Solicitation

The solicitation of the enclosed proxy is made on behalf of the Board of Directors of Murphy USA Inc. (the “Board”) for use at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 5, 2016. It is expected that the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials will be mailed to stockholders beginning on or about March 17, 2016.

The complete mailing address of the Company’s principal executive office is 200 Peach Street, El Dorado, Arkansas 71730.

References in this Proxy Statement to “we,” “us,” “our,” “the Company” and “Murphy USA” refer to Murphy USA Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries.

Quorum and Voting Procedures

Quorum Requirement

A quorum of stockholders is necessary to hold a valid meeting. The presence, in person or by proxy, of the holders of a majority of the total voting power of all outstanding securities of the Company entitled to vote at a meeting of stockholders shall constitute a quorum. Abstentions and “broker non-votes” are counted as present for establishing a quorum. A “broker non-vote” occurs on a proposal when shares held by brokers or nominees as to which instructions have not been received from the beneficial owners or persons entitled to vote and that the broker or nominee does not have discretionary power to vote on a non-routine matter.

Vote Necessary to Approve Proposals

General

Votes cast by proxy or in person at the meeting will be counted by the persons appointed by the Company to act as Judges of Election for the meeting. The Judges of Election will treat shares represented by proxies that reflect abstentions as shares that are present and entitled to vote for purposes of determining the outcome of any other business submitted at the meeting to the stockholders for a vote.

Your proxy will be voted at the meeting, unless you (i) revoke it at any time before the vote by filing a revocation with the Secretary of the Company, (ii) duly execute a proxy card bearing a later date, or (iii) appear at the meeting and vote in person. Proxies returned to the Company, votes cast other than in person and written revocations will be disqualified if received after commencement of the meeting. If you elect to vote your proxy by telephone or Internet as described in the telephone/Internet voting instructions on your proxy card, the Company will vote your shares as you direct. Your telephone/internet vote authorizes the named proxies to vote your shares in the same manner as if you had marked, signed and returned your proxy card.

Proposal 1 – Election of Three Class III Directors Whose Current Terms Expire on the Date of the 2016 Annual Meeting

The Class III directors shall be elected by a plurality of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting so long as a quorum is present. Under this

standard, you may either vote in favor of all Class III directors, or withhold on all Class III directors or a particular Class III director. If you do not vote at all, you will have no impact on the calculation of “votes cast.” “Broker non-votes” will not count as a vote cast and will likewise have no effect. Unless specification to the contrary is made, the shares represented by the enclosed proxy will be voted FOR all the director nominees.

All Other Proposals

For Proposals 2 and 3, the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of our capital stock present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote is required for approval. You may vote “for,” “against” or “abstain” on these matters. If you vote to “abstain,” it will have the same effect as a vote “against.” “Broker non-votes” are not counted as shares present or represented and voting and have no effect on the vote. Unless specification to the contrary is made, the shares represented by the enclosed proxy will be voted FOR the approval of the compensation of the Named Executive Officers, as disclosed in this Proxy Statement pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (on an advisory, non-binding basis) and FOR approval of the action of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors in appointing KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2016.

Broker Voting

If your shares are held in the name of a bank, broker or other holder of record (a “nominee”), you will receive instructions from the nominee that you must follow in order for your shares to be voted. Certain of these institutions offer telephone and Internet voting. Under current New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) rules, the proposal to ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the current fiscal year should be considered a routine matter. However, for purposes of determining the outcome of any non-routine matter as to which the broker does not have discretionary authority to vote, those shares will be treated as not present and not entitled to vote with respect to that matter. Notably, Proposals 1 and 2 should be considered non-routine matters and your broker is not permitted to vote your shares without your instructions and such uninstructed shares are considered “broker non-votes.”

Voting Securities

On March 7, 2016, the record date for the meeting, the Company had 39,975,105 shares of common stock outstanding, all of one class and each share having one vote with respect to all matters to be voted on at the meeting. Information as to common stock ownership of certain beneficial owners and management is set forth in the tables under “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners” and “Security Ownership of Directors and Management” included on page 13 in this Proxy Statement.

The Board recognizes that it is important for the Company’s directors to possess a diverse array of backgrounds and skills, whether in terms of executive management leadership, public company experience or educational achievement. When considering new candidates, the Nominating and Governance Committee, with input from the Board, will seek to ensure the Board reflects a range of talents, ages, skills, diversity and expertise, particularly in the areas of accounting and finance, management, government/regulation, leadership and convenience store and other retail-related industries, sufficient to provide sound and prudent guidance with respect to our operations and interests. In addition, although it does not have a separate policy with respect to diversity, the Nominating and Governance Committee considers the issue of diversity among the factors used to identify nominees for directors. The goal is to assemble and maintain a Board comprised of individuals that not only possess a high level of business acumen, but who also demonstrate a commitment to the Company’s Code of Business Conduct and Ethics in carrying out the Board’s responsibilities with respect to oversight of the Company’s operations.

The Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that directors should not be nominated for election to the Board after their 76th birthday, although the full Board may nominate candidates older than 76 under special circumstances. Dr. Hermes has reached retirement age and will retire from the Board as of the date of the Annual Meeting.

On January 13, 2016, David B. Miller was elected to the Board. Mr. Miller was selected due to his leadership experience and expertise in business valuation, capital structure and strategic relationships, in addition to his broad energy industry knowledge which nicely complements the collective strength and leadership of our Board and will prove invaluable as the Company pursues its strategy.

To the extent authorized by the proxies, the shares represented by the proxies will be voted in favor of the election of the three nominees for director whose names are set forth below. If for any reason any of these nominees is not a candidate when the election occurs, the shares represented by the proxies will be voted for the election of the other nominees named and may be voted for any substituted nominees or the board size may be reduced.

All directors, other than Mr. Clyde (our President and Chief Executive Officer), were determined to be independent by the Board based on the rules of the NYSE and the standards of independence included in the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines. As part of its independence recommendation to the Board, the Nominating and Governance Committee at its February meeting considered familial relationships of certain directors (Mr. Murphy is a first cousin of Mr. Deming and Dean Keller).

Mr. Murphy became the Non-Executive Chairman of the Board in connection with the spin-off of the Company from Murphy Oil Corporation (the “Spin-Off”), which was completed on August 30, 2013. As an independent chairman, he leads our regularly scheduled meetings of independent directors, held without the presence of Company management. These meetings occur at four Board meetings each year.

Stockholders and other interested parties may send communications to the Board, specified individual directors and the independent directors as a group c/o the Secretary, Murphy USA Inc., 200 Peach Street, El Dorado, AR 71730-5836. Communications will be kept confidential and forwarded to the specified director(s). Items that are unrelated to a director’s duties and responsibilities as a Board member, such as junk mail, may be excluded by the Secretary. The names of the nominees and certain information as to them, are as follows:

Director Nominees

Our Board is divided into three classes serving staggered three-year terms. Messrs. Murphy and Clyde and Dean Keller, who are Class III directors, are nominated for re-election at this Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Class I and Class II directors will serve until our annual meetings of stockholders in 2017 and 2018, respectively. At each annual meeting of stockholders, directors will be elected for three-year terms to succeed the class of directors whose terms have expired. This section details the name, age, class, qualifications and committee memberships of our directors as of the 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

Board Leadership Structure

The positions of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Murphy USA are held by two individuals. Mr. Murphy serves as our Chairman of the Board as a non-executive and independent director. Mr. Clyde serves as our President and Chief Executive Officer, and also serves as a director. Along with Mr. Murphy and Mr. Clyde, other directors bring different perspectives and roles to the Company’s management, oversight and strategic development. The Company’s directors bring experience and expertise from both inside and outside the Company and industry, while the President and Chief Executive Officer is most familiar with the Company’s business and industry, most involved in the Company’s day-to-day operations, and most capable of leading the execution of the Company’s strategy. The Board believes that having separate roles of Chairman and President and Chief Executive Officer is in the best interest of stockholders because it facilitates independent oversight of management.

Risk Management

Our Company’s management is responsible for the day-to-day management of risks to the Company. The Board of Directors has broad oversight responsibility for our risk management programs.

The Board of Directors exercises risk management oversight and control both directly and indirectly, the latter through various board committees as discussed below. The Board of Directors regularly reviews information regarding the Company’s credit, liquidity and operations, including the risks associated with each. The Executive Compensation Committee is responsible for overseeing the management of risks relating to the Company’s executive compensation plans and arrangements. The Audit Committee is responsible for oversight of financial risks and the ethical conduct of the Company’s business, including the steps the Company has taken to monitor and mitigate these risks. The Nominating and Governance Committee, in its role of reviewing and maintaining the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, manages risks associated with the independence of the Board and potential conflicts of interest. While each committee is responsible for evaluating certain risks and overseeing the management of these risks, the entire Board is regularly informed through committee reports and by the President and Chief Executive Officer about the known risks to the strategy and the business.

Committees

Our Board of Directors has established several standing committees in connection with the discharge of its responsibilities. The following table presents the standing committees of the Board and the current membership of the committees and the number of times each committee met in 2015.

Audit Committee – The Audit Committee has the sole authority to appoint or replace the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, which reports directly to the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee also assists the Board with its oversight of the integrity of the Company’s financial statements, the independent registered public accounting firm’s qualifications, independence and performance, the performance of the Company’s internal audit function, the compliance by the Company with legal and regulatory requirements, and the review of programs related to compliance with the Company’s Code of Business Conduct and Ethics. The Audit Committee meets with representatives of the independent registered public accounting firm and with members of the Internal Auditing Department for these purposes. The Board has designated Mr. Taylor and Mr. Murphy as its Audit Committee Financial Experts as defined in Item 407 of Regulation S-K. All of the members of the Audit Committee are independent under the rules of the NYSE and the Company’s independence standards.

Executive Committee – The Executive Committee is vested with the authority to exercise certain functions of the board when the board is not in session. The Executive Committee is also in charge of all general administrative affairs of the Company, subject to any limitations prescribed by the board.

Executive Compensation Committee – The Executive Compensation Committee oversees the compensation of the Company’s executives and directors and administers the Company’s annual incentive compensation plan, the long-term incentive plan and the stock plan for non-employee directors.

The Executive Compensation Committee consists entirely of independent directors, each of whom meets the NYSE listing independence standards and our Company’s independence standards. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” for additional information about the Executive Compensation Committee. In carrying out its duties, the Executive Compensation Committee will have direct access to outside advisors, independent compensation consultants and others to assist them.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

During 2015, Messrs. Deming, Holliger, Keyes and Murphy and Dean Keller served as the members of the Compensation Committee. No person who served as a member of the Executive Compensation Committee was, during 2015, an officer or employee of the Company or any of its subsidiaries, or had any relationship requiring disclosure in this Proxy Statement. None of our executive officers served as a member of the compensation committee (or other board committee performing equivalent functions or, in the absence of any such committee, the entire Board of Directors) or director of another entity, one of whose executive officers served as a member of our Board of Directors.

Nominating and Governance Committee – The Nominating and Governance Committee identifies and recommends potential director candidates, makes annual independence recommendations as to each director, recommends appointments to Board committees, oversees evaluation of the Board’s performance and reviews and assesses the Corporate Governance Guidelines of the Company. Information regarding the process for evaluating and selecting potential director candidates, including those recommended by stockholders, is set out in the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines. Stockholders desiring to recommend director candidates for consideration by the Nominating and Governance Committee will be able to address their recommendations to: Nominating and Governance Committee of the Board of Directors, c/o Secretary, Murphy USA, 200 Peach Street, P.O. Box 7300, El Dorado, Arkansas 71731-7300. As a matter of policy, director candidates recommended by stockholders will be evaluated on the same basis as candidates recommended by the directors, executive search firms or other sources. The Corporate Governance Guidelines also provide a mechanism by which stockholders may send communications to directors. The Nominating and Governance Committee consists entirely of independent directors,

each of whom meets the NYSE listing independence standards and the Company’s independence standards.

Charters for the Audit, Executive, Executive Compensation, Nominating and Governance Committees, along with the Corporate Governance Guidelines and the Code of Ethics and Business Conduct, are available on the Company’s Web site, http://ir.corporate.murphyusa.com.

Meetings and Attendance

During fiscal 2015, there were five meetings of the Board. All nominees’ attendance exceeded 75% of the total number of meetings of the Board and committees on which they served. As set forth in the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, all Board members are expected to attend the Annual Meeting of Stockholders, and all did so in 2015.

Compensation of Directors

Directors who are employees of Murphy USA do not receive compensation for their services on the Board. Our Board of Directors determines annual retainers and other compensation for non-employee directors. The primary elements of our non-employee director compensation program include a combination of cash and equity.

In 2015, the cash component consisted of:

All elements of cash components are paid in quarterly installments. The Company also reimburses directors for travel, lodging, and other related expenses they incur in attending Board and Committee meetings.

In addition to the cash component, the non-employee directors also receive an annual grant of time-based restricted stock units which vest after three years. Each non-employee director received a restricted stock unit grant with a target value of $100,000 on February 11, 2015.

The column above showing “All Other Compensation” represents the incremental cost of matching gifts. The non-employee directors are eligible to participate in our matching gift program on the same terms as Murphy USA employees. Under this program, an eligible person’s total gifts of up to $12,500 per calendar year will qualify. The Company will contribute to qualified educational institutions and hospitals in an amount equal to twice the amount contributed by the eligible person. The Company will contribute to qualified welfare and cultural organizations an amount equal to the contribution made by the eligible person.

Stock Ownership Guidelines

The Board of Directors has also established stock ownership guidelines for non-employee directors of the Company. Directors are expected to achieve ownership of at least three times the annual cash retainer within five years of service. A director may not pledge Company securities either by purchasing Company securities on margin or holding Company securities in a margin account, until he or she has achieved the applicable stock ownership target specified in the guidelines above. These guidelines are designed to ensure that directors display confidence in the Company through the ownership of a significant amount of our stock. At December 31, 2015, all of our Directors had met or were on track to comply with these stock ownership guidelines within the applicable five-year period.

Review, Approval or Ratification of Transactions with Related Persons

The Nominating and Governance Committee reviews ordinary course of business transactions with firms associated with directors and nominees for director. The Company’s management also monitors

these transactions on an ongoing basis. Executive officers and directors are governed by the Company’s written Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, which provides that waivers may only be granted by the Board of Directors or a Board committee and must be promptly disclosed to stockholders. No such waivers were granted nor applied for in fiscal 2015. The Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines require that all directors recuse themselves from any discussion or decision affecting their personal, business or professional interests.

Audit Committee Report

Management is responsible for the preparation, presentation and integrity of Murphy USA’s financial statements, for its accounting and financial reporting principles and for the establishment and effectiveness of internal controls and procedures designed to ensure compliance with accounting standards and applicable laws and regulations. The independent auditors are responsible for performing an independent audit of the financial statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), expressing an opinion as to the conformity of these financial statements with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America and expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. The independent auditors have free access to the Audit Committee to discuss any matters they deem appropriate.

Committee Organization and Operation

The Audit Committee’s function is to assist the Board of Directors in its oversight of:

The Audit Committee is also directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of the work of Murphy USA’s independent registered public accounting firm. As of February 2016, the Audit Committee has outsourced the internal audit function to PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, whose responsibilities to the Company include providing ongoing internal audits and reporting its findings to the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee’s charter is available in the Corporate Governance section of Murphy USA’s corporate website at ir.corporate.murphyusa.com.

The Audit Committee held nine meetings during 2015. The Audit Committee Chairman and members of the Audit Committee also held numerous additional meetings throughout 2015 with members of Murphy USA corporate, business segment and internal audit management and with Murphy USA’s independent registered public accounting firm (KPMG LLP). The Committee believes that these meetings were helpful in discharging its oversight responsibilities, including with respect to financial reporting and disclosure, risk management and internal controls.

Independence

The Board of Directors, on the recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, has determined that all members of the Audit Committee are independent, as required by NYSE listing standards and SEC rules.

Expertise

The Board of Directors has also determined, on the recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, that all members of the Audit Committee are financially literate and have accounting or related financial management expertise, each as defined by NYSE listing standards. Mr. Taylor and Mr. Murphy have been designated as the Audit Committee Financial Experts, as defined under SEC rules. The Audit Committee’s assistance in the Board of Directors’ oversight of Murphy USA’s compliance with legal and

regulatory requirements primarily focuses on the effect of such matters on Murphy USA’s financial statements, financial reporting and internal control over financial reporting.

Audited Financial Statements

In the performance of its oversight function, the Audit Committee has considered and discussed the 2015 audited financial statements with management and KPMG LLP, including a discussion of the quality, and not just the acceptability, of the accounting principles, the reasonableness of significant judgments, clarity of the disclosures and the condition of internal control over financial reporting. The Audit Committee has reviewed with the Director of Internal Audit and the KPMG LLP engagement team the scope and plans for their respective audits and has met with each of the Director of Internal Audit and the senior engagement partner of KPMG LLP, with and without management present, to discuss audit results, their evaluations of Murphy USA’s internal controls and the overall quality of Murphy USA’s financial reporting. The Audit Committee has also discussed with KPMG LLP the matters required to be discussed by PCAOB Auditing Standard No. 16, “Communications with Audit Committees.” Finally, the Audit Committee has received the written disclosures and the letter from KPMG LLP as required by the PCAOB’s rules regarding Communication with Audit Committees Concerning Independence and has discussed with KPMG LLP its independence.

Conclusion

Based upon the reports and discussion described in this report, the Audit Committee, in accordance with its responsibilities, recommended to the Board of Directors, and the Board approved, inclusion of the audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2015 in Murphy USA’s 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Audit Committee

Jack T. Taylor (Chairman)

James W. Keyes

Diane N. Landen

Thomas M. Gattle, Jr.

R. Madison Murphy

The following Compensation Discussion and Analysis provides an overview of the compensation provided to our CEO, CFO, and three other most highly compensated executive officers in office at fiscal year-end December 31, 2015:

These five individuals are collectively referred to as our “Named Executive Officers” or “NEOs”.

To further illustrate the concepts in this Compensation Discussion and Analysis, we have included charts and tables where we believe appropriate to enhance our stockholders’ understanding of the compensation of our NEOs. This Compensation Discussion and Analysis should be read in conjunction with this tabular information beginning on page 25 in this Proxy Statement.

Overview

Murphy USA operates one of the nation’s largest convenience store chains, with 1,335 locations in 24 states as of December 31, 2015, most of which are in close proximity to Walmart stores. We believe our proximity to Walmart stores generates significant traffic to our retail stations while our competitively priced gasoline and convenience offerings appeal to our shared customers. We began our relationship with Walmart in 1996 and, in December 2012, signed an agreement that allows us to build up to 200 additional sites, the last of which are scheduled for completion during 2017. In January 2016, we announced an independent growth plan that provides greater flexibility to develop sites independently of Walmart.

While our stores have historically consisted largely of kiosk locations on Walmart parking lots, branded Murphy USA, over the past 10 years we have been developing the Murphy Express brand stores, most of which are located near or adjacent to Walmart Supercenter locations. We have also increased our typical store size to accommodate higher traffic and achieve a more diversified mix of convenience offerings. Our independent growth plan will leverage our larger 1200 sq. ft. stores and focus on the most attractive markets and high-traffic locations to generate target returns on capital.

Executive Compensation Philosophy and Objectives

The Executive Compensation Committee (the “Committee”) bases its executive compensation decisions on principles designed to align the interests of our executives with those of our stockholders. The Committee believes compensation should provide a direct link with

the Company’s values, objectives, business strategies, and financial results. In order to motivate, attract, and retain key executives who are critical to its long-term success, the Company aims to provide pay packages that are competitive with others in the retail industry. In addition, the Company believes that executives should be rewarded for both the short- and long-term success of the Company and, conversely, be subject to a degree of downside risk in the event that the Company does not achieve its performance objectives.

Aligning Pay with Performance

The Committee believes our compensation programs provide for a strong “pay for performance” linkage between the compensation provided to our executives and the Company’s performance relative to its peers. Consistent with the fundamental principle that compensation programs should pay for performance, the Company’s 2015 performance directly impacted compensation decisions and pay outcomes. Annual incentives for NEOs were earned at 145.5% of target, reflecting the Company’s 2015 performance relative to predefined targets. See pages 20-21 for additional information. Performance stock units (“PSUs”) were granted for the first time in 2014, linked to the Company’s performance for the three-year period ended in 2016. Thus, no payouts have been earned. See page 22 for additional information.

We view performance in two ways: (1) the Company’s operating performance, including results against long-term growth targets; and (2) return to stockholders over time, both on an absolute basis and relative to other companies, including both our peers and the S&P 500.

2015 Business Highlights

We measure our operating performance relative to the execution of a proven strategy that reflects five coherent themes that leverage our differentiated strengths and capabilities. This “5-Point Strategy” supports a business model which is both enduring in a highly volatile industry and hard to replicate by competitors. Our strategy creates a unique way to compete for customers, workforce talent, supplier-partner support and stockholder capital. We take none of these stakeholders for granted and our goal is to create sustained value for all of them while making a positive impact in the communities we serve. Highlighted accomplishments among the 5-Point Strategy for 2015 include:

We Do

We Do Not

Role of the Committee

The Committee has responsibility for discharging the Board of Directors’ responsibilities with respect to compensation of the Company’s executives. In particular, the Committee annually reviews and approves corporate goals and objectives relevant to CEO compensation, evaluates the CEO’s performance in light of those goals and objectives, and determines and approves the CEO’s compensation based on this evaluation. In doing so, the Committee reviews all elements of the CEO’s compensation. The Committee also approves non-CEO executive compensation for the Company’s executive officers, approves and administers incentive compensation and equity-based plans, and monitors compliance of directors and executive officers with Company stock ownership requirements. Pursuant to its charter, the Committee has the sole authority to retain and terminate compensation consultants as well as internal and external legal, accounting, and other advisors, including sole authority to approve the advisors’ fees and other engagement terms. For additional information on the responsibilities of the Committee, see the “Committees—Executive Compensation Committee” section included on page 9 in this Proxy Statement.

Role of Market Data

The Committee adopted a peer group for purposes of reviewing and approving 2015 compensation. Due to the relatively small number of publicly-traded retail convenience store competitors, the group was broadened to include other companies in similar industries with which Murphy USA competes for executive talent in order to create a sufficient sample of companies against which compensation can be compared. The peer group was developed based on certain attributes including:

The peer group consists of the following companies:

In addition to comparator company information, the Committee uses several industry compensation surveys to determine competitive market pay levels for the NEOs.

Base salaries and total target direct compensation for the Company’s NEOs were compared to the median of the market data to determine whether the Company’s compensation practices were in alignment with market pay levels. When making compensation-related decisions, the Committee aims to set compensation levels for executive officers based on a deliberate review of market compensation for a particular position as well as each individual’s possession of a unique skill or knowledge set, proven leadership capabilities or experience, and Company performance. Based on such factors, the Committee may determine with respect to one or more individuals that it is appropriate for compensation to meet, exceed, or fall below the median of the market data for a particular compensation element or total compensation.

Role of the CEO in Compensation Decisions

The CEO periodically reviews the performance of each of the NEOs, excluding himself, develops preliminary recommendations regarding salary adjustments and annual and long-term award amounts, and provides recommendations to the Committee. The Committee can exercise its discretion to modify any recommendations and make final decisions.

A.    Base Salary

Base salary is designed to provide a competitive fixed rate of pay recognizing each employee’s level of responsibility and performance. In setting base salary levels for NEOs, the Committee considers competitive market

data in addition to other factors such as duties and responsibilities, experience, individual performance, retention concerns, internal equity considerations, Company performance, general economic conditions, and marketplace compensation trends.

Base salaries are reviewed annually. In 2015, the Committee adjusted salaries awarded to each NEO to bring salaries closer to competitive market levels for similar positions. The increases for Ms. West and

Mr. Cheng also reflect the additional responsibilities assumed by each. The following table shows the base salaries for each of the NEOs effective February 1, 2014 and February 1, 2015:

B.    Annual Incentive Plan

We provide annual incentives for our executive officers through our stockholder-approved Murphy USA Inc. 2013 Annual Incentive Plan, as amended and restated effective as of February 12, 2014 (the “AIP”). The primary objective of the AIP is to align corporate and individual goals with stockholder interests and Company strategy and to reward employees for their performance relative to those goals. Murphy USA targets the median of market pay levels for annual target incentive compensation. Executives have the opportunity to be

compensated above the median of market pay levels when Murphy USA outperforms established performance measures.

Target bonus opportunities under the AIP are communicated as a percentage of annualized base salary. The Committee reviews market data annually with respect to competitive pay levels and sets specific bonus opportunities for each of our NEOs. The following table shows target bonuses as a percentage of salary in effect for each of the NEOs in 2015:

Corporate Performance

In light of strategic actions the Company is taking to continue to drive growth and improve earnings, we refined our AIP metrics in 2015 to further link the Company’s compensation programs with the Company’s business and talent strategies and the long-term interests of our stockholders. For 2015, the AIP metrics for Murphy USA included return on average capital employed (“ROACE”), profitability as measured by fuel cash breakeven target, and corporate goals and objectives (“Goals”). Developed by management and assessed and approved by the Committee, the Goals were thoughtfully designed to

drive every pillar of our 5-Point Strategy described on pages 15-16: (1) Grow Organically, (2) Diversify Merchandise Mix, (3) Sustain Cost Leadership Position, (4) Create Advantage from Market Volatility, and (5) Invest for the Long Term. The Goals included specific, measurable, and quantitative goals such as new site growth, merchandise gross margin growth, fuel margin growth, safety, SG&A cost improvement, etc. The Committee believes these metrics in combination reflected the overall key goals and objectives for the Company for 2015.

The following table summarizes the performance metrics and corresponding weightings used in determining annual incentive award

payouts for Murphy USA employees and the weighted performance scores for each based on actual performance during 2015:

Under the terms of the AIP, achievement of 100% of the target for any metric results in the payment of 100% of target for that metric. Achievement of the minimum level of the performance range results in the payment of 50% of target and achievement of the maximum level of performance results in the payment of 200% of target. No awards relative to a given metric are payable if performance for that metric falls below the minimum. Results between points are interpolated.

Individual Performance

In addition to the corporate performance component, the AIP permits the Committee to exercise negative discretion to reduce an NEO’s award based on the Committee’s subjective review of his/her performance relative to achievement of goals, business plan execution, and other qualitative results. We believe that it is important to include this component in our AIP in order to take into account NEO performance that, in the Committee’s opinion, justify a reduction in the amount otherwise payable to an NEO based on objective corporate performance. Overall, amounts earned under the AIP cannot exceed more than 200% of target. In 2015, the Committee believed that our NEOs’ individual performance was appropriately reflected in our corporate performance results. Thus, the Committee opted not to make any negative adjustments to the awards earned by our NEOs and payable under the AIP based on our corporate performance.

Overall Performance and Payouts

After certifying the results relative to our performance metrics and considering each individual’s contributions throughout the year, the Committee approved the following payments for our NEOs for 2015:

C.    Long-term Incentive Compensation

We provide share-based, long-term compensation to our executive officers through our stockholder-approved Murphy USA Inc. 2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended and restated effective as of August 26, 2014 (the “LTIP”). Long-term incentive levels for Murphy USA’s officers are targeted at the median of competitive market pay levels. The plan provides for a variety of stock and share-based awards, including stock options and restricted stock units (“RSUs”), each of which vests over a period determined by the Committee, as well as PSUs that are earned based on the Company’s achievement of two equally-weighted objective performance goals. We believe that

these awards create a powerful link between the creation of stockholder value and executive pay delivered. In addition, we believe that the balance between absolute and relative performance achieved through the use of stock options, ROACE-based PSUs, and relative TSR-based PSUs is appropriate. In order for executives to fully realize their targeted opportunities, Murphy USA must both successfully achieve its long-term goals and outperform its peers.

Stock Options

In 2015, stock options comprised 25% of each NEO’s annual equity award. Stock options provide a direct link between executive officer compensation and the value delivered to stockholders. The Committee believes that stock options are inherently performance-based, as option holders only realize benefits if the value of our stock increases following the date of grant. All grants of options will vest in two equal installments on the second and third anniversaries of the grant date, and unless otherwise forfeited or exercised, expire seven years from the date of the grant.

Restricted Stock Units

In 2015, RSUs comprised 25% of each NEO’s annual equity award. The Committee believes that RSUs are an important part of the compensation program for NEOs as they (i) drive behaviors to create value for stockholders by linking executive compensation to stock price performance, (ii) encourage retention, and (iii) result in actual share ownership (thereby supporting the Company’s stock ownership guidelines). All grants of RSUs will cliff-vest on the third anniversary of the grant date (unless otherwise forfeited due to termination) and are delivered to the NEOs in the form of unrestricted shares of common stock.

Performance Stock Units

In 2015, PSUs comprised 50% of each NEO’s annual equity award. The Committee believes that PSUs serve as a complement to stock options and RSUs. Our PSUs benchmark Murphy USA performance relative to two equally-weighted metrics, ROACE and TSR relative to our peer group, with payouts at the threshold level of performance equal to 50% of target. The Committee believes the PSU program does not encourage excessive or inappropriate risk-taking, as it caps the maximum payout at 200% of target. PSUs are designed to pay 100% of target at the end of the three-year performance cycle if target levels of performance are achieved. Payment, if earned, is made in unrestricted shares of common stock at the end of the three-year performance period once performance results have been approved by the Committee.

Vesting for 50% of the PSUs will be based on Murphy USA’s TSR performance between 2015 and 2017 relative to the Company’s peer group, with payouts at the threshold level of performance equal to 50% of target and maximum payouts capped at 200% of target. The Committee considers relative TSR an appropriate metric as it aligns

the pay for our officers to the appreciation (or reduction) our stockholders receive in their investment in Murphy USA. TSR achievement and corresponding payout levels are as follows:

Vesting for the remaining 50% of the PSUs will be based on Murphy USA’s three-year average ROACE performance between 2015 and 2017 as compared to the Company’s three-year ROACE targets set by the Committee at the beginning of the performance period, with payouts at the threshold level of performance equal to 50% of target and maximum payouts capped at 200% of target.

D.    Employee Benefits and Perquisites

Murphy USA’s executives are provided usual and customary employee benefits available to all employees (except certain hourly retail employees). These include qualified defined contribution (Savings) plan (401(k)), health insurance, life insurance, accidental death and dismemberment insurance, medical/dental insurance, vision insurance, and long-term disability insurance.

The purpose of the Savings Plan, a tax-qualified defined contribution retirement plan, for employees of Murphy USA is to provide retirement benefits for all employees who participate. All employees are allowed to contribute on a pre-tax basis up to 25 percent of their eligible pay. The Company matching contributions are limited to dollar for dollar on the first six percent of base pay. Participating employees are immediately vested in all employee and Company matching contributions.

Murphy USA provides a Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (“Murphy USA SERP”), an unfunded, nonqualified deferred compensation plan, to eligible executives including the NEOs. The Murphy USA SERP is intended to restore qualified defined contribution (Savings and profit-sharing) plan benefits restricted under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the “IRC”) to certain highly-compensated individuals.

Murphy USA offers limited perquisites to our NEOs consistent with our peer group. The Board of Directors has authorized up to 50 hours annually of personal use of Company aircraft for our CEO as part of his total compensation package. The value of such personal use is periodically reported to the Committee and will be reported as taxable income to the CEO with no income tax assistance or gross-ups provided by the Company.

Reportable values for these programs based on the incremental costs to the Company are included in the “All Other Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation Table included on page 25 in this Proxy Statement.

Other Policies

Severance and Change in Control Protection

The Company has not entered into any employment, CIC, or termination agreements with its NEOs other than with the CEO, which was inherited by Murphy USA in connection with the Spin-Off from prior parent Murphy Oil.

Mr. Clyde is party to a Severance Protection Agreement (the “SPA”) provided to him by Murphy Oil when he joined Murphy Oil in August 2013, which was inherited by Murphy USA in connection with the Spin-Off. The SPA provides certain severance benefits if his employment is terminated within 24 months following a CIC. If Mr. Clyde’s employment is terminated by Murphy USA “without cause” or by Mr. Clyde for “good reason” within this 24-month window, Mr. Clyde will be entitled to his earned but unpaid compensation, a lump sum severance payment equal to three times the sum of his base salary and the average of his last three annual bonuses prior to the termination date (or, if higher, prior to the CIC), accelerated vesting of his outstanding equity-based awards (provided that any performance-based awards will be paid assuming the target level of performance) and continued life, accident, and health insurance benefits for 36 months. Mr. Clyde will not be entitled to any “golden parachute” excise tax gross-up payments. The SPA provides for an excise tax cutback to reduce payments to a level such that the excise tax under Sections 280G and 4999 of the IRC will not apply (unless the executive would receive a greater amount of severance benefits on an after-tax basis without a cutback, in which case the cutback would not apply). Pursuant to the SPA, Mr. Clyde will be subject to a non-disclosure covenant and non-solicitation and non-competition restrictive covenants for 12 months following any such termination.

Under the terms of the LTIP, in the event of a CIC, all outstanding equity awards will vest, become immediately exercisable or payable, and/or have all restrictions lifted (any performance-based awards will be paid assuming the target level of performance).

Stock Ownership Guidelines

To further align the interests of our executive officers with those of our stockholders, the Board of Directors expects all executive officers to display confidence in the Company through the ownership of a significant amount of our stock. Under these guidelines as set forth in the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, executive officers, including our NEOs, are expected to hold Murphy USA common stock having a value that is equivalent to a multiple of each executive officer’s annualized base salary. The targeted multiples vary among the executives depending upon their position:

Because the stock ownership guidelines are a multiple of each executive officer’s annualized salary, the value that must be maintained will increase proportionally with salary increases. Executive officers are expected to achieve targets within five years of assuming their positions. Shares owned directly by the executive, including RSUs and unrestricted stock units, those owned indirectly, assuming the executive has an economic interest in the shares, and shares held through our employee benefit plans including the qualified defined contribution (Savings) plan (401(k)) and deferred compensation plan for executives are included in calculating ownership levels. Shares underlying stock options and unearned PSUs do not count toward the ownership guidelines. At December 31, 2015, all of our NEOs had met or were on track to comply with these stock ownership guidelines within the applicable five-year period.

Likewise, each member of our Board of Directors is expected to achieve ownership of at least three times their annual cash retainer within five years of service as discussed in the Compensation of Directors section of this Proxy Statement on page 11. As noted above, at December 31, 2015, all of our directors had met or were on track to comply with these stock ownership guidelines within the applicable five-year period.

The Committee will periodically assess these guidelines, monitor director and executive officer ownership levels relative to these guidelines, and make recommendations as appropriate.

Pledging Policy

A director or executive officer may not pledge Company securities, either by purchasing Company securities on margin or holding Company securities in a margin account, until he or she has achieved the applicable stock ownership target specified in the guidelines above. All of our directors and executive officers are in compliance with our anti-pledging policy.

Prohibition on Hedging

To ensure that Murphy USA executive officers, including our NEOs, bear the full risks of Murphy USA common stock ownership, the Company has adopted a policy that prohibits hedging transactions that are designed to hedge or speculate on any change in the market value of the Company’s securities.

Recoupment/Clawback Policy

Our executive officers are subject to recoupment provisions in both the AIP and LTIP programs in the case of certain forfeiture events. If the Company restates its financial statements as a result of negligent, intentional, or gross misconduct by the recipient, the Committee may, in its discretion, require that the recipient reimburse the Company in respect of any shares issued or payments made under the AIP and/or

the LTIP in the period covered by the restated financial statements.

Tax Policy

Section 162(m) of the IRC limits the deductibility of compensation paid to certain NEOs to $1 million annually unless compensation is performance-based and the performance criteria are approved by stockholders.

The Committee considers this impact when making compensation decisions and attempts to structure all elements of executive compensation to meet this exception. However, the Committee has retained the flexibility to design and maintain the executive compensation programs in a manner that is most beneficial overall to stockholders, including the payment of compensation that is subject to the deduction limits under IRC Section 162(m).

Role of the Compensation Consultant

The Committee has retained Mercer (US) Inc. (“Mercer”) as its independent compensation consultant. Mercer provides executive and director compensation consulting services to the Committee, regularly attends Committee meetings, reports directly to the Committee on matters relating to compensation for our NEOs, and participates in executive sessions without management present. Mercer provides advice and analysis to the Committee on design and level of executive and director compensation. In connection with their services to the Committee, Mercer works with executive management and the corporate human resources team group to formalize proposals for the Committee. The Committee has assessed the independence of Mercer pursuant to SEC rules and concluded that Mercer’s work for the Committee does not raise any conflicts of interest.

Compensation-based Risk Assessment

In February 2016, the Committee completed a review of the Company’s policies and practices of compensating its employees (including non-executives) as they relate to the Company’s risk management profile to determine whether such policies and practices create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company. As a result of this review, the Committee concluded that any risks arising from the Company’s compensation policies and practices for its employees were not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.

Compensation Committee Report

The Executive Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed with management the foregoing Compensation Discussion and Analysis. Based on the review and discussions, the Executive Compensation Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in the Company’s Proxy Statement.

Executive Compensation Committee

Claiborne P. Deming (Chair)

Fred L. Holliger

The Very Reverend Dr. Christoph Keller, III

James W. Keyes

R. Madison Murphy