UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005

or

For the transition period from                      to                     

Commission File Number: 000-50360

DIRECT GENERAL CORPORATION

(615) 399-0600
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes þ No o

     Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: 21,745,097 shares of common stock, no par value, at May 9, 2005.

Table of Contents

PART I–FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements.

DIRECT GENERAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

2

DIRECT GENERAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

3

DIRECT GENERAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

4

DIRECT GENERAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

1. Nature of Operations

     Direct General Corporation, headquartered in Nashville, Tennessee, is a financial services holding company whose principal operating subsidiaries provide non-standard personal automobile insurance, term life insurance, premium finance and other consumer products and services primarily on a direct basis and primarily in the southeastern United States. Direct General Corporation owns four property/casualty insurance companies, two life/health insurance companies, two premium finance companies, thirteen insurance agencies, two administrative service companies and one company that provides non-insurance consumer products and services.

2. Basis of Presentation

     The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included herein have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (GAAP) have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all normal recurring adjustments which were, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair statement of the results for the interim periods presented. The results of operations for the period ended March 31, 2005 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full year. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited financial statements and accompanying notes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.

3. Acquisitions

     During January 2005, the Company acquired certain assets of All American General Agency, Inc., operating primarily under the name AMCO, and the assets of two other insurance agencies, collectively operating through 82 sales offices in the state of Texas. The assets acquired included customer records and renewal rights and the operating assets of the sales offices used to conduct their agency business. The total purchase price, the majority of which is recorded as goodwill, was $5,380,000 and may be increased by a future contingent payment of up to $500,000. The acquisition of the 82 sales offices increased the Company’s future minimum lease commitments having an initial or remaining term of more than one year by approximately $3.1 million.

4. Common Stock Repurchase

     On January 31, 2005, the Company announced that its Board of Directors approved the repurchase of up to $20,000,000 of its outstanding common stock. As of March 31, 2005, the Company had repurchased 493,350 shares of its outstanding common stock for an aggregate price of approximately $10,000,000.

5. Notes Payable

     The Company maintains a revolving credit facility with a consortium of banks to fund the working capital of the Company’s premium finance operations. On July 1, 2004, the Company renewed its $190.0 million revolving credit facility under substantially similar terms and extended its maturity for an additional three-year period to June 30, 2007. As of March 31, 2005, the amount outstanding under the facility was $173.0 million. The Company also has a $30.0 million revolving credit facility available to support its operations and strategic initiatives. No amounts were outstanding under this facility as of March 31, 2005.

5

6. Earnings Per Share

     The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share:

7. Stock Options

     The Company follows the provisions of Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” to account for its stock option activity in the financial statements. The Company generally grants employee stock options at an exercise price equal to the market price at the date of grant. Employee stock options granted at less than the market price at the date of grant and options granted to non-employees are expensed. During the first quarter of 2005, the Company recorded $84,000 of expense related to options granted to both employees and non-employees to purchase 115,000 shares at an exercise price of $31.00 per share that was less than the current market price at the time of grant.

     If the Company had elected to recognize stock compensation expense based on the fair value of stock options at the grant date, as prescribed by SFAS 123, net income available to common shareholders and basic and diluted earnings per share would have been reported as presented in the following table.

6

8. Contingencies

     The Company is named as defendant in various legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. During the first quarter of 2005, the Company and certain of our officers and directors were named as defendants in six purported securities class action lawsuits and six shareholder derivative class actions. The Company intends to vigorously defend each of these lawsuits. However, all litigation is unpredictable and the ultimate outcome of these cases is uncertain. These matters are in their early procedural stages, and thus the Company is unable to predict the likelihood or range of our potential liability or the potential financial impact on our future operations, if we are not able to successfully defend these cases.

9. Subsequent Events

     In April 2005, the Company signed a purchase agreement to acquire a property and casualty company the assets of which consist of licenses to conduct property and casualty business in 38 states and the District of Columbia and debt securities. The proposed acquisition is pending regulatory approval. The purchase price is estimated to be $10.3 million of which approximately $4.3 million is expected to be allocated to the value of the licenses and recorded as goodwill.

10. Recent Accounting Pronouncements

     The Company periodically reviews recent accounting pronouncements issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board, American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, Emerging Issues Task Force, and Staff Accounting Bulletins issued by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission to determine the potential impact on the Company’s financial statements. Based on its most recent review, the Company has determined that the majority of these recently issued accounting standards either do not apply to the Company or will not have a material impact on its financial statements. However, in December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment, which will affect the manner in which the Company accounts for its share-based payment arrangements, including stock options. Accordingly, effective January 1, 2006, the Company will be required to expense the cost resulting from all share-based payment arrangements in its financial statements. The Company is currently in the process of determining the impact this standard will have on its financial statements.

7

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

     This Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations should be read in conjunction with the Company’s discussion presented under the caption “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” that is available in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Overview of Operating Results

     Net income decreased 9.3% to $13.6 million or $0.61 per share, on a diluted basis, for the three months ended March 31, 2005, as compared to net income of $15.0 million or $0.67 per share, on a diluted basis, in the first quarter of 2004. The annualized return on average equity was 22% during the first quarter, which exceeds our stated long-term objective of 20%. The first quarter results included a slightly higher loss ratio and higher expense ratios. The higher expense ratio was impacted by an increase in operating expenses of approximately $2.4 million from our expansions in Texas, Missouri and Virginia, as compared to the prior year quarter. The increases in costs were partially offset by a $1.0 million increase in net investment income. For the quarter, gross premiums written decreased 4.6% to $161.3 million from $169.0 million in the same period in 2004, including a decrease of approximately $2.2 million associated with the reduction in premiums in the Miami, Florida market. We experienced an increase in renewal policies over the prior year quarter, which partially offset the decrease in new business policies.

Summary of Key Measures of Financial Results

     The table below summarizes certain operating results and key measures we use in monitoring and evaluating our operations. The information provided is intended to summarize and supplement information contained in our consolidated financial statements and to assist the reader in gaining a better understanding of our results of operations.

Explanation of Key Measurers

     We evaluate our operations by monitoring key measures of growth and profitability. We measure our growth by examining our gross revenues, which is comprised of gross premiums written and revenues from all other sources produced through our distribution system. We generally measure our operating results by examining our net income, return on equity, and our loss, expense and combined ratios. In addition, we evaluate our performance by comparing the level of our ancillary income to premiums earned and to operating expenses. The following provides further explanation of the key measures that we use to evaluate our results:

     Gross Premiums Written. Gross premiums written is the sum of direct premiums written and assumed premiums written. Direct premiums written is the sum of the total policy premiums, net of cancellations, associated with policies underwritten and issued by our insurance subsidiaries. Assumed premiums written is the sum of total premiums associated with the insurance risk transferred

8

to us by other insurance companies pursuant to reinsurance contracts. We use gross premiums written, which excludes the impact of premiums ceded to reinsurers, as a measure of the underlying growth of our insurance business from period to period.

     Net Premiums Written. Net premiums written is the sum of direct premiums written and assumed premiums written less ceded premiums written. Ceded premiums written is the portion of our direct and assumed premiums that we transfer to our reinsurers in accordance with the terms of our reinsurance contracts based upon the risks they accept. We use net premiums written, primarily in relation to gross premiums written, to measure the amount of business retained after cessions to reinsurers.

     Gross Revenues (a non-GAAP financial measure). Gross revenues are the sum of gross premiums written plus ancillary income (finance income and commission and service fee income) and net investment income (excluding net realized gains (losses) on securities). We use gross revenues as the primary measure of the underlying growth of our revenue streams from period to period. Gross revenues are reconciled to total revenues in the “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Results of Operations”.

     Loss Ratio. Loss ratio is the ratio (expressed as a percentage) of losses and loss adjustment expenses incurred to premiums earned and measures the underwriting profitability of a company’s insurance business. Loss ratio generally is measured on both a gross (direct and assumed) and net (gross less ceded) basis. We use the gross loss ratio as a measure of the overall underwriting profitability of the insurance business we write and to assess the adequacy of our pricing. Our net loss ratio is meaningful in evaluating our financial results, which are net of ceded reinsurance, as reflected in our consolidated financial statements. Our loss ratios are generally calculated in the same way for GAAP and statutory accounting purposes.

     Expense Ratio. Expense ratio is the ratio (expressed as a percentage) of net operating expenses to premiums earned and measures a company’s operational efficiency in producing, underwriting and administering its insurance business. For statutory accounting purposes, operating expenses of an insurance company exclude investment expenses, and are reduced by other income. There is no such industry definition for determining an expense ratio for GAAP purposes. As a result, we apply the statutory definition to calculate our expense ratio on a GAAP basis. We reduce our operating expenses by ancillary income (excluding net investment income and realized gains (losses) on securities) to calculate our net operating expenses. Due to our historically high levels of reinsurance, we calculate our expense ratio on both a gross basis (before the effect of ceded reinsurance) and a net basis (after the effect of ceded reinsurance). Although the net basis is meaningful in evaluating our financial results that are net of ceded reinsurance, as reflected in our consolidated financial statements, we believe that the gross expense ratio more accurately reflects the operational efficiency of the underlying business and is a better measure of future trends.

     Combined Ratio. Combined ratio is the sum of the loss ratio and the expense ratio and measures a company’s overall underwriting profit. If the combined ratio is at or above 100, an insurance company cannot be profitable without investment income (and may not be profitable if investment income is insufficient). We use the GAAP combined ratio in evaluating our overall underwriting profitability and as a measure for comparison of our profitability relative to the profitability of our competitors.

     Ancillary Income Measures. We have developed measures of our ability to generate ancillary income (finance income and commission and service fee income) that reflect the differences between our business model and those used by our competitors. We measure our ancillary income as a percentage of premiums earned and as a percentage of our operating expenses. We believe that most of our competitors only achieve point of sale contact through an independent agent and are therefore typically unable to generate significant amounts of ancillary income.

     Seasonality. The months of February and March generally represent some of the highest premium production months of the year as many of our customers have more disposable cash as a result of income tax refunds. As a result, gross premiums written are generally the highest during the first quarter of the year. Typically, the Company generally experiences its lowest level of gross premiums written during the second quarter of the year as cancellations on the business written in the first quarter occur. Since the majority of our business is financed, finance receivables and unearned premiums increase during the first quarter. In addition, there are corresponding increases in notes payable and cash as our premium finance subsidiaries draw on the revolving line of credit with our banks to settle balances due to our insurance subsidiaries. Since these settlements occur at the end of the month, our insurance subsidiaries hold a high level of cash that has yet to be permanently invested in the long term portfolio.

9

Results of Operations

Revenues

Premiums

     The following table presents our gross premiums written in our major markets and provides a summary of gross, ceded and net premiums written and earned for the periods presented:

     Gross premiums written decreased $7.7 million or 4.6% for the three months ended March 31, 2005 compared to the first quarter of 2004. For the first quarter of 2005, gross premiums written from the sale of our core non-standard automobile insurance business decreased 5.5% to $154.0 million while gross premiums written from the sale of our term life insurance business increased 21.7% to $7.3 million as compared to the first quarter of 2004. Gross premiums earned, a function of gross premiums written over the current and prior periods, increased 2.8% to $118.2 million in first quarter of 2005 versus the same period in 2004.

     The decrease in gross premiums written included a decrease of approximately $2.2 million related to our decision, in October 2004, to cease writing new business policies in the Miami, Florida market. Overall, new business policies issued decreased by approximately 7%, which included the decrease in Miami new business that was partially offset by a 20% increase in renewal policies issued. We believe that the majority of the decrease in new business policies, outside Miami, was related to the increased competition for this business as reflected by the volume of calls to our Baton Rouge call center being down from the same period in 2004. However, we have seen an increase in the conversion rate of quotes to policies issued, which partially offset the decline in call volume.

     We believe that the number of nonstandard and standard automobile insurers that heavily use both television and radio advertising media have substantially increased in recent months, which contributed to our reduced call volume. We believe that this increased competition for media advertising has impacted the effectiveness of our advertising approach that has historically focused on a saturation of daytime network television complemented by yellow-page advertising. We also believe that a number of larger, national carriers that have predominantly operated in the standard market, are having some success in attracting a portion of our customer base as they have directly or indirectly expanded their target market to include a portion of the nonstandard market through their increased media advertising. One of the trends that we are closely monitoring is our mix of full coverage business, which includes physical damage coverage, as opposed to liability only policies. In certain states, particularly North and South Carolina, we have started to see a decline in the percentage of full coverage business, which we believe may be indicative of a portion of our customer base moving to the standard carriers.

10

     Consistent with our ongoing review of rates by coverage and state, we plan to make minor adjustment to our rates in certain states in an effort to improve our new business growth and stabilize our mix of full coverage versus liability only business. In response to the increased competition, we have recently hired a national advertising company to assist us in developing new marketing strategies to address the changing competitive landscape in many of our existing markets. We initially expect to test these new strategies in Tennessee and, if they are successful, we plan to implement them in our other existing states shortly thereafter.

     Gross premiums written in Texas increased 21.4% over the first quarter of 2004 largely as a result of our advertising campaigns and the increase in the number of sales offices in this market. In March 2005, we began issuing twelve-month policies in some of our Texas offices. We expect to continue to convert our monthly policies in Texas to annual policies over the remainder of the year. We have started to see a positive impact from our advertising programs in Texas, and our new advertising firm is helping us develop a campaign to specifically target the Hispanic market in Texas.

     The growth in net premiums written and earned is a function of gross premiums written and earned less ceded premiums written and earned. We continued to increase our retention of our business during the first quarter of 2005 and, as a result, the ratio of net premiums written to gross premiums written increased to 88.8% as compared to 81.2% in the first quarter of 2004. We expect to retain 88% to 90% of our gross premiums written in 2005.

     We are actively pursuing a number of initiatives to increase our gross revenues. In addition to our new advertising efforts, we are also exploring the possibility of offering our products through alternative distribution channels, including over the Internet and to customers who prefer to operate through the mail. We have been experimenting with Internet sales over the past year in Florida, and we are working to expand this channel in several other states. We also continue to evaluate new insurance products that we believe will be attractive to our customers including renters’, homeowners’ (including mobile homeowners’), motorcycle, boat, and personal watercraft policies. In order to facilitate the future expansion of our Direct General business model into additional states, we recently entered into an agreement to acquire a property and casualty shell insurance company with licenses in 38 states and the District of Columbia. This acquisition, which is currently pending regulatory approval, will provide us with a property and casualty insurance license in these states. The acquisition of these licenses will provide us a valuable tool that will allow us to more efficiently move into new markets. As a result of these growth initiatives and the additional initiatives we expect to introduce during the second quarter and the remainder of the 2005, we are optimistic that our gross revenues should increase during the second half of the year; however, growth is expected to be flat or down slightly throughout the second quarter of 2005.

Ancillary Income

     Ancillary income for the three months ended March 31, 2005 increased 0.8% to $26.5 million compared to the corresponding period in 2004. The majority of this increase was attributable to the success of our Direct prepaid Visa® debit card. We issued more than 57,000 cards during the quarter and revenues from the product were $0.6 million. The increase in revenues from the debit card was largely offset by a $0.6 million reduction in finance income primarily as a result of a decrease in down payments. We expect that the reduction in down payments could negatively impact the level of finance income to gross premiums earned in certain states; however, finance income should be positively impacted from our growth in Texas as we convert more of our Texas policies from monthly policies to annual policies and finance them through our premium finance company.

     The ratio of ancillary income to gross premiums earned was 22.4% and 22.9% for the first quarter of 2005 and 2004, respectively, while the ratio of ancillary income to operating expenses decreased to 77.7% in the 2005 period from 98.7% in the 2004 period. Because operating expenses are net of ceded reinsurance commissions received and we have been reducing our level of reinsurance, our net operating expenses have increased resulting in a lower ratio of ancillary income to operating expenses.

Net Investment Income

     Net investment income was $3.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2005 compared to $2.3 million for the first quarter of 2004. The increase was due primarily to an increase in average invested assets and a slightly higher investment yield as a result of the increasing interest rate environment and slightly longer portfolio duration. Average invested assets increased 24.0% to $329.5 million in the first quarter of 2005 from $265.7 million in the first quarter of 2004. The average investment yield increased to 4.0% in the first quarter of 2005 from 3.5% in the corresponding period in 2004.

Realized Gains on Securities and Other

     We realized no gross gains and gross losses of $0.3 million on the sale of securities for the three months ended March 31, 2005. Comparatively, we realized gross gains on debt securities of $0.2 million and gross losses of $0.2 million for the comparable period in 2004. There was no impact on realized losses attributable to adjustments for other than temporary impairment of securities still held during these periods.

11

     In the first quarter of 2005, we also realized gross gains of $0.4 million and gross losses of $0.5 million on closed contracts in our trading portfolio. The trading portfolio primarily consists of futures contracts, swaps, and other derivative instruments. This represents a speculative investment and does not represent a hedge; accordingly, all open contracts are marked to market with the change in market values included in “net realized gains on securities and other” in our condensed consolidated statement of operations. During the quarter, the market value on open contracts increased by $0.4 million, which was included in “net realized gains on securities and other.” As of March 31, 2005, we had open contracts with gross unrealized gains of $0.5 million and gross unrealized losses of $0.2 million.

Expenses

Insurance Losses and Loss Adjustment Expenses

     Insurance losses and loss adjustment expenses increased to $75.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2005 from $60.8 million for the same period in 2004. The majority of this increase was related to the increase in net premiums earned. Net loss ratios for the first quarter of 2005 and 2004 were 74.5% and 73.3%, respectively. The Company’s quarterly analysis of reserves resulted in an increase to prior year reserves of $0.8 million, which increased the net loss ratio by 0.8 points in the first quarter of 2005. The increase in prior period reserves was primarily associated with the last two accident quarters of 2004 and was a result of an increase in the expected average ultimate payments on personal injury protection “PIP” claims in Florida and increases in expected frequency and severity of physical damage claims, primarily in Tennessee and Georgia. The increase was partially offset by redundancy in bodily injury reserves for Tennessee and Louisiana, as a result of a decrease in estimates of ultimate expected frequency. During the first quarter of 2004, the Company’s development on prior years’ reserves increased the net loss ratio by 0.4 points. The net loss ratios, excluding the impact of the adjustments to prior years’ reserves, were 73.7% and 72.9% for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. During the first quarter of 2005, losses from hail storms that primarily hit Mississippi, Florida, and Georgia increased the Company’s loss ratio by 0.5 points. The impact of catastrophic losses in the first quarter of 2004 was minimal.

     Our first quarter actuarial review indicated some improvement in the PIP loss ratio in Florida for accidents that occurred during the first quarter of 2005, primarily as a result of our decision, in October 2004, to stop writing new business policies in the Miami market. Since October 2004, the number of exposures in this market has decreased nearly 40% and the exposures should continue to decrease over the next two quarters. However, we continue to be cautious about PIP frequency trends increasing in other areas of the state, which could indicate increasing fraud activity. Accordingly, we are closely tracking our PIP frequency trends throughout the State, especially in larger metropolitan areas such as Tampa and Ft. Lauderdale, where the most recent data reflects an increase in reported claims frequency. As in the past, our claims staff continues to actively identify and refer suspicious claims to our special investigations unit to detect potential fraud.

Operating Expenses

     Operating expenses increased 28.2% to $34.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2005, compared to $26.6 million for the same period of 2004. This increase in operating expenses was higher than the 18.0% increase in total revenues primarily as a result of the increased operating costs associated with the acquisition of the 65 AMCO sales offices and 17 other franchisee sales offices in Texas and the additional salary, rent, and advertising costs associated with our expansion in Missouri and Virginia. Collectively, the operating expenses associated with our expansions represented an increase of approximately $2.4 million over the first quarter of 2004. The increase in operating expenses also reflected a $3.4 million reduction in ceded reinsurance commissions received to $2.3 million in the first quarter of 2005 as compared to the same period in 2004. As a result of the increase in operating costs associated with our expansions in Texas, Missouri, and Virginia and the slower than anticipated growth in the first half of 2005, we expect that our expense ratio will be in the 7% to 8% range for the year.

Income Taxes

     Our effective tax rates were 37.5% and 37.9% for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The slight decrease in our effective tax rate is primarily due to strategies we implemented to reduce our state income taxes.

12

Financial Condition

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Sources and Uses of Funds

     We are organized as a holding company system with all of our operations being conducted by our wholly-owned insurance, premium finance, agency, administrative and consumer product subsidiaries. Accordingly, Direct General Corporation receives cash through loans from banks, issuance of equity securities, subsidiary dividends and other transactions. We may use the proceeds from these sources to contribute to the capital of our insurance subsidiaries and premium finance company in order to support premium growth, to repurchase our common stock, to retire our outstanding indebtedness, to pay interest, dividends, and taxes, and for other business purposes.

     Our operating subsidiaries’ primary sources of funds are premiums received, finance income, commission and service fee income, investment income, borrowings under credit facilities and proceeds from the sale and redemption of investments. Funds are used to pay claims and operating expenses, to pay interest and principal repayments under the terms of our indebtedness for borrowed money, to purchase investments and to pay dividends to Direct General Corporation. We had positive cash flow from operations of approximately $29.1 million and $17.2 million in the first three months of 2005 and 2004, respectively. We expect our cash flows to be positive in both the short-term and reasonably foreseeable future.

Financing and Capital

     During the first quarter of 2005, we repurchased 493,350 shares of our common stock for an aggregate price of approximately $10.0 million. Subsequent to the end of the quarter, we repurchased an additional 252,353 shares for approximately $5.0 million and, under our current plan, expect to repurchase $5.0 million more prior to the end of the second quarter. During the first quarter of 2005, we also paid a common stock dividend totaling $0.9 million.

     As of March 31, 2005, the maximum aggregate amount available under our revolving credit agreement used to support our premium finance operations was $190.0 million and the amount outstanding was $173.0 million. We believe that this facility, which matures on June 30, 2007, is sufficient to support our premium finance operations through the end of the year. Later in the year, we plan to reevaluate the size of the facility based on our growth expectations for 2006.

Reinsurance

     The increased capitalization of our insurance subsidiaires has enabled us to continue to reduce our quota share cession percentage. As a result, we ceded 11.2% of our gross premiums written to reinsurers in the three months ended March 31, 2005 as compared to 18.8% in the first quarter of 2004. Our quota share reinsurance agreement for 2005 also provides for adjustments to the cession percentage during the year. We plan to cede between 10% and 12% of our gross premiums written to reinsurers during 2005.

Investments

     Debt securities. Our investment portfolio primarily consists of debt securities, all classified as available-for-sale and carried at market value with unrealized gains and losses reported in our financial statements as a separate component of shareholders’ equity on an after-tax basis. As of March 31, 2005, our investment portfolio of $331.7 million included $5.4 million in net unrealized losses. The effective duration of our investment portfolio was 4.4 years at March 31, 2005.

     As of March 31, 2005, our investment portfolio included gross unrealized gains of $1.2 million and gross unrealized losses of $6.6 million. During the quarter, net unrealized losses on our investment portfolio increased by $5.4 million, which is included in accumulated other comprehensive income, net of applicable taxes, in the stockholders’ equity section of the balance sheet. Our quarterly procedures include an examination of our investment portfolio for evidence of impairment. The assessment of whether such impairment has occurred is based on management’s evaluation, on an individual security basis, of the underlying reasons for the decline in fair value. In such cases, changes in fair value are discussed with our investment advisors and evaluated to determine the extent to which such changes are attributable to interest rates, market-related factors other than interest rates, as well as financial conditions, business prospects and other fundamental factors specific to the issuer. Declines attributable to issuer fundamentals are reviewed in further detail. When one of our securities has a decline in fair value that is determined to be other than temporary, we reduce the carrying value of such security to its current fair value as required by GAAP.

     Based upon our analysis, we believe that we will recover all contractual principle and interest payments related to those securities that currently reflect unrealized losses and that we have the ability to hold these securities until they mature or recover in value. Should either of these beliefs change with regard to a particular security, a charge for impairment would likely be required.

13

While it is not possible to accurately predict if or when a specific security will become impaired, charges for other than temporary impairment could be material to our results of operations in a future period. Management believes it is not likely that future impairment charges will have a significant effect on our liquidity.

     The following table shows the composition by our internal industry classification of the amortized cost, gross unrealized gains, gross unrealized losses and fair value of debt securities available-for-sale as of March 31, 2005:

     The amortized cost and fair value of debt securities available-for-sale as of March 31, 2005, by contractual maturity, is shown below:

     The Securities Valuation Office of the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (“NAIC”) evaluates the bond investments of insurers for regulatory reporting purposes and assigns securities to one of six investment categories called “NAIC designations.” The NAIC designations parallel the credit ratings of the Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organizations for marketable bonds. NAIC designations 1 and 2 include bonds considered to be investment grade, rated “BBB-” or higher by Standard & Poor’s (“S&P”). NAIC designations 3 through 6 include bonds considered below investment grade, rated “BB+” or lower by S&P. All of the debt securities in our portfolio were rated investment grade by the NAIC and S&P as of March 31, 2005. Investment grade securities generally bear lower yields and lower degrees of risk than those that are unrated or are rated non-investment grade.

     The quality distribution of our investment portfolio as of March 31, 2005 was as follows:

     We evaluate the risk versus reward tradeoffs of investment opportunities, measuring their effects on the stability, diversity, overall quality and liquidity of our investment portfolio. The primary market risk exposure to our debt securities portfolio is interest rate risk, which is limited by managing duration to a defined range of three to four years. Interest rate risk includes the risk from

14

movements in the underlying market rate and in credit spreads of the respective sectors of debt securities held in our portfolio. The fair value of our fixed maturity portfolio is directly impacted by changes in market interest rates.

     The following table provides information about our investments that are sensitive to interest rate risk and provides estimates of expected changes in fair value based upon a 100 basis-point increase and decrease in market interest rates as of March 31, 2005:

     Short-term investments. We have a managed trading account with a commodities trading company and, as of March 31, 2005, the total fair value of open trades in this account was a $0.3 million gain, which represents less than 1% of our entire investment portfolio. We invest in commodities, primarily cattle futures and swaps. U.S. Treasury securities of $1.7 million, included in short-term investments and cash of $1.4 million, included in cash and cash equivalents, are held as collateral for this account. We recognized a net realized loss of $0.1 million on closed contracts and a $0.4 million gain on open contracts during the first quarter of 2005. Because this is a speculative investment and not a hedge, both the realized gains on closed contracts and the change in the fair value of open contracts are reported as “net realized gains on securities and other” in our consolidated statement of operations.

     Cash and cash equivalents. Our balance in cash and cash equivalents was $117.7 million as of as of March 31, 2005, which was 65.8% higher than the balance of cash held at December 31, 2004. The increase was primarily attributable to the seasonality of the business.

     Forward-Looking Statements

     This report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. All statements made in the report, other than statements of historical fact, are forward-looking statements. You can identify these statements from our use of the words “may”, “should”, “could”, “potential”, “continue”, “plan”, “forecast”, “estimate”, “project”, “believe”, “intend”, “anticipate”, “expect”, “target”, “is likely”, “will”, or the negative of these terms, and similar expressions. These statements are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements may include, among other things:

     We believe that our expectations are based on reasonable assumptions. However, these forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other important factors that could cause our actual results, performance or achievements, or industry results, to differ materially from our expectations of future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. In addition, our past results of operations do not necessarily indicate our future results. We discuss these and other uncertainties in the “Business – Risks Related to our Business” section of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 16, 2005.

     You should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements. These statements speak only as of the date of this report. Except as otherwise required by applicable laws, we undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements or the risk factors described in this report, whether as a result of new information, future events, changed circumstances or any other reason after the date of this report.

15

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

     Please see the caption “Financial Condition – Liquidity and Capital Resources” in Part I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION, Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of this report for a description of our quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risks.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures.

     Our management, with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e)) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, the chief executive officer and chief financial officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that material information relating to us and our consolidated subsidiaries is made known to such officers by others within these entities, particularly during the period this quarterly report was prepared, in order to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. There have not been any changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

16

PART II– OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.

     We and our subsidiaries are named from time to time as defendants in various legal actions that are incidental to our business and arise out of or are related to claims made in connection with our insurance policies, claims handling, premium finance agreements and other contracts, and employment related disputes. The plaintiffs in some of these lawsuits have alleged bad faith or extracontractual damages and some have claimed punitive damages. We believe that the resolution of these legal actions will not have a material adverse effect on our financial position or results of operations.

     In the first quarter of 2005, we, and certain of our officers and directors were named as defendants in six putative class action lawsuits filed in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee. These cases have been consolidated and Lead Plaintiffs have been appointed. Lead Plaintiffs allege that we and certain of our officers and directors made false and misleading statements with respect to liabilities that had been recorded for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses. Lead Plaintiffs generally contend that certain legislation in Florida which became effective in October 2003 negatively impacted our business by increasing our liability and risk of litigation and that we failed to timely strengthen our loss reserves to account for this alleged increased risk. Lead Plaintiffs further assert that certain officers and directors sold shares of our stock while they knew of the allegedly negative impact of the legislation but before the reserves were strengthened. Lead Plaintiffs seek to recover damages on behalf of all purchasers of our stock during a class period to be determined and attorneys’ fees on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated.

     Also in the first quarter of 2005, we, our directors and certain of our officers were named in three shareholder derivative actions filed in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee, which have been consolidated, and three shareholder derivative actions filed in the Chancery Court for the State of Tennessee. These actions assert various claims for breaches of fiduciary duties based upon the same alleged misleading statements and allegations that form the basis of the putative class action described above.

     We intend to vigorously defend these actions. These actions are still in the early procedural stages and the ultimate outcome of these cases is uncertain.

     In addition to legal actions that are incidental to our business, one or more of our subsidiaries has been named as a defendant in a number of currently pending putative class action lawsuits. For descriptions of these legal actions, please see the caption “Business — Legal Proceeding” included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 (“Form 10-K”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on March 16, 2005 and our periodic reports filed with the SEC under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 since the filing of our Form 10-K.

17

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

     The following table summarizes our common stock repurchase activity for the three-month period ended March 31, 2005 and the approximate value of shares of common stock that may yet be repurchased.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Item 6. Exhibits.

18

SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.