pre14a
SCHEDULE 14A
(Rule 14a-101)
INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934
Filed by the Registrant þ
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o
Check the appropriate box:
þ Preliminary Proxy Statement
o Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
o Definitive Proxy Statement
o Definitive Additional Materials
o Soliciting Material Pursuant to Rule 14a-12
Intevac, Inc.
(Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement if other than the Registrant)
|
|
|
|
|
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box): |
|
|
|
|
|
þ |
|
No fee required. |
|
|
|
|
|
o |
|
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to
Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and
state how it was determined): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5) Total fee paid: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
o |
|
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
|
|
|
|
|
o |
|
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and
identify the filing
for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by
registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Amount Previously Paid: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3) Filing Party: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4) Date Filed: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dear Shareholder:
You are cordially invited to attend the Annual Meeting of
Shareholders of Intevac, Inc., a California corporation, which
will be held May 19, 2005, at 9:00 a.m., local time,
at our headquarters, 3560 Bassett Street, Santa Clara,
California 95054.
At the Annual Meeting, you will be asked to consider and vote
upon the following proposals: (i) to elect seven
(7) directors of Intevac, (ii) to amend the
Companys bylaws to increase the range of authorized number
of directors, and (iii) to ratify the appointment of Grant
Thornton LLP as independent accountants of Intevac for the
fiscal year ending December 31, 2005.
The enclosed Proxy Statement more fully describes the details of
the business to be conducted at the Annual Meeting. After
careful consideration, our Board of Directors has unanimously
approved the proposals and recommends that you vote FOR
each proposal.
After reading the Proxy Statement, please mark, date, sign and
return the enclosed proxy card in the accompanying reply
envelope to ensure receipt by our Transfer Agent no later than
May 16, 2005. Any shareholder attending the Annual Meeting
may vote in person even if he or she has returned a proxy.
YOUR SHARES CANNOT BE VOTED UNLESS YOU SIGN, DATE AND RETURN
THE ENCLOSED PROXY OR ATTEND THE ANNUAL MEETING IN PERSON.
A copy of Intevacs 2004 Annual Report has been mailed with
this Proxy Statement to all shareholders entitled to notice of
and to vote at the Annual Meeting.
We look forward to seeing you at the Annual Meeting. Please
notify Sandra Thompson at (408) 496-2242 if you plan to
attend.
|
|
|
Sincerely yours, |
|
|
|
|
|
Kevin Fairbairn |
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
Santa Clara, California
April 8, 2005
IMPORTANT
Whether or not you plan to attend the meeting, please mark,
date and sign the enclosed proxy and return it at your earliest
convenience in the enclosed postage-prepaid return envelope.
INTEVAC, INC.
3560 Bassett Street
Santa Clara, California 95054
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
To Be Held May 19, 2005
TO OUR SHAREHOLDERS:
You are cordially invited to attend the Annual Meeting of
Shareholders of Intevac, Inc., a California corporation, to be
held May 19, 2005 at 9:00 a.m., local time, at our
headquarters, 3560 Bassett Street, Santa Clara, California
95054, for the following purposes:
|
|
|
1. To elect directors to serve for the ensuing year or
until their respective successors are duly elected and
qualified. The nominees are Norman H. Pond, Kevin Fairbairn,
David S. Dury, Stanley J. Hill, David N. Lambeth, Robert Lemos
and Arthur L. Money. |
|
|
2. To amend the Companys Bylaws to increase the range
of authorized number of directors to a range of five to nine. |
|
|
3. To ratify the appointment of Grant Thornton LLP as
independent accountants of Intevac for the fiscal year ending
December 31, 2005. |
|
|
4. To transact such other business as may properly come
before the meeting or any adjournment thereof. |
The foregoing items of business are more fully described in the
Proxy Statement that accompanies this Notice.
Only shareholders of record at the close of business
March 22, 2005 are entitled to notice of and to vote at the
Annual Meeting and at any continuation or adjournment thereof.
All shareholders are cordially invited and encouraged to attend
the Annual Meeting. In any event, to ensure your representation
at the meeting, please carefully read the accompanying Proxy
Statement which describes the matters to be voted on at the
Annual Meeting and sign, date and return the enclosed proxy card
in the reply envelope provided. Should you receive more than one
proxy because your shares are registered in different names and
addresses, each proxy should be returned to ensure that all your
shares will be voted. If you attend the Annual Meeting and vote
by ballot, your proxy will be revoked automatically and only
your vote at the Annual Meeting will be counted. The prompt
return of your proxy card will assist us in preparing for the
Annual Meeting.
We look forward to seeing you at the Annual Meeting. Please
notify Sandra Thompson at (408) 496-2242 if you plan to
attend.
|
|
|
BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS |
|
|
|
|
CHARLES B. EDDY III |
|
Vice President, Finance and Administration, |
|
Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary |
Santa Clara, California
April 8, 2005
ALL SHAREHOLDERS ARE CORDIALLY INVITED TO ATTEND THE ANNUAL
MEETING IN PERSON. IN ANY EVENT, TO ENSURE YOUR REPRESENTATION
AT THE ANNUAL MEETING, YOU ARE URGED TO VOTE, SIGN AND RETURN
THE ENCLOSED PROXY AS PROMPTLY AS POSSIBLE IN THE
POSTAGE-PREPAID ENVELOPE PROVIDED.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PROXY STATEMENT
FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS OF INTEVAC, INC.
To Be Held May 19, 2005
GENERAL
This Proxy Statement is furnished in connection with the
solicitation by the Board of Directors of Intevac, Inc., a
California corporation, of proxies to be voted at the Annual
Meeting of Shareholders to be held May 19, 2005, or at any
adjournment or postponement thereof, for the purposes set forth
in the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
Shareholders of record as of March 22, 2005 will be
entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. The Annual Meeting will
be held at 9:00 a.m., local time, at our headquarters, 3560
Bassett Street, Santa Clara, California 95054.
It is anticipated that this Proxy Statement and the enclosed
proxy card will be first mailed to shareholders on or about
April 11, 2005.
VOTING RIGHTS
The close of business on March 22, 2005 was the record date
for shareholders entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual
Meeting and any adjournments thereof. At the record date, we had
20,299,505 shares of our Common Stock outstanding and
entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting, held by
132 shareholders of record. We believe that approximately
1,400 beneficial owners hold shares through brokers, fiduciaries
and nominees. Holders of Common Stock are entitled to one vote
for each share of Common Stock they hold.
If any shareholder is unable to attend the Annual Meeting, the
shareholder may still vote by proxy. The enclosed proxy is
solicited by our Board of Directors, and, when the proxy card is
returned properly completed, it will be voted as directed by the
shareholder on the proxy card. Shareholders are urged to specify
their choices on the enclosed proxy card. If a proxy card is
signed and returned without choices specified, in the absence of
contrary instructions, the shares of Common Stock represented by
the proxy will be voted FOR Proposals 1, 2 and 3 and will
be voted in the proxy holders discretion as to other
matters that may properly come before the Annual Meeting.
QUORUM; ABSTENTIONS; BROKER NON-VOTES
The presence at the Annual Meeting, either in person or by
proxy, of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of
Common Stock entitled to vote shall constitute a quorum for the
transaction of business. While there is no definitive statutory
or case law authority in California as to the proper treatment
of abstentions and broker non-votes, we intend to include
abstentions and broker non-votes as present or represented for
purposes of establishing a quorum for the transaction of
business, but to exclude abstentions and broker non-votes from
the calculation of shares voting on any matter.
REVOCABILITY OF PROXIES
Any person giving a proxy has the power to revoke it at any time
before its exercise. A proxy may be revoked by filing with the
Secretary of Intevac an instrument of revocation or a duly
executed proxy bearing a later date, or by attending the Annual
Meeting and voting in person.
SOLICITATION OF PROXIES
Intevac will bear the cost of soliciting proxies. Copies of
solicitation material will be furnished to brokerage houses,
fiduciaries and custodians holding shares in their names that
are beneficially owned by others to forward to the beneficial
owners. We may reimburse such persons for their costs of
forwarding the solicitation material to beneficial owners. The
original solicitation of proxies by mail may be supplemented by
solicitation by telephone, telegram or other means by directors,
officers, employees or agents of Intevac. No additional
compensation will be paid to these individuals for these
services. Except as described above, we do not currently intend
to solicit proxies other than by mail.
The Annual Report of Intevac for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2004 has been mailed concurrently with the
mailing of this Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement to
all shareholders entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual
Meeting. The Annual Report is not incorporated into this Proxy
Statement and is not considered proxy soliciting material.
PROPOSAL NO. 1:
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
At the Annual Meeting, seven directors (constituting the entire
board) are to be elected to serve until the next Annual Meeting
of Shareholders and until a successor for each such director is
elected and qualified, or until the death, resignation or
removal of such director. The seven candidates receiving the
highest number of the affirmative votes of the shares entitled
to vote at the Annual Meeting will be elected directors of
Intevac.
It is intended that the proxies will be voted for the seven
nominees named below unless authority to vote for any such
nominee is withheld. All seven nominees are currently directors
of Intevac, and all were elected to the Board by the
shareholders at the last Annual Meeting. Each person nominated
for election has agreed to serve if elected, and the Board of
Directors has no reason to believe that any nominee will be
unavailable or will decline to serve. In the event, however,
that any nominee is unable or declines to serve as a director at
the time of the Annual Meeting, the proxies will be voted for
any other person who is designated by the current Board of
Directors to fill the vacancy. The proxies solicited by this
Proxy Statement may not be voted for more than seven nominees.
NOMINEES
Set forth below is information regarding the nominees to the
Board of Directors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Position(s) with Intevac |
|
Age | |
|
|
|
|
| |
Norman H. Pond
|
|
Chairman of the Board |
|
|
66 |
|
Kevin Fairbairn
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
51 |
|
David S. Dury(1)(3)
|
|
Director |
|
|
56 |
|
Stanley J. Hill(3)
|
|
Director |
|
|
63 |
|
David N. Lambeth(2)
|
|
Director |
|
|
57 |
|
Robert Lemos(1)(2)
|
|
Director |
|
|
64 |
|
Arthur L. Money(1)
|
|
Director |
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Member of the Audit Committee |
|
(2) |
Member of the Compensation Committee |
|
(3) |
Member of the Nominating and Governance Committee |
BUSINESS EXPERIENCE OF NOMINEES FOR ELECTION AS DIRECTORS
Mr. Pond is a founder of Intevac and has served as
Chairman of the Board since February 1991. Mr. Pond served
as President and Chief Executive Officer from February 1991
until July 2000 and again from September 2001 through January
2002. Mr. Pond holds a BS in physics from the University of
Missouri at Rolla and an MS in physics from the University of
California at Los Angeles.
Mr. Fairbairn joined Intevac as President and Chief
Executive Officer in January 2002 and was appointed a director
in February 2002. Before joining Intevac, Mr. Fairbairn was
employed by Applied Materials from July 1985 to January 2002,
most recently as Vice-President and General Manager of the
Conductor Etch
2
Organization with responsibility for the Silicon and Metal Etch
Divisions. From 1996 to 1999, Mr. Fairbairn was General
Manager of Applieds Plasma Enhanced Chemical Vapor
Deposition Business Unit and from 1993 to 1996, he was General
Manager of Applieds Plasma Silane CVD Product Business
Unit. Mr. Fairbairn holds an MA in Engineering Sciences
from Cambridge University.
Mr. Dury has served as a director of Intevac since
July 2002. Mr. Dury is a co-founder of Mentor Capital
Group, a venture capital firm formed in July 2000. From 1996 to
2000, Mr. Dury served as Senior Vice-President and Chief
Financial Officer of Aspect Development, a software development
firm. Mr. Dury holds a BA in psychology from Duke
University and an MBA from Cornell University. He is also a
director of Phoenix Technologies Ltd.
Mr. Hill was appointed as a director of Intevac in
March 2004. Mr. Hill joined Kaiser Aerospace and
Electronics Corporation (Kaiser), a privately held
manufacturer of electronics and electro-optical systems, in 1969
and served as Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of both
Kaiser and K Systems, Inc., Kaisers parent company, from
1997 to 2000. Prior to his appointment as Chief Executive
Officer, Mr. Hill served in a number of executive positions
at Kaiser. Mr. Hill holds a BS in Mechanical Engineering
from the University of Maine and a Master of Engineering from
the University of Connecticut and has completed post graduate
studies at the University of Santa Clara business school.
He is also a director of First Aviation Services, Inc.
Dr. Lambeth has served as a director of Intevac
since May 1996. Dr. Lambeth has been Professor of both
Electrical and Computer Engineering and Material Science
Engineering at Carnegie Mellon University since 1989.
Dr. Lambeth was Associate Director of the Data Storage
Systems at Carnegie Mellon University from 1989 to 1999. Since
1988, Dr. Lambeth has been the owner of Lambeth Systems, an
engineering consulting and research firm. Dr. Lambeth holds
a BS in electrical engineering from the University of Missouri
and a Ph.D. in physics from the Massachusetts Institute of
Technology.
Mr. Lemos has served as a director of Intevac since
August 2002. Mr. Lemos retired from Varian Associates, Inc.
in 1999 after 23 years, including serving as Vice-President
and Chief Financial Officer from 1988 to 1999. Mr. Lemos
has a BS in Business from the University of San Francisco,
a JD in law from Hastings College and an LLM in law from New
York University.
Mr. Money has served as a director of Intevac since
October 2003. Mr. Money served as the Assistant Secretary
of Defense for Command, Control, Communication and Intelligence
(C3I) from October 1999 to April 2001. Prior to his Senate
confirmation in that role, he was the Senior Civilian Official,
Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense (C3I) from February
1998. Mr. Money also served as the Chief Information
Officer for the Department of Defense from 1998 to 2001. From
1996 to 1998, he served as Assistant Secretary of the Air Force
for Research, Development and Acquisition. Prior to his
government service, Mr. Money was President of ESL Inc., a
subsidiary of TRW, from 1990 to 1995, and prior to 1990, he held
senior management positions with ESL Inc. and with the TRW
Avionics and Surveillance Group. He is also a director of CACI
International, Essex Corporation, Intelli-Check, SafeNet,
Silicon Graphics, Inc. and Terremark Worldwide, Inc.
Mr. Money holds an MS in Mechanical Engineering from the
University of Santa Clara and a BS in Mechanical
Engineering from San Jose State University.
BOARD MEETINGS AND COMMITTEES
The Board of Directors held four meetings during fiscal 2004.
All members of the Board of Directors during fiscal 2004
attended at least seventy-five percent of the aggregate of the
total number of meetings of the Board of Directors held during
the fiscal year and the total number of meetings held by all
committees of the Board on which each such director served
(based on the time that each member served on the Board of
Directors and the committees). There are no family relationships
among executive officers or directors of Intevac. The Board of
Directors has an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee and a
Nominating and Governance Committee.
The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors held five meetings
during fiscal 2004. The Audit Committee, which during 2004 was
comprised of Mr. Dury, Mr. Lemos and Mr. Money,
is responsible for overseeing our accounting and financial
reporting processes, overseeing the audits of our financial
statements
3
and assisting the Board of Directors in oversight and monitoring
of (i) the integrity of the financial statements of
Intevac, (ii) the compliance by Intevac with legal and
regulatory requirements, (iii) the qualifications,
independence and performance of Intevacs external auditors
and (iv) Intevacs internal accounting and financial
controls. Each member of the Audit Committee is
independent as defined in the listing standards of
The Nasdaq National Market. The Board has also determined that
each member of the committee is an audit committee
financial expert as designed in Item 401 of
Regulation S-K. The Audit Committee has a written charter,
which is attached to last years proxy statement. It is
also available on our website at www.intevac.com.
The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors held five
meetings during fiscal 2004. The Compensation Committee, which
during 2004 was comprised of Mr. Lemos and
Dr. Lambeth, has responsibility for the compensation of
Intevacs executive officers and employees, including
approving executive officer compensation plans, stock option
grants, succession plans and compensation strategy for
Intevacs employees. The Board has determined that
Mr. Lemos and Dr. Lambeth are independent
as defined in the listing standards of the Nasdaq National
Market. The Compensation Committee has a written charter, which
is available on our website at www.intevac.com.
The Nominating and Governance Committee of the Board of
Directors was established in March 2004 and held one meeting
during the year. The Nominating and Governance Committee, which
during 2004 was comprised of Mr. Hill and Mr. Dury,
has responsibility for (i) overseeing compliance by the
Board and its committees with corporate governance aspects of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and related SEC and Nasdaq rules,
(ii) determining the criteria for membership on the Board,
(iii) reviewing our Code of Business Conducts and Ethics,
(iv) considering issues of possible conflicts of interest
of board members or corporate officers, and (v) making
recommendations to the board regarding composition and size of
the board and its committees, review and selection of director
nominees, and other corporate governance issues generally. The
Board has determined that both Mr. Hill and Mr. Dury
are independent as defined in the listing standards
of the Nasdaq National Market. The Nominating and Governance
Committee has a written charter, which is available on our
website at www.intevac.com.
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
Through 2002, directors of Intevac did not receive fees for
services provided as a director. Beginning in 2003, non-employee
directors of Intevac received a retainer of $3,000 per
quarter as compensation for their efforts serving on the Board
and its subcommittees. For 2005, the retainer has been increased
$4,500 per quarter. Directors are reimbursed for reasonable
expenses incurred in attending Board or committee meetings. We
do not pay fees for committee participation or special
assignments of the Board of Directors. The directors are
eligible to receive periodic option grants under the 2004 Equity
Incentive Plan. Under the 2004 Plan, all directors are eligible
to receive option grants, when and as determined by the Board of
Directors. During fiscal 2004, Mr. Dury, Dr. Lambeth,
Mr. Lemos and Mr. Money each received an option to
purchase 10,000 shares under the 2004 Plan, and
Mr. Hill received an option to
purchase 30,000 shares under the predecessor of the
2004 Plan.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE MATTERS
Director independence. The Board has determined that,
with the exception of Mr. Pond and Mr. Fairbairn, all
of its members are independent directors as that
term is defined in the listing standards of The Nasdaq Stock
Market.
Contacting the Board of Directors. Any shareholder who
desires to contact our Chairman of the Board or the other
members of our Board of Directors may do so by writing to: Board
of Directors, c/o Stanley J. Hill, Chairman, Nominating and
Governance Committee, Intevac, Inc., 3560 Bassett Street,
Santa Clara, California, 95054. Communications received
will be distributed to the Chairman of the Board or the other
members of the Board as appropriate depending on the facts and
circumstances outlined in the communication received.
4
Board attendance at annual shareholder meetings. Although
we do not have a formal policy regarding attendance by members
of the Board at our Annual Meeting of Shareholders, we
encourage, but do not require, directors to attend.
Mr. Pond, Mr. Fairbairn, Mr. Dury and
Mr. Hill attended our 2004 Annual Meeting of Shareholders;
the other Board members did not attend.
Policy regarding board nominees. It is the policy of the
Nominating and Governance Committee of the Company to consider
recommendations for candidates to the Board of Directors from
shareholders. Shareholder recommendations for candidates to the
Board of Directors must be directed in writing to: Intevac,
Inc., 3560 Bassett Street, Santa Clara, California, 95054,
and must include the candidates name, home and business
contact information, detailed biographical data and
qualifications, information regarding any relationships between
the candidate and the Company within the last three years, and
evidence of the nominating persons ownership of Company
stock. Shareholder nominations to the Board of Directors must
meet the requirements set forth in the Companys bylaws.
The Committees criteria and process for identifying and
evaluating the candidates that it selects, or recommends to the
full Board for selection, as director nominees, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
The Committee periodically reviews the current composition, size
and effectiveness of the Board. |
|
|
|
In its evaluation of director candidates, including the members
of the Board of Directors eligible for re-election, the
Committee seeks to achieve a balance of knowledge, experience
and capability on the Board and considers (1) the current
size and composition of the Board of Directors and the needs of
the Board of Directors and the respective committees of the
Board, (2) such factors as issues of character, judgment,
diversity, age, expertise, business experience, length of
service, independence, other commitments and the like,
(3) the relevance of the candidates skills and
experience to our businesses and (4) such other factors as
the Committee may consider appropriate. |
|
|
|
While the Committee has not established specific minimum
qualifications for director candidates, the Committee believes
that candidates and nominees must reflect a Board that is
comprised of directors who (1) are predominantly
independent, (2) are of high integrity, (3) have
broad, business-related knowledge and experience at the
policy-making level in business, government or technology,
including an understanding of our industry and our business in
particular, (4) have qualifications that will increase
overall Board effectiveness and (5) meet other requirements
that may be required by applicable rules, such as financial
literacy or financial expertise with respect to audit committee
members. |
|
|
|
With regard to candidates who are properly recommended by
shareholders or by other means, the Committee will review the
qualifications of any such candidate, which review may, in the
Committees discretion, include interviewing references for
the candidate, direct interviews with the candidate, or other
actions that the Committee deems necessary or proper. |
|
|
|
In evaluating and identifying candidates, the Committee has the
authority to retain or terminate any third party search firm
that is used to identify director candidates, and has the
authority to approve the fees and retention terms of any search
firm. |
|
|
|
The Committee will apply these same principles when evaluating
Board candidates who may be elected initially by the full Board
either to fill vacancies or to add additional directors prior to
the Annual Meeting of Shareholders at which directors are
elected. |
|
|
|
After completing its review and evaluation of director
candidates, the Committee selects, or recommends to the full
Board of Directors for selection, the director nominees. |
CODE OF ETHICS
We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that
applies to all of our employees, including our principal
executive officer, principal financial officer, principal
accounting officer or controller, and persons performing similar
functions. You can find our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
on our website at
5
www.intevac.com. We post any amendments to the Code of
Business Conduct and Ethics, as well as any waivers that are
required to be disclosed by the rules of either the SEC or the
Nasdaq Stock Market, on our website.
Required Vote
The seven nominees receiving the highest number of affirmative
votes of the shares present or represented and entitled to be
voted at the Annual Meeting shall be elected as directors. Votes
withheld from any director are counted for purposes of
determining the presence or absence of a quorum for the
transaction of business, but have no other legal effect on the
election of directors under California law.
The Board of Directors recommends that shareholders
vote FOR election of all of the above nominees as
directors.
PROPOSAL NO. 2:
AMENDMENT OF BYLAWS TO INCREASE RANGE OF
AUTHORIZED NUMBER OF DIRECTORS
We currently have a Board of Directors consisting of seven
members. Our Bylaws permit the Board to change the authorized
number of directors at any time so long as the exact number
stays within a range of four to seven members. This range of
directors may be changed only with the approval of our
shareholders. As a result, any increase in the size of the Board
from its current seven members will require the approval of the
shareholders.
We believe that Intevac and its shareholders may benefit from
the inclusion of additional persons on our Board of Directors.
As we continue to expand our product lines, the Board believes
that additional members could provide valuable expertise and
experience. At the current time, however, the Board has no plans
to appoint any new directors. Nonetheless, the Board may do so
in the future, and the need to obtain shareholder approval at
such time would require us to incur time and expense in holding
a special meeting of shareholders, delaying our ability to take
timely action on such a candidate.
Under California law, when a corporations bylaws provide
for a range in the authorized number of directors, the upper end
of the range may not be more than one less than two times the
lower end of the range. For example, ranges of three to five,
four to seven and five to nine are permissible, while a range of
four to eight is not.
We are proposing that the range of directors specified in the
Bylaws be changed to five to nine. The exact number of directors
will currently remain at seven, but can be changed by the Board
itself, within the above range, if and when the Board identifies
a suitable candidate for addition to the Board. Any such person
added to the Board by action of the Board would stand for
reelection as a director, along with all other directors, at our
next annual meeting.
Required Vote
The affirmative vote of a majority of the outstanding shares
entitled to vote will be required to approve the amendment to
the Bylaws. Thus, abstentions and broker non-votes can have the
effect of preventing approval of a proposal where the number of
affirmative votes, though a majority of the votes cast, does not
constitute a majority of all outstanding shares.
The Board of Directors recommends that shareholders
vote FOR the proposal to amend the Companys Bylaws to
increase the range of authorized number of directors to a range
of five to nine members.
6
PROPOSAL NO. 3:
RATIFICATION OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors has selected Grant
Thornton LLP as our independent public accountants for the
fiscal year ending December 31, 2005. Grant Thornton LLP
began auditing our financial statements in 2000. Its
representatives are expected to be present at the Annual
Meeting, will have an opportunity to make a statement if they
desire to do so, and will be available to respond to appropriate
questions.
Fees Paid To Accountants For Services Rendered During 2004
The aggregate fees billed by Grant Thornton LLP for the years
ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 were $736,000 and
$179,000, respectively. Audit fees consist of fees billed for
professional services rendered for the audit of our consolidated
annual financial statements and review of the interim
consolidated financial statements included in quarterly reports
and services that are normally provided by Grant Thornton LLP in
connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements.
In addition, in 2004, audit fees included those fees related to
Grant Thorntons audit of the effectiveness of our internal
controls over financial reporting pursuant to Section 404
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
The aggregate fees billed by Grant Thornton LLP for
audit-related services rendered to Intevac for the years ended
December 31, 2004 and 2003 were $6,000 and $14,000,
respectively. Audit-related services consist primarily of
accounting consultations that are related to the performance of
our audit or review of our consolidated financial statements.
The aggregate fees billed by Grant Thornton LLP for tax services
rendered to Intevac for the years ended December 31, 2004
and 2003 were $25,000 and $24,000, respectively. Tax services
include tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning.
The aggregate fees billed by Grant Thornton LLP for services
rendered to Intevac other than those described above for the
years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 were $37,000 and
$44,000, respectively. These services include the annual audit
of our 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan and Trust and assistance in
responding to audits by the State of California Franchise Tax
Board and the State of California Board of Equalization.
In making its recommendation to ratify the appointment of Grant
Thornton LLP as our independent auditor for the fiscal year
ending December 31, 2005, the Audit Committee has
considered whether services other than audit and audit-related
services provided by Grant Thornton LLP are compatible with
maintaining the independence of Grant Thornton LLP and has
determined that such services are so compatible.
Pre-Approval of Audit and Permissible Non-Audit Services
Our Audit Committee approves in advance all engagements with
Grant Thornton LLP, including the audit of our annual financial
statements, the review of the financial statements included in
our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, the audit of our
401(k) Profit Sharing Plan and Trust and tax compliance
services. Fees billed by Grant Thornton LLP are reviewed and
approved by the Audit Committee on a quarterly basis.
7
Required Vote
Shareholder ratification of the selection of Grant Thornton LLP
as Intevacs independent public accountants is not required
by our Bylaws or other applicable legal requirements. However,
the Board is submitting the selection of Grant Thornton LLP to
the shareholders for ratification as a matter of good corporate
practice. If the shareholders fail to ratify the selection, the
Audit Committee will reconsider whether or not to retain that
firm. Even if the selection is ratified, the Audit Committee in
its discretion may direct the appointment of a different
independent accounting firm at any time during the year, if it
determines that such a change would be in the best interests of
Intevac and its shareholders.
The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares
represented and voting at the Annual Meeting (provided that that
vote also constitutes the affirmative vote of a majority of the
required quorum) will be required to ratify the selection of
Grant Thornton LLP as Intevacs independent public
accountants for the year ending December 31, 2005.
The Board of Directors recommends that shareholders
vote FOR the proposal to ratify the selection of Grant
Thornton LLP as Intevacs independent public accountants
for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2005.
8
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND
MANAGEMENT
The following table sets forth certain information regarding the
ownership of our Common Stock as of March 9, 2005 by
(i) all persons known by us to be beneficial owners of five
percent or more of our outstanding Common Stock, based upon a
review of filings made pursuant to Sections 13(d), 13(f)
and 13(g) with the Securities and Exchange Commission,
(ii) each director of Intevac, (iii) the Chief
Executive Officer and each of the three other executive officers
of Intevac serving as such as of the end of the last fiscal year
whose compensation for such year was in excess of $100,000, and
(iv) all executive officers and directors of Intevac as a
group.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount and Nature of | |
|
|
Beneficial Ownership(1) | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Number of | |
|
Percent | |
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner |
|
Shares | |
|
Owned(2) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Redemco, L.L.C.(3)
|
|
|
3,255,969 |
|
|
|
16.1 |
% |
|
395 Mill Creek Circle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vail, CO 81657
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kern Capital Management, LLC
|
|
|
2,720,900 |
|
|
|
13.4 |
% |
|
114 West
47th
Street, Suite 1926
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York, NY 10036
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc.
|
|
|
1,698,794 |
|
|
|
8.4 |
% |
|
100 E. Pratt Street
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Baltimore, MD 21202
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Norman H. Pond(4)
|
|
|
1,006,218 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
3560 Basset Street
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Santa Clara, CA 95054
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kevin Fairbairn(5)
|
|
|
190,645 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Charles B. Eddy(6)
|
|
|
148,003 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Verle Aebi(7)
|
|
|
84,039 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Luke Marusiak
|
|
|
750 |
|
|
|
* |
|
David S. Dury(8)
|
|
|
45,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Stanley J. Hill(9)
|
|
|
34,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
David N. Lambeth(10)
|
|
|
65,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Robert Lemos(11)
|
|
|
48,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Arthur L. Money(12)
|
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
All directors and executive officers as a group (10 persons)(13)
|
|
|
1,661,655 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Except as indicated in the footnotes to this table and pursuant
to applicable community property laws, the persons named in the
table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all
shares of Common Stock. The number of shares beneficially owned
includes shares that such individual had the right to acquire
either on or within 60 days after March 9, 2005,
including upon the exercise of an option. |
|
|
(2) |
Percentage of beneficial ownership is based upon
20,266,172 shares of Common Stock that were outstanding on
March 9, 2004. For each individual, this percentage
includes shares that such individual had the right to acquire
either on or within 60 days after March 9, 2005,
including upon the exercise of an option; however, such shares
are not considered outstanding for the purpose of computing the
percentage owned by any other individual as required by
Rule 13d-3(d)(1)(i) under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934. |
9
|
|
|
|
(3) |
These shares may be deemed to be beneficially owned by Mill
Creek Systems, LLC and by Ann Becher Smead. Mill Creek Systems,
LLC is a Managing Member of Redemco, L.L.C., and Ann Becher
Smead is the Manager of Mill Creek Systems, LLC. |
|
|
(4) |
Includes 775,528 shares held by the Norman Hugh Pond and
Natalie Pond Trust DTD 12/23/80 and 182,357 shares
held by the Pond 1996 Charitable Remainder Unitrust, both of
whose trustees are Norman Hugh Pond and Natalie Pond. Also
includes options exercisable for 48,333 shares of Common
Stock outstanding under the 1995 Stock Option/ Stock Issuance
Plan (the 1995 Option Plan). |
|
|
(5) |
Includes options exercisable for 174,999 shares of Common
Stock under the 1995 Option Plan. |
|
|
(6) |
Includes 88,155 shares held by the Eddy Family
Trust DTD 02/09/00, whose trustees are Charles Brown
Eddy III and Melissa White Eddy, and options exercisable
for 50,833 shares of Common Stock under the 1995 Option
Plan. |
|
|
(7) |
Includes options exercisable for 38,166 shares of Common
Stock under the 1995 Option Plan. |
|
|
(8) |
Includes options exercisable for 35,000 shares of Common
Stock under the 1995 Option Plan and for 10,000 shares
under the 2004 Equity Incentive Plan (the 2004 Plan). |
|
|
(9) |
Includes options exercisable for 30,000 shares of Common
Stock under the 1995 Option Plan. |
|
|
(10) |
Includes options exercisable for 55,000 shares of Common
Stock under the 1995 Option Plan and for 10,000 shares
under the 2004 Plan. |
|
(11) |
Includes options exercisable for 35,000 shares of Common
Stock under the 1995 Option Plan and for 10,000 shares
under the 2004 Plan. |
|
(12) |
Includes options exercisable for 30,000 shares of Common
Stock under the 1995 Option Plan and for 10,000 shares
under the 2004 Plan. |
|
(13) |
Includes options exercisable for 497,331 shares of Common
Stock under the 1995 Option Plan and for 40,000 shares
under the 2004 Plan. |
SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING
COMPLIANCE
Section 16(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934
requires our directors and executive officers, and persons who
own more than ten percent of a registered class of our equity
securities to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission
initial reports of ownership on Form 3, and reports of
changes in ownership on Form 4 or Form 5, of our
Common Stock and other equity securities. Officers, directors
and greater than ten percent shareholders are required by SEC
regulations to furnish Intevac with copies of all
Section 16(a) forms they file.
Based solely upon review of the copies of such reports furnished
to us and written representations that no other reports were
required, we believe that during the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2004, our officers, directors and holders of
more than ten percent of our Common Stock complied with all
Section 16(a) filing requirements, with the following
exceptions:
|
|
|
(1) Directors Dury, Lambeth, Lemos and Money each filed one
late report on a Form 4 covering the grant of stock options. |
|
|
(2) Mr. Fairbairn, Mr. Eddy, Mr. Aebi,
Mr. Marusiak, Ms. Burk, Mr. Gustafson and
Mr. Kerns each filed one late report on a Form 4
covering the grant of stock options. |
|
|
(3) Mr. Lane filed two late reports on a Form 4,
one covering the grant of a stock option and one covering the
sale of 493 shares of our Common Stock. |
10
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION AND RELATED INFORMATION
Summary of Cash and Certain Other Compensation
The following table provides certain summary information
concerning the compensation earned by (i) our Chairman,
(ii) our Chief Executive Officer and (iIi) each of our
three other most highly compensated executive officers whose
salary and bonus was in excess of $100,000 for fiscal 2004, for
services rendered in all capacities to Intevac and its
subsidiaries for each of the last three fiscal years. Such
individuals are referred to as the Named Executive
Officers. No executive officer who would have otherwise
been includible in the table on the basis of salary and bonus
earned for fiscal 2004 resigned or terminated employment during
the fiscal year.
Summary Compensation Table
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation | |
|
|
|
|
Annual Compensation | |
|
Awards | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underlying | |
|
All Other | |
Name and Principal Position(2) |
|
Years | |
|
Salary ($)(1) | |
|
Bonus | |
|
Options (#) | |
|
Compensation | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Norman H. Pond
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
$ |
67,041 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,917 |
|
|
Chairman of the Board |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
67,922 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,798 |
|
|
|
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
140,805 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,562 |
|
Kevin Fairbairn
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
337,069 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
2,793 |
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
270,304 |
|
|
$ |
85,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,609 |
|
|
|
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
216,734 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
|
2,312 |
|
Charles B. Eddy III
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
192,619 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
2,396 |
|
|
Vice President, Finance and |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
185,704 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,375 |
|
|
Administration, Chief Financial
|
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
184,304 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,373 |
|
|
Officer, Treasurer and Secretary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Verle Aebi
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
192,927 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
2,397 |
|
|
President of Photonics Technology Division
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
187,708 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,248 |
|
|
|
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
186,294 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,247 |
|
Luke Marusaik(3)
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
124,618 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
2,109 |
|
|
Chief Operating Officer |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Includes salary deferral contributions to Intevacs 401(k)
Plan. |
|
(2) |
The indicated amount for each Named Executive Officer comprises
the contributions made by Intevac on behalf of such individual
to our 401(k) Plan, which match a portion of the officers
salary deferral contributions to that plan, and the cost of any
life insurance in excess of $50,000 paid by Intevac. |
|
(3) |
Mr. Marusiak joined Intevac in April 2004 as Chief
Operating Officer. |
11
Stock Options
The following table contains information concerning the stock
option grants made to each of the Named Executive Officers
during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004. Except for
the limited stock appreciation rights described in footnote
(2) below, no stock appreciation rights were granted to
those individuals during such year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual Grants | |
|
Potential Realizable | |
|
|
| |
|
Value at Assumed Annual | |
|
|
Number of | |
|
Percent of | |
|
|
|
Rates of Stock Price | |
|
|
Securities | |
|
Total Options | |
|
|
|
Appreciation | |
|
|
Underlying | |
|
Granted to | |
|
Exercise or | |
|
|
|
for Option Term(1) | |
|
|
Options | |
|
Employees in | |
|
Base Price | |
|
Expiration | |
|
| |
Name |
|
Granted(2) | |
|
2004 | |
|
($/Share)(3) | |
|
Date | |
|
5% | |
|
10% | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Norman H. Pond
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kevin Fairbairn
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
8.2 |
% |
|
$ |
14.00 |
|
|
|
02/19/14 |
|
|
$ |
440,226 |
|
|
$ |
1,115,620 |
|
Charles B. Eddy III
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
% |
|
|
4.06 |
|
|
|
07/22/14 |
|
|
|
51,066 |
|
|
|
129,412 |
|
Verle Aebi
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
% |
|
|
4.06 |
|
|
|
07/22/14 |
|
|
|
51,066 |
|
|
|
129,412 |
|
Luke Marusiak
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
8.2 |
% |
|
|
10.01 |
|
|
|
05/14/14 |
|
|
|
314,762 |
|
|
|
797,668 |
|
|
|
(1) |
There can be no assurance that the actual stock price
appreciation over the 10-year option term will be at the 5% and
10% assumed annual rates of compounded stock price appreciation
or at any other defined level. Unless the market price of the
Common Stock appreciates over the option term, no value will be
realized from the option grants made to the Named Executive
Officers. |
|
(2) |
Option shares granted to Mr. Fairbairn and
Mr. Marusiak become fully exercisable with respect to
(i) 25% of the shares upon the optionees completion
of one year of service measured from the grant date and
(ii) the balance of the shares in equal annual installments
over the three-year period thereafter. Option shares granted to
Mr. Eddy and Mr. Aebi become fully exercisable with
respect to (i) 33.33% of the shares upon the
optionees completion of two years of service measured from
the grant date and (ii) the balance of the shares in equal
annual installments over the two-year period thereafter. In
addition, the option shares vest in full upon an acquisition of
Intevac by merger or asset sale, unless such option is assumed
by the acquiring entity. Each option has a maximum term of
10 years measured from the option grant date, subject to
earlier termination following the optionees cessation of
service with Intevac. Each option also includes a limited stock
appreciation right which provides the optionee with a right,
exercisable upon the successful completion of a hostile tender
offer for fifty percent or more of Intevacs outstanding
voting securities, to surrender the option to Intevac, to the
extent the option is at that time exercisable for vested shares,
in return for a cash distribution per surrendered option share
equal to the excess of (i) the highest price per share of
Common Stock paid in the hostile tender offer over (ii) the
option exercise price payable per share. |
|
(3) |
The exercise price may be paid in cash or in shares of our
Common Stock valued at fair market value on the exercise date. |
12
Aggregated Option Exercises in Last Fiscal Year and Fiscal
Year-End Option Values
The following table sets forth information concerning option
exercises and option holdings for fiscal 2004 by each of the
Named Executive Officers. Each option also includes a limited
stock appreciation right which provides the optionee with a
right, exercisable upon the successful completion of a hostile
tender offer for fifty percent or more of Intevacs
outstanding voting securities, to surrender the option to
Intevac, to the extent the option is at that time exercisable
for vested shares, in return for a cash distribution per
surrendered option share equal to the excess of (i) the
highest price per share of Common Stock paid in the hostile
tender offer over (ii) the option exercise price payable
per share. No other stock appreciation rights were outstanding
at the end of the fiscal year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underlying | |
|
Value of Unexercised | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unexercised | |
|
in-the-Money | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options/SARs at | |
|
Options/SARs at | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year-End (#) | |
|
Fiscal Year-End | |
|
|
Shares Acquired | |
|
Value | |
|
Exercisable/ | |
|
Exercisable/ | |
Name |
|
on Exercise (#) | |
|
Realized(1) | |
|
Unexercisable | |
|
Unexercisable(2) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Norman H. Pond
|
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
$ |
51,000 |
|
|
|
48,333/0 |
|
|
$ |
75,399/0 |
|
Kevin Fairbairn
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
145,833/154,167 |
|
|
$ |
718,957/513,543 |
|
Charles B. Eddy III
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,833/22,000 |
|
|
$ |
83,498/78,720 |
|
Verle Aebi
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,666/22,000 |
|
|
$ |
67,786/78,720 |
|
Luke Marusaik
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0/50,000 |
|
|
$ |
0/0 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Equal to the fair market value of the purchased shares on the
option exercise date less the exercise price paid for those
shares. |
|
(2) |
Based on the market price of $7.56 per share, which was the
closing price per share of our Common Stock on the Nasdaq
National Market on the last day of fiscal 2004, less the
exercise price payable for such shares. Options for which the
exercise price is greater than $7.56 are excluded from this
calculation. |
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION
The following table summarizes the number of outstanding options
granted to employees and directors, as well as the number of
securities remaining available for future issuance, under our
equity compensation plans at December 31, 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) | |
|
(b) | |
|
(c) | |
|
|
Number of | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities to Be | |
|
|
|
Number of Securities | |
|
|
Issued Upon | |
|
Weighted-Average | |
|
Remaining Available | |
|
|
Exercise of | |
|
Exercise Price of | |
|
for Future Issuance | |
|
|
Outstanding | |
|
Outstanding | |
|
Under Equity | |
|
|
Options, Warrants | |
|
Options, Warrants | |
|
Compensation | |
Plan Category |
|
and Rights | |
|
and Rights | |
|
Plans(1) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders(2)
|
|
|
1,712,955 |
|
|
$ |
6.04 |
|
|
|
1,121,290 |
|
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,712,955 |
|
|
$ |
6.04 |
|
|
|
1,121,290 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Excludes securities reflected in column (a). |
|
(2) |
Included in the column (c) amount are 276,013 shares
available for future issuance under our 2003 Employee Stock
Purchase Plan. |
13
CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS
We did not enter into any transactions and no relationships
existed during the fiscal year ending December 31, 2004
which are required to be disclosed pursuant to Item 404 of
Regulation S-K.
EMPLOYMENT CONTRACTS, TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT
AND CHANGE-IN-CONTROL AGREEMENTS
None of our executive officers except Kevin Fairbairn has an
employment agreement with us, and all of our executive
officers employment may be terminated at any time at the
discretion of the Board of Directors. For Mr. Fairbairn, in
the event of involuntary termination from his position as
President and Chief Executive Officer for any reason not
involving good cause, but subject to his execution of a waiver
and release of claims that is acceptable to us, we will continue
to pay his base salary for twelve months following termination.
Upon a change of control of Intevac, all options held by
Mr. Fairbairn will immediately vest in full unless the
acquiring company assumes the options or substitutes new options
and Mr. Fairbairn chooses not to accept the assumed of
substituted options. In addition, in the event of involuntary
termination of Mr. Fairbairn following a change of control,
he will be entitled to receive a lump sum equal to twelve months
of base salary. If his employment continues, he will be entitled
to an amount equal to two times his annual salary after twelve
months of employment.
Pursuant to the express provisions of the 1995 Stock Option/
Stock Issuance Plan, the outstanding options under the 1995
Option Plan held by the Chief Executive Officer and our other
executive officers would immediately accelerate in full, and all
unvested shares of Common Stock at the time held by such
individuals under the 1995 Option Plan would immediately vest,
if their employment were to be terminated either involuntarily
or through a forced resignation within twelve months after any
acquisition of Intevac by merger or asset sale in which those
options and shares did not otherwise vest. In addition, the
Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors has the
authority as administrator of the 1995 Plan to provide for the
accelerated vesting of outstanding options under the 1995 Option
Plan held by the Chief Executive Officer and our other executive
officers, and the immediate vesting of all unvested shares of
Common Stock at the time held by such individuals under the 1995
Option Plan, if their employment were to be terminated either
involuntarily or through a forced resignation following a
hostile take-over of Intevac effected through a successful
tender offer for more than fifty percent of our outstanding
Common Stock or through a change in the majority of the Board as
a result of one or more contested elections for Board membership.
Under the 2004 Equity Incentive Plan, the Board of Directors or
its Compensation Committee, as administrator of the plan, has
the authority to provide for the accelerated vesting of
outstanding options under the plan, including options held by
our executive officers, under such circumstances and at such
times as the Board or Committee deems appropriate, including in
the event of termination of the optionee or a change in control
of Intevac.
14
REPORT OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE ON EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
The information contained in this report shall not be deemed
to be soliciting material or to be filed with the
SEC, nor shall such information be incorporated by reference
into any past or future filing under the Securities Act or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent Intevac specifically
incorporates it by reference into such filing.
The purpose of the Compensation Committee of the Board of
Directors is to discharge the Boards responsibilities
relating to compensation of our executive officers and
employees. The Committee has overall responsibility for:
approving executive officer compensation plans, recommending
director compensation to the Board of Directors, reviewing and
approving an annual report on executive compensation for
inclusion in our Proxy statement, reviewing succession plans on
an annual basis, and overseeing compensation strategy for our
employees with attention to key employees.
In addition, the Compensation Committee has exclusive
responsibility for administering the 2004 Equity Incentive Plan,
under which stock option grants and direct stock issuances may
be made to executive officers and other employees. In carrying
out its duties, the Compensation Committee has access to
independent compensation consultants and outside survey data.
The Compensation Committee is currently comprised of two
non-employee independent directors, David N. Lambeth and Robert
Lemos. The Compensation Committees responsibilities are
further defined in its Charter, which is available on our
internet home page, located at www.intevac.com.
In the discussion below, we describe our executive compensation
policies and practices. We also identify the procedures we use
to determine the compensation of our Chief Executive Officer,
the next three most highly compensated executive officers and
other key officers.
Compensation Philosophy. We operate in diverse technology
market segments, each with varying growth rates at any point in
time. To succeed, each business must have specific strategies,
tactics and measures of performance appropriate to its
competitive environment, as well as compensation programs to
support its objectives.
Our Committee relies on four core aspects with regards to
executive compensation policies and practices.
|
|
|
|
|
Market Driven: Our programs are structured to be
competitive both in their design and in the total compensation
opportunity they offer. Comparison groups will vary by business,
based on the leading competitors in the industries in which we
compete for business and in the markets in which we compete for
talent. |
|
|
|
Shareholder-Aligned: To focus on the common linkage to
Intevac, employees have some portion of their compensation
dependent upon company-wide financial performance. |
|
|
|
Performance-Based: Employees have their pay linked to a
combination of company, team and individual performance. The
specific measures of success that apply and the forms of
compensation that are affected vary by business and by position.
Individual performance is objectively assessed via a formal
performance management process. |
|
|
|
Values-Oriented: The design and administration of our
compensation programs are supportive of our values and
commitment to diversity. Our assessments of individual
performance are measured against our values. |
Total Annual Compensation. After reviewing compensation
information from various surveys of companies in the high
technology industry that compete with us for executive talent
and/or have revenues comparable to our revenues, the Committee
determines each officers total annual cash compensation.
Our goal is to target base pay near the median level and
establish total cash compensation based on achieved performance
goals.
Bonuses. Our Compensation Committee has the power to set
target bonuses for each officer based on his or her potential
impact on our operating and financial results and based on
market competitive pay practices.
15
The actual bonus that is paid to each officer under the bonus
plan depends on the achievement of business unit and financial
performance goals and overall company performance.
Long-Term Stock-Based Incentive Compensation. Long-term
incentives are provided through stock option grants. Our
committee believes that stock options motivate our officers to
maximize shareholder value and to remain employed with Intevac.
All Intevac stock options to date have had a per share exercise
price equal to the fair market value of our common stock on the
grant date.
The size of the option grant to each officer is designed to
create a meaningful opportunity for stock ownership and is based
upon the officers current position with Intevac, internal
comparability with option grants made to other Intevac
executives, the officers current level of performance and
the officers potential for future responsibility and
promotion over the option term. The Compensation Committee also
takes into account the number of vested and unvested options
held by the officer, to maintain an appropriate level of equity
incentive for that individual. However, the Compensation
Committee does not adhere to any specific guidelines as to the
relative option holdings of our officers.
Compensation of Chief Executive Officer. During the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, Mr. Fairbairn
received a base salary of $337,069. His base salary was set at a
level which the Compensation Committee believed would be
competitive with the base salary levels in effect for chief
executive officers at similarly-sized companies within our
industry.
Tax Deductibility of Executive Compensation.
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, enacted in
1993, generally disallows a tax deduction to publicly held
companies for compensation paid to certain executive officers,
to the extent that that compensation exceeds $1 million per
officer in any year. The compensation paid to all of our
executive officers for fiscal 2004 did not exceed the
$1 million limit per officer, and it is not expected the
compensation to be paid to any of our executive officers for
fiscal 2005 will exceed that limit. In addition, our 1995 Stock
Option/ Stock Issuance Plan and the 2004 Equity Incentive Plan
are both structured so that any compensation deemed paid to an
executive officer in connection with the exercise of his or her
outstanding options under the plans will qualify as
performance-based compensation that will not be subject to the
$1 million limitation.
|
|
|
This report is submitted by the Compensation Committee. |
|
|
David N. Lambeth |
|
Robert Lemos (Chairman) |
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER
PARTICIPATION
The Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors was formed
September 14, 1995 and during 2004 was comprised of David
N. Lambeth and Robert Lemos. Neither of these individuals was at
any time during fiscal 2004, or at any other time, an officer or
employee of Intevac. None of our executive officers serves as a
member of the board of directors or compensation committee of
any other entity that has one or more executive officers serving
as a member of our Board of Directors or Compensation Committee.
16
AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT
The information contained in this report shall not be deemed
to be soliciting material or to be filed with the
SEC, nor shall such information be incorporated by reference
into any past or future filing under the Securities Act or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent Intevac specifically
incorporates it by reference into such filing.
Composition. The Audit Committee currently consists of
Mr. Dury, Mr. Lemos and Mr. Money, each of whom
is a non-employee director who the Board of Directors has
determined meets the independence and other requirements to
serve on the Audit Committee under the listing standards of The
Nasdaq Stock Market. The Board has also determined that each
member of the committee is an audit committee financial
expert as defined in Item 401 of Regulation S-K.
Responsibilities. The Audit Committee operates under a
written charter that has been adopted by the Board. The Audit
Committee is responsible for overseeing our accounting and
financial reporting processes, overseeing the audits of our
financial statements and assisting the Board of Directors in
oversight and monitoring of (i) the integrity of our
financial statements, (ii) our compliance with legal and
regulatory requirements, (iii) the qualifications,
independence and performance of our external auditors, and
(iv) our internal accounting and financial controls. Our
management is responsible for maintaining our books of account
and preparing periodic financial statements based thereon and
the system of internal controls. The independent accountants are
responsible for auditing our annual financial statements. The
Audit Committees responsibilities are further defined in
its Charter, which is available on our internet home page,
located at www.intevac.com.
Review with Management and Independent Accountants. In
this context, the Audit Committee hereby reports as follows:
|
|
|
1. The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed with
management and the independent accountants our audited
consolidated financial statements contained in our Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2004. |
|
|
2. The Audit Committee has discussed with the independent
accountants matters required to be discussed by Statement on
Auditing Standards No. 61 (Communications with Audit
Committees). |
|
|
3. The Audit Committee has received from the independent
accountants, Grant Thornton LLP, the written disclosures and the
letter required by Independence Standards Board Standard
No. 1 (Independence Discussions with Audit Committees), and
the Audit Committee has discussed with Grant Thornton LLP the
independent accountants independence. |
|
|
4. The Audit Committee has considered whether the provision
of services covered by Fees Paid To Accountants For Services
Rendered is compatible with maintaining the independence of
Grant Thornton LLP. |
Based on the review and discussion referred to in
paragraphs 1-4 above, the Audit Committee recommended to
the Board, and the Board has approved, that the audited
consolidated financial statements be included in our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2004, for filing with the SEC.
The Audit Committee has recommended to the Board that Grant
Thornton LLP be selected as our independent accountants for the
fiscal year ending December 31, 2005.
|
|
|
This report is submitted by the Audit Committee. |
|
|
David S. Dury (Chairman) |
|
Robert Lemos |
|
Arthur L. Money |
17
PERFORMANCE GRAPH
The following graph compares the cumulative total shareholder
return on the Common Stock of Intevac with that of the NASDAQ
Stock Market Total Return Index, a broad market index published
by the Center for Research in Security Prices
(CRSP), and the NASDAQ Computer Manufacturers Stock
Total Return Index compiled by CRSP. The comparison for each of
the periods assumes that $100 was invested December 31,
1999 in our Common Stock, the stocks included in the NASDAQ
Stock Market Total Return Index and the stocks included in the
NASDAQ Computer Manufacturers Stock Total Return Index. These
indices, which reflect formulas for dividend reinvestment and
weighting of individual stocks, do not necessarily reflect
returns that could be achieved by individual investors.
COMPARISON OF CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN SINCE DECEMBER 31,
1999
AMONG INTEVAC, NASDAQ STOCK MARKET TOTAL RETURN INDEX AND
NASDAQ COMPUTER MANUFACTURERS TOTAL RETURN INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
12/31/99 |
|
|
12/31/00 |
|
|
12/31/01 |
|
|
12/31/02 |
|
|
12/31/03 |
|
|
12/31/04 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
Intevac, Inc.
|
|
|
$ |
100 |
|
|
|
$ |
89 |
|
|
|
$ |
68 |
|
|
|
$ |
114 |
|
|
|
$ |
403 |
|
|
|
$ |
216 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nasdaq Stock Market Total Return Index
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nasdaq Computer Manufacturers Total Return Index
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in any of
our previous filings under the Securities Act of 1933 or the
Exchange Act that might incorporate future filings, including
this Proxy Statement, in whole or in part, the preceding
Compensation Committee Report on Executive Compensation, the
preceding Audit Committee Report and the preceding Performance
Graph shall not be incorporated by reference into any such
filings; nor shall such reports or graph be incorporated by
reference into any future filings.
18
OTHER BUSINESS
The Board of Directors knows of no other business that will be
presented for consideration at the Annual Meeting. If other
matters are properly brought before the Annual Meeting, however,
it is the intention of the persons named in the accompanying
proxy to vote the shares represented thereby on such matters in
accordance with their best judgment.
SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS
Proposals of shareholders which are intended to be presented at
our Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held in 2006 must be
received by Intevac no later than December 5, 2005 to be
included in the proxy statement and proxy relating to that
meeting. If a shareholder intends to raise a proposal at our
2006 Annual Meeting of Shareholders that is not eligible for
inclusion in the proxy statement relating to the meeting and the
shareholder fails to give us notice in accordance with the
requirements set forth in the Securities Exchange Act by
February 18, 2006, the proxy holders will be allowed to use
their discretionary authority when and if the proposal is raised
at our 2006 Annual Meeting.
|
|
|
BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS |
|
|
|
|
CHARLES B. EDDY III |
|
Vice President, Finance and Administration, |
|
Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary |
April 8, 2005
19
THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
INTEVAC, INC.
Kevin Fairbairn and Charles B. Eddy III, or either of them, are hereby appointed as the
lawful agents and proxies of the undersigned (with all powers the undersigned would possess if
personally present, including full power of substitution) to represent and to vote all shares of
capital stock of Intevac, Inc. which the undersigned is entitled to vote at our Annual Meeting of
Shareholders on May 19, 2005, and at any adjournments or postponements thereof, as follows on the
reverse side.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CONTINUED AND TO BE SIGNED ON REVERSE SIDE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR each of the proposals below. This Proxy will be
voted as directed, or, if no direction is indicated, will be voted FOR each of the proposals below
and at the discretion of the persons named as proxies upon such other matters as may properly come
before the meeting. This proxy may be revoked at any time before it is voted.
1. |
The election of all nominees listed below for the Board of Directors, as described in the
Proxy Statement: |
Nominees: Norman H. Pond, Kevin Fairbairn, David S. Dury, Stanley J. Hill, David N. Lambeth,
Robert Lemos and Arthur L. Money
(INSTRUCTION: To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee, write such name or
names in the space provided below.)
2. |
Proposal to approve an amendment to the Companys Bylaws to increase the range of authorized
directors to a range of five to nine.: |
|
|
|
|
|
FOR o
|
|
AGAINST o
|
|
ABSTAIN o |
3. |
Proposal to ratify the appointment of Grant Thornton LLP as independent public accountants of
Intevac for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2005: |
|
|
|
|
|
FOR o
|
|
AGAINST o
|
|
ABSTAIN o |
4. |
Transaction of any other business which may properly come before the meeting and any
adjournment or postponement thereof. |
DATE: _______________________, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Signature) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Signature if held jointly) |
|
|
(Please sign exactly as shown on your stock certificate and on the envelope in which this proxy was
mailed. When signing as partner, corporate officer, attorney, executor, administrator, trustee,
guardian or in any other representative capacity, give full title as such and sign your own name as
well. If stock is held jointly, each joint owner should sign.)
PLEASE MARK, SIGN, DATE AND RETURN THIS PROXY CARD PROMPTLY,
USING THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.