nv2za
As
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 24, 2009
Securities Act File No. 333-155806
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form N-2
REGISTRATION STATEMENT
UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
Pre-Effective Amendment No. 2
Main Street Capital Corporation
(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)
1300 Post Oak Boulevard, Suite 800
Houston, TX 77056
(713) 350-6000
(Address and telephone number,
including area code, of principal executive offices)
Vincent D. Foster
Chief Executive Officer
Main Street Capital Corporation
1300 Post Oak Boulevard, Suite 800
Houston, TX 77056
(Name and address of agent for service)
COPIES TO:
|
|
|
Jason B. Beauvais
Vice President, General Counsel
and Secretary
Main Street Capital Corporation
1300 Post Oak Boulevard, Suite 800
Houston, TX 77056
|
|
Steven B. Boehm, Esq.
Harry S. Pangas, Esq.
Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP
1275 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20004-2415
Tel: (202) 383-0100
Fax: (202) 637-3593 |
Approximate date of proposed public offering: From time to time after the
effective date of this Registration Statement.
If any securities being registered on this form will be offered on a delayed or
continuous basis in reliance on Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, other than
securities offered in connection with a dividend reinvestment plan, check the following
box. þ
It is proposed that this filing will become effective (check appropriate box):
o when declared effective pursuant to section 8(c).
CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proposed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum |
|
|
Amount of |
|
|
Title of Securities |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
Registration |
|
|
Being Registered |
|
|
Offering Price |
|
|
Fee |
|
|
Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share |
|
|
$ |
300,000,000 |
|
|
|
$ |
11,790(1) |
|
|
|
(1) Previously paid.
The Registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on such date or dates as
may be necessary to delay its effective date until the Registrant shall file a further
amendment which specifically states that this Registration Statement shall thereafter
become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 or until
the Registration Statement shall become effective on such date as the Securities and
Exchange Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.
The information in this prospectus is not complete and may be
changed. We may not sell these securities until the registration statement
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This
prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities and is not soliciting an
offer to buy these securities in any state where the offer or sale is not
permitted.
SUBJECT
TO COMPLETION, DATED April 24, 2009
PROSPECTUS
$300,000,000
Main Street Capital Corporation
Common Stock
We may offer, from time to time, up to $300,000,000 of our common stock, $0.01 par
value per share, in one or more offerings. Our common stock may be offered at prices
and on terms to be disclosed in one or more supplements to this prospectus. The
offering price per share of our common stock, less any underwriting commissions or
discounts, will not be less than the net asset value per share of our common stock at
the time of the offering, except (i) with the consent of the majority of our common
stockholders or (ii) under such other circumstances as the Securities and Exchange
Commission may permit. On June 17, 2008, our common stockholders voted to allow us to
issue common stock at a price below net asset value per share for a period of one year
ending on the earlier of June 16, 2009 or the date of our 2009 annual stockholders
meeting. Our stockholders did not specify a maximum discount below net asset value at
which we are able to issue our common stock; however, we cannot issue shares of our
common stock below net asset value unless our Board of Directors determines that it
would be in our and our stockholders best interests to do so. Shares of closed-end
investment companies such as us frequently trade at a discount to their net asset
value. This risk is separate and distinct from the risk that our net asset value per
share may decline. We cannot predict whether our common stock will trade above, at or
below net asset value. You should read this prospectus and the applicable prospectus
supplement carefully before you invest in our common stock.
Our common stock may be offered directly to one or more purchasers through agents
designated from time to time by us, or to or through underwriters or dealers. The
prospectus supplement relating to the offering will identify any agents or underwriters
involved in the sale of our common stock, and will disclose any applicable purchase
price, fee, commission or discount arrangement between us and our agents or
underwriters or among our underwriters or the basis upon which such amount may be
calculated. See Plan of Distribution. We may not sell any of our common stock through
agents, underwriters or dealers without delivery of a prospectus supplement describing
the method and terms of the offering of such common stock.
We are a principal investment fund focused on providing customized debt and equity
financing to lower middle-market companies that operate in diverse industries. We seek
to fill the current financing gap for lower middle-market businesses, which have
limited access to financing from commercial banks and other traditional sources.
Our investment objective is to maximize our portfolios total return by generating
current income from our debt investments and realizing capital appreciation from our equity and equity-related investments, including warrants, convertible securities and other rights to acquire equity securities in a portfolio company. We are an internally managed, closed-end, non-diversified
management investment company that has elected to be treated as a business development
company under the Investment Company Act of 1940.
Our common stock is listed on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol
MAIN. On April 23, 2009, the last reported sale price of our common stock on the
Nasdaq Global Select Market was $11.70 per share.
Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk, and should be considered highly speculative. See Risk Factors beginning on page 8 to read about factors you should consider, including the risk of leverage, before investing in our common stock.
This prospectus and the accompanying prospectus supplement contain important
information about us that a prospective investor should know before investing in our
common stock. Please read this prospectus and the accompanying prospectus supplement
before investing and keep them for future reference. We file annual, quarterly and
current reports, proxy statements and other information with the Securities and
Exchange Commission. This information is available free of charge by contacting us at
1300 Post Oak Boulevard, Suite 800, Houston, Texas 77056 or by telephone at
(713) 350-6000 or on our website at www.mainstcapital.com. Information contained on our
website is not incorporated by reference into this prospectus, and you should not
consider that information to be part of this prospectus. The Securities and Exchange
Commission also maintains a website at www.sec.gov that contains such information.
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission
has approved or disapproved of these securities or determined if this prospectus is
truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
The date of this prospectus is , 2009
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
|
F-1 |
|
EX-99.N.1 |
EX-99.N.2 |
This prospectus is part of a registration statement that we have filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, using the shelf registration process.
Under the shelf registration process, we may offer, from time to time, up to
$300,000,000 of our common stock on terms to be determined at the time of the offering.
This prospectus provides you with a general description of the common stock that we may
offer. Each time we use this prospectus to offer common stock, we will provide a
prospectus supplement that will contain specific information about the terms of that
offering. The prospectus supplement may also add, update or change information
contained in this prospectus. Please carefully read this prospectus and any
accompanying prospectus supplement together with the additional information described
under Available Information and Risk Factors before you make an investment
decision.
No dealer, salesperson or other person is authorized to give any information or to
represent anything not contained in this prospectus or any accompanying supplement to
this prospectus. You must not rely on any unauthorized information or representations
not contained in this prospectus or any accompanying prospectus supplement as if we had
authorized it. This prospectus and any accompanying prospectus supplement do not
constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of any offer to buy any security other
than the registered securities to which they relate, nor do they constitute an offer to
sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any securities in any jurisdiction to any
person to whom it is unlawful to make such an offer or solicitation in such
jurisdiction. The information contained in this prospectus and any accompanying
prospectus supplement is accurate as of the dates on their covers.
PROSPECTUS SUMMARY
This summary highlights some of the information in this prospectus. It is not complete
and may not contain all of the information that you may want to consider. You should read
the entire prospectus and any prospectus supplement carefully, including the section
entitled Risk Factors.
Main Street Capital Corporation (MSCC) was formed on
March 9, 2007, for the purpose of (i) acquiring 100%
of the equity interests of Main Street Mezzanine Fund, LP (the
Fund) and its general partner, Main Street Mezzanine
Management, LLC (the General Partner),
(ii) acquiring 100% of the equity interests of Main Street
Capital Partners, LLC (the Investment Manager),
(iii) raising capital in an initial public offering, which
was completed in October 2007 (the IPO), and
(iv) thereafter operating as an internally managed business
development company (BDC) under the Investment
Company Act of 1940, as amended (the 1940 Act). The
transactions discussed above were consummated in October 2007
and are collectively termed the Formation
Transactions. The
Fund is licensed as a Small Business Investment Company
(SBIC) by the United States Small Business
Administration (SBA) and the Investment Manager acts
as the Funds manager and investment adviser. The
Investment Manager also acts as the manager and investment
adviser to Main Street Capital II, LP (MSC II), a
privately owned, affiliated SBIC which commenced investment
operations in January 2006. MSCC did not acquire any interest in
MSC II in connection with the Formation Transactions and
currently does not hold any equity interest in MSC II. Unless otherwise noted or the context
otherwise indicates, the terms we, us,
our and Main Street refer to the Fund
and the General Partner prior to the IPO and to MSCC and its
subsidiaries, including the Fund and the General Partner,
subsequent to the IPO.
Main Street
We are a principal investment firm focused on providing
customized financing solutions to lower middle-market companies,
which we generally define as companies with annual revenues
between $10 million and $100 million. Our investment
objective is to maximize our portfolios total return by
generating current income from our debt investments and
realizing capital appreciation from our equity and
equity-related investments, including warrants, convertible
securities and other rights to acquire equity securities in a
portfolio company. Our investments generally range in size from
$2 million to $15 million. Our ability to invest
across a companys capital structure, from senior secured
loans to subordinated debt to equity securities, allows us to
offer portfolio companies a comprehensive suite of financing
solutions, or one-stop financing.
Our investments are made through both MSCC and the Fund. Since
the IPO, MSCC and the Fund have co-invested in substantially
every investment we have made. MSCC and the Fund share the same
investment strategies and criteria in the lower middle-market,
although they are subject to different regulatory regimes. See
Regulation. An investors return in
MSCC will depend, in part, on the Funds investment returns
as the Fund is a wholly owned subsidiary of MSCC.
We typically seek to work with entrepreneurs, business owners
and management teams to provide customized financing for
strategic acquisitions, business expansion and other growth
initiatives, ownership transitions and recapitalizations. In
structuring transactions, we seek to protect our rights, manage
our risk and create value by: (i) providing financing at
lower leverage ratios; (ii) generally taking first priority
liens on assets; and (iii) providing significant equity
incentives for management teams of our portfolio companies. We
seek to avoid competing with other capital providers for
transactions because we believe competitive transactions often
have execution risks and can result in potential conflicts among
creditors and lower returns due to more aggressive valuation
multiples and higher leverage ratios.
As of December 31, 2008, Main Street had debt and equity
investments in 31 portfolio companies. Approximately 84% of our
total portfolio investments at cost, excluding our 100% equity
interest in the Investment Manager, were in the form of debt
investments and 91% of such debt investments at cost were
secured by first priority liens on the assets of our portfolio
companies. As of December 31, 2008, Main Street had a
weighted average effective yield on its debt investments of 14%.
Weighted average yields are computed using the effective
interest rates for all debt investments at December 31,
2008, including amortization of deferred debt origination fees
and accretion of original issue discount. At December 31,
2008, we had equity ownership in approximately 94% of our
portfolio companies and the average fully diluted equity
ownership in those portfolio companies was approximately 25%.
You should be aware that investments in the lower middle-market carry a number of
risks including, but not limited to, investing in companies which have a limited operating
history and financial resources and other risks common to investing in below investment
grade debt and equity investments in private, smaller companies. Please see Risk
Factors Risks Related to Our Investments for a more complete discussion of the risks
involved with investing in the lower middle-market.
Our principal executive offices are located at 1300 Post Oak Boulevard, Suite 800,
Houston, Texas 77056, and our telephone number is (713) 350-6000. We maintain a website at
http://www.mainstcapital.com. Information contained on our website is not incorporated by
reference into this prospectus or any prospectus supplement, and you should not consider
that information to be part of this prospectus or any prospectus supplement.
1
Business Strategies
Our investment objective is to maximize our portfolios total return by generating
current income from our debt investments and realizing capital appreciation from our equity and equity-related investments, including warrants, convertible securities and other rights to acquire equity securities in a portfolio company. We have adopted the following business strategies to achieve
our investment objective:
|
|
|
Delivering Customized Financing Solutions. We believe our ability to
provide a broad range of customized financing solutions to lower
middle-market companies sets us apart from other capital providers
that focus on providing a limited number of financing solutions. We
offer to our portfolio companies customized debt financing solutions
with equity components that are tailored to the facts and
circumstances of each situation. Our ability to invest across a
companys capital structure, from senior secured loans to subordinated
debt to equity securities, allows us to offer our portfolio companies
a comprehensive suite of financing solutions, or one-stop financing. |
|
|
|
|
Focusing on Established Companies in the Lower Middle-Market. We
generally invest in companies with established market positions,
experienced management teams and proven revenue streams. Those
companies generally possess better risk-adjusted return profiles than
newer companies that are building management or are in the early
stages of building a revenue base. In addition, established lower
middle-market companies generally provide opportunities for capital
appreciation. |
|
|
|
|
|
Leveraging the Skills and Experience of Our Investment Team. Our
investment team has significant experience in lending to and investing
in lower middle-market companies. The members of our investment team
have broad investment backgrounds, with prior experience at private
investment funds, investment banks and other financial services
companies, and currently include seven certified public accountants and
one chartered financial analyst. The expertise of our investment team
in analyzing, valuing, structuring, negotiating and closing
transactions should provide us with competitive advantages by allowing
us to consider customized financing solutions and non-traditional and
complex structures. |
|
|
|
|
|
Investing Across Multiple Industries. We seek to maintain a portfolio
of investments that is appropriately balanced among various companies,
industries, geographic regions and end markets. This portfolio balance
is intended to mitigate the potential effects of negative economic
events for particular companies, regions and industries. |
|
|
|
|
Capitalizing on Strong Transaction Sourcing Network. Our investment
team seeks to leverage its extensive network of referral sources for
investments in lower middle-market companies. We have developed a
reputation in our marketplace as a responsive, efficient and reliable
source of financing, which has created a growing stream of proprietary
deal flow for us. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefiting from Lower Cost of Capital. The Funds SBIC license has
allowed it to issue SBA-guaranteed debentures. SBA-guaranteed
debentures carry long-term fixed rates that are generally lower than
rates on comparable bank and other debt. Because lower cost SBA
leverage is, and will continue to be, a significant part of our
capital base through the Fund, our relative cost of debt capital should be lower than
many of our competitors. In addition, the SBIC leverage that we receive through the Fund represents a
stable, long-term component of our capital structure. |
|
|
2
Investment Criteria
Our investment team has identified the following investment criteria that it
believes are important in evaluating prospective portfolio companies. Our
investment team uses these criteria in evaluating investment opportunities.
However, not all of these criteria have been, or will be, met in connection with
each of our investments.
|
|
|
Proven Management Team with Meaningful Financial Commitment. We look
for operationally-oriented management with direct industry experience
and a successful track record. In addition, we expect the management
team of each portfolio company to have meaningful equity ownership in
the portfolio company to better align our respective economic
interests. We believe management teams with these attributes are more
likely to manage the companies in a manner that protects our debt
investment and enhances the value of our equity investment. |
|
|
|
|
Established Companies with Positive Cash Flow. We seek to invest in
established companies in the lower middle-market with sound historical
financial performance. We typically focus on companies that have
historically generated EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes,
Depreciation and Amortization) of $1.0 million to $10.0 million and
commensurate levels of free cash flow. We generally do not intend to
invest in start-up companies or companies with speculative business
plans. |
|
|
|
|
Defensible Competitive Advantages/Favorable Industry Position. We
primarily focus on companies having competitive advantages in their
respective markets and/or operating in industries with barriers to
entry, which may help to protect their market position and
profitability. |
|
|
|
|
Exit Alternatives. We expect that the primary means by which we exit
our debt investments will be through the repayment of our investment
from internally generated cash flow and/or refinancing. In addition,
we seek to invest in companies whose business models and expected
future cash flows may provide alternate methods of repaying our
investment, such as through a strategic acquisition by other industry
participants or a recapitalization. |
Formation Transactions
As part of the Formation Transactions, the Investment Manager,
which employs all of the executive officers and other employees
of MSCC, became a wholly owned subsidiary of MSCC. However, the
Investment Manager is accounted for as a portfolio investment of
Main Street, since the Investment Manager is not a registered
investment company and since it conducts a significant portion
of its investment management activities for MSC II, a separate
SBIC fund in which MSCC does not have an equity interest. The
Investment Manager receives recurring investment management fees
from MSC II pursuant to a separate investment advisory
agreement, paid quarterly, which currently total
$3.3 million per year. The portfolio investment in the
Investment Manager is accounted for using fair value accounting,
with the fair value determined by MSCC and approved, in good
faith, by MSCCs Board of Directors. MSCCs valuation
of the Investment Manager is based upon the discounted net cash flows
from third party recurring investment managers fees. The net
cash flows utilized in the valuation of the Investment Manager
exclude any revenues and expenses from all related parties
(including MSCC) but include the management fees from MSC II and
an estimated allocation of costs related to providing services
to MSC II. For more information on the Investment Manager, see
Note D Wholly Owned Investment
Manager to our consolidated financial statements.
3
In connection with the Formation Transactions, MSCC entered into
a support services agreement with the Investment Manager. The
agreement requires the Investment Manager to manage the
day-to-day operational and investment activities of Main Street.
The Investment Manager generally incurs all normal operating and
administrative expenses, except those specifically required to
be borne by MSCC, which principally include costs that are
specific to MSCCs status as a publicly traded entity. The
expenses paid by the Investment Manager include the cost of
salaries and related benefits, rent, equipment and other
administrative costs required for Main Streets day-to-day
operations.
The Investment Manager is reimbursed for its expenses associated
with providing operational and investment management services to
MSCC and its subsidiaries. Each quarter, as part of the support
services agreement, MSCC makes payments to cover all expenses
incurred by the Investment Manager, less amounts the Investment
Manager receives from MSC II pursuant to a separate investment
advisory services agreement. Based on this separate investment
advisory services agreement, MSC II paid the Investment Manager
approximately $3.3 million in 2008 for these services.
The IPO involved the public offering and sale of
4,300,000 shares of our common stock, including shares sold
upon the underwriters exercise of the over-allotment
option, at a price to the public of $15.00 per share of our
common stock, resulting in net proceeds to us of approximately
$60.2 million, after deducting underwriters
commissions totaling approximately $4.3 million. As a
result of the IPO and the Formation Transactions described
above, we are a closed-end, non-diversified management
investment company that has elected to be treated as a BDC under
the 1940 Act. Because the Investment Manager, which employs all
of the executive officers and other employees of MSCC, is wholly
owned by us, we do not pay any external investment advisory
fees, but instead we incur the net operating costs associated
with employing investment and portfolio management professionals
through the Investment Manager.
Immediately following the completion of the Formation
Transactions, Main Street Equity Interests, Inc.
(MSEI) was created as a wholly-owned consolidated
subsidiary of MSCC to hold certain of our portfolio investments.
MSEI has elected for tax purposes to be treated as a taxable
entity and is taxed at normal corporate tax rates based on its
taxable income. The taxable income of MSEI may differ from its
book income due to deferred tax timing differences as well as
permanent differences.
We co-invested with MSC II in several existing portfolio
investments prior to the IPO, but did not
co-invest
with MSC II subsequent to the IPO and prior to June 2008. On
June 4, 2008, we received exemptive relief from the SEC to
allow us to resume co-investing with MSC II in accordance with
the terms of such exemptive relief.
4
The Offering
We may offer, from time to time, up to $300,000,000 of our common stock, on terms
to be determined at the time of the offering. Our common stock may be offered at
prices and on terms to be disclosed in one or more prospectus supplements. The
offering price per share of our common stock, less any underwriting commissions or
discounts, will not be less than the net asset value per share of our common stock at
the time of the offering, except (i) with the consent of the majority of our common
stockholders (which we received from our stockholders at our June 17, 2008 annual
stockholders meeting, for a period of one year ending on the earlier of June 16, 2009
or the date of our 2009 annual stockholders meeting) or (ii) under such other
circumstances as the SEC may permit. Our stockholders did not specify a maximum
discount below net asset value at which we are able to issue our common stock;
however, we cannot issue shares of our common stock below net asset value unless our
Board of Directors determines that it would be in our and our stockholders best
interests to do so.
Our common stock may be offered directly to one or more purchasers by us or
through agents designated from time to time by us, or to or through underwriters or
dealers. The prospectus supplement relating to the offering will disclose the terms of
the offering, including the name or names of any agents or underwriters involved in
the sale of our common stock by us, the purchase price, and any fee, commission or
discount arrangement between us and our agents or underwriters or among our
underwriters or the basis upon which such amount may be calculated. See Plan of
Distribution. We may not sell any of our common stock through agents, underwriters or
dealers without delivery of a prospectus supplement describing the method and terms of
the offering of our common stock.
Set forth below is additional information regarding the offering of our common
stock:
|
|
|
Use of proceeds
|
|
We intend to use all of the net proceeds from selling our
common stock to make investments in lower middle-market
companies in accordance with our investment objective and
strategies described in this prospectus or any prospectus
supplement, pay our operating expenses and dividends to
our stockholders and for general corporate purposes.
Pending such use, we will |
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
invest the net proceeds
primarily in short-term securities consistent with our BDC
election and our election to be taxed as a regulated investment
company (RIC). See Use
of Proceeds. |
|
|
|
|
Nasdaq Global Select
Market symbol
|
|
MAIN |
|
|
|
Dividends
|
|
We have paid quarterly, but, beginning in the fourth quarter of
2008, will pay monthly, dividends to our stockholders out of
assets legally available for distribution. Our dividends, if
any, will be determined by our Board of Directors. |
|
|
|
|
Taxation
|
|
MSCC has elected to be treated for federal
income tax purposes as a RIC under Subchapter M
of the Code. Accordingly, we generally will not
pay corporate-level federal income taxes on any
net ordinary income or capital gains that we
distribute to our stockholders as dividends. To
maintain our RIC tax treatment, we must meet
specified source-of-income and asset
diversification requirements and distribute
annually at least 90.0% of our net ordinary
income and realized net short-term capital
gains in excess of realized net long-term
capital losses, if any. Depending on the level
of taxable income earned in a tax year, we may
choose to carry forward taxable income in
excess of current year distributions into the
next tax year and pay a 4% excise tax on such
income. Any such carryover taxable income must
be distributed through a dividend declared
prior to filing the final tax return related to
the year which generated such taxable income.
See Material U.S. Federal Income Tax
Considerations. |
|
|
|
|
Dividend reinvestment plan
|
|
We have adopted a dividend reinvestment plan
for our stockholders. The dividend reinvestment
plan is an opt out reinvestment plan. As a
result, if we declare dividends, then
stockholders cash dividends will be
automatically reinvested in additional shares
of our common stock, unless they specifically
opt out of the dividend reinvestment plan so
as to receive cash dividends. Stockholders who
receive dividends in the form of stock will be
subject to the same federal, state and local
tax consequences as stockholders who elect to
receive their dividends in cash. See Dividend
Reinvestment Plan. |
|
|
|
Trading at a discount
|
|
Shares of closed-end investment companies
frequently trade at a discount to their net
asset value. This risk is separate and distinct
from the risk that our net asset value per
share may decline. We cannot predict whether
our shares will trade above, at or below net
asset value. |
|
Risk factors |
Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. You should consider carefully the
information found in Risk Factors, including the following risks: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The current state of the economy and financial markets increases the liklihood of
adverse effects on our financial position and results of operations. Continued economic
adversity could impair our portfolio companies financial positions and operating results
and affect the industries in which we invest, which could, in turn, harm our operating
results. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our investment portfolio is and will continue to be recorded at fair value, with our Board
of Directors having final responsibility for overseeing, reviewing and approving, in good faith,
our estimate of fair value and, as a result, there is and will continue to be uncertainty as to
the value of our portfolio investments. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our financial condition and results of operations
depends on our ability to effectively manage and deploy capital. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
We may face increasing competition for investment opportunities. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
We have a limited operating history as a BDC and as a RIC. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regulations governing our operation as a BDC will affect
our ability to, and the way in which we raise additional capital. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our wholly-owned subsidiary, the Fund,
is licensed by the SBA, and therefore subject to SBIC regulations. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Because we borrow money, the potential for gain or loss on amounts invested
in us is
magnified and may increase the risk of investing in us. |
|
|
|
|
We, through the Fund, issue debt securities guaranteed by the SBA and sold in the
capital markets. As a result of its guarantee of the debt securities, the SBA has fixed
dollar claims on the assets of the Fund that are superior to the claims of our common
stockholders. |
|
|
|
We will be subject to corporate-level income tax if we are unable to qualify as a RIC
under Subchapter M of the Code. |
|
|
|
|
|
We may not be able to pay you dividends, our dividends may not grow over time, and a
portion of dividends paid to you may be a return of capital. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Because we intend to distribute substantially all of our income to our stockholders to
maintain our status as a RIC, we will continue to need additional capital to finance our
growth, and regulations governing our operation as a BDC will affect our ability to, and
the way in which we, raise additional capital. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders may incur dilution if we sell shares of our common stock in one or more
offerings at prices below the then current net asset value per share of our common stock
or issue securities to subscribe to, convert to or purchase shares of our common stock. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our investments in portfolio companies involve higher levels of risk, and we could lose all or part of
our investment. Investing in lower middle-market companies involves a number of
significant risks. Among other things, these companies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
may have limited financial resources and may be unable to meet their
obligations under their debt instruments that we hold, which may be accompanied by
a deterioration in the value of any collateral and a reduction in the likelihood
of us realizing any guarantees from subsidiaries or affiliates of our portfolio
companies that we may have obtained in connection with our investment, as well as
a corresponding decrease in the value of the equity components of our investments; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
may have shorter operating histories, narrower product lines, smaller
market shares and/or significant customer concentrations than larger businesses, which tend to render them more vulnerable to competitors actions and
market conditions, as well as general economic downturns; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
are more likely to depend on the management talents and efforts of a
small group of persons; therefore, the death, disability, resignation or
termination of one or more of these persons could have a material adverse impact
on our portfolio company and, in turn, on us; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
generally have less predictable operating results, may from time to
time be parties to litigation, may be engaged in rapidly changing businesses with
products subject to a substantial risk of obsolescence, and may require
substantial additional capital to support their operations, finance expansion or
maintain their competitive position; and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
generally have less publicly available information about their
businesses, operations and financial condition. We are required to rely on the
ability of our management team and investment professionals to obtain adequate
information to evaluate the potential returns from investing in these companies.
If we are unable to uncover all material information about these companies, we may
not make a fully informed investment decision, and may lose all or part of our
investment. |
|
|
|
|
|
Our portfolio companies may incur
debt that ranks equally with, or senior to, our investments in such companies. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
We are a non-diversified investment company within the meaning of the 1940 Act, and therefore we are not limited with respect to
the proportion of our assets that may be invested in securities of a single issuer. |
|
|
|
|
|
Shares of closed-end investment companies, including BDCs, may trade at a discount to
their net asset value. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
We may be unable to invest a significant portion of the net proceeds from an offering on acceptable
terms, which could harm our financial condition and operating results. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The market price of our common stock may be volatile and fluctuate significantly. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Risk Factors beginning on page 8 for a more complete discussion of these and other risks you should carefully
consider before deciding to invest in shares of
our common stock. |
|
|
|
Available Information
|
|
We file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other
information with the SEC under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, or the Exchange Act. You can inspect any materials we file with
the SEC, without charge, at the SECs Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington,
D.C. 20549. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the Public
Reference Room. The information we file with the SEC is available free of charge by contacting
us at 1300 Post Oak Boulevard, Suite 800, Houston, TX 77056, by telephone at (713) 350-6000 or
on our website at http://www.mainstcapital.com. The SEC also maintains a website that contains
reports, proxy statements and other information regarding registrants, including us, that file
such information electronically with the SEC. The address of the SECs web site is
http://www.sec.gov. Information contained on our website or on the SECs web site about us is
not incorporated into this prospectus, and you should not consider information contained on
our website or on the SECs website to be part of this prospectus. |
|
6
FEES AND EXPENSES
The following table is intended to assist you in understanding the costs and expenses
that an investor in this offering will bear directly or indirectly. We caution you that
some of the percentages indicated in the table below are estimates and may vary. Except
where the context suggests otherwise, whenever this prospectus contains a reference to fees
or expenses paid by you, us or Main Street, or that we will pay fees or expenses,
stockholders will indirectly bear such fees or expenses as investors in us.
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholder Transaction Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales load (as a percentage of offering price) |
|
|
|
% (1) |
Offering expenses |
|
|
|
% (2) |
Dividend reinvestment plan expenses |
|
|
|
% (3) |
Total stockholder transaction expenses (as a percentage of offering price) |
|
|
|
% (4) |
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Expenses (as a percentage of net assets attributable to common stock): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
6.3 |
% (5) |
Interest payments on borrowed funds |
|
|
2.8 |
% (6) |
Total annual expenses |
|
|
9.1 |
% (7) |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In the event that our common stock is sold to or through underwriters, a corresponding prospectus supplement will disclose
the applicable sales load. |
|
(2) |
|
In the event that we conduct on offering of our common stock, a corresponding prospectus supplement will disclose the
estimated offering expenses. |
|
(3) |
|
The expenses of administering our dividend reinvestment plan are included in operating expenses. |
|
(4) |
|
Total stockholder transaction expenses may include sales load and will be disclosed in a future prospectus supplement, if any. |
|
|
|
(5) |
|
Operating expenses include the expenses of the Investment
Manager as if it were
consolidated with MSCC for accounting purposes, including expenses incurred by the
Investment Manager in managing MSC II pursuant to an investment advisory services
agreement between the Investment Manager and MSC II and other third party consulting
arrangements. Based on this investment
advisory services agreement, MSC II paid the Investment Manager approximately $3.3
million in 2008 for these services. In accordance with the terms of the support services agreement between MSCC and the Investment Manager, MSCC is only required
to
reimburse the Investment Manager for expenses incurred by the Investment Manager in
providing investment management and other services to MSCC less amounts the
Investment Manager receives from MSC II and other third parties. Consequently, MSCC is only incurring the
expenses of the Investment Manager net of fees received for third party investment
advisory and consulting services. Our percentage of operating expenses to net assets attributable to
common stock only including the expenses incurred by MSCC net of the investment
advisory and consulting service fees received by the Investment
Manager from MSC II and other third parties would be 3.4%.
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6) |
|
Interest payments on borrowed funds principally consist of approximately $3.2 million of annual interest payments on funds
borrowed directly by the Fund. As of December 31, 2008, the Fund had $55.0 million of outstanding indebtedness guaranteed
by the SBA. This does not include MSCCs undrawn $30 million investment credit facility which
would bear interest, subject to MSCCs election, on a per annum basis equal to (i) the
applicable LIBOR rate plus 2.75% or (ii) the applicable base rate plus 0.75%.
|
|
|
|
|
(7) |
|
The total annual expenses are the sum of operating expenses and interest payments on borrowed funds. In the future we may
borrow money to leverage our net assets and increase our total assets. |
|
Example
The following example demonstrates the projected dollar amount of total cumulative
expenses that would be incurred over various periods with respect to a hypothetical
investment in our common stock. In calculating the following expense amounts, we have
assumed we would have no additional leverage and that our annual operating expenses would
remain at the levels set forth in the table above. In the event that shares to which this
prospectus relates are sold to or through underwriters, a corresponding prospectus
supplement will restate this example to reflect the applicable sales load.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 Year |
|
3 Years |
|
5 Years |
|
10 Years |
You would pay the
following expenses
on a $1,000
investment,
assuming a 5.0%
annual return |
|
$ |
94 |
|
|
$ |
270 |
|
|
$ |
430 |
|
|
$ |
774 |
|
The example and the expenses in the table above should not be considered a
representation of our future expenses, and actual expenses may be greater or less than
those shown. While the example assumes, as required by the SEC, a 5.0% annual return, our
performance will vary and may result in a return greater or less than 5.0%. In addition,
while the example assumes reinvestment of all dividends at net asset value, participants in
our dividend reinvestment plan will receive a number of shares of our common stock,
determined by dividing the total dollar amount of the dividend payable to a participant by
(i) the market price per share of our common stock at the close of trading on the dividend
payment date in the event that we use newly issued shares to satisfy the share requirements
of the divided reinvestment plan or (ii) the average purchase price of all shares of common
stock purchased by the administrator of the dividend reinvestment plan in the event that
shares are purchased in the open market to satisfy the share requirements of the dividend
reinvestment plan, which may be at, above or below net asset value. See Dividend
Reinvestment Plan for additional information regarding our dividend reinvestment plan.
7
RISK FACTORS
Investing in our common stock involves a number of significant risks. In addition to the
other information contained in this prospectus and any accompanying prospectus supplement,
you should consider carefully the following information before making an investment in our
common stock. The risks set out below are not the only risks we face. Additional risks and
uncertainties not presently known to us or not presently deemed material by us might also
impair our operations and performance. If any of the following events occur, our business,
financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. In
such case, our net asset value and the trading price of our common stock could decline, and
you may lose all or part of your investment.
Risks Relating to Economic Conditions
The
current state of the economy and financial markets increases the
likelihood of adverse effects on our financial position and
results of operations. Continued economic adversity could impair
our portfolio companies financial positions and operating
results and affect the industries in which we invest, which
could, in turn, harm our operating results.
Beginning in late 2007, the United States entered a recession.
Throughout 2008, the economy continued to deteriorate and many
believe that the current recession could continue for an
extended period. During 2008, banks and others in the financial
services industry reported significant write-downs in the fair
value of their assets, which has led to the failure of a number
of banks and investment companies, a number of distressed
mergers and acquisitions, the government take-over of the
nations two largest government-sponsored mortgage
companies, and the passage of the $700 billion Emergency
Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 in October 2008 and the
$787 billion American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009
(the 2009 Stimulus Bill). In addition, the stock
market has declined significantly, with both the S&P 500
and the NASDAQ Global Select Market (on which our stock trades),
declining by nearly 40% between December 31, 2007 and
December 31, 2008. As the recession deepened during 2008,
unemployment rose and consumer confidence declined, which led to
significant reductions in spending by both consumers and
businesses.
Although we have been able to secure access to additional
liquidity, including the recently obtained $30 million
investment credit facility and the increase in available
leverage through the SBIC program as part of the 2009 Stimulus
Bill, the current turmoil in the debt markets and uncertainty in
the equity capital markets provides no assurance that debt or
equity capital will be available to us in the future on
favorable terms, or at all.
The deterioration in consumer confidence and a general reduction
in spending by both consumers and businesses has had an adverse
effect on a number of the industries in which some of our
portfolio companies operate. In the event that the United States
economy remains in a protracted period of weakness, the results
of some of the lower middle-market companies like those in which
we invest, will continue to experience deterioration, which
could ultimately lead to difficulty in meeting their debt
service requirements and an increase in their defaults. In
addition, the end markets for certain of our portfolio
companies products and services have experienced, and
continue to experience, negative economic trends. We can provide
no assurance that the performance of certain of our portfolio
companies will not be negatively impacted by economic or other
conditions which could have a negative impact on our future
results.
Risks Relating to Our Business and Structure
Our
investment portfolio is and will continue to be recorded at fair
value, with our Board of Directors having final responsibility
for overseeing, reviewing and approving, in good faith, our
estimate of fair value and, as a result, there is and will
continue to be uncertainty as to the value of our portfolio
investments.
Under the 1940 Act, we are required to carry our portfolio
investments at market value or, if there is no readily available
market value, at fair value as determined by us with our Board
of Directors having final responsibility for overseeing,
reviewing and approving, in good faith, our estimate of fair
value. Typically, there is not a public market for the
securities of the privately held companies in which we have
invested and will generally continue to invest. As a result, we
value these securities quarterly at fair value based on input
from management, a third party independent valuation firm and
our audit committee and with the oversight, review and approval
of our Board of Directors.
The determination of fair value and consequently, the amount of
unrealized gains and losses in our portfolio, are to a certain
degree, subjective and dependent on a valuation process approved
by our Board of Directors. Certain factors that may be
considered in determining the fair value of our investments
include external events, such as private mergers, sales and
acquisitions involving comparable companies. Because such
valuations, and particularly valuations of private securities
and private companies, are inherently uncertain, may fluctuate
over short periods of time and may be based on estimates, our
determinations of fair value may differ materially from the
values that would have been used if a ready market for these
securities existed. Due to this uncertainty, our fair value
determinations may cause our net asset value on a given date to
materially understate or overstate the value that we may
ultimately realize on one or more of our investments. As a
result, investors purchasing our common stock based on an
overstated net asset value would pay a higher price than the
value of our investments might warrant. Conversely, investors
selling shares during a period in which the net asset value
understates the value of our investments will receive a lower
price for their shares than the value of our investments might
warrant.
Our financial condition and results of operations depends on our ability to effectively
manage and deploy capital.
Our ability to achieve our investment objective of
maximizing our portfolios total
return by generating current income from our debt investments and capital appreciation from
our equity and equity-related investments, including warrants, convertible securities and
other rights to acquire equity securities in a portfolio company, depends on our ability to effectively manage
8
and deploy capital, which depends, in turn, on our investment teams ability to
identify, evaluate and monitor, and our ability to finance and invest in, companies that meet
our investment criteria.
Accomplishing our investment objective on a cost-effective basis is largely a function
of our investment teams handling of the investment process, its ability to provide
competent, attentive and efficient services and our access to investments offering acceptable
terms. In addition to monitoring the performance of our existing investments, members of our
investment team are also called upon, from time to time, to provide managerial assistance to
some of our portfolio companies. These demands on their time may distract them or slow the
rate of investment.
Even if we are able to grow and build upon our investment operations, any failure to
manage our growth effectively could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition, results of operations and prospects. The results of our operations will depend on
many factors, including the availability of opportunities for investment, readily accessible
short and long-term funding alternatives in the financial markets and economic conditions.
Furthermore, if we cannot successfully operate our business or implement our investment
policies and strategies as described herein, it could negatively impact our ability to pay
dividends.
We may face increasing competition for investment opportunities.
We compete for investments with other BDCs and investment funds
(including private equity funds, mezzanine funds and other
SBICs), as well as traditional financial services
companies such as commercial banks and other sources of funding.
Many of our competitors are substantially larger and have
considerably greater financial, technical and marketing
resources than we do. For example, some competitors may have a
lower cost of capital and access to funding sources that are not
available to us, including from federal government agencies
through federal rescue programs such as the U.S. Department
of Treasurys Financial Stability Plan (formerly known as
the Troubled Asset Relief Program). In addition, some of our
competitors may have higher risk tolerances or different risk
assessments than we have. These characteristics could allow our
competitors to consider a wider variety of investments,
establish more relationships and offer better pricing and more
flexible structuring than we are able to do. We may lose
investment opportunities if we do not match our
competitors pricing, terms and structure. If we are forced
to match our competitors pricing, terms and structure, we
may not be able to achieve acceptable returns on our investments
or may bear substantial risk of capital loss. A significant part
of our competitive advantage stems from the fact that the market
for investments in lower middle-market companies is underserved
by traditional commercial banks and other financing sources. A
significant increase in the number
and/or the
size of our competitors in this target market could force us to
accept less attractive investment terms. Furthermore, many of
our competitors have greater experience operating under, or are
not subject to, the regulatory restrictions that the 1940 Act
imposes on us as a BDC.
We are dependent upon our key investment personnel for our future success.
We depend on the members of our investment team, particularly Vincent D. Foster, Todd A.
Reppert, Rodger A. Stout, Curtis L. Hartman, Dwayne L. Hyzak and David L. Magdol, for the
identification, review, final selection, structuring, closing and monitoring of our
investments. These employees have significant investment expertise and relationships that we
rely on to implement our business plan. Although we have entered into employment agreements
with Messrs, Reppert, Stout, Hartman, Hyzak and Magdol and a non-compete agreement with
Mr. Foster, we have no guarantee that they will remain employed with us. If we lose the
services of these individuals, we may not be able to operate our business as we expect, and
our ability to compete could be harmed, which could cause our operating results to suffer.
Our success depends on attracting and retaining qualified personnel in a competitive
environment.
Our growth will require that we retain new investment and administrative personnel in a
competitive market. Our ability to attract and retain personnel with the requisite
credentials, experience and skills depends on several factors including, but not limited to,
our ability to offer competitive wages, benefits and professional growth opportunities. Many
of the entities, including investment funds (such as private equity funds and mezzanine
funds) and traditional financial services companies, with which we compete for experienced
personnel have greater resources than we have.
The competitive environment for qualified personnel may require us to take certain
measures to ensure that we are able to attract and retain experienced personnel. Such
measures may include increasing the attractiveness of our overall compensation packages,
altering the structure of our compensation packages through the use of additional forms of
compensation, or other steps. The inability to attract and retain
experienced personnel would
have a material adverse effect on our business.
Our business model depends to a significant extent upon strong referral relationships, and
our inability to maintain or develop these relationships, as well as the failure of these
relationships to generate investment opportunities, could adversely affect our business.
We expect that members of our management team will maintain their relationships with
intermediaries, financial institutions, investment bankers, commercial bankers, attorneys,
accountants, consultants and other individuals within our network, and we
9
will rely to a significant extent upon these relationships to provide us with potential
investment opportunities. If our management team fails to maintain its existing relationships
or develop new relationships with sources of investment opportunities, we will not be able to
grow our investment portfolio. In addition, individuals with whom members of our management
team have relationships are not obligated to provide us with investment opportunities, and,
therefore, there is no assurance that such relationships will generate investment
opportunities for us.
We
have a limited operating history as a BDC and as a RIC.
The 1940 Act imposes numerous constraints on the operations of BDCs. Prior to the
completion of the IPO, we did not operate, and our management team had no experience
operating, as a BDC under the 1940 Act or as a RIC under Subchapter M of the Code. As a
result, we have limited operating results under these regulatory frameworks that can
demonstrate either their effect on our business or our ability to manage our business under
these frameworks. Our management teams limited experience in managing a portfolio of assets
under such constraints may hinder our ability to take advantage of attractive investment
opportunities and, as a result, achieve our investment objective. Furthermore, any failure to
comply with the requirements imposed on BDCs by the 1940 Act could cause the SEC to bring an
enforcement action against us. If we do not remain a BDC, we might be regulated as a
registered closed-end investment company under the 1940 Act, which would further decrease our
operating flexibility.
Regulations governing our operation as a BDC will affect our ability to, and the way in
which we raise additional capital.
Our business will require capital to operate and grow. We may acquire such additional
capital from the following sources:
Senior Securities. We may issue debt securities or preferred stock and/or borrow money
from banks or other financial institutions, which we refer to collectively as senior
securities. As a result of issuing senior securities, we will be exposed to additional risks,
including the following:
|
|
|
|
Under the provisions of the 1940 Act, we are permitted, as a
BDC, to issue senior securities only in amounts such that our
asset coverage, as defined in the 1940 Act, equals at least 200%
immediately after each issuance of senior securities. If the
value of our assets declines, we may be unable to satisfy this
test. If that happens, we will be prohibited from issuing debt
securities or preferred stock
and/or
borrowing money from banks or other financial institutions until
such time as we satisfy this test. |
|
|
|
|
|
Any amounts that we use to service our debt or make payments on
preferred stock will not be available for dividends to our common
stockholders. |
|
|
|
|
It is likely that any senior securities or other indebtedness we issue
will be governed by an indenture or other instrument containing
covenants restricting our operating flexibility. Additionally, some of
these securities or other indebtedness may be rated by rating
agencies, and in obtaining a rating for such securities and other
indebtedness, we may be required to abide by operating and investment
guidelines that further restrict operating and financial flexibility. |
|
|
|
|
We and, indirectly, our stockholders will bear the cost of issuing and
servicing such securities and other indebtedness. |
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock or any convertible or exchangeable securities that we
issue in the future may have rights, preferences and privileges more
favorable than those of our common stock, including separate voting
rights and could delay or prevent a transaction or a change in control
to the detriment of the holders of our common stock. |
Additional Common Stock. We are not generally able to issue and sell our common stock
at a price below net asset value per share. We may, however, sell our common stock, warrants,
options or rights to acquire our common stock, at a price below the current net asset value
of the common stock if our Board of Directors determines that such sale is in the best
interests of our stockholders, and our stockholders approve such sale. See
Stockholders may incur dilution if we sell shares of our common stock in one or more
offerings at prices below the then current net asset value per share of our common stock or
issue securities to subscribe to, convert to or purchase shares of our common stock for a
discussion of proposals approved by our stockholders that permit us to issue shares of our
common stock below net asset value. We may also make rights offerings to our stockholders
at prices per share less than the net asset
value per share, subject to applicable requirements of the 1940 Act. If we raise additional
funds by issuing more common stock or senior securities convertible into, or exchangeable
for, our common stock, the percentage ownership of our stockholders at that time would
decrease, and they may experience dilution. Moreover, we can offer no assurance that we will
be able to issue and sell additional equity securities in the future, on favorable terms or
at all.
10
Our
wholly-owned subsidiary, the Fund, is licensed by the SBA, and
therefore subject to SBIC regulations.
The Fund, our wholly-owned subsidiary, is licensed to act as a
small business investment company and is regulated by the SBA.
The SBA also places certain limitations on the financing terms
of investments by SBICs in portfolio companies and prohibits
SBICs from providing funds for certain purposes or to businesses
in a few prohibited industries. Compliance with SBIC
requirements may cause the Fund to forego attractive investment
opportunities that are not permitted under SBIC regulations.
Further, the SBIC regulations require that a licensed SBIC be
periodically examined and audited by the SBA to determine its
compliance with the relevant SBIC regulations. The SBA
prohibits, without prior SBA approval, a change of
control of an SBIC or transfers that would result in any
person (or a group of persons acting in concert) owning 10% or
more of a class of capital stock of a licensed SBIC. If the Fund
fails to comply with applicable SBIC regulations, the SBA could,
depending on the severity of the violation, limit or prohibit
its use of debentures, declare outstanding debentures
immediately due and payable,
and/or limit
it from making new investments. In addition, the SBA can revoke
or suspend a license for willful or repeated violation of, or
willful or repeated failure to observe, any provision of the
Small Business Investment Act of 1958 or any rule or regulation
promulgated thereunder. Such actions by the SBA would, in turn,
negatively affect us because the Fund is our wholly owned
subsidiary.
Because we borrow money, the potential for gain or loss on amounts invested in us is
magnified and may increase the risk of investing in us.
Borrowings, also known as leverage, magnify the potential for
gain or loss on invested equity capital. As we use leverage to
partially finance our investments, you will experience increased
risks of investing in our common stock. We, through the Fund,
issue debt securities guaranteed by the SBA and sold in the
capital markets. As a result of its guarantee of the debt
securities, the SBA has fixed dollar claims on the assets of the
Fund that are superior to the claims of our common stockholders.
We may also borrow from banks and other lenders, including under
the $30 million, three-year investment credit facility we
entered into in October 2008. See Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations Capital Resources for a discussion
regarding the two credit facilities into which we have entered.
If the value of our assets increases, then leveraging would
cause the net asset value attributable to our common stock to
increase more sharply than it would have had we not leveraged.
Conversely, if the value of our assets decreases, leveraging
would cause net asset value to decline more sharply than it
otherwise would have had we not leveraged our business.
Similarly, any increase in our income in excess of interest
payable on the borrowed funds would cause our net investment
income to increase more than it would without the leverage,
while any decrease in our income would cause net investment
income to decline more sharply than it would have had we not
borrowed. Such a decline could negatively affect our ability to
pay common stock dividends. Leverage is generally considered a
speculative investment technique.
As of December 31, 2008, we, through the Fund, had
$55 million of outstanding indebtedness guaranteed by the
SBA, which had a weighted average annualized interest cost of
approximately 5.8% (exclusive of deferred financing costs). The
debentures guaranteed by the SBA have a maturity of ten years
and require semi-annual payments of interest. We will need to
generate sufficient cash flow to make required interest payments
on the debentures. If we are unable to meet the financial
obligations under the debentures, the SBA,
as a creditor, will have a superior claim to the assets of the
Fund over our stockholders in the event we liquidate or the SBA
exercises its remedies under such debentures as the result of a
default by us.
Illustration. The following table illustrates
the effect of leverage on returns from an investment in our
common stock assuming various annual returns, net of expenses.
The calculations in the table below are hypothetical and actual
returns may be higher or lower than those appearing below.
Assumed
Return on Our Portfolio(1)
(net of expenses)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10.0)%
|
|
|
(5.0)%
|
|
|
0.0%
|
|
|
5.0%
|
|
|
10.0%
|
|
Corresponding net return to common stockholder
|
|
|
(18.0
|
)%
|
|
|
(10.4
|
)%
|
|
|
(2.8
|
)%
|
|
|
4.8
|
%
|
|
|
12.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Assumes $170.6 million in total assets, $55 million in
debt outstanding, $112.4 million in net assets, and an
average cost of funds of 5.8%. Actual interest payments may be
different. |
11
Our ability to achieve our investment objective may depend in part on our ability to
achieve additional leverage on favorable terms by issuing debentures guaranteed by the SBA, through the Fund, or by borrowing from banks or insurance companies, and there can be no assurance that such
additional leverage can in fact be achieved.
SBIC
regulations limit the outstanding dollar amount of
SBA-guaranteed debentures that may be issued by an SBIC or group
of SBICs under common control.
The SBIC regulations currently limit the dollar amount of
SBA-guaranteed debentures that can be issued by any one SBIC or
group of SBICs under common control to $225 million.
Moreover, an SBIC may not generally borrow an amount in excess
of two times its regulatory capital. Because of our investment
teams affiliations with MSC II, a privately owned SBIC
which commenced investment operations in January 2006, the Fund
and MSC II may be deemed to be a group of affiliated SBICs under
common control. Thus, the dollar amount of SBA-guaranteed
debentures that can be issued collectively by the Fund and MSC
II may be limited to $225 million, absent relief from the
SBA. While we cannot presently predict whether or not we,
through the Fund, will borrow the maximum permitted amount, if
we reach the maximum dollar amount of SBA guaranteed debentures
permitted, and thereafter require additional capital, our cost
of capital may increase, and there is no assurance that we will
be able to obtain additional financing on acceptable terms.
The Funds current status as an SBIC does not automatically
assure that it will continue to receive SBA-guaranteed debenture
funding. Receipt of SBA leverage funding is dependent upon the
Fund continuing to be in compliance with SBIC regulations and
policies. Moreover, the amount of SBA leverage funding available
to SBICs is dependent upon annual Congressional authorizations
and in the future may be subject to annual Congressional
appropriations. There can be no assurance that there will be
sufficient debenture funding available at the times desired by
the Fund.
We may experience fluctuations in our quarterly results.
We could experience fluctuations in our quarterly operating results due to a number of
factors, including our ability or inability to make investments in companies that meet our
investment criteria, the interest rate payable on the debt securities we acquire, the level
of portfolio dividend and fee income, the level of our expenses, variations in and the timing
of the recognition of realized and unrealized gains or losses, the degree to which we
encounter competition in our markets and general economic conditions. As a result of these
factors, results for any period should not be relied upon as being indicative of performance
in future periods.
Our Board of Directors may change our operating policies and strategies without prior
notice or stockholder approval, the effects of which may be adverse.
Our Board of Directors has the authority to modify or waive our current operating
policies, investment criteria and strategies without prior notice and without stockholder
approval. We cannot predict the effect any changes to our current operating policies,
investment criteria and strategies would have on our business, net asset value, operating
results and value of our stock. However, the effects might be adverse, which could negatively
impact our ability to pay you dividends and cause you to lose all or part of your investment.
We will be subject to corporate-level income tax if we are unable to qualify as a RIC under
Subchapter M of the Code.
To maintain RIC tax treatment under the Code, we must meet the
following annual distribution, source income and asset
diversification requirements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
The annual distribution requirement for a RIC will be satisfied
if we distribute to our stockholders on an annual basis at least
90% of our net ordinary income and realized net short-term
capital gains in excess of realized net long-term capital
losses, if any. Depending on the level of taxable income earned
in a tax year, we may choose to carry forward taxable income in
excess of current year distributions into the next tax year and
pay a 4% excise tax on such income. Any such carryover taxable
income must be distributed through a dividend declared prior to
filing the final tax return related to the year which generated
such taxable income. For more information regarding tax
treatment, see Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations
Taxation as a Regulated Investment Company. Because we use
debt financing, we are subject to certain asset coverage ratio
requirements under the 1940 Act and are (and may in the future
become) subject to certain financial covenants under loan and
credit agreements that could, under certain circumstances,
restrict us from making distributions necessary to satisfy the
distribution requirement. If we are unable to obtain cash from
other sources, we could fail to qualify for RIC tax treatment
and thus become subject to corporate-level income tax.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The source income requirement will be satisfied if we obtain at
least 90% of our income for each year from distributions,
interest, gains from the sale of stock or securities or similar
sources.
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
The asset diversification requirement will be satisfied if we
meet certain asset diversification requirements at the end of
each quarter of our taxable year. To satisfy this requirement,
at least 50% of the value of our assets must consist of cash,
cash equivalents, U.S. Government securities, securities of
other RICs, and other acceptable securities; and no more than
25% of the value of our assets can be invested in the
securities, other than U.S. government securities or
securities of other RICs, of one issuer, of two or more issuers
that are controlled, as determined under applicable Code rules,
by us and that are engaged in the same or similar or related
trades or businesses or of certain qualified publicly
traded partnerships. Failure to meet these requirements
may result in our having to dispose of certain investments
quickly in order to prevent the loss of RIC status. Because most
of our investments will be in private companies, and therefore
will be relatively illiquid, any such dispositions could be made
at disadvantageous prices and could result in substantial losses.
|
|
If we fail to maintain RIC tax treatment for any reason and are
subject to corporate income tax, the resulting corporate taxes
could substantially reduce our net assets, the amount of income
available for distribution and the amount of our distributions.
We may not be able to pay you dividends, our dividends may not grow over time, and a
portion of dividends paid to you may be a return of capital.
We intend to pay monthly dividends to our stockholders out of assets legally available
for distribution. We cannot assure you that we will achieve investment results that will
allow us to pay a specified level of cash dividends, previously projected dividends for
future periods, or year-to-year increases in cash dividends. Our ability to pay dividends
might be adversely affected by, among other things, the impact of one or more of the risk
factors described herein. In addition, the inability
to satisfy the asset coverage test applicable to us as a BDC could limit our ability to pay
dividends. All dividends will be paid at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will
depend on our earnings, our financial condition, maintenance of our RIC status, compliance
with applicable BDC regulations, the Funds compliance with applicable SBIC regulations and
such other factors as our Board of Directors may deem relevant from time to time. We cannot
assure you that we will pay dividends to our stockholders in the future.
When we make monthly distributions, we will be required to determine the extent to which
such distributions are paid out of current or accumulated earnings, recognized capital gains
or capital. To the extent there is a return of capital, investors will be required to reduce
their basis in our stock for federal tax purposes. In the future, our distributions may
include a return of capital.
We may have difficulty paying our required distributions if we recognize income before or
without receiving cash representing such income.
For federal income tax purposes, we will include in income certain amounts that we have
not yet received in cash, such as original issue discount, which may arise if we receive
warrants in connection with the origination of a loan or possibly in other circumstances, or
contractual payment-in-kind, or PIK, interest, which represents contractual interest added to
the loan balance and due at the end of the loan term. Such original issue discounts or
increases in loan balances as a result of contractual PIK arrangements will be included in
income before we receive any corresponding cash payments. We also may be required to include
in income certain other amounts that we will not receive in cash.
Approximately 2.7% of our
total investment income for the year ended December 31,
2008 was attributable to paid in kind interest.
Since, in certain cases, we may recognize income before or without receiving cash
representing such income, we may have difficulty meeting the annual distribution requirement
necessary to maintain RIC tax treatment under the Code. Accordingly, we may have to sell some
of our investments at times and/or at prices we would not consider advantageous, raise
additional debt or equity capital or forgo new investment opportunities for this purpose. If
we are not able to obtain cash from other sources, we may fail to qualify for RIC tax
treatment and thus become subject to corporate-level income tax. For additional discussion
regarding the tax implications of a RIC, please see Material U.S. Federal Income Tax
Considerations Taxation as a Regulated Investment Company.
We may
in the future choose to pay dividends in our own stock, in which
case you may be required to pay tax in excess of the cash you
receive.
We may distribute taxable dividends that are payable in part in
our stock. Under a recently issued IRS revenue procedure, up to
90% of any such taxable dividend for 2009 could be payable in
our stock. Taxable stockholders receiving such dividends will be
required to include the full amount of the dividend as ordinary
income (or as long-term capital gain to the extent such
distribution is properly designated as a capital gain dividend)
to the extent of our current and accumulated earnings and
profits for United States federal income tax purposes. As a
result, a U.S. stockholder may be required to pay tax with
respect to such dividends in excess of any cash received. If a
U.S. stockholder sells the stock it receives as a dividend
in order to pay this tax, the sales proceeds may be less than
the amount included in income with respect to the dividend,
depending on the market price of our stock at the time of the
sale. Furthermore, with respect to
non-U.S. stockholders,
we may be required to withhold U.S. tax with respect to
such dividends, including in respect of all or a portion of such
dividend that is payable in stock. In addition, if a significant
number of our stockholders determine to sell shares of our stock
in order to pay taxes owed on dividends, it may put downward
pressure on the trading price of our stock.
The Fund, as an SBIC, may be unable to make distributions to us that will enable us to meet
or maintain RIC status, which could result in the imposition of an entity-level tax.
In order for us to continue to qualify for RIC tax treatment and to minimize
corporate-level taxes, we will be required to distribute substantially all of our net
ordinary income and net capital gain income, including income from certain of our
subsidiaries, which includes the income from the Fund. We will be partially dependent on the
Fund for cash distributions to enable us to meet the RIC distribution requirements. The Fund
may be limited by the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, and SBIC regulations governing
SBICs, from making certain distributions to us that may be necessary to enable us to maintain
our status as a RIC. We may have to request a waiver of the SBAs restrictions for the Fund
to make certain distributions to maintain
13
our eligibility for RIC status. We cannot assure you that the SBA will grant such waiver
and if the Fund is unable to obtain a waiver, compliance with the
SBIC regulations may result
in loss of RIC tax treatment and a consequent imposition of an entity-level tax on us.
Because we intend to distribute substantially all of our income to our stockholders to
maintain our status as a RIC, we will continue to need additional capital to finance our
growth, and regulations governing our operation as a BDC will affect our ability to, and
the way in which we, raise additional capital.
In
order to satisfy the requirements applicable to a RIC and to
minimize corporate-level taxes, we intend to distribute to our
stockholders substantially all of our net ordinary income and
net capital gain income. We may carry forward excess
undistributed taxable income into the next year, net of the 4%
excise tax. Any such carryover taxable income must be
distributed through a dividend declared prior to filing the
final tax return related to the year which generated such
taxable income. As a BDC, we generally are required to meet an
asset coverage ratio, as defined in the 1940 Act
, of at least
200% immediately after each issuance of senior securities. This
requirement limits the amount that we may borrow. Because we
will continue to need capital to grow our
investment portfolio,
this limitation may prevent us from incurring debt and require
us to raise additional equity at a time when it may be
disadvantageous to do so.
While we expect to be able to borrow and to issue additional debt and equity securities,
we cannot assure you that debt and equity financing will be available to us on favorable
terms, or at all. In addition, as a
BDC, we generally are not permitted to issue equity securities priced below net asset value
without stockholder approval. If additional funds are not available to us, we could be forced
to curtail or cease new investment activities, and our net asset value could decline.
Stockholders may incur dilution if we sell shares of our common stock in one or more
offerings at prices below the then current net asset value per share of our common stock or
issue securities to subscribe to, convert to or purchase shares of our common stock.
At
our 2008 annual meeting of stockholders, our stockholders
approved two proposals designed to allow us to access the
capital markets in ways that we were previously unable to as a
result of restrictions that, absent stockholder approval, apply
to BDCs under the 1940 Act. Specifically, our stockholders
approved proposals that (1) authorize us to sell shares of
our common stock below the then current net asset value per
share of our common stock in one or more offerings for a period
of one year ending on the earlier of June 16, 2009 or the
date of our 2009 annual meeting of stockholders and
(2) authorize us to issue securities to subscribe to,
convert to, or purchase shares of our common stock in one or
more offerings. Any decision to sell shares of our common stock
below the then current net asset value per share of our common
stock or securities to subscribe to, convert to, or purchase
shares of our common stock would be subject to the determination
by our Board of Directors that such issuance is in our and our
stockholders best interests.
If
we were to sell shares of our common stock below net asset value per share, such
sales would result in an immediate dilution to the net asset value per share. This dilution
would occur as a result of the sale of shares at a price below the then current net asset
value per share of our common stock and a proportionately greater decrease in a stockholders
interest in our earnings and assets and voting interest in us than the increase in our assets
resulting from such issuance. In addition, if we issue securities to subscribe to, convert to
or purchase shares of common stock, the exercise or conversion of such securities would
increase the number of outstanding shares of our common stock. Any such exercise would be
dilutive on the voting power of existing stockholders, and could be dilutive with regard to
dividends and our net asset value, and other economic aspects of the common stock.
Because the number of shares of common stock that could be so issued and the timing
of any issuance is not currently known, the actual dilutive effect cannot be predicted;
however, the example below illustrates the effect of dilution to existing stockholders
resulting from the sale of common stock at prices below the net asset value of such shares.
Illustration: Example of Dilutive Effect of the Issuance of Shares Below Net Asset
Value. Assume that Company XYZ has 1,000,000 total shares outstanding, $15,000,000 in total
assets and $5,000,000 in total liabilities. The net asset value per share of the common stock
of Company XYZ is $10.00. The following table illustrates the reduction to net asset value,
or NAV, and the dilution experienced by Stockholder A following the sale of 40,000 shares of
the common stock of Company XYZ at $9.50 per share, a price below its NAV per share.
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior to Sale |
|
Following Sale |
|
Percentage |
|
|
Below NAV |
|
Below NAV |
|
Change |
Reduction to NAV |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Shares Outstanding |
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
1,040,000 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
% |
NAV per share |
|
$ |
10.00 |
|
|
$ |
9.98 |
|
|
|
(0.2 |
)% |
Dilution to Existing Stockholder |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Held by Stockholder A |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
10,000 |
(1) |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
Percentage Held by Stockholder A |
|
|
1.00 |
% |
|
|
0.96 |
% |
|
|
(3.8 |
)% |
Total Interest of Stockholder A in NAV |
|
$ |
100,000 |
|
|
$ |
99,808 |
|
|
|
(0.2 |
)% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Assumes that Stockholder A does not purchase additional shares in the sale of shares below NAV. |
Changes in laws or regulations governing our operations may adversely affect our business
or cause us to alter our business strategy.
We, the Fund, and our portfolio companies are subject to applicable local, state and
federal laws and regulations, including, without limitation, federal immigration laws and
regulations. New legislation may be enacted or new interpretations, rulings or regulations
could be adopted, including those governing the types of investments we are permitted to
make, any of which could harm us and our stockholders, potentially with retroactive effect.
In addition, any change to the SBAs current debenture SBIC program could have a significant
impact on our ability to obtain lower-cost leverage, through the Fund, and, therefore, our ability to compete
with other finance companies.
Additionally, any changes to the laws and regulations governing our operations relating
to permitted investments may cause us to alter our investment strategy in order to avail
ourselves of new or different opportunities. Such changes could result in material
differences to the strategies and plans set forth herein and may result in our investment
focus shifting from the areas of expertise of our investment team to other types of
investments in which our investment team may have less expertise or little or no experience.
Thus, any such changes, if they occur, could have a material adverse effect on our results of
operations and the value of your investment.
Terrorist attacks, acts of war or natural disasters may affect any market for our common
stock, impact the businesses in which we invest and harm our business, operating results
and financial condition.
Terrorist acts, acts of war or natural disasters may disrupt our operations, as well as
the operations of the businesses in which we invest. Such acts have created, and continue to
create, economic and political uncertainties and have contributed to global economic
instability. Future terrorist activities, military or security operations, or natural
disasters could further weaken the domestic/global economies and create additional
uncertainties, which may negatively impact the businesses in which we invest directly or
indirectly and, in turn, could have a material adverse impact on our business, operating
results and financial condition. Losses from terrorist attacks and natural disasters are
generally uninsurable.
15
Risks Related to Our Investments
Our investments in portfolio companies involve higher levels of
risk, and we could lose all or part of our
investment.
Investing in lower middle-market companies involves a number of significant risks. Among
other things, these companies:
|
|
|
may have limited financial resources and may be unable to meet their
obligations under their debt instruments that we hold, which may be
accompanied by a deterioration in the value of any collateral and a
reduction in the likelihood of us realizing any guarantees from
subsidiaries or affiliates of our portfolio companies that we may have
obtained in connection with our investment, as well as a corresponding
decrease in the value of the equity components of our investments; |
|
|
|
|
may have shorter operating histories, narrower product lines, smaller
market shares and/or significant customer concentrations than larger
businesses, which tend to render them more vulnerable to competitors
actions and market conditions, as well as general economic downturns; |
|
|
|
|
are more likely to depend on the management talents and efforts of a
small group of persons; therefore, the death, disability, resignation
or termination of one or more of these persons could have a material
adverse impact on our portfolio company and, in turn, on us; |
|
|
|
|
generally have less predictable operating results, may from time to
time be parties to litigation, may be engaged in rapidly changing
businesses with products subject to a substantial risk of
obsolescence, and may require substantial additional capital to
support their operations, finance expansion or maintain their
competitive position; and |
|
|
|
|
generally have less publicly available information about their
businesses, operations and financial condition. We are required to
rely on the ability of our management team and investment
professionals to obtain adequate information to evaluate the potential
returns from investing in these companies. If we are unable to uncover
all material information about these companies, we may not make a
fully informed investment decision, and may lose all or part of our
investment. |
In addition, in the course of providing significant managerial assistance to certain of
our portfolio companies, certain of our officers and directors may serve as directors on the
boards of such companies. To the extent that litigation arises out of our investments in
these companies, our officers and directors may be named as defendants in such litigation,
which could result in an expenditure of funds (through our indemnification of such officers
and directors) and the diversion of management time and resources.
The lack of liquidity in our investments may adversely affect our business.
We invest, and will continue to invest in companies whose securities are not publicly
traded, and whose securities will be subject to legal and other restrictions on resale or
will otherwise be less liquid than publicly traded securities. The illiquidity of these
investments may make it difficult for us to sell these investments when desired. In addition,
if we are required to liquidate all or a portion of our portfolio quickly, we may realize
significantly less than the value at which we had previously recorded these investments. As a
result, we do not expect to achieve liquidity in our investments in the near-term. Our
investments are usually subject to contractual or legal restrictions on resale or are
otherwise illiquid because there is usually no established trading market for such
investments. The illiquidity of most of our investments may make it difficult for us to
dispose of them at a favorable price, and, as a result, we may suffer losses.
We may not have the funds or ability to make additional investments in our portfolio
companies.
We may not have the funds or ability to make additional investments in our portfolio
companies. After our initial investment in a portfolio company, we may be called upon from
time to time to provide additional funds to such company or have the opportunity to increase
our investment through the exercise of a warrant to purchase common stock. There is no
assurance that we will make, or will have sufficient funds to make, follow-on investments.
Any decisions not to make a follow-on investment or any inability on our part to make such an
investment may have a negative impact on a portfolio company in need of such an investment,
may result in a missed opportunity for us to increase our participation in a successful
operation or may reduce the expected yield on the investment.
Our portfolio companies may incur debt that ranks equally with, or senior to, our
investments in such companies.
16
We invest primarily in secured term debt as well as equity issued by lower middle-market
companies. Our portfolio companies may have, or may be permitted to incur, other debt that
ranks equally with, or senior to, the debt in which we invest. By their terms, such debt
instruments may entitle the holders to receive payment of interest or principal on or before
the dates on which we are entitled to receive payments with respect to the debt instruments
in which we invest. Also, in the event of insolvency, liquidation, dissolution,
reorganization or bankruptcy of a portfolio company, holders of debt instruments ranking
senior to our investment in that portfolio company would typically be entitled to receive
payment in full before we receive any distribution. After repaying such senior creditors,
such portfolio company may not have any remaining assets to use for repaying its obligation
to us. In the case of debt ranking equally with debt instruments in which we invest, we would
have to share on an equal basis any distributions with other creditors holding such debt in
the event of an insolvency, liquidation, dissolution, reorganization or bankruptcy of the
relevant portfolio company.
There may be circumstances where our debt investments could be subordinated to claims of
other creditors or we could be subject to lender liability claims.
Even though we may have structured certain of our investments as secured loans, if one
of our portfolio companies were to go bankrupt, depending on the facts and circumstances, and
based upon principles of equitable subordination as defined by existing case law, a
bankruptcy court could subordinate all or a portion of our claim to that of other creditors
and transfer any lien securing such subordinated claim to the bankruptcy estate. The
principles of equitable subordination defined by case law have generally indicated that a
claim may be subordinated only if its holder is guilty of misconduct or where the senior loan
is re-characterized as an equity investment and the senior lender has actually provided
significant managerial assistance to the bankrupt debtor. We may also be subject to lender
liability claims for actions taken by us with respect to a borrowers business or instances
where we exercise control over the borrower. It is possible that we could become subject to a
lenders liability claim, including as a result of actions taken in rendering significant
managerial assistance or actions to compel and collect payments from the borrower outside the
ordinary course of business.
Second priority liens on collateral securing loans that we make to our portfolio companies
may be subject to control by senior creditors with first priority liens. If there is a
default, the value of the collateral may not be sufficient to repay in full both the first
priority creditors and us.
Certain loans that we make are secured by a second priority security interest in the
same collateral pledged by a portfolio company to secure senior debt owed by the portfolio
company to commercial banks or other traditional lenders. Often the senior lender has
procured covenants from the portfolio company prohibiting the incurrence of additional
secured debt without the senior lenders consent. Prior to and as a condition of permitting
the portfolio company to borrow money from us secured by the same collateral pledged to the
senior lender, the senior lender will require assurances that it will control the disposition
of any collateral in the event of bankruptcy or other default. In many such cases, the senior
lender will require us to enter into an intercreditor agreement prior to permitting the
portfolio company to borrow from us. Typically the intercreditor agreements we are requested
to execute expressly subordinate our debt instruments to those held by the senior lender and
further provide that the senior lender shall control: (1) the commencement of foreclosure or
other proceedings to liquidate and collect on the collateral; (2) the nature, timing and
conduct of foreclosure or other collection proceedings; (3) the amendment of any collateral
document; (4) the release of the security interests in respect of any collateral; and (5) the
waiver of defaults under any security agreement. Because of the control we may cede to senior
lenders under intercreditor agreements we may enter, we may be unable to realize the proceeds
of any collateral securing some of our loans.
Finally, the value of the collateral securing our debt investment will ultimately depend
on market and economic conditions, the availability of buyers and other factors. Therefore,
there can be no assurance that the proceeds, if any, from the sale or sales of all of the
collateral would be sufficient to satisfy the loan obligations secured by our first or second
priority liens. There is also a risk that such collateral securing
our investments will
decrease in value over time, will be difficult to sell in a timely
manner, will be difficult to
appraise and will fluctuate in value based upon the success of the portfolio company and
market conditions. If such proceeds are not sufficient to repay amounts outstanding under the
loan obligations secured by our second priority liens, then we, to the extent not repaid from
the proceeds of the sale of the collateral, will only have an unsecured claim against the
companys remaining assets, if any.
17
We are a non-diversified investment company within the meaning of the 1940 Act, and
therefore we are not limited with respect to the proportion of our assets that may be
invested in securities of a single issuer.
We are classified as a non-diversified investment company within the meaning of the 1940
Act, which means that we are not limited by the 1940 Act with respect to the proportion of
our assets that we may invest in securities of a single issuer. Although we seek to maintain a diversified portfolio in accordance with our business strategies, to the extent that we assume
large positions in the securities of a small number of issuers, our net asset value may
fluctuate to a greater extent than that of a diversified investment company as a result of
changes in the financial condition or the markets assessment of the issuer. We may also be
more susceptible to any single economic or regulatory occurrence than a diversified
investment company. Beyond our RIC asset diversification requirements, we do not have fixed
guidelines for diversification, and our investments could be concentrated in relatively few
portfolio companies.
We generally will not control our portfolio companies.
We do not, and do not expect to, control the decision making in many of our portfolio
companies, even though we may have board representation or board observation rights, and our
debt agreements may contain certain restrictive covenants. As a result, we are subject to the
risk that a portfolio company in which we invest will make business decisions with which we
disagree and the management of such company, as representatives of the holders of their
common equity, will take risks or otherwise act in ways that do not serve our interests as
debt investors. Due to the lack of liquidity for our investments in non-traded companies, we
may not be able to dispose of our interests in our portfolio companies as readily as we would
like or at an appropriate valuation. As a result, a portfolio company may make decisions that
would decrease the value of our portfolio holdings.
Defaults by our portfolio companies will harm our operating results.
A portfolio companys failure to satisfy financial or operating covenants imposed by us
or other lenders could lead to defaults and, potentially, termination of its loans and
foreclosure on its secured assets, which could trigger cross-defaults under other agreements
and jeopardize a portfolio companys ability to meet its obligations under the debt or equity
securities that we hold. We may incur expenses to the extent necessary to seek recovery upon
default or to negotiate new terms, which may include the waiver of certain financial
covenants, with a defaulting portfolio company.
Any unrealized losses we experience on our loan portfolio may be an indication of future
realized losses, which could reduce our income available for distribution.
As a BDC, we are required to carry our investments at market value or, if no market
value is ascertainable, at the fair value as determined in good faith by our Board of
Directors. Decreases in the market values or fair values of our investments will be recorded
as unrealized depreciation. Any unrealized losses in our loan portfolio could be an
indication of a portfolio companys inability to meet its repayment obligations to us with
respect to the affected loans. This could result in realized losses in the future and
ultimately in reductions of our income available for distribution in future periods.
Prepayments of our debt investments by our portfolio companies could adversely impact our
results of operations and reduce our return on equity.
We are subject to the risk that the investments we make in our portfolio companies may
be repaid prior to maturity. When this occurs, we will generally reinvest these proceeds in
temporary investments, pending their future investment in new portfolio companies. These
temporary investments will typically have substantially lower yields than the debt being
prepaid and we could experience significant delays in reinvesting these amounts. Any future
investment in a new portfolio company may also be at lower yields than the debt that was
repaid. As a result, our results of operations could be materially adversely affected if one
or
18
more of our portfolio companies elect to prepay amounts owed to us. Additionally,
prepayments could negatively impact our return on equity, which could result in a decline in
the market price of our common stock.
Changes in interest rates may affect our cost of capital and net investment income.
Some of our debt investments will bear interest at variable rates and the interest
income from these investments could be negatively affected by decreases in market interest
rates. In addition, an increase in interest rates would make it more expensive to use debt to
finance our investments. As a result, a significant increase in market interest rates could
increase our cost of capital, which
would reduce our net investment income. Also, an increase in interest rates available to
investors could make an investment in our common stock less attractive if we are not able to
increase our dividend rate, a situation which could reduce the value of our common stock.
Conversely, a decrease in interest rates may have an adverse impact on our returns by
requiring us to seek lower yields on our debt investments and by increasing the risk that our
portfolio companies will prepay our debt investments, resulting in the need to redeploy
capital at potentially lower rates. A decrease in market interest rates may also adversely
impact our returns on idle funds, which would reduce our net investment income.
We may not realize gains from our equity investments.
Certain investments that we have made in the past and may make in the future include
warrants or other equity securities. Investments in equity securities involve a number of
significant risks, including the risk of further dilution as a result of additional
issuances, inability to access additional capital and failure to pay current distributions.
Investments in preferred securities involve special risks, such as the risk of deferred
distributions, credit risk, illiquidity and limited voting rights. In addition, we may from
time to time make non-control, equity investments in portfolio companies. Our goal is
ultimately to realize gains upon our disposition of such equity interests. However, the
equity interests we receive may not appreciate in value and, in fact, may decline in value.
Accordingly, we may not be able to realize gains from our equity interests, and any gains
that we do realize on the disposition of any equity interests may not be sufficient to offset
any other losses we experience. We also may be unable to realize any value if a portfolio
company does not have a liquidity event, such as a sale of the business, recapitalization or
public offering, which would allow us to sell the underlying equity interests. We often seek
puts or similar rights to give us the right to sell our equity securities back to the
portfolio company issuer. We may be unable to exercise these puts rights for the
consideration provided in our investment documents if the issuer is in financial distress.
Risks Relating to an Offering of Our Common Stock
Shares of closed-end investment companies, including BDCs, may trade at a discount to their
net asset value.
Shares of closed-end investment companies, including BDCs, may trade at a discount from
net asset value. This characteristic of closed-end investment companies and BDCs is separate
and distinct from the risk that our net asset value per share may decline. We cannot predict
whether our common stock will trade at, above or below net asset value. In addition, if our
common stock trades below net asset value, we will generally not be able to issue additional
common stock at the market price unless our stockholders approve such a sale and our Board of
Directors makes certain determinations. See
Risks Relating to Our Business and Structure Stockholders may incur dilution
if we sell shares of our common stock in one or more offerings at prices below the then
current net asset value per share of our common stock or issue securities to subscribe to,
convert to or purchase shares of our common stock for a discussion of proposals approved by
our stockholders that permit us to issue shares of our common stock below net asset value.
We may be unable to invest a significant portion of the net proceeds from an offering on
acceptable terms, which could harm our financial condition and operating results.
Delays in investing the net proceeds raised in an offering may cause our performance to
be worse than that of other fully invested BDCs or other lenders or investors pursuing
comparable investment strategies. We cannot assure you that we will be able to identify any
investments that meet our investment objective or that any investment that we make will
produce a positive return. We may be unable to invest the net proceeds of any offering on
acceptable terms within the time period that we anticipate or at all, which could harm our
financial condition and operating results.
We anticipate that, depending on market conditions and the amount of any particular
offering, it may take us a substantial period of time to invest substantially all of the net
proceeds of any offering in securities meeting our investment objective. During this period,
we will invest the net proceeds of any offering primarily in cash, cash equivalents,
U.S. government securities and high-quality debt instruments, which may produce returns that are significantly lower than the
returns which we expect to achieve when our portfolio is fully invested in securities meeting
our investment objective. As a result, any distributions that we pay during such period may
be substantially lower than the distributions that we may be able to pay when our portfolio
is fully invested in securities meeting our investment objective. In addition, until such
time as the net proceeds of any offering are invested in securities meeting our investment
objective, the market
19
price for our common stock may decline. Thus, the initial return on your investment may
be lower than when, if ever, our portfolio is fully invested in securities meeting our
investment objective.
Investing in our common stock may involve an above average degree of risk.
The investments we make in accordance with our investment objective may result in a
higher amount of risk than alternative investment options and a higher risk of volatility or
loss of principal. Our investments in portfolio companies involve
higher levels of risk, and
therefore, an investment in our shares may not be suitable for someone with lower risk
tolerance.
The market price of our common stock may be volatile and fluctuate significantly.
Fluctuations in the trading prices of our shares may adversely affect the liquidity of
the trading market for our shares and, if we seek to raise capital through future equity
financings, our ability to raise such equity capital. The market price and liquidity of the
market for our common stock may be significantly affected by numerous factors, some of which
are beyond our control and may not be directly related to our operating performance. These
factors include:
|
|
|
significant volatility in the market price and trading volume of
securities of BDCs or other companies in our sector, which are not
necessarily related to the operating performance of these companies; |
|
|
|
|
changes in regulatory policies, accounting pronouncements or tax
guidelines, particularly with respect to RICs, BDCs or SBICs; |
|
|
|
|
|
inability to obtain any exemptive relief that may be required by us in the future from the SEC; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
loss of our BDC or RIC status or the Funds status as an SBIC; |
|
|
|
|
|
changes in our earnings or variations in our operating results; |
|
|
|
|
changes in the value of our portfolio of investments; |
|
|
|
|
any shortfall in our investment income or net investment income or any
increase in losses from levels expected by investors or securities
analysts; |
|
|
|
|
loss of a major funding source; |
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in interest rates; |
|
|
|
|
the operating performance of companies comparable to us; |
|
|
|
|
departure of our key personnel; |
|
|
|
|
global or national credit market changes; and |
|
|
|
|
general economic trends and other external factors. |
Provisions of the Maryland General Corporation Law and our articles of incorporation and
bylaws could deter takeover attempts and have an adverse impact on the price of our common
stock.
The Maryland General Corporation Law and our articles of incorporation and bylaws
contain provisions that may have the effect of discouraging, delaying or making difficult a
change in control of our company or the removal of our incumbent directors. The existence of
these provisions, among others, may have a negative impact on the price of our common stock
and may discourage third-party bids for ownership of our company. These provisions may
prevent any premiums being offered to you for our common stock.
20
CAUTIONARY
STATEMENT CONCERNING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Some of the statements in this prospectus and any accompanying prospectus supplement
constitute forward-looking statements because they relate to future events or our future
performance or financial condition. The forward-looking statements contained in this
prospectus and any accompanying prospectus supplement may include statements as to:
|
|
|
our future operating results and dividend projections; |
|
|
|
|
our business prospects and the prospects of our portfolio companies; |
|
|
|
|
the impact of the investments that we expect to make; |
|
|
|
|
the ability of our portfolio companies to achieve their objectives; |
|
|
|
|
our expected financings and investments; |
|
|
|
|
the adequacy of our cash resources and working capital; and |
|
|
|
|
the timing of cash flows, if any, from the operations of our portfolio companies. |
In addition, words such as anticipate, believe, expect and intend indicate a
forward-looking statement, although not all forward-looking statements include these words.
The forward-looking statements contained in this prospectus and any accompanying prospectus
supplement involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from
those implied or expressed in the forward-looking statements for any reason, including the
factors set forth in Risk Factors and elsewhere in this prospectus and any accompanying
prospectus supplement. Other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially
include:
|
|
|
changes in the economy; |
|
|
|
|
risks associated with possible disruption in our operations or the economy
generally due to terrorism or natural disasters; and |
|
|
|
|
future changes in laws or regulations and conditions in our operating areas. |
We have based the forward-looking statements included in this prospectus and will base
the forward-looking statements included in any accompanying prospectus supplement on
information available to us on the date of this prospectus and any accompanying prospectus
supplement, as appropriate, and we assume no obligation to update any such forward-looking
statements, except as required by law. Although we undertake no obligation to revise or update any forward-looking
statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, you are
advised to consult any additional disclosures that we may make directly to you or through
reports that we in the future may file with the SEC, including annual reports on Form 10-K,
quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K.
21
FORMATION TRANSACTIONS
MSCC was formed on March 9, 2007, for the purpose of (i) acquiring 100% of
the equity interests of the Fund and its general partner, the General Partner, (ii)
acquiring 100% of the equity interests of the Investment Manager, (iii) raising
capital in the IPO, and (iv) thereafter operating as an internally
managed BDC
under the 1940 Act. The Fund is licensed as an SBIC by the SBA and
the
Investment Manager acts as the Funds manager and investment adviser. The Investment Manager
also acts as the manager and investment adviser to MSC II, a privately owned, affiliated SBIC which commenced investment operations in January 2006.
MSCC did not
acquire any interest in MSC II in connection with the Formation Transactions and
currently does not hold any equity interest in MSC II. The transactions discussed
above were consummated in October 2007 and are collectively termed the Formation
Transactions.
As part of the Formation Transactions, the Investment Manager,
which employs all of the executive officers and other employees
of MSCC, became a wholly owned subsidiary of MSCC. However, the
Investment Manager is accounted for as a portfolio investment of
Main Street, since the Investment Manager is not a registered
investment company and since it conducts a significant portion
of its investment management activities for MSC II, a separate
SBIC fund in which MSCC does not have an equity interest. The
Investment Manager receives recurring investment management fees
from MSC II pursuant to a separate investment advisory
agreement, paid quarterly, which currently total
$3.3 million per year. The portfolio investment in the
Investment Manager is accounted for using fair value accounting,
with the fair value determined by MSCC and approved, in good
faith, by MSCCs Board of Directors. MSCCs valuation
of the
Investment Manager is based upon the discounted net cash flows
from third party recurring investment managers fees. The net
cash flows utilized in the valuation of the Investment Manager
exclude any revenues and expenses from all related parties
(including MSCC) but include the management fees from MSC II and
an estimated allocation of costs related to providing services
to MSC II. For more information on the Investment Manager, see
Note D Wholly Owned Investment
Manager to our consolidated financial statements.
In connection with the Formation Transactions, MSCC entered into
a support services agreement with the Investment Manager. The
agreement requires the Investment Manager to manage the
day-to-day operational and investment activities of Main Street.
The Investment Manager generally incurs all normal operating and
administrative expenses, except those specifically required to
be borne by MSCC, which principally include costs that are
specific to MSCCs status as a publicly traded entity. The
expenses paid by the Investment Manager include the cost of
salaries and related benefits, rent, equipment and other
administrative costs required for Main Streets day-to-day
operations.
The Investment Manager is reimbursed for its expenses associated
with providing operational and investment management services to
MSCC and its subsidiaries. Each quarter, as part of the support
services agreement, MSCC makes payments to cover all expenses
incurred by the Investment Manager, less amounts the Investment
Manager receives from MSC II pursuant to a separate investment
advisory services agreement. Based on this separate investment
advisory services agreement, MSC II paid the Investment Manager
approximately $3.3 million in 2008 for these services.
The IPO involved the public offering and sale of
4,300,000 shares of our common stock, including shares sold
upon the underwriters exercise of the over-allotment
option, at a price to the public of $15.00 per share of our
common stock, resulting in net proceeds to us of approximately
$60.2 million, after deducting underwriters
commissions totaling approximately $4.3 million. As a
result of the IPO and the Formation Transactions described
above, we are a closed-end, non-diversified management
investment company that has elected to be treated as a BDC under
the 1940 Act. Because the Investment Manager, which employs all
of the executive officers and other employees of MSCC, is wholly
owned by us, we do not pay any external investment advisory
fees, but instead we incur the net operating costs associated
with employing investment and portfolio management professionals
through the Investment Manager.
Immediately following the completion of the Formation
Transactions,
MSEI was created as a wholly-owned consolidated
subsidiary of MSCC to hold certain of our portfolio investments.
MSEI has elected for tax purposes to be treated as a taxable
entity and is taxed at normal corporate tax rates based on its
taxable income. The taxable income of MSEI may differ from its
book income due to deferred tax timing differences as well as
permanent differences.
We co-invested with MSC II in several existing portfolio
investments prior to the IPO, but did not
co-invest
with MSC II subsequent to the IPO and prior to June 2008. On
June 4, 2008, we received exemptive relief from the SEC to
allow us to resume co-investing with MSC II in accordance with
the terms of such exemptive relief.
22
USE OF PROCEEDS
We intend to use
all of the net proceeds from selling our common stock to make investments in lower middle-market companies
in accordance with our investment objective and strategies described in this prospectus or any prospectus supplement,
pay our operating expenses and dividends to our stockholders and for general corporate purposes.
Pending such use, we will invest the net proceeds of any offering primarily in
short-term securities consistent with our BDC election and our election to be taxed as a RIC.
See Regulation Regulation as a Business Development Company Idle Funds
Investments. Our ability to achieve our investment objective may be
limited to the extent that the net proceeds from an offering, pending full investment, are
held in interest-bearing deposits or other short-term instruments. The supplement to this
prospectus relating to an offering will more fully identify the use of proceeds from such an
offering.
PRICE RANGE OF COMMON STOCK AND DISTRIBUTIONS
Our common stock is traded on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol MAIN. The
following table sets forth, for each fiscal quarter since our initial public offering, the range of
high and low sales prices of our common stock as reported on the Nasdaq Global Select Market, the
sales price as a percentage of our net asset value (NAV) and the dividends declared by us for each
fiscal quarter. The stock quotations are inter-dealer quotations and do not include mark-ups,
mark-downs or commissions and as such do not necessarily represent actual transactions.
23
During the fourth quarter of 2008, we began paying monthly instead of quarterly dividends to
our stockholders, determined by our Board of Directors on a quarterly basis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage |
|
Percentage |
|
Cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price Range |
|
of High Sales |
|
of Low Sales Price |
|
Dividend |
|
|
NAV(1) |
|
High |
|
Low |
|
Price to NAV(2) |
|
to NAV(2) |
|
Per Share(3) |
Year ended
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 5, 2007 to
December 31,
2007(4) |
|
$ |
12.85 |
|
|
$ |
15.02 |
|
|
$ |
13.60 |
|
|
|
117 |
% |
|
|
106 |
% |
|
$ |
0.33 |
|
Year ended
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter |
|
$ |
12.87 |
|
|
$ |
14.10 |
|
|
$ |
12.75 |
|
|
|
110 |
% |
|
|
99 |
% |
|
$ |
0.34 |
|
Second Quarter |
|
$ |
13.02 |
|
|
$ |
14.40 |
|
|
$ |
10.90 |
|
|
|
111 |
% |
|
|
84 |
% |
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
Third Quarter |
|
$ |
12.49 |
|
|
$ |
14.40 |
|
|
$ |
11.38 |
|
|
|
115 |
% |
|
|
91 |
% |
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
Fourth Quarter |
|
$ |
12.20 |
|
|
$ |
11.95 |
|
|
$ |
8.82 |
|
|
|
98 |
% |
|
|
72 |
% |
|
$ |
0.375 |
|
Year ended
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter |
|
|
* |
|
|
$ |
10.43 |
|
|
$ |
9.07 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
$ |
0.375 |
|
Second Quarter
(through April 23,
2009) |
|
|
* |
|
|
$ |
12.99 |
|
|
$ |
9.66 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
$ |
0.375 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Net asset value per share is determined as of the last day in the relevant
quarter and therefore may not reflect the net asset value per share on the date
of the high and low sales prices. The net asset values shown are based on
outstanding shares at the end of each period. Net asset value has not yet been
determined for the first and second quarters of 2009. |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Calculated as the respective high or low sales price divided by net asset value. |
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Represents the dividend declared in the specified quarter. We have adopted an
opt out dividend reinvestment plan for our common stockholders. As a result,
if we declare a dividend, then stockholders cash dividends will be
automatically reinvested in additional shares of our common stock, unless they
specifically opt out of the dividend reinvestment plan so as to receive cash
dividends. See Dividend Reinvestment Plan. |
|
24
|
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Our stock began trading on the Nasdaq Global Select Market on October 5, 2007. |
|
The last reported price for our common stock on April 23, 2009 was
$11.70 per share. As of
April 22, 2009, we had 120 stockholders of record.
Shares of BDCs may trade at a market price that is less than the value of the net assets
attributable to those shares. The possibilities that our shares of common stock will trade at a
discount from net asset value or at premiums that are unsustainable over the long term are separate
and distinct from the risk that our net asset value will decrease. It is not possible to predict
whether the common stock offered hereby will trade at, above, or below net asset value. Since our
IPO in October 2007, our shares of common stock have traded at prices both less than and exceeding
our net asset value.
We have distributed quarterly, but, beginning in the fourth quarter of 2008, we began to
distribute monthly, dividends to our stockholders.
Our dividends, if any, are determined by our Board of Directors. MSCC has elected to be
treated for federal income tax purposes as a RIC under Subchapter M of the Code. As long as we
qualify as a RIC, we will not be taxed on our investment company taxable income or realized net
capital gains, to the extent that such taxable income or gains are distributed, or deemed to be
distributed, to stockholders on a timely basis.
To maintain RIC tax treatment, we must, among other things, distribute at least 90.0% of our
net ordinary income and realized net short-term capital gains in excess of realized net long-term
capital losses, if any. Depending on the level of taxable income earned in a tax year, we may
choose to carry forward taxable income in excess of current year distributions into the next tax
year and pay a 4% excise tax on such income. Any such carryover taxable income must be distributed
through a dividend declared prior to filing the final tax return related to the year which
generated such taxable income. Please refer to Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations
for further information regarding the consequences of our retention of net capital gains. We may,
in the future, make actual distributions to our stockholders of our net capital gains. We can offer
no assurance that we will achieve results that will permit the payment of any cash distributions
and, if we issue senior securities, we will be prohibited from making distributions if doing so
causes us to fail to maintain the asset coverage ratios stipulated by the 1940 Act or if
distributions are limited by the terms of any of our borrowings. See Regulation and Material
U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations.
25
PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
On November 13, 2008, we announced that our Board of
Directors authorized our officers, in their discretion and
subject to compliance with the 1940 Act and other applicable
laws, to purchase on the open market or in privately negotiated
transactions, an amount up to $5 million of the outstanding
shares of our common stock at prices per share not to exceed our
last reported net asset value per share. The share repurchase
program is authorized to be in effect through the earlier of
December 31, 2009 or such time as the approved
$5 million repurchase amount has been fully utilized. We
can not assure you the extent that we will conduct open market
purchases, and to the extent we do conduct open market
purchases, we may terminate them at any time. As of
December 31, 2008, we had purchased 34,700 shares of
our common stock for $331,006 in the open market pursuant to the
program. The following chart summarizes repurchases of our
common stock under the stock repurchase program through
December 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum Number
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(or Approximate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of
|
|
|
Dollar Value) of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased
|
|
|
Shares that May
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
as Part of Publicly
|
|
|
Yet be Purchased
|
|
|
|
Total Number of
|
|
|
Average Price Paid
|
|
|
Announced Plans
|
|
|
Under the Plans or
|
|
Period
|
|
Shares Purchased
|
|
|
per Share
|
|
|
or Programs
|
|
|
Programs
|
|
|
October 1, 2008 through October 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 1, 2008 through November 30, 2008
|
|
|
8,500
|
|
|
$
|
9.29
|
|
|
|
8,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 1, 2008 through December 31, 2008
|
|
|
26,200
|
|
|
$
|
9.62
|
|
|
|
26,200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
34,700
|
|
|
$
|
9.54
|
|
|
|
34,700
|
|
|
$
|
4,668,994
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
SELECTED
FINANCIAL DATA
The selected financial and other data below reflects the
combined operations of the Fund and the General Partner for the
years ended December 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006 and the
consolidated operations of Main Street and its subsidiaries for
the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2008. The selected
financial data at December 31, 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008
and for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007
and 2008, have been derived from combined/consolidated financial
statements that have been audited by Grant Thornton LLP, an
independent registered public accounting firm. The selected
financial data at December 31, 2004 has been derived from
unaudited combined financial statements. You should read this
selected financial and other data in conjunction with our
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations, Senior
Securities and the financial
statements and related notes thereto.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
Statement of operations data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest, fee and dividend income |
|
$ |
4,452 |
|
|
$ |
7,338 |
|
|
$ |
9,013 |
|
|
$ |
11,312 |
|
|
$ |
15,967 |
|
Interest from idle funds and other |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
222 |
|
|
|
749 |
|
|
|
1,163 |
|
|
|
1,328 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment income |
|
|
4,461 |
|
|
|
7,560 |
|
|
|
9,762 |
|
|
|
12,475 |
|
|
|
17,295 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
|
(869 |
) |
|
|
(2,064 |
) |
|
|
(2,717 |
) |
|
|
(3,246 |
) |
|
|
(3,778 |
) |
General and administrative |
|
|
(184 |
) |
|
|
(197 |
) |
|
|
(198 |
) |
|
|
(512 |
) |
|
|
(1,684 |
) |
Expenses reimbursed to Investment Manager |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,007 |
) |
Share-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(511 |
) |
Management fees to affiliate |
|
|
(1,916 |
) |
|
|
(1,929 |
) |
|
|
(1,942 |
) |
|
|
(1,500 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Professional costs related to initial public offering |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(695 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses |
|
|
(2,969 |
) |
|
|
(4,190 |
) |
|
|
(4,857 |
) |
|
|
(5,953 |
) |
|
|
(6,980 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income |
|
|
1,492 |
|
|
|
3,370 |
|
|
|
4,905 |
|
|
|
6,522 |
|
|
|
10,315 |
|
Total net realized gain from investments |
|
|
1,171 |
|
|
|
1,488 |
|
|
|
2,430 |
|
|
|
4,692 |
|
|
|
1,398 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized income |
|
|
2,663 |
|
|
|
4,858 |
|
|
|
7,335 |
|
|
|
11,214 |
|
|
|
11,713 |
|
Total net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) from
investments |
|
|
1,764 |
|
|
|
3,032 |
|
|
|
8,488 |
|
|
|
(5,406 |
) |
|
|
(3,961 |
) |
Income tax benefit (provision) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,263 |
) |
|
|
3,182 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations |
|
$ |
4,427 |
|
|
$ |
7,890 |
|
|
$ |
15,823 |
|
|
$ |
2,545 |
|
|
$ |
10,934 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income per share basic and diluted |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
$ |
0.76 |
|
|
$ |
1.15 |
|
Net realized income per share basic and diluted |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
$ |
1.31 |
|
|
$ |
1.31 |
|
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations per
share basic and diluted |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
|
$ |
1.22 |
|
Weighted average shares outstanding basic |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
8,587,701 |
|
|
|
8,967,383 |
|
Weighted average shares outstanding diluted |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
8,587,701 |
|
|
|
8,971,064 |
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, |
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
Balance sheet data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total portfolio investments at fair value |
|
$ |
37,972 |
|
|
$ |
51,192 |
|
|
$ |
73,711 |
|
|
$ |
105,650 |
|
|
$ |
127,007 |
|
Idle funds investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,063 |
|
|
|
4,390 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
796 |
|
|
|
26,261 |
|
|
|
13,769 |
|
|
|
41,889 |
|
|
|
35,375 |
|
Deferred tax asset |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,121 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
262 |
|
|
|
439 |
|
|
|
630 |
|
|
|
1,576 |
|
|
|
1,101 |
|
Deferred financing costs, net of accumulated amortization |
|
|
984 |
|
|
|
1,442 |
|
|
|
1,333 |
|
|
|
1,670 |
|
|
|
1,635 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
40,014 |
|
|
$ |
79,334 |
|
|
$ |
89,443 |
|
|
$ |
174,848 |
|
|
$ |
170,629 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and net assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SBIC debentures |
|
$ |
22,000 |
|
|
$ |
45,100 |
|
|
$ |
45,100 |
|
|
$ |
55,000 |
|
|
$ |
55,000 |
|
Deferred tax liability |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,026 |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest payable |
|
|
354 |
|
|
|
771 |
|
|
|
855 |
|
|
|
1,063 |
|
|
|
1,108 |
|
Accounts payable and other liabilities |
|
|
422 |
|
|
|
194 |
|
|
|
216 |
|
|
|
610 |
|
|
|
2,165 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
22,776 |
|
|
|
46,065 |
|
|
|
46,171 |
|
|
|
59,699 |
|
|
|
58,273 |
|
Total net assets |
|
|
17,238 |
|
|
|
33,269 |
|
|
|
43,272 |
|
|
|
115,149 |
|
|
|
112,356 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and net assets |
|
$ |
40,014 |
|
|
$ |
79,334 |
|
|
$ |
89,443 |
|
|
$ |
174,848 |
|
|
$ |
170,629 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average effective yield on debt investments(1) |
|
|
15.3 |
% |
|
|
15.3 |
% |
|
|
15.0 |
% |
|
|
14.3 |
% |
|
|
14.0 |
% |
Number of portfolio companies(3) |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
Expense ratios (as percentage of average net assets): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses(2) |
|
|
13.7 |
% |
|
|
9.0 |
% |
|
|
5.5 |
% |
|
|
4.8 |
% |
|
|
2.8 |
% |
Interest expense |
|
|
5.7 |
% |
|
|
8.8 |
% |
|
|
7.0 |
% |
|
|
5.7 |
% |
|
|
3.3 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Weighted-average effective yield is calculated based on our debt
investments at the end of each period and includes amortization
of deferred debt origination fees and accretion of original
issue discount, but excludes debt investments with non-accrual
status. |
|
(2) |
|
The ratio for the year ended December 31, 2007 reflects the
impact of professional costs related to the IPO. These
costs were 25.7% of operating expenses for the year. |
|
(3) |
|
Excludes the investment in affiliated Investment Manager, as
referenced in Formation Transactions and in the
notes to the financial statements elsewhere herein. |
28
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our
financial statements and the notes thereto included elsewhere in this prospectus.
Statements we make in the following
discussion which express a belief, expectation or intention, as well as those that are not
historical fact, are forward-looking statements that are subject to risks, uncertainties
and
assumptions. Our actual results, performance or achievements, or industry results, could
differ materially from those we express in the following discussion as a result
of a variety of factors, including the risks and uncertainties we have referred to under
the headings Cautionary Statement Concerning Forward-Looking Statements and Risk
Factors in this prospectus.
ORGANIZATION
Main Street Capital Corporation (MSCC) was formed on
March 9, 2007 for the purpose of (i) acquiring 100% of
the equity interests of Main Street Mezzanine Fund, LP (the
Fund) and its general partner, Main Street Mezzanine
Management, LLC (the General Partner),
(ii) acquiring 100% of the equity interests of Main Street
Capital Partners, LLC (the Investment Manager),
(iii) raising capital in an initial public offering, which
was completed in October 2007 (the IPO), and
(iv) thereafter operating as an internally managed business
development company (BDC) under the Investment
Company Act of 1940, as amended (the 1940 Act). The
transactions discussed above were consummated in October 2007
and are collectively termed the Formation
Transactions. Immediately following the Formation
Transactions, Main Street Equity Interests, Inc.
(MSEI) was formed as a wholly owned consolidated
subsidiary of MSCC. MSEI has elected for tax purposes to be
treated as a taxable entity and is taxed at normal corporate tax
rates based on its taxable income. Unless otherwise noted or the
context otherwise indicates, the terms we,
us, our and Main Street
refer to the Fund and the General Partner prior to the IPO and
to MSCC and its subsidiaries, including the Fund and the General
Partner, subsequent to the IPO.
OVERVIEW
We are a principal investment firm focused on providing
customized debt and equity financing to lower middle-market
companies, which we generally define as companies with annual
revenues between $10 and $100 million that operate in
diverse industries. We invest primarily in secured debt
instruments, equity investments, warrants and other securities
of lower middle-market companies based in the United States. Our
principal investment objective is to maximize our
portfolios total return by generating current income from
our debt investments and capital appreciation from our equity
and equity-related investments, including warrants, convertible
securities and other rights to acquire equity securities in a
portfolio company. Our investments generally range in size from
$2 million to $15 million.
Our investments are made through both MSCC and the Fund. Since
the IPO, MSCC and the Fund have co-invested in substantially
every investment we have made. MSCC and the Fund share the same
investment strategies and criteria in the lower middle-market,
although they are subject to different regulatory regimes. See
Regulation. An investors
return in MSCC will depend, in part, on the Funds
investment returns as the Fund is a wholly owned subsidiary of
MSCC.
We seek to fill the current financing gap for lower
middle-market businesses, which, historically, have had limited
access to financing from commercial banks and other traditional
sources. Given the current credit environment, we believe the
limited access to financing for lower middle market companies is
even more pronounced. The underserved nature of the lower middle
market creates the opportunity for us to meet the financing
needs of lower middle-market companies while also negotiating
favorable transaction terms and equity participations. Our
ability to invest across a companys capital structure,
from senior secured loans to equity securities, allows us to
offer portfolio companies a comprehensive suite of financing
solutions, or one stop financing. Providing
customized, one stop financing solutions has become
even more relevant to our portfolio companies in the current
credit environment. We generally seek to partner directly with
entrepreneurs, management teams and business owners in making
our investments. Main Street believes that its core investment
strategy has a lower correlation to the broader debt and equity
markets.
29
Due to the uncertainties in the current economic environment and
our desire to maintain adequate liquidity, we intend to be very
selective in our near term portfolio growth. However, we
anticipate that our net investment income will continue to grow
as we deploy our existing lower yield cash and cash equivalents
into higher yielding portfolio investments. During 2008, we paid
approximately $1.425 per share in dividends. In September 2008,
we declared monthly dividends for the fourth quarter of 2008
totaling $0.375 per share representing a 13.6% increase from the
dividends paid in the fourth quarter of 2007. In December 2008,
we declared monthly dividends for the first quarter of 2009
totaling $0.375 per share representing a 10.3% increase from the
dividends paid in the first quarter of 2008. For tax purposes,
the monthly dividend paid in January 2009 was applied against
the 2008 taxable income distribution requirements since it was
declared and accrued prior to December 31, 2008. Excluding
the impact for the tax treatment of the January 2009 dividend,
we estimate that we generated undistributed taxable income (or
spillover income) of approximately $4 million,
or $0.44 per share, during 2008 that will be carried forward
toward distributions paid in 2009. For the 2009 calendar year,
we estimate that we will pay dividends in the range of $1.50 to
$1.65 per share representing an increase of 5.3% to 15.8% over
the total dividends per share paid during calendar year 2008.
The estimated range for total 2009 dividends is based upon
projections of 2009 taxable income, anticipated 2009 portfolio
activity, and the $4 million of 2008 spillover
income which
will be utilized to pay dividends during 2009. We will continue
to pay dividends on a monthly basis during 2009 and will
continue to provide quarterly updates related to our 2009
dividend guidance.
At December 31, 2008, we had $39.8 million in cash
and
cash equivalents plus idle funds investments. During October
2008, we closed a $30 million multi-year investment line of
credit. Due to our existing and available cash and other
resources, we expect to have sufficient cash resources to
support our investment and operational activities throughout all
of 2009 and well into 2010. However, this projection will be
impacted by, among other things, the pace of new and follow on
investments, investment redemptions, the level of cash flow from
operations and cash flow from realized gains, and the level of
dividends paid in cash.
The recently enacted American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of
2009 (the 2009 Stimulus Bill) contains several
provisions applicable to Small Business Investment Company
(SBIC) funds, including the Fund, our wholly owned
subsidiary. One of the key SBIC-related provisions included in
the 2009 Stimulus Bill increases the maximum amount of combined
SBIC leverage (or SBIC leverage cap) to $225 million for
affiliated SBIC funds. The prior maximum amount of SBIC leverage
available to affiliated SBIC funds was approximately
$137 million, as adjusted annually based upon changes in
the Consumer Price Index. Due to the increase in the maximum
amount of SBIC leverage available, we will now have access to
incremental SBIC leverage to support our future investment
activities. Since the increase in the SBIC leverage cap applies
to affiliated SBIC funds, we will allocate such increased
borrowing capacity between our wholly owned SBIC subsidiary and
Main Street Capital II, LP (MSC II), an
independently owned SBIC that is managed by Main Street and
therefore deemed to be affiliated for SBIC regulatory purposes.
It is currently estimated that at least $55 million to
$60 million of additional SBIC leverage is now accessible
by Main Street for future investment activities, subject to the
required capitalization of our wholly owned SBIC subsidiary.
In our view, the SBIC leverage, including the increased
capacity, remains a strategic advantage due to its long-term,
flexible structure and a very low fixed cost. The SBIC leverage
also provides proper matching of duration and cost compared with
our portfolio debt investments. The weighted average duration of
our portfolio debt investments is 3.5 years compared to a
weighted average duration of over 6 years for our SBIC
leverage. This duration on our SBIC leverage does not consider
the opportunity to revolve or refinance our existing SBIC
leverage into new
10-year
tranches upon contractual maturity. Approximately 85% of
portfolio debt investments bear interest at fixed rates which is
also appropriately matched by the long-term, low cost fixed
rates available through our SBIC leverage. In addition, we
believe the embedded value of our SBIC leverage would be
significant if we had adopted the provisions of Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 159,
The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities (SFAS 159) relating to
accounting for debt obligations at their fair value.
30
CRITICAL
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis
of Presentation
The financial statements are prepared in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America (U.S. GAAP). For the years ended
December 31, 2008 and 2007, the consolidated financial
statements of Main Street include the accounts of MSCC, the
Fund, MSEI and the General Partner. The Investment Manager is
accounted for as a portfolio investment. The Formation
Transactions involved an exchange of equity interests between
companies under common control. In accordance with the guidance
on exchanges of equity interests between entities under common
control contained in SFAS No. 141, Business
Combinations (SFAS 141), Main Streets
results of operations and cash flows for the year ended
December 31, 2007 are presented as if the Formation
Transactions had occurred as of January 1, 2007. Main
Streets results of operations for the years ended
December 31, 2008 and 2007, cash flows for the years ended
December 31, 2008 and 2007 and financial positions as of
December 31, 2008 and 2007 are presented on a consolidated
basis. In addition, the results of Main Streets operations
and its cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2006
have been presented on a combined basis in order to provide
comparative information with respect to prior periods. The
effects of all intercompany transactions between Main Street and
its subsidiaries have been eliminated in consolidation. As a
result of adopting the provisions of SFAS No. 157,
Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157), in
the first quarter of 2008, certain reclassifications have been
made to prior period balances to conform with the current
financial statement presentation.
Under the investment company rules and regulations pursuant to
Article 6 of
Regulation S-X
and the Audit and Accounting Guide for Investment Companies
issued by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants
(the AICPA Guide), we are precluded from
consolidating portfolio company investments, including those in
which we have a controlling interest, unless the portfolio
company is another investment company. An exception to this
general principle in the AICPA Guide occurs if we own a
controlled operating company that provides all or substantially
all of its services directly to us, or to an investment company
of ours. None of the investments made by us qualify for this
exception. Therefore, our portfolio investments are carried on
the balance sheet at fair value, as discussed further in
Note B to our consolidated financial statements, with any
adjustments to fair value recognized as Net Change in
Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) from Investments on
our Statement of Operations until the investment is disposed of,
resulting in any gain or loss on exit being recognized as a
Net Realized Gain (Loss) from Investments.
Portfolio
Investment Valuation
The most significant estimate inherent in the preparation of our
financial statements is the valuation of our portfolio
investments and the related amounts of unrealized appreciation
and depreciation. As of December 31, 2008 and
December 31, 2007, approximately 74% and 60%, respectively,
of our total assets represented investments in portfolio
companies valued at fair value (including the investment in the
Investment Manager). We are required to report our investments
at fair value. We adopted the provisions of SFAS 157 in the
first quarter of 2008. SFAS 157 defines fair value,
establishes a framework for measuring fair value, establishes a
fair value hierarchy based on the quality of inputs used to
measure fair value, and enhances disclosure requirements for
fair value measurements. With the adoption of this statement, we
incorporated the income approach to estimate the fair value of
our debt investments principally using a yield-to-maturity
model, resulting in the recognition of $0.7 million in
unrealized appreciation from ten debt investments upon adoption.
Our business plan calls for us to invest primarily in illiquid
securities issued by private companies
and/or
thinly traded public companies. These investments may be subject
to restrictions on resale and will generally have no established
trading market. As a result, we determine in good faith the fair
value of our portfolio investments pursuant to a valuation
policy in accordance with SFAS 157 and a valuation process
approved by our Board of Directors and in accordance with the
1940 Act. We review external events, including private mergers,
sales and acquisitions involving comparable companies, and
include these events in the valuation process. Our valuation
policy is intended to provide a consistent basis for determining
the fair value of the portfolio.
31
For valuation purposes, control investments are composed of
equity and debt securities for which we have a controlling
interest in the portfolio company or have the ability to
nominate a majority of the portfolio companys board of
directors. Market quotations are generally not readily available
for our control investments. As a result, we determine the fair
value of these investments using a combination of market and
income approaches. Under the market approach, we will typically
use the enterprise value methodology to determine the fair value
of these investments. The enterprise value is the fair value at
which an enterprise could be sold in a transaction between two
willing parties, other than through a forced or liquidation
sale. Typically, private companies are bought and sold based on
multiples of earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and
amortization, or EBITDA, cash flows, net income, revenues, or in
limited cases, book value. There is no single methodology for
estimating enterprise value. For any one portfolio company,
enterprise value is generally described as a range of values
from which a single estimate of enterprise value is derived. In
estimating the enterprise value of a portfolio company, we
analyze various factors, including the portfolio companys
historical and projected financial results. We allocate the
enterprise value to investments in order of the legal priority
of the investments. We will also use the income approach to
determine the fair value of these securities, based on
projections of the discounted future free cash flows that the
portfolio company or the debt security will likely generate. The
valuation approaches for our control investments estimate the
value of the investment if we were to sell, or exit, the
investment, assuming the highest and best use of the investment
by market participants. In addition, these valuation approaches
consider the value associated with our ability to control the
capital structure of the portfolio company, as well as the
timing of a potential exit.
For valuation purposes, non-control investments are composed of
debt and equity securities for which we do not have a
controlling interest in the portfolio company, or the ability to
nominate a majority of the portfolio companys board of
directors. Market quotations for our non-control investments are
not readily available. For our non-control investments, we use
the market approach to value our equity investments and the
income approach to value our debt instruments. For non-control
debt investments, we determine the fair value primarily using a
yield approach that analyzes the discounted cash flows of
interest and principal for the debt security, as set forth in
the associated loan agreements, as well as the financial
position and credit risk of each of these portfolio investments.
Our estimate of the expected repayment date of a debt security
is generally the legal maturity date of the instrument, as we
generally intend to hold our loans to maturity. The yield
analysis considers changes in leverage levels, credit quality,
portfolio company performance and other factors. We will use the
value determined by the yield analysis as the fair value for
that security; however, because of our general intent to hold
our loans to maturity, the fair value will not exceed the face
amount of the debt security. A change in the assumptions that we
use to estimate the fair value of our debt securities using the
yield analysis could have a material impact on the determination
of fair value. If there is deterioration in credit quality or a
debt security is in workout status, we may consider other
factors in determining the fair value of a debt security,
including the value attributable to the debt security from the
enterprise value of the portfolio company or the proceeds that
would be received in a liquidation analysis.
Due to the inherent uncertainty in the valuation process, our
estimate of fair value may differ materially from the values
that would have been used had a ready market for the securities
existed. In addition, changes in the market environment,
portfolio company performance and other events that may occur
over the lives of the investments may cause the gains or losses
ultimately realized on these investments to be different than
the valuations currently assigned. We determine the fair value
of each individual investment and record changes in fair value
as unrealized appreciation or depreciation.
Revenue
Recognition
Interest
and Dividend Income
We record interest and dividend income on the accrual basis to
the extent amounts are expected to be collected. Dividend income
is recorded as dividends are declared or at the point an
obligation exists for the portfolio company to make a
distribution. In accordance with our valuation policy, we
evaluate accrued interest and dividend income periodically for
collectibility. When a loan or debt security becomes
90 days or more past due, and if we otherwise do not expect
the debtor to be able to service all of its debt or other
obligations, we will generally place the loan or debt security
on non-accrual status and cease recognizing interest income
32
on that loan or debt security until the borrower has
demonstrated the ability and intent to pay contractual amounts
due. If a loan or debt securitys status significantly
improves regarding ability to service the debt or other
obligations, or if a loan or debt security is fully impaired or
written off, we will remove it from non-accrual status.
Fee
Income
We may periodically provide services, including structuring and
advisory services, to our portfolio companies. For services that
are separately identifiable and evidence exists to substantiate
fair value, income is recognized as earned, which is generally
when the investment or other applicable transaction closes. Fees
received in connection with debt financing transactions for
services that do not meet these criteria are treated as debt
origination fees, net of direct loan origination costs, and are
amortized, based on the effective interest method, as additional
interest income over the life of the related debt investment.
Payment-in-Kind
(PIK) Interest
While not significant to our total debt investment portfolio, we
currently hold several loans in our portfolio that contain PIK
interest provisions. The PIK interest, computed at the
contractual rate specified in each loan agreement, is added to
the principal balance of the loan and recorded as interest
income. To maintain regulated investment company
(RIC) tax treatment (as discussed below), this
non-cash source of income will need to be paid out to
stockholders in the form of distributions, even though we may
not have collected the cash. We will stop accruing PIK interest
and write off any accrued and uncollected interest when it is
determined that PIK interest is no longer collectible.
Share-Based
Compensation
We account for our share-based compensation plan using the fair
value method, as prescribed by SFAS No. 123R,
Share-Based Payment. Accordingly, for restricted stock
awards, we measured the grant date fair value based upon the
market price of our common stock on the date of the grant and
will amortize this fair value to share-based compensation
expense over the requisite service period or vesting term.
Income
Taxes
MSCC has elected and intends to qualify for the tax treatment
applicable to a RIC under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986, as amended (the Code), and, among
other things, intends to make the required distributions to our
stockholders as specified therein. As a RIC, we generally will
not pay corporate-level federal income taxes on any net ordinary
income or capital gains that we distribute to our stockholders
as dividends. Depending on the level of taxable income earned in
a tax year, we may choose to carry forward taxable income in
excess of current year distributions into the next tax year and
pay a 4% excise tax on such income. Any such carryover taxable
income must be distributed through a dividend declared prior to
filing the final tax return related to the year which generated
such taxable income.
MSCCs wholly owned subsidiary, MSEI, is a taxable entity
which holds certain of our portfolio investments. MSEI is
consolidated with Main Street for U.S. GAAP reporting
purposes, and the portfolio investments held by MSEI are
included in our consolidated financial statements. The principal
purpose of MSEI is to permit us to hold equity investments in
portfolio companies which are pass through entities
for tax purposes in order to comply with the source
income requirements contained in the RIC tax provisions.
MSEI is not consolidated with Main Street for income tax
purposes and may generate income tax expense as a result of
MSEIs ownership of certain portfolio investments. This
income tax expense, if any, is reflected in our consolidated
statement of operations.
MSEI uses the liability method in accounting for income taxes.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded for temporary
differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and
their reported amounts in the financial statements, using
statutory tax rates in effect for the year in which the
temporary differences are expected to reverse. A valuation
allowance is provided against deferred tax assets when it is
more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred
tax asset will not be realized.
33
PORTFOLIO
COMPOSITION
Portfolio investments principally consist of secured debt,
equity warrants and direct equity investments in privately held
companies. The debt investments are secured by either a first or
second lien on the assets of the portfolio company, generally
bear interest at fixed rates, and generally mature between five
and seven years from the original investment. We also receive
nominally priced equity warrants and make direct equity
investments, usually in connection with a debt investment in a
portfolio company.
The Investment Manager is a wholly owned subsidiary of MSCC.
However, the Investment Manager is accounted for as a portfolio
investment of Main Street, since it is not an investment company
and since it conducts a significant portion of its investment
management activities outside of MSCC and its subsidiaries. To
allow for more relevant disclosure of our core
investment portfolio, our investment in the Investment Manager
has been excluded from the tables and amounts set forth below.
Summaries of the composition of our core investment portfolio at
cost and fair value as a percentage of total portfolio
investments are shown in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost:
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
First lien debt
|
|
|
76.2
|
%
|
|
|
81.5
|
%
|
Equity
|
|
|
11.0
|
%
|
|
|
10.7
|
%
|
Second lien debt
|
|
|
7.4
|
%
|
|
|
6.1
|
%
|
Equity warrants
|
|
|
5.4
|
%
|
|
|
1.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value:
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
First lien debt
|
|
|
67.0
|
%
|
|
|
70.1
|
%
|
Equity
|
|
|
15.7
|
%
|
|
|
18.6
|
%
|
Equity warrants
|
|
|
10.2
|
%
|
|
|
8.0
|
%
|
Second lien debt
|
|
|
7.1
|
%
|
|
|
3.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table shows the core investment portfolio
composition by geographic region of the United States at cost
and fair value as a percentage of total portfolio investments.
The geographic composition is determined by the location of the
corporate headquarters of the portfolio company:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost:
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
Southwest
|
|
|
50.2
|
%
|
|
|
31.9
|
%
|
West
|
|
|
36.3
|
%
|
|
|
37.1
|
%
|
Southeast
|
|
|
5.1
|
%
|
|
|
11.4
|
%
|
Midwest
|
|
|
4.7
|
%
|
|
|
5.8
|
%
|
Northeast
|
|
|
3.7
|
%
|
|
|
13.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value:
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
Southwest
|
|
|
56.0
|
%
|
|
|
41.2
|
%
|
West
|
|
|
31.1
|
%
|
|
|
32.9
|
%
|
Midwest
|
|
|
5.1
|
%
|
|
|
6.5
|
%
|
Southeast
|
|
|
4.1
|
%
|
|
|
10.3
|
%
|
Northeast
|
|
|
3.7
|
%
|
|
|
9.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34
Main Streets portfolio investments are generally in lower
middle-market companies conducting business in a variety of
industries. Set forth below are tables showing the composition
of Main Streets core investment portfolio by industry at
cost and fair value as of December 31, 2008 and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost:
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
Industrial equipment
|
|
|
12.0
|
%
|
|
|
6.6
|
%
|
Precast concrete manufacturing
|
|
|
11.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Custom wood products
|
|
|
9.3
|
%
|
|
|
8.4
|
%
|
Agricultural services
|
|
|
8.3
|
%
|
|
|
11.6
|
%
|
Electronics manufacturing
|
|
|
7.6
|
%
|
|
|
9.5
|
%
|
Transportation/Logistics
|
|
|
6.6
|
%
|
|
|
6.7
|
%
|
Retail
|
|
|
6.5
|
%
|
|
|
3.3
|
%
|
Restaurant
|
|
|
6.1
|
%
|
|
|
3.4
|
%
|
Health care products
|
|
|
5.8
|
%
|
|
|
4.2
|
%
|
Mining and minerals
|
|
|
4.8
|
%
|
|
|
9.1
|
%
|
Manufacturing
|
|
|
4.7
|
%
|
|
|
12.0
|
%
|
Health care services
|
|
|
4.2
|
%
|
|
|
5.9
|
%
|
Professional services
|
|
|
4.1
|
%
|
|
|
3.3
|
%
|
Metal fabrication
|
|
|
3.4
|
%
|
|
|
4.6
|
%
|
Equipment rental
|
|
|
2.1
|
%
|
|
|
2.6
|
%
|
Infrastructure products
|
|
|
1.7
|
%
|
|
|
2.4
|
%
|
Information services
|
|
|
0.9
|
%
|
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
Industrial services
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
Distribution
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
2.2
|
%
|
Consumer products
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value:
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
Precast concrete manufacturing
|
|
|
13.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Industrial equipment
|
|
|
10.2
|
%
|
|
|
6.0
|
%
|
Agricultural services
|
|
|
8.1
|
%
|
|
|
10.5
|
%
|
Electronics manufacturing
|
|
|
7.7
|
%
|
|
|
9.6
|
%
|
Retail
|
|
|
7.0
|
%
|
|
|
3.4
|
%
|
Custom wood products
|
|
|
6.8
|
%
|
|
|
7.5
|
%
|
Restaurant
|
|
|
6.7
|
%
|
|
|
4.5
|
%
|
Transportation/Logistics
|
|
|
6.5
|
%
|
|
|
6.6
|
%
|
Health care services
|
|
|
6.1
|
%
|
|
|
6.0
|
%
|
Health care products
|
|
|
5.8
|
%
|
|
|
4.1
|
%
|
Professional services
|
|
|
5.4
|
%
|
|
|
4.1
|
%
|
Manufacturing
|
|
|
5.1
|
%
|
|
|
9.5
|
%
|
Metal fabrication
|
|
|
4.3
|
%
|
|
|
4.2
|
%
|
Industrial services
|
|
|
2.8
|
%
|
|
|
2.9
|
%
|
Equipment rental
|
|
|
2.0
|
%
|
|
|
2.4
|
%
|
Information services
|
|
|
0.9
|
%
|
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
Infrastructure products
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
|
2.2
|
%
|
Distribution
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
|
2.4
|
%
|
Mining and minerals
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
Our core investment portfolio carries a number of risks
including, but not limited to: (1) investing in lower
middle-market companies which have a limited operating history
and financial resources; (2) holding investments that are
not publicly traded and which may be subject to legal and other
restrictions on resale; and (3) other risks common to
investing in below investment grade debt and equity investments
in private, smaller companies.
PORTFOLIO
ASSET QUALITY
We utilize an internally developed investment rating system for
our entire portfolio of investments. Investment Rating 1
represents a portfolio company that is performing in a manner
which significantly exceeds our original expectations and
projections. Investment Rating 2 represents a portfolio company
that is performing above our original expectations. Investment
Rating 3 represents a portfolio company that is generally
performing in accordance with our original expectations.
Investment Rating 4 represents a portfolio company that is
underperforming our original expectations. Investments with such
a rating require increased Main Street monitoring and scrutiny.
Investment Rating 5 represents a portfolio company that is
significantly underperforming. Investments with such a rating
require heightened levels of Main Street monitoring and scrutiny
and involve the recognition of unrealized depreciation on such
investment.
The following table shows the distribution of our investments on
our 1 to 5 investment rating scale at fair value as of
December 31, 2008 and 2007 (excluding Main Streets
investment in the Investment Manager):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
Investments at
|
|
|
Percentage of
|
|
|
Investments at
|
|
|
Percentage of
|
|
Investment Rating
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Total Portfolio
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Total Portfolio
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
1
|
|
$
|
27,523
|
|
|
|
24.9
|
%
|
|
$
|
24,619
|
|
|
|
28.0
|
%
|
2
|
|
|
23,150
|
|
|
|
21.0
|
%
|
|
|
35,068
|
|
|
|
39.8
|
%
|
3
|
|
|
53,123
|
|
|
|
48.1
|
%
|
|
|
24,034
|
|
|
|
27.3
|
%
|
4
|
|
|
6,035
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
5
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
|
4,304
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals
|
|
$
|
110,331
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
88,025
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Based upon our investment rating system, the weighted average
rating of our portfolio as of December 31, 2008 and 2007
was approximately 2.4 and 2.2 respectively. As of
December 31, 2008 and 2007, we had one debt investment in
each period representing 0.5% and 3.1%, respectively, of total
portfolio fair value (excluding Main Streets investment in
the Investment Manager) which was on non-accrual status.
In the event that the United States economy remains in a
prolonged period of weakness, it is possible that the financial
results of small- to mid-sized companies, like those in which we
invest, could experience deterioration, which could ultimately
lead to difficulty in meeting their debt service requirements
and an increase in defaults. In addition, the end markets for
certain of our portfolio companies products and services
have experienced, and continue to experience, negative economic
trends. We are seeing somewhat reduced operating results at
several portfolio companies due to the general economic
difficulties. We expect the trend of reduced operating results
to continue throughout 2009. Consequently, we can provide no
assurance that the performance of certain of our portfolio
companies will not be negatively impacted by these economic or
other conditions which could have a negative impact on our
future results.
36
DISCUSSION
AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Comparison
of years ended December 31, 2008 and December 31,
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
Net Change
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Total investment income
|
|
$
|
17.3
|
|
|
$
|
12.5
|
|
|
$
|
4.8
|
|
|
|
39
|
%
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
(7.0
|
)
|
|
|
(6.0
|
)
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)
|
|
|
17
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
|
|
6.5
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
|
|
58
|
%
|
Total net realized gain from investments
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
|
|
(3.3
|
)
|
|
|
(70
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized income
|
|
|
11.7
|
|
|
|
11.2
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) from
investments
|
|
|
(4.0
|
)
|
|
|
(5.4
|
)
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
N
|
A
|
Income tax benefit (provision)
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
|
(3.3
|
)
|
|
|
6.5
|
|
|
|
N
|
A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations
|
|
$
|
10.9
|
|
|
$
|
2.5
|
|
|
$
|
8.4
|
|
|
|
330
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
Net Change
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
$
|
10.3
|
|
|
$
|
6.5
|
|
|
$
|
3.8
|
|
|
|
58
|
%
|
Share-based compensation expense
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
N
|
A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributable net investment income(a)
|
|
|
10.8
|
|
|
|
6.5
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
|
|
66
|
%
|
Total net realized gain (loss) from investments
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
|
|
(3.3
|
)
|
|
|
(70
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributable net realized income(a)
|
|
$
|
12.2
|
|
|
$
|
11.2
|
|
|
$
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Distributable net investment income and distributable net
realized income are net investment income and net realized
income, respectively, as determined in accordance with U.S.
GAAP, excluding the impact of share-based compensation expense
which is non-cash in nature. Main Street believes presenting
distributable net investment income, distributable net realized
income, and related per share measures are useful and
appropriate supplemental disclosures for analyzing its financial
performance since share-based compensation does not require
settlement in cash. However, distributable net investment income
and distributable net realized income are non U.S. GAAP measures
and should not be considered as replacements to net investment
income, net realized income, and other earnings measures
presented in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Instead, distributable
net investment income and distributable net realized income
should be reviewed only in connection with such U.S. GAAP
measures in analyzing Main Streets financial performance.
A reconciliation of net investment income in accordance with
U.S. GAAP to distributable net investment income and
distributable net realized income is presented in the table
above. |
Investment
Income
For the year ended December 31, 2008, total investment
income was $17.3 million, a $4.8 million, or 39%,
increase over the $12.5 million of total investment income
for the year ended December 31, 2007. The increase was
attributable to a $4.6 million increase in interest, fee
and dividend income from investments and a $0.2 million
increase in interest income from idle funds, which was
principally earned on the remaining proceeds from our IPO. The
increase in interest, fee and dividend income was primarily
attributable to (i) higher average levels of outstanding
debt investments, which was principally due to the closing of
eight new debt investments since December 31, 2007,
partially offset by debt repayments received during the same
period and certain portfolio investments that were on
non-accrual status or written off in 2008,
(ii) significantly higher levels of cash dividend income
from portfolio equity investments, and (iii) higher levels
of fee income. For the year ended December 31, 2008, Main
Street received approximately $3 million in cash dividend
37
payments from portfolio company equity investments. These
dividend payments were paid to Main Street based upon the
accumulated earnings and available cash of certain portfolio
companies for the year ended December 31, 2008. Future
dividend payments will vary due to changes in portfolio company
accumulated earnings and available cash.
Expenses
For the year ended December 31, 2008, total expenses
increased by approximately $1.0 million, or 17%, to
approximately $7.0 million from $6.0 million for the
year ended December 31, 2007. Share-based compensation
expense recognized during 2008 related to non-cash amortization
expense for restricted share grants made in July 2008 totaled
$0.5 million. There were no similar expenses incurred
during 2007. In addition, 2007 operating expenses included
$0.7 million of costs related to Main Streets IPO
which was completed in October 2007. There were no similar
expenses incurred during 2008. Operating expenses, excluding the
non-cash, share-based compensation expense and the 2007
IPO-related expenses discussed above, increased
$1.2 million in 2008 compared with 2007 due to a
$0.7 million increase in general and administrative expense
associated with higher costs to operate as a public company and
a $0.5 million increase in interest expense as a result of
an additional $9.9 million of SBIC Debentures borrowed
through the Fund during 2007, and unused commitment fees on two
credit facilities totaling $80 million, one entered into in
December 2007 and the other in October
2008, by MSCC.
Distributable
Net Investment Income
Distributable net investment income for the year ended
December 31, 2008 was $10.8 million, or a 66%
increase, compared to distributable net investment income of
$6.5 million during the year ended December 31,
2007.
The increase in distributable net investment income was
attributable to the increase in total investment income
partially offset by the increase in total expenses discussed
above.
Net
Investment Income
Net investment income for the year ended December 31, 2008
was $10.3 million, or a 58% increase, compared to net
investment income of $6.5 million during the year ended
December 31, 2007. The increase in net investment income
was attributable to the increase in total investment income
partially offset by the increase in total expenses discussed
above.
Distributable
Net Realized Income
For the year ended December 31, 2008, the net realized
gains from investments was $1.4 million, representing a
$3.3 million, or 70%, decrease over the net realized gains
of $4.7 million during the year ended December 31,
2007. The net realized gains during the year ended
December 31, 2008 principally related to the realized gains
recognized on equity investments in four portfolio companies,
offset by realized losses on debt and equity investments in two
portfolio companies, compared to higher net realized gains
recognized on equity investments in four portfolio companies
during the year ended December 31, 2007.
The higher distributable net investment income in the year ended
December 31, 2008 offset by the lower net realized gains
during that period resulted in a $1.0 million, or 9%,
increase in the distributable net realized income for the year
ended December 31, 2008 compared with the year ended
December 31, 2007.
Net
Realized Income
The higher net investment income in the year ended
December 31, 2008 offset by the lower net realized gains
during that period resulted in a $0.5 million, or 4%,
increase in the net realized income for the year ended
December 31, 2008 compared with the corresponding period in
2007.
38
Net
Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Operations
For the year ended December 31, 2008,
the net increase in
net assets resulting from operations was $10.9 million in
2008 compared with $2.5 million for the year ended
December 31, 2007. The $4.0 million net change in
unrealized depreciation from investments for 2008 was
attributable to (i) $2.9 million from the accounting
reversal of net unrealized appreciation attributable to the
total net realized gain on the exit of six portfolio
investments, (ii) unrealized depreciation on nine
investments in portfolio companies totaling $8.9 million,
offset by unrealized appreciation on thirteen investments
in
portfolio companies totaling $8.7 million, and
(iii) $0.9 million in unrealized depreciation
attributable to Main Streets investment in its affiliated
investment manager. During 2008, Main Street also recognized a
cumulative income tax benefit of $3.2 million primarily
consisting of deferred tax benefits related to net unrealized
losses on certain portfolio investments and the difference
between taxable income and book income from equity investments
which are flow through entities owned by MSEI, our wholly owned
taxable subsidiary. We do not anticipate incurring this level of
tax benefit in future periods.
Comparison
of years ended December 31, 2007, and December 31,
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
Net Change
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
Total investment income
|
|
$
|
12.5
|
|
|
$
|
9.8
|
|
|
$
|
2.7
|
|
|
|
28%
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
(6.0
|
)
|
|
|
(4.9
|
)
|
|
|
(1.1
|
)
|
|
|
23%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
6.5
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
33%
|
|
Total net realized gain (loss) from investments
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
93%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized income
|
|
|
11.2
|
|
|
|
7.3
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
|
53%
|
|
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) from
investments
|
|
|
(5.4
|
)
|
|
|
8.5
|
|
|
|
(13.9
|
)
|
|
|
NA
|
|
Income tax benefit (provision)
|
|
|
(3.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.3
|
)
|
|
|
NA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations
|
|
$
|
2.5
|
|
|
$
|
15.8
|
|
|
$
|
(13.3
|
)
|
|
|
(84)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment
Income
For the year ended December 31, 2007, total investment
income was $12.5 million, a $2.7 million, or 28%,
increase over the $9.8 million of total investment income
for the year ended December 31, 2006. The increase was
primarily attributable to a $2.3 million increase in
interest, fee and dividend income from investments and a
$0.4 million increase in interest income from idle funds
principally related to funds received from the IPO. The increase
in interest, fee and dividend income from investments was
primarily attributable to (i) higher average levels of
outstanding debt investments, which was principally due to the
closing of six new debt investments in the year ended
December 31, 2007 and several new debt investments in the
last half of 2006, partially offset by debt repayments received
during the same periods, and (ii) higher levels of dividend
income from portfolio equity investments.
Expenses
For the year ended December 31, 2007, total expenses
increased by approximately $1.1 million, or 23%, to
approximately $6.0 million from $4.9 million for the
year ended December 31, 2006. The increase in total
expenses was primarily attributable to a $0.5 million
increase in interest expense as a result of the additional
$9.9 million of SBIC Debentures borrowed by the Fund during
the year ended December 31, 2007 and $0.7 million of
professional costs related to the IPO. The professional costs
related to the IPO principally consisted of audit and review
costs as well as other offering-related professional fees. In
addition, general and administrative expenses increased
$0.3 million primarily attributable to an increase in
administration costs associated with being a public company. The
increase in total expenses was partially offset by a decrease of
$0.4 million in management fees paid due to Main
Streets internally managed operating structure subsequent
to the IPO.
39
Net
Investment Income
As a result of the $2.7 million increase in total
investment income as compared to the $1.1 million increase
in total expenses, net investment income for the year ended
December 31, 2007, was $6.5 million, or a 33%
increase, compared to net investment income of $4.9 million
during the year ended December 31, 2006. Professional fees
related to the IPO represented $0.7 million of the
$1.1 million increase in total expenses, or 11.7% of total
expenses for the year ended December 31, 2007.
Net
Realized Income
For the year ended December 31, 2007, net realized gains
from investments were $4.7 million, representing a
$2.3 million increase over net realized gains during the
year ended December 31, 2006. The higher level of net
realized gains during the year ended December 31, 2007
principally related to the realized gains recognized on equity
investments in four portfolio companies compared to lower net
realized gains recognized on equity investments in five
portfolio companies during the year ended December 31, 2006.
The higher net realized gains in the year ended
December 31, 2007 combined with the higher net investment
income during 2007 resulted in a $3.9 million, or 53%,
increase, in the net realized income for the year ended
December 31, 2007 compared with 2006.
Net
Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Operations
During the year ended December 31, 2007, we recorded a net
change in unrealized depreciation in the amount of
$5.4 million, or a $13.9 million decrease over the
$8.5 million in net change in unrealized appreciation for
the year ended December 31, 2006. The net change in
unrealized depreciation for the year ended December 31,
2007 included unrealized appreciation on 13 equity investments
in portfolio companies, partially offset by unrealized
depreciation on 6 equity investments, the reclassification of
$3.8 million of previously recognized unrealized gains into
realized gains on 5 exited investments and $0.4 million in
unrealized depreciation attributable to Main Streets
investment in the affiliated Investment Manager.
Subsequent to the Formation Transactions and the IPO, we
recognized a cumulative income tax expense of $3.3 million
primarily consisting of non-cash deferred taxes related to net
unrealized gains from certain portfolio equity investments
transferred into MSEI, our wholly-owned taxable subsidiary.
These equity investments had historically been made in portfolio
companies which were pass through entities for tax
purposes. The transfer of the equity investments into MSEI was
required in order to comply with the RIC source
income requirements. We do not anticipate incurring this
level of deferred tax expense in future periods, given the
amount recognized in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007
represents the cumulative impact of deferred taxes related to
net unrealized gains on the equity investments transferred.
As a result of these events, our net increase in net assets
resulting from operations during the year ended
December 31, 2007, was $2.5 million, or an 84%
decrease compared to a net increase in net assets resulting from
operations of $15.8 million during the year ended
December 31, 2006.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Cash
Flows
For the year ended December 31, 2008, we experienced a net
decrease in cash and cash equivalents of $6.5 million.
During that period, we generated $10.9 million of cash from
our operating activities, primarily from net investment income
partially offset by the semi-annual interest payments on our
SBIC debentures, through the Fund. We used $3.5 million in
net cash for investing activities, principally due to the
funding of new investments and several smaller follow-on
investments for a total of $47.7 million. We also made a
$4.2 million investment in idle funds investments,
and
received proceeds from the maturity of a $24.1
million
investment in idle funds investments. We received
$16.3 million in cash proceeds from repayment of debt
investments and $8.0 million of cash proceeds from the
redemption and sale of equity investments. For the year ended
December 31, 2008, we used $13.9 million in cash
for
financing activities, which principally
40
consisted of $13.2 million in cash dividends to
stockholders, $0.4 million in deferred loan origination
costs and $0.3 million used in the purchase of
treasury
stock pursuant to our open market share repurchase program.
For the year ended December 31, 2007, we experienced a net
increase in cash and equivalents in the amount of
$28.1 million. During 2007, we generated $5.4 million
of cash from our operating activities, primarily from net
investment income. We used $38.0 million in net cash for
investing activities, principally due to the funding of new
investments and several smaller follow-on investments for a
total of $29.5 million of invested capital and the purchase
of $24.1 million of investments in idle funds investments,
partially offset by $9.6 million in cash proceeds from
repayment of debt investments and $5.9 million of cash
proceeds from the redemption or sale of several equity
investments. We generated $60.7 million in cash from
financing activities, which principally consisted of the net
proceeds of $60.2 million from the IPO and
$9.9 million in additional SBIC debenture borrowings,
through the Fund, partially offset by $7.5 million of cash
distributions to partners and stockholders and $1.6 million
of payments related to IPO costs.
For the year ended December 31, 2006, we experienced a net
decrease in cash and cash equivalents in the amount of
$12.5 million. During 2006, we generated $4.2 million
of cash from our operating activities, primarily from net
investment income. During 2006, we used $10.9 million in
cash for investing activities. The 2006 net cash used for
investing activities included the funding of new or follow on
investments for a total of $28.1 million of invested
capital, partially offset by $12.2 million in cash proceeds
from repayments of debt investments and $5.0 million of
cash proceeds from the redemption or sale of several equity
investments. During 2006, we used $5.9 million in cash for
financing activities, which principally consisted of
$6.2 million of cash distributions to partners (including a
$0.5 million return of capital distribution), partially
offset by additional partner contributions.
Capital
Resources
As of December 31, 2008, we had $39.8 million in cash
and cash equivalents plus idle funds investments, and our net
assets totaled $112.4 million. On October 24, 2008,
Main Street entered into a $30 million, three-year
investment credit facility (the Investment Facility)
with Branch Banking and Trust Company
(BB&T) and Compass Bank, as lenders, and
BB&T, as administrative agent for the lenders. The purpose
of the Investment Facility is to provide additional liquidity in
support of future investment and operational activities. The
Investment Facility allows for an increase in the total size of
the facility up to $75 million, subject to certain
conditions, and has a maturity date of October 24, 2011.
Borrowings under the Investment Facility bear interest, subject
to Main Streets election, on a per annum basis equal to
(i) the applicable LIBOR rate plus 2.75% or (ii) the
applicable base rate plus 0.75%. Main Street will pay unused
commitment fees of 0.375% per annum on the average unused lender
commitments under the Investment Facility. The Investment
Facility is secured by certain assets of MSCC, MSEI and the
Investment Manager. The Investment Facility contains certain
affirmative and negative covenants, including but not limited
to: (i) maintaining a minimum liquidity of not less than
10% of the aggregate principal amount outstanding,
(ii) maintaining an interest coverage ratio of at least
2.00 to 1.00, and (iii) maintaining a minimum tangible net
worth. At December 31, 2008, Main Street had no borrowings
outstanding under the Investment Facility, and Main Street was
in compliance with all covenants of the Investment Facility.
Due to our existing cash and cash equivalents plus idle funds
investments and the additional borrowing capacity under the
Investment Facility, we project that we will have sufficient
liquidity to fund our investment and operational activities
throughout all of calendar year 2009 and well into 2010.
However, this projection will be impacted by, among other
things, the pace of new and follow on investments,
investment
redemptions, the level of cash flow from operations
and cash
flow from realized gains, and the
level of dividends paid in
cash.
We anticipate that we will continue to fund our investment
activities through existing cash and cash equivalents plus idle
funds investments and a combination of future debt and
additional equity capital. Due to the Funds status as a
licensed SBIC, we have the ability to issue, through the Fund,
debentures guaranteed by the Small Business Administration (the
SBA) at favorable interest rates. Under the
regulations applicable to
41
SBICs, an SBIC can have outstanding debentures guaranteed by the
SBA generally in an amount up to twice its regulatory capital,
which generally equates to the amount of its equity capital.
The 2009 Stimulus Bill contains several provisions applicable to
SBIC funds, including the Fund. One of the key
SBIC-related
provisions included in the 2009 Stimulus Bill increases the
maximum amount of combined SBIC leverage (or SBIC leverage cap)
to $225 million for affiliated SBIC funds. The prior
maximum amount of SBIC leverage available to affiliated SBIC
funds was approximately $137 million, as adjusted annually
based upon changes in the Consumer Price Index. Due to the
increase in the maximum amount of SBIC leverage available, we
will now have access to incremental SBIC leverage to support our
future investment activities. Since the increase in the SBIC
leverage cap applies to affiliated SBIC funds, we will allocate
such increased borrowing capacity between the Fund, our wholly
owned SBIC subsidiary, and MSC II, an independently owned SBIC
that is managed by Main Street and therefore deemed to
be
affiliated with the Fund for SBIC regulatory purposes. It is
currently estimated that at least $55 million to
$60 million of additional SBIC leverage is now accessible
by Main Street for future investment activities, subject to the
required capitalization of the Fund.
Debentures guaranteed by the SBA have fixed interest rates that
approximate prevailing
10-year
Treasury Note rates plus a spread and have a maturity of ten
years with interest payable semi-annually. The principal amount
of the debentures is not required to be paid before maturity but
may be pre-paid at any time. Debentures issued prior to
September 2006 were subject to pre-payment penalties during
their first five years. Those pre-payment penalties no longer
apply to debentures issued after September 1, 2006. On
December 31, 2008, we, through the Fund, had
$55 million of outstanding indebtedness guaranteed by the
SBA, which carried an average fixed interest rate of
approximately 5.8%. The first maturity related to the
Funds SBIC debentures does not occur until 2013.
On December 31, 2007, we entered into a Treasury Secured
Revolving Credit Agreement (the Treasury Facility)
among us, Wachovia Bank, National Association, and Branch
Banking and Trust Company (BB&T), as
administrative agent for the lenders. Under the Treasury
Facility, the lenders agreed to extend revolving loans to us in
an amount not to exceed $100 million; however, due to the
maturation of our investment portfolio and the additional
flexibility provided by the Investment Facility, we unilaterally
reduced the Treasury Facility from $100 million to
$50 million during October 2008. The reduction in the size
of the Treasury Facility resulted in a 50% reduction in the
amount of unused commitment fees paid by us. The purpose of the
Treasury Facility is to provide us flexibility in the sizing of
portfolio investments and to facilitate the growth of our
investment portfolio. The Treasury Facility has a two-year term
and bears interest, at our option, either (i) at the LIBOR
rate or (ii) at a published prime rate of interest, plus
0.25% in either case. The applicable interest rates under the
Treasury Facility would be increased by 0.15% if usage under the
Treasury Facility is in excess of 50% of the days within a given
calendar quarter. The Treasury Facility also requires payment of
0.15% per annum in unused commitment fees based on the average
daily unused balances under the facility. The Treasury Facility
is secured by certain securities accounts maintained by
BB&T and is also guaranteed by the Investment Manager. The
Treasury Facility contains certain affirmative and negative
covenants, including but not limited to: (i) maintaining a
cash collateral coverage ratio of at least 1.01 to 1.0,
(ii) maintaining an interest coverage ratio of at least 2.0
to 1.0, and (iii) maintaining a minimum tangible net worth.
At December 31, 2008, we had no borrowings
outstanding
under the Treasury Facility, and Main Street was in compliance
with all covenants of the Treasury Facility.
We intend to generate additional cash from future offerings of
securities, future borrowings, repayments or sales of
investments, and cash flow from operations, including income
earned from investments in our portfolio companies and, to a
lesser extent, from the temporary investments of cash in
U.S. government securities and other idle funds investments
that mature in one year or less with the exception of
diversified bond funds. Our primary uses of funds will be
investments in portfolio companies, operating expenses and cash
distributions to holders of our common stock.
If our common stock trades below our net asset value per share,
we will generally not be able to issue additional common stock
at the market price unless our stockholders approve such a sale
and our Board of Directors makes certain determinations. See
Risk Factors Risks Relating to Our Business
and Structure
42
Stockholders may incur dilution if we sell shares of our common
stock in one or more offerings at prices below the then current
net asset value per share of our common stock or issue
securities to subscribe to, convert to or purchase shares of our
common stock for a discussion of the proposal approved by
our stockholders at our 2008 annual meeting of stockholders that
authorizes us to sell shares of our common stock below the then
current net asset value per share of our common stock in one or
more offerings for a period of one year ending on the earlier of
June 16, 2009 or the date of our 2009 annual meeting of
stockholders. We will need approval of similar proposals by our
stockholders to issue shares below the then current net asset
value per share after the earlier of June 16, 2009 and the
date of our 2009 annual meeting of stockholders.
In order to satisfy the Code requirements applicable to a RIC,
we intend to distribute to our stockholders substantially all of
our taxable income, but we may also elect to periodically
spillover certain excess undistributed taxable income from one
tax year into the next tax year. In addition, as a BDC, we
generally are required to meet a coverage ratio of total assets
to total senior securities, which include all of our borrowings
and any preferred stock we may issue in the future, of at least
200%. This requirement limits the amount that we may borrow. In
January 2008, we received exemptive relief from the SEC that
permits us to exclude SBA-guaranteed debt issued by the Fund
from our asset coverage ratio, which, in turn, enables us to
fund more investments with debt capital.
Current
Market Conditions
Beginning in late 2007, the United States entered a recession.
Throughout 2008, the economy continued to deteriorate and many
believe that the current recession could continue for an
extended period. During 2008, banks and others in the financial
services industry reported significant write-downs in the fair
value of their assets, which has led to the failure of a number
of banks and investment companies, a number of distressed
mergers and acquisitions, the government take-over of the
nations two largest government-sponsored mortgage
companies, and the passage of the $700 billion Emergency
Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 in October 2008 and the
$787 billion 2009 Stimulus Bill. In addition, the stock
market has declined significantly, with both the S&P 500
and the NASDAQ Global Select Market (on which our stock trades),
declining by nearly 40% between December 31, 2007 and
December 31, 2008. As the recession deepened during 2008,
unemployment rose and consumer confidence declined, which led
to
significant reductions in spending by both consumers and
businesses.
Although we have been able to secure access to additional
liquidity, including the recently obtained $30 million
investment credit facility and the increase in available
leverage through the SBIC program as part of the 2009 Stimulus
Bill, the current turmoil in the debt markets and uncertainty in
the equity capital markets provides no assurance that debt or
equity capital will be available to us in the future on
favorable terms, or at all.
The deterioration in consumer confidence and a general reduction
in spending by both consumers and businesses has had an adverse
effect on a number of the industries in which some of our
portfolio companies operate. In the event that the United States
economy remains in a protracted period of weakness, the results
of some of the lower middle-market companies like those in which
we invest, will continue to experience deterioration, which
could ultimately lead to difficulty in meeting their debt
service requirements and an increase in their defaults. In
addition, the end markets for certain of our portfolio
companies products and services have experienced, and
continue to experience, negative economic trends. We can provide
no assurance that the performance of certain of our portfolio
companies will not be negatively impacted by economic or other
conditions which could have a negative impact on our future
results.
Recently
Issued Accounting Standards
In June 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued
EITF 03-6-1,
Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based
Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities. This FASB
Staff Position (FSP) addresses whether instruments
granted in share-based payment transactions are participating
securities prior to vesting and, therefore, need to be included
in the earnings allocation in computing earnings per share
(EPS). This FSP will be effective for financial
statements issued for fiscal
43
years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim
periods within those years. All prior-period EPS data presented
will be adjusted retrospectively (including interim financial
statements, summaries of earnings, and selected financial data)
to conform to the provisions of this FSP. Early application is
not permitted. We are currently analyzing the effect, if any,
this statement may have on our consolidated results of
operations.
In October 2008, the FASB issued Staff Position
No. 157-3,
Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset When the
Market for That Asset is Not Active
(FSP 157-3).
FSP 157-3
provides an illustrative example of how to determine the fair
value of a financial asset in an inactive market. The FSP does
not change the fair value measurement principles set forth in
SFAS 157. Since adopting SFAS 157 in January 2008, our
practices for determining the fair value of our investment
portfolio have been, and continue to be, consistent with the
guidance provided in the example in
FSP 157-3.
Therefore, our adoption of
FSP 157-3
did not affect our practices for determining the fair value of
our investment portfolio and does not have a material effect on
our financial position or results of operations.
Inflation
Inflation has not had a significant effect on our results of
operations in any of the reporting periods presented in this
report. However, our portfolio companies have and may continue
to experience the impacts of inflation on their operating
results, including periodic escalations in their costs for raw
materials and required energy consumption.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
We may be a party to financial instruments with off-balance
sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the
financial needs of our portfolio companies. These instruments
include commitments to extend credit and involve, to varying
degrees, elements of liquidity and credit risk in excess of the
amount recognized in the balance sheet. At December 31,
2008, we had two outstanding commitments to fund unused
revolving loans for up to $900,000.
Contractual
Obligations
As of December 31, 2008, our future fixed commitments for
cash payments on contractual obligations for each of the next
five years and thereafter are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014 and
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
thereafter
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
SBIC debentures payable
|
|
$
|
55,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,000
|
|
|
$
|
51,000
|
|
Interest due on SBIC debentures
|
|
|
21,495
|
|
|
|
3,179
|
|
|
|
3,179
|
|
|
|
3,179
|
|
|
|
3,188
|
|
|
|
3,179
|
|
|
|
5,591
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
76,495
|
|
|
$
|
3,179
|
|
|
$
|
3,179
|
|
|
$
|
3,179
|
|
|
$
|
3,188
|
|
|
$
|
7,179
|
|
|
$
|
56,591
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MSCC is obligated to make payments under a support services
agreement with the Investment Manager. Subsequent to the
completion of the Formation Transactions and the IPO, the
Investment Manager is reimbursed for its excess expenses
associated with providing investment management and other
services to MSCC and its subsidiaries, as well as MSC II. Each
quarter, as part of the support services agreement, MSCC makes
payments to cover all expenses incurred by the Investment
Manager, less the recurring management fees that the Investment
Manager receives from MSC II pursuant to a long-term investment
advisory services agreement and any other fees received for
providing external services.
Related
Party Transactions
We co-invested with MSC II in several existing portfolio
investments prior to the IPO, but did not
co-invest
with MSC II subsequent to the IPO and prior to June 2008. In
June 2008, we received exemptive relief from the SEC to allow us
to resume co-investing with MSC II in accordance with the terms
of such exemptive relief. MSC II is managed by the Investment
Manager, and the Investment Manager is wholly
44
owned by MSCC. MSC II is an SBIC fund with similar investment
objectives to Main Street and which began its investment
operations in January 2006. The co-investments among Main Street
and MSC II had all been made at the same time and on the same
terms and conditions. The co-investments were also made in
accordance with the Investment Managers conflicts policy
and in accordance with the applicable SBIC conflict of interest
regulations.
As discussed further in Note D to the accompanying
consolidated financials statements, Main Street paid certain
management fees to the Investment Manager during the year ended
December 31, 2007. Subsequent to the completion of the
Formation Transactions, the Investment Manager is a wholly owned
portfolio company of Main Street. At December 31, 2008 and
2007, the Investment Manager had a receivable of $302,633 and a
payable of $207,783, respectively, with MSCC related to
recurring expenses required to support MSCCs business.
RECENT
DEVELOPMENTS
The recently enacted 2009 Stimulus Bill contains several
provisions applicable to SBIC funds, including the Fund,
our
wholly owned subsidiary. One of the key SBIC-
related provisions
included in the 2009 Stimulus Bill increases the maximum
amount
of combined SBIC leverage (or SBIC leverage cap) to
$225 million for affiliated SBIC funds. The prior
maximum
amount of SBIC leverage available to affiliated SBIC funds was
approximately $137 million, as adjusted annually based upon
changes in the Consumer Price Index. Due to the
increase in the
maximum amount of SBIC leverage available, we will
now have
access to incremental SBIC leverage to support our future
investment activities. Since the increase in the SBIC leverage
cap applies to affiliated SBIC funds, we will allocate such
increased borrowing capacity between our wholly owned SBIC
subsidiary and MSC II, an independently owned SBIC that is
managed by Main Street and therefore deemed to be affiliated
with the Fund for SBIC regulatory purposes. It is currently
estimated that at least $55 million to $60 million of
additional SBIC leverage is now accessible by Main Street for
future investment activities, subject to the required
capitalization of our wholly owned SBIC subsidiary.
45
SENIOR SECURITIES
Information about our senior securities is shown in the following table as of
December 31 for the years indicated in the table, unless otherwise noted. Grant Thornton
LLPs report on the senior securities table as of
December 31, 2008, is attached as an
exhibit to the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Amount |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
Asset |
|
Involuntary |
|
|
|
|
Exclusive of |
|
Coverage |
|
Liquidating |
|
Average |
|
|
Treasury |
|
per Unit |
|
Preference |
|
Market Value |
Class and Year |
|
Securities (1) |
|
(2) |
|
per Unit (3) |
|
per Unit (4) |
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SBIC debentures payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
$ |
22,000 |
|
|
|
1,784 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A |
|
2005 |
|
|
45,100 |
|
|
|
1,738 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A |
|
2006 |
|
|
45,100 |
|
|
|
1,959 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A |
|
2007 |
|
|
55,000 |
|
|
|
3,094 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A |
|
2008 |
|
|
55,000 |
|
|
|
3,043 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Total amount of each class of senior securities outstanding at the end of the period presented. |
|
(2) |
|
Asset coverage per unit is the ratio of the carrying value of our total consolidated assets,
less all liabilities and indebtedness not represented by senior securities, to the aggregate
amount of senior securities representing indebtedness. Asset coverage per unit is expressed in
terms of dollar amounts per $1,000 of indebtedness. |
|
(3) |
|
The amount to which such class of senior security would be entitled upon the involuntary
liquidation of the issuer in preference to any security junior to it. The indicates
information which the Securities and Exchange Commission expressly does not require to be
disclosed for certain types of senior securities. |
|
(4) |
|
Not applicable because senior securities are not registered for public trading. |
BUSINESS
We are a principal investment firm focused on providing
customized financing solutions to lower middle-market companies,
which we generally define as companies with annual revenues
between $10 million and $100 million. Our investment
objective is to maximize our portfolios total return by
generating current income from our debt investments and
realizing capital appreciation from our equity and
equity-related investments, including warrants, convertible
securities and other rights to acquire equity securities in a
portfolio company. Our investments generally range in size from
$2 million to $15 million. Our ability to invest
across a companys capital structure, from senior secured
loans to subordinated debt to equity securities, allows us to
offer portfolio companies a comprehensive suite of financing
solutions, or one-stop financing.
Our investments are made through both MSCC and the Fund. Since
the IPO, MSCC and the Fund have co-invested in substantially
every investment we have made. MSCC and the Fund share the same
investment strategies and criteria in the lower middle-market,
although they are subject to different regulatory regimes. See
Regulation. An investors return in
MSCC will depend, in part, on the Funds investment returns
as the Fund is a wholly owned subsidiary of MSCC.
We typically seek to work with entrepreneurs, business owners
and management teams to provide customized financing for
strategic acquisitions, business expansion and other growth
initiatives, ownership transitions and recapitalizations. In
structuring transactions, we seek to protect our rights, manage
our risk and create value by: (i) providing financing at
lower leverage ratios; (ii) generally taking first priority
liens on assets; and (iii) providing significant equity
incentives for management teams of our portfolio companies. We
seek to avoid competing with other capital providers for
transactions because we believe competitive transactions often
have execution risks and can result in potential conflicts among
creditors and lower returns due to more aggressive valuation
multiples and higher leverage ratios.
46
As of December 31, 2008, Main Street had debt and equity
investments in 31 portfolio companies. Approximately 84% of our
total portfolio investments at cost, excluding our 100% equity
interest in the Investment Manager, were in the form of debt
investments and 91% of such debt investments at cost were
secured by first priority liens on the assets of our portfolio
companies. As of December 31, 2008, Main Street had a
weighted average effective yield on its debt investments of 14%.
Weighted average yields are computed using the effective
interest rates for all debt investments at December 31,
2008, including amortization of deferred debt origination fees
and accretion of original issue discount. At December 31,
2008, we had equity ownership in approximately 94% of our
portfolio companies and the average fully diluted equity
ownership in those portfolio companies was approximately 25%.
Business Strategies
Our investment objective is to maximize our portfolios total return by generating
current income from our debt investments and realizing capital
appreciation from our equity and equity-related investments, including warrants, convertible securities and other rights to acquire equity securities in a portfolio company. We have adopted the following business strategies to achieve our
investment objective:
|
|
|
Delivering Customized Financing Solutions. We believe our ability to
provide a broad range of customized financing solutions to lower
middle-market companies sets us apart from other capital providers
that focus on providing a limited number of financing solutions. We
offer to our portfolio companies customized debt financing solutions
with equity components that are tailored to the facts and
circumstances of each situation. Our ability to invest across a
companys capital structure, from senior secured loans to subordinated
debt to equity securities, allows us to offer our portfolio companies
a comprehensive suite of financing solutions, or one-stop financing. |
|
|
|
|
Focusing on Established Companies in the Lower Middle-Market. We
generally invest in companies with established market positions,
experienced management teams and proven revenue streams. Those
companies generally possess better risk-adjusted return profiles than
newer companies that are building management or are in the early
stages of building a revenue base. In addition, established lower
middle-market companies generally provide opportunities for capital
appreciation. |
|
|
|
|
|
Leveraging the Skills and Experience of Our Investment Team. Our
investment team has significant experience in lending to and investing
in lower middle-market companies. The members of our investment team
have broad investment backgrounds, with prior experience at private
investment funds, investment banks and other financial services
companies, and currently include seven certified public accountants and
one chartered financial analyst. The expertise of our investment team
in analyzing, valuing, structuring, negotiating and closing
transactions should provide us with competitive advantages by allowing
us to consider customized financing solutions and non-traditional and
complex structures. |
|
|
|
|
|
Investing Across Multiple Industries. We seek to maintain a portfolio
of investments that is appropriately balanced among various companies,
industries, geographic regions and end markets. This portfolio balance
is intended to mitigate the potential effects of negative economic
events for particular companies, regions and industries. |
|
|
|
|
Capitalizing on Strong Transaction Sourcing Network. Our investment
team seeks to leverage its extensive network of referral sources for
investments in lower middle-market companies. We have developed a
reputation in our marketplace as a responsive, efficient and reliable
source of financing, which has created a growing stream of proprietary
deal flow for us. |
|
|
|
|
|
Benefiting from Lower Cost of Capital. The Funds SBIC license has
allowed it to issue SBA-guaranteed debentures. SBA-guaranteed
debentures carry long-term fixed rates that are generally lower than
rates on comparable bank and other debt. Because lower cost SBA
leverage is, and will continue to be, a significant part of our
capital base through the Fund, our relative cost of debt capital should be lower than
many of our competitors. In addition, the SBIC leverage that we
receive through the Fund represents a
stable, long-term component of our capital structure. |
|
Investment Criteria
Our investment team has identified the following investment criteria that it believes
are important in evaluating prospective portfolio companies. Our investment team uses these
criteria in evaluating investment opportunities. However, not all of these criteria have
been, or will be, met in connection with each of our investments.
47
|
|
|
Proven Management Team with Meaningful Financial Commitment. We look
for operationally-oriented management with direct industry experience
and a successful track record. In addition, we expect the management
team of each portfolio company to have meaningful equity ownership in
the portfolio company to better align our respective economic
interests. We believe management teams with these attributes are more
likely to manage the companies in a manner that protects our debt
investment and enhances the value of our equity investment. |
|
|
|
|
Established Companies with Positive Cash Flow. We seek to invest in
established companies in the lower middle-market with sound historical
financial performance. We typically focus on companies that have
historically generated EBITDA of $1.0 million to $10.0 million and
commensurate levels of free cash flow. We generally do not intend to
invest in start-up companies or companies with speculative business
plans. |
|
|
|
|
Defensible Competitive Advantages/Favorable Industry Position. We
primarily focus on companies having competitive advantages in their
respective markets and/or operating in industries with barriers to
entry, which may help to protect their market position and
profitability. |
|
|
|
|
Exit Alternatives. We expect that the primary means by which we exit
our debt investments will be through the repayment of our investment
from internally generated cash flow and/or refinancing. In addition,
we seek to invest in companies whose business models and expected
future cash flows may provide alternate methods of repaying our
investment, such as through a strategic acquisition by other industry
participants or a recapitalization. |
Portfolio Investments
Debt Investments
Historically,
we have made debt investments principally in the form of single
tranche debt. Single tranche debt financing involves issuing one debt security that blends
the risk and return profiles of both secured and subordinated debt. We believe that single
tranche debt is more appropriate for many lower middle-market companies given their size in
order to reduce structural complexity and potential conflicts among creditors.
Our debt investments generally have terms of three to seven years, with limited required
amortization prior to maturity, and provide for monthly or quarterly payment of interest at
fixed interest rates generally between 12% and 14% per annum, payable currently in cash. In
some
instances, we have provided floating interest rates for a portion of a single tranche debt
security. In addition, certain debt investments may have a form of interest that is not paid
currently but is accrued and added to the loan balance and paid at maturity. We refer to this
as payment-in-kind or PIK interest. We typically structure our debt investments with the
maximum seniority and collateral that we can reasonably obtain while seeking to achieve our
total return target. In most cases, our debt investment will be collateralized by a first
priority lien on substantially all the assets of the portfolio
company. As of December 31, 2008, 91% of our debt investments
at
cost were secured by first priority liens on the assets of
portfolio companies.
In addition to seeking a senior lien position in the capital structure of our portfolio
companies, we seek to limit the downside potential of our investments by negotiating
covenants that are designed to protect our investments while affording our portfolio
companies as much flexibility in managing their businesses as possible. Such restrictions may
include affirmative and negative covenants, default penalties, lien protection, change of
control or change of management provisions, key-man life insurance, guarantees, equity
pledges, personal guaranties, where appropriate, and put rights. In addition, we typically
seek board representation or observation rights in all of our portfolio companies.
While we will continue to focus on single tranche debt investments, we also anticipate
structuring some of our debt investments as mezzanine loans. We anticipate that these
mezzanine loans will be primarily junior secured or unsecured, subordinated loans that
provide for relatively high fixed interest rates that will provide us with significant
current interest income. These loans typically will have interest-only payments in the early
years, with amortization of principal deferred to the later years of the mezzanine loan term.
Also, in some cases, our mezzanine loans may be collateralized by a subordinated lien on some
or all of the assets of the borrower. Typically, our mezzanine loans will have maturities of
three to five years. We will generally target fixed interest rates of 12% to 14%, payable
currently in cash for our mezzanine loan investments with higher targeted total returns from
equity warrants, direct equity investments or PIK interest.
Warrants
In connection with our debt investments, we have historically received equity warrants
to establish or increase our equity interest in the portfolio company. Warrants we receive in
connection with a debt investment typically require only a nominal cost
48
to exercise, and
thus, as a portfolio company appreciates in value, we may achieve additional investment
return from this equity interest. We typically structure the warrants to provide provisions
protecting our rights as a minority-interest holder, as well as secured or unsecured put
rights, or rights to sell such securities back to the portfolio company, upon the occurrence
of specified events. In certain cases, we also may obtain registration rights in connection
with these equity interests, which may include demand and piggyback registration rights.
Direct Equity Investments
We also will seek to make direct equity investments in situations where
it is appropriate to
align our interests with key management and stockholders, and to allow for some participation
in the appreciation in enterprise values of our portfolio companies. We usually make our
direct equity investments in connection with debt investments. In addition, we may have both
equity warrants and direct equity positions in some of our portfolio companies. We seek
to maintain fully diluted equity positions in our portfolio companies of 5% to 50%, and
may have controlling interests in some instances. We have a value orientation toward our
direct equity investments and have traditionally been able to purchase our equity investments
at reasonable valuations.
Investment Process
Our
investment committee is responsible for all aspects of our
investment process. The current members of our investment
committee are Vincent D. Foster, our Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer, Todd A. Reppert, our President and Chief
Financial Officer, and Dwayne L. Hyzak, Senior Vice President.
Mr. Hyzak replaced David L. Magdol, Senior Vice President,
in this revolving seat on the investment committee effective
January 1, 2009 and will serve through 2009. Our investment
strategy involves a team approach, whereby potential
transactions are screened by members of our investment team
before being presented to the investment committee. Our
investment committee meets on an as needed basis depending on
transaction volume. Our investment committee generally
categorizes our investment process into seven distinct stages:
Deal Generation/Origination
Deal
generation and origination is maximized through long-standing and extensive
relationships with industry contacts, brokers, commercial and investment bankers,
entrepreneurs, services providers such as lawyers and accountants, as well as current and
former portfolio companies and investors. Our investment team has focused its deal generation
and origination efforts on lower middle-market companies. We have developed a reputation as a
knowledgeable, reliable and active source of capital and assistance in this market.
Screening
During the screening process, if a transaction initially meets our investment criteria,
we will perform preliminary due diligence, taking into consideration some or all of the
following information:
|
|
|
a comprehensive financial model based on quantitative analysis of historical financial
performance, projections and pro forma adjustments to determine the estimated internal
rate of return; |
|
|
|
|
a brief industry and market analysis; importing direct industry expertise from other
portfolio companies or investors; |
|
|
|
|
preliminary qualitative analysis of the management teams competencies and backgrounds; |
|
|
|
|
potential investment structures and pricing terms; and |
|
|
|
|
regulatory compliance. |
Upon successful screening of the proposed transaction, the investment team makes a
recommendation to our investment committee. If our investment committee concurs with moving
forward on the proposed transaction, we issue a non-binding term sheet to the company.
Term Sheet
The non-binding term sheet will include the key economic terms based upon our analysis
performed during the screening process as well as a proposed timeline and our qualitative
expectation for the transaction. While the term sheet is non-binding, it generally does
require an expense deposit to be paid in order to move the transaction to the due diligence
phase. Upon execution of a term sheet and payment of the expense deposit, we begin our formal
due diligence process.
49
Due Diligence
Due diligence on a proposed investment is performed by a minimum of two members of our
investment team, whom we refer to collectively as the deal team, and certain external
resources, who together conduct due diligence to understand the relationships among the
prospective portfolio companys business plan, operations and financial performance. Our due
diligence review includes some or all of the following:
|
|
|
initial or additional site visits with management and key personnel; |
|
|
|
|
detailed review of historical and projected financial statements; |
|
|
|
|
operational reviews and analysis; |
|
|
|
|
interviews with customers and suppliers; |
|
|
|
|
detailed evaluation of company management, including background checks; |
|
|
|
|
review of material contracts; |
|
|
|
|
in-depth industry, market, and strategy analysis; and |
|
|
|
|
review by legal, environmental or other consultants, if applicable. |
During the due diligence process, significant attention is given to sensitivity analyses
and how the company might be expected to perform given downside, base-case and upside
scenarios. In certain cases, we may decide not
to make an investment based on the results of the diligence process.
Document and Close
Upon completion of a satisfactory due diligence review, the deal team presents the
findings and a recommendation to our investment committee. The presentation contains
information including, but not limited to, the following:
|
|
|
company history and overview; |
|
|
|
|
transaction overview, history and rationale, including an analysis of transaction strengths and risks; |
|
|
|
|
analysis of key customers and suppliers and key contracts; |
|
|
|
|
a working capital analysis; |
|
|
|
|
an analysis of the companys business strategy; |
|
|
|
|
a management background check and assessment; |
|
|
|
|
third-party accounting, legal, environmental or other due diligence findings; |
|
|
|
|
investment structure and expected returns; |
|
|
|
|
anticipated sources of repayment and potential exit strategies; |
|
|
|
|
pro forma capitalization and ownership; |
|
|
|
|
an analysis of historical financial results and key financial ratios; |
|
|
|
|
sensitivities to managements financial projections; and |
|
|
|
|
detailed reconciliations of historical to pro forma results. |
50
If any adjustments to the transaction terms or structures are proposed by the investment
committee, such changes are made and applicable analyses updated. Approval for the
transaction must be made by the affirmative vote from a majority of the members of the
investment committee. Upon receipt of transaction approval, we will re-confirm regulatory
company compliance, process and finalize all required legal documents, and fund the
investment.
Post-Investment
We continuously monitor the status and progress of the portfolio companies. We offer
managerial assistance to our portfolio companies, giving them access to our investment
experience, direct industry expertise and contacts. The same deal team that was involved in
the investment process will continue its involvement in the portfolio company
post-investment. This provides for continuity of knowledge and allows the deal team to
maintain a strong business relationship with key management of our portfolio companies for
post-investment assistance and monitoring purposes. As part of the monitoring process, the
deal team will analyze monthly/quarterly financial statements versus the previous periods and
year, review financial projections, meet with management, attend board meetings and review
all compliance certificates and covenants. While we maintain limited involvement in the
ordinary course operations of our portfolio companies, we maintain a higher level of
involvement in non-ordinary course financing or strategic activities and any non-performing
scenarios.
We also use an internally developed investment rating system to characterize and monitor
our expected level of returns on each of our investments.
|
|
|
Investment Rating 1 represents a portfolio company that is performing
in a manner which significantly exceeds our original expectations and
projections; |
|
|
|
|
Investment Rating 2 represents a portfolio company that, in general,
is performing above our original expectations; |
|
|
|
|
Investment Rating 3 represents a portfolio company that is generally
performing in accordance with our original expectations; |
|
|
|
|
Investment Rating 4 represents a portfolio company that is
underperforming our original expectations. Investments with such a
rating require increased Main Street monitoring and scrutiny; and |
|
|
|
|
Investment Rating 5 represents a portfolio company that is
significantly underperforming. Investments with such a rating require
heightened levels of Main Street monitoring and scrutiny and involve
the recognition of unrealized depreciation on such investment. |
The following table shows the distribution of our portfolio investments (excluding the
investment in our affiliated Investment Manager) on the 1 to 5 investment rating scale at
fair value as of December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
Investments at
|
|
|
Percentage of
|
|
|
Investments at
|
|
|
Percentage of
|
|
Investment Rating
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Total Portfolio
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Total Portfolio
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
$
|
27,523
|
|
|
|
24.9
|
%
|
|
$
|
24,619
|
|
|
|
28.0
|
%
|
2
|
|
|
23,150
|
|
|
|
21.0
|
%
|
|
|
35,068
|
|
|
|
39.8
|
%
|
3
|
|
|
53,123
|
|
|
|
48.1
|
%
|
|
|
24,034
|
|
|
|
27.3
|
%
|
4
|
|
|
6,035
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
5
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
|
4,304
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals
|
|
$
|
110,331
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
88,025
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Based
upon our investment rating system, the weighted average
rating of our portfolio as of December 31, 2008 and 2007
was approximately 2.4 and 2.2, respectively. As of
December 31, 2008 and 2007, we had one debt investment in
each period representing 0.5% and 3.1%, respectively, of total
portfolio fair value (excluding Main Streets investment in
the Investment Manager) which was on non-accrual status.
51
Exit Strategies/Refinancing
While
we generally exit most investments through the refinancing or repayment of
our debt and redemption of our equity positions, we typically assist our portfolio companies
in developing and planning exit opportunities, including any sale or merger of our portfolio
companies. We may also assist in the structure, timing, execution and transition of the exit
strategy.
Determination of Net Asset Value and Valuation Process
We
determine the net asset value per share of our common stock on a quarterly
basis. The net asset value per share is equal to our total assets minus liabilities and any
preferred stock outstanding divided by the total number of shares of common stock
outstanding.
Our business plan calls for us to invest primarily in illiquid securities issued by
private companies and/or thinly traded public companies. These investments may be subject to
restrictions on resale and will generally have no established trading market. As a result, we
determine in good faith the fair value of our portfolio investments pursuant to a valuation
policy in accordance with
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No.
157, Fair Value
Measurements (SFAS 157)
and a valuation process approved by our Board of Directors
and in accordance with the 1940 Act. We review external events, including private mergers,
sales and acquisitions involving comparable companies, and include these events in the
valuation process. Our valuation policy is intended to provide a consistent basis for
determining the fair value of the portfolio.
For valuation purposes, control investments are composed of equity and debt securities
for which we have a controlling interest in the portfolio company or have the ability to nominate a majority of the
portfolio companys board of directors. Market quotations are generally not readily available
for our control investments. As a result, we determine the fair value of these investments
using a combination of market and income approaches. Under the market approach, we will
typically use the enterprise value methodology to determine the fair value of these
investments. The enterprise value is the fair value at which an enterprise could be sold in a
transaction between two willing parties, other than through a forced or liquidation sale.
Typically, private companies are bought and sold based on multiples of earnings before
interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, or EBITDA, cash flows, net income, revenues,
or in limited cases, book value. There is no single methodology for estimating enterprise
value. For any one portfolio company, enterprise value is generally described as a range of
values from which a single estimate of enterprise value is derived. In estimating the
enterprise value of a portfolio company, we analyze various factors, including the portfolio
companys historical and projected financial results. We allocate the enterprise value to
investments in order of the legal priority of the investments. We will also use the
income approach to determine the fair value of these securities, based on projections of the
discounted future free cash flows that the portfolio company or the debt security will likely
generate. The valuation approaches for our control investments estimate the value of the
investment if we were to sell, or exit, the investment, assuming the highest and best use of
the investment by market participants. In addition, these valuation approaches consider the
value associated with our ability to control the capital structure of the portfolio company,
as well as the timing of a potential exit.
For valuation purposes,
non-control investments are composed of debt and equity
securities for which we do not have a controlling interest in the portfolio company, or the ability to nominate a
majority of the portfolio companys board of directors. Market quotations for our non-control investments are not
readily available. For our non-control investments, we use the market approach to value our
equity investments and the income approach to value our debt instruments. For non-control
debt investments, we determine the fair value primarily using a yield approach that analyzes
the discounted cash flows of interest and principal for the debt security, as set forth in
the associated loan agreements, as well as the financial position and credit risk of each of
these portfolio investments. Our estimate of the expected repayment date of a debt security
is generally the legal maturity date of the instrument, as we generally intend to hold our
loans to maturity. The yield analysis considers changes in leverage levels, credit quality,
portfolio company performance and other factors. We will use the value determined by the
yield analysis as the fair value for that security; however, because of our general intent to
hold our loans to maturity, the fair value will not exceed the face
amount of the debt security. A
change in the assumptions that we use to estimate the fair value of our debt securities using
the yield analysis could have a material impact on the determination of fair value. If there
is deterioration in credit quality or a debt security is in workout status, we may consider
other factors in determining the fair value of a debt security, including the value
attributable to the debt security from the enterprise value of the portfolio company or the
proceeds that would be received in a liquidation analysis.
Due to the inherent uncertainty in the valuation process, our estimate of fair value may
differ materially from the values that would have been used had a ready market for the
securities existed. In addition, changes in the market environment, portfolio company
performance and other events that may occur over the lives of the
investments could cause the
gains or losses ultimately realized on these investments to be different than the valuations
currently assigned. We determine the fair value of each individual investment and record
changes in fair value as unrealized appreciation or depreciation.
52
As described below, we undertake a multi-step valuation
process
each quarter in connection with determining the fair value of
our investments, with our Board of Directors ultimately and
solely responsible for overseeing, reviewing and approving, in
good faith, our estimate of the fair value of each individual
investment.
|
|
|
Our quarterly valuation process will begin with each portfolio
company or investment being initially valued by the deal team
responsible for the portfolio investment; |
|
|
|
|
Preliminary valuation conclusions will then be reviewed and
discussed with senior management;
|
|
|
|
|
The Audit Committee of our Board of Directors will review the
preliminary valuations, and the deal team will consider and
assess, as appropriate, any changes that may be required to the
preliminary valuation to address any comments provided by the
Audit Committee; |
|
|
|
|
The Board of Directors will assess the valuations and will
ultimately approve the fair value of each investment in our
portfolio in good faith; and
|
|
|
|
|
An independent valuation firm engaged by the Board of Directors
will perform certain mutually agreed limited procedures that we
have identified and asked them to perform on a selection of our
final portfolio company valuation conclusions. |
Prior to the IPO, the valuations of the Funds investments
were determined by the General Partner through a multi-step
process consistent with the process discussed above except that
the review and determination of fair value was made by the
General Partner and not by the Audit Committee or the Board of
Directors.
Duff & Phelps, LLC, an independent valuation firm
(Duff & Phelps), has provided third-party
valuation consulting services to Main Street, which consisted of
certain mutually agreed limited procedures that Main Street
identified and requested Duff & Phelps to perform
(hereinafter referred to as the Procedures). During
2008, the Procedures were performed on investments in 24
portfolio companies and on the investment in the Investment
Manager comprising approximately 84% of the total portfolio
investments at fair value as of December 31, 2008, with the
Procedures performed on investments in 5 portfolio companies for
the quarter ended March 31, 2008, investments in 8
portfolio companies for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, 5
portfolio companies for the quarter ended September 30,
2008 and 6 portfolio companies and the Investment Manager for
the quarter ended December 31, 2008. Duff &
Phelps had also reviewed a total of 24 portfolio companies
comprising approximately 77% of the total portfolio investments
at fair value as of December 31, 2007. Upon completion of
the Procedures in each case, Duff & Phelps concluded
that the fair value, as determined by Main Street, of those
investments subjected to the Procedures did not appear to be
unreasonable.
Determination of fair value involves subjective judgments and
estimates. The notes to our financial statements will refer to
the uncertainty with respect to the possible effect of such
valuations, and any change in such valuations, on our financial
statements.
Competition
We compete for investments with a number of BDCs and investment funds (including private
equity funds, mezzanine funds and other SBICs), as well as traditional financial services
companies such as commercial banks and other sources of financing. Many of the entities that
compete with us have greater financial and managerial resources. We believe we are able to be
competitive with these entities primarily on the basis of our focus on the underserved lower middle-market the experience and contacts of our management team, our responsive and efficient
investment analysis and decision-making processes, our comprehensive suite of customized
financing solutions and the investment terms we offer.
53
We believe that some of our competitors make senior secured loans, junior secured loans
and subordinated debt investments with interest rates and returns that are comparable to or
lower than the rates and returns that we target. Therefore, we do not seek to compete
primarily on the interest rates and returns that we offer to potential portfolio companies.
For additional information concerning the competitive risks we face, see Risk Factors
Risks Relating to Our Business and Structure We
may face increasing competition for investment opportunities.
Employees
As
of December 31, 2008, we had 17 employees, each of whom was employed by the
Investment Manager. These employees include investment and portfolio management
professionals, operations professionals and administrative staff. In 2008, we hired several
investment professionals, as well as our Chief Accounting Officer and General Counsel. We
will hire additional investment professionals and additional administrative personnel,
as necessary. All of our employees are located in our Houston office.
Properties
We do not own any real estate or other physical properties materially important to our
operations. Currently, we lease office space in Houston, Texas for our corporate
headquarters.
Legal Proceedings
Although we may, from time to time, be involved in litigation arising out of our
operations in the normal course of business or otherwise, we are currently not a party to any
pending material legal proceedings.
PORTFOLIO COMPANIES
The following table sets forth certain unaudited information as of December 31, 2008,
for each portfolio company in which we had a debt or equity investment. Other than these
investments, our only formal relationships with our portfolio companies are the managerial
assistance ancillary to our investments and the board observer or participation rights we may
receive.
54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name and Address |
|
Nature of |
|
Title of Securities |
|
Percentage of
Fully Diluted |
|
Cost of |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
of Portfolio Company |
|
Principal Business |
|
Held by Us |
|
Equity Held |
|
Investment |
|
|
of Investment |
|
Advantage Millwork Company, Inc. |
|
Manufacturer/Distributor |
|
12% Secured Debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,955,442 |
|
|
|
2,955,442 |
|
10510 Okanella Street, Suite 200 |
|
of Wood Doors |
|
Warrants |
|
|
12.2 |
% |
|
|
97,808 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Houston, TX 77041 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,053,250 |
|
|
|
2,955,442 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
American Sensor Technologies, Inc. |
|
Manufacturer of Commercial/ |
|
Prime plus 0.5% Secured Debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,800,000 |
|
|
|
3,800,000 |
|
450 Clark Drive |
|
Industrial Sensors |
|
Warrants |
|
|
20.0 |
% |
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mt. Olive, NJ 07828 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,850,000 |
|
|
|
4,050,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Café Brazil, LLC |
|
Casual Restaurant |
|
12% Secured Debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,728,113 |
|
|
|
2,750,000 |
|
202 West Main Street Suite 100 |
|
Group |
|
LLC Interests |
|
|
42.3 |
% |
|
|
41,837 |
|
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allen, TX 75002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,769,950 |
|
|
|
3,750,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carlton Global Resources, LLC |
|
Processor of |
|
13% PIK Secured Debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,655,836 |
|
|
|
|
|
20021 Valley Blvd, Suite B |
|
Industrial Minerals |
|
LLC Interests |
|
|
8.5 |
% |
|
|
400,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tehachapi, CA 93561 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,055,836 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CBT Nuggets, LLC |
|
Produces and Sells |
|
14% Secured Debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,642,518 |
|
|
|
1,680,000 |
|
44 Club Road Suite 150 |
|
IT Certification |
|
10% Secured Debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
|
150,000 |
|
Eugene, OR 97401 |
|
Training Videos |
|
LLC Interests |
|
|
29.1 |
% |
|
|
432,000 |
|
|
|
1,625,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants |
|
|
10.5 |
% |
|
|
72,000 |
|
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,296,518 |
|
|
|
3,955,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ceres Management, LLC (Lambs) |
|
Aftermarket Automotive |
|
14% Secured Debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,372,601 |
|
|
|
2,372,601 |
|
11675 Jollyville Road, Suite 300 |
|
Services Chain |
|
LLC Interests |
|
|
42.0 |
% |
|
|
1,200,000 |
|
|
|
1,300,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Austin, TX 78759 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,572,601 |
|
|
|
3,672,601 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
California Healthcare Medical Billing, Inc. |
|
Healthcare Services |
|
12% Secured Debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,141,706 |
|
|
|
1,141,706 |
|
1121 E. Washington Ave. |
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
6.0 |
% |
|
|
390,000 |
|
|
|
390,000 |
|
Escondido, CA 92025 |
|
|
|
Warrants |
|
|
12.0 |
% |
|
|
240,000 |
|
|
|
240,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,771,706 |
|
|
|
1,771,706 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condit Exhibits, LLC |
|
Tradeshow Exhibits/ |
|
13% current / 5% PIK Secured Debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,273,194 |
|
|
|
2,273,194 |
|
500 West Tennessee |
|
Custom Displays |
|
LLC Interests |
|
|
28.1 |
% |
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denver, CO 80223 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,573,194 |
|
|
|
2,573,194 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
East Teak Fine Hardwoods, Inc. |
|
Hardwood Products |
|
Common Stock |
|
|
3.3 |
% |
|
|
130,000 |
|
|
|
490,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1106 Drake Road
Donalds, SC 29638 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gulf Manufacturing, LLC |
|
Industrial Metal |
|
Prime plus 1% Secured Debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,190,764 |
|
|
|
1,200,000 |
|
1221 Indiana St. |
|
Fabrication |
|
13% Secured Debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,747,777 |
|
|
|
1,880,000 |
|
Humble, TX 77396 |
|
|
|
LLC Interests |
|
|
18.6 |
% |
|
|
472,000 |
|
|
|
1,100,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants |
|
|
8.4 |
% |
|
|
160,000 |
|
|
|
550,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,570,541 |
|
|
|
4,730,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hawthorne Customs & Dispatch Services, LLC |
|
Transportation/ |
|
13% Secured Debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,171,988 |
|
|
|
1,171,988 |
|
9370 Wallisville Road |
|
Logistics |
|
LLC Interests |
|
|
27.8 |
% |
|
|
375,000 |
|
|
|
435,000 |
|
Houston, TX 77013 |
|
|
|
Warrants |
|
|
16.5 |
% |
|
|
37,500 |
|
|
|
230,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,584,488 |
|
|
|
1,836,988 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hayden Acquisition, LLC |
|
Manufacturer of |
|
8% Secured Debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,781,303 |
|
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7801 West Tangerine Rd. |
|
Utility Structures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rillito, AZ 85654 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Houston Plating & Coatings, LLC |
|
Plating & Industrial |
|
Prime plus 2% Secured Debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
|
300,000 |
|
1315 Georgia St. |
|
Coating Services |
|
LLC Interests |
|
|
11.1 |
% |
|
|
210,000 |
|
|
|
2,750,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South Houston, TX 77587 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
510,000 |
|
|
|
3,050,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hydratec Holdings, LLC |
|
Agricultural Services |
|
12.5% Secured Debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,311,329 |
|
|
|
5,311,329 |
|
325 Road 192 |
|
|
|
Prime plus 1% Secured Debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,579,911 |
|
|
|
1,579,911 |
|
Delano, CA 93215 |
|
|
|
LLC Interests |
|
|
60.0 |
% |
|
|
1,800,000 |
|
|
|
2,050,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,691,240 |
|
|
|
8,941,240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jensen Jewelers of Idaho, LLC |
|
Retail Jewelry |
|
Prime Plus 2% Secured Debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,030,957 |
|
|
|
1,044,000 |
|
130 2nd Avenue North |
|
|
|
13% current / 6% PIK Secured Debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
986,980 |
|
|
|
1,004,591 |
|
Twin Falls, ID 83301 |
|
|
|
LLC Interests |
|
|
24.3 |
% |
|
|
376,000 |
|
|
|
380,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,393,937 |
|
|
|
2,428,591 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
KBK Industries, LLC |
|
Specialty Manufacturer |
|
14% Secured Debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,787,758 |
|
|
|
3,937,500 |
|
East Highway 96 |
|
of Oilfield and |
|
8% Secured Debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
468,750 |
|
|
|
468,750 |
|
Rush Center, KS 67575 |
|
Industrial Products |
|
8% Secured Debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
450,000 |
|
|
|
450,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
LLC Interests |
|
|
14.5 |
% |
|
|
187,500 |
|
|
|
775,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,894,008 |
|
|
|
5,631,250 |
|
|
Laurus Healthcare, LP |
|
Healthcare Facilities |
|
13% Secured Debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,259,664 |
|
|
|
2,275,000 |
|
10000 Memorial Drive, Suite 540 |
|
|
|
Warrants |
|
|
17.5 |
% |
|
|
105,000 |
|
|
|
2,500,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Houston, TX 77056 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,364,664 |
|
|
|
4,775,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NAPCO Precast, LLC |
|
Precast Concrete |
|
18% Secured Debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,348,011 |
|
|
|
6,461,538 |
|
6949 Low Bid Lane |
|
Manufacturing |
|
Prime Plus 2% Secured Debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,660,945 |
|
|
|
3,692,308 |
|
San Antonio, TX 78250 |
|
|
|
LLC Interests |
|
|
36.1 |
% |
|
|
2,000,000 |
|
|
|
5,100,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,008,956 |
|
|
|
15,253,846 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Trench Safety, LLC |
|
Trench & Traffic |
|
10% PIK Debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
404,256 |
|
|
|
404,256 |
|
15955 West Hardy Road, Suite 100 |
|
Safety Equipment |
|
LLC Interests |
|
|
11.7 |
% |
|
|
1,792,308 |
|
|
|
1,792,308 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Houston, TX 77060 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,196,564 |
|
|
|
2,196,564 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OMi Holdings, Inc. |
|
Manufacturer of |
|
12% Secured Debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,603,400 |
|
|
|
6,603,400 |
|
1515 E. I-30 Service Road |
|
Overhead Cranes |
|
Common Stock |
|
|
28.8 |
% |
|
|
900,000 |
|
|
|
570,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Royse City, TX 75189 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,503,400 |
|
|
|
7,173,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pulse Systems, LLC |
|
Manufacturer of |
|
14% Secured Debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,819,464 |
|
|
|
1,831,274 |
|
4070 G Nelson Avenue |
|
Components for |
|
Warrants |
|
|
7.4 |
% |
|
|
132,856 |
|
|
|
450,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Concord, CA 94520 |
|
Medical Devices |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,952,320 |
|
|
|
2,281,274 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quest Design & Production, LLC |
|
Design and Fabrication |
|
10% Secured Debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
465,060 |
|
|
|
600,000 |
|
10323 Greenland Ct. |
|
of Custom Display |
|
0% Secured Debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000,000 |
|
|
|
1,400,000 |
|
Stafford, TX 77477 |
|
Systems |
|
Warrants |
|
|
40.0 |
% |
|
|
1,595,858 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants |
|
|
20.0 |
% |
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,100,918 |
|
|
|
2,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Schneider Sales Management, LLC |
|
Sales Consulting |
|
13% Secured Debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,909,972 |
|
|
|
1,909,972 |
|
1925 Winchester Blvd. #204 |
|
and Training |
|
Warrants |
|
|
12.0 |
% |
|
|
45,000 |
|
|
|
45,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greenwood Village, CO 80111 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,954,972 |
|
|
|
1,954,972 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Support Systems Homes, Inc. |
|
Manages Substance |
|
15% Secured Debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
226,589 |
|
|
|
226,589 |
|
1925 Winchester Blvd. #204 |
|
Abuse Treatment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Campbell, CA 95008 |
|
Centers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Technical Innovations, LLC |
|
Manufacturer of Specialty |
|
7% Secured Debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
409,297 |
|
|
|
409,297 |
|
20714 Highway 36 |
|
Cutting Tools and Punches |
|
13.5% Secured Debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,698,216 |
|
|
|
3,750,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brazoria, TX 77422 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,107,513 |
|
|
|
4,159,297 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Universal Scaffolding & Equipment, LLC |
|
Manufacturer of Scaffolding |
|
Prime plus 1% Secured Debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
875,072 |
|
|
|
875,072 |
|
973 S. Third St. |
|
and Shoring Equipment |
|
13% current / 5% PIK Secured Debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,311,508 |
|
|
|
3,160,000 |
|
Memphis, TN 38106 |
|
|
|
LLC Interests |
|
|
18.4 |
% |
|
|
992,063 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,178,643 |
|
|
|
4,035,072 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Uvalco Supply, LLC |
|
Farm and Ranch Supply |
|
LLC Interests |
|
|
39.6 |
% |
|
|
905,743 |
|
|
|
1,575,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2521 E Main St.
Uvalde, TX 78801 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vision Interests, Inc. |
|
Manufacturer/ |
|
13% Secured Debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,579,117 |
|
|
|
3,579,117 |
|
6630 Arroyo Springs St. Suite 600 |
|
Installer of Commercial |
|
Common Stock |
|
|
8.9 |
% |
|
|
372,000 |
|
|
|
420,000 |
|
Las Vegas, NV 89113 |
|
Signage |
|
Warrants |
|
|
11.2 |
% |
|
|
160,000 |
|
|
|
420,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,111,117 |
|
|
|
4,419,117 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Walden Smokey Point, Inc. |
|
Specialty Transportation/ |
|
14% current / 4% PIK Secured Debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,704,533 |
|
|
|
4,704,533 |
|
7615 Bryonwood Dr. |
|
Logistics |
|
Common Stock |
|
|
7.6 |
% |
|
|
600,000 |
|
|
|
600,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arlington, WA 98223 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,304,533 |
|
|
|
5,304,533 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WorldCall, Inc. |
|
Telecommunication/ |
|
13% Secured Debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1250 Capital of Texas Hwy., Bldg. 2, Suite 235 |
|
Information Services |
|
Common Stock |
|
|
9.9 |
% |
|
|
631,199 |
|
|
|
640,000 |
|
Austin, TX 78746 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
296,631 |
|
|
|
382,837 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
927,830 |
|
|
|
1,022,837 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Zieglers NYPD, LLC |
|
Restaurant |
|
Prime Plus 2% Secured Debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
594,239 |
|
|
|
594,239 |
|
13901 North 73rd St., #219 |
|
|
|
13% current / 5% PIK Secured Debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,663,437 |
|
|
|
2,663,437 |
|
Scottsdale, AZ 85260 |
|
|
|
Warrants |
|
|
28.6 |
% |
|
|
360,000 |
|
|
|
360,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,617,676 |
|
|
|
3,617,676 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
104,960,011 |
|
|
|
110,331,189 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55
Description of Portfolio Companies
Set forth below is a brief description of each of our current portfolio companies as of
December 31, 2008.
|
|
|
Advantage Millwork Company, Inc. is a premier designer and manufacturer of high quality wood, decorative
metal and wrought iron entry doors. |
|
|
|
|
American Sensor Technologies, Inc. designs, develops, manufactures and markets state-of-the-art, high
performance commercial and industrial sensors. |
|
|
|
|
Café Brazil, LLC owns and operates nine full service restaurant/coffee houses in the Dallas/Fort Worth
Metroplex. |
|
|
|
|
Carlton Global Resources, LLC is a producer and processor of various industrial minerals for use in the
manufacturing, construction and building materials industry. |
|
|
|
|
CBT Nuggets, LLC produces and sells original content IT certification training videos. CBT Nuggets, LLCs
training videos provide comprehensive training for certification exams from Microsoft ®, CompTIA ®, Cisco
®, Citrix ® and many other professional certification vendors. |
|
|
|
|
Ceres Management, LLC (d/b/a Lambs Tire and Automotive Centers) is a leading operator of Goodyear tire
retail and automotive repair centers in and around Austin, Texas, with fifteen operating locations. |
|
|
|
|
|
California Healthcare Medical Billing, Inc. provides outsourced billing, revenue cycle management, business services,
IT and Electronic Health Record (EHR) technology to physician practices and clinics. |
|
|
|
|
|
Condit Exhibits, LLC is a Denver, Colorado based designer, manufacturer and manager of trade show exhibits
and permanent displays. |
|
|
|
|
East Teak Fine Hardwoods, Inc. is a leading provider of teak lumber, exotic hardwoods and hardwood products. |
|
|
|
|
Gulf Manufacturing, LLC manufactures, modifies, and distributes specialty flanges, fittings, rings, plates,
spacers, and other fabricated metal products utilized primarily in piping applications. |
56
|
|
|
Hawthorne Customs & Dispatch Services, LLC provides one stop logistics services to its customers in order
to facilitate the import and export of various products to and from the United States. |
|
|
|
|
Hayden Acquisition, LLC is a manufacturer and supplier of precast concrete underground utility structures
to the construction industry. |
|
|
|
|
Houston Plating & Coatings, LLC is a provider of nickel plating and industrial coating services primarily
serving the oil field services industry. |
|
|
|
|
Hydratec Holdings, LLC is engaged in the design, sale and installation of agricultural micro-irrigation
products/systems to farmers in the San Joaquin valley in central California. |
|
|
|
|
Jensen Jewelers of Idaho, LLC is the largest privately owned jewelry chain in the Rocky Mountains with 14
stores in 5 states, including Idaho, Montana, Nevada, South Dakota and Wyoming. |
|
|
|
|
KBK Industries, LLC is a manufacturer of standard and customized fiberglass tanks and related products
primarily for use in oil and gas production, chemical production and agriculture applications. |
|
|
|
|
Laurus Healthcare, LP develops and manages single or multi-specialty health care centers through physician
partnerships that provide various surgical, diagnostic and interventional services. |
|
|
|
|
NAPCO Precast, LLC designs, manufactures, transports and erects precast and pre-stressed concrete products
primarily for the non-residential/commercial construction industry. |
|
|
|
|
National Trench Safety, LLC engages in the rental and sale of underground equipment and trench safety
products, including trench shielding, trench shoring, road plates, pipe lasers, pipe plugs and confined
space equipment. |
|
|
|
|
OMi Holdings, Inc. designs, manufactures, and installs overhead material handling equipment including
bridge cranes, runway systems, monorails, jib cranes and hoists. |
|
|
|
|
Pulse Systems, LLC manufactures a wide variety of components used in medical devices for minimally-invasive
surgery, primarily in the endovascular field. |
|
|
|
|
Quest Design & Production, LLC is engaged in the design, fabrication and installation of graphic
presentation materials and associated custom display fixtures used in sales and information center
environments. |
|
|
|
|
|
Schneider Sales Management, LLC is a leading publisher of proprietary sales training materials
and provider of sales-management consulting services for financial institutions. |
|
|
|
|
|
Support Systems Homes, Inc. operates drug and alcohol rehabilitation centers offering a wide range of
substance abuse treatment programs for recovery from addictions. |
|
|
|
|
Technical Innovations, LLC designs and manufactures manual, semiautomatic, pneumatic and computer
numerically controlled machines and tools used primarily by medical device manufacturers to place access
holes in catheters. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Universal Scaffolding & Equipment, LLC is in the business of manufacturing, sourcing and selling
scaffolding, forming and shoring products, and related custom fabricated products for the commercial and
industrial construction industry. |
|
|
|
|
Uvalco Supply, LLC is a leading provider of farm and ranch supplies to ranch owners and farmers, as well as
a leading provider of design, fabrication and erection services for metal buildings throughout South Texas. |
|
|
|
|
Vision Interests, Inc. is a full service sign company that designs, manufactures, installs and services
interior and exterior signage for a wide range of customers. |
|
|
|
|
|
Walden Smokey Point, Inc. is an established leader in a niche sector of
the trucking and logistics industry.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WorldCall, Inc. is a holding company which owns both regulated and unregulated communications and
information service providers. |
|
|
|
|
|
Zieglers NYPD, LLC is a New York-
themed Pizzeria and Italian restaurant with locations across the Phoenix metro area. |
|
57
MANAGEMENT
Our business and affairs are managed under the direction of our Board of Directors. Our
Board of Directors appoints our officers, who serve at the discretion of the Board of
Directors. The responsibilities of the Board of Directors include, among other things, the
oversight of our investment activities, the quarterly valuation of our assets, oversight of
our financing arrangements and corporate governance activities. The Board of Directors has an
Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee,
and may establish additional committees from time to time as necessary.
Board of Directors and Executive Officers
Our Board of Directors consist of six members, four of whom are classified under
applicable Nasdaq listing standards as independent directors and under Section 2(a)(19) of
the 1940 Act as non-interested persons. Pursuant to our articles of incorporation, each
member of our Board of Directors serves a one year term, with each current director serving
until the 2009 annual meeting of stockholders and until his respective successor is duly
qualified and elected. Our articles of incorporation give our Board of Directors sole
authority to appoint directors to fill vacancies that are created either through an increase
in the number of directors or due to the resignation, removal or death of any director.
Directors
Information
regarding our current Board of Directors is set forth below as of
April 30, 2009. We have divided
the directors into two groups independent directors and interested directors. Interested
directors are interested persons of MSCC as defined in Section 2(a)(19) of the 1940 Act.
The address for each director is c/o Main Street Capital Corporation, 1300 Post Oak
Boulevard, Suite 800, Houston, Texas 77056.
Independent Directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director |
|
Expiration |
Name |
|
Age |
|
Since |
|
of Term |
Michael Appling Jr. |
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
Joseph E. Canon |
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
Arthur L. French |
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
William D. Gutermuth |
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
Interested Directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director |
|
Expiration |
Name |
|
Age |
|
Since |
|
of Term |
Vincent D. Foster |
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
Todd A. Reppert |
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
Executive Officers
The following persons serve as our executive officers in the following
capacities (ages as of April 30, 2009):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Position(s) Held |
|
|
|
|
|
|
with the |
Name |
|
Age |
|
Company |
Vincent D. Foster |
|
|
52 |
|
|
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer |
Todd A. Reppert |
|
|
39 |
|
|
Director, President and Chief Financial Officer |
Rodger A. Stout |
|
|
57 |
|
|
Senior Vice President-Finance and Administration,
Chief Compliance Officer and Treasurer |
Jason B. Beauvais |
|
|
34 |
|
|
Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary |
Michael S. Galvan |
|
|
40 |
|
|
Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer |
Curtis L. Hartman |
|
|
36 |
|
|
Senior Vice President |
Dwayne L. Hyzak |
|
|
36 |
|
|
Senior Vice President |
David L. Magdol |
|
|
38 |
|
|
Senior Vice President |
58
The address for each executive officer is c/o Main Street Capital Corporation, 1300 Post
Oak Boulevard, Suite 800, Houston, Texas 77056.
Biographical Information
Independent Directors
Michael Appling Jr. has been a member of our Board of Directors since July 2007. Mr.
Appling is also the President and Chief Executive Officer of TNT Crane & Rigging Inc., a
privately held full service crane and rigging operator. From July 2002 through August 2007,
he was the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of XServ, Inc., a large
private equity-funded, international industrial services and rental company. Mr. Appling has
also held the position of CEO and President for United Scaffolding, Inc., an XServ, Inc.
operating subsidiary. In February 2007, XServ, Inc. was sold to The Brock Group, a private
industrial services company headquartered in Texas. From March 2000 to June 2002, Mr. Appling
served as the Chief Financial Officer of CheMatch.com, an online commodities trading forum.
ChemConnect, Inc., a venture-backed independent trading exchange, acquired CheMatch.com in
January 2002. From June 1999 to March 2000, Mr. Appling was Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of American Eco Corporation, a publicly traded, international fabrication,
construction and maintenance provider to the energy, pulp and paper
and power industries. Mr. Appling
worked for ITEQ, Inc., a publicly traded, international fabrication and services company from
September 1997 to May 1999, first as a Director of Corporate Development and then as Vice
President, Finance and Accounting. From July 1991 to September 1997, Mr. Appling worked at
Arthur Andersen LLP, where he practiced as a certified public accountant.
Joseph E. Canon has been a member of our Board of Directors since July 2007. Since 1982,
Mr. Canon has been the Executive Vice President and Executive Director, and a member of the
Board of Directors, of Dodge Jones Foundation, a private charitable foundation located in
Abilene, Texas. Prior to 1982, Mr. Canon was an Executive Vice President of the First
National Bank of Abilene. From 1974 to 1982, he was the Vice President and Trust Officer with
the First National Bank of Abilene. Mr. Canon currently serves on the Board of Directors of
First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (NASDAQ-GM:FFIN), a financial holding company headquartered
in Abilene, Texas. Mr. Canon also serves on the Board of Directors for several bank and
trust/asset management subsidiaries of First Financial Bankshares, Inc. He has also served on
the Board of Directors of various other organizations including the Abilene Convention and
Visitors Bureau, Abilene Chamber of Commerce, Conference of Southwest Foundations, City of
Abilene Tax Increment District, West Central Texas Municipal Water District and the John G.
and Marie Stella Kenedy Memorial Foundation.
Arthur L. French has been a member of our Board of Directors since July 2007. From
September 2003 through March 2007, Mr. French was a member of the Advisory Board of the
Investment Manager and limited partner of the Fund (both of which are now subsidiaries of
Main Street). Mr. French began his private investment activities in January 2000; he has
served as a director of FabTech Industries, a steel fabricator, since November 2000, and as a
director of Rawson, Inc., a distributor of industrial instrumentation products, since May
2003. Mr. French served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Metals USA Inc. from
1996-1999, where he managed the process of founders acquisition, assembled the management
team and took the company through a successful IPO in July 1997. From 1989-1996, he served as
Executive Vice President and Director of Keystone International, Inc. After serving as a
helicopter pilot in the United States Army, Captain-Corps of Engineers from 1963-1966, Mr.
French began his career as a Sales Engineer for Fisher Controls International, Inc., in 1966.
During his 23-year career at Fisher Controls, from 1966-1989, Mr. French held various titles,
and ended his career at Fisher Controls as President and Chief Operating Officer.
William D. Gutermuth has been a member of our Board of Directors since July 2007.
Since 1986, Mr. Gutermuth has been a partner
in the law firm of Bracewell & Giuliani LLP,
specializing in the practice of corporate and
securities law. From 1999 until 2005, Mr.
Gutermuth was the Chair of Bracewell &
Giulianis Corporate and Securities Section.
Mr. Gutermuth is a published author and
frequent lecturer on topics relating to
corporate governance and enterprise risk
management. He has been recognized by
independent evaluation organizations as One
of the Best Lawyers in America-Corporate M&A
and Securities Law and as a Texas Super
Lawyer. In addition, Mr. Gutermuth serves as
a director of the Texas TriCities Chapter of
the National Association of Corporate
Directors.
Interested Directors
Vincent D. Foster has been Chairman of our Board of Directors since April 2007. He is
our Chief Executive Officer and a member of our investment committee. Since 2002, Mr. Foster
has been a senior managing director of the General Partner and the Investment Manager (both
of which are now subsidiaries of Main Street). He has also been the senior managing
director of the general partner for MSC II, an SBIC he co-founded, since January 2006. From
2000 to 2002, Mr. Foster was the senior managing director of the predecessor entity of the
Fund. Prior to that, Mr. Foster co-founded Main Street Merchant Partners, a merchant-banking
firm. He has served as director of U.S. Concrete, Inc.
(NASDAQ-GM: RMIX) since 1999. He also serves as a director of Quanta Services, Inc. (NYSE:
PWR), an electrical and telecommunications contracting
59
company, Carriage Services, Inc. (NYSE: CSV), a death-care company, and Team, Inc.
(NASDAQ-GS: TISI), a provider of specialty industrial services. In addition, Mr. Foster
serves as a director, officer and founder of the Texas TriCities Chapter of the
National Association of Corporate Directors. Prior to his private investment activities,
Mr. Foster was a partner of Andersen Worldwide and Arthur Andersen LLP from 1988-1997.
Mr. Foster was the director of Andersens Corporate Finance and Mergers and Acquisitions
practice for the Southwest United States and specialized in working with companies involved
in consolidating industries.
Todd A. Reppert has been a member of our Board of Directors since April 2007. He is our
President and Chief Financial Officer and is a member of our investment committee. Since
2002, he has been a senior managing director of the General Partner and the Investment
Manager (both of which are now subsidiaries of Main Street). Mr. Reppert has been a senior
managing director of the general partner for MSC II, an SBIC he co-founded, since January
2006. From 2000 to 2002, Mr. Reppert was a senior managing director of the predecessor entity
of the Fund. Prior to that, he was a principal of Sterling City Capital, LLC, a private
investment group focused on small to middle-market companies. Prior to joining Sterling City
Capital in 1997, Mr. Reppert was with Arthur Andersen LLP. At Arthur Andersen LLP, he
assisted in several industry consolidation initiatives, as well as numerous corporate finance
and merger/acquisition initiatives.
Non-Director Executive Officers
Rodger A. Stout serves as our Chief
Compliance Officer, Senior Vice President-Finance and Administration and Treasurer. Mr. Stout has been the chief financial officer of the
General Partner, the Investment Manager and the general partner of MSC II, an SBIC, since
2006. From 2000 to 2006, Mr. Stout was senior vice president and chief financial officer for
FabTech Industries, Inc., a consolidation of nine steel fabricators. From 1985 to 2000, he was a senior financial executive for
Jerold B. Katz Interests. He held numerous positions over his 15-year tenure with this
national scope financial services conglomerate. Those positions included director, executive
vice president, senior financial officer and investment officer. Prior to 1985, Mr. Stout was
an international tax executive in the oil and gas service industry.
Jason B. Beauvais serves as our Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary. Prior to
joining us in June 2008, Mr. Beauvais was an attorney with Occidental Petroleum Corporation,
an international oil and gas exploration and production company, since August 2006. From
October 2002 to August 2006, he was an associate in the Corporate and Securities section of
Baker Botts L.L.P., where he primarily counseled companies in public issuances and private
placements of debt and equity and handled a wide range of general corporate and securities
matters as well as mergers and acquisitions. Mr. Beauvais has been licensed to practice law
in Texas since 2002.
Michael S. Galvan serves as our Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer. Prior to
joining us in February 2008, Mr. Galvan was senior manager of financial operations with
Direct Energy, a retail gas and electricity service provider since October 2006. From
September 2005 to October 2006, he was a senior audit manager with Malone & Bailey, PC, where
he managed and coordinated audits of publicly traded companies and other companies. From
March 2003 to September 2005, Mr. Galvan was Director of Bankruptcy Coordination at Enron
Corporation. Prior to March 2003, he served in other executive positions at various Enron
affiliates.
Curtis L. Hartman serves as one of our Senior Vice Presidents. Mr. Hartman has been a
managing director of the General Partner and the Investment Manager since 2002 and a managing
director of the general partner for MSC II since January 2006. From 2000 to 2002,
he was a director of the predecessor entity of the Fund. From 1999 to 2000, Mr. Hartman was
an investment adviser for Sterling City Capital, LLC. Concurrently with joining Sterling City
Capital, he joined United Glass Corporation, a Sterling City Capital portfolio company, as
director of corporate development. Prior to joining Sterling City Capital, Mr. Hartman was a
manager with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, in its M&A/Transaction Services group. Prior to
that, he was employed as a senior auditor by Deloitte & Touche
LLP.
Dwayne
L. Hyzak serves as one of our Senior Vice Presidents and is a member of our
investment committee. Mr. Hyzak has been a
managing director of the General Partner and the Investment Manager since 2002. He has
also been a managing director of the general partner for MSC II since January 2006.
From 2000 to 2002, Mr. Hyzak was a director of integration with Quanta Services,
Inc. (NYSE: PWR), an electrical and telecommunications contracting company, where he was
principally focused on the companys mergers and acquisitions and corporate finance
activities. Prior to joining Quanta Services, Inc., he was a manager with Arthur Andersen LLP
in its Transaction Advisory Services group.
David L. Magdol serves as one of our Senior Vice Presidents. Mr. Magdol has been a managing director of the General Partner and the
Investment Manager since 2002 and a managing director of the general partner for MSC II
since January 2006. From 2000 to 2002, Mr. Magdol was a vice president in the
Investment Banking Group of Lazard Freres & Co. LLC. From 1996 to 2000, Mr. Magdol served as
a vice president of McMullen Group, a private equity investment firm capitalized by Dr. John
J. McMullen. From 1993 to 1995, Mr. Magdol worked in the Structured Finance Services Group of
Chemical Bank as a management associate.
60
Meetings of the Board of Directors and Committees
Our
Board of Directors met six times and acted by unanimous written
consent eight
times during 2008. Our Board of Directors has established an audit committee, a compensation
committee and a nominating and corporate governance committee. Each of the audit committee,
compensation committee and nominating and corporate governance committee operates pursuant to
a charter, each of which is available under Governance on the Investor Relations section of
our website at www.mainstcapital.com, and is also available in print to any stockholder who
requests a copy in writing to Main Street Capital Corporation, Corporate Secretarys Office,
1300 Post Oak Blvd., Suite 800, Houston, Texas 77056.
Our Board of Directors approved the designation of Arthur L. French as lead director to
preside at all executive sessions of non-management directors. In the lead directors
absence, the remaining non-management directors may appoint a presiding director by majority
vote. The non-management directors meet in executive session without management on a regular
basis. Stockholders or other interested persons may send written communications to Arthur L.
French, addressed to Lead Director, c/o Main Street Capital Corporation, Corporate
Secretarys Office, 1300 Post Oak Blvd., Suite 800, Houston, Texas 77056.
Audit Committee
The Audit Committee is responsible for selecting, engaging and discharging our
independent accountants, reviewing the plans, scope and results of the audit engagement with
our independent accountants, approving professional services provided by our independent
accountants (as well as the compensation for those services), reviewing the independence of
our independent accountants and reviewing the adequacy of our internal control over financial
reporting. In addition, the Audit Committee is responsible for assisting our Board of
Directors, in connection with its review and approval of the determination of, the fair value
of our debt and equity securities that are not publicly traded or for which current market
values are not readily available. Our Board of Directors has determined that Mr. Appling is
an Audit Committee financial expert as defined by the SEC and an independent director.
Messrs. Canon and French are the other members of the Audit Committee. During the year ended
December 31, 2008, the Audit Committee met five times and acted by unanimous written consent once.
Compensation Committee
The Compensation Committee
determines the compensation for our executive officers and
the amount of salary, bonus and stock-based compensation to be included in the compensation
package for each of our executive officers. The actions of the Compensation Committee are
generally reviewed and ratified by the entire Board of Directors, excluding the employee
directors. The members of the Compensation Committee are Messrs. Canon, French and Gutermuth.
During the year ended December 31, 2008, the Compensation
Committee met five times and acted by unanimous written consent once.
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for determining
criteria for service on our Board of Directors, identifying, researching and recommending to
the Board of Directors director nominees for election by our stockholders, selecting nominees
to fill vacancies on our Board of Directors or a committee of the Board, developing and
recommending to our Board of Directors any amendments to our corporate governance principles
and overseeing the self-evaluation of our Board of Directors and its committees and
evaluations of our management. The members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee are Messrs. Appling, Canon and Gutermuth. During the
year ended December 31, 2008,
the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee met five times.
Investment Committee
Our investment committee is responsible for all aspects of our investment process,
including, origination, due diligence and underwriting, approval, documentation and closing,
and portfolio management and investment monitoring. The current members of our investment
committee are Messrs. Foster, Reppert and Hyzak. Our investment strategy involves a team
approach, whereby potential transactions are screened by members of our investment team
before being presented to the investment committee. Our investment committee meets on an as
needed basis depending on transaction volume.
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
We have adopted a code of business conduct and ethics that applies to our directors,
officers and employees. Our code of business conduct and ethics is available on the Investor
Relations section of our Web site at www.mainstcapital.com under Governance. We intend to
disclose any future amendments to, or waivers from, this code of conduct within four business
days of the waiver or amendment through a Web site posting.
61
COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
The following table sets forth the compensation that we paid during the year ended December
31, 2008 to our directors. Directors who are also employees of Main Street or of its subsidiaries
do not receive compensation for their services as directors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees Earned or |
|
Stock Awards |
|
All Other |
|
|
Name |
|
Paid in Cash |
|
(1)(2) |
|
Compensation (3) |
|
Total |
Michael Appling Jr. |
|
$ |
40,000 |
|
|
$ |
45,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,838 |
|
|
$ |
86,838 |
|
Joseph E. Canon |
|
|
35,000 |
|
|
|
45,000 |
|
|
|
1,838 |
|
|
|
81,838 |
|
Arthur L. French |
|
|
35,000 |
|
|
|
45,000 |
|
|
|
1,838 |
|
|
|
81,838 |
|
William D. Gutermuth |
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
45,000 |
|
|
|
1,838 |
|
|
|
76,838 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
These amounts represent the dollar amount recognized for financial statement reporting purposes with
respect to the 2008 fiscal year for the fair value
of awards granted in 2008 as well as prior fiscal
years, if any, as determined in accordance with FAS 123R. Pursuant to SEC rules, the amounts shown
exclude the impact of estimated forfeitures related to service-based vesting conditions. Please see
the discussion of the assumptions made in the valuation of these awards in Note M to the audited
consolidated financial statements included herein.
These amounts reflect our accounting expense for these awards, and do not correspond to the actual
value that will be recognized by our directors.
|
|
(2) |
|
Each of our non-employee directors received an award of 5,000 restricted shares under the Main
Street Capital Corporation 2008 Non-Employee Director Restricted
Stock Plan on July 1, 2008. 2,500 restricted shares of each grant vested 100% immediately on the grant date for service on the Board
over the past year, and 2,500 restricted shares of each grant will vest 100% on June 10, 2009,
provided that the grantee has been in continuous service as a member of the Board of Directors
through such date. The grant date fair value of each non-employee directors award
of restricted
stock granted in 2008 was $60,000 based on the $12.00 closing price of our common stock on the
Nasdaq Global Select Market on July 1, 2008. Each non-employee director had 2,500 unvested shares
of restricted stock outstanding as of December 31, 2008. |
|
(3) |
|
These amounts reflect the dollar value of dividends paid on unvested restricted stock awards in 2008. |
The compensation for non-employee directors for 2008 was comprised of cash compensation
paid
to or earned by directors in connection with their service as a director. That cash compensation
consisted of an annual retainer of $30,000. Non-employee directors will not receive fees based on
meetings attended absent circumstances that require an exceptionally high number of meetings within
an annual period. We also reimburse our non-employee directors for all reasonable expenses incurred
in connection with their service on our Board. The chairs of our Board committees receive
additional annual retainers as follows:
|
|
|
the chair of the Audit Committee: $10,000; and |
|
|
|
|
the chair of each of the Compensation and Nominating and Corporate Governance
committees: $5,000. |
Our 2008 Non-Employee Director Restricted Stock Plan provides a means through which we
may
attract and retain qualified non-employee directors to enter into and remain in service on our
Board of Directors. Under our 2008 Non-Employee Director Restricted Stock Plan, at the
beginning
of each one-year term of service on our Board of Directors,
each non-employee director will receive
a number of shares equivalent to $30,000 worth of shares based on the market value
at the close of
the exchange on the date of grant. Forfeiture provisions will lapse as
to an entire award at the
end of the one-year term.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
The following Compensation Discussion and Analysis, or CD&A, provides information relating to
the 2008 compensation of Main Streets Chief Executive Officer, President and Chief
Financial
Officer and four other most highly compensated executive officers during 2008. Those six
individuals are referred to in this CD&A as the Named Executive Officers, or NEOs.
Compensation Philosophy and Objectives
The Main Street compensation system was developed by the Compensation Committee and approved
by all Independent Directors. The system is designed to attract and retain key executives, motivate
them to achieve the companys short-term and long-term objectives, reward them for superior
performance and align their interests with those of the companys stockholders. Significant
elements of the compensation arrangements with the NEOs (other than the Chief Executive Officer)
are set forth in separate employment agreements Main Street entered into with them in connection
with the companys initial public offering. Main Streets Chief Executive Officer, who has signed a
non-compete agreement, serves at the discretion of the Board of Directors. The structure of those
employment agreements and Main Streets incentive compensation programs are designed to encourage
and reward the following, among other things:
|
|
|
superior risk-adjusted returns on the companys investment portfolio; |
|
|
|
|
management team development; |
|
|
|
|
maintenance of liquidity and capital flexibility to accomplish the companys
business objectives; and |
|
|
|
|
strength in income and capital gains to support and grow the companys dividend
payments. |
62
Subject to the provisions of the employment agreements with the NEOs described below, the
Compensation Committee has the primary authority to establish compensation for the NEOs and other
key employees and administers all executive compensation arrangements and policies. Main Streets
Chief Executive Officer assists the Compensation Committee by providing annual recommendations
regarding the compensation of NEOs and other key employees, excluding himself. The Compensation
Committee can exercise its discretion in modifying or accepting those recommendations. The Chief
Executive Officer routinely attends Compensation Committee meetings. However, the Compensation
Committee also meets in executive session without the Chief Executive Officer or other members of
management present when discussing the Chief Executive Officers compensation and on certain other
occasions.
The Compensation Committee takes into account competitive market practices with respect to the
salaries and total direct compensation of the NEOs. Members of the Compensation Committee consider
market practices by reviewing proxy statements or similar information made available by other
internally managed business development companies, or BDCs, under the 1940 Act. The Compensation
Committee also has the authority to utilize compensation consultants to better understand
competitive pay practices. In this regard, the Compensation Committee engaged a compensation
consultant in late 2008 to study the level and structure of compensation paid to
our NEOs as compared to other internally managed business development companies, private
equity firms and specialty finance companies (both public and private). The Compensation Committee
is considering the findings of the compensation consultant but does not currently expect any
material changes to the compensation program for our NEOs.
Assessment of Market Data
To assess the competitiveness of executive compensation levels, the Compensation Committee
analyzes a comparative group of BDCs and reviews their competitive performance and compensation
levels. This analysis centers around key elements of compensation practices within the BDC industry
in general and, more specifically, compensation practices at internally managed BDCs reasonably
comparable in asset size, typical investment size and type, market capitalization and general
business scope to the company. Since there are relatively few internally managed BDCs, and because
of Main Streets relatively small asset size and market capitalization in comparison to many BDCs,
the Compensation Committee includes certain internally managed BDCs in Main Streets peer group
that are substantially larger than the company. The peer group consists
of the following companies:
American Capital Strategies, Ltd., Allied Capital Corporation, Hercules Technology Growth Capital,
Inc., Kohlberg Capital Corporation, MCG Capital Corporation, Patriot Capital Funding, Inc., Harris
& Harris Group, Inc. and Triangle Capital Corporation.
Items reviewed include, but are not necessarily limited to,
base compensation, bonus
compensation, equity option awards, restricted stock awards, and other compensation as detailed in
the respective proxies, research analysts reports and other publicly available information. In
addition to actual levels of compensation, the Compensation Committee also analyzes the approach
other BDCs are taking with regard to their compensation practices. Such items include, but are
not
necessarily limited to, the use of employment agreements for certain employees, a mix of cash and
equity compensation, the use of third party compensation consultants and certain corporate and
executive performance measures established to achieve long-term total return for stockholders.
Although each of the peer companies is not precisely comparable in size, scope and operations to
the company, the Compensation Committee believes that they are the most relevant comparable
companies available with disclosed executive compensation data, and provide a good representation
of competitive compensation levels for the companys executives.
Assessment of Company Performance
The Compensation Committee believes that consistent financial performance coupled with
reasonable, long-term stockholders returns and
proportional employee compensation are essential
components for Main Streets long-term business success. Main Street typically makes three to seven
year investments in lower middle-market companies. The companys business plan involves taking on
investment risk over an extended period of time, and a premium is placed on the ability to maintain
stability of net asset values and continuity of earnings to pass through to stockholders in the
form of recurring dividends. Main Streets strategy is to generate current income from debt
investments and to realize capital gains from equity-related investments. This income supports the
payment of dividends to stockholders. The recurring payment of dividends requires a methodical
investment acquisition approach and active monitoring and management of the investment portfolio
over time. A meaningful part of the companys employee base is dedicated to the maintenance of
asset values and expansion of this recurring income to support and grow dividends. The
Compensation Committee believes that stability with regard to the management
team is important in
achieving successful implementation of the companys strategy.
Executive Compensation Components
For 2008, the components of Main Streets
direct compensation program for NEOs include:
|
|
|
base salary; |
|
|
|
|
annual cash bonuses; |
|
|
|
|
long-term compensation pursuant to the 2008 Equity Incentive Plan; and |
63
The Compensation Committee designs each NEOs direct compensation package to appropriately
reward the NEO for his contribution to the company. The judgment and experience of the Compensation
Committee are weighed with performance metrics and consultation with the Chief Executive Officer to
determine the appropriate mix of compensation for each individual. Cash compensation consisting of
base salary and discretionary bonuses tied to achievement of individual performance goals reviewed
and approved by the Compensation Committee is intended to motivate NEOs
to remain with the company
and work to achieve its business objectives. Stock-based compensation is
awarded based on
performance expectations reviewed and approved by the Compensation Committee for each NEO. The
blend of short-term and long-term compensation may be adjusted from time to time to balance the
Compensation Committees views regarding an NEOs individual preference for current cash
compensation with appropriate retention incentives.
Base Salary
Base salary is used to recognize particularly the experience, skills, knowledge and
responsibilities required of the NEOs in their roles. In connection with establishing the base
salary of each NEO, the Compensation Committee and management considered a number of factors,
including the seniority and experience level of the individual, the functional role of his
position, the level of the individuals responsibility, the companys ability to replace the
individual, the past base salary of the individual and the number of well-qualified candidates
available in the area. In addition, the Compensation Committee considers publicly available
information regarding the base salaries paid to similarly situated executive officers and other
competitive market practices.
The salaries of the NEOs are reviewed on an annual basis, as well as at the time of promotion
or any substantial change in responsibilities. Each of the NEO employment agreements establishes a
target for annual increase in base salary at 5%, but provides that any increase is at the sole
discretion of the Compensation Committee. Each such employment agreement also provides that the
base salary is not subject to reduction. The key factors in determining increases in salary level
are relative performance and competitive pressures.
Annual Cash Bonuses
Annual cash bonuses are intended to reward individual performance during the year and can
therefore be highly variable from year to year. Bonus opportunities for the NEOs are determined by
the Compensation Committee on a discretionary basis and are based on performance criteria,
including corporate and individual performance goals and measures, set by the Compensation
Committee with the Chief Executive Officers input. As more fully described below in Employment
Agreements, the employment agreements of the NEOs provide for target annual cash bonus amounts
as
a percentage of base salary.
Long-Term Incentive Awards
Main Streets Board and stockholders have approved the 2008 Equity Incentive Plan to provide
stock-based awards as long-term incentive compensation to employees, including the NEOs. The
company uses stock-based awards to (i) attract and retain key employees, (ii) motivate employees by
means of performance-related incentives to achieve long-range performance goals, (iii) enable
employees to participate in the companys long-term growth and (iv) link employees compensation to
the long-term interests of stockholders. At the time of each award, the Compensation Committee will
determine the terms of the award, including any performance period (or periods) and any performance
objectives relating to vesting of the award.
Options. The Compensation Committee may grant equity options to purchase Main Streets common
stock (including incentive stock options and nonqualified stock options). The Compensation
Committee expects that any options granted by it will represent a fixed number of shares of common
stock, will have an exercise price equal to the fair market value of common stock on the date of
grant, and will be exercisable, or vested, at some later time after grant. Some stock options may
provide for vesting simply by the grantee remaining employed by Main Street for a period of time,
and some may provide for vesting based on the grantee and/or the company attaining specified
performance levels. To date the Compensation Committee has not granted any stock options to any
NEO.
Restricted Stock. Main Street has received exemptive relief from the SEC that permits the
company to grant restricted stock in exchange for
or in recognition of services by its executive
officers and employees. Pursuant to the 2008 Equity Incentive Plan, the Compensation Committee may
award shares of restricted stock to plan participants in such amounts and on such terms as the
Compensation Committee determines in its sole discretion, provided that such awards are consistent
with the conditions set forth in the SECs exemptive order. Each restricted stock grant will be for
a fixed number of shares as set forth in an award agreement between the grantee and Main Street.
Award agreements will set forth time and/or performance vesting schedules and other appropriate
terms and/or restrictions with respect to awards, including rights to dividends and voting rights.
As more fully described below, each of the NEO employment agreements provides for a target annual
restricted stock award or an equitable substitute.
Other Benefits
Main Streets NEOs participate in the same benefit plans and programs as the companys other
employees, including comprehensive medical insurance, comprehensive dental insurance, business
travel accident insurance, short term disability coverage, long term disability insurance, and
vision care.
Main Street maintains a 401(k) plan for all full-time employees who are at least 21 years of
age through which the company makes non-discretionary matching contributions to each participants
plan account on the participants behalf. For each participating employee, the companys
contribution is generally a match of the employees contributions up to a 4.5% contribution level
with a maximum annual matching contribution of $10,350 during 2008. All contributions to the plan,
including the companys, vest immediately. The Board of Directors may also, at its sole discretion,
make additional contributions to employee 401(k) plan accounts, which would vest on the same basis
as other employer contributions.
64
Perquisites
The company provides no other material benefits, perquisites or retirement benefits to the
NEOs.
Employment Agreements
In connection with Main Streets initial public offering, the company
entered into employment
agreements with each of its NEOs, other than Mr. Foster, its Chief
Executive Officer. Initial terms
of the employment agreements extend to December 31, 2010. As the Chairman of the Board of Directors
and Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Foster does not have an employment agreement and will serve as an
executive officer at the direction and discretion of the Board of Directors. However, Mr. Foster
has executed a confidentiality and non-compete agreement with the company. The NEO employment
agreements specify an initial base salary which was paid in 2007 and contemplate a 5% target annual
increase in base salary (provided that any increase is in the sole discretion of the Compensation
Committee).
Each NEO employment agreement specifies a target discretionary annual bonus as a percentage of
his then current base salary based upon achieving the performance objectives established by the
Compensation Committee. Under the NEO employment agreements, the applicable NEOs have referenced
target bonus amounts for each of the years ending December 31, 2008, 2009 and 2010. The target
bonus amounts for Mr. Reppert are 50%, 60% and 70% of his base salary, respectively, for each of
those three calendar years. The target bonus amounts for Messrs. Stout, Hartman, Hyzak and Magdol
are 40%, 50% and 60% of their base salaries for each of those three calendar years, respectively.
The Compensation Committee has established applicable individual performance objectives, and will
approve the actual bonus awarded to each NEO annually.
Each NEO employment agreement also provides for the initial
grant of restricted stock in an
amount equal to 40,000 shares for Mr. Reppert and 30,000 shares for each of Messrs. Stout, Hartman,
Hyzak and Magdol in respect of such executives service performed in 2007, including in connection
with the successful completion of the companys initial public offering, and in 2008. As discussed
below, initial grants of restricted stock related to this provision were made to the NEOs on July
1, 2008. In addition, the NEO employment agreements provide for targeted annual restricted stock
awards for each of calendar years 2009 and 2010 with date of grant
valuation of 75% of base salary for Mr. Reppert and date of grant valuation of 50% of base salaries for each of
Messrs. Stout, Hartman, Hyzak and Magdol, in each case subject to the Compensation Committees
discretion based on the satisfaction of objective, reasonable and attainable performance criteria
established by the Compensation Committee. Restricted stock awards will generally vest in equal
annual portions over the four years subsequent to the date of grant.
The NEO employment agreements also provide for certain severance and other benefits upon
termination after a change of control or certain other specified termination events. The severance
and other benefits in these circumstances are discussed below and reflected in the Potential
Payments upon Termination or Change of Control Table.
Mr. Repperts employment
agreement generally provides for a non-competition period after his
voluntary termination or a termination without cause by the company. However, Messrs. Stout,
Hartman, Hyzak and Magdol would generally only be subject to the non-competition provisions of
their employment agreements in the event they are terminated without cause. The NEO employment
agreements also provide for a non-solicitation period after any termination of employment and
provide for the protection of Main Streets confidential information.
Change in Control and Severance
Upon a change in control, equity-based awards under the 2008 Equity Incentive Plan may vest
and/or become immediately exercisable or salable. In addition, upon termination of employment
following a change in control, the NEOs who are parties to the NEO employment agreements may be
entitled to severance payments.
2008 Equity Incentive Plan. Upon specified transactions involving a change in control (as
defined in the 2008 Equity Incentive Plan), all outstanding awards under the 2008 Equity Incentive
Plan may either be assumed or substituted for by the surviving entity. If the surviving entity does
not assume or substitute similar awards, the awards held by the plan participants will be subject
to accelerated vesting in full and, in the case of options, then terminated to the extent not
exercised within a designated time period.
Transactions involving a change in control under the 2008 Equity Incentive Plan include:
|
|
|
a consolidation, merger, stock sale or similar transaction or series of related
transactions in which Main Street is not the surviving corporation or which results in
the acquisition of all or substantially all of the companys then outstanding common
stock by a single person or entity or by a group of persons and/or entities acting in
concert; |
|
|
|
|
a sale or transfer of all or substantially all of the companys assets; |
|
|
|
|
Main Streets dissolution or liquidation; or |
|
|
|
|
a change in the membership of the companys Board of Directors such that the
individuals who, as of the effective date of the plan, constitute the Board of
Directors, whom are referred to as the Continuing Directors, and any new director whose
election or nomination by the Board of Directors was approved by a vote of at least a
majority of the Continuing Directors, cease to constitute at least a majority of the
Board. |
Severance. Under specified transactions involving a change in control (as defined in each NEO
employment agreement), if an NEO who is a party to an NEO employment agreement terminates his
employment with Main Street for good reason within one year following such change in control, or if
the company terminates or fails to renew the NEOs employment agreement within the one year
commencing with a change in control, he will receive a severance package beginning on the date of
termination. The severance package will include a lump-sum payment equal to two or three times,
depending upon the NEOs position, the NEOs annual salary at that time, plus the NEOs target
bonus compensation as described in the employment agreement, and the company will continue to
provide the NEO with certain benefits provided to him immediately prior to the termination as
described in the employment agreement for a designated time period.
Under the employment agreements, a Change in Control occurs if:
|
|
|
A person or a group acquires ownership of Main Streets capital stock that, together
with stock held by such person or group, constitutes more than 50 percent of the total
fair market value or total voting power of the companys capital stock; |
|
|
|
|
a person or a group acquires (or has acquired during the 12-month period ending on
the date of the most recent acquisition by such person or persons) ownership of capital
stock possessing 30 percent or more of the total voting power of the companys capital
stock; |
|
|
|
|
a majority of members of the Board is replaced during any 12-month period by
directors whose appointment or election is not endorsed by a majority of the members of
the Board prior to the date of such appointment or election; or |
65
|
|
|
a person or a group acquires (or has acquired during the 12-month period ending on
the date of the most recent acquisition by such person or persons) company assets that
have a total gross fair market value equal to or more than 40 percent of the total
gross fair market value of all of the companys assets immediately prior to such
acquisition or acquisitions. Certain transfers of assets are not considered a change in
control if transferred to specified parties. |
The rationale behind providing a severance package in certain events is (1) to attract and
retain dedicated and talented executives and to provide such executives with reasonable financial
remuneration and restitution in the event of dislocation and disruption
of employment as a result
of involuntary severance, and (2) to maintain and maximize shareholder value through the management
teams commitment and fidelity to the integrity of a change-in-control transaction. For further
discussion regarding executive compensation in the event of a termination or change in control,
please see the table entitled Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control Table
included herein.
Tax Deductibility of Compensation
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code generally disallows a deduction to public
companies to the extent of excess annual compensation over $1 million paid to certain executive
officers, except for qualified performance-based compensation. Main Streets general policy, where
consistent with business objectives, is to preserve the deductibility of executive officer
compensation. The Compensation Committee may authorize forms of compensation that might not be
deductible if the Compensation Committee deems such to be in the best interests of Main Street and
its stockholders. The company had no nondeductible compensation paid to executive officers in 2008.
2008 Compensation Determination
The Compensation Committee analyzed the competitiveness of the components of compensation
described above on both an individual and aggregate basis. The Compensation Committee believes
that the total compensation paid to the NEOs for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 achieves
the overall objectives of Main Streets executive compensation program.
Determination of Annual Base Salary
The Compensation Committee annually reviews the base salary of each executive officer,
including each NEO, and determines whether or not to increase it in its sole discretion. Increases
to base salary can be awarded to recognize, among other things, relative performance, relative cost
of living and competitive pressures. Increases in the 2008 annual base salary of each NEO over his
2007 annualized base salary are based exclusively on the loss by such NEO of certain benefits that
were received prior to the companys initial public offering. Without the adjustments described in
the previous sentence, the 2008 base salary of each NEO would have been equal to such NEOs 2007
annualized base salary.
Mr. Foster was paid an annual base salary of $353,910 for 2008, an increase of 1.5% over his
2007 annualized base salary.
Mr. Reppert was paid an annual base salary of $316,410 for 2008, an increase of 1.7% over his
2007 annualized base salary.
Mr. Stout was paid an annual base salary of $215,160 for 2008, an increase of 2.5% over his
2007 annualized base salary.
Mr. Hartman was paid an annual base salary of $215,160 for 2008, an increase of 2.5% over his
2007 annualized base salary.
Mr. Hyzak was paid an annual base salary of $215,160 for 2008, an increase of 2.5% over his
2007 annualized base salary.
Mr. Magdol was paid an annual base salary of $215,160 for 2008, an increase of 2.5% over his
2007 annualized base salary.
Determination of Annual Cash Incentive Bonus
Cash bonuses are determined annually by the Compensation Committee on a discretionary basis.
Cash bonuses for 2008 were accrued in 2008 but were determined by the Compensation Committee and
paid to NEOs in the first quarter of 2009. The 2008 target cash bonus percentage of base salary
for each NEO is presented below as well as the actual cash bonus percentage of base salary for each
NEO in 2008. The Compensation Committee, in its sole discretion, may award cash bonuses that exceed
cash bonus targets if it believes that the performance of the NEO during the given year merits such
a bonus. The company did not pay a cash bonus to any NEO in 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual % of |
|
|
Target % of |
|
2008 Salary |
Named Executive Officer |
|
2008 Salary |
|
Awarded |
Vincent D. Foster |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
0 |
% |
Todd A. Reppert |
|
|
50 |
% |
|
|
36 |
% |
Rodger A. Stout |
|
|
40 |
% |
|
|
35 |
% |
Curtis L. Hartman |
|
|
40 |
% |
|
|
35 |
% |
Dwayne L. Hyzak |
|
|
40 |
% |
|
|
35 |
% |
David L. Magdol |
|
|
40 |
% |
|
|
35 |
% |
The Compensation Committee considered performance achievements in the determination of cash
bonuses for 2008, including company performance and the personal performance of each individual.
The performance goals used for determining the cash bonuses for NEOs included, among other things,
the following:
|
|
|
Maintaining liquidity and capital flexibility to accomplish the companys business
objectives; |
|
|
|
|
Maintaining appropriate dividend payouts to stockholders; |
|
|
|
|
Maintaining the highest ethical standards, internal controls and adherence to
regulatory requirements; and |
|
|
|
|
Maintaining reasonable relative overall portfolio performance. |
Based on a recommendation by Mr. Foster in light of the current economic environment, the
Compensation Committee did not award Mr. Foster a 2008 cash bonus but will however consider
awarding Mr. Foster additional restricted stock in 2009 in lieu thereof. Cash bonuses were paid as
shown below to other NEOs for 2008 performance. These bonuses are
less than specified in the individual employment contracts of the NEOs but do not
reflect negatively on any individual executives performance. Instead, these bonus amounts
reflect the Compensation Committees and the executives desire to maintain an appropriate
operating cost level in a difficult economic environment.
Mr. Reppert was paid an annual cash bonus of $115,000 for 2008. This cash bonus recognizes Mr.
Repperts performance as President and CFO during very turbulent market conditions and
particularly his leadership in strengthening the companys liquidity and capital flexibility.
Mr. Stout was paid an annual cash bonus of $75,000 for 2008. This cash bonus recognizes Mr.
Stouts management of internal control, financial and accounting responsibilities while
transitioning to treasury and compliance accountability.
Mr. Hartman was paid an annual cash bonus of $75,000 for 2008. This cash bonus recognizes Mr.
Hartmans performance in managing current portfolio investments, executing new investment
opportunities and developing and training Main Street personnel.
Mr. Hyzak was paid an annual cash bonus of $75,000 for 2008. This cash bonus recognizes Mr.
Hyzaks performance in managing current portfolio investments, executing new investment
opportunities and developing and training Main Street personnel.
Mr. Magdol was paid an annual cash bonus of $75,000 for 2008. This cash bonus recognizes Mr.
Magdols performance in managing current portfolio investments, executing new investment
opportunities and developing and training Main Street personnel.
66
Determination of Long-Term Incentive Awards
As contemplated by each NEOs employment agreement, after approval of the 2008 Equity
Incentive Plan by the stockholders, each NEO was granted shares of restricted stock under the plan,
effective July 1, 2008. The 2008 target grant amount of restricted shares for each NEO is
presented below as well as the actual 2008 grant amount of restricted shares awarded to each NEO.
All restricted stock grants to NEOs under the 2008 Equity Incentive Plan vest ratably over four
years from the grant date. Messrs. Foster and Reppert recommended that the Compensation Committee
reallocate a portion of their individual grants of restricted shares to other company employees,
including Messrs. Stout, Hartman, Hyzak and Magdol, for their diligence and dedication in
connection with the successful initial public offering of the company in October 2007 and in the
implementation of the companys strategies in 2007 and 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Target Number of |
|
Actual Number of |
Named Executive Officer |
|
Restricted Shares |
|
Restricted Shares Granted |
Vincent D. Foster |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
Todd A. Reppert |
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
Rodger A. Stout |
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
35,000 |
|
Curtis L. Hartman |
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
32,500 |
|
Dwayne L. Hyzak |
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
35,000 |
|
David L. Magdol |
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
32,500 |
|
Executive Officer Compensation
The following table summarizes compensation of our Chief Executive Officer, our President and
Chief Financial Officer and our four highest paid executive officers who did not serve as our Chief
Executive Officer or Chief Financial Officer during 2008, all of whom we refer to as our NEOs, for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008.
Summary Compensation Table
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock |
|
All Other |
|
|
Principal Position |
|
Year |
|
Salary(1) |
|
Bonus(2) |
|
Awards(3) |
|
Compensation(4) |
|
Total |
Vincent D. Foster |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
$ |
353,910 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
$ |
45,000 |
|
|
$ |
32,400 |
(5) |
|
$ |
431,310 |
|
Chairman & Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
87,188 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
2,531 |
|
|
|
89,719 |
|
|
Todd A. Reppert |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
$ |
316,410 |
|
|
$ |
115,000 |
|
|
$ |
45,000 |
|
|
$ |
32,400 |
(6) |
|
$ |
508,810 |
|
President & Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
77,813 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
2,531 |
|
|
|
80,344 |
|
|
Rodger A. Stout |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chief Compliance Officer, Senior
Vice President Finance and |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
$ |
215,160 |
|
|
$ |
75,000 |
|
|
$ |
52,500 |
|
|
$ |
35,072 |
(7) |
|
$ |
377,732 |
|
Administration and Treasurer |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
52,500 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
2,363 |
|
|
|
54,863 |
|
|
Curtis L. Hartman |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
$ |
215,160 |
|
|
$ |
75,000 |
|
|
$ |
48,750 |
|
|
$ |
33,570 |
(8) |
|
$ |
372,480 |
|
Senior Vice President |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
52,500 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
2,531 |
|
|
|
55,031 |
|
|
Dwayne L. Hyzak |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
$ |
215,160 |
|
|
$ |
75,000 |
|
|
$ |
52,500 |
|
|
$ |
35,407 |
(9) |
|
$ |
378,067 |
|
Senior Vice President |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
52,500 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
2,531 |
|
|
|
55,031 |
|
|
David L. Magdol |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
$ |
215,160 |
|
|
$ |
75,000 |
|
|
$ |
48,750 |
|
|
$ |
33,570 |
(10) |
|
$ |
372,480 |
|
Senior Vice President |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
52,500 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
2,531 |
|
|
|
55,031 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The 2007 salary amounts reflect the actual salaries of the NEOs that were in
effect during the period from October 4, 2007, the completion of our initial
public offering, through December 31, 2007. All executive compensation is paid
by one of our wholly owned subsidiaries, Main Street Capital Partners, LLC. |
|
(2) |
|
These amounts reflect annual cash bonuses earned during 2008 by
the NEOs and were determined based on individual performance goals adopted by
the Compensation Committee. No cash bonuses were paid to NEOs in 2007. All
annual cash bonuses are paid by one of our wholly owned
subsidiaries, Main Street Capital Partners, LLC. |
|
(3) |
|
These amounts represent the dollar amount recognized for financial statement
reporting purposes with respect to the 2008 fiscal year for the fair value of
awards granted in 2008 as well as prior fiscal years, if any, as determined in
accordance with FAS 123R. Pursuant to SEC rules, the amounts shown exclude the
impact of estimated forfeitures related to service-based vesting conditions.
Please see the discussion of the assumptions made in the valuation of these
awards in Note M to the audited consolidated financial statements included herein.
These amounts reflect our
accounting expense for these awards, and do not correspond to the actual value
that will be recognized by our NEOs. |
|
(4) |
|
For 2008, these amounts reflect (i) employer matching contributions we made to
our 401(k) Plan and (ii) the dollar value of dividends paid on unvested restricted
stock awards. For 2007, these amounts reflect employer matching contributions
we made to our 401(k) Plan during the period from October 4, 2007, the completion
of our initial public offering, through December 31, 2007. We make matching
contributions for each semi-monthly payroll period. |
|
(5) |
|
Includes $10,350 employer matching contributions to our 401(k) Plan and $22,050
dollar value of dividends on unvested restricted stock awards. |
|
(6) |
|
Includes $10,350 employer matching contributions to our 401(k) Plan and $22,050
dollar value of dividends on unvested restricted stock awards. |
|
|
|
|
(7) |
|
Includes $25,725 dollar value of dividends on unvested restricted stock awards. |
|
(8) |
|
Includes $23,888 dollar value of dividends on unvested restricted stock awards. |
|
(9) |
|
Includes $25,725 dollar value of dividends on unvested restricted stock awards. |
|
(10) |
|
Includes $23,888 dollar value of dividends on unvested restricted stock awards. |
67
Grants of Plan-Based Awards
The following table sets forth information regarding restricted stock awards granted to our
NEOs in fiscal 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards; |
|
Grant Date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares of |
|
of Stock |
Name |
|
Grant Date |
|
Stock |
|
Awards |
Vincent D. Foster |
|
|
7/1/08 |
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
$ |
360,000 |
|
Todd A. Reppert |
|
|
7/1/08 |
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
$ |
360,000 |
|
Rodger A. Stout |
|
|
7/1/08 |
|
|
|
35,000 |
|
|
$ |
420,000 |
|
Curtis L. Hartman |
|
|
7/1/08 |
|
|
|
32,500 |
|
|
$ |
390,000 |
|
Dwayne L. Hyzak |
|
|
7/1/08 |
|
|
|
35,000 |
|
|
$ |
420,000 |
|
David L. Magdol |
|
|
7/1/08 |
|
|
|
32,500 |
|
|
$ |
390,000 |
|
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End
The following table sets forth the awards of restricted stock for which forfeiture provisions
were outstanding at December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market Value of |
|
|
Number of Shares |
|
Shares of |
|
|
of Stock that |
|
Stock that have not |
Name |
|
have not Vested (1) |
|
Vested (2) |
Vincent D. Foster |
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
$ |
293,100 |
|
Todd A. Reppert |
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
$ |
293,100 |
|
Rodger A. Stout |
|
|
35,000 |
|
|
$ |
341,950 |
|
Curtis L. Hartman |
|
|
32,500 |
|
|
$ |
317,525 |
|
Dwayne L. Hyzak |
|
|
35,000 |
|
|
$ |
341,950 |
|
David L. Magdol |
|
|
32,500 |
|
|
$ |
317,525 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
No restricted stock awards have been transferred. |
|
(2) |
|
The market value of shares of stock that have not vested was
determined based on the closing price of our common stock on the
Nasdaq Global Select Market on December 31, 2008, which was $9.77. |
Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control
Each NEO, other than our Chief Executive Officer (who has signed a non-compete agreement and
serves at the discretion of our Board of Directors), is entitled under his employment agreement to
certain payments upon termination of employment or in the event of a change in control. The
following table sets forth those potential payments as of December 31, 2008 with respect to each
applicable NEO:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within One Year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination |
|
After Change in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Without Cause |
|
Control; Termination |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination |
|
or Good |
|
Without Cause or |
|
|
Benefit |
|
Death(3) |
|
Disability(3) |
|
with Cause(4) |
|
Reason(3)(4) |
|
Good Reason(3)(4) |
Todd A. Reppert |
|
Severance(1)
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
632,820 |
|
|
$ |
949,230 |
|
|
|
Bonus(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
379,692 |
|
|
|
569,538 |
|
Rodger A. Stout |
|
Severance(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
322,740 |
|
|
|
430,320 |
|
|
|
Bonus(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
161,370 |
|
|
|
215,160 |
|
Curtis L. Hartman |
|
Severance(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
322,740 |
|
|
|
430,320 |
|
|
|
Bonus(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
161,370 |
|
|
|
215,160 |
|
Dwayne L. Hyzak |
|
Severance(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
322,740 |
|
|
|
430,320 |
|
|
|
Bonus(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
161,370 |
|
|
|
215,160 |
|
David L. Magdol |
|
Severance(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
322,740 |
|
|
|
430,320 |
|
|
|
Bonus(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
161,370 |
|
|
|
215,160 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Severance pay includes an NEOs annual base salary and applicable
multiple thereof paid monthly beginning at the time of termination or
paid in lump-sum if termination is within one year of a change in
control. |
|
(2) |
|
Bonus compensation includes an NEOs current target annual bonus and
applicable multiple thereof paid monthly beginning at the time of
termination or paid lump-sum if termination is within one year of a
change in control. |
|
(3) |
|
Upon these termination events, the NEO will become fully vested in any
previously unvested stock-based compensation. |
|
(4) |
|
For a discussion of how the employment agreements define the term
Change of Control, see Compensation Discussion and AnalysisChange
in Control and Severance. The employment agreements define Cause as
conviction of a felony or other crime of moral turpitude; failure or
refusal to perform all duties and obligations; gross negligence or
willful misconduct to our material detriment; or the material breach
of the employment agreement or any provision of a uniformly applied
policy such as our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics. The employment
agreements define Good Reason as the existence, without the
executives consent, of any of the following conditions at any time
during the two years prior to the executives termination: a material
diminution in an executives base salary, target bonus or authority
and duties (not including any position on our Board of Directors);
implementation of a requirement that the executive report to an
employee or corporate officer rather than directly to the Chairman of
the Board and the Chief Executive Officer or a material diminution in
the authority and responsibilities of the executives supervisor; a
material change in the location where the executives duties are to be
performed; or the material breach by us of the employment agreement,
including the failure of any successor to us to assume the terms of
the agreement. |
68
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND TRANSACTIONS
Transactions with Related Persons
We co-invested with Main Street Capital II
, LP in several existing portfolio investments prior
to our initial public offering (the IPO), but did not co-invest with Main Street
Capital II, LP
subsequent to the IPO and prior to June 2008. In June 2008, we received exemptive relief from the
SEC to allow us to resume co-investing with Main Street Capital II, LP in accordance with the terms
of such exemptive relief. Main Street Capital II, LP is managed by Main Street Capital Partners,
LLC, and Main Street Capital Partners, LLC is wholly owned by us.
Main Street Capital II, LP is
a privately owned SBIC fund with similar investment objectives to us and which began its investment operations in
January 2006. The co-investments among us and Main Street Capital II, LP have all been made at
the
same time and on the same terms and conditions. The co-investments were also made in accordance
with Main Street Capital Partners, LLCs conflicts policy and in accordance with the applicable
SBIC conflict of interest regulations.
In addition, during the year ended December 31,
2008, one of our wholly owned subsidiaries,
Main Street Capital Partners, LLC, received $3.3 million from Main Street Capital II
, L.P. for
providing investment advisory services to Main Street Capital II, L.P
.. Messrs. Foster and Reppert
control the general partner of Main Street Capital II,
L.P.
CONTROL PERSONS AND PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS
The following table sets forth information with respect to the beneficial ownership of our
common stock by:
|
|
|
each person known to us to beneficially own more than five percent of the outstanding
shares of our common stock; |
|
|
|
|
each of our directors and executive officers; and |
|
|
|
|
all of our directors and executive officers as a group. |
Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC and includes voting
or investment power with respect to the securities. There is no common stock subject to options
that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of March 20, 2009. Percentage of
beneficial ownership is based on 9,076,139 shares of common stock outstanding as of March 20, 2009.
Unless otherwise indicated, to our knowledge, each stockholder listed below has sole voting
and investment power with respect to the shares beneficially owned by the stockholder, and
maintains an address c/o Main Street Capital Corporation. Our address is 1300 Post Oak Boulevard,
Suite 800, Houston, Texas 77056.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Owned Beneficially |
Name |
|
Number |
|
Percentage |
Independent Directors: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael Appling Jr. |
|
|
19,239 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Joseph E. Canon |
|
|
292,620 |
(1) |
|
|
3.2 |
% |
Arthur L. French |
|
|
15,487 |
|
|
|
* |
|
William D. Gutermuth |
|
|
10,709 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Interested Directors: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vincent D. Foster |
|
|
1,068,785 |
(2) |
|
|
11.78 |
% |
Todd A. Reppert |
|
|
654,089 |
(3) |
|
|
7.21 |
% |
Executive Officers: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rodger A. Stout |
|
|
67,537 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Jason B. Beauvais |
|
|
9,176 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Michael S. Galvan |
|
|
8,575 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Curtis L. Hartman |
|
|
227,972 |
(4) |
|
|
2.51 |
% |
Dwayne L. Hyzak |
|
|
239,486 |
|
|
|
2.64 |
% |
David L. Magdol |
|
|
247,767 |
|
|
|
2.73 |
% |
All Directors and Officers as a Group (12 persons) |
|
|
2,861,443 |
|
|
|
31.53 |
% |
|
|
|
* |
|
Less than 1% |
|
(1) |
|
Includes (i) 63,121 shares of common stock held by the Dodge Jones Foundation for
which Mr. Canon has sole voting and investment power as Executive Vice President and
(ii) 218,183 shares of common stock held by JMK Investments, LP for which Mr. Canon
has shared voting and investment power as co-manager of its general partner. Mr.
Canon disclaims beneficial ownership of the securities held by the Dodge Jones
Foundation and JMK Investments, LP. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes 7,629 shares of common stock held by Foster Irrevocable Trust for the
benefit of Mr. Fosters children. Although Mr. Foster is not the trustee, and
accordingly does not have voting power or dispositive power over these shares, he
may from time to time direct the trustee to vote and dispose of these shares. Also
includes 2,222 shares and 2,175 shares held in custodial accounts for Mr. Fosters
daughters, Amy Foster and Brittany Foster, respectively. |
|
(3) |
|
Includes 142,387 shares of common stock held by Reppert Investments Limited
Partnership which are beneficially owned by Mr. Reppert. |
|
(4) |
|
Includes 188,947 shares of common stock held in margin accounts or otherwise pledged. |
69
The following table sets forth, as of March 20, 2009, the dollar range of our equity
securities that is beneficially owned by each of our directors.
|
|
|
|
|
Dollar Range of Equity |
|
|
Securities Beneficially |
|
|
Owned(1)(2)(3) |
Interested Directors: |
|
|
Vincent D. Foster
|
|
over $100,000 |
Todd A. Reppert
|
|
over $100,000 |
Independent Directors: |
|
|
Michael Appling Jr.
|
|
over $100,000 |
Joseph E. Canon
|
|
over $100,000 |
Arthur L. French
|
|
over $100,000 |
William D. Gutermuth
|
|
over $100,000 |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Beneficial ownership has been determined in accordance with Rule 16a-1(a)(2) of the Exchange Act. |
|
(2) |
|
The dollar range of equity securities beneficially owned by our directors is based on a stock
price of $9.47 per share as of March 20, 2009. |
|
(3) |
|
The dollar range of equity securities beneficially owned are: none, $1-$10,000, $10,001-$50,000,
$50,001-$100,000, or over $100,000. |
SALES OF COMMON STOCK BELOW NET ASSET VALUE
On June 17, 2008, our common stockholders voted to allow us to issue
common stock at any discount from our net asset value (NAV) per share for a period of one
year ending on the earlier of June 16, 2009 or the date of our 2009 annual stockholders meeting,
and we are seeking similar approval from our stockholders at our 2009 annual stockholders meeting
for the following year. In order to sell shares pursuant to this authorization:
|
|
|
a majority of our independent directors who have no financial interest in the sale
must have approved the sale; and |
|
|
|
|
a majority of such directors, who are not interested persons of Main Street, in
consultation with the underwriter or underwriters of the offering if it is to be
underwritten, must have determined in good faith, and as of a time immediately prior to
the first solicitation by us or on our behalf of firm commitments to purchase such
shares or immediately prior to the issuance of such shares, that the price at which
such shares are to be sold is not less than a price which closely approximates the
market value of those shares, less any underwriting commission or discount. |
We are permitted to sell shares of common stock below NAV per share in rights offerings
although we will not do so under this prospectus. Any offering of common stock below NAV per share
will be designed to raise capital for investment in accordance with our investment objectives and
business strategies.
In making a determination that an offering below NAV per share is in our and our stockholders
best interests, our Board of Directors would consider a variety of factors including:
|
|
|
The effect that an offering below NAV per share would have on our stockholders,
including the potential dilution they would experience as a result of the offering; |
|
|
|
|
The amount per share by which the offering price per share and the net proceeds per
share are less than the most recently determined NAV per share; |
|
|
|
|
|
The relationship of recent market prices of our common stock to NAV per share and
the potential impact of the offering on the market price per share of our common stock; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Whether the proposed offering price would closely approximate the market value of
our shares; |
|
|
|
|
|
The potential market impact of being able to raise capital during the current
financial market difficulties; |
|
|
|
|
The nature of any new investors anticipated to acquire shares in the offering; |
|
|
|
The anticipated rate of return on and quality, type and availability of investments
to be funded with the proceeds from the offering, if any; and |
|
|
|
|
|
The leverage available to us, both before and after any
offering, and the terms thereof. |
|
Sales by us of our common stock at a discount from NAV pose potential risks for our existing
stockholders whether or not they participate in the offering, as well as for new investors who
participate in the offering.
The following three headings and accompanying tables will explain and provide hypothetical
examples on the impact of an offering at a price less than NAV per share on three different sets of
investors:
|
|
|
existing stockholders who do not purchase any shares in the offering; |
|
|
|
|
|
existing stockholders who purchase a relatively small amount of shares in the offering
or a relatively large amount of shares in the offering; and |
|
|
|
|
|
new investors who become stockholders by purchasing shares in the offering. |
Impact on Existing Stockholders who do not Participate in the Offering
Our existing stockholders who do not participate in an offering below NAV per share or who do
not buy additional shares in the secondary market at the same or lower price we obtain in the
offering (after expenses and commissions) face the greatest potential risks. These stockholders
will experience an immediate decrease (often called dilution) in the NAV of the shares they hold
and their NAV per share. These stockholders will also experience a disproportionately greater
decrease in their participation in our earnings and assets and their voting power than the increase
we will experience in our assets, potential earning power and voting interests due to the offering.
These stockholders may also experience a decline in the market price of their shares, which often
reflects to some degree announced or potential
decreases in NAV per share. This decrease could be more pronounced as the size
of the offering and level of discount to NAV increases.
The following table illustrates the level of NAV dilution that would be experienced by a
nonparticipating stockholder in three different hypothetical offerings of different sizes and
levels of discount from NAV per share. Actual sales prices and discounts may differ from the presentation
below.
The examples assume that Company XYZ has 1,000,000 common shares outstanding, $15,000,000 in
total assets and $5,000,000 in total liabilities. The current NAV and NAV per share are thus
$10,000,000 and $10.00. The table illustrates the dilutive effect on nonparticipating Stockholder A
of (1) an offering of 50,000 shares (5% of the outstanding shares) at $9.50 per share after
offering expenses and commission (a 5% discount from NAV), (2) an offering of 100,000 shares (10%
of the outstanding shares) at $9.00 per share after offering expenses and commissions (a 10%
discount from NAV) and (3) an offering of 200,000 shares (20% of the outstanding shares) at $8.00
per share after offering expenses and commissions (a 20% discount from NAV). The prospectus
supplement pursuant to which any discounted offering is made will include a chart based on the
actual number of shares in such offering and the actual discount to the most recently determined
NAV.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Example 1 |
|
Example 2 |
|
Example 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5% Offering |
|
10% Offering |
|
20% Offering |
|
|
|
|
|
|
at 5% Discount |
|
at 10% Discount |
|
at 20% Discount |
|
|
Prior to Sale |
|
Following |
|
|
|
Following |
|
|
|
Following |
|
|
|
|
Below NAV |
|
Sale |
|
% Change |
|
Sale |
|
% Change |
|
Sale |
|
% Change |
Offering Price |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price per
Share to Public (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
10.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
9.47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
8.42 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net Proceeds per Share to Issuer |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
9.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
9.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
8.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in Shares and Decrease to NAV |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Shares Outstanding |
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
1,050,000 |
|
|
|
5.00 |
% |
|
|
1,100,000 |
|
|
|
10.00 |
% |
|
|
1,200,000 |
|
|
|
20.00 |
% |
NAV per Share |
|
$ |
10.00 |
|
|
$ |
9.98 |
|
|
|
(0.20 |
)% |
|
$ |
9.91 |
|
|
|
(0.90 |
)% |
|
$ |
9.67 |
|
|
|
(3.30 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilution to Nonparticipating Stockholder A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share Dilution |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Held by Stockholder A |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage Outstanding Held by
Stockholder A |
|
|
1.00 |
% |
|
|
0.95 |
% |
|
|
(4.76 |
)% |
|
|
0.91 |
% |
|
|
(9.09 |
)% |
|
|
0.83 |
% |
|
|
(16.67 |
)% |
NAV Dilution |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total NAV Held by Stockholder A |
|
$ |
100,000 |
|
|
$ |
99,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
99,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
96,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investment by Stockholder A
(Assumed to be $10.00 per Share) |
|
$ |
100,000 |
|
|
$ |
100,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
100,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
100,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Dilution to Stockholder A
(Total NAV Less Total Investment) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(200 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(900 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(3,300 |
) |
|
|
|
|
NAV Dilution per Share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NAV per Share Held by Stockholder A |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
9.98 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
9.91 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
9.67 |
|
|
|
|
|
Investment per Share Held by
Stockholder A (Assumed to be $10.00
per Share on Shares Held Prior to
Sale) |
|
$ |
10.00 |
|
|
$ |
10.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
10.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
10.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
NAV Dilution per Share
Experienced by Stockholder A (NAV per Share Less
Investment per Share) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(0.09 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(0.33 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Percentage NAV Dilution Experienced
by Stockholder A (NAV Dilution per
Share Divided by Investment per
Share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.20 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.90 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.30 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Assumes 5% in selling compensation and expenses paid by us. |
Impact on Existing Stockholders who do Participate in the Offering
Our existing stockholders who participate in an offering below NAV per share or who buy
additional shares in the secondary market at the same or lower price as we obtain in the offering
(after expenses and commissions) will experience the same types of NAV dilution as the
nonparticipating stockholders, albeit at a lower level, to the extent they purchase less than the
same percentage of the discounted offering as their interest in our shares immediately prior to the
offering. The level of NAV dilution to such stockholders will decrease as the number of shares such stockholders
purchase increases. Existing stockholders who buy more than their
proportionate percentage will experience NAV
dilution but will, in contrast to existing stockholders who purchase less than their proportionate
share of the offering, experience an increase (often called accretion) in NAV per share over their
investment per share and will also experience a disproportionately greater increase in their
participation in our earnings and assets and their voting power than our increase in assets,
potential earning power and voting interests due to the offering. The level of accretion will
increase as the excess number of shares purchased by such stockholder increases. Even a stockholder
who over-participates will, however, be subject to the risk that we may make additional discounted
offerings in which such stockholder does not participate, in which case such a stockholder will
experience NAV dilution as described above in such subsequent offerings. These stockholders may
also experience a decline in the market price of their shares, which often reflects to some degree
announced or potential decreases in NAV per
share. This decrease could be more pronounced as the size of the offering and the level of
discount to NAV increases.
The following chart illustrates the level of dilution and accretion in the hypothetical 20%
discount offering from the prior chart (Example 3) for a stockholder that acquires shares equal to
(1) 50% of its proportionate share of the offering (i.e., 1,000 shares, which is 0.5% of an
offering of 200,000 shares rather than its 1.0% proportionate share) and (2) 150% of such
percentage (i.e., 3,000 shares, which is 1.5% of an offering of 200,000 shares rather than its 1.0%
proportionate share). The prospectus supplement pursuant to which any discounted offering is made
will include a chart for this example based on the actual number of shares in such offering and
the actual discount from the most recently determined NAV per share.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50% |
|
150% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Participation |
|
Participation |
|
|
Prior to Sale |
|
Following |
|
|
|
Following |
|
|
|
|
Below NAV |
|
Sale |
|
% Change |
|
Sale |
|
% Change |
Offering Price |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price per
Share to Public (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
8.42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
8.42 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net Proceeds per Share to Issuer |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
8.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
8.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in Shares and Decrease to NAV |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Shares Outstanding |
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
1,200,000 |
|
|
|
20.00 |
% |
|
|
1,200,000 |
|
|
|
20.00 |
% |
NAV per Share |
|
$ |
10.00 |
|
|
$ |
9.67 |
|
|
|
(3.33 |
)% |
|
$ |
9.67 |
|
|
|
(3.33 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilution/Accretion to Participating Stockholder A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share Dilution/Accretion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Held by Stockholder A |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
11,000 |
|
|
|
10.00 |
% |
|
|
13,000 |
|
|
|
30.00 |
% |
Percentage Outstanding Held by
Stockholder A |
|
|
1.00 |
% |
|
|
0.92 |
% |
|
|
(8.33 |
)% |
|
|
1.08 |
% |
|
|
8.33 |
% |
NAV Dilution/Accretion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total NAV Held by Stockholder A |
|
$ |
100,000 |
|
|
$ |
106,333 |
|
|
|
6.33 |
% |
|
$ |
125,667 |
|
|
|
25.67 |
% |
Total Investment by Stockholder A
(Assumed to be $10.00 per Share on
Shares Held Prior to Sale) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
108,420 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
125,260 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Dilution/Accretion to
Stockholder A (Total NAV Less Total
Investment) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(2,087 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
407 |
|
|
|
|
|
NAV Dilution/Accretion per Share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NAV per Share Held by Stockholder A |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
9.67 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
9.67 |
|
|
|
|
|
Investment per Share Held by
Stockholder A (Assumed to be $10.00
per Share on Shares Held Prior to
Sale) |
|
$ |
10.00 |
|
|
$ |
9.86 |
|
|
|
(1.44 |
)% |
|
$ |
9.64 |
|
|
|
(3.65 |
)% |
NAV Dilution/Accretion per Share
Experienced by Stockholder A (NAV per
Share Less Investment per Share) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(0.19 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage NAV Dilution/Accretion
Experienced by Stockholder A (NAV
Dilution/Accretion per Share Divided
by Investment per Share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.92 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.32 |
% |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Assumes 5% in selling compensation and expenses paid by us. |
Impact on New Investors
Investors
who are not currently stockholders, but who participate in an offering below NAV and
whose investment per share is greater than the resulting NAV per share due to selling compensation
and expenses paid by us will experience an immediate decrease, albeit small, in the NAV of
their shares and their NAV per share compared to the price they pay
for their shares (Example 1 below). On the other hand, investors who
are not currently stockholders, but who participate in an offering below NAV per share and whose
investment per share is also less than the resulting NAV per share will experience an
immediate increase in the NAV of their shares and their NAV per share compared to the price they
pay for their shares (Examples 2 and 3 below). These latter investors will experience a disproportionately greater participation in
our earnings and assets and their voting power than our increase in assets, potential earning power
and voting interests. These investors will, however, be subject to the risk that we may make
additional discounted offerings in which such new stockholder does not participate, in which case
such new stockholder will experience dilution as described above in such subsequent offerings.
These investors may also experience a decline in the market price of their shares, which often
reflects to some degree announced or potential decreases in NAV per share. This
decrease could be more pronounced as the size of the offering and level of discount to NAV
increases.
The following chart illustrates the level of dilution or accretion for new investors that
would be experienced by a new investor in the same hypothetical 5%, 10% and 20% discounted
offerings as described in the first chart above. The illustration is for a new investor who
purchases the same percentage (1.00%) of the shares in the offering as Stockholder A in the prior
examples held immediately prior to the offering. The prospectus supplement pursuant to which any
discounted offering is made will include a chart for these examples based on the actual number of
shares in such offering and the actual discount from the most recently determined NAV per share.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Example 1 |
|
Example 2 |
|
Example 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5% Offering |
|
10% Offering |
|
20% Offering |
|
|
|
|
|
|
at 5% Discount |
|
at 10% Discount |
|
at 20% Discount |
|
|
Prior to Sale |
|
Following |
|
|
|
|
|
Following |
|
|
|
|
|
Following |
|
|
|
|
Below NAV |
|
Sale |
|
% Change |
|
Sale |
|
% Change |
|
Sale |
|
% Change |
Offering Price |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price per
Share to Public (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
10.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
9.47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
8.42 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net Proceeds per Share to Issuer |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
9.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
9.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
8.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in Shares and Decrease to NAV |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Shares Outstanding |
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
1,050,000 |
|
|
|
5.00 |
% |
|
|
1,100,000 |
|
|
|
10.00 |
% |
|
|
1,200,000 |
|
|
|
20.00 |
% |
NAV per Share |
|
$ |
10.00 |
|
|
$ |
9.98 |
|
|
|
(0.20 |
)% |
|
$ |
9.91 |
|
|
|
(0.90 |
)% |
|
$ |
9.67 |
|
|
|
(3.30 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilution/Accretion to New Investor A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share Dilution |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Held by Investor A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage Outstanding Held by Investor A |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
0.05 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.09 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.17 |
% |
|
|
|
|
NAV Dilution |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total NAV Held by Investor A |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,990 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
9,910 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
19,340 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investment by Investor A (At Price
to Public) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
9,470 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
16,840 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Dilution/Accretion to Investor A
(Total NAV Less Total Investment) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
440 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
NAV Dilution per Share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NAV per Share Held by Investor A |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
9.98 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
9.91 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
9.67 |
|
|
|
|
|
Investment per Share Held by Investor A |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
10.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
9.47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
8.42 |
|
|
|
|
|
NAV Dilution/Accretion per Share
Experienced by Investor A (NAV per Share
Less Investment per Share) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage NAV Dilution/Accretion
Experienced by Investor A (NAV
Dilution/Accretion per Share Divided by
Investment per Share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.20 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.65 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.85 |
% |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Assumes 5% in selling compensation and expenses paid by us. |
DIVIDEND REINVESTMENT PLAN
We have adopted a dividend reinvestment plan that provides for the reinvestment of
dividends on behalf of our stockholders, unless a stockholder has elected to receive
dividends in cash. As a result, if we declare a cash dividend, our stockholders who have not
opted out of our dividend reinvestment plan by the dividend record date will have their
cash dividend automatically reinvested into additional shares of our common stock.
No action will be required on the part of a registered stockholder to have their cash
dividends reinvested in shares of our common stock. A registered stockholder may elect to
receive an entire dividend in cash by notifying American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, the
plan administrator and our transfer agent and registrar, in writing so that such notice is
received by the plan administrator no later than the record date for dividends to
stockholders. The plan administrator will set up an account for shares acquired through the
plan for each stockholder who has not elected to receive dividends in cash and hold such
shares in non-certificated form. Upon request by a stockholder participating in the plan,
received in writing not less than 10 days prior to the record date, the plan administrator
will, instead of crediting shares to the participants account, issue a certificate
registered in the participants name for the number of whole shares of our common stock and a
check for any fractional share. Those stockholders whose shares are held by a broker or other
financial intermediary may receive dividends in cash by notifying their broker or other
financial intermediary of their election.
When the share price is generally trading above net asset value, we intend to primarily
use newly issued shares to implement the plan. However, we reserve the right to purchase
shares in the open market in connection with our implementation of the plan when our share
price is generally trading below net asset value. The number of newly issued shares to be
issued to a stockholder is determined by dividing the total dollar amount of the dividend
payable to such stockholder by the market price per share of our common stock at the close of
regular trading on the Nasdaq Global Select Market on the dividend payment date. Shares
purchased in open market transactions by the administrator of the dividend reinvestment plan
will be allocated to a stockholder based upon the average purchase price, excluding any
brokerage charges or other charges, of all shares of common stock purchased with respect to
the dividend. Market price per share on that date will be the closing price for such shares
on the Nasdaq Global Select Market or, if no sale is reported for such day, at the average of
their reported bid and asked prices. The number of shares of our common stock to be
outstanding after giving effect to payment of the dividend cannot be established until the
value per share at which additional shares will be issued has been determined and elections
of our stockholders have been tabulated.
There will be no brokerage charges or other charges for dividend reinvestment to
stockholders who participate in the plan. We will pay the plan administrators fees under the
plan.
Stockholders who receive dividends in the form of stock generally are subject to the
same federal, state and local tax consequences as are stockholders who elect to receive their
dividends in cash. A stockholders basis for determining gain or loss upon the sale of stock
received in a dividend from us will be equal to the total dollar amount of the dividend
payable to the
70
stockholder. Any stock received in a dividend will have a holding period for tax
purposes commencing on the day following the day on which the shares are credited to the
U.S. stockholders account.
Participants may terminate their accounts under the plan by notifying the plan
administrator via its website at www.amstock.com, by filling out the transaction request form
located at the bottom of their statement and sending it to the plan administrator at
59 Maiden Lane New York, New York 10038 or by calling the plan administrators at (212)
936-5100.
We may terminate the plan upon notice in writing mailed to each participant at least
30 days prior to any record date for the payment of any dividend by us. All correspondence
concerning the plan should be directed to the plan administrator by mail at 59 Maiden Lane
New York, New York 10038 or by telephone at (212) 936-5100.
DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STOCK
The following description is based on relevant portions of the Maryland General
Corporation Law and on our articles of incorporation and bylaws. This summary may not contain
all of the information that is important to you, and we refer you to the Maryland General
Corporation Law and our articles of incorporation and bylaws for a more detailed description
of the provisions summarized below.
Capital Stock
Under the terms of our articles of incorporation, our authorized capital stock consists
of 150,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of
which 9,054,931 shares
were outstanding as of April 22, 2009. Under our articles of incorporation, our Board of
Directors is authorized to classify and reclassify any unissued shares of stock into other
classes or series of stock, and to cause the issuance of such shares, without obtaining
stockholder approval. In addition, as permitted by the Maryland General Corporation Law, but
subject to the 1940 Act, our articles of incorporation provide that the Board of Directors,
without any action by our stockholders, may amend the articles of incorporation from time to
time to increase or decrease the aggregate number of shares of stock or the number of shares
of stock of any class or series that we have authority to issue. Under Maryland law, our
stockholders generally are not personally liable for our debts or obligations.
Common Stock
All shares of our common stock have equal voting rights and rights to earnings, assets
and distributions, except as described below. When shares are issued, upon payment therefor,
they will be duly authorized, validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable. Distributions may
be paid to the holders of our common stock if, as and when authorized by our Board of
Directors and declared by us out of assets legally available therefore. Shares of our common
stock have no conversion, exchange, preemptive or redemption rights. In the event of our
liquidation, dissolution or winding up, each share of our common stock would be entitled to
share ratably in all of our assets that are legally available for distribution after we pay
all debts and other liabilities and subject to any preferential rights of holders of our
preferred stock, if any preferred stock is outstanding at such time. Each share of our common
stock is entitled to one vote on all matters submitted to a vote of stockholders, including
the election of directors. Except as provided with respect to any other class or series of
stock, the holders of our common stock will possess exclusive voting power. There is no
cumulative voting in the election of directors, which means that holders of a majority of the
outstanding shares of common stock will elect all of our directors, and holders of less than
a majority of such shares will be unable to elect any director.
Preferred Stock
Our articles of incorporation authorize our Board of Directors to classify and
reclassify any unissued shares of stock into other classes or series of stock, including
preferred stock. Prior to issuance of shares of each class or series, the Board of Directors
is required by Maryland law and by our articles of incorporation to set the terms,
preferences, conversion or other rights, voting powers, restrictions, limitations as to
dividends or other distributions, qualifications and terms or conditions of redemption for
each class or series. Thus, the Board of Directors could authorize the issuance of shares of
preferred stock with terms and conditions which could have the effect of delaying, deferring
or preventing a transaction or a change in control that might involve a premium price for
holders of our common stock or otherwise be in their best interest. You should note, however,
that any issuance of preferred stock must comply with the requirements of the 1940 Act. The
1940 Act requires, among other things, that (1) immediately after issuance and before any
dividend or other distribution is made with respect to our common stock and before any
purchase of common stock is made, such preferred stock together with all other senior
securities must not exceed an amount equal to 50.0% of our total assets after deducting the
amount of such dividend, distribution or purchase price, as the case may be, and (2) the
holders of shares of preferred stock, if any are issued, must be entitled as a class to elect
two directors at all times and to elect a majority of the directors if distributions on such
preferred stock are in arrears by two years or more. Certain matters under the 1940 Act
require the separate vote of the holders of any issued and outstanding preferred stock. We
believe that the
71
availability for issuance of preferred stock will provide us with increased flexibility
in structuring future financings and acquisitions.
Limitation on Liability of Directors and Officers; Indemnification and Advance of Expenses
Maryland law permits a Maryland corporation to include in its articles of incorporation
a provision limiting the liability of its directors and officers to the corporation and its
stockholders for money damages except for liability resulting from (a) actual receipt of an
improper benefit or profit in money, property or services or (b) active and deliberate
dishonesty established by a final judgment as being material to the cause of action. Our
articles of incorporation contain such a provision that eliminates directors and officers
liability to the maximum extent permitted by Maryland law, subject to the requirements of the
Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the 1940 Act).
Our articles of incorporation require us, to the maximum extent permitted by Maryland
law and subject to the requirements of the 1940 Act, to indemnify any present or former
director or officer or any individual who, while a director or officer and at our request,
serves or has served another corporation, real estate investment trust, partnership, joint
venture, trust, employee benefit plan or other enterprise as a director, officer, partner or
trustee, from and against any claim or liability to which such person may become subject or
which such person may incur by reason of his or her service in any such capacity, except with
respect to any matter as to which such person shall have been finally adjudicated in any
proceeding not to have acted in good faith in the reasonable belief that his or her action
was in our best interest or to be liable to us or our stockholders by reason of willful
misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence or reckless disregard of the duties involved in the
conduct of such persons office.
Our bylaws obligate us, to the maximum extent permitted by Maryland law and subject to
the requirements of the 1940 Act, to indemnify any present or former director or officer or
any individual who, while a director or officer and at our request, serves or has served
another corporation, real estate investment trust, partnership, joint venture, trust,
employee benefit plan or other enterprise as a director, officer, partner or trustee and who
is made, or threatened to be made, a party to a proceeding by reason of his or her service in
any such capacity from and against any claim or liability to which that person may become
subject or which that person may incur by reason of his or her service in any such capacity,
except with respect to any matter as to which such person shall have been finally adjudicated
in any proceeding not to have acted in good faith in the reasonable belief that his or her
action was in our best interest or to be liable to us or our stockholders by reason of
willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence or reckless disregard of the duties involved
in the conduct of such persons office. Our bylaws also require that, to the maximum extent
permitted by Maryland law, we may pay certain expenses incurred by any such indemnified
person in advance of the final disposition of a proceeding upon receipt of an undertaking by
or on behalf of such indemnified person to repay amounts we have so paid if it is ultimately
determined that indemnification of such expenses is not authorized under our bylaws.
Maryland law requires a corporation (unless its articles of incorporation provide
otherwise, which our articles of incorporation do not) to indemnify a director or officer who
has been successful in the defense of any proceeding to which he or she is made, or
threatened to be made, a party by reason of his or her service in that capacity. Maryland law
permits a corporation to indemnify its present and former directors and officers, among
others, against judgments, penalties, fines, settlements and reasonable expenses actually
incurred by them in connection with any proceeding to which they may be made, or threatened
to be made, a party by reason of his or her service in those or other capacities unless it is
established that (a) the act or omission of the director or officer was material to the
matter giving rise to the proceeding and (1) was committed in bad faith or (2) was the result
of active and deliberate dishonesty, (b) the director or officer actually received an
improper personal benefit in money, property or services or (c) in the case of any criminal
proceeding, the director or officer had reasonable cause to believe that the act or omission
was unlawful. However, under Maryland law, a Maryland corporation may not indemnify for an
adverse judgment in a suit by or in the right of the corporation or for a judgment of
liability on the basis that a personal benefit was improperly received, unless in either case
a court orders indemnification, and then only for expenses. In addition, Maryland law permits
a corporation to advance reasonable expenses to a director or officer upon the corporations
receipt of (a) a written affirmation by the director or officer of his or her good faith
belief that he or she has met the standard of conduct necessary for indemnification by the
corporation and (b) a written undertaking by him or her or on his or her behalf to repay the
amount paid or reimbursed by the corporation if it is ultimately determined that the standard
of conduct was not met.
In addition, we have entered into Indemnity Agreements with our directors and executive
officers. The Indemnity Agreements generally provide that we will, to the extent specified in
the agreements and to the fullest extent permitted by the 1940 Act and Maryland law as in
effect on the day the agreement is executed, indemnify and advance expenses to each
indemnitee that is, or is threatened to be made, a party to or a witness in any civil,
criminal or administrative proceeding. We will indemnify the indemnitee against all expenses,
judgments, fines, penalties and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred
in connection with any such proceeding unless it is established that (i) the act or omission
of the indemnitee was material to the matter giving rise to the proceeding and (a) was
committed in bad faith or (b) was the result of active and deliberate dishonesty, (ii) the
indemnitee actually received an improper personal benefit, or (iii) in the case of a criminal
proceeding, the indemnitee had reasonable cause to believe his conduct was unlawful.
Additionally, for so long as we are subject to the 1940 Act, no advancement of expenses will
be made until (i) the indemnitee provides a security for his undertaking, (ii) we are insured
72
against losses arising by reason of any lawful advances, or (iii) the majority of a
quorum of our disinterested directors, or independent counsel in a written opinion, determine
based on a review of readily available facts that there is reason to believe that the
indemnitee ultimately will be found entitled to indemnification. The Indemnity Agreements
also provide that if the indemnification rights provided for therein are unavailable for any
reason, we will pay, in the first instance, the entire amount incurred by the indemnitee in
connection with any covered proceeding and waive and relinquish any right of contribution we
may have against the indemnitee. The rights provided by the Indemnity Agreements are in
addition to any other rights to indemnification or advancement of expenses to which the
indemnitee may be entitled under applicable law, our articles of incorporation, our bylaws,
any agreement, a vote of stockholders or a resolution of directors, or otherwise. No
amendment or repeal of the Indemnity Agreements will limit or restrict any right of the
indemnitee in respect of any action taken or omitted by the indemnitee prior to such
amendment or repeal. The Indemnity Agreements will terminate upon the later of (i) ten years
after the date the indemnitee has ceased to serve as our director or officer, or (ii) one
year after the final termination of any proceeding for which the indemnitee is granted rights
of indemnification or advancement of expenses or which is brought by the indemnitee. The
above description of the Indemnity Agreements is subject to, and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to, all the provisions of the form of Indemnity Agreement.
We have obtained primary and excess insurance policies insuring our directors and
officers against certain liabilities they may incur in their capacity as directors and
officers. Under such policies, the insurer, on our behalf, may also pay amounts for which we
have granted indemnification to the directors or officers.
Provisions of the Maryland General Corporation Law and Our Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws
The Maryland General Corporation Law and our articles of incorporation and bylaws
contain provisions that could make it more difficult for a potential acquiror to acquire us
by means of a tender offer, proxy contest or otherwise. These provisions are expected to
discourage certain coercive takeover practices and inadequate takeover bids and to encourage
persons seeking to acquire control of us to negotiate first with our Board of Directors. We
believe that the benefits of these provisions outweigh the potential disadvantages of
discouraging any such acquisition proposals because, among other things, the negotiation of
such proposals may improve their terms.
Election of Directors
Our bylaws currently provide that directors are elected by a plurality of the votes cast
in the election of directors. Pursuant to our articles of incorporation and bylaws, our Board
of Directors may amend the bylaws to alter the vote required to elect directors.
Number of Directors; Vacancies; Removal
Our articles of incorporation provide that the number of directors will be set only by
the Board of Directors in accordance with our bylaws. Our bylaws provide that a majority of
our entire Board of Directors may at any time increase or decrease the number of directors.
However, unless the bylaws are amended, the number of directors may never be less than one or
more than twelve. We have elected to be subject to the provision of Subtitle 8 of Title 3 of
the Maryland General Corporation Law regarding the filling of vacancies on the Board of
Directors. Accordingly, at such time, except as may be provided by the Board of Directors in
setting the terms of any class or series of preferred stock, any and all vacancies on the
Board of Directors may be filled only by the affirmative vote of a majority of the remaining
directors in office, even if the remaining directors do not constitute a quorum, and any
director elected to fill a vacancy shall serve for the remainder of the full term of the
directorship in which the vacancy occurred and until a successor is elected and qualifies,
subject to any applicable requirements of the 1940 Act. Our articles of incorporation provide
that a director may be removed only for cause, as defined in the articles of incorporation,
and then only by the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast
in the election of directors.
Action by Stockholders
Under the Maryland General Corporation Law, stockholder action may be taken only at an
annual or special meeting of stockholders or by unanimous consent in lieu of a meeting
(unless the articles of incorporation provide for stockholder action by less than unanimous
written consent, which our articles of incorporation do not). These provisions, combined with
the requirements of our bylaws regarding the calling of a stockholder-requested special
meeting of stockholders discussed below, may have the effect of delaying consideration of a
stockholder proposal until the next annual meeting.
Advance Notice Provisions for Stockholder Nominations and Stockholder Proposals
Our bylaws provide that with respect to an annual meeting of stockholders, nominations
of persons for election to the Board of Directors and the proposal of business to be
considered by stockholders may be made only (1) pursuant to our notice of the meeting, (2) by
the Board of Directors or (3) by a stockholder who is entitled to vote at the meeting and who
has complied with the advance notice procedures of the bylaws. With respect to special
meetings of stockholders, only the business specified in our
73
notice of the meeting may be brought before the meeting. Nominations of persons for
election to the Board of Directors at a special meeting may be made only (1) pursuant to our
notice of the meeting, (2) by the Board of Directors or (3) provided that the Board of
Directors has determined that directors will be elected at the meeting, by a stockholder who
is entitled to vote at the meeting and who has complied with the advance notice provisions of
the bylaws.
The purpose of requiring stockholders to give us advance notice of nominations and other
business is to afford our Board of Directors a meaningful opportunity to consider the
qualifications of the proposed nominees and the advisability of any other proposed business
and, to the extent deemed necessary or desirable by our Board of Directors, to inform
stockholders and make recommendations about such qualifications or business, as well as to
provide a more orderly procedure for conducting meetings of stockholders. Although our bylaws
do not give our Board of Directors any power to disapprove stockholder nominations for the
election of directors or proposals recommending certain action, they may have the effect of
precluding a contest for the election of directors or the consideration of stockholder
proposals if proper procedures are not followed and of discouraging or deterring a third
party from conducting a solicitation of proxies to elect its own slate of directors or to
approve its own proposal without regard to whether consideration of such nominees or
proposals might be harmful or beneficial to us and our stockholders.
Calling of Special Meeting of Stockholders
Our bylaws provide that special meetings of stockholders may be called by our Board of
Directors and certain of our officers. Additionally, our bylaws provide that, subject to the
satisfaction of certain procedural and informational requirements by the stockholders
requesting the meeting, a special meeting of stockholders shall be called by our secretary
upon the written request of stockholders entitled to cast not less than a majority of all of
the votes entitled to be cast at such meeting.
Approval of Extraordinary Corporate Action; Amendment of Articles of Incorporation and
Bylaws
Under Maryland law, a Maryland corporation generally cannot dissolve, amend its articles
of incorporation, merge, sell all or substantially all of its assets, engage in a share
exchange or engage in similar transactions outside the ordinary course of business, unless
approved by the affirmative vote of stockholders entitled to cast at least two-thirds of the
votes entitled to be cast on the matter. However, a Maryland corporation may provide in its
articles of incorporation for approval of these matters by a lesser percentage, but not less
than a majority of all of the votes entitled to be cast on the matter. Our articles of
incorporation generally provide for approval of amendments to our articles of incorporation
and extraordinary transactions by the stockholders entitled to cast at least a majority of
the votes entitled to be cast on the matter. Our articles of incorporation also provide that
certain amendments and any proposal for our conversion, whether by merger or otherwise, from
a closed-end company to an open-end company or any proposal for our liquidation or
dissolution requires the approval of the stockholders entitled to cast at least 75.0% of the
votes entitled to be cast on such matter. However, if such amendment or proposal is approved
by at least 75.0% of our continuing directors (in addition to approval by our Board of
Directors), such amendment or proposal may be approved by the stockholders entitled to cast a
majority of the votes entitled to be cast on such a matter. The continuing directors are
defined in our articles of incorporation as our current directors, as well as those directors
whose nomination for election by the stockholders or whose election by the directors to fill
vacancies is approved by a majority of the continuing directors then on the Board of
Directors.
Our articles of incorporation and bylaws provide that the Board of Directors will have
the exclusive power to make, alter, amend or repeal any provision of our bylaws.
No Appraisal Rights
Except with respect to appraisal rights arising in connection with the Maryland Control
Share Acquisition Act, or Control Share Act, discussed below, as permitted by the Maryland
General Corporation Law, our articles of incorporation provide that stockholders will not be
entitled to exercise appraisal rights.
Control Share Acquisitions
The Control Share Act provides that control shares of a Maryland corporation acquired in
a control share acquisition have no voting rights except to the extent approved by a vote of
two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast on the matter. Shares owned by the acquiror, by
officers or by directors who are employees of the corporation are excluded from shares
entitled to vote on the matter. Control shares are voting shares of stock which, if
aggregated with all other shares of stock owned by the acquiror or in respect of which the
acquiror is able to exercise or direct the exercise of voting power (except solely by virtue
of a revocable proxy), would entitle the acquiror to exercise voting power in electing
directors within one of the following ranges of voting power:
|
|
|
one-tenth but less than one-third; |
74
|
|
|
one-third or more but less than a majority; or |
|
|
|
|
a majority or more of all voting power. |