e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from _______________ to ______________________
Commission File No. 001-33223
Oritani Financial Corp.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
United States
|
|
22-3617996 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number) |
370 Pascack Road, Township of
Washington, New Jersey 07676
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
(201) 664-5400
(Registrants telephone number)
(Former name or former address, if changed since last
report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been
subject to such requirements for the past 90 days.
YES
þ NO o.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
YES o NO o.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a small reporting company. See definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer o |
Accelerated filer þ |
Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Smaller Reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act).
YES o NO þ
As of May 4, 2010, there were 40,552,162 shares of the Registrants common stock, par value
$0.01 per share, issued and 37,041,184 outstanding, of which 27,575,476, or 74.4%, were held by
Oritani Financial Corp., MHC, the Registrants mutual holding company parent.
Oritani Financial Corp.
FORM 10-Q
Index
2
Part I. Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements
Oritani Financial Corp. and Subsidiaries
Township of Washington, New Jersey
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(in thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash on hand and in banks |
|
$ |
5,490 |
|
|
$ |
7,729 |
|
Federal funds sold and short term investments |
|
|
34,192 |
|
|
|
127,640 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
39,682 |
|
|
|
135,369 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, net |
|
|
1,418,034 |
|
|
|
1,278,623 |
|
Securities available for sale, at market value |
|
|
311,363 |
|
|
|
144,419 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities held to maturity,
market value of $78,740 and $120,381 at
March 31, 2010 and June 30, 2009, respectively |
|
|
76,858 |
|
|
|
118,817 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities available for sale,
at market value |
|
|
89,767 |
|
|
|
128,603 |
|
Bank Owned Life Insurance (at cash surrender value) |
|
|
30,250 |
|
|
|
29,385 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank of New York stock (FHLB), at cost |
|
|
24,996 |
|
|
|
25,549 |
|
Accrued interest receivable |
|
|
9,003 |
|
|
|
7,967 |
|
Investments in real estate joint ventures, net |
|
|
5,815 |
|
|
|
5,767 |
|
Real estate held for investment |
|
|
1,213 |
|
|
|
1,338 |
|
Real estate owned |
|
|
434 |
|
|
|
|
|
Office properties and equipment, net |
|
|
14,888 |
|
|
|
13,777 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
31,927 |
|
|
|
23,907 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
2,054,230 |
|
|
$ |
1,913,521 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
$ |
1,257,101 |
|
|
$ |
1,127,630 |
|
Borrowings |
|
|
496,637 |
|
|
|
508,991 |
|
Advance payments by borrowers for taxes and
insurance |
|
|
10,318 |
|
|
|
8,301 |
|
Accrued taxes payable |
|
|
6,198 |
|
|
|
|
|
Official checks outstanding |
|
|
3,507 |
|
|
|
2,699 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
26,386 |
|
|
|
25,802 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
1,800,147 |
|
|
|
1,673,423 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 80,000,000 shares authorized;
40,552,162 issued at March 31, 2010 and June 30, 2009
37,041,184 outstanding at March 31, 2010 and
37,133,684 outstanding at June 30, 2009 |
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
130 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
133,349 |
|
|
|
130,375 |
|
Unallocated common stock held by the employee stock
ownership plan |
|
|
(13,313 |
) |
|
|
(13,909 |
) |
Treasury stock, at cost; 3,510,978 shares at March 31, 2010
and 3,418,478 shares at June 30, 2009 |
|
|
(54,649 |
) |
|
|
(53,418 |
) |
Retained income |
|
|
186,884 |
|
|
|
176,199 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax |
|
|
1,682 |
|
|
|
721 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
254,083 |
|
|
|
240,098 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
$ |
2,054,230 |
|
|
$ |
1,913,521 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
3
Oritani Financial Corp. and Subsidiaries
Township of Washington, New Jersey
Consolidated Statements of Income
Three and Nine Months Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009
(in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
unaudited |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest on mortgage loans |
|
$ |
22,568 |
|
|
$ |
18,553 |
|
|
$ |
64,633 |
|
|
$ |
53,198 |
|
Interest on securities held to maturity and dividends on FHLB stock |
|
|
360 |
|
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
1,077 |
|
|
|
725 |
|
Interest on securities available for sale |
|
|
2,204 |
|
|
|
713 |
|
|
|
5,942 |
|
|
|
1,346 |
|
Interest on mortgage-backed securities held to maturity |
|
|
730 |
|
|
|
1,373 |
|
|
|
2,648 |
|
|
|
4,405 |
|
Interest on mortgage-backed securities available for sale |
|
|
1,141 |
|
|
|
1,763 |
|
|
|
3,859 |
|
|
|
5,436 |
|
Interest on federal funds sold and short term investments |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income |
|
|
27,020 |
|
|
|
22,608 |
|
|
|
78,266 |
|
|
|
65,127 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
5,016 |
|
|
|
6,680 |
|
|
|
17,139 |
|
|
|
17,796 |
|
Borrowings |
|
|
5,122 |
|
|
|
5,118 |
|
|
|
15,616 |
|
|
|
15,058 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense |
|
|
10,138 |
|
|
|
11,798 |
|
|
|
32,755 |
|
|
|
32,854 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income before
provision for loan losses |
|
|
16,882 |
|
|
|
10,810 |
|
|
|
45,511 |
|
|
|
32,273 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
2,500 |
|
|
|
2,400 |
|
|
|
7,550 |
|
|
|
7,775 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
14,382 |
|
|
|
8,410 |
|
|
|
37,961 |
|
|
|
24,498 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service charges |
|
|
435 |
|
|
|
255 |
|
|
|
1,191 |
|
|
|
863 |
|
Real estate operations, net |
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
280 |
|
|
|
960 |
|
|
|
982 |
|
Income from investments in real estate joint ventures |
|
|
229 |
|
|
|
196 |
|
|
|
837 |
|
|
|
739 |
|
Bank-owned life insurance |
|
|
278 |
|
|
|
294 |
|
|
|
866 |
|
|
|
837 |
|
Net gain on sale of assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,043 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net gain (loss) on sales of and writedowns of securities |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
(237 |
) |
|
|
(178 |
) |
|
|
(2,037 |
) |
Other income |
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income |
|
|
1,243 |
|
|
|
822 |
|
|
|
4,856 |
|
|
|
1,490 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation, payroll taxes and fringe benefits |
|
|
4,982 |
|
|
|
4,569 |
|
|
|
15,198 |
|
|
|
13,598 |
|
Advertising |
|
|
169 |
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
498 |
|
|
|
414 |
|
Office occupancy and equipment expense |
|
|
644 |
|
|
|
643 |
|
|
|
1,748 |
|
|
|
1,566 |
|
Data processing service fees |
|
|
298 |
|
|
|
270 |
|
|
|
844 |
|
|
|
799 |
|
Federal insurance premiums |
|
|
567 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
1,726 |
|
|
|
106 |
|
Other expenses |
|
|
764 |
|
|
|
984 |
|
|
|
2,404 |
|
|
|
2,595 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
7,424 |
|
|
|
6,662 |
|
|
|
22,418 |
|
|
|
19,078 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax expense |
|
|
8,201 |
|
|
|
2,570 |
|
|
|
20,399 |
|
|
|
6,910 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
3,189 |
|
|
|
1,067 |
|
|
|
7,975 |
|
|
|
2,862 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
5,012 |
|
|
$ |
1,503 |
|
|
$ |
12,424 |
|
|
$ |
4,048 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available to common stockholders |
|
$ |
4,870 |
|
|
$ |
1,472 |
|
|
$ |
12,098 |
|
|
$ |
3,967 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and fully diluted income per common share |
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.34 |
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
4
Oritani Financial Corp. and Subsidiaries
Township of Washington, New Jersey
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Equity
Nine Months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited)
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumu- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
lated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Un- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
allocated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
compre- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
common |
|
|
|
|
|
|
hensive |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
income |
|
|
stock- |
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
paid-in |
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
held by |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
(loss), |
|
|
holders |
|
|
|
Stock |
|
|
capital |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
ESOP |
|
|
income |
|
|
net of tax |
|
|
equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2008 |
|
$ |
130 |
|
|
$ |
128,656 |
|
|
$ |
(5,926 |
) |
|
$ |
(14,704 |
) |
|
$ |
171,160 |
|
|
$ |
(341 |
) |
|
$ |
278,975 |
|
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,048 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,048 |
|
Unrealized holding gain on securities
available for sale arising during
year, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
862 |
|
|
|
862 |
|
Reclassification adjustment for losses
included in net income, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
902 |
|
|
|
902 |
|
Amortization related to post-
retirement obligations, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
271 |
|
|
|
271 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive
income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,083 |
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting
for split-dollar life insurance, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(79 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(79 |
) |
Purchase of treasury stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(46,386 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(46,386 |
) |
Compensation cost for stock options
and restricted stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,653 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,653 |
|
ESOP shares allocated or committed
to be released |
|
|
|
|
|
|
331 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
596 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
927 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
130 |
|
|
$ |
131,640 |
|
|
$ |
(52,312 |
) |
|
$ |
(14,108 |
) |
|
$ |
175,129 |
|
|
$ |
1,694 |
|
|
$ |
242,173 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
130 |
|
|
$ |
130,375 |
|
|
$ |
(53,418 |
) |
|
$ |
(13,909 |
) |
|
$ |
176,199 |
|
|
$ |
721 |
|
|
$ |
240,098 |
|
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,424 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,424 |
|
Unrealized holding gain on securities
available for sale arising during
year, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
805 |
|
|
|
805 |
|
Reclassification adjustment for losses
included in net income, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
Amortization related to post-
retirement obligations, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive
income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,385 |
|
Cash dividend declared |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,739 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,739 |
) |
Purchase of treasury stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,231 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,231 |
) |
Compensation cost for stock options
and restricted stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,682 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,682 |
|
ESOP shares allocated or committed
to be released |
|
|
|
|
|
|
231 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
596 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
827 |
|
Tax benefit from stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
130 |
|
|
$ |
133,349 |
|
|
$ |
(54,649 |
) |
|
$ |
(13,313 |
) |
|
$ |
186,884 |
|
|
$ |
1,682 |
|
|
$ |
254,083 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
5
Oritani Financial Corp. and Subsidiaries
Township of Washington, New Jersey
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
12,424 |
|
|
$ |
4,048 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ESOP and stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
3,509 |
|
|
|
3,580 |
|
Depreciation of premises and equipment |
|
|
598 |
|
|
|
511 |
|
Amortization and accretion of premiums and discounts, net |
|
|
(42 |
) |
|
|
42 |
|
Provision for losses on loans |
|
|
7,550 |
|
|
|
7,775 |
|
Amortization and accretion of deferred loan fees, net |
|
|
(666 |
) |
|
|
(650 |
) |
Increase in deferred taxes |
|
|
(2,278 |
) |
|
|
(5,017 |
) |
Impairment charge on securities |
|
|
202 |
|
|
|
1,976 |
|
(Gain) loss on sale of securities |
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
61 |
|
Gain on sale of assets |
|
|
(1,043 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Writedown of real estate owned |
|
|
378 |
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in cash surrender value of bank owned life insurance |
|
|
(865 |
) |
|
|
(837 |
) |
Increase in accrued interest receivable |
|
|
(1,036 |
) |
|
|
(1,384 |
) |
(Increase) decrease in other assets |
|
|
(6,205 |
) |
|
|
387 |
|
Increase in other liabilities |
|
|
7,952 |
|
|
|
5,905 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
20,454 |
|
|
|
16,397 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in loans receivable |
|
|
(112,434 |
) |
|
|
(199,552 |
) |
Purchase of mortgage loans |
|
|
(34,673 |
) |
|
|
(34,593 |
) |
Purchase of securities available for sale |
|
|
(310,927 |
) |
|
|
(108,842 |
) |
Purchase of mortgage-backed securities available for sale |
|
|
(5,106 |
) |
|
|
(10,117 |
) |
Redemption (purchase) of Federal Home Loan Bank of New York stock |
|
|
553 |
|
|
|
(3,424 |
) |
Principal payments on mortgage-backed securities held to maturity |
|
|
32,375 |
|
|
|
30,200 |
|
Principal payments on mortgage-backed securities available for sale |
|
|
37,601 |
|
|
|
19,429 |
|
Proceeds from calls and maturities of securities available for sale |
|
|
145,750 |
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
Proceeds from sales of mortgage-backed securities held to maturity |
|
|
9,361 |
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sales of securities available for sale |
|
|
6,087 |
|
|
|
500 |
|
Purchase of Bank Owned Life Insurance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,833 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of real estate held for investment |
|
|
1,182 |
|
|
|
|
|
Additional investment in real estate held for investment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,978 |
) |
Distributions received from real estate held for investment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
546 |
|
Additional investment in real estate joint ventures |
|
|
(387 |
) |
|
|
(780 |
) |
Distributions received from real estate joint ventures |
|
|
401 |
|
|
|
363 |
|
Purchase of fixed assets |
|
|
(1,709 |
) |
|
|
(1,293 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(231,926 |
) |
|
|
(301,374 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in deposits |
|
|
129,471 |
|
|
|
303,108 |
|
Purchase of treasury stock |
|
|
(1,231 |
) |
|
|
(46,386 |
) |
Dividends paid to shareholders |
|
|
(2,177 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Tax benefit from stock-based compensation |
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in advance payments by borrowers for taxes and insurance |
|
|
2,017 |
|
|
|
887 |
|
Proceeds from borrowed funds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
341,225 |
|
Repayment of borrowed funds |
|
|
(12,354 |
) |
|
|
(265,154 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
115,787 |
|
|
|
333,680 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(95,687 |
) |
|
|
48,703 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
135,369 |
|
|
|
8,890 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
39,682 |
|
|
$ |
57,593 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
$ |
32,993 |
|
|
$ |
32,616 |
|
Income taxes |
|
$ |
2,793 |
|
|
$ |
4,888 |
|
Noncash transfer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans receivable transferred to real estate owned |
|
$ |
812 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Real Estate held for investment transferred to office property and equipment |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,690 |
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
6
Notes
to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
1. Basis of Presentation
The consolidated financial statements are composed of the accounts of Oritani Financial Corp., its
wholly owned subsidiaries, Oritani Bank (the Bank), Hampshire Financial, LLC, and Oritani, LLC, and
the wholly owned subsidiaries of Oritani Bank, Ormon LLC (Ormon), and Oritani Asset Corporation (a
real estate investment trust), collectively, the Company or Oritani.
In the opinion of management, all of the adjustments (consisting of normal and recurring
adjustments) necessary for the fair presentation of the consolidated financial condition and the
consolidated results of operations for the unaudited periods presented have been included. The
results of operations and other data presented for the three and nine month periods ended March 31,
2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations that may be expected for the
fiscal year ending June 30, 2010.
Certain information and note disclosures usually included in financial statements prepared in
accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted
pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for the
preparation of the Form 10-Q. The consolidated financial statements presented should be read in
conjunction with the Companys audited consolidated financial statements and notes to consolidated
financial statements included in the Companys June 30, 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 11, 2009.
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP). In June 2009, the Financial
Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued an update to Accounting Standard Codification 105-10,
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. This standard establishes the FASB Accounting Standard
Codification (Codification or ASC) as the source of authoritative U.S. GAAP recognized by the
FASB for nongovernmental entities. The Codification is effective for interim and annual periods
ending after September 15, 2009. The Codification is a reorganization of existing U.S. GAAP and
does not change existing U.S. GAAP. The Company adopted this standard for our financial statements
for periods ending after September 15, 2009. As a result, the Companys disclosures in its
consolidated financial statements and all future references to authoritative accounting literature
will be referenced in accordance with FASB ASC 105-10. The adoption had no impact on the Companys
financial position, results of operations, and earnings per share.
In preparing the consolidated financial statements, management is required to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities presented in the
Consolidated Balance Sheets at March 31, 2010 and June 30, 2009 and in the Consolidated Statements
of Income for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009. Actual results could differ
significantly from those estimates.
A material estimate that is particularly susceptible to significant changes relates to the
determination of the allowance for loan losses. The allowance for loan losses represents
managements best estimate of losses known and inherent in the portfolio that are both probable and
reasonable to estimate. While management uses the most current information available to estimate
losses on loans, actual losses are dependent on future events and, as such, increases in the
allowance for loan losses may be necessary.
In addition, various regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process,
periodically review the Banks allowance for loan losses. Such agencies may require the Bank to
recognize additions
7
to the allowance based on their judgments about information available to them
at the time of their examination.
2. Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share are computed by dividing income available to common stockholders by the
weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. ASC 260, Earnings Per
Share, provides that unvested share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to
dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are participating securities and shall
be included in the computation of earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method. We
determined that our outstanding nonvested restricted stock awards are participating securities.
Accordingly, earnings per common share is computed using the two-class method. The weighted
average common shares outstanding includes the average number of shares of common stock
outstanding, including shares held by Oritani Financial Corp., MHC and allocated or committed to be
released Employee Stock Ownership Plan shares.
Diluted earnings per share is computed using the same method as basic earnings per share, but
reflects the potential dilution that could occur if stock options were exercised and converted into
common stock and unvested shares of restricted stock were to vest. These potentially dilutive
shares would then be included in the weighted average number of shares outstanding for the period
using the treasury stock method. When applying the treasury stock method, we add: (1) the assumed
proceeds from option exercises; (2) the tax benefit that would have been credited to additional
paid-in capital assuming exercise of non-qualified stock options and vesting of shares of
restricted stock; and (3) the average unamortized compensation costs related to unvested shares of
restricted stock and stock options. We then divide this sum by our average stock price to calculate
shares assumed to be repurchased. The excess of the number of shares issuable over the number of
shares assumed to be repurchased is added to basic weighted average common shares to calculate
diluted EPS.
The following is a summary of the Companys earnings per share calculations and reconciliations of
net income to net income available to common shareholders and basic to diluted earnings per share.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months ended |
|
|
For the Nine Months ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(in thousands, except earnings per share data) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
5,012 |
|
|
$ |
1,503 |
|
|
$ |
12,424 |
|
|
$ |
4,048 |
|
Undistributed earnings allocated to unvested restricted awards |
|
|
(142 |
) |
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
(326 |
) |
|
|
(81 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available to common shareholders |
|
$ |
4,870 |
|
|
$ |
1,472 |
|
|
$ |
12,098 |
|
|
$ |
3,967 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding basic |
|
|
35,697 |
|
|
|
36,090 |
|
|
|
35,690 |
|
|
|
37,047 |
|
Effect of dilutive non-vested shares and stock options
outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding diluted |
|
|
35,697 |
|
|
|
36,090 |
|
|
|
35,690 |
|
|
|
37,047 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share-basic and diluted |
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.34 |
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
8
3. Stock Transactions
Stock Repurchase Program. On June 2, 2008, the Company announced a stock repurchase plan to
acquire up to 10% of its publicly-held outstanding shares of common stock, or 1,297,668 shares.
Additional stock repurchase plans were announced on: September 18, 2008, for 10% of the
publicly-held outstanding shares, or 1,173,008 shares, on November 21, 2008 for 10% of the
publicly-held outstanding shares, or 1,061,098 shares, and on March 18, 2009, for 10% of the
publicly-held outstanding shares, or 967,828 shares. Under the stock repurchase program, shares of
the Companys common stock may be purchased in the open market and through privately negotiated
transactions, from time to time, depending on market conditions and prices, the Companys liquidity
requirements and alternative uses of capital. At March 31, 2010, a total of 3,669,937 shares were
acquired under these repurchase plans at a weighted average cost of $15.57 per share. Repurchased
shares are held as treasury stock and are available for general corporate purposes. No additional
shares have been purchased through March 31, 2010. The remaining shares authorized under the March
18, 2009 repurchase plan total 596,291. The Company has no current intention of repurchasing those
shares on the open market.
Plan of Conversion and Reorganization. The Boards of Directors of Oritani Financial Corp., MHC and
the Company adopted a Plan of Conversion and Reorganization (the Plan) on February 19, 2010.
Pursuant to the Plan, the MHC will convert from the mutual holding company form of organization to
the fully public form. The MHC will be merged into the Company, and the MHC will no longer exist.
The Company will merge into a new Delaware corporation named Oritani Financial Corp. As part of
the conversion, the MHCs ownership interest of the Company will be offered for sale in a public
offering. The existing publicly held shares of the Company, which represents the remaining
ownership interest in the Company, will be exchanged for new shares of common stock of Oritani
Financial Corp., the new Delaware corporation. The exchange ratio will ensure that immediately
after the conversion and public offering, the public shareholders of the Company will own the same
aggregate percentage of Oritani Financial Corp. common stock that they owned immediately prior to
that time. When the conversion and public offering are completed, all of the capital stock of
Oritani Bank will be owned by Oritani Financial Corp.
The Plan provides for the establishment, upon the completion of the reorganization, of special
liquidation accounts for the benefit of certain depositors of Oritani Bank in an amount equal to
the greater of the MHCs ownership interest in the retained earnings of the Company as of the date
of the latest balance sheet contained in the prospectus or the retained earnings of Oritani Bank at
the time it reorganized into the MHC. Following the completion of the reorganization, under the
rules of the Office of Thrift Supervision, Oritani Bank will not be permitted to pay dividends on
its capital stock to Oritani Financial Corp., its sole shareholder, if Oritani Banks shareholders
equity would be reduced below the amount of the liquidation accounts.
Direct costs of the conversion and public offering are deferred and will reduce the proceeds from
the shares sold in the public offering. If the conversion and public offering are not completed,
all costs will
be charged to expense in the period in which the public offering is terminated. Deferred
conversion costs totaled $484,000 as of March 31, 2010.
9
4. Equity Incentive Plan
At the Special Meeting of Stockholders of the Company (the Meeting) held on April 22, 2008, the
stockholders of the Company approved the Oritani Financial Corp. 2007 Equity Incentive Plan. On May
7, 2008, certain officers and employees of the Company were granted in aggregate 1,311,457 stock
options and 588,171 shares of restricted stock, and non-employee directors received in aggregate
476,892 stock options and 206,652 shares of restricted stock. On November 21, 2008, 70,000 stock
options were granted at an exercise price equal to the market price of our common stock on the
grant date, based on quoted market prices. All option grants have a vesting period of five years
and an expiration period of ten years. The fair values of all options grants were estimated using
the Black Scholes option-pricing model using the following assumptions: an expected life of 6.5
years, risk-free rate of 3.37%, volatility of 28.22% and a dividend yield of 3.55%. The Company
adopted ASC 718, Compensation-Stock Compensation, upon approval of the Plan, and began to expense
the fair value of all share-based compensation granted over the requisite service periods.
Stock-based compensation expense of $897,000, $896,000, $2.7 million and $2.6 million was
recognized for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
The following is a summary of the status of the Companys non-vested options as of March 31, 2010
and changes therein during the nine months then ended:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Grant Date |
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
|
Stock Options |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Life (years) |
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2009 |
|
|
1,848,349 |
|
|
$ |
3.44 |
|
|
$ |
15.65 |
|
|
|
9.0 |
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
6,624 |
|
|
|
3.44 |
|
|
|
15.65 |
|
|
|
8.8 |
|
Expired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at March 31, 2010 |
|
|
1,841,725 |
|
|
$ |
3.44 |
|
|
$ |
15.65 |
|
|
|
8.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at March 31, 2010 |
|
|
368,345 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected future compensation expense related to the non-vested options outstanding as of March
31, 2010 is $3.5 million over a weighted average period of 3.1 years.
Upon exercise of vested options, management expects to draw on treasury stock as the source of the
shares.
The following is a summary of the status of the Companys restricted shares as of March 31, 2010
and changes therein during the nine months then ended:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Grant Date |
|
|
|
Awarded |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Non-vested at June 30, 2009 |
|
|
635,859 |
|
|
$ |
15.65 |
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested at March 31, 2010 |
|
|
635,859 |
|
|
$ |
15.65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
Expected future compensation expense relating to the non-vested restricted shares as of March
31, 2009 is $7.5 million over a weighted average period of 3.1 years.
5. Postretirement Benefits
The Company provides several post-retirement benefit plans to directors and to certain active and
retired employees. The Company has a nonqualified Directors Retirement Plan (the Retirement
Plan), a nonqualified Benefit Equalization Plan (BEP Plan) which provides benefits to employees who
are disallowed certain benefits under the Companys qualified benefit plans and a Post Retirement
Medical Plan (the Medical Plan) for directors and certain eligible employees. Net periodic benefit
costs for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 are presented in the following
table (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BEP Plan and Retirement Plan |
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
18 |
|
|
$ |
34 |
|
|
$ |
163 |
|
|
$ |
169 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
231 |
|
|
|
208 |
|
Amortization of
unrecognized: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior service cost |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
Net loss |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
142 |
|
|
$ |
168 |
|
|
$ |
496 |
|
|
$ |
473 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Medical Plan |
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
23 |
|
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
$ |
51 |
|
|
$ |
38 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
118 |
|
Amortization of
unrecognized: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior service cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
74 |
|
|
$ |
51 |
|
|
$ |
221 |
|
|
$ |
196 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
6. Net Loans and Allowance for Loan Loss
Net Loans are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Residential |
|
$ |
247,273 |
|
|
$ |
265,962 |
|
Multi-family |
|
|
334,433 |
|
|
|
277,589 |
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
689,546 |
|
|
|
562,138 |
|
Second mortgage and equity loans |
|
|
49,153 |
|
|
|
54,769 |
|
Construction loans |
|
|
105,382 |
|
|
|
130,831 |
|
Other loans |
|
|
21,497 |
|
|
|
10,993 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans |
|
|
1,447,284 |
|
|
|
1,302,282 |
|
Deferred loan fees, net |
|
|
(4,657 |
) |
|
|
(2,979 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, net of deferred loan fees |
|
|
1,442,627 |
|
|
|
1,299,303 |
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
(24,593 |
) |
|
|
(20,680 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loans |
|
$ |
1,418,034 |
|
|
$ |
1,278,623 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The activity in the allowance for loan losses is summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
$ |
22,164 |
|
|
$ |
18,907 |
|
|
$ |
20,680 |
|
|
$ |
13,532 |
|
Provisions charged to operations |
|
|
2,500 |
|
|
|
2,400 |
|
|
|
7,550 |
|
|
|
7,775 |
|
Recoveries of loans previously charged off |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Loans charged off |
|
|
(71 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,640 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
$ |
24,593 |
|
|
$ |
21,307 |
|
|
$ |
24,593 |
|
|
$ |
21,307 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys allowance for loan losses is analyzed quarterly and many factors are considered,
including growth in the portfolio, delinquencies, nonaccrual loan levels, and other environmental
factors. See discussion of delinquent loans in Comparison of Financial Condition at March 31,
2010 and June 30, 2009.
12
7. Mortgage-backed Securities Held to Maturity
The following is a comparative summary of mortgage-backed securities held to maturity at March 31,
2010 and June 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
fair |
|
|
|
cost |
|
|
gains |
|
|
losses |
|
|
value |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Mortgage-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FHLMC |
|
$ |
14,082 |
|
|
|
393 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,475 |
|
FNMA |
|
|
23,181 |
|
|
|
567 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,748 |
|
GNMA |
|
|
2,354 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,365 |
|
CMO |
|
|
37,241 |
|
|
|
911 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,152 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
76,858 |
|
|
|
1,882 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78,740 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
fair |
|
|
|
cost |
|
|
gains |
|
|
losses |
|
|
value |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Mortgage-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FHLMC |
|
$ |
18,783 |
|
|
|
287 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
19,063 |
|
FNMA |
|
|
31,329 |
|
|
|
616 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
31,943 |
|
GNMA |
|
|
5,161 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
5,157 |
|
CMO |
|
|
63,544 |
|
|
|
913 |
|
|
|
239 |
|
|
|
64,218 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
118,817 |
|
|
|
1,832 |
|
|
|
268 |
|
|
|
120,381 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from the sale of securities held to maturity for the nine months ended March 31, 2010
were $9.4 million, resulting in gross gains and gross losses of $41,000 and $148,000, respectively.
These securities had an amortized cost of $9.5 million. The held to maturity securities sold were
mortgage backed securities with 15% or less of their original purchased balances remaining. The
Company did not sell any mortgage-backed securities held to maturity during the nine months ended
March 31, 2009. Mortgage-backed securities with fair values of $77.9 million and $120.4 million at
March 31, 2010 and June 30, 2009, respectively, were pledged to FHLB of New York (FHLBNY) as
collateral for advances. The Company did not record other than temporary impairment charges on
securities held to maturity during the nine months ended March 31, 2010, or 2009.
The contractual maturities of mortgage-backed securities held-to-maturity generally exceed 20
years; however, the effective lives are expected to be shorter due to anticipated prepayments.
Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to
call or prepay obligations with or without penalties.
13
At March 31, 2010, there were no gross unrealized losses on mortgage-backed securities held to
maturity. Gross unrealized losses on mortgage-backed securities held to maturity and the estimated
fair value of the related securities, aggregated by security category and length of time that
individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position at June 30, 2009, were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
Less than 12 months |
|
|
Greater than 12 months |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
|
fair value |
|
|
losses |
|
|
fair value |
|
|
losses |
|
|
fair value |
|
|
losses |
|
Mortgage-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FHLMC |
|
$ |
805 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1,012 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
1,817 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
FNMA |
|
|
845 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
845 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
GNMA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,009 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
2,009 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
CMO |
|
|
8,214 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
2,284 |
|
|
|
196 |
|
|
|
10,498 |
|
|
|
239 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
9,864 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
5,305 |
|
|
|
221 |
|
|
|
15,169 |
|
|
|
268 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The unrealized losses on investments in mortgage-backed securities at June 30, 2009 were
caused by interest rate changes. The contractual cash flows of these securities are guaranteed by
Fannie Mae, Ginnie Mae and Freddie Mac. The majority of the contractual cash flows of the CMOs
are guaranteed by these agencies as well. Because the decline in fair value was attributable to
changes in interest rates and not credit quality, and because the Company had no intent to sell and
believed it was not more likely than not that it would be required to sell these investments until
a market price recovery or maturity, these investments were not considered other than temporarily
impaired. The Company had one AAA rated private label CMO investment with an amortized cost of
$946,000 and a fair value of $809,000. This security was sold on December 11, 2009 resulting in a
realized loss of $137,000.
8. Securities and Mortgage-Backed Securities Available for Sale
The following is a comparative summary of securities and mortgage-backed securities available for
sale at March 31, 2010 and June 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
market |
|
|
|
cost |
|
|
gains |
|
|
losses |
|
|
value |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Securities available for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.
Government and federal agency obligations |
|
$ |
300,693 |
|
|
|
1,767 |
|
|
|
240 |
|
|
|
302,220 |
|
Corporate bonds |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,079 |
|
Mutual funds |
|
|
4,910 |
|
|
|
210 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,120 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
1,763 |
|
|
|
181 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,944 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
309,366 |
|
|
|
2,237 |
|
|
|
240 |
|
|
|
311,363 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FHLMC |
|
$ |
20,399 |
|
|
|
977 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
21,349 |
|
FNMA |
|
|
24,390 |
|
|
|
1,024 |
|
|
|
256 |
|
|
|
25,158 |
|
CMO |
|
|
41,993 |
|
|
|
1,267 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,260 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
86,782 |
|
|
|
3,268 |
|
|
|
283 |
|
|
|
89,767 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
fair |
|
|
|
cost |
|
|
gains |
|
|
losses |
|
|
value |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Securities available for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.
Government and federal agency obligations |
|
$ |
134,754 |
|
|
|
532 |
|
|
|
449 |
|
|
|
134,837 |
|
Corporate bonds |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,156 |
|
Mutual funds |
|
|
5,636 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,676 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
1,965 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
230 |
|
|
|
1,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
144,355 |
|
|
|
743 |
|
|
|
679 |
|
|
|
144,419 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FHLMC |
|
$ |
26,979 |
|
|
|
945 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
27,875 |
|
FNMA |
|
|
27,023 |
|
|
|
889 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
27,911 |
|
GNMA |
|
|
2,537 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2,557 |
|
CMO |
|
|
68,571 |
|
|
|
1,689 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,260 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
125,110 |
|
|
|
3,544 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
128,603 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The amortized cost and estimated fair value of securities available for sale other than mutual
funds, equity securities and mortgage-backed securities at March 31, 2010, by contractual maturity,
are shown below. Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may
have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without penalties.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
fair |
|
|
|
cost |
|
|
value |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due in one year through five years |
|
$ |
287,716 |
|
|
|
289,263 |
|
Due after five years through ten years |
|
|
14,977 |
|
|
|
15,036 |
|
Mutual funds and equity securities |
|
|
6,673 |
|
|
|
7,064 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
309,366 |
|
|
|
311,363 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
$ |
86,232 |
|
|
|
89,214 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from the sale of mortgage-backed securities available for sale for the nine months
ended March 31, 2010 were $6.1 million, resulting in gross gains and gross losses of $112,000 and
$5,000, respectively. These securities had an amortized cost of $6.0 million. The Mutual Fund
caption relates to holdings of shares in an Asset Management Fund with underlying investments in
adjustable rate mortgages and was deemed other-than-temporarily impaired during fiscal 2009. The
Company recorded a non-cash impairment charge to earnings of $1.6 million for the nine months ended
March 31, 2009 on the mutual fund, there were no impairment charges on this security for the nine
months ended March 31,
2010. Proceeds from the sale of the mutual fund were $750,000 and $500,000 for the nine months
ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, resulting in a gain of $24,000 for the nine months
ended March 31, 2010 and a loss of $61,000 for the nine months ended March 31, 2009. The Equity
securities caption relates to holdings of shares in financial institutions common stock. During
fiscal 2010 and 2009 several of these holdings were deemed other-than-temporarily impaired. The
Company recorded a non-cash
15
impairment charge to earnings of $202,000 and $399,000 for the nine
months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, on the equity securities. Available for sale
securities with fair values of $347.1 million and $127.5 million at March 31, 2010 and June 30,
2009, respectively, were pledged to the FHLB of New York (FHLBNY) as collateral for advances.
Gross unrealized losses on securities and mortgage-backed securities available for sale and the
estimated fair value of the related securities, aggregated by security category and length of time
that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position at March 31, 2010 and
June 30, 2009 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
Less than 12 months |
|
|
Greater than 12 months |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
|
market value |
|
|
losses |
|
|
market value |
|
|
losses |
|
|
market value |
|
|
losses |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Securities available for sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.
Government and federal agency obligations |
|
$ |
54,496 |
|
|
|
240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,496 |
|
|
|
240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
54,496 |
|
|
|
240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,496 |
|
|
|
240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FHLMC |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,467 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
2,467 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
FNMA |
|
|
4,831 |
|
|
|
256 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,831 |
|
|
|
256 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,831 |
|
|
|
256 |
|
|
|
2,467 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
7,298 |
|
|
|
283 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
Less than 12 months |
|
|
Greater than 12 months |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
|
market value |
|
|
losses |
|
|
market value |
|
|
losses |
|
|
market value |
|
|
losses |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Securities available for sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.
Government and federal agency obligations |
|
$ |
79,202 |
|
|
|
449 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79,202 |
|
|
|
449 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
654 |
|
|
|
230 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
654 |
|
|
|
230 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
79,856 |
|
|
|
679 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79,856 |
|
|
|
679 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FHLMC |
|
$ |
4,501 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,501 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
FNMA |
|
|
1,801 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,801 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
GNMA |
|
|
501 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
501 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6,803 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,803 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, 2010, management has evaluated the securities in the above table and has
concluded that none of the securities with losses has impairments that are other-than-temporary.
The securities that have been in an unrealized loss position for 12 months or longer include
mortgage backed securities whose market values are sensitive to interest rates.
9. Fair Value Measurements
The Company adopted ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, on July 1, 2008. Under ASC
820, fair value measurements are not adjusted for transaction costs. ASC 820 establishes a fair
value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value.
The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for
identical assets or liabilities (level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable
inputs (level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy under FASB ASC 820 are
described below:
16
Basis of Fair Value Measurement:
Level 1: Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement
date for identical unrestricted assets or liabilities;
Level 2: Quoted prices in markets that are not active, or inputs that are observable either
directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability;
Level 3: Price or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant to the
fair value measurement and unobservable (i.e. supported with little or no market activity).
A financial instruments level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of
input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
The Companys cash instruments are generally classified within Level 1 or Level 2 of the fair value
hierarchy because they are valued using quoted market prices, broker or dealer quotations, or
alternative pricing sources with reasonable levels of price transparency.
The types of instruments whose values are based on quoted market prices in active markets include
most U.S. government and agency securities, mortgage-backed securities, many other sovereign
government obligations, and active listed securities. Such instruments are generally classified
within Level 1 or Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. As required by ASC 820, the Company does
not adjust the quoted price for such instruments.
The following table sets forth the Companys financial assets that were accounted for at fair
values on a recurring basis as of March 31, 2010 and June 30, 2009 by level within the fair value
hierarchy. As required by ASC 820, financial assets are classified in their entirety based on the
lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurements (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in Active |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Markets for |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identical |
|
|
Observable |
|
|
Unobservable |
|
|
|
Fair Value as of |
|
|
Assets |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
Inputs |
|
Assets: |
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
Securities available for sale |
|
$ |
311,363 |
|
|
$ |
47,131 |
|
|
$ |
264,232 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
available for sale |
|
|
89,767 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
89,767 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
401,130 |
|
|
$ |
47,131 |
|
|
$ |
353,999 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in Active |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Markets for |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identical |
|
|
Observable |
|
|
Unobservable |
|
|
|
Fair Value as of |
|
|
Assets |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
Inputs |
|
Assets: |
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
Securities available for sale |
|
$ |
144,419 |
|
|
$ |
27,102 |
|
|
$ |
117,318 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
available for sale |
|
|
128,604 |
|
|
|
1,141 |
|
|
|
127,463 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
273,023 |
|
|
$ |
28,243 |
|
|
$ |
244,781 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Also, the Company may be required, from time to time, to measure the fair value of certain
other financial assets on a nonrecurring basis in accordance with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles. The adjustments to fair value usually result from the application of
lower-of-cost-or-market accounting or write downs of individual assets.
Impaired Loans: The Company had impaired loans with outstanding principal balances of $22.5 million
and $20.0 million at March 31, 2010 and June 30, 2009, respectively, that were recorded at their
estimated fair value (less cost to sell) of $20.5 million and $16.7 million at March 31, 2010 and
June 30, 2009, respectively. Specific reserves for impaired loans totaled $2.1 million at March
31, 2010 and $3.3 million at June 30, 2009. The Company recorded net impairment charges of $1.6
million and $4.0 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Impaired
loans are valued utilizing current appraisals adjusted downward by management, as necessary, for
changes in relevant valuation factors subsequent to the appraisal date and are considered level 3
inputs.
Other Real Estate Owned: The Company had assets acquired through or deed-in-lieu of foreclosure of
$434,000 at March 31, 2010. There were no other real estate owned at June 30, 2009 and 2008.
Other real estate owned is recorded at estimated fair value less estimated selling costs when
acquired, thus establishing a new cost basis. Fair value is generally based on independent
appraisals. These appraisals include adjustments to comparable assets based on the appraisers
market knowledge and experience, and are considered level 3 inputs. When an asset is acquired, the
excess of the loan balance over fair value, less estimated selling costs, is charged to the
allowance for loan losses. If the estimated fair value of the asset declines, a write-down is
recorded through expense. The valuation of foreclosed assets is subjective in nature and may be
adjusted in the future because of changes in the economic conditions. Subsequent valuation
adjustments to other real estate owned totaled $378,000 for the nine months ended March 31, 2010,
reflective of continued deterioration in estimated fair values. Operating costs after acquisition
are expensed.
10. Fair Value of Financial Instruments
ASC 825, Financial Instruments, requires that the Company disclose estimated fair values for its
financial instruments. Fair value estimates, methods and assumptions are set forth below for the
Companys financial instruments.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
For cash on hand and due from banks and federal funds sold and short-term investments, the carrying
amount approximates fair value.
18
Securities
The fair value of securities is estimated based on bid quotations received from securities dealers,
if available. If a quoted market price is not available, fair value is estimated using quoted
market prices of similar instruments, adjusted for differences between the quoted instruments and
the instruments being valued.
FHLB of New York Stock
The fair value for FHLB stock is its carrying value, since this is the amount for which it could be
redeemed. There is no active market for this stock and the Bank is required to maintain a minimum
balance based upon the unpaid principal of home mortgage loans.
Loans
Fair values are estimated for portfolios of loans with similar financial characteristics. Loans
are segregated by type such as residential mortgage, construction, land and consumer. Each loan
category is further segmented into fixed and adjustable rate interest terms and by performing and
nonperforming categories. This method of estimating fair value does not incorporate the exit-price
concept of fair value prescribed by ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures.
Fair value of performing loans is estimated by discounting cash flows using estimated market
discount rates at which similar loans would be made to borrowers and reflect similar credit ratings
and interest rate risk for the same remaining maturities.
Fair value for significant nonperforming loans is based on recent external appraisals of collateral
securing such loans, adjusted for the timing of anticipated cash flows.
Deposit Liabilities
The fair value of deposits with no stated maturity, such as noninterest-bearing demand deposits,
savings, and NOW and money market accounts, is equal to the amount payable on demand as of March
31, 2010 and June 30, 2009. The fair value of certificates of deposit is based on the discounted
value of contractual cash flows. The discount rate is estimated using the rates currently offered
for deposits of similar remaining maturities.
Borrowings
The fair value of borrowings due in six months or less is equal to the amount payable. The fair
value of all other borrowings is calculated based on the discounted cash flow of contractual
amounts due, using market rates currently available for borrowings of similar amount and remaining
maturity.
Commitments to Extend Credit and to Purchase or Sell Securities
The fair value of commitments to extend credit is estimated using the fees currently charged to
enter into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and the
present creditworthiness of the counterparties. For fixed rate loan commitments, fair value also
considers the difference between current levels of interest rates and the committed rates. The fair
value of commitments to purchase or sell securities is estimated based on bid quotations received
from securities dealers.
19
The estimated fair values of the Companys financial instruments are presented in the following
table. Since the fair value of off-balance-sheet commitments approximates book value, these
disclosures are not included.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
Carrying |
|
Fair |
|
Carrying |
|
Fair |
|
|
value |
|
value |
|
value |
|
value |
|
|
(In thousands) |
Financial assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
39,682 |
|
|
|
39,682 |
|
|
|
135,369 |
|
|
|
135,369 |
|
Securities available for sale |
|
|
311,363 |
|
|
|
311,363 |
|
|
|
144,419 |
|
|
|
144,419 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities
held to maturity |
|
|
76,858 |
|
|
|
78,740 |
|
|
|
118,817 |
|
|
|
120,381 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities
available for sale |
|
|
89,767 |
|
|
|
89,767 |
|
|
|
128,603 |
|
|
|
128,603 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank of
New York stock |
|
|
24,996 |
|
|
|
24,996 |
|
|
|
25,549 |
|
|
|
25,549 |
|
Loans |
|
|
1,418,034 |
|
|
|
1,437,665 |
|
|
|
1,278,623 |
|
|
|
1,292,394 |
|
Financial liabilities deposits |
|
|
1,257,101 |
|
|
|
1,258,052 |
|
|
|
1,127,630 |
|
|
|
1,130,285 |
|
Financial liabilities borrowings |
|
|
496,637 |
|
|
|
530,641 |
|
|
|
508,991 |
|
|
|
547,202 |
|
Limitations
Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time, based on relevant market information and
information about the financial instrument. These estimates do not reflect any premium or discount
that could result from offering for sale at one time the Companys entire holdings of a particular
financial instrument. Because no market exists for a significant portion of the Companys financial
instruments, fair value estimates are based on judgments regarding future expected loss experience,
current economic conditions, risk characteristics of various financial instruments, and other
factors. These estimates are subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and matters of
significant judgment and, therefore, cannot be determined with precision. Changes in assumptions
could significantly affect the estimates.
Fair value estimates are based on existing on- and off-balance-sheet financial instruments without
attempting to estimate the value of anticipated future business and the value of assets and
liabilities that are not considered financial instruments. Significant assets and liabilities that
are not considered financial assets or liabilities include the mortgage banking operation, deferred
tax assets, and premises and equipment. In addition, the tax ramifications related to the
realization of the unrealized gains and losses can have a significant effect on fair value
estimates and have not been considered in the estimates.
11. Deposits
Deposits are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand deposit accounts |
|
$ |
122,639 |
|
|
$ |
88,759 |
|
Money market accounts |
|
|
300,738 |
|
|
|
199,965 |
|
Savings accounts |
|
|
147,620 |
|
|
|
147,669 |
|
Time deposits |
|
|
686,104 |
|
|
|
691,237 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits |
|
$ |
1,257,101 |
|
|
$ |
1,127,630 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
12. Income Taxes
In June 2006, the FASB issued ASC 740, Income Taxes, which establishes a recognition threshold
and measurement for income tax positions recognized in an enterprises financial statements. ASC
740 also prescribes a two-step evaluation process for tax positions. The first step is recognition
and the second is measurement. For recognition, an enterprise judgmentally determines whether it is
more-likely-than-not that a tax position will be sustained upon examination, including resolution
of related appeals or litigation processes, based on the technical merits of the position. If the
tax position meets the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold it is measured and recognized in
the financial statements as the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50% likely of
being realized. If a tax position does not meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold, the
benefit of that position is not recognized in the financial statements. The Company recognizes
accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits, where applicable, in income
tax expense.
Tax positions that meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold at the effective date of ASC
740 may be recognized or, continue to be recognized, upon adoption of this standard. The cumulative
effect of applying the provisions of ASC 740 shall be reported as an adjustment to the opening
balance of retained earnings for that fiscal year. The Company adopted ASC 740 on July 1, 2007.
The adoption of ASC 740 resulted in a $900,000 transition adjustment which increased retained
income at July 1, 2007. The Company, through its various wholly owned subsidiaries, deploys
several tax strategies. Based on the facts surrounding these strategies and applicable laws, the
Company believes these strategies are more likely than not of being sustained under examination.
The Company believes it will receive 100% of the benefit of the tax positions and has recognized
the effects of the tax positions in the financial statements.
The Company files income tax returns in the United States federal jurisdiction and in New Jersey
and Pennsylvania state jurisdictions. The Company is no longer subject to federal and state income
tax examinations by tax authorities for years prior to 2004. Currently, the Company is not under
examination by any taxing authority.
13. Real Estate Joint Ventures, net and Real Estate Held for Investment
The Company accounts for investments in joint ventures under the equity method. The balance
reflects the cost basis of investments, plus the Companys share of income earned on the joint
venture operations, less cash distributions, including excess cash distributions, and the Companys
share of losses on joint venture operations. Cash received in excess of the Companys recorded
investment in a joint venture is recorded as unearned revenue in other liabilities. The net book
value of real estate joint ventures was $5.5 million and $5.6 million at March 31, 2010 and June
30, 2009, respectively.
Real estate held for investment includes the Companys undivided interest in real estate properties
accounted for under the equity method and properties held for investment purposes. Cash received
in excess of the Companys recorded investment for an undivided interest in real estate property is
recorded as unearned revenue in other liabilities. The operations of the properties held for
investment purposes are reflected in the financial results of the Company and included in the Other
Income caption in the Income Statement. Properties held for investment purposes are carried at
cost less accumulated depreciation. The net book value of real estate held for investment was
$(229,000) and $(91,000) at March 31, 2010 and June 30, 2009, respectively.
21
14. Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In February 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2010-09, Subsequent Events
(Topic 855): Amendments to Certain Recognition and Disclosure Requirements. ASU 2010-09 addresses
both the interaction of the requirements of Topic 855 with the SECs reporting requirements and the
intended breadth of the reissuance disclosures provisions related to subsequent events. An entity
that is an SEC filer is not required to disclose the date through which subsequent events have been
evaluated. The guidance is effective immediately. The adoption of the new guidance did not have
a material impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-06, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820):
Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements. The update amends Subtopic 820-10 to clarify
existing disclosures, require new disclosures, and includes conforming amendments to guidance on
employers disclosures about postretirement benefit plan assets. ASU 2010-06 is effective for
interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for disclosures about
purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the roll forward of activity in Level 3 fair value
measurements. Those disclosures are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010
and for interim periods within those fiscal years. The adoption of the new guidance did not have a
material impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In June 2009, the FASB issued ASC 810 (formerly Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.
167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R)), relating to the variable interest entities
(VIE). The objective of the guidance is to improve financial reporting by enterprises involved
with VIEs and to provide more relevant and reliable information to users of financial statements.
ASC 810 addresses the effects of eliminating the qualifying special-purpose entity concept,
changes the approach to determining the primary beneficiary of a VIE and requires companies to
assess more frequently whether a VIE must be consolidated. These provisions also require enhanced
interim and year-end disclosures about the significant judgments and assumptions considered in
determining whether a VIE must be consolidated, the nature of restrictions on a consolidated VIEs
assets, the risks associated with a companys involvement with a VIE and how that involvement
affects the companys financial position, financial performance and cash flows. This guidance is
effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2009 and for interim periods within those
fiscal years with early application prohibited. The Company does not expect the adoption of this
guidance to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements
In June 2009, the FASB issued guidance which amends the derecognition guidance in topic 860,
Transfer and Servicing, to enhance reporting about transfers of financial assets, including
securitizations, and where companies having continuing exposure to the risks related to transferred
financial assets. The guidance eliminates the concept of qualifying special-purpose entity,
changes the requirements for derecognizing financial assets and requires additional disclosures
about all continuing involvements with transferred financial assets including information about
gains and losses resulting from transfers during the period. This guidance is effective for
financial asset transfers occurring in fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2009. The Company
does not expect the adoption of this guidance to have a material impact on its consolidated
financial statements.
In 2008, the FASB issued Staff Position No. FAS 132(R)-1, Employers Disclosures about
Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets (ASC Topic 715-20-65). This guidance will expand disclosure by
requiring the following new disclosures: 1) how investment allocation decisions are made by
management; 2) major categories of plan assets; and 3) significant concentrations of risk.
Additionally, ASC 715-20-65 will require an employer to disclose information about the valuation of
plan assets similar to that required in ASC topic 820 Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures.
This guidance is effective
22
for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2009. The Company does not expect the adoption to
have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements.
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Forward Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report contains certain forward looking statements within the meaning of
Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Such forward looking statements may be identified by reference to a future period or periods, or by
use of forward looking terminology, such as may, will, believe, expect, estimate,
anticipate, continue, or similar terms or variations on those terms, or the negative of those
terms. Forward looking statements are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, including, but
not limited to, those related to the economic environment, particularly in the market areas in
which Oritani Financial Corp. (the Company) operates, competitive products and pricing, fiscal
and monetary policies of the U.S. Government, changes in government regulations affecting financial
institutions, including regulatory fees and capital requirements, changes in prevailing interest
rates, acquisitions and the integration of acquired businesses, credit risk management,
asset-liability management, the financial and securities markets and the availability of and costs
associated with sources of liquidity.
The Company wishes to caution readers not to place undue reliance on any such forward looking
statements, which speak only as of the date made. The Company wishes to advise readers that the
factors listed above could affect the Companys financial performance and could cause the Companys
actual results for future periods to differ materially from any opinions or statements expressed
with respect to future periods in any current statements. The Company does not undertake and
specifically declines any obligation to publicly release the results of any revisions, which may be
made to any forward looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of such
statements or to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events.
Overview
Oritani Financial Corp. is the federally chartered mid-tier stock holding company of Oritani
Bank. Oritani Financial Corp. owns 100% of the outstanding shares of common stock of Oritani Bank.
Since being formed in 1998, Oritani Financial Corp. has engaged primarily in the business of
holding the common stock of Oritani Bank and two limited liability companies that own a variety of
real estate investments. In addition, Oritani Financial Corp. has engaged in limited lending to
the real estate investment properties in which (either directly or through one of its subsidiaries)
Oritani Financial Corp. has an ownership interest. Oritani Banks principal business consists of
attracting retail and commercial bank deposits from the general public and investing those
deposits, together with funds generated from operations, in multi-family and commercial real estate
loans, one- to four-family residential mortgage loans as well as in second mortgage and equity
loans, construction loans, business loans, other consumer loans, and investment securities. We
originate loans primarily for investment and hold such loans in our portfolio. Occasionally, we
will also enter into loan participations. Our primary sources of funds are deposits, borrowings
and principal and interest payments on loans and securities. Our revenues are derived principally
from interest on loans and securities as well as our investments in real estate and real estate
joint ventures. We also generate revenues from fees and service charges and other income. Our
results of operations depend primarily on our net interest income which is the difference between
the interest we earn on interest-earning assets and the interest paid on our interest-bearing
liabilities. Our net interest income is primarily affected by the market interest rate
environment, the shape of the U.S.
23
Treasury yield curve, the timing of the placement of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing
liabilities, and the prepayment rate on our mortgage-related assets. Provisions for loan losses
and asset impairment charges can also have a significant impact on our results of operations.
Other factors that may affect our results of operations are general and local economic and
competitive conditions, government policies and actions of regulatory authorities.
Our business strategy is to operate as a well-capitalized and profitable financial institution
dedicated to providing exceptional personal service to our individual and business customers. Our
primary focus has been, and will continue to be, growth in multi-family and commercial real estate
lending. We do not originate or purchase sub-prime loans, and our loan portfolio does not include
any such loans.
The Boards of Directors of Oritani Financial Corp., MHC and the Company adopted a Plan of
Conversion and Reorganization (the Plan) on February 19, 2010. Pursuant to the Plan, the MHC
will convert from the mutual holding company form of organization to the fully public form. The
MHC will be merged into the Company, and the MHC will no longer exist. The Company will merge into
a new Delaware corporation named Oritani Financial Corp. As part of the conversion, the MHCs
ownership interest of the Company will be offered for sale in a public offering. The existing
publicly held shares of the Company, which represents the remaining ownership interest in the
Company, will be exchanged for new shares of common stock of Oritani Financial Corp., the new
Delaware corporation. The exchange ratio will ensure that immediately after the conversion and
public offering, the public shareholders of the Company will own the same aggregate percentage of
Oritani Financial Corp. common stock that they owned immediately prior to that time. When the
conversion and public offering are completed, all of the capital stock of Oritani Bank will be
owned by Oritani Financial Corp.
Comparison of Financial Condition at March 31, 2010 and June 30, 2009
Balance Sheet Summary
Total Assets. Total assets increased $140.7 million, or 7.4%, to $2.05 billion at March 31, 2010,
from $1.91 billion at June 30, 2009. The increase was due primarily to the growth of loans and
securities AFS.
Cash and Cash Equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents (which includes fed funds and short term
investments) decreased $95.7 million to $39.7 million at March 31, 2010, from $135.4 million at
June 30, 2009 as excess liquidity was deployed.
Net Loans. Loans, net increased $139.4 million, or 10.9%, to $1.42 billion at March 31, 2010, from
$1.28 billion at June 30, 2009. The Company continued its emphasis on loan originations,
particularly multifamily and commercial real estate loans. Loan originations totaled $275.8
million and purchases totaled $34.7 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2010.
Delinquency information is provided below:
Delinquency Totals
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/31/2010 |
|
12/31/2009 |
|
9/30/2009 |
|
6/30/2009 |
|
3/31/2009 |
|
|
(in thousands) |
30 - 59 days past due |
|
$ |
6,670 |
|
|
$ |
9,613 |
|
|
$ |
14,318 |
|
|
$ |
4,574 |
|
|
$ |
4,897 |
|
60 - 89 days past due |
|
|
4,293 |
|
|
|
1,974 |
|
|
|
1,049 |
|
|
|
17,825 |
|
|
|
1,042 |
|
nonaccrual |
|
|
41,170 |
|
|
|
51,907 |
|
|
|
52,557 |
|
|
|
52,465 |
|
|
|
52,260 |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
52,133 |
|
|
$ |
63,494 |
|
|
$ |
67,924 |
|
|
$ |
74,864 |
|
|
$ |
58,199 |
|
|
|
|
24
Total delinquent loans have decreased by $22.7 million during the nine months ended March 31,
2010 and by $11.4 million over the three months ended March 31, 2010. Substantial reductions in
nonaccrual assets were achieved over this past quarter, as compared to the totals from the prior
four quarters. Nonaccrual loans decreased $10.7 million, or 20.7%, over the three months ended
March 31, 2010. While reductions have been achieved, nonaccrual and total delinquent loan totals
remain at elevated levels.
A discussion of the significant components of the nonaccrual loan total at March 31, 2010 follows.
These loans have been discussed in prior public releases.
|
|
Two of these loans are to one borrower and totaled $16.5 million at March 31, 2010. The
loans are secured by a condominium construction project and raw land with all building
approvals, both of which are in Northern New Jersey. The borrower declared bankruptcy and
Oritani has provided debtor in possession financing for the completion of the condominium
construction project. While the project is substantially complete, significant delays have
been encountered in finalizing the project and obtaining certificates of occupancy (CO) for
the residential units. Numerous residential units remain under contract and new sales are
continuing. Prior charge offs of the construction loan totaled $4.0 million and prior charge
offs of the land loan totaled $661,000. Both loans are classified as impaired as of March 31,
2010. In addition, specific reserves totaling $1.7 million have been recorded against these
loans. |
|
|
|
A $14.1 million loan secured by a multi-tenant commercial property in Hudson County, New
Jersey. The borrower has experienced cash flow difficulties. Oritani is in litigation with
this borrower, foreclosure proceedings are progressing, summary judgment against the borrower
has been obtained and all tenant rent payments are being made directly to Oritani. The rents
received were sufficient to make each of the monthly payments during the quarter. |
|
|
|
A $3.1 million loan secured by a commercial property located in Bergen County, New Jersey.
The borrower and guarantor on this loan have declared bankruptcy. A contract for the sale of
the property has been accepted by the bankruptcy trustee. This contract was originally
expected to close in March, 2010. The closing has been postponed and is now expected to occur
during the quarter ended June 30, 2010. In accordance with the results of the impairment
analysis for this loan, no reserve was required as the loan is considered to be well
collateralized. |
|
|
|
A $2.9 million loan secured by a warehouse property in Nassau County, New York. The
Company acquired this property via foreclosure in April, 2010. Upon acquisition, the specific
reserve of $355,000 associated with this loan was charged off and the asset was transferred to
Real Estate Owned. The Company has had discussions with several parties regarding disposition
and expects to have a contract for sale of the property shortly. |
|
|
|
A $2.4 million residential construction loan for two luxury homes and an improved lot
located in Essex County, New Jersey. The borrower encountered cash flow difficulties due to
an extended construction and marketing period. Oritani is in litigation with this borrower,
foreclosure proceedings are progressing and summary judgment against the borrower has been
obtained. |
Included in the $4.3 million of loans that are 60-89 days delinquent at March 31, 2010 is a $2.4
million loan. The Company has an executed letter of intention to sell this loan for an amount
slightly in excess of our book value.
Securities Available For Sale. Securities AFS increased $166.9 million to $311.4 million at March
31, 2010, from $144.4 million at June 30, 2009. As described under Total Interest Income, the
Company felt this investment option currently presents the best risk/reward profile.
25
Deposits. Deposits increased $129.5 million, or 11.5%, to $1.26 billion at March 31, 2010, from
$1.13 million at June 30, 2009. Strong deposit growth, particularly in core accounts, remains a
strategic objective of the Company. The Bank opened its 22nd branch location in
Bergenfield (Bergen County), New Jersey, in February.
Stockholders Equity. Stockholders equity increased $14.0 million, or 5.8%, to $254.1
million at March 31, 2010, from $240.1 million at June 30, 2009. On March 18, 2009, the Company
announced the commencement of a fourth (967,828 shares) 10% repurchase program. As of March 31,
2010, the Company had repurchased a total of 3,669,937 shares at a total cost of $57.1 million and
an average cost of $15.57 per share.
26
Average Balance Sheet for the Three and Nine Months Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009
The following tables present certain information regarding Oritani Financial Corp.s financial
condition and net interest income for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009. The
table presents the annualized average yield on interest-earning assets and the annualized average
cost of interest-bearing liabilities. We derived the yields and costs by dividing annualized
income or expense by the average balance of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing
liabilities, respectively, for the periods shown. We derived average balances from daily balances
over the periods indicated. Interest income includes fees that we consider adjustments to yields.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Balance Sheet and Yield/Rate Information |
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended (unaudited) |
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Earned/ |
|
|
Yield/ |
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Earned/ |
|
|
Yield/ |
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Paid |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Paid |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-earning assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans (1) |
|
$ |
1,386,530 |
|
|
$ |
22,568 |
|
|
|
6.51 |
% |
|
$ |
1,220,390 |
|
|
$ |
18,553 |
|
|
|
6.08 |
% |
Securities held to maturity (2) |
|
|
25,554 |
|
|
|
360 |
|
|
|
5.64 |
% |
|
|
24,909 |
|
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
3.05 |
% |
Securities available for sale |
|
|
316,342 |
|
|
|
2,204 |
|
|
|
2.79 |
% |
|
|
73,025 |
|
|
|
713 |
|
|
|
3.91 |
% |
Mortgage backed securities held to maturity |
|
|
79,882 |
|
|
|
730 |
|
|
|
3.66 |
% |
|
|
138,493 |
|
|
|
1,373 |
|
|
|
3.97 |
% |
Mortgage backed securities available for sale |
|
|
99,080 |
|
|
|
1,141 |
|
|
|
4.61 |
% |
|
|
147,157 |
|
|
|
1,763 |
|
|
|
4.79 |
% |
Federal funds sold and short term investments |
|
|
18,157 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
0.37 |
% |
|
|
5,107 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
1.25 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-earning assets |
|
|
1,925,545 |
|
|
|
27,020 |
|
|
|
5.61 |
% |
|
|
1,609,081 |
|
|
|
22,608 |
|
|
|
5.62 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest-earning assets |
|
|
96,047 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
120,435 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
2,021,592 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,729,516 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Savings deposits |
|
|
146,296 |
|
|
|
303 |
|
|
|
0.83 |
% |
|
|
143,321 |
|
|
|
469 |
|
|
|
1.31 |
% |
Money market |
|
|
283,557 |
|
|
|
986 |
|
|
|
1.39 |
% |
|
|
108,444 |
|
|
|
659 |
|
|
|
2.43 |
% |
NOW accounts |
|
|
109,881 |
|
|
|
198 |
|
|
|
0.72 |
% |
|
|
73,047 |
|
|
|
161 |
|
|
|
0.88 |
% |
Time deposits |
|
|
683,358 |
|
|
|
3,529 |
|
|
|
2.07 |
% |
|
|
620,470 |
|
|
|
5,391 |
|
|
|
3.48 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits |
|
|
1,223,092 |
|
|
|
5,016 |
|
|
|
1.64 |
% |
|
|
945,282 |
|
|
|
6,680 |
|
|
|
2.83 |
% |
Borrowings |
|
|
506,182 |
|
|
|
5,122 |
|
|
|
4.05 |
% |
|
|
508,368 |
|
|
|
5,118 |
|
|
|
4.03 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
1,729,274 |
|
|
|
10,138 |
|
|
|
2.35 |
% |
|
|
1,453,650 |
|
|
|
11,798 |
|
|
|
3.25 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
42,191 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,709 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
1,771,465 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,486,359 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
250,127 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
243,157 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
2,021,592 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,729,516 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
16,882 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
10,810 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest rate spread (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.26 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.37 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest-earning assets (4) |
|
$ |
196,271 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
155,431 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest margin (5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.51 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.69 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average of interest-earning assets to interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111.35 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110.69 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes nonaccrual loans. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes Federal Home Loan Bank Stock |
|
(3) |
|
Net interest rate spread represents the difference between the yield on average
interest-earning assets and the cost of average
interest-bearing liabilities. |
|
(4) |
|
Net interest-earning assets represents total interest-earning assets less total
interest-bearing liabilities. |
|
(5) |
|
Net interest margin represents net interest income divided by average total
interest-earning assets. |
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Balance Sheet and Yield/Rate Information |
|
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended (unaudited) |
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Earned/ |
|
|
Yield/ |
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Earned/ |
|
|
Yield/ |
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Paid |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Paid |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-earning assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans (1) |
|
$ |
1,353,417 |
|
|
$ |
64,633 |
|
|
|
6.37 |
% |
|
$ |
1,155,755 |
|
|
$ |
53,198 |
|
|
|
6.14 |
% |
Securities held to maturity (2) |
|
|
25,526 |
|
|
|
1,077 |
|
|
|
5.63 |
% |
|
|
24,733 |
|
|
|
725 |
|
|
|
3.91 |
% |
Securities available for sale |
|
|
279,029 |
|
|
|
5,942 |
|
|
|
2.84 |
% |
|
|
43,699 |
|
|
|
1,346 |
|
|
|
4.11 |
% |
Mortgage backed securities held to maturity |
|
|
95,752 |
|
|
|
2,648 |
|
|
|
3.69 |
% |
|
|
148,556 |
|
|
|
4,405 |
|
|
|
3.95 |
% |
Mortgage backed securities available for sale |
|
|
111,193 |
|
|
|
3,859 |
|
|
|
4.63 |
% |
|
|
148,429 |
|
|
|
5,436 |
|
|
|
4.88 |
% |
Federal funds sold and short term investments |
|
|
38,366 |
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
0.37 |
% |
|
|
1,875 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
0.50 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-earning assets |
|
|
1,903,283 |
|
|
|
78,266 |
|
|
|
5.48 |
% |
|
|
1,523,047 |
|
|
|
65,117 |
|
|
|
5.70 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest-earning assets |
|
|
89,607 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91,501 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,992,890 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,614,548 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Savings deposits |
|
|
146,307 |
|
|
|
978 |
|
|
|
0.89 |
% |
|
|
144,247 |
|
|
|
1,536 |
|
|
|
1.42 |
% |
Money market |
|
|
252,788 |
|
|
|
2,994 |
|
|
|
1.58 |
% |
|
|
83,402 |
|
|
|
1,735 |
|
|
|
2.77 |
% |
NOW accounts |
|
|
104,490 |
|
|
|
602 |
|
|
|
0.77 |
% |
|
|
74,405 |
|
|
|
486 |
|
|
|
0.87 |
% |
Time deposits |
|
|
695,816 |
|
|
|
12,565 |
|
|
|
2.41 |
% |
|
|
520,303 |
|
|
|
14,039 |
|
|
|
3.60 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits |
|
|
1,199,401 |
|
|
|
17,139 |
|
|
|
1.91 |
% |
|
|
822,357 |
|
|
|
17,796 |
|
|
|
2.89 |
% |
Borrowings |
|
|
507,491 |
|
|
|
15,616 |
|
|
|
4.10 |
% |
|
|
504,384 |
|
|
|
15,058 |
|
|
|
3.98 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
1,706,892 |
|
|
|
32,755 |
|
|
|
2.56 |
% |
|
|
1,326,741 |
|
|
|
32,854 |
|
|
|
3.30 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
40,148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,271 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
1,747,040 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,359,012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
245,850 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
255,536 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
1,992,890 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,614,548 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
45,511 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
32,263 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest rate spread (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.92 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.40 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest-earning assets (4) |
|
$ |
196,391 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
196,306 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest margin (5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.19 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.82 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average of interest-earning assets to interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111.51 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
114.80 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes nonaccrual loans. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes Federal Home Loan Bank Stock |
|
(3) |
|
Net interest rate spread represents the difference between the yield on average
interest-earning assets and the cost of average
interest-bearing liabilities. |
|
(4) |
|
Net interest-earning assets represents total interest-earning assets less total
interest-bearing liabilities. |
|
(5) |
|
Net interest margin represents net interest income divided by average total
interest-earning assets. |
28
Comparison of Operating Results for the Quarter Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009
Net Income. Net income increased $3.5 million to $5.0 million, or $0.14 per share, for the quarter
ended March 31, 2010, from $1.5 million, or $0.04 per share, for the corresponding 2009 quarter.
The primary driver of the increased income in the 2010 period was increased net interest income
before provision for loan losses. Net interest income increased by $6.1 million, or 56.2%, to
$16.9 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, from $10.8 million for the quarter ended March
31, 2009. The increase is primarily due to a higher net interest spread and a larger asset base.
Net income was also augmented by recoveries associated with problem loan disposals. Over the
quarter ended March 31, 2010, the Company collected $1.0 million of delinquent interest and
prepayment penalties, $146,000 of late charges and $150,000 of reimbursed legal expenses in
connection with problem loan disposals. The after tax impact of such items totaled $807,000. Our
annualized return on average assets was 0.99% for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 and 0.35% for
the corresponding 2009 quarter. Our annualized return on average equity was 8.02% for the quarter
ended March 31, 2010 and 2.47% for the corresponding 2009 quarter.
Total Interest Income. Total interest income increased by $4.4 million, or 19.5%, to $27.0 million
for the three months ended March 31, 2010, from $22.6 million for the three months ended March 31,
2009. The largest increase occurred in interest on loans, which increased $4.0 million, or 21.6%,
to $22.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010, from $18.6 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2009. Over that same period, the average balance of loans increased by $166.1
million while the yield on the portfolio increased 43 basis points on an actual basis, and 13 basis
points on a normalized basis. Included in interest on loans for the three months ended March 31,
2010 is $1.0 million of prior period and penalty interest recovered in conjunction with problem
loan disposals. These amounts were not included in income for the normalized calculation of loan
yield. Continuing a trend that began in the quarter ended June 30, 2009, excess liquidity is
generally being deployed in securities classified as available for sale (AFS) as management
believes such investments provide the best risk/reward profile considering the current and
projected cash needs of the Company. Such investments are typically callable notes of government
sponsored agencies with limited optionality and call features that increased the likelihood that
the note would be called. Management classified the investments as AFS so that they could be sold
should unexpected liquidity needs develop. Interest on securities AFS increased by $1.5 million to
$2.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010, from $713,000 for the three months ended
March 31, 2009. The average balance of securities AFS increased $243.3 million over that same
period. The yield on the portfolio decreased considerably due to current market rates as well as
the conservative structure of the new investments. Cash flows from the mortgage-backed securities
(MBS) portfolios were primarily redeployed into securities AFS because, as described above,
management felt securities AFS provided the best risk/reward profile given current economic
circumstances and investment options. Interest on MBS held to maturity (HTM) decreased by
$643,000, or 46.8%, to $730,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2010, from $1.4 million for
the three months ended March 31, 2009. Interest on MBS AFS decreased by $622,000, or 35.3%, to
$1.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010, from $1.8 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2009. The combined average balances of the two MBS portfolios decreased $106.7
million over the periods.
Total Interest Expense. Total interest expense decreased by $1.7 million, or 14.1%, to $10.1
million for the three months ended March 31, 2010, from $11.8 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2009. Interest expense on deposits decreased by $1.7 million, or 24.9%, to $5.0 million
for the three months ended March 31, 2010, from $6.7 million for the three months ended March 31,
2009. The average balance of interest bearing deposits increased by $277.8 million and the
average cost of these funds decreased 119 basis points over this period. Market interest rates
allowed the Bank to reprice many
29
maturing time deposits, as well as other interest bearing
deposits, at lower rates, decreasing the cost of
funds. While the Company expects this trend to continue, the rate of decrease is expected to
decelerate significantly, as the majority of the deposit portfolio has repriced in a low rate
environment. Interest expense on borrowings was essentially stable, the average balance decreased
$2.2 million and the cost increased 2 basis points.
Net Interest Income Before Provision for Loan Losses. Net interest income increased by $6.1
million, or 56.2%, to $16.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010, from $10.8 million
for the three months ended March 31, 2009. The Companys net interest rate spread and margin
increased to 3.26% and 3.51% for the three months ended March 31, 2010, from 2.37% and 2.69% for
the three months ended March 31, 2009, respectively. On a normalized basis (excluding the impact
of the recoveries associated with the problem asset disposals), the Companys net interest rate
spread and margin for the three months ended March 31, 2010 were 3.05% and 3.29%, respectively.
The Companys net interest rate spread and net interest margin were hindered in both periods due to
the impact of nonaccrual loans. The Companys net interest income was $1.2 million lower for both
the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 due to the impact of nonaccrual loans. A portion of
the 2009 interest reduction was collected in 2010 in connection with problem loan disposals.
Provision for Loan Losses. The Company recorded provisions for loan losses of $2.5 million for the
three months ended March 31, 2010 as compared to $2.4 million for the three months ended March 31,
2009. A rollforward of the allowance for loan losses for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and
2009 is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
$ |
22,164 |
|
|
$ |
18,907 |
|
Provisions charged to operations |
|
|
2,500 |
|
|
|
2,400 |
|
Loans charged off |
|
|
(71 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
$ |
24,593 |
|
|
$ |
21,307 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses to total loans |
|
|
1.70 |
% |
|
|
1.69 |
% |
The delinquency and nonaccrual totals, along with charge-offs and macro economic factors, remain
the primary contributors to the current level of provision for loan losses. Loan growth was also a
component of the provision for loan losses.
Other Income. Other income increased by $421,000 to $1.2 million for the three months ended March
31, 2010, from $822,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2009. Results for the quarter ended
March 31, 2010, were augmented due to the collection of $146,000 in late charges in connection with
problem loan disposals. Results for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 were reduced due to a
$225,000 impairment charge and a $12,000 loss on partial sale of a mutual fund holding in the
Companys AFS portfolio.
Operating Expenses. Operating expenses increased by $762,000, or 11.4%, to $7.4 million for the
three months ended March 31, 2010, from $6.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009.
The Companys efficiency ratio (total operating expenses divided by the sum of net interest income
before provision for loan losses plus total other income), on an actual basis, for the 2010 quarter
was 41.0%. On a normalized basis, the ratio was 44.7%. Compensation, payroll taxes and fringe
benefits increased $413,000, or 9.0%, to $5.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010,
from $4.6 million for the
30
three months ended March 31, 2009. The increase is primarily due to
increases in payroll taxes and health insurance. Federal deposit insurance premiums increased
significantly over the period due to an
increase in FDIC deposit insurance rates, an increase in insurable deposits and the depletion of a
credit against FDIC deposit insurance charges. FDIC deposit insurance premiums increased to
$567,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2010, from $46,000 for the three months ended March
31, 2009. Other expense decreased $220,000 to $764,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2010,
from $984,000 for the corresponding 2009 period. The decrease was primarily due to $150,000 of
reimbursed legal expenses received in conjunction with problem loan dispositions.
Income Tax Expense. Income tax expense for the three months ended March 31, 2010 was $3.2 million,
due to pre-tax income of $8.2 million, resulting in an effective tax rate of 38.9%. Income tax
expense for the three months ended March 31, 2009 was $1.1 million, due to pre-tax income of $2.6
million, resulting in an effective tax rate of 41.5%.
Comparison of Operating Results for the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009
Net Income. Net income increased $8.4 million to $12.4 million, or $0.34 per share, for the nine
months ended March 31, 2010, from net income of $4.0 million, or $0.11 per share, for the
corresponding 2009 period. The nine month period ended March 31, 2010 was positively impacted by a
higher net interest spread, a larger asset base and recoveries associated with problem loan
disposals. Over the nine month period ended March 31, 2010, the Company collected $2.3 million of
delinquent interest and prepayment penalties, $297,000 of late charges and $501,000 of reimbursed
legal expenses in connection with problem loan disposals. The after tax impact of these recoveries
totaled $1.9 million. The increased income is also partially attributable to securities writedowns
in the 2009 period (which reduced 2009 net income) and a gain on sale of assets in the 2010 period.
Our annualized return on average assets was 0.83% and our annualized return on average equity was
6.74% for the nine month period ended March 31, 2010, versus 0.33% and 2.11% for the nine month
period ended March 31, 2009, respectively.
Total Interest Income. Total interest income increased by $13.1 million, or 20.2%, to $78.3
million for the nine months ended March 31, 2010, from $65.1 million for the nine months ended
March 31, 2009. The largest increase occurred in interest on loans, which increased $11.4 million,
or 21.5%, to $64.6 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2010, from $53.2 million for the
nine months ended March 31, 2009. Over that same period, the average balance of loans increased by
$197.7 million while the yield on the portfolio increased 23 basis points on an actual basis and
was flat on a normalized basis. Included in interest on loans for the nine months ended March 31,
2010 is $2.3 million of prior period and penalty interest recovered in conjunction with problem
loan disposals. These amounts were not included in income for the normalized calculation of loan
yield. Due primarily to the reasons described in Comparison of Operating Results for the Quarter
Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 Total Interest Income, there were significant changes to income
on securities AFS, MBS HTM and MBS AFS. Interest on securities AFS increased by $4.6 million to
$5.9 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2010, from $1.3 million for the nine months ended
March 31, 2009. The average balance of securities AFS increased $235.3 million over that same
period. Interest on MBS HTM decreased by $1.8 million to $2.6 million for the nine months ended
March 31, 2010, from $4.4 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2009. Interest on MBS AFS
decreased by $1.6 million to $3.9 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2010, from $5.4
million for the nine months ended March 31, 2009. The combined average balances of the two MBS
portfolios decreased $90.0 million over the period.
Total Interest Expense. Total interest expense decreased by $99,000 to $32.8 million for the nine
months ended March 31, 2010, from $32.9 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2009. Interest
expense on deposits decreased by $657,000, or 3.7%, to $17.1 million for the nine months ended
March 31, 2010,
31
from $17.8 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2009. The average balance
of interest bearing deposits increased by $377.0 million and the average cost of these funds
decreased 98 basis points over
this period. Market interest rates allowed the Bank to reprice many maturing time deposits, as
well as other interest bearing deposits, at lower rates, decreasing the cost of funds. Interest
expense on borrowings increased by $558,000, or 3.7%, to $15.6 million for the nine months ended
March 31, 2010, from $15.1 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2009. The average balance
of borrowings increased $3.1 million and the cost increased 12 basis points over this period.
Net Interest Income Before Provision for Loan Losses. Net interest income increased by $13.2
million, or 41.0%, to $45.5 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2010, from $32.3 million
for the nine months ended March 31, 2009. The Companys net interest rate spread and margin
increased to 2.92% and 3.19% for the nine months ended March 31, 2010, from 2.40% and 2.82% for the
nine months ended March 31, 2009, respectively. On a normalized basis, the Companys net interest
rate spread and margin for the nine months ended March 31, 2010 were 2.76% and 3.03%, respectively.
The Companys net interest income was reduced by $2.4 million and $2.5 million for the nine months
ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, due to the impact of nonaccrual loans. A portion of
the 2009 interest reduction was collected in 2010 in connection with problem loan disposals.
Provision for Loan Losses. The Company recorded provisions for loan losses of $7.6 million for the
nine months ended March 31, 2010 as compared to $7.8 million for the nine months ended March 31,
2009. A rollforward of the allowance for loan losses for the nine months ended March 31, 2010 and
2009 is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
$ |
20,680 |
|
|
$ |
13,532 |
|
Provisions charged to operations |
|
|
7,550 |
|
|
|
7,775 |
|
Recoveries of loans previously charged off |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Loans charged off |
|
|
(3,640 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
$ |
24,593 |
|
|
$ |
21,307 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses to total loans |
|
|
1.70 |
% |
|
|
1.69 |
% |
The delinquency and nonaccrual totals, along with charge-offs and macro economic factors, remain
the primary contributors to the current level of provision for loan losses. Loan growth was also a
component of the provision for loan losses.
Other Income. Other income increased by $3.4 million to $4.9 million for the nine months ended
March 31, 2010, from $1.5 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2009. Results for the nine
months ended March 31, 2009 were reduced due to a $1.8 million impairment charge taken regarding
equity securities in the Companys AFS portfolio as well as a $225,000 impairment charge and a
$12,000 loss on partial sale of a mutual fund holding in the Companys AFS portfolio. Included in
the results for the 2010 period is a $1.0 million gain on the sale of a commercial office property
that had been held and operated as a real estate investment. In addition, the 2010 period includes
$297,000 of late charges received in connection with problem loan disposals.
Operating Expenses. Operating expenses increased by $3.3 million, or 17.5%, to $22.4 million for
the nine months ended March 31, 2010, from $19.1 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2009.
The Companys efficiency ratio for the 2010 period, on an actual and normalized basis, was 44.5%
and
32
48.0%, respectively. Compensation, payroll taxes and fringe benefits increased $1.6 million,
or 11.8%, to $15.2 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2010, from $13.6 million for the
nine months ended March 31, 2009. The increase is primarily due to increases in payroll taxes and
health insurance, as well
as increases in compensation. Federal deposit insurance premiums increased significantly over the
period due to an increase in FDIC deposit insurance rates, an increase in insurable deposits and
the depletion of a credit against FDIC deposit insurance charges. FDIC deposit insurance premiums
increased to $1.7 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2010, from $106,000 for the nine
months ended March 31, 2009. Other expense decreased $191,000 to $2.4 million for the nine months
ended March 31, 2010, from $2.6 million for the corresponding 2009 period. The decrease was
primarily due to $501,000 of reimbursed legal expenses received in conjunction with problem loan
dispositions.
Income Tax Expense. Income tax expense for the nine months ended March 31, 2010, was $8.0 million,
due to pre-tax income of $20.4 million, resulting in an effective tax rate of 39.1%. For the nine
months ended March 31, 2009, income tax expense was $2.9 million, due to pre-tax income of $6.9
million, resulting in an effective tax rate of 41.4%.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The Companys primary sources of funds are deposits, principal and interest payments on loans and
mortgage-backed securities, Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) borrowings and investment maturities.
While scheduled amortization of loans is a predictable source of funds, deposit flows and mortgage
prepayments are greatly influenced by general interest rates, economic conditions and competition.
The Company has other sources of liquidity if a need for additional funds arises, including an
overnight line of credit and advances from the FHLB.
At March 31, 2010, the Company had no overnight borrowings from the FHLB. The Company utilizes the
overnight line from time to time to fund short-term liquidity needs. The Company had total
borrowings of $496.6 million at March 31, 2010 and $509.0 million at June 30, 2009. The Companys
total borrowings at March 31, 2010, consisted of the $496.3 million in longer term borrowings with
the FHLB and minor amounts due to Oritani Financial Corp., MHC. In the normal course of business,
the Company routinely enters into various commitments, primarily relating to the origination of
loans. At March 31, 2010, outstanding commitments to originate loans totaled $89.6 million and
outstanding commitments to extend credit totaled $62.6 million. The Company expects to have
sufficient funds available to meet current commitments in the normal course of business.
Time deposits scheduled to mature in one year or less totaled $546.0 million at March 31, 2010.
Based upon historical experience, management estimates that a significant portion of such deposits
will remain with the Company.
On September 29, 2009, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation issued a rule pursuant to which
all insured depository institutions would be required to prepay their estimated assessments for the
fourth quarter of 2009, and for all of 2010, 2011 and 2012. On December 30, 2009, the Company paid
$8.2 million in estimated assessments, of which $7.0 million is prepaid.
As of March 31, 2010, the Company exceeded all regulatory capital requirements as follows:
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual |
|
Required |
|
|
Amount |
|
Ratio |
|
Amount |
|
Ratio |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets)
|
|
$ |
271,361 |
|
|
|
18.0 |
% |
|
$ |
120,895 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
% |
Tier I capital (to risk-weighted assets)
|
|
|
252,401 |
|
|
|
16.7 |
|
|
|
60,447 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
Tier I capital (to average assets)
|
|
|
252,401 |
|
|
|
12.5 |
|
|
|
80,864 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
On October 14, 2008, the Treasury announced a voluntary Capital Purchase Program to encourage
U.S. financial institutions to build capital and increase financing. Oritani is not participating
in this program. Oritani currently supports very strong capital ratios and capital levels have not
been, and are not anticipated to be, a hindrance on our ability to lend. In addition,
participation in the program could limit our flexibility regarding capital management strategies
such as dividends and repurchases. The Treasury and the FDIC have also announced an insurance
guarantee program, whereby all funds in non-interest bearing transaction deposit account,
regardless of their balance, would be covered by FDIC insurance through June 30, 2010. Oritani is
a participant in this program.
Critical Accounting Policies
Note 1 to the Companys Audited Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended June 30,
2009, included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K, as supplemented by this report,
contains a summary of significant accounting policies. Various elements of these accounting
policies, by their nature, are inherently subject to estimation techniques, valuation assumptions
and other subjective assessments. Certain assets are carried in the consolidated Balance Sheets at
estimated fair value or the lower of cost or estimated fair value. Policies with respect to the
methodologies used to determine the allowance for loan losses and judgments regarding the valuation
of intangible assets and securities as well as the valuation allowance against deferred tax assets
are the most critical accounting policies because they are important to the presentation of the
Companys financial condition and results of operations, involve a higher degree of complexity, and
require management to make difficult and subjective judgments which often require assumptions or
estimates about highly uncertain matters. The use of different judgments, assumptions, and
estimates could result in material differences in the results of operations or financial condition.
These critical accounting policies and their application are reviewed periodically and, at least
annually, with the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors. For a further discussion of the
critical accounting policies of the Company, see Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K, for the year
ended June 30, 2009.
34
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
The majority of our assets and liabilities are monetary in nature. Consequently, our most
significant form of market risk is interest rate risk. Our assets, consisting primarily of mortgage
loans, have longer maturities than our liabilities, consisting primarily of deposits. As a result,
a principal part of our business strategy is to manage interest rate risk and reduce the exposure
of our net interest income to changes in market interest rates. Accordingly, our Board of Directors
has the authority and responsibility for managing interest rate risk. Oritani Bank has established
an Asset/Liability Management Committee, comprised of various members of its senior management,
which is responsible for evaluating the interest rate risk inherent in our assets and liabilities,
for recommending to the Board the level of risk that is appropriate, given our business strategy,
operating environment, capital, liquidity and performance objectives, and for managing this risk
consistent with the guidelines approved by the Board of Directors. The Asset/Liability Management
Committee reports its activities to the Board on a monthly basis. An interest rate risk analysis is
presented to the Board on a quarterly basis.
We have sought to manage our interest rate risk in order to minimize the exposure of our
earnings and capital to changes in interest rates. As part of our ongoing asset-liability
management, we currently use the following strategies to manage our interest rate risk:
|
(i) |
|
originating multi-family and commercial real estate loans that generally tend
to have shorter interest duration and generally reset at five years; |
|
|
(ii) |
|
originating certain construction and commercial real estate loans that have
short maturities and/or monthly interest resets. |
|
|
(iii) |
|
investing in shorter duration mortgage-backed securities and securities with
call provisions that are considered likely to be invoked; and |
|
|
(iv) |
|
obtaining general financing through longer-term Federal Home Loan Bank
advances. |
Shortening the average maturity of our interest-earning assets by increasing our investments
in shorter-term loans and securities, as well as loans and securities with variable rates of
interest, helps to better match the maturities and interest rates of our assets and liabilities,
thereby reducing the exposure of our net interest income to changes in market interest rates. By
following these strategies, we believe that we are well-positioned to react to increases in market
interest rates.
35
Net Portfolio Value. We compute the amounts by which the net present value of cash flow from
assets, liabilities and off balance sheet items (the institutions net portfolio value or NPV)
would change in the event of a range of assumed changes in market interest rates. A basis point
equals one-hundredth of one percent, and 100 basis points equals one percent. An increase in
interest rates from 3% to 4% would mean, for example, a 100 basis point increase in the Change in
Interest Rates column below.
The table below sets forth, as of March 31, 2010, the estimated changes in our net portfolio
value that would result from the designated instantaneous changes in the United States Treasury
yield curve. Computations of prospective effects of hypothetical interest rate changes are based
on numerous assumptions, including relative levels of market interest rates and loan prepayment and
deposit decay rates, and should not be relied upon as indicative of actual results.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NPV as a Percentage of Present |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value of Assets (3) |
Change in |
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Increase (Decrease) in |
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
Interest Rates |
|
Estimated |
|
NPV |
|
|
|
|
|
(Decrease) |
(basis points) (1) |
|
NPV (2) |
|
Amount |
|
Percent |
|
NPV Ratio (4) |
|
(basis points) |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+200
|
|
$ |
213,525 |
|
|
$ |
(65,676 |
) |
|
|
(23.5 |
)% |
|
|
11.1 |
% |
|
|
(240 |
) |
0
|
|
|
279,201 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
-100
|
|
|
298,986 |
|
|
|
19,785 |
|
|
|
7.1 |
|
|
|
14.0 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Assumes an instantaneous uniform change in interest rates at all maturities. |
|
(2) |
|
NPV is the discounted present value of expected cash flows from assets,
liabilities and off-balance sheet contracts. |
|
(3) |
|
Present value of assets represents the discounted present value of incoming
cash flows on interest-earning assets. |
|
(4) |
|
NPV Ratio represents NPV divided by the present value of assets. |
The table above indicates that at March 31, 2010, in the event of a 100 basis point
decrease in interest rates, we would experience an 7.1% increase in net portfolio value. In the
event of a 200 basis point increase in interest rates, we would experience a 23.5% decrease in net
portfolio value. These changes in net portfolio value are within the limitations established in
our asset and liability management policies.
Certain shortcomings are inherent in the methodology used in the above interest rate risk
measurement. Modeling changes in net portfolio value require making certain assumptions that may
or may not reflect the manner in which actual yields and costs respond to changes in market
interest rates. In this regard, the net portfolio value table presented assumes that the
composition of our interest-sensitive assets and liabilities existing at the beginning of a period
remains constant over the period being measured and assumes that a particular change in interest
rates is reflected uniformly across the yield curve regardless of the duration or repricing of
specific assets and liabilities. Accordingly, although the net portfolio value table provides an
indication of our interest rate risk exposure at a particular point in time, such measurements are
not intended to and do not provide a precise forecast of the effect of changes in market interest
rates on our net interest income and will differ from actual results.
36
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Principal
Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, we evaluated the effectiveness of the design and
operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)
under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that
evaluation, the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer concluded that, as of
the end of the period covered by this report, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective
to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Company files or
submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported
within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commissions rules and forms.
There were no significant changes made in the Companys internal controls over financial
reporting or in other factors that could significantly affect the Companys internal controls over
financial reporting during the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
Part II Other Information
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
The Company and its subsidiaries are subject to various legal actions arising in the normal
course of business. In the opinion of management, the resolution of these legal actions is not
expected to have a material adverse effect on the Companys financial condition or results of
operations.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
The risks set forth below, in addition to the other risks described in this quarterly report,
represent material changes from those risk factors previously disclosed in the Companys Annual
Report on Form 10-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 11, 2009, and
may adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results. In addition to the
risks set forth below and the other risks described in this quarterly report, there may also be
additional risks and uncertainties that are not currently known to us or that we currently deem to
be immaterial that could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition or
operating results. As a result, past financial performance may not be a reliable indicator of
future performance, and historical trends should not be used to anticipate results or trends in
future periods. Further, to the extent that any of the information contained in this Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q constitutes forward-looking statements, the risk factors set forth below also
are cautionary statements identifying important factors that could cause our actual results to
differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statements made by or on behalf of
us.
Our Deposit Growth Has Been a Primary Funding Source. If Deposit Growth Slows, It May Be More
Expensive For Us to Fund Loan Originations.
We have recently experienced a period of unprecedented deposit growth, with a 61.3% increase in
deposit balances from June 30, 2008 to June 30, 2009, and annualized growth for the nine month
period ended March 31, 2010 of 15.3%. Management believes a portion of this growth was due to
external factors, as funds were withdrawn from the stock market and deposited into investment
options considered safe by the investors, such as Oritani Bank. Such depositors may choose to
redeploy these funds in the stock market at a future date, regardless of our efforts. If this
occurs, it would hamper our ability to grow
37
deposits and could even result in a net outflow of deposits. In addition, the increase in deposit
insurance limits also may have contributed to our deposit growth and we could experience a net
outflow of deposits of such deposit insurance limits were reduced. We will continue to focus on
deposit growth, which we use to fund loan originations and purchase investment securities.
However, if we are unable to continue to sufficiently increase our deposit balances, we may be
required to utilize alternative sources of funding, including Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB)
advances, or increase our deposit rates, each of which will increase our cost of funds.
A Legislative Proposal Has Passed the House of Representatives That Would Require Oritani-Delaware
to Become a Bank Holding Company.
Legislation has passed the House of Representatives that would implement sweeping changes to the
current bank regulatory structure. The proposal would, among other things, merge the Office of
Thrift Supervision into the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency. Federal law allows a state
savings bank that qualifies as a Qualified Thrift Lender, such as Oritani Bank, to elect to be
treated as a savings association for purposes of the savings and loan holding company provisions of
the Home Owners Loan Act of 1933, as amended. Such election results in the state savings banks
holding company being regulated as a savings and loan holding company by the Office of Thrift
Supervision rather than as a bank holding company regulated by the Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System. Under the House bill, Oritani would become a bank holding company subject
to regulation and supervision under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended, and the
supervision and regulation of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, including
holding company regulatory capital requirements to which Oritani is not currently subject.
Legislation has also been proposed in the U.S. Senate, which would eliminate the Office of Thrift
Supervision and result in Oritani being regulated by the FDIC. Such regulatory changes could
impact our ability to continue our real estate investments and joint ventures.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
(a) |
|
Unregistered Sale of Equity Securities. There were no sales of unregistered
securities during the period covered by this report. |
|
|
(b) |
|
Use of Proceeds. Not applicable. |
|
|
(c) |
|
Repurchase of Our Equity Securities. There were no repurchases of our equity s
securities during the period covered by this report. |
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
Not applicable.
Item 4. Reserved
Item 5. Other Information
Not applicable
38
Item 6. Exhibits
The following exhibits are either filed as part of this report or are incorporated herein by
reference:
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Charter of Oritani Financial Corp. * |
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Bylaws of Oritani Financial Corp. * |
|
|
|
4
|
|
Form of Common Stock Certificate of Oritani Financial Corp. * |
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Employment Agreement between Oritani Financial Corp. and Kevin J. Lynch*, *** |
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
Form of Employment Agreement between Oritani Financial Corp. and executive officers*, *** |
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
Oritani Bank Director Retirement Plan*, *** |
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
Oritani Bank Benefit Equalization Plan*, *** |
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
Oritani Bank Executive Supplemental Retirement Income Agreement*, *** |
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
Form of Employee Stock Ownership Plan*, *** |
|
|
|
10.7
|
|
Director Deferred Fee Plan*, *** |
|
|
|
10.8
|
|
Oritani Financial Corp. 2007 Equity Incentive Plan**, *** |
|
|
|
14
|
|
Code of Ethics** |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 |
|
|
|
32
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Filed as exhibits to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1, and any amendments
thereto, with the Securities and Exchange Commission (Registration No. 333-137309). |
|
** |
|
Available on our website www.oritani.com |
|
*** |
|
Management contract, compensatory plan or arrangement. |
39
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
ORITANI FINANCIAL CORP.
|
|
Date: May 10, 2010 |
/s/ Kevin J. Lynch
|
|
|
Kevin J. Lynch |
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: May 10, 2010 |
/s/ John M. Fields, Jr.
|
|
|
John M. Fields, Jr. |
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer |
|
|
40