Form 10-Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2011
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from [ to ].
Commission file number: 001-34741
NORANDA ALUMINUM HOLDING CORPORATION
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
20-8908550 |
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) |
|
|
|
801 Crescent Centre Drive, Suite 600 |
|
|
Franklin, Tennessee
|
|
37067 |
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
Registrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code: (615) 771-5700
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to
file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days.
YES þ NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and
posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be
submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter)
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to submit and post such files).
YES þ NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See
definition of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting
company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer þ
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in
Rule 12b-2 of the Act). YES o NO þ
As of November 4, 2011, there were 67,231,472 shares of Noranda common stock
outstanding.
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
|
Item 1. |
|
Financial Statements |
NORANDA ALUMINUM HOLDING CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in millions, except par value)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
September 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
33.8 |
|
|
|
103.9 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
131.6 |
|
|
|
140.0 |
|
Inventories, net |
|
|
201.1 |
|
|
|
203.9 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
12.9 |
|
|
|
14.5 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
19.2 |
|
|
|
36.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
398.6 |
|
|
|
499.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
719.9 |
|
|
|
696.5 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
137.6 |
|
|
|
137.6 |
|
Other intangible assets, net |
|
|
73.0 |
|
|
|
68.6 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
85.6 |
|
|
|
83.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
|
1,414.7 |
|
|
|
1,485.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
95.7 |
|
|
|
128.7 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
54.9 |
|
|
|
64.9 |
|
Taxes payable |
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
Derivative liabilities, net |
|
|
23.2 |
|
|
|
33.5 |
|
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
48.5 |
|
|
|
49.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
227.1 |
|
|
|
278.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
419.7 |
|
|
|
428.5 |
|
Long-term derivative liabilities, net |
|
|
18.4 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
Pension and other post-retirement liabilities |
|
|
116.0 |
|
|
|
110.0 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
57.9 |
|
|
|
49.2 |
|
Long-term deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
277.9 |
|
|
|
245.5 |
|
Common stock subject to redemption (0.2
shares at December 31, 2010 and September
30, 2011) |
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
Shareholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock (25.0 shares
authorized, $0.01 par value; no shares
issued and outstanding at December 31,
2010 and September 30, 2011) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock (200.0 shares authorized;
$0.01 par value; 66.81 shares issued
and outstanding at December 31, 2010,
67.23 shares issued and outstanding at
September 30, 2011, including 0.2
shares subject to redemption at
December 31, 2010 and September 30,
2011) |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
Capital in excess of par value |
|
|
227.7 |
|
|
|
232.9 |
|
Retained earnings (accumulated deficit) |
|
|
(8.2 |
) |
|
|
108.3 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
69.5 |
|
|
|
17.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
289.7 |
|
|
|
359.8 |
|
Non-controlling interest |
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity |
|
|
295.7 |
|
|
|
365.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity |
|
|
1,414.7 |
|
|
|
1,485.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes
2
NORANDA ALUMINUM HOLDING CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in millions, except per share information)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Sales |
|
|
314.2 |
|
|
|
400.4 |
|
|
|
950.6 |
|
|
|
1,221.3 |
|
Operating costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
274.2 |
|
|
|
350.4 |
|
|
|
830.1 |
|
|
|
1,031.8 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
19.9 |
|
|
|
26.8 |
|
|
|
92.0 |
|
|
|
72.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating costs and expenses |
|
|
294.1 |
|
|
|
377.2 |
|
|
|
922.1 |
|
|
|
1,104.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
20.1 |
|
|
|
23.2 |
|
|
|
28.5 |
|
|
|
117.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (income) expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
25.0 |
|
|
|
16.4 |
|
Gain on hedging activities, net |
|
|
(21.7 |
) |
|
|
(19.5 |
) |
|
|
(44.0 |
) |
|
|
(65.6 |
) |
Gain on debt repurchase |
|
|
(3.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income |
|
|
(18.0 |
) |
|
|
(14.3 |
) |
|
|
(19.9 |
) |
|
|
(49.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
38.1 |
|
|
|
37.5 |
|
|
|
48.4 |
|
|
|
166.4 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
12.9 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
16.4 |
|
|
|
49.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
25.2 |
|
|
|
30.8 |
|
|
|
32.0 |
|
|
|
116.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.46 |
|
|
$ |
0.46 |
|
|
$ |
0.65 |
|
|
$ |
1.74 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
|
$ |
0.64 |
|
|
$ |
1.71 |
|
Weighted-average common shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
55.28 |
|
|
|
67.23 |
|
|
|
49.42 |
|
|
|
67.00 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
56.30 |
|
|
|
68.49 |
|
|
|
50.31 |
|
|
|
68.32 |
|
See accompanying notes
3
NORANDA ALUMINUM HOLDING CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY
(in millions)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital in |
|
|
earnings |
|
|
other |
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred |
|
|
Common |
|
|
excess of |
|
|
(accumulated |
|
|
comprehensive |
|
|
controlling |
|
|
|
|
|
|
stock |
|
|
stock |
|
|
par value |
|
|
deficit) |
|
|
income |
|
|
interest |
|
|
Total equity |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Balance, December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
16.1 |
|
|
|
(75.1 |
) |
|
|
144.8 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
92.2 |
|
Components of comprehensive loss: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66.9 |
|
Pension loss, net of tax of $4.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8.4 |
) |
Unrealized loss on derivatives,
net of tax of $8.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14.7 |
) |
Reclassification of derivative
amounts realized in net income, net
of tax of $29.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(52.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(52.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8.4 |
) |
Issuance of common shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
205.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
206.0 |
|
Stock compensation expense related
to equity awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
227.7 |
|
|
|
(8.2 |
) |
|
|
69.5 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
295.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Components of comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
116.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
116.5 |
|
Unrealized loss on derivatives,
net of tax of $2.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4.9 |
) |
Reclassification of derivative
amounts realized in net income, net
of tax of $26.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(46.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(46.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64.9 |
|
Excess tax benefit related to
share-based payment arrangements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
Issuance of common shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
Stock compensation expense related
to equity awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, September 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
232.9 |
|
|
|
108.3 |
|
|
|
17.9 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
365.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes
4
NORANDA ALUMINUM HOLDING CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in millions)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
32.0 |
|
|
|
116.5 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
76.1 |
|
|
|
73.1 |
|
Non-cash interest expense |
|
|
14.3 |
|
|
|
11.0 |
|
Last in, first out and lower of cost or market inventory adjustments |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
17.3 |
|
Loss on disposal of assets |
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
Gain on hedging activities, net of cash settlements |
|
|
(32.3 |
) |
|
|
(83.1 |
) |
Settlements from hedge terminations, net |
|
|
164.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on debt repurchase |
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
|
(2.3 |
) |
Excess tax benefit related to share-based payment arrangements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
Stock compensation expense |
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
Changes in other assets |
|
|
(8.7 |
) |
|
|
(5.7 |
) |
Changes in pension, other post-retirement and other long-term liabilities |
|
|
12.7 |
|
|
|
(13.9 |
) |
Changes in current operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
(29.0 |
) |
|
|
(8.4 |
) |
Inventories, net |
|
|
(13.2 |
) |
|
|
(22.2 |
) |
Taxes receivable and taxes payable |
|
|
(5.1 |
) |
|
|
(1.8 |
) |
Other current assets |
|
|
18.1 |
|
|
|
(20.0 |
) |
Accounts payable |
|
|
9.3 |
|
|
|
34.9 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
(2.7 |
) |
|
|
9.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
249.9 |
|
|
|
110.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(40.3 |
) |
|
|
(44.1 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(40.1 |
) |
|
|
(41.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common shares |
|
|
82.9 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
Repayments on revolving credit facility |
|
|
(215.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Repayments of long-term debt |
|
|
(211.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Excess tax benefit related to share-based payment arrangements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
(344.0 |
) |
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(134.2 |
) |
|
|
70.1 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
167.2 |
|
|
|
33.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
|
33.0 |
|
|
|
103.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes
5
NORANDA ALUMINUM HOLDING CORPORATION
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
1. ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of presentation
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements represent the consolidation of
Noranda Aluminum Holding Corporation and all companies that we directly or indirectly control
(Noranda, the Company, we, us, and our). Noranda HoldCo refers only to Noranda Aluminum
Holding Corporation, excluding its subsidiaries. Noranda AcquisitionCo refers only to Noranda
Aluminum Acquisition Corporation, the wholly-owned direct subsidiary of Noranda HoldCo, excluding
its subsidiaries.
These unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S.
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (U.S. GAAP) for interim financial information. The
consolidated financial statements, including these condensed notes, are unaudited and exclude some
of the disclosures required in annual consolidated financial statements. Consolidated balance sheet
data as of December 31, 2010 was derived from our audited consolidated financial statements. In
managements opinion, these unaudited consolidated financial statements include all adjustments
(including normal recurring accruals) that are considered necessary for the fair presentation of
our financial position and operating results. All intercompany transactions and accounts have been
eliminated in consolidation. Certain reclassifications have been made to previously issued
consolidated financial statements to conform to the current period presentation. These
reclassifications had no impact on operating results or cash flows.
The operating results presented for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the
results that may be expected for any other interim period or for the entire year. For example, our
interim operating results are affected by peak power usage rates from June through September each
year which affect our operating costs at the New Madrid smelter. We are also subject to seasonality
associated with the demand cycles of our end-use customers, which results in lower shipment levels
from November to February relative to other periods during the year.
These unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with our
audited consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with
the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on March 7, 2011.
Common stock offerings
On May 19, 2010, we completed an initial public offering (IPO) of 11.5 million shares of
common stock at an $8.00 per share public offering price on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE:
NOR). The net proceeds after the underwriting discounts, commissions, fees and expenses amounted to
$82.9 million. We used those net proceeds from the offering together with $95.9 million of proceeds
from settling all outstanding fixed price aluminum hedges, to repurchase the remaining principal
amount of outstanding Noranda HoldCo Senior Floating Rate Notes due 2014 (HoldCo Notes) for a
purchase price of $66.4 million, and to repay $110.0 million principal amount outstanding under the
Term B Loan Due 2014 (term B loan.) The remaining $2.4 million was used for other corporate
purposes.
In connection with the IPO, pursuant to our amended and restated certificate of incorporation,
our authorized capital stock increased from 100.0 million to 225.0 million, of which 200.0 million
($0.01 par value) is designated as common stock and 25.0 million (at $0.01 par value) is designated
as preferred stock. As of September 30, 2011, no preferred stock is outstanding.
On December 10, 2010, we completed a follow-on public offering of 11.5 million shares of
common stock at an $11.35 per share public offering price on the NYSE. The net proceeds after the
underwriting discounts, commissions, fees and expenses amounted to $123.1 million. We used those
proceeds to repay $122.3 million principal amount outstanding under the term B loan. The remaining
$0.8 million was used for other corporate purposes.
2. SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW DATA
Depreciation and amortization in the accompanying unaudited consolidated statements of cash
flows includes depreciation of property, plant and equipment and other, amortization of intangible
assets and amortization of other long-term assets as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Depreciation of property, plant and equipment and other |
|
|
22.2 |
|
|
|
21.4 |
|
|
|
68.4 |
|
|
|
63.9 |
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
Amortization of other long-term assets |
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total depreciation and amortization |
|
|
24.9 |
|
|
|
25.0 |
|
|
|
76.1 |
|
|
|
73.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
Purchases of property, plant and equipment accrued in accounts payable and not yet paid were
$3.4 million as of September 30, 2011 and are not reflected as capital expenditures in the
accompanying unaudited consolidated statements of cash flows. For the nine months ended September
30, 2011, we capitalized interest of $0.6 million related to long-term capital projects.
Cash paid for interest and income taxes was as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Interest |
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
14.1 |
|
|
|
59.8 |
|
Jamaican income taxes (prepayment) |
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
3. INVENTORIES
We use the last in, first out (LIFO) method of valuing raw materials, work-in-process and
finished goods inventories at our New Madrid smelter and our rolling mills. Supplies inventories at
our rolling mills are valued using the first in, first out (FIFO) method. Product inventories at
our bauxite mining operations in St. Ann, Jamaica and our alumina refinery operations in Gramercy,
Louisiana, and supplies inventories at our smelter in New Madrid, Missouri are valued at
weighted-average cost and are not subject to the LIFO adjustment. Combined Gramercy and St. Ann
inventories comprise 24.9% and 24.1% of total product inventories, at cost, at December 31, 2010
and September 30, 2011, respectively. Inventories, net, consisted of the following (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Raw materials, at cost |
|
|
61.3 |
|
|
|
83.8 |
|
Work-in-process, at cost |
|
|
66.1 |
|
|
|
59.5 |
|
Finished goods, at cost |
|
|
27.7 |
|
|
|
27.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total product inventories, at cost |
|
|
155.1 |
|
|
|
171.1 |
|
LIFO adjustments |
|
|
13.1 |
|
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
Lower of cost or market (LCM) reserve |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product inventories, at lower of cost or market |
|
|
168.2 |
|
|
|
164.6 |
|
Supplies |
|
|
32.9 |
|
|
|
39.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total inventories, net |
|
|
201.1 |
|
|
|
203.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
Property, plant and equipment, net, consisted of the following (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated useful |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
lives |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
(in years) |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Land |
|
|
|
|
|
|
47.5 |
|
|
|
49.1 |
|
Buildings and improvements |
|
|
1047 |
|
|
|
127.0 |
|
|
|
127.9 |
|
Machinery and equipment |
|
|
350 |
|
|
|
817.6 |
|
|
|
827.1 |
|
Construction in progress |
|
|
|
|
|
|
34.5 |
|
|
|
47.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, at cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,026.6 |
|
|
|
1,051.3 |
|
Accumulated depreciation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(306.7 |
) |
|
|
(354.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
719.9 |
|
|
|
696.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. SUPPLEMENTAL BALANCE SHEET INFORMATION
Cash and cash equivalents consisted of the following (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Cash |
|
|
12.4 |
|
|
|
67.5 |
|
Money market funds (see Note 17, Fair Value Measurements) |
|
|
21.4 |
|
|
|
36.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
33.8 |
|
|
|
103.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
Accounts receivable, net, consisted of the following (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Trade |
|
|
131.8 |
|
|
|
140.1 |
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accounts receivable, net |
|
|
131.6 |
|
|
|
140.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current assets consisted of the following (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Current foreign deferred tax asset |
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
Employee loans receivable, net |
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
Restricted cash (see Note 16, Commitments and Contingencies) |
|
|
9.8 |
|
|
|
27.8 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other current assets |
|
|
19.2 |
|
|
|
36.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets consisted of the following (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Deferred financing costs, net of amortization |
|
|
11.0 |
|
|
|
8.8 |
|
Cash surrender value of life insurance |
|
|
24.0 |
|
|
|
23.9 |
|
Pension asset |
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
Restricted cash (see Note 13, Reclamation, Land
and Asset Retirement Obligations) |
|
|
13.6 |
|
|
|
14.2 |
|
Supplies |
|
|
16.1 |
|
|
|
13.7 |
|
Prepaid Jamaican income taxes |
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
9.0 |
|
Other |
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other assets |
|
|
85.6 |
|
|
|
83.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued liabilities consisted of the following (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Compensation and benefits |
|
|
26.7 |
|
|
|
24.2 |
|
Workers compensation |
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
9.9 |
|
|
|
15.8 |
|
Accrued interest |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
Asset retirement obligations (see Note 13,
Reclamation, Land and Asset Retirement
Obligations) |
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
Land obligation (see Note 13, Reclamation,
Land and Asset Retirement Obligations) |
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
Reclamation obligation (see Note 13
Reclamation, Land and Asset Retirement
Obligations) |
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
Environmental remediation obligations (see
Note 16, Commitments and Contingencies) |
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
Obligations to the Government of Jamaica |
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
Pension and other post-retirement liabilities |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
Restricted stock unit liability awards (see
Note 9, Shareholders Equity and
Share-Based Payments) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accrued liabilities |
|
|
54.9 |
|
|
|
64.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
Other long-term liabilities consisted of the following (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Reserve for uncertain tax positions |
|
|
10.5 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
Workers compensation |
|
|
11.6 |
|
|
|
13.0 |
|
Asset retirement obligations (see Note
13, Reclamation, Land and Asset
Retirement Obligations) |
|
|
12.7 |
|
|
|
13.9 |
|
Land obligation (see Note 13,
Reclamation, Land and Asset Retirement
Obligations) |
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
7.4 |
|
Reclamation obligation (see Note 13,
Reclamation, Land and Asset Retirement
Obligations) |
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
Environmental remediation obligations
(see Note 16, Commitments and
Contingencies) |
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
Deferred interest payable |
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred compensation and other |
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other long-term liabilities |
|
|
57.9 |
|
|
|
49.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI) consisted of the following (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Unrealized gains on cash flow hedges, net of
tax of $75.1 at December 31, 2010 and $45.6 at
September 30, 2011 |
|
|
132.1 |
|
|
|
80.5 |
|
Pension loss, net of tax of $36.8 at December 31,
2010 and $36.8 at September 30, 2011 |
|
|
(62.6 |
) |
|
|
(62.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
69.5 |
|
|
|
17.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6. LONG-TERM DEBT
|
|
|
Our outstanding debt consisted of the following (dollars in millions): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
September 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
Carrying value |
|
|
Fair value |
|
|
Interest rate |
|
|
Carrying value |
|
|
Fair value |
|
|
Interest rate |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
Noranda AcquisitionCo: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Floating Rate
Notes due 2015
(AcquisitionCo Notes) |
|
|
341.5 |
|
|
|
309.0 |
|
|
|
5.19 |
|
|
|
350.3 |
|
|
|
318.8 |
|
|
|
4.42 |
|
Term B loan due 2014 |
|
|
78.2 |
|
|
|
78.2 |
|
|
|
2.01 |
|
|
|
78.2 |
|
|
|
78.2 |
|
|
|
1.99 |
|
Revolving credit facility |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt |
|
|
419.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
428.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, Noranda AcquisitionCo issued $8.9 million of
AcquisitionCo Notes as payment-in-kind for interest due May 15, 2011. For subsequent periods,
Noranda AcquisitionCo is required to pay all interest in cash. In the nine months ended September
30, 2010, Noranda AcquisitionCo and Noranda HoldCo issued $9.1 million and $2.3 million in
AcquisitionCo Notes and HoldCo Notes, respectively, as payment for interest due May 15, 2010. As of
December 31, 2010, we had $215.2 million available for borrowing under our revolving credit
facility, net of $27.5 million outstanding letters of credit. During third quarter 2011,
outstanding letters of credit on the revolving credit facility increased to $29.4 million, which
reduced the amount available for borrowing to $213.3 million as of September 30, 2011.
Gain or loss on debt repurchase
During third quarter 2010, we repurchased and retired $20.6 million aggregate principal amount
of our AcquisitionCo Notes. During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, we used available cash
balances, proceeds from our IPO in May 2010 and proceeds from the termination of fixed-price
aluminum swaps, completed in connection with the IPO, to repay $127.5 million and $215.9 million of
aggregate principal amount on the term B loan and revolving credit facility at face value,
respectively, and to repurchase $66.3 million and $20.6 million aggregate principal amount of our
HoldCo Notes and AcquisitionCo Notes, respectively. Debt repurchases resulted in the accelerated
amortization of $0.3 million of deferred financing cost for the three months ended September 30,
2010 and $2.9 million of deferred financing costs and unamortized debt issuance discount for the
nine months ended September 30, 2010. No debt repurchases or repayments were made during the three
and nine months ended September 30, 2011.
9
In the table below, the net carrying amount of debt repurchased includes aggregate principal
amount of the debt repurchased plus accrued interest, net of any unamortized debt issuance discount
and deferred financing costs. The (gain) loss on debt repurchased during the 2010 periods consisted
of the following (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving credit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
HoldCo Notes |
|
|
AcquisitionCo Note |
|
|
Term B loan |
|
|
facility |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Net carrying amount of debt repurchased |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20.6 |
) |
Amount paid to repurchase debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on debt repurchase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AcquisitionCo |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving credit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
HoldCo Notes |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Term B loan |
|
|
facility |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Net carrying amount of debt repurchased |
|
|
(65.4 |
) |
|
|
(20.6 |
) |
|
|
(125.9 |
) |
|
|
(215.9 |
) |
|
|
(427.8 |
) |
Amount paid to repurchase debt |
|
|
66.4 |
|
|
|
17.1 |
|
|
|
127.5 |
|
|
|
215.9 |
|
|
|
426.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Gain) loss on debt repurchase |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
(3.5 |
) |
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7. RESTRUCTURING
On February 26, 2010, we announced a workforce and business process restructuring in our U.S.
operations that reduced operating costs, conserved liquidity and improved operating efficiency. The
U.S. workforce restructuring plan reduced headcount through a combination of voluntary retirement
packages and involuntary terminations. We completed substantially all activities associated with
this workforce reduction as of February 26, 2010.
In connection with a decision to contract the substantial portion of our bauxite mining to
third party contractors, on April 21, 2010, we announced a workforce reduction in our Jamaican
bauxite mining operations. The workforce restructuring plan reduced headcount through involuntary
terminations. We completed substantially all activities associated with this workforce reduction as
of April 21, 2010.
These restructuring activities resulted in $0.3 million and $8.1 million of pre-tax
restructuring charges in the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively,
primarily due to one-time termination benefits and early retirement benefits. We recorded these
charges in the accompanying unaudited consolidated statements of operations as a component of
selling, general and administrative expenses when employee service requirements, if any, were met.
We paid the majority of these restructuring expenses in 2010. We paid the final restructuring
expenses of $0.5 million during the first nine months of 2011.
8. PENSIONS AND OTHER POST-RETIREMENT BENEFITS
We sponsor defined benefit pension plans for hourly and salaried employees. Benefits under our
sponsored defined benefit pension plans are based on years of service and/or eligible compensation
prior to retirement. We also sponsor other post-retirement benefit (OPEB) plans for certain
employees. These benefits include life and health insurance. In addition, we provide supplemental
executive retirement benefits for certain executive officers.
Net periodic cost (benefit) was as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noranda Pension |
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Service cost |
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
7.9 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
13.3 |
|
|
|
13.7 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(4.2 |
) |
|
|
(4.9 |
) |
|
|
(12.6 |
) |
|
|
(14.7 |
) |
Actuarial loss |
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
Prior service cost |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
Settlement and termination benefits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic cost |
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
13.0 |
|
|
|
11.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
St. Ann Pension |
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Service cost |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
(1.7 |
) |
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
Recognized net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net amortization and deferral |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
Curtailment gain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic cost (benefit) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noranda OPEB |
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Service cost |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
Actuarial gain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Prior service cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic cost |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
St. Ann OPEB |
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Service cost |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
Recognized loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net amortization and deferral |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
Curtailment gain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic cost |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employer contributions
During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, we contributed $18.0 million to the Noranda
pension plans and $0.4 million to the St. Ann pension plans. We anticipate contributing
approximately $3.5 million to the Noranda pension plans during fourth quarter 2011 in order to
maintain an Adjusted Funding Target Attainment Percentage under the Pension Protection Act of 2006
of 80%.
9. SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY AND SHARE-BASED PAYMENTS
We recorded stock compensation expense as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Stock options |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
Restricted stock unit equity awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
Restricted stock unit liability awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stock compensation expense |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We reserved 3,800,000 shares of common stock for issuance under our 2007 Long-Term Incentive
Plan. Employees and non-employee directors held 1,650,231 options at September 30, 2011. The
investor director provider group held 140,000 options at September 30, 2011. The investor director
provider group consists of the six full-time employees of our principal shareholders affiliated
with Apollo Management VI (Apollo) who serve on our Board of Directors (the Board). Common
stock shares awarded or sold to employees and non-employee directors under the plan totaled 940,232
shares through September 30, 2011. We had 618,785 shares available for issuance under the 2007
Long-Term Incentive Plan as of September 30, 2011.
We reserved 5,200,000 shares of common stock for issuance under our 2010 Incentive Award Plan.
As of September 30, 2011, employees and non-employee directors held 496,350 service-vesting
restricted stock units awards (RSUs) and a target amount of 243,791 performance-vesting RSUs. The
number and grant date fair value of the performance awards to be issued, a maximum of
487,582 awards, will be based on Company performance for the years 2011 through 2013. We had
4,459,859 shares available for issuance under the 2010 Incentive Award Plan as of September 30,
2011.
11
In the first nine months of 2011, we granted 90,000 service-vesting RSUs, (the investor
director provider RSUs,) in lieu of RSUs that would otherwise be granted under the director
compensation program to the investor director provider group. These investor director provider RSUs
vest in December 2011 and June 2012, subject to the continued service of the Apollo employees as
our directors. We will make a cash payment to Apollo equal to the fair market value of the
outstanding investor director provider RSUs on the vesting dates. We account for the investor
director provider RSUs as liability awards. We remeasure the fair value of the liability at each
reporting date and adjust stock compensation expense so that the amount ultimately recorded as
stock compensation expense will equal the cash paid on the vesting date (see Note 17 Fair Value
Measurements). As of September 30, 2011, we had $0.5 million in accrued liabilities in the
accompanying unaudited consolidated balance sheet for these awards.
In May 2010, in connection with the Companys IPO, stock options were modified to remove a
call option which had created an implicit seven year vesting period. The effect of this
modification was to accelerate expense recognition for certain fully-vested options and to change
the amount of expense to be recognized based on an assumed forfeiture rate. We recognized $3.2
million of compensation expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 in connection with
this modification.
Our stock option activity and related information follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee options and non-employee director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
options |
|
|
Investor director provider options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average |
|
|
|
Common shares |
|
|
exercise price |
|
|
Common shares |
|
|
exercise price |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
Outstanding, December 31, 2010 |
|
|
2,087,056 |
|
|
|
1.76 |
|
|
|
140,000 |
|
|
|
9.00 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
(422,423 |
) |
|
|
1.58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(14,402 |
) |
|
|
2.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, September 30, 2011 |
|
|
1,650,231 |
|
|
|
1.80 |
|
|
|
140,000 |
|
|
|
9.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fully vested, September 30, 2011
(weighted-average remaining
contractual term of 5.9 years and
6.1 years, respectively) |
|
|
1,029,706 |
|
|
|
2.10 |
|
|
|
140,000 |
|
|
|
9.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currently exercisable, September
30, 2011 (weighted-average
remaining contractual term of 5.9
years and 6.1 years, respectively) |
|
|
919,366 |
|
|
|
2.11 |
|
|
|
140,000 |
|
|
|
9.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our RSU activity follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
employee and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Target |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
non-employee |
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
non-vested |
|
|
Non-vested |
|
|
Fair value as of |
|
|
|
director service |
|
|
average grant |
|
|
performance |
|
|
investor director |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
RSUs |
|
|
date fair value |
|
|
RSUs |
|
|
provider RSUs |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
Non-vested, December 31, 2010 |
|
|
103,524 |
|
|
|
11.63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
405,403 |
|
|
|
15.32 |
|
|
|
248,038 |
|
|
|
90,000 |
|
|
|
8.35 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(12,577 |
) |
|
|
15.48 |
|
|
|
(4,247 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested, September 30, 2011 |
|
|
496,350 |
|
|
|
14.55 |
|
|
|
243,791 |
|
|
|
90,000 |
|
|
|
8.35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We determined grant date fair value of service-vesting RSUs based on the closing price of our
common stock on the grant date. We estimated a forfeiture rate for service-vesting RSUs based on
the historical forfeiture rate for employee stock option grants of comparable size. We expect all
non-employee director and investor director provider RSUs to vest. Service-vesting RSUs will
generally vest over three years, on the anniversary of the grant date, in the following increments:
25% on the first anniversary, 25% on the second anniversary and 50% on the third anniversary. We
recognize stock compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the three year vesting period.
As of September 30, 2011, unrecognized stock compensation expense related to non-vested
options, service-vesting RSUs and investor director provider RSUs was $6.0 million. We will
recognize this amount over a weighted-average period of 1.6 years. We have not yet recognized stock
compensation expense for performance-vesting RSUs because the performance conditions have not been
determined as of September 30, 2011.
Cash Dividend
On November 1, 2011, the Board declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of $0.03 per share
on our outstanding shares of common stock. The Board anticipates declaring this dividend in future
quarters on a regular basis; however, changes in our financial condition and cash needs could
result in dividends being declared in different amounts, or not at all.
12
In addition, on November 1, 2011, the Board declared a supplemental cash dividend of $1.00 per
share on our outstanding common stock. The regular and supplemental dividends will be paid on
November 22, 2011 to shareholders of record as of the close of business on November 14, 2011.
Cash payments
related to the November 2011 regular and supplemental dividends will total approximately $71.0
million in aggregate, comprising $69.2 million of dividends on outstanding shares of common stock
and $1.8 million of cash payments to holders of vested and unvested stock options. We
expect to pay these amounts entirely from available cash balances.
10. INCOME TAXES
Our effective income tax rate was approximately 33.9% for the nine months ended September 30,
2010 and 30.0% for the nine months ended September 30, 2011. The effective tax rate for both
periods was primarily impacted by state income taxes, the Internal Revenue Code Section 199
manufacturing deduction, and adjustments to unrecognized tax benefits.
The Apollo Acquisition was consummated on May 18, 2007, when Noranda AcquisitionCo acquired
the Noranda Aluminum business of Xstrata (Schweiz) A.G., or Xstrata, by acquiring the stock of
Noranda Intermediate Holding Corporation (Noranda Intermediate,) which owned all of the
outstanding shares of Noranda Aluminum, Inc. In connection with the Apollo Acquisition, Xstrata
generally agreed to indemnify us for taxes imposed on Noranda Intermediate and its subsidiaries
with respect to periods ending on or prior to the date of the Apollo Acquisition. At December 31,
2010 and September 30, 2011, we had a receivable of $4.5 million and $1.2 million, respectively,
from Xstrata equal to our provision for uncertain tax positions (net of federal benefits) for
income taxes of Noranda Intermediate and its subsidiaries for periods ending on or prior to the
date of the Apollo Acquisition. The net decrease of $3.3 million in the nine months ended September
30, 2011 consists of a $3.4 million decrease as a result of the expiration of the statute of
limitations with respect to certain income tax returns, partially offset by an increase of $0.1
million for additional amounts related to prior period tax positions.
As of December 31, 2010 and September 30, 2011, we had unrecognized tax benefits (including
interest) of approximately $11.8 million and $3.7 million, respectively. The net decrease of $8.1
million in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 consists of an $8.3 million decrease as a
result of the expiration of the statute of limitations with respect to certain income tax returns,
partially offset by an increase of $0.2 million for additional amounts related to prior period tax
positions, resulting in a $5.3 million reduction (net of federal benefits) in income tax expense.
The total amounts of net unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31, 2010 and September 30, 2011
that, if recognized, would impact the effective tax rate were $7.7 million and $2.5 million,
respectively. Within the next twelve months, we estimate that the unrecognized benefits could
change by approximately $1.8 million as a result of tax audit closings, settlements, and the
expiration of the statute of limitations with respect to returns in various jurisdictions.
11. NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE
We present both basic and diluted earnings per share (EPS) on the face of the accompanying
unaudited consolidated statements of operations. The calculation of basic and diluted EPS follows
(in millions, except per share values):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
25.2 |
|
|
$ |
30.8 |
|
|
$ |
32.0 |
|
|
$ |
116.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average common shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
55.28 |
|
|
|
67.23 |
|
|
|
49.42 |
|
|
|
67.00 |
|
Effect of dilution |
|
|
1.02 |
|
|
|
1.26 |
|
|
|
0.89 |
|
|
|
1.32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
56.30 |
|
|
|
68.49 |
|
|
|
50.31 |
|
|
|
68.32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.46 |
|
|
$ |
0.46 |
|
|
$ |
0.65 |
|
|
$ |
1.74 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
|
$ |
0.64 |
|
|
$ |
1.71 |
|
Certain stock options could potentially dilute basic EPS in the future, but were not included
in the computation of diluted EPS because to do so would have been antidilutive. Those antidilutive
options were as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
Antidilutive options |
|
|
0.20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.13 |
|
|
|
|
|
13
12. DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
We use derivative instruments to mitigate the risks associated with fluctuations in aluminum
prices, natural gas prices and interest rates. All derivatives are held for purposes other than
trading.
Fixed price aluminum swaps. In 2007 and 2008, we implemented a hedging strategy designed to
reduce commodity price risk and protect operating cash flows in our primary aluminum products
segment through the use of fixed price aluminum sale swaps. In addition, during first quarter 2009,
we entered into fixed price aluminum purchase swaps to lock in a portion of the favorable market
position of our fixed price aluminum sale swaps. In March 2009, we entered into a hedge settlement
agreement with Merrill Lynch to provide a mechanism for us to monetize our favorable net fixed
price swap positions to fund debt repurchases, subject to certain limitations.
At the closing of our IPO in May 2010, we settled all of our remaining fixed price aluminum
swaps and used the proceeds to repay indebtedness. We have no outstanding fixed price aluminum
swaps at September 30, 2011.
Variable price aluminum swaps and other. From time to time, we enter into forward contracts
with our customers to sell aluminum in the future at fixed prices in the normal course of business.
Because these contracts expose us to aluminum market price fluctuations, we economically hedge this
risk by entering into variable price aluminum swap contracts with Merrill Lynch, typically for
terms less than one year. We also have a small number of other hedging contracts with various
brokers related to Midwest premiums. As of September 30, 2011, our outstanding variable price
aluminum swaps were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average hedged price |
|
|
Pounds hedged |
|
|
|
per pound |
|
|
annually |
|
Year |
|
$ |
|
|
(in millions) |
|
2011 |
|
|
1.11 |
|
|
|
15.7 |
|
2012 |
|
|
1.02 |
|
|
|
28.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas swaps. We purchase natural gas to meet our production requirements. These
purchases expose us to the risk of fluctuating natural gas prices. To offset changes in the Henry
Hub Index Price of natural gas, we enter into financial swaps by purchasing the fixed forward price
for the Henry Hub Index and simultaneously entering into an agreement to sell at the actual Henry
Hub Index Price. As of September 30, 2011, our outstanding natural gas swaps were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average price |
|
|
|
|
|
|
per million BTUs |
|
|
BTUs hedged annually |
|
Year |
|
$ |
|
|
(in millions) |
|
2011 |
|
|
7.28 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
2012 |
|
|
7.46 |
|
|
|
8.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps. We have floating rate debt, which is subject to variations in interest
rates. We have entered into an interest rate swap agreement to limit our exposure to floating
interest rates through November 15, 2011. As of September 30, 2011, our outstanding interest rate
swaps were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hedged LIBOR rate |
|
|
Variable rate debt hedged |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
$ |
|
November 15, 2011 |
|
|
4.98 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
We recognize all derivative instruments as either assets or liabilities at their estimated
fair value in our consolidated balance sheets. The following table presents the fair values of our
derivative instruments outstanding (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
September 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Variable price aluminum swaps and other |
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
(5.1 |
) |
Natural gas swaps |
|
|
(40.3 |
) |
|
|
(32.2 |
) |
Interest rate swaps |
|
|
(4.4 |
) |
|
|
(2.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(41.6 |
) |
|
|
(39.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
Merrill Lynch is the counterparty for a substantial portion of our derivatives. All swap
arrangements with Merrill Lynch are part of a master arrangement which is subject to the same
guarantee and security provisions as the senior secured credit facilities. The master arrangement
does not require us to post additional collateral, or cash margin. We present the fair values of
derivatives where Merrill Lynch is the counterparty in a net position on the consolidated balance
sheets as a result of our master netting agreement. The following is a presentation of the gross
components of our net derivative balances (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
September 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Current derivative assets |
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
Current derivative liabilities |
|
|
(26.6 |
) |
|
|
(34.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current derivative liabilities, net |
|
|
(23.2 |
) |
|
|
(33.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term derivative assets |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term derivative liabilities |
|
|
(18.5 |
) |
|
|
(6.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term derivative liabilities, net |
|
|
(18.4 |
) |
|
|
(6.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following is a gross presentation of the derivative balances segregated by type of
contract and between derivatives that are designated and qualify for hedge accounting and those
that are not (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
September 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
Hedges that qualify for |
|
|
Hedges that do not qualify |
|
|
Hedges that qualify for |
|
|
Hedges that do not qualify |
|
|
|
hedge accounting |
|
|
for hedge accounting |
|
|
hedge accounting |
|
|
for hedge accounting |
|
|
|
Asset |
|
|
Liability |
|
|
Asset |
|
|
Liability |
|
|
Asset |
|
|
Liability |
|
|
Asset |
|
|
Liability |
|
Variable price
aluminum swaps and
other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
(5.6 |
) |
Natural gas swaps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12.2 |
) |
Interest rate swaps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23.0 |
) |
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
(22.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20.0 |
) |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
(20.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges, the effective
portion of any gain or loss on the derivative is reported as a component of accumulated other
comprehensive income and reclassified into earnings in the same period or periods during which the
hedged transaction affects earnings.
|
|
|
Fixed price aluminum swaps. From January 1, 2008 to January 29, 2009, fixed price
aluminum swaps were designated and qualified as cash flow hedges. As a result of the New
Madrid power outage in January 2009, we concluded that certain hedged sale transactions
were no longer probable of occurring, and we discontinued hedge accounting for all our
fixed price aluminum sale swaps on January 29, 2009. At that date, amounts were frozen in
AOCI until such time as they are reclassified into earnings in the period the hedged
sales occur, or until it is determined that the original forecasted sales are probable of
not occurring. |
|
|
|
Natural gas swaps. We entered into certain natural gas contracts during the fourth
quarter of 2009 that qualified for and were designated as cash flow hedges based on a
portion of estimated consumption of natural gas. |
The following table presents the net amount of unrealized gains (losses) on cash flow hedges
that were reported as a component of AOCI at September 30, 2011, and the expected timing of those
amounts being reclassified into earnings (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized gains |
|
|
|
Amounts expected to be |
|
|
(losses) on cash flow |
|
|
|
reclassified into earnings |
|
|
hedges, pre-tax, in |
|
|
|
October 1, 2011 to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
AOCI |
|
|
|
September 30, 2012 |
|
|
Thereafter |
|
|
at September 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Fixed price aluminum swaps |
|
|
111.3 |
|
|
|
34.8 |
|
|
|
146.1 |
|
Natural gas swaps |
|
|
(16.4 |
) |
|
|
(3.6 |
) |
|
|
(20.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94.9 |
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
|
126.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
Gains and losses on the derivatives representing hedge ineffectiveness are recognized in
current earnings, along with amounts that are reclassified from AOCI. Derivatives that do not
qualify for hedge accounting or have not been designated for hedge accounting treatment are
adjusted to fair value through (gains) losses on hedging activities in the accompanying unaudited
consolidated statements of operations. The following table presents how our hedging activities
affected our accompanying unaudited consolidated statements of operations for each period (in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives qualified |
|
|
Derivatives not |
|
|
|
|
|
|
as hedges |
|
|
qualified as hedges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts reclassified |
|
|
Change in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
from AOCI |
|
|
fair value |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Three months ended September 30, 2010: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed price aluminum swaps |
|
|
(23.2 |
) |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
(22.9 |
) |
Variable price aluminum swaps and other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5.0 |
) |
|
|
(5.0 |
) |
Natural gas swaps |
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total (gain) loss on hedging activities |
|
|
(22.0 |
) |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
(21.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, 2011: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed price aluminum swaps |
|
|
(30.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30.7 |
) |
Variable price aluminum swaps and other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
Natural gas swaps |
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total (gain) loss on hedging activities |
|
|
(27.1 |
) |
|
|
7.6 |
|
|
|
(19.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, 2010: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed price aluminum swaps |
|
|
(62.2 |
) |
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
(63.4 |
) |
Variable price aluminum swaps and other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
Natural gas swaps |
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
12.7 |
|
|
|
15.7 |
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total (gain) loss on hedging activities |
|
|
(59.2 |
) |
|
|
15.2 |
|
|
|
(44.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, 2011: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed price aluminum swaps |
|
|
(84.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(84.1 |
) |
Variable price aluminum swaps and other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
Natural gas swaps |
|
|
10.8 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
13.5 |
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total (gain) loss on hedging activities |
|
|
(73.3 |
) |
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
(65.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13. RECLAMATION, LAND, AND ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATIONS
Reclamation obligation
St. Ann has a reclamation obligation to rehabilitate land disturbed by St. Anns bauxite
mining operations. A summary of our reclamation obligation activity at St. Ann follows (in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
September 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
Balance, beginning of period |
|
|
9.4 |
|
Additional liabilities incurred |
|
|
0.8 |
|
Liabilities settled |
|
|
(4.1 |
) |
Accretion expense |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period |
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Land obligation
In cases where land to be mined is privately owned, St. Ann agrees to purchase the residents
property, including land, crops, homes, and other improvements in exchange for consideration paid
in the form of cash, a commitment to relocate the residents to another area, or a combination of
these two options (the St. Ann Land Obligation). We account for the costs associated with
fulfilling the St. Ann Land Obligation by recording an asset (included in other assets in our
consolidated balance sheets) for the estimated cost of the consideration, with a corresponding
liability (included in accrued liabilities and other long-term liabilities in our consolidated
balance sheets.) We amortize those costs over a three year period, representing the approximate
time the land is used for mining purposes, including reclamation (the Mining Period).
16
In addition to the St. Ann Land Obligation, we have an agreement with the Government of
Jamaica (GOJ) which requires us to fulfill obligations that pre-date St. Anns partnership with
the GOJ. The costs to fulfill those obligations will be reimbursed by the GOJ up to a $4.3 million
limit. St. Ann bears any costs in excess of the $4.3 million limit (the Predecessor Land
Obligation). At September 30, 2011, we believe our costs to fulfill the Predecessor Land
Obligation will exceed the $4.3 million limit by $1.2 million, and we have recorded such amount as
a liability in our financial statements.
For both the St. Ann Land Obligation and the Predecessor Land Obligation, we record the costs
to acquire and develop the assets to be used to satisfy the obligations, such as land, land
improvements, and housing, as property, plant and equipment in our consolidated balance sheets. As
cash is paid or title to land, land improvements and houses is transferred, we remove those assets
from our financial statements and reduce the land obligation.
Relocating residents occurs often over several years, requiring management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities at the date of the
consolidated financial. Actual results could differ from these estimates. As such, estimates of
the cost to fulfill the St. Ann Land Obligation and the Predecessor Land Obligation are subject to
revision; therefore, it is reasonably possible that further adjustments to our liabilities may be
necessary.
As revisions are made, we amortize such adjustments prospectively over the remaining
amortization period in cases where the Mining Period has not been completed. As revisions are made
in cases where the Mining Period is complete, we record such adjustments as additional amortization
expense in the period of revision.
At September 30, 2011, we determined that the information that gave rise to revisions recorded
during 2011 was known or knowable at December 31, 2010. As a result cost of goods sold was
overstated in the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2011 by $3.0 million and $4.2
million, respectively. We have evaluated the materiality of the error from a qualitative and
quantitative perspective in accordance with ASC 250-10-S99-1 Staff Accounting Bulletin Topics 1.M,
Assessing Materiality and determined it to be immaterial to our 2010 consolidated financial
statements. We have further determined that the impact of correcting this error in the current year
will not be material to our 2011 financial statements. As a result, we have not adjusted any
previously issued consolidated financial statements.
Asset retirement obligations
Our asset retirement obligations (ARO) consist of costs related to the disposal of certain
spent pot liners associated with the New Madrid smelter, as well as costs associated with the
future closure and post-closure care of red mud lakes at the Gramercy facility, where Gramercy
disposes of red mud wastes from its refining process.
A summary of our asset retirement obligation activity follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
September 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
Balance, beginning of period |
|
|
14.9 |
|
Additional liabilities incurred |
|
|
0.6 |
|
Liabilities settled |
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
Accretion expense |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period |
|
|
15.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
We had $9.2 million of restricted cash in an escrow account at December 31, 2010 and $9.2
million at September 30, 2011 as security for the payment of red mud lake closure obligations that
will arise under state environmental laws if we were to cease operations at the Gramercy facility.
This amount is included in other assets in the accompanying unaudited consolidated balance sheets.
The remaining restricted cash in other assets relates primarily to funds for workers compensation
claims.
17
14. NON-CONTROLLING INTEREST
Through St. Ann, we hold a 49% partnership interest in Noranda Jamaica Bauxite Partners
(NJBP), in which the Government of Jamaica holds a 51% interest. NJBP mines bauxite,
approximately 50% of which is sold to Gramercy, with the balance sold to third parties. We have
determined that NJBP is a variable interest entity under U.S. GAAP, and St. Ann is NJBPs primary
beneficiary. The determination that St. Ann is the primary beneficiary was based on the fact that
St. Ann absorbs the profits and losses associated with the partnership, while the GOJ receives
certain fees from St. Ann, such as royalties, production and asset usage fees. Therefore, we
consolidate NJBP into our consolidated financial statements.
The following amounts related to NJBP are included in our accompanying unaudited consolidated
balance sheets (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
September 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impact on |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impact on |
|
|
|
NJBP |
|
|
Impact of |
|
|
consolidated |
|
|
NJBP |
|
|
Impact of |
|
|
consolidated |
|
|
|
balances |
|
|
eliminations |
|
|
statements |
|
|
balances |
|
|
eliminations |
|
|
statements |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
16.1 |
|
|
|
(16.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.1 |
|
|
|
(14.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Inventories, net (consisting of
maintenance supplies, inventory and
fuel) |
|
|
8.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.6 |
|
|
|
14.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.1 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
38.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38.4 |
|
|
|
38.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38.3 |
|
Haul roads, net and other assets |
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
(43.1 |
) |
|
|
36.0 |
|
|
|
(7.1 |
) |
|
|
(52.4 |
) |
|
|
36.8 |
|
|
|
(15.6 |
) |
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
(4.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4.6 |
) |
|
|
(4.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4.2 |
) |
Environmental, land and reclamation
liabilities |
|
|
(8.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8.3 |
) |
|
|
(6.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6.0 |
) |
Non-controlling interest |
|
|
(6.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6.0 |
) |
|
|
(6.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment and advances to NJBP |
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
19.9 |
|
|
|
25.6 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
22.7 |
|
|
|
28.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
We entered into a management consulting and advisory services agreement with Apollo on May 18,
2007 for the provision of certain structuring, management and advisory services for an initial term
ending on May 18, 2017. Terms of the agreement provided for annual fees of $2.0 million, payable in
one lump sum annually. Historically, we expensed approximately $0.5 million of such fees each
quarter in selling, general and administrative expenses in our consolidated statements of
operations. Upon completion of our IPO in second quarter 2010, as permitted by the terms of that
management agreement, Apollo terminated the agreement and received a $13.5 million fee from the
Company. This payment consisted of $1.0 million in management fees accrued in 2010 prior to the
termination of the management agreement and $12.5 million in accelerated management fees due upon
termination of the management agreement. The fee is included in selling, general and administrative
expenses in our accompanying unaudited consolidated statements of operations for the nine months
ended September 30, 2010.
We sell flat rolled aluminum products to Berry Plastics Corporation, a portfolio company of
Apollo, under an annual sales contract. Sales to this entity were as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
$ |
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
2.0 |
|
September 30, 2011 |
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
$ |
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
8.7 |
|
September 30, 2011 |
|
|
7.1 |
|
We have historically sold flat rolled aluminum products to Richardson Trident Co., which was
acquired in first quarter of 2011 by Metals USA Holdings Corp, a portfolio company of Apollo. Sales
to Metals USA Holdings Corp. and its subsidiaries were as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
$ |
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
3.4 |
|
September 30, 2011 |
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
$ |
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
7.8 |
|
September 30, 2011 |
|
|
11.5 |
|
18
16. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Labor Commitments
We are a party to six collective bargaining agreements: the United Steelworkers of America
(USWA); the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers (IAMAW); the
University and Allied Workers Union (UAWU); and the Union of Technical, Administrative and
Supervisory Personnel (UTASP).
|
|
|
During third quarter 2011, we finalized the terms of a three year agreement with the
UAWU which will extend through April 30, 2013. |
|
|
|
The agreement at St. Ann with the UTASP expired in December 2010. A claim for a new
contract was received in June 2011 and we are currently negotiating the terms of a new
agreement which we expect to finalize during fourth quarter 2011. |
|
|
|
The agreement with the IAMAW at our Newport rolling mill expired in May 2011, and on
June 1, 2011, a new three year labor agreement went into effect. |
|
|
|
All other collective bargaining agreements expire within the next five years. |
We have completed the process of formalizing recognition of a third union at St. Ann with the
Bustamante Industrial Trade Union (BITU). During third quarter 2011, we finalized terms of a
three year agreement with the BITU, which will extend through December 2012.
Legal Contingencies
We are a party to legal proceedings incidental to our business. In the opinion of management,
the potential liability, if any, with respect to these actions will not materially affect our
financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Environmental Matters
In addition to our asset retirement obligations discussed in Note 13, Reclamation, Land and
Asset Retirement Obligations, we have identified certain environmental conditions requiring
remedial action or ongoing monitoring at the Gramercy refinery. As of December 31, 2010 and
September 30, 2011, we had undiscounted liabilities of $2.0 million and $1.8 million, respectively,
in accrued liabilities and $2.3 million and $2.5 million, respectively, in other long-term
liabilities for remediation of Gramercys known environmental conditions. Approximately two-thirds
of the recorded liability represents clean-up costs expected to be incurred during the next five
years. The remainder represents monitoring costs which will be incurred ratably over a 30 year
period. Because the remediation and subsequent monitoring related to these environmental conditions
occurs over an extended period of time, these estimates are subject to change based on future
costs. No other third parties are involved in any ongoing environmental remediation activities with
us.
We cannot predict what environmental laws or regulations will be enacted or amended in the
future, how existing or future laws or regulations will be interpreted or enforced or the amount of
future expenditures that may be required to comply with such laws or regulations. Such future
requirements may result in liabilities which may have a material adverse effect on our financial
condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Production Levy
At the end of 2009, we and the GOJ reached an agreement setting the fiscal regime structure
for St. Anns bauxite mining operations through December 31, 2014. The agreement covers the fiscal
regime, as well as commitments for certain expenditures for haulroad development, maintenance,
dredging, land purchases, contract mining, training and other general capital expenditures from
2009 through 2014. If we do not meet our commitment to the GOJ regarding these expenditures, we
would owe to the GOJ a penalty that could be material to our
financial statements. We believe the possibility that we will not
meet the commitment is remote.
Power Contract
Electricity is our largest cash cost component in the production of primary aluminum and is a
key factor to our long-term competitive position in the primary aluminum business. We have a power
purchase agreement with Ameren pursuant to which we have agreed to purchase substantially all of
New Madrids electricity through May 2020. Included in the contract is a minimum purchase
requirement equal to five mega watts, calculated at peak and non-peak demand charges, or
approximately $4.2 million over the life of the contract. This minimum purchase requirements
represent significantly less power usage than we require, given the power-intensive nature of our
smelter facility. Our current rate structure with Ameren consists of two components: a base rate
and a fuel adjustment clause (FAC).
On
September 3, 2010, Ameren filed a new rate case with the
Missouri Public Service Commission (MoPSC) seeking an 11% base rate
increase. In July 2011, the MoPSC ruled on this rate case approving Ameren to increase its base
rates, which increased our base rate by 5.2% effective July 31, 2011.
We are currently a party to the appeal of several rate-related issues, including rate increases
approved by the MoPSC in January 2009, May 2010, and July 2011, and the amount of cost increases
related to the FAC. Despite these appeals, our financial statements reflect our payment of power
costs at the enacted rates, with disputed amounts held in escrow by the Missouri Circuit Court. As
of December 31, 2010 and September 30, 2011, other current assets
(see Note 5, Supplemental Balance Sheet Information)
included $9.8 million and $27.8 million, respectively, for amounts held in escrow
related to these appeals, with corresponding liabilities recorded in accounts payable.
On November 7, 2011, the Missouri Court of Appeals issued a decision to uphold the MoPSCs
January 2009 rate increase approval. The parties to the appeal, including Noranda, are evaluating
whether to request rehearing of the Court of Appeals decision or to appeal that decision to the
Missouri Supreme Court. If the parties decide not to file additional appeals, or if such appeals
are filed and are not successful, a substantial portion of the escrowed funds will be released to
Ameren. At September 30, 2011, such amount of released funds would have been
$27.6 million. The release of these funds will not result in any impact to our operating
results, our net working capital, or our net assets.
19
17. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
The fair values and fair value hierarchy level of our assets and liabilities that are measured
at fair value on a recurring basis were as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
September 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total fair value |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total fair value |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Cash equivalents |
|
|
21.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21.4 |
|
|
|
36.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36.4 |
|
Derivative assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
Derivative liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(45.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(45.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(40.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(40.1 |
) |
RSU liability awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
21.4 |
|
|
|
(41.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20.2 |
) |
|
|
35.9 |
|
|
|
(39.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash equivalents are temporary cash investments with high credit quality financial
institutions, which include money market funds invested in U.S. treasury securities, short-term
treasury bills and commercial paper. These instruments are valued based upon unadjusted, quoted
prices in active markets and are classified as Level 1.
Fair values of all derivative instruments are classified as Level 2 and are primarily measured
using industry standard models that incorporate inputs including: quoted forward prices for
commodities, interest rates, and current market prices for those assets and liabilities.
Substantially all of the inputs are observable throughout the full term of the derivative
instrument. The counterparty of our derivative trades is Merrill Lynch, with the exception of a
small portion of our other hedging contracts related to Midwest premiums.
We discuss the RSU liability awards in Note 9, Shareholders Equity and Share-Based
Payments. The fair value of this Level 1 liability is determined based on the closing market price
of our common stock.
In Note 6, Long-Term Debt, we disclose the fair values of our debt instruments. We use bid
prices obtained through broker quotes to determine the fair value of our AcquisitionCo Notes. The
fair value of our AcquisitionCo Notes is classified as Level 2 within the hierarchy. While the
AcquisitionCo Notes have quoted market prices used to determine fair value, we do not believe
transactions of those instruments occur in sufficient frequency or volume for a Level 1
classification. The fair values of the term B loan and revolving credit facility are based on
interest rates available at each balance sheet date. These instruments are classified as Level 2,
also.
We had no transfers between fair value hierarchy levels during the nine months ended September
30, 2011.
20
18. SEGMENTS
We manage and operate our business segments based on the markets we serve and the products we
produce. We have five reportable segments consisting of bauxite, alumina refining, primary aluminum
products, flat rolled products and corporate. Segment profit (loss) (in which certain items, are
not allocated to the segments and in which certain items, primarily the income statement effects of
current period cash settlements of hedges, are allocated to the segments) is a measure used by
management as a basis for resource allocation.
The following tables summarize operating results and assets of our reportable segments and
include a reconciliation of segment profit (loss) to income before income taxes (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Primary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alumina |
|
|
aluminum |
|
|
Flat rolled |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bauxite |
|
|
refining |
|
|
products |
|
|
products |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
External customers |
|
|
17.6 |
|
|
|
52.2 |
|
|
|
110.8 |
|
|
|
133.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
314.2 |
|
Intersegment |
|
|
17.9 |
|
|
|
35.4 |
|
|
|
38.3 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(91.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total sales |
|
|
35.5 |
|
|
|
87.6 |
|
|
|
149.1 |
|
|
|
133.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(91.7 |
) |
|
|
314.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment profit (loss) |
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
|
12.5 |
|
|
|
14.4 |
|
|
|
(5.8 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
38.8 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
12.0 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24.9 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Primary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alumina |
|
|
aluminum |
|
|
Flat rolled |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bauxite |
|
|
refining |
|
|
products |
|
|
products |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Segment profit (loss) |
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
|
12.5 |
|
|
|
14.4 |
|
|
|
(5.8 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
38.8 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(2.5 |
) |
|
|
(5.0 |
) |
|
|
(12.0 |
) |
|
|
(5.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24.9 |
) |
Last in, first out and lower of cost or
market inventory adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
11.0 |
|
Loss on disposal of assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
Non-cash pension, accretion and stock
compensation |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.0 |
) |
Restructuring, relocation and severance |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
Consulting and sponsor fees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
Cash settlements on hedging transactions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
12.9 |
|
|
|
(7.2 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
20.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
Gain on hedging activities, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21.7 |
) |
Gain on debt repurchase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Primary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alumina |
|
|
aluminum |
|
|
Flat rolled |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bauxite |
|
|
refining |
|
|
products |
|
|
products |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
External customers |
|
|
17.4 |
|
|
|
60.6 |
|
|
|
159.2 |
|
|
|
163.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
400.4 |
|
Intersegment |
|
|
23.5 |
|
|
|
43.5 |
|
|
|
28.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(95.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total sales |
|
|
40.9 |
|
|
|
104.1 |
|
|
|
187.7 |
|
|
|
163.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(95.5 |
) |
|
|
400.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment profit (loss) |
|
|
6.8 |
|
|
|
23.4 |
|
|
|
21.8 |
|
|
|
12.1 |
|
|
|
(8.0 |
) |
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
60.2 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
11.5 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25.0 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Primary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alumina |
|
|
aluminum |
|
|
Flat rolled |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bauxite |
|
|
refining |
|
|
products |
|
|
products |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Segment profit (loss) |
|
|
6.8 |
|
|
|
23.4 |
|
|
|
21.8 |
|
|
|
12.1 |
|
|
|
(8.0 |
) |
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
60.2 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(3.2 |
) |
|
|
(5.3 |
) |
|
|
(11.5 |
) |
|
|
(4.7 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25.0 |
) |
Last in, first out and lower of cost or
market inventory adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.0 |
) |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
Gain (loss) on disposal of assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
Non-cash pension, accretion and stock
compensation |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.6 |
) |
Restructuring, relocation and severance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
Consulting and sponsor fees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
Cash settlements on hedging transactions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.5 |
) |
|
|
(5.3 |
) |
|
|
(8.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
17.9 |
|
|
|
6.9 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
(14.7 |
) |
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
23.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
Gain on hedging activities, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19.5 |
) |
Total other income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Primary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alumina |
|
|
aluminum |
|
|
Flat rolled |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bauxite |
|
|
refining |
|
|
products |
|
|
products |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
External customers |
|
|
42.7 |
|
|
|
161.9 |
|
|
|
345.8 |
|
|
|
400.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
950.6 |
|
Intersegment |
|
|
48.0 |
|
|
|
113.2 |
|
|
|
98.4 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(259.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total sales |
|
|
90.7 |
|
|
|
275.1 |
|
|
|
444.2 |
|
|
|
400.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(259.7 |
) |
|
|
950.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment profit (loss) |
|
|
20.0 |
|
|
|
35.9 |
|
|
|
70.1 |
|
|
|
40.2 |
|
|
|
(19.5 |
) |
|
|
(2.5 |
) |
|
|
144.2 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
8.1 |
|
|
|
15.4 |
|
|
|
36.4 |
|
|
|
15.5 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76.1 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
20.0 |
|
|
|
6.8 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Primary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alumina |
|
|
aluminum |
|
|
Flat rolled |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bauxite |
|
|
refining |
|
|
products |
|
|
products |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Segment profit (loss) |
|
|
20.0 |
|
|
|
35.9 |
|
|
|
70.1 |
|
|
|
40.2 |
|
|
|
(19.5 |
) |
|
|
(2.5 |
) |
|
|
144.2 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(8.1 |
) |
|
|
(15.4 |
) |
|
|
(36.4 |
) |
|
|
(15.5 |
) |
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(76.1 |
) |
Last in, first out and lower of cost or
market inventory adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
0.3 |
|
Loss on disposal of assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.8 |
) |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.4 |
) |
Non-cash pension, accretion and stock
compensation |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
(2.6 |
) |
|
|
(1.8 |
) |
|
|
(5.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11.4 |
) |
Restructuring, relocation and severance |
|
|
(3.2 |
) |
|
|
(1.6 |
) |
|
|
(1.9 |
) |
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9.0 |
) |
Consulting and sponsor fees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18.9 |
) |
Cash settlements on hedging transactions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
|
19.9 |
|
|
|
26.1 |
|
|
|
20.8 |
|
|
|
(45.7 |
) |
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
28.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25.0 |
|
Gain on hedging activities, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(44.0 |
) |
Gain on debt repurchase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Primary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alumina |
|
|
aluminum |
|
|
Flat rolled |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bauxite |
|
|
refining |
|
|
products |
|
|
products |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
External customers |
|
|
52.0 |
|
|
|
182.2 |
|
|
|
498.8 |
|
|
|
488.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,221.3 |
|
Intersegment |
|
|
63.4 |
|
|
|
135.0 |
|
|
|
62.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(260.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total sales |
|
|
115.4 |
|
|
|
317.2 |
|
|
|
561.1 |
|
|
|
488.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(260.7 |
) |
|
|
1,221.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment profit (loss) |
|
|
19.2 |
|
|
|
73.9 |
|
|
|
117.6 |
|
|
|
41.8 |
|
|
|
(21.8 |
) |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
230.8 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
7.6 |
|
|
|
15.7 |
|
|
|
34.8 |
|
|
|
14.1 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73.1 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
9.4 |
|
|
|
18.7 |
|
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Primary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alumina |
|
|
aluminum |
|
|
Flat rolled |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bauxite |
|
|
refining |
|
|
products |
|
|
products |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Segment profit (loss) |
|
|
19.2 |
|
|
|
73.9 |
|
|
|
117.6 |
|
|
|
41.8 |
|
|
|
(21.8 |
) |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
230.8 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(7.6 |
) |
|
|
(15.7 |
) |
|
|
(34.8 |
) |
|
|
(14.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(73.1 |
) |
Last in, first out and lower of cost or
market inventory adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10.4 |
) |
|
|
(7.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
(17.3 |
) |
Gain (loss) on disposal of assets |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.6 |
) |
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.8 |
) |
Non-cash pension, accretion and stock
compensation |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
(2.2 |
) |
|
|
(1.8 |
) |
|
|
(4.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9.6 |
) |
Restructuring, relocation and severance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.8 |
) |
Consulting and sponsor fees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.8 |
) |
Cash settlements on hedging transactions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.5 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.7 |
) |
|
|
(1.7 |
) |
|
|
(5.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
12.0 |
|
|
|
57.3 |
|
|
|
67.6 |
|
|
|
14.8 |
|
|
|
(33.6 |
) |
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
117.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.4 |
|
Gain on hedging activities, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(65.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(49.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
166.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
September 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Segment assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bauxite |
|
|
135.2 |
|
|
|
159.4 |
|
Alumina refining |
|
|
229.2 |
|
|
|
223.5 |
|
Primary aluminum products |
|
|
605.4 |
|
|
|
609.0 |
|
Flat rolled products |
|
|
411.9 |
|
|
|
412.6 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
74.3 |
|
|
|
134.4 |
|
Eliminations |
|
|
(41.3 |
) |
|
|
(53.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
|
1,414.7 |
|
|
|
1,485.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19. SUBSIDIARY ISSUER OF GUARANTEED NOTES
The following unaudited condensed consolidating financial statements present separately the
financial condition and results of operations and cash flows for Noranda HoldCo (as parent
guarantor), Noranda AcquisitionCo (as the issuer), the subsidiary guarantors, the subsidiary
non-guarantors and eliminations (the guarantor financial statements). The guarantor financial
statements have been prepared and presented in accordance with SEC Regulation S-X Rule 3-10
Financial Statements of Guarantors and Issuers of Guaranteed Securities Registered or Being
Registered.
The accounting policies used in the preparation of the guarantor financial statements are
consistent with those found elsewhere in the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial
statements. Intercompany transactions have been presented gross in the guarantor financial
statements; however these transactions eliminate in consolidation.
24
NORANDA ALUMINUM HOLDING CORPORATION
Consolidating Balance Sheet
As of December 31, 2010
(in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
guarantor |
|
|
Issuer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Noranda |
|
|
(Noranda |
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HoldCo) |
|
|
AcquisitionCo) |
|
|
guarantors |
|
|
non-guarantors |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
|
20.4 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33.8 |
|
Accounts receivable, net: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
128.1 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
131.6 |
|
Affiliates |
|
|
21.4 |
|
|
|
11.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.4 |
|
|
|
(47.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Inventories, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
176.0 |
|
|
|
27.2 |
|
|
|
(2.1 |
) |
|
|
201.1 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.9 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.5 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
28.9 |
|
|
|
32.3 |
|
|
|
323.3 |
|
|
|
63.9 |
|
|
|
(49.8 |
) |
|
|
398.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in affiliates |
|
|
356.5 |
|
|
|
1,265.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,622.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Advances due from affiliates |
|
|
28.3 |
|
|
|
46.7 |
|
|
|
516.7 |
|
|
|
63.5 |
|
|
|
(655.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
663.6 |
|
|
|
56.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
719.9 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
137.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
137.6 |
|
Other intangible assets, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73.0 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.0 |
|
|
|
59.6 |
|
|
|
15.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
|
413.7 |
|
|
|
1,355.7 |
|
|
|
1,773.8 |
|
|
|
198.7 |
|
|
|
(2,327.2 |
) |
|
|
1,414.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88.1 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95.7 |
|
Affiliates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
21.3 |
|
|
|
14.4 |
|
|
|
12.0 |
|
|
|
(47.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
38.1 |
|
|
|
16.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54.9 |
|
Taxes payable |
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
Derivative liabilities, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.2 |
|
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
21.6 |
|
|
|
211.4 |
|
|
|
36.3 |
|
|
|
(47.7 |
) |
|
|
227.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
419.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
419.7 |
|
Long-term derivative liabilities, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.4 |
|
Pension and other post-retirement
liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105.3 |
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
116.0 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
44.3 |
|
|
|
11.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57.9 |
|
Advances due to affiliates |
|
|
78.0 |
|
|
|
521.5 |
|
|
|
56.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(655.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Long-term deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
38.4 |
|
|
|
34.1 |
|
|
|
204.8 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
277.9 |
|
Common stock subject to redemption |
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
Shareholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
Capital in excess of par value |
|
|
227.7 |
|
|
|
352.1 |
|
|
|
1,199.7 |
|
|
|
83.7 |
|
|
|
(1,635.5 |
) |
|
|
227.7 |
|
Retained earnings
(accumulated deficit) |
|
|
(8.2 |
) |
|
|
(65.1 |
) |
|
|
(142.2 |
) |
|
|
55.1 |
|
|
|
152.2 |
|
|
|
(8.2 |
) |
Accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
69.5 |
|
|
|
69.5 |
|
|
|
75.7 |
|
|
|
(6.3 |
) |
|
|
(138.9 |
) |
|
|
69.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
289.7 |
|
|
|
356.5 |
|
|
|
1,133.2 |
|
|
|
132.5 |
|
|
|
(1,622.2 |
) |
|
|
289.7 |
|
Non-controlling interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity |
|
|
289.7 |
|
|
|
356.5 |
|
|
|
1,133.2 |
|
|
|
138.5 |
|
|
|
(1,622.2 |
) |
|
|
295.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity |
|
|
413.7 |
|
|
|
1,355.7 |
|
|
|
1,773.8 |
|
|
|
198.7 |
|
|
|
(2,327.2 |
) |
|
|
1,414.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
NORANDA ALUMINUM HOLDING CORPORATION
Consolidating Balance Sheet
As of September 30, 2011
(in millions)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
guarantor |
|
|
Issuer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Noranda |
|
|
(Noranda |
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HoldCo) |
|
|
AcquisitionCo) |
|
|
guarantors |
|
|
non-guarantors |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
7.6 |
|
|
|
85.0 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
103.9 |
|
Accounts receivable, net: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
134.4 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
140.0 |
|
Affiliates |
|
|
21.6 |
|
|
|
11.9 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
25.1 |
|
|
|
(59.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Inventories, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
177.3 |
|
|
|
29.5 |
|
|
|
(2.9 |
) |
|
|
203.9 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.7 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.5 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29.8 |
|
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
29.4 |
|
|
|
96.9 |
|
|
|
355.1 |
|
|
|
79.8 |
|
|
|
(62.1 |
) |
|
|
499.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in affiliates |
|
|
510.0 |
|
|
|
1,464.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,974.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Advances due from affiliates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
76.9 |
|
|
|
641.6 |
|
|
|
63.5 |
|
|
|
(782.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
639.6 |
|
|
|
56.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
696.5 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
137.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
137.6 |
|
Other intangible assets, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68.6 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
|
53.3 |
|
|
|
21.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
|
539.4 |
|
|
|
1,647.3 |
|
|
|
1,895.8 |
|
|
|
222.0 |
|
|
|
(2,818.8 |
) |
|
|
1,485.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
112.7 |
|
|
|
16.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
128.7 |
|
Affiliates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
21.6 |
|
|
|
25.1 |
|
|
|
12.5 |
|
|
|
(59.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
|
38.1 |
|
|
|
20.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64.9 |
|
Taxes payable |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
Derivative liabilities, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33.5 |
|
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
27.8 |
|
|
|
258.3 |
|
|
|
51.0 |
|
|
|
(59.2 |
) |
|
|
278.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
428.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
428.5 |
|
Long-term derivative liabilities, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
Pension and other post-retirement
liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98.4 |
|
|
|
11.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110.0 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
36.9 |
|
|
|
12.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49.2 |
|
Advances due to affiliates |
|
|
135.6 |
|
|
|
646.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(782.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Long-term deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
41.3 |
|
|
|
34.5 |
|
|
|
170.9 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
(2.9 |
) |
|
|
245.5 |
|
Common stock subject to redemption |
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
Shareholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
Capital in excess of par value |
|
|
232.9 |
|
|
|
352.1 |
|
|
|
1,199.7 |
|
|
|
83.7 |
|
|
|
(1,635.5 |
) |
|
|
232.9 |
|
Retained earnings
(accumulated deficit) |
|
|
108.3 |
|
|
|
140.0 |
|
|
|
101.3 |
|
|
|
62.1 |
|
|
|
(303.4 |
) |
|
|
108.3 |
|
Accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
17.9 |
|
|
|
17.9 |
|
|
|
24.2 |
|
|
|
(6.3 |
) |
|
|
(35.8 |
) |
|
|
17.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
359.8 |
|
|
|
510.0 |
|
|
|
1,325.2 |
|
|
|
139.5 |
|
|
|
(1,974.7 |
) |
|
|
359.8 |
|
Non-controlling interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity |
|
|
359.8 |
|
|
|
510.0 |
|
|
|
1,325.2 |
|
|
|
145.5 |
|
|
|
(1,974.7 |
) |
|
|
365.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity |
|
|
539.4 |
|
|
|
1,647.3 |
|
|
|
1,895.8 |
|
|
|
222.0 |
|
|
|
(2,818.8 |
) |
|
|
1,485.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
NORANDA ALUMINUM HOLDING CORPORATION
Consolidating Statements of Operations
(in millions)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
guarantor |
|
|
Issuer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Noranda |
|
|
(Noranda |
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HoldCo) |
|
|
AcquisitionCo) |
|
|
guarantors |
|
|
non-guarantors |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
296.6 |
|
|
|
35.5 |
|
|
|
(17.9 |
) |
|
|
314.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
264.4 |
|
|
|
27.7 |
|
|
|
(17.9 |
) |
|
|
274.2 |
|
Selling, general and administrative
expenses |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
16.5 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating costs and expenses |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
280.9 |
|
|
|
30.4 |
|
|
|
(17.9 |
) |
|
|
294.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
15.7 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (income) expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense (income), net |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
Gain on hedging activities, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21.7 |
) |
Gain on debt repurchase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other (income) expense |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
(21.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
(3.9 |
) |
|
|
37.4 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38.1 |
|
Income tax (benefit) expense |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
(2.1 |
) |
|
|
13.4 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.9 |
|
Equity in net income (loss) of subsidiaries |
|
|
25.4 |
|
|
|
27.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(52.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
25.2 |
|
|
|
25.4 |
|
|
|
24.0 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
(52.6 |
) |
|
|
25.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
guarantor |
|
|
Issuer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Noranda |
|
|
(Noranda |
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HoldCo) |
|
|
AcquisitionCo) |
|
|
guarantors |
|
|
non-guarantors |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
383.0 |
|
|
|
40.9 |
|
|
|
(23.5 |
) |
|
|
400.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
340.1 |
|
|
|
33.8 |
|
|
|
(23.5 |
) |
|
|
350.4 |
|
Selling, general and administrative
expenses |
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22.0 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating costs and expenses |
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
362.1 |
|
|
|
37.4 |
|
|
|
(23.5 |
) |
|
|
377.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.9 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (income) expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense (income), net |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
Gain on hedging activities, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other (income) expense |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
(19.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
|
(5.2 |
) |
|
|
40.3 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37.5 |
|
Income tax (benefit) expense |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(1.7 |
) |
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
Equity in net income (loss) of subsidiaries |
|
|
31.7 |
|
|
|
35.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(66.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
30.8 |
|
|
|
31.7 |
|
|
|
32.9 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
(66.9 |
) |
|
|
30.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27
NORANDA ALUMINUM HOLDING CORPORATION
Consolidating Statements of Operations
(in millions)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
guarantor |
|
|
Issuer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Noranda |
|
|
(Noranda |
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HoldCo) |
|
|
AcquisitionCo) |
|
|
guarantors |
|
|
non-guarantors |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
907.9 |
|
|
|
90.7 |
|
|
|
(48.0 |
) |
|
|
950.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
808.2 |
|
|
|
69.9 |
|
|
|
(48.0 |
) |
|
|
830.1 |
|
Selling, general and administrative
expenses |
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
|
18.6 |
|
|
|
55.5 |
|
|
|
12.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating costs and expenses |
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
|
18.6 |
|
|
|
863.7 |
|
|
|
82.4 |
|
|
|
(48.0 |
) |
|
|
922.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
(5.4 |
) |
|
|
(18.6 |
) |
|
|
44.2 |
|
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (income) expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense (income), net |
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
22.8 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
(4.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
25.0 |
|
Gain on hedging activities, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(44.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(44.0 |
) |
(Gain) loss on debt repurchase |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
(1.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other (income) expense |
|
|
7.1 |
|
|
|
20.9 |
|
|
|
(43.8 |
) |
|
|
(4.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
(12.5 |
) |
|
|
(39.5 |
) |
|
|
88.0 |
|
|
|
12.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48.4 |
|
Income tax (benefit) expense |
|
|
(3.9 |
) |
|
|
(13.7 |
) |
|
|
29.7 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.4 |
|
Equity in net income (loss) of subsidiaries |
|
|
40.6 |
|
|
|
66.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(107.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
32.0 |
|
|
|
40.6 |
|
|
|
58.3 |
|
|
|
8.1 |
|
|
|
(107.0 |
) |
|
|
32.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
guarantor |
|
|
Issuer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Noranda |
|
|
(Noranda |
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HoldCo) |
|
|
AcquisitionCo) |
|
|
guarantors |
|
|
non-guarantors |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,169.4 |
|
|
|
115.3 |
|
|
|
(63.4 |
) |
|
|
1,221.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,001.9 |
|
|
|
93.3 |
|
|
|
(63.4 |
) |
|
|
1,031.8 |
|
Selling, general and administrative
expenses |
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
56.4 |
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating costs and expenses |
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
1,058.3 |
|
|
|
103.4 |
|
|
|
(63.4 |
) |
|
|
1,104.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
(5.5 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
111.1 |
|
|
|
11.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
117.2 |
|
Other (income) expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense (income), net |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
16.6 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.4 |
|
Gain on hedging activities, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(65.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(65.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other (income) expense |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
16.6 |
|
|
|
(65.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(49.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
(5.2 |
) |
|
|
(16.9 |
) |
|
|
176.6 |
|
|
|
11.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
166.4 |
|
Income tax (benefit) expense |
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
(5.6 |
) |
|
|
52.8 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49.9 |
|
Equity in net income (loss) of subsidiaries |
|
|
120.4 |
|
|
|
131.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(252.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
116.5 |
|
|
|
120.4 |
|
|
|
123.8 |
|
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
|
(252.1 |
) |
|
|
116.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28
NORANDA ALUMINUM HOLDING CORPORATION
Condensed Consolidating Statements of Cash Flows
Nine months ended September 30, 2010
(in millions)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
guarantor |
|
|
Issuer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Noranda |
|
|
(Noranda |
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HoldCo) |
|
|
AcquisitionCo) |
|
|
guarantors |
|
|
non-guarantors |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by (used in)
operating activities |
|
|
(32.0 |
) |
|
|
242.9 |
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
|
|
6.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
249.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35.0 |
) |
|
|
(5.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(40.3 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of property,
plant and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash used in investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34.8 |
) |
|
|
(5.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(40.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common
shares |
|
|
82.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82.9 |
|
Repayments on revolving credit
facility |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(215.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(215.9 |
) |
Repayments of long-term debt |
|
|
(66.4 |
) |
|
|
(144.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(211.0 |
) |
Distribution to parent from
subsidiary |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by (used in) financing
activities |
|
|
17.4 |
|
|
|
(361.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(344.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(14.6 |
) |
|
|
(118.5 |
) |
|
|
(2.7 |
) |
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(134.2 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of
period |
|
|
21.4 |
|
|
|
140.5 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
167.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
|
6.8 |
|
|
|
22.0 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
NORANDA ALUMINUM HOLDING CORPORATION
Condensed Consolidating Statements of Cash Flows
Nine months ended September 30, 2011
(in millions)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
guarantor |
|
|
Issuer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Noranda |
|
|
(Noranda |
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HoldCo) |
|
|
AcquisitionCo) |
|
|
guarantors |
|
|
non-guarantors |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by (used in)
operating activities |
|
|
(1.9 |
) |
|
|
65.5 |
|
|
|
38.0 |
|
|
|
8.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(37.4 |
) |
|
|
(6.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(44.1 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of property,
plant and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash used in investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(37.2 |
) |
|
|
(4.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(41.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common
shares |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
Excess tax benefit related to
share-based payment arrangements |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
Distribution to parent from
subsidiary |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by (used in) financing
activities |
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
64.6 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70.1 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of
period |
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
|
20.4 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
|
7.6 |
|
|
|
85.0 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
103.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
Overview
Unless otherwise specified or unless the context otherwise requires, references to (i)
Noranda HoldCo refer only to Noranda Aluminum Holding Corporation, excluding its subsidiaries;
(ii) Noranda AcquisitionCo refer only to Noranda Aluminum Acquisition Corporation, the wholly
owned direct subsidiary of Noranda HoldCo, excluding its subsidiaries; and (iii) the Company,
Noranda, we, us and our refer collectively to Noranda HoldCo and its subsidiaries.
We are a leading North American integrated producer of value-added primary aluminum products
and high quality rolled aluminum coils. We have two businesses: our upstream business and
downstream business. Our upstream business consists of three reportable segments: primary aluminum
products, alumina refining, and bauxite. These three segments are closely integrated and consist of
a smelter near New Madrid, Missouri, which we refer to as New Madrid, and supporting operations
at our bauxite mine and alumina refinery. New Madrid has annual production capacity of
approximately 580 million pounds (263,000 metric tonnes). Operated at capacity, this represented
approximately 15% of total 2010 U.S. primary aluminum production, based on data from CRU. Our flat
rolled products segment comprises our downstream business, which is one of the largest aluminum
foil producers in North America and consists of four rolling mill facilities with a combined
maximum annual production capacity of 410 to 495 million pounds, depending on production mix.
Our third quarter 2011 operating results reflect the combined effects of continued strong
aluminum industry fundamentals, our integrated business model, and our efforts to take costs out of
the business and improve operating effectiveness. As a result, we produced year-over-year growth in
revenue, profitability and liquidity:
|
|
|
Strong demand in billet, rod, and high-purity sow product groups allowed us to
capitalize on higher London Metal Exchange (LME) aluminum prices, resulting in 27.4%
revenue growth over third quarter 2010. |
|
|
|
Revenue growth more than offset the effect of higher raw materials input costs
resulting in a 15.4% increase in operating income over third quarter 2010. |
|
|
|
As anticipated, and consistent with trends throughout 2011, our third quarter 2011
integrated net cash cost for primary aluminum products was $0.81 per pound compared to
$0.77 per pound in third quarter 2010. This increase reflected upward pressure in key
input costs such as energy (electricity in our primary aluminum segment and oil-based
fuels in our bauxite segment), carbon-based products (primarily in our aluminum products
segment) and chemical products (alumina refining segment). |
|
|
|
Our cash flow from operations was $33.7 million in third quarter 2011, including $10.5
million cash from operating working capital reductions. |
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA was $54.0 million, 63.6% higher than third quarter 2010. |
|
|
|
Our results reflect approximately $14.1 million in cost and capital expenditure
savings in third quarter 2011 pursuant to our CORE program and $51.7 million to date in
2011 towards our three year $140.0 million CORE program goal. Our CORE program has
generated $171.8 million of total savings since its inception in 2009. |
Within the recent environment of global economic uncertainty, we have observed that demand
patterns remain stable across the integrated business and the rate of raw material input costs
inflation has slowed:
|
|
|
For fourth quarter 2011, we expect to experience seasonal demand patterns comparable
to those seen in fourth quarter 2010 for value-added primary aluminum products such as
billet and rod, and for flat rolled products. Despite this seasonal decline in
value-added products demand, we expect primary aluminum segment total volume for 2011 as
a whole to be at or near capacity. |
|
|
|
We expect 2012 demand to be similar to 2011 levels in key product groups such as
value-added primary aluminum, flat rolled products, alumina, and bauxite. |
31
Forward-looking Statements
This report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements are statements about
future, not past, events and involve certain important risks and uncertainties, any of which could
cause the Companys actual results to differ materially from those expressed in forward-looking
statements, including, without limitation: the cyclical nature of the aluminum industry and
fluctuating commodity prices, which cause variability in earnings and cash flows; a downturn in
general economic conditions, including changes in interest rates, as well as a downturn in the
end-use markets for certain of the Companys products; fluctuations in the relative cost of certain
raw materials and energy compared to the price of primary aluminum and aluminum rolled products;
the effects of competition in Norandas business lines; Norandas ability to retain customers, a
substantial number of which do not have long-term contractual arrangements with the Company; the
ability to fulfill the businesss substantial capital investment needs; labor relations (i.e.
disruptions, strikes or work stoppages) and labor costs; unexpected issues arising in connection
with Norandas operations outside of the United States; the ability to retain key management
personnel; and Norandas expectations with respect to its acquisition activity, or difficulties
encountered in connection with acquisitions, dispositions or similar transactions.
Forward-looking statements contain words such as believes, expects, may, should,
seeks, approximately, intends, plans, estimates, or anticipates or similar expressions
that relate to Norandas strategy, plans or intentions. All statements Noranda makes relating to
its estimated and projected earnings, margins, costs, expenditures, cash flows, growth rates and
financial results or to the Companys expectations regarding future industry trends are
forward-looking statements. Noranda undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any
forward-looking statement as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as
otherwise required by law. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking
statements, which speak only as of the date on which they are made and which reflect managements
current estimates, projections, expectations or beliefs. All forward-looking statements herein are
based upon information available to us on the date of this report on Form 10-Q.
Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from our expectations,
which we refer to as cautionary statements, are disclosed herein under Part II, Item 1A Risk
Factors, and in Item 1A in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
All forward-looking information in this report on Form 10-Q and subsequent written and oral
forward-looking statements attributable to us, or persons acting on our behalf, are expressly
qualified in their entirety by our cautionary statements. In light of these risks and
uncertainties, the matters referred to in the forward-looking statements contained in this report
on Form 10-Q may not in fact occur. Accordingly, investors should not place undue reliance on those
statements. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement
as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as otherwise required by law.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance
with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (U.S. GAAP). Preparation of these financial
statements requires management to make significant judgments and estimates. See item 7,
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Note 1,
Accounting Policies in our audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December
31, 2010, included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, as filed March 7, 2011, for a discussion of
our critical accounting policies and estimates.
Inventory Valuation
An actual valuation of inventory under the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method can be made only
at the end of each year based on the inventory costs at that time. Accordingly, interim LIFO
calculations must be based on managements estimates of expected year-end inventory costs. Because
these calculations are subject to many factors beyond managements control, interim results are
subject to the final year-end LIFO inventory valuation which could significantly differ from
interim estimates. To estimate the effect of LIFO on interim periods, we calculate a LIFO reserve
each quarter, giving consideration to expected year-end inventory pricing.
The following table illustrates the sensitivity of our LIFO adjustment by showing the amount
by which pre-tax income would have changed for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, given
certain specified changes in inventory costs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) |
|
Inventory item |
|
Sensitivity |
|
|
in pre-tax income ($ in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Primary aluminum segment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coke |
|
10% increase in price |
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
Alumina |
|
$0.10 increase in LME per pound |
|
|
(2.1 |
) |
Flat rolled products segment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Metal |
|
$0.10 increase in LME per pound |
|
|
(5.1 |
) |
32
Results of Operations
The following table summarizes our results of operations for the periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Statements of operations data (unaudited, in millions): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales |
|
|
314.2 |
|
|
|
400.4 |
|
|
|
950.6 |
|
|
|
1,221.3 |
|
Operating costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
274.2 |
|
|
|
350.4 |
|
|
|
830.1 |
|
|
|
1,031.8 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
19.9 |
|
|
|
26.8 |
|
|
|
92.0 |
|
|
|
72.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating costs and expenses |
|
|
294.1 |
|
|
|
377.2 |
|
|
|
922.1 |
|
|
|
1,104.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
20.1 |
|
|
|
23.2 |
|
|
|
28.5 |
|
|
|
117.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (income) expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
25.0 |
|
|
|
16.4 |
|
Gain on hedging activities, net |
|
|
(21.7 |
) |
|
|
(19.5 |
) |
|
|
(44.0 |
) |
|
|
(65.6 |
) |
Gain on debt repurchase |
|
|
(3.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income |
|
|
(18.0 |
) |
|
|
(14.3 |
) |
|
|
(19.9 |
) |
|
|
(49.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
38.1 |
|
|
|
37.5 |
|
|
|
48.4 |
|
|
|
166.4 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
12.9 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
16.4 |
|
|
|
49.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
25.2 |
|
|
|
30.8 |
|
|
|
32.0 |
|
|
|
116.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
0.46 |
|
|
|
0.46 |
|
|
|
0.65 |
|
|
|
1.74 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
0.45 |
|
|
|
0.45 |
|
|
|
0.64 |
|
|
|
1.71 |
|
Weighted-average common shares outstanding (in millions): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
55.28 |
|
|
|
67.23 |
|
|
|
49.42 |
|
|
|
67.00 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
56.30 |
|
|
|
68.49 |
|
|
|
50.31 |
|
|
|
68.32 |
|
Sales by segment (in millions): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bauxite |
|
|
35.5 |
|
|
|
40.9 |
|
|
|
90.7 |
|
|
|
115.4 |
|
Alumina refining |
|
|
87.6 |
|
|
|
104.1 |
|
|
|
275.1 |
|
|
|
317.2 |
|
Primary aluminum products |
|
|
149.1 |
|
|
|
187.7 |
|
|
|
444.2 |
|
|
|
561.1 |
|
Flat rolled products |
|
|
133.7 |
|
|
|
163.2 |
|
|
|
400.3 |
|
|
|
488.3 |
|
Eliminations |
|
|
(91.7 |
) |
|
|
(95.5 |
) |
|
|
(259.7 |
) |
|
|
(260.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
314.2 |
|
|
|
400.4 |
|
|
|
950.6 |
|
|
|
1,221.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment profit (loss) (in millions): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bauxite |
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
6.8 |
|
|
|
20.0 |
|
|
|
19.2 |
|
Alumina refining |
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
|
23.4 |
|
|
|
35.9 |
|
|
|
73.9 |
|
Primary aluminum products |
|
|
12.5 |
|
|
|
21.8 |
|
|
|
70.1 |
|
|
|
117.6 |
|
Flat rolled products |
|
|
14.4 |
|
|
|
12.1 |
|
|
|
40.2 |
|
|
|
41.8 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
(5.8 |
) |
|
|
(8.0 |
) |
|
|
(19.5 |
) |
|
|
(21.8 |
) |
Eliminations |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
(2.5 |
) |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
38.8 |
|
|
|
60.2 |
|
|
|
144.2 |
|
|
|
230.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial and other data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average realized Midwest transaction price (per pound)(1) |
|
|
0.99 |
|
|
|
1.18 |
|
|
|
1.02 |
|
|
|
1.21 |
|
Integrated net cash cost for primary aluminum products (per pound
shipped)(2) |
|
|
0.77 |
|
|
|
0.81 |
|
|
|
0.72 |
|
|
|
0.72 |
|
Third party shipments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bauxite (kMts) |
|
|
570.5 |
|
|
|
619.9 |
|
|
|
1,392.7 |
|
|
|
1,853.9 |
|
Alumina refining (kMts) |
|
|
164.7 |
|
|
|
160.2 |
|
|
|
507.3 |
|
|
|
482.2 |
|
Primary aluminum products (pounds, in millions) |
|
|
102.3 |
|
|
|
123.8 |
|
|
|
310.5 |
|
|
|
383.0 |
|
Flat rolled products (pounds, in millions) |
|
|
92.0 |
|
|
|
94.9 |
|
|
|
267.7 |
|
|
|
286.3 |
|
Intersegment shipments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bauxite (kMts) |
|
|
665.8 |
|
|
|
749.3 |
|
|
|
1,920.1 |
|
|
|
2,018.3 |
|
Alumina refining (kMts) |
|
|
124.8 |
|
|
|
123.9 |
|
|
|
354.0 |
|
|
|
380.9 |
|
Primary aluminum products (pounds, in millions) |
|
|
38.4 |
|
|
|
24.8 |
|
|
|
97.5 |
|
|
|
52.6 |
|
33
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The price for primary aluminum products consists of two components: the
price quoted for primary aluminum ingot by the LME and the Midwest transaction premium, a
premium to LME price reflecting domestic market dynamics as well as the cost of shipping
and warehousing. As a significant portion of our value-added products are sold at the
prior months Midwest transaction price plus a fabrication premium, we calculate a
realized price which reflects the specific pricing of sales transactions in each
period. |
|
(2) |
|
Unit net cash cost for primary aluminum per pound represents our costs of
producing commodity grade aluminum net of value-added premiums on primary aluminum sales.
We have provided unit net cash cost per pound of aluminum shipped because we believe it
provides investors with additional information to measure our operating performance.
Using this metric, investors are able to assess the prevailing LME price plus Midwest
premium per pound versus our unit net costs per pound shipped. Unit net cash cost per
pound shipped is positively or negatively impacted by changes in primary aluminum,
alumina and bauxite production and sales volumes, natural gas and oil related costs,
seasonality in our electrical contract rates, and increases or decreases in other
production related costs. Unit net cash costs is not a measure of financial performance
under U.S. GAAP and may not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by other
companies in our industry and should not be considered in isolation from or as an
alternative to any performance measures derived in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The
following table shows the calculation of integrated net cash cost of primary aluminum: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
Total primary aluminum cash cost (in millions)(a) |
|
$ |
108.6 |
|
|
$ |
119.7 |
|
|
$ |
292.5 |
|
|
$ |
314.7 |
|
Total primary aluminum shipments (pounds in millions) |
|
|
140.7 |
|
|
|
148.6 |
|
|
|
408.0 |
|
|
|
435.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Integrated net cash cost for primary aluminum products (per pound shipped) |
|
$ |
0.77 |
|
|
$ |
0.81 |
|
|
$ |
0.72 |
|
|
$ |
0.72 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) Total primary aluminum cash cost is calculated below (in
millions): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total primary aluminum product sales |
|
$ |
149.1 |
|
|
$ |
187.7 |
|
|
$ |
444.2 |
|
|
$ |
561.1 |
|
Less: fabrication premiums and other revenue |
|
|
(10.3 |
) |
|
|
(11.9 |
) |
|
|
(28.2 |
) |
|
|
(35.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized Midwest transaction price revenue |
|
|
138.8 |
|
|
|
175.8 |
|
|
|
416.0 |
|
|
|
525.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Primary aluminum products segment profit |
|
|
12.5 |
|
|
|
21.8 |
|
|
|
70.1 |
|
|
|
117.6 |
|
Alumina refining segment profit |
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
|
23.4 |
|
|
|
35.9 |
|
|
|
73.9 |
|
Bauxite segment profit |
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
6.8 |
|
|
|
20.0 |
|
|
|
19.2 |
|
Profit eliminations |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
(2.5 |
) |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
30.2 |
|
|
|
56.1 |
|
|
|
123.5 |
|
|
|
210.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total primary aluminum cash cost |
|
$ |
108.6 |
|
|
$ |
119.7 |
|
|
$ |
292.5 |
|
|
$ |
314.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discussion of Operating Results
A discussion of our results of operations is presented for the three months and nine months
ended September 30, 2010 and September 30, 2011.
You should read the following discussion of our results of operations in conjunction with the
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this
report on Form 10-Q.
Three months ended September 30, 2010 compared to three months ended September 30, 2011 discussion
of consolidated operating results
Sales
Sales for third quarter 2010 were $314.2 million compared to $400.4 million in third quarter
2011. The $86.2 million increase in sales is mainly the result of higher realized prices for
aluminum and higher third-party shipment volumes in the bauxite and primary aluminum segments.
|
|
|
The LME price improved from an average of $0.95 per pound during third quarter 2010 to
$1.09 per pound during third quarter 2011. Our average realized Midwest transaction price
(MWTP) for third quarter 2011 was $1.18 per pound, compared to $0.99 per pound in third
quarter 2010. These realized price improvements contributed $58.6 million to our
quarter-over-quarter sales growth. |
|
|
|
Demand remained strong during third quarter 2011, particularly across the majority of
product groups in our flat rolled products segment and for billet and rod in the primary
aluminum products segment. The strong demand in these segments contributed to $27.6
million of quarter-over-quarter sales growth. |
Cost of sales
Cost of sales for third quarter 2010 was $274.2 million compared to $350.4 million in third
quarter 2011. The $76.2 million increase in cost of sales is mainly due to (i) the increase in LME
prices, as reflected in the pass-through nature of the flat rolled products segment; (ii) higher
shipment volumes in the bauxite segment; and (iii) upward pressure in key input costs such as
energy (electricity in our primary aluminum segment and oil-based fuels in our bauxite segment),
carbon-based products (primarily in our aluminum products segment) and chemical products (alumina
refining segment.)
Third quarter 2010 cost of sales were favorably impacted by $11.0 million of non-cash
lower-of-cost-or-market and LIFO adjustments due to the sell through of inventory and an increase
in the LME aluminum price in third quarter 2010 compared to second quarter 2010. Third quarter 2011
was favorably impacted by $1.9 million of non-cash lower-of-cost-or-market and LIFO adjustments.
34
Selling, general and administrative expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses in third quarter 2010 were $19.9 million and
increased to $26.8 million in third quarter 2011. The $6.9 million expense increase primarily
consists of (i) $2.8 million of project-related legal and
consulting fees in the 2011 period; (ii) increased stock compensation expense of $0.7 million primarily related to restricted stock units granted
in 2011; and (iii) $3.4
million of expense for the release of an indemnification receivable from our previous owner
associated with a portion of our uncertain tax positions. The indemnification receivable was
released because the statute of limitations expired on the uncertain tax position, which resulted
in a reversal against income tax expense of a $3.4 million liability.
Operating income
Operating income in third quarter 2010 was $20.1 million compared to $23.2 million in third
quarter 2011. The $3.1 million increase in operating income relates to $10.0 million improvement in
sales margin (sales minus cost of sales), partially offset by the $6.9 million increase in selling,
general and administrative expenses, as discussed above.
Sales margin for third quarter 2010 was $40.0 million compared to $50.0 million in the third
quarter 2011. The $10.0 million sales margin increase primarily resulted from the favorable impacts
of higher external shipment volumes and realized prices coupled with cost savings achieved through
our CORE program.
Interest expense, net
Interest expense in third quarter 2010 was $7.2 million and decreased to $5.2 million in third
quarter 2011. The $2.0 million decrease in interest expense resulted from the repayment of debt
during 2010. Average debt outstanding was $546.8 million during third quarter 2010, compared to
$428.5 million during third quarter 2011.
Gain on hedging activities, net
Gain on hedging activities was $21.7 million in third quarter 2010 and $19.5 million in third
quarter 2011. The $2.2 million decrease primarily related to variability in the LME price relative
to our variable-price aluminum transactions.
Gain on debt repurchase
During third quarter 2010, we repurchased and retired $20.6 million aggregate principal amount
of our AcquisitionCo Notes with a net carrying amount of $20.6 million for $17.1 million, resulting
in a net gain on debt repurchase of $3.5 million. We did not repurchase any debt during the three
months ended September 30, 2011.
Income before income taxes
Income before income taxes was $38.1 million in third quarter 2010 and $37.5 million in the
third quarter 2011. The special items outlined below impacted the comparability of our pre-tax
income (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) to pre-tax income |
|
Pre-tax impact of special items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Release of indemnification receivable related to uncertain tax positions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.4 |
) |
Gain on debt repurchase |
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on hedging activities |
|
|
21.7 |
|
|
|
19.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total pre-tax impact of special items |
|
|
25.2 |
|
|
|
16.1 |
|
Income tax impact of special items |
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After-tax impact of special items |
|
|
16.4 |
|
|
|
16.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The income tax impact of special items includes a $5.4 million tax benefit related to the
release of a portion of our reserve for uncertain tax positions for the 2011 period. This $5.4
million tax benefit comprises the $3.4 million of uncertain tax positions indemnified by our
previous owner and $2.0 million of uncertain tax positions taken after May 2007. Excluding these
two items, our expected annual effective tax rate for 2011 would have been 32.6%.
Pre-tax income in the third quarter 2011 was favorably impacted by a $3.1 million increase in
operating income and a $2.0 million decrease in interest expense, partially offset by a $2.2
million decrease in gain on hedging activities.
Income tax expense
Income tax expense was $12.9 million in third quarter 2010 compared to $6.7 million in third
quarter 2011. The provision for income taxes resulted in an effective tax rate of 33.9% for third
quarter 2010 and 17.9% for third quarter 2011. The effective income tax rate for third quarter 2011
was impacted by the release of a portion of our reserve for uncertain tax positions which reduced
third quarter income tax expense by $5.4 million. Our effective tax rate in both periods was
impacted by state income taxes, the Internal Revenue Code Section 199 manufacturing deduction and
accrued interest related to unrecognized tax benefits.
35
Net income
Net income was $25.2 million in third quarter 2010 and increased to $30.8 million in third
quarter 2011. The $5.6 million increase primarily resulted from the $6.2 million lower income taxes
offset by the $0.6 million decrease in pre-tax income.
Three months ended September 30 2010 compared to three months ended September 30, 2011 discussion
of segment results
Bauxite
Sales to external customers from our bauxite segment for third quarter 2010 were $17.6
million, compared to $17.4 million for third quarter 2011.
Segment profit in third quarter 2010 was $7.7 million compared to $6.8 million in third
quarter 2011. This $0.9 million decrease resulted from the continued rise in fuel costs and
demurrage, offset in part by the favorable effects of higher volumes and higher bauxite pricing.
Alumina refining
Sales to external customers from our alumina refining segment for third quarter 2010 were
$52.2 million compared to $60.6 million for third quarter 2011. This $8.4 million increase is
primarily pricing related, as reflected by the LME-indexed nature of alumina pricing. In 2011,
substantially all of our external shipments of smelter-grade alumina are priced at 15.5% of LME,
compared to 14.5% in 2010. In both 2010 and 2011, our internal smelter-grade alumina sales price
was 14.0% of LME.
Segment profit in third quarter 2010 was $10.1 million compared to $23.4 million in third
quarter 2011. Third quarter 2011 alumina segment profit reflected a $9.8 million favorable impact
to revenue from LME-indexed smelter grade alumina sales. Third quarter 2011 segment profit was also
favorably impacted by CORE savings, which were partially offset by the effects of increased costs
of bauxite and chemical products.
Primary aluminum products
Sales to external customers from our primary aluminum products segment increased from $110.8
million in third quarter 2010 to $159.2 million in third quarter 2011.
|
|
|
A 19.2% increase in realized MWTP in the third quarter 2011 compared to third quarter
2010 increased external primary aluminum products revenue by approximately $25.1 million. |
|
|
|
A 21.0% increase in external primary aluminum shipments generated approximately $23.3
million additional revenue comparing third quarter 2011 to third quarter 2010. Shipment
increases in third quarter 2011 compared to third quarter 2010 were driven by the
increased volume of value-added shipments resulting from improved demand due to the U.S.
economic recovery. |
Primary aluminum products segment costs increased in third quarter 2011 compared to third
quarter 2010, primarily due to increased power costs and raw materials costs, such as alumina, as
well as upward cost pressure on carbon-based raw materials. Fuel adjustment charges through our
power contract were $4.1 million during third quarter 2011, compared to $1.3 million in third
quarter 2010.
|
|
|
The integrated net cash cost of primary aluminum was $0.81 per pound in third quarter
2011, compared to $0.77 per pound in third quarter 2010. This increase reflects the
impact from higher input costs for carbon-based products. |
Segment profit improved from $12.5 million in third quarter 2010 to $21.8 million in third
quarter 2011. The $9.3 million improvement reflects higher realized prices and higher sales volume,
partially offset by higher power costs, increased alumina transfer prices and carbon-based raw
materials as discussed above.
Flat rolled products
Sales to external customers in our flat rolled products segment were $133.6 million in third
quarter 2010 compared to $163.2 million in third quarter 2011. The $29.6 million increase in sales
was primarily due to the increase in LME prices, as well as higher shipment volumes to external
customers.
|
|
|
Higher LME prices contributed $25.4 million to the sales increase. Fabrication
premiums were relatively unchanged. |
|
|
|
A 3.2% increase in shipment volumes contributed $4.2 million to the revenue increase
due to higher end-market demand associated with the U.S. economic recovery. |
Flat rolled products segment costs increased due to the increase in the LME price, since the
majority of flat rolled product cost represents the pass-through cost of metal.
Segment profit in third quarter 2010 was $14.4 million compared to $12.1 million in third
quarter 2011. The $2.3 million decrease in segment profit primarily reflects the unfavorable $2.7
million metal margin swing due to rapidly declining LME prices, offset in part by the favorable
impact of modest volume increases.
36
Corporate
Corporate costs in third quarter 2010 were $5.8 million compared to $8.0 million in third
quarter 2011. The $2.2 million increase is due primarily to higher project-related legal and
consulting fees.
Nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to nine months ended September 30, 2011 discussion of
consolidated operating results
Sales
Sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 were $950.6 million compared to $1,221.3
million in the nine months ended September 30, 2011. The $270.7 million increase is mainly the
result of higher realized prices for aluminum and higher third-party shipment volumes in the
bauxite, primary aluminum and flat rolled products segments.
|
|
|
The LME price improved from an average of $0.96 per pound during the 2010 period to
$1.13 per pound during the 2011 period. Our average realized MWTP for the 2011 period was
$1.21 per pound, compared to $1.02 per pound in the 2010 period. |
|
|
|
Demand remained strong during the first nine months of 2011, particularly across the
majority of product groups in our flat rolled products segment and for billet and rod in
the primary aluminum products segment. |
Cost of sales
Cost of sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was $830.1 million compared to
$1,031.8 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2011. The $201.7 million increase is due to
(i) higher shipment volumes in the bauxite, primary aluminum and flat rolled products segments;
(ii) the increase in LME prices, as reflected in the pass-through nature of the flat rolled
products segment; and (iii) the effects of rising carbon-based products prices and seasonal peak
power rates in the primary aluminum products segment, and higher metal prices in the flat rolled
products segment.
We recorded $0.3 million of favorable non-cash LIFO and LCM related adjustments in the first
nine months of 2010. We recorded $17.3 million of unfavorable non-cash LIFO and LCM adjustments in
the 2011 period primarily due to a higher LME price for aluminum at September 30, 2011 compared to
December 31, 2010.
Selling, general and administrative expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses in the nine months ended September 30, 2010 were
$92.0 million, and decreased to $72.3 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2011. The
decrease in expenses of $19.7 million primarily resulted from the favorable impact of (i) $13.5
million of Apollo management consulting fees ($12.5 million related to the termination of the
agreement in connection with our IPO); (ii) $8.1 million of restructuring costs related to our
workforce and contract mining restructuring plans, for which there were no comparable charges
during the first nine months of 2011 (iii) $1.6 million lower pension costs associated with
settlement and termination benefits; offset by $3.4 million of expense for the release of an
indemnification receivable from our previous owner associated with a portion of our uncertain tax
positions. The indemnification receivable was released because the statute of limitations expired
on the uncertain tax position, which resulted in a reversal against income tax expense of a $3.4
million liability.
Operating income
Operating income in the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was $28.5 million compared to
$117.2 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2011. The $88.7 million increase in operating
income relates to sales margin (sales minus cost of sales) improvement of $69.0 million and a $19.7
million decrease in selling, general and administrative expenses, as discussed above.
Sales margin for the first nine months of 2010 was $120.5 million compared to $189.5 million
in the first nine months of 2011. The sales margin increase of $69.0 million primarily resulted
from the favorable impacts of higher external shipment volumes and realized prices coupled with
cost savings achieved through our CORE program, as well as efficiencies gained in bringing the
smelter back to full production.
Interest expense, net
Interest expense in the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was $25.0 million and decreased
to $16.4 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2011. The $8.6 million decrease resulted
from the repayment of debt during the 2010 period. Average debt outstanding was $651.8 million
during the nine months ended September 30, 2010, compared to $424.6 million during the nine months
ended September 30, 2011.
Gain on hedging activities, net
Gain on hedging activities was $44.0 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and
increased to $65.6 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2011. The increase of $21.6
million primarily related to the impact in the 2010 period of changes in the fair value of fixed
price aluminum hedges which were terminated in May 2010 as well as variability in the LME price
relative to our variable-price aluminum transactions.
37
Gain on debt repurchase
During the first nine months of 2010 we used net proceeds from our completed IPO, available
cash balances and proceeds from the termination of fixed-price aluminum swaps to repay $127.5
million and $215.9 million of aggregate principal amounts on the term B loan and revolving credit
facility at face value, respectively, and repurchase $66.3 million and $20.6 million aggregate
principal amount of our HoldCo Notes and AcquisitionCo Notes, respectively. The debt repurchases
resulted in a $0.9 million net gain. No debt repurchases were made during the nine months ended
September 30, 2011.
Income before income taxes
Income before income taxes was $48.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and
increased to $166.4 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2011. The special items outlined
below impacted the comparability of our pre-tax income (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) to pre-tax income |
|
Pre-tax impact of special items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Release of indemnification receivable related to uncertain tax positions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.4 |
) |
Restructuring |
|
|
(7.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Gain on debt repurchase |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
Management agreement termination |
|
|
(12.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Modification of stock options |
|
|
(3.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Transaction related legal costs |
|
|
(5.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Gain on hedging activities |
|
|
44.0 |
|
|
|
65.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total pre-tax impact of special items |
|
|
16.1 |
|
|
|
62.2 |
|
Income tax impact of special items |
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
15.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After-tax impact of special items |
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
|
47.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The income tax impact of special items includes a $5.3 million tax benefit related to the
release of a portion of our reserve for uncertain tax positions for the 2011 period. This $5.3
million tax benefit comprises the $3.4 million of uncertain tax positions indemnified by our
previous owner and $2.0 million of uncertain tax positions taken after May 2007, offset by an
increase of $0.1 million for additional amounts related to prior period tax positions. Excluding
these two items, our expected annual effective tax rate for 2011 would have been 32.6%.
In addition, pre-tax income for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 was favorably
impacted by $88.7 million of increased operating income, $21.6 million of increased gain on hedging
activities and $8.6 million in reduced interest expense.
Income tax expense
Income tax expense was $16.4 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to
$49.9 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2011. The provision for income taxes resulted
in an effective tax rate of 33.9% for the 2010 period and 30.0% for the 2011 period. The effective
income tax rate for the 2011 period was impacted by the release of a portion of our reserve for
uncertain tax positions which reduced income tax expense for the 2011 period by $5.3 million. Our
effective tax rate in both periods was impacted by state income taxes, the Internal Revenue Code
Section 199 manufacturing deduction and accrued interest related to unrecognized tax benefits.
Net income
Net income was $32.0 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and increased to net
income of $116.5 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2011. The $84.5 million increase
resulted from the increase in pre-tax income described above; offset by $33.5 million of increased
income taxes.
Nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to nine months ended September 30, 2011 discussion of
segment results
Bauxite
Sales to external customers from our bauxite segment for the nine months ended September 30,
2010 were $42.7 million, compared to $52.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011.
During 2010, the bauxite segments third party customer
was unable to accept its committed level of bauxite. During 2011, we are experiencing
customary levels of demand from our third party customer.
38
Segment profit in the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was $20.0 million compared to $19.2
million in the nine months ended September 30, 2011. The higher bauxite sales discussed above were
almost completely offset by higher demurrage and fuel costs, resulting in comparable year over year
segment profit.
Alumina refining
Sales to external customers from our alumina refining segment for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 were $161.9 million compared to $182.2 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2011. This $20.3 million increase is primarily pricing related, as reflected by the
LME-indexed nature of alumina pricing.
Segment profit in the first nine months of 2010 was $35.9 million compared to $73.9 million in
the first nine months of 2011. The 2011 period segment profit reflects an 18.8% increase in average
LME prices combined with savings from our CORE program, offset in part by increased input costs for
bauxite and caustic soda.
Primary aluminum products
Sales to external customers from our primary aluminum products segment increased from $345.8
million reported in the nine months ended September 30, 2010 to $498.8 million in the nine months
ended September 30, 2011.
|
|
|
An 18.6% increase in realized MWTP in the 2011 period compared to the 2010 period
increased external primary aluminum products revenue by approximately $72.3 million. |
|
|
|
A 23.3% increase in external primary aluminum shipments generated approximately $80.7
million of additional revenue comparing the 2011 period to the 2010 period. Shipment
increases in the 2011 period compared to the 2010 period were driven by the increased
volume of value-added shipments, as discussed above. |
Primary aluminum products segment costs increased in the first nine months of 2011 compared to
the first nine months of 2010, primarily due to increased power and raw materials costs, such as
alumina, as well as upward cost pressure in carbon-based products. Fuel adjustment charges of $12.8
million were recorded in cost of goods sold during the first nine months of 2011 compared to $1.9
million during the first nine months of 2010.
|
|
|
The integrated net cash cost of primary aluminum was $0.72 per pound in both periods. |
Segment profit in the 2010 period was $70.1 million compared to $117.6 million in the 2011
period. The 2010 period results reflect lower realized prices and the lingering negative impact of
the New Madrid power outage on volumes and cash cost. The 2011 period results were most
significantly impacted by increased realized pricing and higher shipments, which were offset in
part by higher power costs and increased raw materials costs.
Flat rolled products
Sales in our flat rolled products segment were $400.2 million in the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 compared to $488.3 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2011. The
$88.1 million increase was primarily due to the increase in LME prices, as well as higher shipment
volumes to external customers.
|
|
|
Rising LME prices contributed $60.3 million to the sales increase. Fabrication
premiums were relatively unchanged. |
|
|
|
A 6.9% increase in shipment volumes contributed $27.8 million to the revenue increase,
primarily due to higher end-market demand associated with the U.S. economic recovery. |
Flat rolled products segment costs increased due to the increase in the LME price, since the
majority of flat rolled product cost represents the pass-through cost of metal.
Segment profit in the first nine months of 2010 was $40.2 million compared to $41.8 million in
the first nine months of 2011. The increase in segment profit of $1.6 million reflects primarily
the impact of higher shipments resulting from increased customer demand, offset in part by higher
electricity and freight costs.
Corporate
Corporate costs in the nine months ended September 30, 2010 were $19.5 million and corporate
costs in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 were $21.8 million. The increase reflects the
variability in legal and consulting fees.
39
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our primary sources of liquidity are available cash balances, cash provided by operating
activities and available borrowings under our revolving credit facility:
|
|
|
At September 30, 2011, we had $103.9 million of cash and cash equivalents. |
|
|
|
For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, cash provided by operating activities
totaled $110.3 million. |
|
|
|
Our revolving credit facility has $213.3 million available for borrowing under the
revolving credit facility at September 30, 2011. Our revolving credit facility, together
with our term B loan, is part of our senior secured credit facilities which are secured
by first priority security interests in substantially all of the assets of Noranda
AcquisitionCo. Our revolving credit facility matures in May 2013 and our term B loan
matures in May 2014. Our revolving credit facility has a $242.7 million borrowing
capacity. We had no amounts outstanding under our revolving credit facility, although we
had outstanding letters of credit of $29.4 million, which resulted in $213.3 million
available for borrowing under the revolving credit facility at September 30, 2011. |
As of December 31, 2010 and September 30, 2011, our total indebtedness was as follows (in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
September 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Noranda AcquisitionCo: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Floating Rate Notes due 2015 (AcquisitionCo Notes) |
|
|
341.5 |
|
|
|
350.3 |
|
Term B loan due 2014 |
|
|
78.2 |
|
|
|
78.2 |
|
Revolving credit facility |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt |
|
|
419.7 |
|
|
|
428.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table sets forth unaudited condensed consolidated cash flow information for the
periods indicated (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
249.9 |
|
|
|
110.3 |
|
Cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(40.1 |
) |
|
|
(41.5 |
) |
Cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
(344.0 |
) |
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(134.2 |
) |
|
|
70.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
Operating activities generated $249.9 million of cash in the nine months ended September 30,
2010 compared to $110.3 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2011. The 2010 period
included $164.6 million of cash settlements related to fixed-price aluminum hedges. In the 2011
period, we produced $212.2 million of Adjusted EBITDA, comprising $230.8 million of total segment
profit less $18.6 million of cash payments on natural gas hedges. (Adjusted EBITDA is defined and
discussed under the following Covenant Compliance and Financial Ratios section.) During the 2011
period, we made $42.4 million of pension funding, interest and other payments and $63.8 million of
income tax payments, offset by $4.3 million provided by operating working capital.
Investing activities
Capital expenditures were $40.3 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and $44.1
million in the nine months ended September 30, 2011.
Property, plant and equipment accrued in accounts payable and not yet paid were $3.4 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and are not reflected as capital expenditures in the
accompanying unaudited consolidated statements of cash flows.
During second quarter 2010, we announced that we had initiated steps to complete a $38.0
million capital project at our New Madrid smelter facility. We expect the project to increase the
smelters annual metal production by approximately 35 million pounds. We anticipate the capital
spending will be spread primarily over 2011, 2012, and 2013, and we expect additional capacity to
be on-line during 2013. During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, we invested approximately
$1.4 million toward the expansion project, for a total of $4.5 million invested to date.
40
We announced that we initiated at a projected cost of $2.4 million the engineering phase of
two new capital projects to support both growth and productivity:
|
|
|
A $40 million project in the primary aluminum products segment to define and build a
new state of the art value-added rod mill, which we expect will increase its annual rod
capacity and improve energy utilization. This project will require ratification by our
Board of Directors (the Board) following engineering test results. |
|
|
|
A $35 million project to define and build new recycling and re-melt facilities at
Huntingdon, TN. We expect this project to increase re-melt capacity and enhance our
ability to participate in the recycled products space, a growing customer demand. This
project will require ratification by the Board following engineering test results. |
Financing activities
During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, our financing cash flows mainly reflected
debt reduction and issuance of common stock associated with our IPO. During the nine months ended
September 30, 2011, our financing cash flows reflected the excess tax benefit of share-based
payment arrangements and the issuance of common shares in connection with stock option exercises.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, AcquisitionCo issued $8.9 million of
AcquisitionCo Notes as payment-in-kind interest due May 15, 2011. For subsequent periods, Noranda
AcquisitionCo is required to pay all interest in cash. In the nine months ended September 30, 2010,
AcquisitionCo and HoldCo issued $9.1 million and $2.3 million in AcquisitionCo Notes and HoldCo
Notes, respectively, as payment for interest due May 15, 2010.
Cash Dividend
On November 1, 2011, the Board declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of $0.03 per share
on our outstanding shares of common stock. The Board anticipates declaring this dividend in future
quarters on a regular basis; however, changes in our financial condition and cash needs could
result in dividends being declared in different amounts, or not at all.
In addition, on November 1, 2011, the Board declared a supplemental cash dividend of $1.00 per
share on our outstanding common stock. The regular and supplemental dividends will be paid on
November 22, 2011 to shareholders of record as of the close of business on November 14, 2011.
Cash
payments related to the November 2011 regular and supplemental dividends will total approximately $71.0
million in aggregate, comprising $69.2 million of dividends on outstanding shares of common stock
and $1.8 million of cash payments to holders of vested and unvested stock options. We
expect to pay these amounts entirely from available cash balances.
Covenant Compliance and Financial Ratios
Upon the occurrence of certain events, such as a change of control, we could be required to
repay or refinance our indebtedness. In addition, certain covenants contained in our debt
agreements restrict our ability to take certain actions (including incurring additional secured or
unsecured debt, expanding borrowings under existing term loan facilities, paying dividends and
engaging in mergers, acquisitions and certain other investments) unless we meet certain standards
in respect of the ratio of our Adjusted EBITDA, calculated on a trailing four-quarter basis, to our
fixed charges (the fixed-charge coverage ratio) or the ratio of our senior secured net debt to
our Adjusted EBITDA, calculated on a trailing four-quarter basis (the net senior secured leverage
ratio). Furthermore, our ability to take certain actions, including paying dividends and making
acquisitions and certain other investments, depends on the amounts available for such actions under
the applicable covenants, which amounts accumulate with reference to our Adjusted EBITDA, and in
some cases our net income, on a quarterly basis. Our debt agreements do not require us to maintain
any financial performance metric or ratio in order to avoid a default. We met all financial ratio
thresholds as of September 30, 2011.
The minimum or maximum ratio levels set forth in our covenants as conditions to our
undertaking certain actions and our actual performance are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual as of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Requirements |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
September 30, 2011 |
|
AcquisitionCo Notes(1) |
|
Fixed Charge |
|
Minimum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coverage Ratio |
|
|
2.0 to 1.0 |
|
|
|
6.3 to 1 |
|
|
|
9.3 to 1 |
|
Term B loan and revolving credit facility leverage ratio(2) |
|
Net Senior Secured
Leverage Ratio |
|
Maximum
3.0 to 1.0 |
|
|
0.2 to 1 |
|
|
|
|
(3) |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Fixed charges are the sum of consolidated interest expense and all cash
dividend payments in respect of preferred stock. In measuring interest expense for the
ratio, pro forma effect is given to any repayment or issuance of debt as if such
transaction occurred at the beginning of the trailing four-quarter period. Fixed charges
on a pro forma basis (giving effect to debt repayments) for the four quarters ended
December 31, 2010 and September 30, 2011 were $36.1 million and $30.1 million,
respectively. |
|
(2) |
|
As used in calculating this ratio, senior secured net debt means the amount
outstanding under our term B loan and the revolving credit facility, plus other
first-lien secured debt (of which we have none as of September 30, 2011), less
unrestricted cash and permitted investments (as defined under our senior secured
credit facilities). At December 31, 2010, senior secured debt was $78.2 million and
unrestricted cash and permitted investments were $26.5 million, resulting in senior
secured net debt of $51.7 million At September 30, 2011, senior secured debt was $78.2
million and unrestricted cash and permitted investments were $96.3 million, resulting in
senior secured net debt of $(18.1) million. |
|
(3) |
|
Since our unrestricted cash and permitted investments exceed senior secured
debt, the net senior secured leverage ratio is not a meaningful measurement at September
30, 2011; therefore, we have excluded it from the table above. |
41
Management uses Adjusted EBITDA as a liquidity measure in respect of the fixed-charge
coverage ratio and the net senior secured leverage ratio, as defined in our debt agreements. As
used herein, Adjusted EBITDA means net income before income taxes, net interest expense and
depreciation and amortization, adjusted to eliminate certain non-cash expenses, restructuring
charges, related party management fees, charges resulting from purchase accounting and other
specified items of income or expense as outlined below (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
Twelve months ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Adjusted EBITDA |
|
|
33.0 |
|
|
|
54.0 |
|
|
|
161.2 |
|
|
|
212.2 |
|
|
|
226.1 |
|
|
|
277.1 |
|
Last in, first out and lower of cost or market inventory
adjustments (a) |
|
|
11.0 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
(17.3 |
) |
|
|
(4.1 |
) |
|
|
(21.7 |
) |
Loss on disposal of assets |
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
(3.4 |
) |
|
|
(1.8 |
) |
|
|
(4.0 |
) |
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
Non-cash pension, accretion and stock compensation |
|
|
(2.0 |
) |
|
|
(2.6 |
) |
|
|
(11.4 |
) |
|
|
(9.6 |
) |
|
|
(14.9 |
) |
|
|
(13.1 |
) |
Restructuring, relocation and severance |
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
(9.0 |
) |
|
|
(1.8 |
) |
|
|
(11.9 |
) |
|
|
(4.7 |
) |
Consulting and sponsor fees |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
(18.9 |
) |
|
|
(1.8 |
) |
|
|
(18.9 |
) |
|
|
(1.8 |
) |
Interest rate swaps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5.6 |
) |
|
|
(2.3 |
) |
|
|
(11.0 |
) |
|
|
(7.7 |
) |
Gain (loss) on debt repurchase |
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
Charges and fees related to hedge terminations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Non-cash derivative gains and losses (b) |
|
|
27.1 |
|
|
|
25.9 |
|
|
|
40.9 |
|
|
|
83.9 |
|
|
|
73.2 |
|
|
|
116.2 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8.6 |
) |
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
(5.6 |
) |
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
(2.8 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(24.9 |
) |
|
|
(25.0 |
) |
|
|
(76.1 |
) |
|
|
(73.1 |
) |
|
|
(98.7 |
) |
|
|
(95.7 |
) |
Interest expense, net |
|
|
(7.2 |
) |
|
|
(5.2 |
) |
|
|
(25.0 |
) |
|
|
(16.4 |
) |
|
|
(31.1 |
) |
|
|
(22.5 |
) |
Income tax expense |
|
|
(12.9 |
) |
|
|
(6.7 |
) |
|
|
(16.4 |
) |
|
|
(49.9 |
) |
|
|
(35.0 |
) |
|
|
(68.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
25.2 |
|
|
|
30.8 |
|
|
|
32.0 |
|
|
|
116.5 |
|
|
|
66.9 |
|
|
|
151.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA is not a measure of financial performance under U.S. GAAP, and may not be
comparable to similarly titled measures used by other companies in our industry. Adjusted EBITDA
should not be considered in isolation from or as an alternative to net income, income from
continuing operations, operating income or any other performance measures derived in accordance
with U.S. GAAP. Adjusted EBITDA has limitations as an analytical tool and you should not consider
it in isolation or as a substitute for analysis of our results as reported under U.S. GAAP. For
example, Adjusted EBITDA excludes certain tax payments that may represent a reduction in cash
available to us; does not reflect any cash requirements for the assets being depreciated and
amortized that may have to be replaced in the future; does not reflect capital cash expenditures,
future requirements for capital expenditures or contractual commitments; does not reflect changes
in, or cash requirements for, our working capital needs; and does not reflect the interest expense,
or the cash requirements necessary to service interest or principal payments, on our indebtedness.
Adjusted EBITDA also includes incremental stand-alone costs and adds back non-cash hedging gains
and losses, and certain other non-cash charges that are deducted in calculating net income.
However, these are expenses that may recur, vary greatly and are difficult to predict. In addition,
certain of these expenses can represent the reduction of cash that could be used for other
corporate purposes. You should not consider our Adjusted EBITDA as an alternative to operating
income or net income, determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP, as an indicator of our operating
performance, or as an alternative to cash flows from operating activities, determined in accordance
with U.S. GAAP, as an indicator of our cash flows or as a measure of liquidity.
42
The following table reconciles Adjusted EBITDA to cash flow from operating activities for the
periods presented (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
Twelve |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Adjusted EBITDA |
|
|
33.0 |
|
|
|
54.0 |
|
|
|
161.2 |
|
|
|
212.2 |
|
|
|
226.1 |
|
Settlements from hedge terminations, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
164.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
164.6 |
|
Stock compensation expense |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
Changes in other assets |
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
(8.7 |
) |
|
|
(5.7 |
) |
|
|
(10.0 |
) |
Changes in pension, other post-retirement
liabilities and other long-term liabilities |
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
(11.6 |
) |
|
|
12.7 |
|
|
|
(13.9 |
) |
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
Changes in current operating assets and liabilities |
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
21.1 |
|
|
|
(19.0 |
) |
|
|
(8.1 |
) |
|
|
(36.7 |
) |
Changes in current income taxes |
|
|
(2.9 |
) |
|
|
(14.4 |
) |
|
|
(9.0 |
) |
|
|
(52.9 |
) |
|
|
(20.2 |
) |
Changes in accrued interest |
|
|
(6.1 |
) |
|
|
(4.5 |
) |
|
|
(10.7 |
) |
|
|
(5.4 |
) |
|
|
(7.4 |
) |
Non-cash pension, accretion and stock compensation |
|
|
(2.0 |
) |
|
|
(2.6 |
) |
|
|
(11.4 |
) |
|
|
(9.6 |
) |
|
|
(14.9 |
) |
Restructuring, relocation and severance |
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
(9.0 |
) |
|
|
(1.8 |
) |
|
|
(11.9 |
) |
Consulting and sponsor fees |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
(18.9 |
) |
|
|
(1.8 |
) |
|
|
(18.9 |
) |
Interest rate swaps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5.6 |
) |
|
|
(2.3 |
) |
|
|
(11.0 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
(4.3 |
) |
|
|
(7.8 |
) |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
(4.8 |
) |
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow from operating activities |
|
|
30.9 |
|
|
|
33.7 |
|
|
|
249.9 |
|
|
|
110.3 |
|
|
|
270.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Our New Madrid smelter and our rolling mills use the LIFO method of
inventory accounting for financial reporting and tax purposes. This adjustment
restates net income to the FIFO method by eliminating LIFO expenses related to
inventories held at the New Madrid smelter and the rolling mills. Product inventories
at Gramercy and St. Ann and supplies inventories at New Madrid are stated at lower of
weighted-average cost or market, and are not subject to the LIFO adjustment. We also
reduce inventories to the lower of cost (adjusted for purchase accounting) or market
value. |
|
(b) |
|
We use derivative financial instruments to mitigate effects of fluctuations
in aluminum and natural gas prices. This adjustment eliminates the non-cash gains and
losses resulting from fair market value changes of aluminum swaps. Cash settlements
(received) or paid, except settlements on hedge terminations, related to our
derivatives are included in Adjusted EBITDA and are shown in the table below: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
Twelve months ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Fixed priced aluminum swaps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Variable price aluminum swaps and other |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
(2.5 |
) |
|
|
(2.5 |
) |
|
|
(4.2 |
) |
Natural gas swaps |
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
|
16.3 |
|
|
|
18.6 |
|
|
|
23.3 |
|
|
|
25.6 |
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
11.0 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
(3.1 |
) |
|
|
18.4 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
|
|
|
29.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The previous table presents fixed price aluminum swap cash settlement amounts net of
early termination discounts totaling $9.0 million in the twelve months ended December
31, 2010. We settled all fixed price aluminum swaps in connection with our IPO. |
43
|
|
|
Item 3. |
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk |
There have been no material changes to the market risks disclosed in our Annual Report on Form
10-K, as filed on March 7, 2011.
|
|
|
Item 4. |
|
Controls and Procedures |
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is
defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
Exchange Act), as of September 30, 2011. Based on such evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the end of such period, our disclosure
controls and procedures are effective.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as such term is
defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the quarter ended September
30, 2011 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal
control over financial reporting.
44
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
|
Item 1. |
|
Legal Proceedings |
There have been no material changes to the description of our legal proceedings previously
disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, as filed on March 7, 2011.
There have been no material changes to the risk factors previously disclosed in our Annual
Report on Form 10-K, as filed on March 7, 2011 except as noted below:
Electricity and natural gas are essential to our businesses, which are energy intensive. The
cost of these resources can vary widely and unpredictably. The factors that affect our energy costs
tend to be specific to each of our facilities. Electricity is the largest cost component at our New
Madrid smelter and is a key factor to our long-term competitive position in the primary aluminum
business. We have a power purchase agreement with Ameren Missouri, Missouris largest electric
utility (Ameren), pursuant to which we have agreed to purchase substantially all of New Madrids
electricity through May 2020. Ameren may increase the rates it charges their customers, including
Noranda, with the approval of the Missouri Public Service Commission (MoPSC).
On June 21, 2010, the MoPSC ruled on the power rate case filed by Ameren on July 24, 2009. The
MoPSCs ruling resulted in no significant change to the base electricity rate for the New Madrid
smelter. The FAC resulted in additional fuel charges of $12.8 million recorded in cost of goods
sold during the nine months ended September 30, 2011. We are not able to predict future fuel
adjustment charges, as they are dependent on Amerens fuel costs and off system sales volume and
prices.
On September 3, 2010, Ameren filed a new rate case with the MoPSC seeking a system-wide
increase of $263 million or approximately an 11% base rate increase. In July 2011, the MoPSC ruled
on this rate case approving Ameren to increase its base rates by $172.0 million state-wide, which
increased our base rate by 5.2% effective July 31, 2011. We are currently appealing several
rate-related issues; including the previous two rate rulings and the amount of cost increases
related to the FAC. The outcome of our appeals or any future rate cases that Ameren may initiate
could materially and adversely affect the competitiveness and long-term viability of our smelter.
Furthermore, adverse changes in the rate-making process could result in uncompetitive power rates
which could have a material and adverse affect on our business, financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows.
Electricity is also a key cost component at our rolling mill facilities. Electricity is
purchased through medium-term contracts at industrial rates from regional utilities supplied
through local distributors. If we are unable to obtain power at affordable rates upon expiration of
these contracts, we may be forced to curtail or idle a portion of our production capacity, which
could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows.
Natural gas is the largest cost component at our Gramercy refinery and a key cost component at
our rolling mill facilities. Our Gramercy refinery has contracts to guarantee secure supply at an
index-based price. Our smelter and our rolling mills also purchase natural gas on the open market.
The price of natural gas can be particularly volatile. As a result, our natural gas costs may
fluctuate dramatically, and we may not be able to mitigate the effect of higher natural gas costs
on our cost of sales. Any substantial increases in energy costs could cause our operating costs to
increase and could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows. At September 30, 2011, we are a party to forward swaps for natural gas,
effectively fixing our cost for approximately 45% of our natural gas exposure through 2012. We will
continue to have price risk with respect to the unhedged portion of our natural gas purchases. In
addition, our actual future usage may be higher or lower than we estimated. As a result of these
factors, our hedging activities may be less effective than expected in reducing the economic
variability of our future costs.
Fuel is a substantial component of the cost structure at our St. Ann bauxite mining operation.
Our fuel is provided under an indexed-based contract linked to the price of oil. Our fuel costs at
St. Ann may fluctuate, and we may not be able to mitigate the effect of higher fuel costs. Changes
in the index will have an impact on our cost structure. Any increases in fuel costs could cause our
operating costs to increase and could materially and adversely affect our business, financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows.
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
None
|
|
|
Item 3. |
|
Defaults upon Senior Securities |
None
|
|
|
Item 5. |
|
Other Information |
None.
45
See the Index to Exhibits.
46
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on our behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
NORANDA ALUMINUM HOLDING CORPORATION
|
|
Date: November 10, 2011 |
/s/ Robert B. Mahoney
|
|
|
Robert B. Mahoney |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
|
47
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
Stock Purchase Agreement, dated April 10, 2007, by and among Noranda Aluminum Acquisition Corporation, Noranda Finance,
Inc. and Xstrata (Schweiz) A.G. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of Noranda Aluminum Holding Corporations
Registration Statement on Form S-4 filed on January 31, 2008) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Noranda Aluminum Holding Corporation (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.1 of the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-166947), filed on May 19, 2010) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
Amended and Restated By-Laws, of Noranda Aluminum Holding Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of the
Companys Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-166947), filed on May 19, 2010) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
Management Incentive Term Sheet, dated November October 3, 2011, between Wayne Hale and Noranda Aluminum Holding
Corporation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.1 |
|
|
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) Promulgated Under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) Promulgated Under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
|
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
101.INS
|
|
|
XBRL Instance Document |
|
|
|
|
|
101.SCH
|
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document |
|
|
|
|
|
101.CAL
|
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document |
|
|
|
|
|
101.DEF
|
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document |
|
|
|
|
|
101.LAB
|
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document |
|
|
|
|
|
101.PRE
|
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document |
48