Sykes Enterprises, Incorporated
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006
|
|
|
o |
|
Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File No. 0-28274
Sykes Enterprises, Incorporated
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Florida
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
|
56-1383460
(IRS Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
400 North Ashley Drive, Tampa, FL
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
33602
(Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (813) 274-1000
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for at least the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer,
or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer Accelerated filer þ Non-accelerated filer
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
As of July 21, 2006, there were 40,222,613 outstanding shares of common stock.
Sykes Enterprises, Incorporated and Subsidiaries
INDEX
2
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1 Financial Statements
Sykes Enterprises, Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(in thousands, except per share data) |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
146,573 |
|
|
$ |
127,612 |
|
Receivables, net |
|
|
98,482 |
|
|
|
88,213 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
14,468 |
|
|
|
10,601 |
|
Assets held for sale |
|
|
7,404 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
266,927 |
|
|
|
226,426 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
60,433 |
|
|
|
72,261 |
|
Goodwill, net |
|
|
6,028 |
|
|
|
5,918 |
|
Intangibles, net |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
2,112 |
|
Deferred charges and other assets |
|
|
29,527 |
|
|
|
24,468 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
364,915 |
|
|
$ |
331,185 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
17,082 |
|
|
$ |
12,990 |
|
Accrued employee compensation and benefits |
|
|
34,417 |
|
|
|
31,777 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
29,269 |
|
|
|
25,172 |
|
Deferred grants related to assets held for sale |
|
|
6,514 |
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
1,338 |
|
|
|
2,220 |
|
Other accrued expenses and current liabilities |
|
|
8,526 |
|
|
|
10,274 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
97,146 |
|
|
|
82,433 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred grants |
|
|
10,816 |
|
|
|
18,107 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
4,246 |
|
|
|
4,555 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
112,208 |
|
|
|
105,095 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 10,000 shares
authorized; no shares issued and outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 200,000 shares authorized;
44,592 and 44,009 shares issued |
|
|
446 |
|
|
|
440 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
169,009 |
|
|
|
165,674 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
133,405 |
|
|
|
115,735 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
1,775 |
|
|
|
(3,435 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
304,635 |
|
|
|
278,414 |
|
Deferred stock compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(355 |
) |
Treasury stock at cost: 4,703 shares and 4,712 shares |
|
|
(51,928 |
) |
|
|
(51,969 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
252,707 |
|
|
|
226,090 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
364,915 |
|
|
$ |
331,185 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
Sykes Enterprises, Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
(in thousands, except for per share data) |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
135,221 |
|
|
$ |
122,194 |
|
|
$ |
266,308 |
|
|
$ |
243,566 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct salaries and related costs |
|
|
86,378 |
|
|
|
76,026 |
|
|
|
169,394 |
|
|
|
153,455 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
42,333 |
|
|
|
41,369 |
|
|
|
83,328 |
|
|
|
81,259 |
|
Net loss (gain) on disposal of property and
equipment |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
(1,627 |
) |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
(1,696 |
) |
Impairment of long-lived assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
382 |
|
|
|
|
|
Reversal of restructuring and other charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(56 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(314 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
128,716 |
|
|
|
115,712 |
|
|
|
253,118 |
|
|
|
232,704 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
6,505 |
|
|
|
6,482 |
|
|
|
13,190 |
|
|
|
10,862 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
2,855 |
|
|
|
496 |
|
|
|
3,776 |
|
|
|
946 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(183 |
) |
|
|
(385 |
) |
|
|
(276 |
) |
|
|
(459 |
) |
Income from rental operations, net |
|
|
444 |
|
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
954 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Other income (expense) |
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
704 |
|
|
|
(208 |
) |
|
|
386 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense) |
|
|
3,270 |
|
|
|
929 |
|
|
|
4,246 |
|
|
|
883 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before (benefit) provision for
income taxes |
|
|
9,775 |
|
|
|
7,411 |
|
|
|
17,436 |
|
|
|
11,745 |
|
(Benefit) provision for income taxes |
|
|
(1,996 |
) |
|
|
2,434 |
|
|
|
(234 |
) |
|
|
3,803 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
11,771 |
|
|
$ |
4,977 |
|
|
$ |
17,670 |
|
|
$ |
7,942 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
$ |
0.44 |
|
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
39,900 |
|
|
|
39,289 |
|
|
|
39,679 |
|
|
|
39,242 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
40,251 |
|
|
|
39,445 |
|
|
|
40,044 |
|
|
|
39,393 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
Sykes Enterprises, Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders Equity
Six Months Ended June 30, 2005, Six Months Ended December 31, 2005 and
Six Months Ended June 30, 2006
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
Deferred |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid-in |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Issued |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Income (Loss) |
|
|
Compensation |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2005 |
|
|
43,832 |
|
|
$ |
438 |
|
|
$ |
163,885 |
|
|
$ |
92,327 |
|
|
$ |
4,871 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(51,486 |
) |
|
$ |
210,035 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock |
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
306 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
307 |
|
Deferred stock compensation
for the issuance of restricted
common stock units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
854 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(854 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of deferred
stock compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
313 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
313 |
|
Comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,942 |
|
|
|
(9,292 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,350 |
) |
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2005 |
|
|
43,921 |
|
|
|
439 |
|
|
|
165,045 |
|
|
|
100,269 |
|
|
|
(4,421 |
) |
|
|
(541 |
) |
|
|
(51,486 |
) |
|
|
209,305 |
|
|
Issuance of common stock |
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
530 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
531 |
|
Deferred stock compensation
for the issuance of restricted
common stock units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of deferred
stock compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
186 |
|
Issuance of common stock
under Deferred Compensation Plan and held in
rabbi trust |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(483 |
) |
|
|
(384 |
) |
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,466 |
|
|
|
986 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,452 |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2005 |
|
|
44,009 |
|
|
|
440 |
|
|
|
165,674 |
|
|
|
115,735 |
|
|
|
(3,435 |
) |
|
|
(355 |
) |
|
|
(51,969 |
) |
|
|
226,090 |
|
Reclassification of deferred
stock compensation balance
upon adoption of SFAS 123R |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(355 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
355 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock |
|
|
278 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
1,675 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,678 |
|
Stock-based compensation
expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,103 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,103 |
|
Excess tax benefit from stock-
based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
656 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
656 |
|
Issuance of common stock
under Deferred Compensation
Plan and held in rabbi trust,
net of settlements |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
111 |
|
Issuance of restricted common
stock |
|
|
290 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock to
Board of Directors
previously deferred under
the 1996 Non-employee
Director Fee Plan |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47 |
|
Modification of Deferred
Compensation Plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
142 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
142 |
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,670 |
|
|
|
5,210 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,880 |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2006 |
|
|
44,592 |
|
|
$ |
446 |
|
|
$ |
169,009 |
|
|
$ |
133,405 |
|
|
$ |
1,775 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(51,928 |
) |
|
$ |
252,707 |
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
Sykes Enterprises, Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
17,670 |
|
|
$ |
7,942 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
11,878 |
|
|
|
13,290 |
|
Stock compensation expense |
|
|
1,103 |
|
|
|
313 |
|
Deferred income tax benefit |
|
|
(2,135 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net loss (gain) on disposal of property and equipment |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
(1,696 |
) |
Termination costs associated with exit activities |
|
|
789 |
|
|
|
186 |
|
Foreign exchange gain on liquidation of foreign entities |
|
|
(94 |
) |
|
|
(365 |
) |
Reversal of restructuring and other charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(314 |
) |
Impairment of long-lived assets |
|
|
382 |
|
|
|
|
|
Bad debt expense (reversals) |
|
|
(115 |
) |
|
|
60 |
|
Unrealized gain on investments held in rabbi trust |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables |
|
|
(5,249 |
) |
|
|
4,103 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
(2,688 |
) |
|
|
(1,006 |
) |
Deferred charges and other assets |
|
|
(3,254 |
) |
|
|
(2,595 |
) |
Accounts payable |
|
|
3,926 |
|
|
|
2,344 |
|
Income taxes receivable/payable |
|
|
(2,964 |
) |
|
|
(1,255 |
) |
Accrued employee compensation and benefits |
|
|
168 |
|
|
|
(364 |
) |
Other accrued expenses and current liabilities |
|
|
(2,040 |
) |
|
|
3,238 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
2,900 |
|
|
|
2,388 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
479 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
20,754 |
|
|
|
26,270 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(7,801 |
) |
|
|
(5,653 |
) |
Cash paid for acquisition of Kelly, Luttmer & Assoc. Ltd, net of cash acquired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,246 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment |
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
2,486 |
|
Other |
|
|
(254 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used for investing activities |
|
|
(7,950 |
) |
|
|
(6,413 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments of long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(77 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of stock |
|
|
1,678 |
|
|
|
307 |
|
Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation |
|
|
656 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
2,334 |
|
|
|
230 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effects of exchange rates on cash |
|
|
3,823 |
|
|
|
(4,841 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
18,961 |
|
|
|
15,246 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents beginning |
|
|
127,612 |
|
|
|
93,868 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents ending |
|
$ |
146,573 |
|
|
$ |
109,114 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during period for
interest |
|
$ |
191 |
|
|
$ |
343 |
|
Cash paid during period for income taxes |
|
$ |
4,667 |
|
|
$ |
5,143 |
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
6
Sykes Enterprises, Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
Six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005
(Unaudited)
Sykes Enterprises, Incorporated and consolidated subsidiaries (Sykes or the Company) provides
outsourced customer contact management solutions and services in the business process outsourcing
arena to companies, primarily within the communications, technology/consumer, financial services,
healthcare, and transportation and leisure industries. Sykes provides flexible, high quality
outsourced customer contact management services (with an emphasis on inbound technical support and
customer service), which includes customer assistance, healthcare and roadside assistance,
technical support and product sales to its clients customers. Utilizing Sykes integrated
onshore/offshore global delivery model, Sykes provides its services through multiple communications
channels encompassing phone, e-mail, Web and chat. Sykes complements its outsourced customer
contact management services with various enterprise support services in the United States that
encompass services for a companys internal support operations, from technical staffing services to
outsourced corporate help desk services. In Europe, Sykes also provides fulfillment services
including multilingual sales order processing via the Internet and phone, inventory control,
product delivery and product returns handling. The Company has operations in two geographic regions
entitled (1) the Americas, which includes the United States, Canada, Latin America, India and the
Asia Pacific Rim, in which the client base is primarily companies in the United States that are
using the Companys services to support their customer management needs; and (2) EMEA, which
includes Europe, the Middle East, and Africa.
Note 1
Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America
(generally accepted accounting principles) for interim financial information and with the
instructions to Form 10-Q. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and notes
required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the
opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered
necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2006 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for
any future quarters or the year ending December 31, 2006. For further information, refer to the
consolidated financial statements and notes thereto, included in the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC).
Stock-Based Compensation The Company has three stock-based compensation plans: the 2001 Equity
Incentive Plan (for employees and certain non-employees), the 2004 Non-Employee Director Fee Plan
(for non-employee directors), both approved by the shareholders, and the Deferred Compensation Plan
(for certain eligible employees), which are discussed more fully in Note 12. Stock-based awards
under these plans may consist of common stock, common stock units, stock options, cash-settled or
stock-settled stock appreciation rights, restricted stock and other stock-based awards. The Company
issues common stock to satisfy stock option exercises or vesting of stock awards.
Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (SFAS) No. 123R, (SFAS 123R), Share-Based Payment, for its stock-based compensation
plans. In conjunction with the adoption of SFAS 123R on January 1, 2006 the Company also adopted
the following: Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) 107, Share-Based Payments, which provides guidance
on valuation methods available and other matters; Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Staff
Position No. 123 R-2 (SFAS 123R-2), Practical Accommodation to the Application of Grant Date as
Defined in SFAS 123R, which provides guidance on the application of grant date; and FASB Staff
Position SFAS No. 123R-3, Transition Election Related to Accounting for the Tax Effects of Share
Based Payment Awards, which provides for an elective alternative transition method that
establishes a computational component to arrive at the beginning balance of the accumulated paid-in
capital pool related to employee compensation and a simplified method to determine the subsequent
impact on the accumulated paid-in capital pool of employee awards that are fully vested and
outstanding upon the adoption of SFAS 123R. The Company elected to use the alternative transition
method in conjunction with the adoption of SFAS 123R. The adoption of SFAS 123R did not have a
material effect on the Companys income before provision
for income taxes, net income, cash flows and basic and diluted earnings per share for the three and
six months ended June 30, 2006.
7
Sykes Enterprises, Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
Six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005
(Unaudited)
Note 1
Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
Stock-Based Compensation (continued)
SFAS 123R requires companies to recognize in their income statement the grant-date fair value of
stock options and other equity-based compensation issued to employees and directors. The standard
requires that compensation expense for most equity-based awards be recognized over the requisite
service period, usually the vesting period, while compensation expense for liability-based awards
(those usually settled in cash rather than stock) be measured to fair-value at each balance sheet
date until the award is settled. Under SFAS 123R, the pro forma disclosures previously permitted
are no longer an alternative to financial statement recognition. The Company elected to use the
modified prospective method which requires the Company to record compensation expense for the
non-vested portion of previously issued awards that remain outstanding at the initial date of
adoption of SFAS 123R and to record compensation expense for any awards issued or modified after
January 1, 2006. Results for prior periods have not been restated. Upon adoption of SFAS 123R, the
deferred stock compensation balance of $0.4 million as of January 1, 2006 was reclassified to
additional paid-in capital in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statement of Changes in
Shareholders Equity. SFAS 123R also requires the benefits of tax deductions in excess of
recognized compensation cost to be reported as a financing cash flow and a corresponding reduction
in operating cash flows, rather than as an operating cash flow as previously required. Accordingly,
the excess tax benefit of $0.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 was classified as a
financing cash flow and a corresponding reduction in operating cash flows in the accompanying
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows.
On February 1, 2005, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors approved accelerating the
vesting of most out-of-the-money, unvested stock options held by current employees, including
executive officers and certain employee directors. An option was considered out-of-the-money if the
stated option exercise price was greater than the closing price, $7.23, of the Companys common
stock on the day the Compensation Committee approved the acceleration. The aggregate number of
shares issuable under the accelerated stock options was 125,550 at a weighted average exercise
price of $9.416 as of February 1, 2005.
The Compensation Committee also approved accelerating the vesting of out-of the-money, unvested
stock options held by non-employee directors, subject to shareholder approval at the May 2005
Annual Shareholders Meeting. Options held by non-employee directors were considered
out-of-the-money if the stated option exercise price was greater than the closing price, $8.39, of
the Companys common stock on May 24, 2005. Upon shareholder approval
in May 2005, the Company accelerated the vesting of 8,332 unvested stock options at an exercise
price of $8.732 on May 24, 2005. There was no additional compensation expense recognized in 2005,
or in the amounts in the pro forma stock-based compensation table presented within this Note 1, as
a result of accelerating the vesting of the stock options on February 1, 2005 and May 24, 2005.
The decision to accelerate vesting of these options and eliminate future compensation expense was
based on a review of the Companys long-term incentive programs in light of current market
conditions and changing accounting rules regarding stock option expensing under SFAS 123R.
Excluding holders of foreign stock options that elected to decline the accelerated vesting, it is
estimated that the maximum future compensation expense that would have been charged to earnings,
absent the acceleration of these options, based on adoption date for SFAS 123R as of January 1,
2006, was less than $0.1 million.
Prior to January 1, 2006, the Company accounted for its stock-based compensation plans under the
recognition and measurement principles of Accounting Principles Board Opinion (APB) No. 25,
Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees (APB 25) and related interpretations and disclosure
requirements established by SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation (SFAS 123). The
Company had the option under SFAS 123 to measure compensation costs for stock options using the
intrinsic value method prescribed by APB 25. Under APB 25, compensation expense was generally not
recognized for stock option grants if the exercise price was the same as the market price and the
number of shares to be issued was set on the date the employee stock options were granted. Since
the Company granted employee stock options on this basis and the Company elected to use the
intrinsic value
method, no compensation expense was recognized for stock option grants. For grants of common stock
units awarded to non-employee directors, under the 2004 Non-Employee Director Fee Plan,
compensation expense was
8
Sykes Enterprises, Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
Six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005
(Unaudited)
Note 1
Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
Stock-Based Compensation (continued)
recognized over the requisite service periods based on the fair value of the Companys stock on the
date of grant, which is the same under APB 25 and SFAS 123R.
The following table presents the impact on net income and net income per share as if the Company
had elected to recognize compensation expense for the issuance of options to employees of the
Company based on the fair value method of accounting prescribed by SFAS 123 prior to the adoption
of SFAS 123R:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
(In thousands except per share amounts) |
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
Net Income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income as reported |
|
$ |
4,977 |
|
|
$ |
7,942 |
|
Add: Stock-based compensation included in
reported net income, net of tax |
|
|
313 |
|
|
|
313 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deduct: Stock-based compensation under the
fair value method, net of tax |
|
|
(336 |
) |
|
|
(803 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net income |
|
$ |
4,954 |
|
|
$ |
7,452 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income Per Share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic, as reported |
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
Basic, pro forma |
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted, as reported |
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
Diluted, pro forma |
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
The Company has not issued any stock options since January 1, 2004. For options issued before this
date, the Company used the Black-Scholes option pricing model to estimate the fair value of each
stock option at the date of grant using various assumptions.
Investments Held in Rabbi Trust Securities held in a rabbi trust for a supplemental nonqualified
executive retirement program, as more fully described under Deferred Compensation Plan in Note
12, Stock-Based Compensation Plans, include the fair market value of investments in various mutual
funds and shares of the Companys common stock. The fair market value of these investments is
determined by quoted market prices and is adjusted to the current market price at the end of each
reporting period. The investments held in mutual funds, classified as trading securities, had a
fair market value of approximately $0.8 million and $0.7 million at June 30, 2006 and December 31,
2005 and are included in Prepaid expenses and other current assets and Deferred charges and
other assets in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, respectively. These
investments were comprised of 76% equity securities and 24% debt securities at June 30, 2006 and
55% equity securities and 45% debt securities at December 31, 2005. During the three and six
months ended June 30, 2006, the Company recorded less than $0.1 million in unrealized gains from
holding these investments which is included in Other income (expense) in the accompanying
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (none in the comparable 2005 period.)
The investments held in the Companys common stock had a carrying value of approximately $0.4
million and $0.5 million at June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively, and are included in
Treasury Stock in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. During the six months ended June 30, 2006, the
9
Sykes Enterprises, Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
Six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005
(Unaudited)
Note 1 Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
Investments Held in Rabbi Trust (continued)
Company recorded approximately $0.1 million in compensation expense
associated with these investments, which is included in General and administrative in the
accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (none in the comparable 2005 period.)
Property and Equipment The carrying value of property and equipment, including leased assets, to
be held and used is evaluated for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate
that the carrying amount may not be recoverable in accordance with SFAS No. 144, Accounting for
the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets. An asset is considered to be impaired when the
sum of the undiscounted future net cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset and its
eventual disposition does not exceed its carrying amount. The amount of the impairment loss, if
any, is measured as the amount by which the carrying value of the asset exceeds its estimated fair
value, which is generally determined based on appraisals or sales prices of comparable assets.
Occasionally, the Company redeploys property and equipment from under-utilized centers to other
locations to improve capacity utilization if it is determined that the related undiscounted future
cash flows in the under-utilized centers would not be sufficient to recover the carrying amount of
these assets. During the three months ended March 31, 2006, based on the Companys evaluation for
impairment, the Company recorded a $0.4 million impairment charge for property and equipment in one
of its underutilized European customer contact management centers. This impairment charge
represented the amount by which the carrying value of the assets exceeded the estimated fair value
of those assets which cannot be redeployed to other locations. Except as noted above, the Company
determined that its property and equipment, including the idle facility in Perry County, Kentucky,
were not impaired as of June 30, 2006.
The Company leases the land, building and contents of four former U.S. customer contact management
centers to unrelated third parties. In June 2006, the Company signed an agreement to sell the four
leased properties at a gain. The sale is anticipated to close in September 2006; however, the
purchaser has a unilateral right to terminate the agreement before that time. At June 30, 2006, the
assets were reclassified from Property and equipment, net to Assets held for sale and the
Company discontinued depreciating these assets and amortizing the related deferred grants. As of
June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, the leased properties (classified as Assets held for sale at
June 30, 2006 and Property and equipment, net at December 31, 2005) consist of the following (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
Building and improvements |
|
$ |
10,460 |
|
|
$ |
10,460 |
|
Equipment, furniture and fixtures |
|
|
6,305 |
|
|
|
6,875 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,765 |
|
|
|
17,335 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(9,361 |
) |
|
|
(9,678 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,404 |
|
|
$ |
7,657 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related to these assets held for sale are deferred grants of $6.5 million as of June 30, 2006
which are shown in current liabilities in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet at
June 30, 2006.
10
Sykes Enterprises, Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
Six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005
(Unaudited)
Note 1 Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
Property and Equipment (continued)
Future minimum rental payments, including penalties for failure to renew, to be received on
non-cancelable operating leases absent the sale of the leased properties, are contractually due as
follows as of June 30, 2006 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount |
|
2006 |
|
$ |
1,105 |
|
2007 |
|
|
2,291 |
|
2008 |
|
|
1,932 |
|
2009 |
|
|
567 |
|
2010 |
|
|
448 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6,343 |
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign Currency Translation - The assets and liabilities of the Companys foreign subsidiaries,
whose functional currency is other than the U.S. Dollar, are translated at the exchange rates in
effect on the reporting date, and income and expenses are translated at the weighted average
exchange rate during the period. The net effect of translation gains and losses is not included in
determining net income, but is included in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), which is
reflected as a separate component of shareholders equity until the sale or until the complete or
substantially complete liquidation of the net investment in the foreign subsidiary. Foreign
currency transactional gains and losses are included in other income (expense) in the accompanying
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Foreign Currency and Derivative Instruments Periodically, the Company enters into
foreign currency contracts with financial institutions to protect against currency exchange risks
associated with existing assets and liabilities denominated in a foreign currency. These contracts
require the Company to exchange currencies in the future at rates agreed upon at the contracts
inception. The contracts entered into by the Company have been primarily related to the Euro. A
foreign currency contract acts as an economic hedge as the gains and losses on these contracts
typically offset or partially offset gains and losses on the assets, liabilities, and transactions
being hedged. The Company does not designate its foreign currency contracts as accounting hedges
and does not hold or issue financial instruments for speculative or trading purposes. Foreign
currency contracts are accounted for on a mark-to-market basis, with unrealized gains or losses
recognized as a component of other income (expense). There were no realized and unrealized gains
or losses related to these contracts for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements In March 2004, the Emerging Issues Task Force (the EITF)
reached a consensus on Issue No. 03-1 (EITF 03-1), The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment
and Its Application to Certain Investments. EITF 03-1 provides guidance on other-than-temporary
impairment evaluations for securities accounted for under SFAS No. 115, Accounting for Certain
Investments in Debt and Equity Securities, and SFAS No. 124, Accounting for Certain Investments
Held by Not-for-Profit Organizations, and non-marketable equity securities accounted for under the
cost method. The EITF developed a basic three-step test to evaluate whether an investment is
other-than-temporarily impaired. In September 2004, the FASB delayed the effective date of the
recognition and measurement provisions of EITF 03-1. However, the disclosure provisions were
effective for fiscal years ending after June 15, 2004. In November 2005, the FASB issued final FASB
Staff Position Nos. SFAS 115-1 and SFAS 124-1 The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and
Its Application to Certain Investments which superseded EITF 03-1 and provided similar guidance.
The Company adopted the guidance in these standards on January 1, 2006. The impact of this adoption
did not have a material impact on the financial condition, results of operations or cash flows of
the Company.
11
Sykes Enterprises, Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
Six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005
(Unaudited)
Note 1 Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
Recent Accounting Pronouncements (continued)
In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154 (SFAS 154), Accounting Changes and Error Corrections,
which requires retrospective application to prior periods financial statements for changes in
accounting principle and redefines the term restatement as the revising of previously issued
financial statements to reflect the correction of an error. Under retrospective application, the
new accounting principle is applied as of the beginning of the first period presented as if that
principle had always been used. The cumulative effect of the change is reflected in the carrying
value of assets and liabilities as of the first period presented and the offsetting adjustments are
recorded to opening retained earnings. SFAS 154 is effective for accounting changes and
corrections of errors made in the years beginning after December 31, 2005.
In February 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 155 (SFAS 155), Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial
Instruments, which amends SFAS No. 133 (SFAS 133), Accounting for Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities and SFAS No. 140 (SFAS 140), Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of
Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities. SFAS 155 simplifies the accounting for
certain derivatives embedded in other financial instruments by allowing them to be accounted for as
a whole if the holder elects to account for the whole instrument on a fair value basis. SFAS 155
also clarifies and amends certain other provisions of SFAS 133 and SFAS 140. SFAS 155 is effective
for all financial instruments acquired, issued or subject to a remeasurement event occurring in
fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2006. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of
this standard on its financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
In April 2006, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position FIN 46(R)-6 (FIN 46(R)-6), Determining the
Variability to Be Considered in Applying FASB Interpretation No. 46(R), that will become effective
beginning the first day of the first reporting period after June 15, 2006. FIN 46(R)-6 clarifies
that the variability to be considered in applying FASB Interpretation 46(R) shall be based on an
analysis of the design of the variable interest entity. The adoption of FIN 46(R)-6 is not expected
to have a material impact on the financial condition, results of operations or cash flows of the
Company.
In July 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation 48 (FIN 48), Accounting for Uncertainty in
Income Taxes, which clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in the
financial statements in accordance with FASB Statement No. 109,
Accounting for Income Taxes. FIN 48
provides guidance on the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or
expected to be taken in a tax return. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition,
classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosures, and transition.
FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. The Company is currently
evaluating the impact of this standard on the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Note 2 Acquisition
On July 3, 2006, the Company completed the acquisition of all the outstanding shares of capital
stock Centro Interacción Multimedia, S.A. (Apex), an established customer contact management
solutions and services provider headquartered in the City of Cordoba, Argentina. Apex serves
clients in Argentina, Mexico and the United States. The Company will report Apex in its Americas
segment. Client programs range from in-bound customer care and help-desk/technical support to
out-bound sales and cross selling within the business-to-consumer and certain business-to-business
segments for Internet Service Providers, wireless carriers and credit card companies. The Company
acquired these operations in an effort to broaden its operations in a growing market in the
communications and financial services verticals. The purchase price for the shares was $27.4
million less $0.4 million, representing APEXs obligations on certain of its capital leases as of
the closing date, for a net purchase price of $27.0 million, eighty percent of which ($21.6
million) was paid in cash from offshore operations and twenty percent of which ($5.4 million) was
paid by the delivery of 330,992 shares of the common stock of the Company, valued at $16.324 per
share, which was the average of the closing sales prices of the common stock for the five trading
days of June 26 through June 30, 2006. Of the net purchase price of $27.0 million, $5.0 million was
paid to an escrow account (eighty percent in cash and twenty percent in common stock) to secure the
Sellers
12
Sykes Enterprises, Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
Six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005
(Unaudited)
Note 2 Acquisition (continued)
indemnification obligations and to provide for a holdback of the purchase price until amounts
billed by Apex to a major client reach established targets. Based on a preliminary third-party
valuation, the net purchase price of $27.0
million less the $5.0 million contingent purchase price held in escrow plus estimated direct
acquisition costs of $0.5 million, or $22.5 million, is expected to result in a purchase price
allocation to net assets of $3.9 million, to purchased intangible assets of $7.4 million (primarily
customer relationships, existing technologies and covenants not to compete) and to goodwill of
$11.2 million. The purchased intangible assets (other than goodwill) are amortized over a period of
two to six years.
On July 3, 2006, after the acquisition of Apex was completed, the Company contributed additional
capital of $1.3 million to Apex for working capital support and general corporate purposes.
The following unaudited pro forma data summarizes the combined results of Sykes Enterprises,
Incorporated and Apex for all periods presented as if the combination had been consummated on
January 1, 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
Revenues |
|
$ |
142,587 |
|
|
$ |
129,379 |
|
|
$ |
280,365 |
|
|
$ |
252,119 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before (benefit) provision for income taxes |
|
$ |
10,998 |
|
|
$ |
8,364 |
|
|
$ |
20,121 |
|
|
$ |
12,887 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
12,564 |
|
|
$ |
5,593 |
|
|
$ |
19,411 |
|
|
$ |
8,680 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per diluted share |
|
$ |
0.31 |
|
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
Estimated
future amortization expense for the five succeeding years excluding
the effects of the contingent purchase price held in escrow is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ending December 31, |
|
Amount |
2006 (remaining six months) |
|
$ |
678 |
|
2007 |
|
$ |
1,355 |
|
2008 |
|
$ |
1,305 |
|
2009 |
|
$ |
1,228 |
|
2010 |
|
$ |
1,200 |
|
Note 3 Intangibles, Net
In connection with a March, 2005 acquisition in Canada, the Company recorded identifiable
intangible assets with definite lives, primarily customer relationships, existing technologies and
covenants not to compete, that are being amortized using the straight-line method over their
estimated period of benefit, generally ranging from two to fifteen years. Amortization expense was
$0.1 million and $0.2 million during the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 and $0.1 million
and $0.1 million during the comparable 2005 periods, respectively.
13
Sykes Enterprises, Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
Six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005
(Unaudited)
Note 3 Intangibles, Net (continued)
The following table presents the purchased intangibles at June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005 (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Gross Carrying Amount |
|
$ |
2,534 |
|
|
$ |
2,432 |
|
Accumulated Amortization |
|
|
(534 |
) |
|
|
(320 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Carrying Amount |
|
$ |
2,000 |
|
|
$ |
2,112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated future amortization expense for the five succeeding years, excluding estimates for the
Apex acquisition discussed in Note 2, is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ending December 31, |
|
Amount |
2006 (remaining six months) |
|
$ |
200 |
|
2007 |
|
$ |
269 |
|
2008 |
|
$ |
135 |
|
2009 |
|
$ |
131 |
|
2010 |
|
$ |
131 |
|
Note 4 Deferred Revenue
The components of deferred revenue consist of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Future service |
|
$ |
26,873 |
|
|
$ |
24,247 |
|
Penalties and holdbacks |
|
|
2,396 |
|
|
|
925 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
29,269 |
|
|
$ |
25,172 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 5 Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
The Company presents data in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders
Equity in accordance with SFAS No. 130, Reporting Comprehensive Income (SFAS 130). SFAS 130
establishes rules for the reporting of comprehensive income (loss) and its components.
14
Sykes Enterprises, Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
Six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005
(Unaudited)
Note 5 Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
The components of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) include foreign currency
translation adjustments as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
|
Income (Loss) |
|
Balance at January 1, 2005 |
|
$ |
4,871 |
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
(8,540 |
) |
Less: foreign currency translation loss included in net
income (no tax effect) |
|
|
234 |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2005 |
|
|
(3,435 |
) |
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
5,210 |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2006 |
|
$ |
1,775 |
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings associated with the Companys investments in its international subsidiaries are considered
to be permanently invested and no provision for United States federal and state income taxes on
those earnings or translation adjustments has been provided.
Note 6 Termination Costs Associated with Exit Activities
On November 3, 2005, the Company committed to a plan (the Plan) to reduce its workforce by
approximately 200 people in one of its European customer contact management centers in Germany in
response to the October 2005 contractual expiration of a technology client program, which
previously had generated annual revenues of approximately $12.0 million. The Company expects to
complete the Plan by the end of the third quarter of 2006. The Company estimates it will incur
total charges related to the Plan of approximately $1.6 million to $1.9 million, an increase of
$0.3 million from December 31, 2005. These charges include approximately $1.3 million to $1.5
million for severance and related costs and $0.1 million to $0.2 million for other exit costs.
Additionally, upon completion of the Plan, the Company will cease using certain property and
equipment estimated at $0.2 million, and has depreciated these assets over the shortened useful
life, which approximates eight months. As a result, the Company recorded additional depreciation
of approximately $0.2 million during the six months ended June 30, 2006. Termination costs of $0.8
million are included in Direct salaries and related costs in the accompanying Condensed
Consolidated Statement of Operations for the six months ended June 30, 2006. Cash payments related
to termination costs made under the Plan totaled $0.6 million for the six months ended June 30,
2006. Termination costs to date approximate $1.3 million as of June 30, 2006 with cash payments to
date of $0.6 million.
On January 19, 2005, the Company announced to its workforce that, as part of its continued efforts
to optimize assets and improve operating performance, it would migrate the call volumes of the
customer contact management services and related operations from its Bangalore, India facility, a
component of the Companys Americas segment, to other offshore facilities. Before the plan of
migration, the Companys Bangalore facility generated approximately $0.9 million in revenue in the
first quarter of 2005, the last full quarter of operations. The Company substantially completed the
plan of migration, including the redeployment of site infrastructure and the recruiting, training
and ramping-up of agents associated with the migration of Bangalore call volumes to other offshore
facilities, in the second quarter of 2005. In connection with this migration, the Company
terminated 413 employees and accrued over their remaining service period, an estimated liability
for termination costs of $0.2 million based on the fair value as of the termination date,
in accordance SFAS No. 146, Accounting for Costs associated with Exit or Disposal Activities.
These termination costs are included in Direct salaries and related costs in the accompanying
Consolidated Statement of Operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005,
respectively. Cash payments related to these termination costs totaled $0.1 million and $0.2
million during the three and six months ended June 30, 2005, respectively.
15
Sykes Enterprises, Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
Six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005
(Unaudited)
Note 7 Restructuring and Other Charges
2002 Charges
In October 2002, the Company approved a restructuring plan to close and consolidate two U.S. and
three European customer contact management centers, to reduce capacity within the European
fulfillment operations and to write-off certain specialized e-commerce assets primarily in response
to the October 2002 notification of the contractual expiration of two technology client programs in
March 2003 with approximate annual revenues of $25.0 million. The restructuring plan was designed
to reduce costs and bring the Companys infrastructure in-line with the current
business environment. Related to these actions, the Company recorded restructuring and other
charges in the fourth quarter of 2002 of $20.8 million primarily for the write-off of certain
assets, lease termination and severance costs. In connection with the 2002 restructuring, the
Company reduced the number of employees by 470 during 2002 and by 330 during 2003. The plan was
substantially completed by the end of 2003.
In connection with the contractual expiration of the two technology client contracts previously
reported, the Company also recorded additional depreciation expense of $1.2 million in the fourth
quarter of 2002 and $1.3 million in the first quarter of 2003 primarily related to a specialized
technology platform which is no longer utilized upon the expiration of the contracts in March 2003.
The following tables summarize the 2002 plan accrued liability for restructuring and other charges
and related activity in 2005 (in thousands) (no activity in 2006):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
Balance at |
|
|
April 1, |
|
Cash |
|
Non-Cash |
|
June 30, |
Three Months ended June 30, 2005: |
|
2005 |
|
Outlays |
|
Changes (1) |
|
2005 |
|
|
|
Severance and related costs |
|
$ |
75 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(41 |
) |
|
$ |
34 |
|
Other restructuring costs |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
116 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(56 |
) |
|
$ |
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
Balance at |
|
|
January 1, |
|
Cash |
|
Non-Cash |
|
June 30, |
Six Months ended June 30, 2005: |
|
2005 |
|
Outlays |
|
Changes (1) |
|
2005 |
|
|
|
Severance and related costs |
|
$ |
106 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(72 |
) |
|
$ |
34 |
|
Other restructuring costs |
|
|
285 |
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
(242 |
) |
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
391 |
|
|
$ |
(17 |
) |
|
$ |
(314 |
) |
|
$ |
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
During 2005, the Company reversed severance and related costs and certain other closing
costs associated primarily with the closure of certain European customer contact management
centers. |
2000 Charges
The Company recorded restructuring and other charges during the second and fourth quarters of 2000
approximating $30.5 million. The second quarter 2000 restructuring and other charges approximating
$9.6 million resulted from the Companys consolidation of several European and one U.S. fulfillment
center and the closing or consolidation of six technical staffing offices. Included in the second
quarter 2000 restructuring and other charges was a $3.5 million lease termination payment to the
Companys former chairman (and largest shareholder) related to the termination of a ten-year
operating lease agreement for the use of his private jet. As a result of the second quarter 2000
restructuring, the Company reduced the number of employees by 157 during 2000 and satisfied the
remaining lease
16
Sykes Enterprises, Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
Six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005
(Unaudited)
Note 7 Restructuring and Other Charges (continued)
2000 Charges (continued)
obligations related to the closed facilities during 2001.
The Company also announced, after a comprehensive review of operations, its decision to exit
certain non-core, lower margin businesses to reduce costs, improve operating efficiencies and focus
on its core competencies of technical support, customer service and consulting solutions. As a
result, the Company recorded $20.9 million in restructuring and other charges during the fourth
quarter of 2000 related to the closure of its U.S. fulfillment operations, the consolidation of its
Tampa, Florida technical support center and the exit of its worldwide localization
operations. Included in the fourth quarter 2000 restructuring and other charges is a $2.4 million
severance payment related to the employment contract of the Companys former President. In
connection with the fourth quarter 2000 restructuring, the Company reduced the number of employees
by 245 during the first half of 2001 and satisfied a significant portion of the remaining lease
obligations related to the closed facilities during 2001.
The following tables summarize the 2000 plan accrued liability for restructuring and other charges
and related activity in 2005 (in thousands) (no activity in 2006):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
Balance at |
|
|
April 1, |
|
Cash |
|
Non-Cash |
|
June 30, |
Three Months ended June 30, 2005: |
|
2005 |
|
Outlays |
|
Changes |
|
2005 |
|
|
|
Severance and related costs |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
Balance at |
|
|
January 1, |
|
Cash |
|
Non-Cash |
|
June 30, |
Six Months ended June 30, 2005: |
|
2005 |
|
Outlays |
|
Changes |
|
2005 |
|
|
|
Severance and related costs |
|
$ |
87 |
|
|
$ |
(87 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
Note 8 Borrowings
On March 15, 2004, the Company entered into a $50.0 million revolving credit facility with a group
of lenders (the Credit Facility), which amount is subject to certain borrowing limitations.
Pursuant to the terms of the Credit Facility, the amount of $50.0 million may be increased up to a
maximum of $100.0 million with the prior written consent of the lenders. The $50.0 million Credit
Facility includes a $10.0 million swingline subfacility, a $15.0 million letter of credit
subfacility and a $40.0 million multi-currency subfacility.
The Credit Facility, which includes certain financial covenants, may be used for general corporate
purposes including acquisitions, share repurchases, working capital support, and letters of credit,
subject to certain limitations. The Credit Facility, including the multi-currency subfacility,
accrues interest, at the Companys option, at (a) the Base Rate (defined as the higher of the
lenders prime rate or the Federal Funds rate plus 0.50%) plus an applicable margin up to 0.50%, or
(b) the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus an applicable margin up to 2.25%. Borrowings
under the swingline subfacility accrue interest at the prime rate plus an applicable margin up to
0.50% and borrowings under the letter of credit subfacility accrue interest at the LIBOR plus an
applicable margin up to 2.25%. In addition, a commitment fee of up to 0.50% is charged on the
unused portion of the Credit Facility on a quarterly basis. The borrowings under the Credit
Facility, which will terminate on March 14, 2008, are secured by a pledge of 65% of the stock of
each of the Companys active direct foreign subsidiaries. The Credit Facility prohibits the Company
from incurring additional indebtedness, subject to certain specific exclusions. There were no
borrowings during the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 and no outstanding balances as of
June 30, 2006 with $50.0 million availability on the Credit Facility.
17
Sykes Enterprises, Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
Six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005
(Unaudited)
Note 9 Income Taxes
The Companys effective tax rate was (1.3)% and 32.4% for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and
2005, respectively. The 33.7% decrease in the effective tax rate was primarily due to tax benefits
of approximately $3.0 million resulting from the Canadian tax appeals settlement, additional
income earned in tax holiday jurisdictions and year-to-date losses in jurisdications for which
current tax benefits can be recognized; accompanied by the shift in the mix of earnings within tax
jurisdictions and the effects of permanent differences, valuation allowances, foreign withholdings
and other taxes, state income taxes and foreign income tax rate
differentials. The difference in the Companys effective tax rate of (1.3)% as compared to the U.S. statutory federal income tax
rate of 35.0% was primarily due to tax benefits of approximately $3.0 million resulting from the
Canadian tax appeals settlement and additional income earned in tax holiday jurisdictions;
accompanied by the effects of requisite valuation allowances, permanent differences, foreign
withholding and other taxes, state income taxes and foreign income tax rate differentials.
Earnings associated with the Companys investments in its international subsidiaries are considered
to be permanently invested and no provision for federal and state income taxes on those earnings or
translation adjustments has been provided. Determination of any unrecognized deferred tax liability
for temporary differences related to investments in foreign subsidiaries that are essentially
permanent in nature is not practicable.
The Company is currently under examination in the U.S. by several states for sales and use taxes
and franchise taxes for periods covering 1999 through 2003. The U.S. Internal Revenue Service
completed audits of the Companys U.S. tax returns for tax years through July 31, 1999 and is
currently auditing the tax years ended July 31, 2002, July 31, 2003 and December 31, 2003. Certain
German subsidiaries of the Company are under examination by the German tax authorities for periods
covering 1997 through 2003. Additionally, certain Canadian subsidiaries are under examination by
Canadian tax authorities for tax years 1999 through 2003, a Philippine subsidiary is being audited
by the Philippine tax authorities for tax years 2003 and 2004, and Indias tax authorities have
initiated inquiries with respect to the Companys operations in India for tax years ended in 2004
and 2005.
As of June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, the Company had a contingent income tax liability of
$2.4 million and $3.2 million, respectively, consisting of amounts for subsidiaries located in both
the Americas and EMEA segments that is included in Income taxes payable in the accompanying
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. The net decrease of $0.8 million was primarily due to tax
benefits resulting from the Canadian tax appeals settlement for tax years 1993 through 1998,
partially offset by federal and provincial determinations made by the Canadian tax authorities in
the tax examinations for tax years 1999 through 2003. The amount of the contingent liability is
based on an estimate of the probable liability in accordance with SFAS 5 Accounting for
Contingencies, using available evidence, including detailed analyses of the potential income tax
issues, income tax assessments and notices of disallowance, consultation with independent outside
tax and legal advisors and the Companys historical experience in settling similar issues without
additional income tax liability. Management believes that the $2.4 million contingent income tax
liability, a net decrease of $0.8 million from December 31, 2005, is the probable amount that will
be paid upon settlement of the related tax audits based on current available evidence and issues
and does not believe there would be a material impact on liquidity beyond what has been provided
for in Income taxes payable.
Note 10 Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share are based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding
during the periods. Diluted earnings per share includes the weighted average number of common
shares outstanding during the respective periods and the further dilutive effect, if any, from
stock options, common stock units and shares held in a rabbi trust using the treasury stock method.
Options to purchase 0.4 million shares and 0.3 million shares of common stock at various prices for
the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2006 and 1.4 million shares and 1.8 million shares
of common stock for the comparable 2005 periods were antidilutive and were excluded from the
calculation of diluted earnings per share.
18
Sykes Enterprises, Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
Six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005
(Unaudited)
Note 10 Earnings Per Share (continued)
The numbers of shares used in the earnings per share computations are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
Basic: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
39,900 |
|
|
|
39,289 |
|
|
|
39,679 |
|
|
|
39,242 |
|
Diluted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilutive effect of stock options, stock
appreciation rights and common stock units |
|
|
351 |
|
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
365 |
|
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total weighted average diluted shares outstanding |
|
|
40,251 |
|
|
|
39,445 |
|
|
|
40,044 |
|
|
|
39,393 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On August 5, 2002, the Companys Board of Directors authorized the Company to purchase up to three
million shares of its outstanding common stock. A total of 1.6 million shares have been repurchased
under this program since inception. The shares are purchased, from time to time, through open
market purchases or in negotiated private transactions, and the purchases are based on factors,
including but not limited to, the stock price and general market conditions. During the six months
ended June 30, 2006, the Company made no purchases under the 2002 repurchase program.
Note 11 Segments and Geographic Information
The Company operates within two regions, the Americas and EMEA which represented 67.3% and
32.7%, respectively, of the Companys consolidated revenues for the three months ended June 30,
2006 and 67.3% and 32.7%, respectively, of the Companys consolidated revenues for the six months
ended June 30, 2006. In the comparable 2005 periods, the Americas and EMEA regions represented
63.3% and 36.7%, respectively, of the Companys consolidated revenues for the three months ended
June 30, 2005 and 62.3% and 37.7%, respectively, of the Companys consolidated revenues for the six
months ended June 30, 2005. Each region represents a reportable segment comprised of aggregated
regional operating segments, which portray similar economic characteristics. The Company aligns its
business into two segments to effectively manage the business and support the customer care needs
of every client and to respond to the demand of the Companys global customers.
The reportable segments consist of (1) the Americas, which includes the United States, Canada,
Latin America, India and the Asia Pacific Rim, and provides outsourced customer contact management
solutions (with an emphasis on technical support and customer service) and technical staffing and
(2) EMEA, which includes Europe, the Middle East and Africa, and provides outsourced customer
contact management solutions (with an emphasis on technical support and customer service) and
fulfillment services. The sites within Latin America, India and the Asia Pacific Rim are included
in the Americas region given the nature of the business and client profile, which is primarily made
up of U.S. based companies that are using the Companys services in these locations to support
their customer contact management needs.
19
Sykes Enterprises, Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
Six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005
(Unaudited)
Note 11 Segments and Geographic Information (continued)
Information about the Companys reportable segments for the three and six months ended June 30,
2006 compared to the corresponding prior year periods, is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
Americas |
|
|
EMEA |
|
|
Other (1) |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2006: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
90,937 |
|
|
$ |
44,284 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
135,221 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
$ |
4,663 |
|
|
$ |
1,151 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,814 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
$ |
13,324 |
|
|
$ |
1,298 |
|
|
$ |
(8,117 |
) |
|
$ |
6,505 |
|
Other income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,270 |
|
|
|
3,270 |
|
Benefit for income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,996 |
|
|
|
1,996 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
11,771 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2005: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
77,306 |
|
|
$ |
44,888 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
122,194 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
$ |
4,768 |
|
|
$ |
1,457 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6,225 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations before
reversal of restructuring and other charges |
|
$ |
12,723 |
|
|
$ |
1,625 |
|
|
$ |
(7,922 |
) |
|
$ |
6,426 |
|
Reversal of restructuring and other charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,482 |
|
Other income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
929 |
|
|
|
929 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,434 |
) |
|
|
(2,434 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,977 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2006: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
179,209 |
|
|
$ |
87,099 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
266,308 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
$ |
9,525 |
|
|
$ |
2,353 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
11,878 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations before
impairment of long-lived assets |
|
$ |
27,176 |
|
|
$ |
2,374 |
|
|
$ |
(15,978 |
) |
|
$ |
13,572 |
|
Impairment of long-lived assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(382 |
) |
|
|
(382 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,190 |
|
Other income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,246 |
|
|
|
4,246 |
|
Benefit for income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
234 |
|
|
|
234 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
17,670 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2005: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
151,670 |
|
|
$ |
91,896 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
243,566 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
$ |
10,179 |
|
|
$ |
3,111 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
13,290 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations before
reversal of restructuring and other
charges |
|
$ |
22,223 |
|
|
$ |
3,635 |
|
|
$ |
(15,310 |
) |
|
$ |
10,548 |
|
Reversal of restructuring and other charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
314 |
|
|
|
314 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,862 |
|
Other income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
883 |
|
|
|
883 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,803 |
) |
|
|
(3,803 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,942 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
Sykes Enterprises, Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
Six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005
(Unaudited)
Note 11 Segments and Geographic Information (continued)
(1) Other items (including corporate costs, restructuring and impairment costs,
other income and expense, and income taxes) are shown for purposes of reconciling to the Companys
consolidated totals as shown in the table above for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006
and 2005. The accounting policies of the reportable segments are the same as those described in
Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2005. Inter-segment revenues are not material to the Americas and EMEA segment
results. The Company evaluates the performance of its geographic segments based on revenue and
income (loss) from operations, and does not include segment assets or other income and expense
items for management reporting purposes.
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, the Company had no clients that
exceeded ten percent of consolidated revenues.
Note 12 Stock-Based Compensation
A detailed description of each of the Companys stock-based compensation plans is provided below,
including the 2001 Equity Incentive Plan, the 2004 Non-Employee Director Fee Plan and the Deferred
Compensation Plan. Stock-based compensation expense related to these plans, which is included in
General and administrative costs in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of
Operations, was $0.7 million and $1.1 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006. The
costs for the comparable 2005 periods was $0.3 million and $0.3 million. The related income tax
benefits recognized in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2006 was $0.2 million and $0.4 million, respectively. In
addition, the Company realized the benefit of tax deductions in excess of recognized tax benefits
of $0.5 million and $0.7 million from the exercise of stock options in the three and six months
ended June 30, 2006, respectively. There were no capitalized stock-based compensation costs at June
30, 2006.
2001 Equity Incentive Plan The Companys 2001 Equity Incentive Plan (the
Plan), which is shareholder-approved, permits the grant of stock options, stock appreciation
rights, restricted stock and other stock-based awards to certain employees of the Company, and
certain non-employees who provide services to the Company, for up to 7.0 million shares of common
stock in order to encourage them to remain in the employment of or to diligently provide services
to the Company and to increase their interest in the Companys success.
Stock Options Options are granted at fair market value on the date of the grant and generally
vest over one to four years. All options granted under the Plan expire if not exercised by the
tenth anniversary of their grant date. The fair value of each stock option award is estimated on
the date of grant using the Black-Scholes valuation model that uses various assumptions. The fair
value of the stock option awards is expensed on a straight-line basis over the vesting period of
the award. Expected volatility is based on historical volatility of the Companys stock. The
risk-free rate for periods within the contractual life of the award is based on the yield curve of
a zero-coupon U.S. Treasury bond on the date the award is granted with a maturity equal to the
expected term of the award. Exercises and forfeitures are estimated within the valuation model
using employee termination and other historical data. The expected term of the stock option awards
granted is derived from historical exercise experience under the Plan and represents the period of
time that stock option awards granted are expected to be outstanding. No stock options were granted
during the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005.
21
Sykes Enterprises, Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
Six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005
(Unaudited)
Note 12 Stock-Based Compensation (continued)
Stock Options (continued)
The following table summarizes stock option activity under the Plan as of June 30, 2006, and
changes during the six months then ended:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Term |
|
|
Value |
|
Stock Options |
|
(000s) |
|
|
Price |
|
|
(in years) |
|
|
(000s) |
|
|
Outstanding at January 1, 2006 |
|
|
1,213 |
|
|
$ |
10.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(233 |
) |
|
|
7.20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited or expired |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
11.32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2006 |
|
|
965 |
|
|
$ |
10.69 |
|
|
|
4.75 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested or expected to vest at June 30, 2006 |
|
|
921 |
|
|
$ |
10.94 |
|
|
|
4.66 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at June 30, 2006 |
|
|
921 |
|
|
$ |
10.94 |
|
|
|
4.66 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There is no intrinsic value for options exercised during the three and six months ended June
30, 2006 and 2005 since the exercise price of the options is the same as the market price of the
underlying stock on the date of grant.
The following table summarizes the status of nonvested stock options under the Plan as of June 30,
2006, and changes during the six months then ended:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Shares |
|
Grant-Date |
Nonvested Stock Options |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Fair Value |
|
Nonvested at January 1, 2006 |
|
|
93 |
|
|
$ |
7.63 |
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Vested |
|
|
(49 |
) |
|
$ |
9.61 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested at June 30, 2006 |
|
|
44 |
|
|
$ |
5.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2006, there was $30 thousand of total unrecognized compensation cost related to the
nonvested stock options granted under the Plan (the effect of estimated forfeitures is not
material.) This cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of six months. The
total fair value of stock options vested during the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, was
$0.3 million and $0.2 million, respectively.
Cash received from stock options exercised under all stock-based compensation plans for the six
months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, was $1.7 million and $0.3 million, respectively. The actual
tax benefit realized for the tax deductions from these stock option exercises totaled $0.7 million
for the six months ended June 30, 2006 (not material in the comparable 2005 period.)
Stock Appreciation Rights On March 29, 2006, the Companys Board of Directors, at the
recommendation of the Compensation and Human Resource Development Committee (the Committee),
approved awards of stock-settled stock appreciation rights (SARs), for a number of eligible
participants. SARs represent the right to receive, without payment to the Company, a certain number
of shares of common stock, as determined by the Committee, equal to the amount by which the fair
market value of a share of common stock exceeds the grant price at the time of exercise.
22
Sykes Enterprises, Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
Six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005
(Unaudited)
Note 12 Stock-Based Compensation (continued)
Stock Appreciation Rights (continued)
The SARs were granted at fair market value of the Companys common stock on the date of the grant
and vest one-third on each of the anniversaries of the date of grant, provided the participant is
employed by the Company on such date. The SARs have a term of 10 years from the date of grant. In
the event of a change in control, the SARs will vest on the date of the change in control, provided
that the participant is employed by the Company on the date of the change in control.
The SARs are exercisable only within three months after the death, disability, retirement or
termination of the participants employment with the Company, if and to the extent the SARs were
exercisable immediately prior to such termination. If the participants employment is terminated
for cause, or the participant terminates his or her own employment with the Company, any portion of
the SARs not yet exercised (whether or not vested) terminates immediately on the date of
termination of employment.
The fair value of each SAR is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes valuation
model that uses various assumptions. The fair value of the SARs is expensed on a straight-line
basis over the requisite service period. Expected volatility is based on historical volatility of
the Companys stock. The risk-free rate for periods within the contractual life of the award is
based on the yield curve of a zero-coupon U.S. Treasury bond on the date the award is granted with
a maturity equal to the expected term of the award. Exercises and forfeitures are estimated within
the valuation model using employee termination and other historical data. The expected term of the
SARs granted represents the period of time the SARs are expected to be outstanding.
The following table summarizes the assumptions used to estimate the fair value of SARs granted
during the six months ended June 30, 2006 (no SARs were granted in the comparable 2005 period):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
2006 |
Expected volatility |
|
|
61 |
% |
Weighted-average volatility |
|
|
61 |
% |
Expected dividends |
|
|
|
|
Expected term (in years) |
|
|
3.8 |
|
Risk-free rate |
|
|
4.8 |
% |
The following table summarizes SARs activity under the Plan as of June 30, 2006, and changes during
the six months then ended:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Term |
|
|
Value |
|
Stock Appreciation Rights |
|
(000s) |
|
|
Price |
|
|
(in years) |
|
|
(000s) |
|
|
Outstanding at January 1, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited or expired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2006 |
|
|
126 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
9.75 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested or expected to vest at June 30, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at June 30, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
Sykes Enterprises, Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
Six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005
(Unaudited)
Note 12 Stock-Based Compensation (continued)
Stock Appreciation Rights (continued)
The weighted-average grant-date fair value of the SARs granted during the six months ended June 30,
2006 was $7.28. No SARs were exercised during the six months ended June 30, 2006.
The following table summarizes the status of nonvested SARs under the Plan as of June 30, 2006, and
changes during the six months then ended:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Shares |
|
Grant-Date |
Nonvested Stock Appreciation Rights |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Fair Value |
|
Nonvested at January 1, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Granted |
|
|
126 |
|
|
$ |
7.28 |
|
Vested |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested at June 30, 2006 |
|
|
126 |
|
|
$ |
7.28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2006, there was $0.8 million of total unrecognized compensation cost, net of
estimated forfeitures, related to nonvested stock appreciation rights granted under the Plan. This
cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.8 years. None of the SARs
vested during the six months ended June 30, 2006.
Restricted Shares On March 29, 2006 and on May 24, 2006, the Companys Board of Directors, at
the recommendation of the Committee, approved awards of performance-based restricted shares
(Restricted Shares), for a number of eligible participants. The Restricted Shares represent
shares of the Companys common stock which are issued to the participant subject to (a)
restrictions on transfer for a period of time and (b) forfeiture under certain conditions. The
performance goals, including revenue growth and income from operations targets, provide a range of
vesting possibilities from 0% to 100% and will be measured as of December 31, 2007 for the
2006-2007 performance period and as of December 31, 2008 for the 2006-2008 performance period. If
the performance conditions are met for the 2006-2007 performance period and for the 2006-2008
performance period, the shares will vest and all restrictions on the transfer of the restricted
shares will lapse on March 29, 2008 and March 29, 2009, respectively. The Company recognizes
compensation cost, net of estimated forfeitures, based on the fair value (which approximates the
current market price) of the Restricted Shares on the date of grant ratably over the requisite
service period based on the probability of achieving the performance goals, as determined in
accordance with SFAS 5, Accounting for Contingencies. Changes in the probability of achieving the
performance goals from period to period will result in corresponding changes in compensation
expense.
In the event of a change in control (as defined in the Plan) prior to the date the restricted
shares vest, all of the restricted shares will vest and the restrictions on transfer will lapse
with respect to such vested shares on the date of the change in control, provided that participant
is employed by the Company on the date of the change in control.
If the participants employment with the Company is terminated for any reason, either by the
Company or participant, prior to the date on which the restricted shares have vested and the
restrictions have lapsed with respect to such vested shares, any restricted shares remaining
subject to the restrictions (together with any dividends paid thereon) will be forfeited, unless
there has been a change in control prior to such date.
24
Sykes Enterprises, Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
Six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005
(Unaudited)
Note 12 Stock-Based Compensation (continued)
Restricted Shares (continued)
The following table summarizes the status of nonvested restricted shares under the Plan as of June
30, 2006, and changes during the six months then ended:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Shares |
|
Grant-Date |
Nonvested Restricted Shares |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Fair Value |
|
Nonvested at January 1, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Granted |
|
|
290 |
|
|
$ |
14.83 |
|
Vested |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested at June 30, 2006 |
|
|
290 |
|
|
$ |
14.83 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2006, based on the probability of achieving the performance goals, there was $3.1
million of total unrecognized compensation cost, net of estimated forfeitures, related to nonvested
restricted shares granted under the Plan. This cost is expected to be recognized over a
weighted-average period of 2.5 years. None of the restricted shares vested during the six months
ended June 30, 2006.
2004 Non-Employee Director Fee Plan The Companys 2004 Non-Employee Director
Fee Plan (the 2004 Fee Plan), which is shareholder-approved, replaced and superseded the 1996
Non-Employee Director Fee Plan (the 1996 Fee Plan) and was used in lieu of the 2004 Nonemployee
Director Stock Option Plan (the 2004 Stock Option Plan). The 2004 Fee Plan provides that all new
non-employee Directors joining the Board receive an initial grant of common stock units (CSUs) on
the date the new Director is appointed or elected, the number of which will be determined by
dividing a dollar amount to be determined from time to time by the Board (currently set at $30,000)
by an amount equal to 110% of the average closing prices of the Companys common stock for the five
trading days prior to the date the new Director is appointed or elected. The initial grant of CSUs
will vest in three equal installments, one-third on the date of each of the following three annual
shareholders meetings. A CSU is a bookkeeping entry on the Companys books that records the
equivalent of one share of common stock. On the date each CSU vests, the Director will become
entitled to receive a share of the Companys common stock and the CSU will be canceled. For
federal income tax purposes, the Director will not be deemed to have received income with respect
to the CSUs until the CSUs vest. No options were awarded under the 2004 Stock Option Plan and none
will be awarded. The number of shares remaining available for issuance under the 2004 Fee Plan
cannot exceed 378 thousand.
Additionally, the 2004 Fee Plan provides that each non-employee Director receives on the day after
the annual shareholders meeting, an annual retainer for service as a non-employee Director, the
amount of which shall be determined from time to time by the Board (currently set at $50,000) to be
paid 75% in CSUs and 25% in cash. The number of CSUs to be granted under the 2004 Fee Plan will be
determined by dividing the amount of the annual retainer by an amount equal to 105% of the average
of the closing prices for the Companys common stock on the five trading days preceding the award
date (the day after the annual meeting). The annual grant of CSUs will vest in two equal
installments, one-half on the date of each of the following two annual shareholders meetings.
There were grants of 30 thousand and 0.1 million CSUs issued under the 2004 Fee Plan during the six
months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
25
Sykes Enterprises, Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
Six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005
(Unaudited)
Note 12 Stock-Based Compensation (continued)
2004 Non-Employee Director Fee Plan (continued)
The following table summarizes the status of the nonvested CSUs under the 2004 Fee Plan as of June
30, 2006, and changes during the six months then ended:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Shares |
|
Grant-Date |
Nonvested Common Stock Units |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Fair Value |
|
Nonvested at January 1, 2006 |
|
|
72 |
|
|
$ |
8.26 |
|
Granted |
|
|
30 |
|
|
$ |
17.04 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(46 |
) |
|
$ |
8.25 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested at June 30, 2006 |
|
|
56 |
|
|
$ |
12.89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2006, there was $0.7 million of total unrecognized compensation costs, net of
estimated forfeitures, related to nonvested CSUs granted under the 2004 Fee Plan. This cost is
expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.8 years. During the six months ended
June 30, 2006 and 2005, a total of 46 thousand and 32 thousand CSUs vested, respectively.
Before January 1, 2006, the Company accounted for grants of CSUs issued under the 2004 Fee Plan in
accordance with APB 25 and recognized compensation cost over the requisite service period. The fair
value of the CSUs, which is the same under APB 25 and SFAS 123R, was based on the fair value of the
Companys stock on the date of grant. Under SFAS 123R, the Company will continue to recognize
compensation cost over the remaining service period. Until a CSU vests, the Director has none of
the rights of a shareholder with respect to the CSU or the common stock underlying the CSU. CSUs
are not transferable.
Deferred Compensation Plan The Companys non-qualified Deferred Compensation
Plan (the Deferred Compensation Plan), which is not shareholder-approved, was adopted by the
Board of Directors effective December 17, 1998 and amended on March 29, 2006 and May 23, 2006. It
provides certain eligible employees the ability to defer any portion of their compensation until
the participants retirement, termination, disability or death, or a change in control of the
Company. Using the Companys common stock, the Company matches 50% of the amounts deferred by
certain senior management participants on a quarterly basis up to a total of $12,000 per year for
the president and senior vice presidents and $7,500 per year for vice presidents (participants
below the level of vice president are not eligible to receive matching contributions from the
Company). Matching contributions and the associated earnings vest over a seven year service
period. Deferred compensation amounts used to pay benefits, which are held in a rabbi trust,
include investments in various mutual funds and shares of the Companys common stock (See Note 1,
Summary of Accounting Policies, under Investments Held in Rabbi Trust.) The Deferred Compensation
Plans assets totaled $0.9 million and $0.7 million at June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005,
respectively, excluding the Companys common stock match, while liabilities totaled $0.9 million
and $1.0 million, respectively. As of June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, the liabilities of the
Deferred Compensation Plan were recorded in treasury stock and additional paid-in capital, as
appropriate, and accrued employee compensation and benefits as of June 30, 2006 and other long-term
liabilities as of December 31, 2005 in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
26
Sykes Enterprises, Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
Six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005
(Unaudited)
Note
12 Stock-Based Compensation (continued)
Deferred Compensation Plan (continued)
The following table summarizes the status of the nonvested common stock issued under the Deferred
Compensation Plan as of June 30, 2006, and changes during the six months then ended:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Shares |
|
Grant-Date |
Nonvested Common Stock |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Fair Value |
|
Nonvested at January 1, 2006 |
|
|
21 |
|
|
$ |
6.41 |
|
Granted |
|
|
6 |
|
|
$ |
13.57 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
$ |
10.48 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested at June 30, 2006 |
|
|
12 |
|
|
$ |
8.13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2006, there was $0.2 million of total unrecognized compensation cost, net of
estimated forfeitures, related to nonvested common stock granted under the Deferred Compensation
Plan. This cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.9 years. The total
fair value of the common stock vested during the six months ended June 30, 2006 was $0.2 million
and $0.1 million for the comparable 2005 period.
The deferred compensation obligation of $0.1 million, which was previously included in Other
long-term liabilities as of December 31, 2005 is now included in Additional Paid in Capital as
of June 30, 2006 in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Cash used to settle the Companys obligation under the Deferred Compensation Plan was less than
$0.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006. There were no cash settlements during the
comparable 2005 period.
Note
13 Pension and Other Post-Retirement Benefits
Defined Benefit Pension Plan
The Company sponsors a non-contributory defined benefit pension plan (the Pension Plan) for its
employees in the Philippines. The Pension Plan provides defined benefits based on years of service
and final salary. All permanent employees meeting the minimum service requirement are eligible to
participate in the Pension Plan. As of June 30, 2006, the Pension Plan is unfunded.
The following tables provide a reconciliation of the change in the benefit obligation for the
Pension Plan and the net amount recognized in the statement of financial position (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2005 |
|
|
December 31, 2004 |
|
Beginning benefit obligation |
|
$ |
830 |
|
|
$ |
519 |
|
Service cost |
|
|
284 |
|
|
|
123 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
Actuarial loss |
|
|
224 |
|
|
|
120 |
|
Effect of foreign currency translation |
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending benefit obligation |
|
$ |
1,512 |
|
|
$ |
830 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded status |
|
$ |
(1,512 |
) |
|
$ |
(830 |
) |
Unrecognized net actuarial loss |
|
|
197 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net amount recognized |
|
$ |
(1,315 |
) |
|
$ |
(830 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27
Sykes Enterprises, Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
Six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005
(Unaudited)
Note
13 Pension and Other Post-Retirement Benefits (continued)
The net amount recognized in the balance sheet consists of accrued benefit costs of $1.3 million
and $0.8 million as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
Weighted-average actuarial assumptions used to determine the benefit obligations for the Pension
Plan were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2005 |
|
December 31, 2004 |
Discount rate |
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
12 |
% |
Rate of compensation increase |
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
8 |
% |
The Company evaluates these assumptions on a periodic basis taking into consideration current
market conditions and historical market data. The discount rate is used to state expected future
cash flows at a present value on the measurement date, which is December 31. This rate represents
the market rate for high-quality fixed income investments. A lower discount rate would increase the
present value of benefit obligations. Other assumptions include demographic factors such as
retirement, mortality and turnover.
The following table provides information about net periodic benefit cost for the Pension Plan for
the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 and June 30, 2005 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
168 |
|
|
$ |
317 |
|
|
$ |
317 |
|
|
$ |
633 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized actuarial losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost |
|
$ |
251 |
|
|
$ |
317 |
|
|
$ |
473 |
|
|
$ |
633 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average actuarial assumptions used to determine net periodic benefit cost for the three
and six months ended June 30, 2006 and June 30, 2005 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2005 |
|
December 31, 2004 |
Discount rate |
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
12 |
% |
Rate of compensation increase |
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
8 |
% |
The Company does not expect to make cash contributions to its Pension Plan during 2006.
The estimated future benefit payments, which reflect expected future service, as appropriate, are
as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
2006 (remaining six months) |
|
$ |
|
|
2007 |
|
$ |
|
|
2008 |
|
$ |
|
|
2009 |
|
$ |
|
|
2010 |
|
$ |
73 |
|
2011 through 2015 |
|
$ |
395 |
|
28
Sykes Enterprises, Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
Six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005
(Unaudited
Note
13 Pension and Other Post-Retirement Benefits (continued)
Post-Retirement Defined Contribution Healthcare Plan
On January 1, 2005, the Company established a Post-Retirement Defined Contribution Healthcare Plan
(the Healthcare Plan) for eligible employees meeting certain service and age requirements. The
Healthcare Plan is fully funded by the participants and accordingly, the Company does not recognize
expense relating to the Healthcare Plan.
29
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Board of Directors
Sykes Enterprises, Incorporated
400 N. Ashley Drive
Tampa, FL 33602
We have reviewed the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet of Sykes Enterprises,
Incorporated and subsidiaries (the Company) as of June 30, 2006, and the related condensed
consolidated statements of operations for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2006
and 2005, of changes in shareholders equity for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2005,
December 31, 2005, and June 30, 2006, and cash flows for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2006
and 2005. These interim financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management.
We conducted our reviews in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of
applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and
accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with
the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the objective of
which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole.
Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.
Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to such
condensed consolidated interim financial statements for them to be in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
We have previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet of the Company as of December 31,
2005, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in shareholders equity, and
cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein); and in our report dated March 14, 2006,
we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements. In our opinion, the
information set forth in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31,
2005 is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the consolidated balance sheet from
which it has been derived.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Certified Public Accountants
Tampa, Florida
August 9, 2006
30
Sykes Enterprises, Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations
Item 2
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations.
This discussion should be read in conjunction with the condensed consolidated financial statements
and notes included elsewhere in this report and the consolidated financial statements and notes in
the Sykes Enterprises, Incorporated (Sykes, our, we or us) Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
Our discussion and analysis may contain forward-looking statements (within the meaning of the
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995) that are based on current expectations,
estimates, forecasts, and projections about Sykes, our beliefs, and assumptions made by us. In
addition, we may make other written or oral statements, which constitute forward-looking
statements, from time to time. Words such as believe, estimate, project, expect, intend,
may, anticipate, plan, seek, variations of such words, and similar expressions
are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. Similarly, statements that describe our
future plans, objectives, or goals also are forward-looking statements. These statements are not
guarantees of future performance and are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, including
those discussed below and elsewhere in this report. Our actual results may differ materially from
what is expressed or forecasted in such forward-looking statements, and undue reliance should not
be placed on such statements. All forward-looking statements are made as of the date hereof, and we
undertake no obligation to update any such forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new
information, future events or otherwise.
Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from what is expressed or forecasted
in such forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to: (i) the ability to
successfully integrate Apexs operations and employees, (ii) the ability to deliver on Apexs
potential earnings per share accretion, (iii) the ability to deliver on the future financial and
operating performance of the combined company, (iv) the timing of significant orders for our
products and services, (v) variations in the terms and the elements of services offered under our
standardized contract including those for future bundled service offerings, (vi) changes in
applicable accounting principles or interpretations of such principles, (vii) difficulties or
delays in implementing our bundled service offerings, (viii) failure to achieve sales, marketing
and other objectives, (ix) construction delays or higher than anticipated development costs in
connection with new technical and customer contact management centers, (x) delays in our ability to
develop new products and services and market acceptance of new products and services, (xi) rapid
technological change, (xii) loss or addition of significant clients, (xiii) risks inherent in
conducting business abroad, (xiv) currency fluctuations, (xv) fluctuations in business conditions
and the economy, (xvi) our ability to attract and retain key management personnel, (xvii) our
ability to continue the growth of our support service revenues through additional technical and
customer contact management centers, (xviii) our ability to further penetrate into vertically
integrated markets, (xix) our ability to expand our global presence through strategic alliances and
selective acquisitions, (xx) our ability to continue to establish a competitive advantage through
sophisticated technological capabilities, (xxi) the ultimate outcome of any lawsuits, (xxii) our
ability to recognize deferred revenue through delivery of products or satisfactory performance of
services, (xxiii) our dependence on trend toward outsourcing, (xxiv) risk of interruption of
technical and customer contact management center operations due to such factors as fire and other
disasters, power failures, telecommunication failures, unauthorized intrusions, computer viruses
and other emergencies, (xxv) the existence of substantial competition, (xxvi) the early termination
of contracts by clients, and (xxvii) other risk factors which are identified in our most recent
Annual Report on Form 10-K, including factors identified under the headings Business, Risk
Factors and Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations.
31
Sykes Enterprises, Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, certain data derived from our Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Operations and certain of such data expressed as a percentage of
revenues (in thousands, except percentage amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
135,221 |
|
|
$ |
122,194 |
|
|
$ |
266,308 |
|
|
$ |
243,566 |
|
Percentage of revenues |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct salaries and related costs |
|
$ |
86,378 |
|
|
$ |
76,026 |
|
|
$ |
169,394 |
|
|
$ |
153,455 |
|
Percentage of revenues |
|
|
63.9 |
% |
|
|
62.2 |
% |
|
|
63.6 |
% |
|
|
63.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
$ |
42,333 |
|
|
$ |
41,369 |
|
|
$ |
83,328 |
|
|
$ |
81,259 |
|
Percentage of revenues |
|
|
31.3 |
% |
|
|
33.9 |
% |
|
|
31.3 |
% |
|
|
33.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss (gain) on disposal of property and equipment |
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
(1,627 |
) |
|
$ |
14 |
|
|
$ |
(1,696 |
) |
Percentage of revenues |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
(1.3 |
)% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
(0.7 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of long-lived assets |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
382 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Percentage of revenues |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
0.1 |
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reversal of restructuring and other charges |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(56 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(314 |
) |
Percentage of revenues |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
(0.1 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
$ |
6,505 |
|
|
$ |
6,482 |
|
|
$ |
13,190 |
|
|
$ |
10,862 |
|
Percentage of revenues |
|
|
4.8 |
% |
|
|
5.3 |
% |
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
4.5 |
% |
The following table summarizes our revenues, for the periods indicated, by geographic region
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Americas |
|
$ |
90,937 |
|
|
$ |
77,306 |
|
|
$ |
179,209 |
|
|
$ |
151,670 |
|
EMEA |
|
|
44,284 |
|
|
|
44,888 |
|
|
|
87,099 |
|
|
|
91,896 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
$ |
135,221 |
|
|
$ |
122,194 |
|
|
$ |
266,308 |
|
|
$ |
243,566 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2006 Compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2005
Revenues
For the three months ended June 30, 2006, we recognized consolidated revenues of $135.2 million, an
increase of $13.0 million, or 10.7%, from $122.2 million of consolidated revenues for the
comparable 2005 period.
On a geographic segmentation basis, revenues from the Americas region, including the United States,
Canada, Latin America, India and the Asia Pacific Rim, represented 67.3%, or $90.9 million, for the
three months ended June 30, 2006, compared to 63.3%, or $77.3 million, for the comparable 2005
period. Revenues from the EMEA region, including Europe, the Middle East and Africa, represented
32.7%, or $44.3 million, for the three months ended June 30, 2006, compared to 36.7%, or $44.9
million, for the comparable 2005 period.
The increase in the Americas revenue of $13.6 million, or 17.6%, for the three months ended June
30, 2006, compared to the same period in 2005, reflects a broad-based growth in client call
volumes, including new and existing client programs, within our offshore operations, Canada and the
United States. Revenues from new and existing client programs in our offshore operations
represented 35.6% of consolidated revenues on 10,900 seats
32
Sykes Enterprises, Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations
for the three months ended June 30, 2006, compared to 30.5% on 10,000 seats for the comparable 2005
period. The trend of generating more of our revenues from new and existing client programs in our
offshore operations is likely to continue in 2006. While operating margins generated offshore are
generally comparable or higher than those in the United States, our ability to maintain these
offshore operating margins longer term is difficult to predict due to potential increased
competition for the available workforce and costs of functional currency fluctuations in offshore
markets.
EMEA revenues decreased $0.6 million, or 1.3%, for the three months ended June 30, 2006,
compared to the same period in 2005. EMEA revenues for the second quarter of 2006 experienced a
$0.1 million decline as a result of the weakness in the Euro compared to the same period in 2005.
Excluding this foreign currency impact, EMEA revenues decreased $0.5 million compared with the same
period last year. This decrease reflects the ongoing softness in our key European markets
characterized by competitive pricing and offshore alternatives and certain program expirations.
Direct Salaries and Related Costs
Direct salaries and related costs increased $10.4 million, or 13.6%, to $86.4 million for the three
months ended June 30, 2006, from $76.0 million in the comparable 2005 period. As a percentage of
revenues, direct salaries and related costs increased to 63.9% for the three months ended June 30,
2006, from 62.2% for the comparable 2005 period. This increase was attributable to higher salary
costs, primarily training costs associated with the ramp up of business in our offshore and U.S.
operations, and higher auto tow claim costs in Canada, partially offset by lower telephone costs.
Although the weakened Euro negatively impacted revenues, it positively impacted direct salaries and
related costs for the three months ended June 30, 2006 by approximately $0.1 million compared to
the same period in 2005.
General and Administrative
General and administrative expenses increased $0.9 million to $42.3 million for
the three months ended June 30, 2006, from $41.4 million in the comparable 2005 period.
As a percentage of revenues, general and administrative expenses decreased to 31.3% for the three
months ended June 30, 2006 from 33.9% for the comparable 2005 period. This decrease was
primarily attributable to lower legal and professional fees incurred, depreciation expense, lease
costs and equipment maintenance incurred and telephone costs, partially offset by higher
compensation costs including $0.4 million associated with the companys stock based compensation
plans as compared to the same period of 2005. Although the weakening Euro negatively impacted
revenues, it had an immaterial positive impact on general and administrative expenses for the three
months ended June 30, 2006 compared to the same period in 2005.
Net Loss (Gain) on Disposal of Property and Equipment
The net loss (gain) on disposal of property and equipment of zero for the three months ended June
30, 2006 compares to a $1.6 million net gain on disposal of property and equipment for the
comparable 2005 period which was primarily a result of our $1.7 million net gain on the sale of our
Greeley, Colorado facility partially offset by a $0.1 million loss on the disposal of plant and
equipment.
Reversal of Restructuring and Other Charges
The $0.1 million reversal of restructuring and other charges for the three months ended June 30,
2005 primarily relates to the reversal of severance and other costs in one of our European customer
contact centers. There was no reversal of restructuring and other charges for the three months
ended June 30, 2006.
Interest Income
Interest income was $2.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006, compared to $0.5 million
for the comparable 2005 period reflecting interest income of $1.7 million on a foreign tax
settlement as well as higher levels of average interest-bearing investments in cash and cash
equivalents earning higher rates of interest income.
33
Sykes Enterprises, Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations
Interest (Expense)
Interest expense was $0.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006, compared to $0.4
million for the comparable 2005 period reflecting higher levels of commitment fees paid on our
credit facility in the prior year in addition to interest paid on a foreign tax settlement.
Income from Rental Operations, Net
Income from rental operations, net was $0.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006,
compared to $0.1 million for the comparable 2005 period. The increase of $0.3 million was
primarily related to higher rental income of $0.2 million from the leasing of two additional
centers in the U.S. in the second and fourth quarters of 2005 and lower depreciation costs, taxes,
insurance and maintenance costs aggregating $0.1 million.
Other Income (Expense)
Other income, net was $0.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006, compared to $0.7
million for the comparable 2005 period. The decrease in other income, net of $0.5 million was
primarily attributable to a decrease in foreign currency transaction gains, net of losses. Other
income (expense) excludes the effects of cumulative translation effects included in Accumulated
Other Comprehensive Loss in shareholders equity in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance
Sheets.
Provision (Benefit) for Income Taxes
The benefit for income taxes of $2.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006 was
based upon pre-tax book income of $9.8 million, compared to the provision for income
taxes of $2.4 million for the comparable 2005 period based upon pre-tax book income of
$7.4 million. The effective tax rate for the three months ended June 30, 2006 was
(20.4)% compared to an effective tax rate of 32.8% for the comparable 2005 period. The 53.2%
decrease in the effective tax rate was primarily due to tax benefits of approximately $3.0 million
resulting from the Canadian tax appeals settlement, additional income earned in tax holiday
jurisdictions and losses for the three months ended June 30, 2006 in jurisdictions for which
current tax benefits can be recognized; accompanied by a shift in the mix of earnings within tax
jurisdictions and the effects of permanent differences, valuation allowances, foreign withholding
and other taxes, state income taxes, and foreign income tax rate differentials.
Net Income
As a result of the foregoing, we reported income from operations for the three months ended June
30, 2006 of $6.5 million, no change from the comparable 2005 period. This was principally
attributable to a $13.0 million increase in revenues, offset by a $10.4 million increase in direct salaries and related costs, a $0.9 million increase in
general and administrative expenses, a $1.6 million decrease in net gain on disposal of
property and equipment and a $0.1 million decrease in reversal of restructuring and other charges,
as previously discussed. A $2.4 million increase in interest income, a $0.2 million
decrease in interest expense and a $0.3 million increase in income from rental
operations, net, a $0.5 million decrease in other income and a $4.4 million lower tax
provision resulted in net income of $11.8 million for the three months ended June 30,
2006, an increase of $6.8 million compared to the same period in 2005.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2006 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2005
Revenues
For the six months ended June 30, 2006, we recognized consolidated revenues of $266.3 million, an
increase of $22.7 million, or 9.3%, from $243.6 million of consolidated revenues for the comparable
2005 period.
On a geographic segmentation basis, revenues from the Americas region, including the United States,
Canada, Latin America, India and the Asia Pacific Rim, represented 67.3%, or $179.2 million, for
the six months ended June 30, 2006, compared to 62.3%, or $151.7 million, for the comparable 2005
period. Revenues from the EMEA region, including Europe, the Middle East and Africa, represented
32.7%, or $87.1 million, for the six months ended June 30, 2006, compared to 37.7%, or $91.9
million, for the comparable 2005 period.
34
Sykes Enterprises, Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations
The increase in the Americas revenue of $27.5 million, or 18.2%, for the six months ended June 30,
2006, compared to the same period in 2005, reflects a broad-based growth in client call volumes,
including new and existing client programs, within our offshore operations, Canada and the United
States. Revenues from new and existing client programs in our offshore operations represented 34.9%
of consolidated revenues on 10,900 seats for the six months ended
June 30, 2006, compared to 30.3%
on 10,000 seats for the comparable 2005 period. The trend of generating more of our revenues from
new and existing client programs in our offshore operations is likely to continue in 2006. While
operating margins generated offshore are generally comparable or higher than those in the United
States, our ability to maintain these offshore operating margins longer term is difficult to
predict due to potential increased competition for the available workforce and costs of functional
currency fluctuations in offshore markets.
EMEA revenues decreased $4.8 million, or 5.2%, for the six months ended June 30, 2006,
compared to the same period in 2005. EMEA revenues for the first half of 2006 experienced a $3.9
million decline as a result of the weakness in the Euro compared to the same period in 2005.
Excluding this foreign currency impact, EMEA revenues decreased $0.9 million compared with the same
period last year. This decrease reflects the ongoing softness in our key European markets
characterized by competitive pricing and offshore alternatives and certain program expirations.
Direct Salaries and Related Costs
Direct salaries and related costs increased $15.9 million, or 10.4%, to $169.4 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2006, from $153.5 million in the comparable 2005 period. As a percentage of
revenues, direct salaries and related costs increased to 63.6% for the six months ended June 30,
2006, from 63.0% for the comparable 2005 period. This increase was attributable to higher salary
costs, primarily training costs associated with the ramp up of business in our offshore and U.S.
operations, and higher auto tow claim costs in Canada, partially offset by lower telephone costs.
Although the weakened Euro negatively impacted revenues, it positively impacted direct salaries and
related costs for the six months ended June 30, 2006 by approximately $2.7 million compared to the
same period in 2005.
General and Administrative
General and administrative expenses increased $2.1 million to $83.3 million for
the six months ended June 30, 2006, from $81.2 million in the comparable 2005 period. As
a percentage of revenues, general and administrative expenses decreased to 31.3% for the six months
ended June 30, 2006 from 33.4% for the comparable 2005 period. This decrease was
primarily attributable to lower legal and professional fees incurred, depreciation expense, lease
costs and equipment maintenance incurred and telephone costs, partially offset by higher
compensation costs including $0.8 million associated with the companys stock based compensation
plans as compared to the same period of 2005. Although the weakening Euro negatively impacted
revenues, it positively impacted general and administrative expenses for the six months ended June
30, 2006 by $1.1 million compared to the same period in 2005.
Net Loss (Gain) on Disposal of Property and Equipment
The net loss (gain) on disposal of property and equipment of zero for the six months ended June 30,
2006 compares to a $1.7 million net gain on disposal of property and equipment for the comparable
2005 period which was primarily a result of our $1.7 million net gain on the sale of our Greeley,
Colorado facility.
Impairment of Long-lived Assets
The $0.4 million impairment of long-lived assets for the six months ended June 30, 2006 related to
an asset impairment charge in one of our underutilized European customer contact management
centers. This impairment charge represented the amount by which the carrying value of the assets
exceeded the estimated fair value of those assets which cannot be redeployed to other locations.
There was no impairment charge in the same period in 2005.
35
Sykes Enterprises, Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations
Reversal of Restructuring and Other Charges
The $0.3 million reversal of restructuring and other charges for the six months ended June 30, 2005
relates to the reversal of severance and other costs primarily with the closure of certain European
customer contact centers. There was no reversal of restructuring and other charges for the six
months ended June 30, 2006.
Interest Income
Interest income was $3.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006, compared to $0.9 million
for the comparable 2005 period reflecting interest income of $1.7 million on a foreign tax
settlement as well as higher levels of average interest-bearing investments in cash and cash
equivalents earning higher rates of interest income.
Interest (Expense)
Interest expense was $0.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006, compared to $0.5 million
for the comparable 2005 period reflecting higher levels of commitment fees paid on our credit
facility in the prior year in addition to interest paid on a foreign tax settlement.
Income from Rental Operations, Net
Income from rental operations, net was $1.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006,
compared to zero for the comparable 2005 period. The increase of $1.0 million was primarily
related to higher rental income of $0.5 million from the leasing of two additional centers in the
U.S. in the second and fourth quarters of 2005 and lower depreciation costs of $0.5 million.
Other Income (Expense)
Other expense, net was $0.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006, compared to other
income, net of $0.4 million for the comparable 2005 period. The increase in other expense, net of
$0.6 million was primarily attributable to an increase in foreign currency transaction gains, net
of losses. Other income (expense) excludes the effects of cumulative translation effects included
in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss in shareholders equity in the accompanying Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Provision (Benefit) for Income Taxes
The benefit for income taxes of $0.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 was
based upon pre-tax book income of $17.4 million, compared to the provision for income
taxes of $3.8 million for the comparable 2005 period based upon pre-tax book income of
$11.7 million. The effective tax rate was (1.3)% for the six months ended June 30, 2006
compared to an effective tax rate of 32.4% for the comparable 2005 period. The 33.7% decrease in
the effective tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2006 was primarily due to tax benefits of
approximately $3.0 million resulting from the Canadian tax appeals settlement, additional income
earned in tax holiday jurisdictions and year-to-date losses in jurisdictions for which current tax
benefits can be recognized; accompanied by a shift in the mix of earnings within tax jurisdictions
and the effects of permanent differences, valuation allowances, foreign withholding and other
taxes, state income taxes, and foreign income tax rate differentials.
Net Income
As a result of the foregoing, we reported income from operations for the six months ended June 30,
2006 of $13.2 million, an increase of $2.3 million from the comparable 2005
period. This increase was principally attributable to a $22.7 million increase in
revenues, offset by a $15.9 million increase in direct salaries and related
costs, a $2.1 million increase in general and administrative expenses, a $1.7 million
decrease in net gain on disposal of property and equipment, a $0.4 million increase in
impairment of long-lived assets and a $0.3 million decrease in reversal of restructuring and other
charges, as previously discussed. The $2.3 million increase in income from operations, a
$2.8 million increase in interest income, a $0.2 million decrease in interest expense and
a $1.0 million increase in income from rental operations, net, a $0.6 million decrease in
other income and a $4.0 million lower tax provision resulted in net income of $17.7
million for the six months ended June 30, 2006, an increase of $9.7 million,
compared to the same period in 2005.
36
Sykes Enterprises, Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our primary sources of liquidity are generally cash flows generated by operating activities and
from available borrowings under our revolving credit facilities. We utilize these capital resources
to make capital expenditures associated primarily with our customer contact management services,
invest in technology applications and tools to further develop our service offerings and for
working capital and other general corporate purposes, including repurchase of our common stock in
the open market and to fund possible acquisitions. In future periods, we intend similar uses of
these funds.
On August 5, 2002, the Board of Directors authorized the Company to purchase up to three million
shares of our outstanding common stock. A total of 1.6 million shares have been
repurchased under this program since inception. The shares are purchased, from time to time,
through open market purchases or in negotiated private transactions, and the purchases are based on
factors, including but not limited to, the stock price and general market conditions. During the
six months ended June 30, 2006, we did not repurchase common shares under the 2002 repurchase
program.
During the six months ended June 30, 2006, we generated $20.8 million in cash from
operating activities and received $1.7 million in cash from issuance of stock and
$0.7 million from excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation. Further, we used
$7.8 million in funds for capital expenditures and $0.3 million in other
investing activities resulting in a $18.9 million increase in available cash (including
the favorable effects of international currency exchange rates on cash of $3.8 million).
Net cash flows provided by operating activities for the six months ended June 30, 2006 were $20.8
million, compared to $26.3 million for the comparable 2005 period. The $5.5 million decrease in net
cash flows from operating activities was due to a $15.5 million net decrease in cash flows from
assets and liabilities offset by an increase in net income of $9.7 million and a net increase in
non-cash reconciling items of $0.3 million such as depreciation expense, stock-based compensation
and termination costs associated with exit activities. This $15.5 million net change was
principally a result of a $9.3 million increase in receivables, a $2.3 million increase in other
assets, $2.7 million decrease in other liabilities, $1.7 million decrease in income taxes payable,
offset by a $0.5 million increase in deferred revenue.
Capital expenditures, which are generally funded by cash generated from operating activities and
borrowings available under our credit facilities, were $7.8 million for the six months ended June
30, 2006, compared to $5.7 million for the comparable 2005 period, an increase of $2.1 million,
which was driven primarily by offshore expansion. During the six months ended June 30, 2006,
approximately 22% of the capital expenditures were the result of investing in new and existing
customer contact management centers, primarily offshore, and 78% was expended primarily for
maintenance and systems infrastructure. In 2006, we anticipate capital expenditures in the range of
$14.0 million to $18.0 million.
On July 3, 2006, the Company completed the acquisition of all the outstanding shares of capital
stock of Apex (See Note 2). The net purchase price for the shares was $27.0 million, eighty percent
of which ($21.6 million) was paid in cash from offshore operations and twenty percent of which
($5.4 million) was paid by the delivery of common stock of the Company. On July 3, 2006, after the
acquisition of Apex was completed, the Company contributed additional capital of $1.3 million to
Apex for working capital support and general corporate purposes.
An available source of future cash flows from financing activities is from borrowings under our
$50.0 million revolving credit facility (the Credit Facility), which amount is subject to certain
borrowing limitations. Pursuant to the terms of the Credit Facility, the amount of $50.0 million
may be increased up to a maximum of $100.0 million with the prior written consent of the lenders.
The $50.0 million Credit Facility includes a $10.0 million swingline subfacility, a $15.0 million
letter of credit subfacility and a $40.0 million multi-currency subfacility.
The Credit Facility, which includes certain financial covenants, may be used for general corporate
purposes including acquisitions, share repurchases, working capital support, and letters of credit,
subject to certain limitations. The Credit Facility, including the multi-currency subfacility,
accrues interest, at our option, at (a) the Base Rate (defined as the higher of the lenders prime
rate or the Federal Funds rate plus 0.50%) plus an applicable margin up to 0.50%, or (b) the London
Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus an applicable margin up to 2.25%. Borrowings under the
swingline subfacility accrue interest at the prime rate plus an applicable
37
Sykes Enterprises, Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations
margin up to 0.50% and borrowings under the letter of credit subfacility accrue interest at the
LIBOR plus an applicable margin up to 2.25%. In addition, a commitment fee of up to 0.50% is
charged on the unused portion of the Credit Facility on a quarterly basis. The borrowings under
the Credit Facility, which will terminate on March 14, 2008, are secured by a pledge of 65% of the
stock of each of our active direct foreign subsidiaries. The Credit Facility prohibits us from
incurring additional indebtedness, subject to certain specific exclusions. There were no
borrowings in the first six months of 2006 and 2005 and no outstanding balances as of June 30, 2006
and December 31, 2005 with $50.0 million availability on the Credit Facility. At June 30, 2006, we
were in compliance with all loan requirements of the Credit Facility.
At June 30, 2006, we had $146.6 million in cash, of which approximately 77.4% or $113.4 million was
held in international operations and may be subject to additional taxes if repatriated to the
United States.
We believe that our current cash levels, accessible funds under our credit facilities and cash
flows from future operations will be adequate to meet anticipated working capital needs, future
debt repayment requirements (if any), continued expansion objectives, anticipated levels of capital
expenditures and contractual obligations for the foreseeable future and stock repurchases.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Other
At June 30, 2006, we did not have any material commercial commitments, including guarantees or
standby repurchase obligations, with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, including
entities often referred to as structured finance or special purpose entities or variable interest
entities, which would have been established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet
arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes.
From time to time, during the normal course of business, we may make certain indemnities,
commitments and guarantees under which we may be required to make payments in relation to certain
transactions. These include, but are not limited to: (i) indemnities to clients, vendors and
service providers pertaining to claims based on negligence or willful misconduct and (ii)
indemnities involving breach of contract, the accuracy of representations and warranties, or other
liabilities assumed by us in certain contracts. In addition, we have agreements whereby we will
indemnify certain officers and directors for certain events or occurrences while the officer or
director is, or was, serving at our request in such capacity. The indemnification period covers all
pertinent events and occurrences during the officers or directors lifetime. The maximum potential
amount of future payments we could be required to make under these indemnification agreements is
unlimited; however, we have director and officer insurance coverage that limits our exposure and
enables us to recover a portion of any future amounts paid. We believe the applicable insurance
coverage is generally adequate to cover any estimated potential liability under these
indemnification agreements. The majority of these indemnities, commitments and guarantees do not
provide for any limitation of the maximum potential for future payments we could be obligated to
make. We have not recorded any liability for these indemnities, commitments and other guarantees in
the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. In addition, we have some client contracts
that do not contain contractual provisions for the limitation of liability, and other client
contracts that contain agreed upon exceptions to limitation of liability. We have not recorded any
liability in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets with respect to any client
contracts under which we have or may have unlimited liability.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States requires estimations and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities
at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during
the reporting period. These estimates and assumptions are based on historical experience and
various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results
could differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
We believe the following accounting policies are the most critical since these policies require
significant judgment or involve complex estimations that are important to the portrayal of our
financial condition and operating results:
|
|
We recognize revenue pursuant to applicable accounting standards, including SEC Staff
Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 101 (SAB 101), Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements,
SAB 104, |
38
Sykes Enterprises, Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations
|
|
Revenue Recognition and the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) No. 00-21, (EITF 00-21)
Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables. SAB 101, as amended, and SAB 104 summarize
certain of the SEC staffs views in applying generally accepted accounting principles to revenue
recognition in financial statements and provide guidance on revenue recognition issues in the
absence of authoritative literature addressing a specific arrangement or a specific industry.
EITF 00-21 provides further guidance on how to account for multiple element contracts.
|
|
|
|
We recognize revenue from services as the services are performed under a fully executed
contractual agreement and record estimated reductions to revenue for contractual penalties and
holdbacks for failure to meet specified minimum service levels and other performance based
contingencies. Royalty revenue is recognized when a contract has been fully executed, the
product has been delivered or provided, the license fees or rights are fixed and determinable,
the collection of the resulting receivable is probable and there are no other contingencies.
Revisions to these estimates, which could result in adjustments to fixed price contracts and
estimated losses, are recorded in the period when such adjustments or losses are known or can be
reasonably estimated. Product sales are recognized upon shipment to the customer and
satisfaction of all obligations. |
|
|
|
We recognize revenue from licenses of our software products and rights when the agreement has
been executed, the product or right has been delivered or provided, collectibility is probable
and the software license fees or rights are fixed and determinable. If any portion of the
license fees or rights is subject to forfeiture, refund or other contractual contingencies, we
defer revenue recognition until these contingencies have been resolved. Revenue from support and
maintenance activities is recognized ratably over the term of the maintenance period and the
unrecognized portion is recorded as deferred revenue. Deferred revenue included in current
liabilities in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets includes estimated
penalties and holdbacks of approximately $2.4 million and $0.9 million as of June 30, 2006 and
December 31, 2005, respectively, for failure to meet specified minimum service levels in certain
contracts and other performance based contingencies. |
|
|
|
Certain contracts to sell our products and services contain multiple elements or non-standard
terms and conditions. As a result, we evaluate each contract to determine the appropriate
accounting, including whether the deliverables specified in a multiple element arrangement
should be treated as separate units of accounting for revenue recognition purposes, and if so,
how the price should be allocated among the deliverable elements and the timing of revenue
recognition for each element. We recognize revenue for delivered elements only when the fair
values of undelivered elements are known, uncertainties regarding client acceptance are
resolved, and there are no client-negotiated refund or return rights affecting the revenue
recognized for delivered elements. Once we determine the allocation of revenue between
deliverable elements, there are no further changes in the revenue allocation. |
|
|
|
We maintain allowances for doubtful accounts of $2.9 million as of
June 30, 2006, or 3.1% of trade receivables, for estimated losses
arising from the inability of our customers to make required
payments. If the financial condition of our customers were to
deteriorate, resulting in a reduced ability to make payments,
additional allowances may be required which would reduce income
from operations. |
|
|
|
We reduce deferred tax assets by a valuation allowance if, based
on the weight of available evidence for each respective tax
jurisdiction, it is more likely than not that some portion or all
of such deferred tax assets will not be realized. The valuation
allowance for a particular tax jurisdiction is allocated between
current and noncurrent deferred tax assets for that jurisdiction
on a pro-rata basis. Available evidence which is considered in
determining the amount of valuation allowance required includes,
but is not limited to, our estimate of future taxable income and
any applicable tax-planning strategies. At December 31, 2005,
management determined that a valuation allowance of approximately
$28.8 million was necessary to reduce U.S. deferred tax assets by
$9.9 million and foreign deferred tax assets by $18.9
million, where it was more likely than not that some portion or
all of such deferred tax assets will not be realized. The
recoverability of the remaining net deferred tax asset of $17.9
million at December 31, 2005 is dependent upon future
profitability within each tax jurisdiction. As of June 30, 2006,
based on our estimates of future taxable income and any applicable
tax-planning strategies within various tax jurisdictions, we
believe that it is more likely than not that the remaining net
deferred tax asset will be realized. |
|
|
|
We review long-lived assets, which had a carrying value of $68.5
million as of June 30, 2006, including goodwill, intangibles and
property and equipment, for impairment whenever events or changes
in
|
39
Sykes Enterprises, Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations
|
|
circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable and at least
annually for impairment testing of goodwill. An asset is considered to be impaired when the
carrying amount exceeds the fair value. Upon determination that the carrying value of the asset
is impaired, we would record an impairment charge or loss to reduce the asset to its fair value.
Future adverse changes in market conditions or poor operating results of the underlying
investment could result in losses or an inability to recover the carrying value of the
investment and, therefore, might require an impairment charge in the future. |
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In March 2004, the EITF reached a consensus on Issue No. 03-1 (EITF 03-1), The Meaning of
Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments. EITF 03-1 provides
guidance on other-than-temporary impairment evaluations for securities accounted for under SFAS No.
115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities, and SFAS No. 124,
"Accounting for Certain Investments Held by Not-for-Profit Organizations, and non-marketable
equity securities accounted for under the cost method. The EITF developed a basic three-step test
to evaluate whether an investment is other-than-temporarily impaired. In September 2004, the FASB
delayed the effective date of the recognition and measurement provisions of EITF 03-1. However, the
disclosure provisions were effective for fiscal years ending after June 15, 2004. In November 2005,
the FASB issued final FASB Staff Position Nos. SFAS 115-1 and SFAS 124-1 The Meaning of
Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments which superseded EITF
03-1 and provided similar guidance. We adopted the guidance in these standards on January 1, 2006.
The impact of this adoption did not have a material impact on our financial condition, results of
operations or cash flows.
In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154 (SFAS 154), Accounting Changes and Error Corrections,
which requires retrospective application to prior periods financial statements for changes in
accounting principle and redefines the term restatement as the revising of previously issued
financial statements to reflect the correction of an error. Under retrospective application, the
new accounting principle is applied as of the beginning of the first period presented as if that
principle had always been used. The cumulative effect of the change is reflected in the carrying
value of assets and liabilities as of the first period presented and the offsetting adjustments are
recorded to opening retained earnings. SFAS 154 is effective for accounting changes and
corrections of errors made in the years beginning after December 31, 2005.
In February 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 155 (SFAS 155), Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial
Instruments, which amends SFAS No. 133 (SFAS 133), Accounting for Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities and SFAS No. 140 (SFAS 140), Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of
Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities. SFAS 155 simplifies the accounting for
certain derivatives embedded in other financial instruments by allowing them to be accounted for as
a whole if the holder elects to account for the whole instrument on a fair value basis. SFAS 155
also clarifies and amends certain other provisions of SFAS 133 and SFAS 140. SFAS 155 is effective
for all financial instruments acquired, issued or subject to a remeasurement event occurring in
fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2006. We are currently evaluating the impact of this
standard on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
In April 2006, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position FIN 46(R)-6 (FIN 46(R)-6), Determining the
Variability to Be Considered in Applying FASB Interpretation No. 46(R), that will become effective
beginning the first day of the first reporting period after June 15, 2006. FIN 46(R)-6 clarifies
that the variability to be considered in applying FASB Interpretation 46(R) shall be based on an
analysis of the design of the variable interest entity. The adoption of FIN 46(R)-6 is not expected
to have a material impact on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
In July 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation 48 (FIN 48), Accounting for Uncertainty in
Income Taxes, which clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in the
financial statements in accordance with FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. FIN 48
provides guidance on the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or
expected to be taken in a tax return. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition,
classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosures, and transition.
FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. We are currently evaluating
the impact of this standard on the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
40
Sykes Enterprises, Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Form 10-Q
For the Quarter Ended June 30, 2006
Item 3 Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Foreign Currency and Interest Rate Risk
Our earnings and cash flows are subject to fluctuations due to changes in non-U.S. currency
exchange rates. We are exposed to non-U.S. exchange rate fluctuations as the financial results of
non-U.S. subsidiaries are translated into U.S. dollars in consolidation. As exchange rates vary,
those results, when translated, may vary from expectations and adversely impact overall expected
profitability. The cumulative translation effects for subsidiaries using functional currencies
other than the U.S. dollar are included in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) in
shareholders equity. Movements in non-U.S. currency exchange rates may affect our competitive
position, as exchange rate changes may affect business practices and/or pricing strategies of
non-U.S. based competitors. Periodically, we use foreign currency contracts to hedge intercompany
receivables and payables, and transactions initiated in the United States that are denominated in
foreign currency. The principal foreign currency hedged is the Euro using foreign currency
contracts ranging in periods from one to three months. Foreign currency contracts are accounted
for on a mark-to-market basis, with realized and unrealized gains or losses recognized as
a component of other income (expense), as we do not designate our foreign currency contracts as
accounting hedges.
There were no realized or unrealized gains or losses related to these foreign currency contracts
during the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005.
Our exposure to interest rate risk results from variable debt outstanding from time to time under
our revolving credit facility. At June 30, 2006, we had no debt outstanding at variable interest
rates. We have not historically used derivative instruments to manage exposure to changes in
interest rates.
Fluctuations in Quarterly Results
For the year ended December 31, 2005, quarterly revenues as a percentage of total consolidated
annual revenues were approximately 26%, 25%, 25% and 24%, respectively, for each of the respective
quarters of the year. We have experienced and anticipate that in the future we will continue to
experience variations in quarterly revenues. The variations are due to the timing of new contracts
and renewal of existing contracts, the timing of the expenses incurred to support new business, the
timing and frequency of client spending for customer contact management services, non-U.S. currency
fluctuations, and the seasonal pattern of customer contact management support and fulfillment
services.
Item 4 Controls and Procedures
As of June 30, 2006, under the direction of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, we evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and
procedures, as defined in Rule 13a 15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
We concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were generally effective as of June 30,
2006, such that the information required to be disclosed in our SEC reports is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the SECs rules and forms, and is
accumulated and communicated to management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
There were no significant changes in our internal controls over financial reporting during the
quarter ended June 30, 2006 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially
affect, our internal controls over financial reporting, other than described below.
On May 1, 2006, we implemented a new financial system in our Canadian operations, which included
the general ledger, accounts receivable, accounts payable, purchase order, inventory control and
activity management modules. We expect this financial system, which is used in most of our
locations, to further advance the control environment in our Canadian operations by automating
manual processes, improving management visibility and standardizing processes.
41
Sykes Enterprises, Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Form 10-Q
For the Quarter Ended June 30, 2006
Part
II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1
Legal Proceedings
From time to time, we are involved in legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business.
With respect to these matters, we believe that we have adequate legal defenses and/or provided
adequate accruals for related costs such that the ultimate outcome will not have a material adverse
effect on our future financial position or results of operations.
Item 2
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Below is a summary of stock repurchases for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 (in thousands, except
average price per share). See Note 10, Earnings Per Share, to the Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements for information regarding our stock repurchase program.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
Number Of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased |
|
Shares That May |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
as Part of |
|
Yet Be |
|
|
Total Number |
|
Price |
|
Publicly |
|
Purchased |
|
|
of Shares |
|
Paid Per |
|
Announced Plans |
|
Under Plans or |
Period |
|
Purchased (1) |
|
Share |
|
or Programs |
|
Programs |
April 1, 2006 April 30, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,644 |
|
|
|
1,356 |
|
May 1,
2006 May 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,644 |
|
|
|
1,356 |
|
June 1,
2006 June 30, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,644 |
|
|
|
1,356 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
All shares purchased as part of a repurchase plan publicly announced on August 5, 2002.
Total number of shares approved for repurchase under the plan was 3 million with no
expiration date. |
Item 4
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
a. |
|
The Annual Meeting of Shareholders was held on May 23, 2006 |
|
|
b. |
|
The following members of the Board of Directors were elected to Class III and to serve
until the 2009 Annual Meeting and until their successors are elected and qualified: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For |
|
Withhold |
Charles E. Sykes |
|
|
37,631,240 |
|
|
|
137,105 |
|
Furman P. Bodenheimer, Jr. |
|
|
37,599,815 |
|
|
|
168,530 |
|
William J. Meurer |
|
|
36,868,467 |
|
|
|
899,878 |
|
The following are the members of the Board of Directors whose term of office as a director
continued after the meeting:
|
|
|
Paul L. Whiting
|
|
H. Parks Helms. |
Mark C. Bozek
|
|
Linda McClintock-Greco, M.D. |
Lt. Gen Michael DeLong (Retired)
|
|
James K. (Jack) Murray, Jr. |
Iain A. Macdonald
|
|
James S. MacLeod |
42
Sykes Enterprises, Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Form 10-Q
For the Quarter Ended June 30, 2006
|
c. |
|
The following additional matters were voted upon at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders: |
The proposal to amend the 2001 Equity Incentive Plan was approved as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For |
|
Against |
|
Abstain |
|
Broker Non-Votes |
29,904,300 |
|
3,681,512 |
|
118,625 |
|
4,063,908 |
The proposal to approve the use of certain performance criteria under the 2001 Equity Incentive
Plan was approved as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For |
|
Against |
|
Abstain |
|
Broker Non-Votes |
30,276,276 |
|
3,306,682 |
|
121,479 |
|
4,063,908 |
The proposal to amend the Deferred Compensation Plan was approved as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For |
|
Against |
|
Abstain |
|
Broker Non-Votes |
31,628,464 |
|
1,950,192 |
|
125,781 |
|
4,063,908 |
The proposal to ratify the appointment of independent auditors was approved as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For |
|
Against |
|
Abstain |
|
|
36,945,982 |
|
810,749 |
|
11,614 |
|
|
Item 6 Exhibits
Exhibits
The following documents are filed as an exhibit to this Report:
|
15 |
|
Awareness letter. |
|
|
31.1 |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a). |
|
|
31.2 |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a). |
|
|
32.1 |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350. |
|
|
32.2 |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350. |
43
Sykes Enterprises, Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Form 10-Q
For the Quarter Ended June 30, 2006
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SYKES ENTERPRISES, INCORPORATED
(Registrant) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: August 9, 2006
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ W. Michael Kipphut |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. Michael Kipphut |
|
|
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
|
|
44
Sykes Enterprises, Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Form 10-Q
For the Quarter Ended June 30, 2006
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
Awareness letter. |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a). |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a). |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350. |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350. |