þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Ohio | 31-0746639 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of Incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | |
4150 East 5th Avenue Columbus, Ohio | 43219 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
-2-
October 28, | January 28, | |||||||
2006 | 2006 | |||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Cash and equivalents |
$ | 97,191 | $ | 124,759 | ||||
Short-term investments |
75,350 | |||||||
Accounts receivable, net |
3,735 | 4,039 | ||||||
Receivables from related parties |
5,829 | 49 | ||||||
Inventories |
235,047 | 216,698 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
15,487 | 13,981 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
19,740 | 18,591 | ||||||
Total current assets |
452,379 | 378,117 | ||||||
Property and equipment, net |
102,793 | 95,921 | ||||||
Goodwill |
25,899 | 25,899 | ||||||
Tradenames and other intangibles, net |
5,568 | 6,216 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes and other assets |
2,681 | 1,562 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 589,320 | $ | 507,715 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 86,499 | $ | 78,889 | ||||
Accounts payable to related parties |
8,705 | 6,631 | ||||||
Accrued expenses: |
||||||||
Compensation |
11,175 | 9,933 | ||||||
Taxes |
18,095 | 9,557 | ||||||
Advertising |
11,409 | 8,586 | ||||||
Other |
24,155 | 25,993 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
160,038 | 139,589 | ||||||
Noncurrent liabilities |
72,244 | 63,410 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies |
||||||||
Shareholders equity: |
||||||||
Class A Common Shares, no par value;
170,000,000 authorized; 16,221,950
and 16,190,088 issued and outstanding,
respectively |
282,170 | 281,119 | ||||||
Class B Common Shares, no par value;
100,000,000 authorized; 27,702,667
and 27,702,667 issued and outstanding,
respectively |
||||||||
Preferred Shares, no par value; 100,000,000
authorized; no shares issued or outstanding |
||||||||
Retained earnings |
74,868 | 26,007 | ||||||
Deferred compensation |
(2,410 | ) | ||||||
Total shareholders equity |
357,038 | 304,716 | ||||||
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
$ | 589,320 | $ | 507,715 | ||||
-3-
Three months ended | Nine months ended | |||||||||||||||
October 28, | October 29, | October 28, | October 29, | |||||||||||||
2006 | 2005 | 2006 | 2005 | |||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 332,219 | $ | 302,240 | $ | 950,008 | $ | 860,257 | ||||||||
Cost of sales |
(233,544 | ) | (219,221 | ) | (672,944 | ) | (618,077 | ) | ||||||||
Gross profit |
98,675 | 83,019 | 277,064 | 242,180 | ||||||||||||
Operating expenses |
(73,451 | ) | (65,292 | ) | (200,854 | ) | (188,712 | ) | ||||||||
Operating profit |
25,224 | 17,727 | 76,210 | 53,468 | ||||||||||||
Non-related parties interest expense |
(145 | ) | (140 | ) | (428 | ) | (2,161 | ) | ||||||||
Related parties interest expense |
(6,592 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Total interest expense |
(145 | ) | (140 | ) | (428 | ) | (8,753 | ) | ||||||||
Interest income |
1,708 | 289 | 5,290 | 369 | ||||||||||||
Interest income (expense), net |
1,563 | 149 | 4,862 | (8,384 | ) | |||||||||||
Earnings before income taxes |
26,787 | 17,876 | 81,072 | 45,084 | ||||||||||||
Income tax provision |
(10,786 | ) | (6,965 | ) | (32,211 | ) | (17,942 | ) | ||||||||
Net income |
$ | 16,001 | $ | 10,911 | $ | 48,861 | $ | 27,142 | ||||||||
Basic and diluted earnings per share: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | 0.36 | $ | 0.25 | $ | 1.11 | $ | 0.78 | ||||||||
Diluted |
$ | 0.36 | $ | 0.25 | $ | 1.11 | $ | 0.77 | ||||||||
Shares used in per share calculations: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
43,922 | 43,891 | 43,909 | 34,994 | ||||||||||||
Diluted |
44,226 | 44,066 | 44,193 | 35,080 |
4
Number of | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A | Class B | Class A | Class B | Deferred | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common | Common | Common | Common | Retained | Compensation | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Shares | Shares | Shares | Earnings | Expense | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, January 29, 2005 |
27,703 | $ | 101,442 | $ | 77,384 | $ | 178,826 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Sale of stock |
16,172 | $ | 277,937 | 277,937 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
27,142 | 27,142 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividend to parent |
(101,442 | ) | (88,558 | ) | (190,000 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Restricted stock units granted |
1,887 | $ | (1,887 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of deferred
compensation expense |
158 | 158 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock units granted |
16 | 422 | 422 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Exercise of stock options |
1 | 23 | 23 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, October 29, 2005 |
16,189 | 27,703 | $ | 280,269 | $ | 0 | $ | 15,968 | $ | (1,729 | ) | $ | 294,508 | |||||||||||||||
Balance, January 28, 2006 |
16,190 | 27,703 | $ | 281,119 | $ | 0 | $ | 26,007 | $ | (2,410 | ) | $ | 304,716 | |||||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 48,861 | 48,861 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reclassification of unamortized
deferred compensation |
$ | (2,410 | ) | $ | 2,410 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock units granted |
10 | 291 | 291 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Exercise of stock options |
22 | 416 | 416 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tax benefit related to stock
options exercised |
93 | 93 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock based compensation expense,
before related tax effects |
2,661 | 2,661 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, October 28, 2006 |
16,222 | 27,703 | $ | 282,170 | $ | 0 | $ | 74,868 | $ | 0 | $ | 357,038 | ||||||||||||||||
5
Nine months ended | ||||||||
October 28, | October 29, | |||||||
2006 | 2005 | |||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||||||
Net income |
$ | 48,861 | $ | 27,142 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income
to net cash provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
14,201 | 14,229 | ||||||
Amortization of debt issuance costs |
88 | 582 | ||||||
Amortization of deferred compensation expense |
158 | |||||||
Stock based compensation expense |
2,661 | |||||||
Deferred income taxes |
(2,077 | ) | 2,223 | |||||
Loss on disposal of assets |
1,346 | 250 | ||||||
Grants of director stock units |
291 | 422 | ||||||
Change in working capital, assets and liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts receivable |
304 | (14,985 | ) | |||||
Accounts receivable from related parties |
(5,780 | ) | (14,779 | ) | ||||
Inventories |
(18,349 | ) | (21,372 | ) | ||||
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
(1,785 | ) | (6,962 | ) | ||||
Advances to/from affiliates |
23,676 | |||||||
Accounts payable |
7,982 | (3,789 | ) | |||||
Proceeds from lease incentives |
4,315 | 8,972 | ||||||
Other noncurrent liabilities |
4,519 | 2,100 | ||||||
Accrued expenses |
10,677 | 18,293 | ||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
67,254 | 36,160 | ||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||
Cash paid for property and equipment |
(19,981 | ) | (19,850 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sale of assets |
26 | |||||||
Purchases of available-for-sale investments |
(150,400 | ) | ||||||
Maturities and sales from available-for-sale investments |
75,050 | |||||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(95,331 | ) | (19,824 | ) | ||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||
Proceeds from sale of stock |
277,937 | |||||||
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
416 | 23 | ||||||
Excess tax benefit related to stock option exercises |
93 | |||||||
Payment of note to parent |
(190,000 | ) | ||||||
Net decrease in revolving credit facility |
(55,000 | ) | ||||||
Debt issuance costs |
(570 | ) | ||||||
Net cash provided by financing activities |
509 | 32,390 | ||||||
Net (decrease) increase in cash and equivalents |
(27,568 | ) | 48,726 | |||||
Cash and equivalents, beginning of period |
124,759 | 8,339 | ||||||
Cash and equivalents, end of period |
$ | 97,191 | $ | 57,065 | ||||
6
1. | BUSINESS OPERATIONS |
DSW Inc. (DSW) and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, including DSW Shoe Warehouse, Inc. (DSWSW) and Brand Technology Services LLC (BTS), are herein referred to collectively as DSW or the Company. Prior to December 2004, DSW was a wholly-owned subsidiary of Value City Department Stores, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Retail Ventures, Inc. (RVI or Retail Ventures). In December 2004, RVI completed a corporate reorganization whereby Value City Department Stores, Inc. merged with and into Value City Department Stores, LLC (Value City), another wholly-owned subsidiary of RVI. In turn, Value City transferred all of the issued and outstanding shares of DSW to RVI in exchange for a promissory note. On June 29, 2005, DSW commenced an initial public offering (IPO) that closed on July 5, 2005. DSWs Class A Common Stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange trading under the symbol DSW. | ||
DSW operates in two segments (DSW stores and leased departments) and sells branded footwear in both. DSW stores also sell accessories. As of October 28, 2006, DSW operated a total of 215 stores located throughout the United States as a segment. DSW stores offer a wide selection of brand name and designer dress, casual and athletic footwear for men and women. DSW also operates leased shoe departments for three non-affiliated retailers and one affiliated retailer in its leased department segment. DSW entered into supply agreements to merchandise the non-affiliated shoe departments in Stein Mart, Inc. (Stein Mart), Gordmans, Inc. (Gordmans) and Frugal Fannies Fashion Warehouse (Frugal Fannies). DSW has operated leased shoe departments for Filenes Basement, Inc. (Filenes Basement), a wholly-owned subsidiary of RVI, since its acquisition by RVI in March 2000. DSW owns the merchandise until the merchandise is sold, records sales of merchandise net of returns and sales tax, owns the fixtures (except for Filenes Basement) and provides supervisory assistance in these covered locations. DSW receives a percentage of the net revenue generated from the sales of the merchandise. Stein Mart, Gordmans, Frugal Fannies and Filenes Basement provide the sales associates. DSW pays a percentage of net sales as rent. As of October 28, 2006, DSW supplied 162 leased departments for Stein Mart, 62 for Gordmans, 29 for Filenes Basement and one for Frugal Fannies. During the nine months ended October 28, 2006, DSW opened 20 new DSW stores, closed four stores, ceased operations in five leased departments, and added 21 new leased departments. | ||
On May 30, 2006, the Company entered into an Amended and Restated Supply Agreement (the Agreement) to supply shoes to Stein Mart. Under the terms of the Agreement, the Company will be the exclusive supplier of shoes to all Stein Mart stores that have shoe departments. Under the Agreement, DSW will be supplying shoes to an additional 102 Stein Mart stores by the end of the fiscal fourth quarter of 2006. |
2. | OWNERSHIP |
On July 5, 2005, DSW closed on its initial public offering (IPO) of 16,171,875 Class A Common Shares raising net proceeds of $285.8 million, net of the underwriters commission and before expenses of approximately $7.8 million. DSW used the net proceeds of the offering to repay $196.6 million of intercompany indebtedness, including interest, owed to RVI and for working capital and general corporate purposes, including the paying down of $20.0 million outstanding on RVIs old secured revolving credit facility and a $10.0 million |
7
intercompany advance. The 410.09 common shares of DSW held by RVI outstanding at January 29, 2005 were changed to 27,702,667 Class B Common Shares. It is the 27,702,667 Class B Common Shares which are being used in the prior periods calculation of earnings per share. Subsequent to the IPO, the transactions between DSW and RVI and its other subsidiaries are settled in accordance with a shared services agreement and result in the advances from affiliates being classified as a current receivable or payable, as appropriate. On October 28, 2006, RVI owned approximately 63.1% of DSWs outstanding Common Shares, representing approximately 93.2% of the combined voting power of DSWs outstanding Common Shares. |
On August 10, 2006, RVI announced the pricing of its 6.625% Mandatorily Exchangeable Notes due September 15, 2011, or PIES (Premium Income Exchangeable SecuritiesSM) in the aggregate principal amount of $143,750,000. The closing of the transaction took place during the third quarter of fiscal 2006. | ||
Except to the extent RVI exercises its cash settlement option, the PIES are mandatorily exchangeable, on the maturity date, into Class A Common Shares of DSW, no par value per share, which are issuable upon exchange of DSW Class B Common Shares, no par value per share, beneficially owned by RVI. On the maturity date, each holder of the PIES will receive a number of DSW Class A Common Shares per $50 principal amount of PIES equal to the exchange ratio described in the offering prospectus, or if RVI elects, the cash equivalent thereof or a combination of cash and DSW Class A Common Shares. The settlement of the PIES will not change the number of DSW Common Shares outstanding. |
3. | BASIS OF PRESENTATION |
The accompanying unaudited interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with
DSWs Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
on April 13, 2006 (the 2005 Annual Report). In the opinion of management, the unaudited interim financial statements reflect all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, which are necessary to present fairly the consolidated financial position and results of operations for the periods presented. |
4. | ADOPTION OF ACCOUNTING STANDARDS |
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) periodically issues Statements of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS), some of which require implementation by a date falling within or after the close of the fiscal year. | ||
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004) Share-Based Payment (SFAS No. 123R). This statement revised SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, (SFAS No. 123) and requires a fair value measurement of all stock-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options and recognition of those expenses in the statements of operations. SFAS No. 123R establishes standards for the |
8
accounting for transactions in which an entity exchanges its equity instruments for goods and services and focuses on accounting for transactions in which an entity obtains employee services in share-based payment transactions. In addition, SFAS No. 123R requires the recognition of compensation expense over the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for an award. Effective January 29, 2006, DSW adopted SFAS No. 123R. The impact of adoption to DSWs results of operations is presented in Note 5. |
In May 2005, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 154, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections a replacement of APB Opinion No. 20 and FASB Statement No. 3 (SFAS No. 154). SFAS No. 154 changes the requirements for the accounting for and reporting of a change in accounting principle. SFAS No. 154 is effective for accounting changes and corrections of errors made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005. The adoption of this new pronouncement in fiscal 2006 was not material to DSWs financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. |
In July 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, (FIN 48) which clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprises financial statements in accordance with FASB Statement No.109, Accounting for Income Taxes. The evaluation of a tax position in accordance with FIN 48 is a two step process. The first step is recognition: The enterprise determines whether it is more likely than not that a tax position will be sustained upon examination, including resolution of any related appeals or litigation processes, based on the technical merits of the position. The second step is measurement: A tax position that meets the more likely than not recognition threshold is measured to determine that amount of benefit to recognize in the financial statements. The tax position is measured at the largest amount of benefit that is greater than 50 percent likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. FIN 48 provides for a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle to be recorded upon the initial adoption. This interpretation is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. DSW does not believe the interpretation will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements. | ||
In September 2006, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 157, Fair Value Measurements which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in GAAP, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The intent of this standard is to ensure consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and enhanced disclosures regarding the measurements. This statement is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years. DSW is currently evaluating the impact this statement may have on its consolidated financial statements. | ||
In September 2006, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 158, Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans- an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R), (SFAS No. 158) which requires an employer to recognize the overfunded or underfunded status of a defined benefit postretirement plan as an asset or liability in its statement of financial position and to recognize changes in that funded statues in the year in which the changes occur through comprehensive income of a business entity. This statement also requires the employer to measure the funded status of the plan as of the date of its year-end statement of financial position. The employer still must disclose any additional information about certain affects of net periodic benefit cost for the |
9
next fiscal year that arise from delayed recognition of the gains or losses, prior service costs or credits, and transition asset or obligation in the notes to the financial statements. This statement is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. DSW is currently evaluating the impact this interpretation may have on its consolidated financial statements. | ||
In September 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108, Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements When Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements (SAB 108). SAB 108 provides guidance on how prior year misstatements should be taken into consideration when quantifying misstatements in current year financial statements for purposes of determining whether the current years financial statements are materially misstated. SAB 108 is effective for fiscal years ending after November 15, 2006. DSW is currently assessing the potential impact that the adoption of SAB No. 108 will have on its financial statements; the impact is not expected to be material. |
5. | STOCK BASED COMPENSATION |
DSW has a 2005 Equity Incentive Plan that provides for the issuance of equity awards to purchase up to 4,600,000 common shares, including stock options and restricted stock units to management, key employees of DSW and affiliates, consultants (as defined in the plan), and directors of DSW. Options generally vest 20% per year on a cumulative basis from the date of grant. Options granted under the 2005 Equity Incentive Plan generally remain exercisable for a period of ten years from the date of grant. Prior to fiscal 2005, DSW did not have a stock option plan or any equity units outstanding. | ||
On January 29, 2006, DSW adopted the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123R relating to its stock-based compensation plans. Prior to January 29, 2006, DSW had accounted for stock-based compensation in accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related interpretations (APB 25). In accordance with APB 25, compensation expense for employee stock options was generally not recognized for options granted that had an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying common shares on the date of grant. | ||
Under the modified prospective method of SFAS No. 123R, compensation expense was recognized during the nine months ended October 28, 2006, for all unvested stock options, based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the original provisions of SFAS No. 123, and for all stock based payments granted after January 29, 2006, based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123R. Stock-based compensation expense of approximately $1.1 million and $2.7 million, respectively, was recorded in operating expenses in the condensed consolidated statements of income for the three and nine month periods ending October 28, 2006. DSWs financial results for the prior periods have not been restated as a result of this adoption. | ||
Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123R, DSW presented all tax benefits of deductions resulting from the exercise of stock options as operating cash flows in the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows. During the nine months ended October 29, 2005, the tax benefits were less than $0.1 million. Beginning in fiscal 2006 with the adoption of SFAS |
10
No. 123R, the cash flows resulting from the tax benefits resulting from tax deductions in excess of compensation expense recognized for those options (excess tax benefits) are classified as financing cash flows. | ||
Consistent with the valuation method used for the disclosure only provisions of SFAS No. 123, DSW uses the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to value stock-based compensation expense. This model assumes that the estimated fair value of options is amortized over the options vesting periods and the compensation costs are included in operating expenses in the condensed consolidated statements of income. DSW recognizes compensation expense for stock option awards granted subsequent to the adoption of SFAS No. 123R and time-based restricted stock awards on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of the award. Compensation expense for stock option awards granted prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123R is recorded based upon the accrual basis. | ||
The following table illustrates the pro forma effect on net income and income per share for the three and nine months ended October 29, 2005 if the Company had applied the fair value recognition of SFAS No. 123. |
Three months ended | Nine months ended | |||||||
October 29, 2005 | October 29, 2005 | |||||||
(in thousands, except per share amounts) | ||||||||
Net income, as reported |
$ | 10,911 | $ | 27,142 | ||||
Add: Stock-based employee compensation expense included in reported net income, net of tax |
70 | 94 | ||||||
Deduct: Total stock-based employee
compensation benefit (expense)
determined under fair value based
method for all awards, net of tax
|
(628 | ) | (839 | ) | ||||
Pro forma net income |
$ | 10,353 | $ | 26,397 | ||||
Income per share: |
||||||||
Basic as reported |
$ | 0.25 | $ | 0.78 | ||||
Diluted as reported |
$ | 0.25 | $ | 0.77 | ||||
Basic pro forma |
$ | 0.24 | $ | 0.75 | ||||
Diluted pro forma |
$ | 0.23 | $ | 0.75 |
Forfeitures of options are estimated at the grant date based on historical rates of RVIs stock option activity and reduce the compensation expense recognized. The expected term of options granted is derived from historical data of RVIs stock options due to the limited historical data on DSW stock activity. The risk-free interest rate is based on the yield for U.S. Treasury securities with a remaining life equal to the five year expected term of the options at the grant date. Expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of the DSW Common Shares combined with the historical volatility of three similar companies common shares, due to the relative short historical trading history of the DSW Common Shares. The expected dividend yield curve is zero, which is based on DSWs intention of not declaring dividends to shareholders combined with the limitations on declaring dividends as set forth in DSWs credit facility. |
The following table illustrates the weighted-average assumptions used in the option-pricing model for options granted in each of the periods presented. |
Nine months ended | ||||||||
October 28, | October 29, | |||||||
2006 | 2005 | |||||||
Assumptions |
||||||||
Risk-free interest rate |
4.6 | % | 4.4 | % | ||||
Expected volatility of DSW common stock |
40.5 | % | 37.7 | % | ||||
Expected option term |
5 years | 5 years |
The weighted-average fair value of each option granted for the three months ended October 28, 2006 and October 29, 2005 was $11.76 and $9.56 per share, respectively, and for the nine months ended October 28, 2006 and October 29, 2005 was $12.93 per share and $8.14 per share, respectively. |
The following table summarizes DSWs stock option plans and related Weighted Average Exercise Prices (WAEP) for the three and nine months ended October 28, 2006 (shares and aggregate intrinsic value in thousands): |
11
Three months ended | Nine months ended | |||||||||||||||
October 28, 2006 | October 28, 2006 | |||||||||||||||
Shares | WAEP | Shares | WAEP | |||||||||||||
Outstanding beginning of period |
1,042 | $ | 21.48 | 914 | $ | 19.54 | ||||||||||
Granted |
71 | $ | 27.99 | 254 | $ | 29.77 | ||||||||||
Exercised |
(3 | ) | $ | 19.00 | (22 | ) | $ | 19.00 | ||||||||
Forfeited |
(4 | ) | $ | 20.08 | (40 | ) | $ | 19.11 | ||||||||
Outstanding end of period |
1,106 | $ | 21.91 | 1,106 | $ | 21.91 | ||||||||||
As of October 28, 2006 | ||||||||||||||||
Weighted | ||||||||||||||||
Average | Aggregate | |||||||||||||||
Remaining | Intrinsic | |||||||||||||||
Shares | WAEP | Contract Life | Value | |||||||||||||
Options outstanding |
1,106 | $ | 21.91 | 9 Years | $ | 14,417 | ||||||||||
Options exercisable |
146 | $ | 19.05 | 9 Years | $ | 2,317 | ||||||||||
Shares available
for additional
grants |
3,300 |
The aggregate intrinsic value is calculated as the amount by which the fair value of the underlying common shares exceeds the option exercise price. The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the three and nine months ended October 28, 2006 was less than $0.1 million and $0.3 million, respectively. | ||
As of October 28, 2006, the total compensation cost related to nonvested options not yet recognized was approximately $5.1 million with a weighted average expense recognition period remaining of 4.0 years. The total fair value of options that vested during the three and nine months ended October 28, 2006 was less than $0.1 million and $1.1 million, respectively. | ||
The following table summarizes information about options outstanding as of October 28, 2006 (shares in thousands): |
Options Outstanding | Options Exercisable | |||||||||||||||||||
Weighted | ||||||||||||||||||||
Average | ||||||||||||||||||||
Remaining | ||||||||||||||||||||
Contract | ||||||||||||||||||||
Range of Exercise Prices | Shares | Life | WAEP | Shares | WAEP | |||||||||||||||
$19.00$20.00 |
768 | 9 years | $ | 19.00 | 144 | $ | 19.00 | |||||||||||||
$20.01$25.00 |
73 | 9 years | $ | 24.52 | 2 | $ | 23.58 | |||||||||||||
$25.01$30.00 |
168 | 10 years | $ | 27.94 | ||||||||||||||||
$30.01$35.00 |
67 | 10 years | $ | 31.16 | ||||||||||||||||
$35.01$36.00 |
30 | 10 years | $ | 35.79 |
12
Restricted Stock Units | ||
Restricted stock units generally cliff vest at the end of four years from the date of grant and are settled immediately upon vesting. Restricted stock units granted to employees that are subject to the risk of forfeiture are not included in the computation of basic earnings per share. | ||
Compensation cost is measured at fair value on the grant date and recorded over the vesting period. Fair value is determined by multiplying the number of units granted by the grant date market price. The total aggregate intrinsic value of nonvested restricted stock units at October 28, 2006 was $5.0 million and the weighted average remaining contractual life was three years. As of October 28, 2006, the total compensation cost related to nonvested restricted stock units not yet recognized was approximately $2.2 million with a weighted average expense recognition period remaining of 2.6 years. |
The following table summarizes DSWs restricted stock units and related WAEP for the three and nine months ended October 28, 2006 (shares in thousands): |
Three months ended | Nine months ended | |||||||||||||||
October 28, 2006 | October 28, 2006 | |||||||||||||||
Shares | WAEP | Shares | WAEP | |||||||||||||
Outstanding beginning of period |
144 | $ | 21.80 | 131 | $ | 20.46 | ||||||||||
Granted |
20 | $ | 30.34 | |||||||||||||
Exercised
Forfeited |
(7 | ) | $ | 19.00 | ||||||||||||
Outstanding end of period |
144 | $ | 21.80 | 144 | $ | 21.80 | ||||||||||
DSW issues stock units to directors who are not employees of DSW or RVI. During the three and nine months ended October 28, 2006, DSW granted 394 and 9,982 director stock units, respectively, and expensed less than $0.1 million and $0.3 million respectively, related to these grants. During the three and nine months ended October 29, 2005, DSW granted 1,003 and 16,503 director stock units, respectively, and expensed less than $0.1 million and $0.4 million, respectively, related to these grants. Stock units are automatically granted to each director who is not an employee of DSW or RVI on the date of each annual meeting of shareholders for the purpose of electing directors. The number of stock units granted to each non-employee director is calculated by dividing one-half of the directors annual retainer (excluding any amount paid for service as the chair of a board committee) by the fair market value of a share of the DSW Class A Common Shares on the date of the meeting. In addition, each director eligible to receive compensation for board service may elect to have the cash portion of such directors compensation paid in the form of stock units. Stock units granted to directors vest immediately and are settled upon the director terminating service from the board. Stock units granted to directors which are not subject to forfeiture are considered to be outstanding for the purposes of computing basic earnings per share. As of October 28, 2006, 26,995 director stock units had been issued and no director stock units had been settled. |
13
6. | EARNINGS PER SHARE |
Basic earnings per share are based on net income and a simple weighted average of Class A and Class B Common Shares and director stock units outstanding. Diluted earnings per share reflect the potential dilution of Class A Common Shares related to outstanding stock options and restricted stock units. The numerator for the diluted earnings per share calculation is net income. The denominator is the weighted average diluted shares outstanding. |
Three months ended | Nine months ended | |||||||||||||||
October 28, | October 29, | October 28, | October 29, | |||||||||||||
2006 | 2005 | 2006 | 2005 | |||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding |
43,922 | 43,891 | 43,909 | 34,994 | ||||||||||||
Assumed exercise of dilutive stock options |
160 | 76 | 148 | 41 | ||||||||||||
Assumed exercise of dilutive restricted
stock units |
144 | 99 | 136 | 45 | ||||||||||||
Number of shares for computation of
dilutive earnings per share |
44,226 | 44,066 | 44,193 | 35,080 | ||||||||||||
For the three and nine months ended October 28, 2006 and October 29, 2005, all potentially dilutive stock options were dilutive. |
7. | INVESTMENTS |
Short-term investments include investment grade variable-rate debt obligations and auction rate securities and are classified as available-for-sale securities. These securities are recorded at cost, which approximates fair value due to their variable interest rates, which typically reset every 7 to 182 days, and despite the long-term nature of their stated contractual maturities, DSW has the intent and ability to quickly liquidate these securities. Because the fair value approximates the cost, there are no accumulated unrealized holding gains or losses in other comprehensive income from these investments. All income generated from these investments is recorded as interest income. | ||
During the three and nine months ended October 28, 2006, $81.4 million and $150.4 million of cash, respectively, was used to purchase available-for-sale securities while $53.0 million and $75.1 million of cash, respectively, was generated by the sale of available-for-sale securities. As of October 28, 2006, DSW held $75.4 million in short-term investments and at January 28, 2006, DSW had no short-term investments. | ||
The table below details the short-term investments classified as available-for-sale securities outstanding at October 28, 2006 (in thousands): |
October 28, 2006 | ||||
Maturity of | ||||
Less Than 1 Year | ||||
Aggregate fair value |
$ | 75,350 | ||
Net gains in accumulated other comprehensive income |
||||
Net losses in accumulated other comprehensive income |
||||
Net carrying amount |
$ | 75,350 | ||
14
8. | LONG-TERM OBLIGATIONS |
In July 2005, upon the consummation of DSWs IPO, RVI and the lenders thereunder amended or terminated the existing credit facilities and other debt obligations of Value City and its other affiliates, including certain facilities under which DSW had rights and obligations as a co-borrower and co-guarantor and released DSW and DSWSW from their obligations as co-borrowers and co-guarantors. At the same time, DSW entered into a new $150 million secured revolving credit facility (DSW Revolving Loan) with a term of five years. | ||
Under this new facility, DSW and DSWSW are named as co-borrowers. The new secured revolving credit facility has borrowing base restrictions and provides for borrowings at variable interest rates based on London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR), the prime rate and the Federal Funds effective rate, plus a margin. DSWs obligations under its new secured revolving credit facility are collateralized by a lien on substantially all of DSWs and its subsidiarys personal property and a pledge of all of its shares of DSWSW. In addition, this facility contains usual and customary restrictive covenants relating to DSWs management and the operation of its business. These covenants will, among other things, restrict DSWs ability to grant liens on its assets, incur additional indebtedness, open or close stores, pay cash dividends and redeem its stock, enter into transactions with affiliates and merge or consolidate with another entity. In addition, if at any time DSW utilizes over 90% of its borrowing capacity under this facility, it must comply with a fixed charge coverage ratio test set forth in the facility documents. At October 28, 2006 and January 28, 2006, $134.2 million and $136.4 million, respectively, were available under the DSW Revolving Loan and no direct borrowings were outstanding. At October 28, 2006 and January 28, 2006, $15.8 million and $13.6 million, respectively, in letters of credit were issued and outstanding. The maturity of the DSW Revolving Loan is July 5, 2010. |
In March 2005, DSW and RVI and certain of their affiliates increased the ceiling under their then-existing revolving credit facility from $350 million to $425 million. The increase of $75 million to the revolving credit facility was accomplished by amendment under substantially the same terms as the then-existing revolving credit agreement. | ||
In March 2005, DSW declared a dividend and issued an intercompany note to RVI in the amount of $165 million. The indebtedness evidenced by this note was scheduled to mature in March 2020 and bore interest at a rate equal to LIBOR, plus 850 basis points per year. | ||
In May 2005, DSW declared an additional dividend and issued an intercompany note to RVI in the amount of $25 million. The indebtedness evidenced by this note was scheduled to mature in May 2020 and bore interest at a rate equal to LIBOR, plus 950 basis points per year. |
15
In July 2005, subsequent to the IPO, DSW prepaid in full, without penalty, the principal balance of both the $165 million and $25 million dividend notes, plus accrued interest of approximately $6.6 million. |
9. | SEGMENT REPORTING |
DSW is managed in two operating segments: DSW stores and leased departments. All of the operations are located in the United States. DSW has identified such segments based on internal management reporting and management responsibilities and measures segment profit as gross profit, which is defined as net sales less cost of sales. The tables below present segment information: |
DSW | Leased | |||||||||||
Stores | Departments | Total | ||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||
Three months ended October 28, 2006: |
||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 298,618 | $ | 33,601 | $ | 332,219 | ||||||
Gross profit |
92,708 | 5,967 | 98,675 | |||||||||
Capital expenditures |
9,117 | 192 | 9,309 | |||||||||
Nine months ended October 28, 2006: |
||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 852,809 | $ | 97,199 | $ | 950,008 | ||||||
Gross profit |
260,067 | 16,997 | 277,064 | |||||||||
Capital expenditures |
21,434 | 364 | 21,798 | |||||||||
As of October 28, 2006: |
||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 558,376 | $ | 30,944 | $ | 589,320 |
DSW | Leased | |||||||||||
Stores | Departments | Total | ||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||
Three months ended October 29, 2005: |
||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 270,536 | $ | 31,704 | $ | 302,240 | ||||||
Gross profit |
78,361 | 4,658 | 83,019 | |||||||||
Capital expenditures |
5,630 | 110 | 5,740 | |||||||||
Nine months ended October 29, 2005: |
||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 768,721 | $ | 91,536 | $ | 860,257 | ||||||
Gross profit |
229,070 | 13,110 | 242,180 | |||||||||
Capital expenditures |
21,008 | 240 | 21,248 | |||||||||
As of January 28, 2006: |
||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 479,364 | $ | 28,351 | $ | 507,715 |
16
10. | SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION |
Nine months ended | ||||||||
October 28, | October 29, | |||||||
2006 | 2005 | |||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||
Cash paid during the period for: |
||||||||
Interest to non-related parties |
$ | 7 | $ | 1,544 | ||||
Interest to related parties |
$ | 0 | $ | 6,592 | ||||
Income taxes |
$ | 28,336 | $ | 13,678 | ||||
Noncash investing and operating activities |
||||||||
Changes in accounts payable due to
asset purchases |
$ | 1,702 | $ | 1,398 |
11. | COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES |
As previously reported, on March 8, 2005, Retail Ventures announced that it had learned of the theft of credit card and other purchase information from a portion of DSW customers. On April 18, 2005, Retail Ventures issued the findings from its investigation into the theft. The theft covered transaction information involving approximately 1.4 million credit cards and data from transactions involving approximately 96,000 checks. | ||
DSW and Retail Ventures contacted and continue to cooperate with law enforcement and other authorities with regard to this matter. DSW is involved in several legal proceedings arising out of this incident, including two putative class action lawsuits, which seek unspecified monetary damages, credit monitoring and other relief. Each of the two lawsuits seeks to certify a different class of consumers. One of the lawsuits seeks to certify a nationwide class that would include every consumer who used a credit card, debit card, or check to make purchases at DSW between November 2004 and March 2005 and whose transaction data was taken during the data theft incident. The other lawsuit seeks to certify a class of consumers that is limited geographically to consumers who made purchases at certain stores in Ohio. | ||
In connection with this matter, DSW entered into a consent order with the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), which has jurisdiction over consumer protection matters. The FTC published the final order on March 14, 2006, and copies of the complaint and consent order are available from the FTCs Web site at http://www.ftc.gov and also from the FTCs Consumer Response Center, Room 130, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20580. | ||
DSW has not admitted any wrongdoing or that the facts alleged in the FTCs proposed unfairness complaint are true. Under the consent order, DSW will pay no fine or damages. DSW has agreed, however, to maintain a comprehensive information security program and to undergo a biannual assessment of such program by an independent third party. | ||
There can be no assurance that there will not be additional proceedings or claims brought against DSW in the future. DSW has contested and will continue to vigorously contest the |
17
claims made against DSW and will continue to explore its defenses and possible claims against others. | ||
DSW estimates that the potential exposure for losses related to this theft, including exposure under currently pending proceedings, ranges from approximately $6.5 million to approximately $9.5 million. Because of many factors, including the early development of information regarding the theft and recoverability under insurance policies, there is no amount in the estimated range that represents a better estimate than any other amount in the range. Therefore, in accordance with Financial Accounting Standard No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies, DSW accrued a charge to operations in the first quarter of fiscal 2005 equal to the low end of the range set forth above, or $6.5 million. As the situation develops and more information becomes available, the amount of the reserve may increase or decrease accordingly. The amount of any such change may be material. As of October 28, 2006, the balance of the associated accrual for potential exposure was $3.1 million. | ||
Although difficult to quantify, since the announcement of the theft, DSW has not discerned any material negative effect on sales trends it believes is attributable to the theft. However, this may not be indicative of the long-term developments regarding this matter. | ||
DSW is involved in various other legal proceedings that are incidental to the conduct of its business. DSW estimates the range of liability related to pending litigation where the amount and range of loss can be estimated. DSW records its best estimate of a loss when the loss is considered probable. Where a liability is probable and there is a range of estimated loss, DSW records the minimum estimated liability related to the claim. In the opinion of management, the amount of any liability with respect to these legal proceedings will not be material. As additional information becomes available, DSW assesses the potential liability related to its pending litigation and revises the estimates. Revisions in DSWs estimates and potential liability could materially impact its results of operations and financial condition. |
On December 5, 2006, RVI, Retail Ventures Services, Inc., Value City and Filenes Basement, collectively the RVI Entities, entered into an IT Transfer and Assignment Agreement (the IT Transfer Agreement) with BTS. Under the terms of the IT Transfer Agreement, the RVI Entities will transfer certain information technology contracts to BTS. The IT transfer Agreement is effective as of October 29, 2006. | ||
Additionally, on December 5, 2006, DSW and RVI entered into an Amended and Restated Shared Services Agreement, effective as of October 29, 2006 (the Amended Shared Services Agreement). Under the terms of the Amended Shared Services Agreement, DSW, through BTS, will provide information technology services to RVI and its subsidiaries, including Value City and Filenes Basement. RVI information technology associates are now employed by BTS. Additionally, DSW and RVI agreed to include other non-material changes in the Amended Shared Services Agreement. |
18
19
| Revenue Recognition. Revenues from merchandise sales are recognized at the point of sale and are net of returns and exclude sales tax. Revenue from stored value cards, which include gift cards and returned merchandise credits, are deferred and recognized when the cards are redeemed. The liability associated with outstanding stored value cards was $8.1 million and $9.1 million at October 28, 2006 and January 28, 2006, respectively, and these amounts are included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets within accrued expenses other. We did not recognize income from unredeemed stored value cards during the three and nine months ending October 28, 2006 and October 29, 2005. | ||
| Cost of Sales and Merchandise Inventories. Merchandise inventories are stated at the lower of cost, determined using the first-in, first-out basis, or market, using the retail inventory method. The retail inventory method is widely used in the retail industry due to its practicality. Under the retail inventory method, the valuation of inventories at cost and the resulting gross profit are calculated by applying a calculated cost to retail ratio to the retail value of inventories. The cost of the inventory reflected on our consolidated balance sheet is decreased by charges to cost of sales at the time the retail value of the inventory is lowered through the use of markdowns. Hence, earnings are negatively impacted as merchandise is marked down prior to sale. Reserves to value inventory at the lower of cost or market were $21.9 million on October 28, 2006 and $19.2 million at January 28, 2006. |
20
Inherent in the calculation of inventories are certain significant management judgments and estimates, including setting the original merchandise retail value or mark-on, markups of initial prices established, reductions in prices due to customers perception of value (known as markdowns), and estimates of losses between physical inventory counts, or shrinkage, which, combined with the averaging process within the retail inventory method, can significantly impact the ending inventory valuation at cost and the resulting gross profit. | |||
We include in the cost of sales expenses associated with warehousing, distribution and store occupancy. Warehousing costs are comprised of labor, benefits and other labor-related costs associated with the operations of the warehouse, which are primarily payroll-related taxes and benefits. The non-labor costs associated with warehousing include rent, depreciation, insurance, utilities and maintenance and other operating costs that are passed to us from the landlord. Distribution costs include the transportation of merchandise to the warehouse and from the warehouse to our stores. Store occupancy costs include rent, utilities, repairs, maintenance, insurance and janitorial costs and other costs associated with licenses and occupancy-related taxes, which are primarily real estate taxes passed to us by our landlords. Redemption for customer loyalty certificates are included in cost of sales. (See Customer Loyalty Program below for more details) | |||
| Short-Term Investments. Short-term investments include investment grade variable-rate debt obligations and auction rate securities and are classified as available-for-sale securities. These securities are recorded at cost, which approximates fair value due to their variable interest rates, which reset every 7 to 182 days. Despite the long-term nature of their stated contractual maturities, we have the intent and ability to quickly liquidate these securities. As a result of the resetting variable rates, there are no cumulative gross unrealized or realized holding gains or losses from these investments. All income generated from these investments is recorded as interest income. As of October 28, 2006, we held $75.4 million in short-term investments and at January 28, 2006, we had no short-term investments. | ||
| Asset Impairment and Long-lived Assets. We must periodically evaluate the carrying amount of our long-lived assets, primarily property and equipment, and finite life intangible assets when events and circumstances warrant such a review to ascertain if any assets have been impaired. The carrying amount of a long-lived asset is considered impaired when the carrying value of the asset exceeds the expected future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest) from the asset. Our reviews are conducted at the lowest identifiable level, which includes a store. The impairment loss recognized is the excess of the carrying amount of the asset over its fair value, estimated on discounted cash flow. Should an impairment loss be realized, it will be included in cost of sales. We recorded zero and $0.8 million in impairment losses during the three and nine months ended October 28, 2006. The amount of impairment losses recorded in fiscal 2005 was $0.2 million, all of which was recorded in the fourth quarter. | ||
We believe at this time that the long-lived assets carrying values and useful lives continue to be appropriate. To the extent these future projections or our strategies change, our conclusion regarding asset impairment may differ from our current estimates. |
| Store Closing Reserves. During the nine months ending October 28, 2006, we recorded reserves associated with the closing of four DSW stores in the amount of $0.5 million. Expenses related to closed stores are recorded as operating expenses. These estimates are monitored on at least a quarterly basis for changes in circumstances. |
21
Balance at January | Balance at October | |||||||||||||||||||
28, 2006 | Related Charges | Payments | Adjustments | 28, 2006 | ||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Employee severance and termination benefits |
$ | 19 | $ | (19 | ) | $ | | |||||||||||||
Lease Costs |
$ | 282 | 431 | (838 | ) | $ | 233 | 108 | ||||||||||||
Other |
64 | 64 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 282 | $ | 514 | $ | (857 | ) | $ | 233 | $ | 172 |
Balance at January | Balance at October | |||||||||||||||||||
29, 2005 | Related Charges | Payments | Adjustments | 29, 2005 | ||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Employee severance and termination benefits |
||||||||||||||||||||
Lease Costs |
$ | 532 | $ | | $ | (209 | ) | $ | | $ | 323 | |||||||||
Other |
||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 532 | $ | | $ | (209 | ) | $ | | $ | 323 |
| Self-insurance Reserves. We record estimates for certain health and welfare, workers compensation and casualty insurance costs that are self-insured programs. Self insurance reserves include actuarial estimates of both claims filed, carried at their expected ultimate settlement value, and claims incurred but not yet reported. Our liability represents an estimate of the ultimate cost of claims incurred as of the balance sheet date. Health and welfare estimates are calculated monthly, based on a historical analysis for the average of the previous two months claims cost and the number of associates employed. Workers compensation and casualty insurance estimates are calculated semi-annually, with the assistance of an actuary, utilizing claims development estimates based on historical experience and other factors. We have purchased stop loss insurance to limit our exposure to any significant exposure on a per person basis for health and welfare and on a per claim basis for workers compensation and casualty insurance. Although we do not anticipate the amounts ultimately paid will differ significantly from our estimates, self-insurance reserves could be affected if future claim experience differs significantly from the historical trends and the actuarial assumptions. For example, for workers compensation and liability claims estimates, a 1% increase or decrease to the assumptions for claims costs and loss development factors would increase or decrease our self-insurance accrual by less than $0.1 million. The self-insurance reserves were $1.9 million and $0.9 million at October 28, 2006 and January 28, 2006, respectively. | ||
| Customer Loyalty Program. We maintain a customer loyalty program for our DSW stores in which program members receive a future discount on qualifying purchases. Upon reaching the target-earned threshold, our members receive certificates for these discounts which must be redeemed within six months. During the third quarter of fiscal 2006 we re-launched our loyalty program, which included changing: the name from Reward Your Style to DSW Rewards, the points threshold to receive a certificate and the certificate amounts. The |
22
changes were designed to improve customer awareness, customer loyalty and our ability to communicate with our customers. We accrue the anticipated redemptions of the discount earned at the time of the initial purchase. To estimate these costs, we are required to make assumptions related to customer purchase levels and redemption rates based on historical experience. As these certificates are redeemed, the charge is to cost of sales. The accrued liability as of October 28, 2006 and January 28, 2006 was $10.7 million and $8.3 million, respectively. Substantially all certificates under the Reward Your Style program will expire on or before January 31, 2007. | |||
Income Taxes. We are required to determine the aggregate amount of income tax expense to accrue and the amount which will be currently payable based upon tax statutes of each jurisdiction we do business in. In making these estimates, we adjust income based on a determination of generally accepted accounting principles for items that are treated differently by the applicable taxing authorities. Deferred tax assets and liabilities, as a result of these differences, are reflected on our balance sheet for temporary differences that will reverse in subsequent years. A valuation allowance is established against deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. If management had made these determinations on a different basis, our tax expense, assets and liabilities could be different. |
Three months ended | Nine months ended | |||||||||||||||
October 28, | October 29, | October 28, | October 29, | |||||||||||||
2006 | 2005 | 2006 | 2005 | |||||||||||||
Net sales |
100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
Cost of sales |
(70.3 | ) | (72.5 | ) | (70.8 | ) | (71.9 | ) | ||||||||
Gross profit |
29.7 | 27.5 | 29.2 | 28.1 | ||||||||||||
Operating expenses |
(22.1 | ) | (21.6 | ) | (21.2 | ) | (21.9 | ) | ||||||||
Operating profit |
7.6 | 5.9 | 8.0 | 6.2 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense |
(0.1 | ) | (0.9 | ) | ||||||||||||
Interest income |
0.5 | 0.1 | 0.5 | |||||||||||||
Interest income (expense), net |
0.5 | 0.0 | 0.5 | (0.9 | ) | |||||||||||
Earnings before income taxes |
8.1 | 5.9 | 8.5 | 5.3 | ||||||||||||
Income tax provision |
(3.3 | ) | (2.3 | ) | (3.4 | ) | (2.1 | ) | ||||||||
Net income |
4.8 | % | 3.6 | % | 5.1 | % | 3.2 | % | ||||||||
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
(a) | Recent sales of unregistered securities. Not applicable. | |
(b) | Use of Proceeds. Not applicable. | |
(c) | Purchases of equity securities by the issuer and affiliated purchasers |
34
35
DSW INC. (Registrant) |
||||
Date: December 6, 2006 | By: | /s/ Douglas J. Probst | ||
Douglas J. Probst | ||||
Chief Financial Officer (duly authorized officer and chief financial officer) |
36
Exhibit Number | Description | |
10.1
|
Lease, dated June 30, 2006 between JLPK Levittown NY LLC, an affiliate of Schottenstein Stores Corporation and DSW Inc., re: Levittown, NY DSW store | |
10.2
|
Lease, dated November 27, 2006 between JLP Lynnhaven VA LLC, an affiliate of Schottenstein Stores Corporation and DSW Inc., re: Lynnhaven, Virginia DSW store | |
10.3
|
Lease, dated November 30, 2006 between 4300 Venture 34910 LLC, an affiliate of Schottenstein Stores Corporation, and DSW Inc., re: Home office | |
10.4
|
Lease, dated November 30, 2006 between 4300 East Fifth Avenue LLC, an affiliate of Schottenstein Stores Corporation, and DSW Inc., re: Trailer Parking spaces for home office. | |
10.5
|
Lease Amendment, dated November 30, 2006 between 4300 Venture 6729 LLC, an affiliate of Schottenstein Stores Corporation, and DSW Inc., re: warehouse and corporate headquarters | |
10.6
|
IT Transfer and Assignment Agreement dated October 29, 2006 | |
10.7
|
Amended and Restated Shared Services Agreement between DSW Inc. and Retail Ventures, Inc., dated October 29, 2006. | |
31.1
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer | |
31.2
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer | |
32.1
|
Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer | |
32.2
|
Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer |
37