10-Q
Table of Contents

 
 
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
     
þ   QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended: March 31, 2010
or
     
o   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition from                      to                     
Commission file number: 0-13814
Cortland Bancorp
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
     
Ohio   34-1451118
     
(State or other jurisdiction of Incorporation or organization)   (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
     
194 West Main Street, Cortland, Ohio   44410
     
(Address of principal executive offices)   (Zip code)
(330) 637-8040
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
N/A
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
             
Large accelerated filer o   Accelerated filer o   Non-accelerated filer o   Small reporting company þ
    (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)        
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. Yes o No þ
APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
     
TITLE OF CLASS   SHARES OUTSTANDING
Common Stock, No Par Value   at May 14, 2010 4,525,545 Shares
 
 

 

 


 

         
PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
 
       
Item 1. Financial Statements
       
 
       
Cortland Bancorp and Subsidiaries:
       
 
       
    2  
 
       
    3  
 
       
    4  
 
       
    5  
 
       
    6 - 23  
 
       
       
 
       
    24  
 
       
    25  
 
       
    26 - 40  
 
       
    41 - 42  
 
       
    43  
 
       
PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
 
       
    44  
 
       
    44  
 
       
    44  
 
       
    44  
 
       
    44  
 
       
    44  
 
       
    45  
 
       
    51  
 
       
 Exhibit 10.20.1
 Exhibit 10.21.1
 Exhibit 10.22.1
 Exhibit 10.27.1
 Exhibit 10.28.1
 Exhibit 10.29.1
 Exhibit 10.32.1
 Exhibit 31.1
 Exhibit 31.2
 Exhibit 32

 

1


Table of Contents

CORTLAND BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Amounts in thousands, except share data)
                 
    (Unaudited)        
    MARCH 31,     DECEMBER 31,  
    2010     2009  
ASSETS
               
Cash and due from banks
  $ 6,901     $ 8,212  
Interest bearing deposits
    22,427       36,611  
 
           
Total cash and cash equivalents
    29,328       44,823  
 
               
Investment securities available for sale (Note 3)
    157,537       141,273  
Investment securities held to maturity (estimated fair value of $30,491 at March 31, 2010 and $31,490 at December 31, 2009 ) (Note 3)
    29,635       30,651  
Total loans (Note 4)
    237,137       248,248  
Less allowance for loan losses (Note 4)
    (2,447 )     (2,437 )
 
           
Net loans
    234,690       245,811  
 
           
Premises and equipment
    6,986       7,127  
Bank owned life insurance
    13,322       13,211  
Other assets
    14,418       14,403  
 
           
 
               
Total assets
  $ 485,916     $ 497,299  
 
           
 
               
LIABILITIES
               
Noninterest-bearing deposits
  $ 57,302     $ 60,173  
Interest-bearing deposits
    317,985       327,322  
 
           
Total deposits
    375,287       387,495  
 
           
Federal Home Loan Bank advances
    51,500       56,500  
Other short term borrowings
    7,119       6,866  
Subordinated debt
    5,155       5,155  
Other liabilities
    8,123       4,375  
 
           
Total liabilities
    447,184       460,391  
 
           
 
               
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
               
Common stock — $5.00 stated value — authorized 20,000,000 shares; issued 4,728,267 in 2010 and 2009; outstanding shares 4,525,545 in 2010 and 4,525,551 in 2009
    23,641       23,641  
Additional paid-in capital
    20,850       20,850  
Retained earnings
    1,036       142  
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
    (3,201 )     (4,131 )
Treasury stock at cost, 202,722 at March 31, 2010 and 202,716 at December 31, 2009
    (3,594 )     (3,594 )
 
           
Total shareholders’ equity
    38,732       36,908  
 
           
 
               
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
  $ 485,916     $ 497,299  
 
           
See accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements
of Cortland Bancorp and Subsidiaries

 

2


Table of Contents

CORTLAND BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (UNAUDITED)
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data)
                 
    THREE  
    MONTHS ENDED  
    MARCH 31,  
    2010     2009  
INTEREST INCOME
               
Interest and fees on loans
  $ 3,679     $ 3,851  
Interest and dividends on investment securities:
               
Taxable interest income
    1,486       2,160  
Nontaxable interest income
    321       349  
Dividends
    40       40  
Other interest income
    23       20  
 
           
Total interest income
    5,549       6,420  
 
           
 
               
INTEREST EXPENSE
               
Deposits
    1,116       1,835  
Borrowed funds
    622       703  
Subordinated debt
    22       43  
 
           
Total interest expense
    1,760       2,581  
 
           
Net interest income
    3,789       3,839  
PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES
    175       151  
 
           
 
               
NET INTEREST INCOME AFTER PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES
    3,614       3,688  
 
           
 
               
OTHER INCOME
               
Fees for other customer services
    545       537  
Investment securities gains — net
            87  
Impairment losses on investment securities:
               
Impairment losses on investment securities
    (275 )     (10,251 )
Non credit-related (gains) losses on securities not expected to be sold (recognized in other comprehensive income before tax)
    (269 )     6,584  
 
           
Net impairment losses on investment securities
    (544 )     (3,667 )
Gain on sale of loans — net
    4       71  
Other real estate losses — net
    (4 )     (14 )
Earnings on bank owned life insurance
    136       135  
Other non-interest income
    27       84  
 
           
Total other income
    164       (2,767 )
 
           
 
               
OTHER EXPENSES
               
Salaries and employee benefits
    1,261       1,838  
Net occupancy and equipment
    472       492  
State and local taxes
    108       105  
FDIC premiums
    225       80  
Bank exam and audit fees
    109       108  
Office supplies
    86       99  
Other operating expenses
    478       558  
 
           
Total other expenses
    2,739       3,280  
 
           
 
               
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE FEDERAL INCOME TAXES
    1,039       (2,359 )
 
               
Federal income tax expense (benefit)
    145       (962 )
 
           
 
               
NET INCOME (LOSS)
  $ 894     $ (1,397 )
 
           
 
               
BASIC EARNINGS (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE (NOTE 6)
  $ 0.20     $ (0.31 )
 
           
DILUTED EARNINGS (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE (NOTE 6)
  $ 0.20     $ (0.31 )
 
           
CASH DIVIDENDS DECLARED PER SHARE
  $     $  
 
           
See accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements
of Cortland Bancorp and Subsidiaries

 

3


Table of Contents

CORTLAND BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (UNAUDITED)
(Amounts in thousands)
                                                 
                            ACCUMULATED             TOTAL  
            ADDITIONAL             OTHER             SHARE-  
    COMMON     PAID-IN     RETAINED     COMPREHENSIVE     TREASURY     HOLDERS’  
    STOCK     CAPITAL     EARNINGS     LOSS     STOCK     EQUITY  
 
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2009
                                               
 
                                               
BALANCE AT JANUARY 1, 2009
  $ 23,641     $ 21,078     $ 6,480     $ (11,078 )   $ (4,093 )   $ 36,028  
 
                                               
Comprehensive loss:
                                               
Net loss
                    (1,397 )                     (1,397 )
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax :
                                               
Unrealized losses on available- for-sale securities, net of reclassification adjustment
                            2,777               2,777  
Other comprehensive loss related to securities for which other than temporary impairment has been recognized in earnings, net of tax
                            (4,345 )             (4,345 )
 
                                             
Total comprehensive loss
                                            (2,965 )
 
                                             
 
                                               
Common stock transactions:
                                               
Treasury shares reissued
            (228 )                     500       272  
 
                                   
 
                                               
BALANCE AT MARCH 31, 2009
  $ 23,641     $ 20,850     $ 5,083     $ (12,646 )   $ (3,593 )   $ 33,335  
 
                                   
 
                                               
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2010
                                               
 
                                               
BALANCE AT JANUARY 1, 2010
  $ 23,641     $ 20,850     $ 142     $ (4,131 )   $ (3,594 )   $ 36,908  
 
                                               
Comprehensive income:
                                               
Net income
                    894                       894  
Other comprehensive income, net of tax :
                                               
Unrealized gains on available- for-sale securities, net of reclassification adjustment
                            753               753  
Other comprehensive gain related to securities for which other than temporary impairment has been recognized in earnings, net of reclassification adjustment, net of tax benefit
                            177               177  
 
                                             
 
                                               
Total comprehensive income
                                            1,824  
 
                                   
 
                                               
BALANCE AT MARCH 31, 2010
  $ 23,641     $ 20,850     $ 1,036     $ (3,201 )   $ (3,594 )   $ 38,732  
 
                                   
COMPONENTS OF OTHER COMPREHENSIVE
LOSS (INCOME)
                 
    THREE MONTHS ENDED  
    MARCH 31,  
    2010     2009  
 
               
Net unrealized holding gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities arising during the period, net of tax
  $ 571     $ (3,931 )
Reclassification adjustment for net gains realized in net income, net of tax
          (57 )
Reclassification adjustment for other than temporary impairment losses on debt securities, net of tax
    359       2,420  
 
           
Net unrealized gains (losses) on available- for-sale securities, net of tax
  $ 930     $ (1,568 )
 
           
See accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements
of Cortland Bancorp and Subsidiaries

 

4


Table of Contents

CORTLAND BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)
(Amounts in thousands)
                 
    FOR THE  
    THREE MONTHS ENDED  
    MARCH 31,  
    2010     2009  
NET CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
  $ 472     $ 737  
 
               
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
               
Purchases of securities available for sale
    (17,787 )     (76 )
Proceeds from call, maturity and principal payments on securities
    7,521       12,989  
Net decrease in loans
    11,249       9,402  
Proceeds from disposition of other real estate
    11          
Purchases of premises and equipment
    (6 )     (100 )
 
           
Net cash flows from investing activities
    988       22,215  
 
           
 
               
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
               
Net increase (decrease) in deposit accounts
    (12,208 )     2,118  
Pay down of Federal Home Loan Bank advances
    (5,000 )        
Net increase in short term borrowings
    253       464  
Treasury shares reissued
            272  
 
           
Net cash flows from financing activities
    (16,955 )     2,854  
 
           
 
               
NET CHANGE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
    (15,495 )     25,806  
 
               
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
               
Beginning of period
    44,823       26,843  
 
           
End of period
  $ 29,328     $ 52,649  
 
           
 
               
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES
               
Interest paid
  $ 1,825     $ 2,626  
Income taxes paid
  $ 400     $ 210  
See accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements
of Cortland Bancorp and Subsidiaries

 

5


Table of Contents

CORTLAND BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
(Dollars in thousands, except for per share amounts)
1.) Basis of Presentation:
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“U.S.GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring items) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three months ended March 31, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2010. These interim unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with our annual audited financial statements as of December 31, 2009, included in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. The accompanying consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2009, has been derived from the audited consolidated balance sheet but does not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements.
The Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) topic 105 Generally Accepted Accounting Principles became effective on July 1, 2009. At that date, the ASC became FASB’s officially recognized source of authoritative U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) applicable to all public and non-public non-governmental entities, superseding existing FASB, American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA), Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) and related literature. Rules and interpretive releases of the SEC under the authority of federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. All other accounting literature is considered non-authoritative. The switch to the ASC affects the way companies refer to U.S. GAAP in financial statements and accounting policies. Citing particular content in the ASC involves specifying the unique numeric path to the content through the Topic, Subtopic, Section and Paragraph structure.
2.) Reclassifications:
Certain items contained in the 2009 financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the presentation for 2010. Such reclassifications had no effect on the net results of operations.
3.) Investment Securities:
Investments in debt and equity securities are classified as held to maturity, trading or available for sale. Securities classified as held to maturity are those that management has the positive intent and ability to hold to maturity. Securities classified as available for sale are those that could be sold for liquidity, investment management, or similar reasons, even though management has no present intentions to do so.
Securities held to maturity are stated at cost, adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts, with such amortization or accretion included in interest income. Securities available for sale are carried at fair value with unrealized gains and losses recorded as a separate component of shareholders’ equity, net of tax effects. Realized gains or losses on dispositions are based on net proceeds and the adjusted carrying amount of securities sold, using the specific identification method. Interest on securities is accrued and credited to operations based on the principal balance outstanding, adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts.
Unrealized losses on investments have not been recognized into income. Management has considered whether the present value of cash flow expected to be collected are less than the security’s amortized cost basis (the difference defined as the credit loss), the magnitude and duration of the decline, the reasons underlying the decline and the Company’s intent to sell the security or whether it is more likely than not that the Company would be required to sell the security before its anticipated recovery in market value, to determine whether the loss in value is other-than-temporary.

 

6


Table of Contents

CORTLAND BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
(Dollars in thousands, except for per share amounts)
The following is a summary of investment securities:
                                 
            Gross     Gross     Estimated  
    Amortized     Unrealized     Unrealized     Fair  
    Cost     Gains     Losses     Value  
March 31, 2010
                               
Investment securities available for sale
                               
U.S. Government agencies and corporations
  $ 35,240     $ 463     $ 120     $ 35,583  
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
    13,310       211       66       13,455  
Mortgage-backed and related securities
    89,278       2,963       51       92,190  
Trust preferred pools/collateralized debt obligations
    20,523               8,250       12,273  
Corporate securities
    287                       287  
 
                       
Total debt securities
    158,638       3,637       8,487       153,788  
Regulatory stock
    3,749                       3,749  
 
                       
Total available for sale
  $ 162,387     $ 3,637     $ 8,487     $ 157,537  
 
                       
Investment securities held to maturity
                               
U.S. Treasury securities
  $ 128     $ 12     $       $ 140  
U.S. Government agencies and corporations
    5,991       150               6,141  
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
    15,837       592       11       16,418  
Mortgage-backed and related securities
    7,679       345       232       7,792  
 
                       
Total held to maturity
  $ 29,635     $ 1,099     $ 243     $ 30,491  
 
                       
                                 
            Gross     Gross     Estimated  
    Amortized     Unrealized     Unrealized     Fair  
    Cost     Gains     Losses     Value  
December 31, 2009
                               
Investment securities available for sale
                               
U.S. Government agencies and corporations
  $ 20,465     $ 315     $ 227     $ 20,553  
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
    12,351       230       83       12,498  
Mortgage-backed and related securities
    89,613       2,729       280       92,062  
Trust preferred pools/collateralized debt obligations
    21,068               8,944       12,124  
Corporate securities
    287                       287  
 
                       
Total debt securities
    143,784       3,274       9,534       137,524  
Regulatory stock
    3,749                       3,749  
 
                       
Total available for sale
  $ 147,533     $ 3,274     $ 9,534     $ 141,273  
 
                       
Investment securities held to maturity
                               
U.S. Treasury securities
  $ 130     $ 11     $       $ 141  
U.S. Government agencies and corporations
    5,990       134               6,124  
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
    16,097       631       15       16,713  
Mortgage-backed and related securities
    8,434       326       248       8,512  
 
                       
Total held to maturity
  $ 30,651     $ 1,102     $ 263     $ 31,490  
 
                       
At March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 regulatory stock consisted of $3,523 in Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) stock and $226 in Federal Reserve Bank (FED) stock. Each investment is carried at cost, and the Company is required to hold such investments as a condition of membership in order to transact business with the FHLB and the FED.
The FHLB of Cincinnati’s financial condition remained strong despite the economic recession and the FHLB of Cincinnati continued to fulfill its role as an important provider of reliable and attractively priced wholesale funding, with a competitive dividend paid to the Bank in each of the four quarters of 2009 and the first quarter of 2010.

 

7


Table of Contents

CORTLAND BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
(Dollars in thousands, except for per share amounts)
The amortized cost and fair value of debt securities at March 31, 2010, by contractual maturity, are shown below. Actual maturities will differ from contractual maturities because issuers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.
                 
    March 31, 2010  
    Amortized     Estimated  
    Cost     Fair Value  
Investment securities available for sale
               
Due in one year or less
  $ 3,230     $ 3,242  
Due after one year through five years
    527       547  
Due after five years through ten years
    29,962       30,109  
Due after ten years
    35,641       27,700  
 
           
Subtotal
    69,360       61,598  
Mortgage-backed securities
    89,278       92,190  
 
           
Total
  $ 158,638     $ 153,788  
 
           
Investment securities held to maturity
               
Due in one year or less
  $ 2,857     $ 2,911  
Due after one year through five years
    697       754  
Due after five years through ten years
    7,007       7,162  
Due after ten years
    11,395       11,872  
 
           
Subtotal
    21,956       22,699  
Mortgage-backed securities
    7,679       7,792  
 
           
Total
  $ 29,635     $ 30,491  
 
           
Realized gains or losses on dispositions are based on net proceeds and the adjusted carrying amount of securities sold, or called using the specific identification method. The table below sets forth the proceeds and gains or loses realized on securities sold or called for the period ended:
                 
    THREE MONTHS  
    March 31,  
    2010     2009  
Proceeds on securities sold
  None     None  
Gross realized gains
  None     None  
Gross realized losses
  None     None  
 
               
Proceeds on securities called
  None     $ 7,804  
Gross realized gains
  None       87  
Gross realized losses
  None     None  
Securities available for sale, carried at fair value, totaled $157,537 at March 31, 2010 and $141,273 at December 31, 2009 representing 84.17% and 82.17%, respectively, of all investment securities. These levels provide an adequate level of liquidity in management’s opinion.
Investment securities with a carrying value of approximately $92,544 at March 31, 2010 and $87,678 at December 31, 2009 were pledged to secure deposits and for other purposes.

 

8


Table of Contents

CORTLAND BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
(Dollars in thousands, except for per share amounts)
The following is a summary of the fair value of securities with unrealized losses and an aging of those unrealized losses at March 31, 2010:
                                                 
    Less than 12 Months     12 Months or More     Total  
    Fair     Unrealized     Fair     Unrealized     Fair     Unrealized  
    Value     Losses     Value     Losses     Value     Losses  
U.S. Government agencies and corporations
  $ 13,013     $ 120     $       $       $ 13,013     $ 120  
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
    5,371       65       1,161       12       6,532       77  
Mortgage-backed and related securities
    11,412       56       518       227       11,930       283  
Trust preferred pools/collateralized debt obligations
                    12,080       8,250       12,080       8,250  
 
                                   
 
  $ 29,796     $ 241     $ 13,759     $ 8,489     $ 43,555     $ 8,730  
 
                                   
The above table comprises 55 investment securities where the fair value is less than the related amortized cost.
The following is a summary of the fair value of securities with unrealized losses and an aging of those unrealized losses at December 31, 2009:
                                                 
    Less than 12 Months     12 Months or More     Total  
    Fair     Unrealized     Fair     Unrealized     Fair     Unrealized  
    Value     Losses     Value     Losses     Value     Losses  
U.S. Government agencies and corporations
  $ 11,111     $ 227     $       $       $ 11,111     $ 227  
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
    4,019       69       1,705       29       5,724       98  
Mortgage-backed and related securities
    32,696       272       2,130       256       34,826       528  
Trust preferred pools/collateralized debt obligations
                    11,932       8,944       11,932       8,944  
 
                                   
 
  $ 47,826     $ 568     $ 15,767     $ 9,229     $ 63,593     $ 9,797  
 
                                   
The above table comprises 66 investment securities where the fair value is less than the related amortized cost.
The unrealized loss on Collateralized Debt Obligations (CDO’S) represents pools of trust preferred debt primarily issued by bank holding companies and insurance companies. The unrealized loss on these securities at March 31, 2010 was $8,250 as compared to a $8,944 loss at December 31, 2009.
The unrealized losses on the Company’s investment in U.S. Government agencies and corporations, obligations of states and political subdivisions, and mortgage-backed and related securities were caused by changes in market rates and related spreads, as well as reflecting current distressed conditions in the credit markets and the market’s on-going reassessment of appropriate liquidity and risk premiums. It is expected that the securities would not be settled at a price less than the amortized cost of the Company’s investment because the decline in market value is attributable to changes in interest rates and relative spreads and not credit quality, and because the Company does not intend to sell those investments and it is not more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the investments before recovery of its amortized cost basis less any current period credit loss. The Company does not consider those investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired at March 31, 2010.
Among the Company’s numerous mortgage backed securities is one privately issued variable rate CMO. The security was valued on March 31 at $.64 on a dollar and is scheduled to reprice in February of 2011. The Company had the security tested by a third party for subprime mortgage containment and none was found. As government intervention takes hold and the market in general somewhat settled, the CMO market has begun a slow recovery. A year ago, this security priced at $.31 on a dollar, and at December 31, 2009, at $.62. The doubling of the value since March 2009 provides evidence that the impairment is temporary. General market liquidity has been improving, even with the government phasing out of its many assistive programs. The security carries a credit rating of “A” indicating little probability of default. Also, as a variable rate security, interest resets have been bringing the rate down, thus reducing the value. As interest rates rise in the next 9 to 12 months (as economists predict), and the rate resets higher, the price of the security should also recover relative to our book value. The security’s underlying delinquency rate is 6.92%. A current third party analysis of this security indicates at the current delinquency and default rates, no loss is projected on this security through its maturity. This CMO is in the held to maturity portfolio and it is not more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the debt security before its anticipated recovery. As a result of all of the facts presented, the Company does not consider this investment to be other-than-temporarily impaired.

 

9


Table of Contents

CORTLAND BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
(Dollars in thousands, except for per share amounts)
During September 2008, the U.S. government placed mortgage finance companies Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA) and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (FHLMC), under conservatorship, giving management control to their regulator, the Federal Housing Finance Agency, or FHFA, and providing both companies with access to credit from the U.S. Treasury. Debt obligations now provide an explicit guarantee of the full faith and credit of the United States government to existing and future debt holders of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac limited to the period under which they are under conservatorship. The Company’s investment in FNMA and FHLMC is $6,151 and $5,950 respectively.
In response to the takeover, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation tentatively approved a rule, proposed by all four federal bank regulators, that eases capital requirements for federally insured depository institutions that hold FNMA and FHLMC corporate debt, subordinated debt, mortgage guarantees and derivatives.
Securities Deemed to be Other-Than-Temporarily Impaired
The Company reviews investment debt securities on an ongoing basis for the presence of other-than- temporary impairment (OTTI) with formal reviews performed quarterly. OTTI losses on individual investment securities were recognized during the first quarter of 2010 in accordance with FASB ASC topic 320, Investments — Debt and Equity Securities. The purpose of this ASC is to provide greater clarity to investors about the credit and noncredit component of an OTTI event and to communicate more effectively when an OTTI event has occurred. This ASC amends the OTTI guidance in GAAP for debt securities and improves the presentation and disclosure of other-than-temporary impairment on investment securities and changes the calculation of the OTTI recognized in earnings in the financial statements. This ASC does not amend existing recognition and measurement guidance related to OTTI of equity securities.
For debt securities, ASC topic 320 requires an entity to assess whether (a) it has the intent to sell the debt security, or (b) it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell the debt security before its anticipated recovery. If either of these conditions is met, an OTTI on the security must be recognized.
In instances in which a determination is made that a credit loss (defined as the difference between the present value of the cash flows expected to be collected and the amortized cost basis) exists but the entity does not intend to sell the debt security and it is not more likely than not that the entity will be required to sell the debt security before the anticipated recovery of its remaining amortized cost basis (i.e., the amortized cost basis less any current-period credit loss), ASC topic 320 determines the presentation and amount of the OTTI recognized in the income statement.
In these instances, the impairment is separated into (a) the amount of the total impairment related to the credit loss, and (b) the amount of the total impairment related to all other factors. The amount of the total OTTI related to the credit loss is recognized in earnings. The amount of the total impairment related to all other factors is recognized in other comprehensive income (loss). The total OTTI is presented in the income statement with an offset for the amount of the total OTTI that is recognized in other comprehensive income (loss).
Through the impairment assessment process, the Company determined that the investments discussed below were other-than-temporarily impaired at March 31, 2010. The Company recorded impairment credit losses in earnings on available-for-sale securities of $544 for the quarter ended March 31, 2010. The non-credit portion of impairment included at March 31, 2010 recorded in Other Comprehensive Income (loss) was $4,067. In the quarter ended March 31, 2009, the Company recorded impairment credit losses in earnings on available for sale securities of $3,667. The $6,584 non- credit portion of impairment was recorded in Other Comprehensive Income (loss). For the year ended December 31, 2009 the Company recorded impairment credit losses of $14,502.

 

10


Table of Contents

CORTLAND BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
(Dollars in thousands, except for per share amounts)
                 
    THREE MONTHS ENDED  
    March 31,  
    2010     2009  
Impaired Losses Recognized in income on Other-Than-Temporarily Impaired Securities
               
Collateralized debt obligations
  $ 544     $ 3,667  
 
           
Total
  $ 544     $ 3,667  
 
           
Over the past eight quarters, the Company recognized $2,066 of other-than-temporary losses attributable to its General Motors Corporation Corporate Securities with a cost basis of $2,353. The impairment charges were recognized due to the fact that General Motors filed for government-assisted Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection on June 1, 2009. Pursuant to the reorganization, secured creditors of the newly emerged company were granted priority in the liability settlement process. Unsecured creditors, such as the Company’s position in these corporate bonds, are subject to much more restrictive settlement options still to be determined. Under this scenario, the market has priced these securities well below the par values. The Company did not expect the value to recover from this pricing level, thus recognized other- than-temporary impairment. Since the bond has traded recently above the reduced book value there was no additional impairment recognized during the current quarter.
For the quarter ended March 31, 2010, the Company recognized OTTI of $544 attributable to twelve CDO’s with a cost basis of $14,675. For the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company recognized OTTI of $13,687 attributable to eighteen CDO’s with a cost basis of $21,618. For the quarter ended March 31, 2009, the Company recognized OTTI of $3,667 attributable to six CDO’s with a cost basis of $11,539. The impairment charges were recognized after determining the likely future cash flows of these securities had been adversely impacted. See Note 8, Fair Value for additional discussion of CDO impairment.
4.) Concentration of Credit Risk and Off Balance Sheet Risk:
The Company currently does not enter into derivative financial instruments including futures, forwards, interest rate risk swaps, option contracts, or other financial instruments with similar characteristics. The Company also does not participate in any partnerships that might give rise to off-balance sheet liabilities.
The Company, through its subsidiary bank, is a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit, standby letters of credit, and financial guarantees. Such instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit risk in excess of the amount recognized on the balance sheet. The contract or notional amounts of those instruments reflect the extent of involvement the Company has in particular classes of financial instruments.
In the event of nonperformance by the other party, the Company’s exposure to credit loss on these financial instruments is represented by the contract or notional amount of the instrument. The Company uses the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for instruments recorded on the balance sheet. The amount and nature of collateral obtained, if any, is based on management’s credit evaluation.

 

11


Table of Contents

CORTLAND BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
(Dollars in thousands, except for per share amounts)
                 
    CONTRACT OR NOTIONAL AMOUNT  
    March 31,     December 31,  
    2010     2009  
Financial instruments whose contract amount represents credit risk:
               
Commitments to extend credit:
               
Fixed rate
  $ 557     $ 933  
Variable rate
    31,484       33,959  
Standby letters of credit
    498       703  
Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Generally these financial arrangements have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Company’s subsidiary bank to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. Since many of these commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. The Bank evaluates each customer’s creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by the Bank upon extension of credit, is based on management’s credit evaluation of the counterparty. Collateral held varies but may include accounts receivable, inventory, property, plant and equipment and income producing commercial properties.
The Company’s subsidiary bank also offers limited overdraft protection as a non-contractual courtesy which is available to demand deposit accounts in good standing for business, personal or household use. The Company reserves the right to discontinue this service without prior notice. The available amount of overdraft protection on depositors’ accounts not included in the table above at March 31, 2010 totaled $10,541 and $10,553 at December 31, 2009. The total average daily balance of overdrafts used at March 31, 2010 was $120 and $139 at December 31, 2009, or approximately 1.1% of the total aggregate overdraft protection available to depositors at March 31, 2010 and 1.3% at December 31, 2009. The balance at March 31, 2010 of all deposit overdrafts included in total loans was $125, with the balance at December 31, 2009 of $129.
The Company, through its subsidiary bank, grants residential, consumer and commercial loans to customers located primarily in Northeast Ohio and Western Pennsylvania. The following represents the composition of the loan portfolio:
                 
    March 31,     December 31,  
    2010     2009  
1-4 Family residential mortgages
    25.2 %     24.5 %
Commercial mortgages
    55.6 %     51.0 %
Consumer loans
    3.2 %     3.1 %
Commercial loans
    9.8 %     15.5 %
Home equity loans
    6.2 %     5.9 %
There are $308 in mortgage loans held for sale included in 1-4 family residential mortgages as of March 31, 2010, and none at December 31, 2009. These loans are carried, in the aggregate, at the lower of cost or estimated market value based on secondary market prices.
The following table sets forth the aggregate balance of underperforming loans for each of the following categories at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009:
                 
    March 31,     December 31,  
    2010     2009  
Loans accounted for on a non-accrual basis
  $ 988     $ 1,230  
Loans contractually past due 90 days or more as to interest or principal payments (not included in non-accrual loans above)
  NONE     NONE  
Loans considered troubled debt restructurings (not included in non-accrual loans or loans contractually past due above)
    612       920  

 

12


Table of Contents

CORTLAND BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
(Dollars in thousands, except for per share amounts)
The following shows the amounts of contractual interest income and interest income actually reflected in income on loans accounted for on a non-accrual basis and loans considered troubled debt restructuring for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009.
                 
    March 31,     March 31,  
    2010     2009  
Gross interest income that would have been recorded if the loans had been current in accordance with their original terms (contractual interest income)
  $ 30     $ 23  
Interest income actually included in income on the loans
    9       9  
A loan is placed on a non-accrual basis whenever sufficient information is received to question the collectibility of the loan or any time legal proceedings are initiated involving a loan. When a loan is placed on non-accrual status, any interest that has been accrued and not collected on the loan is charged against earnings. Cash payments received while a loan is classified as non-accrual are recorded as a reduction to principal or reported as interest income according to management’s judgment as to collectibility of principal.
A loan is returned to accrual status when either all of the principal and interest amounts contractually due are brought current and future payments are, in management’s opinion, collectible, or when it otherwise becomes well secured and in the process of collection. When a loan is charged-off, any interest accrued but not collected on the loan is charged against earnings.
Loans are considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due in accordance with the original contractual terms of the loan agreement, including scheduled principal and interest payments. If a loan is impaired, a specific valuation allowance is allocated, if necessary. Impaired loans are generally included in non-accrual loans. Management does not individually evaluate certain smaller balance loans for impairment as such loans are evaluated on an aggregate basis. These loans include 1 – 4 family, consumer and home equity loans. Impaired loans, or portions thereof, are charged off when deemed uncollectible.
Impaired loans were as follows:
                 
    March 31,     December 31,  
    2010     2009  
Balance of impaired loans with no allocated allowance
  $ 101     $ 855  
Balance of impaired loans with an allocated allowance
    186       401  
 
           
Total recorded investment in impaired loans
  $ 287     $ 1,256  
 
           
Amount of the allowance allocated to impaired loans
  $ 108     $ 156  
 
           
Average balance of impaired loans
  $ 772     $ 1,078  
 
           
The impaired loans included in the table above were primarily comprised of collateral dependent commercial loans. Interest income recognized on these loans subsequent to their classification as impaired was $2 for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and $52 for the twelve months ended December 31, 2009.
Loans in the amount of $7,809 as of March 31, 2010, and $16,354 as of December 31, 2009 were not included in any of the above categories and were not currently considered impaired, but which can be considered to be potential problem loans.
Any loans classified for regulatory purposes as loss, doubtful, substandard, or special mention that have not been disclosed above either do not (i) represent or result from trends or uncertainties which management reasonably expects will materially impact future operating results, liquidity, or capital resources, or (ii) represent material credits about which management is aware of any information which causes management to have serious doubts as to the ability of such borrowers to comply with the loan repayment terms.

 

13


Table of Contents

CORTLAND BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
(Dollars in thousands, except for per share amounts)
The following is an analysis of the allowance for loan losses for the periods ended March 31, 2010 and March 31, 2009:
                 
    THREE MONTHS ENDED  
    March 31,  
    2010     2009  
Balance at beginning of period
  $ 2,437     $ 2,470  
Loan charge-offs:
               
1-4 family residential mortgages
    22       7  
Commercial mortgages
    137        
Consumer loans and other loans
    35       57  
Commercial loans
    1       2  
Home equity loans
           
 
           
 
    195       66  
 
               
Recoveries on previous loan losses:
               
1-4 family residential mortgages
    1        
Commercial mortgages
          1  
Consumer loans and other loans
    26       29  
Commercial loans
           
Home equity loans
    3        
 
           
 
    30       30  
Net charge-offs
    (165 )     (36 )
Provision charged to operations
    175       151  
 
           
Balance at end of period
  $ 2,447     $ 2,585  
 
           
 
               
Ratio of annualized net charge-offs to average loans outstanding
    0.27 %     0.06 %
 
           
5.) Legal Proceedings:
The Bank is involved in legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management, the outcomes from these matters, either individually or in the aggregate, are not expected to have any material effect on the Company.
6.) Earnings Per Share and Capital Transactions:
The following table sets forth the computation of basic earnings per common share and diluted earnings per common share. Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the applicable period.
                 
    THREE MONTHS ENDED  
    March 31,  
    2010     2009  
Net income (loss)
  $ 894     $ (1,397 )
Weighted average common shares outstanding*
    4,525,550       4,525,326  
 
               
Basic earnings (loss) per share*
  $ 0.20     $ (0.31 )
 
               
Diluted earnings (loss) per share*
  $ 0.20     $ (0.31 )
     
*  
Average shares outstanding and the resulting per share amounts have been restated to give retroactive effect to the two 1% stock dividends in 2009.

 

14


Table of Contents

CORTLAND BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
(Dollars in thousands, except for per share amounts)
7.) Subordinated Debt
In July 2007 a trust formed by the Company issued $5,000 of floating rate trust preferred securities as part of a pooled offering of such securities due December 2037. The Bancorp owns all $155 of the common securities issued by the trust. The securities bear interest at the 3-month LIBOR rate plus 1.45%. The rate at March 31, 2010 was 1.71% and at December 31, 2009 was 1.70%. The Company issued subordinated debentures to the trust in exchange for the proceeds of the trust preferred offering. The debentures represent the sole assets of this trust. The Company may redeem the subordinated debentures, in whole or in part, at a premium declining ratably to par in September 2012.
In accordance with FASB ASC, Topic 942, Financial Services – Depository and Lending the trust is not consolidated with the Company’s financial statements. Accordingly, the Company does not report the securities issued by the trust as liabilities, but instead reports as liabilities the subordinated debentures issued by the Company and held by the trust. The subordinated debentures qualify as Tier 1 capital for regulatory purposes in determining and evaluating the Company’s capital adequacy.
8.) Fair Value
Measurements
Accounting guidance under ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, affirms that the objective of fair value when the market for an asset is not active is the price that would be received to sell the asset in an orderly transaction, and clarifies and includes additional factors for determining whether there has been a significant decrease in market activity for an asset when the market for that asset is not active. ASC Topic 820 requires an entity to base its conclusion about whether a transaction was not orderly on the weight of the evidence.
The Company groups assets and liabilities recorded at fair value into three levels based on the markets in which the assets and liabilities are traded and the reliability of the assumptions used to determine fair value. A financial instrument’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement (with level 1 considered highest and level 3 considered lowest). A brief description of each level follows:
Level 1: Quoted prices are available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reported date.
Level 2: Pricing inputs are other than quoted prices in active markets, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reported date. The nature of these assets and liabilities include items for which quoted prices are available but which trade less frequently, and items that are fair valued using other financial instruments, the parameters of which can be directly observed.
Level 3: Assets and liabilities that have little to no pricing observability as of the reported date. These items do not have two-way markets and are measured using management’s best estimate of fair value, where inputs into the determination of fair value require significant management judgment or estimation.

 

15


Table of Contents

CORTLAND BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
(Dollars in thousands, except for per share amounts)
The following table presents the assets reported on the consolidated balance sheets at their fair value as of March 31 2010 and December 31, 2009 by level within the fair value hierarchy. Financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
                                 
            Fair Value Measurements at 3/31/10 Using  
            Quoted Prices in              
            Active Markets     Significant Other     Significant  
            for Identical Assets     Observable     Unobservable  
Description   3/31/10     (Level 1)     Inputs (Level 2)     Inputs (Level 3)  
U. S. Government agencies and corporations
  $ 35,583     $       $ 35,583     $    
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
    13,455               13,455          
Mortgage-backed and related securities
    92,190               92,190          
Trust preferred pools/collateralize debt obligations
    12,273                       12,273  
Corporate securities
    287             287        
 
                       
Total
  $ 153,788     $     $ 141,515     $ 12,273  
 
                       
                                 
    Fair Value Measurements at 12/31/09 Using  
            Quoted Prices in              
            Active Markets for     Significant Other     Significant  
            Identical Assets     Observable     Unobservable  
Description   12/31/09     (Level 1)     Inputs (Level 2)     Inputs (Level 3)  
U. S. Government agencies and corporations
  $ 20,553     $       $ 20,553     $    
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
    12,498               12,498          
Mortgage-backed and related securities
    92,062               92,062          
Trust preferred pools/collateralize debt obligations
    12,124                       12,124  
Corporate securities
    287             287        
 
                       
Total
  $ 137,524     $     $ 125,400     $ 12,124  
 
                       
The following tables present the changes in the Level 3 fair value category for the three months ended March 31, 2010. The Company classifies financial instruments in Level 3 of the fair-value hierarchy when there is reliance on at least one significant unobservable input to the valuation model. In addition to these unobservable inputs, the valuation models for Level 3 financial instruments typically also rely on a number of inputs that are readily observable either directly or indirectly.
                                                         
                                            Losses included  
                                            in net income  
            Net realized/Unrealized                     for the period  
            gains/(losses) included in                     relating to assets  
            Non-     Other     Transfers     Purchases     held at  
    January l,     interest     Comprehensive     in and/or     Issuance     March 31,     March 31,  
Net Unrealized   2010     Income     Income     out of Level 3     and settlements     2010     2010  
 
                                                       
Trust preferred Pools/CDO’s
  $ 12,124     $ (544 )   $ 693     $       $       $ 12,273     $ (544 )

 

16


Table of Contents

CORTLAND BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
(Dollars in thousands, except for per share amounts)
The Company conducts other-than-temporary impairment analysis on a quarterly basis. The initial indication of other-than-temporary impairment for both debt and equity securities is a decline in the market value below the amount recorded for an investment. A decline in value that is considered to be other-than-temporary is recorded as a loss within non-interest income in the consolidated statements of income. In determining whether an impairment is other than temporary, the Company considers a number of factors, including, but not limited to, the length of time and extent to which the market value has been less than cost, recent events specific to the issuer, including investment downgrades by rating agencies and economic conditions of its industry, and a determination that the Company does not intend to sell those investments and it is not more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the investments before recovery of its amortized cost basis less any current period credit loss. Among the factors that are considered in determining the Company’s intent and ability is a review of its capital adequacy, interest rate risk position and liquidity.
The Company also considers the issuer’s financial condition, capital strength and near-term prospects. In addition, for debt securities the Company considers the cause of the price decline (general level of interest rates and industry- and issuer-specific factors), current ability to make future payments in a timely manner and the issuer’s ability to service debt, the assessment of a security’s ability to recover any decline in market value, the ability of the issuer to meet contractual obligations and the Company’s intent and ability to retain the security all of which require considerable judgment.
Collateralized debt obligations are accounted for under FASB ASC Topic 325 Investments Other. The Company evaluates current available information in estimating the future cash flows of securities and determines whether there have been favorable or adverse changes in estimated cash flows from the cash flows previously projected. The Company considers the structure and term of the pool and the financial condition of the underlying issuers. Specifically, the evaluation incorporates factors such as interest rates and appropriate risk premiums, the timing and amount of interest and principal payments and the allocation of payments to the various note classes. Current estimates of cash flows are based on the most recent trustee reports, announcements of deferrals or defaults, expected future deferrals and defaults, and other relevant market information.
The Company owns 32 collateralized debt obligation securities (CDO) totaling $35,142 (par value) that are backed by trust preferred securities issued by banks, thrifts, insurance companies and real estate investment trusts. These securities were all rated investment grade at inception. Beginning the second half of 2008 and through the first quarter of 2010, factors outside the Company’s control impacted the fair value of these securities and will likely continue to do so for the foreseeable future. These factors include, but are not limited to: guidance on fair value accounting, issuer credit deterioration, issuer deferral and default rates, potential failure or government seizure of underlying financial institutions or insurance companies, ratings agency actions, or regulatory actions. As a result of changes in these and various other factors during 2009 and the first quarter of 2010, Moody’s Investors Service, Fitch Ratings and Standards and Poors downgraded multiple CDO securities, including securities held by the Company. All of the CDO securities held by the Company are now considered to be below investment grade. The deteriorating economic, credit and financial conditions experienced in 2008 and through the first quarter of 2010 have resulted in illiquid and inactive financial markets and severely depressed prices for these securities. The Company analyzed the cash flow characteristics of these securities. The Company determined that for fourteen of these securities, it does not intend to sell the securities and it is not more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the securities before recovery of its amortized cost basis. It was determined that there was no adverse change in the cash flows for these fourteen securities. The Company does not consider the investment in these assets to be other-than-temporarily impaired at March 31, 2010. However, there is a risk that subsequent evaluations could result in recognition of other-than-temporary impairment charges in the future. Upon completion of the March 31, 2010 analysis, our model indicated other-than-temporary impairment on the remaining eighteen securities, all of which experienced additional defaults or deferrals during the period. These eighteen securities had impairment losses of $18.3 million, of which $14.2 million was recorded as expense ($544 in the current quarter) and $4.1 million was recorded in other comprehensive income (loss). These eighteen securities remained classified as available for sale at March 31, 2010, and together, the 32 securities subjected to FASB ASC Topic 320 accounted for the entire $8.3 million of gross unrealized losses in the trust preferred pools/collateralized debt obligations category at March 31, 2010.

 

17


Table of Contents

CORTLAND BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
(Dollars in thousands, except for per share amounts)
The following table details the eighteen debt securities with other-than-temporary impairment, their credit ratings at March 31, 2010 and the related losses recognized in earnings:
                                 
            Amount of other-                
            than-temporary                
            impairment             Amount of other-than-  
    Moody’s/     related to credit             temporary impairment  
    Fitch     loss at             related to credit loss at  
    Rating     January 1, 2010     Addition     March 31, 2010  
 
                               
PreTSL II Mezzanine
  Ca/C   $ 816     $ 364     $ 1,180  
PreTSL VIII B-3
    C/C       1,390       0       1,390  
PreTSL XVI D
  NR/C     518       0       518  
PreTSL XVI D
  NR/C     991       0       991  
Alesco Preferred Funding VIII Class E Notes 1
  Ca/C     1,500       0       1,500  
Tropic CDO V Class B-1L
    C/C       4,425       1       4,426  
MM Community Funding III Class B
  Baa3/B     6       5       11  
PreTSL IX Class B-2
  Ca/C     247       0       247  
PreTSL XVII Class D
  NR/C     930       0       930  
PreTSL XXV Class D
  NR/C     1,001       0       1,001  
PreTSL XXVI Class D
  NR/C     464       0       464  
PreTSL XVIII Class D
  NR/C     513       0       513  
Trapeza CDO II Class C-1
  Ca/C     317       31       348  
PreTSL XVII Class C
  Ca/C     94       56       150  
PreTSL XV Class B-3
  Ca/C     84       40       124  
PreTSL XXIII Class C-FP
    C/C       204       7       211  
PreTSL I Mezzanine
  Caa1/C     103       1       104  
PreTSL XV Class B-2
  Ca/C     84       39       123  
 
                         
Total
          $ 13,687     $ 544     $ 14,231  
 
                         

 

18


Table of Contents

CORTLAND BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
(Dollars in thousands, except for per share amounts)
The following table provides additional information related to our entire pooled trust preferred collateralized debt obligations as of March 31, 2010 used to evaluate other-than-temporary impairments.
Pooled Trust Preferred Security Detail
                                                                 
                                                    Deferrals     Excess  
                                                    and     Subordination  
                                            Number of     Defaults as     as a % of  
                            Unrealized     Moody’s/     Issuers     % of     Current  
            Book           Gain     Fitch     Currently     Current     Performing  
Deal   Class     Value     Fair Value     Loss     Rating     Performing     Collateral     Collateral  
 
                                                               
PreTSL I
  Mezzanine     $ 841     $ 654     $ (187 )   Caal/C     26       24.86 %     0.00 %
PreTSL II
  Mezzanine       933       604       (329 )   Ca/C     22       38.90       0.00  
PreTSL IV
  Mezzanine       183       133       (50 )   Ca/CCC     4       27.07       19.07  
PreTSL V
  Mezzanine     274       194       (80 )   Ba3/C     2       43.12       0.00  
PreTSL VIII
    B-3       610       239       (371 )     C/C       23       43.67       0.00  
PreTSL IX
    B-2       753       363       (390 )   Ca/C     35       29.22       0.00  
PreTSL XV
    B-2       378       117       (261 )   Ca/C     57       26.08       0.00  
PreTSL XV
    B-3       379       116       (263 )   Ca/C     57       26.08       0.00  
PreTSL XVI
    D       0       0       0     NR/C     42       31.67       0.00  
PreTSL XVI
    D       0       0       0     NR/C     42       31.67       0.00  
PreTSL XVII
    C       828       152       (676 )   Ca/C     45       20.62       0.00  
PreTSL XVII
    D       0       0       0     NR/C     45       20.62       0.00  
PreTSL XVIII
    D       0       0       0     NR/C     59       21.75       0.00  
PreTSL XXIII
    C-2       1,011       239       (772 )     C/C       100       22.95       0.00  
PreTSL XXIII
  C-FP     1,544       481       (1,063 )     C/C       100       22.95       0.00  
PreTSL XXV
    D       0       0       0     NR/C     53       30.96       0.00  
PreTSL XXVI
    D       0       0       0     NR/C     53       28.31       0.00  
I-PreTSL I
    B-1       985       740       (245 )   NR/BB     16       9.04       7.78  
I-PreTSL I
    B-2       1,000       744       (256 )   NR/BB     16       9.04       7.78  
I-PreTSL I
    B-3       1,000       742       (258 )   NR/BB     16       9.04       7.78  
I-PreTSL II
    B-3       2,990       2,516       (474 )   NR/BB     29       0.00       14.33  
I-PreTSL III
    B-2       1,000       733       (267 )   B2/BB     24       5.81       9.05  
I-PreTSL III
    C       1,000       583       (417 )   NR/B     24       5.81       1.49  
I-PreTSL IV
    B-1       1,000       693       (307 )   Ba2/B     31       4.16       8.84  
I-PreTSL IV
    B-2       1,000       693       (307 )   Ba2/B     31       4.16       8.84  
I-PreTSL IV
    C       500       255       (245 )   Caa1/CCC     31       4.16       4.68  
Alesco VIII
    E       0       0       0     Ca/C     59       33.87       0.00  
MM Community Funding III
    B       456       330       (126 )   Baa3/B     8       22.69       9.99  
MM Community Funding II
    B       193       193       0     Baa2/BB     6       26.98       14.21  
Tropic V
    B-1L       0       0       0       C/C       60       34.59       0.00  
Trapeza II
    C-1       665       265       (400 )   Ca/C     24       35.11       0.00  
Trapeza IX
    B-1       1,000       494       (506 )   Caa3/CC     42       10.91       12.37  
 
                                                         
Total
          $ 20,523     $ 12,273     $ (8,250 )                                
 
                                                         

 

19


Table of Contents

CORTLAND BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
(Dollars in thousands, except for per share amounts)
The market for these securities at March 31, 2010 is not active and markets for similar securities are also not active. The inactivity was evidenced first by a significant widening of the bid-ask spread in the brokered markets in which CDOs trade and then by a significant decrease in the volume of trades relative to historical levels. The new issue market is also inactive as no new pooled trust preferred CDOs have been issued since 2007. There are currently very few market participants who are willing and or able to transact for these securities. The pooled market value for these securities remains very depressed relative to historical levels. Although there has been marked improvement in the credit spread premium in the corporate bond space, no such improvement has been noted in the market for trust preferred CDO’s.
Given conditions in the debt markets today and the absence of observable transactions in the secondary and the new issue markets, we determined:
   
The few observable transactions and market quotations that are available are not reliable for purposes of determining fair value at March 31, 2010;
 
   
An income valuation approach technique (present value technique) that maximizes the use of relevant observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs will be equally or more representative of fair value than the market approach valuation technique used at prior measurement dates; and
 
   
The CDOs will be classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy because the Company determined that significant adjustments are required to determine fair value at the measurement date.
The Company enlisted the aid of an independent third party to perform the TRUP CDO valuations. The approach to determining fair value involved the following process:
  1.  
Estimate the credit quality of the collateral using average probability of default values for each issuer (adjusted for rating levels).
 
  2.  
Consider the potential for correlation among issuers within the same industry for default probabilities (e.g. banks with other banks).
 
  3.  
Forecast the cash flows for the underlying collateral and apply to each CDO tranche to determine the resulting distribution among the securities.
 
  4.  
Discount the expected cash flows to calculate the present value of the security.
 
  5.  
The effective discount rates on an overall basis generally range from 9.70% to 47.19% and are highly dependent upon the credit quality of the collateral, the relative position of the tranche in the capital structure of the CDO and the prepayment assumptions.
The following table presents the assets measured on a nonrecurring basis on the consolidated balance sheets at their fair value as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 by level within the fair value hierarchy. Impaired loans that are collateral dependent are written down to fair value through the establishment of specific reserves. Techniques used to value the collateral that secure the impaired loans include: quoted market prices for identical assets classified as Level 1 inputs; observable inputs, employed by certified appraisers, for similar assets classified as Level 2 inputs. In cases where valuation techniques include inputs that are unobservable and are based on estimates and assumptions developed by management based on the best information available under each circumstance, the asset valuation is classified as Level 3 inputs.
                                 
    March 31, 2010  
    Level 1     Level 2     Level 3     Total  
Assets Measured on a Non-recurring basis
                               
Impaired loans
  $       $ 179     $       $ 179  
Other real estate owned
            677               677  
Mortgage loans held for sale
    308                       308  
                                 
    December 31, 2009  
    Level 1     Level 2     Level 3     Total  
Assets Measured on a Non-recurring basis
                               
Impaired loans
  $       $ 1,100     $       $ 1,100  
Other real estate owned
            687               687  

 

20


Table of Contents

CORTLAND BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
(Dollars in thousands, except for per share amounts)
Impaired Loans: A loan is considered to be impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due (both interest and principal) according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Impaired loans are measured, as a practical expedient, at the loan’s observable market price or the fair market value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. At March 31, 2010, the recorded investment in impaired loans was $287 with a related reserve of $108 resulting in a net balance of $179. At December 31, 2009, the recorded investment in impaired loans was $1,256 with a related reserve of $156 resulting in a net balance of $1,100.
Other Real Estate Owned (OREO): Real Estate acquired through foreclosure or deed-in-lieu of foreclosure is included in other assets. Such real estate is carried at fair value less estimated costs to sell. Any reduction from the carrying value of the related loan to fair value at the time of acquisition is accounted for as a loan loss. Any subsequent reduction in fair market value is reflected as a valuation allowance through a charge to income. Costs of significant property improvements are capitalized, whereas costs, relating to holding and maintaining the property, are charged to expense. At March 31 2010 the recorded investment in OREO was $687 with a valuation allowance of $10 resulting in a net balance of $677. At December 31, 2009, the recorded investment in OREO was $697 with a valuation allowance of $10 resulting in a net balance of $687.
Mortgage loans held for sale: The fair value of loans held-for-sale is based upon an actual purchase and sale agreement between the Company and an independent market participant. The sale is executed within a reasonable period following quarter end at the stated fair value.
Financial Instruments
The FASB ASC Topic 825, Financial Instruments, requires disclosure of fair value information about financial instruments, whether or not recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheet, for which it is practicable to estimate the value. In cases where quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on estimates using present value or other estimation techniques. Those techniques are significantly affected by the assumptions used, including the discount rate and estimates of future cash flows.
Such techniques and assumptions, as they apply to individual categories of the financial instruments, are as follows:
Cash and cash equivalents — The carrying amounts for cash and cash equivalents are a reasonable estimate of those assets’ fair value.
Investment securities — Fair values of securities are based on quoted market prices, where available. If quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on quoted market prices of comparable securities. Prices on trust preferred securities were calculated using a discounted cash-flow technique. Cash flows were estimated based on credit and prepayment assumptions. The present value of the projected cash flows was calculated using a discount rate equal to the current yield used to accrete the beneficial interest.
Loans, net of allowance for loan loss — Market quotations are generally not available for loan portfolios. The fair value is estimated by discounting future cash flows using current market inputs at which loans with similar terms and qualities would be made to borrowers of similar credit quality.
Accrued interest receivable — The carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of these assets fair value.
Demand and savings deposits — Demand, savings, and money market deposit accounts are valued at the amount payable on demand.

 

21


Table of Contents

CORTLAND BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
(Dollars in thousands, except for per share amounts)
Time deposits — The fair value of certificates of deposit is based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows. The discount rates are estimated using market rates currently offered for similar instruments with similar remaining maturities.
FHLB advances — The fair value for fixed rate advances is estimated by discounting the future cash flows using rates at which advances would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings and for the same remaining maturities. The fair value for the fixed rate advances that are convertible to quarterly LIBOR floating rate advances on or after certain specified dates at the option of the FHLB and the FHLB fixed rate advances that are putable on or after certain specified dates at the option of the FHLB are priced using the FHLB of Cincinnati’s model.
Other short term borrowings — Other short term borrowings generally have an original term to maturity of one year or less. Consequently, their carrying value is a reasonable estimate of fair value.
Subordinated debt — The carrying amount for the subordinated debt is a reasonable estimate of the debts’ fair value due to the fact the debt floats based on LIBOR and resets quarterly.
Accrued interest payable — The carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of these liabilities fair value.
The fair value of unrecorded commitments at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 is not material.
In addition, other assets and liabilities of the Company that are not defined as financial instruments are not included in the disclosures, such as property and equipment. Also, non-financial instruments typically not recognized in financial statements nevertheless may have value but are not included in the above disclosures. These include, among other items, the estimated earning power of core deposit accounts, the trained work force, customer goodwill and similar items. Accordingly, the aggregate fair value amounts presented do not represent the underlying value of the Company.
The carrying amounts and estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments are as follows:
                                 
    March 31, 2010     December 31, 2009  
    Carrying     Estimated     Carrying     Estimated  
    amount     Fair Value     amount     Fair Value  
ASSETS
                               
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 29,328     $ 29,328     $ 44,823     $ 44,823  
Investment securities available for sale
    157,537       157,537       141,273       141,273  
Investment securities held to maturity
    29,635       30,491       30,651       31,490  
Loans, net of allowance for loan losses
    234,690       239,200       245,811       250,913  
Accrued interest receivable
    2,307       2,307       2,112       2,112  
 
                               
LIABILITIES
                               
Demand and savings deposits
  $ 211,326     $ 211,326     $ 222,704     $ 222,704  
Time deposits
    163,961       166,982       164,791       168,947  
FHLB advances
    51,500       54,681       56,500       59,805  
Other short term borrowings
    7,119       7,119       6,866       6,866  
Subordinated debt
    5,155       5,155       5,155       5,155  
Accrued interest payable
    660       660       725       725  

 

22


Table of Contents

CORTLAND BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
(Dollars in thousands, except for per share amounts)
10.) Memorandum of Understanding
As disclosed under Item 5 of the Form 10Q filing for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, Cortland Banks, in May 2009, was presented with an informal memorandum of understanding.
On May 26, 2009, the Board of Directors of Cortland Bancorp and Cortland Banks adopted resolutions authorizing its President and Chief Executive Officer to enter into the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the Federal Reserve. The MOU was executed June 1, 2009. The Division of Financial Institutions, State of Ohio, became a party to the MOU in December 2009, when the agreement was revised. The revised MOU was executed December 31, 2009. The MOU requires the Company and Cortland Banks to obtain the Federal Reserve’s approval prior to: (i) incurring any debt; (ii) repurchasing any of its stock; or (iii) paying any dividends.
The MOU also required Cortland Banks, within specified timeframes, to submit the following plans to the Federal Reserve for its approval: (i) a plan to strengthen and improve management of the overall risk exposure of the investment portfolio; (ii) a plan to maintain an adequate capital position, (iii) a plan to strengthen board oversight of the management and operations of the Bank and (iv) a plan for 2010 to improve the Bank’s earnings and overall condition.
The provisions of the MOU shall remain effective and enforceable until stayed, modified, terminated or suspended by the Federal Reserve. The Company is substantially in compliance with the provisions of the MOU as of March 31, 2010.

 

23


Table of Contents

CORTLAND BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED AVERAGE BALANCE SHEETS,
YIELDS AND RATES (UNAUDITED)
(Fully taxable equivalent basis in thousands of dollars)
                                                                         
    YEAR TO DATE AS OF  
    MARCH 31, 2010     DECEMBER 31, 2009,     MARCH 31, 2009  
    Average             Average     Average             Average     Average             Average  
    Balance (1)     Interest     Rate     Balance (1)     Interest     Rate     Balance (1)     Interest     Rate  
ASSETS
                                                                       
Federal funds sold and other earning assets
  $ 34,320     $ 23       0.26 %   $ 59,923     $ 155       0.27 %   $ 30,277     $ 20       0.27 %
Investment securities (1) (2)
    179,916       1,999       4.45 %     176,524       8,965       5.08 %     203,413       2,711       5.34 %
Loans (2) (3)
    242,043       3,696       6.15 %     238,290       15,229       6.39 %     242,669       3,876       6.43 %
 
                                                           
Total interest-earning assets
    456,279     $ 5,718       5.04 %     474,737     $ 24,349       5.13 %     476,359     $ 6,607       5.60 %
 
                                                                 
Cash and due from banks
    6,547                       6,661                       6,623                  
Bank premises and equipment
    7,077                       7,392                       7,564                  
Other assets
    18,938                       9,460                       3,250                  
 
                                                                 
Total non-interest-earning assets
    32,562                       23,513                       17,437                  
 
                                                                 
Total Assets
  $ 488,841                     $ 498,250                     $ 493,796                  
 
                                                                 
 
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
                                                                       
Interest-bearing demand deposits
  $ 69,378     $ 73       0.43 %   $ 65,266     $ 436       0.67 %   $ 62,228     $ 162       1.06 %
Savings
    87,534       74       0.34 %     84,933       516       0.61 %     82,037       185       0.91 %
Time
    161,740       969       2.43 %     175,153       5,342       3.05 %     178,551       1,488       3.37 %
 
                                                           
Total interest-bearing deposits
    318,652       1,116       1.42 %     325,352       6,294       1.93 %     322,816       1,835       2.30 %
Other borrowings
    62,920       622       4.01 %     68,307       2,813       4.12 %     68,286       703       4.18 %
Subordinated Debt
    5,155       22       1.70 %     5,155       127       2.46 %     5,155       43       3.33 %
 
                                                           
Total interest-bearing liabilities
    386,727     $ 1,760       1.85 %     398,814     $ 9,234       2.32 %     396,257     $ 2,581       2.64 %
 
                                                                 
Demand deposits
    59,572                       58,506                       57,714                  
Other liabilities
    4,764                       4,857                       3,782                  
Shareholders’ equity
    37,778                       36,073                       36,043                  
 
                                                                 
Total liabilities and Shareholders’ equity
  $ 488,841                     $ 498,250                     $ 493,796                  
 
                                                                 
Net interest income
          $ 3,958                     $ 15,115                     $ 4,026          
 
                                                                 
Net interest rate spread (4)
                    3.19 %                     2.81 %                     2.96 %
 
                                                                 
Net interest margin (5)
                    3.47 %                     3.19 %                     3.38 %
 
                                                                 
Ratio of interest-earning assets to interest-bearing liabilities
                    117.98 %                     119.04 %                     120.21 %
 
                                                                 
     
(1)  
Includes both taxable and tax exempt securities and loans.
 
(2)  
Tax exempt interest is shown on a tax equivalent basis for proper comparison using a statutory federal income tax rate of 34%. The tax equivalent income adjustment for loans and investment is $17 and $151 for March 31, 2010,$82 and $644 for December 31, 2009, $25 and $162 for March 31. 2009.
 
(3)  
Includes applicable loan origination and commitment fees, net of deferred origination cost amortization.
 
(4)  
Interest rate spread represents the difference between the yield on earning assets and the rate paid on interest bearing liabilities.
 
(5)  
Interest margin is calculated by dividing the difference between total interest earned and total interest expensed by total interest-earning assets.
See accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements
of Cortland Bancorp and Subsidiaries

 

24


Table of Contents

CORTLAND BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA FOR QUARTER ENDED
(In thousands of dollars, except for ratios and per share amounts)
                                         
    March 31.     December 31,     September 30,     June 30,     March 31,  
Unaudited   2010     2009     2009     2009     2009  
SUMMARY OF OPERATIONS
                                       
Total interest income
  $ 5,549     $ 5,681     $ 5,701     $ 5,821     $ 6,420  
Total interest expense
    (1,760 )     (1,973 )     (2,248 )     (2,432 )     (2,581 )
 
                             
NET INTEREST INCOME (NII)
    3,789       3,708       3,453       3,389       3,839  
Provision for loan losses
    (175 )     (90 )     (121 )     (65 )     (151 )
 
                             
NII after loss provision
    3,614       3,618       3,332       3,324       3,688  
Security losses including impairment losses
    (544 )     (257 )     (2,463 )     (7,770 )     (3,580 )
Gain on sale of loans
    4       32       43       119       71  
Total other income (excluding security and loan gains)
    704       771       752       736       742  
Total other noninterest expense
    (2,739 )     (3,428 )     (3,383 )     (3,557 )     (3,280 )
 
                             
Income (loss) before tax
    1,039       736       (1,719 )     (7,148 )     (2,359 )
 
                             
Net income (loss)
  $ 894     $ 643     $ (983 )   $ (4,598 )   $ (1,397 )
 
                             
 
                                       
PER COMMON SHARE DATA (1)
                                       
Net (loss) income, both basic and diluted
  $ 0.20     $ 0.14     $ (0.22 )   $ (1.01 )   $ (0.31 )
Cash dividends declared
                             
Book value
    8.59       8.16       8.18       7.77       7.37  
 
                                       
BALANCE SHEET DATA
                                       
Assets
  $ 485,916     $ 497,299     $ 498,375     $ 500,049     $ 493,400  
Investments
    187,172       171,924       173,958       141,773       172,875  
Net loans
    234,690       245,811       234,150       233,096       233,826  
Deposits
    375,287       387,495       379,946       386,169       382,071  
Borrowings
    58,619       63,366       71,801       68,903       68,612  
Subordinated Debt
    5,155       5,155       5,155       5,155       5,155  
Shareholders equity
    38,732       36,908       37,024       35,156       33,335  
 
                                       
AVERAGE BALANCES
                                       
Assets
  $ 488,841     $ 495,976     $ 502,645     $ 500,364     $ 493,796  
Investments
    179,916       173,799       154,037       169,883       203,413  
Net loans
    239,615       234,996       234,140       234,016       240,136  
Deposits
    378,224       381,458       385,524       387,891       380,530  
Borrowings
    62,920       66,985       69,166       68,795       68,286  
Subordinated Debt
    5,155       5,155       5,155       5,155       5,155  
Shareholders equity
    37,778       37,397       36,380       34,455       36,043  
 
                                       
ASSET QUALITY RATIOS
                                       
Loans 30 days or more beyond their contractual due date as a percent of total loans
    0.69 %     0.80 %     0.59 %     0.85 %     0.86 %
Underperforming assets (2) as a percentage of:
                                       
Total assets
    1.08       0.98       0.46       0.42       0.46  
Equity plus allowance for loan losses
    12.76       12.37       5.85       5.57       6.25  
Tier I capital
    11.23       10.59       5.09       4.54       4.42  
 
                                       
FINANCIAL RATIOS
                                       
Return on average equity
    9.83 %     6.88 %     (10.81 )%     (53.38 )%     (15.50 )%
Return on average assets
    0.73       0.52       (0.78 )     (3.68 )     (1.13 )
Effective tax rate
    14.00       12.64       (42.82 )     (35.70 )     (40.80 )
Net interest margin
    3.47       3.34       3.06       2.98       3.38  
     
(1)  
Basic and diluted earnings per share are based on weighted average shares outstanding adjusted retroactively for stock dividends. Cash dividends per common share are based on actual cash dividends declared, adjusted retroactively for the stock dividends. Book value per common share is based on shares outstanding at each period , adjusted retroactively for the stock dividends.
 
(2)  
Underperforming assets include non accrual loans and investments, OREO and restructured loans.

 

25


Table of Contents

CORTLAND BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
(Dollars in thousands, except for per share amounts)
Financial Review
The following is management’s discussion and analysis of the financial condition and results of operations of Cortland Bancorp (the “Company”). The discussion should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes included elsewhere in this report.
Note Regarding Forward-looking Statements
The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a “safe harbor” for forward-looking statements. In addition to historical information, certain information included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and other material filed or to be filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission (as well as information included in oral statements or other written statements made or to be made by the Company) may contain herein, the forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. The words “believes,” “expects,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “projects,” “contemplates,” “anticipates,” “forecasts,” “intends,” or similar terminology identify forward-looking statements. These statements reflect management’s beliefs and assumptions, and are based on information currently available to management.
Economic circumstances, the Company’s operations and actual results could differ significantly from those discussed in any forward-looking statements. Some of the factors that could cause or contribute to such differences are changes in the economy and interest rates either nationally or in the Company’s market area; changes in customer preferences and consumer behavior; increased competitive pressures or changes in either the nature or composition of competitors; changes in the legal and regulatory environment; changes in factors influencing liquidity such as expectations regarding the rate of inflation or deflation, currency exchange rates, and other factors influencing market volatility; unforeseen risks associated with other global economic, political and financial factors.
While actual results may differ significantly from the results discussed in the forward-looking statements, the Company undertakes no obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statement for any reason, even if new information becomes available.
Analysis of Assets and Liabilities
Our earning assets are comprised of investment securities, loans and loans held for sale and deposits at financial institutions, mainly the Federal Reserve Bank. Earning assets were $446,736 at March 31, 2010, a decrease of 1.9% from March 31, 2009, which was $455,577, and a decrease of 2.2% since December 31, 2009, which stood at $456,783.
Total cash and cash equivalents decreased by $15,495 from year-end and by $23,321 from the balance at March 31, 2009. This occurred mainly in deposits held at the Federal Reserve Bank, which decreased by $15,204 from year-end and decreased by $25,801 from March 31, 2009, as funds were employed into the investment portfolio.
We classify investment securities as available-for-sale to give management the flexibility to sell the securities prior to maturity, if needed, based on fluctuating interest rates or changes in our funding requirements. However, we also have some securities in our held-to-maturity investment portfolio.
At March 31, 2010, the investment securities portfolio was $187,172 compared to $172,875 at March 31, 2009, an increase of $14,297 or 8.3%. Investment securities increased $15,248 compared to December 31, 2009, an increase of 8.9%. This increase is primarily the result of management’s decision to invest a portion of liquid funds into short-term investment grade securities. Investment securities represented 41.9% of earning assets at March 31, 2010, compared to 37.9% at March 31, 2009, and 37.6% at December 31, 2009. Management, in the first half of 2009 allowed proceeds of calls or sales of investments to build up in an interest-bearing deposit account. Since then, management invested in U.S. Government agencies, municipal bonds and mortgage-backed securities. Management has also used funds to decrease borrowings as they mature. The investment portfolio represented 49.9% of each deposit dollar, up from 45.2% a year ago and 44.4% of year end levels.

 

26


Table of Contents

CORTLAND BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except for per share amounts)
The investment securities available-for-sale portfolio had net unrealized losses of $4.9 million at March 31, 2010, a decrease of $14.3 million compared to net unrealized losses of $19.2 million at March 31, 2009, and a decrease of $1.4 million compared to net unrealized losses of $6.3 million at December 31, 2009. Contributing to the volatility in net unrealized losses over the past twelve months are changes in interest rates and an inactive market for certain securities as discussed in Note 8 to the financial statements. A $14.5 million other-than-temporary-impairment was recorded during 2009 related to pooled trust preferred securities and investments in General Motors Corporation bonds, while $544 was recorded in 2010.
Loans net of the allowance for losses increased by $864 during the twelve month period from March 31, 2009 to March 31, 2010, and decreased by $11,121 from year-end. Gross loans as a percentage of earning assets stood at 53.1% as of March 31, 2010, 51.9% at March 31, 2009 and 54.3% as of December 31, 2009. The loan to deposit ratio at the end of the first three months of 2010 was 63.2% as compared to 61.9% for the same period a year ago. The decrease in loans from year end was due in part to two 60 day term commercial loans for a total of $12,500 that closed in December 2009 and were fully secured by segregated deposit accounts with the Bank. The loans matured in the first quarter of 2010. At March 31, 2010 the loan loss allowance of $2,447 represented approximately 1.03% of outstanding loans, and at March 31, 2009 the loan loss allowance of $2,585 represented approximately 1.09% of outstanding loans. The loan loss allowance at December 31, 2009 of $2,437 represented approximately 0.98% of outstanding loans.
During the first three months, loan charge-offs were $195 in 2010 compared to $66 in 2009, while the recovery of previously charged-off loans amounted to $30 in both 2010 and 2009. The charge-offs in 2010 were due in part to one commercial real estate loan totaling $132 for which $75 had been previously reserved. Non-accrual loans at March 31, 2010 represented 0.4% of the loan portfolio compared to 0.5% at December 31, 2009 and 0.3% at March 31, 2009.
Charge-offs of specific problem loans, as well as for smaller balance homogeneous loans, are recorded periodically during the year. The number of loan accounts and the amount of charge-off associated with account balances vary from period to period as loans are deemed uncollectible by management.
Bank owned life insurance had a cash surrender value of $13,322 at March 31, 2010, $13,211 at December 31, 2009 and $12,862 at March 31, 2009. Other assets increased by $15 from year-end and $735 from March 31, 2009. Other real estate owned stood at $677 in March 2010 as compared to $687 at December 31, 2009 and $1,145 at March 31, 2009. Net deferred tax assets measured $7,494 at March 31, 2010, $7,893 at December 31, 2009 and $8,615 at March 31, 2009, primarily reflecting deferred tax benefits arising from unrealized losses on available for sale investment securities and other-than-temporary impairment losses recognized in 2008, 2009 and 2010. Interest receivable on investments and loans stood at $2,307 at March 31, 2010, $2,112 at December 31, 2009 and $2,724 at March 31, 2009.
Non interest-bearing deposits decreased by $2,871 from year-end and increased by $585 from twelve months ago. Interest-bearing deposits decreased by $9,337 from year-end and decreased by $7,369 from March 31, 2009. The decrease from year end is due to money market accounts opened in December 2009 to secure two loans totaling $12,500 that were closed when the loans matured in early 2010.
Federal Home Loan Bank advances and other short term borrowings decreased by $5,000 from year-end and decreased by $11,000 from March 31, 2009. The decrease is due to management’s decision to pay down individual borrowings at their respective due dates. Future maturities are also expected to be paid off.

 

27


Table of Contents

CORTLAND BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)
Other liabilities measured $8,123 at March 31, 2010, $4,375 at December 31, 2009 and $4,227 at March 31, 2009. The large increase at March 31, 2010 reflects the liability for security purchases not settled of $4,282. The other large component is accrued expense which measured $2,411 at March 31, 2010, $2,854 at December 31, 2009 and $3,057 at March 31, 2009. The largest item in this category is accrued expense for post-retirement benefits. The Company completed its management reorganization during the quarter and recorded a reduction in the post retirement plans of $542, offset by a severance accrual of $85.
Capital Resources
Regulatory standards for measuring capital adequacy require banks and bank holding companies to maintain capital based on “risk-adjusted” assets so that categories of assets of potentially higher credit risk require more capital backing than assets with lower risk. In addition, banks and bank holding companies are required to maintain capital to support, on a risk-adjusted basis, certain off-balance sheet activities such as standby letters of credit and interest rate swaps.
The risk-based standards classify capital into two tiers. Tier 1 capital consists of common shareholders’ equity, noncumulative and cumulative perpetual preferred stock, qualifying trust preferred securities and minority interests less intangibles and the unrealized market value adjustment of investment securities available for sale. Tier 2 capital consists of a limited amount of the allowance for loan and lease losses, perpetual preferred stock (not included in Tier 1), hybrid capital instruments, term subordinated debt, and intermediate-term preferred stock.
In April 2009, the FFIEC issued additional instructions for reporting of direct credit substitutions that have been downgraded below investment grade. Included in the definition of a direct credit substitute are mezzanine and subordinated tranches of collateralized debt obligations and non agency Collateralized Mortgage Obligations. Adopting these instructions beginning in 2009 results in an increase in total risk weighted assets with an attendant decrease in the risk-based capital and Tier 1 risk based capital ratios.
As a result of the decline in value of our trust preferred CDO securities, the regulatory capital levels of the Bank have come under significant pressure. As a result of investment downgrades by the rating agencies during 2009 and 2010, all of the trust preferred CDO’s and the General Motors corporate securities were rated as “highly speculative grade” debt securities. As a consequence, the Bank is required to maintain higher levels of regulatory risk-based capital for these securities due to the greater perceived risk of default by the underlying bank and insurance company issuers. Specifically, regulatory guidance requires the Bank to apply a higher “risk weighting formula” for these securities to calculate its regulatory capital ratios. The result of that calculation increased the Bank’s risk-weighted assets for these securities to $95.2 million, down from the $98.5 million in amortized cost of these securities as of December 31, 2009, thereby significantly diluting the regulatory capital ratios
In management’s opinion, as supported by the data in the following table, the Company met all capital adequacy requirements to which it was subject as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009. As of those dates, the Company was “well capitalized” under regulatory prompt corrective action provisions.
                                 
    Actual Regulatory     Regulatory Capital Ratio  
    Capital Ratios as of:     requirements to be:  
    March 31,     Dec. 31,     Well     Adequately  
    2010     2009     Capitalized     Capitalized  
Total risk-based capital to risk-weighted assets
    13.71 %     13.22 %     10.00 %     8.00 %
Tier I capital to risk-weighted assets
    13.01 %     12.54 %     6.00 %     4.00 %
Tier I capital to average assets
    9.52 %     9.09 %     5.00 %     4.00 %
Risk based capital standards require a minimum ratio of 8% of qualifying total capital to risk-adjusted total assets with at least 4% constituting Tier 1 capital. Capital qualifying as Tier 2 capital is limited to 100% of Tier 1 capital. All banks and bank holding companies are also required to maintain a minimum leverage capital ratio (Tier 1 capital to total average assets) in the range of 3% to 4%, subject to regulatory guidelines. Capital ratios remained above regulatory minimums for “well capitalized” financial institutions.

 

28


Table of Contents

CORTLAND BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991 (FDICIA) required banking regulatory agencies to revise risk-based capital standards to ensure that they adequately account for the following additional risks: interest rate, concentration of credit, and non traditional activities. Accordingly, regulators will subjectively consider an institution’s exposure to declines in the economic value of its capital due to changes in interest rates in evaluating capital adequacy. The table below illustrates the Company’s qualifying capital and risk weighted assets at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 and the corresponding capital ratios.
                 
    Risk Based Capital  
    March 31,     December 31,  
    2010     2009  
 
               
Tier 1 Capital
  $ 46,919     $ 46,015  
Tier 2 Capital
    2,531       2,511  
 
           
QUALIFYING CAPITAL
  $ 49,450     $ 48,526  
 
           
Risk-Adjusted Total Assets (*)
  $ 360,633     $ 367,083  
 
           
 
               
Tier 1 Risk- Based Capital Ratio
    13.01 %     12.54 %
Total Risk- Based Capital Ratio
    13.71 %     13.22 %
Total Leverage Capital Ratio
    9.52 %     9.09 %
     
(*)  
Includes off-balance sheet exposures
Average total assets for leverage capital purposes is calculated as average assets, less intangibles and the net unrealized market value adjustment of quarter end March 31, 2010 investment securities available for sale, which averaged $492,665 for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and $506,376 for the year ended December 31, 2009.
The Company’s Board of Directors declared a quarterly stock dividend of 1% payable on April 1, 2009 to shareholders of record as of March 9, 2009.
Regulations require that Investments designated as available for sale are marked-to-market with corresponding entries to the deferred tax account and shareholders’ equity. Regulatory agencies, however, exclude these adjustments in computing risk-based capital, as their inclusion would tend to increase the volatility of this important measure of capital adequacy.

 

29


Table of Contents

CORTLAND BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except for per share amounts)
Analysis of Earnings
Executive Summary
Net income for the first three months of 2010 is $894 compared to net loss of $(1,397) for the first three months of 2009.
The Company derives a majority of its earnings by managing interest income and interest expense. As the Federal Reserve continues to hold short-term interest rates at historically low levels, and longer term mortgage rates also remain relatively low, the Company has managed the mix of assets and liabilities and the terms over which interest is recognized to marginally improve net interest margin. The margin for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 was 3.47%, 13 basis points above the December 2009 quarter end, and a 9 basis point improvement over the first quarter of 2009.
While unemployment levels have stopped their relentless climb, they remain at elevated levels both regionally and nationally. Consequently, the housing market continues to be negatively impacted by a high level of bankruptcy filings and home foreclosures, and business failures are now being reported on a more routine basis. Despite these market conditions, the Company, to date, has not experienced notable deterioration in credit quality and has actually reported positive trends in certain areas of asset quality during the first three months of 2010.
Loans accounted for on a nonaccrual basis declined from $1.2 million at the December 31, 2009 year end to $988 thousand at the recent quarter ended March 31, 2010. The ratio of non accrual loans to total loans, which was 0.50% at year end 2009, improved to 0.42% at March 31, 2010. Loans charged off, net of recoveries were $165 thousand in the first quarter of 2010 versus $42 thousand for the quarter ended December 2009. A single credit of $132 comprised 80% of the charge-offs for the quarter. The allowance for loan losses is 1.03% of loans and 107% of nonperforming loans.
Excluding the impairment charges, noninterest income was $708 for the three months ended March 31, 2010 versus $900 for the same period in 2009. The $192 difference was primarily the result of a reduced volume of loans sold to the secondary market in 2010 generating lesser gains, and a decrease in gains on securities sold.
Noninterest expense for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 was $2.7 million versus $3.3 million for the comparable period in 2009. The Company completed its management reorganization during the quarter and recorded credits of $457 related to various compensation programs, net of severance costs. This was partially offset by increased FDIC premiums of $145 during the quarter.
The major factor driving the increase in net income for the quarter is the lower level of securities impairment versus impairment charges recorded during the same period in 2009. Among its investments, the Company owns a number of collateralized debt obligation securities that are backed by trust preferred securities issued by banks, insurance companies and real estate investment trusts. The market for these securities and similar securities became illiquid during the financial crisis of 2008 and is currently still not active. For these securities, the Company modeled and analyzed the cash flow characteristics and determined the extent to which these securities are other than temporarily impaired. Accordingly, a $544 and $3.7 million other than temporary impairment charge was recorded as expense for the first quarters of 2010 and 2009, respectively. The level of impairment is mainly driven by the ability of the community banks which securitize the obligations in the investment pools to pay their obligations. The economic downturn and resulting recession has caused many banks to defer or default on their debt obligations.

 

30


Table of Contents

CORTLAND BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in Thousands, except for per share amounts)
Certain Non GAAP Measures
Certain financial information has been determined by methods other than Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). Specifically, certain financial measures are based on core earnings rather than net income. Core earnings exclude income, expense, gains and losses that either is not reflective of ongoing operations or that are not expected to reoccur with any regularity or reoccur with a high degree of uncertainty and volatility. Such information may be useful to both investors and management, and can aid them in understanding the Company’s current performance trends and financial condition. Core earnings are a supplemental tool for analysis and not a substitute for GAAP net income. Reconciliation from GAAP net income to the non GAAP measure of core earnings is shown as part of management’s discussion and analysis of quarterly and year-to-date financial results of operations.
Core earnings (earnings before other than temporary impairment charge, and certain other non-recurring items) decreased by 7.0% in the first quarter of 2010 compared to 2009. Core earnings for the first quarter of 2010 were $951 compared to last year’s $1,023. The decrease was due mainly to increased FDIC assessment rates. FDIC expense after tax increased $96. Core earnings per share were $0.21 in 2010 and $0.23 in 2009.
The following is a reconciliation between core earnings and earnings under generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (GAAP earnings):
                 
    THREE MONTHS ENDED  
    March 31,  
    2010     2009  
GAAP earnings or loss
  $ 894     $ (1,397 )
Impairment losses on investment securities
    544       3,667  
Credits relating to reorganization — net
    (457 )        
Tax effect of adjustments
    (30 )     (1,247 )
 
           
Core earnings
  $ 951     $ 1,023  
 
           
 
               
Core earnings per share
  $ 0.21     $ 0.23  

 

31


Table of Contents

CORTLAND BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in Thousands, except for per share amounts)
Analysis of Net Interest Income for the First Three Months
First Three Months of 2010 as Compared to First Three Months of 2009
                                                 
    INTEREST MARGIN YTD  
    March 31, 2010             March 31, 2009        
    Average             Average     Average             Average  
    Balance (1)     Interest     Rate     Balance (1)     Interest     Rate  
INTEREST-EARNING ASSETS
                                               
 
                                               
Federal funds sold and other earning assets
  $ 34,320     $ 23       0.26 %   $ 30,277     $ 20       0.27 %
Investment securities (1) (2)
    179,916       1,999       4.45 %     203,413       2,711       5.34 %
Loans (2) (3)
    242,043       3,696       6.15 %     242,669       3,876       6.43 %
 
                                       
Total interest-earning assets
  $ 456,279     $ 5,718       5.04 %   $ 476,359     $ 6,607       5.60 %
 
                                       
 
                                               
INTEREST-BEARING LIABILITIES
                                               
 
Interest-bearing demand deposits
  $ 69,378     $ 73       0.43 %   $ 62,228     $ 162       1.06 %
Savings
    87,534       74       0.34 %     82,037       185       0.91 %
Time
    161,740       969       2.43 %     178,551       1,488       3.37 %
 
                                       
 
                                               
Total interest-bearing deposits
    318,652       1,116       1.42 %     322,816       1,835       2.30 %
Federal funds purchased
                                               
Other borrowings
    62,920       622       4.01 %     68,286       703       . 4.18 %
Subordinated debt
    5,155       22       1.70 %     5,155       43       3.33 %
 
                                       
 
                                               
Total interest-bearing liabilities
  $ 386,727     $ 1,760       1.85 %   $ 396,257     $ 2,581       2.64 %
 
                                       
Net interest income
          $ 3,958                     $ 4,026          
 
                                           
Net interest rate spread (4)
                    3.19 %                     2.96 %
 
                                           
Net interest margin (5)
                    3.47 %                     3.38 %
 
                                           
     
(1)  
Includes both taxable and tax exempt securities and loans
 
(2)  
Tax exempt interest is shown on a tax equivalent basis for proper comparison using a statutory federal income tax rate of 34%. The tax equivalent income adjustment for loans and investments is $17 and $151 for March 2010 and $25 and $162 for March 2009.
 
(3)  
Includes applicable loan origination and commitment fees, net of deferred origination cost amortization.
 
(4)  
Interest rate spread represents the difference between the yield on earning assets and the rate paid on interest bearing deposits.
 
(5)  
Interest margin is calculated by dividing the difference between total interest earned and total interest expensed by total interest-earning assets.
Net interest income, the principal source of the Company’s earnings, is the amount by which interest and fees generated by interest-earning assets, primarily loans and investment securities, exceed the interest cost of deposits and borrowed funds. On a fully taxable equivalent, net interest income measured $3,958 at March 31, 2010 and $4,026 at March 31, 2009. During the recent reporting period the net interest margin registered 3.47% at March 31, 2010 and 3.38% at March 31, 2009.
The decrease in interest income, on a fully taxable equivalent basis, of $889 is the product of a 56 basis point decrease in interest rates earned and a 4.2% year-over-year decrease in average earning assets. The decrease in interest expense of $821 was a product of a 79 basis point decrease in rates paid and a 2.4% decrease in interest-bearing liabilities. The net result was a 1.7% decrease in net interest income on a fully taxable equivalent basis, but a 9 basis point increase in the Company’s net interest margin due to the smaller asset base.

 

32


Table of Contents

CORTLAND BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in Thousands, except for per share amounts)
Interest and dividend income on securities registered a decrease of $702 or 27.5%, during the three months ended March 31, 2010 when compared to 2009. On a fully taxable equivalent basis, income on investment securities decreased by $712 or 26.3%. The average invested balances in securities decreased by $23,497 or 11.6% from the levels of a year ago. The decrease in the average balance of investment securities resulted from a management decision to not reinvest all of the proceeds from called securities that were realized in the first half of 2009. At that time management decided to start investing a portion of the liquid funds into short term investment grade securities. During the first three months ended March 31, 2010, $22,069 in investment securities were purchased while $7,521 of investment securities were called by the issuer or matured, and in the first three months of 2009 $76 in investment securities were purchased while $12,989 were called by the issuer or matured. There were no sales of investment securities in 2009 or 2010. The decrease in the average balance of investment securities was accompanied by an 89 basis point decrease in the tax equivalent yield of the portfolio. The Company expects to continue redeployment of liquidity into loans and investments.
Interest and fees on loans decreased by $172 or 4.5%, while on a fully taxable equivalent basis, income on loans decreased by $180 or 4.6%, for the three months of 2010 compared to 2009. A $626 decrease in the average balance of the loan portfolio, or 0.3%, was accompanied by a 28 basis point decrease in the portfolio’s tax equivalent yield.
Other interest income increased by $3 from the same period a year ago. The average balance of Federal Reserve bank and other money market funds increased by $4,043 , or 13.4%. The yield decreased by 1 basis points during the first three months of 2010 compared to 2009.
Average interest-bearing demand deposits and money market accounts increased by $7,150 while savings balances increased by $5,497. Total interest paid on these products was $147, a $200 decrease from last year. The average rate paid on these products decreased by 63 basis points in the aggregate. The average balance of time deposit products decreased by $16,811 as the average rate paid decreased by 94 basis points, from 3.37% to 2.43%. Interest expense decreased on time deposits by $519 from the prior year. As time deposits mature, the balances are reinvested at the lower current rates. As the Federal Reserve has no immediate intent to raise short-term interest rates, the Company expects the cost of deposits to continue declining.
Average borrowings, federal funds purchased and subordinated debt decreased by $5,366 while the average rate paid on borrowings decreased by 29 basis points. $6,000 in Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings were paid off at their due dates in the last two months of 2009, and an additional $5,000 was paid off in the first quarter of 2010. Management plans to pay down individual borrowings at their respective due dates in the future using current liquidity.

 

33


Table of Contents

CORTLAND BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in Thousands, except for per share amounts)
Impairment Analysis
The Company owns 32 collateralized debt obligation securities totaling $35,142 (par value) that are secured by trust preferred securities issued by banks, thrifts, insurance companies and real estate investment trusts, (TRUP CDOs). The market for these securities at March 31, 2010 is not active and markets for similar securities are also not active. Given conditions in the debt markets today and the absence of observable transactions in the secondary and new issue markets, the Company determined the few observable transactions and market quotations that are available are not reliable for purposes of determining fair value at March 31, 2010. It was decided that an income valuation approach technique (present value technique) that maximizes the use of relevant observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs would be more representative of fair value than the market approach valuation technique used at measurement dates prior to 2009.
The Company enlisted the aid of an independent third party to perform the TRUP CDO valuations. The approach to determining fair value involved the following process:
  1.  
Estimate the credit quality of the collateral using average probability of default values for each issuer (adjusted for rating levels).
 
  2.  
Consider the potential for correlation among issuers within the same industry for default probabilities (e.g. banks with other banks).
 
  3.  
Forecast the cash flows for the underlying collateral and apply to each CDO tranche to determine the resulting distribution among the securities.
 
  4.  
Discount the expected cash flows to calculate the present value of the security.
 
  5.  
The effective discount rates on an overall basis generally range from 9.70% to 47.19% and are highly dependent upon the credit quality of the collateral, the relative position of the tranche in the capital structure of the CDO and the prepayment assumptions.
Based upon the results of the analysis, the Company currently believes that a weighted average price of approximately $0.35 per $1.00 of par value is representative of the fair value of the 32 trust preferred securities, with the specific valuations ranging from zero to $1.00. See Notes 3 and 8 for further discussion of impairment.
The Company considered all information available as of March 31, 2010 to estimate the impairment and resulting fair value of the CDO’S. The CDO’S are supported by a number of banks and insurance companies located throughout the country. The FDIC has recently indicated that there are many institutions still considered troubled banks even after the numerous failures in 2009. If the conditions of the underlying banks in the CDO’S worsen, there may be additional impairment to recognize in subsequent quarters.
Analysis of Other Income, Other Expense and Federal Income Tax for the First Three Months
Other income from all sources increased by $2,931 from the same period a year ago. Gains on securities called and net gains on the sale of available for sale investment securities decreased by $87 from year ago levels. With rates falling during the quarter, U.S. Government agencies and corporations elected to call an increasing number of issues. In 2009 the Bank held several of these issues at a discount and thus recognized a gain when they were called. Gains were offset by impairment losses attributable to Collateralized Debt Obligations (CDO’s), representing pools of trust preferred debt primarily issued by bank holding companies, and insurance companies and General Motors bonds. $544 in losses were recognized in 2010 as compared to $3,667 in 2009. (See Note 3 — Investment Securities). Gains on 1-4 residential mortgage loans sold in the secondary mortgage market decreased by $67 from the same period a year ago due to a decrease in loan sales activity. Fees for other customer services increased by $8. In November 2009, the Federal Reserve Board issued a final rule that, effective July 1, 2010, prohibits financial institutions from charging consumers fees for paying overdrafts on automated teller machine and one-time debit card

 

34


Table of Contents

CORTLAND BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in Thousands, except for per share amounts)
transactions, unless a consumer consents, or opts in, to the overdraft service for those types of transactions. Consumers must be provided a notice that explains the financial institution’s overdraft services, including the fees associated with the service, and the consumer’s choices. Because the Banks’ customers must provide advance consent to the overdraft service for automated teller machine and one-time debit card transactions, the Company cannot provide any assurance as to the ultimate impact of this rule on the amount of overdraft/insufficient funds charges reported in future periods. Loss on the sale of Other Real Estate Owned (OREO) was $4 at March 31, 2010, a decrease of $10 from the loss of $14 recorded at March 31, 2009. Other sources of non-recurring non-interest income decreased by $56 from the same period a year ago. This latter income category is subject to fluctuation due to the non-recurring nature of the items.
Total other expenses in the first three months were $2,739 in 2010 compared to $3,280 in 2009, a decrease of $541 or 16.5%. Full time equivalent employment averaged 147 during the first three months of 2010 compared to 162 for the same period of 2009. Salaries and benefits decreased by $577, or 31.4%, from the similar period a year ago. The Company completed its management reorganization during the quarter and recorded credits of $457 related to various compensation plans, net of severance costs.
Insurance premiums paid to the FDIC increased by $145. The increase is primarily due to the increase in the rates banks pay for deposit insurance. Deposits are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) up to a maximum amount, which is generally $250,000 (in effect until December 31, 2013) per depositor subject to aggregation rules. As an FDIC-insured institution, the Bank is required to pay deposit insurance premium assessments to the FDIC. The FDIC adopted a Restoration Plan to restore the reserve ratio of the Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF) to 1.15%. Effective April 1, 2009, the Restoration Plan provides base assessment rate adjustments. In addition, under an interim rule, the FDIC imposed a five basis point emergency special assessment on insured depository institutions on June 30, 2009. The special assessment was payable on September 30, 2009. Pursuant to a final rule adopted by the FDIC in November 2009, the Bank was required to prepay its estimated quarterly risk-based assessments to the FDIC for the fourth quarter of 2009 and for all of 2010, 2011 and 2012. The Bank prepaid the amount of $2,974 in December 2009 and had a remaining balance of $2,707 at March 31, 2010. These prepaid assessment amounts are included in other assets of the Company. The Bank will be assessed quarterly premiums by the FDIC commencing with the March 31, 2010 quarter, and such assessments will be charged against the prepaid asset until such time as the prepaid asset has been fully expensed, at which point the Bank will resume paying premiums to the FDIC. The Company anticipates its FDIC insurance expense will continue to adversely impact operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 2010.
All other expense categories decreased by 8.0%, or $109 in the aggregate. This expense category is subject to fluctuation due to non-recurring items.
Income before tax amounted to $1,039 for the first three months of 2010 compared to loss before income tax benefit of $(2,359) for the similar period of 2009. The effective tax rate for the first three months was 14.0% in 2010 and (40.8) % in 2009, resulting in income tax expense of $145 and benefit of $(962), respectively. The provision for income taxes differs from the amount of income tax determined applying the applicable U.S. statutory federal income tax rate to pre-tax income as a result of the following differences:
                 
    THREE MONTHS ENDED  
    March 31,  
    2010     2009  
Provision at statutory rate
  $ 353     $ (802 )
Tax effect of non-taxable income
    (230 )     (181 )
Tax effect of non-deductible expense
    22       21  
 
           
Federal income tax (benefit) expense
  $ 145     $ (962 )
 
           

 

35


Table of Contents

CORTLAND BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except for per share amounts)
Liquidity
The central role of the Company’s liquidity management is to (1) ensure sufficient liquid funds to meet the normal transaction requirements of its customers, (2) take advantage of market opportunities requiring flexibility and speed, and (3) provide a cushion against unforeseen liquidity needs.
Liquidity risk arises from the possibility that we may not be able to satisfy current or future financial commitments, or may become unduly reliant on alternative funding sources. The objective of liquidity management is to ensure we have the ability to fund balance sheet growth and meet deposit and debt obligations in a timely and cost-effective manner. Management monitors liquidity through a regular review of asset and liability maturities, funding sources, and loan and deposit forecasts. We maintain strategic and contingency liquidity plans to ensure sufficient available funding to satisfy requirements for balance sheet growth, properly manage capital markets’ funding sources and to address unexpected liquidity requirements.
Principal sources of liquidity for the Company include assets considered relatively liquid, such as interest-bearing deposits in other banks, federal funds sold, cash and due from banks, as well as cash flows from maturities and repayments of loans, investment securities and mortgage-backed securities.
Concerns over deposit fluctuations with respect to the overall banking industry were addressed by the FDIC in September and October 2008. The FDIC temporarily increased the individual account deposit insurance from $100 per account to $250 per account through December 31, 2009, which has subsequently been extended through December 31, 2013. The FDIC also implemented a Transaction Account Guarantee (TAG) component of the Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program, which provides for full FDIC coverage for transaction accounts, regardless of dollar amounts. The Company elected to opt-in to this program, thus, our customers receive full coverage for transaction accounts under the program. In April 2010, the FDIC approved an interim rule that extends the Transaction Account Guarantee Program from June 30, 2010 to December 31, 2010. The program may be extended an additional year beyond December 31, 2010 without additional rulemaking, provided the FDIC announces the extension before October 29, 2010. Current participants in the program had a one-time, irrevocable opportunity to opt out of the extension by notifying the FDIC by April 30, 2010. The Company elected to continue participation in this program. Concerns regarding the overall banking industry or the Company could have an adverse effect on future deposit levels.
In order to address the concern of FDIC insurance of larger depositors, the Bank became a member of the Certificate of Deposit Account Registry Service (CDARS®) program late in 2009. Through CDARS®, the Bank’s customers can increase their FDIC insurance by up to $50 million through reciprocal certificate of deposit accounts. This is accomplished by the Bank entering into reciprocal depository relationships with other member banks. The individual customer’s large deposit is broken into amounts below the $100 amount (or $250 if the time deposit matures prior to December 31, 2013) and placed with other banks that are members of the network. The reciprocal member bank issues certificate of deposits in amounts that ensure that the entire deposit is eligible for FDIC insurance. At March 31, 2010, the Bank had $10 in deposits in the CDARS® program. For regulatory purposes, CDARS® is considered a brokered deposit even though reciprocal deposits are generally from customers in the local market.
Along with its liquid assets, the Company has other sources of liquidity available to it which help to ensure that adequate funds are available as needed. These other sources include, but are not limited to, the ability to obtain deposits through the adjustment of interest rates, the purchasing of federal funds, and access to the Federal Reserve Discount Window. The Company is also a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati, which provides yet another source of liquidity. At March 31, 2010, the Bank had approximately $4.9 million available of collateral based borrowing capacity at FHLB of Cincinnati, $24.9 million in cash management lines of credit with FHLB of Cincinnati and $369 of availability with the Federal Reserve Discount window. Additionally, agreements were in place that gave the Company access to approximately 10% of total assets in brokered certificates of deposit that could be used as an additional source of liquidity. At March 31, 2010 there was a $2,997 outstanding balance in brokered certificates of deposit.

 

36


Table of Contents

CORTLAND BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except for per share amounts)
The holding company has much more limited sources of liquidity. In addition to its existing liquid assets, it can raise funds in the securities markets through debt or equity offerings or it can receive dividends from its bank subsidiary. Generally, the Bank may pay dividends without prior approval as long as the dividend is not more than the total of the current calendar year-to-date earnings plus any earnings from the previous two years not already paid out in dividends, and as long as the Bank would remain well capitalized after the dividend payment. As of March 31, 2010, the Bank can pay no dividends to the holding company without regulatory approval. Future dividend payments by the Bank to the holding company would be based upon future earnings and the approval of the regulators. The holding company has cash of $769 at March 31, 2010 available to meet cash needs. It also holds a $6 million note receivable, the cash flow from which approximates the debt service on the Junior Subordinated Debentures. Cash is generally used by the holding company to pay quarterly interest payment on the debentures, pay dividends to common shareholders, and to fund operating expenses. Currently, any debt offerings or cash dividends to shareholders require prior approval of the regulators.
Cash and cash equivalents decreased from $52,649 in March of 2009 and $44,823 in December 2009 to $29,328 in 2010. The bank management had elected to employ a higher level of funds into the Federal Reserve Bank account to achieve a higher level of short-term liquidity needed to support increased loan demand, and compensate for poorly functioning credit markets. Beginning in June 2009, management decided to start investing a portion of the liquid funds into short-term investment grade securities. The following table details the cash flows from operating activities for three months ended March 2010 and 2009. Unpledged securities of $78,319 are also available for borrowing under repurchase agreements or as additional collateral for FHLB lines of credit
                 
    2010     2009  
Net income
  $ 894     $ (1,397 )
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flows from operating activities:
               
Depreciation, amortization and accretion
    312       177  
Provision for loan loss
    175       151  
Investment securities gains
            (87 )
Impairment losses
    544       3,667  
Other real estate losses
    4       14  
Origination of loans held for sale
    (520 )     (4,707 )
Proceeds from the sale of loans
    216       4,596  
Net gain on the sale of loans
    (4 )     (71 )
Changes in:
               
Deferred tax benefit
    (80 )     (1,352 )
Other assets and liabilities
    (1,069 )     (254 )
 
           
Net cash flows from operating activities
  $ 472     $ 737  
 
           
Key differences stem from: 1) Impairment losses of $544 were recognized in 2010 compared to $3,667 in 2009. This also accounts for the decrease of deferred tax benefit to $(80) at March 31, 2010 from $(1,352) for 2009. 2) other liabilities decreased in 2010 due in part to a net $457 reduction in accrued post retirement plans and accrued severance due to a management reorganization completed in 2010. Refer to the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for a summary of the sources and uses of cash for 2010 and 2009.

 

37


Table of Contents

CORTLAND BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except for per share amounts)
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operation are based upon our Consolidated Financial Statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of our consolidated financial statements. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
Certain accounting policies involve significant judgments and assumptions by management which has a material impact on the carrying value of certain assets and liabilities; management considers such accounting policies to be critical accounting policies. The judgments and assumptions used by management are based on historical experience and other factors, which are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances.
Management believes the following are critical accounting policies that require the most significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of its consolidated financial statements.
Accounting for the Allowance for Loan Losses
The determination of the allowance for loan losses and the resulting amount of the provision for loan losses charged to operations reflects management’s current judgment about the credit quality of the loan portfolio and takes into consideration changes in lending policies and procedures, changes in economic and business conditions, changes in the nature and volume of the portfolio and in the terms of loans, changes in the experience, ability and depth of lending management, changes in the volume and severity of past due nonaccrual and adversely classified or graded loans, changes in the quality of the loan review system, changes in the value of underlying collateral for collateral-dependent loans, the existence and effect of any concentrations of credit and the effect of competition, legal and regulatory requirements and other external factors. The nature of the process by which we determine the appropriate allowance for loan losses requires the exercise of considerable judgment. While management utilizes its best judgment and information available, the ultimate adequacy of the allowance is dependent upon a variety of factors beyond our control, including the performance of the loan portfolio, the economy, changes in interest rates and the view of the regulatory authorities toward loan classifications. The allowance is increased by the provision for loan losses and decreased by charge-offs when management believes the uncollectibility of a loan is confirmed. Subsequent recoveries, if any are credited to the allowance. A weakening of the economy or other factors that adversely affect asset quality could result in an increase in the number of delinquencies, bankruptcies or defaults and a higher level of non-performing assets, net charge offs, and provision for loan losses in future periods.
The Company’s allowance for loan losses methodology consists of three elements (i) specific valuation allowances based on probable losses on specific loans; (ii) valuation allowances based on historical loan loss experience for similar loans with similar characteristics and trends; and (iii) general valuation allowances based on general economic conditions and other qualitative risk factors both internal and external to the Company. These elements support the basis for determining allocations between the various loan categories and the overall adequacy of our allowance to provide for probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio. These elements are further supported by additional analysis of relevant factors such as the historical losses in the portfolio, trends in the non-performing/non-accrual loans, loan delinquencies, the volume of the portfolio, peer group comparisons and federal regulatory policy for loan and lease losses. Other significant factors of portfolio analysis include changes in lending policies/underwriting standards, trends in volume and terms, portfolio composition and concentrations of credit, and trends in the national and local economy.
With these methodologies, a general allowance is established for each loan type based on historical losses for each loan type in the portfolio. Additionally, management allocates a specific allowance for “Impaired Credits”, which based on current information and events, it is probable the Company will not collect all amounts due according to the original contractual terms of the loan agreement. The level of the general allowance is established to provide coverage for management’s estimate of the credit risk in the loan portfolio by various loan segments not covered by the specific allowance.

 

38


Table of Contents

CORTLAND BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except for per share amounts)
Investment Securities and Impairment
The classification and accounting for investment securities are discussed in detail in Note 3 of the Consolidated Financial Statements presented elsewhere herein. Investment securities must be classified as held-to-maturity, available-for-sale, or trading. The appropriate classification is based partially on our ability to hold the securities to maturity and largely on management’s intentions, if any, with respect to either holding or selling the securities. The classification of investment securities is significant since it directly impacts the accounting for unrealized gains and losses on securities. Unrealized gains and losses on trading securities, if any, flow directly through earnings during the periods in which they arise, whereas available- for-sale securities are recorded as a separate component of shareholder’s equity (accumulated other comprehensive income or loss) and do not affect earnings until realized. The fair values of our investment securities are generally determined by reference to quoted market prices and reliable independent sources. At each reporting date, we assess whether there is an “other-than-temporary” impairment to our investment securities. Such impairment to the extent it is credit related, must be recognized in current earnings rather than in other comprehensive income (loss).
The Company reviews investment debt securities on an ongoing basis for the presence of other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI) with formal reviews performed quarterly. OTTI losses on individual investment securities were recognized during the first quarter of 2010 in accordance with FASB ASC topic 320, Investments – Debt and Equity Securities. The purpose of this ASC was to provide greater clarity to investors about the credit and noncredit component of an other-than-temporary impairment event and to communicate more effectively when an other-than-temporary impairment event has occurred. This ASC amends the other-than-temporary impairment guidance in GAAP for debt securities and improves the presentation and disclosure of other-than-temporary impairment on investment securities and changes the calculation of the other-than-temporary impairment recognized in earnings in the financial statements. This ASC does not amend existing recognition and measurement guidance related to other-than-temporary impairment of equity securities.
For debt securities, ASC topic 320 requires an entity to assess whether (a) it has the intent to sell the debt security, or (b) it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell the debt security before its anticipated recovery. If either of these conditions is met, an other-than-temporary impairment on the security must be recognized.
In instances in which a determination is made that a credit loss (defined as the difference between the present value of the cash flows expected to be collected and the amortized cost basis) exists but the entity does not intend to sell the debt security and it is not more likely than not that the entity will be required to sell the debt security before the anticipated recovery of its remaining amortized cost basis (i.e., the amortized cost basis less any current-period credit loss), ASC topic 320 changes the presentation and amount of the other-than-temporary impairment recognized in the income statement.
In these instances, the impairment is separated into (a) the amount of the total impairment related to the credit loss, and (b) the amount of the total impairment related to all other factors. The amount of the total other-than-temporary impairment related to the credit loss is recognized in earnings. The amount of the total impairment related to all other factors is recognized in other comprehensive income (loss). The total other-than-temporary impairment is presented in the income statement with an offset for the amount of the total other-than-temporary impairment that is recognized in other comprehensive income (loss).
Investment securities are discussed in more detail in Note 3 and Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements presented elsewhere herein.
Income Taxes
The provision for income taxes is based on income reported for financial statement purposes and differs from the amount of taxes currently payable, since certain income and expense items are reported for financial statement purposes in different periods than those for tax reporting purposes. Accrued taxes represent the net estimated amount due or to be received from taxing authorities. In estimating accrued taxes, we assess the relative merits and risks of the appropriate tax treatment of transactions taking into account statutory, judicial and regulatory guidance in the context of our tax position.
We account for income taxes using the asset and liability approach, the objective of which is to establish deferred tax assets and liabilities for the temporary differences between the financial reporting basis and tax basis of our assets and liabilities at enacted tax rates expected to be in effect when such amounts are realized or settled.

 

39


Table of Contents

CORTLAND BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
(Dollars in thousands, except for per share amounts)
Authoritative Accounting Guidance
In September 2009, the FASB issued new guidance impacting Topic 820. This creates a practical expedient to measure the fair value of an alternative investment that does not have a readily determinable fair value. This guidance also requires certain additional disclosures. This guidance is effective for interim and annual periods ending after December 15, 2009. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operation.
In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-04, Accounting for Various Topics – Technical Corrections to SEC Paragraphs. ASU 2010-04 makes technical corrections to existing SEC guidance including the following topics: accounting for subsequent investments, termination of an interest rate swap, issuance of financial statements — subsequent events, use of residual method to value acquired assets other than goodwill, adjustments in assets and liabilities for holding gains and losses, and selections of discount rate used for measuring defined benefit obligation. ASU 2010-04 is effective January 15, 2010. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position.
In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-06, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820): Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements. ASU 2010-06 amends Subtopic 820-10 to clarify existing disclosures, require new disclosures, and includes conforming amendments to guidance on employers’ disclosures about postretirement benefit plan assets. ASU 2010-06 is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the roll forward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. Those disclosures are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010 and for interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company has presented the necessary disclosures in the Note 8 herein. The Company does not expect the adoption of the remaining provisions of this ASU to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In February 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-09, Subsequent Events: Amendments to Certain Recognition and Disclosure Requirements (Topic 855). ASU No. 2010-09 removes some contradictions between the requirements of GAAP and the filing rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). SEC filers are required to evaluate subsequent events through the date the financial statements are issued, and they are no longer required to disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated. This guidance was effective upon issuance except for the use of the issued date for conduit debt obligors, and it is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations, financial position or disclosures.
The Company has been, until recently, entitled to engage in the expanded range of activities in which a financial holding company, as defined in Federal Reserve Board rules, may engage. However, the Company had not taken advantage of that expanded authority and has elected to rescind its financial holding company status. The Company is now entitled to engage in these activities deemed permissible to a bank holding company, as defined by Federal Reserve Board rules and the applicable laws of the United States.
Available Information
The Company files an annual report on Form 10K, quarterly reports on Form 10Q, current reports on Form 8K and amendments to those reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) pursuant to Section 13 (a) or (15) d of the Exchange Act. The Company’s Internet address is www.cortland-banks.com. The Company makes available through this address, free of charge, the reports filed, as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed, or otherwise furnished to the SEC. The SEC also maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC at www.sec.gov.

 

40


Table of Contents

CORTLAND BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
(Dollars in thousands, except for per share amounts)
Management considers interest rate risk to be the Company’s principal source of market risk. Interest rate risk is measured as the impact of interest rate changes on the Company’s net interest income. Components of interest rate risk comprise re-pricing risk, basis risk and yield curve risk. Re-pricing risk arises due to timing differences in the re-pricing of assets and liabilities as interest rate changes occur. Basis risk occurs when re-pricing assets and liabilities reference different key rates. Yield curve risk arises when a shift occurs in the relationship among key rates across the maturity spectrum.
The effective management of interest rate risk seeks to limit the adverse impact of interest rate changes on the Company’s net interest margin, providing the Company with the best opportunity for maintaining consistent earnings growth. Toward this end, Management uses computer simulation to model the Company’s financial performance under varying interest rate scenarios. These scenarios may reflect changes in the level of interest rates, changes in the shape of the yield curve, and changes in interest rate relationships.
The simulation model allows Management to test and evaluate alternative responses to a changing interest rate environment. Typically when confronted with a heightened risk of rising interest rates, the Company will evaluate strategies that shorten investment and loan re-pricing intervals and maturities, emphasize the acquisition of floating rate over fixed rate assets, and lengthen the maturities of liability funding sources. When the risk of falling rates is perceived, Management will typically consider strategies that shorten the maturities of funding sources, lengthen the re-pricing intervals and maturities of investments and loans, and emphasize the acquisition of fixed rate assets over floating rate assets.
The most significant assumptions used in the simulation relate to the cash flows and re-pricing characteristics of the Company’s balance sheet. Re-pricing and runoff rate assumptions are based on a detailed interface with actual customer information and investment data stored on the subsidiary bank’s information systems. Consensus prepayment speeds derived from an independent third party source are used to adjust the runoff cash flows for the impact of the specific interest rate environments under consideration. Simulated results are benchmarked against historical results. Actual results may differ from simulated results not only due to the timing, magnitude and frequency of interest rate changes, but also due to changes in general economic conditions, changes in customer preferences and behavior, and changes in strategies by both existing and potential competitors.
The table on the following page shows the Company’s current estimate of interest rate sensitivity based on the composition of the balance sheet at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009. For purposes of this analysis, short term interest rates as measured by the federal funds rate and the prime lending rate are assumed to increase (decrease) gradually over the subsequent twelve months reaching a level 300 basis points higher (lower) than the rates in effect at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 for the respective simulations. Under both the rising rate scenario and the falling rate scenario, the yield curve is assumed to exhibit a parallel shift.

 

41


Table of Contents

CORTLAND BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
(CONTINUED)
(Dollars in thousands, except for per share amounts)
Over the past twelve months, the Federal Reserve kept its target rate on overnight federal funds constant. At March 31, 2010, the difference between the yield on the ten-year Treasury and the three-month Treasury was a positive 368 basis points compared to a positive 379 basis points at December 31, 2009. With longer-term rates exceeding short-term rates the yield curve has a positive slope.
The base case against which interest rate sensitivity is measured assumes no change in short-term rates. The base case also assumes no growth in assets and liabilities and no change in asset or liability mix. Under these simulated conditions the base case projects net interest income of $16,420 for the twelve month period ending March 31, 2011.
                                                 
    Simulated Net Interest Income (NII) Scenarios  
    Fully Taxable Equivalent Basis  
    For the Twelve Months Ending  
    Net Interest Income     $ Changes in NII     %Change in NII  
Changes in   March 31,     Dec. 31,     March 31,     Dec. 31,     March 31,     Dec. 31,  
Interest Rates   2011     2010     2011     2010     2011     2010  
Graduated increase of +300 basis points
  $ 18,098     $ 18,093     $ 1,678     $ 1,298       10.2 %     7.7 %
Short-term rates unchanged
    16,420       16,795                                  
Graduated decrease of -300 basis points
    14,695       15,040       (1,725 )     (1,755 )     (10.5 %)     (10.4 %)
The level of interest rate risk indicated is within limits that Management considers acceptable. However, given that interest rate movements can be sudden and unanticipated, and are increasingly influenced by global events and circumstances beyond the purview of the Federal Reserve, no assurance can be made that interest rate movements will not impact key assumptions and parameters in a manner not presently embodied by the model.

 

42


Table of Contents

CORTLAND BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
It is Management’s opinion that hedging instruments currently available are not a cost effective means of controlling interest rate risk for the Company. Accordingly, the Company does not currently use financial derivatives, such as interest rate options, floors or other similar instruments.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. With the supervision and participation of management, including the Company’s principal executive officer and chief financial officer, the effectiveness of disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”)) has been evaluated as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, the Company’s principal executive officer and chief financial officer has concluded that such disclosure controls and procedures are, to the best of their knowledge, effective as of the end of the period covered by this report to ensure that material information relating to the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries is made known to them, particularly during the period for which our periodic reports, including this report, are being prepared.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that there have been no significant changes during the period covered by this report in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-13 and 15d-15 of the Exchange Act) that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, internal control over financial reporting.

 

43


Table of Contents

CORTLAND BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
See Note (5) of the financial statements.
Item 1A Risk Factors
There have been no material changes from the risk factors previously disclosed in response to Item 1A of Part 1 of Form 10-K filed March 31, 2010.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Not applicable
Company’s Common Stock. There were no repurchases of shares of the Company’s common stock during the three months ended March 31, 2010.
Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities
Not applicable
Item 4. (Removed and Reserved)
Item 5. Other Information
Not applicable

 

44


Table of Contents

CORTLAND BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
PART II — OTHER INFORMATION (CONTINUED)
Item 6. Exhibits
                                     
Exhibit       Incorporated by Reference     Filed  
No.   Exhibit Description   Form   Exhibit   Filing Date     Herewith  
 
3.1
    Restated Amended Articles of Cortland Bancorp reflecting amendment dated May 18, 1999. Note: filed for purposes of SEC reporting compliance only. This restated document has not been filed with the State of Ohio   10-K     3.1     03/16/06              
 
                                   
3.2
    Code of Regulations, as amended                              
 
                                   
 
    For the Bancorp   10-K     3.2     03/16/06              
 
    For Cortland Savings and Banking   10-K     3.2     03/15/07              
 
                                   
4
    The rights of holders of equity securities are defined in portions of the Articles of Incorporation and Code of Regulations as referenced in Exhibits 3.1 and 3.2   10-K     4     03/16/06              
 
                                   
*10.1
    Group Term Carve Out Plan dated February 23, 2001, by The Cortland Savings and Banking Company with each executive officer other than Rodger W. Platt and with selected other officers, as amended by the August 2002 letter amendment   10-K     10.1     03/16/06              
 
                                   
*10.2
    Group Term Carve Out Plan Amended Split Dollar Policy Endorsement entered into by The Cortland Savings and Banking Company on December 15, 2003 with Stephen A. Telego, Sr.   10-K     10.2     03/16/06              
 
                                   
*10.3
    Amended Director Retirement Agreement between Cortland Bancorp and Jerry A. Carleton, dated as of December 18, 2007   10-K     10.3     03/17/08              

 

45


Table of Contents

                           
Exhibit       Incorporated by Reference   Filed
No.   Exhibit Description   Form   Exhibit   Filing Date   Herewith
 
*10.4
    Amended Director Retirement Agreement between Cortland Bancorp and David C. Cole, dated as of December 18, 2007   10-K     10.4     03/17/08    
 
                         
*10.5
    Amended Director Retirement Agreement between Cortland Bancorp and George E. Gessner, dated as of December 18, 2007   10-K     10.5     03/17/08    
 
                         
*10.6
    Amended Director Retirement Agreement between Cortland Bancorp and William A. Hagood, dated as of October 12, 2003   10-K     10.6     03/16/06    
 
                         
*10.7
    Amended Director Retirement Agreement between Cortland Bancorp and James E. Hoffman III, dated as of December 18, 2007   10-K     10.7     03/17/08    
 
                         
*10.8
    Amended Director Retirement Agreement between Cortland Bancorp and Neil J. Kaback, dated as of December 18, 2007   10-K     10.8     03/17/08    
 
                         
*10.9
    Director Retirement Agreement between Cortland Bancorp and K. Ray Mahan, dated as of March 1, 2001   10-K     10.9     03/16/06    
 
                         
*10.10
    Amended Director Retirement Agreement between Cortland Bancorp and Richard B. Thompson, dated as of December 18, 2007   10-K     10.10     03/17/08    
 
                         
*10.11
    Amended Director Retirement Agreement between Cortland Bancorp and Timothy K. Woofter, dated as of December 18, 2007   10-K     10.11     03/17/08    

 

46


Table of Contents

                           
Exhibit       Incorporated by Reference   Filed
No.   Exhibit Description   Form   Exhibit   Filing Date   Herewith
 
*10.12
    Form of Split Dollar Agreement entered into by Cortland Bancorp and each of Directors David C. Cole, George E. Gessner, William A. Hagood, James E. Hoffman III, K. Ray Mahan, and Timothy K. Woofter as of February 23, 2001, as of March 1, 2004, with Director Neil J. Kaback, and as of October 1, 2001, with Director Richard B. Thompson;   10-K     10.12     03/16/06    
 
                         
 
    as amended on December 26, 2006, for Directors Cole, Gessner, Hoffman, Mahan, Thompson, and Woofter;   10-K     10.12     3/15/07    
 
                         
 
    Amended Split Dollar Agreement and Endorsement entered into by Cortland Bancorp as of December 18, 2007, with Director Jerry A. Carleton   10-K     10.12     03/17/08    
 
                         
10.13
    Reserved                    
 
                         
10.14
    Reserved                    
 
                         
*10.15
    Form of Indemnification Agreement entered into by Cortland Bancorp with each of its directors as of May 24, 2005   10-K     10.15     03/16/06    
 
                         
10.16
    Reserved                    
 
                         
*10.17
    Third Amended and Restated Salary Continuation Agreement between The Cortland Savings and Banking Company and Timothy Carney, dated as of December 3, 2008   8-K     10.17     12/12/08    
 
                         
*10.18
    Third Amended and Restated Salary Continuation Agreement between The Cortland Savings and Banking Company and Lawrence A. Fantauzzi, dated as of December 3, 2008   8-K     10.18     12/12/08    
 
                         
*10.19
    Third Amended and Restated Salary Continuation Agreement between The Cortland Savings and Banking Company and James M. Gasior, dated as of December 3, 2008   8-K     10.19     12/12/08    

 

47


Table of Contents

                           
Exhibit       Incorporated by Reference   Filed
No.   Exhibit Description   Form   Exhibit   Filing Date   Herewith
 
*10.20
    Second Amended Salary Continuation Agreement between The Cortland Savings and Banking Company and Marlene Lenio, dated as of December 3, 2008   8-K     10.20     12/12/08    
 
                         
*10.20.1
    Amendment of the December 3, 2008 Second Amended Salary Continuation Agreement between The Cortland Savings and Banking Company and Marlene J. Lenio                   ü
 
                         
*10.21
    Amended Salary Continuation Agreement between The Cortland Savings and Banking Company and Craig Phythyon, dated as of December 3, 2008   8-K     10.21     12/12/08    
 
                         
*10.21.1
    Amendment of the December 3, 2008 Second Amended Salary Continuation Agreement between The Cortland Savings and Banking Company and Craig M. Phythyon                   ü
 
                         
*10.22
    Third Amended and Restated Salary Continuation Agreement between The Cortland Savings and Banking Company and Stephen A. Telego, Sr., dated as of December 3, 2008   8-K     10.22     12/12/08    
 
                         
*10.22.1
    Amendment of the December 3, 2008 Second Amended Salary Continuation Agreement between The Cortland Savings and Banking Company and Stephen A. Telego, Sr.                   ü
 
                         
10.23
    Reserved                    
 
                         
*10.24
    Third Amended Split Dollar Agreement and Endorsement between The Cortland Savings and Banking Company and Timothy Carney, dated as of December 3, 2008   8-K     10.24     12/12/08    
 
                         
10.25
    Reserved                    
 
                         
*10.26
    Third Amended Split Dollar Agreement and Endorsement between The Cortland Savings and Banking Company and James M. Gasior, dated as of December 3, 2008   8-K     10.26     12/12/08    

 

48


Table of Contents

                           
Exhibit     Incorporated by Reference   Filed
No. Exhibit Description   Form   Exhibit   Filing Date   Herewith
 
*10.27
  Second Amended Split Dollar Agreement between The Cortland Savings and Banking Company and Marlene Lenio, dated as of December 3, 2008   8-K     10.27     12/12/08    
 
                       
*10.27.1
  Termination of the Second Amended Split Dollar Agreement between The Cortland Savings and Banking Company and Marlene Lenio                   ü
 
                       
*10.28
  Amended Split Dollar Agreement and Endorsement between The Cortland Savings and Banking Company and Craig Phythyon, dated as of December 3, 2008   8-K     10.28     12/12/08    
 
                       
*10.28.1
  Termination of the Second Amended Split Dollar Agreement between The Cortland Savings and Banking Company and Craig Phythyon                   ü
 
                       
*10.29
  Third Amended Split Dollar Agreement and Endorsement between The Cortland Savings and Banking Company and Stephen A. Telego, Sr., dated as of December 3, 2008   8-K     10.29     12/12/08    
 
                       
*10.29.1
  Termination of the Second Amended Split Dollar Agreement between The Cortland Savings and Banking Company and Stephen A. Telego, Sr.                   ü
 
                       
10.30
  Reserved                    
 
                       
*10.31
  Severance Agreement entered into by Cortland Bancorp and The Cortland Savings and Banking Company in December 3, 2008, with each of Timothy Carney, James M. Gasior, and Stephen A. Telego, Sr.   8-K     10.31     12/12/08    
 
                       
*10.32
  Severance Agreement entered into by Cortland Bancorp and The Cortland Savings and Banking Company in December 3, 2008, with each of Marlene Lenio, Craig M. Phythyon and Barbara Sandrock   8-K     10.32     12/12/08    

 

49


Table of Contents

                           
Exhibit       Incorporated by Reference   Filed
No.   Exhibit Description   Form   Exhibit   Filing Date   Herewith
 
                         
*10.32.1
    Termination of Severance Agreement entered into by each of Mses. Marlene Lenio and Barbara Sandrock and Messrs. Craig M. Phythyon and Stephen A. Telego, Sr.                   ü
 
                         
*10.33
    Agreement and General Release with Lawrence A. Fantauzzi   8-K     10.1     10/22/09    
 
                         
11
    Statement re computation of per share earnings       See Note 6 of financial statements        
 
                         
15
    Letter re unaudited interim financial statements         N/A          
 
                         
18
    Letter re change in accounting principles         N/A          
 
                         
19
    Report furnished to security holders         N/A          
 
                         
22
    Published report regarding matters submitted to vote of security holders         N/A          
 
                         
23
    Consents of experts and counsel — Consent of independent registered public Accounting firms         N/A          
 
                         
24
    Power of Attorney         N/A          
 
                         
31.1
    Certification of the Chief Executive Officer under Rule 13a-14(a)                   ü
 
                         
31.2
    Certification of the Chief Financial Officer under Rule 13a-14(a)                   ü
 
                         
32
    Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer required under section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002                   ü
     
*  
Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement
Copies of any exhibits will be furnished to shareholders upon written request. Requests should be directed to Tim Carney, Secretary, Cortland Bancorp, 194 West Main Street, Cortland, Ohio 44410.

 

50


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
         
  Cortland Bancorp
(Registrant)
 
 
DATED: May 17, 2010  /s/ James M. Gasior    
  James M. Gasior   
  (Chief Executive Officer)   
     
DATED: May 17, 2010  /s/ David J. Lucido    
  David J. Lucido   
  (Chief Financial Officer)   
 

 

51