e10vq
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Commission File Number: 000-50345
Old Line Bancshares, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Maryland
|
|
20-0154352 |
(State or other jurisdiction
of incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
1525 Pointer Ridge Place
Bowie, Maryland
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
20716
(Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (301) 430-2500
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such files.
Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:
Large accelerated filer o |
Accelerated filer o |
Non-accelerated filer o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Smaller reporting company þ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
As of May 8, 2009, the registrant had 3,862,364 shares of common stock outstanding.
Part I. Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements
Old Line Bancshares, Inc. & Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
$ |
7,053,061 |
|
|
$ |
8,823,170 |
|
Federal funds sold |
|
|
111,267 |
|
|
|
2,140,525 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
7,164,328 |
|
|
|
10,963,695 |
|
Time deposits in other banks |
|
|
11,638,162 |
|
|
|
13,267,000 |
|
Investment securities available for sale |
|
|
30,869,489 |
|
|
|
29,565,976 |
|
Investment securities held to maturity |
|
|
7,630,994 |
|
|
|
8,003,391 |
|
Loans, less allowance for loan losses |
|
|
246,841,748 |
|
|
|
231,053,618 |
|
Restricted equity securities at cost |
|
|
2,765,650 |
|
|
|
2,126,550 |
|
Premises and equipment |
|
|
12,258,128 |
|
|
|
12,388,046 |
|
Accrued interest receivable |
|
|
1,126,374 |
|
|
|
1,091,560 |
|
Prepaid income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,649 |
|
Bank owned life insurance |
|
|
8,177,510 |
|
|
|
8,096,039 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
2,505,564 |
|
|
|
1,139,101 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
330,977,947 |
|
|
$ |
317,730,625 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing |
|
$ |
36,403,344 |
|
|
$ |
39,880,119 |
|
Interest-bearing |
|
|
203,851,047 |
|
|
|
191,550,521 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits |
|
|
240,254,391 |
|
|
|
231,430,640 |
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
24,661,925 |
|
|
|
17,773,934 |
|
Long-term borrowings |
|
|
21,510,918 |
|
|
|
21,531,133 |
|
Accrued interest payable |
|
|
588,637 |
|
|
|
625,446 |
|
Income tax payable |
|
|
177,349 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
66,614 |
|
|
|
65,651 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
912,397 |
|
|
|
4,012,968 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
288,172,231 |
|
|
|
275,439,772 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share and additional paid in
capital; 7,000 shares issued and outstanding |
|
|
6,718,662 |
|
|
|
6,703,591 |
|
Common stock, par value $0.01 per share; authorized 15,000,000 shares;
issued and outstanding 3,862,364 in 2009 and 2008 |
|
|
38,624 |
|
|
|
38,624 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
28,909,419 |
|
|
|
28,838,810 |
|
Warrants to purchase 141,892 shares of common stock |
|
|
301,434 |
|
|
|
301,434 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
5,705,656 |
|
|
|
5,411,772 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
428,629 |
|
|
|
392,611 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Old Line Bancshares, Inc. stockholders equity |
|
|
42,102,424 |
|
|
|
41,686,842 |
|
Noncontrolling interest |
|
|
703,292 |
|
|
|
604,011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity |
|
|
42,805,716 |
|
|
|
42,290,853 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity |
|
$ |
330,977,947 |
|
|
$ |
317,730,625 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements
1
Old Line Bancshares, Inc. & Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Income
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Interest revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, including fees |
|
$ |
3,601,883 |
|
|
$ |
3,503,684 |
|
U.S. Treasury securities |
|
|
4,856 |
|
|
|
22,487 |
|
U.S. government agency securities |
|
|
102,921 |
|
|
|
25,532 |
|
Mortgage backed securities |
|
|
267,921 |
|
|
|
18,059 |
|
Municipal securities |
|
|
22,999 |
|
|
|
24,917 |
|
Federal funds sold |
|
|
435 |
|
|
|
126,378 |
|
Other |
|
|
100,933 |
|
|
|
49,385 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest revenue |
|
|
4,101,948 |
|
|
|
3,770,442 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
1,189,384 |
|
|
|
1,334,837 |
|
Borrowed funds |
|
|
260,311 |
|
|
|
206,072 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense |
|
|
1,449,695 |
|
|
|
1,540,909 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
2,652,253 |
|
|
|
2,229,533 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
|
38,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income after provision for loan losses |
|
|
2,352,253 |
|
|
|
2,191,133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service charges on deposit accounts |
|
|
79,089 |
|
|
|
72,952 |
|
Earnings on bank owned life insurance |
|
|
93,461 |
|
|
|
91,603 |
|
Income on investment in real estate LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,896 |
|
Other fees and commissions |
|
|
431,050 |
|
|
|
54,987 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest revenue |
|
|
603,600 |
|
|
|
232,438 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries |
|
|
837,057 |
|
|
|
734,931 |
|
Employee benefits |
|
|
302,424 |
|
|
|
269,453 |
|
Occupancy |
|
|
232,181 |
|
|
|
279,922 |
|
Equipment |
|
|
79,878 |
|
|
|
70,475 |
|
Data processing |
|
|
75,337 |
|
|
|
61,252 |
|
Other operating |
|
|
535,253 |
|
|
|
329,277 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest expense |
|
|
2,062,130 |
|
|
|
1,745,310 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
893,723 |
|
|
|
678,261 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes |
|
|
282,115 |
|
|
|
233,428 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
611,608 |
|
|
|
444,833 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest |
|
|
99,281 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Old Line Bancshares, Inc. |
|
|
512,327 |
|
|
|
444,833 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock dividends and discount accretion |
|
|
102,572 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available to common shareholders |
|
$ |
409,755 |
|
|
$ |
444,833 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per common share |
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
Diluted earnings per common share |
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements
2
Old Line Bancshares, Inc. & Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders Equity
Three Months Ended March 31, 2009
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
& |
|
|
Common stock |
|
|
paid-in |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
comprehensive |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Noncontrolling |
|
|
|
Warrants |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Par value |
|
|
capital |
|
|
earnings |
|
|
income |
|
|
income |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2008 |
|
|
7,005,025 |
|
|
|
3,862,364 |
|
|
$ |
38,624 |
|
|
$ |
28,838,810 |
|
|
$ |
5,411,772 |
|
|
$ |
392,611 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
604,011 |
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
512,327 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
512,327 |
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain on
securities available for
sale, net of income taxes of $23,461 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,018 |
|
|
|
36,018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
548,345 |
|
|
|
99,281 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock based compensation awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,609 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock cash dividend
$0.03 per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(115,871 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock dividend and accretion |
|
|
15,071 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(102,572 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, March 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
7,020,096 |
|
|
|
3,862,364 |
|
|
$ |
38,624 |
|
|
$ |
28,909,419 |
|
|
$ |
5,705,656 |
|
|
$ |
428,629 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
703,292 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements
3
Old Line Bancshares, Inc. & Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest received |
|
$ |
4,022,418 |
|
|
$ |
3,653,997 |
|
Fees and commissions received |
|
|
522,129 |
|
|
|
137,262 |
|
Interest paid |
|
|
(1,486,504 |
) |
|
|
(1,656,524 |
) |
Cash paid to suppliers and employees |
|
|
(6,316,141 |
) |
|
|
(1,560,139 |
) |
Income taxes paid |
|
|
(92,578 |
) |
|
|
(402,307 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,350,676 |
) |
|
|
172,289 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease of time deposits in other banks |
|
|
1,628,838 |
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of investment securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held to maturity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,241,731 |
) |
Available for sale |
|
|
(3,103,269 |
) |
|
|
(2,000,000 |
) |
Proceeds from disposal of investment securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held to maturity at maturity or call |
|
|
374,057 |
|
|
|
|
|
Available for sale at maturity or call |
|
|
1,840,790 |
|
|
|
5,467,425 |
|
Loans made, net of principal collected |
|
|
(16,026,628 |
) |
|
|
(1,257,882 |
) |
Purchase of equity securities |
|
|
(639,100 |
) |
|
|
(46,300 |
) |
Investment in real estate LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(100 |
) |
Purchase of premises, equipment and software |
|
|
(30,979 |
) |
|
|
(375,337 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,956,291 |
) |
|
|
(5,453,925 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time deposits |
|
|
8,894,793 |
|
|
|
7,064,240 |
|
Other deposits |
|
|
(71,042 |
) |
|
|
1,895,418 |
|
Net increase in short-term borrowings |
|
|
6,887,991 |
|
|
|
5,489,748 |
|
(Decrease) increase in long-term borrowings |
|
|
(20,215 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Repurchase of common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,385,554 |
) |
Cash dividends paid-preferred stock |
|
|
(68,056 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends paid-common stock |
|
|
(115,871 |
) |
|
|
(121,420 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,507,600 |
|
|
|
12,942,432 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(3,799,367 |
) |
|
|
7,660,796 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year |
|
|
10,963,695 |
|
|
|
12,994,168 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year |
|
$ |
7,164,328 |
|
|
$ |
20,654,964 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements
4
Old Line Bancshares, Inc. & Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciliation of net income to net cash
provided by operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
512,327 |
|
|
$ |
444,833 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net
cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
167,177 |
|
|
|
97,644 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
|
38,400 |
|
Change in deferred loan fees net of costs |
|
|
(61,502 |
) |
|
|
(60,118 |
) |
Amortization of premiums and discounts |
|
|
16,786 |
|
|
|
890 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(23,461 |
) |
|
|
(9,069 |
) |
Stock based compensation awards |
|
|
70,609 |
|
|
|
44,879 |
|
(Income) loss from investment in real estate LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,896 |
) |
Increase (decrease) in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued interest payable |
|
|
(36,809 |
) |
|
|
(115,615 |
) |
Other liabilities |
|
|
(2,835,723 |
) |
|
|
(3,925 |
) |
Decrease (increase) in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued interest receivable |
|
|
(34,814 |
) |
|
|
(57,217 |
) |
Bank owned life insurance |
|
|
(81,471 |
) |
|
|
(82,180 |
) |
Other assets |
|
|
(1,343,795 |
) |
|
|
(113,337 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(3,350,676 |
) |
|
$ |
172,289 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements
5
Old Line Bancshares, Inc. & Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
1. |
|
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES |
|
|
|
Organization and Description of Business-Old Line Bancshares, Inc. (Old Line Bancshares) was
incorporated under the laws of the State of Maryland on April 11, 2003 to serve as the
holding company of Old Line Bank. The primary business of Old Line Bancshares is to own all
of the capital stock of Old Line Bank. We provide a full range of banking services to
customers located in Prince Georges, Charles, Anne Arundel, and St. Marys counties in
Maryland and surrounding areas. |
|
|
|
On November 17, 2008, we purchased Chesapeake Custom Homes, L.L.C.s 12.5% membership
interest in Pointer Ridge Office Investment, LLC (Pointer Ridge), a real estate investment
company. The effective date of the purchase was November 1, 2008. As a result of this
purchase, our membership interest increased from 50.0% to 62.5%. Consequently, we
consolidated Pointer Ridges results of operations from the date of acquisition. Prior to
the date of acquisition, we accounted for our investment in Pointer Ridge using the equity
method. |
|
|
|
Basis of Presentation and Consolidation-The accompanying consolidated financial statements
include the activity of Old Line Bancshares and its wholly owned subsidiary, Old Line Bank,
and its majority owned membership interest in Pointer Ridge. We have eliminated all
significant intercompany transactions and balances. |
|
|
|
We report the noncontrolling interests in Pointer Ridge in the consolidated balance sheet.
We reported the income of Pointer Ridge attributable to Old Line Bancshares from the date of
our acquisition of majority interest separately on the consolidated statement of income. |
|
|
|
The foregoing consolidated financial statements are unaudited; however, in the opinion of
management we have included all adjustments (comprising only normal recurring accruals)
necessary for a fair presentation of the results of the interim period. We derived the
balances as of December 31, 2008 from audited financial statements. These statements should
be read in conjunction with Old Line Bancshares financial statements and accompanying notes
included in Old Line Bancshares Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. We have
made no significant changes to Old Line Bancshares accounting policies as disclosed in the
Form 10-K. |
|
|
|
The accounting and reporting policies of Old Line Bancshares conform to accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America. |
2. |
|
INVESTMENT SECURITIES |
|
|
|
As Old Line Bank purchases securities, management determines if we should classify the
securities as held to maturity, available for sale or trading. We record the securities
which management has the intent and ability to hold to maturity at amortized cost which is
cost adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts to maturity. We
classify securities which we may sell before maturity as available for sale and carry these
securities at fair value with unrealized gains and losses included in stockholders equity
on an after tax basis. Management has not identified any investment securities as trading. |
|
|
|
We record gains and losses on the sale of securities on the trade date and determine
these gains or losses using the specific identification method. We amortize premiums and
accrete discounts using the interest method. |
6
Old Line Bancshares, Inc. & Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
3. |
|
POINTER RIDGE OFFICE INVESTMENT, LLC |
|
|
|
On January 1, 2009, we adopted SFAS No. 160 (revised 2007), Noncontrolling Interests in
Consolidated Financial Statements. On November 17, 2008, we purchased Chesapeake Custom
Homes, L.L.C.s 12.5% membership interest in Pointer Ridge. The effective date of the
purchase was November 1, 2008. As a result of this purchase, we own 62.5% of Pointer Ridge
and consolidated their results of operations from the date of acquisition. |
|
|
|
The following table summarizes the condensed Balance Sheets and Statements of Income
information for Pointer Ridge. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
Balance Sheets |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
Current assets |
|
$ |
868,226 |
|
|
$ |
540,105 |
|
Non-current assets |
|
|
7,570,466 |
|
|
|
7,619,352 |
|
Liabilities |
|
|
6,563,245 |
|
|
|
6,548,760 |
|
Equity |
|
$ |
1,875,447 |
|
|
$ |
1,610,697 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statements of Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
535,155 |
|
|
$ |
249,122 |
|
Expenses |
|
|
270,405 |
|
|
|
240,701 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
264,750 |
|
|
$ |
8,421 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. |
|
INCOME TAXES |
|
|
|
The provision for income taxes includes taxes payable for the current year and deferred
income taxes. We determine deferred tax assets and liabilities based on the difference
between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax
rates in effect for the year in which we expect the differences to reverse. We allocate tax
expense and tax benefits to the Bank and Old Line Bancshares based on their proportional
share of taxable income. |
7
Old Line Bancshares, Inc. & Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
5. |
|
EARNINGS PER SHARE |
|
|
|
Effective January 1, 2009, we adopted the Financial Accounting Standards Board Staff
Position (FSP) No. EITF 03-6-1, Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based
Payment Transaction Are Participating Securities. FSP EITF 03-6-1 provides that unvested
share based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends or dividend
equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are participating securities and shall be included in
the computation of earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method. We have determined
that our outstanding non-vested stock awards are not participating securities. We determine
basic earnings per common share by dividing net income by the weighted average number of
shares of common stock outstanding giving retroactive effect to the stock dividends. |
|
|
|
We calculate diluted earnings per share by including the average dilutive common stock
equivalents outstanding during the period. Dilutive common equivalent shares consist of
stock options, calculated using the treasury stock method. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
|
Weighted average number of shares |
|
|
3,862,364 |
|
|
|
4,034,126 |
|
Dilutive average number of shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,121 |
|
6. |
|
STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION |
|
|
|
We account for employee stock options under the fair value method of accounting using a
Black-Scholes valuation model to measure stock-based compensation expense at the date of
grant. In the first quarter of 2006, we adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(SFAS) 123R, Share-Based Payment, under the modified prospective method. Statement 123R
requires companies to recognize compensation expense related to stock-based compensation
awards in their income statements over the period during which an individual is required to
provide service in exchange for such award. For the three months ended
March 31, 2009 and 2008, we recorded stock-based compensation expense of $70,609 and
$44,879, respectively. |
|
|
|
Under SFAS 123R, a company may only recognize tax benefits for options that ordinarily will
result in a tax deduction when the grant is exercised (non-qualified options). For the
three months ended
March 31, 2009, we recognized an $8,298 tax benefit associated with the portion of the
expense that was related to the issuance of non-qualified options. There were no
non-qualified options included in the expense calculation during the three months ended
March 31, 2008. |
|
|
|
We have two stock option plans under which we may issue options, the 2001 Incentive Stock Option
Plan, as amended, and the 2004 Equity Incentive Plan. Our Compensation Committee administers the
stock option plans. As the plans outline, the Compensation Committee approves stock option grants
to directors and employees, determines the number of shares, the type of option, the option price,
the term (not to exceed 10 years from the date of issuance) and the vesting period of options
issued. The Compensation Committee has approved and we have issued grants with options vesting
immediately as well as over periods of two, three and five years. We recognize the compensation
expense associated with these grants over their respective vesting period. At March 31, 2009, there was $63,157 of total
unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested stock options that we expect to realize
over the next 3.5 years. As of March 31, 2009, there were 71,530 shares remaining available
for future issuance under the stock option plans. Directors and officers did not exercise
any options during the three month period ended March 31, 2009 or 2008. |
8
Old Line Bancshares, Inc. & Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
6. |
|
STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION (Continued) |
|
|
|
A summary of the stock option activity during the three month period follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Number |
|
average |
|
Number |
|
average |
|
|
of shares |
|
exercise price |
|
of shares |
|
exercise price |
|
|
Outstanding, beginning of period |
|
|
236,620 |
|
|
$ |
9.09 |
|
|
|
216,920 |
|
|
$ |
9.37 |
|
Options granted |
|
|
62,650 |
|
|
|
6.30 |
|
|
|
37,300 |
|
|
|
7.75 |
|
Options forfeited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,000 |
) |
|
|
11.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, end of period |
|
|
299,270 |
|
|
$ |
8.50 |
|
|
|
244,220 |
|
|
$ |
9.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information related to options as of March 31, 2009 follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding options |
|
Exercisable options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Number |
|
average |
|
average |
|
Number |
|
average |
Exercise |
|
of shares at |
|
remaining |
|
exercise |
|
of shares at |
|
exercise |
price |
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
term |
|
price |
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
price |
|
$3.33-$4.80 |
|
|
19,800 |
|
|
|
2.16 |
|
|
$ |
3.83 |
|
|
|
19,800 |
|
|
$ |
3.83 |
|
$4.81-$6.50 |
|
|
72,550 |
|
|
|
8.99 |
|
|
|
6.12 |
|
|
|
38,784 |
|
|
|
5.95 |
|
$6.51-$8.00 |
|
|
37,300 |
|
|
|
8.84 |
|
|
|
7.75 |
|
|
|
24,867 |
|
|
|
7.75 |
|
$8.01-$10.50 |
|
|
159,620 |
|
|
|
6.51 |
|
|
|
10.20 |
|
|
|
153,220 |
|
|
|
10.20 |
|
$10.51-11.31 |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
8.11 |
|
|
|
10.85 |
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
10.85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
299,270 |
|
|
|
7.17 |
|
|
$ |
8.50 |
|
|
|
238,671 |
|
|
$ |
8.73 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intrinsic value of outstanding options
where the market value exceeds the
exercise price |
|
$ |
98,316 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intrinsic value of exercisable options
where the market value exceeds the
exercise price |
|
$ |
50,530 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
Old Line Bancshares, Inc. & Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
7. |
|
RETIREMENT PLAN |
|
|
|
Eligible employees participate in a profit sharing plan that qualifies under Section 401(k)
of the Internal Revenue Code. The plan allows for elective employee deferrals and Old Line
Bank makes matching contributions of up to 4% of employee eligible compensation. Our
contributions to the plan, included in employee benefit expenses, for the three months ended
March 31, 2009 and 2008 were $31,376 and $32,114, respectively. |
|
|
|
Old Line Bank also offers Supplemental Executive Retirement Plans (SERPs) to its executive
officers providing for retirement income benefits. We accrue the present value of the SERPs
over the remaining number of years to the executives retirement dates. Old Line Banks
expenses for the SERPs for the three month periods ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 were
$31,358 and $29,811, respectively. |
8. |
|
ASSETS MEASURED AT FAIR VALUE ON A CONTINUING BASIS |
|
|
|
On January 1, 2008, we adopted Statement of Financing Accounting Standards No. 157, Fair
Value Measurements. SFAS 157 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell
an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market
participants. A fair value measurement assumes that the transaction to sell the asset or
transfer the liability occurs in the principal market for the asset or liability, or, in the
absence of a principal market, the most advantageous market for the asset or liability. The
price in the principal (or most advantageous) market used to measure the fair value of the
asset or liability shall not be adjusted for transaction costs. An orderly transaction is a
transaction that assumes exposure to the market for a period prior to the measurement date
to allow for marketing activities that are usual and customary for transactions involving
such assets and liabilities; it is not a forced transaction. Market participants are buyers
and sellers in the principal market that are (i) independent, (ii) knowledgeable, (iii) able
to transact and (iv) willing to transact. The Bank values investment securities classified
as available for sale at fair value. The fair value hierarchy established in SFAS 157,
defines three input levels for fair value measurement. Level 1 is based on quoted market
prices in active markets for identical assets. Level 2 is based on significant observable
inputs other than those in Level 1. Level 3 is based on significant unobservable inputs. |
|
|
|
We value investment securities classified as available for sale at fair value on a recurring
basis. We value treasury securities, government sponsored entity securities, and some
agency securities under Level 1, and collateralized mortgage obligations and some agency
securities under Level 2. At March 31, 2009, we established values for available for sale
investment securities as follows (000s); |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Fair Value |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
Inputs |
|
Investment securities available for sale |
|
$ |
30,869 |
|
|
$ |
9,866 |
|
|
$ |
21,003 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our valuation methodologies may produce a fair value calculation that may not be indicative
of net realizable value or reflective of future fair values. While management believes our
methodologies are appropriate and consistent with other market participants, the use of
different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial
instruments could result in a different estimate of fair value. Furthermore, we have not
comprehensively revalued the fair value amounts since the presentation dates, and therefore,
estimates of fair value after the balance sheet date may differ significantly from the above
presented amounts. There were no gains or losses (realized and unrealized) included in
earnings for the quarter ended March 31, 2009. |
10
Old Line Bancshares, Inc. & Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
9. |
|
RECENT ACCOUNTING STANDARDS |
|
|
|
The following are recent accounting pronouncements approved by the Financial Accounting
Standards Board (FASB). These Statements will not have any material impact on the financial
statements of Old Line Bancshares or the Bank. |
|
|
|
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160 (revised 2007), Noncontrolling Interests in
Consolidated Financial Statements. SFAS 160 amends Accounting Research Bulletin 51,
Consolidated Financial Statements, to establish accounting and reporting standards for
noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. It
also clarifies that a noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary is an ownership interest in
the consolidated entity that should be reported as equity in the consolidated financial
statements. SFAS 160 also changes the way the consolidated income statement is presented by
requiring consolidated net income to be reported at amounts that include the amounts
attributable to both the parent and the noncontrolling interest. It also requires
disclosure, on the face of the consolidated statement of income, of the amounts of
consolidated net income attributable to the parent and to the noncontrolling interest. SFAS
160 is effective at the beginning of the companys first fiscal year after December 15,
2008. On January 1, 2009, we adopted SFAS 160 and it affected the way we reported the
noncontrolling interest in Pointer Ridge, but it did not have a material impact on our
consolidated results of operations or financial position. |
|
|
|
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations. SFAS
No. 141(R) will significantly change the accounting for business combinations in a number of
areas, including the treatment of contingent consideration, contingencies, acquisition
costs, in-process research and development costs and restructuring costs. Additionally,
under SFAS No. 141(R), changes in deferred tax asset valuation allowances and acquired
income tax uncertainties in a business combination after the measurement period will impact
income tax expense. The provisions of this standard were effective beginning January 1,
2009. SFAS No. 141(R) did not have a material impact on our consolidated results of
operations or financial position. |
|
|
|
FASB Statement No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities an
amendment of FASB Statement No. 133, requires enhanced disclosures about an entitys
derivative and hedging activities and thereby improves the transparency of financing
reporting. The use and complexity of derivative instruments and hedging activities have
increased significantly over the past several years. Constituents have expressed concerns
that the existing disclosure requirements in FASB Statement No. 133, Accounting for
Derivative Instruments Hedging Activities, do not provide adequate information about how
derivative and hedging activities affect an entitys financial position, financial
performance, and cash flows. This Statement is effective for financial statements issued
for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008, with early
application encouraged. This Statement encourages, but does not require, comparative
disclosures for earlier periods at initial adoption. SFAS No. 161 did not have a material
impact on our consolidated results of operations or financial position. |
|
|
Financial Accounting Standards Board Staff Positions and Interpretations |
|
|
|
FSP No. EITF 03-06-1, Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment
Transactions are Participating Securities provides that unvested share-based payment awards
that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or
unpaid) are participating securities and shall be included in the computation of earnings
per share pursuant to the two-class method. FSP EITF 03-6-1 became effective on January 1,
2009. As outlined in Note 5-Earnings Per Share, we adopted EITF 03-06-1 and it did not have
any impact on our consolidated results of operations or financial position. |
11
Old Line Bancshares, Inc. & Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
|
|
FSP SFAS 157-4 Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or
Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly affirms
that the objective of fair value when the market for an asset is not active is the price that we
would receive to sell the asset in an orderly transaction, and clarifies and includes additional
factors for determining whether there has been a significant decrease in market activity for an asset when the market for that asset is not
active. FSP SFAS 157-4 also requires an entity to base its conclusion on whether a
transaction was not orderly on the weight of the evidence. FSP SFAS 157-4 also amended SFAS
157, Fair Value Measurements, to expand certain disclosure requirements. FSP SFAS 157-4
becomes effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009. We
do not expect that it will have a material impact on our consolidated results of operations
or financial position. |
|
|
|
FSP SFAS 115-2 and SFAS 124-2 Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than Temporary
Impairments (i) changes existing guidance for determining whether an impairment is other
than temporary to debt securities and (ii) replaces the existing requirement that the
entitys management assert that it has both the intent and ability to hold an impaired
security until recovery with a requirement that management assert: (a) it does not have the
intent to sell the security; and (b) it is more likely that it will not have to sell the
security before recovery of its cost basis. Under FSP SFAS 115-2 and SFAS 124-2, declines
in the fair value of held-to-maturity and available-for-sale securities below their cost
deemed to be other than temporary are reflected in earnings as realized losses to the extent
the impairment is related to credit losses. The amount of the impairment related to other
factors is recognized in other comprehensive income. FSP SFAS 115-2 and SFAS 124-2 become
effective for interim and annual reporting periods ended after June 15, 2009, with early
adoption permitted for periods ending after March 15, 2009. We do not expect that FSP SFAS
115-2 and SFAS 124-2 will have a material impact on our consolidated results of operations
or financial position. |
|
|
|
FSP SFAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments
amends SFAS 107, Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments, to require an entity
to provide disclosures about fair value of financial instruments to interim financial
information and amends APB Opinion No. 28. Interim Financial Reporting, to require those
disclosures in summarized financial information at interim reporting periods. Under FSP
SFAS 107-1 and APB 28-1, a publicly traded company shall include disclosures about the fair
value of its financial instruments whenever it issues summarized financial information for
interim reporting periods and in its financial statements for annual reporting periods, the
fair value of all financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate that value,
whether recognized or not recognized in the statement of financial position, as required by
SFAS 107. The new interim disclosures required by FSP SFAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 will be
included in our interim financial statements beginning with the second quarter of 2009. |
12
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Introduction
Some of the matters discussed below include forward-looking statements. Forward-looking
statements often use words such as believe, expect, plan, may, will, should, project,
contemplate, anticipate, forecast, intend or other words of similar meaning. You can also
identify them by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. Our
actual results and the actual outcome of our expectations and strategies could be different from
those anticipated or estimated for the reasons discussed below and under the heading Information
Regarding Forward Looking Statements.
Overview
Old Line Bancshares was incorporated under the laws of the State of Maryland on April 11, 2003
to serve as the holding company of Old Line Bank.
Our primary business is to own all of the capital stock of Old Line Bank. We also have an
approximately $1.2 million investment in a real estate investment limited liability company named
Pointer Ridge Office Investment, LLC (Pointer Ridge). We own 62.5% of Pointer Ridge. Frank
Lucente, one of our directors and a director of Old Line Bank, controls 12.5% of Pointer Ridge and
controls the manager of Pointer Ridge. The purpose of Pointer Ridge is to acquire, own, hold for
profit, sell, assign, transfer, operate, lease, develop, mortgage, refinance, pledge and otherwise
deal with real property located at the intersection of Pointer Ridge Road and Route 301 in Bowie,
Maryland. Pointer Ridge owns a commercial office building containing approximately 40,000 square
feet and leases this space to tenants. We lease approximately 50% of this building for our main
office and operate a branch of Old Line Bank from this address.
Summary of Recent Performance and Other Activities
During one of the most challenging economic periods in the last thirty years, we are pleased
to report continued profitability for the first quarter of 2009. Net income available to common
shareholders declined $35,078 or 7.89% to $409,755 for the three month period ending March 31, 2009
and there was no change to earnings of $0.11 per basic and diluted common share.
During the first three months of 2009 the following events occurred.
|
|
|
We maintained asset quality with total non-performing assets of $1.5 million
(0.45% of total assets) and no other loans past due more than 30 days at quarter
end. |
|
|
|
|
We increased the provision for loan losses by $261,600 from $38,400 to $300,000. |
|
|
|
|
The loan portfolio grew $15.7 million or 6.79%. |
|
|
|
|
Total deposits grew $8.9 million or 3.85%. |
|
|
|
|
We maintained liquidity and by all regulatory measures remained well
capitalized. |
|
|
|
|
We recognized a non-recurring increase in earnings on our investment in Pointer
Ridge of approximately $153,000 during the quarter. |
We believe that it was an accomplishment to increase earnings, grow the loan portfolio and
maintain credit quality despite the turbulence in the financial markets, the continued weak
economic environment and the uncertainties faced by our industry.
13
The following summarizes the highlights of our financial performance for the three month
period ended March 31, 2009 compared to the three month period ended March 31, 2008 (figures in the
table may not match those discussed in the balance of this section due to rounding).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
Net income available to common
shareholders |
|
$ |
410 |
|
|
$ |
445 |
|
|
$ |
(35 |
) |
|
|
(7.87 |
)% |
Interest revenue |
|
|
4,102 |
|
|
|
3,770 |
|
|
|
332 |
|
|
|
8.81 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
1,450 |
|
|
|
1,541 |
|
|
|
(91 |
) |
|
|
(5.91 |
) |
Net interest income after provision
for loan losses |
|
|
2,352 |
|
|
|
2,191 |
|
|
|
161 |
|
|
|
7.35 |
|
Non-interest revenue |
|
|
604 |
|
|
|
232 |
|
|
|
372 |
|
|
|
160.34 |
|
Non-interest expense |
|
|
2,062 |
|
|
|
1,745 |
|
|
|
317 |
|
|
|
18.17 |
|
Average total loans |
|
|
239,957 |
|
|
|
204,787 |
|
|
|
35,170 |
|
|
|
17.17 |
|
Average interest earning assets |
|
|
292,632 |
|
|
|
234,486 |
|
|
|
58,146 |
|
|
|
24.80 |
|
Average total interest-bearing deposits |
|
|
200,636 |
|
|
|
148,424 |
|
|
|
52,212 |
|
|
|
35.18 |
|
Average noninterest-bearing deposits |
|
|
36,388 |
|
|
|
35,307 |
|
|
|
1,081 |
|
|
|
3.06 |
|
Net interest margin (1) |
|
|
3.70 |
% |
|
|
3.84 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on average equity |
|
|
5.00 |
% |
|
|
5.13 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per common share |
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per common share |
|
|
0.11 |
|
|
|
0.11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
See Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures |
Growth Strategy
We have based our strategic plan on the premise of enhancing stockholder value and growth
through branching and operating profits. Our short-term goals include maintaining credit quality,
creating an attractive branch network, expanding fee income, generating extensions of core banking
services and using technology to maximize stockholder value.
We believe a natural evolution of a community-focused bank like Old Line Bank is to expand the
delivery channels via the branch network. We plan to expand in Prince Georges County, Maryland
and may expand in Charles County and Anne Arundel County as well as into contiguous northern and
western counties, such as Montgomery County and Howard County, Maryland.
In May 2008, we executed a lease agreement to lease 1,620 square feet of space in a store unit
located at 167-U Jennifer Road, Annapolis, Maryland in Anne Arundel County. In September 2008, we
opened this branch. We hired the staff for this branch during the months of August and September
of 2008.
In February 2008, we opened a branch in College Park (Prince Georges County), Maryland at
9658 Baltimore Avenue, College Park, Maryland. This branch is in the same building as the loan
production office that houses our team of loan officers. We hired the Branch Manager and staff for
this location in February 2008.
As part of our expansion efforts, in July 2004, Old Line Bank executed a lease and applied to
regulatory authorities to open a branch at 1641 State Route 3 North, Crofton, Maryland in Anne
Arundel County. We anticipated that construction of the building in which we plan to locate the
branch would begin during the second or third quarter of 2006 and we expected to open the branch in
the first quarter of 2007. However, the owner of the property was unable to complete the
requirements contained in the lease and begin construction of the branch. Construction of this
location began
in 2007. We expect to open this branch during the second quarter of 2009.
14
In July 2007, we identified a site for a second branch location in Bowie, Maryland.
Currently, the landlord is preparing a pad site. Assuming the landlord completes the preparation
of the pad site and meets all of the conditions of the lease, we plan to lease the pad site and
construct a branch. The pad site is located in the Fairwood Office Park in Bowie, Maryland. We
anticipate we will open this branch during the 3rd quarter of 2009.
As previously reported, in December 2008, we increased our ownership in Pointer Ridge Office
Investment, LLC from 50.0% to 62.5%. As a result, we now consolidate their results of operations
and financial performance. This consolidation caused an approximately $405,000 increase in
non-interest revenue, a $102,000 increase in interest expense, an $81,000 reduction in occupancy
expense, a $119,000 increase in non-interest expense and an approximately $165,000 increase in
pre-tax earnings.
Although the current economic climate presents significant challenges to our industry, we
anticipate the bank will experience loan and deposit growth during the remainder of 2009 and
beyond. We do expect that the current economic climate will cause a slower rate of loan growth in
the future than we have historically experienced. We anticipate that after establishment of the
Bowie and Crofton branches outlined above that we will slow down the rate of branch expansion,
although should we identify new branch locations that will support our long term growth plans we
may open additional branches.
Because of the new branches, we anticipate salaries and benefits expenses and other operating
expenses will increase during 2009. We anticipate that, over time, income generated from the
branches will offset any increase in expenses. We also expect that for the remainder of 2009
Pointer Ridge will operate at a slight loss.
Other Opportunities
We use the Internet and technology to augment our growth plans. Currently, we offer our
customers image technology, Internet banking with on-line account access and bill payer service. In
2007, we began offering selected commercial customers the ability to remotely capture their
deposits and electronically transmit them to us. This service has modestly increased equipment
cost, reduced courier fees, and positively impacted deposit growth.
In order to support our growth, provide improved management information capabilities and
enhance the products and services we deliver to our customers, during the 1st quarter of
2009, we began enhancing our core data processing systems. We completed this process in April
2009. We anticipate that this new system will cause data processing costs to moderately increase.
We will continue to evaluate cost effective ways that technology can enhance our management,
products and services.
We plan to take advantage of strategic opportunities presented to us via mergers occurring in
our marketplace. For example, we may purchase branches that other banks close or lease branch
space from other banks or hire additional loan officers. We currently have no specific plans to
acquire existing financial institutions or branches thereof or to hire additional loan officers.
15
Results of Operations
Net Interest Income
Net interest income is the difference between income on interest earning assets and the cost
of funds supporting those assets. Earning assets are comprised primarily of loans, investments,
and federal funds sold; interest-bearing deposits and other borrowings make up the cost of funds.
Noninterest-bearing deposits and capital are also funding sources. Changes in the volume and mix
of earning assets and funding sources along with changes in associated interest rates determine
changes in net interest income.
Three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to three months ended March 31, 2008
Net interest income after provision for loan losses for the three months ended March 31, 2009
increased $161,120 or 7.35% to $2.4 million from $2.2 million for the same period in 2008
Interest revenue increased from $3.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008 to $4.1
million for the same period in 2009. As discussed below and outlined in detail in the Rate/Volume
Analysis, these changes were the result of interest earning assets growing at a faster rate than
interest-bearing liabilities. A decline in the interest rates on these interest earning assets
partially offset the growth. The decline in rates was a result of the Federal Reserve decreasing
the federal funds rate from 4.25% in the first quarter of 2008 to 0.25% in the first quarter of
2009. The increase in interest earning assets was primarily caused by a $35.2 million increase in
average total loans. In order to fund this loan growth, we deployed funds from lower yielding
federal funds sold. The growth in average total loans was attributable to a $1.1 million increase
in our legal lending limit that occurred as a result of the issuance of the $7 million of Series A
Preferred Stock to the U.S. Treasury in December 2008, because of the business development efforts
of the entire Old Line Bank lending team and directors, and the expansion of our branch network.
We believe that the expansion of our branch network provides us with increased name recognition and
new opportunities that contributed to our growth. During the fourth quarter of 2008, we also
transferred balances from lower yielding federal funds into higher yielding investment securities.
This transfer also improved interest income.
Interest expense for all interest-bearing liabilities decreased $91,214 or 5.92% to $1.4
million for the three months ended March 31, 2009. This was primarily attributable to a 121 basis
point decrease in the cost of interest-bearing deposits. This decrease was partially offset by a
10 basis point increase in the cost of borrowed funds. The decrease in the interest rate on
interest-bearing deposits was a result of the decrease in the Federal Reserve interest rate
previously discussed. The consolidation of Pointer Ridges assets, liabilities and equity caused a
10 basis point increase in the cost of borrowed funds. The decrease in the cost of
interest-bearing liabilities was partially offset by a $59.9 million increase in average total
interest-bearing liabilities. As a result of these items, our net interest margin was 3.70% for the
three months ended March 31, 2009, as compared to 3.84% for the three months ended March 31, 2008.
16
The following table illustrates average balances of total interest earning assets and total
interest-bearing liabilities for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, showing the
average distribution of assets, liabilities, stockholders equity and related income, expense
and corresponding weighted average yields and rates. The average balances used in this table
and other statistical data were calculated using average daily balances.
Average Balances, Interest and Yields
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
balance |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Yield |
|
|
balance |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Yield |
|
|
|
|
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal funds sold(1) |
|
$ |
415,599 |
|
|
$ |
436 |
|
|
|
0.43 |
% |
|
$ |
16,712,451 |
|
|
$ |
129,193 |
|
|
|
3.10 |
% |
Time deposits in other banks |
|
|
14,081,697 |
|
|
|
87,668 |
|
|
|
2.52 |
|
|
|
2,000,000 |
|
|
|
20,266 |
|
|
|
4.06 |
|
Investment securities(1)(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury |
|
|
499,956 |
|
|
|
5,142 |
|
|
|
4.17 |
|
|
|
2,769,346 |
|
|
|
23,783 |
|
|
|
3.44 |
|
U.S. government agency |
|
|
10,510,365 |
|
|
|
108,854 |
|
|
|
4.20 |
|
|
|
3,065,740 |
|
|
|
27,004 |
|
|
|
3.53 |
|
Mortgage backed securities |
|
|
23,921,423 |
|
|
|
267,921 |
|
|
|
4.54 |
|
|
|
1,675,894 |
|
|
|
18,059 |
|
|
|
4.32 |
|
Municipal securities |
|
|
2,725,547 |
|
|
|
33,709 |
|
|
|
5.02 |
|
|
|
3,005,390 |
|
|
|
36,248 |
|
|
|
4.84 |
|
Other |
|
|
2,578,398 |
|
|
|
13,267 |
|
|
|
2.09 |
|
|
|
2,080,657 |
|
|
|
30,041 |
|
|
|
5.79 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities |
|
|
40,235,689 |
|
|
|
428,893 |
|
|
|
4.32 |
|
|
|
12,597,027 |
|
|
|
135,135 |
|
|
|
4.30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans: (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
71,891,993 |
|
|
|
1,062,649 |
|
|
|
5.99 |
|
|
|
55,896,847 |
|
|
|
1,053,762 |
|
|
|
7.56 |
|
Mortgage |
|
|
152,503,483 |
|
|
|
2,331,221 |
|
|
|
6.20 |
|
|
|
130,781,054 |
|
|
|
2,210,937 |
|
|
|
6.78 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
15,561,072 |
|
|
|
208,013 |
|
|
|
5.42 |
|
|
|
18,109,472 |
|
|
|
238,985 |
|
|
|
5.29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans |
|
|
239,956,548 |
|
|
|
3,601,883 |
|
|
|
6.09 |
|
|
|
204,787,373 |
|
|
|
3,503,684 |
|
|
|
6.86 |
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
2,057,751 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,610,509 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans, net of allowance |
|
|
237,898,797 |
|
|
|
3,601,883 |
|
|
|
6.14 |
|
|
|
203,176,864 |
|
|
|
3,503,684 |
|
|
|
6.92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest earning assets(1) |
|
|
292,631,782 |
|
|
|
4,118,880 |
|
|
|
5.71 |
|
|
|
234,486,342 |
|
|
|
3,788,278 |
|
|
|
6.48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest bearing cash |
|
|
6,267,452 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,844,427 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premises and equipment |
|
|
12,324,862 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,195,720 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
10,492,299 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,775,269 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
321,716,395 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
253,301,758 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest bearing deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Savings |
|
$ |
5,948,272 |
|
|
|
5,617 |
|
|
|
0.38 |
|
|
$ |
6,245,038 |
|
|
|
11,561 |
|
|
|
0.74 |
|
Money market and NOW |
|
|
31,429,957 |
|
|
|
31,708 |
|
|
|
0.41 |
|
|
|
34,283,999 |
|
|
|
111,404 |
|
|
|
1.30 |
|
Other time deposits |
|
|
163,257,626 |
|
|
|
1,152,059 |
|
|
|
2.86 |
|
|
|
107,894,604 |
|
|
|
1,211,872 |
|
|
|
4.51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing deposits |
|
|
200,635,855 |
|
|
|
1,189,384 |
|
|
|
2.40 |
|
|
|
148,423,641 |
|
|
|
1,334,837 |
|
|
|
3.61 |
|
Borrowed funds |
|
|
40,925,627 |
|
|
|
260,311 |
|
|
|
2.58 |
|
|
|
33,306,846 |
|
|
|
206,072 |
|
|
|
2.48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
241,561,482 |
|
|
|
1,449,695 |
|
|
|
2.43 |
|
|
|
181,730,487 |
|
|
|
1,540,909 |
|
|
|
3.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing deposits |
|
|
36,388,123 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,307,109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
277,949,605 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
217,037,596 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
1,534,543 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,479,612 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling interest |
|
|
669,272 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
41,562,975 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,784,550 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
321,716,395 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
253,301,758 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest spread(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income and
Net interest margin(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,669,185 |
|
|
|
3.70 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,247,369 |
|
|
|
3.84 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1) |
|
Interest revenue is presented on a fully taxable equivalent (FTE)
basis. The FTE basis adjusts for the tax favored status of these investments.
Management believes providing this information on a FTE basis provides investors
with a more accurate picture of our net interest spread and net interest income
and we believe it to be the preferred industry measurement of these calculations.
See Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures. |
|
2) |
|
Available for sale investment securities are presented at amortized
cost. |
|
3) |
|
Average non-accruing loans for the three month periods ended March
31, 2009 and 2008 were $1,000,461 and $1,061,145, respectively. |
17
The following table describes the impact on our interest revenue and expense resulting from changes
in average balances and average rates for the periods indicated. We have allocated the change in
interest revenue, interest expense and net interest income due to both volume and rate
proportionately to the rate and volume variances.
Rate/Volume Variance Analysis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 compared to 2008 |
|
|
|
Variance due to: |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Volume |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest earning assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal funds sold(1) |
|
$ |
(128,757 |
) |
|
$ |
(100,695 |
) |
|
$ |
(28,062 |
) |
Time deposits in other banks |
|
|
67,402 |
|
|
|
(35,430 |
) |
|
|
102,832 |
|
Investment Securities(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury |
|
|
(18,641 |
) |
|
|
10,168 |
|
|
|
(28,809 |
) |
U.S. government agency |
|
|
81,850 |
|
|
|
19,627 |
|
|
|
62,223 |
|
Mortgage backed securities |
|
|
249,862 |
|
|
|
3,828 |
|
|
|
246,034 |
|
Municipal securities |
|
|
(2,539 |
) |
|
|
2,549 |
|
|
|
(5,088 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(16,774 |
) |
|
|
(28,373 |
) |
|
|
11,599 |
|
Loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
8,887 |
|
|
|
(438,316 |
) |
|
|
447,203 |
|
Mortgage |
|
|
120,284 |
|
|
|
(410,173 |
) |
|
|
530,457 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
(30,972 |
) |
|
|
14,607 |
|
|
|
(45,579 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest revenue (1) |
|
|
330,602 |
|
|
|
(962,208 |
) |
|
|
1,292,810 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Savings |
|
|
(5,944 |
) |
|
|
(5,804 |
) |
|
|
(140 |
) |
Money market and NOW |
|
|
(79,696 |
) |
|
|
(77,381 |
) |
|
|
(2,315 |
) |
Other time deposits |
|
|
(59,813 |
) |
|
|
(957,641 |
) |
|
|
897,828 |
|
Borrowed funds |
|
|
54,239 |
|
|
|
22,329 |
|
|
|
31,910 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense |
|
|
(91,214 |
) |
|
|
(1,018,497 |
) |
|
|
927,283 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income(1) |
|
$ |
421,816 |
|
|
$ |
56,289 |
|
|
$ |
365,527 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Interest revenue is presented on a fully taxable equivalent
(FTE) basis. Management believes providing this information on a
FTE basis provides investors with a more accurate picture of our
net interest spread and net interest income and we believe it to
be the preferred industry measurement of these calculations. See
Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures. |
18
Provision for Loan Losses
Originating loans involves a degree of risk that credit losses will occur in varying amounts
according to, among other factors, the type of loans being made, the credit-worthiness of the
borrowers over the term of the loans, the quality of the collateral for the loan, if any, as well
as general economic conditions. We charge the provision for loan losses to earnings to maintain
the total allowance for loan losses at a level considered by management to represent its best
estimate of the losses known and inherent in the portfolio that are both probable and reasonable to
estimate, based on, among other factors, prior loss experience, volume and type of lending
conducted, estimated value of any underlying collateral, economic conditions (particularly as such
conditions relate to Old Line Banks market area), regulatory guidance, peer statistics,
managements judgment, past due loans in the loan portfolio, loan charge off experience and
concentrations of risk (if any). We charge losses on loans against the allowance when we believe
that collection of loan principal is unlikely. We add back recoveries on loans previously charged
to the allowance.
The provision for loan losses was $300,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2009, as
compared to $38,400 for the three months ended March 31, 2008, an increase of $261,600 or 681.25%.
After completing the analysis outlined below, during the three month period ended March 31, 2009,
we increased the provision for loan losses primarily because there was a 6.83% growth in the loan
portfolio from December 31, 2008 to March 31, 2009, and there remains significant weakness in the
economic environment in which we operate. Although we have not experienced any substantive change
in the quality of the loans in the portfolio, during the period we placed one additional loan in
the amount of $699,856 in non-accrual status. At quarter end, we had two non-performing loans and
no other loans past due more than 30 days. We believe that most of our clients, even those that
directly or indirectly serve the real estate industry, remain financially strong. However, as the
real estate industry continues to encounter weakness and we remain in a recession, we believe that
it is prudent to continue to increase our provision for loan losses.
We review the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses at least quarterly. Our review
includes evaluation of impaired loans as required by SFAS No. 114, Accounting by Creditors for
Impairment of a Loan, and SFAS No. 118, Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan-Income
Recognition and Disclosure. Also incorporated in determining the adequacy of the allowance is
guidance contained in the Securities and Exchange Commissions SAB No. 102, Loan Loss Allowance
Methodology and Documentation; the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Councils Policy
Statement on Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses Methodologies and Documentation for Banks and
Savings Institutions and the Interagency Policy Statement on the Allowance for Loan and Lease
Losses provided by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, Board of Governors of the Federal
Reserve System, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, National Credit Union Administration and
Office of Thrift Supervision.
We base the evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses upon loan categories.
We categorize loans as installment and other consumer loans (other than boat loans), boat loans,
mortgage loans (commercial real estate, residential real estate and real estate construction) and
commercial loans. We apply loss ratios to each category of loan other than commercial loans. We
further divide commercial loans by risk rating and apply loss ratios by risk rating, to determine
estimated loss amounts. We evaluate delinquent loans and loans for which management has knowledge
about possible credit problems of the borrower or knowledge of problems with loan collateral
separately and assign loss amounts based upon the evaluation.
We determine loss ratios for installment and other consumer loans (other than boat loans),
boat loans and mortgage loans (commercial real estate, residential real estate and real estate
construction) based upon a review of prior 18 months delinquency trends for the category, the three
year loss ratio for the category, peer group loss ratios, probability of loss factors and industry
standards.
19
With respect to commercial loans, management assigns a risk rating of one through eight to
each loan at inception, with a risk rating of one having the least amount of risk and a risk rating
of eight having the greatest amount of risk. For commercial loans of less than $250,000, we may
review the risk rating annually based on, among other things, the borrowers financial condition,
cash flow and ongoing financial viability; the collateral
securing the loan; the borrowers industry; and payment history. We review the risk rating
for all commercial loans in excess of $250,000 at least annually. We evaluate loans with a risk
rating of five or greater separately and allocate a portion of the allowance for loan losses based
upon the evaluation. For loans with risk ratings between one and four, we determine loss ratios
based upon a review of prior 18 months delinquency trends, the three year loss ratio, peer group
loss ratios, probability of loss factors and industry standards.
We also identify and make any necessary allocation adjustments for any specific concentrations
of credit in a loan category that in managements estimation increase the risk inherent in the
category. If necessary, we will also make an adjustment within one or more loan categories for
economic considerations in our market area that may impact the quality of the loans in the
category. For all periods presented, there were no specific adjustments made for concentrations of
credit. As discussed above, we have increased our provision for loan losses for the period in all
segments of our portfolio as a result of economic considerations. We consider qualitative or
environmental factors that are likely to cause estimated credit losses associated with our existing
portfolio to differ from historical loss experience. These factors include, but are not limited
to, changes in lending policies and procedures, changes in the nature and volume of the loan
portfolio, changes in the experience, ability and depth of lending management and the effect of
other external factors such as economic factors, competition and legal and regulatory requirements
on the level of estimated credit losses in our existing portfolio.
In the event that our review of the adequacy of the allowance results in any unallocated
amounts, we reallocate such amounts to our loan categories based on the percentage that each
category represents to total gross loans. We have risk management practices designed to ensure
timely identification of changes in loan risk profiles. However, undetected losses inherently
exist within the portfolio. We believe that the allocation of the unallocated portion of the
reserve in the manner described above is appropriate.
We will not create a separate valuation allowance unless we consider a loan impaired under
SFAS No. 114 and SFAS No. 118. At March 31, 2009, we had two non-accrual loans totaling $1.5
million. As outlined in previous reports, we do not consider the first non-accrual loan in the
amount of $839,875 as impaired. For approximately one year, the borrower has made payments on the
principal balance and the value of the collateral is sufficient to provide repayment. Therefore,
we have not allocated any portion of the allowance for loan losses to this loan. The borrower on
the second facility has declared bankruptcy. We are currently in the process of determining the
value of the property securing this loan and in negotiations with the borrower regarding
reaffirmation of the debt. We have determined this loan is impaired. We have allocated $175,000
of the allowance for loan losses to this loan. We have no other loans past due 30 days or more.
We also do not have any substantive loans comprised of sub-prime mortgages.
Our policies require a review of assets on a regular basis, and we believe that we
appropriately classify loans as well as other assets if warranted. We believe that we use the best
information available to make a determination with respect to the allowance for loan losses,
recognizing that the determination is inherently subjective and that future adjustments may be
necessary depending upon, among other factors, a change in economic conditions of specific
borrowers or generally in the economy, and new information that becomes available to us. However,
there are no assurances that the allowance for loan losses will be sufficient to absorb losses on
non-performing assets, or that the allowance will be sufficient to cover losses on non-performing
assets in the future.
The allowance for loan losses represents 0.92% of gross loans at March 31, 2009 and 0.85% at
December 31, 2008. We have no exposure to foreign countries or foreign borrowers. Based on our
analysis and the satisfactory historical performance of the loan portfolio, we believe this
allowance appropriately reflects the inherent risk of loss in our portfolio.
20
The following table provides an analysis of the allowance for loan losses for the periods
indicated:
Allowance for Loan Losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Balance, beginning of period |
|
$ |
1,983,751 |
|
|
$ |
1,586,737 |
|
|
$ |
1,586,737 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
|
38,400 |
|
|
|
415,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chargeoffs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18,440 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total chargeoffs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18,440 |
) |
Recoveries: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
454 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total recoveries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
454 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (chargeoffs) recoveries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
(17,986 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period |
|
$ |
2,283,751 |
|
|
$ |
1,625,296 |
|
|
$ |
1,983,751 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratio of allowance for loan losses to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans |
|
|
0.92 |
% |
|
|
0.79 |
% |
|
|
0.85 |
% |
Non-accrual loans |
|
|
148.32 |
% |
|
|
155.71 |
% |
|
|
233.20 |
% |
Ratio of net-chargeoffs during period to
average loans outstanding during period |
|
|
0.000 |
% |
|
|
0.000 |
% |
|
|
0.008 |
% |
The following table provides a breakdown of the allowance for loan losses:
Allocation of Allowance for Loan Losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in Each |
|
|
|
|
|
|
in Each |
|
|
|
|
|
|
in Each |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Category |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Category |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Category |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer & others |
|
$ |
8,273 |
|
|
|
0.40 |
% |
|
$ |
10,563 |
|
|
|
0.40 |
% |
|
$ |
13,391 |
|
|
|
0.02 |
% |
Boat |
|
|
99,820 |
|
|
|
5.65 |
|
|
|
101,557 |
|
|
|
8.09 |
|
|
|
94,910 |
|
|
|
6.70 |
|
Mortgage |
|
|
1,734,420 |
|
|
|
63.56 |
|
|
|
1,108,791 |
|
|
|
63.86 |
|
|
|
1,348,850 |
|
|
|
63.21 |
|
Commercial |
|
|
441,238 |
|
|
|
30.39 |
|
|
|
404,385 |
|
|
|
27.65 |
|
|
|
526,600 |
|
|
|
30.07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,283,751 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
$ |
1,625,296 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
$ |
1,983,751 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
Non-interest Revenue
Three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to three months ended March 31, 2008
Non-interest revenue totaled $603,600 for the three months ended March 31, 2009, an increase
of $371,162 or 159.68% from the 2008 amount of $232,438. As previously outlined, in November
2008, we increased our ownership interest in Pointer Ridge from 50.0% to 62.5% and consolidated
their results of operations from the date of acquisition. Prior to that time, we recorded our
income from our investment in Pointer Ridge in other income. Non-interest revenue for the three
months ended March 31, 2009 and March 31, 2008 also included fee income from service charges on
deposit accounts and earnings on bank owned life insurance.
The following table outlines the changes in non-interest revenue for the three month periods.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
Service charges on deposit accounts |
|
$ |
79,089 |
|
|
$ |
72,952 |
|
|
$ |
6,137 |
|
|
|
8.41 |
% |
Earnings on bank owned life insurance |
|
|
93,461 |
|
|
|
91,603 |
|
|
|
1,858 |
|
|
|
2.03 |
|
Income (loss) on investment in real estate LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,896 |
|
|
|
(12,896 |
) |
|
|
(100.00 |
) |
Pointer Ridge rent and other revenue |
|
|
405,477 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
405,477 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
Other fees and commissions |
|
|
25,573 |
|
|
|
54,987 |
|
|
|
(29,414 |
) |
|
|
(53.49 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest revenue |
|
$ |
603,600 |
|
|
$ |
232,438 |
|
|
$ |
371,162 |
|
|
|
159.68 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the 1st quarter of 2009, Pointer Ridge received a one-time lease termination
fee in the amount of approximately $300,000. This amount plus Pointer Ridges monthly rental
income increased our non-interest revenue $405,477. Service charges on deposit accounts increased
due to increases in the number of customers and the services they used. Earnings on bank owned
life insurance increased primarily because the rate earned on the investment increased. Other fees
and commissions decreased $29,414 primarily because of a decrease in other loan fees that was
caused primarily from a decline in construction related settlements.
Non-interest Expense
Three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to three months ended March 31, 2008
Non-interest expense increased 18.15% or $316,820 for the three months ended March 31, 2009.
The following chart outlines the changes in non-interest expenses for the period. As previously
outlined, in November 2008, we increased our ownership interest in Pointer Ridge from 50.0% to
62.5% and consolidated their results of operations from the date of acquisition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31 |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
Salaries |
|
$ |
837,057 |
|
|
$ |
734,931 |
|
|
$ |
102,126 |
|
|
|
13.90 |
% |
Employee benefits |
|
|
302,424 |
|
|
|
269,453 |
|
|
|
32,971 |
|
|
|
12.24 |
|
Occupancy |
|
|
232,181 |
|
|
|
279,922 |
|
|
|
(47,741 |
) |
|
|
(17.06 |
) |
Equipment |
|
|
79,878 |
|
|
|
70,475 |
|
|
|
9,403 |
|
|
|
13.34 |
|
Data processing |
|
|
75,337 |
|
|
|
61,252 |
|
|
|
14,085 |
|
|
|
23.00 |
|
Pointer Ridge other operating |
|
|
119,065 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
119,065 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
Other operating |
|
|
416,188 |
|
|
|
329,277 |
|
|
|
86,911 |
|
|
|
26.39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest expenses |
|
$ |
2,062,130 |
|
|
$ |
1,745,310 |
|
|
$ |
316,820 |
|
|
|
18.15 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
Salaries and benefits increased primarily because we opened the College Park branch in
February 2008 and the Annapolis branch in September 2008, the increase in stock option expense for
options granted in the first quarter and an increase in health care costs. The opening of these
branches and annual rental increases increased occupancy and equipment expenses. As a result of
the consolidation of Pointer Ridge, these increases were offset by the elimination of $129,678 of
rental expenses paid to Pointer Ridge. Data processing costs increased because of our new
locations and new services provided by our data processor. Other operating expenses increased
primarily because of increased FDIC and Maryland State insurance assessments, higher ATM and Visa
Debit costs, increased stationery and supplies and increased travel expenses.
Income Taxes
Three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to three months ended March 31, 2008
Income tax expense was $282,115 (31.57% of pre-tax income) for the three months ended March
31, 2009 as compared to $233,428 (34.42% of pre-tax income) for the same period in 2008. The
decrease in the effective tax rate is primarily due to the consolidation of net income attributable
to the noncontrolling interest and the $8,298 tax benefit recognized from the issuance of
non-qualified stock options in 2009.
Net Income Available to Common Shareholders
Three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to three months ended March 31, 2008
Net income attributable to Old Line Bancshares was $512,327 for the three months ended March
31, 2009 compared to $444, 833 for the three month period ended March 31, 2008. Net income
available to common shareholders was $409,755 or $0.11 per basic and diluted common share for the
three month period ending March 31, 2009 compared to net income available to common shareholders of
$444,833 or $0.11 per basic and diluted common share for the same period in 2008. The increase in
net income attributable to Old Line Bancshares for the 2009 period was primarily the result of a
$161,120 increase in net interest income after provision for loan losses and a $371,162 increase in
non-interest revenue compared to the same period in 2008. These items were offset by a $316,820
increase in non-interest expense, a $48,687 increase in income taxes, and the elimination of the
$99,281 noncontrolling interest compared to the same period in 2008. The decrease in net income
available to common shareholders for the 2009 period was primarily due to the $102,572 preferred
stock dividend payable to the U.S. Treasury during the period for its $7 million investment in the
preferred stock. This preferred stock was not issued as of March 31, 2008. Earnings per common
share remained comparable for the period on a basic and diluted basis because of marginally lower
earnings in 2009 and because the average number of common shares decreased by 171,762 common shares
from 4,034,126 for the three months ended March 31, 2008 to 3,862,364 for the same period in 2009.
This occurred because we repurchased 217,085 shares of common stock during 2008.
Analysis of Financial Condition
Investment Securities
Our portfolio consists primarily of time deposits in other banks, investment grade securities
including U.S. Treasury securities, U.S. government agency securities, U.S. government sponsored
entity securities, securities issued by states, counties and municipalities, mortgage-backed
securities, and certain equity securities, including Federal Reserve Bank stock, Federal Home Loan
Bank stock, Maryland Financial Bank stock and Atlantic Central Bankers Bank stock. We have
prudently managed our investment portfolio to maintain liquidity and safety and we have never owned
stock in Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac or any of the more complex securities available in the market.
The portfolio provides a source of liquidity, collateral for borrowings as well as a means of
diversifying our earning asset portfolio. While we generally intend to hold the investment
securities until maturity, we classify a significant portion of the investment securities as
available for sale. We account for investment securities so classified at fair value and report
the unrealized appreciation and depreciation as a separate component of stockholders equity, net
of income tax effects. We account for investment securities classified in the held to maturity
category at amortized cost. We invest in securities for the yield they produce and not to profit
from trading the securities. There are no trading securities in the portfolio.
23
The investment securities at March 31, 2009 amounted to $38.5 million, an increase of $931,116
million, or 2.48%, from the December 31, 2008 amount of $37.6 million. Available for sale
investment securities increased to $30.9 million at March 31, 2009 from $29.6 million at December
31, 2008. The increase in the available for sale investment securities occurred because we
deployed federal funds into higher yielding investment securities. Held to maturity securities at
March 31, 2009 decreased to $7.6 million from the $8.0 million balance on December 31, 2008 because
securities matured or were called during the period. The fair value of available for sale
securities included net unrealized gains of $707,835 at March 31, 2009 (reflected as unrealized
gains of $428,629 in stockholders equity after deferred taxes) as compared to net unrealized gains
of $648,356 ($392,611 net of taxes) as of December 31, 2008. In general, the increase in fair
value was a result of maturities, decreasing market rates and changes in investment ratings. As
required under SFAS No. 115, we have evaluated securities with unrealized losses for an extended
period of time and determined that these losses are temporary because, at this point in time, we
expect to hold them until maturity. As the maturity date moves closer and/or interest rates
decline, the unrealized losses in the portfolio will decline or dissipate.
Loan Portfolio
Loans secured by real estate or luxury boats comprise the majority of the loan portfolio. Old
Line Banks loan customers are generally located in the greater Washington, D.C. metropolitan area.
The loan portfolio, net of allowance, unearned fees and origination costs, increased $15.7
million or 6.79% to $246.8 million at March 31, 2009 from $231.1 million at December 31, 2008.
Commercial business loans increased by $5.6 million (8.00%), commercial real estate loans increased
by $12.7 million (11.46%), residential real estate loans (generally home equity and fixed rate home
improvement loans) increased by $749,000 (5.84%), real estate construction loans (primarily
commercial real estate construction) decreased by $2.4 million (10.26%) and consumer loans
decreased by $585,000 (3.74%) from their respective balances at December 31, 2008.
During the first three months of 2009, we received scheduled loan payoffs on construction
loans that negatively impacted our loan growth for the period. In spite of these payoffs, we
experienced a 6.79% growth in the loan portfolio. We saw loan and deposit growth generated from
our entire team of lenders, branch personnel and board of directors. We anticipate the entire team
will continue to focus their efforts on business development during the remainder of 2009 and
continue to grow the loan portfolio. However, continued deterioration in the economic climate may
cause slower loan growth.
The following table outlines those construction loans that have an interest reserve included
in the commitment amount and where advances on the loan currently pay the interest due.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/31/09 |
|
|
12/31/08 |
|
|
|
# of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
# of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowers |
|
|
(000s) |
|
|
Borrowers |
|
|
(000s) |
|
Loans with interest paid from loan advances: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hotels |
|
|
3 |
|
|
$ |
12,627 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
$ |
8,563 |
|
Owner occupied |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2,882 |
|
Single family acquisition & development |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
6,133 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
5,889 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
$ |
18,760 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
$ |
17,334 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At inception, the total loan and commitment amount were equivalent to an appraised as is or as
developed 80% or less loan to value. We continually monitor these loans and where appropriate
have received new appraisals on these properties, additional collateral, a payment on the
principal, or have downgraded the risk rating on the loan and increased our loan loss provision
accordingly. In certain cases, these loans have experienced a delay in the project either as a
result of delays in receiving regulatory approvals or the borrower has elected to delay the project
because the current economic climate has caused real estate values to decline. Although payments
on these loans are current, management monitors their performance closely.
24
The following table summarizes the composition of the loan portfolio by dollar amount and
percentages:
Loan Portfolio
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31 |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real Estate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
$ |
123,458 |
|
|
|
49.64 |
% |
|
$ |
110,826 |
|
|
|
47.63 |
% |
Construction |
|
|
21,039 |
|
|
|
8.46 |
|
|
|
23,422 |
|
|
|
10.07 |
|
Residential |
|
|
13,569 |
|
|
|
5.46 |
|
|
|
12,820 |
|
|
|
5.51 |
|
Commercial |
|
|
75,575 |
|
|
|
30.39 |
|
|
|
69,961 |
|
|
|
30.07 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
15,053 |
|
|
|
6.05 |
|
|
|
15,638 |
|
|
|
6.72 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
248,694 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
232,667 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
(2,284 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,983 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Deferred loan costs, net |
|
|
431 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
370 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
246,841 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
231,054 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Quality
Management performs reviews of all delinquent loans and directs relationship officers to work
with customers to resolve potential credit issues in a timely manner. Management generally
classifies loans as non-accrual when it does not expect collection of full principal and interest
under the original terms of the loan or payment of principal or interest has become 90 days past
due. Classifying a loan as non-accrual results in our no longer accruing interest on such loan and
reversing any interest previously accrued but not collected. We will generally restore a
non-accrual loan to accrual status when the borrower brings delinquent principal and interest
payments current and we expect to collect future monthly principal and interest payments. We
recognize interest on non-accrual loans only when received. At March 31, 2009, we had two loans
totaling $1.5 million that were 90 days past due and were classified as non-accrual compared to one
loan in the amount of $850,675 at December 31, 2008.
As previously reported, in March 2009, the borrower on an approximately $700,000 residential
real estate mortgage filed bankruptcy. We are currently in the process of determining the value of
the property that secured this loan and are in negotiations with the borrower regarding
reaffirmation of the debt. We have determined the loan is impaired and have allocated $175,000 of
the allowance for loan losses for this loan. The borrower on the second loan in the amount of
$839,875 at March 31, 2009 filed for bankruptcy protection in November, 2007 under Chapter 11 of
the United States Bankruptcy Code. In February 2009, the borrower exited bankruptcy. A commercial
real estate property secures this loan. The loan to value at inception of this loan was 80%.
During the first quarter of 2008, the borrower began remitting payments and advised us that the
borrower planned to make all past due interest and principal current prior to March 31, 2009.
Through October 2008, the borrower remitted regular payments plus a portion of the arrearage. In
November 2008, the borrower requested a revision to this repayment schedule with full repayment of
all past due amounts to occur by May 2010. We expect to receive payment in full on this loan.
Therefore, we do not consider it impaired and have not designated a specific allowance for this
non-accrual loan. As of March 31, 2009, the interest not accrued on these loans was $108,085 none
of which was included in net income for the quarter ended March 31, 2009. Other than the loans
outlined above there were no loans 30 days or more past due as of March 31, 2009 and December 31,
2008.
25
We classify any property acquired as a result of foreclosure on a mortgage loan as real
estate owned and record it at the lower of the unpaid principal balance or fair value at the date
of acquisition and subsequently carry the loan at the lower of cost or net realizable value. We
charge any required write-down of the loan to its net realizable value against the allowance for
loan losses at the time of foreclosure. We charge to expense any subsequent adjustments to net
realizable value. Upon foreclosure, Old Line Bank generally requires an appraisal of the property
and, thereafter, appraisals of the property on at least an annual basis and external inspections on
at least a quarterly basis. As of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, we held no real estate
acquired as a result of foreclosure.
We apply the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 114 (SFAS No.
114), Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan, as amended by Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 118 (SFAS No. 118), Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a
Loan-Income Recognition and Disclosure. SFAS No. 114 and SFAS No. 118 require that impaired loans,
which consist of all modified loans and other loans for which collection of all contractual
principal and interest is not probable, be measured based on the present value of expected future
cash flows discounted at the loans effective interest rate, or at the loans observable market
price or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. If the measure of
the impaired loan is less than the recorded investment in the loan, we recognize impairment through
a valuation allowance and corresponding provision for loan losses. Old Line Bank considers
consumer loans as homogenous loans and thus does not apply the SFAS No. 114 impairment test to
these loans. We write off impaired loans when collection of the loan is doubtful.
As of March 31, 2009 we had one impaired loan as outlined above and no restructured loans. At
December 31, 2008, we had no impaired or restructured loans. Although we are currently unaware that
any of our borrowers are facing significant financial difficulty and have no impaired or
restructured loans, a continued decline in the economy may adversely affect our asset quality.
Bank owned life insurance
In June 2005, we purchased $3.3 million of BOLI on the lives of our executive officers,
Messrs. Cornelsen and Burnett and Ms. Rush. With a new $4 million investment made in February
2007, we increased the insurance on Messrs. Cornelsen and Burnett and expanded the coverage of the
insurance policies to insure the lives of several other officers of Old Line Bank. We anticipate
the earnings on these policies will pay for our employee benefit expenses as well as our
obligations under our Salary Continuation Agreements and Supplemental Life Insurance Agreements
that we entered into with our executive officers in January 2006. Higher rates caused increased
earnings during the first three months of 2009 and the cash surrender value of the insurance
policies increased by $81,471. There were no post retirement death benefits associated with the
BOLI policies.
Deposits
We seek deposits within our market area by paying competitive interest rates, offering high
quality customer service and using technology to deliver deposit services effectively.
At March 31, 2009, the deposit portfolio had grown to $240.3 million, an $8.9 million or 3.85%
increase over the December 31, 2008 level of $231.4 million. Noninterest-bearing deposits
decreased $3.5 million during the period to $36.4 million from $39.9 million primarily due to
existing customers moving funds into interest bearing accounts. Interest-bearing deposits grew
$12.3 million to $203.9 million from $191.6 million. Approximately $8.9 million of the increase in
interest bearing deposits was in certificates of deposit and the remainder was in money market and
savings accounts. The growth in these categories was the result of expansion of existing customer
relationships and new customers.
In the first quarter of 2006, we began acquiring brokered certificates of deposit through the
Promontory Interfinancial Network. Through this deposit matching network and its certificate of
deposit account registry service (CDARS), we obtained the ability to offer our customers access to
FDIC-insured deposit products in aggregate amounts exceeding current insurance limits. When we
place funds through CDARS on behalf of a customer, we receive matching deposits through the
networks reciprocal deposit program. We can also place deposits through this network without
receiving matching deposits. At March 31, 2009, we had $30.9 million in CDARS through the
reciprocal deposit program compared to $31.8 million at December 31, 2008. We had received $17.0
million at March 31, 2009 and $12.1 million at December 31, 2008 in deposits through the CDARS
network that were not reciprocal deposits.
26
Borrowings
Old Line Bank has available lines of credit, including overnight federal funds and repurchase
agreements from its correspondent banks totaling $25.9 million as of March 31, 2009. Old Line Bank
has an additional secured line of credit from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta (FHLB) that
totaled $92.8 million at March 31, 2009 and $85.4 million at December 31, 2008. As a condition of
obtaining the line of credit from the FHLB, the FHLB requires that Old Line Bank purchase shares of
capital stock in the FHLB. Prior to allowing Old Line Bank to borrow under the line of credit, the
FHLB also requires that Old Line Bank provide collateral to support borrowings. Therefore, at
March 31, 2009 we have provided collateral to support up to $74.9 million of borrowings. Of this,
we had borrowed $15 million at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008.
Short-term borrowings consisted of short-term promissory notes issued to Old Line Banks
customers. Old Line Bank offers its commercial customers an enhancement to the basic non-interest
bearing demand deposit account. This service electronically sweeps excess funds from the customers
account into an interest-bearing Master Note with Old Line Bank. These Master Notes re-price daily
and have maturities of 270 days or less. At March 31, 2009, Old Line Bank had $24.7 million
outstanding in these short term promissory notes with an average interest rate of 0.45%. At
December 31, 2008, Old Line Bank had $17.8 million outstanding with an average interest rate of
0.50%.
At March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, Old Line Bank had three advances in the amount of $5
million each, from the FHLB totaling $15 million. On November 24, 2007, Old Line Bank borrowed
$5.0 million with an interest rate of 3.66%. Interest is due on the 23rd day of each
February, May, August and November, commencing on February 23, 2008. On November 23, 2008, or any
interest payment date thereafter, the FHLB has the option to convert the interest rate on this
advance from a fixed rate to a three (3) month London Interbank Offer Rate (LIBOR) based variable
rate. Old Line Bank must repay this advance in full on November 23, 2010.
On December 12, 2007, Old Line Bank borrowed another $5.0 million from the FHLB. The interest
rate on this advance is 3.3575% and interest is payable on the 12th day of each March,
June, September and December, commencing on March 12, 2008. On December 12, 2008, or any interest
payment date thereafter, the FHLB has the option to convert the interest rate on this advance to a
fixed rate three (3) month LIBOR. The maturity date on this advance is December 12, 2012.
On December 19, 2007, Old Line Bank borrowed an additional $5.0 million from the FHLB. The
interest rate on this borrowing is 3.119% and is payable on the 19th day of each month.
On January 22, 2008 or any interest payment date thereafter, the FHLB has the option to convert the
interest rate on this advance from a fixed rate to a one (1) month LIBOR based variable rate. This
borrowing matures on December 19, 2012.
As outlined previously, as a result of increasing our membership interest in Pointer Ridge to
62.5%, we have consolidated their results of operation from the date of acquisition. Prior to the
date of acquisition, we accounted for our investment in Pointer Ridge using the equity method. On
August 25, 2006, Pointer Ridge entered into an Amended and Restated Promissory note in the
principal amount of $6.6 million. This loan accrues interest at a rate of 6.28% through September
5, 2016. After September 5, 2016, the rate adjusts to the greater of (i) 6.28% plus 200 basis
points or (ii) the Treasury Rate (as defined in the Amended Promissory Note) plus 200 basis points.
At December 31, 2008, Pointer Ridge had borrowed $6.5 million under the Amended Promissory Note.
We have guaranteed to the lender payment of up to 62.5% of the loan payment plus any costs the
lender incurs resulting from any omissions or alleged acts or omissions by Pointer Ridge arising
out of or relating to misapplication or misappropriation of money, rents received after an event of
default, waste or damage to the property, failure to maintain insurance, fraud or material
misrepresentation, filing of bankruptcy or Pointer Ridges failure to maintain its status as a
single purpose entity.
27
Interest Rate Sensitivity Analysis and Interest Rate Risk Management
A principal objective of Old Line Banks asset/liability management policy is to minimize
exposure to changes in interest rates by an ongoing review of the maturity and re-pricing of
interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. The Asset and Liability Committee of the
Board of Directors oversees this review.
The Asset and Liability Committee establishes policies to control interest rate sensitivity.
Interest rate sensitivity is the volatility of a banks earnings resulting from movements in market
interest rates. Management monitors rate sensitivity in order to reduce vulnerability to interest
rate fluctuations while maintaining adequate capital levels and acceptable levels of liquidity.
Monthly financial reports supply management with information to evaluate and manage rate
sensitivity and adherence to policy. Old Line Banks asset/liability policys goal is to manage
assets and liabilities in a manner that stabilizes net interest income and net economic value
within a broad range of interest rate environments. Management makes adjustments to the mix of
assets and liabilities periodically in an effort to achieve dependable, steady growth in net
interest income regardless of the behavior of interest rates in general.
As part of the interest rate risk sensitivity analysis, the Asset and Liability Committee
examines the extent to which Old Line Banks assets and liabilities are interest rate sensitive and
monitors the interest rate sensitivity gap. An interest rate sensitive asset or liability is one
that, within a defined time period, either matures or experiences an interest rate change in line
with general market rates. The interest rate sensitivity gap is the difference between
interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities scheduled to mature or re-price within
such time period. A gap is considered positive when the amount of interest rate sensitive assets
exceeds the amount of interest rate sensitive liabilities. A gap is considered negative when the
amount of interest rate sensitive liabilities exceeds the amount of interest rate sensitive assets.
During a period of rising interest rates, a negative gap would tend to adversely affect net
interest income, while a positive gap would tend to result in an increase in net interest income.
During a period of declining interest rates, a negative gap would tend to result in an increase in
net interest income, while a positive gap would tend to adversely affect net interest income. If
re-pricing of assets and liabilities were equally flexible and moved concurrently, the impact of
any increase or decrease in interest rates on net interest income would be minimal.
Old Line Bank currently has a negative gap over the short term, which suggests that the net
yield on interest earning assets may decrease during periods of rising interest rates. However, a
simple interest rate gap analysis by itself may not be an accurate indicator of how changes in
interest rates will affect net interest income. Changes in interest rates may not uniformly affect
income associated with interest-earning assets and costs associated with interest-bearing
liabilities. In addition, the magnitude and duration of changes in interest rates may have a
significant impact on net interest income. Although certain assets and liabilities may have
similar maturities or periods of re-pricing, they may react in different degrees to changes in
market interest rates. Interest rates on certain types of assets and liabilities fluctuate in
advance of changes in general market interest rates, while interest rates on other types may lag
behind changes in general market rates. In the event of a change in interest rates, prepayment and
early withdrawal levels also could deviate significantly from those assumed in calculating the
interest-rate gap. The ability of many borrowers to service their debts also may decrease in the
event of an interest rate increase.
Liquidity
Our overall asset/liability strategy takes into account our need to maintain adequate
liquidity to fund asset growth and deposit runoff. Our management monitors the liquidity position
daily in conjunction with Federal Reserve guidelines. We have credit lines unsecured and secured
available from several correspondent banks totaling $25.9 million. Additionally, we may borrow
funds from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta and the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond. We can
use these credit facilities in conjunction with the normal deposit strategies, which include
pricing changes to increase deposits as necessary. We can also sell or pledge available for sale
investment securities to create additional liquidity. From time to time we may sell or participate
out loans to create additional liquidity as required. Additional sources of liquidity include
funds held in time deposits and cash from the investment and loan portfolios.
28
Our immediate sources of liquidity are cash and due from banks and federal funds sold. On
March 31, 2009, we had $7.1 million in cash and due from banks, and $111,267 in federal funds sold
and overnight investments. As of December 31, 2008, we had $8.8 million in cash and due from
banks, and $2.1 million in federal funds sold and other overnight investments. Federal funds
decreased because we deployed these funds to loans.
Old Line Bank has sufficient liquidity to meet its loan commitments as well as fluctuations in
deposits. We usually retain maturing certificates of deposit as we offer competitive rates on
certificates of deposit. Management is not aware of any demands, trends, commitments, or events
that would result in Old Line Banks inability to meet anticipated or unexpected liquidity needs.
During the recent period of turmoil in the financial markets, some institutions experienced
large deposit withdrawals that caused liquidity problems. We did not have any significant
withdrawals of deposits or any liquidity issues. Although we plan for various liquidity scenarios,
if turmoil in the financial markets continues or worsens and our depositors lose confidence in us,
we could experience liquidity issues.
Capital
Our stockholders equity amounted to $42.8 million at March 31, 2009 and $42.3 million at
December 31, 2008. We are considered well capitalized under the risk-based capital guidelines
adopted by the Federal Reserve. Stockholders equity increased during the three month period by
net income of $512,327. The $70,609 adjustment for stock based compensation awards and the $36,018
after tax unrealized gain on available for sale securities also increased stockholders equity.
These items were partially offset by the $115,871 dividend paid in March on common stock and the
$102,572 accrued dividend and accretion discount on the preferred stock issued to the U.S.
Treasury. By all regulatory measures, we remain well capitalized.
Contractual Obligations, Commitments, Contingent Liabilities, and Off-balance Sheet Arrangements
Old Line Bancshares is a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the
normal course of business. These financial instruments primarily include commitments to extend
credit, lines of credit and standby letters of credit. Old Line Bancshares uses these financial
instruments to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments involve, to
varying degrees, elements of credit, interest rate, and liquidity risk. These commitments do not
represent unusual risks and management does not anticipate any losses which would have a material
effect on Old Line Bancshares. Old Line Bancshares also has operating lease obligations.
Outstanding loan commitments and lines and letters of credit at March 31, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments to extend credit and available credit lines: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
$ |
24,336 |
|
|
$ |
23,937 |
|
Real estate-undisbursed development and construction |
|
|
14,970 |
|
|
|
21,981 |
|
Real estate-undisbursed home equity lines of credit |
|
|
8,951 |
|
|
|
5,515 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
48,257 |
|
|
$ |
51,433 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standby letters of credit |
|
$ |
1,220 |
|
|
$ |
1,583 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no
violation of any condition established in the contract. Old Line Bancshares generally requires
collateral to support financial
instruments with credit risk on the same basis as it does for on-balance sheet instruments.
The collateral is based on managements credit evaluation of the counter party. Commitments
generally have interest rates fixed at current market rates, expiration dates or other termination
clauses and may require payment of a fee. Available credit lines represent the unused portion of
lines of credit previously extended and available to the customer so long as there is no violation
of any contractual condition. These lines generally have variable interest rates. Since many of
the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, and since it is unlikely that
customers will draw upon their lines of credit in full at any time, the total commitment amount or
line of credit amount does not necessarily represent future cash requirements. We evaluate each
customers credit-worthiness on a case-by-case basis. During this period of economic turmoil, we
have re-evaluated many of our commitments to extend credit. Because we conservatively underwrite
these facilities at inception, we have not had to withdraw any commitments. We are not aware of
any loss that we would incur by funding our commitments or lines of credit.
Commitments for real estate development and construction, which totaled $15.0 million, or
30.80% of the $48.6 million of outstanding commitments at March 31, 2009, are generally short-term
and turn over rapidly with principal repayment from permanent financing arrangements upon
completion of construction or from sales of the properties financed.
Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued to guarantee the performance of a
customer to a third party. Our exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the
customer is the contract amount of the commitment. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of
credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loan facilities to customers. In
general, loan commitments, credit lines and letters of credit are made on the same terms, including
with respect to collateral, as outstanding loans. We evaluate each customers credit-worthiness
and the collateral required on a case-by-case basis.
Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures
Below is a reconciliation of the fully tax equivalent adjustments and the GAAP basis
information presented in this report:
Three months ended March 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
Federal Funds |
|
|
Investment |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Net Interest |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
|
Sold |
|
|
Securities |
|
|
Earning Assets |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Spread |
|
GAAP interest income |
|
$ |
435 |
|
|
$ |
411,962 |
|
|
$ |
4,101,948 |
|
|
$ |
2,652,253 |
|
|
|
|
|
Tax equivalent adjustment |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
16,931 |
|
|
|
16,932 |
|
|
|
16,932 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax equivalent interest income |
|
$ |
436 |
|
|
$ |
428,893 |
|
|
$ |
4,118,880 |
|
|
$ |
2,669,185 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAAP interest yield |
|
|
0.42 |
% |
|
|
4.15 |
% |
|
|
5.68 |
% |
|
|
3.67 |
% |
|
|
3.25 |
% |
Taxable equivalent adjustment |
|
|
0.01 |
% |
|
|
0.17 |
% |
|
|
0.03 |
% |
|
|
0.03 |
% |
|
|
0.03 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax equivalent interest yield |
|
|
0.43 |
% |
|
|
4.32 |
% |
|
|
5.71 |
% |
|
|
3.70 |
% |
|
|
3.28 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
Federal Funds |
|
|
Investment |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Net Interest |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
|
Sold |
|
|
Securities |
|
|
Earning Assets |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Spread |
|
GAAP interest income |
|
$ |
126,378 |
|
|
$ |
120,114 |
|
|
$ |
3,770,442 |
|
|
$ |
2,229,533 |
|
|
|
|
|
Tax equivalent adjustment |
|
|
2,815 |
|
|
|
15,021 |
|
|
|
17,836 |
|
|
|
17,836 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax equivalent interest income |
|
$ |
129,193 |
|
|
$ |
135,135 |
|
|
$ |
3,788,278 |
|
|
$ |
2,247,369 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAAP interest yield |
|
|
3.03 |
% |
|
|
3.82 |
% |
|
|
6.45 |
% |
|
|
3.81 |
% |
|
|
3.05 |
% |
Taxable equivalent adjustment |
|
|
0.07 |
% |
|
|
0.48 |
% |
|
|
0.03 |
% |
|
|
0.03 |
% |
|
|
0.03 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax equivalent interest yield |
|
|
3.10 |
% |
|
|
4.30 |
% |
|
|
6.48 |
% |
|
|
3.84 |
% |
|
|
3.08 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
Impact of Inflation and Changing Prices
Management has prepared the financial statements and related data presented herein in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles which require the measurement of financial
position and operating results in terms of historical dollars, without considering changes in the
relative purchasing power of money over time due to inflation.
Unlike industrial companies, virtually all the assets and liabilities of a financial
institution are monetary in nature. As a result, interest rates have a more significant impact on
a financial institutions performance than the effects of general levels of inflation. Interest
rates do not necessarily move in the same direction or in the same magnitude as the price of goods
and services, and may frequently reflect government policy initiatives or economic factors not
measured by price index. As discussed above, we strive to manage our interest sensitive assets and
liabilities in order to offset the effects of rate changes and inflation.
Application of Critical Accounting Policies
We prepare our financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America and follow general practices within the industry in which
we operate. Application of these principles requires management to make estimates, assumptions,
and judgments that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes.
We base these estimates, assumptions, and judgments on information available as of the date of the
financial statements; accordingly, as this information changes, the financial statements could
reflect different estimates, assumptions, and judgments. Certain policies inherently have a
greater reliance on the use of estimates, assumptions, and judgments and as such have a greater
possibility of producing results that could be materially different than originally reported.
Estimates, assumptions, and judgments are necessary when assets and liabilities are required to be
recorded at fair value, when a decline in the value of an asset not carried on the financial
statements at fair value warrants an impairment write-down or valuation reserve to be established,
or when an asset or liability needs to be recorded contingent upon a future event. Carrying
assets and liabilities at fair value inherently results in more financial statement volatility. We
base the fair values and the information used to record valuation adjustments for certain assets
and liabilities on quoted market prices or from information other third-party sources provide, when
available.
Based on the valuation techniques used and the sensitivity of financial statement amounts to
the methods, assumptions, and estimates underlying those amounts, management has identified the
determination of the provision for loan losses as the accounting area that requires the most
subjective or complex judgments, and as such could be most subject to revision as new information
becomes available.
31
Management has significant discretion in making the judgments inherent in the determination of
the provision and allowance for loan losses, including in connection with the valuation of
collateral and the financial condition of the borrower, and in establishing loss ratios and risk
ratings. The establishment of allowance factors is a continuing exercise and allowance factors may
change over time, resulting in an increase or decrease in the amount of the provision or allowance
based upon the same volume and classification of loans.
Changes in allowance factors or in managements interpretation of those factors will have a
direct impact on the amount of the provision, and a corresponding effect on income and assets.
Also, errors in managements perception and assessment of the allowance factors could result in the
allowance not being adequate to cover losses in the portfolio, and may result in additional
provisions or charge-offs, which would adversely affect income and capital. For additional
information regarding the allowance for loan losses, see Provision for Loan Losses.
Information Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This report contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended (the Exchange Act). We may also include forward-looking statements in other statements
that we make. All statements that are not descriptions of historical facts are forward-looking
statements. Forward-looking statements often use words such as believe, expect, plan, may,
will, should, project, contemplate, anticipate, forecast, intend or other words of
similar meaning. You can also identify them by the fact that they do not relate strictly to
historical or current facts.
The statements presented herein with respect to, among other things, Old Line Bancshares
plans, objectives, expectations and intentions, including branch and market expansion, statements
regarding anticipated changes in revenue and expenses, our expectation that Pointer Ridge will
operate at a slight loss for the remainder of 2009, future sources of earnings/income, strategic
opportunities, sources of liquidity, the allowance for loan losses, expected loan, deposit and
asset growth, costs of funds, our intentions with respect to our investment securities, losses on
non-accrual loans, interest rate sensitivity, the expected income from new branches offsetting
related expenses, expected openings of new branches, earnings on BOLI and financial and other goals
and plans are forward looking. Old Line Bancshares bases these statements on our beliefs,
assumptions and on information available to us as of the date of this filing, which involves risks
and uncertainties. These risks and uncertainties include, among others those discussed in this
report; the ability of Old Line Bancshares to retain key personnel; the ability of Old Line
Bancshares to successfully implement its growth and expansion strategy; risk of loan losses; that
the allowance for loan losses may not be sufficient; that changes in interest rates and monetary
policy could adversely affect Old Line Bancshares; that changes in regulatory requirements and/or
restrictive banking legislation may adversely affect Old Line Bancshares; that the market value of
investments could negatively impact stockholders equity; risks associated with Old Line
Bancshares lending limit; increased expenses due to stock benefit plans; expenses associated with
operating as a public company; potential conflicts of interest associated with the interest in
Pointer Ridge; further deterioration in general economic conditions; and changes in competitive,
governmental, regulatory, technological and other factors which may affect Old Line Bancshares
specifically or the banking industry generally. For a more complete discussion of some of these
risks and uncertainties see Factors Affecting Future Results in Old Line Bancshares Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Old Line Bancshares actual results and the actual outcome of our expectations and strategies
could differ materially from those anticipated or estimated because of these risks and
uncertainties and you should not put undue reliance on any forward-looking statements. All
forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this filing, and Old Line Bancshares
undertakes no obligation to update the forward-looking statements to reflect factual assumptions,
circumstances or events that have changed after we have made the forward-looking statements.
32
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Market risk is the exposure to economic loss that arises from changes in the values of certain
financial instruments. Due to the nature of our operations, only interest rate risk is significant
to our consolidated results of operations or financial position. For information regarding our
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk, see Interest Rate Sensitivity Analysis
and Interest Rate Risk Management in Part I, Item 2 of this Form 10-Q.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, Old Line
Bancshares Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer evaluated the effectiveness of Old
Line Bancshares disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange
Act. Based upon that evaluation, Old Line Bancshares Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer concluded that Old Line Bancshares disclosure controls and procedures are effective as of
March 31, 2009. Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and other procedures that are
designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by Old Line Bancshares in the reports
that it files or submits under the Exchange Act, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported
within the time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms.
In addition, there were no changes in Old Line Bancshares internal control over financial
reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the quarter ended March 31,
2009, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, Old Line
Bancshares internal control over financial reporting.
PART II-OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
None
Item 1A. Risk Factors
There have been no material changes in the risk factors from those disclosed in our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
None
Item 5. Other Information
None
Item 6. Exhibits
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
32
|
|
Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer |
33
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Old Line Bancshares, Inc.
|
|
Date: May 12, 2009 |
By: |
/s/ James W. Cornelsen
|
|
|
|
James W. Cornelsen, |
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: May 12, 2009 |
By: |
/s/ Christine M. Rush
|
|
|
|
Christine M. Rush, |
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Accounting and Financial Officer) |
|
|
34