred in defending any action, suite or proceeding may be paid by our company in advance of the final disposition, when authorized by our board of directors, upon receipt of any undertaking by or on behalf of the person defending to repay such advances if indemnification is not ultimately available under the indemnification provisions of our By-laws.

Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of our company under Nevada law or otherwise, we have been advised the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission is that such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act of 1933 and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than payment by us for expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of our company in successful defense of any action, suit, or proceeding) is asserted by a director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, we will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction, the question of whether such indemnification by it is against public policy in the Securities Act of 1933 and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.



- 74 -






ITEM 15.  RECENT SALES OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES.


On November 1, 2010, we entered into two definitive agreements relating to the private placement of $35,000 of our securities through the sale of 140,000 total shares of our common stock at $0.25 per share, with 70,000 total warrant shares attached that are exercisable at $.50 per share for three years from the date of this sale, to two accredited investors.  In conjunction with the private placement, there were no fees, commissions, or professional fees for services payable.  The placement was undertaken by the officers of BRI.  The private placement of these securities was exempt from registration under pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.  The proceeds from these sales of unregistered securities were used to paying outstanding debt.


On November 26, 2010, BRI issued 6,180,000 shares of our restricted common stock to 25 accredited investors and three non-accredited investors, at $.25 per share in a private placement pursuant to Rule 506 of Regulation D of the Securities Act of 1933.  Shares were offered in $.50 Units consisting of two shares of common stock and one Stock Purchase Warrant to purchase one share of common stock at $.50 for three years, callable at $0.01 per share at any time after November 26, 2011, if the underlying shares are registered, and the common stock trades for 20 consecutive trading days at an average closing sales price of $.75 or more.  The gross proceeds from the private placement offering were $1,545,000.


The private placement offering was exempt from registration pursuant to Rule 506 of Regulation D of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 4(2) of the Securities Act.  The purchasers of the shares were provided with a private placement memorandum as well as copies of our Form 10-K filed on March 31, 2010 and our Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, our Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 filed on May 19, 2010.   We reasonably believe that the recipients, immediately prior to issuing the shares, had such knowledge and experience in its financial and business matters that they were capable of evaluating the merits and risks of the investment.  The recipients had the opportunity to speak with our officers and directors prior to its investment decision.  


The net proceeds to us from the sale of the 6,180,000 shares, after deducting the expenses of this Offering and assuming that the maximum permitted commissions and non-accountable allowances are paid, are estimated to be approximately $1,400,000.  $80,000 was paid out to a non-affiliated foreign investment company in finder’s fees pursuant a consulting contract for identifying potential foreign investors that amounted to $800,000 invested in the Private Placement.  We used the funds from the private placement approximately as follows, (i) $400,000 was allotted to Holms Energy in exchange for the Greenfield mineral rights; (ii) $100,000 was used for the acquisition of the Holms Energy assets; (iii) 80,000 was paid in finder’s fee consulting contracts to a foreign investment company; and (iv) The balance of $820,000 was allocated to cover costs of the fundraising and acquisitions, and general working capital purposes of BRI.


The allocation of the net proceeds from the recent private placement set forth above represents our best estimate based upon its currently proposed plans and assumptions relating to its operations and certain assumptions regarding general economic conditions.  If any of these factors change, we may find it necessary or advisable to reallocate some of the proceeds within the above-described categories or to use portions thereof for other purposes.  We may also use a portion of the net proceeds for the acquisition of additional mineral right which we believe is complimentary to those of our company.  Pursuant to the Asset Purchase Agreement, BRI acquired existing mineral rights from Rocky and Evenette Greenfield from Holms Energy, who paid $400,000 as an initial down payment and now installment payments in the amount of $120,000 per year plus interest at 5% per annum for 8 years and a balloon payment in the amount of $299,000 totaling $1,649,000 plus interest will be due.


Proceeds not immediately required for the purposes described above will be invested principally in United States government securities, short-term certificates of deposit, or other similar short-term, interest bearing investments.


On November 26, 2010, under the Asset Purchase Agreement, Multisys Acquisition issued Holms Energy 40,000,000 shares of restricted common stock,.  With the issuance of the 40,000,000 shares to the Holms Energy members, they own a controlling interest in BRI.  Subsequent to the closing, Holms Energy intends to disburse 40,000,000 shares to its members on a ratable ownership basis.  See Item 5.01 - Changes in Control of Registrant, “Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities” below, which is incorporated herein by reference.


The issuance of the shares to the members of Holms Energy, LLC was exempt from registration pursuant to Rule 505 of Regulation D under the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 4(2).  The members of Holms Energy were the members of Holms Energy, LLC will be provided with copies of our Form 10-K filed on March 31, 2010 and our Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, our Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 filed on May 19, 2010 and a copy of our definitive Schedule 14A.  In addition they will each sign investor representation letters indicating that they are sophisticated investors who have the experience and resources to assess the valuation of the transaction and undertaking not to sell their shares without an applicable exemption from registration.




- 75 -







ITEM 16.  EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES.



Designation of

Exhibit Numbers Set

Forth in Item 601

of Regulation S-K

 

Exhibit

Description

3.1

 

Articles of Incorporation dated June 6, 2008*

 

 

 

3.2

 

Bylaws dated June 6, 2008*

 

 

 

5.1

 

Opinion of Michael Espey, Esq.*

 

 

 

10.1

 

Strokes International Software Reseller Agreement between Strokes International, Inc. and Peter Schmid dated June 1, 2008*

 

 

 

10.2

 

Assignment of Interest Agreement between Bakken Resources, Inc [formerly Multisys Language Solutions, Inc.] and Peter Schmid dated June 11, 2008*

 

 

 

10.3

 

2008 Non-Qualified Stock Option and Stock Appreciation Rights Plan Adopted June 10, 2008*

 

 

 

10.4

 

Form of Subscription Agreement 2008*

 

 

 

10.5

 

Exclusive Marketing  and Distribution Agreement between Bakken Resources, Inc. [formerly Multisys Language Solutions, Inc.] and Xiamen Eurotech Intelligence Commercial and Trading Co. dated June 23, 2008*

 

 

 

10.6

 

 Corporate Governance Guidelines*

 

 

 

10.7

 

Corporate Governance and Director’s Nominating Committee Charter*

 

 

 

10.8

 

Compensation Committee Charter*

 

 

 

10.9

 

Audit Committee Charter*

 

 

 

10.10

 

Asset Purchase Agreement with Holms Energy, LLC entered into on November 26, 2010 (incorporated herein by reference to Form 8-K, Exhibit 10.1, Exhibit B, filed with the Securities and Exchange on October 21, 2010, file # 000-53632).

 

 

 

10.11

 

Asset Purchase Agreement between Holms Energy, LLC and Evenette and Rocky Greenfield entered into on November 12, 2010 (incorporated herein by reference to Form 8-K, Exhibit 10.2, Exhibit B, filed with the Securities and Exchange on October 21, 2010, file # 000-53632).

 

 

 

10.12

 

Promissory note with Holms Energy, LLC for $485,000 entered into on November 12, 2010. (incorporated herein by reference to Form 8-K, Exhibit 10.2 filed with the Securities and Exchange on November 18, 2010, file # 000-53632).

 

 

 

14.1

 

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics*

 

 

 

14.2

 

Code of Ethics for the CEO and Senior Financial Officers*

 

 

 

23.1

 

Consent of Li & Company, PC

 

 

 

23.2

 

Consent of Michael Espey, Esq.(included in Exhibit 5.1)*


*previously filed



- 76 -





 

Financial Statement Schedules


The financial statements and related schedules, if any, appear beginning on page 34.


ITEM 17.  UNDERTAKINGS.


A.  The undersigned small business issuer undertakes:


1. To file, during any period in which offers or sales are being made, a post-effective amendment to this Registration Statement:


(i) To include any prospectus required by Section 10(a)(3) of the Securities Act of 1933;


(ii) To reflect in the prospectus any facts or events after the effective date of the Registration Statement (or the most recent post-effective amendment thereof) which, individually or in the aggregate, represent a fundamental change in the information set forth in the Registration Statement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any increase or decrease in volume of securities offered (if the total dollar value of securities offered would not exceed that which was registered) and any deviation from the low or high end of the estimated maximum offering range may be reflected in the form of a prospectus filed with the Commission pursuant to Rule 424(b) if, in the aggregate, the changes in the volume and price represent no more than a 20 percent change in the maximum aggregate offering price set forth in the “Calculation of Registration Fee” table in the effective registration statement; and


(iii) To include any material information with respect to the plan of distribution not previously disclosed in the Registration Statement or any material change to such information in the Registration Statement.


2. That, for the purpose of determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933, each such post-effective amendment shall be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.


3. To remove from registration by means of a post-effective amendment any of the securities being registered which remain unsold at the termination of the offering.


4. That, for the purpose of determining liability of the registrant under the Securities Act of 1933 to any purchaser in the initial distribution of the securities:


The undersigned registrant undertakes that in a primary offering of securities of the undersigned registrant pursuant to this Registration Statement, regardless of the underwriting method used to sell the securities to the purchaser, if the securities are offered or sold to such purchaser by means of any of the following communications, the undersigned registrant will be a seller to the purchaser and will be considered to offer or sell such securities to such purchaser:


(i) Any preliminary prospectus or prospectus of the undersigned registrant relating to the offering required to be filed pursuant to Rule 424 (§230.424 of this chapter);


(ii) Any free writing prospectus relating to the offering prepared by or on behalf of the undersigned registrant or used or referred to by the undersigned registrant;


(iii) The portion of any other free writing prospectus relating to the offering containing material information about the undersigned registrant or its securities provided by or on behalf of the undersigned registrant; and


(iv) Any other communication that is an offer in the offering made by the undersigned registrant to the purchaser.


5. That, for purposes of determining liability under the Securities Act of 1933 to any purchaser, if the registrant is subject to Rule 430C, each prospectus filed pursuant to Rule 424(b) as part of a registration statement relating to an offering, other than registration statements relying on Rule 430B or other than prospectuses filed in reliance on Rule 430A, shall be deemed to be part of and included in the registration statement as of the date it is first used after effectiveness.  Provided however, that no statement made in a registration statement or prospectus that is part of the registration statement or made in a document incorporated or deemed incorporated by reference into the registration statement or prospectus that is part of



- 77 -






the registration statement will, as to a purchaser with a time of contract of sale prior to such first use, supersede or modify any statement that was made in the registration statement or prospectus that was part of the registration statement or made in any such document immediately prior to such date of first use.


B. Insofar as indemnification for liabilities under the Securities Act may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the Registrant pursuant to the foregoing provisions or otherwise, the Registrant has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by the Registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the Registrant in a successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by a director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, the Registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issuer.



- 78 -







SIGNATURES


In accordance with the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, Bakken Resources, Inc. certifies that it has reasonable grounds to believe that it meets all of the requirements of filing on Form S-1 and authorized this amended registration statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, in the City of Helena, Montana, dated December 29, 2010.


 

BAKKEN RESOURCES, INC.


 


 


 

Date: December 29, 2010

By:  

/s/ Val M. Holms

 

Val M. Holms

President, CEO, Interim CFO, and Director

(principal executive officer and

principal financial and accounting officer)


 

In accordance with the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this registration statement was signed by the following persons in the capacities and on the dates stated:


 

BAKKEN RESOURCES, INC.


 


 


 

Date: December 29, 2010

By:  

/s/ Val M. Holms

 

Val M. Holms

President, CEO, Interim CFO, and Director

 

(principal executive officer and

principal financial and accounting officer)

 

 

 

Date: December 29, 2010

By:  

/s/ Karen Midtlyng   

 

Karen Midtlyng

 

Secretary, Interim Treasurer, and Director

 

 

Date: December 29, 2010

By:  

/s/ David E. Boleneus

 

David E. Boleneus

 

Director

 

 

 

Date: December 29, 2010

By:  

/s/ Frank H. Blair

 

Frank H. Blair

 

Director


 



- 79 -