e10vq
 
 
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
     
þ   QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009
OR
     
o   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Commission File Number: 000-50345
Old Line Bancshares, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
     
Maryland   20-0154352
(State or other jurisdiction
of incorporation or organization)
  (I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
     
1525 Pointer Ridge Place
Bowie, Maryland
(Address of principal executive offices)
  20716
(Zip Code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (301) 430-2500
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
     Yes þ    No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files.
     Yes o    No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:
Large accelerated filer o Accelerated filer o  Non-accelerated filer o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Smaller reporting company þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
     Yes o    No þ
As of May 8, 2009, the registrant had 3,862,364 shares of common stock outstanding.
 
 

 


 

Part I. Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements
Old Line Bancshares, Inc. & Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets
                 
    March 31,     December 31,  
    2009     2008  
 
    (Unaudited)          
 
               
Assets
               
Cash and due from banks
  $ 7,053,061     $ 8,823,170  
Federal funds sold
    111,267       2,140,525  
 
           
Total cash and cash equivalents
    7,164,328       10,963,695  
Time deposits in other banks
    11,638,162       13,267,000  
Investment securities available for sale
    30,869,489       29,565,976  
Investment securities held to maturity
    7,630,994       8,003,391  
Loans, less allowance for loan losses
    246,841,748       231,053,618  
Restricted equity securities at cost
    2,765,650       2,126,550  
Premises and equipment
    12,258,128       12,388,046  
Accrued interest receivable
    1,126,374       1,091,560  
Prepaid income taxes
          35,649  
Bank owned life insurance
    8,177,510       8,096,039  
Other assets
    2,505,564       1,139,101  
 
           
Total assets
  $ 330,977,947     $ 317,730,625  
 
           
 
               
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
               
 
               
Deposits
               
Noninterest-bearing
  $ 36,403,344     $ 39,880,119  
Interest-bearing
    203,851,047       191,550,521  
 
           
Total deposits
    240,254,391       231,430,640  
Short-term borrowings
    24,661,925       17,773,934  
Long-term borrowings
    21,510,918       21,531,133  
Accrued interest payable
    588,637       625,446  
Income tax payable
    177,349        
Deferred income taxes
    66,614       65,651  
Other liabilities
    912,397       4,012,968  
 
           
Total liabilities
    288,172,231       275,439,772  
 
           
 
               
Stockholders’ equity
               
Preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share and additional paid in capital; 7,000 shares issued and outstanding
    6,718,662       6,703,591  
Common stock, par value $0.01 per share; authorized 15,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 3,862,364 in 2009 and 2008
    38,624       38,624  
Additional paid-in capital
    28,909,419       28,838,810  
Warrants to purchase 141,892 shares of common stock
    301,434       301,434  
Retained earnings
    5,705,656       5,411,772  
Accumulated other comprehensive income
    428,629       392,611  
 
           
Total Old Line Bancshares, Inc. stockholders’ equity
    42,102,424       41,686,842  
Noncontrolling interest
    703,292       604,011  
 
           
Total equity
    42,805,716       42,290,853  
 
           
Total liabilities and equity
  $ 330,977,947     $ 317,730,625  
 
           
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

1


 

Old Line Bancshares, Inc. & Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Income
(Unaudited)
                 
Three Months Ended March 31,   2009     2008  
 
Interest revenue
               
Loans, including fees
  $ 3,601,883     $ 3,503,684  
U.S. Treasury securities
    4,856       22,487  
U.S. government agency securities
    102,921       25,532  
Mortgage backed securities
    267,921       18,059  
Municipal securities
    22,999       24,917  
Federal funds sold
    435       126,378  
Other
    100,933       49,385  
 
           
Total interest revenue
    4,101,948       3,770,442  
 
           
 
               
Interest expense
               
Deposits
    1,189,384       1,334,837  
Borrowed funds
    260,311       206,072  
 
           
Total interest expense
    1,449,695       1,540,909  
 
           
 
               
Net interest income
    2,652,253       2,229,533  
 
               
Provision for loan losses
    300,000       38,400  
 
           
Net interest income after provision for loan losses
    2,352,253       2,191,133  
 
           
 
               
Non-interest revenue
               
Service charges on deposit accounts
    79,089       72,952  
Earnings on bank owned life insurance
    93,461       91,603  
Income on investment in real estate LLC
          12,896  
Other fees and commissions
    431,050       54,987  
 
           
Total non-interest revenue
    603,600       232,438  
 
           
 
               
Non-interest expense
               
Salaries
    837,057       734,931  
Employee benefits
    302,424       269,453  
Occupancy
    232,181       279,922  
Equipment
    79,878       70,475  
Data processing
    75,337       61,252  
Other operating
    535,253       329,277  
 
           
Total non-interest expense
    2,062,130       1,745,310  
 
           
 
               
Income before income taxes
    893,723       678,261  
 
               
Income taxes
    282,115       233,428  
 
           
Net income
    611,608       444,833  
 
               
Less: Net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest
    99,281        
 
           
Net income attributable to Old Line Bancshares, Inc.
    512,327       444,833  
 
               
Preferred stock dividends and discount accretion
    102,572        
 
           
Net income available to common shareholders
  $ 409,755     $ 444,833  
 
           
 
               
Basic earnings per common share
  $ 0.11     $ 0.11  
Diluted earnings per common share
  $ 0.11     $ 0.11  
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

2


 

Old Line Bancshares, Inc. & Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity
Three Months Ended March 31, 2009
(Unaudited)
                                                                 
    Preferred                                     Accumulated              
    Stock                     Additional             other              
    &     Common stock     paid-in     Retained     comprehensive     Comprehensive     Noncontrolling  
    Warrants     Shares     Par value     capital     earnings     income     income     Interest  
 
 
                                                               
Balance, December 31, 2008
    7,005,025       3,862,364     $ 38,624     $ 28,838,810     $ 5,411,772     $ 392,611     $     $ 604,011  
Net income
                              512,327             512,327          
Unrealized gain on securities available for sale, net of income taxes of $23,461
                                    36,018       36,018          
 
                                                             
Comprehensive income
                                                  $ 548,345       99,281  
 
                                                             
Stock based compensation awards
                        70,609                              
Common stock cash dividend $0.03 per share
                              (115,871 )                      
 
                                                               
Preferred stock dividend and accretion
    15,071                         (102,572 )                      
 
                                                               
 
                                                 
Balance, March 31, 2009
  $ 7,020,096       3,862,364     $ 38,624     $ 28,909,419     $ 5,705,656     $ 428,629             $ 703,292  
 
                                                 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

3


 

Old Line Bancshares, Inc. & Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
                 
Three Months Ended March 31,   2009     2008  
 
 
               
Cash flows from operating activities
               
Interest received
  $ 4,022,418     $ 3,653,997  
Fees and commissions received
    522,129       137,262  
Interest paid
    (1,486,504 )     (1,656,524 )
Cash paid to suppliers and employees
    (6,316,141 )     (1,560,139 )
Income taxes paid
    (92,578 )     (402,307 )
 
           
 
    (3,350,676 )     172,289  
 
           
 
               
Cash flows from investing activities
               
Net decrease of time deposits in other banks
    1,628,838        
Purchase of investment securities
               
Held to maturity
          (7,241,731 )
Available for sale
    (3,103,269 )     (2,000,000 )
Proceeds from disposal of investment securities
               
Held to maturity at maturity or call
    374,057        
Available for sale at maturity or call
    1,840,790       5,467,425  
Loans made, net of principal collected
    (16,026,628 )     (1,257,882 )
Purchase of equity securities
    (639,100 )     (46,300 )
Investment in real estate LLC
          (100 )
Purchase of premises, equipment and software
    (30,979 )     (375,337 )
 
           
 
    (15,956,291 )     (5,453,925 )
 
           
 
               
Cash flows from financing activities
               
Net increase (decrease) in
               
Time deposits
    8,894,793       7,064,240  
Other deposits
    (71,042 )     1,895,418  
Net increase in short-term borrowings
    6,887,991       5,489,748  
(Decrease) increase in long-term borrowings
    (20,215 )      
Repurchase of common stock
          (1,385,554 )
Cash dividends paid-preferred stock
    (68,056 )      
Cash dividends paid-common stock
    (115,871 )     (121,420 )
 
           
 
    15,507,600       12,942,432  
 
           
 
               
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
    (3,799,367 )     7,660,796  
 
               
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
    10,963,695       12,994,168  
 
           
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
  $ 7,164,328     $ 20,654,964  
 
           
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

4


 

Old Line Bancshares, Inc. & Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
                 
Three Months Ended March 31,   2009     2008  
 
 
               
Reconciliation of net income to net cash provided by operating activities
               
Net income
  $ 512,327     $ 444,833  
 
               
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities
               
 
               
Depreciation and amortization
    167,177       97,644  
Provision for loan losses
    300,000       38,400  
Change in deferred loan fees net of costs
    (61,502 )     (60,118 )
Amortization of premiums and discounts
    16,786       890  
Deferred income taxes
    (23,461 )     (9,069 )
Stock based compensation awards
    70,609       44,879  
(Income) loss from investment in real estate LLC
          (12,896 )
Increase (decrease) in
               
Accrued interest payable
    (36,809 )     (115,615 )
Other liabilities
    (2,835,723 )     (3,925 )
Decrease (increase) in
               
Accrued interest receivable
    (34,814 )     (57,217 )
Bank owned life insurance
    (81,471 )     (82,180 )
Other assets
    (1,343,795 )     (113,337 )
 
           
 
  $ (3,350,676 )   $ 172,289  
 
           
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

5


 

Old Line Bancshares, Inc. & Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
1.   SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
 
    Organization and Description of Business-Old Line Bancshares, Inc. (Old Line Bancshares) was incorporated under the laws of the State of Maryland on April 11, 2003 to serve as the holding company of Old Line Bank. The primary business of Old Line Bancshares is to own all of the capital stock of Old Line Bank. We provide a full range of banking services to customers located in Prince George’s, Charles, Anne Arundel, and St. Mary’s counties in Maryland and surrounding areas.
 
    On November 17, 2008, we purchased Chesapeake Custom Homes, L.L.C.’s 12.5% membership interest in Pointer Ridge Office Investment, LLC (Pointer Ridge), a real estate investment company. The effective date of the purchase was November 1, 2008. As a result of this purchase, our membership interest increased from 50.0% to 62.5%. Consequently, we consolidated Pointer Ridge’s results of operations from the date of acquisition. Prior to the date of acquisition, we accounted for our investment in Pointer Ridge using the equity method.
 
    Basis of Presentation and Consolidation-The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the activity of Old Line Bancshares and its wholly owned subsidiary, Old Line Bank, and its majority owned membership interest in Pointer Ridge. We have eliminated all significant intercompany transactions and balances.
 
    We report the noncontrolling interests in Pointer Ridge in the consolidated balance sheet. We reported the income of Pointer Ridge attributable to Old Line Bancshares from the date of our acquisition of majority interest separately on the consolidated statement of income.
 
    The foregoing consolidated financial statements are unaudited; however, in the opinion of management we have included all adjustments (comprising only normal recurring accruals) necessary for a fair presentation of the results of the interim period. We derived the balances as of December 31, 2008 from audited financial statements. These statements should be read in conjunction with Old Line Bancshares’ financial statements and accompanying notes included in Old Line Bancshares’ Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. We have made no significant changes to Old Line Bancshares’ accounting policies as disclosed in the Form 10-K.
 
    The accounting and reporting policies of Old Line Bancshares conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
2.   INVESTMENT SECURITIES
 
    As Old Line Bank purchases securities, management determines if we should classify the securities as held to maturity, available for sale or trading. We record the securities which management has the intent and ability to hold to maturity at amortized cost which is cost adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts to maturity. We classify securities which we may sell before maturity as available for sale and carry these securities at fair value with unrealized gains and losses included in stockholders’ equity on an after tax basis. Management has not identified any investment securities as trading.
 
    We record gains and losses on the sale of securities on the trade date and determine these gains or losses using the specific identification method. We amortize premiums and accrete discounts using the interest method.

6


 

Old Line Bancshares, Inc. & Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
3.   POINTER RIDGE OFFICE INVESTMENT, LLC
 
    On January 1, 2009, we adopted SFAS No. 160 (revised 2007), Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements. On November 17, 2008, we purchased Chesapeake Custom Homes, L.L.C.’s 12.5% membership interest in Pointer Ridge. The effective date of the purchase was November 1, 2008. As a result of this purchase, we own 62.5% of Pointer Ridge and consolidated their results of operations from the date of acquisition.
 
    The following table summarizes the condensed Balance Sheets and Statements of Income information for Pointer Ridge.
                 
    March 31,   December 31,
Balance Sheets   2009   2008
Current assets
  $ 868,226     $ 540,105  
Non-current assets
    7,570,466       7,619,352  
Liabilities
    6,563,245       6,548,760  
Equity
  $ 1,875,447     $ 1,610,697  
                 
    Three Months Ended  
    March 31,  
    2009     2008  
 
               
Statements of Income
               
Revenue
  $ 535,155     $ 249,122  
Expenses
    270,405       240,701  
 
           
Net income
  $ 264,750     $ 8,421  
 
           
4.   INCOME TAXES
 
    The provision for income taxes includes taxes payable for the current year and deferred income taxes. We determine deferred tax assets and liabilities based on the difference between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which we expect the differences to reverse. We allocate tax expense and tax benefits to the Bank and Old Line Bancshares based on their proportional share of taxable income.

7


 

Old Line Bancshares, Inc. & Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
5.   EARNINGS PER SHARE
 
    Effective January 1, 2009, we adopted the Financial Accounting Standards Board Staff Position (FSP) No. EITF 03-6-1, Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transaction Are Participating Securities. FSP EITF 03-6-1 provides that unvested share based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are participating securities and shall be included in the computation of earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method. We have determined that our outstanding non-vested stock awards are not participating securities. We determine basic earnings per common share by dividing net income by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding giving retroactive effect to the stock dividends.
 
    We calculate diluted earnings per share by including the average dilutive common stock equivalents outstanding during the period. Dilutive common equivalent shares consist of stock options, calculated using the treasury stock method.
                 
    Three Months Ended
    March 31,
    2009   2008
 
 
Weighted average number of shares
    3,862,364       4,034,126  
Dilutive average number of shares
          3,121  
6.   STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
 
    We account for employee stock options under the fair value method of accounting using a Black-Scholes valuation model to measure stock-based compensation expense at the date of grant. In the first quarter of 2006, we adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) 123R, Share-Based Payment, under the modified prospective method. Statement 123R requires companies to recognize compensation expense related to stock-based compensation awards in their income statements over the period during which an individual is required to provide service in exchange for such award. For the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, we recorded stock-based compensation expense of $70,609 and $44,879, respectively.
 
    Under SFAS 123R, a company may only recognize tax benefits for options that ordinarily will result in a tax deduction when the grant is exercised (non-qualified options). For the three months ended March 31, 2009, we recognized an $8,298 tax benefit associated with the portion of the expense that was related to the issuance of non-qualified options. There were no non-qualified options included in the expense calculation during the three months ended March 31, 2008.
 
    We have two stock option plans under which we may issue options, the 2001 Incentive Stock Option Plan, as amended, and the 2004 Equity Incentive Plan. Our Compensation Committee administers the stock option plans. As the plans outline, the Compensation Committee approves stock option grants to directors and employees, determines the number of shares, the type of option, the option price, the term (not to exceed 10 years from the date of issuance) and the vesting period of options issued. The Compensation Committee has approved and we have issued grants with options vesting immediately as well as over periods of two, three and five years. We recognize the compensation expense associated with these grants over their respective vesting period. At March 31, 2009, there was $63,157 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested stock options that we expect to realize over the next 3.5 years. As of March 31, 2009, there were 71,530 shares remaining available for future issuance under the stock option plans. Directors and officers did not exercise any options during the three month period ended March 31, 2009 or 2008.

8


 

Old Line Bancshares, Inc. & Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
6.   STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION (Continued)
 
    A summary of the stock option activity during the three month period follows:
                                 
    March 31,
    2009   2008
            Weighted           Weighted
    Number   average   Number   average
    of shares   exercise price   of shares   exercise price
 
 
Outstanding, beginning of period
    236,620     $ 9.09       216,920     $ 9.37  
Options granted
    62,650       6.30       37,300       7.75  
Options forfeited
                (10,000 )     11.00  
 
                               
Outstanding, end of period
    299,270     $ 8.50       244,220     $ 9.06  
 
                               
    Information related to options as of March 31, 2009 follows:
                                         
    Outstanding options   Exercisable options
            Weighted   Weighted           Weighted
    Number   average   average   Number   average
Exercise   of shares at   remaining   exercise   of shares at   exercise
price   March 31, 2009   term   price   March 31, 2009   price
 
$3.33-$4.80
    19,800       2.16     $ 3.83       19,800     $ 3.83  
$4.81-$6.50
    72,550       8.99       6.12       38,784       5.95  
$6.51-$8.00
    37,300       8.84       7.75       24,867       7.75  
$8.01-$10.50
    159,620       6.51       10.20       153,220       10.20  
$10.51-11.31
    10,000       8.11       10.85       2,000       10.85  
 
                                       
 
    299,270       7.17     $ 8.50       238,671     $ 8.73  
 
                                       
Intrinsic value of outstanding options where the market value exceeds the exercise price   $ 98,316                          
Intrinsic value of exercisable options where the market value exceeds the exercise price   $ 50,530                          

9


 

Old Line Bancshares, Inc. & Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
7.   RETIREMENT PLAN
 
    Eligible employees participate in a profit sharing plan that qualifies under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. The plan allows for elective employee deferrals and Old Line Bank makes matching contributions of up to 4% of employee eligible compensation. Our contributions to the plan, included in employee benefit expenses, for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 were $31,376 and $32,114, respectively.
 
    Old Line Bank also offers Supplemental Executive Retirement Plans (SERPs) to its executive officers providing for retirement income benefits. We accrue the present value of the SERPs over the remaining number of years to the executives’ retirement dates. Old Line Bank’s expenses for the SERPs for the three month periods ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 were $31,358 and $29,811, respectively.
8.   ASSETS MEASURED AT FAIR VALUE ON A CONTINUING BASIS
 
    On January 1, 2008, we adopted Statement of Financing Accounting Standards No. 157, Fair Value Measurements. SFAS 157 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. A fair value measurement assumes that the transaction to sell the asset or transfer the liability occurs in the principal market for the asset or liability, or, in the absence of a principal market, the most advantageous market for the asset or liability. The price in the principal (or most advantageous) market used to measure the fair value of the asset or liability shall not be adjusted for transaction costs. An orderly transaction is a transaction that assumes exposure to the market for a period prior to the measurement date to allow for marketing activities that are usual and customary for transactions involving such assets and liabilities; it is not a forced transaction. Market participants are buyers and sellers in the principal market that are (i) independent, (ii) knowledgeable, (iii) able to transact and (iv) willing to transact. The Bank values investment securities classified as available for sale at fair value. The fair value hierarchy established in SFAS 157, defines three input levels for fair value measurement. Level 1 is based on quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets. Level 2 is based on significant observable inputs other than those in Level 1. Level 3 is based on significant unobservable inputs.
 
    We value investment securities classified as available for sale at fair value on a recurring basis. We value treasury securities, government sponsored entity securities, and some agency securities under Level 1, and collateralized mortgage obligations and some agency securities under Level 2. At March 31, 2009, we established values for available for sale investment securities as follows (000’s);
                                 
    Total Fair Value     Level 1     Level 2     Level 3  
    March 31, 2009     Inputs     Inputs     Inputs  
Investment securities available for sale
  $ 30,869     $ 9,866     $ 21,003     $  
 
                       
    Our valuation methodologies may produce a fair value calculation that may not be indicative of net realizable value or reflective of future fair values. While management believes our methodologies are appropriate and consistent with other market participants, the use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different estimate of fair value. Furthermore, we have not comprehensively revalued the fair value amounts since the presentation dates, and therefore, estimates of fair value after the balance sheet date may differ significantly from the above presented amounts. There were no gains or losses (realized and unrealized) included in earnings for the quarter ended March 31, 2009.

10


 

Old Line Bancshares, Inc. & Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
9.   RECENT ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
 
    The following are recent accounting pronouncements approved by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB). These Statements will not have any material impact on the financial statements of Old Line Bancshares or the Bank.
 
    In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160 (revised 2007), Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements. SFAS 160 amends Accounting Research Bulletin 51, Consolidated Financial Statements, to establish accounting and reporting standards for noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. It also clarifies that a noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary is an ownership interest in the consolidated entity that should be reported as equity in the consolidated financial statements. SFAS 160 also changes the way the consolidated income statement is presented by requiring consolidated net income to be reported at amounts that include the amounts attributable to both the parent and the noncontrolling interest. It also requires disclosure, on the face of the consolidated statement of income, of the amounts of consolidated net income attributable to the parent and to the noncontrolling interest. SFAS 160 is effective at the beginning of the company’s first fiscal year after December 15, 2008. On January 1, 2009, we adopted SFAS 160 and it affected the way we reported the noncontrolling interest in Pointer Ridge, but it did not have a material impact on our consolidated results of operations or financial position.
 
    In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations. SFAS No. 141(R) will significantly change the accounting for business combinations in a number of areas, including the treatment of contingent consideration, contingencies, acquisition costs, in-process research and development costs and restructuring costs. Additionally, under SFAS No. 141(R), changes in deferred tax asset valuation allowances and acquired income tax uncertainties in a business combination after the measurement period will impact income tax expense. The provisions of this standard were effective beginning January 1, 2009. SFAS No. 141(R) did not have a material impact on our consolidated results of operations or financial position.
 
    FASB Statement No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133, requires enhanced disclosures about an entity’s derivative and hedging activities and thereby improves the transparency of financing reporting. The use and complexity of derivative instruments and hedging activities have increased significantly over the past several years. Constituents have expressed concerns that the existing disclosure requirements in FASB Statement No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments Hedging Activities, do not provide adequate information about how derivative and hedging activities affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. This Statement is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008, with early application encouraged. This Statement encourages, but does not require, comparative disclosures for earlier periods at initial adoption. SFAS No. 161 did not have a material impact on our consolidated results of operations or financial position.
    Financial Accounting Standards Board Staff Positions and Interpretations
 
    FSP No. EITF 03-06-1, Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions are Participating Securities provides that unvested share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are participating securities and shall be included in the computation of earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method. FSP EITF 03-6-1 became effective on January 1, 2009. As outlined in Note 5-Earnings Per Share, we adopted EITF 03-06-1 and it did not have any impact on our consolidated results of operations or financial position.

11


 

Old Line Bancshares, Inc. & Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
    FSP SFAS 157-4 Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly affirms that the objective of fair value when the market for an asset is not active is the price that we would receive to sell the asset in an orderly transaction, and clarifies and includes additional factors for determining whether there has been a significant decrease in market activity for an asset when the market for that asset is not active. FSP SFAS 157-4 also requires an entity to base its conclusion on whether a transaction was not orderly on the weight of the evidence. FSP SFAS 157-4 also amended SFAS 157, Fair Value Measurements, to expand certain disclosure requirements. FSP SFAS 157-4 becomes effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009. We do not expect that it will have a material impact on our consolidated results of operations or financial position.
 
    FSP SFAS 115-2 and SFAS 124-2 Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than Temporary Impairments (i) changes existing guidance for determining whether an impairment is other than temporary to debt securities and (ii) replaces the existing requirement that the entity’s management assert that it has both the intent and ability to hold an impaired security until recovery with a requirement that management assert: (a) it does not have the intent to sell the security; and (b) it is more likely that it will not have to sell the security before recovery of its cost basis. Under FSP SFAS 115-2 and SFAS 124-2, declines in the fair value of held-to-maturity and available-for-sale securities below their cost deemed to be other than temporary are reflected in earnings as realized losses to the extent the impairment is related to credit losses. The amount of the impairment related to other factors is recognized in other comprehensive income. FSP SFAS 115-2 and SFAS 124-2 become effective for interim and annual reporting periods ended after June 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted for periods ending after March 15, 2009. We do not expect that FSP SFAS 115-2 and SFAS 124-2 will have a material impact on our consolidated results of operations or financial position.
 
    FSP SFAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments amends SFAS 107, Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments, to require an entity to provide disclosures about fair value of financial instruments to interim financial information and amends APB Opinion No. 28. Interim Financial Reporting, to require those disclosures in summarized financial information at interim reporting periods. Under FSP SFAS 107-1 and APB 28-1, a publicly traded company shall include disclosures about the fair value of its financial instruments whenever it issues summarized financial information for interim reporting periods and in its financial statements for annual reporting periods, the fair value of all financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate that value, whether recognized or not recognized in the statement of financial position, as required by SFAS 107. The new interim disclosures required by FSP SFAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 will be included in our interim financial statements beginning with the second quarter of 2009.

12


 

          Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Introduction
          Some of the matters discussed below include forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements often use words such as “believe,” “expect,” “plan,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “project,” “contemplate,” “anticipate,” “forecast,” “intend” or other words of similar meaning. You can also identify them by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. Our actual results and the actual outcome of our expectations and strategies could be different from those anticipated or estimated for the reasons discussed below and under the heading “Information Regarding Forward Looking Statements.”
Overview
          Old Line Bancshares was incorporated under the laws of the State of Maryland on April 11, 2003 to serve as the holding company of Old Line Bank.
          Our primary business is to own all of the capital stock of Old Line Bank. We also have an approximately $1.2 million investment in a real estate investment limited liability company named Pointer Ridge Office Investment, LLC (Pointer Ridge). We own 62.5% of Pointer Ridge. Frank Lucente, one of our directors and a director of Old Line Bank, controls 12.5% of Pointer Ridge and controls the manager of Pointer Ridge. The purpose of Pointer Ridge is to acquire, own, hold for profit, sell, assign, transfer, operate, lease, develop, mortgage, refinance, pledge and otherwise deal with real property located at the intersection of Pointer Ridge Road and Route 301 in Bowie, Maryland. Pointer Ridge owns a commercial office building containing approximately 40,000 square feet and leases this space to tenants. We lease approximately 50% of this building for our main office and operate a branch of Old Line Bank from this address.
Summary of Recent Performance and Other Activities
          During one of the most challenging economic periods in the last thirty years, we are pleased to report continued profitability for the first quarter of 2009. Net income available to common shareholders declined $35,078 or 7.89% to $409,755 for the three month period ending March 31, 2009 and there was no change to earnings of $0.11 per basic and diluted common share.
          During the first three months of 2009 the following events occurred.
    We maintained asset quality with total non-performing assets of $1.5 million (0.45% of total assets) and no other loans past due more than 30 days at quarter end.
 
    We increased the provision for loan losses by $261,600 from $38,400 to $300,000.
 
    The loan portfolio grew $15.7 million or 6.79%.
 
    Total deposits grew $8.9 million or 3.85%.
 
    We maintained liquidity and by all regulatory measures remained “well capitalized”.
 
    We recognized a non-recurring increase in earnings on our investment in Pointer Ridge of approximately $153,000 during the quarter.
          We believe that it was an accomplishment to increase earnings, grow the loan portfolio and maintain credit quality despite the turbulence in the financial markets, the continued weak economic environment and the uncertainties faced by our industry.

13


 

          The following summarizes the highlights of our financial performance for the three month period ended March 31, 2009 compared to the three month period ended March 31, 2008 (figures in the table may not match those discussed in the balance of this section due to rounding).
                                 
    Three months ended March 31,    
    (Dollars in thousands)    
    2009   2008   $ Change   % Change
 
Net income available to common shareholders
  $ 410     $ 445     $ (35 )     (7.87 )%
Interest revenue
    4,102       3,770       332       8.81  
Interest expense
    1,450       1,541       (91 )     (5.91 )
Net interest income after provision for loan losses
    2,352       2,191       161       7.35  
Non-interest revenue
    604       232       372       160.34  
Non-interest expense
    2,062       1,745       317       18.17  
Average total loans
    239,957       204,787       35,170       17.17  
Average interest earning assets
    292,632       234,486       58,146       24.80  
Average total interest-bearing deposits
    200,636       148,424       52,212       35.18  
Average noninterest-bearing deposits
    36,388       35,307       1,081       3.06  
Net interest margin (1)
    3.70 %     3.84 %                
Return on average equity
    5.00 %     5.13 %                
Basic earnings per common share
  $ 0.11     $ 0.11     $        
Diluted earnings per common share
    0.11       0.11              
 
(1)   See “Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures”
Growth Strategy
          We have based our strategic plan on the premise of enhancing stockholder value and growth through branching and operating profits. Our short-term goals include maintaining credit quality, creating an attractive branch network, expanding fee income, generating extensions of core banking services and using technology to maximize stockholder value.
          We believe a natural evolution of a community-focused bank like Old Line Bank is to expand the delivery channels via the branch network. We plan to expand in Prince George’s County, Maryland and may expand in Charles County and Anne Arundel County as well as into contiguous northern and western counties, such as Montgomery County and Howard County, Maryland.
          In May 2008, we executed a lease agreement to lease 1,620 square feet of space in a store unit located at 167-U Jennifer Road, Annapolis, Maryland in Anne Arundel County. In September 2008, we opened this branch. We hired the staff for this branch during the months of August and September of 2008.
          In February 2008, we opened a branch in College Park (Prince George’s County), Maryland at 9658 Baltimore Avenue, College Park, Maryland. This branch is in the same building as the loan production office that houses our team of loan officers. We hired the Branch Manager and staff for this location in February 2008.
          As part of our expansion efforts, in July 2004, Old Line Bank executed a lease and applied to regulatory authorities to open a branch at 1641 State Route 3 North, Crofton, Maryland in Anne Arundel County. We anticipated that construction of the building in which we plan to locate the branch would begin during the second or third quarter of 2006 and we expected to open the branch in the first quarter of 2007. However, the owner of the property was unable to complete the requirements contained in the lease and begin construction of the branch. Construction of this location began in 2007. We expect to open this branch during the second quarter of 2009.

14


 

          In July 2007, we identified a site for a second branch location in Bowie, Maryland. Currently, the landlord is preparing a pad site. Assuming the landlord completes the preparation of the pad site and meets all of the conditions of the lease, we plan to lease the pad site and construct a branch. The pad site is located in the Fairwood Office Park in Bowie, Maryland. We anticipate we will open this branch during the 3rd quarter of 2009.
          As previously reported, in December 2008, we increased our ownership in Pointer Ridge Office Investment, LLC from 50.0% to 62.5%. As a result, we now consolidate their results of operations and financial performance. This consolidation caused an approximately $405,000 increase in non-interest revenue, a $102,000 increase in interest expense, an $81,000 reduction in occupancy expense, a $119,000 increase in non-interest expense and an approximately $165,000 increase in pre-tax earnings.
          Although the current economic climate presents significant challenges to our industry, we anticipate the bank will experience loan and deposit growth during the remainder of 2009 and beyond. We do expect that the current economic climate will cause a slower rate of loan growth in the future than we have historically experienced. We anticipate that after establishment of the Bowie and Crofton branches outlined above that we will slow down the rate of branch expansion, although should we identify new branch locations that will support our long term growth plans we may open additional branches.
          Because of the new branches, we anticipate salaries and benefits expenses and other operating expenses will increase during 2009. We anticipate that, over time, income generated from the branches will offset any increase in expenses. We also expect that for the remainder of 2009 Pointer Ridge will operate at a slight loss.
          Other Opportunities
          We use the Internet and technology to augment our growth plans. Currently, we offer our customers image technology, Internet banking with on-line account access and bill payer service. In 2007, we began offering selected commercial customers the ability to remotely capture their deposits and electronically transmit them to us. This service has modestly increased equipment cost, reduced courier fees, and positively impacted deposit growth.
          In order to support our growth, provide improved management information capabilities and enhance the products and services we deliver to our customers, during the 1st quarter of 2009, we began enhancing our core data processing systems. We completed this process in April 2009. We anticipate that this new system will cause data processing costs to moderately increase. We will continue to evaluate cost effective ways that technology can enhance our management, products and services.
          We plan to take advantage of strategic opportunities presented to us via mergers occurring in our marketplace. For example, we may purchase branches that other banks close or lease branch space from other banks or hire additional loan officers. We currently have no specific plans to acquire existing financial institutions or branches thereof or to hire additional loan officers.

15


 

Results of Operations
     Net Interest Income
          Net interest income is the difference between income on interest earning assets and the cost of funds supporting those assets. Earning assets are comprised primarily of loans, investments, and federal funds sold; interest-bearing deposits and other borrowings make up the cost of funds. Noninterest-bearing deposits and capital are also funding sources. Changes in the volume and mix of earning assets and funding sources along with changes in associated interest rates determine changes in net interest income.
Three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to three months ended March 31, 2008
          Net interest income after provision for loan losses for the three months ended March 31, 2009 increased $161,120 or 7.35% to $2.4 million from $2.2 million for the same period in 2008
          Interest revenue increased from $3.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008 to $4.1 million for the same period in 2009. As discussed below and outlined in detail in the Rate/Volume Analysis, these changes were the result of interest earning assets growing at a faster rate than interest-bearing liabilities. A decline in the interest rates on these interest earning assets partially offset the growth. The decline in rates was a result of the Federal Reserve decreasing the federal funds rate from 4.25% in the first quarter of 2008 to 0.25% in the first quarter of 2009. The increase in interest earning assets was primarily caused by a $35.2 million increase in average total loans. In order to fund this loan growth, we deployed funds from lower yielding federal funds sold. The growth in average total loans was attributable to a $1.1 million increase in our legal lending limit that occurred as a result of the issuance of the $7 million of Series A Preferred Stock to the U.S. Treasury in December 2008, because of the business development efforts of the entire Old Line Bank lending team and directors, and the expansion of our branch network. We believe that the expansion of our branch network provides us with increased name recognition and new opportunities that contributed to our growth. During the fourth quarter of 2008, we also transferred balances from lower yielding federal funds into higher yielding investment securities. This transfer also improved interest income.
          Interest expense for all interest-bearing liabilities decreased $91,214 or 5.92% to $1.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009. This was primarily attributable to a 121 basis point decrease in the cost of interest-bearing deposits. This decrease was partially offset by a 10 basis point increase in the cost of borrowed funds. The decrease in the interest rate on interest-bearing deposits was a result of the decrease in the Federal Reserve interest rate previously discussed. The consolidation of Pointer Ridge’s assets, liabilities and equity caused a 10 basis point increase in the cost of borrowed funds. The decrease in the cost of interest-bearing liabilities was partially offset by a $59.9 million increase in average total interest-bearing liabilities. As a result of these items, our net interest margin was 3.70% for the three months ended March 31, 2009, as compared to 3.84% for the three months ended March 31, 2008.

16


 

     The following table illustrates average balances of total interest earning assets and total interest-bearing liabilities for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, showing the average distribution of assets, liabilities, stockholders’ equity and related income, expense and corresponding weighted average yields and rates. The average balances used in this table and other statistical data were calculated using average daily balances.
Average Balances, Interest and Yields
                                                 
    2009     2008  
 
    Average                     Average              
Three Months Ended March 31,   balance     Interest     Yield     balance     Interest     Yield  
     
 
Assets:
                                               
Federal funds sold(1)
  $ 415,599     $ 436       0.43 %   $ 16,712,451     $ 129,193       3.10 %
Time deposits in other banks
    14,081,697       87,668       2.52       2,000,000       20,266       4.06  
Investment securities(1)(2)
                                               
U.S. Treasury
    499,956       5,142       4.17       2,769,346       23,783       3.44  
U.S. government agency
    10,510,365       108,854       4.20       3,065,740       27,004       3.53  
Mortgage backed securities
    23,921,423       267,921       4.54       1,675,894       18,059       4.32  
Municipal securities
    2,725,547       33,709       5.02       3,005,390       36,248       4.84  
Other
    2,578,398       13,267       2.09       2,080,657       30,041       5.79  
 
                                   
 
Total investment securities
    40,235,689       428,893       4.32       12,597,027       135,135       4.30  
 
                                   
Loans: (3)
                                               
Commercial
    71,891,993       1,062,649       5.99       55,896,847       1,053,762       7.56  
Mortgage
    152,503,483       2,331,221       6.20       130,781,054       2,210,937       6.78  
Consumer
    15,561,072       208,013       5.42       18,109,472       238,985       5.29  
 
                                   
Total loans
    239,956,548       3,601,883       6.09       204,787,373       3,503,684       6.86  
Allowance for loan losses
    2,057,751                   1,610,509                
 
                                   
Total loans, net of allowance
    237,898,797       3,601,883       6.14       203,176,864       3,503,684       6.92  
 
                                   
Total interest earning assets(1)
    292,631,782       4,118,880       5.71       234,486,342       3,788,278       6.48  
 
                                       
Non-interest bearing cash
    6,267,452                       3,844,427                  
Premises and equipment
    12,324,862                       4,195,720                  
Other assets
    10,492,299                       10,775,269                  
 
                                           
Total assets
  $ 321,716,395                     $ 253,301,758                  
 
                                           
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity:
                                               
Interest bearing deposits
                                               
Savings
  $ 5,948,272       5,617       0.38     $ 6,245,038       11,561       0.74  
Money market and NOW
    31,429,957       31,708       0.41       34,283,999       111,404       1.30  
Other time deposits
    163,257,626       1,152,059       2.86       107,894,604       1,211,872       4.51  
 
                                   
Total interest-bearing deposits
    200,635,855       1,189,384       2.40       148,423,641       1,334,837       3.61  
Borrowed funds
    40,925,627       260,311       2.58       33,306,846       206,072       2.48  
 
                                   
Total interest-bearing liabilities
    241,561,482       1,449,695       2.43       181,730,487       1,540,909       3.40  
 
                                           
Noninterest-bearing deposits
    36,388,123                       35,307,109                  
 
                                           
 
    277,949,605                       217,037,596                  
Other liabilities
    1,534,543                       1,479,612                  
Noncontrolling interest
    669,272                                        
Stockholders’ equity
    41,562,975                       34,784,550                  
 
                                           
 
                                               
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
  $ 321,716,395                     $ 253,301,758                  
 
                                           
 
                                               
Net interest spread(1)
                    3.28                       3.08  
 
                                               
Net interest income and Net interest margin(1)
          $ 2,669,185       3.70 %           $ 2,247,369       3.84 %
 
                                       
 
1)   Interest revenue is presented on a fully taxable equivalent (FTE) basis. The FTE basis adjusts for the tax favored status of these investments. Management believes providing this information on a FTE basis provides investors with a more accurate picture of our net interest spread and net interest income and we believe it to be the preferred industry measurement of these calculations. See “Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures.”
 
2)   Available for sale investment securities are presented at amortized cost.
 
3)   Average non-accruing loans for the three month periods ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 were $1,000,461 and $1,061,145, respectively.

17


 

The following table describes the impact on our interest revenue and expense resulting from changes in average balances and average rates for the periods indicated. We have allocated the change in interest revenue, interest expense and net interest income due to both volume and rate proportionately to the rate and volume variances.
Rate/Volume Variance Analysis
                         
    Three months Ended March 31,  
    2009 compared to 2008  
    Variance due to:  
    Total     Rate     Volume  
 
                       
Interest earning assets:
                       
Federal funds sold(1)
  $ (128,757 )   $ (100,695 )   $ (28,062 )
Time deposits in other banks
    67,402       (35,430 )     102,832  
Investment Securities(1)
                       
U.S. Treasury
    (18,641 )     10,168       (28,809 )
U.S. government agency
    81,850       19,627       62,223  
Mortgage backed securities
    249,862       3,828       246,034  
Municipal securities
    (2,539 )     2,549       (5,088 )
Other
    (16,774 )     (28,373 )     11,599  
Loans:
                       
Commercial
    8,887       (438,316 )     447,203  
Mortgage
    120,284       (410,173 )     530,457  
Consumer
    (30,972 )     14,607       (45,579 )
 
                 
Total interest revenue (1)
    330,602       (962,208 )     1,292,810  
 
                 
 
                       
Interest-bearing liabilities
                       
Savings
    (5,944 )     (5,804 )     (140 )
Money market and NOW
    (79,696 )     (77,381 )     (2,315 )
Other time deposits
    (59,813 )     (957,641 )     897,828  
Borrowed funds
    54,239       22,329       31,910  
 
                 
Total interest expense
    (91,214 )     (1,018,497 )     927,283  
 
                 
 
                       
Net interest income(1)
  $ 421,816     $ 56,289     $ 365,527  
 
                 
 
(1)   Interest revenue is presented on a fully taxable equivalent (FTE) basis. Management believes providing this information on a FTE basis provides investors with a more accurate picture of our net interest spread and net interest income and we believe it to be the preferred industry measurement of these calculations. See “Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures.”

18


 

          Provision for Loan Losses
          Originating loans involves a degree of risk that credit losses will occur in varying amounts according to, among other factors, the type of loans being made, the credit-worthiness of the borrowers over the term of the loans, the quality of the collateral for the loan, if any, as well as general economic conditions. We charge the provision for loan losses to earnings to maintain the total allowance for loan losses at a level considered by management to represent its best estimate of the losses known and inherent in the portfolio that are both probable and reasonable to estimate, based on, among other factors, prior loss experience, volume and type of lending conducted, estimated value of any underlying collateral, economic conditions (particularly as such conditions relate to Old Line Bank’s market area), regulatory guidance, peer statistics, management’s judgment, past due loans in the loan portfolio, loan charge off experience and concentrations of risk (if any). We charge losses on loans against the allowance when we believe that collection of loan principal is unlikely. We add back recoveries on loans previously charged to the allowance.
          The provision for loan losses was $300,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2009, as compared to $38,400 for the three months ended March 31, 2008, an increase of $261,600 or 681.25%. After completing the analysis outlined below, during the three month period ended March 31, 2009, we increased the provision for loan losses primarily because there was a 6.83% growth in the loan portfolio from December 31, 2008 to March 31, 2009, and there remains significant weakness in the economic environment in which we operate. Although we have not experienced any substantive change in the quality of the loans in the portfolio, during the period we placed one additional loan in the amount of $699,856 in non-accrual status. At quarter end, we had two non-performing loans and no other loans past due more than 30 days. We believe that most of our clients, even those that directly or indirectly serve the real estate industry, remain financially strong. However, as the real estate industry continues to encounter weakness and we remain in a recession, we believe that it is prudent to continue to increase our provision for loan losses.
          We review the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses at least quarterly. Our review includes evaluation of impaired loans as required by SFAS No. 114, Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan, and SFAS No. 118, Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan-Income Recognition and Disclosure. Also incorporated in determining the adequacy of the allowance is guidance contained in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s SAB No. 102, Loan Loss Allowance Methodology and Documentation; the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council’s Policy Statement on Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses Methodologies and Documentation for Banks and Savings Institutions and the Interagency Policy Statement on the Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses provided by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, National Credit Union Administration and Office of Thrift Supervision.
          We base the evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses upon loan categories. We categorize loans as installment and other consumer loans (other than boat loans), boat loans, mortgage loans (commercial real estate, residential real estate and real estate construction) and commercial loans. We apply loss ratios to each category of loan other than commercial loans. We further divide commercial loans by risk rating and apply loss ratios by risk rating, to determine estimated loss amounts. We evaluate delinquent loans and loans for which management has knowledge about possible credit problems of the borrower or knowledge of problems with loan collateral separately and assign loss amounts based upon the evaluation.
          We determine loss ratios for installment and other consumer loans (other than boat loans), boat loans and mortgage loans (commercial real estate, residential real estate and real estate construction) based upon a review of prior 18 months delinquency trends for the category, the three year loss ratio for the category, peer group loss ratios, probability of loss factors and industry standards.

19


 

          With respect to commercial loans, management assigns a risk rating of one through eight to each loan at inception, with a risk rating of one having the least amount of risk and a risk rating of eight having the greatest amount of risk. For commercial loans of less than $250,000, we may review the risk rating annually based on, among other things, the borrower’s financial condition, cash flow and ongoing financial viability; the collateral securing the loan; the borrower’s industry; and payment history. We review the risk rating for all commercial loans in excess of $250,000 at least annually. We evaluate loans with a risk rating of five or greater separately and allocate a portion of the allowance for loan losses based upon the evaluation. For loans with risk ratings between one and four, we determine loss ratios based upon a review of prior 18 months delinquency trends, the three year loss ratio, peer group loss ratios, probability of loss factors and industry standards.
          We also identify and make any necessary allocation adjustments for any specific concentrations of credit in a loan category that in management’s estimation increase the risk inherent in the category. If necessary, we will also make an adjustment within one or more loan categories for economic considerations in our market area that may impact the quality of the loans in the category. For all periods presented, there were no specific adjustments made for concentrations of credit. As discussed above, we have increased our provision for loan losses for the period in all segments of our portfolio as a result of economic considerations. We consider qualitative or environmental factors that are likely to cause estimated credit losses associated with our existing portfolio to differ from historical loss experience. These factors include, but are not limited to, changes in lending policies and procedures, changes in the nature and volume of the loan portfolio, changes in the experience, ability and depth of lending management and the effect of other external factors such as economic factors, competition and legal and regulatory requirements on the level of estimated credit losses in our existing portfolio.
          In the event that our review of the adequacy of the allowance results in any unallocated amounts, we reallocate such amounts to our loan categories based on the percentage that each category represents to total gross loans. We have risk management practices designed to ensure timely identification of changes in loan risk profiles. However, undetected losses inherently exist within the portfolio. We believe that the allocation of the unallocated portion of the reserve in the manner described above is appropriate.
          We will not create a separate valuation allowance unless we consider a loan impaired under SFAS No. 114 and SFAS No. 118. At March 31, 2009, we had two non-accrual loans totaling $1.5 million. As outlined in previous reports, we do not consider the first non-accrual loan in the amount of $839,875 as impaired. For approximately one year, the borrower has made payments on the principal balance and the value of the collateral is sufficient to provide repayment. Therefore, we have not allocated any portion of the allowance for loan losses to this loan. The borrower on the second facility has declared bankruptcy. We are currently in the process of determining the value of the property securing this loan and in negotiations with the borrower regarding reaffirmation of the debt. We have determined this loan is impaired. We have allocated $175,000 of the allowance for loan losses to this loan. We have no other loans past due 30 days or more. We also do not have any substantive loans comprised of sub-prime mortgages.
          Our policies require a review of assets on a regular basis, and we believe that we appropriately classify loans as well as other assets if warranted. We believe that we use the best information available to make a determination with respect to the allowance for loan losses, recognizing that the determination is inherently subjective and that future adjustments may be necessary depending upon, among other factors, a change in economic conditions of specific borrowers or generally in the economy, and new information that becomes available to us. However, there are no assurances that the allowance for loan losses will be sufficient to absorb losses on non-performing assets, or that the allowance will be sufficient to cover losses on non-performing assets in the future.
          The allowance for loan losses represents 0.92% of gross loans at March 31, 2009 and 0.85% at December 31, 2008. We have no exposure to foreign countries or foreign borrowers. Based on our analysis and the satisfactory historical performance of the loan portfolio, we believe this allowance appropriately reflects the inherent risk of loss in our portfolio.

20


 

          The following table provides an analysis of the allowance for loan losses for the periods indicated:
Allowance for Loan Losses
                         
    Three Months Ended     Year Ended  
    March 31,     December 31,  
    2009     2008     2008  
 
Balance, beginning of period
  $ 1,983,751     $ 1,586,737     $ 1,586,737  
Provision for loan losses
    300,000       38,400       415,000  
 
                 
 
                       
Chargeoffs:
                       
Commercial
                 
Consumer
                (18,440 )
 
                 
Total chargeoffs
                (18,440 )
Recoveries:
                       
Consumer
          159       454  
 
                 
Total recoveries
          159       454  
 
                 
Net (chargeoffs) recoveries
          159       (17,986 )
 
                       
Balance, end of period
  $ 2,283,751     $ 1,625,296     $ 1,983,751  
 
                 
 
                       
Ratio of allowance for loan losses to:
                       
Total loans
    0.92 %     0.79 %     0.85 %
Non-accrual loans
    148.32 %     155.71 %     233.20 %
Ratio of net-chargeoffs during period to average loans outstanding during period
    0.000 %     0.000 %     0.008 %
          The following table provides a breakdown of the allowance for loan losses:
Allocation of Allowance for Loan Losses
                                                 
    March 31,     December 31,  
    2009     2008     2008  
            % of Loans             % of Loans             % of Loans  
            in Each             in Each             in Each  
    Amount     Category     Amount     Category     Amount     Category  
 
                                               
Consumer & others
  $ 8,273       0.40 %   $ 10,563       0.40 %   $ 13,391       0.02 %
Boat
    99,820       5.65       101,557       8.09       94,910       6.70  
Mortgage
    1,734,420       63.56       1,108,791       63.86       1,348,850       63.21  
Commercial
    441,238       30.39       404,385       27.65       526,600       30.07  
 
                                   
 
                                               
Total
  $ 2,283,751       100.00 %   $ 1,625,296       100.00 %   $ 1,983,751       100.00 %
 
                                   

21


 

          Non-interest Revenue
          Three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to three months ended March 31, 2008
          Non-interest revenue totaled $603,600 for the three months ended March 31, 2009, an increase of $371,162 or 159.68% from the 2008 amount of $232,438. As previously outlined, in November 2008, we increased our ownership interest in Pointer Ridge from 50.0% to 62.5% and consolidated their results of operations from the date of acquisition. Prior to that time, we recorded our income from our investment in Pointer Ridge in other income. Non-interest revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and March 31, 2008 also included fee income from service charges on deposit accounts and earnings on bank owned life insurance.
The following table outlines the changes in non-interest revenue for the three month periods.
                                 
    March 31,     March 31,              
    2009     2008     $ Change     % Change  
Service charges on deposit accounts
  $ 79,089     $ 72,952     $ 6,137       8.41 %
Earnings on bank owned life insurance
    93,461       91,603       1,858       2.03  
Income (loss) on investment in real estate LLC
          12,896       (12,896 )     (100.00 )
Pointer Ridge rent and other revenue
    405,477             405,477       100.00  
Other fees and commissions
    25,573       54,987       (29,414 )     (53.49 )
 
                         
Total non-interest revenue
  $ 603,600     $ 232,438     $ 371,162       159.68 %
 
                         
          During the 1st quarter of 2009, Pointer Ridge received a one-time lease termination fee in the amount of approximately $300,000. This amount plus Pointer Ridge’s monthly rental income increased our non-interest revenue $405,477. Service charges on deposit accounts increased due to increases in the number of customers and the services they used. Earnings on bank owned life insurance increased primarily because the rate earned on the investment increased. Other fees and commissions decreased $29,414 primarily because of a decrease in other loan fees that was caused primarily from a decline in construction related settlements.
          Non-interest Expense
          Three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to three months ended March 31, 2008
          Non-interest expense increased 18.15% or $316,820 for the three months ended March 31, 2009. The following chart outlines the changes in non-interest expenses for the period. As previously outlined, in November 2008, we increased our ownership interest in Pointer Ridge from 50.0% to 62.5% and consolidated their results of operations from the date of acquisition.
                                 
    March 31     March 31,              
    2009     2008     $ Change     % Change  
Salaries
  $ 837,057     $ 734,931     $ 102,126       13.90 %
Employee benefits
    302,424       269,453       32,971       12.24  
Occupancy
    232,181       279,922       (47,741 )     (17.06 )
Equipment
    79,878       70,475       9,403       13.34  
Data processing
    75,337       61,252       14,085       23.00  
Pointer Ridge other operating
    119,065             119,065       100.00  
Other operating
    416,188       329,277       86,911       26.39  
 
                         
Total non-interest expenses
  $ 2,062,130     $ 1,745,310     $ 316,820       18.15 %
 
                         

22


 

          Salaries and benefits increased primarily because we opened the College Park branch in February 2008 and the Annapolis branch in September 2008, the increase in stock option expense for options granted in the first quarter and an increase in health care costs. The opening of these branches and annual rental increases increased occupancy and equipment expenses. As a result of the consolidation of Pointer Ridge, these increases were offset by the elimination of $129,678 of rental expenses paid to Pointer Ridge. Data processing costs increased because of our new locations and new services provided by our data processor. Other operating expenses increased primarily because of increased FDIC and Maryland State insurance assessments, higher ATM and Visa Debit costs, increased stationery and supplies and increased travel expenses.
          Income Taxes
          Three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to three months ended March 31, 2008
          Income tax expense was $282,115 (31.57% of pre-tax income) for the three months ended March 31, 2009 as compared to $233,428 (34.42% of pre-tax income) for the same period in 2008. The decrease in the effective tax rate is primarily due to the consolidation of net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest and the $8,298 tax benefit recognized from the issuance of non-qualified stock options in 2009.
          Net Income Available to Common Shareholders
          Three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to three months ended March 31, 2008
          Net income attributable to Old Line Bancshares was $512,327 for the three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to $444, 833 for the three month period ended March 31, 2008. Net income available to common shareholders was $409,755 or $0.11 per basic and diluted common share for the three month period ending March 31, 2009 compared to net income available to common shareholders of $444,833 or $0.11 per basic and diluted common share for the same period in 2008. The increase in net income attributable to Old Line Bancshares for the 2009 period was primarily the result of a $161,120 increase in net interest income after provision for loan losses and a $371,162 increase in non-interest revenue compared to the same period in 2008. These items were offset by a $316,820 increase in non-interest expense, a $48,687 increase in income taxes, and the elimination of the $99,281 noncontrolling interest compared to the same period in 2008. The decrease in net income available to common shareholders for the 2009 period was primarily due to the $102,572 preferred stock dividend payable to the U.S. Treasury during the period for its $7 million investment in the preferred stock. This preferred stock was not issued as of March 31, 2008. Earnings per common share remained comparable for the period on a basic and diluted basis because of marginally lower earnings in 2009 and because the average number of common shares decreased by 171,762 common shares from 4,034,126 for the three months ended March 31, 2008 to 3,862,364 for the same period in 2009. This occurred because we repurchased 217,085 shares of common stock during 2008.
Analysis of Financial Condition
          Investment Securities
          Our portfolio consists primarily of time deposits in other banks, investment grade securities including U.S. Treasury securities, U.S. government agency securities, U.S. government sponsored entity securities, securities issued by states, counties and municipalities, mortgage-backed securities, and certain equity securities, including Federal Reserve Bank stock, Federal Home Loan Bank stock, Maryland Financial Bank stock and Atlantic Central Bankers Bank stock. We have prudently managed our investment portfolio to maintain liquidity and safety and we have never owned stock in Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac or any of the more complex securities available in the market. The portfolio provides a source of liquidity, collateral for borrowings as well as a means of diversifying our earning asset portfolio. While we generally intend to hold the investment securities until maturity, we classify a significant portion of the investment securities as available for sale. We account for investment securities so classified at fair value and report the unrealized appreciation and depreciation as a separate component of stockholders’ equity, net of income tax effects. We account for investment securities classified in the held to maturity category at amortized cost. We invest in securities for the yield they produce and not to profit from trading the securities. There are no trading securities in the portfolio.

23


 

          The investment securities at March 31, 2009 amounted to $38.5 million, an increase of $931,116 million, or 2.48%, from the December 31, 2008 amount of $37.6 million. Available for sale investment securities increased to $30.9 million at March 31, 2009 from $29.6 million at December 31, 2008. The increase in the available for sale investment securities occurred because we deployed federal funds into higher yielding investment securities. Held to maturity securities at March 31, 2009 decreased to $7.6 million from the $8.0 million balance on December 31, 2008 because securities matured or were called during the period. The fair value of available for sale securities included net unrealized gains of $707,835 at March 31, 2009 (reflected as unrealized gains of $428,629 in stockholders’ equity after deferred taxes) as compared to net unrealized gains of $648,356 ($392,611 net of taxes) as of December 31, 2008. In general, the increase in fair value was a result of maturities, decreasing market rates and changes in investment ratings. As required under SFAS No. 115, we have evaluated securities with unrealized losses for an extended period of time and determined that these losses are temporary because, at this point in time, we expect to hold them until maturity. As the maturity date moves closer and/or interest rates decline, the unrealized losses in the portfolio will decline or dissipate.
          Loan Portfolio
          Loans secured by real estate or luxury boats comprise the majority of the loan portfolio. Old Line Bank’s loan customers are generally located in the greater Washington, D.C. metropolitan area.
          The loan portfolio, net of allowance, unearned fees and origination costs, increased $15.7 million or 6.79% to $246.8 million at March 31, 2009 from $231.1 million at December 31, 2008. Commercial business loans increased by $5.6 million (8.00%), commercial real estate loans increased by $12.7 million (11.46%), residential real estate loans (generally home equity and fixed rate home improvement loans) increased by $749,000 (5.84%), real estate construction loans (primarily commercial real estate construction) decreased by $2.4 million (10.26%) and consumer loans decreased by $585,000 (3.74%) from their respective balances at December 31, 2008.
          During the first three months of 2009, we received scheduled loan payoffs on construction loans that negatively impacted our loan growth for the period. In spite of these payoffs, we experienced a 6.79% growth in the loan portfolio. We saw loan and deposit growth generated from our entire team of lenders, branch personnel and board of directors. We anticipate the entire team will continue to focus their efforts on business development during the remainder of 2009 and continue to grow the loan portfolio. However, continued deterioration in the economic climate may cause slower loan growth.
          The following table outlines those construction loans that have an interest reserve included in the commitment amount and where advances on the loan currently pay the interest due.
                                 
    3/31/09     12/31/08  
    # of             # of        
    Borrowers     (000’s)     Borrowers     (000’s)  
Loans with interest paid from loan advances:
                               
Hotels
    3     $ 12,627       3     $ 8,563  
Owner occupied
                  1       2,882  
Single family acquisition & development
    5       6,133       5       5,889  
 
                       
 
    8     $ 18,760       9     $ 17,334  
 
                           
At inception, the total loan and commitment amount were equivalent to an appraised “as is” or “as developed” 80% or less loan to value. We continually monitor these loans and where appropriate have received new appraisals on these properties, additional collateral, a payment on the principal, or have downgraded the risk rating on the loan and increased our loan loss provision accordingly. In certain cases, these loans have experienced a delay in the project either as a result of delays in receiving regulatory approvals or the borrower has elected to delay the project because the current economic climate has caused real estate values to decline. Although payments on these loans are current, management monitors their performance closely.

24


 

The following table summarizes the composition of the loan portfolio by dollar amount and percentages:
Loan Portfolio
(Dollars in thousands)
                                 
    March 31     December 31,  
    2009     2008  
 
 
                               
Real Estate
                               
Commercial
  $ 123,458       49.64 %   $ 110,826       47.63 %
Construction
    21,039       8.46       23,422       10.07  
Residential
    13,569       5.46       12,820       5.51  
Commercial
    75,575       30.39       69,961       30.07  
Consumer
    15,053       6.05       15,638       6.72  
 
                         
 
    248,694       100.00 %     232,667       100.00 %
 
                           
Allowance for loan losses
    (2,284 )             (1,983 )        
Deferred loan costs, net
    431               370          
 
                           
 
  $ 246,841             $ 231,054          
 
                           
          Asset Quality
          Management performs reviews of all delinquent loans and directs relationship officers to work with customers to resolve potential credit issues in a timely manner. Management generally classifies loans as non-accrual when it does not expect collection of full principal and interest under the original terms of the loan or payment of principal or interest has become 90 days past due. Classifying a loan as non-accrual results in our no longer accruing interest on such loan and reversing any interest previously accrued but not collected. We will generally restore a non-accrual loan to accrual status when the borrower brings delinquent principal and interest payments current and we expect to collect future monthly principal and interest payments. We recognize interest on non-accrual loans only when received. At March 31, 2009, we had two loans totaling $1.5 million that were 90 days past due and were classified as non-accrual compared to one loan in the amount of $850,675 at December 31, 2008.
          As previously reported, in March 2009, the borrower on an approximately $700,000 residential real estate mortgage filed bankruptcy. We are currently in the process of determining the value of the property that secured this loan and are in negotiations with the borrower regarding reaffirmation of the debt. We have determined the loan is impaired and have allocated $175,000 of the allowance for loan losses for this loan. The borrower on the second loan in the amount of $839,875 at March 31, 2009 filed for bankruptcy protection in November, 2007 under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. In February 2009, the borrower exited bankruptcy. A commercial real estate property secures this loan. The loan to value at inception of this loan was 80%. During the first quarter of 2008, the borrower began remitting payments and advised us that the borrower planned to make all past due interest and principal current prior to March 31, 2009. Through October 2008, the borrower remitted regular payments plus a portion of the arrearage. In November 2008, the borrower requested a revision to this repayment schedule with full repayment of all past due amounts to occur by May 2010. We expect to receive payment in full on this loan. Therefore, we do not consider it impaired and have not designated a specific allowance for this non-accrual loan. As of March 31, 2009, the interest not accrued on these loans was $108,085 none of which was included in net income for the quarter ended March 31, 2009. Other than the loans outlined above there were no loans 30 days or more past due as of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008.

25


 

          We classify any property acquired as a result of foreclosure on a mortgage loan as “real estate owned” and record it at the lower of the unpaid principal balance or fair value at the date of acquisition and subsequently carry the loan at the lower of cost or net realizable value. We charge any required write-down of the loan to its net realizable value against the allowance for loan losses at the time of foreclosure. We charge to expense any subsequent adjustments to net realizable value. Upon foreclosure, Old Line Bank generally requires an appraisal of the property and, thereafter, appraisals of the property on at least an annual basis and external inspections on at least a quarterly basis. As of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, we held no real estate acquired as a result of foreclosure.
          We apply the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 114 (“SFAS No. 114”), Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan, as amended by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 118 (“SFAS No. 118”), Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan-Income Recognition and Disclosure. SFAS No. 114 and SFAS No. 118 require that impaired loans, which consist of all modified loans and other loans for which collection of all contractual principal and interest is not probable, be measured based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, or at the loan’s observable market price or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. If the measure of the impaired loan is less than the recorded investment in the loan, we recognize impairment through a valuation allowance and corresponding provision for loan losses. Old Line Bank considers consumer loans as homogenous loans and thus does not apply the SFAS No. 114 impairment test to these loans. We write off impaired loans when collection of the loan is doubtful.
          As of March 31, 2009 we had one impaired loan as outlined above and no restructured loans. At December 31, 2008, we had no impaired or restructured loans. Although we are currently unaware that any of our borrowers are facing significant financial difficulty and have no impaired or restructured loans, a continued decline in the economy may adversely affect our asset quality.
          Bank owned life insurance
          In June 2005, we purchased $3.3 million of BOLI on the lives of our executive officers, Messrs. Cornelsen and Burnett and Ms. Rush. With a new $4 million investment made in February 2007, we increased the insurance on Messrs. Cornelsen and Burnett and expanded the coverage of the insurance policies to insure the lives of several other officers of Old Line Bank. We anticipate the earnings on these policies will pay for our employee benefit expenses as well as our obligations under our Salary Continuation Agreements and Supplemental Life Insurance Agreements that we entered into with our executive officers in January 2006. Higher rates caused increased earnings during the first three months of 2009 and the cash surrender value of the insurance policies increased by $81,471. There were no post retirement death benefits associated with the BOLI policies.
          Deposits
          We seek deposits within our market area by paying competitive interest rates, offering high quality customer service and using technology to deliver deposit services effectively.
          At March 31, 2009, the deposit portfolio had grown to $240.3 million, an $8.9 million or 3.85% increase over the December 31, 2008 level of $231.4 million. Noninterest-bearing deposits decreased $3.5 million during the period to $36.4 million from $39.9 million primarily due to existing customers moving funds into interest bearing accounts. Interest-bearing deposits grew $12.3 million to $203.9 million from $191.6 million. Approximately $8.9 million of the increase in interest bearing deposits was in certificates of deposit and the remainder was in money market and savings accounts. The growth in these categories was the result of expansion of existing customer relationships and new customers.
          In the first quarter of 2006, we began acquiring brokered certificates of deposit through the Promontory Interfinancial Network. Through this deposit matching network and its certificate of deposit account registry service (CDARS), we obtained the ability to offer our customers access to FDIC-insured deposit products in aggregate amounts exceeding current insurance limits. When we place funds through CDARS on behalf of a customer, we receive matching deposits through the network’s reciprocal deposit program. We can also place deposits through this network without receiving matching deposits. At March 31, 2009, we had $30.9 million in CDARS through the reciprocal deposit program compared to $31.8 million at December 31, 2008. We had received $17.0 million at March 31, 2009 and $12.1 million at December 31, 2008 in deposits through the CDARS network that were not reciprocal deposits.

26


 

          Borrowings
          Old Line Bank has available lines of credit, including overnight federal funds and repurchase agreements from its correspondent banks totaling $25.9 million as of March 31, 2009. Old Line Bank has an additional secured line of credit from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta (FHLB) that totaled $92.8 million at March 31, 2009 and $85.4 million at December 31, 2008. As a condition of obtaining the line of credit from the FHLB, the FHLB requires that Old Line Bank purchase shares of capital stock in the FHLB. Prior to allowing Old Line Bank to borrow under the line of credit, the FHLB also requires that Old Line Bank provide collateral to support borrowings. Therefore, at March 31, 2009 we have provided collateral to support up to $74.9 million of borrowings. Of this, we had borrowed $15 million at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008.
          Short-term borrowings consisted of short-term promissory notes issued to Old Line Bank’s customers. Old Line Bank offers its commercial customers an enhancement to the basic non-interest bearing demand deposit account. This service electronically sweeps excess funds from the customer’s account into an interest-bearing Master Note with Old Line Bank. These Master Notes re-price daily and have maturities of 270 days or less. At March 31, 2009, Old Line Bank had $24.7 million outstanding in these short term promissory notes with an average interest rate of 0.45%. At December 31, 2008, Old Line Bank had $17.8 million outstanding with an average interest rate of 0.50%.
          At March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, Old Line Bank had three advances in the amount of $5 million each, from the FHLB totaling $15 million. On November 24, 2007, Old Line Bank borrowed $5.0 million with an interest rate of 3.66%. Interest is due on the 23rd day of each February, May, August and November, commencing on February 23, 2008. On November 23, 2008, or any interest payment date thereafter, the FHLB has the option to convert the interest rate on this advance from a fixed rate to a three (3) month London Interbank Offer Rate (LIBOR) based variable rate. Old Line Bank must repay this advance in full on November 23, 2010.
          On December 12, 2007, Old Line Bank borrowed another $5.0 million from the FHLB. The interest rate on this advance is 3.3575% and interest is payable on the 12th day of each March, June, September and December, commencing on March 12, 2008. On December 12, 2008, or any interest payment date thereafter, the FHLB has the option to convert the interest rate on this advance to a fixed rate three (3) month LIBOR. The maturity date on this advance is December 12, 2012.
          On December 19, 2007, Old Line Bank borrowed an additional $5.0 million from the FHLB. The interest rate on this borrowing is 3.119% and is payable on the 19th day of each month. On January 22, 2008 or any interest payment date thereafter, the FHLB has the option to convert the interest rate on this advance from a fixed rate to a one (1) month LIBOR based variable rate. This borrowing matures on December 19, 2012.
          As outlined previously, as a result of increasing our membership interest in Pointer Ridge to 62.5%, we have consolidated their results of operation from the date of acquisition. Prior to the date of acquisition, we accounted for our investment in Pointer Ridge using the equity method. On August 25, 2006, Pointer Ridge entered into an Amended and Restated Promissory note in the principal amount of $6.6 million. This loan accrues interest at a rate of 6.28% through September 5, 2016. After September 5, 2016, the rate adjusts to the greater of (i) 6.28% plus 200 basis points or (ii) the Treasury Rate (as defined in the Amended Promissory Note) plus 200 basis points. At December 31, 2008, Pointer Ridge had borrowed $6.5 million under the Amended Promissory Note. We have guaranteed to the lender payment of up to 62.5% of the loan payment plus any costs the lender incurs resulting from any omissions or alleged acts or omissions by Pointer Ridge arising out of or relating to misapplication or misappropriation of money, rents received after an event of default, waste or damage to the property, failure to maintain insurance, fraud or material misrepresentation, filing of bankruptcy or Pointer Ridge’s failure to maintain its status as a single purpose entity.

27


 

          Interest Rate Sensitivity Analysis and Interest Rate Risk Management
          A principal objective of Old Line Bank’s asset/liability management policy is to minimize exposure to changes in interest rates by an ongoing review of the maturity and re-pricing of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. The Asset and Liability Committee of the Board of Directors oversees this review.
          The Asset and Liability Committee establishes policies to control interest rate sensitivity. Interest rate sensitivity is the volatility of a bank’s earnings resulting from movements in market interest rates. Management monitors rate sensitivity in order to reduce vulnerability to interest rate fluctuations while maintaining adequate capital levels and acceptable levels of liquidity. Monthly financial reports supply management with information to evaluate and manage rate sensitivity and adherence to policy. Old Line Bank’s asset/liability policy’s goal is to manage assets and liabilities in a manner that stabilizes net interest income and net economic value within a broad range of interest rate environments. Management makes adjustments to the mix of assets and liabilities periodically in an effort to achieve dependable, steady growth in net interest income regardless of the behavior of interest rates in general.
          As part of the interest rate risk sensitivity analysis, the Asset and Liability Committee examines the extent to which Old Line Bank’s assets and liabilities are interest rate sensitive and monitors the interest rate sensitivity gap. An interest rate sensitive asset or liability is one that, within a defined time period, either matures or experiences an interest rate change in line with general market rates. The interest rate sensitivity gap is the difference between interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities scheduled to mature or re-price within such time period. A gap is considered positive when the amount of interest rate sensitive assets exceeds the amount of interest rate sensitive liabilities. A gap is considered negative when the amount of interest rate sensitive liabilities exceeds the amount of interest rate sensitive assets. During a period of rising interest rates, a negative gap would tend to adversely affect net interest income, while a positive gap would tend to result in an increase in net interest income. During a period of declining interest rates, a negative gap would tend to result in an increase in net interest income, while a positive gap would tend to adversely affect net interest income. If re-pricing of assets and liabilities were equally flexible and moved concurrently, the impact of any increase or decrease in interest rates on net interest income would be minimal.
          Old Line Bank currently has a negative gap over the short term, which suggests that the net yield on interest earning assets may decrease during periods of rising interest rates. However, a simple interest rate “gap” analysis by itself may not be an accurate indicator of how changes in interest rates will affect net interest income. Changes in interest rates may not uniformly affect income associated with interest-earning assets and costs associated with interest-bearing liabilities. In addition, the magnitude and duration of changes in interest rates may have a significant impact on net interest income. Although certain assets and liabilities may have similar maturities or periods of re-pricing, they may react in different degrees to changes in market interest rates. Interest rates on certain types of assets and liabilities fluctuate in advance of changes in general market interest rates, while interest rates on other types may lag behind changes in general market rates. In the event of a change in interest rates, prepayment and early withdrawal levels also could deviate significantly from those assumed in calculating the interest-rate gap. The ability of many borrowers to service their debts also may decrease in the event of an interest rate increase.
          Liquidity
          Our overall asset/liability strategy takes into account our need to maintain adequate liquidity to fund asset growth and deposit runoff. Our management monitors the liquidity position daily in conjunction with Federal Reserve guidelines. We have credit lines unsecured and secured available from several correspondent banks totaling $25.9 million. Additionally, we may borrow funds from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta and the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond. We can use these credit facilities in conjunction with the normal deposit strategies, which include pricing changes to increase deposits as necessary. We can also sell or pledge available for sale investment securities to create additional liquidity. From time to time we may sell or participate out loans to create additional liquidity as required. Additional sources of liquidity include funds held in time deposits and cash from the investment and loan portfolios.

28


 

          Our immediate sources of liquidity are cash and due from banks and federal funds sold. On March 31, 2009, we had $7.1 million in cash and due from banks, and $111,267 in federal funds sold and overnight investments. As of December 31, 2008, we had $8.8 million in cash and due from banks, and $2.1 million in federal funds sold and other overnight investments. Federal funds decreased because we deployed these funds to loans.
          Old Line Bank has sufficient liquidity to meet its loan commitments as well as fluctuations in deposits. We usually retain maturing certificates of deposit as we offer competitive rates on certificates of deposit. Management is not aware of any demands, trends, commitments, or events that would result in Old Line Bank’s inability to meet anticipated or unexpected liquidity needs.
          During the recent period of turmoil in the financial markets, some institutions experienced large deposit withdrawals that caused liquidity problems. We did not have any significant withdrawals of deposits or any liquidity issues. Although we plan for various liquidity scenarios, if turmoil in the financial markets continues or worsens and our depositors lose confidence in us, we could experience liquidity issues.
          Capital
          Our stockholders’ equity amounted to $42.8 million at March 31, 2009 and $42.3 million at December 31, 2008. We are considered “well capitalized” under the risk-based capital guidelines adopted by the Federal Reserve. Stockholders’ equity increased during the three month period by net income of $512,327. The $70,609 adjustment for stock based compensation awards and the $36,018 after tax unrealized gain on available for sale securities also increased stockholders’ equity. These items were partially offset by the $115,871 dividend paid in March on common stock and the $102,572 accrued dividend and accretion discount on the preferred stock issued to the U.S. Treasury. By all regulatory measures, we remain well capitalized.
Contractual Obligations, Commitments, Contingent Liabilities, and Off-balance Sheet Arrangements
          Old Line Bancshares is a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business. These financial instruments primarily include commitments to extend credit, lines of credit and standby letters of credit. Old Line Bancshares uses these financial instruments to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit, interest rate, and liquidity risk. These commitments do not represent unusual risks and management does not anticipate any losses which would have a material effect on Old Line Bancshares. Old Line Bancshares also has operating lease obligations.
          Outstanding loan commitments and lines and letters of credit at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, are as follows:
                 
    March 31,     December 31,  
    2009     2008  
 
    (Dollars in thousands)  
 
               
Commitments to extend credit and available credit lines:
               
Commercial
  $ 24,336     $ 23,937  
Real estate-undisbursed development and construction
    14,970       21,981  
Real estate-undisbursed home equity lines of credit
    8,951       5,515  
 
           
 
               
 
  $ 48,257     $ 51,433  
 
           
 
               
Standby letters of credit
  $ 1,220     $ 1,583  
 
           

29


 

          Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Old Line Bancshares generally requires collateral to support financial instruments with credit risk on the same basis as it does for on-balance sheet instruments. The collateral is based on management’s credit evaluation of the counter party. Commitments generally have interest rates fixed at current market rates, expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Available credit lines represent the unused portion of lines of credit previously extended and available to the customer so long as there is no violation of any contractual condition. These lines generally have variable interest rates. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, and since it is unlikely that customers will draw upon their lines of credit in full at any time, the total commitment amount or line of credit amount does not necessarily represent future cash requirements. We evaluate each customer’s credit-worthiness on a case-by-case basis. During this period of economic turmoil, we have re-evaluated many of our commitments to extend credit. Because we conservatively underwrite these facilities at inception, we have not had to withdraw any commitments. We are not aware of any loss that we would incur by funding our commitments or lines of credit.
          Commitments for real estate development and construction, which totaled $15.0 million, or 30.80% of the $48.6 million of outstanding commitments at March 31, 2009, are generally short-term and turn over rapidly with principal repayment from permanent financing arrangements upon completion of construction or from sales of the properties financed.
          Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. Our exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the customer is the contract amount of the commitment. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loan facilities to customers. In general, loan commitments, credit lines and letters of credit are made on the same terms, including with respect to collateral, as outstanding loans. We evaluate each customer’s credit-worthiness and the collateral required on a case-by-case basis.
Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures
          Below is a reconciliation of the fully tax equivalent adjustments and the GAAP basis information presented in this report:
Three months ended March 31, 2009
                                         
                                    Net  
    Federal Funds     Investment     Interest     Net Interest     Interest  
    Sold     Securities     Earning Assets     Income     Spread  
GAAP interest income
  $ 435     $ 411,962     $ 4,101,948     $ 2,652,253          
Tax equivalent adjustment
    1       16,931       16,932       16,932          
 
                               
Tax equivalent interest income
  $ 436     $ 428,893     $ 4,118,880     $ 2,669,185          
 
                               
 
                                       
GAAP interest yield
    0.42 %     4.15 %     5.68 %     3.67 %     3.25 %
Taxable equivalent adjustment
    0.01 %     0.17 %     0.03 %     0.03 %     0.03 %
 
                             
Tax equivalent interest yield
    0.43 %     4.32 %     5.71 %     3.70 %     3.28 %
 
                             
Three months ended March 31, 2008
                                         
                                    Net  
    Federal Funds     Investment     Interest     Net Interest     Interest  
    Sold     Securities     Earning Assets     Income     Spread  
GAAP interest income
  $ 126,378     $ 120,114     $ 3,770,442     $ 2,229,533          
Tax equivalent adjustment
    2,815       15,021       17,836       17,836          
 
                               
Tax equivalent interest income
  $ 129,193     $ 135,135     $ 3,788,278     $ 2,247,369          
 
                               
 
                                       
GAAP interest yield
    3.03 %     3.82 %     6.45 %     3.81 %     3.05 %
Taxable equivalent adjustment
    0.07 %     0.48 %     0.03 %     0.03 %     0.03 %
 
                             
Tax equivalent interest yield
    3.10 %     4.30 %     6.48 %     3.84 %     3.08 %
 
                             

30


 

Impact of Inflation and Changing Prices
          Management has prepared the financial statements and related data presented herein in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles which require the measurement of financial position and operating results in terms of historical dollars, without considering changes in the relative purchasing power of money over time due to inflation.
          Unlike industrial companies, virtually all the assets and liabilities of a financial institution are monetary in nature. As a result, interest rates have a more significant impact on a financial institution’s performance than the effects of general levels of inflation. Interest rates do not necessarily move in the same direction or in the same magnitude as the price of goods and services, and may frequently reflect government policy initiatives or economic factors not measured by price index. As discussed above, we strive to manage our interest sensitive assets and liabilities in order to offset the effects of rate changes and inflation.
Application of Critical Accounting Policies
          We prepare our financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and follow general practices within the industry in which we operate. Application of these principles requires management to make estimates, assumptions, and judgments that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. We base these estimates, assumptions, and judgments on information available as of the date of the financial statements; accordingly, as this information changes, the financial statements could reflect different estimates, assumptions, and judgments. Certain policies inherently have a greater reliance on the use of estimates, assumptions, and judgments and as such have a greater possibility of producing results that could be materially different than originally reported. Estimates, assumptions, and judgments are necessary when assets and liabilities are required to be recorded at fair value, when a decline in the value of an asset not carried on the financial statements at fair value warrants an impairment write-down or valuation reserve to be established, or when an asset or liability needs to be recorded contingent upon a future event. Carrying assets and liabilities at fair value inherently results in more financial statement volatility. We base the fair values and the information used to record valuation adjustments for certain assets and liabilities on quoted market prices or from information other third-party sources provide, when available.
          Based on the valuation techniques used and the sensitivity of financial statement amounts to the methods, assumptions, and estimates underlying those amounts, management has identified the determination of the provision for loan losses as the accounting area that requires the most subjective or complex judgments, and as such could be most subject to revision as new information becomes available.

31


 

          Management has significant discretion in making the judgments inherent in the determination of the provision and allowance for loan losses, including in connection with the valuation of collateral and the financial condition of the borrower, and in establishing loss ratios and risk ratings. The establishment of allowance factors is a continuing exercise and allowance factors may change over time, resulting in an increase or decrease in the amount of the provision or allowance based upon the same volume and classification of loans.
          Changes in allowance factors or in management’s interpretation of those factors will have a direct impact on the amount of the provision, and a corresponding effect on income and assets. Also, errors in management’s perception and assessment of the allowance factors could result in the allowance not being adequate to cover losses in the portfolio, and may result in additional provisions or charge-offs, which would adversely affect income and capital. For additional information regarding the allowance for loan losses, see “Provision for Loan Losses”.
Information Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
          This report contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). We may also include forward-looking statements in other statements that we make. All statements that are not descriptions of historical facts are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements often use words such as “believe,” “expect,” “plan,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “project,” “contemplate,” “anticipate,” “forecast,” “intend” or other words of similar meaning. You can also identify them by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts.
          The statements presented herein with respect to, among other things, Old Line Bancshares’ plans, objectives, expectations and intentions, including branch and market expansion, statements regarding anticipated changes in revenue and expenses, our expectation that Pointer Ridge will operate at a slight loss for the remainder of 2009, future sources of earnings/income, strategic opportunities, sources of liquidity, the allowance for loan losses, expected loan, deposit and asset growth, costs of funds, our intentions with respect to our investment securities, losses on non-accrual loans, interest rate sensitivity, the expected income from new branches offsetting related expenses, expected openings of new branches, earnings on BOLI and financial and other goals and plans are forward looking. Old Line Bancshares bases these statements on our beliefs, assumptions and on information available to us as of the date of this filing, which involves risks and uncertainties. These risks and uncertainties include, among others those discussed in this report; the ability of Old Line Bancshares to retain key personnel; the ability of Old Line Bancshares to successfully implement its growth and expansion strategy; risk of loan losses; that the allowance for loan losses may not be sufficient; that changes in interest rates and monetary policy could adversely affect Old Line Bancshares; that changes in regulatory requirements and/or restrictive banking legislation may adversely affect Old Line Bancshares; that the market value of investments could negatively impact stockholders’ equity; risks associated with Old Line Bancshares’ lending limit; increased expenses due to stock benefit plans; expenses associated with operating as a public company; potential conflicts of interest associated with the interest in Pointer Ridge; further deterioration in general economic conditions; and changes in competitive, governmental, regulatory, technological and other factors which may affect Old Line Bancshares specifically or the banking industry generally. For a more complete discussion of some of these risks and uncertainties see “Factors Affecting Future Results” in Old Line Bancshares’ Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
          Old Line Bancshares’ actual results and the actual outcome of our expectations and strategies could differ materially from those anticipated or estimated because of these risks and uncertainties and you should not put undue reliance on any forward-looking statements. All forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this filing, and Old Line Bancshares undertakes no obligation to update the forward-looking statements to reflect factual assumptions, circumstances or events that have changed after we have made the forward-looking statements.

32


 

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
          Market risk is the exposure to economic loss that arises from changes in the values of certain financial instruments. Due to the nature of our operations, only interest rate risk is significant to our consolidated results of operations or financial position. For information regarding our Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk, see “Interest Rate Sensitivity Analysis and Interest Rate Risk Management” in Part I, Item 2 of this Form 10-Q.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
          As of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, Old Line Bancshares’ Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer evaluated the effectiveness of Old Line Bancshares’ disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act. Based upon that evaluation, Old Line Bancshares’ Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that Old Line Bancshares’ disclosure controls and procedures are effective as of March 31, 2009. Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by Old Line Bancshares in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms.
          In addition, there were no changes in Old Line Bancshares’ internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the quarter ended March 31, 2009, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, Old Line Bancshares’ internal control over financial reporting.
PART II-OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
          None
Item 1A. Risk Factors
          There have been no material changes in the risk factors from those disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
          None
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
          None
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
          None
Item 5. Other Information
          None
Item 6. Exhibits
     
31.1
  Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer
 
   
31.2
  Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer
 
   
32
  Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

33


 

SIGNATURES
          Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
         
  Old Line Bancshares, Inc.
 
 
Date: May 12, 2009  By:   /s/ James W. Cornelsen    
    James W. Cornelsen,   
    President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) 
 
 
     
Date: May 12, 2009  By:   /s/ Christine M. Rush    
    Christine M. Rush,   
    Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Accounting and Financial Officer) 
 
 

34