AMENDMENT NO. 4 ON FORM S-3
As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
August 4, 2006
Registration
No. 333-134227
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
AMENDMENT NO. 4
ON FORM S-3 TO
Form S-1
REGISTRATION STATEMENT
UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
DSW INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
|
|
Ohio |
|
5661 |
|
31-0746639 |
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization) |
|
(Primary Standard Industrial
Classification Code Number) |
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
4150 East 5th Avenue
Columbus, Ohio 43219
(614) 237-7100
(Address, Including Zip Code, and Telephone Number, Including
Area Code, of Registrants Principal Executive Offices)
William L. Jordan
General Counsel
4150 East 5th Avenue
Columbus, Ohio 43219
(614) 237-7100
(Name, Address, Including Zip Code, and Telephone Number,
Including Area Code, of Agent For Service)
Copies to:
|
|
|
Robert M. Chilstrom
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Four Times Square
New York, New York 10036-6522
(212) 735-3000 |
|
Steven J. Slutzky
Debevoise & Plimpton LLP
919 Third Avenue
New York, New York 10022
(212) 909-6000 |
Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the
public: From time to time after the effective date of this
Registration Statement.
If the only securities being registered on this form are being
offered pursuant to dividend or interest reinvestment plans,
please check the following
box. o
If any of the securities being registered on this form are to be
offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to
Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, check the
following
box. o
If this form is filed to register additional securities for an
offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act,
check the following box and list the Securities Act registration
statement number of earlier effective registration statement for
the same
offering. o
If this form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to
Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following
box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of
the earlier effective registration statement for the same
offering. o
If this form is a registration statement pursuant to General
Instruction I.D. or a post-effective amendment thereto that
shall become effective upon filing with the Commission pursuant
to Rule 462(e) under the Securities Act, check the
following
box. o
If this form is a post-effective amendment to a registration
statement filed pursuant to General Instruction I.D. filed to
register additional securities or additional classes of
securities pursuant to Rule 413(b) under the Securities
Act, check the following
box. o
The Registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on
such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective
date until the Registrant shall file a further amendment which
specifically states that this Registration Statement shall
thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a)
of the Securities Act of 1933 or until the Registration
Statement shall become effective on such date as the Commission,
acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.
The information
in this prospectus is not complete and may be changed. These
securities may not be sold until the registration statement
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is effective.
This prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities and is
not soliciting offers to buy these securities in any state or
jurisdiction where the offer or sale is not
permitted.
|
Subject to Completion, dated
August 4, 2006.
PROSPECTUS
Shares
Class A Common Shares
This prospectus relates to up
to Class A
Common Shares of DSW Inc. that may be delivered by Retail
Ventures, Inc., or Retail Ventures,
on ,
2011 (or earlier if exchange is accelerated upon an acceleration
following an event of default under the PIES), to holders of
Retail
Ventures %
Mandatorily Exchangeable Notes Due September 15, 2011, or
PIESsm,
that Retail Ventures is offering by means of a separate
prospectus. Under the terms of the PIES, Retail Ventures will
have an obligation to deliver (unless Retail Ventures elects to
settle the PIES in cash), on September 15, 2011 (or earlier
if exchange is accelerated), a maximum
of of
our Class A Common Shares per $50 principal amount of PIES,
and a maximum
of of
our Class A Common Shares in the aggregate, subject to
exchange adjustments as provided in the PIES. To the extent that
the underwriter in Retail Ventures offering of PIES
exercises in full its option to purchase additional PIES, this
prospectus will relate to up to an
additional of
our Class A Common Shares.
This prospectus accompanies a prospectus of Retail Ventures
relating to the sale of the Retail Ventures PIES. This
prospectus relates only to our Class A Common Shares that
Retail Ventures may deliver to the holders of the PIES. The
Retail Ventures prospectus is not a part of this prospectus and
is not incorporated by reference into this prospectus. We will
not receive any of the proceeds from the sale of the PIES or the
delivery of Class A Common Shares to which this prospectus
relates and will have no obligation with respect to the PIES.
Our Class A Common Shares are listed on the New York Stock
Exchange, or NYSE, under the symbol DSW. On
August 3, 2006, the last reported sale price of the
Class A Common Shares on the NYSE was $29.82 per share.
Investing in our Class A Common Shares involves
risks.
See Risk Factors beginning on page 7.
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state
securities commission has approved or disapproved of these
securities or determined if this prospectus is accurate or
complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal
offense.
,
2006
This prospectus relates only to our Class A Common
Shares that Retail Ventures may be required to deliver to the
holders of the PIES. Retail Ventures is offering the PIES in an
offering that is described in a separate prospectus. Retail
Ventures has attached this prospectus to its prospectus in order
to provide information about us and our Class A Common
Shares. Retail Ventures prospectus does not constitute a
part of this prospectus and is not incorporated by reference
into this prospectus.
We have no obligations with respect to Retail Ventures
PIES. Accordingly, we are not under any obligation to take the
interests of Retail Ventures or the holders of the PIES into
consideration for any reason. We will not receive any of the
proceeds from Retail Ventures offering of the PIES and are
not responsible for, and have not participated in, the
determination of the quantities or prices of the PIES or the
determination or calculation of the number of shares (or, if
Retail Ventures elects, the cash value thereof) holders of the
PIES will receive at maturity. We are not involved with the
administration or trading of the PIES.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ABOUT THIS PROSPECTUS
You should rely only on the information contained in this
prospectus, as well as the information incorporated by reference
herein, with respect to DSW. We have not, and the underwriter
for the offering of the PIES has not, authorized any other
person to provide you with different information. If anyone
provides you with different or inconsistent information, you
should not rely on it. We are not, and the underwriter for the
offering of the PIES is not, making an offer to sell these
securities in any jurisdiction where an offer or sale is not
permitted. You should assume that the information appearing in
this prospectus or any documents incorporated by reference is
accurate as of the date of the applicable document. Our
business, financial condition, results of operations and
prospects may have changed since that date.
The market share and industry data disclosed under
Business Industry Overview and
Competition in this prospectus have been obtained from NPD
Fashionworld®,
a division of NPD Group, Inc.
i
PROSPECTUS SUMMARY
This summary highlights material information about our business
contained elsewhere in this prospectus. This summary does not
contain all the information you should consider before investing
in our Class A Common Shares. Before investing in our
Class A Common Shares, you should read this entire
prospectus carefully, including the Risk Factors and
Forward-Looking Statements sections and the
consolidated financial statements and notes to those
consolidated financial statements beginning on
page F-1.
In this prospectus, our fiscal years ended February 2,
2002, February 1, 2003, January 31, 2004,
January 29, 2005 and January 28, 2006 are referred to
as fiscal 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004 and 2005, respectively. Our
fiscal year consists of 52 or 53 weeks and ends on the
Saturday closest to January 31 in each year. All years shown
consisted of 52 weeks. Our 2006 fiscal year contains
53 weeks. Our consolidated financial results as part of
Retail Ventures contained in this prospectus may not reflect
what our financial results would have been had we been a
stand-alone company during the periods presented.
OUR BUSINESS
Overview
DSW is a leading U.S. specialty branded footwear retailer
operating 204 DSW stores in 33 states as of April 29,
2006. We offer a wide selection of brand name and designer
dress, casual and athletic footwear for women and men. Our core
focus is to create a distinctive store experience that satisfies
both the rational and emotional shopping needs of our customers
by offering them a vast, exciting selection of in-season styles
combined with the convenience and value they desire. We believe
this combination of selection, convenience and value
differentiates us from our competitors and appeals to a broad
range of consumers. As of April 29, 2006, Retail Ventures,
which is a holding company operating retail stores in three
segments (DSW, Value City and Filenes Basement), owned
approximately 27.7 million of our Class B Common
Shares, or in excess of 63.1% of our total outstanding shares
and 93.2% of the combined voting power of our outstanding Common
Shares.
DSW allows customers to personalize their shopping experience by
offering a sea of shoes that are accessible,
easy-to-shop, and
fulfill a broad range of style and fashion desires. Typical DSW
stores are approximately 25,000 square feet, with over 85%
of total square footage used as selling space. Over
30,000 pairs of shoes in more than 2,000 styles are
displayed on the selling floor of most of our stores, compared
to a significantly smaller product offering at typical
department stores. Our stores feature self-service fixtures that
allow customers to view, touch, and try on the product without
relying on salespeople to check availability. Our locations have
clear signage, and well-trained sales associates are available
to assist customers as desired. New footwear merchandise is
organized by style on the main floor, and clearance goods are
organized by size in the rear of the store. The store layout
allows customers who do not have time for relaxed browsing to
swiftly identify the shoe styles they are seeking and shop in a
targeted, time-efficient manner.
Our goal is to further strengthen our position as a leading
specialty branded retailer of adult footwear in the United
States. Since 1998, we have accelerated our expansion by
investing in new stores, merchandise development, technology and
our people to support further growth and enhance our
performance. In fiscal 2005, we generated $1.14 billion in
net sales and $70.1 million in operating profit. During the
same period, we sold over 27.3 million pairs of shoes.
Our Competitive Strengths
We believe that our leading market position is driven by the
following competitive strengths:
|
|
|
|
|
Breadth of Product Offerings. Our goal is to excite our
customers with a sea of shoes by offering the
largest selection of brand name and designer merchandise of any
footwear retailer or typical department store in the nation. |
1
|
|
|
|
|
Our Distinctive and Convenient Store Layout. We cater to
both passionate shoe enthusiasts who take pleasure in our wide
product offering and to time-constrained customers who know
exactly what they want. All merchandise is displayed on the
selling floor with self-service fixtures, clear signage and
spacious aisles. |
|
|
|
The Value Proposition Offered to Our Customers. We
provide our customers with high-quality, in-season fashions at
everyday prices that we believe are competitive with the typical
sale price found at specialty retailers and department stores.
Through our customer loyalty program called Reward Your
Style, we offer additional savings to frequent shoppers. |
|
|
|
Demonstrated Ability to Consistently Deliver Profitable
Growth. Over the five-fiscal-year period ended
January 28, 2006, our store base, net sales and operating
profit have grown at compound annual rates of 21%, 22% and 48%,
respectively. In fiscal 2005, we generated $1.14 billion in
net sales and $70.1 million in operating profit, or 6.1% of
net sales. |
Growth Strategy
We plan to pursue the following three strategies for growth in
sales and earnings:
|
|
|
|
|
Expanding Our Store Base. We believe our retail concept
provides substantial opportunity for expansion. Over the
five-fiscal-year period ended January 28, 2006, we have
opened 124 DSW stores, including 29 new stores in fiscal
2005, and plan to open approximately 30 stores in each
fiscal year from fiscal 2006 through fiscal 2010. As of
April 29, 2006, we have signed leases for an additional
20 stores to be opened in fiscal 2006 and 2007. We intend,
over time, to cluster stores in strategic areas to enhance name
recognition and achieve economies of scale. |
|
|
|
Driving Sales Through Enhanced Merchandising. We intend
to increase the number of customer transactions and average
transaction value by continually refining our merchandise mix
and undertaking other initiatives, such as expanding vendor
relationships, increasing sales within existing merchandise
categories and extending into related product categories. |
|
|
|
Leveraging Our Operating Model. As we grow our business
and fill in markets to their full potential, we believe we will
continue to improve our profitability by leveraging our cost
structure. We also intend to continue investing in our
infrastructure to enhance our planning and allocation, inventory
management, distribution and point of sale functions. |
Leased Shoe Department Businesses
As of April 29, 2006, we operated a total of 216 leased
shoe departments for three non-affiliated retailers. As of
April 29, 2006, we also operated 25 leased shoe departments
for Filenes Basement, Inc., or Filenes Basement, a
wholly-owned subsidiary of Retail Ventures. We pay a specified
percentage of net sales as rent to these retailers. In fiscal
2005, leased shoe department sales comprised 10.5% of our total
sales.
Relationship with Retail Ventures
In connection with our initial public offering in July 2005, we
entered into several agreements with Retail Ventures related to
the separation of our business operations from Retail Ventures,
including, among others, a master separation agreement and a
shared services agreement. Many aspects of our business which
were fully managed and controlled by us without Retail
Ventures involvement continue to operate as they did prior
to the initial public offering. We continue to manage operations
for critical functions such as merchandise buying, planning and
allocation, distribution and store operations. Under the shared
services agreement, which became effective as of
January 30, 2005, we provide services to several
subsidiaries of Retail Ventures relating to planning and
allocation support, distribution services and transportation
management, site research, lease negotiation, store design and
construction management. Retail Ventures provides us with
services relating to import administration, risk management,
information technology, tax, logistics, legal services,
financial services, shared benefits administration and payroll
and maintains insurance for us and for our directors, officers
and employees. The initial term of the shared services agreement
expires
2
at the end of fiscal 2007 and will be extended automatically for
additional one-year terms unless terminated by one of the
parties. With respect to each shared service, we cannot
reasonably anticipate whether the services will be shared for a
period shorter or longer than the initial term.
Retail Ventures has advised us that its current intent is to
continue to hold all the Class B Common Shares owned by it,
except to the extent necessary to satisfy obligations under
warrants it has granted to certain of its lenders and its
obligations under the PIES. The Class B Common Shares of
DSW held by Retail Ventures are currently subject to liens in
favor of these lenders, as well as a lien granted to Value City
Department Stores LLC, or Value City. For further discussion of
these warrant agreements, see Managements Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations The DSW Separation, Certain
Relationships and Related Party Transactions Notes,
Credit Agreements and Guarantees and Description of
Indebtedness.
Retail Ventures is currently subject to (a) contractual
obligations with its lenders to retain ownership of at least 55%
by value of the Common Shares of DSW for so long as the Value
City non-convertible loan, or the non-convertible loan, facility
remains outstanding and (b) contractual obligations with
its warrantholders to retain enough DSW Common Shares to be able
to satisfy its obligations to deliver such shares to its
warrantholders if the warrantholders elect to exercise their
warrants in full for DSW Class A Common Shares (without
regard to any limitations on exercisability of the warrants).
Upon completion of the offering of the PIES by Retail Ventures,
Retail Ventures will be released from these contractual
obligations with its lenders as well as the liens on the Common
Shares of DSW described above. However, Retail Ventures will
pledge sufficient DSW Common Shares to the collateral agent for
the PIES to enable Retail Ventures to satisfy its obligations to
deliver Class A Common Shares upon exchange of the PIES,
and sufficient DSW Common Shares will continue to be subject to
liens and/or contractual obligations to enable Retail Ventures
to satisfy its obligations to the warrantholders to deliver
Class A Common Shares upon exercise of the warrants. Retail
Ventures will continue to be subject to usual and customary
restrictive covenants under the Value City revolving credit
facility. In addition, Retail Ventures has agreed not to sell or
otherwise dispose of any of our Common Shares for a period of
90 days after the date of this prospectus without the prior
written consent of Lehman Brothers Inc. as the underwriter for
the offering of the PIES, except to the extent necessary to
allow for the transfer of our Class A Common Shares by
Retail Ventures upon exercise of warrants for our Class A
Common Shares by Schottenstein Stores Corporation, or SSC,
Cerberus Partners L.P., or Cerberus, or Millennium Partners,
L.P., or Millennium, or their permitted transferees. See
Plan of Distribution
Lock-up
Agreements. There can be no assurance concerning the
period of time during which Retail Ventures will maintain its
ownership of our Common Shares. For a further discussion of the
ongoing relationships between us and Retail Ventures, and the
risks relating to our relationship with and separation from
Retail Ventures, see Risk Factors Risks
Relating to our Business and Risks Relating to our
Relationship with and Separation From Retail Ventures and
Certain Relationships and Related Party
Transactions Relationships Between Our Company and
Retail Ventures.
Our Corporate Information
We were incorporated on January 20, 1969, as Shonac
Corporation. We opened our first DSW store in Dublin, Ohio in
July 1991. In 1998, Value City Department Stores, Inc., which
subsequently became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Retail
Ventures, purchased DSW and affiliated shoe businesses from SSC
and Nacht Management, Inc. In December 2004, Retail Ventures
completed a corporate reorganization, or the reorganization,
whereby Value City Department Stores, Inc., a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Retail Ventures, merged with and into Value City,
another wholly-owned subsidiary of Retail Ventures. In turn,
Value City transferred all the issued and outstanding shares of
DSW to Retail Ventures in exchange for a promissory note. In
February 2005, we changed our name from Shonac Corporation to
DSW Inc. In July 2005, we completed an initial public offering
of our Class A Common Shares, selling approximately
16.2 million shares at an offering price of $19.00 per
share.
Our principal executive offices are located at 4150 East
5th Avenue, Columbus, Ohio 43219. Our telephone number at
that address is
(614) 237-7100.
Our website address is http://www.dswshoe.com.
3
Information on our website is provided for informational
purposes only and should not be considered to be part of, or
incorporated by reference in, this prospectus.
Recent Developments
On May 30, 2006, we entered into an amended and restated
supply agreement to supply shoes to Stein Mart, Inc., or Stein
Mart. Under the terms of this agreement, we will be the
exclusive supplier of shoes to all Stein Mart stores that have
shoe departments. As of April 29, 2006, we supplied
merchandise to 158 Stein Mart stores. Under the amended and
restated supply agreement, we will be supplying merchandise to
an additional 102 Stein Mart stores beginning in 2007. We will
own the merchandise until the merchandise is sold to the
customer. We will receive a percentage of the net revenue
generated from the sale of the merchandise, consistent with our
original supply agreement with Stein Mart. The amended and
restated supply agreement terminates on December 31, 2009,
but will automatically extend for another three years in the
event that neither party gives notice of its intent not to renew.
For the thirteen weeks ended July 29, 2006, compared to the
thirteen weeks ended July 30, 2005, we reported a
comparable store sales increase of 2.2%. Net sales for the
thirteen weeks ended July 29, 2006 increased 9.1% to $301.3
million from $276.2 million for the same period last year.
Comparable store sales increased 3.2% for the year-to-date
period and net sales increased 10.7% to $617.8 million from
$558.0 million for the same period last year. As of
July 29, 2006, we operated 205 stores in 33 states and
supplied footwear to 239 leased locations (25 for related
retailers and 214 for non-related retailers) in the United
States.
4
OUR CORPORATE STRUCTURE
The following diagram sets forth our corporate structure as of
April 29, 2006.
|
|
(1) |
Assumes the issuance of (i) 8,333,333 Retail Ventures
common shares issuable upon the exercise of convertible
warrants, (ii) 1,594,377 Retail Ventures common shares
issuable upon the exercise of term loan warrants, and
(iii) up to 479,792 Retail Ventures common shares issuable
pursuant to the anti-dilution provisions of the term loan
warrants. |
|
(2) |
As of April 29, 2006, holders of Class A Common Shares
own approximately 36.9% of our outstanding Common Shares and
6.8% of the combined voting power of our outstanding Common
Shares. |
|
(3) |
As of April 29, 2006, Retail Ventures, which holds 100% of
our Class B Common Shares, owns in excess of 63.1% of our
outstanding Common Shares and 93.2% of the combined voting power
of our outstanding Common Shares. |
THE OFFERING
This prospectus relates only to our Class A Common Shares
that Retail Ventures may deliver to the holders of the PIES. The
PIES are obligations of Retail Ventures. We will have no
obligation of any kind with respect to the PIES. We will not
receive any of the proceeds from the sale of the PIES or the
delivery of Class A Common Shares to which this prospectus
relates.
5
SUMMARY CONSOLIDATED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION
We present below summary historical financial data. The
following summary historical financial data (i) as of
April 29, 2006 and for the thirteen week periods ended
April 30, 2005 and April 29, 2006 were derived from
our unaudited historical condensed consolidated financial
statements included elsewhere in this prospectus, (ii) as
of January 29, 2005 and January 28, 2006 and for each
of the fiscal years 2003, 2004 and 2005 were derived from our
audited historical consolidated financial statements included
elsewhere in this prospectus, (iii) as of January 31,
2004 were derived from our audited consolidated financial
statements not included herein, and (iv) as of
April 30, 2005 were derived from our unaudited condensed
consolidated financial statements not included herein.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Thirteen | |
|
|
For the Fiscal Year Ended | |
|
Weeks Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
1/31/04 | |
|
1/29/05 | |
|
1/28/06 | |
|
4/30/05 | |
|
4/29/06 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands except net sales per average gross square foot) | |
Statement of Income Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
sales(1)
|
|
$ |
791,348 |
|
|
$ |
961,089 |
|
|
$ |
1,144,061 |
|
|
$ |
281,806 |
|
|
$ |
316,487 |
|
Gross profit
|
|
$ |
202,927 |
|
|
$ |
270,211 |
|
|
$ |
315,719 |
|
|
$ |
82,798 |
|
|
$ |
93,287 |
|
Operating
profit(2)
|
|
$ |
28,053 |
|
|
$ |
56,109 |
|
|
$ |
70,112 |
|
|
$ |
15,053 |
|
|
$ |
27,889 |
|
Net
income(2)
|
|
$ |
14,807 |
|
|
$ |
34,955 |
|
|
$ |
37,181 |
|
|
$ |
6,980 |
|
|
$ |
17,519 |
|
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
291,184 |
|
|
$ |
395,437 |
|
|
$ |
507,715 |
|
|
$ |
407,115 |
|
|
$ |
548,474 |
|
Working
capital(3)
|
|
$ |
103,244 |
|
|
$ |
138,919 |
|
|
$ |
238,528 |
|
|
$ |
151,715 |
|
|
$ |
258,423 |
|
Current
ratio(4)
|
|
|
2.39 |
|
|
|
2.28 |
|
|
|
2.71 |
|
|
|
2.21 |
|
|
|
2.60 |
|
Long term
obligations(5)
|
|
$ |
35,000 |
|
|
$ |
55,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
205,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Other Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of DSW stores at end of period
(6)
|
|
|
142 |
|
|
|
172 |
|
|
|
199 |
|
|
|
172 |
|
|
|
204 |
|
DSW total square footage at end of
period(7)
|
|
|
3,571,498 |
|
|
|
4,372,671 |
|
|
|
5,061,642 |
|
|
|
4,502,278 |
|
|
|
5,167,201 |
|
Average gross square footage at end of
period(8)
|
|
|
3,364,094 |
|
|
|
4,010,245 |
|
|
|
4,721,129 |
|
|
|
4,440,123 |
|
|
|
5,102,802 |
|
Net sales per average gross sq. ft.
(9)
|
|
$ |
214 |
|
|
$ |
217 |
|
|
$ |
217 |
|
|
$ |
57 |
|
|
$ |
56 |
|
Number of leased shoe departments at end of period
|
|
|
168 |
|
|
|
224 |
|
|
|
238 |
|
|
|
231 |
|
|
|
241 |
|
Total comparable store sales change
(10)
|
|
|
5.9 |
% |
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
5.4 |
% |
|
|
4.4 |
% |
|
|
4.2 |
% |
|
|
(1) |
Includes net sales of leased shoe departments. |
|
(2) |
Results for the fiscal year ended January 28, 2006 and for
the thirteen weeks ended April 30, 2005 include a
$6.5 million pre-tax charge and a $3.9 million
after-tax charge in operating profit and net income,
respectively, related to the reserve for estimated losses
associated with the theft of credit card and other purchase
information. |
|
(3) |
Working capital represents current assets less current
liabilities. |
|
(4) |
Current ratio represents current assets divided by current
liabilities. |
|
|
(5) |
Comprised of borrowings under the Value City revolving credit
facility to which we were previously a party. The balance as of
April 30, 2005 also includes $165 million owed to
Retail Ventures. See Description of
Indebtedness The $165.0 Million Intercompany
Note. |
|
|
(6) |
Number of DSW stores for each period presented prior to fiscal
2005 includes two combination DSW/ Filenes Basement stores
which were re-categorized as leased shoe departments at the
beginning of fiscal 2005. |
|
(7) |
DSW total square footage represents the total amount of square
footage at the end of the period for DSW stores only; it does
not reflect square footage of leased shoe departments. |
|
(8) |
Average gross square footage represents the monthly average of
square feet for DSW stores only for each period presented and
consequently reflects the effect of opening stores in different
months throughout the period. |
|
(9) |
Net sales per average gross square foot is the result of
dividing net sales for DSW stores only for the period presented
by average gross square footage calculated as described in
footnote 8 above. |
|
(10) |
Comparable DSW stores and comparable leased shoe departments are
those units that have been in operation for at least
14 months at the beginning of the fiscal year. Stores or
leased shoe departments, as the case may be, are added to the
comparable base at the beginning of the year and are dropped for
comparative purposes in the month that they are closed. |
6
RISK FACTORS
Investing in our Class A Common Shares involves a high
degree of risk. You should carefully consider the following
factors, as well as other information contained in this
prospectus and incorporated by reference in this prospectus,
before deciding to invest in our Class A Common Shares. If
any of the following risks actually occurs, our business,
financial condition, operating results or cash flow could suffer
materially and adversely. In this case, the trading price of our
Class A Common Shares could decline, and you could lose all
or part of your investment.
Safe Harbor Under the Private Securities Litigation Reform
Act of 1995
Certain information in this registration statement of which this
prospectus is a part, particularly information regarding future
economic performance and finances, and plans, expectations and
objectives of management, is forward-looking. The following
factors, in addition to other possible factors not listed, could
affect our actual results and cause such results to differ
materially from those expressed in forward-looking statements:
Risks Relating to Our Business
|
|
|
We intend to continue to open approximately 30 new DSW
stores per year from fiscal 2006 to fiscal 2010, which could
strain our resources and have a material adverse effect on our
business and financial performance. |
Our continued and future growth largely depends on our ability
to successfully open and operate new DSW stores on a profitable
basis. During fiscal 2005, fiscal 2004 and fiscal 2003, we
opened 29, 30 (net of one store closing during that period)
and 16 new DSW stores, respectively. As of April 29, 2006,
we have also opened five new stores for fiscal 2006. We intend
to open approximately 30 stores per year in each fiscal year
from fiscal 2006 through fiscal 2010. As of April 29, 2006,
we have signed leases for an additional 20 stores. During fiscal
2005, the average investment required to open a typical new DSW
store was approximately $1.4 million. This continued
expansion could place increased demands on our financial,
managerial, operational and administrative resources. For
example, our planned expansion will require us to increase the
number of people we employ as well as to monitor and upgrade our
management information and other systems and our distribution
facilities. These increased demands and operating complexities
could cause us to operate our business less efficiently, have a
material adverse effect on our operations and financial
performance and slow our growth.
|
|
|
We may be unable to open all the stores contemplated by
our growth strategy on a timely basis, and new stores we open
may not be profitable or may have an adverse impact on the
profitability of existing stores, either of which could have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and
results of operations. |
We intend to open approximately 30 stores per year in each
fiscal year from fiscal 2006 through fiscal 2010. However, we
may not achieve our planned expansion on a timely and profitable
basis or achieve results in new locations similar to those
achieved in existing locations in prior periods. Our ability to
open and operate new DSW stores successfully on a timely and
profitable basis depends on many factors, including, among
others, our ability to:
|
|
|
|
|
identify suitable markets and sites for new store locations; |
|
|
|
negotiate favorable lease terms; |
|
|
|
build-out or refurbish sites on a timely and effective basis; |
|
|
|
obtain sufficient levels of inventory to meet the needs of new
stores; |
|
|
|
obtain sufficient financing and capital resources or generate
sufficient cash flows from operations to fund growth; |
|
|
|
open new stores at costs not significantly greater than those
anticipated; |
7
|
|
|
|
|
successfully open new DSW stores in regions of the United States
in which we currently have few or no stores; |
|
|
|
control the costs of other capital investments associated with
store openings, including, for example, those related to the
expansion of distribution facilities; |
|
|
|
hire, train and retain qualified managers and store
personnel; and |
|
|
|
successfully integrate new stores into our existing
infrastructure, operations and management and distribution
systems or adapt such infrastructure, operations and systems to
accommodate our growth. |
As a result, we may be unable to open new stores at the rates
expected or at all. If we fail to successfully implement our
growth strategy, the opening of new DSW stores could be delayed
or prevented, could cost more than anticipated and could divert
resources from other areas of our business, any of which could
have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition and results of operations.
To the extent that we open new DSW stores in our existing
markets, we may experience reduced net sales in existing stores
in those markets. As the number of our stores increases, our
stores will become more concentrated in the markets we serve. As
a result, the number of customers and financial performance of
individual stores may decline and the average sales per square
foot at our stores may be reduced. This could have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results
of operations.
|
|
|
We rely on our good relationships with vendors to purchase
brand name and designer merchandise at favorable prices. If
these relationships were to be impaired, we may not be able to
obtain a sufficient selection of merchandise at attractive
prices, and we may not be able to respond promptly to changing
fashion trends, either of which could have a material adverse
effect on our competitive position, our business and financial
performance. |
We do not have long-term supply agreements or exclusive
arrangements with any vendors and, therefore, our success
depends on maintaining good relations with our vendors. Our
growth strategy depends to a significant extent on the
willingness and ability of our vendors to supply us with
sufficient inventory to stock our stores. If we fail to
strengthen our relations with our existing vendors or to enhance
the quality of merchandise they supply us, and if we cannot
maintain or acquire new vendors of in-season brand name and
designer merchandise, our ability to obtain a sufficient amount
and variety of merchandise at favorable prices may be limited,
which could have a negative impact on our competitive position.
In addition, our inability to stock our DSW stores with
in-season merchandise at attractive prices could result in lower
net sales and decreased customer interest in our stores, which,
in turn, would adversely affect our financial performance.
During fiscal 2005, taking into account industry consolidation,
merchandise supplied to DSW by three key vendors accounted for
approximately 22% of our net sales. The loss of or a reduction
in the amount of merchandise made available to us by any one of
these key vendors could have an adverse effect on our business.
|
|
|
We may be unable to anticipate and respond to fashion
trends and consumer preferences in the markets in which we
operate, which could have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition and results of operations. |
Our merchandising strategy is based on identifying each
regions customer base and having the proper mix of
products in each store to attract our target customers in that
region. This requires us to anticipate and respond to numerous
and fluctuating variables in fashion trends and other conditions
in the markets in which our stores are situated. A variety of
factors will affect our ability to maintain the proper mix of
products in each store, including:
|
|
|
|
|
variations in local economic conditions, which could affect our
customers discretionary spending; |
|
|
|
unanticipated fashion trends; |
8
|
|
|
|
|
our success in developing and maintaining vendor relationships
that provide us access to in-season merchandise at attractive
prices; |
|
|
|
our success in distributing merchandise to our stores in an
efficient manner; and |
|
|
|
changes in weather patterns, which in turn affect consumer
preferences. |
If we are unable to anticipate and fulfill the merchandise needs
of each region, we may experience decreases in our net sales and
may be forced to increase markdowns in relation to slow-moving
merchandise, either of which could have an adverse effect on our
business, financial condition and results of operations.
|
|
|
Our comparable store sales and quarterly financial
performance may fluctuate for a variety of reasons, which could
result in a decline in the price of our Class A Common
Shares. |
Our business is sensitive to customers spending patterns,
which in turn are subject to prevailing regional and national
economic conditions and the general level of economic activity.
Our comparable store sales and quarterly results of operations
have fluctuated in the past, and we expect them to continue to
fluctuate in the future. A variety of other factors affect our
comparable store sales and quarterly financial performance,
including:
|
|
|
|
|
changes in our merchandising strategy; |
|
|
|
timing and concentration of new DSW store openings and related
pre-opening and other
start-up costs; |
|
|
|
levels of pre-opening expenses associated with new DSW stores; |
|
|
|
changes in our merchandise mix; |
|
|
|
changes in and regional variations in demographic and population
characteristics; |
|
|
|
timing of promotional events; |
|
|
|
seasonal fluctuations due to weather conditions; |
|
|
|
actions by our competitors; and |
|
|
|
general U.S. economic conditions and, in particular, the
retail sales environment. |
Accordingly, our results for any one fiscal quarter are not
necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for any
other quarter, and comparable store sales for any particular
future period may decrease. Our future financial performance may
fall below the expectations of securities analysts and
investors. In that event, the price of our Class A Common
Shares would likely decline. For more information on our
quarterly results of operations, see Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations.
|
|
|
We rely on a single distribution center. The loss or
disruption of our centralized distribution center could have a
material adverse effect on our business and operations. |
Most of our inventory is shipped directly from suppliers to a
single centralized distribution center in Columbus, Ohio, where
the inventory is then processed, sorted and shipped to one of 12
pool locations located throughout the country and then on to our
stores. Our operating results depend on the orderly operation of
our receiving and distribution process, which in turn depends on
third-party vendors adherence to shipping schedules and
our effective management of our distribution facilities. We may
not anticipate all the changing demands that our expanding
operations will impose on our receiving and distribution system,
and events beyond our control, such as disruptions in operations
due to fire or other catastrophic events, labor disagreements or
shipping problems, may result in delays in the delivery of
merchandise to our stores.
While we believe that our distribution center is adequate to
meet our foreseeable needs, we may need to increase our
distribution capacity in the future to accommodate our expanding
retail business. Because our ability to expand our distribution
facilities at our current site is limited, we may need to
acquire, construct or lease additional distribution facilities
in other geographic locations to accommodate our planned
expansion.
9
We may also need to invest in additional information technology
to achieve a unified receiving and distribution system.
While we maintain business interruption and property insurance,
in the event our distribution center were to be shut down for
any reason or if we were to incur higher costs and longer lead
times in connection with a disruption at our distribution
center, our insurance may not be sufficient, and insurance
proceeds may not be timely paid to us.
|
|
|
We are dependent on Retail Ventures to provide us with
many key services for our business. |
From 1998 until our initial public offering in July 2005, we
were operated as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Value City
Department Stores, Inc. or Retail Ventures, and many key
services required by us for the operation of our business are
currently provided by Retail Ventures and its subsidiaries. We
have entered into agreements with Retail Ventures related to the
separation of our business operations from Retail Ventures
including, among others, a master separation agreement and a
shared services agreement. Under the terms of the shared
services agreement, which was effective as of January 30,
2005, Retail Ventures provides us with key services relating to
import administration, risk management, information technology,
tax, logistics, legal services, financial services, shared
benefits administration and payroll. Additionally, Retail
Ventures maintains insurance for us and for our directors,
officers and employees. In turn, we provide several subsidiaries
of Retail Ventures with services relating to planning and
allocation support, distribution services and transportation
management, site research, lease negotiation, store design and
construction management. The initial term of the shared services
agreement expires at the end of fiscal 2007 and will be extended
automatically for additional one-year terms unless terminated by
one of the parties. With respect to each shared service, we
cannot reasonably anticipate whether the services will be shared
for a shorter or longer than the initial term. We believe it is
necessary for Retail Ventures to provide these services for us
under the shared services agreement to facilitate the efficient
operation of our business as we transition to becoming an
independent public company. We, as a result, are dependent on
our relationship with Retail Ventures for shared services. See
Certain Relationships and Related Party
Transactions Relationships Between Our Company and
Retail Ventures Agreements Relating to our
Separation from Retail Ventures.
Once the transition periods specified in the shared services
agreement have expired and are not renewed, or if Retail
Ventures does not or is unable to perform its obligations under
the shared services agreement, we will be required to provide
these services ourselves or to obtain substitute arrangements
with third parties. We may be unable to provide these services
because of financial or other constraints or be unable to timely
implement substitute arrangements on terms that are favorable to
us, or at all, which would have an adverse effect on our
business, financial condition and results of operations.
|
|
|
Our failure to retain our existing senior management team
and to continue to attract qualified new personnel could
adversely affect our business. |
Our business requires disciplined execution at all levels of our
organization to ensure that we continually have sufficient
inventories of assorted brand name merchandise at below
traditional retail prices. This execution requires an
experienced and talented management team. If we were to lose the
benefit of the experience, efforts and abilities of any of our
key executive and buying personnel, our business could be
materially adversely affected. We have entered into employment
agreements with several of these officers. For more information
on our management team and their employment agreements and
severance agreements, see Management. Furthermore,
our ability to manage our retail expansion will require us to
continue to train, motivate and manage our employees and to
attract, motivate and retain additional qualified managerial and
merchandising personnel. Competition for these types of
personnel is intense, and we may not be successful in
attracting, assimilating and retaining the personnel required to
grow and operate our business profitably.
|
|
|
We may be unable to compete favorably in our highly
competitive market. |
The retail footwear market is highly competitive with few
barriers to entry. We compete against a diverse group of
retailers, both small and large, including locally owned shoe
stores, regional and national department
10
stores, specialty retailers and discount chains. Some of our
competitors are larger and have substantially greater resources
than we do. Our success depends on our ability to remain
competitive with respect to style, price, brand availability and
customer service. The performance of our competitors, as well as
a change in their pricing policies, marketing activities and
other business strategies, could have a material adverse effect
on our business, financial condition, results of operations and
our market share.
|
|
|
A decline in general economic conditions, or the outbreak
or escalation of war or terrorist acts, could lead to reduced
consumer demand for our footwear and accessories. |
Consumer spending habits, including spending for the footwear
and related accessories that we sell, are affected by, among
other things, prevailing economic conditions, levels of
employment, salaries and wage rates, prevailing interest rates,
income tax rates and policies, consumer confidence and consumer
perception of economic conditions. In addition, consumer
purchasing patterns may be influenced by consumers
disposable income. A general slowdown in the U.S. economy
or an uncertain economic outlook could adversely affect consumer
spending habits.
Consumer confidence is also affected by the domestic and
international political situation. The outbreak or escalation of
war, or the occurrence of terrorist acts or other hostilities in
or affecting the United States, could lead to a decrease in
spending by consumers. In the event of an economic slowdown, we
could experience lower net sales than expected on a quarterly or
annual basis and be forced to delay or slow our retail expansion
plans.
|
|
|
We rely on foreign sources for our merchandise, and our
business is therefore subject to risks associated with
international trade. |
We purchase merchandise from domestic and foreign vendors. In
addition, many of our domestic vendors import a large portion of
their merchandise from abroad, primarily from China, Brazil and
Italy. We believe that almost all the merchandise we purchased
during fiscal 2005 was manufactured outside the United States.
For this reason, we face risks inherent in purchasing from
foreign suppliers, such as:
|
|
|
|
|
economic and political instability in countries where these
suppliers are located; |
|
|
|
international hostilities or acts of war or terrorism affecting
the United States or foreign countries from which our
merchandise is sourced; |
|
|
|
increases in shipping costs; |
|
|
|
transportation delays and interruptions, including as a result
of increased inspections of import shipments by domestic
authorities; |
|
|
|
work stoppages; |
|
|
|
adverse fluctuations in currency exchange rates; |
|
|
|
U.S. laws affecting the importation of goods, including
duties, tariffs and quotas and other non-tariff barriers; |
|
|
|
expropriation or nationalization; |
|
|
|
changes in local government administration and governmental
policies; |
|
|
|
changes in import duties or quotas; |
|
|
|
compliance with trade and foreign tax laws; and |
|
|
|
local business practices, including compliance with local laws
and with domestic and international labor standards. |
We require our vendors to operate in compliance with applicable
laws and regulations and our internal requirements. However, we
do not control our vendors or their labor and business
practices. The violation of labor or other laws by one of our
vendors could have an adverse effect on our business.
11
|
|
|
Our secured revolving credit facility could limit our
operational flexibility. |
We have entered into a $150 million secured revolving
credit facility with a term expiring July 2010. Under this
facility, we and our subsidiary, DSW Shoe Warehouse, Inc., or
DSWSW, are named as
co-borrowers. This
facility is subject to a borrowing base restriction and provides
for borrowings at variable interest rates based on the London
Interbank Offered Rate, or LIBOR, the prime rate and the Federal
Funds effective rate, plus a margin. Our obligations under our
secured revolving credit facility are secured by a lien on
substantially all our and our subsidiarys personal
property and a pledge of our shares of DSWSW. In addition, our
secured revolving credit facility contains usual and customary
restrictive covenants relating to our management and the
operation of our business. These covenants, among other things,
restrict our ability to grant liens on our assets, incur
additional indebtedness, open or close stores, pay cash
dividends and redeem our stock, enter into transactions with
affiliates and merge or consolidate with another entity. In
addition, if at any time we utilize over 90% of our borrowing
capacity under this facility, we must comply with a fixed charge
coverage ratio test set forth in the facility documents. These
covenants could restrict our operational flexibility, and any
failure to comply with these covenants or our payment
obligations would limit our ability to borrow under the secured
revolving credit facility and, in certain circumstances, may
allow the lenders thereunder to require repayment. For more
information regarding our secured revolving credit facility, see
Description of Indebtedness.
|
|
|
From the time of our acquisition by Value City Department
Stores, Inc. in 1998 until the completion of our initial public
offering in July 2005, we were not operated as an entity
separate from Value City and Retail Ventures, and, as a result,
our historical financial information may not be indicative of
our historical financial results or future financial
performance. |
Our consolidated financial information included in this
prospectus may not be indicative of our future financial
performance. This is because these statements do not necessarily
reflect our historical financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows as they would have been had we been
operated during all the periods presented as a separate,
stand-alone entity.
Our consolidated financial information assumes that we, for the
periods presented, had existed as a separate legal entity, and
has been derived from the consolidated financial statements of
Retail Ventures. Some costs have been reflected in the
consolidated financial statements that are not necessarily
indicative of the costs that we would have incurred had we
operated as an independent, stand-alone entity for all periods
presented. These costs include allocated portions of Retail
Ventures corporate overhead, interest expense and income
taxes.
|
|
|
We face security risks related to our electronic
processing and transmission of confidential customer
information. On March 8, 2005, Retail Ventures announced
the theft of credit card and other purchase information relating
to our customers. This security breach could materially
adversely affect our reputation and business and subject us to
liability. |
We rely on commercially available encryption software and other
technologies to provide security for processing and transmission
of confidential customer information, such as credit card
numbers. Advances in computer capabilities, new discoveries in
the field of cryptography, or other events or developments,
including improper acts by third parties, may result in a
compromise or breach of the security measures we use to protect
customer transaction data. Compromises of these security systems
could have a material adverse effect on our reputation and
business, and may subject us to significant liabilities and
reporting obligations. A party who is able to circumvent our
security measures could misappropriate our information, cause
interruptions in our operations, damage our reputation and
customers willingness to shop in our stores and subject us
to possible liability. We may be required to expend significant
capital and other resources to protect against these security
breaches or to alleviate problems caused by these breaches.
As previously reported, on March 8, 2005, Retail Ventures
announced that it had learned of the theft of credit card and
other purchase information from a portion of our customers. On
April 18, 2005, Retail Ventures issued the findings from
its investigation into the theft. The theft was of transaction
information involving approximately 1.4 million credit
cards and data from transactions involving approximately 96,000
checks.
12
We and Retail Ventures contacted and continue to cooperate with
law enforcement and other authorities with regard to this
matter. We are involved in several legal proceedings arising out
of this incident, including four putative class action lawsuits,
which seek unspecified monetary damages, credit monitoring and
other relief. Each of the four lawsuits seeks to certify a
different class of consumers. One of the lawsuits seeks to
certify a nationwide class that would include every consumer who
used a credit card, debit card, or check to make purchases at
DSW between November 2004 and March 2005 and whose transaction
data was taken during the data theft incident. The other three
lawsuits seek to certify classes of consumers that are limited
geographically. Those cases use different putative class
definitions to identify consumers who made purchases at certain
stores in Ohio, Michigan, and Illinois. On July 26, 2006,
the Michigan federal district court granted DSWs motion to
dismiss the Michigan lawsuit and so ordered the dismissal of
that lawsuit.
In connection with this matter, we entered into a consent order
with the Federal Trade Commission, or FTC, which has
jurisdiction over consumer protection matters. The FTC published
the final order on March 14, 2006, and copies of the
complaint and consent order are available from the FTCs
Web site at http://www.ftc.gov and also from the FTCs
Consumer Response Center, Room 130, 600 Pennsylvania
Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20580.
We have not admitted any wrongdoing or that the facts alleged in
the FTCs proposed unfairness complaint are true. Under the
consent order, we will pay no fine or damages. We have agreed,
however, to maintain a comprehensive information security
program and to undergo a biannual assessment of such program by
an independent third party.
There can be no assurance that there will not be additional
proceedings or claims brought against us in the future. We have
contested and will continue to vigorously contest the claims
made against us and will continue to explore our defenses and
possible claims against others.
We estimate that the potential exposures for losses related to
this theft ranges from approximately $6.5 million to
approximately $9.5 million. Because of many factors,
including the early development of information regarding the
theft, the early stage of the lawsuits asserted against us and
recoverability under insurance policies, there is no amount in
the estimated range that represents a better estimate than any
other amount in the range. Therefore, in accordance with
Financial Accounting Standard No. 5, Accounting for
Contingencies, we accrued a charge to operations in the
first quarter of fiscal 2005 equal to the low end of the range
set forth above, or $6.5 million. To our knowledge, no
class action lawsuits brought by consumers alleging claims
similar to those asserted in the putative class actions against
us have been litigated against other merchants which have
experienced similar data thefts. As the situation develops and
more information becomes available to us, the amount of the
reserve may increase or decrease accordingly. The amount of any
such change may be material. As of April 29, 2006, the
balance of the associated accrual for potential exposure was
$4.6 million.
Risks Relating to Our Class A Common Shares and this
Offering
|
|
|
The PIES may adversely affect the market price for our
Class A Common Shares. |
The market price of our Class A Common Shares is likely to
be influenced by the PIES. For example, the market price of our
Class A Common Shares could become more volatile and could
be depressed by (a) investors anticipation of the
potential resale in the market of a substantial number of
additional Class A Common Shares received upon exchange of
the PIES, (b) possible sales of our Class A Common
Shares by investors who view the PIES as a more attractive means
of equity participation in us than owning our Class A
Common Shares and (c) hedging or arbitrage trading activity
that may develop involving the PIES and our Class A Common
Shares.
|
|
|
We are controlled directly by Retail Ventures and
indirectly by SSC, whose interests may differ from those of our
other shareholders. |
As of April 29, 2006, Retail Ventures, a public
corporation, owns 100% of our Class B Common Shares, which
represents in excess of 63.1% of our outstanding Common Shares.
These shares collectively represent approximately 93.2% of the
combined voting power of our outstanding Common Shares. As of
April 29,
13
2006, SSC owned approximately 42.8% of the outstanding common
shares of Retail Ventures and beneficially owned approximately
53.6% (assumes issuance of (i) 8,333,333 shares of
Retail Ventures common stock issuable upon the exercise of
convertible warrants, (ii) 1,594,377 shares of Retail
Ventures common stock issuable upon the exercise of term loan
warrants, and (iii) 479,792 shares of Retail Ventures
common stock issuable pursuant to the anti-dilution provisions
of the term loan warrants) of the outstanding common shares of
Retail Ventures. SSC, a privately held corporation, is
controlled by Jay L. Schottenstein, the Chairman of the Boards
of Directors of DSW and Retail Ventures and our Chief Executive
Officer, and members of his immediate family. Given their
respective ownership interests, Retail Ventures and, indirectly,
SSC, are able to control or substantially influence the outcome
of all matters submitted to our shareholders for approval,
including:
|
|
|
|
|
the election of directors; |
|
|
|
mergers or other business combinations; and |
|
|
|
acquisitions or dispositions of assets. |
The interests of Retail Ventures or SSC may differ from or be
opposed to the interests of our other shareholders, and their
control may have the effect of delaying or preventing a change
in control that may be favored by other shareholders. See
Principal Shareholders and Certain
Relationships and Related Party Transactions.
|
|
|
SSC and Retail Ventures or its affiliates may compete
directly against us. |
Corporate opportunities may arise in the area of potential
competitive business activities that may be attractive to Retail
Ventures, SSC and us in the area of employee recruiting and
retention. Any competition could intensify if Value City begins
to carry an assortment of shoes in its stores similar to those
found in our stores, target customers similar to ours or adopt a
similar business model or strategy for its shoe businesses.
Given that Value City is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Retail
Ventures and DSW is not wholly-owned, Retail Ventures and SSC
may be inclined to direct relevant corporate opportunities to
them rather than us.
Our amended and restated articles of incorporation provide that
Retail Ventures and SSC are under no obligation to communicate
or offer any corporate opportunity to us. In addition, Retail
Ventures and SSC have the right to engage in similar activities
as us, do business with our suppliers and customers and, except
as limited by the master separation agreement, employ or
otherwise engage any of our officers or employees. SSC and its
affiliates engage in a variety of businesses, including, but not
limited to, business and inventory liquidations and real estate
acquisitions. The provisions also outline how corporate
opportunities are to be assigned in the event that our, Retail
Ventures or SSCs directors and officers learn of
corporate opportunities. See Certain Relationships and
Related Party Transactions Provisions of Our Amended
Articles of Incorporation Governing Corporate Opportunities and
Related Party Transactions.
|
|
|
Some of our directors and officers also serve as directors
and officers of Retail Ventures, and may have conflicts of
interest because they may own Retail Ventures stock or options
to purchase Retail Ventures stock, or they may receive cash- or
equity-based awards based on the performance of Retail
Ventures. |
Some of our directors and officers also serve as directors or
officers of Retail Ventures and may own Retail Ventures stock or
options to purchase Retail Ventures stock, or they may be
entitled to participate in the Retail Ventures Plans as defined
in Management Executive
Compensation Employee Incentive Plans. Jay L.
Schottenstein is our Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the
Board of Directors and Chairman of the Board of Directors of
Retail Ventures; Heywood Wilansky is a director of DSW and Chief
Executive Officer of Retail Ventures; Harvey L. Sonnenberg is a
director of DSW and of Retail Ventures; James A. McGrady is a
Vice President of DSW and the Executive Vice President, Chief
Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary of Retail Ventures;
and Steven E. Miller is Senior Vice President and Controller of
both DSW and Retail Ventures. The Retail Ventures Plans provide
cash- and equity-based compensation to employees based on Retail
Ventures performance. These employment arrangements and
ownership interests or cash- or equity-based awards could
create, or appear to create, potential conflicts of interest
when directors
14
or officers who own Retail Ventures stock or stock options or
who participate in the Retail Ventures Plans are faced with
decisions that could have different implications for Retail
Ventures than they do for us. These potential conflicts of
interest may not be resolved in our favor.
|
|
|
We do not expect to pay dividends in the foreseeable
future. |
We anticipate that future earnings will be used principally to
finance our retail expansion. Thus, we do not intend to pay cash
dividends on our Common Shares in the foreseeable future.
Provisions in our secured revolving credit facility may also
restrict us from declaring dividends. Our board of directors
will have sole discretion to determine the dividend amount, if
any, to be paid. Our board of directors will consider a number
of factors, including applicable provisions of Ohio corporate
law, our financial condition, capital requirements, funds
generated from operations, future business prospects, applicable
contractual restrictions and any other factors our board may
deem relevant. For further description of our dividend policy,
see Dividend Policy.
|
|
|
If our existing shareholders or holders of rights to
purchase our Common Shares sell the shares they own, or if
Retail Ventures distributes its Common Shares to its
shareholders, it could adversely affect the price of our
Class A Common Shares. |
The market price of our Class A Common Shares could decline
as a result of market sales by our existing shareholders,
including Retail Ventures, or a distribution of our Common
Shares to Retail Ventures shareholders or the perception
that such sales or distributions will occur. These sales or
distributions also might make it difficult for us to sell equity
securities in the future at a time and at a price that we deem
appropriate. We cannot predict the size of future sales of our
Common Shares.
As of April 29, 2006, there were 16,198,528 of our
Class A Common Shares outstanding (including
17,453 shares of director stock units issuable pursuant to
the terms of DSWs equity incentive plan). Additionally, we
have issued 131,300 restricted Class A Common Shares and
stock units pursuant to the terms of DSWs equity incentive
plan. As of April 29, 2006, there were 27,702,667 of our
Class B Common Shares outstanding, which are restricted
securities within the meaning of Rule 144 under the
Securities Act but are eligible for resale subject to applicable
volume, manner of sale, holding period and other limitations of
Rule 144.
SSC, Cerberus and Millennium have the right to acquire our
Class A Common Shares from Retail Ventures pursuant to
warrant agreements they have with Retail Ventures. For further
discussion of these warrant agreements, see
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations The DSW
Separation, Certain Relationships and Related Party
Transactions Notes, Credit Agreements and
Guarantees and Description of Indebtedness.
We, Retail Ventures, each of Retail Ventures executive
officers and directors and SSC, as well as each of our executive
officers and directors, have agreed to a lock-up,
meaning that neither we nor they will sell any Common Shares
without the prior consent of Lehman Brothers Inc. as the
underwriter for the offering of the PIES for 90 days
following the date of this prospectus, except to the extent
necessary to allow for the transfer of our Class A Common
Shares by Retail Ventures upon exercise of warrants for DSW
Class A Common Shares by SSC, Cerberus or Millennium, or
their permitted transferees. SSC may also transfer the warrants
issued by Retail Ventures and held by it as of the date of this
prospectus without such consent. See Plan of
Distribution Lock-up Agreements. These
warrants are exercisable at the option of the holder into either
Retail Ventures Common Shares or Class A Common Shares of
DSW held by Retail Ventures.
Upon the expiration of the
lock-up period, all
these Common Shares are eligible for future sale, subject to the
applicable volume, manner of sale, holding period and other
limitations of Rule 144. Retail Ventures has registration
rights with respect to its DSW Common Shares in specified
circumstances pursuant to the master separation agreement. In
addition, SSC and Cerberus (and any party to whom either of them
transfers at least 15% of their interest in registrable DSW
Common Shares) have the right to require that we register for
resale in specified circumstances the Class A Common Shares
issued to them upon exercise of their warrants, and each of
these entities and Millennium will be entitled to participate in
registrations initiated by
15
the other entities. See Certain Relationships and Related
Party Transactions for a discussion of Common Shares that
may be sold into the public market in the future.
|
|
|
Our amended articles of incorporation, amended and
restated code of regulations and Ohio state law contain
provisions that may have the effect of delaying or preventing a
change in control of DSW. This could adversely affect the value
of your shares. |
Our amended articles of incorporation authorize our board of
directors to issue up to 100,000,000 preferred shares and to
determine the powers, preferences, privileges, rights (including
voting rights) qualifications, limitations and restrictions on
those shares, without any further vote or action by the
shareholders. The rights of the holders of our Class A
Common Shares will be subject to, and may be adversely affected
by, the rights of the holders of any preferred shares that may
be issued in the future. The issuance of preferred shares could
have the effect of delaying, deterring or preventing a change in
control and could adversely affect the voting power of the
Class A Common Shares.
In addition, provisions of our amended articles of
incorporation, amended and restated code of regulations and Ohio
law, together or separately, could discourage potential
acquisition proposals, delay or prevent a change in control and
limit the price that certain investors might be willing to pay
in the future for our Common Shares. Among other things, these
provisions establish a staggered board, require a supermajority
vote to remove directors, and establish certain advance notice
procedures for nomination of candidates for election as
directors and for shareholder proposals to be considered at
shareholders meetings. For further description of these
provisions of amended articles of incorporation, amended and
restated code of regulations and Ohio law, see Description
of Capital Stock Anti-Takeover Effects of Certain
Provisions of our Amended Articles of Incorporation, our Amended
and Restated Code of Regulations and Ohio Law.
Risks Relating to our Relationship with and Separation from
Retail Ventures
|
|
|
The agreements we entered into with Retail Ventures in
connection with our initial public offering could restrict our
operations and adversely affect our financial condition. |
We and Retail Ventures have entered into a number of agreements
governing our separation from and our relationship with Retail
Ventures, including a master separation agreement and a shared
services agreement. Accordingly, the terms and provisions of
these agreements may be less favorable to us than terms and
provisions we could have obtained in arms length
negotiations with unaffiliated third parties.
We and Retail Ventures have entered into a tax separation
agreement. The tax separation agreement governs the respective
rights, responsibilities and obligations of Retail Ventures and
us with respect to tax liabilities and benefits, tax attributes,
tax contests and other matters regarding taxes and related tax
returns. Although Retail Ventures has informed us that it does
not currently intend or plan to undertake a spin-off of our
stock to Retail Ventures shareholders, we and Retail
Ventures have agreed to set forth our respective rights,
responsibilities and obligations with respect to any possible
spin-off in the tax separation agreement. If Retail Ventures
were to decide to pursue a possible spin-off, we have agreed to
cooperate with Retail Ventures and to take any and all actions
reasonably requested by Retail Ventures in connection with such
a transaction. We have also agreed not to knowingly take or fail
to take any actions that could reasonably be expected to
preclude Retail Ventures ability to undertake a tax-free
spin-off. In addition, we generally would be responsible for any
taxes resulting from the failure of a spin-off to qualify as a
tax-free transaction to the extent such taxes are attributable
to, or result from, any action or failure to act by us or
certain transactions in our stock (including transactions over
which we would have no control, such as acquisitions of our
stock and the exercise of warrants, options, exchange rights,
conversion rights or similar arrangements with respect to our
stock) following or preceding a spin-off. We would also be
responsible for a percentage (based on the relative market
capitalizations of DSW and Retail Ventures at the time of such
spin-off) of such taxes to the extent such taxes are not
otherwise attributable to us or Retail Ventures. Our agreements
in connection with such tax matters last indefinitely. See
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations Separation
Agreements and Certain Relationships and Related
Party Transactions Relationships Between Our Company
and Retail Ventures.
16
|
|
|
We may be prevented from issuing stock to raise capital,
to effectuate acquisitions or to provide equity incentives to
members of our management and board of directors. |
Beneficial ownership of at least 80% of the total voting power
and 80% of each class of nonvoting capital stock is required in
order for Retail Ventures to effect a tax-free spin-off of DSW
or certain other tax-free transactions. Although Retail Ventures
has informed us that it does not currently intend or plan to
undertake a spin-off of our stock to Retail Ventures
shareholders, under the terms of our tax separation agreement,
we have agreed that for so long as Retail Ventures continues to
own greater than 50% of the voting control of our outstanding
stock, we will not knowingly take or fail to take any action
that could reasonably be expected to preclude Retail
Ventures ability to undertake a tax-free spin-off. In
addition, Retail Ventures is currently subject to
(a) contractual obligations with its lenders to retain
ownership of at least 55% by value of the Common Shares of DSW
for so long as the non-convertible loan facility remains
outstanding and (b) contractual obligations with its
warrantholders to retain enough DSW Common Shares to be able to
satisfy its obligations to deliver such shares to its
warrantholders if the warrantholders elect to exercise their
warrants in full for DSW Class A Common Shares (without
regard to any limitations on exercisability of the warrants).
Upon completion of the offering of the PIES by Retail Ventures,
Retail Ventures will be released from these contractual
obligations with its lenders as well as certain liens on the
Common Shares of DSW in favor of these lenders and a lien
granted to Value City. However, Retail Ventures will pledge
sufficient DSW Common Shares to the collateral agent for the
PIES to enable Retail Ventures to satisfy its obligations to
deliver Class A Common Shares upon exchange of the PIES,
and sufficient DSW Common Shares will continue to be subject to
liens and/or contractual obligations to enable Retail Ventures
to satisfy its obligations to the warrantholders to deliver
Class A Common Shares upon exercise of the warrants. These
restrictions may prevent us from issuing additional equity
securities to raise capital, to effectuate acquisitions or to
provide management or director equity incentives. See
Certain Relationships and Related Party
Transactions Relationships Between Our Company and
Retail Ventures.
|
|
|
Our prior and continuing relationship with Retail Ventures
exposes us to risks attributable to Retail Ventures
businesses. |
Retail Ventures is obligated to indemnify us for losses that a
party may seek to impose upon us or our affiliates for
liabilities relating to the Retail Ventures business that are
incurred through a breach of the master separation agreement or
any ancillary agreement by Retail Ventures or its non-DSW
affiliates, if such losses are attributable to Retail Ventures
in connection with our initial public offering or are not
expressly assumed by us under the master separation agreement.
Any claims made against us that are properly attributable to
Retail Ventures or Value City in accordance with these
arrangements requires us to exercise our rights under the master
separation agreement to obtain payment from Retail Ventures. We
are exposed to the risk that, in these circumstances, Retail
Ventures cannot, or will not, make the required payment. If this
were to occur, our business and financial performance could be
adversely affected. See Certain Relationships and Related
Party Transactions.
|
|
|
Possible future sales of Class A Common Shares by
Retail Ventures, SSC, Cerberus and Millennium could adversely
affect prevailing market prices for the Class A Common
Shares. |
The Class B Common Shares held by Retail Ventures are
currently subject to liens in favor of SSC and Cerberus, as well
as a lien granted to Value City. However, Retail Ventures may
sell any and all of the Common Shares held by it upon the
consent of these lenders, subject to applicable securities laws
and the restrictions set forth below. For a discussion of these
liens, see Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations The
DSW Separation and Description of
Indebtedness. In addition, SSC, Cerberus and Millennium
have the right to acquire from Retail Ventures our Class A
Common Shares. Sales or distribution by Retail Ventures, SSC,
Cerberus and Millennium of a substantial number of Class A
Common Shares in the public market or to their respective
shareholders, or the perception that such SSC, Cerberus and
Millennium sales or distributions could occur, could adversely
affect prevailing market prices for the Class A Common
Shares. See Certain Relationships and Related Party
Transactions
17
Relationships Between our Company and Retail
Ventures Agreements Relating to our Separation from
Retail Ventures Exchange Agreement.
Retail Ventures has advised us that its current intent is to
continue to hold all the Common Shares owned by it, except to
the extent necessary to satisfy obligations under warrants it
has granted to SSC, Cerberus, and Millennium and obligations
under the PIES. See Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations The DSW Separation, Certain
Relationships and Related Party Transactions Notes,
Credit Agreements and Guarantees and Description of
Indebtedness. In addition, Retail Ventures is currently
subject to (a) contractual obligations with its lenders to
retain ownership of at least 55% by value of our Common Shares
for so long as the non-convertible loan facility remains
outstanding and (b) contractual obligations with its
warrantholders to retain enough DSW Common Shares to be able to
satisfy its obligations to deliver such shares to its
warrantholders if the warrantholders elect to exercise their
warrants in full for DSW Class A Common Shares (without
regard to any limitations on exercisability of the warrants).
Upon completion of the offering of the PIES by Retail Ventures,
Retail Ventures will be released from these contractual
obligations with its lenders, as well as the liens on the Common
Shares of DSW described above. However, Retail Ventures will
pledge sufficient DSW Common Shares to the collateral agent for
the PIES to enable Retail Ventures to satisfy its obligations to
deliver Class A Common Shares upon exchange of the PIES,
and sufficient DSW Common Shares will continue to be subject to
liens and/or contractual obligations to enable Retail Ventures
to satisfy its obligations to the warrantholders to deliver
Class A Common Shares upon exercise of the warrants. In
addition, Retail Ventures has agreed not to sell or otherwise
dispose of any DSW Common Shares that Retail Ventures holds for
a period of 90 days after the date of this prospectus
without the prior written consent of Lehman Brothers Inc. as
underwriter for the offering of the PIES, except to the extent
necessary to allow for the transfer of our Class A Common
Shares by Retail Ventures upon exercise of warrants by SSC,
Cerberus or Millennium, or their permitted transferees, for DSW
Class A Common Shares. See Plan of
Distribution Lock-up Agreements.
If Retail Ventures were to require funds to service or refinance
its indebtedness or to fund its operations in the future and
could not obtain capital from alternative sources, it could seek
to sell some or all of the DSW Common Shares that it holds in
order to obtain such funds.
Similarly, SSC, Cerberus and Millennium are not subject to any
contractual obligation to retain Class A Common Shares they
may acquire from Retail Ventures, except that SSC has agreed not
to sell or otherwise dispose of any of our Common Shares for a
period of 90 days after the date of this prospectus without
the prior written consent of Lehman Brothers Inc., though SSC
may transfer the warrants issued by Retail Ventures and held by
it as of the date of this prospectus without such consent. These
warrants are exercisable at the option of the holder either into
Retail Ventures common shares or into Class A Common
Shares of DSW held by Retail Ventures. As a result, there can be
no assurance concerning the period of time during which Retail
Ventures, SSC, Cerberus or Millennium will maintain their
respective beneficial ownership of Common Shares in the future.
Retail Ventures, SSC and Cerberus (and any party to whom either
of them transfers at least 15% of their interest in registrable
DSW Common Shares) have registration rights with respect to
their respective Common Shares, which would facilitate any
future distribution, and SSC, Cerberus and Millennium will be
entitled to participate in the registrations initiated by the
other entities. See Certain Relationships and Related
Party Transactions Relationships Between Our Company
and Retail Ventures.
18
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Some of the statements under Prospectus Summary,
Risk Factors, Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,
Business and elsewhere in this prospectus, including
information incorporated by reference herein, may contain
forward-looking statements within the meaning of
Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and
Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, or the Exchange Act, which reflect our current views
with respect to, among other things, future events and financial
performance. You can identify these forward-looking statements
by the use of forward-looking words such as outlook,
believes, expects,
potential, continues, may,
will, should, seeks,
approximately, predicts,
intends, plans, estimates,
anticipates or the negative version of those words
or other comparable words. Any forward-looking statements
contained in this prospectus are based upon our historical
performance and on current plans, estimates and expectations.
The inclusion of this forward-looking information should not be
regarded as a representation by us, the underwriter for the
offering of the PIES or any other person that the future plans,
estimates or expectations contemplated by us will be achieved.
Such forward-looking statements are subject to various risks and
uncertainties. Accordingly, there are or will be important
factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially
from those indicated in these statements. We believe that these
factors include but are not limited to those described under
Risk Factors. These factors should not be construed
as exhaustive and should be read in conjunction with the other
cautionary statements that are included in this prospectus. We
do not undertake any obligation to publicly update or review any
forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new
information, future developments or otherwise.
If one or more of these or other risks or uncertainties
materialize, or if our underlying assumptions prove to be
incorrect, actual results may vary materially from what we may
have projected. Any forward-looking statements you read in this
prospectus reflect our current views with respect to future
events and are subject to these and other risks, uncertainties
and assumptions relating to our operations, results of
operations, financial condition, growth strategy and liquidity.
You should specifically consider the factors identified in this
prospectus that could cause actual results to differ before
making an investment decision.
19
USE OF PROCEEDS
This prospectus relates only to our Class A Common Shares
that Retail Ventures may deliver to the holders of the PIES. We
will not receive any of the proceeds from the sale of the PIES
or the delivery of Class A Common Shares to which this
prospectus relates and will have no obligation with respect to
the PIES.
20
THE SELLING SHAREHOLDER
The selling shareholder of our Class A Common Shares
offered hereby is Retail Ventures. As of April 29, 2006,
Retail Ventures owned 27,702,667 of our Class B Common
Shares, or in excess of 63.1% of our total outstanding Common
Shares and 93.2% of the combined voting power of our outstanding
Common Shares. Until the settlement of the PIES, Retail Ventures
will retain all voting and other beneficial rights in the
Class B Common Shares it pledges to secure the PIES,
subject to liens in favor of the collateral agent for the
benefit of the holders of the PIES. Pursuant to an exchange
agreement with Retail Ventures, upon the request of Retail
Ventures, we are required to exchange some or all of the
Class B Common Shares held by Retail Ventures for
Class A Common Shares, and we will deliver to the
collateral agent such number of our Class A Common Shares
as may be necessary to satisfy Retail Ventures obligations
under the PIES upon receipt of notice from the collateral agent
and exchange of a corresponding number of Class B Common
Shares.
Under the terms of the PIES offered by Retail Ventures, Retail
Ventures will have an obligation to deliver (unless Retail
Ventures elects to settle the PIES in cash), on
September 15, 2011 (or earlier if exchange is accelerated),
a maximum
of Class A
Common Shares per $50 principal amount of PIES, and a maximum
of Class A
Common Shares in the aggregate, subject to exchange adjustments
as provided in the PIES. The PIES will be exchanged into a
number of Class A Common Shares equal to the exchange
ratio, as provided in the PIES.
21
PRICE RANGE OF CLASS A COMMON SHARES
We completed our initial public offering on July 5, 2005.
Our Class A Common Shares are listed for trading under the
ticker symbol DSW on the NYSE. The following table
sets forth the high and low sales prices of our Class A
Common Shares as reported on the NYSE Composite Tape during the
periods indicated. As of April 29, 2006, there were 5
holders of record of our Class A Common Shares and one
holder of record of our Class B Common Shares.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High | |
|
Low | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Fiscal 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
$ |
27.50 |
|
|
$ |
23.11 |
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
27.32 |
|
|
|
17.50 |
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
28.10 |
|
|
|
20.00 |
|
Fiscal 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
|
32.61 |
|
|
|
26.32 |
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
37.39 |
|
|
|
28.26 |
|
|
Third Quarter (through August 3, 2006)
|
|
|
35.22 |
|
|
|
29.52 |
|
22
DIVIDEND POLICY
We do not anticipate paying cash dividends on our Common Shares
in the foreseeable future. Presently, we expect that all of our
future earnings will be retained for development of our
business. The payment of any future dividends will be at the
discretion of our board of directors and will depend upon, among
other things, future earnings, operations, capital requirements,
our general financial condition and general business conditions.
In March 2005, we incurred intercompany indebtedness to fund a
$165.0 million dividend to Retail Ventures. Additionally,
in May 2005, we incurred intercompany indebtedness to fund a
$25 million dividend to Retail Ventures. In July 2005, we
repaid both of these notes in full from the net proceeds of our
initial public offering.
Our credit facility restricts the payment of dividends by us or
our subsidiaries, other than dividends paid in stock, and cash
dividends can only be paid to Retail Ventures by us up to the
aggregate amount $5.0 million, less the amount of any loan
advances made to Retail Ventures by us or our subsidiaries. See
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations Liquidity and
Capital Resources and Description of
Indebtedness Our Secured Revolving Credit
Facility.
23
SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL AND OPERATING DATA
We present below summary historical financial data. The
following summary historical financial data (i) as of
April 29, 2006 and for the thirteen week periods ended
April 30, 2005 and April 29, 2006, were derived from
our unaudited historical condensed consolidated financial
statements included elsewhere in this prospectus, (ii) as
of January 29, 2005 and January 28, 2006 and for each
of fiscal years 2003, 2004 and 2005 were derived from our
audited historical consolidated financial statements included
elsewhere in this prospectus, (iii) as of February 2,
2002, February 1, 2003 and January 31, 2004 and for
each of fiscal years 2001 and 2002 were derived from our audited
consolidated financial statements not included herein, and
(iv) as of April 30, 2005 were derived from our
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements not
included herein.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the | |
|
|
|
|
Thirteen Weeks | |
|
|
For the Fiscal Year Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2/2/02 | |
|
2/1/03 | |
|
1/31/04 | |
|
1/29/05 | |
|
1/28/06 | |
|
4/30/05 | |
|
4/29/06 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands except per share information and net sales per average gross square foot) | |
Statement of Income Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
sales(1)
|
|
$ |
523,509 |
|
|
$ |
644,345 |
|
|
$ |
791,348 |
|
|
$ |
961,089 |
|
|
$ |
1,144,061 |
|
|
$ |
281,806 |
|
|
$ |
316,487 |
|
Gross profit
|
|
$ |
123,396 |
|
|
$ |
158,756 |
|
|
$ |
202,927 |
|
|
$ |
270,211 |
|
|
$ |
315,719 |
|
|
$ |
82,798 |
|
|
$ |
93,287 |
|
Operating
profit(2)
|
|
$ |
4,668 |
|
|
$ |
17,781 |
|
|
$ |
28,053 |
|
|
$ |
56,109 |
|
|
$ |
70,112 |
|
|
$ |
15,053 |
|
|
$ |
27,889 |
|
Net
income(2)
|
|
$ |
239 |
|
|
$ |
8,060 |
|
|
$ |
14,807 |
|
|
$ |
34,955 |
|
|
$ |
37,181 |
|
|
$ |
6,980 |
|
|
$ |
17,519 |
|
Earnings per share (basic and
diluted)(3)
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
|
$ |
0.53 |
|
|
$ |
1.26 |
|
|
$ |
1.00 |
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
232,821 |
|
|
$ |
295,703 |
|
|
$ |
291,184 |
|
|
$ |
395,437 |
|
|
$ |
507,715 |
|
|
$ |
407,115 |
|
|
$ |
548,474 |
|
Working
capital(4)
|
|
$ |
60,121 |
|
|
$ |
87,141 |
|
|
$ |
103,244 |
|
|
$ |
138,919 |
|
|
$ |
238,528 |
|
|
$ |
151,715 |
|
|
$ |
258,423 |
|
Current
ratio(5)
|
|
|
1.77 |
|
|
|
2.07 |
|
|
|
2.39 |
|
|
|
2.28 |
|
|
|
2.71 |
|
|
|
2.21 |
|
|
|
2.60 |
|
Long term
obligations(6)
|
|
$ |
325 |
|
|
$ |
54,116 |
|
|
$ |
35,000 |
|
|
$ |
55,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
205,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Other Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of DSW
stores:(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of period
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
142 |
|
|
|
172 |
|
|
|
172 |
|
|
|
199 |
|
|
|
New stores
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
Closed/re-categorized
stores(7)
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of period
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
142 |
|
|
|
172 |
|
|
|
199 |
|
|
|
177 |
|
|
|
204 |
|
|
Comparable DSW stores
(units)(8)
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
168 |
|
|
DSW total square footage at end of
period(9)
|
|
|
2,583,295 |
|
|
|
3,180,006 |
|
|
|
3,571,498 |
|
|
|
4,372,671 |
|
|
|
5,061,642 |
|
|
|
4,502,278 |
|
|
|
5,167,201 |
|
|
|
Average gross square footage
(10)
|
|
|
2,217,108 |
|
|
|
2,912,545 |
|
|
|
3,364,094 |
|
|
|
4,010,245 |
|
|
|
4,721,129 |
|
|
|
4,440,123 |
|
|
|
5,102,802 |
|
|
|
Net sales per average gross
sq. ft.(11)
|
|
$ |
230 |
|
|
$ |
214 |
|
|
$ |
214 |
|
|
$ |
217 |
|
|
$ |
217 |
|
|
$ |
57 |
|
|
$ |
56 |
|
Number of leased shoe departments at end of period
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
168 |
|
|
|
224 |
|
|
|
238 |
|
|
|
231 |
|
|
|
241 |
|
Total comparable store sales
change(8)
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.1 |
% |
|
|
5.9 |
% |
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
5.4 |
% |
|
|
4.4 |
% |
|
|
4.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Includes net sales of leased shoe departments. |
|
|
(2) |
Results for the fiscal year ended January 28, 2006 and for
the thirteen weeks ended April 30, 2005 include a
$6.5 million pre-tax charge, and a $3.9 million
after-tax charge in operating profit and net income,
respectively, related to the reserve for estimated losses
associated with the theft of credit card and other purchase
information. |
24
|
|
|
|
(3) |
For fiscal 2001-2004, computed based upon 27.7 million
shares outstanding. During fiscal 2001-2004, we were a
wholly-owned subsidiary of Retail Ventures. For fiscal 2005,
computed based upon a weighted average of 37.2 million
basic shares outstanding and 37.3 million diluted shares
outstanding. For the thirteen weeks ended April 30, 2005,
computed based upon 27.7 million shares outstanding. For
the thirteen weeks ended April 29, 2006, computed based
upon a weighted average of 43.9 million basic shares
outstanding and 44.1 million diluted shares outstanding. |
|
|
(4) |
Working capital represents current assets less current
liabilities. |
|
|
(5) |
Current ratio represents current assets divided by current
liabilities. |
|
|
|
(6) |
Comprised of borrowings under the Value City revolving credit
facility to which we were previously a party. The balance as of
April 30, 2005 also includes $165 million owed to
Retail Ventures. See Description of
Indebtedness The $165.0 Million Intercompany
Note. |
|
|
|
(7) |
Number of DSW stores for each fiscal period presented prior to
fiscal 2005 includes two combination DSW/ Filenes Basement
stores which were re-categorized as leased shoe departments in
the first quarter of fiscal 2005. |
|
|
(8) |
Comparable DSW stores and comparable leased shoe departments are
those units that have been in operation for at least
14 months at the beginning of the fiscal year. Stores or
leased shoe departments, as the case may be, are added to the
comparable base at the beginning of the year and are dropped for
comparative purposes in the month that they are closed. |
|
|
(9) |
DSW total square footage represents the total amount of square
footage at the end of the period for DSW stores only; it does
not reflect square footage of leased shoe departments. |
|
|
(10) |
Average gross square footage represents the monthly average of
square feet for DSW stores only for each period presented and
consequently reflects the effect of opening stores in different
months throughout the period. |
|
(11) |
Net sales per average gross square foot is the result of
dividing net sales for DSW stores only for the period presented
by average gross square foot calculated as described in
footnote 10 above. |
25
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
This managements discussion and analysis of financial
condition and results of operations contains forward-looking
statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Please see
Forward-Looking Statements for a discussion of the
uncertainties, risks and assumptions associated with these
statements. You should read the following discussion in
conjunction with our historical consolidated financial
statements and the notes thereto, appearing elsewhere in this
prospectus, including Prospectus Summary
Summary Consolidated Financial Information,
Capitalization and Selected Consolidated
Financial and Operating Data. The results of operations
for the periods reflected herein are not necessarily indicative
of results that may be expected for future periods, and our
actual results may differ materially from those discussed in the
forward-looking statements as a result of various factors,
including but not limited to those listed under Risk
Factors and included elsewhere in this prospectus.
Overview
DSW is a leading U.S. specialty branded footwear retailer
operating 204 DSW stores in 33 states as of April 29,
2006, with net sales of approximately $1.14 billion in
fiscal 2005. We offer in our DSW stores a combination of
selection, convenience and value that we believe differentiates
us from our competitors such as mall-based department stores,
national chains and independent shoe retailers and appeals to
consumers from a broad range of socioeconomic and demographic
backgrounds. In addition to operating DSW stores, as of
April 29, 2006, we operated a total of 216 leased shoe
departments for three non-affiliated retailers, including
158 leased shoe departments for Stein Mart; 57 for
Gordmans, Inc., or Gordmans; and one for Frugal
Fannies Fashion Warehouse, or Frugal Fannies. As of
April 29, 2006, we also operated 25 leased shoe departments
for Filenes Basement, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Retail
Ventures. We plan to further strengthen our position as a
leading specialty branded footwear retailer by pursuing three
primary strategies for growth expanding our store
base, driving sales through enhanced merchandising and
continuing to improve profitability.
The first DSW store was opened in July 1991. From 1998 until the
completion of our initial public offering in July 2005, we
operated as a subsidiary of Retail Ventures and its
predecessors, and our assets, liabilities and operating results
were included in the financial statements of Value City
Department Stores, Inc. or Retail Ventures since the time of our
acquisition by Value City Department Stores, Inc. and the
formation of Retail Ventures, respectively. Upon completion of
our initial public offering, DSW became a publicly-traded
company and operates its business as a stand-alone entity. For
more information regarding the separation of the DSW business
from Retail Ventures, please see Separation
Agreements and Certain Relationships and Related
Party Transactions Relationships Between Our Company
and Retail Ventures. As of April 29, 2006, Retail
Ventures owned approximately 27.7 million of our
Class B Common Shares, or in excess of 63.1% of our
outstanding shares, representing approximately 93.2% of the
aggregate voting power of our outstanding Common Shares.
We also operate leased shoe departments for three non-affiliated
retailers and one affiliated retailer in our leased department
segment. We entered into supply agreements to merchandise
certain non-affiliated shoe departments in Stein Mart, Gordmans
and Frugal Fannies stores as of July 2002, June 2004 and
September 2003, respectively. We have operated leased shoe
departments for Filenes Basement since its acquisition by
Retail Ventures in March 2000. Effective as of January 30,
2005, we updated and reaffirmed our contractual arrangement with
Filenes Basement. We own the merchandise, record sales of
merchandise net of returns and sales tax, own the fixtures
(except for Filenes Basement) and provide supervisory
assistance in these covered locations. Stein Mart, Gordmans,
Frugal Fannies and Filenes Basement provide the
sales associates. We pay a percentage of net sales as rent.
Our consolidated financial statements, which are discussed
below, reflect the historical position, results of operations
and cash flows of the DSW business, which has been transferred
to us from Retail Ventures or other affiliates pursuant to the
reorganization. They assume that DSW, for the periods presented,
had existed as a separate legal entity. Our consolidated
financial statements reflect the accounting policies adopted by
26
Retail Ventures in the preparation of its financial statements.
Some costs have been reflected in the consolidated financial
statements that are not necessarily indicative of the costs that
DSW would have incurred had it operated as an independent,
stand-alone entity for all periods presented. These costs
include allocated portions of Retail Ventures corporate
overhead, interest expense and income taxes.
DSW generates revenues by purchasing primarily in-season shoes
and accessories directly from vendors for sale to customers in
DSW stores and leased shoe departments. We have operated leased
shoe departments in Filenes Basement stores since April
2000, in Stein Mart stores since July 2002, in Gordmans stores
since June 2004 and in the Frugal Fannies store since
September 2003.
The main growth strategy for our business is to increase total
net sales through DSW store expansion while maintaining positive
comparable store sales growth for DSW stores. We intend to open
approximately 30 stores per year in each fiscal year from fiscal
2006 through fiscal 2010. As of April 29, 2006, we have
signed leases for an additional 20 stores for fiscal 2006 and
2007. For fiscal 2006, we expect to spend $13.4 million and
$20.0 million, respectively, for capital expenditures and
inventory in connection with new DSW store openings. We expect
to receive approximately $7.5 million in tenant allowances
in connection with these store openings. We plan to finance
investment in new DSW stores with cash flows from operating
activities and may draw from our $150 million secured
revolving credit facility if necessary. However, we may be
unable to open new stores contemplated by our growth plan on a
timely basis. For a further discussion of the risks associated
with our growth strategy, see Risk Factors
Risks Relating to Our Business.
We expect our expenses to increase as we operate the additional
stores and support the increasing size of the business. However,
we will strive to limit the growth rate of our expenses to a
rate that is less than the growth rate of net sales. We expect
the increase in net sales to come primarily from an increase in
our market share, as we do not expect a significant increase in
the total footwear market.
We utilize economic and demographic information to select new
DSW store locations that we believe will generate additional
incremental sales with minimal negative effects on existing
stores. The selection of stores is based on evaluating total
sales expectations for the location, as well as the
appropriateness of the size and rent. In the past, we have
closed stores which have not been profitable, and we may do so
again in the future. In addition, we have also moved stores to
other locations in the same market. In fiscal years 2002, 2003,
and 2004, we opened DSW stores that were approximately 6% larger
than the average store size of a typical DSW store in prior
fiscal years. In fiscal 2005, the average size of our new stores
equaled the average size of our stores existing at the beginning
of the year. However, to date, the sales volumes of these newer
stores have been less than our average store sales, and, as a
result, we have experienced a decrease in net sales per average
gross square foot. As the newer stores increase their net sales
and we open new stores sized to fit market potential, we expect
to improve our net sales per gross square foot performance in
the future. Beginning in fiscal 2006, we believe the average
square footage of our new stores will be less than the current
chain average.
We anticipate that cash from operations, together with our
existing cash, will be adequate to fund operating expenses,
working capital, capital expenditures and our planned retail
expansion. We may also draw from our $150 million secured
revolving credit facility, if necessary. However, there can be
no assurance as to the future availability of external financing
or internally generated funds required to execute our DSW store
expansion strategy as planned. For more information regarding
our plans for funding our operations and expansion, see
Liquidity and Capital Resources.
In evaluating DSWs results of operations, our management
refers to a number of key financial and non-financial measures
relating to the performance of our business. Among our key
financial results are net sales,
27
operating profit and net income. Non-financial measures that we
use in evaluating our performance include number of DSW stores
and leased shoe departments, net sales per average gross square
foot for DSW stores, and change in comparable stores sales.
The following describes certain line items set forth in our
consolidated statement of income:
Net Sales. We record net sales exclusive of sales tax and
net of returns. For comparison purposes, we define stores or
leased shoe departments as comparable or non-comparable. A
stores or leased shoe departments sales are included
in comparable sales if the store or leased shoe department has
been in operation at least 14 months at the beginning of
the fiscal year. Stores and leased shoe departments are excluded
from the comparison in the month that they close. Stores that
are remodeled or relocated are excluded from the comparison if
there is a material change in the size of the store or if the
store is relocated out of its area.
Cost of Sales. Our cost of sales includes the cost of
merchandise, distribution and warehousing (including
depreciation), store occupancy (excluding depreciation),
permanent and point of sale reductions, markdowns and shrinkage.
Since the beginning of fiscal 2005, our cost of sales also
reflects the impact of shared services.
Operating Expenses. Operating expenses include expenses
related to store selling, store management and store payroll
costs, advertising, leased shoe department operations, store
depreciation and amortization, pre-opening advertising and other
pre-opening costs (which are expensed as incurred), corporate
expenses for buying services, information services, depreciation
expense for corporate cost centers, marketing, legal, finance,
outside professional services, allocable costs from Retail
Ventures and other corporate related departments and benefits
for associates and related payroll taxes. Since the beginning of
fiscal 2005, our operating expenses also reflect the cost of
shared services and the cost of operating as a public company.
Corporate level expenses are primarily attributable to
operations at our corporate offices in Columbus, Ohio.
We follow a 52/53-week
fiscal year that ends on the Saturday nearest to January 31 in
each year. Fiscal 2005, 2004 and 2003 each consisted of
52 weeks. Our current fiscal year consists of 53 weeks.
Our business is subject to seasonal trends. Our net sales,
measured on a comparable stores basis, have typically been
higher in spring and early fall, when our customers
interest in new seasonal styles increases. Unlike many other
retailers, we have not historically experienced a large increase
in net sales during our fourth quarter associated with the
winter holiday season.
In connection with the completion of our initial public offering
in July 2005, we entered into several agreements with Retail
Ventures in connection with the separation of our business from
the Retail Ventures group.
Master Separation Agreement. The master separation
agreement contains key provisions relating to the separation of
our business from Retail Ventures. The master separation
agreement requires us to exchange information with Retail
Ventures, follow certain accounting practices and resolve
disputes with Retail Ventures in a particular manner. We also
have agreed to maintain the confidentiality of certain
information and preserve available legal privileges. The
separation agreement also contains provisions relating to the
allocation of the costs of our initial public offering,
indemnification, non-solicitation of employees and employee
benefit matters.
Under the master separation agreement, we agreed to effect up to
one demand registration per calendar year of our Common Shares,
whether Class A or Class B, held by Retail Ventures,
if requested by Retail Ventures. We have also granted Retail
Ventures the right to include its DSW Common Shares in an
unlimited number of other registrations of such shares initiated
by us or on behalf of our other shareholders.
28
Shared Services Agreement. Many aspects of our business,
which were fully managed and controlled by us without Retail
Ventures involvement, continue to operate as they did
prior to our initial public offering. We continue to manage
operations for critical functions such as merchandise buying,
planning and allocation, distribution and store operations.
Under the shared services agreement, which became effective as
of January 30, 2005, we provide services to several
subsidiaries of Retail Ventures relating to planning and
allocation support, distribution services and transportation
management, site research, lease negotiation, store design and
construction management. Retail Ventures provides us with
services relating to import administration, risk management,
information technology, tax, logistics, legal services,
financial services, shared benefits administration and payroll
and maintains insurance for us and for our directors, officers,
and employees.
The initial term of the shared services agreement expires at the
end of fiscal 2007 and will be extended automatically for
additional one-year terms unless terminated by one of the
parties. With respect to each shared service, we cannot
reasonably anticipate whether the services will be shared for a
period shorter or longer than the initial term.
Tax Separation Agreement. Until the completion of our
initial public offering in July 2005, we had historically been
included in Retail Ventures consolidated group, or the
Consolidated Group, for U.S. federal income tax purposes as
well as in certain consolidated, combined or unitary groups
which include Retail Ventures and/or certain of its
subsidiaries, or a Combined Group, for state and local income
tax purposes. We entered into a tax separation agreement with
Retail Ventures that became effective upon consummation of our
initial public offering. Pursuant to the tax separation
agreement, we and Retail Ventures generally make payments to
each other such that, with respect to tax returns for any
taxable period in which we or any of our subsidiaries are
included in the Consolidated Group or any Combined Group, the
amount of taxes paid by us is determined, subject to certain
adjustments, as if we and each of our subsidiaries included in
the Consolidated Group or Combined Group filed our own
consolidated, combined or unitary tax return. Retail Ventures
prepares pro forma tax returns for us with respect to any tax
return filed with respect to the Consolidated Group or any
Combined Group in order to determine the amount of tax
separation payments under the tax separation agreement. We have
the right to review and comment on such pro forma tax returns.
We are responsible for any taxes with respect to tax returns
that include only us and our subsidiaries.
Retail Ventures is exclusively responsible for preparing and
filing any tax return with respect to the Consolidated Group or
any Combined Group. We generally are responsible for preparing
and filing any tax returns that include only us and our
subsidiaries. Retail Ventures has agreed to undertake to provide
these services with respect to our separate tax returns. For the
tax services provided to us by Retail Ventures, we pay Retail
Ventures a monthly fee equal to 50% of all costs associated with
the maintenance and operation of Retail Ventures tax
department (including all overhead expenses). In addition, we
reimburse Retail Ventures for 50% of any third party fees and
expenses generally incurred by Retail Ventures tax
department and 100% of any third party fees and expenses
incurred by Retail Ventures tax department solely in
connection with the performance of the tax services provided to
us.
Retail Ventures is primarily responsible for controlling and
contesting any audit or other tax proceeding with respect to the
Consolidated Group or any Combined Group; provided, however,
that, except in cases involving taxes relating to a spin-off, we
have the right to control decisions to resolve, settle or
otherwise agree to any deficiency, claim or adjustment with
respect to any item for which we are solely liable under the tax
separation agreement. Pursuant to the tax separation agreement,
we have the right to control and contest any audit or tax
proceeding that relates to any tax returns that include only us
and our subsidiaries. We and Retail Ventures have joint control
over decisions to resolve, settle or otherwise agree to any
deficiency, claim or adjustment for which we and Retail Ventures
could be jointly liable, except in cases involving taxes
relating to a spin-off. Disputes arising between the parties
relating to matters covered by the tax separation agreement are
subject to resolution through specific dispute resolution
provisions.
We have been included in the Consolidated Group for periods in
which Retail Ventures owned at least 80% of the total voting
power and value of the our outstanding stock. Following
completion of our initial public offering in July 2005, we are
no longer included in the Consolidated Group. Each member of a
29
consolidated group for U.S. federal income tax purposes is
jointly and severally liable for the U.S. federal income
tax liability of each other member of the consolidated group.
Similarly, in some jurisdictions, each member of a consolidated,
combined or unitary group for state, local or foreign income tax
purposes is jointly and severally liable for the state, local or
foreign income tax liability of each other member of the
consolidated, combined or unitary group. Accordingly, although
the tax separation agreement allocates tax liabilities between
us and Retail Ventures, for any period in which we were included
in the Consolidated Group or a Combined Group, we could be
liable in the event that any income tax liability was incurred,
but not discharged, by any other member of the Consolidated
Group or a Combined Group.
Retail Ventures has informed us that it does not currently
intend or plan to undertake a spin-off of our stock to Retail
Ventures shareholders. Nevertheless, we and Retail Ventures have
set forth our respective rights, responsibilities and
obligations with respect to any possible spin-off in the tax
separation agreement. If Retail Ventures were to decide to
pursue a possible spin-off, we have agreed to cooperate with
Retail Ventures and to take any and all actions reasonably
requested by Retail Ventures in connection with such a
transaction. We have also agreed not to knowingly take or fail
to take any actions that could reasonably be expected to
preclude Retail Ventures ability to undertake a tax-free
spin-off. In addition, we generally would be responsible for any
taxes resulting from the failure of a spin-off to qualify as a
tax-free transaction to the extent such taxes are attributable
to, or result from, any action or failure to act by us or
certain transactions in our stock (including transactions over
which we would have no control, such as acquisitions of our
stock and the exercise of warrants, options, exchange rights,
conversion rights or similar arrangements with respect to our
stock) following or preceding a spin-off. We would also be
responsible for a percentage (based on the relative market
capitalizations of us and Retail Ventures at the time of such
spin-off) of such taxes to the extent such taxes are not
otherwise attributable to us or Retail Ventures. Our agreements
in connection with such spin-off matters last indefinitely. In
addition, present and future majority-owned affiliates of ours
or Retail Ventures will be bound by our agreements, unless
Retail Ventures or we, as applicable, consent to grant a release
of an affiliate (such consent cannot be unreasonably withheld,
conditioned or delayed), which may limit our ability to sell or
otherwise dispose of such affiliates. Additionally, a minority
interest participant(s) in a future joint venture, if any, would
need to evaluate the effect of the tax separation agreement on
such joint venture, and such evaluation may negatively affect
their decision whether to participate in such a joint venture.
Furthermore, the tax separation agreement may negatively affect
our ability to acquire a majority interest in a joint venture.
|
|
|
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates |
The preparation of our consolidated financial statements in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles, or
GAAP, requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of commitments and contingencies at the date of the
financial statements and reported amounts of revenues and
expenses during the reporting period. On an ongoing basis, we
evaluate our estimates and judgments, including, but not limited
to, those related to inventory valuation, depreciation,
amortization, recoverability of long-lived assets (including
intangible assets), estimates for self insurance reserves for
health and welfare, workers compensation and casualty
insurance, customer loyalty program, income taxes,
contingencies, litigation and revenue recognition. We base these
estimates and judgments on our historical experience and other
factors we believe to be relevant, the results of which form the
basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets
and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other
sources. The process of determining significant estimates is
fact-specific and takes into account factors such as historical
experience, current and expected economic conditions, product
mix, and in some cases, actuarial and appraisal techniques. We
constantly re-evaluate these significant factors and make
adjustments where facts and circumstances dictate.
While we believe that our historical experience and other
factors considered provide a meaningful basis for the accounting
policies applied in the preparation of the consolidated
financial statements, we cannot guarantee that our estimates and
assumptions will be accurate. As the determination of these
estimates requires the exercise of judgment, actual results
inevitably will differ from those estimates, and such
differences may be material to our financial statements.
30
We believe the following represent the most significant
accounting policies, critical estimates and assumptions, among
others, used in the preparation of our consolidated financial
statements:
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue Recognition. Revenues from merchandise sales are
recognized at the point of sale and are net of returns and
exclude sales tax. Revenue from gift cards is deferred and the
revenue is recognized upon redemption of the gift cards. |
|
|
|
Cost of Sales and Merchandise Inventories. Merchandise
inventories are stated at the lower of cost, determined using
the first-in, first-out
basis, or market, using the retail inventory method. The retail
inventory method is widely used in the retail industry due to
its practicality. Under the retail inventory method, the
valuation of inventories at cost and the resulting gross profit
are calculated by applying a calculated cost to retail ratio to
the retail value of inventories. The cost of the inventory
reflected on our consolidated balance sheet is decreased by
charges to cost of sales at the time the retail value of the
inventory is lowered through the use of markdowns. Hence,
earnings are negatively impacted as merchandise is marked down
prior to sale. Reserves to value inventory at the lower of cost
or market were $19.6 million on April 29, 2006 and
$19.2 million on January 28, 2006. Inherent in the
calculation of inventories are certain significant management
judgments and estimates, including setting the original
merchandise retail value or mark-on, markups of initial prices
established, reductions in prices due to customers
perception of value (known as markdowns), and estimates of
losses between physical inventory counts, or shrinkage, which,
combined with the averaging process within the retail inventory
method, can significantly impact the ending inventory valuation
at cost and the resulting gross profit. |
We include in the cost of sales
expenses associated with warehousing, distribution and store
occupancy. Warehousing costs are comprised of labor, benefits
and other labor-related costs associated with the operations of
the warehouse, which are primarily payroll-related taxes and
benefits. The non-labor costs associated with warehousing
include rent, depreciation, insurance, utilities and maintenance
and other operating costs that are passed to us from the
landlord. Distribution costs include the transportation of
merchandise to the warehouse and from the warehouse to our
stores. Store occupancy costs include rent, utilities, repairs,
maintenance, insurance and janitorial costs and other costs
associated with licenses and occupancy-related taxes, which are
primarily real estate taxes passed to us by our landlords.
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Impairment and Long-lived Assets. We must
periodically evaluate the carrying amount of our long-lived
assets, primarily property and equipment, and finite life
intangible assets when events and circumstances warrant such a
review to ascertain if any assets have been impaired. The
carrying amount of a long-lived asset is considered impaired
when the carrying value of the asset exceeds the expected future
cash flows from the asset. Our reviews are conducted at the
lowest identifiable level, which includes a store. The
impairment loss recognized is the excess of the carrying amount
of the asset over its fair value, estimated on discounted cash
flow. Should an impairment loss be realized, it will be included
in cost of sales. The amount of impairment losses recorded in
fiscal 2005 was $0.2 million, all of which was recorded in
the fourth quarter. No impairment losses have been recorded
during the thirteen weeks ended April 29, 2006. We believe
at this time that the long-lived assets carrying values
and useful lives continue to be appropriate. To the extent these
future projections or our strategies change, our conclusion
regarding asset impairment may differ from our current estimates. |
|
|
|
Self-insurance Reserves. We record estimates for certain
health and welfare, workers compensation and casualty insurance
costs that are self-insured programs. These estimates are based
on actuarial assumptions and are subject to change based on
actual results. Should the total cost of claims for health and
welfare, workers compensation and casualty insurance exceed
those anticipated, reserves recorded may not be sufficient, and,
to the extent actual results vary from assumptions, earnings
would be impacted. |
|
|
|
Customer Loyalty Program. We maintain a customer loyalty
program for our DSW stores in which customers receive a future
discount on qualifying purchases. The Reward Your
Style program is |
31
|
|
|
|
|
designed to promote customer awareness and loyalty and provide
us with the ability to communicate with our customers and
enhance our understanding of their spending trends. Upon
reaching the target spending level, customers may redeem these
discounts on a future purchase. Generally, these future
discounts must be redeemed within six months. We accrue the
estimated costs of the anticipated redemptions of the discount
earned at the time of the initial purchase and charge such costs
to operating expense based on historical experience. The
estimates of the costs associated with the loyalty program
require us to make assumptions related to customer purchase
levels and redemption rates. The accrued liability as of
April 29, 2006 and January 28, 2006 was
$10.2 million and $8.3 million, respectively. To the
extent assumptions of purchases and redemption rates vary from
actual results, earnings would be impacted. |
|
|
|
Income Taxes. We are required to determine the aggregate
amount of income tax expense to accrue and the amount which will
be currently payable based upon tax statutes of each
jurisdiction we do business in. In making these estimates, we
adjust income based on a determination of generally accepted
accounting principles for items that are treated differently by
the applicable taxing authorities. Deferred tax assets and
liabilities, as a result of these differences, are reflected on
our balance sheet for temporary differences that will reverse in
subsequent years. A valuation allowance is established against
deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not that some or
all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. If our
management had made these determinations on a different basis,
our tax expense, assets and liabilities could be different. |
Results of Operations
As of April 29, 2006, we operated 204 DSW stores and leased
shoe departments in 158 Stein Mart stores, 57 Gordmans stores,
25 Filenes Basement stores and one Frugal Fannies
store. We manage our operations in two segments, defined as DSW
stores and leased departments. The leased departments are
comprised of leased shoe departments in Stein Mart, Gordmans,
Frugal Fannies and Filenes Basement. The following
table represents selected components of our historical
consolidated results of operations, expressed as percentages of
net sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Fiscal Year Ended | |
|
For the | |
|
For the | |
|
|
| |
|
Thirteen Weeks | |
|
Thirteen Weeks | |
|
|
January 31, | |
|
January 29, | |
|
January 28, | |
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
April 30, | |
|
April 29, | |
|
|
(52 Weeks) | |
|
(52 Weeks) | |
|
(52 Weeks) | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Net sales, including sales from leased departments
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Cost of sales
|
|
|
(74.4 |
) |
|
|
(71.9 |
) |
|
|
(72.4 |
) |
|
|
(70.6 |
) |
|
|
(70.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
25.6 |
|
|
|
28.1 |
|
|
|
27.6 |
|
|
|
29.4 |
|
|
|
29.5 |
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
(22.1 |
) |
|
|
(22.3 |
) |
|
|
(21.5 |
) |
|
|
(24.1 |
) |
|
|
(20.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
8.8 |
|
Interest (expense) Income, net
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
9.2 |
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
(1.9 |
) |
|
|
(2.3 |
) |
|
|
(1.6 |
) |
|
|
(3.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
1.9 |
% |
|
|
3.6 |
% |
|
|
3.2 |
% |
|
|
2.5 |
% |
|
|
5.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thirteen Weeks Ended April 29, 2006 Compared to Thirteen
Weeks Ended April 30, 2005
Net Sales. Net sales for the thirteen week period ended
April 29, 2006 increased by 12.3%, or $34.7 million,
to $316.5 million from $281.8 million in the thirteen
week period ended April 30, 2005. Our comparable store
sales in the first quarter of fiscal 2006 improved 4.2% compared
to the first quarter of fiscal 2005. The increase in DSW sales
includes a net increase of 27 DSW stores and ten non-affiliated
leased shoe departments. The DSW store locations opened
subsequent to April 30, 2005 added $21.1 million
32
in sales for the quarter ended April 29, 2006, while the
leased shoe departments opened subsequent to April 30, 2005
added $1.0 million for the quarter ended April 29,
2006. Leased shoe department sales comprised 10.3% of total net
sales in the first quarter of fiscal 2006, compared to 10.8% in
the first quarter of fiscal 2005.
For the first quarter of fiscal 2006, DSW comparable store sales
increased in womens by 5.5%, athletic by 3.2%, mens
by 1.7%, and accessories by 3.1%. Sales increases in the
womens category were driven by increases in the seasonal
classes, while the increase in the athletic category was the
result of an increase in the womens and mens fashion
classes. The increase in mens was driven by the young
mens class. The increase in the accessories category was
driven by an increase in gifts.
Gross Profit. Gross profit increased $10.5 million
to $93.3 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2006 from
$82.8 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2005, and
increased as a percentage of net sales from 29.4% in the first
quarter of fiscal 2005 to 29.5% in the first quarter of fiscal
2006. The margin for the first quarter of fiscal 2006 was
positively affected by an increased initial markup, a reduction
of the internal shrink accrual rate to the comparable prior year
period and decreased warehouse expense. Those positive factors
were mostly offset by an increase in markdowns and increase in
occupancy expense. The store occupancy expense increased from
12.6% of net sales in the first quarter of fiscal 2005 to 12.9%
of net sales in the first quarter of fiscal 2006. The increase
in store occupancy expense is the result of increases in lease
expense for new stores. Warehouse expense as a percentage of net
sales decreased from 1.7% in the first quarter of fiscal 2005 to
1.1% in the first quarter of fiscal 2006. The decrease in
warehouse expense is the result of improved operational
efficiencies achieved through the use of electronic shipping
information and increased unit volumes.
Operating Expenses. For the first quarter of fiscal 2006,
operating expenses decreased $2.3 million to
$65.4 million from $67.7 million in the first quarter
of fiscal 2005, which represented 20.7% and 24.1% of net sales,
respectively. The favorable operating percent was in part the
result of leveraging store expenses and marketing, and a
reduction in pre-opening costs. In addition, operating costs for
the first quarter of fiscal 2005 included a charge of
$6.5 million related to an estimate for potential losses
related to the theft of credit card and other purchase
information. Operating expenses for the first quarter of fiscal
2006 include $0.9 million in pre-opening costs compared to
$1.5 million in pre-opening costs in the first quarter of
fiscal 2005. Pre-opening costs are expensed as incurred and
therefore do not necessarily reflect expenses for the stores
opened in a given fiscal period. Included in operating expenses
is the related operating cost, excluding occupancy, associated
with operating the leased shoe departments. The DSW stores and
leased shoe departments that opened subsequent to April 30,
2005 added $3.4 million in expenses compared to the first
quarter of fiscal 2005, excluding pre-opening and occupancy
(excluding depreciation and amortization) expenses.
Operating Profit. Operating profit was $27.9 million
in the first quarter of fiscal 2006 compared to
$15.1 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2005, and
increased as a percentage of net sales from 5.3% in the first
quarter of fiscal 2005 to 8.8% in the first quarter of fiscal
2006. Operating profit as a percentage of net sales was impacted
by the leveraging of operating expenses and the estimate for
potential losses related to the theft of credit card and other
purchase information that was incurred in the first quarter of
the prior fiscal year.
Interest Income (Expense). Interest income for the first
quarter of fiscal 2006 was $1.3 million as compared to
$3.5 million of interest expense for the first quarter of
fiscal 2005. Interest income for the quarter was the result of
investment activity from funds generated by our initial public
offering in July 2005 and from operations. The interest expense
incurred in the first quarter of fiscal 2005 includes
$2.7 million of interest due to RVI relating to
$165.0 million of indebtedness incurred to fund a dividend
and $0.7 million of interest on direct borrowings under the
Value City Revolving Credit Facility.
Income Taxes. Our effective tax rate for the first
quarter of fiscal 2006 was 40.0%, compared to 39.5% for the
first quarter of fiscal 2005.
Net Income. For the first quarter of fiscal 2006, net
income increased $10.5 million, or 151.0%, over the first
quarter of fiscal 2005 and represented 5.5% and 2.5% of net
sales, respectively. This increase was
33
primarily the result of the decrease in operating expenses due
to the leveraging of operating expenses and the
$6.5 million charge in the first quarter of the prior
fiscal year for estimated potential losses related to the theft
of credit card and other purchase information and the interest
income during the period as opposed to having interest expense
in the prior fiscal year.
Fiscal Year Ended January 28, 2006 (Fiscal 2005)
Compared to Fiscal Year Ended January 29, 2005 (Fiscal
2004)
Net Sales. Net sales for the fifty-two weeks ended
January 28, 2006 increased by 19.0%, or
$183.0 million, to $1.14 billion from
$961.1 million in the fifty-two week period ended
January 29, 2005. Our comparable store sales in fiscal 2005
improved 5.4% compared to the previous fiscal year. The increase
includes an increase of 29 new DSW stores, 11 non-affiliated
leased shoe departments and one Filenes Basement leased
shoe department during fiscal 2005. The new DSW locations added
$59.8 million in sales compared to fiscal 2004, while the
new leased shoe departments added $3.7 million. Leased shoe
department sales comprised 10.5% of total net sales in fiscal
2005, compared to 9.4% in fiscal 2004.
Compared with fiscal 2004, DSW comparable store sales for fiscal
2005 increased in womens 6.8%, athletic 6.4%, mens
3.8% and decreased in accessories 6.4%. Sales increases in
womens were across all categories; dress, casual and
seasonal. The seasonal performance of boots drove the
womens increase with a 19.7% increase for the year. The
increase in athletic was driven by womens, and
specifically womens fashion athletic. The increase in
mens was driven by an expanded assortment offering in
casual and fashion. The decrease in accessories was due to a
narrowing of the offering in gift products.
Gross Profit. Gross profit increased $45.5 million
to $315.7 million in fiscal 2005 from $270.2 million
in fiscal 2004, and decreased as a percentage of net sales from
28.1% in fiscal 2004 to 27.6% in fiscal 2005. The decrease is
primarily attributable to increased markdowns in all categories
as we executed all of our planned clearance rotations. In fiscal
2004, we did not undertake one of our planned clearance
rotations in the third quarter. The decrease was partially
offset by an increase in initial markup. The increase in initial
markups is the result of increased average unit retail prices
and the ability to buy at lower costs, which is due to the fact
that we placed larger orders. We are not expecting to continue
increasing our initial mark up at the same pace as prior years.
Warehouse expense as a percentage of net sales decreased from
2.2% in fiscal 2004 to 1.4% in fiscal 2005. The decrease in
warehouse expense is the result of improved operational
efficiencies achieved through the use of electronic shipping
information, increased unit volumes and the application of the
shared service agreement for the full year. This decrease in
warehouse expense was partially offset by increases in store
occupancy, from 12.9% of net sales in fiscal 2004 to 13.4% of
net sales in fiscal 2005. The increase in the store occupancy
was the result of an increase in the penetration of the leased
business compared to the total.
Operating Expenses. For fiscal 2005, operating expenses
increased $31.5 million from $214.1 million in fiscal
2004 to $245.6 million in fiscal 2005. Operating expenses
represented 22.3% of net sales in fiscal 2004 and 21.5% of net
sales in fiscal 2005. Operating expenses for fiscal 2005 include
$7.7 million in pre-opening costs compared to
$10.8 million in the prior fiscal year. Pre-opening costs
are expensed as incurred and therefore do not necessarily
reflect expenses for the stores opened in a given fiscal year.
Included in operating expenses is the related operating cost
associated with operating the leased shoe departments, excluding
occupancy. The new DSW stores and leased shoe departments added
$9.9 million in expenses compared to fiscal 2004, excluding
pre-opening expenses. Fiscal 2005 operating expenses also
included a $6.5 million charge related to the theft of
credit card and other purchase information discussed below.
During the first quarter of fiscal 2005, we accrued an estimated
liability related to the theft of credit card and other purchase
information. Potential exposures for losses related to stolen
information were estimated to fall within a range of
approximately $6.5 million to approximately
$9.5 million. Because of many factors, including the early
development of information regarding the theft and
recoverability under insurance policies, there is no amount in
the estimated range that represents a better estimate than any
other amount in the range. Therefore, in accordance with
Financial Accounting Standard No. 5, Accounting for
34
Contingencies, we have accrued a charge to operations equal to
the low end of the range set forth above, or $6.5 million.
At January 28, 2006 the balance of the reserve was
approximately $4.8 million.
Operating Profit. Operating profit was $70.1 million
in fiscal 2005 compared to $56.1 million in fiscal 2004,
and increased as a percentage of net sales from 5.8% in fiscal
2004 to 6.1% in fiscal 2005. Operating profit was positively
affected by the full year of operations for our DSW stores and
leased shoe departments opened in fiscal 2004.
Interest Expenses. Interest expense, net of interest
income, was $7.5 million in fiscal 2005 compared to
$2.7 million in fiscal 2004. Interest expense increased in
fiscal 2005 as a result of interest paid to Retail Ventures
related to dividends paid via a note prior to our initial public
offering. Interest expense includes the amortization of debt
issuance costs of $0.6 million and $0.5 million in
fiscal 2005 and fiscal 2004, respectively. As of
January 28, 2006, we had no debt.
Income Taxes. Our effective tax rate for fiscal 2005 was
40.6%, compared to 34.5% for fiscal 2004. The favorable rate
experienced in fiscal 2004, primarily in the fourth quarter, was
driven by several factors which included the deductibility of
certain expenses associated with the termination benefits of the
former Chief Executive Officer of Retail Ventures, among others.
Fiscal Year Ended January 29, 2005 (Fiscal 2004)
Compared to Fiscal Year Ended January 31, 2004 (Fiscal
2003)
Net Sales. Net sales for the fifty-two weeks ended
January 29, 2005 increased by 21.4%, or
$169.8 million, to $961.1 million from
$791.3 million in the fifty-two week period ended
January 31, 2004. Our comparable store sales in fiscal 2004
improved 5.0% compared to the previous fiscal year. The increase
includes a net increase of 30 new DSW stores, 51 non-affiliated
leased shoe departments and five Filenes Basement leased
shoe departments in fiscal 2004. The new DSW locations added
$82.0 million in sales compared to fiscal 2003, while the
new leased shoe departments added $12.7 million. Leased
shoe department sales comprised 9.4% of total net sales in
fiscal 2004, compared to 8.9% in fiscal 2003.
Compared with fiscal 2003, DSW comparable store sales increased
in womens 4.3%, athletic 11.6% and accessories 9.6%, and
decreased in the mens category by 0.3%. Sales increases in
womens were driven by increases in dress, better and
sandals in the spring and womens casual in the fall. The
increase in athletic was the result of sales increases in
fashion athletic in both the mens and womens
categories. The increase in accessories was the result of
additional new merchandise being offered.
Gross Profit. Gross profit increased $67.3 million
to $270.2 million in fiscal 2004 from $202.9 million
in fiscal 2003, and increased as a percentage of net sales from
25.6% in fiscal 2003 to 28.1% in fiscal 2004. This increase is
primarily attributable to increased initial markups and a
decrease in markdowns when compared to the prior fiscal year.
The initial markup increase is the result of increased average
unit retail prices and the ability to buy at lower costs, which
is due to the fact that we placed larger orders. The decreased
markdowns relate to the fact that we did not execute a planned
rotation of clearance due to our favorable clearance position in
September 2004. Warehouse expense as a percentage of net sales
decreased from 2.5% in fiscal 2003 to 2.2% in fiscal 2004. The
decrease in warehouse expense is the result of improved
operational efficiencies achieved through the use of electronic
shipping information and increased unit volumes. This decrease
in warehouse expense was partially offset by increases in store
occupancy, from 12.8% of net sales in fiscal 2003 to 12.9% of
net sales in fiscal 2004.
Operating Expenses. For fiscal 2004, operating expenses
increased $39.2 million from $174.9 million in fiscal
2003 to $214.1 million in fiscal 2004. Operating expenses
represented 22.1% of net sales in fiscal 2003 and 22.3% of net
sales in fiscal 2004. Operating expenses for fiscal 2004 include
$10.8 million in pre-opening costs compared to
$5.1 million in the prior fiscal year. Pre-opening costs
are expensed as incurred and therefore do not necessarily
reflect expenses for the stores opened in a given fiscal year.
Included in operating expenses is the related operating cost
associated with operating the leased shoe departments, excluding
occupancy. The new DSW stores and leased shoe departments added
$14.8 million in expenses compared to fiscal 2003,
excluding pre-opening expenses.
35
Operating Profit. Operating profit was $56.1 million
in fiscal 2004 compared to $28.1 million in fiscal 2003,
and increased as a percentage of net sales from 3.5% in fiscal
2003 to 5.8% in fiscal 2004. Operating profit was positively
affected by the full year of operations for our DSW stores and
leased shoe departments opened in fiscal 2003.
Interest Expense. Interest expense, net of interest
income, was $2.7 million in each of fiscal 2004 and fiscal
2003. Interest expense in fiscal 2004 was the result of an
increase in the average weighted borrowing rate, offset in part
by a decrease in average weighted borrowings. Interest expense
includes the amortization of debt issuance costs of
$0.5 million in each of fiscal 2004 and fiscal 2003.
Income Taxes. Our effective tax rate for fiscal 2004 was
34.5%, compared to 41.5% for fiscal 2003. The favorable rate
experienced in fiscal 2004, primarily in the fourth quarter, was
driven by several factors which included the deductibility of
certain expenses associated with the termination benefits of the
former Chief Executive Officer of Retail Ventures, among others.
The favorable effective tax rate is not expected to continue
into the future as we anticipate our effective tax rate will
approximate its statutory rate.
Quarterly Results
|
|
|
Quarterly Operations Data |
The following tables set forth unaudited quarterly condensed
consolidated statements of operations data, expressed in
thousands of dollars. This quarterly information is unaudited,
but has been prepared on the same basis as the annual
consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this
prospectus and, in the opinion of our management, reflects all
adjustments necessary for a fair representation of the
information for the periods presented. This quarterly condensed
statement of income data should be read in conjunction with our
audited consolidated financial statements and the related notes
included elsewhere in this prospectus. Results of operations for
any quarter are not necessarily indicative of results for any
future period or for the full fiscal year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thirteen Weeks Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
|
April 30, | |
|
July 30, | |
|
October 29, | |
|
January 28, | |
|
April 29, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands except per share data) | |
Net sales
|
|
$ |
281,806 |
|
|
$ |
276,211 |
|
|
$ |
302,240 |
|
|
$ |
283,804 |
|
|
$ |
316,487 |
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
(199,008 |
) |
|
|
(199,848 |
) |
|
|
(219,221 |
) |
|
|
(210,265 |
) |
|
|
(223,200 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
82,798 |
|
|
|
76,363 |
|
|
|
83,019 |
|
|
|
73,539 |
|
|
|
93,287 |
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
(67,745 |
) |
|
|
(55,675 |
) |
|
|
(65,292 |
) |
|
|
(56,895 |
) |
|
|
(65,398 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit
|
|
|
15,053 |
|
|
|
20,688 |
|
|
|
17,727 |
|
|
|
16,644 |
|
|
|
27,889 |
|
Interest (expense) income, net:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-related
|
|
|
(849 |
) |
|
|
(1,092 |
) |
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
879 |
|
|
|
1,324 |
|
|
Related parties
|
|
|
(2,672 |
) |
|
|
(3,920 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
11,532 |
|
|
|
15,676 |
|
|
|
17,876 |
|
|
|
17,523 |
|
|
|
29,213 |
|
Income taxes expense
|
|
|
(4,552 |
) |
|
|
(6,425 |
) |
|
|
(6,965 |
) |
|
|
(7,484 |
) |
|
|
(11,694 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
6,980 |
|
|
$ |
9,251 |
|
|
$ |
10,911 |
|
|
$ |
10,039 |
|
|
$ |
17,519 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per
share(1):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thirteen Weeks Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
|
May 1, | |
|
July 31, | |
|
October 30, | |
|
January 29, | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands except per share data) | |
Net sales
|
|
$ |
232,559 |
|
|
$ |
234,403 |
|
|
$ |
262,444 |
|
|
$ |
231,683 |
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
(164,972 |
) |
|
|
(167,464 |
) |
|
|
(184,991 |
) |
|
|
(173,451 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
67,587 |
|
|
|
66,939 |
|
|
|
77,453 |
|
|
|
58,232 |
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
(53,782 |
) |
|
|
(51,305 |
) |
|
|
(60,664 |
) |
|
|
(48,351 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit
|
|
|
13,805 |
|
|
|
15,634 |
|
|
|
16,789 |
|
|
|
9,881 |
|
Interest expense, net:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-related
|
|
|
(726 |
) |
|
|
(745 |
) |
|
|
(989 |
) |
|
|
(274 |
) |
|
Related parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
13,079 |
|
|
|
14,889 |
|
|
|
15,800 |
|
|
|
9,607 |
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
(5,263 |
) |
|
|
(5,992 |
) |
|
|
(6,358 |
) |
|
|
(807 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
7,816 |
|
|
$ |
8,897 |
|
|
$ |
9,442 |
|
|
$ |
8,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted earnings per
share(1)
|
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
|
$ |
0.32 |
|
|
$ |
0.34 |
|
|
$ |
0.32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
The earnings per share calculations for each quarter are based
upon the applicable weighted average shares outstanding for each
period and may not necessarily be equal to the full year share
amount. |
Seasonality
Our business, measured in terms of net sales, is subject to
seasonal trends. Our net sales, measured on a comparable stores
basis, have typically been higher in spring and early fall, when
our customers interest in new seasonal styles increases.
Unlike many other retailers, we have not historically
experienced a large increase in net sales during our fourth
quarter associated with the winter holiday season.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our primary ongoing cash requirements are for seasonal and new
store inventory purchases, capital expenditures in connection
with our expansion, the remodeling of existing stores and
infrastructure growth. Since our initial public offering in July
2005, we have funded our expenditures with cash flows from
operations. Prior to the initial public offering, we funded our
expenditures with cash flows from operations and borrowings
under the credit facilities to which we had been a party. Our
working capital and inventory levels typically build seasonally.
We believe that we will be able to continue to fund our
operating requirements and the expansion of our business
pursuant to our growth strategy in the future with existing
cash, cash flows from operations and borrowings under the DSW
secured revolving credit facility, if necessary.
$150 Million Secured Revolving Credit Facility.
Simultaneously with the amendment and restatement of the Value
City revolving credit facility described below, we entered into
a new $150 million secured revolving credit facility with a
term of five years. Under this facility, we and our subsidiary,
DSWSW, are named as co-borrowers. This facility is subject to a
borrowing base restriction and provides for borrowings at
variable interest rates based on LIBOR, the prime rate and the
Federal Funds effective rate, plus a margin. Our obligations
under the secured revolving credit facility are secured by a
lien on substantially all of our and our subsidiarys
personal property and a pledge of our shares of DSWSW. In
addition, our secured revolving credit facility contains usual
and customary restrictive covenants relating to our management
and the operation of our business. These covenants restrict,
among other things, our ability to grant liens on our assets,
incur additional indebtedness, open or close stores, pay cash
dividends and make other distributions to Retail Ventures in
excess of $5.0 million in the aggregate, redeem our stock,
transfer our or DSWSWs
37
assets to Retail Ventures, enter into transactions with
affiliates and merge or consolidate with another entity. In
addition, if at any time we utilize over 90% of our borrowing
capacity under this facility, we must comply with a fixed charge
coverage ratio test set forth in the facility documents. At
April 29, 2006 and January 28, 2006,
$141.0 million and $136.4 million was available under
the $150 million secured revolving credit facility and no
direct borrowings were outstanding. At April 29, 2006 and
January 28, 2006, $9.0 million and $13.6 million
in letters of credit were issued and outstanding.
|
|
|
Transactions with Retail Ventures |
Union Square Store Guaranty by Retail Ventures. In
January 2004, we entered into a lease agreement with 40 East 14
Realty Associates, L.L.C., an unrelated third party, for our
Union Square store in New York, New York. In connection with the
lease, Retail Ventures has agreed to guarantee payment of our
rent and other expenses and charges and the performance of our
other obligations.
Intercompany Accounts. Prior to the completion of our
initial public offering in July 2005, DSW and Retail Ventures
used intercompany transactions in the conduct of their
operations. Under this arrangement, Retail Ventures acted as a
central processing location for payments for the acquisition of
merchandise, payroll, outside services, capital additions and
expenses by controlling the payroll and accounts payable
activities for all Retail Ventures subsidiaries, including
DSW. DSW transferred cash received from sales of merchandise to
cash accounts controlled by Retail Ventures. The concentration
of cash and the offsetting payments for merchandise, expenses,
capital assets and accruals for future payments were accumulated
on our balance sheet in advances to affiliates. The balance of
advances to affiliates fluctuated based on DSWs activities
with Retail Ventures.
Following completion of our initial public offering, DSWs
intercompany activities have been limited to those arrangements
set forth in the shared services agreement and the other
agreements between DSW and Retail Ventures. DSW no longer
concentrates its cash from the sale of merchandise into Retail
Ventures accounts but into its own DSW accounts. DSW pays
for its own merchandise, expenses and capital additions from
newly established disbursement accounts. Any intercompany
payments are made pursuant to the terms of the shared services
agreement and other agreements between DSW and Retail Ventures.
|
|
|
The DSW Separation from Retail Ventures |
Upon completion of our initial public offering in July 2005,
Retail Ventures amended or amended and restated the existing
credit facilities and other debt obligations of Value City and
its other affiliates, including certain facilities under which
DSW had rights and obligations as a co-borrower and/or
co-guarantor. We are no
longer a party to any of these agreements.
The Value City Revolving Credit Facility. Prior to
completion of our initial public offering in July 2005, we were
party to a Loan and Security Agreement, as amended, entered into
with National City Business Credit, Inc., or National City, as
administrative agent, and the other parties named therein,
originally entered into in June 2002. Upon the completion of our
initial public offering, this revolving credit agreement was
amended and restated and we were released from our obligations
as a party thereto.
The Value City Term Loan Facility. Prior to
completion of our initial public offering in July 2005, we were
party to a Financing Agreement, as amended, among Cerberus, as
agent and lender, and SSC as lender, and the other parties named
as co-borrowers
therein, originally entered into in June 2002. Upon the
completion of our initial public offering, the indebtedness with
respect to this term loan was repaid in full, this term loan
agreement was terminated and we were released from our
obligations as a party thereto.
Under the terms of this term loan agreement, SSC and Cerberus
each provided us, Value City and the other Retail Ventures
affiliates named as
co-borrowers with a
separate $50 million term loan comprised of two tranches
with initial three-year terms. In July 2004, the maturity dates
of these loans were extended until June 11, 2006. In
connection with the second tranche of these term loans, Retail
Ventures issued to each of Cerberus and SSC warrants to
purchase 1,477,396 common shares of Retail Ventures at a
purchase price of $4.50 per share, subject to adjustment.
In September 2002, Back Bay Capital Funding LLC, or Back Bay,
38
bought from each of Cerberus and SSC a $1.5 million
interest in each of the tranches of their term loans for an
aggregate $6.0 million interest, and Back Bay received from
each of Cerberus and SSC a corresponding portion of the warrants
to purchase Retail Ventures common shares originally issued in
connection with the second tranche of their term loans.
Effective November 23, 2005, Millennium Partners, L.P.
purchased from Back Bay term loan warrants to purchase an
aggregate of 177,288 of Retail Ventures common shares, subject
to adjustment. The term loans stated rate of interest per
annum through June 11, 2004 was 14% if paid in cash and 15%
if the co-borrowers
elected a paid-in-kind,
or PIK, option. During the first two years of the term loans,
the co-borrowers could
elect to pay all interest in PIK. During the final two years of
the term loans, the stated rate of interest was 15.0% if paid in
cash or 15.5% if by PIK, and the PIK option was limited to 50%
of the interest due. For fiscal 2002 and fiscal 2003, the
co-borrowers elected to
pay interest in cash.
In connection with the amendment of this term loan agreement,
Retail Ventures amended the outstanding warrants to provide SSC,
Cerberus and Millennium the right, from time to time, in whole
or in part, to (i) acquire Retail Ventures common shares at
the then current conversion price (subject to the anti-dilution
provisions), (ii) acquire from Retail Ventures our
Class A Common Shares at an exercise price of
$19.00 per share (subject to anti-dilution provisions) or
(iii) acquire a combination thereof.
Assuming an exercise price per share of $19.00, SSC and Cerberus
would each receive from Retail Ventures 328,915 of our
Class A Common Shares, and Millennium would receive 41,989
Class A Common Shares, if they exercised these warrants in
full exclusively for DSW Common Shares. The warrants expire in
June 2012. Although Retail Ventures has informed us that it does
not currently intend or plan to undertake a spin-off of DSW
Common Shares to Retail Ventures shareholders, in the
event that Retail Ventures effects a spin-off of its DSW Common
Shares to its shareholders in the future, the holders of
outstanding unexercised warrants will receive the same number of
DSW Common Shares that they would have received had they
exercised their warrants in full for Retail Ventures common
shares immediately prior to the record date of the spin-off,
without regard to any limitations on exercise in the warrants.
Following the completion of any such spin-off, the warrants will
be exercisable solely for Retail Ventures common shares.
We have entered into an exchange agreement with Retail Ventures
whereby, upon the request of Retail Ventures, we will be
required to exchange some or all of our Class B Common
Shares held by Retail Ventures for Class A Common Shares.
The Value City Senior Subordinated Convertible
Loan Facility. Prior to completion of our initial
public offering in July 2005, we were a
co-guarantor under the
Amended and Restated Senior Subordinated Convertible Loan
Agreement, entered into by Value City, as borrower, Cerberus, as
agent and lender, SSC, as lender, and DSW and the other parties
named as guarantors, originally entered into in June 2002. Upon
the completion of our initial public offering, this convertible
loan agreement was amended and restated and we are no longer a
party thereto.
In connection with the amendment and restatement of this
convertible loan agreement, Retail Ventures repaid
$25 million of this facility and the convertible loan was
converted into a non-convertible loan. The capital stock of DSW
held by Retail Ventures currently secures the non-convertible
loan. This lien will be released upon completion of the PIES
offering by Retail Ventures. However, Retail Ventures will
pledge sufficient DSW Common Shares to the collateral agent for
the PIES to enable Retail Ventures to satisfy its obligations to
deliver Class A Common Shares upon exchange of the PIES,
and sufficient DSW Common Shares will continue to be subject to
liens and/or contractual obligations to enable Retail Ventures
to satisfy its obligations to the warrantholders to deliver
Class A Common Shares upon exercise of the warrants. In
connection with the amendment and restatement of the convertible
loan agreement in July 2005, Retail Ventures agreed to issue to
SSC and Cerberus convertible warrants which are exercisable from
time to time until the later of June 11, 2007 and the
repayment in full of Value Citys obligations under the
amended and restated loan agreement. Under the convertible
warrants, SSC and Cerberus will have the right, from time to
time, in whole or in part, to (i) acquire Retail Ventures
common shares at the conversion price referred to in the
convertible loan (subject to anti-dilution provisions),
(ii) acquire from Retail Ventures our Class A
39
Common Shares at an exercise price of $19.00 per share
(subject to anti-dilution provisions) or (iii) acquire a
combination thereof.
On March 13, 2006, Retail Ventures issued 2,000,000 of its
common shares to Cerberus in connection with the partial
exercise of Cerberus outstanding convertible warrants. The
common shares were issued at an exercise price of $4.50 per
share for an aggregate cash purchase price of $9,000,000. On
April 26, 2006, Retail Ventures issued an additional
3,000,000 of its common shares to Cerberus in connection with
the partial exercise of Cerberus outstanding convertible
warrants. These common shares were issued at an exercise price
of $4.50 per share for an aggregate cash purchase price of
$13,500,000. On July 26, 2006, Retail Ventures issued an
additional 2,000,000 of its common shares to Cerberus in
connection with the partial exercise of Cerberus
outstanding convertible warrants. These common shares were
issued at an exercise price of $4.50 per share for an aggregate
cash purchase price of $9,000,000. Following this exercise,
Cerberus remaining convertible warrants entitle Cerberus
to acquire 315,790 of our Class A Common Shares (subject to
anti-dilution provisions) if they exercise their remaining
warrants exclusively for DSW Common Shares. As of April 29,
2006, SSC would receive 1,973,684 of our Class A Common
Shares from Retail Ventures (subject to anti-dilution
provisions) if they exercised these warrants exclusively for DSW
Common Shares.
Although Retail Ventures has informed us that it does not
currently intend or plan to undertake a spin-off of Common
Shares to Retail Ventures shareholders, in the event that
Retail Ventures effects a spin-off of its DSW Common Shares to
its shareholders in the future, the holders of outstanding
unexercised warrants will receive the same number of DSW Common
Shares that they would have received had they exercised their
warrants in full for Retail Ventures common shares immediately
prior to the record date of the spin-off, without regard to any
limitation on exercise contained in the warrants. Following the
completion of any such spin-off, the warrants will be
exercisable solely for Retail Ventures common shares.
Value City Intercompany Note. The capital stock of DSW
held by Retail Ventures currently secures a $240 million
Value City intercompany note made payable by Retail Ventures to
Value City, which was executed and delivered on January 1,
2005 in connection with the transfer of all the capital stock of
DSW and Filenes Basement by Value City to Retail Ventures
on that date. Under the terms of the Value City intercompany
note, the lien granted to Value City on the DSW capital stock
held by Retail Ventures will be released upon written notice
that warrants held by Cerberus, SSC and Millennium are to be
exercised in exchange for DSW capital stock held by Retail
Ventures and to be delivered by Retail Ventures upon the
exercise of such warrants. The lien will also be released upon
repayment of the note in full. In connection with the offering
of the PIES by Retail Ventures, the lien on the DSW capital
stock that secures the Value City intercompany note will be
released and the approximately $49.7 million remaining
balance of the Value City intercompany note will be repaid.
The $165.0 Million Intercompany Note. In March 2005,
we incurred intercompany indebtedness to fund a
$165.0 million dividend to Retail Ventures. We repaid this
note in full in July 2005.
The $25.0 Million Intercompany Note. In May 2005, we
incurred intercompany indebtedness to fund a $25.0 million
dividend to Retail Ventures. We repaid this note in full in July
2005.
Cross-Corporate Guarantees. We previously entered into
cross-corporate guarantees with various financing institutions
pursuant to which we, Retail Ventures, Filenes Basement
and Value City, jointly and severally, guaranteed payment
obligations owed to these entities under factoring arrangements
they have entered into with vendors who may provide merchandise
to some or all of Retail Ventures subsidiaries. In July
2005, we terminated these cross-corporate guarantees and no
amounts remain guaranteed by us.
For the thirteen week period ended April 29, 2006, our net
cash provided by operations was $38.2 million, compared to
$25.8 million provided by operations for the thirteen week
period ended April 30, 2005. The $12.4 million
increase in cash provided by operations over the comparable
period is primarily due to increased net income and an increase
in accounts payable partially offset by an increase in inventory.
40
Net working capital increased $19.9 million to
$258.4 million at April 29, 2006 from
$238.5 million at January 28, 2006, primarily due to
increased cash and inventory related to new stores opened in
fiscal 2006. Current assets divided by current liabilities at
April 29, 2006 and January 28, 2006 were 2.6 and 2.7,
respectively.
We operate all our stores, warehouses and corporate office space
from leased facilities. Lease obligations are accounted for
either as operating leases or as capital leases. We disclose in
the notes to the financial statements included elsewhere in this
prospectus the minimum payments due under operating or capital
leases.
For fiscal 2005, our cash used in investing activities amounted
to $25.3 million compared to $33.9 million for fiscal
2004. For each fiscal year from fiscal 2003 through fiscal 2005,
our cash used in investing activities consisted of capital
expenditures. Cash used for capital expenditures was
$25.3 million, $33.9 million, and $22.1 million
for fiscal 2005, fiscal 2004, and fiscal 2003, respectively.
Capital expenditures were related primarily to new stores.
Our future capital expenditures will depend primarily on the
number of new stores we open, the number of existing stores we
remodel and the timing of these expenditures. In fiscal 2005, we
opened 29 new DSW stores. We plan to open approximately 30
stores per year in each fiscal year from fiscal 2006 through
fiscal 2010. During fiscal 2005, the average investment required
to open a typical new DSW store was approximately
$1.4 million. Of this amount, gross inventory typically
accounted for $680,000, fixtures and leasehold improvements
typically accounted for $460,000 (prior to tenant allowances)
and pre-opening advertising and other pre-opening expenses
typically accounted for $280,000. We plan to finance investment
in new stores with existing cash and cash flows from operating
activities, and may draw upon our revolving credit facility, if
necessary.
For fiscal 2005, our net cash provided by financing activities
was $32.4 million, compared to $19.9 million for
fiscal 2004, and net cash used by financing activities of
$19.2 million in fiscal 2003. The cash provided of
$32.4 million in fiscal 2005 was primarily the result of
the proceeds from the sale of stock from our initial public
offering, offset by the amounts we paid to Retail Ventures for
our intercompany indebtedness arising from our dividends to
Retail Ventures and the repayment of our obligations under our
prior credit facilities.
Contractual and Other Obligations
We have the following minimum commitments under contractual
obligations, as defined by the Securities and Exchange
Commission, or SEC. A purchase obligation is defined
as an agreement to purchase goods or services that is
enforceable and legally binding on us and that specifies all
significant terms, including: fixed or minimum quantities to be
purchased, fixed, minimum or variable price provisions; and the
approximate timing of the transaction. Other long-term
liabilities are defined as long-term liabilities that are
reflected on our balance sheet in accordance with GAAP. Based on
this definition, the table below includes only those contracts
which include fixed or minimum obligations. It does not include
normal purchases, which are made in the ordinary course of
business.
41
The following table provides aggregated information about
contractual obligations and other long-term liabilities as of
January 28, 2006:
Contractual Obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No |
|
|
|
|
Less than | |
|
|
|
More than | |
|
Expiration |
|
|
Total | |
|
1 Year | |
|
1-3 Years | |
|
3-5 Years | |
|
5 Years | |
|
Date |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
Long-term debt
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Capital lease and operating lease
obligations(1)
|
|
|
804,322 |
|
|
|
91,666 |
|
|
|
184,028 |
|
|
|
173,870 |
|
|
|
354,758 |
|
|
|
|
|
Construction
commitments(2)
|
|
|
299 |
|
|
|
299 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase
obligations(3)
|
|
|
495 |
|
|
|
375 |
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
805,116 |
|
|
$ |
92,340 |
|
|
$ |
184,148 |
|
|
$ |
173,870 |
|
|
$ |
354,758 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Our operating leases require us to pay for common area
maintenance costs and real estate taxes. In fiscal 2005, these
common area maintenance costs and real estate taxes represented
30.1% of our required lease payments. These costs and taxes vary
year by year and are based almost entirely on actual costs
incurred and taxes paid incurred by the landlord. As such, they
are not included in the lease obligations presented above. |
|
(2) |
Construction commitments include capital items to be purchased
for projects that were under construction, or for which a lease
had been signed, as of January 28, 2006. |
|
(3) |
Many of our purchase obligations are cancelable by us without
payment or penalty, and we have excluded such obligations, along
with all associate employment and intercompany obligations. |
We had outstanding letters of credit that totaled approximately
$9.0 million at April 29, 2006 and $13.6 million
at January 28, 2006. If certain conditions are met under
these arrangements, we would be required to satisfy the
obligations in cash. Due to the nature of these arrangements and
based on historical experience, we do not expect to make any
significant payment outside of terms set forth in these
arrangements.
As of April 29, 2006, we have entered into various
construction commitments, including capital items to be
purchased for projects that were under construction, or for
which a lease has been signed. Our obligations under these
commitments aggregated to approximately $0.3 million as of
April 29, 2006. In addition, as of April 29, 2006, we
have signed lease agreements for 20 new store locations
with annual rent of approximately $7.6 million. In
connection with the new lease agreements, we will receive
approximately $5.8 million of tenant allowances, which will
reimburse us for expenditures at these locations.
We operate all our stores, warehouses and corporate office space
from leased facilities. Lease obligations are accounted for
either as operating leases or as capital leases based on lease
by lease review at lease inception. We had no capital leases
outstanding as of April 29, 2006.
On July 5, 2005, subsequent to our initial public offering,
we paid in full the principal balance of both the
$165 million and $25 million dividend notes plus
accrued interest of approximately $6.6 million to Retail
Ventures, $20 million outstanding on DSWs old secured
revolving credit facility and a $10 million intercompany
advance from Retail Ventures used to pay down on the outstanding
old credit facility borrowing.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or
FASB, issued SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), or
SFAS No. 123R, Share-Based Payment. This
statement revised SFAS No. 123, Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation, and requires companies to expense
the value of employee stock options and similar awards. The
effective date of this standard is interim and annual periods
beginning after June 15, 2005. No stock options or similar
awards have been granted by DSW as of fiscal years 2004 and
2003. In April 2005, the SEC delayed the compliance date for
SFAS No. 123R until the beginning of our fiscal year
42
2006. We will utilize the modified prospective method of
adoption. We expect that the impact of adoption of
SFAS 123R to our results of operations will be similar, on
an annualized basis, to the pro forma disclosures presented in
Note 3 of the Notes to our Consolidated Financial
Statements.
In November 2005, the FASB issued FIN 47, Accounting for
Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations, or FIN 47,
which clarified the term conditional asset retirement
obligation as used in FASB Statement No. 143,
Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations. Conditional
asset retirement obligation refers to a legal obligation to
perform an asset retirement activity in which the timing and/or
method of settlement are dependent on a future event that may or
may not be within the control of the entity. While the timing
and/or method of settlement is unknown, the obligation to
perform the asset retirement obligation is unconditional.
FIN 47 requires that the fair value of the asset retirement
activity be recorded when it can be reasonably estimated. The
adoption of FIN 47 during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005
did not have a material impact on our financial position or
results of operations.
In July 2006, the FASB issued FIN 48, Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes, which clarifies the accounting
for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an
enterprises financial statements in accordance with FASB
Statement No.109, Accounting for Income Taxes. The
evaluation of a tax position in accordance with FIN 48 is a two
step process. The first step is recognition: The enterprise
determines whether it is more likely than not that a tax
position will be sustained upon examination, including
resolution of any related appeals or litigation processes, based
on the technical merits of the position. The second step is
measurement: A tax position that meets the more likely than not
recognition threshold is measured to determine that amount of
benefit to recognize in the financial statements. The tax
position is measured at the largest amount of benefit that is
greater than 50 percent likely of being realized upon
ultimate settlement. FIN 48 provides for a cumulative effect of
a change in accounting principle to be recorded upon the initial
adoption. This interpretation is effective for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2006. We are currently
evaluating the impact this proposed interpretation will have on
our consolidated financial statements.
Proposed Accounting Standards
An exposure draft of the proposed amendment to FASB Statement
No. 132, Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit
Pension and Other Postretirement Plans an amendment
of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106 and 132R, was issued
in March 2006. This Exposure Draft would amend the FASB
Statements No. 87, 88, 106 and 132R. The intent of the
Exposure Draft is to require an employer to recognize as a
component of other comprehensive income, net of tax, the
actuarial gains and losses and prior service costs and credits
that arise during the period. The comment deadline on this
Exposure Draft is May 31, 2006, with a planned effective
date for fiscal years ending after December 31, 2006. We do
not believe that the impact of this proposed amendment will have
a material effect on our results of operations.
An exposure draft of a proposed SFAS, Fair Value
Measurements, was issued in June 2004. This exposure draft
defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair
value in GAAP, and expands disclosures about fair value
measurements. The intent of this standard is to ensure
consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and
enhanced disclosures regarding the measurements. FASB expects to
issue a final statement by June 30, 2006. We are currently
evaluating the impact this exposure draft will have on our
consolidated financial statements.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
It is not our intention to participate in transactions that
generate relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial
partnerships, such as special purpose entities or variable
interest entities, which would facilitate off-balance sheet
arrangements or other limited purposes. We have not entered into
any off-balance sheet arrangements, as that term is
described by the SEC, as of April 29, 2006.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Our cash and cash equivalents are maintained only with
maturities of 90 days or less. Our short-term investments
have interest reset periods of 35 days or less. These
financial instruments may be subject to
43
interest rate risk through lost income should interest rates
increase during their limited term to maturity or resetting of
interest rates. As of April 29, 2006 and January 28,
2006, there was no long-term debt outstanding. Future
borrowings, if any, would bear interest at negotiated rates and
would be subject to interest rate risk. Because we have no
outstanding debt, we do not believe that a hypothetical adverse
change of 10% in interest rates would have a material effect on
our financial position.
Inflation
Our results of our operations and financial condition are
presented based upon historical cost. While it is difficult to
accurately measure the impact of inflation because of the nature
of the estimates required, management believes that the effect
of inflation, if any, on our results of operations and financial
condition has been minor; however, there can be no assurance
that the business will not be affected by inflation in the
future.
44
BUSINESS
Company Overview
DSW is a leading U.S. specialty branded footwear retailer
operating 204 shoe stores in 33 states as of April 29,
2006. We offer a wide selection of brand name and designer
dress, casual and athletic footwear for women and men. Our
typical customers are brand-, quality- and style-conscious
shoppers who have a passion for footwear and accessories. Our
core focus is to create a distinctive store experience that
satisfies both the rational and emotional shopping needs of our
customers by offering them a vast, exciting selection of
in-season styles combined with the convenience and value they
desire. We believe this combination of selection, convenience
and value differentiates us from our competitors and appeals to
consumers from a broad range of socioeconomic and demographic
backgrounds.
Since its inception, DSW has evolved into a distinctive,
consumer-friendly retail concept that allows customers to
personalize their shopping experience by offering a sea of
shoes that are accessible,
easy-to-shop, and
fulfill a broad range of style and fashion desires. We cater to
customers who take pleasure in the hunt for the perfect shoe and
value the shopping experience itself as an enjoyable pastime.
Typical DSW stores are approximately 25,000 square feet,
with over 85% of total square footage used as selling space.
Over 30,000 pairs of shoes in more than 2,000 styles are
displayed on the selling floor of most of our stores, compared
to a significantly smaller product offering at typical
department stores. Our stores feature self-service fixtures that
allow customers to view, touch, and try on the product without
relying on salespeople to check availability. Our locations have
clear signage, and well-trained sales associates are available
to assist customers as desired. New footwear merchandise is
organized by style on the main floor, and clearance goods are
organized by size in the rear of the store. Accessories and
impulse items are featured at the front. The store layout allows
customers who do not have time for relaxed browsing to swiftly
identify the shoe styles they are seeking and shop in a
targeted, time-efficient manner.
Our goal is to further strengthen our position as a leading
specialty branded retailer of adult footwear in the United
States. Since 1998, we have accelerated our expansion by
investing in new stores, merchandise development, technology and
our people to support further growth and enhance our
performance. In fiscal 2005, we generated $1.14 billion in
net sales and $70.1 million in operating profit. During the
same period, we sold over 27.3 million pairs of shoes. Over
the five-fiscal-year period ended January 28, 2006, we have
grown our DSW store base, net sales and operating profit at
compound annual rates of approximately 21%, 22% and 48%,
respectively. See Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
and our historical consolidated financial statements and the
notes thereto.
We also operate leased shoe departments for three non-affiliated
retailers and one affiliated retailer. We entered into supply
agreements to merchandise the non-affiliated shoe departments in
Stein Mart, Gordmans and Frugal Fannies stores as of July
2002, June 2004 and September 2003, respectively. We have
operated leased shoe departments for Filenes Basement, a
wholly-owned subsidiary of Retail Ventures, since its
acquisition by Retail Ventures in March 2000. Effective as of
January 30, 2005, we updated and reaffirmed our contractual
arrangement with Filenes Basement. We own the merchandise,
record sales of merchandise net of returns and sales tax, own
the fixtures (except for Filenes Basement) and provide
supervisory assistance in these covered locations. Stein Mart,
Gordmans, Frugal Fannies and Filenes Basement
provide the sales associates. We pay a percentage of net sales
as rent. As of April 29, 2006, we supplied merchandise to
158 Stein Mart stores, 57 Gordmans stores, one Frugal
Fannies store and 25 Filenes Basement stores. On
May 30, 2006, we entered into an amended and restated
supply agreement to supply shoes to an additional 102 Stein Mart
stores beginning in 2007.
Corporate History
We were incorporated on January 20, 1969 as Shonac
Corporation and opened our first DSW store in Dublin, Ohio in
July 1991. In 1998, Value City Department Stores, Inc., which
subsequently became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Retail
Ventures, purchased DSW and affiliated shoe businesses from
SSC and Nacht Management, Inc. In December 2004, Retail
Ventures carried out a corporate reorganization whereby
45
Value City Department Stores, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of
Retail Ventures, merged with and into Value City, another
wholly-owned subsidiary of Retail Ventures. In turn, Value City
transferred all the issued and outstanding shares of DSW to
Retail Ventures in exchange for a promissory note. In February
2005, we changed our name from Shonac Corporation to DSW Inc. In
July 2005, we completed an initial public offering of our
Class A Common Shares, selling approximately
16.2 million shares at an offering price of $19.00 per
share. As of April 29, 2006, Retail Ventures owned
approximately 27.7 million of our Class B Common
Shares, or in excess of 63.1% of our total outstanding shares
and 93.2% of the combined voting power of our outstanding Common
Shares.
Competitive Strengths
We believe that our leading market position is driven by our
competitive strengths the breadth of our branded
product offerings, our distinctive and convenient store layout,
the value proposition offered to our customers and our
demonstrated ability to deliver profitable growth on a
consistent basis. Over the past few years, we have broadened our
merchandise assortment, honed our retail operating model and
continued our dedication to providing quality in season products
at attractive prices. We believe we will continue to improve our
ability to leverage these competitive strengths and we believe
we will attract and retain talented managers and merchandisers.
|
|
|
The Breadth of Our Product Offerings |
Our goal is to excite our customers with a sea of
shoes that fulfill a broad range of style and fashion
needs. We believe that our typical store offers the largest
selection of brand name and designer merchandise of any footwear
retailer or typical department store in the nation. We carry
primarily in-season footwear found in specialty and department
stores and branded make-ups (shoes made exclusively for a
retailer), with selection at each store geared toward the
particular demographics of the location. A typical DSW store
carries approximately 30,000 pairs of shoes in over 2,000 styles
compared to a significantly smaller product offering at typical
department stores. We also offer a complementary selection of
handbags, hosiery and other accessories which appeal to our
brand- and fashion-conscious customers.
Our strategy is designed to ensure that a broad and consistent
selection of merchandise is available. We keep merchandise fresh
by receiving new shipments at least weekly and by trying to put
new items on the selling floor within 24 hours of delivery.
Our goal is to provide our customers with a wide selection of
in-season branded merchandise every day that increases our
customers likelihood of finding the right shoe at the
right price each time they visit our stores. The continual
turnover of new merchandise encourages customers to visit often
and see the new styles that arrive each week.
We strive to improve the quality and breadth of our vendor
relationships. We primarily purchase in-season merchandise
directly from more than 300 domestic and foreign vendors. Our
buyers have established strong, mutually beneficial
relationships with vendors that view DSW as a significant
distribution channel for their branded offerings. Our suppliers
consider us to be an attractive retail channel due to both the
scale and geographic reach of our store base and our willingness
to buy merchandise across a broad selection of styles. The
quality of our vendor relationships allows us to secure an
extensive assortment of in-season merchandise and distinguishes
us from other shoe retailers.
|
|
|
Our Distinctive and Convenient Store Layout |
We provide our customers with the highest level of convenience
based on our belief that customers should be empowered to
control and personalize their shopping experiences. Our store
layout and visual merchandising techniques provide a convenient
shopping process, regardless of the type of shoe-buying
experience our customers desire on a particular trip.
Indulge in Your Passion for Shoes. We cater to the
passionate shoe enthusiast and indulge customers who love to
shop. Customers take pleasure in our wide product offering in
search of the products that best suit their needs. Our
merchandise is displayed on the selling floor with self-service
fixtures to enable customers to view and touch the merchandise.
We believe this self-service aspect provides our customers with
46
maximum convenience as they are able to browse and try on the
merchandise without feeling rushed or pressured into making a
decision too quickly. Therefore, customers are able to shop at
their own pace as they savor the thrill and enjoyment of
indulging their passion for shoes. Although all DSW stores are
designed for self-service shopping, sales associates are
available to help customers locate merchandise and to assist as
needed.
Easy Shopping Experience. DSW also caters to shoppers who
are time-constrained and come to our stores knowing exactly what
they want. Our wide selection ensures that they are more likely
to find styles they are seeking at DSW than at other shoe
retailers, thereby minimizing the risk of leaving empty-handed.
The stores are also designed for an efficient shopping
experience. Our self-service concept empowers our customers to
shop quickly and easily because they do not have to rely on a
salesperson to check for sizes and styles. Typical DSW stores
are approximately 25,000 square feet, with over 85% of
total square footage used as selling space. We organize most of
our stores on a single level, which allows customers to view the
entire store and product offering as they enter and move quickly
to the area where their desired styles are located. Interiors
are well-lit, with informative signage, and spacious aisles
allow ease of movement throughout the store. We display shoes in
a logical manner that groups together similar styles such as
dress, casual, seasonal and athletic merchandise. In our
self-liquidating clearance racks, shoes are grouped by size and
displayed in the rear of the store. Of the 204 DSW stores open
as of April 29, 2006, 170 are either freestanding or
located in shopping centers, which provide customers with direct
access to parking, and the remainder are in shopping malls or
downtown locations. For added convenience, we provide a
centralized check-out, which aids customers in quickly locating
the cashier for efficient processing.
|
|
|
The Value Proposition Offered to Our Customers |
Through our buying organization, we are able to provide our
customers with high-quality, in-season fashions at prices that
we believe are competitive with the typical sale price found at
specialty retailers and department stores. We employ a
consistent pricing strategy that typically provides our
customers with the same price on our merchandise from the day it
is received until it goes into our planned clearance rotation.
Our pricing strategy differentiates us from our competitors who
usually price and promote merchandise at discounts available
only for limited time periods. We find that customers appreciate
having the power to shop for value when it is most convenient
for them, rather than waiting for a department store or
specialty retailer to have a sale event. For easy comparison by
our customers, we prominently display our price and the
corresponding vendors suggested retail price for each pair
of shoes.
Our graduated, self-liquidating clearance process includes
moving shoes to the large clearance racks located in the rear of
the store when only a few pairs remain. Because this process
also applies to our fastest-moving merchandise, some of our
shoppers benefit from steep price reductions on our most popular
items. This process provides more floor space for new
merchandise at a faster rate.
We believe that customers value our pricing strategy
knowing that no matter when our customers shop with us, they are
typically assured of receiving our best value price on whatever
merchandise they purchase. We believe our everyday value prices
are competitive with the typical sale price found at most of our
competitors. During fiscal 2005, the average ticket price for a
pair of shoes (including clearance stock) in a DSW store was
approximately $41.
In order to provide additional value to shoe enthusiasts and
other regular customers, we developed a customer loyalty program
called Reward Your Style. This program offers
additional savings to frequent shoppers and encourages repeat
sales. We target market to Reward Your Style members
throughout the year. We classify these members by frequency and
use direct mail and on-line communication to stimulate further
sales and traffic. As of January 28, 2006, over
6.8 million members enrolled in the Reward Your
Style loyalty program had purchased merchandise in the
previous two fiscal years, up from approximately
5.5 million members as of January 29, 2005. In fiscal
2005, approximately 60% of DSW store net sales were generated by
shoppers in the loyalty program, and these shoppers spent an
average of 19% more per purchase than customers who were not
enrolled.
47
|
|
|
Demonstrated Ability to Consistently Deliver Profitable
Growth |
Since 1998, we have focused our operating model on selection,
convenience and value. We believe that the profitable growth we
have achieved in the past is attributable to our operating model
and managements focus on store-level profitability and
economic payback.
Over the five fiscal years ended January 28, 2006, our net
sales and operating profit have grown at compound annual growth
rates of 22% and 48%, respectively. In addition, for all our
annual new store classes since 1996, we have achieved positive
operating cash flow within two years of opening. We intend to
continue to focus on net sales, operating profit and cash flow
per annual new store class as we pursue our growth strategy.
Growth Strategy
We plan to continue to strengthen our position as a leading
specialty branded footwear retailer by pursuing the following
three primary strategies for growth in sales and
profitability expanding our store base, driving
sales through enhanced merchandising and leveraging our
operating model. For additional information regarding our growth
strategy, see Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Overview Expansion Strategy.
We believe our specialty retail concept has broad national
appeal and provides substantial opportunity for new store
expansion. Over the five-fiscal-year period ended
January 28, 2006, we have rapidly expanded our store base
by opening 124 DSW stores, including 29 new stores in fiscal
2005. As of April 29, 2006, we operated 204 shoe stores in
33 states and have signed leases for an additional 20
stores, 13 of which we expect to open in fiscal 2006. We plan to
open approximately 30 stores in each fiscal year from fiscal
2006 through fiscal 2010 and believe that opening stores at this
rate will not compromise our new store economics. We plan to
open stores both in markets in which we currently operate and in
new markets.
Based on an internal planning model created in fiscal 2005, we
believe that we have the long-term potential to operate over 400
stores in the United States, including the 204 stores existing
as of April 29, 2006. Our long-range planning model is
based on an examination of each metropolitan area we currently
serve or desire to serve. The objective of the analysis is to
understand the demand for our products in each market over time,
and our ability to capture that demand. The analysis also looks
at our current penetration levels in the markets we serve, and
our expected deepening of those penetration levels as we
continue to grow our brand and become the shoe retailer of
choice in our markets.
Site Selection. In general, our evaluation of potential
new stores focuses on store size, configuration, location, and
lease terms. Beginning in fiscal 2005, we also began to enhance
our methodologies of selecting sites by incorporating additional
statistical factors. This has allowed us to develop a deeper
understanding of the center types and trade areas we wish to
serve over time. It has also allowed us to better understand key
leading indicators of our success in a market. We believe these
enhancements will provide us with a deeper knowledge of the
characteristics of a successful DSW location, and in turn, help
us develop a quality real estate portfolio that meets our
financial expectations.
New Store Model. After we approve a site, we negotiate
lease terms and begin planning the store layout and design. We
typically devote approximately six weeks from the time we take
possession to prepare a store for its opening. During fiscal
2005 the average investment required to open a new DSW store was
approximately $1.4 million per store. Of this amount, in
fiscal 2005, gross inventory typically accounted for
approximately $680,000, fixtures and leasehold improvements
typically accounted for approximately $460,000 (prior to tenant
allowances) and pre-opening advertising and other pre-opening
expenses typically accounted for approximately $280,000. All our
stores are leased.
48
|
|
|
Driving Sales Through Enhanced Merchandising |
We intend to increase the number of customer transactions and
average transaction value by continually refining our
merchandise mix. Our merchandising group constantly monitors
current fashion trends as well as historical sales trends to
identify popular styles and styles that may become popular in
the upcoming season. We track store performance and sales trends
on a weekly basis and have a flexible incremental buying process
that enables us to order styles frequently throughout each
season, in contrast to department stores, which typically make
one large purchase at the beginning of the season.
Expanding Vendor Relationships. We have established
strong vendor relationships that allow us to gain favorable
access to high quality, brand name merchandise at attractive
prices. These favorable relationships also allow us to make
opportunistic in-season merchandise purchases that may be
offered to us from time to time. We intend to capitalize on the
success of our existing vendor relationships as well as identify
and develop new supply sources, in particular to enhance our
offering of designer brands.
Increasing Sales Within Existing Merchandise Categories.
In order to further increase sales within our existing
womens, mens and athletic shoe categories, we aim to
increase the quality and breadth of existing vendor offerings
and to keep our product mix fresh and on target by testing new
fashions and actively monitoring sell-through rates in our
stores. Additionally, we employ marketing initiatives, including
broad advertising campaigns, the Reward Your Style
loyalty program and sales of gift cards to encourage repeat
visits and attract new customers.
Extending Into New Product Categories. While shoes are
the main focus of DSW, we believe offering a complementary
assortment of handbags, hosiery and other accessories is an
important driver of profitable sales. We will continue to
explore new, related product categories that we believe could
enhance sales.
|
|
|
Leveraging Our Operating Model |
As we grow our business and fill in markets to their full
potential, we believe we will continue to improve our
profitability by leveraging our cost structure, particularly in
the areas of advertising, regional management, distribution and
overhead functions. Additionally, we intend to continue
investing in our infrastructure to improve our operating and
financial performance. Most significantly, we believe continued
investment in information systems will enhance our efficiency in
areas such as merchandise planning and allocation, inventory
management, distribution and point of sale functions, among
others.
DSW Store Locations
As of April 29, 2006, we operated 204 DSW stores in
33 states in the United States. The table below shows the
locations of our DSW stores by region as of April 29, 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Northeast |
|
West |
|
Central |
|
Southeast |
|
Connecticut
|
|
3 |
|
Arizona |
|
5 |
|
Illinois |
|
10 |
|
Alabama |
|
1 |
Delaware
|
|
1 |
|
California |
|
15 |
|
Indiana |
|
6 |
|
Florida |
|
15 |
Maine
|
|
1 |
|
Colorado |
|
6 |
|
Iowa |
|
1 |
|
Georgia |
|
8 |
Maryland
|
|
6 |
|
Nevada |
|
3 |
|
Kansas |
|
3 |
|
North Carolina |
|
4 |
Massachusetts
|
|
8 |
|
Oregon |
|
1 |
|
Michigan |
|
11 |
|
Tennessee |
|
3 |
New Hampshire
|
|
1 |
|
Texas |
|
20 |
|
Minnesota |
|
5 |
|
Virginia |
|
10 |
New Jersey
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
Missouri |
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
New York
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
Nebraska |
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
Pennsylvania
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
Ohio |
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
Rhode Island
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Oklahoma |
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wisconsin |
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
49
Merchandising
DSW stores offer a wide selection of high quality, in-season and
fashion-oriented footwear, handbags and accessories with
everyday prices that we believe are competitive with the typical
sale price found at specialty retailers and department stores.
Our merchandising group continually monitors current fashion
trends, as well as historical sales trends, to identify popular
styles and those that may become popular in the upcoming season.
We believe that our stores offer the largest selection of brand
name and designer merchandise of any footwear retailer or
typical department store in the nation. We primarily carry
in-season footwear found in specialty and department stores and
branded make-ups (shoes made exclusively for a retailer), with
selection at each store geared towards the particular
demographics of the location. A typical DSW store carries over
2,000 shoe styles, compared to a significantly smaller product
offering at typical department stores. Our goal is to offer a
wide selection of on-trend branded merchandise that greatly
increases our customers likelihood of finding the right
shoe at the right price in one trip.
We believe our wide selection of merchandise from
moderate-priced brands to higher-end designer goods contributes
to a distinctive shopping experience for our customers. This
breadth of brands differentiates us from price-oriented
retailers and builds strong customer loyalty. We purchase
in-season designer and branded merchandise both on a planned and
opportunistic basis.
In the main portion of each of our stores, the shoes are
organized by style in order to highlight the breadth of our
merchandise assortment. However, when only a few pairs of a
style remain, we place those shoes on a clearance rack organized
by size in the rear of the store and reduce their prices
periodically. Our clearance approach has been successful in
creating additional excitement and traffic in our stores and in
moving the remaining merchandise quickly. It also creates
available floor space for new styles and a wider selection of
shoes.
We separate our DSW merchandise into four total
categories womens dress and casual footwear;
mens dress and casual footwear; athletic footwear; and
accessories. While shoes are the main focus of DSW, we also
offer a complementary assortment of handbags, hosiery and other
accessories. The following table sets forth the approximate
percentage of our sales attributable to each DSW merchandise
category in fiscal 2005:
|
|
|
Category |
|
Percent of Net Sales |
|
|
|
Womens
|
|
64% |
Mens
|
|
17% |
Athletic
|
|
13% |
Accessories and Other
|
|
6% |
|
|
|
Buying, Planning and Allocation |
As of January 28, 2006, our merchandising group consists of
a Vice Chairman and Chief Merchandising Officer, two Vice
President General Merchandising Managers, a Vice President
Planning and Allocation, a Corporate Merchandise Manager, two
divisional merchandise managers, and three senior buyers. For
each major product category, there is a buyer, an assistant
buyer, a merchandise planner and a store planner, whose
responsibility is allocation. We begin the buying process for
our DSW stores in January for the following fall merchandise and
in June for the following spring merchandise. Once our buyers
determine the styles and merchandise mix for an upcoming season,
they focus on purchasing the required quantities at the lowest
cost and the highest quality available, as well as within the
most advantageous flow or timetable.
Our planning and allocation group serves as strategic partner
to, and exercises financial control over, the buying team. Each
buyers purchasing plan is reviewed on a monthly basis by
the Vice Chairman and Chief Merchandising Officer and the Vice
President Planning and Allocation. Monthly updates based on
seasonal trends are incorporated into the buying plan. We
believe this organizational scheme helps maximize our
50
buying opportunities while maintaining appropriate
organizational and financial control. Since October 2003, all
functional areas within planning and allocation have been
supported by a software package that integrates financial
analysis into the planning and allocation process. While this
software is already yielding positive results, we believe that
continued use of this software will yield additional
improvements in our planning and allocation functions.
Merchandise planning at the category level, for pre-season
planning and in-season adjustments, is developed through strong
relationships with our buying organization. Channel planning at
the store level tailors the assortment of merchandise by store
based on each stores customer demographics and balances
the merchandise mix by factoring in volume and space management
objectives. Allocation management, which directs the flow of
merchandise from our distribution center to the individual
stores, allows us to quickly respond and adjust assortments
based on trend, store and style specific sales patterns. Our
allocation decisions are based not only on quantity and
assortment, but also include consideration of price, vendor,
color and other style characteristics. We believe that this
approach to planning and allocation allows us to optimize our
ability to deliver the right merchandise to the right store at
the right time, thereby increasing sales and reducing the need
for markdowns.
We believe we have good relationships with our vendors. We
purchase merchandise directly from more than 300 domestic and
foreign vendors as of January 28, 2006. Our vendors include
suppliers who either manufacture their own merchandise or supply
merchandise manufactured by others, or both. Most of our
domestic vendors import a large portion of their merchandise
from abroad. We have implemented quality control programs under
which our DSW buyers and store managers inspect incoming
merchandise for fit, color and material, as well as for overall
quality of manufacturing. As the number of DSW locations
increases and our sales volumes grow, we believe there will
continue to be adequate sources available to acquire a
sufficient supply of quality goods in a timely manner and on
satisfactory economic terms. After giving effect to
consolidation among our vendors, during fiscal 2005, merchandise
supplied by our three top vendors accounted for approximately
22% of our net sales.
We believe that many vendors view us as a significant
distribution channel for their branded offerings and appreciate
our uncomplicated purchasing program. Our vendor relationships
result in greater access to high quality, in-season merchandise
at attractive prices.
Marketing and Advertising
Our marketing strategy for DSW focuses on communicating the
selection, convenience and value offered by DSW through the use
of the slogan Indulge in your passion for shoes. We
utilize television, radio and print media advertising as well as
in-store promotions. In fiscal 2005, we spent
$38.0 million, or 3.3% of our net sales, on advertising,
excluding costs to promote each new store opening, which are
included in pre-opening expenses. We also maintain a gift card
program with the intent to generate additional sales by reaching
new customers and increasing awareness of the DSW concept.
In early 1998, we introduced the Reward Your Style
customer loyalty program at DSW. The Reward Your
Style program seeks to motivate members to shop at DSW by
offering them a $25 reward certificate for every $250 they
spend. In addition to customer rewards, the program regularly
communicates with customers through direct mail,
e-mail and the DSW
website. Messages include fashion updates, new arrivals and
other shopping information. As of January 28, 2006, over
6.8 million members enrolled in the Reward Your
Style program had purchased merchandise in the previous
two fiscal years and, in fiscal 2005, approximately 60% of DSW
store net sales were generated by shoppers in the loyalty
program. We believe that this program has successfully increased
the shopping frequency and average transaction size of our
customers.
51
While the program develops customer loyalty, it also provides us
with valuable market intelligence and purchasing information
regarding our most frequent customers. We carefully analyze the
members transaction activity and use this information to
directly advertise, to encourage repeat shopping and to
communicate with our customers. By understanding the
characteristics of our best DSW customers, we are able to
identify other existing customers in lower spending groups with
similar profiles and target communications and advertisements to
increase the attractiveness of our offerings to them, which we
believe results in increases in their spending level.
Staffing and Operations
At DSW, store associates receive training to maximize the
customer shopping experience in our self-service environment.
Training components consist of customer service, maintaining
neat, clean and orderly store conditions for ease of shopping,
efficient checkout process and friendly service. We also
maintain a store management training program to develop the
skills of management personnel and to provide an ongoing talent
pool for future store expansion. We prefer to fill store
management and field supervisor positions through internal
promotions.
DSW stores are organized into the West, Central, Northeast and
Southeast geographic regions. Each region is supported by a
Regional Vice President or Director, who supervises senior
district, district and area managers headquartered in the
respective region, district or area. The Regional Vice
Presidents and Directors spend the majority of their time in
their stores to ensure adherence to merchandising, operational
and personnel standards. The typical staff for a DSW store
consists of a store manager and two assistant managers who
supervise 15 to 25 full-and part-time hourly associates. Each
store manager reports directly to a district or area manager,
each of whom in turn reports to one of four Regional Vice
Presidents or Regional Directors, who in turn report to the
Chief Operating Officer. Our DSW store managers are responsible
on a day-to-day basis
for customer relations, personnel hiring and scheduling, and all
other operational matters arising in the stores. Our store
managers are an important source of information concerning local
market conditions, trends and customer preferences. We provide
bonuses to our store managers which are largely based on store
profitability and inventory control.
Distribution
DSWs distribution center is located in an approximately
700,000 square foot facility in Columbus, Ohio. The design
of the distribution center facilitates the prompt delivery of
priority purchases and fast-selling footwear to stores so we can
take full advantage of each selling season. This distribution
center facility uses a warehouse management system, upgraded in
2003, and material handling equipment, including automated
conveyor systems, to separate and collate shipments to our
stores. We use a cross dock conveyor system which enhances the
movement of merchandise through the distribution facility using
vendor advance shipment notifications, or ASNs. We have invested
in technology and have made process improvements in our
distribution center. As a result, we believe that our current
receiving and distribution process and infrastructure will
support our anticipated growth for our expanding retail store
base for the foreseeable future. We continue to examine how
goods flow to stores and plan to continue to refine this process.
Most of our inventory is shipped directly from suppliers to a
single centralized distribution center in Columbus, Ohio, where
the inventory is then processed, sorted and shipped to one of 12
pool locations located throughout the country and then on to our
stores. Over time, we expect to increase the amount of
merchandise that bypasses the distribution center on initial
allocations.
Management Information and Control Systems
We believe a high level of automation is essential to
maintaining and improving our competitive position and executing
our expansion strategy. We rely upon computer systems to provide
information for all areas of our business, including merchandise
planning and allocation, inventory control, distribution,
warehouse operations, financial planning, store billing, point
of sale and automated payroll and accounting. We focus on
leveraging our technology infrastructure and systems whenever
appropriate to simplify our processes and
52
increase our efficiency. We continually update our technical
infrastructure for our stores, corporate headquarters and
distribution center.
In order to promote our continued growth, we have undertaken
several major initiatives to build upon the merchandise
management system and warehouse management systems that support
DSW. An electronic data interchange, or EDI, project is underway
to utilize product UPC barcodes and electronic exchange of
purchase orders, ASNs and invoices with our top vendors. As of
January 28, 2006, approximately 80% of our footwear product
is processed using UPC bar codes, which has reduced processing
costs and improved flow of goods through the distribution center
to the stores. EDI purchase orders and ASNs were piloted with
key vendors in early 2004. They accounted for approximately 40%
of the volume of our shipments as of the end of fiscal 2005, and
we expect they will represent approximately 70% of volume by the
end of fiscal 2006. This will speed the flow of goods from the
vendor to DSW stores, as well as reduce the amount of inventory
needed in our warehouse. Additionally, new merchandise planning
and merchandise allocation systems were implemented in 2003 to
improve inventory productivity and store assortments and reduce
supply chain cycle time.
We utilize point of sale, or POS, registers with full scanning
capabilities to increase speed and accuracy at customer
checkouts and facilitate inventory restocking. In October 2004,
we launched an application that provides us with the ability to
look up a customers Reward Your Style number
at POS registers. In fiscal 2005, the POS system was further
upgraded with debit card terminals and signature capture.
We use enterprise data warehouse and customer relationship
management software to manage the Reward Your Style
program. We expect this will allow us to support, expand and
integrate Reward Your Style with the POS system to
improve the customer experience while reducing costs.
Information technology support is provided to us as a shared
service under the shared services agreement by Retail
Ventures information technology department for a period
that ends at the end of fiscal 2007 and will extend
automatically unless terminated by one of the parties.
Industry Overview and Competition
According to NPD
Fashionworld®,
a market research company, for the twelve months ended January
2006, DSW captured 2.3% of the $36.6 billion U.S. adult
footwear market. Based on our unique retail format and the high
quality, in-season selection of our shoe merchandise, we believe
that DSW provides a distinct shoe-shopping destination for our
customers. We view our primary competitors to be department
stores. According to NPD
Fashionworld®,
for the twelve months ended January 2006, department stores
represented 12.4% of the footwear market based on dollar volume,
decreasing from 13.0% for the same period a year ago. DSW also
competes with mall-based company stores, national chains,
independent shoe retailers, single-brand specialty retailers and
brand-oriented discounters.
We believe shoppers prefer our wide selection of on-trend
merchandise compared to product offerings of typical traditional
department stores, mall-based company stores, national chains,
single-brand specialty retailers and independent shoe retailers
because those retailers generally offer a more limited selection
at higher average prices and in a less convenient format than we
do. In addition, we believe that we successfully compete against
retailers who have attempted to duplicate our format because
they typically offer assortments with fewer recognizable brands
and more styles from prior seasons.
Although our prices are value-oriented, our core customer is not
the low-price shoe buyer. Therefore, we do not view
non-brand-oriented discount retailers as our prime competitors.
These non-brand-oriented discount retailers may offer footwear
at lower price points; however, they generally offer lower
quality, private label shoes. In contrast, we serve customers
who are typically brand-, quality- and style-conscious shoppers.
As such, we believe they prefer our value offerings to those of
the non-brand oriented discount stores. In addition, we believe
we will increase our market share as discount shoppers realize
that they can buy higher quality brands and more fashionable
shoes in our stores clearance sections for prices only
slightly higher than what they are willing to spend at a
discount store.
53
Leased Shoe Department Businesses
We have operated leased shoe departments for Filenes
Basement, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Retail Ventures, since
its acquisition by Retail Ventures in March 2000. Effective as
of January 30, 2005, we updated and reaffirmed our
contractual arrangement with Filenes Basement. Under the
new agreement, we own the merchandise, record sales of
merchandise net of returns and sales tax and provide supervisory
assistance in all covered locations. We pay a percentage of net
sales as rent. Filenes Basement provides the fixtures and
sales associates. As of April 29, 2006, we operated leased
shoe departments in 25 Filenes Basement locations. In
three of these locations, Filenes Basement licenses and
uses the name DSW in connection with the leased shoe departments.
We also operate leased shoe departments for three non-affiliated
retailers. We entered into supply agreements to merchandise the
shoe departments in Stein Mart, Gordmans and Frugal
Fannies stores as of July 2002, June 2004 and September
2003, respectively. We own the merchandise, record sales of
merchandise net of returns and sales tax, provide fixtures and
provide supervisory assistance in these covered locations. Stein
Mart, Gordmans and Frugal Fannies provide the sales
associates. We pay a percentage of net sales as rent. As of
April 29, 2006, we supplied merchandise to 158 Stein Mart
stores, 57 Gordmans stores and one Frugal Fannies store.
On May 30, 2006, we entered into an amended and restated
supply agreement to supply shoes to an additional 102 Stein Mart
stores beginning in 2007. Under the terms of this agreement, we
will be the exclusive supplier of shoes to all Stein Mart stores
that have shoe departments.
As of January 28, 2006, our leased shoe department segment
was supported by a store field operations group, a merchandising
group and a planning and allocation group that are separate from
the DSW stores segment.
The leased business store field operations is supported by a
Vice President of Leased Businesses, who supervises district and
area managers headquartered in the specific district or area.
The managers spend their time in the lessors stores
assisting the lessors staff with merchandise and
operational matters. Each district and area manager reports
directly to the Vice President of Leased Businesses who reports
to the Chief Operating Officer.
The merchandise group consists of a Divisional Merchandise
Manager of Leased Businesses, who supervises the buying staff.
The Divisional Merchandise Manager reports directly to the Chief
Merchandising Officer. The planning and allocation group
consists of a Manager of Planning & Allocation Leased,
who supervises merchandise and store planners. See Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements Note 11.
Segment Reporting.
Intellectual Property
We have registered a number of trademarks and service marks in
the United States and internationally, including
DSW®,
DSW Shoe
Warehouse®
and Reward Your
Style®.
The renewal dates for these U.S. trademarks are
April 25, 2015, May 23, 2015, and June 22, 2009,
respectively.
We believe that our trademarks and service marks, especially
those related to the DSW concept, have significant value and are
important to building our name recognition. We aggressively
protect our patented fixture designs, as well as our packaging,
store design elements, marketing slogans and graphics. To
protect our brand identity, we have also protected the DSW
trademark in several foreign countries.
Properties
All DSW stores, our principal executive office and all our
distribution, warehouse and office facilities are leased or
subleased. As of April 29, 2006, we leased or subleased 15
DSW stores and our main warehouse facility from entities
affiliated with SSC. We also signed a lease with affiliates of
SSC for one additional store expected to be opened in fiscal
2006. The remaining DSW stores are leased from unrelated
entities. Most of the DSW store leases provide for a minimum
annual rent plus a percentage of gross sales over specified
breakpoints. Most of our leases are for a fixed term with
options for three to five extension periods, each of which is
for a period of four or five years, exercisable at our option.
54
As of April 29, 2006, we operated 204 DSW stores. See
DSW Store Locations for a listing of the
states where our DSW stores are located.
Our warehouse and distribution facility is located in an
approximately 700,000 square foot facility in Columbus,
Ohio. The lease expires in December 2016 and has three renewal
options with terms of five years each. While we believe that
this facility is adequate to meet our foreseeable needs, we may
need to increase our distribution capacity in the future to
accommodate our expanding retail business. Our principal
executive office is also located on the site of our main
warehouse and distribution facility in Columbus, Ohio. We may
expand our office space in this facility in the near future. If
we do so, we may incur additional capital expenditures to build
out this additional space.
Associates
As of January 28, 2006, we employed approximately
4,950 associates. None of our associates is covered by any
collective bargaining agreement.
We offer competitive wages, comprehensive medical and dental
insurance, vision care, company-paid and supplemental life
insurance programs, associate-paid long-term and short-term
disability insurance and a 401(k) plan to our full-time
associates and some of our part-time associates.
We have not experienced any work stoppages, and we consider our
relations with our associates to be good.
Legal Proceedings
As previously reported, on March 8, 2005, Retail Ventures
announced that it had learned of the theft of credit card and
other purchase information from a portion of DSW customers. On
April 18, 2005, Retail Ventures issued the findings from
its investigation into the theft. The theft covered transaction
information involving approximately 1.4 million credit
cards and data from transactions involving approximately
96,000 checks.
We and Retail Ventures contacted and continue to cooperate with
law enforcement and other authorities with regard to this
matter. We are involved in several legal proceedings arising out
of this incident, including four putative class action lawsuits,
which seek unspecified monetary damages, credit monitoring and
other relief. Each of the four lawsuits seeks to certify a
different class of consumers. One of the lawsuits seeks to
certify a nationwide class that would include every consumer who
used a credit card, debit card, or check to make purchases at
DSW between November 2004 and March 2005 and whose transaction
data was taken during the data theft incident. The other three
lawsuits seek to certify classes of consumers that are limited
geographically. Those cases use different putative class
definitions to identify consumers who made purchases at certain
stores in Ohio, Michigan, and Illinois. On July 26, 2006,
the Michigan federal district court granted DSWs motion to
dismiss the Michigan lawsuit and so ordered the dismissal of
that lawsuit.
In connection with this matter, we entered into a consent order
with the FTC, which has jurisdiction over consumer protection
matters. The FTC published the final order on March 14,
2006, and copies of the complaint and consent order are
available from the FTCs Web site at http://www.ftc.gov and
also from the FTCs Consumer Response Center,
Room 130, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.,
Washington, D.C. 20580.
We have not admitted any wrongdoing or that the facts alleged in
the FTCs proposed unfairness complaint are true. Under the
consent order, we will pay no fine or damages. We have agreed,
however, to maintain a comprehensive information security
program, and to undergo a biannual assessment of such program by
an independent third party.
There can be no assurance that there will not be additional
proceedings or claims brought against DSW in the future. We have
contested and will continue to vigorously contest the claims
made against us and will continue to explore our defenses and
possible claims against others.
We estimate that the potential exposures for losses related to
this theft range from approximately $6.5 million to
approximately $9.5 million. Because of many factors,
including the early development of
55
information regarding the theft, the early stage of the lawsuits
asserted against us and recoverability under insurance policies,
there is no amount in the estimated range that represents a
better estimate than any other amount in the range. Therefore,
in accordance with Financial Accounting Standard No. 5,
Accounting for Contingencies, we accrued a charge to
operations in the first quarter of fiscal 2005 equal to the low
end of the range set forth above, or $6.5 million. To our
knowledge, no class action lawsuits brought by consumers
alleging claims similar to those asserted in the putative class
actions against us have been litigated against other merchants
which have experienced similar data thefts. As the situation
develops and more information becomes available to us, the
amount of the reserve may increase or decrease accordingly. The
amount of any such change may be material.
Although difficult to quantify, since the announcement of the
theft, we have not discerned any material negative effect on
sales trends we believe is attributable to the theft. However,
this may not be indicative of the long-term developments
regarding this matter.
We are involved in various other legal proceedings that are
incidental to the conduct of our business. We estimate the range
of liability related to pending litigation where the amount of
the range of loss can be estimated. We recorded our best
estimate of a loss when the loss is considered probable. Where a
liability is probable and there is a range of estimated loss, we
recorded the most likely estimated liability related to the
claim. In the opinion of management, the amount of any liability
with respect to these proceedings will not be material. As
additional information becomes available, we will assess the
potential liability related to our pending litigation and revise
the estimates. Revisions in our estimates and potential
liability could materially impact our results of operations and
financial condition.
56
MANAGEMENT
Directors and Executive Officers
The following table sets forth certain information about our
directors, director nominees and executive officers, together
with their positions and ages:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Age | |
|
Position With Us |
|
|
| |
|
|
Jay L. Schottenstein
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors |
Deborah L. Ferrée
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
Vice Chairman and Chief Merchandising Officer |
Peter Z. Horvath
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
President |
Kevin M. Lonergan
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer |
Douglas J. Probst
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
Derek Ungless
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer |
Harris Mustafa
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
Executive Vice President, Supply Chain and Merchandise Planning
and Allocation |
Carolee Friedlander*
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
Director |
Philip B. Miller*
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
Director |
James D. Robbins*
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
Director |
Harvey L. Sonnenberg
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
Director |
Allan J. Tanenbaum*
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
Director |
Heywood Wilansky
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
Director |
|
|
* |
Independent directors under NYSE rules. |
Each of our executive officers holds office until his or her
successor is elected or appointed and qualified or until his or
her resignation or removal, if earlier. Each director listed
below holds office until his successor is duly elected or
appointed and qualified or until his earlier death, retirement,
disqualification, resignation or removal.
Jay L. Schottenstein serves as our Chief Executive
Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors. He was appointed
as our Chief Executive Officer in March 2005.
Mr. Schottenstein became a director of DSW in March 2005.
He has been Chairman of the Board of Directors of Retail
Ventures, American Eagle Outfitters, Inc. and SSC since March
1992 and was Chief Executive Officer of Retail Ventures from
April 1991 to July 1997 and from July 1999 to December 2000.
Mr. Schottenstein served as Vice Chairman of SSC from 1986
until March 1992 and as a director of SSC since 1982. He served
in various executive capacities at SSC since 1976.
Mr. Schottenstein is also a director of American Eagle
Outfitters, Inc. and Retail Ventures.
Deborah L. Ferrée has served as our Vice Chairman
and Chief Merchandising Officer since January 2006.
Ms. Ferrée joined us in November 1997. She served as
our President and Chief Merchandising Officer from November 2004
until January 2006. From March 2002 until November 2004, she
served as Executive Vice President and Chief Merchandising
Officer. Prior to that, she served as Senior Vice President of
Merchandising beginning in September 2000, and Vice President of
Merchandising beginning in October 1997. Prior to joining us,
Ms. Ferrée worked in the retail industry for more than
30 years in various positions, including serving as
Divisional Merchandising Manager of Shoes, Accessories and
Intimate Apparel for Harris Department Store, womens buyer
for Ross Stores and Divisional Merchandise Manager of the May
Company.
57
Peter Z. Horvath has served as our President since
January 2006. From January 2005 until January 2006,
Mr. Horvath served as our Executive Vice President and
Chief Operating Officer. He has extensive retail experience,
having spent nineteen years with the Limited Brands business. He
has held numerous finance function roles within various
divisions of Limited Brands, most recently serving as Senior
Vice President of Merchandise Planning and Allocation for the
entire Limited Brands enterprise from April 2002 to August 2004.
From February 1997 to April 2002, he served as Chief Financial
Officer for multiple apparel divisions of Limited Brands. From
1985 to February 1997, Mr. Horvath held various positions
with Limited Brands, including Vice President Controller of
Express, Inc. and Director of Financial Reporting for Limited
Stores.
Kevin M. Lonergan serves as our Executive Vice President
and Chief Operating Officer. Prior to joining us in January
2006, Mr. Lonergan served as Vice President of the West
Zone for American Eagle Outfitters, beginning in January 2004,
where he was responsible for 397 stores in 30 states.
Prior to that time, Mr. Lonergan served as Executive Vice
President and Chief Operating Officer of Old Navy, a division of
Gap, Inc., where he oversaw all store operations and helped
build the newly formed Old Navy division from its inception in
1993. Prior to serving in that capacity, Mr. Lonergan held
executive positions at various divisions of Gap, Inc., Target
and Carson Pirie Scott. Mr. Lonergan has over 35 years
of business experience in all phases of retail, including
department stores, specialty and mass merchandising, and has
been responsible for many areas of business, including stores,
operations, finance, real estate, human resources, systems, and
customer service.
Douglas J. Probst serves as our Executive Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer. Mr. Probst joined
DSW in March 2005. From April 1990 to February 2005, he held
various positions with Too Inc., a company spun-off from The
Limited, Inc., including Vice President of Finance and
Controller from May 2004 to February 2005, Vice President
Finance from October 2003 to May 2004 and Vice President
Financial Analysis and Store Control from December 1999 to
October 2003. From August 1986 to March 1990, he was in the
practice of public accounting with KPMG. Mr. Probst is a
certified public accountant.
Derek Ungless serves as our Executive Vice President and
Chief Marketing Officer, a position he has held since June 2005.
From April 2002 to May 2005, he was Executive Vice President of
Marketing for Express, part of Limited Brands. Mr. Ungless
was Senior Vice President and Head of Global Brand Design of the
Estee Lauder brand, part of Estee Lauder Companies Inc. from
September 2000 until November 2001 and was Executive Vice
President and Creative Director of Brooks Brothers from October
1997 until September 2000. Mr. Ungless has over twelve
years of experience working in the retail industry.
Harris Mustafa serves as our Executive Vice President,
Supply Chain and Merchandise Planning and Allocation. Prior to
joining us in July 2006, Mr. Mustafa served as Executive
Vice President, Private Brand and Product Development at Saks
Department Store Group, beginning in 2004, and as Senior Vice
President, Planning and Operations, Private Brand Group at Saks
Department Store Group from 2003 to 2004. From 2002 to 2003
Mr. Mustafa was Senior Vice President, Business Planning at
Williams-Sonoma, Inc. From 1987 to 2002, Mr. Mustafa held
various positions at Payless ShoeSource, Inc., including Senior
Vice President, Managing Director Payless ShoeSource
International from 1999 to 2002 and Senior Vice President,
Merchandising Distribution from 1995 to 1999.
Carolee Friedlander has served as a director of DSW since
2005. Ms. Friedlander serves as a founding partner of
Circle Financial Group, a membership organization that provides
wealth management services, and has held that position since
August 2004. From July 2001 to August 2004, Ms. Friedlander
served as Senior Vice President of Retail Brand Alliance, Inc.,
and as President and Chief Executive Officer of Carolee Designs,
Inc., a subsidiary of Retail Brand Alliance. Prior to that,
Ms. Friedlander served as President and Chief Executive
Officer of Carolee Designs, a fashion accessory company she
founded in 1973 and sold to Retail Brand Alliance in July 2001.
Philip B. Miller has served as a director of DSW since
2005. Mr. Miller is the President of Philip B. Miller
Associates, a consulting firm, and an Operating Director of
Tri-Artisan Capital Partners, a privately held merchant bank,
and has held those positions since July 2001. Mr. Miller
also serves on the Board of
58
Directors of St. John Knits, a position he has held since
December 2002, and as its interim Chief Executive Officer since
March 2006. Mr. Miller served as Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer of Saks Fifth Avenue, Inc. from 1993 until
January 2000 and continued as Chairman of that company until
July 2001. From 1983 to 1990, Mr. Miller served as Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer of Marshall Fields, Inc.
Mr. Miller also serves as a director of Kenneth Cole
Productions, Inc.
James D. Robbins has served as a director of DSW since
2005. From 1993 until his retirement in June 2001,
Mr. Robbins served as Managing Partner of the Columbus,
Ohio office of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. Mr. Robbins is a
certified public accountant. Mr. Robbins currently holds
directorships in Dollar General Corporation and Huntington
Preferred Capital, Inc., positions he has held since March 2002
and November 2001, respectively. Mr. Robbins also serves as
chairman of the audit committees of both of these companies.
Harvey L. Sonnenberg has served as a director of DSW
since 2005. Mr. Sonnenberg has been a partner in the
certified public accounting firm, Weiser, LLP, since November
1994. Mr. Sonnenberg is active in a number of professional
organizations, including the American Institute of Certified
Public Accountants and the New York State Society of Certified
Public Accountants, and has long been involved in rendering
professional services to the retail and apparel industry.
Mr. Sonnenberg is a certified public accountant.
Mr. Sonnenberg is a director of Retail Ventures.
Allan J. Tanenbaum has served as a director of DSW since
2005. Mr. Tanenbaum currently serves as General Counsel and
Managing Director of Equicorp Partners, LLC, an Atlanta-based
private investment and advisory firm. From February 2001 to
December 31, 2005, Mr. Tanenbaum served as Senior Vice
President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary for AFC
Enterprises, Inc., a franchisor and operator of quick-service
restaurants. From June 1996 to February 2001, Mr. Tanenbaum
was a shareholder in Cohen Pollock Merlin Axelrod &
Tanenbaum, P.C., an Atlanta, Georgia law firm, where he
represented corporate clients in connection with mergers and
acquisitions and other commercial transactions.
Heywood Wilansky has served as a director of DSW since
2005. Mr. Wilansky has been the President and Chief
Executive Officer of Retail Ventures since November 2004. Before
joining Retail Ventures, he served as President and Chief
Executive Officer of Filenes Basement, a subsidiary of
Retail Ventures, from February 2003 to November 2004.
Mr. Wilansky was a professor of marketing at the University
of Maryland business school from August 2002 to February 2003.
From August 2000 to January 2003, he was President and Chief
Executive Officer of Strategic Management Resources, LLC. From
August 1995 to July 2000, he was President and Chief Executive
Officer of Bon Ton Stores. Mr. Wilansky is also a director
of Retail Ventures and Bertuccis Corporation.
Board Composition
Our amended and restated code of regulations authorizes seven
directors to serve on the board of directors, or board. As of
May 1, 2006, the following individuals serve on the board
of directors: Mr. Schottenstein, Ms. Friedlander,
Mr. Miller, Mr. Robbins, Mr. Sonnenberg,
Mr. Tannenbaum and Mr. Wilansky.
Pursuant to our amended and restated code of regulations, when
the authorized number of directors is six or more, but less than
nine, the directors are divided into two classes, designated as
Class I and Class II. The members of each class serve
for a staggered, two-year term, except that Class I
directors in the initial term immediately following our initial
public offering in July 2005 serve for one year. Each director
is elected to serve until the election of the directors
successor at an annual meeting of shareholders for the election
of directors for the year in which the directors term
expires or at a special meeting called for that purpose. As of
the date of this prospectus, we do not anticipate increasing or
decreasing the authorized number of directors.
|
|
|
|
|
Class I Directors. Messrs. Wilansky,
Sonnenberg, Tanenbaum and Ms. Friedlander, whose terms will
expire at the 2008 annual meeting of shareholders; and |
|
|
|
Class II Directors. Messrs. Schottenstein,
Miller, and Robbins, whose terms will expire at the 2007 annual
meeting of shareholders. |
59
Our board has determined that a majority of our directors are
independent as defined under the NYSE rules.
Committees of the Board of Directors
Our Board of Directors has a Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee, a Compensation Committee and an Audit Committee, all
of which are comprised solely of independent directors as
defined under applicable SEC rules and the listing standards of
the NYSE.
Audit Committee. The Audit Committee assists the board in
fulfilling its oversight responsibility relating to our
financial statements and the financial reporting process,
compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, the
qualifications and independence of our independent public
accountants, our system of internal controls, the internal audit
function, our code of ethical conduct, retaining and, if
appropriate, terminating the independent public accountants and
approving audit and non-audit services to be performed by the
independent public accountants.
The members of our Audit Committee are Messrs. Robbins
(Chair), Miller and Tanenbaum. The Board of Directors has
determined that each of them is independent and is financially
literate in accordance with the applicable SEC rules and listing
standards of the NYSE. The Board has also determined that our
Audit Committees Chairman, James D. Robbins, qualifies as
an audit committee financial expert as such term is defined by
the SEC under Item 401(h) of
Regulation S-K.
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees functions
include assisting the Board in determining the desired
qualifications of directors, identifying potential individuals
meeting those qualification criteria, proposing to the board a
slate of nominees for election by the shareholders and reviewing
candidates nominated by shareholders. In addition, the
nominating and corporate governance committee reviews the
Corporate Governance Principles, makes recommendations to the
board with respect to other corporate governance principles
applicable to us, oversees the annual evaluation of the board
and management and reviews management and board succession plans.
The members of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
are Messrs. Tanenbaum (Chair) and Robbins, and
Ms. Friedlander, each of whom is independent as discussed
above.
Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committees
functions include evaluating the Chief Executive Officers
performance, setting the Chief Executive Officers annual
compensation; reviewing and approving the compensation packages
of our other executive officers; making recommendations to the
board with respect to our incentive compensation, retirement and
other benefit plans; making administrative and compensations
decisions under such plans; and recommending to the board the
compensation for non-employee board members.
The members of our Compensation Committee are
Messrs. Miller (Chair) and Robbins and
Ms. Friedlander. Each member of the Compensation Committee
is independent as discussed above. None of the members of the
Compensation Committee are present or former officers of our
Company or are themselves or any of their affiliates, if any,
parties to agreements with us.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider
Participation
Ms. Friedlander and Messrs. Miller and Robbins serve
on our Compensation Committee. None of the members of our
Compensation Committee during fiscal 2005 had at any time been
an officer or employee of our Company or any of our
subsidiaries. None of our executive officers served as a member
of the board or compensation committee of any other entity which
had an executive officer serving as a member of our Compensation
Committee during fiscal 2005.
60
Compensation of Directors
In connection with the completion of our initial public
offering, in July 2005 we granted each of Ms. Friedlander
and Messrs. Miller, Robbins, Sonnenberg and Tanenbaum 3,100
stock units under the DSW 2005 Equity Plan as a retainer for
their service as a director. Additionally in fiscal 2005, we
paid a pro rata portion of the $50,000 annual cash retainer
described below to each of Ms. Friedlander and
Messrs. Miller, Robbins, Sonnenberg and Tanenbaum.
We intend to pay an annual retainer to our directors who are not
employees of DSW or Retail Ventures (currently,
Ms. Friedlander and Messrs. Miller, Robbins,
Sonnenberg and Tanenbaum). The annual retainer will consist of
$50,000 in cash and a grant of a number of stock units with a
value equal to $50,000, determined by using the fair market
value of a Class A Common Share at the date of grant. For
fiscal 2006 and thereafter, we intend to issue stock units for
the annual retainer to eligible directors at the time of our
Annual Meeting of Shareholders. The cash portion of the retainer
is paid quarterly and each eligible director may elect to
receive their cash retainer and committee chairperson fees in
the form of stock units.
Stock units issued to a director are fully vested on the date of
grant, but will not be distributable to the director until the
director leaves the board (for any reason). When the director
leaves the board, the stock units owed to the director will be
settled in DSW Class A Common Shares (with cash for any
fractional shares), unless the directors award agreement
provides for a cash settlement. The stock units will be settled
in a lump sum transfer, and the compensated director may not
defer settlement or spread the settlement over a longer period
of time.
Directors have no voting rights in respect of the stock units,
but they will have the power to vote the DSW Class A Common
Shares received upon settlement of the award. In general,
directors have equivalent rights to receive dividends paid on
our Class A Common Shares. Each director will be
credited with the same dividend that would be issued
if the stock unit was a Class A Common Share. The amounts
associated with the dividend equivalent rights will not be
distributed until the directors stock unit award is
settled at the time that the director leaves the board. We will
be entitled to a tax deduction when the award is settled, and
the director will be taxed on the then fair market value of the
award.
Directors do not receive any additional compensation for
attending board meetings or board committee meetings. However,
the chairmen of the Audit Committee, Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee and Compensation Committee each receive an
additional $10,000, $5,000 and $7,500 in cash or stock units (as
they may elect) per year, respectively. We pay this compensation
on a quarterly basis. All members of our board of directors are
reimbursed for reasonable costs and expenses incurred in
attending meetings of our board of directors and its committees.
Codes of Conduct
We have adopted a code of ethics that applies to all our
directors, officers and employees, including our principal
executive officer, principal financial officer, principal
accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar
functions, and an additional code of ethics that applies to
senior financial officers. These codes of ethics have been
designated as the Code of Conduct and the Code
of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers, respectively. We
intend to disclose any amendment to, or waiver from, any
applicable provision of the Code of Conduct or Code of Ethics
for Senior Financial Offices (if such amendment or waiver
relates to elements listed under Item 406(b) of
Regulation S-K and
applies to our directors, principal executive officer, principal
financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller,
or persons performing similar functions) by posting such
information on our corporate and investor website at
www.dswshoe.com.
Executive Compensation
Prior to completion of our initial public offering in July 2005,
we were a wholly-owned subsidiary of Retail Ventures. As such,
the Compensation Committee and Board of Directors of Retail
Ventures established the compensation of our named executive
officers and all equity awards, cash bonuses and other
compensation was paid pursuant to Retail Ventures plans.
61
The following table summarizes compensation awarded or paid to,
or earned by, our Chief Executive Officer and each of the next
four most highly compensated executive officers during each of
our last three fiscal years. We refer to these officers as our
named executive officers in other parts of this
prospectus.
Summary Compensation Table
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long Term Compensation | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards | |
|
Payouts | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Compensation | |
|
|
|
Securities | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Restricted | |
|
Underlying | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Annual | |
|
Stock | |
|
Options/ | |
|
LTIP | |
|
All Other | |
Name and |
|
Fiscal | |
|
Salary | |
|
Bonus | |
|
Compensation | |
|
Award(s) | |
|
SARs | |
|
Payouts(1) | |
|
Compensation(2) | |
Principal Position |
|
Year | |
|
($) | |
|
($) | |
|
($) | |
|
($) | |
|
(#) | |
|
($) | |
|
($) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Jay L. Schottenstein
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
$ |
224,824 |
|
|
|
None |
|
|
|
None |
|
|
|
None |
|
|
|
None |
|
|
|
None |
|
|
$ |
1,322 |
|
|
Chairman and Chief
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
None |
|
|
|
None |
|
|
|
None |
|
|
|
None |
|
|
|
None |
|
|
|
None |
|
|
|
None |
|
|
Executive Officer
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
None |
|
|
|
None |
|
|
|
None |
|
|
|
None |
|
|
|
None |
|
|
|
None |
|
|
|
None |
|
Deborah L. Ferrée
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
$ |
700,000 |
|
|
$ |
912,576 |
(3) |
|
$ |
46,559 |
(4) |
|
$ |
535,800 |
(5) |
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
|
None |
|
|
$ |
15,929 |
|
|
Vice Chairman and
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
$ |
553,083 |
|
|
$ |
710,938 |
|
|
|
|
(6) |
|
|
None |
|
|
|
None |
|
|
$ |
345,000 |
|
|
$ |
8,037 |
|
|
Chief Merchandising
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
$ |
510,337 |
|
|
$ |
402,079 |
|
|
|
|
(6) |
|
|
None |
|
|
|
None |
|
|
$ |
345,000 |
|
|
$ |
9,428 |
|
|
Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peter Z. Horvath
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
$ |
500,000 |
|
|
$ |
726,840 |
(3) |
|
|
|
(6) |
|
$ |
535,800 |
(5) |
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
|
None |
|
|
|
None |
|
|
President
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
$ |
28,846 |
|
|
|
None |
|
|
|
None |
|
|
|
None |
|
|
|
None |
|
|
|
None |
|
|
|
None |
|
|
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
None |
|
|
|
None |
|
|
|
None |
|
|
|
None |
|
|
|
None |
|
|
|
None |
|
|
|
None |
|
Douglas J. Probst
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
$ |
302,885 |
|
|
$ |
364,512 |
(3) |
|
|
|
(6) |
|
$ |
247,000 |
(5) |
|
|
70,000 |
|
|
|
None |
|
|
|
None |
|
|
Executive Vice President, |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
None |
|
|
|
None |
|
|
|
None |
|
|
|
None |
|
|
|
None |
|
|
|
None |
|
|
|
None |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer,
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
None |
|
|
|
None |
|
|
|
None |
|
|
|
None |
|
|
|
None |
|
|
|
None |
|
|
|
None |
|
|
and Treasurer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derek Ungless
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
$ |
218,077 |
|
|
$ |
222,610 |
(3) |
|
|
|
(6) |
|
$ |
144,400 |
(5) |
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
|
None |
|
|
|
None |
|
|
Executive Vice President |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
None |
|
|
|
None |
|
|
|
None |
|
|
|
None |
|
|
|
None |
|
|
|
None |
|
|
|
None |
|
|
and Chief Marketing |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
None |
|
|
|
None |
|
|
|
None |
|
|
|
None |
|
|
|
None |
|
|
|
None |
|
|
|
None |
|
|
Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
In July 2002, the Compensation Committee of Retail Ventures
recommended and the Board of Directors of Retail Ventures
approved the establishment of a value creation
program, pursuant to which cash payments were made to certain
participants including Ms. Ferrée.
Ms. Ferrée was awarded an aggregate of $690,000
pursuant to the program, subject to a risk of forfeiture on
termination of employment, $345,000 of which was paid during
fiscal 2004 and fiscal 2003, respectively. |
|
(2) |
The amounts shown in this column for each named executive
officer includes contributions or other allocations to Retail
Ventures 401(k) Plan and Employee Stock Purchase Plan for
the named executive officer, as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
401(k) Plan and Associate | |
|
|
Stock Purchase Plan | |
|
|
| |
Name |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Jay L. Schottenstein
|
|
$ |
1,322 |
|
|
|
None |
|
|
|
None |
|
Deborah L. Ferrée
|
|
$ |
8,983 |
|
|
$ |
8,037 |
|
|
$ |
9,428 |
|
Peter Z. Horvath
|
|
|
None |
|
|
|
None |
|
|
|
None |
|
Douglas J. Probst
|
|
|
None |
|
|
|
None |
|
|
|
None |
|
Derek Ungless
|
|
|
None |
|
|
|
None |
|
|
|
None |
|
|
|
|
For fiscal 2005, includes $6,946 reimbursement (including a tax
gross up of $2,219) for cancelled vacation costs to
Ms. Ferrée. |
|
|
(3) |
Bonus amounts for 2005 are comprised of the following: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive | |
|
Discretionary | |
|
Signing | |
Officer |
|
Compensation | |
|
Bonus | |
|
Bonus | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Deborah L. Ferrée
|
|
$ |
637,006 |
|
|
$ |
275,571 |
|
|
|
|
|
Peter Z. Horvath
|
|
$ |
455,004 |
|
|
$ |
196,836 |
|
|
$ |
75,000 |
|
Douglas J. Probst
|
|
$ |
226,515 |
|
|
$ |
97,997 |
|
|
$ |
40,000 |
|
Derek Ungless
|
|
$ |
103,033 |
|
|
$ |
44,577 |
|
|
$ |
75,000 |
|
|
|
(4) |
Includes $44,890 related to perquisites paid by us, $1,136
relating to country club dues and membership fees paid by us and
$533 relating to country club tax gross up. |
62
|
|
(5) |
The value (determined based on the closing price of the
Class A Common Shares on the NYSE on the date of grant) of
28,200 restricted stock units (Units) awarded to
Ms. Ferrée and Mr. Horvath, 13,000 Units awarded
to Mr. Probst, and 7,600 Units awarded to Mr. Ungless,
as of June 28, 2005 pursuant to our initial public
offering. The Units vest on June 28, 2009 and do not have
voting or dividend rights. As of January 28, 2006, the
value of the shares underlying the Units was $761,400 for
Ms. Ferrée and Mr. Horvath, $351,000 for
Mr. Probst, and $205,200 for Mr. Ungless (determined
based on the closing price of our Class A Common Shares on
the NYSE on the last trading day before January 28, 2006). |
|
(6) |
The aggregate amount of perquisites and other benefits paid to
the named officers in these fiscal years did not exceed the
lesser of $50,000 or 10% of the total of annual salary and bonus
reported for the named executive officer. |
The following table sets forth information concerning individual
grants of DSW stock options and stock appreciation rights
(SARS) made during the last fiscal year to each of
the named executive officers.
DSW Options/ SAR Grants in Last Fiscal Year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual Grants | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Potential Realizable Value | |
|
|
|
|
at Assumed Annual Rates | |
|
|
Number of | |
|
% of Total | |
|
|
|
of Stock Price | |
|
|
Securities | |
|
Options/SARs | |
|
|
|
Appreciation for Option | |
|
|
Underlying | |
|
Granted to | |
|
Exercise or | |
|
|
|
Term(1) | |
|
|
Options/SARs(2) | |
|
Employees in | |
|
Base Price | |
|
Expiration | |
|
| |
Name |
|
Granted (#) | |
|
Fiscal Year | |
|
($/share) | |
|
Date | |
|
5% | |
|
10% | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Jay L. Schottenstein
|
|
|
None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deborah L. Ferrée
|
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
|
17.81 |
% |
|
$ |
19.00 |
|
|
|
6/28/15 |
|
|
$ |
1,792,350 |
|
|
$ |
4,542,166 |
|
Peter Z. Horvath
|
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
|
17.81 |
% |
|
$ |
19.00 |
|
|
|
6/28/15 |
|
|
$ |
1,792,350 |
|
|
$ |
4,542,166 |
|
Douglas J. Probst
|
|
|
70,000 |
|
|
|
8.31 |
% |
|
$ |
19.00 |
|
|
|
6/28/15 |
|
|
$ |
836,430 |
|
|
$ |
2,119,677 |
|
Derek Ungless
|
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
|
4.75 |
% |
|
$ |
19.00 |
|
|
|
6/28/15 |
|
|
$ |
477,960 |
|
|
$ |
1,211,244 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Represents the potential realizable value of each grant of
options/ SARS assuming that the market price of the common
shares appreciates in value from the date of grant to the end of
the option term at either a 5% or 10% annualized rate, based on
the difference between the assumed per share value and the per
share option exercise price, multiplied by the total number of
option shares. |
|
(2) |
Options were granted with an exercise price equal to the market
price at the grant date and vest ratably over five years from
the date of grant. |
The following table sets forth information regarding each
individual exercise of stock options to purchase DSW
Class A Common Shares made during the last fiscal year by
each of the named executive officers.
DSW Aggregated Option/ SAR Exercises in Last Fiscal Year and
Fiscal Year End Option Values
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities Underlying | |
|
Value of Unexercised | |
|
|
Shares | |
|
|
|
Unexercised Options/SARs | |
|
In-the-Money Options/SARs | |
|
|
Acquired | |
|
Value | |
|
at Fiscal Year-end (#) | |
|
at Fiscal Year-end ($)(1) | |
|
|
on Exercise | |
|
Realized | |
|
| |
|
| |
Name |
|
(#) | |
|
($) | |
|
Exercisable | |
|
Unexercisable | |
|
Exercisable | |
|
Unexercisable | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Jay L. Schottenstein
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deborah L. Ferrée
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,200,000 |
|
Peter Z. Horvath
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
120,000 |
|
|
$ |
240,000 |
|
|
$ |
960,000 |
|
Douglas J. Probst
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
560,000 |
|
Derek Ungless
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
320,000 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Represents the total gain which would be realized if all
in-the-money options
held at year end were exercised, determined by multiplying the
number of shares underlying the options by the difference
between the per share option exercise price and the per share
fair market value of DSW Class A Common Shares at year end
of $27.00. An option is
in-the-money if the
fair market value of the underlying shares exceeds the exercise
price of the option. |
63
The following table sets forth information regarding each
individual exercise of stock options to purchase Retail Ventures
common shares made during the last fiscal year by each of the
named executive officers.
Retail Ventures Aggregated Option/ SAR Exercises in Last
Fiscal Year and
Fiscal Year End Option Values
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities Underlying | |
|
Value of Unexercised | |
|
|
Shares | |
|
|
|
Unexercised Options/SARs | |
|
In-the-Money Options/SARs | |
|
|
Acquired | |
|
|
|
at Fiscal Year-end (#) | |
|
at Fiscal Year-end ($)(1) | |
|
|
on Exercise | |
|
Value | |
|
| |
|
| |
Name |
|
(#) | |
|
Realized ($) | |
|
Exercisable | |
|
Unexercisable | |
|
Exercisable | |
|
Unexercisable | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Jay L. Schottenstein
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deborah L. Ferrée
|
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,875,250 |
|
|
|
86,000 |
|
|
|
216,000 |
|
|
$ |
635,060 |
|
|
$ |
1,777,680 |
|
Peter Z. Horvath
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Douglas J. Probst
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derek Ungless
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Represents the total gain which would be realized if all
in-the-money options
held at year end were exercised, determined by multiplying the
number of shares underlying the options by the difference
between the per share option exercise price and the per share
fair market value of Retail Ventures common shares at year end
of $12.73. An option is
in-the-money if the
fair market value of the underlying shares exceeds the exercise
price of the option. |
Equity Compensation Plan Table
The following table sets forth additional information as of
January 28, 2006, about our Class A Common Shares that
may be issued upon the exercise of options and other rights
under our existing equity compensation plans and arrangements,
divided between plans approved by our shareholders and plans or
arrangements not submitted to our shareholders for approval. The
information includes the number of shares covered by, and the
weighted average exercise price of, outstanding options,
warrants and other rights and the number of shares remaining
available for future grants, excluding the shares to be issued
upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants, and other rights.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities | |
|
|
Number of Securities to | |
|
|
|
Remaining Available for | |
|
|
be Issued Upon | |
|
Weighted-average | |
|
Issuance Under Equity | |
|
|
Exercise of Outstanding | |
|
Exercise Price of | |
|
Compensation Plans | |
|
|
Options, Warrants and | |
|
Outstanding Options, | |
|
(excluding Securities | |
|
|
Rights | |
|
Warrants and Rights | |
|
Reflected in Column(a) | |
Plan Category |
|
(a) | |
|
(b) | |
|
(c) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Equity compensation plans approved by security
holders(1)(2)
|
|
|
1,062,513 |
|
|
$ |
19.54 |
|
|
|
3,537,487 |
|
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Total
|
|
|
1,062,513 |
|
|
$ |
19.54 |
|
|
|
3,537,487 |
|
|
|
(1) |
DSW Inc. 2005 Equity Incentive Plan. |
|
(2) |
Includes 914,200 shares issuable pursuant to the exercise
of outstanding stock options, 131,300 shares issuable
pursuant to restricted stock units, and 17,013 shares
issuable pursuant to director stock units. Since the restricted
stock units and director stock units have no exercise price,
they are not included in the weighted average exercise price
calculation in column (b). |
Employee Incentive Plans
|
|
|
The Retail Ventures Incentive Plans |
Some of our employees (including our named executive officers)
and non-employee directors have participated in or are eligible
to participate in equity incentive plans sponsored by Retail
Ventures which provide them an opportunity to earn incentive
cash compensation and to receive equity-based compensation
64
related to the common shares of Retail Ventures. These plans
include the Amended and Restated Retail Ventures, Inc. 1991
Stock Option Plan, or the Retail Ventures 1991 Option Plan, the
Retail Ventures, Inc. Amended and Restated 2000 Stock Incentive
Plan, or the Retail Ventures 2000 Stock Incentive Plan, and the
Value City Department Stores, Inc. 2003 Incentive Compensation
Plan, or the Retail Ventures 2003 Incentive Plan and the Retail
Ventures, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan, or the Retail
Ventures ESPP, which was terminated as of May 27, 2005. All
of these plans are collectively referred to as the Retail
Ventures Plans. Some of our officers and employees may also
participate in the Retail Venture Plans, other than the Retail
Ventures ESPP.
After our initial public offering, awards previously issued
under the Retail Ventures Plans remained outstanding and
continue to be earned or exercisable under their terms.
All of the Retail Ventures Plans (other than the Retail Ventures
ESPP) are administered by the Retail Ventures Board of
Directors, or a committee comprised of independent board members
who are outside directors within the meaning of
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended, or the Code. The Retail Ventures ESPP was administered
by a committee comprised of several Retail Ventures employees.
Subject to the terms of each plan, the administrator of each
Retail Ventures Plan decides who may participate, when awards
are granted, the number and types of awards granted and the
terms and conditions that must be met to earn the award,
including the period over which a cash award is earned and the
period over which an equity award may be earned and exercised or
settled. The plan administrator also determines the exercise
price of the stock options and stock appreciation rights granted
under any Retail Ventures Plans.
Subject to shareholder approval in certain instances, the Retail
Ventures Board of Directors may amend, suspend or terminate the
Retail Ventures Plans at any time, provided that no such
amendment, suspension or termination may adversely affect any
award previously granted to a participant without their consent.
Awards granted under the Retail Ventures Plans are generally not
transferable by the participant except by will or the laws of
descent and distribution, and options are exercisable, during
the lifetime of the participant, only by the participant or his
guardian or legal representative, unless otherwise permitted by
the plan administrator.
With the exception of the Retail Ventures ESPP, the Retail
Ventures Plans are intended to permit the payment of
performance-based compensation within the meaning of
Section 162(m) of the Code, which generally limits the
deduction that Retail Ventures may take for compensation paid in
excess of $1,000,000 to certain of its covered
officers in any one calendar year. Under
Section 162(m) of the Code, compensation that is
qualified performance-based compensation within the
meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code, will not be subject
to this limitation if certain requirements are met. Any payments
that are intended to be deductible as qualified
performance-based compensation under Section 162(m)
of the Code must be based on one or more of the performance
measures listed in the Retail Ventures Plans as previously
approved by the shareholders of Retail Ventures and which
otherwise satisfy requirements applicable to qualified
performance-based compensation under Section 162(m)
of the Code.
The DSW Incentive Plans
In connection with our initial public offering, our board of
directors adopted and our shareholders approved the DSW Inc.
2005 Equity Incentive Plan, or the DSW 2005 Equity Plan, and the
DSW Inc. 2005 Cash Incentive Compensation Plan, or the DSW 2005
Cash Incentive Plan, to enable us to attract, retain and reward
outstanding employees, directors and consultants through cash
incentives and/or equity-based compensatory awards, including
incentive stock options (within the meaning of Section 422
of the Code), non-qualified stock options, performance shares,
performance units, restricted stock, restricted stock units,
stock appreciation rights and stock units. The DSW 2005 Equity
Plan and the DSW 2005 Cash Incentive Plan are collectively
referred to as the DSW Plans. We have granted stock options to
employees and consultants to purchase up to 900,000 registered
Class A Common Shares at an exercise price per share equal
to the initial
65
public offering price per share and up to 100,000 restricted
Class A Common, have been issued to employees at a price
per share equal to the initial public offering price per share.
Some of our officers, including those who also simultaneously
hold positions with Retail Ventures, may participate in both the
Retail Ventures Plans described above and in the DSW Plans.
Also, some Retail Ventures employees providing services to DSW
may be eligible to participate in the DSW Plans.
The DSW Plans are administered by the Compensation Committee of
our board of directors with respect to awards granted to
consultants and employees after the offering and were
administered by the entire board with respect to awards granted
to employees and consultants before our initial public offering
and to non-employee directors before and after our initial
public offering. The Compensation Committee is comprised of at
least two members who satisfy the independence requirements of
current NYSE listing standards, are outside
directors within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the
Code, and are non-employee directors within the
meaning of
Rule 16b-3 under
the Exchange Act.
Awards granted under the DSW Plans are generally not
transferable by the participant except by will or the laws of
descent and distribution, and each award is exercisable, during
the lifetime of the participant, only by the participant or his
guardian or legal representative, unless permitted by the
committee.
The DSW Plans are intended to permit us to deliver
performance-based compensation within the meaning of
Section 162(m) of the Code, which generally limits the
deduction that we may take for compensation paid in excess of
$1,000,000 to certain of our executive officers in any one
calendar year. Under Section 162(m) of the Code,
compensation that is qualified performance-based
compensation within the meaning of Section 162(m) of
the Code, will not be subject to this limitation if certain
requirements are met. Any awards that are intended to be
deductible as qualified performance-based
compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code must be
based on one or more of the performance measures listed in the
DSW Plans and otherwise satisfy the requirements applicable to
qualified performance-based compensation under
Section 162(m) of the Code.
In the event of a change in control of DSW, all awards will vest
or become exercisable and generally will be settled for cash.
However, the value of any acceleration of vesting will, if
appropriate, be reduced to avoid any golden parachute penalties
under Sections 280G or 4999 of the Code unless otherwise
provided in an award agreement or another written agreement
(such as an employment agreement) between DSW and an affected
employee. Generally, a change in control is defined in the DSW
Plans to include (i) a change in a majority of DSWs
directors during any
12-month period,
(ii) with some exceptions (including exceptions for
acquisitions by Retail Ventures, SSC, trusts established for
members of the Schottenstein family and Cerberus Partners Ltd.),
the acquisition by any person (or a group of persons acting
together) of more than 30% of DSWs outstanding voting
securities and sufficient voting power to elect a majority of
DSWs board, (iii) a merger or business combination
affecting DSW and after which DSW shareholders hold less than
50% of the surviving entitys voting power, (iv) a
complete dissolution or liquidation of DSW and (v) any
other transaction that the board decides will have at least as
material an effect on DSW as any of the transactions specified
above.
Our board or the Compensation Committee of the board may
terminate, suspend or amend the DSW Plans at any time without
shareholder approval, except to the extent necessary to satisfy
applicable law or listing requirements. However, generally no
amendment may adversely affect any rights of a participant under
an outstanding award without their consent. Unless terminated
sooner, the DSW 2005 Equity Plan will terminate automatically
ten years from the date of its implementation.
The DSW 2005 Equity Plan authorizes 4,600,000 shares of our
common shares to be issued under the plan, all of which may be
issued through the exercise of incentive stock options. The DSW
2005 Equity Plan also provides that any shares subject to an
unfulfilled award (e.g., a forfeited option or an award settled
for cash in an amount that is less than the awards fair
market value less any exercise price) may be subject to a
subsequent award under the plan.
66
The DSW 2005 Equity Plan provides that our employees may receive
incentive stock options, our employees and consultants may
receive nonstatutory stock options, restricted stock, restricted
stock units, performance shares and performance units and stock
appreciation rights and that our compensated directors may
receive nonstatutory options, restricted stock, restricted stock
units or stock unit awards.
The DSW 2005 Equity Plan allows the Compensation Committee, in
its discretion, to issue stock options to purchase shares of DSW
under the DSW 2005 Equity Plan in substitution for stock options
to purchase shares of Retail Ventures previously granted to our
employees under the Retail Ventures 1991 Option Plan and/or the
Retail Ventures 2000 Stock Incentive Plan. The aggregate value
and general features of these substitute options are determined
in accordance with Section 424 of the Code and the
regulations thereunder.
The maximum number of our shares underlying options that may be
issued annually to any executive officer is 500,000 and the
maximum number of whole-share grants (such as restricted stock
and performance shares) is 100,000.
The DSW 2005 Equity Plan limits participants ability to
exercise awards they hold when they terminate employment. Under
these rules (and unless the award agreement specifies
otherwise), (i) all options, restricted stock, restricted
stock units, stock units and stock appreciation rights that are
affiliated with or issued in tandem with an option held by an
employee or a compensated director who retires (i.e., in the
case of employees, after reaching age 65 and completing
five years of service or, in the case of compensated directors,
after completing one full term as a compensated director after
reaching age 65) becomes disabled as defined in the 2005
Equity Plan or dies will become exercisable and may be exercised
anytime within one year (three months in the case of incentive
stock options held by an employee who is retiring) after
termination because of retirement, disability or death or, if
shorter, the date the award would expire under its terms
(ii) all options, restricted stock, restricted stock units,
stock units and stock appreciation rights that are affiliated
with or issued in tandem with an option held by a consultant who
becomes disabled (as defined in the DSW 2005 Equity Plan) or
dies will become exercisable and may be exercised anytime within
one year after termination because of disability or death or, if
shorter, the date the award would expire under its terms and
(iii) all exercisable awards held by a participant whose
employment terminates for any other reason (other than for
cause as defined in the DSW 2005 Equity Plan) may be
exercised anytime within 90 days after termination or, if
shorter, the date the award would expire under its terms and all
awards that are not exercisable at termination will be
forfeited. The effect of termination on performance shares,
performance units and stock appreciation rights that are not
affiliated with or issued in tandem with an option will be
specified in the award agreement. All awards (whether or not
then exercisable) held by a participant who is terminated for
cause (as defined in the DSW 2005 Equity Plan) are
immediately forfeited and may not be exercised at any time.
Subject to applicable legal requirements, at any time prior to a
change in control of DSW, the compensation committee is
authorized to cancel any or all outstanding stock options and
other awards granted under the DSW 2005 Equity Plan. Upon
cancellation, we are obligated to pay the participants only with
respect to those options and awards that are then exercisable.
With respect to outstanding stock options that are exercisable
when cancelled, we will pay the participant the difference
between the fair market value of the common shares underlying
the stock option and the exercise price of the stock option.
With respect to other awards under the DSW 2005 Equity Plan
which are exercisable when cancelled, we will pay the
participant the fair market value of the common shares subject
to the award.
Based on federal income tax laws currently in effect, we believe
that we will not be entitled to a federal income tax deduction
when an incentive stock option, nonstatutory stock option,
restricted stock award, restricted stock unit award, performance
stock award, performance stock unit award or stock unit award is
granted and participants will not be required to include any
amount in federal taxable income at that time. Except in the
case of incentive stock options, we will be entitled to a
federal income deduction in the year these awards are settled or
exercised and participants will be required to recognize
ordinary federal income taxes on the same amount in the same
year. The amount of our federal income tax deduction (and the
amount simultaneously taxable to the participant) will be the
fair market value of the award when it is settled in the case of
a restricted stock award, restricted stock unit award,
performance stock award, performance stock unit
67
award and stock unit award. In the case of nonstatutory stock
options, the amount of our federal income tax deduction (and the
amount simultaneously taxable to participants) will be the
difference between the price a participant pays to exercise the
nonstatutory stock option and the fair market value of the stock
acquired when the option is exercised. Generally, upon exercise
of an incentive stock option, we would not be entitled to any
federal income tax deduction and the participant would not
recognize income upon exercise. If the participant (i) does
not dispose of the shares within two years after the date of the
grant and one year after the transfer of shares upon exercise
and (ii) is an employee of ours or of one of our
subsidiaries from the date of the grant through and until three
months before the exercise date, any gain from a subsequent sale
of shares acquired through incentive stock options would be
taxed to the participant as a long-term capital gain and we
would not be entitled to a federal income tax deduction.
However, if a participant does not satisfy the requirements of
clauses (i) and (ii) above, we will be entitled to a
federal income tax deduction equal to the difference between the
price a participant paid to exercise the incentive stock option
and the fair market value of the stock acquired when the option
was exercised and the participant will be required to recognize
ordinary income in the same amount.
|
|
|
The DSW 2005 Cash Incentive Plan |
The DSW 2005 Cash Incentive Plan authorizes the Compensation
Committee to designate employees (including executive officers
and employees who are not executive officers) who may earn
additional cash compensation under the DSW 2005 Cash Incentive
Plan, to identify business-related performance goals that must
be met over a performance period specified by the Compensation
Committee as a condition of the payment of the incentive
compensation and to specify the amount of the cash bonus to be
paid if those performance goals are met. The performance goals
that executive officers must achieve to earn a cash bonus are
derived from criteria listed in the DSW 2005 Cash Incentive
Plan. Employees who are not executive officers also may earn a
cash bonus under the DSW 2005 Cash Incentive Plan, although
their performance goals may be based on criteria not listed in
the DSW 2005 Cash Incentive Plan. The Compensation Committee
must establish performance goals as soon as administratively
practicable before the beginning of the performance period but,
in the case of executive officers, no later than 90 days
after the beginning of the performance period or the expiration
of 25% of the performance period, whichever is earliest.
At the end of each performance period, the Compensation
Committee will ascertain whether each employee has or has not
met applicable performance goals and certify those results to
our board along with a statement of the amount of any cash bonus
earned. If an employee has not met applicable performance goals,
he or she will not receive a cash bonus under the DSW 2005 Cash
Incentive Plan for that performance period. If an employee has
met applicable performance goals, we will pay the stipulated
cash bonus as soon as administratively practicable but in no
case later than two and one-half months after the end of our
fiscal year during which the performance period ends or the
calendar year during which the performance period ends,
whichever is latest. The maximum annual bonus that any executive
officer may earn under the DSW 2005 Cash Incentive Plan is
$3,000,000.
Unless otherwise provided in the award agreement, an employee
who terminates employment for any reason other than death or
disability before the end of a performance period will forfeit
any right to receive a bonus during that performance period.
However, unless otherwise provided in the award agreement, an
employee who terminates employment because of death or
disability (as defined in the DSW 2005 Cash Incentive Plan) will
receive a prorated bonus under the DSW 2005 Cash Incentive Plan
but only if applicable performance goals are actually achieved
at the end of that performance period. The amount paid in these
circumstances is the bonus the deceased or disabled employee
would have received at the end of the performance period
multiplied by a fraction, the numerator of which is the number
of days between the beginning of the performance period and the
date employment terminated and the denominator of which is the
total number of days included in the performance period.
Based on federal income tax laws currently in effect, we believe
that we will be entitled to a federal income tax deduction equal
to the full amount paid from the DSW 2005 Cash Incentive Plan in
the year it is paid and that employees receiving payments from
the DSW 2005 Cash Incentive Plan will be required to recognize
ordinary income in the same year.
68
Benefit Plans
We continue to participate in certain of the health and welfare
benefit plans that are sponsored by Retail Ventures. Such plans
include a health and medical plan, prescription drug plan,
vision service plan, optional dental plan, life insurance plans,
disability plans, and a cafeteria plan subject to
Section 125 of the Code.
Our full-time employees who attain age twenty-one may contribute
up to thirty percent of their compensation on a pre-tax basis to
a profit sharing and 401(k) plan, subject to Internal Revenue
Service limitations. Part-time employees may contribute to the
plan after attaining age twenty-one and completing one year of
service as defined in the plan. We match employee deferrals into
the plan, 100% on the first 3% of eligible compensation deferred
and 50% on the next 2% of eligible compensation deferred.
Matching begins after one year of qualified service.
Additionally, we may contribute a discretionary profit sharing
amount to the plan each year. The plan offers participants a
diverse choice of investment options and contains provisions for
loans and hardship withdrawals.
Employment Contracts, Termination of Employment and
Change-in-Control
Arrangements
We have not entered into an employment agreement with
Mr. Schottenstein, our Chief Executive Officer.
Mr. Schottenstein was appointed on March 14, 2005,
with an annual salary of $250,000. Effective April 2, 2006,
Mr. Schottensteins annual salary was raised to
$500,000.
We have entered into an employment agreement with
Ms. Ferrée, our Vice Chairman and Chief Merchandising
Officer, which originally became effective on November 22,
2004. The agreement provides for an indefinite term (which
terminates upon the executives death, disability (as such
term is defined in the agreement), voluntary termination by the
executive or involuntary termination by us). Under the
agreement, Ms. Ferrée will receive an annual base
salary of $700,000, which will be increased annually by a
minimum of 2.5% over the previous years base salary.
Effective April 2, 2006, Ms. Ferrées base
salary was increased to $750,000. Ms. Ferrée will also
participate in our bonus (cash incentive) plans with a target
bonus opportunity of 100% of base salary and a maximum annual
bonus of 200% of base salary. The agreement also provides for
Ms. Ferrées participation in our employee
pension or welfare benefit plans at a level commensurate with
her title and position and provides an entitlement to an annual
perquisite allowance from us of $40,000.
If the employment of Ms. Ferrée is involuntarily
terminated by us without cause, or if Ms. Ferrée
terminates her employment with us for good reason, as such term
is defined in her employment agreement, Ms. Ferrée
will be entitled to receive payment of her base salary through
the end of 2007 if such termination occurs prior to the end of
2006 or for a 12-month
period beginning on the date of termination if such termination
occurs on or after January 1, 2007; up to 18 months
reimbursement for the cost of health care continuation; a
pro-rata portion of any cash incentive bonus for the year of
termination and one year of accelerated vesting with respect to
her outstanding stock options. The agreement with
Ms. Ferrée also contains confidentiality and
non-disparagement provisions effective through the term of the
agreement, a non-competition provision effective through the
longer of one year following termination of employment or the
period of any salary continuation, and a non-solicitation
provision effective through the longer of two years following
termination of employment or the period of any salary
continuation.
We have entered into an employment agreement with
Mr. Horvath, our President, which originally became
effective on January 3, 2005. The agreement provides for an
indefinite term (which terminates upon Mr. Horvaths
death, disability (as such term is defined in the agreement),
voluntary termination by Mr. Horvath or involuntary
termination by us). Under the agreement, Mr. Horvath will
receive an annual base salary of $500,000, which will be
increased annually by a minimum of 2.5% over the previous
years base salary. Effective April 2, 2006,
Mr. Horvaths base salary was increased to $550,000.
In addition, Mr. Horvath received a signing bonus of
$75,000 upon entering into the agreement. Mr. Horvath also
participates in our bonus (cash incentive) plans with a target
bonus opportunity of 100% of base salary and a maximum annual
bonus of 200% of base salary. The agreement also provides for
Mr. Horvaths participation
69
in our employee pension or welfare benefit plans at a level
commensurate with his title and position and provides an
entitlement to an annual perquisite allowance from us of $40,000.
If the employment of Mr. Horvath is involuntarily
terminated by us without cause, or if Mr. Horvath
terminates his employment with us for good reason, as such terms
are defined in his employment agreement, Mr. Horvath will
be entitled to receive payment of his base salary through the
end of fiscal 2008 if such termination occurs prior to the end
of fiscal 2007 or for a
12-month period
beginning on the date of termination if such termination occurs
after the end of fiscal 2007; up to 18 months reimbursement
for the cost of health care continuation; a pro-rata portion of
any cash incentive bonus for the year of termination and one
year of accelerated vesting with respect to his outstanding
stock options. The agreement with Mr. Horvath also contains
confidentiality and non-disparagement provisions effective
through the term of the agreement, a non-competition provision
effective through the longer of one year following termination
of employment or the period of any salary continuation, and a
non-solicitation provision effective through the longer of two
years following termination of employment or the period of any
salary continuation.
We have entered into an employment agreement with Kevin M.
Lonergan, our Executive Vice President and Chief Operating
Officer, which originally became effective on December 1,
2005. The agreement provides for an indefinite term (which
terminates upon Mr. Lonergans death, disability (as
such term is defined in the agreement), voluntary termination by
Mr. Lonergan or involuntary termination by us). Under the
agreement, Mr. Lonergan will receive an annual base salary
of $500,000, which will be increased annually by a minimum of
2.5% over the previous years base salary. In addition,
Mr. Lonergan also received, subject to certain conditions
set forth in the employment agreement and applicable award
agreement, (i) options to purchase 50,000 of our
Class A Common Shares at an exercise price equal to the
closing price of our Class A Common Shares on the date such
grant is approved, subject to a
5-year vesting period
from the date Mr. Lonergan commenced employment,
(ii) 10,000 restricted stock units that vest 100% on
June 29, 2009, and (iii) 20,000 additional restricted
stock units, with a
2-year vesting schedule
from the date Mr. Lonergan commenced employment. We also
agreed to provide Mr. Lonergan with a comprehensive
relocation package. Mr. Lonergan also participates in our
bonus (cash incentive) plans with a target bonus opportunity of
80% of base salary and a maximum annual bonus of 160% of base
salary. The agreement also provides for Mr. Lonergans
participation in our employee pension or welfare benefit plans
at a level commensurate with his title and position and provides
an entitlement to an annual perquisite allowance from us of
$25,000.
In the event that Mr. Lonergans employment is
terminated involuntarily by us without cause or by
Mr. Lonergan with good reason (as such terms are defined in
the employment agreement), (i) we will continue to pay
Mr. Lonergans base salary at the rate then in effect
through January 24, 2009, if such termination occurs prior
to January 26, 2008, or for a period of 12 months, if
such termination occurs on or after January 26, 2008,
(ii) we will reimburse Mr. Lonergan for COBRA costs
for up to 12 months, subject to certain conditions,
(iii) we will pay to Mr. Lonergan the pro rata share
of any cash incentive bonus that he would have received had he
not been terminated, and (iv) Mr. Lonergan may exercise any
outstanding stock options which are vested on the date of his
termination and those stock options that would have vested
during the one year following his termination. The agreement
with Mr. Lonergan also contains confidentiality and
non-disparagement provisions effective through the term of the
agreement, a non-competition provision effective through the
longer of one year following termination of employment or the
period of any salary continuation, and a non-solicitation
provision effective through the longer of two years following
termination of employment or the period of any salary
continuation.
We have entered into an employment agreement with
Mr. Probst, our Executive Vice President, Chief Financial
Officer and Treasurer, which originally became effective on
March 15, 2005. The agreement provides for an indefinite
term (which terminates upon Mr. Probsts death,
disability (as such term is defined in his employment
agreement), voluntary termination by Mr. Probst or
involuntary termination by us). The agreement provides for an
annual salary of $350,000 and a cash bonus of 80% of his base
salary and a maximum annual bonus of 160% of base salary. For
fiscal year 2005, Mr. Probst was guaranteed a cash bonus of
80% of his base salary. Effective April 2, 2006,
Mr. Probsts base salary was increased to $375,000. In
addition, Mr. Probst received a signing bonus in the gross
amount of $40,000 upon entering into the
70
agreement. The agreement also provides for
Mr. Probsts participation in our employee pension or
welfare benefit plans at a level commensurate with his title and
position. The agreement also provides for a vehicle allowance
and fuel card.
If Mr. Probsts employment is terminated by us
without cause or for good reason, (as
such terms are defined in his agreement), then Mr. Probst
will be entitled to 12 months of base salary,
12 months of reimbursement for the cost of health care
continuation, a pro-rata portion of any cash incentive bonus for
the year of termination, and one year of accelerated vesting
with respect to his outstanding stock options. The agreement
also contains confidentiality and non-disparagement provisions
effective through the term of the agreement, a non-competition
provision effective through the longer of one year following
termination of employment or the period of any salary
continuation, and a non-solicitation provision effective through
the longer of two years following termination of employment or
the period of any salary continuation.
We have entered into an employment agreement with
Mr. Ungless, our Executive Vice President and Chief
Marketing Officer, which originally became effective on
June 26, 2005. The agreement provides for an indefinite
term (which terminates upon Mr. Ungless death,
disability (as such term is defined in the agreement), voluntary
termination by Mr. Ungless or involuntary termination by
us. Under the agreement, Mr. Ungless will receive an annual
base salary of $350,000. Effective April 2, 2006,
Mr. Ungless base salary was increased to $385,000. In
addition, Mr. Ungless received a signing bonus of $75,000
upon entering into the agreement. If Mr. Ungless
voluntarily resigns from DSW in the first 12 months of his
date of hire, he is required to repay the net amount of the
bonus to us. Mr. Ungless will also participate in our bonus
(cash incentive) plans with a target bonus opportunity of 50% of
base salary and a maximum annual bonus of 100% of base salary.
The agreement also provides for Mr. Ungless
participation in our employee pension or welfare benefit plans
at a level commensurate with his title and position. The
agreement also provides for a vehicle allowance and fuel card.
If the employment of Mr. Ungless is involuntarily
terminated by us without cause, Mr. Ungless will be
entitled to receive payment of his base salary for a 12-month
period beginning on the date of termination, provided, however,
that Mr. Ungless is expected to promptly and reasonably
pursue new employment. If during the 12 months of salary
continuation Mr. Ungless becomes employed either as an
employee or a consultant, Mr. Ungless base salary
paid by DSW will be reduced by the amount of the base salary or
consultant compensation paid by the new employer or entity for
the remainder of the 12 month salary continuation period.
Additionally, in the event that Mr. Ungless is
involuntarily terminated by us without cause, he will be
entitled to receive up to 12 months reimbursement for the
cost of health care continuation; a pro-rata portion of any cash
incentive bonus for the year of termination and one year of
accelerated vesting with respect to his outstanding stock
options. The agreement with Mr. Ungless also contains
confidentiality and non-disparagement provisions effective
through the term of the agreement, a non-competition provision
effective through the longer of one year following termination
of employment or the period of any salary continuation, and a
non-solicitation provision effective through the longer of two
years following termination of employment or the period of any
salary continuation.
We have entered into an employment agreement with Harris
Mustafa, our Executive Vice President, Supply Chain and
Merchandise Planning and Allocation, which became effective as
of July 10, 2006. The agreement provides for an indefinite
term (which terminates upon the executives death,
disability (as such term is defined in the agreement), voluntary
termination by Mr. Mustafa or involuntary termination by
us). Under the agreement, Mr. Mustafa will receive an
annual base salary of $465,000. In addition, Mr. Mustafa
received a signing bonus of $75,000 upon entering into the
agreement and, subject to certain conditions set forth in the
employment agreement and applicable award agreement,
(i) options to purchase 30,000 shares of our Class A
Common Shares at an exercise price equal to the closing price of
our Class A Common Shares on the date such grant is
approved, subject to a 5-year vesting period from the date
Mr. Mustafa commenced employment, and (ii) 5,500
restricted stock units with cliff vesting of 100% as of
July 10, 2010. We also agreed to provide Mr. Mustafa
with a comprehensive relocation package and an after-tax
perquisite allowance of $21,000 per year. Mr. Mustafa also
participates in our bonus (cash incentive) plans with a target
bonus opportunity of 50% of base salary and a maximum annual
bonus of up to 100% of his base salary.
71
In the event that Mr. Mustafas employment is
terminated involuntarily by us without cause (as such term is
defined in the employment agreement), (i) we will continue
to pay Mr. Mustafas base salary at the rate then in
effect for a period of 12 months, provided that
Mr. Mustafa promptly and reasonably pursues new employment,
(ii) we will reimburse Mr. Mustafa for COBRA costs for
up to 12 months, subject to certain conditions,
(iii) we will pay to Mr. Mustafa the pro rata share of
any cash incentive bonus that he would have received had he not
been terminated, and (iv) Mr. Mustafa may exercise any
outstanding stock options which are vested on the date of his
termination and those stock options that would have vested
during the one year following his termination. In the event that
Mr. Mustafa becomes employed as an employee or a consultant
during the 12 month period following his involuntary
termination by us, Mr. Mustafas base salary to be
paid by us will be reduced to 50% of the base salary amount for
the remainder of the 12 month salary continuation period.
|
|
|
Termination of Employment |
On November 3, 2004, the board of directors of Retail
Ventures voted to terminate the employment of John C. Rossler,
President and Chief Executive Officer of Retail Ventures, and
Edwin J. Kozlowski, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating
Officer of Retail Ventures, and to terminate their respective
employment agreements without cause in accordance
with the terms of the agreements. In connection with their
terminations of employment, Messrs. Rossler and Kozlowski
each entered into confidential settlement agreements and
releases with Retail Ventures in March 2005. In connection with
the termination of their employment with Retail Ventures, we
paid a portion of John C. Rosslers and Edwin J.
Kozlowskis settlement payments.
Mr. Rosslers employment agreement, effective as of
February 3, 2002, provided for an annual salary of $700,000
with annual increases of 2.5%. Pursuant to its terms, on
termination without cause (as such term is defined
in his employment agreement), Mr. Rossler became entitled
to receive 12 months of his base salary plus reimbursement
for his cost of maintaining continuing health care coverage for
a period of up to 18 months following his termination.
Mr. Rossler has a duty to mitigate these payments pursuant
to the terms of his employment agreement. In addition,
(i) Mr. Rossler is entitled to a pro rata incentive
compensation payment based on the extent to which performance
standards are met on the last day of the year in which he is
terminated without cause; and (ii) subject to the terms of
Retail Ventures stock incentive plan and any applicable
award agreement, (a) all stock options held by
Mr. Rossler will be fully vested and exercisable,
(b) all restrictions then imposed on any restricted stock
(other than those imposed by any applicable state or federal
statute) held by Mr. Rossler will lapse and be removed and
the shares will be distributed to him, and (c) all
performance stock options held by Mr. Rossler will be fully
vested and exercisable. In consideration of the payments made
and benefits provided to Mr. Rossler upon his termination
of employment without cause, Mr. Rossler has agreed to
non-competition and non-solicitation restrictions which remain
in effect until the second anniversary of his termination of
employment and to a standard confidentiality covenant. Pursuant
to the settlement agreement with Mr. Rossler, the effective
date of Mr. Rosslers termination of employment was
January 14, 2005 and he will receive severance as described
above through December 20, 2005. Mr. Rossler waived
any claim to an incentive compensation payment for fiscal 2004.
In addition, under the settlement agreement, Mr. Rossler
agreed to release Retail Ventures from all claims relating to
his employment.
Mr. Kozlowskis employment agreement, effective as of
February 3, 2002, provided for an annual salary of $500,000
with annual increases of 2.5%. Pursuant to its terms, on
termination without cause (as such term is defined
in his employment agreement), Mr. Kozlowski became entitled
to receive 12 months of his base salary plus reimbursement
for his cost of maintaining continuing health care coverage for
a period of up to 18 months following his termination.
Mr. Kozlowski has a duty to mitigate these payments
pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement. In addition,
(i) Mr. Kozlowski is entitled to a pro rata incentive
compensation payment based on the extent to which performance
standards are met on the last day of the year in which he is
terminated without cause; and (ii) subject to the terms of
Retail Ventures stock incentive plan and any applicable
award agreement, (a) all stock options held by
Mr. Kozlowski will be fully vested and exercisable,
(b) all restrictions then imposed on any restricted stock
(other than those imposed by any applicable state or federal
statute) held by Mr. Kozlowski will lapse and be removed
and the shares will be
72
distributed to him, and (c) all performance stock options
held by Mr. Kozlowski will be fully vested and exercisable.
In consideration of the payments made and benefits provided to
Mr. Kozlowski upon his termination of employment without
cause, Mr. Kozlowski has agreed to non-competition and
non-solicitation restrictions which remain in effect until the
second anniversary of his termination of employment and to a
standard confidentiality covenant. Pursuant to the settlement
agreement with Mr. Kozlowski, the effective date of
Mr. Kozlowskis termination of employment was
January 14, 2005 and he will receive severance as described
above through December 7, 2005. Mr. Kozlowski waived
any claim to an incentive compensation payment for the year
2004. Pursuant to the settlement agreement, Mr. Kozlowski
will keep the automobile in his possession as of the date of the
settlement agreement, with the cash value of the automobile
being considered severance pay under the employment agreement,
and he agreed to repay in full by April 15, 2005 the
balance of the loan made to him by Retail Ventures to cover
certain expenses related to personal benefits. This loan was
repaid in full by Mr. Kozlowski in April 2005. In addition,
under the settlement agreement, Mr. Kozlowski agreed to
release Retail Ventures from all claims relating to his
employment.
73
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
General
Prior to the completion of our initial public offering in July
2005, we were operated as a direct wholly-owned subsidiary of
Retail Ventures. As of April 29, 2006, Retail Ventures
owned 27,702,667 of our Class B Common Shares, or in excess
of 63.1% of our total outstanding shares and 93.2% of the
combined voting power of our outstanding Common Shares. Retail
Ventures has the power acting alone to approve any action
requiring a vote of the majority of our voting shares and to
elect all our directors.
As of April 29, 2006, Jay Schottenstein, the Chairman of
Retail Ventures, beneficially owned approximately 78.4% of the
common shares of SSC. As of April 29, 2006, SSC owned
approximately 42.8% of the outstanding shares and beneficially
owned approximately 53.6% (assumes issuance of
(i) 8,333,333 Retail Ventures Common Shares issuable upon
the exercise of convertible warrants,
(ii) 1,594,377 shares of Retail Ventures Common Shares
issuable upon the exercise of term loan warrants, and
(iii) 479,792 Retail Ventures Common Shares issuable
pursuant to the anti-dilution provisions of the term loan
warrants) of the outstanding shares of Retail Ventures. For
fiscal 2003, fiscal 2004 and fiscal 2005, we paid approximately
$5.7 million, $10.3 million and $10.8 million,
respectively, in total fees, rents and expenses to SSC.
In the ordinary course of business, we have entered into a
number of agreements with Retail Ventures, Value City and SSC
and their affiliates relating to our business and our
relationship with these companies, the material terms of which
are described below. We believe that each of the agreements
entered into with these entities is on terms at least as
favorable to us as could be obtained in an arms length
transaction with an unaffiliated third party. In the event that
we desire to enter into any agreements with Retail Ventures or
any of our directors, officers or other affiliates in the
future, in accordance with Ohio law, any contract, action or
other transaction between or affecting us and one of our
directors or officers or between or affecting us and any entity
in which one or more of our directors or officers is a director,
trustee or officer or has a financial or personal interest, will
either be approved by the shareholders, a majority of the
disinterested members of our board or a committee of our board
that authorizes such contracts, action or other transactions or
must be fair to us as of the time our directors, a committee of
our directors or our shareholders approve the contract, action
or transaction. In addition, any transactions with directors,
officers or other affiliates will be subject to requirements of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and other SEC rules and regulations.
Relationships Between Our Company And Retail Ventures
|
|
|
Historical Relationship With Retail Ventures |
Prior to the completion of our initial public offering in July
2005, we were a wholly-owned subsidiary of Value City or Retail
Ventures since 1998. As a result, in the ordinary course of our
business, we have received various services provided by Value
City and Retail Ventures, including import administration, risk
management, information technology, tax, financial services, and
shared benefits administration and payroll, as well as other
corporate services. Retail Ventures also maintained insurance
for us and for our directors, officers and employees. Retail
Ventures also provided us with the services of a number of its
executives and employees. Our historical financial statements
include allocations to us by Retail Ventures of its costs
related to these services. These cost allocations have been
determined on a basis that we and Retail Ventures consider to be
reasonable reflections of the use of services provided or the
benefit received by us. These allocations totaled
$24.4 million in fiscal 2003, $29.5 million in fiscal
2004, and $17.3 million in fiscal 2005.
|
|
|
Retail Ventures as our Controlling Shareholder |
As of April 29, 2006, Retail Ventures owns in excess of
63.1% of our outstanding Common Shares, and 93.2% of the
combined voting power of our outstanding Common Shares. For as
long as Retail Ventures continues to control more than 50% of
the combined voting power of our Common Shares, Retail Ventures
will be able to direct the election of all the members of our
board and exercise a controlling influence over our business and
affairs, including any determinations with respect to mergers or
other business combinations
74
involving our company, the acquisition or disposition of assets
by our company, the incurrence of indebtedness by our company,
the issuance of any additional common shares or other equity
securities, and the payment of dividends with respect to our
common shares. Similarly, Retail Ventures will have the power to
determine matters submitted to a vote of our shareholders
without the consent of our other shareholders, will have the
power to prevent a change in control of our company and will
have the power to take other actions that might be favorable to
Retail Ventures.
Retail Ventures has advised us that its current intent is to
continue to hold all the Class B Common Shares owned by it,
except to the extent necessary to satisfy obligations under
warrants it has granted to certain of its lenders and
obligations under the PIES. The Class B Common Shares of
DSW held by Retail Ventures are currently subject to liens in
favor of SSC and Cerberus, as well as a lien granted to Value
City. Retail Ventures is currently subject to
(a) contractual obligations with its lenders to retain
ownership of at least 55% by value of the Common Shares of DSW
for so long as the non-convertible loan facility remains
outstanding and (b) contractual obligations with its
warrantholders to retain enough DSW Common Shares to be able to
satisfy its obligations to deliver such shares to its
warrantholders if the warrantholders elect to exercise their
warrants in full for DSW Class A Common Shares (without
regard to any limitations on exercisability of the warrants).
Upon completion of the offering of the PIES by Retail Ventures,
Retail Ventures will be released from these contractual
obligations with its lenders as well as the liens on the Common
Shares of DSW described above. However, Retail Ventures will
pledge sufficient DSW Common Shares to the collateral agent for
the PIES to enable Retail Ventures to satisfy its obligations to
deliver Class A Common Shares upon exchange of the PIES,
and sufficient DSW Common Shares will continue to be subject to
liens and/or contractual obligations to enable Retail Ventures
to satisfy its obligations to the warrantholders to deliver
Class A Common Shares upon exercise of the warrants.
Beneficial ownership of at least 80% of the total voting power
and 80% of each class of nonvoting capital stock is required in
order for Retail Ventures to effect a tax-free spin-off of DSW
or certain other tax-free transactions. Retail Ventures has
advised us that it does not intend or plan to undertake a
spin-off of DSW or another tax-free transaction involving DSW.
For a further discussion of these risks, see Risk
Factors Risks Relating to our Relationship with and
Separation from Retail Ventures.
|
|
|
Agreements Between Us And Retail Ventures |
This section describes the material provisions of agreements
between us and Retail Ventures. The description of the
agreements is not complete and, with respect to each material
agreement, is qualified by reference to the terms of the
agreement, each of which is filed as an exhibit to our
registration statement filed in connection with our initial
public offering. We entered into these agreements with Retail
Ventures in the context of our relationship as a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Retail Ventures. The prices and other terms of
these agreements may be less favorable to us than those we could
have obtained in arms-length negotiations with
unaffiliated third parties for similar services or under similar
agreements.
|
|
|
Agreements Relating to our Separation from Retail Ventures |
In connection with our initial public offering, we and Retail
Ventures entered into agreements governing various interim and
ongoing relationships between us. These agreements include:
|
|
|
|
|
a master separation agreement; |
|
|
|
a shared services agreement and other intercompany arrangements; |
|
|
|
a tax separation agreement; |
|
|
|
an exchange agreement; and |
|
|
|
a footwear fixture agreement. |
75
Master Separation Agreement. The master separation
agreement contains key provisions relating to the separation of
our business from Retail Ventures. The master separation
agreement requires us to exchange information with Retail
Ventures, follow certain accounting practices and resolve
disputes with Retail Ventures in a particular manner. We also
have agreed to maintain the confidentiality of certain
information and preserve available legal privileges. The
separation agreement also contains provisions relating to the
allocation of the costs of our initial public offering,
indemnification, non-solicitation of employees and employee
benefit matters.
Under the master separation agreement, we agreed to effect up to
one demand registration per calendar year of our Common Shares,
whether Class A or Class B, held by Retail Ventures,
if requested by Retail Ventures. We have also granted Retail
Ventures the right to include its Common Shares of DSW in an
unlimited number of other registrations of such shares initiated
by us or on behalf of our other shareholders.
Shared Services Agreement. Many aspects of our business,
which were fully managed and controlled by us without Retail
Ventures involvement, continue to operate as they did
prior to our initial public offering. We continue to manage
operations for critical functions such as merchandise buying,
planning and allocation, distribution and store operations.
Under the shared services agreement, which became effective as
of January 30, 2005, we provide services to several
subsidiaries of Retail Ventures relating to planning and
allocation support, distribution services and transportation
management, site research, lease negotiation, store design and
construction management. Retail Ventures provides us with
services relating to import administration, risk management,
information technology, tax, logistics, legal services,
financial services, shared benefits administration and payroll
and maintain insurance for us and for our directors, officers
and employees.
The initial term of the shared services agreement expires at the
end of fiscal 2007 and will be extended automatically for
additional one-year terms unless terminated by one of the
parties. With respect to each shared service, we cannot
reasonably anticipate whether the services will be shared for a
period shorter or longer than the initial term.
Prior to and following the consummation of our initial public
offering, we have had, and will continue to have, the option to
use certain administrative and marketing services provided by
third party vendors pursuant to contracts between those third
party vendors and Retail Ventures. We pay Retail Ventures for
these services as expenses for these services are incurred.
These services are provided to us by virtue of our status as
Retail Ventures affiliate and are unrelated to those
delineated in the shared services agreement.
Prior to the completion of our initial public offering in July
2005, we and Retail Ventures used intercompany transactions in
the conduct of their operations. Under this arrangement, Retail
Ventures acted as a central processing location for payments for
the acquisition of merchandise, payroll, outside services,
capital additions and expenses by controlling the payroll and
accounts payable activities for all Retail Ventures
subsidiaries, including DSW. We transferred cash received from
sales of merchandise to cash accounts controlled by Retail
Ventures. The balance of advances to affiliates fluctuated based
on DSWs activities with Retail Ventures.
Following the consummation of our initial public offering, our
intercompany activities are limited to those arrangements set
forth in the shared services agreement and the other agreements
described in this prospectus. We no longer concentrate our cash
from the sale of merchandise into Retail Ventures accounts
but into our own DSW accounts. We pay for our own merchandise,
expenses and capital additions from our own disbursement
accounts. Any intercompany payments are made pursuant to the
terms of the shared services agreement and the other agreements
described in this prospectus.
In fiscal 2005, we paid Retail Ventures approximately
$17.3 million for services rendered to us under the shared
service agreement. In addition, in fiscal 2005, Retail Ventures
paid us approximately $8.7 million for services we rendered
on behalf of Retail Ventures.
Tax Separation Agreement. Until the completion of our
initial public offering in July 2005, we had historically been
included in Retail Ventures Consolidated Group for
U.S. federal income tax purposes as well as in Combined
Groups for state and local income tax purposes. We entered into
a tax separation
76
agreement with Retail Ventures that became effective upon
consummation of our initial public offering. Pursuant to the tax
separation agreement, we and Retail Ventures generally make
payments to each other such that, with respect to tax returns
for any taxable period in which we or any of our subsidiaries
are included in the Consolidated Group or any Combined Group,
the amount of taxes to be paid by us will be determined, subject
to certain adjustments, as if we and each of our subsidiaries
included in the Consolidated Group or Combined Group filed our
own consolidated, combined or unitary tax return. Retail
Ventures will prepare pro forma tax returns for us with respect
to any tax return filed with respect to the Consolidated Group
or any Combined Group in order to determine the amount of tax
separation payments under the tax separation agreement. We have
the right to review and comment on such pro forma tax returns.
We are responsible for any taxes with respect to tax returns
that include only us and our subsidiaries.
Retail Ventures is exclusively responsible for preparing and
filing any tax return with respect to the Consolidated Group or
any Combined Group. We generally are responsible for preparing
and filing any tax returns that include only us and our
subsidiaries. Retail Ventures has agreed to undertake to provide
these services with respect to our separate tax returns. For the
tax services provided to us by Retail Ventures, we pay Retail
Ventures a monthly fee equal to 50% of all costs associated with
the maintenance and operation of Retail Ventures tax
department (including all overhead expenses). In addition, we
reimburse Retail Ventures for 50% of any third party fees and
expenses generally incurred by Retail Ventures tax
department and 100% of any third party fees and expenses
incurred by Retail Ventures tax department solely in
connection with the performance of the tax services provided to
us.
Retail Ventures is primarily responsible for controlling and
contesting any audit or other tax proceeding with respect to the
Consolidated Group or any Combined Group; provided, however,
that, except in cases involving taxes relating to a spin-off, we
have the right to control decisions to resolve, settle or
otherwise agree to any deficiency, claim or adjustment with
respect to any item for which we are solely liable under the tax
separation agreement. Pursuant to the tax separation agreement,
we have the right to control and contest any audit or tax
proceeding that relates to any tax returns that include only us
and our subsidiaries. We and Retail Ventures have joint control
over decisions to resolve, settle or otherwise agree to any
deficiency, claim or adjustment for which we and Retail Ventures
could be jointly liable, except in cases involving taxes
relating to a spin-off. Disputes arising between the parties
relating to matters covered by the tax separation agreement are
subject to resolution through specific dispute resolution
provisions.
We have been included in the Consolidated Group for periods in
which Retail Ventures owned at least 80% of the total voting
power and value of the our outstanding stock. Following
completion of our initial public offering in July 2005, we are
no longer included in the Consolidated Group. Each member of a
consolidated group for U.S. federal income tax purposes is
jointly and severally liable for the U.S. federal income
tax liability of each other member of the consolidated group.
Similarly, in some jurisdictions, each member of a consolidated,
combined or unitary group for state, local or foreign income tax
purposes is jointly and severally liable for the state, local or
foreign income tax liability of each other member of the
consolidated, combined or unitary group. Accordingly, although
the tax separation agreement allocates tax liabilities between
us and Retail Ventures, for any period in which we were included
in the Consolidated Group or a Combined Group, we could be
liable in the event that any income tax liability was incurred,
but not discharged, by any other member of the Consolidated
Group or a Combined Group.
Retail Ventures has informed us that it does not currently
intend or plan to undertake a spin-off of our stock to Retail
Ventures shareholders. Nevertheless, we and Retail Ventures
agreed to set forth our respective rights, responsibilities and
obligations with respect to any possible spin-off in the tax
separation agreement. If Retail Ventures were to decide to
pursue a possible spin-off, we have agreed to cooperate with
Retail Ventures and to take any and all actions reasonably
requested by Retail Ventures in connection with such a
transaction. We have also agreed not to knowingly take or fail
to take any actions that could reasonably be expected to
preclude Retail Ventures ability to undertake a tax-free
spin-off. In addition, we generally would be responsible for any
taxes resulting from the failure of a spin-off to qualify as a
tax-free transaction to the extent such taxes are attributable
to, or result from, any action or failure to act by us or
certain transactions in our stock (including transactions over
which we would have no control, such as acquisitions of our
stock and the exercise of warrants, options, exchange rights,
conversion rights or similar arrangements with respect to
77
our stock) following or preceding a spin-off. We would also be
responsible for a percentage (based on the relative market
capitalizations of us and Retail Ventures at the time of such
spin-off) of such taxes to the extent such taxes are not
otherwise attributable to us or Retail Ventures. Our agreements
in connection with such spin-off matters last indefinitely. In
addition, present and future majority-owned affiliates of DSW or
Retail Ventures will be bound by our agreements, unless Retail
Ventures or we, as applicable, consent to grant a release of an
affiliate (such consent cannot be unreasonably withheld,
conditioned or delayed), which may limit our ability to sell or
otherwise dispose of such affiliates. Additionally, a minority
interest participant(s) in a future joint venture, if any, would
need to evaluate the effect of the tax separation agreement on
such joint venture, and such evaluation may negatively affect
their decision whether to participate in such a joint venture.
Furthermore, the tax separation agreement may negatively affect
our ability to acquire a majority interest in a joint venture.
Exchange Agreement. In connection with our initial public
offering, we entered into an exchange agreement with Retail
Ventures. In the event that Retail Ventures desires to exchange
all or a portion of our Class B Common Shares held by it
for Class A Common Shares, we will issue to Retail Ventures
an equal number of duly authorized, validly issued, fully paid
and nonassessable Class A Common Shares in exchange for our
Class B Common Shares held by Retail Ventures. Retail
Ventures may make one or more requests for such exchange,
covering all or a part of the Class B Common Shares that it
holds.
Footwear Fixture Agreement. In connection with the
completion of our initial public offering in July 2005, we
entered into an agreement with Retail Ventures related to our
patented footwear display fixtures. We agreed to sell Retail
Ventures, upon its request, the fixtures covered by the patents
at the cost associated with obtaining and delivering them. In
addition, we have agreed to pay Retail Ventures a percentage of
any net profit we may receive should we ever market and sell the
fixtures to third parties.
Leases and Subleases
Office, warehouse and distribution facility. We lease our
approximately 700,000 square foot corporate headquarters,
warehouse and distribution facility in Columbus, Ohio from an
affiliate of SSC, 4300 East Fifth Avenue LLC. The lease
expires in December 2016 and has three renewal options with
terms of five years each. The monthly rent is $179,533, $194,228
and $208,922 during the first, second and third five-year
periods of the initial term, respectively. The rent increases to
$220,416, $235,111 and $249,805 in the first, second and third
renewal terms, respectively. On account of this agreement, we
paid to the landlord approximately $3.1 million in fiscal
2003, $3.4 million in fiscal 2004, and $3.0 million
for fiscal 2005.
DSW stores. As of April 29, 2006, we leased or
subleased 15 DSW stores from affiliates of SSC and signed a
lease for one additional store expected to be opened in fiscal
2006. We paid SSC or its affiliates approximately
$6.4 million for fiscal 2005 and approximately
$6.6 million for fiscal 2004 on account of the leases and
subleases. Listed below are the locations of the stores that we
leased from affiliates of SSC as of January 28, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum Rent as of | |
Store Location |
|
Landlord |
|
Expiration Date | |
|
Renewal Options |
|
January 28, 2006(1) | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Glen Allen, Virginia
|
|
Jubilee Richmond, LLC |
|
|
October 2015 |
|
|
Three, with terms of five years each. |
|
$ |
429,249 |
|
Fairfax, Virginia
|
|
Jubilee Limited Partnership |
|
|
November 2009 |
|
|
Two, with terms of 10 years each. |
|
$ |
525,589 |
|
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (Clariton Boulevard)
|
|
SSC |
|
|
December 2017 |
|
|
Three, with terms of five, five and two years, respectively. |
|
$ |
341,356 |
|
Troy, Michigan
|
|
Jubilee Limited Partnership |
|
|
February 2013 |
|
|
Two, with terms of five years each. |
|
$ |
512,000 |
|
Springdale, Ohio
|
|
Jubilee Springdale, LLC |
|
|
October 2016 |
|
|
Three, with terms of five years each. |
|
$ |
568,000 |
|
78
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum Rent as of | |
Store Location |
|
Landlord |
|
Expiration Date | |
|
Renewal Options |
|
January 28, 2006(1) | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Denton, Texas
|
|
Jubilee Limited Partnership |
|
|
February 2019 |
|
|
Three, with terms of five years each. |
|
$ |
319,790 |
|
Richmond, Virginia (Midlothian)
|
|
JLP Richmond LLC |
|
|
April 2019 |
|
|
Three, with terms of five years each. |
|
$ |
420,000 |
|
Merrillville, Indiana
(2)
|
|
Jubilee Limited Partnership |
|
|
December 2017 |
|
|
Three, with terms of five years each. |
|
$ |
360,000 |
|
Beavercreek, Ohio
|
|
Shoppes of Beavercreek, Ltd |
|
|
September 2012 |
|
|
Three, with terms of five years each. |
|
$ |
363,585 |
|
Chesapeake, Virginia
|
|
JLP Chesapeake, LLC |
|
|
July 2011 |
|
|
Four, with terms of five years each. |
|
$ |
402,325 |
|
Columbus, Ohio (Polaris)
|
|
SSC Polaris, LLC |
|
|
October 2017 |
|
|
Four, with terms of five years each. |
|
$ |
583,800 |
|
Cary, North Carolina
|
|
JLP Cary, LLC |
|
|
February 2018 |
|
|
Three, with terms of five years each. |
|
$ |
424,782 |
|
Madison, Tennessee
|
|
JLP Madison LLC |
|
|
November 2017 |
|
|
Three, with terms of five years each. |
|
$ |
252,992 |
|
Kalamazoo, Michigan
|
|
K&S Maple Hill Mall, L.P. |
|
|
October 2020 |
|
|
Three, with terms of five years each. |
|
$ |
312,996 |
|
South Bend, Indiana
|
|
KSK Scottsdale Mall, L.P. |
|
|
October 2020 |
|
|
Three, with terms of five years each. |
|
$ |
338,897 |
|
Warrensville Heights,
Ohio(3)
|
|
JLP Harvard Park, LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
Three, with terms of five years each. |
|
$ |
360,000 |
|
|
|
(1) |
For each lease, we also (a) pay percentage rent equal to
approximately 2% annually of gross sales that exceed specified
breakpoints that increase as the minimum rent increases and
(b) pay a portion of expenses related to maintenance, real
estate taxes and insurance. |
|
(2) |
DSW occupies this premises under a license agreement entered
into with Value City. Value City is the tenant under the lease
entered into with the landlord. |
|
(3) |
This store is expected to open in fiscal 2006, at which time the
expiration date will be determined. |
Corporate Services Agreement with SSC
We receive services from SSC pursuant to a Corporate Services
Agreement between Retail Ventures and SSC. The agreement sets
forth the costs of shared services, including specified legal,
advertising, import, real estate and administrative services. As
of January 28, 2006, the only services we receive pursuant
to this agreement pertain to real estate services and the
administration of our health insurance and benefit plans. For
fiscal 2003, fiscal 2004 and fiscal 2005, our allocated portion
of the amount Retail Ventures paid SSC or its affiliates was
$0.2 million, $0.3 million, and $0.6 million,
respectively, for such services. In connection with our initial
public offering, the Corporate Services Agreement was amended
and Schottenstein Management Company, or SMC, was added as a
party.
We entered into a side letter agreement relating to corporate
services with SSC and SMC. Under the side letter agreement, we
have agreed to pay for any services provided by SSC or SMC to us
through Retail Ventures in the event that Retail Ventures does
not pay for those services.
Until July 2004, we were self-insured through our participation
in a self-insurance program maintained by SSC. While we no
longer participate in the program we continue to remain liable
for liabilities incurred by us under the program. Under the
program, SSC charged Retail Ventures amounts based, among other
factors, on loss experience and its actual payroll and related
costs for administering the program. For fiscal 2003, our
allocated portion of the amount Retail Ventures paid SSC was
approximately $0.2 million. For fiscal 2004 and fiscal
2005, our allocated portion of the amount Retail Ventures paid
SSC was in an amount immaterial to the financial statements.
79
We have had, and will continue to have, the option to use
corporate aircraft provided by a third party vendor pursuant to
a contract between the third party vendor and SSC and a Retail
Ventures affiliate. We expect to pay SSC for these services as
expenses for these services are incurred. These services are
made available to us by virtue of our status as an SSC affiliate.
Agreement with Value City for Leased Shoe Departments
Until December 28, 2004, we were party to a license
agreement with Value City Department Stores, Inc. which gave us
the exclusive right to supply footwear to leased shoe
departments in specified Value City Department Stores, Inc.
stores. Under this license, we agreed to pay to Value City
Department Stores, Inc. a specified percentage of our annual
gross sales from each of the Value City Department Stores, Inc.
leased shoe departments. In addition, we paid some of Value City
Department Stores, Inc.s expenses, including those related
to advertising for the shoe departments and employee services
for shoe department employees.
The managers and full- and part-time associates who staffed our
departments in these Value City Department Stores, Inc. stores
were employees of Value City Department Stores, Inc. We
reimbursed Value City Department Stores, Inc. for the payroll
taxes, benefits and other expenses associated with those
associates. We supplied our own merchandise and store fixtures,
maintained our own insurance and were responsible for repairs
and maintenance of our fixtures, merchandise and equipment.
We paid approximately $41.6 million in total license fees
and other expenses (including payroll and benefits) to Value
City Department Stores, Inc. for fiscal 2003 and approximately
$41.2 million for fiscal 2004. The historical and pro forma
financial data included elsewhere in this prospectus does not
give effect to transactions that have taken place pursuant to
this agreement. As part of the reorganization that took place on
December 28, 2004, this contract was terminated.
Agreements with Filenes Basement for Leased Shoe
Departments
Until January 29, 2005, we were party to an agreement with
Filenes Basement pursuant to which we had the exclusive
right to operate leased shoe departments with approximately
20,000 square feet of selling space and approximately
3,000 feet of storage space in Filenes Basement
stores. At the time this contract was terminated, this agreement
pertained only to the two combination DSW/Filenes Basement
stores. Under this agreement, we owned the merchandise, recorded
sales of merchandise net of returns and sales tax and provided
supervisory assistance in all covered locations. We paid a
percentage of net sales as rent. We also paid certain taxes,
insurance premiums and freight costs with respect to the
merchandise. We paid approximately $2.0 million in total
fees and expenses to Filenes Basement for fiscal 2003 and
$2.1 million for fiscal 2004.
Until January 29, 2005, we were party to an agreement with
Filenes Basement pursuant to which we had the exclusive
right to operate leased shoe departments with approximately
1,000 square feet of selling space and 200 square feet
of storage space in Filenes Basement stores. At the time
this contract was terminated, we operated departments of this
size in 22 Filenes Basement stores. Under this agreement,
we owned the merchandise, recorded sales of merchandise net of
returns and sales tax and provided supervisory assistance in all
covered locations. We paid a percentage of net sales as rent. We
also paid certain taxes, insurance premiums and freight costs
with respect to the merchandise. We paid approximately
$3.8 million in total fees and expenses to Filenes
Basement for fiscal 2003 and $4.8 million for fiscal 2004.
Effective as of January 30, 2005, we updated and reaffirmed
our contractual arrangement with Filenes Basement related
to combination DSW/Filenes Basement stores. Under the new
agreement, we have the exclusive right to operate leased shoe
departments with 10,000 square feet or more of selling
space in Filenes Basement stores. We own the merchandise,
record sales of merchandise net of returns and sales tax, and
receive a per-store license fee for use of our name on the
stores. We pay a percentage of net sales as rent. The employees
that supervise the shoe departments are employees of us who
report directly to our supervisors. Filenes Basement
provides the fixtures and sales associates. As of April 29,
2006, this agreement pertained to only three combination DSW/
Filenes Basement stores. We paid approximately
$2.6 million in total fees and expenses to Filenes
Basement for fiscal 2005.
80
Effective as of January 30, 2005, we updated and reaffirmed
our contractual arrangement with Filenes Basement related
to the smaller leased shoe departments. Under the new agreement
we have the exclusive right to operate leased shoe departments
with less than 10,000 square feet of selling space in
Filenes Basement stores. We own the merchandise, record
sales net of returns and sales tax and provide supervisory
assistance in all covered locations. We pay a percentage of net
sales as rent. Filenes Basement provides the fixtures and
sales associates. We also pay certain taxes, insurance premiums
and freight costs with respect to the merchandise. As of
April 29, 2006, we operated leased shoe departments in 22
of these Filenes Basement stores. We paid approximately
$8.0 million in total fees and expenses to Filenes
Basement for fiscal 2005.
Agreement with Filenes Basement for Atrium Space at our
Union Square Store in Manhattan
Effective as of January 30, 2005, we entered into a shared
expenses agreement with Filenes Basement related to the
shared atrium space connecting Filenes Basements
leased spaced at Union Square and our Union Square store leased
space, and for other expenses related to our leased space, which
are located in the same building in New York, New York. Under
that agreement, we have agreed to share with Filenes
Basement expenses related to the use and maintenance of the
atrium space and to share other expenses related to the
operation and maintenance of the Filenes Basement leased
space and our leased space. Our share of these expenses totaled
approximately $25,500 for fiscal 2005.
Registration Rights Agreements
Under the master separation agreement, we have agreed to effect
up to one demand registration per calendar year of our Common
Shares, whether Class A or Class B, held by Retail
Ventures, if requested by Retail Ventures. We have also granted
Retail Ventures the right to include its Common Shares of DSW in
an unlimited number of other registrations of such shares
initiated by us or on behalf of our other shareholders.
We have also entered into a registration rights agreement with
Cerberus and SSC, under which we have agreed to register in
specified circumstances the Class A Common Shares issued to
them upon exercise of their warrants and each of these entities
and Millennium will be entitled to participate in the
registrations initiated by the other entities. Under this
agreement, each of Cerberus (together with transferees of at
least 15% of its interest in registrable DSW Common Shares) and
SSC (together with transferees of at least 15% of its interest
in registrable DSW Common Shares) may request up to five demand
registrations with respect to the Class A Common Shares
issued to them upon exercise of their warrants provided that no
party may request more than two demand registrations, except
that each of Cerberus and SSC may each request up to three
demand registrations. The agreement will also grant Cerberus,
SSC and Millennium the right to include these Class A
Common Shares in an unlimited number of other registrations of
any of our securities initiated by us or on behalf of our other
shareholders (other than a demand registration made under the
agreement). Our failure to perform our obligations under this
agreement would result in an event of default under the Value
City subordinated convertible loan facility, as amended.
Notes, Credit Agreements and Guarantees
Upon completion of our initial public offering in July 2005,
Retail Ventures amended or amended and restated the existing
credit facilities and other debt obligations of Value City and
its other affiliates, including certain facilities under which
we had rights and obligations as a co-borrower and co-guarantor.
We are no longer a party to any of these agreements.
The Value City Revolving Credit Facility. Prior to
completion of our initial public offering in July 2005, we were
party to a Loan and Security Agreement, as amended, entered into
with National City, as administrative agent, and the other
parties named therein, originally entered into in June 2002.
Upon the completion of our initial public offering, this
revolving credit agreement was amended and restated and we were
released from our obligations as a party thereto.
The Value City Term Loan Facility. Prior to
completion of our initial public offering in July 2005, we were
party to a Financing Agreement, as amended, among Cerberus, as
agent and lender, and SSC as lender,
81
and the other parties named as co-borrowers therein, originally
entered into in June 2002. Upon the completion of our initial
public offering, the indebtedness with respect to this term loan
was repaid in full, this term loan agreement was terminated and
we were released from our obligations as a party thereto.
Under the terms of this term loan agreement, SSC and Cerberus
each provided us, Value City and the other Retail Ventures
affiliates named as co-borrowers with a separate
$50 million term loan comprised of two tranches with
initial three-year terms. In July 2004, the maturity dates of
these loans were extended until June 11, 2006. In
connection with the second tranche of these term loans, Retail
Ventures issued to each of Cerberus and SSC warrants to
purchase 1,477,396 common shares of Retail Ventures at a
purchase price of $4.50 per share, subject to adjustment.
In September 2002, Back Bay bought from each of Cerberus and SSC
a $1.5 million interest in each of the tranches of their
term loans for an aggregate $6.0 million interest, and Back
Bay received from each of Cerberus and SSC a corresponding
portion of the warrants to purchase Retail Ventures common
shares originally issued in connection with the second tranche
of their term loans. Effective November 23, 2005,
Millennium purchased from Back Bay term loan warrants to
purchase an aggregate of 177,288 of Retail Ventures common
shares, subject to adjustment. The term loans stated rate
of interest per annum through June 11, 2004 was 14% if paid
in cash and 15% if the co-borrowers elected a PIK option. During
the first two years of the term loans, the co-borrowers could
elect to pay all interest in PIK. During the final two years of
the term loans, the stated rate of interest was 15.0% if paid in
cash or 15.5% if by PIK, and the PIK option was limited to 50%
of the interest due. For fiscal 2002 and fiscal 2003, the
co-borrowers elected to pay interest in cash.
In connection with the amendment of this term loan agreement,
Retail Ventures amended the outstanding warrants to provide SSC,
Cerberus and Millennium the right, from time to time, in whole
or in part, to (i) acquire Retail Ventures common shares at
the then current conversion price (subject to the anti-dilution
provisions), (ii) acquire from Retail Ventures Class A
Common Shares of DSW at an exercise price of $19.00 per
share (subject to anti-dilution provisions) or
(iii) acquire a combination thereof. Assuming an exercise
price per share of $19.00, SSC and Cerberus would each receive
328,915 Class A Common Shares, and Millennium would receive
41,989 Class A Common Shares, if they exercised these
warrants in full exclusively for DSW Common Shares. The warrants
expire in June 2012. Although Retail Ventures has informed us
that it does not currently intend or plan to undertake a
spin-off of Common Shares to Retail Ventures shareholders,
in the event that Retail Ventures effects a spin-off of its DSW
Common Shares to its shareholders in the future, the holders of
outstanding unexercised warrants will receive the same number of
DSW Common Shares that they would have received had they
exercised their warrants in full for Retail Ventures common
shares immediately prior to the record date of the spin-off,
without regard to any limitations on exercise in the warrants.
Following the completion of any such spin-off, the warrants will
be exercisable solely for Retail Ventures common shares.
We have entered into an exchange agreement with Retail Ventures
whereby, upon the request of Retail Ventures, we will be
required to exchange some or all of the Class B Common
Shares of DSW held by Retail Ventures for Class A Common
Shares.
The Value City Senior Subordinated Convertible
Loan Facility. Prior to completion of our initial
public offering in July 2005, we were a co-guarantor under the
Amended and Restated Senior Subordinated Convertible Loan
Agreement, entered into by Value City, as borrower, Cerberus, as
agent and lender, SSC, as lender, and DSW and the other parties
named as guarantors, originally entered into in June 2002. Upon
the completion of our initial public offering, this convertible
loan agreement was amended and restated and we are no longer a
party thereto.
In connection with the amendment and restatement of this
convertible loan agreement, Retail Ventures repaid
$25 million of this facility and the convertible loan was
converted into a non-convertible loan. The capital stock of DSW
held by Retail Ventures currently secures the non-convertible
loan. This lien will be released upon completion of the PIES
offering by Retail Ventures. However, Retail Ventures will
pledge sufficient DSW Common Shares to the collateral agent for
the PIES to enable Retail Ventures to satisfy its obligations to
deliver Class A Common Shares upon exchange of the PIES,
and sufficient DSW Common Shares will continue to be subject to
liens and/or contractual obligations to enable Retail Ventures
to satisfy
82
its obligations to the warrantholders to deliver Class A
Common Shares upon exercise of the warrants. In connection with
the amendment and restatement of the convertible loan agreement
in July 2005, Retail Ventures agreed to issue to SSC and
Cerberus convertible warrants which are exercisable from time to
time until the later of June 11, 2007 and the repayment in
full of Value Citys obligations under the amended and
restated loan agreement. Under the convertible warrants, SSC and
Cerberus will have the right, from time to time, in whole or in
part, to (i) acquire Retail Ventures common shares at the
conversion price referred to in the convertible loan (subject to
anti-dilution provisions), (ii) acquire from Retail
Ventures Class A Common Shares of DSW at an exercise price
of $19.00 per share (subject to anti-dilution provisions)
or (iii) acquire a combination thereof. Although Retail
Ventures has informed us that it does not currently intend or
plan to undertake a spin-off of Common Shares to Retail
Ventures shareholders, in the event that Retail Ventures
effects a spin-off of its DSW Common Shares to its shareholders
in the future, the holders of outstanding unexercised warrants
will receive the same number of DSW Common Shares that they
would have received had they exercised their warrants in full
for Retail Ventures common shares immediately prior to the
record date of the spin-off, without regard to any limitation on
exercise contained in the warrants. Following the completion of
any such spin-off, the warrants will be exercisable solely for
Retail Ventures common shares.
On March 13, 2006, Retail Ventures issued 2,000,000 of its
common shares to Cerberus in connection with the partial
exercise of Cerberus outstanding convertible warrants. The
common shares were issued at an exercise price of $4.50 per
share for an aggregate cash purchase price of $9,000,000. On
April 26, 2006, Retail Ventures issued an additional
3,000,000 of its common shares to Cerberus in connection with
the partial exercise of Cerberus outstanding convertible
warrants. These common shares were issued at an exercise price
of $4.50 per share for an aggregate cash purchase price of
$13,500,000. On July 26, 2006, Retail Ventures issued an
additional 2,000,000 of its common shares to Cerberus in
connection with the partial exercise of Cerberus
outstanding convertible warrants. These common shares were
issued at an exercise price of $4.50 per share for an aggregate
cash purchase price of $9,000,000. Following this exercise,
Cerberus remaining convertible warrants entitle Cerberus
to acquire 315,790 Class A Common Shares of DSW (subject to
anti-dilution provisions) if they exercise their remaining
warrants exclusively for DSW Common Shares. As of April 29,
2006, SSC would receive 1,973,684 Class A Common Shares
(subject to anti-dilution provisions) if they exercised these
warrants exclusively for DSW Common Shares.
Value City Intercompany Note. The capital stock of DSW
held by Retail Ventures currently secures a $240 million
Value City intercompany note made payable by Retail Ventures to
Value City, which was executed and delivered on January 1,
2005 in connection with the transfer of all the capital stock of
DSW and Filenes Basement by Value City to Retail Ventures
on that date. Under the terms of the Value City Intercompany
Note, the lien granted to Value City on the DSW capital stock
held by Retail Ventures will be released upon written notice
that warrants held by Cerberus, SSC and Millennium are to be
exercised in exchange for DSW capital stock held by Retail
Ventures and to be delivered by Retail Ventures upon the
exercise of such warrants. The lien will also be released upon
repayment of the note in full. In connection with the offering
of the PIES by Retail Ventures, this lien on the DSW capital
stock that secures the Value City Intercompany Note will be
released and the approximately $49.7 million remaining
balance of the Value City Intercompany Note will be repaid.
The $165.0 Million Intercompany Note. In March 2005,
we incurred intercompany indebtedness to fund a
$165.0 million dividend to Retail Ventures. We repaid this
note in full in July 2005.
The $25.0 Million Intercompany Note. In May 2005, we
incurred intercompany indebtedness to fund a $25.0 million
dividend to Retail Ventures. We repaid this note in full in July
2005.
Cross-Corporate Guarantees. We previously entered into
cross-corporate guarantees with various financing institutions
pursuant to which we, Retail Ventures, Filenes Basement
and Value City, jointly and severally, guaranteed payment
obligations owed to these entities under factoring arrangements
they have entered into with vendors who may provide merchandise
to some or all of Retail Ventures subsidiaries. In July
2005, we terminated these cross-corporate guarantees and no
amounts remain guaranteed by us.
Union Square Store Guaranty by Retail Ventures. In
January 2004, we entered into a lease agreement with
40 East 14 Realty Associates, L.L.C., an unrelated
third party, for our Union Square store in Manhattan,
83
New York. In connection with the lease, Retail Ventures has
agreed to guarantee payment of our rent and other expenses and
charges and the performance of our other obligations.
Intercompany Accounts. Prior to the completion of our
initial public offering in July 2005, we and Retail Ventures
used intercompany transactions in the conduct of their
operations. Under this arrangement, Retail Ventures acted as a
central processing location for payments for the acquisition of
merchandise, payroll, outside services, capital additions and
expenses by controlling the payroll and accounts payable
activities for all Retail Ventures subsidiaries, including
us. We transferred cash received from sales of merchandise to
cash accounts controlled by Retail Ventures. The concentration
of cash and the offsetting payments for merchandise, expenses,
capital assets and accruals for future payments were accumulated
on our balance sheet in advances to affiliates. The balance of
advances to affiliates fluctuated based on our activities with
Retail Ventures.
Following completion of our initial public offering, our
intercompany activities are limited to those arrangements set
forth in the shared services agreement and the other agreements
between us and Retail Ventures. We no longer concentrate our
cash from the sale of merchandise into Retail Ventures
accounts but into our own DSW accounts. We pay for our own
merchandise, expenses and capital additions from newly
established disbursement accounts. Any intercompany payments are
made pursuant to the terms of the shared services agreement and
other agreements between us and Retail Ventures.
Provisions of Our Amended Articles of Incorporation Governing
Corporate Opportunities and Related Party Transactions
Retail Ventures remains a substantial shareholder of DSW and SSC
remains a substantial shareholder of Retail Ventures. Retail
Ventures and SSC are engaged in the same or similar activities
or lines of business as we are and have interests in the same
areas of corporate opportunities. Summarized below are
provisions in our amended articles of incorporation that govern
conflicts, corporate opportunities and related party
transactions.
Conflicts/Competition. Retail Ventures and SSC have the
right to engage in the same businesses as we do, to do business
with our suppliers and customers and to employ any of our
officers or employees.
Corporate Opportunities. In the event that Retail
Ventures, SSC or any director or officer of either of them who
is also one of our directors or officers learns about a
potential transaction or business opportunity which we are
financially able to undertake, which is in our line of business,
which is of practical advantage to us and in which we have an
interest or a reasonable expectancy, but which may also be
appropriate for Retail Ventures or SSC, our amended articles of
incorporation provide:
|
|
|
|
|
If Retail Ventures or SSC learns about a corporate opportunity,
it does not have to tell us about it and it is not a breach of
any fiduciary duty for it to pursue such corporate opportunity
for itself or to direct it elsewhere. |
|
|
|
If one of our directors or officers who is also a director or
officer of Retail Ventures or SSC learns about a corporate
opportunity, he or she shall not be liable to us or to our
shareholders if Retail Ventures or SSC pursues the corporate
opportunity for itself, directs it elsewhere or does not
communicate information about the opportunity to us, if such
director or officer acts in a manner consistent with the
following policy: |
|
|
|
|
|
If the corporate opportunity is offered to one of our officers
who is also a director but not an officer of Retail Ventures or
SSC, the corporate opportunity belongs to us unless it was
expressly offered to the officer in writing solely in his or her
capacity as a director of Retail Ventures or SSC, in which case
it belongs to Retail Ventures or SSC, as the case may be. |
|
|
|
If the corporate opportunity is offered to one of our directors
who is not an officer of DSW, and who is also a director or
officer of Retail Ventures or SSC, the corporate opportunity
belongs to us only if it was expressly offered to the director
in writing solely in his or her capacity as our director. |
84
|
|
|
|
|
If the corporate opportunity is offered to one of our officers,
whether or not such person is also a director, who is also an
officer of Retail Ventures or SSC, it belongs to us only if it
is expressly offered to the officer in writing solely in his or
her capacity as our officer or director. |
Related Party Transactions. We may, from time to time,
enter into contracts or otherwise transact business with Retail
Ventures, SSC, our directors, directors of Retail Ventures or
SSC or organizations in which any of such directors has a
financial interest. Such contracts and transactions are
permitted if:
|
|
|
|
|
the relationship or interest is disclosed or is known to the
board of directors or the committee approving the contract or
transaction, and the board of directors or committee, in good
faith reasonably justified by the facts, authorizes the contract
or transaction by the affirmative vote of a majority of the
directors who are not interested in the contract or transaction; |
|
|
|
the relationship or interest is disclosed or is known to the
shareholders, and the shareholders approve the contract or
transaction by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority
of the voting power of the corporation held by persons not
interested in the contract or transaction; or |
|
|
|
the contract or transaction is fair at the time it is authorized
or approved by the board of directors, a committee of the board
of directors, or the shareholders. |
Loans to Management
In June 2001, we loaned Edwin J. Kozlowski, who was then serving
as our Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer,
$412,758.00. In May 2003, Mr. Kozlowski repaid the balance
of the loan. Interest had accrued at the prime rate set from
time to time by National City Bank, Columbus, Ohio.
Mr. Kozlowski entered into an employment agreement with
Retail Ventures, effective May 1, 2001, to serve as its
Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer for a term
ending April 30, 2004. Under the terms of the agreement, in
July 2001, Retail Ventures loaned Mr. Kozlowski $80,000 to
cover expenses related to personal benefits. This loan was being
forgiven at the rate of 10% for each 12 consecutive month period
Mr. Kozlowski remained employed after the date the loan was
made. The largest amount of the loan outstanding in fiscal 2004
was $68,329. On November 3, 2004, the board of directors
voted to terminate Mr. Kozlowskis employment. In
April 2005, Mr. Kozlowski repaid the loan in full.
85
PRINCIPAL SHAREHOLDERS
|
|
|
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners |
The following table sets forth information regarding the
beneficial ownership of our Class A and Class B Common
Shares as of May 1, 2006 by each person or entity who is
known by us to beneficially own 5% or more of our outstanding
Common Shares. For information regarding Retail Ventures
beneficial ownership following the consummation of the PIES
offering, see The Selling Shareholder.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of | |
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares | |
|
Shares Beneficially | |
|
Percentage of | |
|
|
Beneficially Owned | |
|
Owned | |
|
Combined Voting | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
Power of All Classes | |
Name and Beneficial Owner |
|
Class A | |
|
Class B | |
|
Class A | |
|
Class B | |
|
of Common Stock | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Retail Ventures, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,702,667 |
(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
93.2 |
% |
3241 Westerville Road
Columbus, Ohio 43224 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Schottenstein Stores Corporation
|
|
|
2,302,599 |
(2)(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.0 |
% |
1800 Moler Road
Columbus, Ohio 43207 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jay L. Schottenstein
|
|
|
2,652,699 |
(2)(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.1 |
% |
1800 Moler Road
Columbus, Ohio 43207 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stephen Feinberg
|
|
|
1,118,389 |
(2)(4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5 |
% |
c/o Cerberus Partners L.P.
299 Park Avenue
New York, New York 10171 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Baron Capital Management, Inc.
|
|
|
3,197,600 |
(5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
19.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.3 |
% |
767 Fifth Avenue
New York, New York 10153 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wellington Management Company, LLP
|
|
|
1,913,570 |
(6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.8 |
% |
75 State Street
Boston, Massachusetts 02109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wells Fargo & Company
|
|
|
1,349,420 |
(7) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.6 |
% |
420 Montgomery Street
San Francisco, California 94104 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Delaware Management Holdings
|
|
|
1,170,592 |
(8) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5 |
% |
2005 Market Street |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arbor Capital Management, LLC
|
|
|
818,200 |
(9) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
% |
One Financial Plaza
120 South Sixth Street
Suite 100
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Class B Common Shares of DSW held by Retail Ventures are
exchangeable into a like number of Class A Common Shares of
DSW. Common Shares of DSW held by Retail Ventures are currently
subject to a lien securing Retail Ventures obligations
under the non-convertible loan facility provided by Cerberus and
SSC to Value City and a lien in favor of Value City. These liens
will be released upon the consummation of the offering of the
PIES by Retail Ventures. However, Retail Ventures will pledge
sufficient DSW Common Shares to the collateral agent for the
PIES to enable Retail Ventures to satisfy its obligations to
deliver Class A Common Shares upon exchange of the PIES,
and sufficient DSW Common Shares will continue to be subject to
liens and/or contractual obligations to enable Retail Ventures
to satisfy its obligations to the warrantholders to deliver
Class A Common Shares upon exercise of the warrants. |
|
(2) |
Each of Cerberus and SSC has the right to acquire Class A
Common Shares of DSW from Retail Ventures pursuant to certain
warrant agreements. As described in footnote 4 below,
Stephen Feinberg exercises sole voting and investment authority
over all of our securities owned by Cerberus, directly or
indirectly. |
86
|
|
(3) |
As of April 29, 2006, Mr. Schottenstein was the
beneficial owner of approximately 78.4% of the outstanding
common shares of SSC. As described in footnote 2 above, SSC
has the right to acquire 2,302,599 Class A Common Shares of
DSW (subject to adjustment) from Retail Ventures pursuant to
certain warrant agreements. Mr. Schottenstein is also the
sole beneficial owner of 144,000 Retail Ventures common shares
and holds 52,500 Retail Ventures common shares through Glosser
Brothers Acquisition, Inc., or GBA, of which
Mr. Schottenstein is Chairman of the Board, President, a
director and a trustee or co-trustee of family trusts that own
100% of the stock of GBA. Mr. Schottenstein has voting and
investment power as co-trustee of a family trust that owns
30,000 Retail Ventures common shares, and is one of five
trustees of a foundation that owns 67,944 Retail Ventures common
shares. Mr. Schottenstein also held options exercisable for
50,000 Retail Ventures common shares. As of April 29, 2006,
SSC owned approximately 42.8% of the outstanding shares and
beneficially owned approximately 53.6% (assumes issuance of
(i) 8,333,333 Retail Ventures Common Shares issuable upon
the exercise of convertible warrants,
(ii) 1,594,377 shares of Retail Ventures Common Shares
issuable upon the exercise of term loan warrants, and
(iii) 479,792 Retail Ventures Common Shares issuable
pursuant to the anti-dilution provisions of the term loan
warrants) of the outstanding shares of Retail Ventures. These
warrants are exerciseable at the option of the holder for RVI
common shares or for DSW Class A Common Shares held by RVI,
or a combination thereof. |
|
(4) |
Stephen Feinberg exercises sole voting and investment authority
over all of our securities owned by Cerberus, directly or
indirectly. Thus, pursuant to
Rule 13d-3 under
the Exchange Act, Mr. Feinberg is deemed to beneficially
own 1,118,389 of our Class A Common Shares issuable to
Cerberus upon the exercise of its warrants exclusively for DSW
Common Shares. Under the terms of the warrants, Cerberus may not
exercise the warrants, to the extent such exercise would cause
Cerberus, together with its affiliates, to beneficially own a
number of Class A Common Shares which would exceed 9.99% of
our then outstanding Common Shares following such exercise,
excluding for purposes of such determination Class A Common
Shares issuable upon exercise of the additional warrants which
have not been exercised. |
|
(5) |
Baron Capital Group, Inc., or BCG, is the parent company of
BAMCO, Inc., or BAMCO, and Baron Capital Management, Inc., or
BCM. BAMCO and BCM are investment advisors registered under
Section 203 of the Investment Advisors Act of 1940. BAMCO
beneficially owns 2,960,500 Class A Common Shares, and BCM
beneficially owns 237,100 Class A Common Shares. Baron
Small Growth Fund, or BCS, and Baron Growth Fund, or BGF, are
investment companies registered under Section 8 of the
Investment Company Act and are advisory clients of BAMCO and own
1,500,000 and 1,350,000 Class A Common Shares,
respectively. Ronald Baron owns a controlling interest in BCG.
BCG and Ronald Baron disclaim beneficial ownership of shares
held by their controlled entities (or the investment advisory
clients thereof to the extent such shares are held by persons
other than BCG and Ronald Baron. BAMCO and BCM disclaim
beneficial ownership of shares held by their investment advisory
clients to the extent such shares are held by persons other than
BAMCO, BCM and their affiliates. Based on information contained
in a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 14,
2006. |
|
(6) |
Wellington Management is an investment advisor and may be deemed
to beneficially own 1,913,570 Class A Common Shares on
behalf of its clients. Wellington Management reported it had
shared voting power over 1,625,260 Class A Common Shares
and shared dispositive power over 1,895,970 Class A Common
Shares. Based on information contained in a Schedule 13G
filed with the SEC on January 10, 2006. |
|
(7) |
Wells Fargo & Company reported it had sole voting power
over 1,257,200 Class A Common Shares, sole dispositive
power over 1,274,980 Class A Common Shares, and shared
dispositive power over 74,440 Class A Common Shares. Based
on information contained in a Schedule 13G filed with the
SEC on February 15, 2006. |
|
(8) |
Delaware Management Holdings reported it had sole voting power
over 1,161,428 Class A Common Shares, shared voting power
over 369 Class A Common Shares, and sole dispositive power
over 1,170,592 Class A Common Shares. Based on information
contained in a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on
February 9, 2006. |
|
(9) |
Arbor Capital Management, LLC is an investment adviser
registered under Section 203 of the Investment Advisers Act
of 1940. Mr. Leggott is CEO of Arbor Capital Management,
LLC and beneficially owns a controlling percentage of its
outstanding voting securities. Mr. Leggott could be deemed
to have voting and/or investment power with respect to the
shares beneficially owned by Arbor Capital Management, LLC.
Arbor Capital Management, LLC report it had sole voting and sole
dispositive power over 818,200 Class A Common Shares. Based
on information contained in a Schedule 13G filed with the
SEC on February 3, 2006. |
The information with respect to beneficial ownership is based
upon information furnished by the shareholder or information
contained in filings made with the SEC.
87
Security Ownership of Management
The following table sets forth, as of May 1, 2006,
information with respect to our Class A Common Shares owned
beneficially by each director individually, by the executive
officers named in the Summary Compensation Table and by all
directors and executive officers as a group:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of | |
|
Percentage of | |
|
|
Number of Shares | |
|
Shares Beneficially | |
|
Combined Voting | |
|
|
Beneficially Owned(1) | |
|
Owned(2) | |
|
Power of All | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
Classes of | |
Name and Beneficial Owner |
|
Class A | |
|
Class B | |
|
Class A | |
|
Class B | |
|
Common Stock | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Deborah Ferrée
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Carolee Friedlander
|
|
|
6,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Peter Z. Horvath
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Philip B. Miller
|
|
|
6,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Douglas J. Probst
|
|
|
18,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
James D. Robbins
|
|
|
4,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Jay L.
Schottenstein(3)
|
|
|
2,652,699 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.1 |
% |
Harvey L. Sonnenberg
|
|
|
5,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Allan J. Tanenbaum
|
|
|
6,089 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Derek Ungless
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Heywood Wilansky
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
All directors and executive officers as a group (12 persons)
|
|
|
2,823,688 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
* |
Represents less than 1% of outstanding common shares, net of
treasury shares. |
|
|
(1) |
Except as otherwise noted, the persons named in this table have
sole power to vote and dispose of the shares listed. |
|
|
|
Includes the following number of Class A Common Shares as
to which the named person has the right to acquire beneficial
ownership upon the exercise of stock options and the amount of
restricted shares that could be issued within 60 days of
May 1, 2006: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Options Exercisable | |
|
Restricted Shares that Could | |
|
|
Within 60 days of May 1, | |
|
be Issued Within 60 days of | |
Beneficial Owner |
|
2006 | |
|
May 1, 2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Deborah Ferrée
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Carolee Friedlander
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,100 |
|
Peter Z. Horvath
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Philip B. Miller
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,100 |
|
Douglas J. Probst
|
|
|
14,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
James D. Robbins
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,100 |
|
Harvey L. Sonnenberg
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,100 |
|
Allan J. Tanenbaum
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,089 |
|
Derek Ungless
|
|
|
8,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
All directors and executive officers as a group
|
|
|
88,000 |
|
|
|
17,489 |
|
|
|
(2) |
The percent is based upon 16,181,075 Class A Common Shares
and 27,702,667 Class B Common Shares outstanding, plus the
number of shares a person has the right to acquire within
60 days of May 1, 2006. |
|
(3) |
Includes 350,000 Class A Common Shares held by family
trusts and 2,302,599 Class A Common Shares that SSC has the
right to acquire from Retail Ventures pursuant to certain
warrant agreements. As of May 1, 2006,
Mr. Schottenstein was the beneficial owner of approximately
78.4% of the outstanding common shares of SSC. |
The information with respect to beneficial ownership is based
upon information furnished by each director, director nominee or
executive officer, or information contained in filings made with
the SEC.
88
DESCRIPTION OF INDEBTEDNESS
$150 Million Secured Revolving Credit Facility.
Simultaneously with the amendment and restatement of the Value
City revolving credit facility described below, we entered into
a new $150 million secured revolving credit facility with a
term of five years. Under this facility, we and our subsidiary,
DSWSW, are named as co-borrowers. This facility is subject to a
borrowing base restriction and provides for borrowing at
variable interest rates based on LIBOR, the prime rate and the
Federal Funds effective rate, plus a margin. Our obligations
under the secured revolving credit facility are secured by a
lien on substantially all of our and our subsidiarys
personal property and a pledge of our shares of DSWSW. In
addition, our secured revolving credit facility contains usual
and customary restrictive covenants relating to our management
and the operation of our business. These covenants restrict,
among other things, our ability to grant liens on our assets,
incur additional indebtedness, open or close stores, pay cash
dividends and redeem our stock, enter into transactions with
affiliates and merge or consolidate with another entity. In
addition, if at any time we utilize over 90% of our borrowing
capacity under this facility, we must comply with a fixed charge
coverage ratio test set forth in the facility documents. At
April 29, 2006 and January 28, 2006,
$141.0 million and $136.4 million was available under
the $150 million secured revolving credit facility and no
direct borrowings were outstanding. At April 29, 2006 and
January 28, 2006, $9.0 million and $13.6 million
in letters of credit were issued and outstanding.
Upon completion of our initial public offering in July 2005,
Retail Ventures amended or amended and restated the existing
credit facilities and other debt obligations of Value City and
its other affiliates, including certain facilities under which
DSW had rights and obligations as a co-borrower and
co-guarantor. We are no longer a party to any of these
agreements.
The Value City Revolving Credit Facility. Prior to
completion of our initial public offering in July 2005, we were
party to a Loan and Security Agreement, as amended, entered into
with National City, as administrative agent, and the other
parties named therein, originally entered into in June 2002.
Upon the completion of our initial public offering, this
revolving credit agreement was amended and restated and we were
released from our obligations as a party thereto.
The Value City Term Loan Facility. Prior to
completion of our initial public offering in July 2005, we were
party to a Financing Agreement, as amended, among Cerberus, as
agent and lender, and SSC as lender, and the other parties named
as co-borrowers therein, originally entered into in June 2002.
Upon the completion of our initial public offering, the
indebtedness with respect to this term loan was repaid in full,
this term loan agreement was terminated and we were released
from our obligations as a party thereto.
Under the terms of this term loan agreement, SSC and Cerberus
each provided us, Value City and the other Retail Ventures
affiliates named as co-borrowers with a separate
$50 million term loan comprised of two tranches with
initial three-year terms. In July 2004, the maturity dates of
these loans were extended until June 11, 2006. In
connection with the second tranche of these term loans, Retail
Ventures issued to each of Cerberus and SSC warrants to
purchase 1,477,396 common shares of Retail Ventures at a
purchase price of $4.50 per share, subject to adjustment.
In September 2002, Back Bay bought from each of Cerberus and SSC
a $1.5 million interest in each of the tranches of their
term loans for an aggregate $6.0 million interest, and Back
Bay received from each of Cerberus and SSC a corresponding
portion of the warrants to purchase Retail Ventures common
shares originally issued in connection with the second tranche
of their term loans. Effective November 23, 2005,
Millennium purchased from Back Bay term loan warrants to
purchase an aggregate of 177,288 of Retail Ventures common
shares, subject to adjustment. The term loans stated rate
of interest per annum through June 11, 2004 was 14% if paid
in cash and 15% if the co-borrowers elected a PIK, option.
During the first two years of the term loans, the co-borrowers
could elect to pay all interest in PIK. During the final two
years of the term loans, the stated rate of interest was 15.0%
if paid in cash or 15.5% if by PIK, and the PIK option was
limited to 50% of the interest due. For fiscal 2002 and fiscal
2003, the co-borrowers elected to pay interest in cash.
In connection with the amendment of this term loan agreement,
Retail Ventures amended the outstanding warrants to provide SSC,
Cerberus and Millennium the right, from time to time, in whole
or in part, to (i) acquire Retail Ventures common shares at
the then current conversion price (subject to the anti-dilution
89
provisions), (ii) acquire from Retail Ventures Class A
Common Shares of DSW at an exercise price of $19.00 per
share (subject to anti-dilution provisions) or
(iii) acquire a combination thereof. Assuming an exercise
price per share of $19.00, SSC and Cerberus would each receive
328,915 Class A Common Shares, and Millennium would receive
41,989 Class A Common Shares, if they exercised their
warrants in full exclusively for DSW Common Shares. The warrants
expire in June 2012. Although Retail Ventures has informed us
that it does not currently intend or plan to undertake a
spin-off of Common Shares to Retail Ventures shareholders,
in the event that Retail Ventures effects a spin-off of its DSW
Common Shares to its shareholders in the future, the holders of
outstanding unexercised warrants will receive the same number of
DSW Common Shares that they would have received had they
exercised their warrants in full for Retail Ventures common
shares immediately prior to the record date of the spin-off,
without regard to any limitations on exercise in the warrants.
Following the completion of any such spin-off, the warrants will
be exercisable solely for Retail Ventures common shares.
We have entered into an exchange agreement with Retail Ventures
whereby, upon the request of Retail Ventures, we will be
required to exchange some or all of the Class B Common
Shares of DSW held by Retail Ventures for Class A Common
Shares.
The Value City Senior Subordinated Convertible
Loan Facility. Prior to completion of our initial
public offering in July 2005, we were a co-guarantor under the
Amended and Restated Senior Subordinated Convertible Loan
Agreement, entered into by Value City, as borrower, Cerberus, as
agent and lender, SSC, as lender, and DSW and the other parties
named as guarantors, originally entered into in June 2002. Upon
the completion of our initial public offering, this convertible
loan agreement was amended and restated and we are no longer a
party thereto.
In connection with the amendment and restatement of this
convertible loan agreement, Retail Ventures repaid
$25 million of this facility and the convertible loan was
converted into a non-convertible loan. The capital stock of DSW
held by Retail Ventures currently secures the non-convertible
loan. This lien will be released upon completion of the PIES
offering by Retail Ventures. However, Retail Ventures will
pledge sufficient DSW Common Shares to the collateral agent for
the PIES to enable Retail Ventures to satisfy its obligations to
deliver Class A Common Shares upon exchange of the PIES,
and sufficient DSW Common Shares will continue to be subject to
liens and/or contractual obligations to enable Retail Ventures
to satisfy its obligations to the warrantholders to deliver
Class A Common Shares upon exercise of the warrants. In
connection with the amendment and restatement of the convertible
loan agreement in July 2005, Retail Ventures agreed to issue to
SSC and Cerberus convertible warrants which are exercisable from
time to time until the later of June 11, 2007 and the
repayment in full of Value Citys obligations under the
amended and restated loan agreement. Under the convertible
warrants, SSC and Cerberus will have the right, from time to
time, in whole or in part, to (i) acquire Retail Ventures
common shares at the conversion price referred to in the
convertible loan (subject to anti-dilution provisions),
(ii) acquire from Retail Ventures Class A Common
Shares of DSW at an exercise price of $19.00 per share
(subject to anti-dilution provisions) or (iii) acquire a
combination thereof. Although Retail Ventures has informed us
that it does not currently intend or plan to undertake a
spin-off of Common Shares to Retail Ventures shareholders,
in the event that Retail Ventures effects a spin-off of its DSW
Common Shares to its shareholders in the future, the holders of
outstanding unexercised warrants will receive the same number of
DSW Common Shares that they would have received had they
exercised their warrants in full for Retail Ventures common
shares immediately prior to the record date of the spin-off,
without regard to any limitation on exercise contained in the
warrants. Following the completion of any such spin-off, the
warrants will be exercisable solely for Retail Ventures common
shares.
On March 13, 2006, Retail Ventures issued 2,000,000 of its
common shares to Cerberus in connection with the partial
exercise of Cerberus outstanding convertible warrants. The
common shares were issued at an exercise price of $4.50 per
share for an aggregate cash purchase price of $9,000,000. On
April 26, 2006, Retail Ventures issued an additional
3,000,000 of its common shares to Cerberus in connection with
the partial exercise of Cerberus outstanding convertible
warrants. These common shares were issued at an exercise price
of $4.50 per share for an aggregate cash purchase price of
$13,500,000. On July 2006, Retail Ventures issued an
additional 2,000,000 of its common shares to Cerberus in
connection with the partial exercise of Cerberus
outstanding convertible warrants. These common shares were
issued at an exercise price
90
of $4.50 per share for an aggregate cash purchase price of
$9,000,000, Following this exercise, Cerberus remaining
convertible warrants entitle Cerberus to acquire 315,790
Class A Common Shares of DSW (subject to anti-dilution
provisions) if they exercise their remaining warrants
exclusively for DSW Common Shares. As of April 29, 2006,
SSC would receive 1,973,684 Class A Common Shares (subject
to anti-dilution provisions) if they exercised these warrants
exclusively for DSW Common Shares.
The $165.0 Million Intercompany Note. In March 2005,
we incurred intercompany indebtedness to fund a
$165.0 million dividend to Retail Ventures. We repaid this
note in full in July 2005.
The $25.0 Million Intercompany Note. In May 2005, we
incurred intercompany indebtedness to fund a $25.0 million
dividend to Retail Ventures. We repaid this note in full in July
2005.
Cross-Corporate Guarantees. We previously entered into
cross-corporate guarantees with various financing institutions
pursuant to which we, Retail Ventures, Filenes Basement
and Value City, jointly and severally, guaranteed payment
obligations owed to these entities under factoring arrangements
they have entered into with vendors who may provide merchandise
to some or all of Retail Ventures subsidiaries. In July
2005, we terminated these cross-corporate guarantees and no
amounts remain guaranteed by us.
91
DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STOCK
Our amended articles of incorporation provide that we may issue
up to 170,000,000 Class A Common Shares without par value,
100,000,000 Class B Common Shares and
100,000,000 preferred shares, without par value. As of
April 29, 2006, we had 16,198,528 Class A Common
Shares outstanding (including 17,453 shares of director
stock units issuable pursuant to the terms of DSWs equity
incentive plan), 27,702,667 Class B Common Shares
outstanding, and no preferred shares outstanding.
The following description of our capital stock does not purport
to be complete and is subject to, and is qualified by, our
amended articles of incorporation and amended and restated code
of regulations, which we have previously filed with the SEC.
Common Shares
Prior to our initial public offering in July 2005, our articles
of incorporation were amended to change the common shares of DSW
into 27,702,667 Class B Common Shares. Before giving effect
to our initial public offering, the 27,702,667 outstanding
Class B Common Shares were owned by Retail Ventures, as our
direct parent, and no Class A Common Shares were
outstanding.
The holders of Class A Common Shares and Class B
Common Shares generally have identical rights except that
holders of Class A Common Shares are entitled to one vote
per share on all matters to be voted on by the shareholders,
while holders of Class B Common Shares are entitled to
eight votes per share on all matters to be voted on by the
shareholders, voting together with the holders of the
Class A Common Shares as a single class. The holders of
Common Shares are not entitled to cumulative voting rights.
Generally, all matters to be voted on by shareholders must be
approved by a majority (or, in the case of election of
directors, by a plurality) of the votes entitled to be cast by
all Class A Common Shares and Class B Common Shares
present in person or represented by proxy, voting together as a
single class, subject to any voting rights granted to holders of
any preferred shares.
Holders of Common Shares have no pre-emptive rights, and the
Common Shares are not subject to further calls or assessment by
us. There are no redemption or sinking fund provisions
applicable to the Common Shares.
Holders of Class A Common Shares and Class B Common
Shares will share in an equal amount per share in any dividend
declared by the board of directors, subject to any preferential
rights of any outstanding preferred shares. Dividends consisting
of Class A Common Shares and Class B Common Shares may
be paid only as follows: (i) dividends of Class A
Common Shares may be paid only to holders of Class A Common
Shares and dividends of Class B Common Shares may be paid
only to holders of Class B Common Shares and
(ii) shares shall be paid proportionately with respect to
each outstanding Class A Common Share and Class B
Common Share.
Upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the affairs of
DSW, our creditors and any holders of preferred shares will be
paid before any distribution to holders of Common Shares. The
holders of Common Shares would be entitled to receive a pro rata
distribution of any excess amount. All outstanding Common Shares
are fully paid and nonassessable.
The rights, preferences and privileges of holders of Common
Shares are subject to, and may be adversely affected by, the
rights of holders of any series of preferred shares which our
board of directors may designate and issue in the future.
Our Class A Common Shares are listed on the NYSE under the
symbol DSW.
We entered into an exchange agreement with Retail Ventures that
became effective upon the consummation of our initial public
offering in July 2005. In the event that Retail Ventures desires
to exchange all or a portion of the Class B Common Shares
held by it for Class A Common Shares, we agreed to issue to
Retail Ventures an equal number of duly authorized, validly
issued, fully paid and nonassessable Class A Common Shares
for the Class B Common Shares of DSW to be exchanged by
Retail Ventures. Retail Ventures may make one or more requests
for such exchange, covering all or a part of the Class B
Common Shares that it holds.
92
Preferred Shares
The board may fix by resolution the designations, preferences
and relative, participating, optional or other rights and the
qualifications, limitations or restrictions of our preferred
shares, including the number of shares in any series,
liquidation preferences, dividend rights, voting rights,
conversion rights and redemption provisions. Terms selected
could decrease the amount of earnings and assets available for
distribution to holders of our Common Shares or adversely affect
the rights and power, including voting rights, of the holders of
our Common Shares without any further vote or action by the
shareholders. Any series of preferred shares issued by the board
could have priority over the Common Shares in terms of dividend
or liquidation rights or both. The issuance of preferred shares,
or the issuance of rights to purchase preferred shares, could
have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change of
control of DSW or an unsolicited acquisition proposal or of
making the removal of management more difficult. Additionally,
the issuance of preferred shares may have the effect of
decreasing the market price of our Common Shares. There are
currently no outstanding preferred shares. While we have no
present intent to issue any preferred shares, any issuance could
make it more difficult for a third party to acquire a majority
of our outstanding voting shares.
Provisions of Our Amended Articles of Incorporation Governing
Corporate Opportunities and Related Party Transactions
Retail Ventures is a substantial shareholder of DSW and SSC is a
substantial shareholder of Retail Ventures. Retail Ventures and
SSC are engaged in the same or similar activities or lines of
business as we are and have interests in the same areas of
corporate opportunities. See Certain Relationships and
Related Party Transactions Provisions of our Amended
Articles of Incorporation Governing Corporate Opportunities and
Related Party Transactions, for descriptions of the
provisions in our amended articles of incorporation that govern
conflicts, corporate opportunities and related party
transactions. These provisions are substantially similar to
those that previously applied to us through provisions of Retail
Ventures amended articles of incorporation.
Anti-Takeover Effects of Certain Provisions of our Amended
Articles of Incorporation, our Amended and Restated Code of
Regulations and Ohio Law.
Provisions of our amended articles of incorporation and amended
and restated code of regulations and of the Ohio General
Corporation Law summarized below may be deemed to have an
anti-takeover effect and may delay, defer or prevent a tender
offer or takeover attempt that a shareholder might consider in
its best interest, including those attempts that might result in
a premium over the market price for the shares held by
shareholders.
No Cumulative Voting. Where cumulative voting is
permitted, each share is entitled to as many votes as there are
directors to be elected and each shareholder may cast all of his
or her votes for a single candidate or distribute such votes
among two or more candidates. Cumulative voting makes it easier
for a minority shareholder to elect a director. Our amended
articles of incorporation expressly deny shareholders the right
to cumulative voting.
Supermajority Vote to Remove Directors. Our amended and
restated code of regulations provides that the shareholders may
remove a director only by the vote of the holders of not less
than three-fourths of the voting power of DSW entitling them to
elect directors in place of those to be removed. This provision,
when coupled with the voting power of the Class B Common
Shares held by Retail Ventures (93.2% as of April 29,
2006), will preclude even a majority shareholder from removing
incumbent directors and simultaneously gaining control of the
board of directors by filling the vacancies.
Classified Board. Our amended and restated code of
regulations provides for the board of directors to be divided
into two classes of directors serving staggered two-year terms
when the authorized number of directors is six or more, but less
than nine. Because the amended and restated code of regulations
authorizes seven directors, approximately one-half of the board
of directors will be elected each year. This provision,
93
when coupled with the vote required to remove directors, can
preclude even a majority shareholder from gaining control of the
board of directors in one election.
Authorized But Unissued Shares. Our authorized but
unissued Common Shares and preferred shares are available for
future issuance without shareholder approval under Ohio law.
These additional shares may be utilized for a variety of
corporate purposes, including future public offerings to raise
additional capital, corporate acquisitions and employee benefit
plans. Our amended articles of incorporation authorize our board
of directors to issue up to 100,000,000 preferred shares and to
determine the powers, preferences, privileges, rights, including
voting rights, qualifications, limitations and restrictions on
those shares, without any further vote or action by the
shareholders. The existence of authorized but unissued Common
Shares and preferred shares could have the effect of delaying,
deterring or preventing an attempt to obtain control of DSW by
means of a proxy contest, tender offer, merger or otherwise.
Special Meetings of Shareholders. Our amended and
restated code of regulations provides that special meetings of
our shareholders may be called only by:
|
|
|
|
|
the chairman of the board, the president, or in case of the
presidents death or disability, the vice president
authorized to exercise the authority of the president; |
|
|
|
the directors by action at a meeting, or a majority of the
incumbent directors acting without a meeting; or |
|
|
|
the holders of at least 50% of all shares outstanding and
entitled to vote thereat. |
Actions by Written Consent. Section 1701.54 of the
Ohio General Corporation Law requires that an action by written
consent of the shareholders in lieu of a meeting be unanimous,
except that under Section 1701.11 of the Ohio General
Corporation Law, a corporations code of regulations may be
amended by an action by written consent of holders of two-thirds
of the voting power of the corporation or, if the articles of
incorporation or code of regulations otherwise provide, such
greater or lesser amount, but not less than a majority. Our
amended and restated code of regulations provides that the code
of regulations may be amended by an action by written consent of
holders of a majority of our total voting power. Based on its
current ownership, Retail Ventures has enough shares to amend
our amended and restated code of regulations. This provision
coupled with Retail Ventures ownership may have the effect
of delaying, deferring or preventing a tender offer or takeover
attempt that a shareholder might consider in its best interest.
Advance Notice Requirements for Shareholder Proposals and
Director Nominations. Our amended and restated code of
regulations provides that shareholders seeking to nominate
candidates for election as directors at an annual or special
meeting of shareholders must provide timely notice to us in
writing. To be timely, a shareholders notice must be
received at our principal executive offices not less than
60 days nor more than 90 days prior to the first
anniversary of the date of the previous years annual
meeting (or, if the date of the annual meeting is changed by
more than 30 days from the anniversary date of the
preceding years annual meeting, or in the case of a
special meeting, within seven days after we mail the notice of
the date of the meeting or otherwise publicly disclose the date
of the meeting). The amended and restated code of regulations
also prescribes the proper written form for a shareholders
notice. These provisions may preclude shareholders from making
nominations for directors at an annual or special meeting.
We Have Opted Out of the Ohio Control Share Acquisition
Statute. We have opted out of the application of
Section 1701.831 of the Ohio Revised Code, known as the
Ohio Control Share Acquisition Statute. This statute
provides that, unless a corporations articles of
incorporation or code of regulations provide that such section
does not apply, notice and information filings, and special
shareholder meeting and voting procedures, must occur prior to
any persons acquisition of an issuers shares that
would entitle the acquirer to exercise or direct the voting
power of the issuer in the election of directors within any of
the following ranges:
|
|
|
|
|
one-fifth or more but less than one-third of the voting power; |
|
|
|
one-third or more but less than a majority of the voting
power; and |
|
|
|
a majority or more of the voting power. |
94
We Have Opted Out of the Merger Moratorium Statute. We
have opted out of the application of Chapter 1704 of the
Ohio Revised Code, known as the Merger Moratorium
Statute. This statute prohibits certain transactions if
they involve both the issuer and either a person who became the
beneficial owner of 10% or more of the issuers shares
without the prior approval of its board of directors or anyone
affiliated or associated with such person, unless a
corporations articles of incorporation or code of
regulations provide that such statute does not apply. The
prohibition imposed by Chapter 1704 is absolute for at
least three years and continues indefinitely thereafter unless
the transaction is approved by the holders of at least
two-thirds of the voting power of the issuer or satisfies
statutory conditions relating to the fairness of the
consideration to be received by the shareholders.
Transfer Agent and Registrar
The transfer agent and registrar for our Class A Common
Shares is National City Bank. The telephone number of National
City Bank is
1-800-622-6757.
95
MATERIAL U.S. FEDERAL INCOME AND ESTATE TAX
CONSEQUENCES
The following is a general discussion of the anticipated
material U.S. federal income and estate tax consequences
relating to the ownership and disposition of our Class A
Common Shares by non-United States holders, as defined below,
who may receive our Class A Common Shares upon exchange of
the PIES and hold such Class A Common Shares as capital
assets. This discussion is based on currently existing
provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or
the Code, existing and proposed Treasury regulations promulgated
thereunder, and administrative and judicial interpretation
thereof, all as in effect or proposed on the date hereof and all
of which are subject to change, possibly with retroactive effect
or different interpretations. This discussion does not address
all the tax consequences that may be relevant to specific
holders in light of their particular circumstances or to holders
subject to special treatment under U.S. federal income or
estate tax laws (such as financial institutions, insurance
companies, tax-exempt organizations, retirement plans,
partnerships and their partners, other pass-through entities and
their members, dealers in securities, brokers,
U.S. expatriates, or persons who have acquired our
Class A Common Shares as part of a straddle, hedge,
conversion transaction or other integrated investment). This
discussion does not address the U.S. state and local or
non-U.S. tax
consequences relating to the ownership and disposition of our
Class A Common Shares. You are urged to consult your own
tax advisor regarding the U.S. federal tax consequences of
owning and disposing of our Class A Common Shares, as well
as the applicability and effect of any state, local or foreign
tax laws.
As used in this discussion, the term non-United States
holder refers to a beneficial owner of our Class A
Common Shares that for U.S. federal income tax purposes is
not:
(i) an individual who is a citizen or resident of the
United States;
(ii) a corporation (or other entity taxable as a
corporation) created or organized in or under the laws of the
United States or any state or political subdivision thereof or
therein, including the District of Columbia;
(iii) an estate the income of which is subject to
U.S. federal income tax regardless of source
thereof; or
(iv) a trust (a) with respect to which a court within
the United States is able to exercise primary supervision over
its administration and one or more United States persons have
the authority to control all its substantial decisions, or
(b) that has in effect a valid election under applicable
U.S. Treasury Regulations to be treated as a United States
person.
An individual may, in many cases, be treated as a resident of
the United States, rather than a nonresident, among other ways,
by virtue of being present in the United States on at least
31 days in that calendar year and for an aggregate of at
least 183 days during the three-year period ending in that
calendar year (counting for such purposes all the days present
in the current year, one-third of the days present in the
immediately preceding year and one-sixth of the days present in
the second preceding year). Residents are subject to
U.S. federal income tax as if they were U.S. citizens.
If a partnership or other entity or arrangement treated as a
partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes holds
Class A Common Shares, the tax treatment of a partner will
generally depend upon the status of the partner and the
activities of the partnership. If you are a partner of a
partnership holding Class A Common Shares, we urge you to
consult your own tax advisor.
Dividends
We or a withholding agent will have to withhold
U.S. federal withholding tax from the gross amount of any
dividends paid to a non-United States holder at a rate of 30%,
unless (i) an applicable income tax treaty reduces such
tax, and a non-United States holder claiming the benefit of such
treaty provides to us or such agent proper Internal Revenue
Service, or IRS, documentation or (ii) the dividends are
effectively connected with a non-United States holders
conduct of a trade or business in the United States and the
non-United States holder provides to us or such agent proper IRS
documentation. In the latter case, such non-United States holder
generally will be subject to U.S. federal income tax with
respect to such dividends in the same manner as a
U.S. citizen or corporation, as applicable, unless
otherwise provided in an applicable income tax
96
treaty. Additionally, a non-United States holder that is a
corporation could be subject to a branch profits tax on
effectively connected dividend income at a rate of 30% (or at a
reduced rate under an applicable income tax treaty). If a
non-United States holder is eligible for a reduced rate of
U.S. federal withholding tax pursuant to an income tax
treaty, such non-United States holder may obtain a refund of any
excess amount withheld by filing an appropriate claim for refund
with the IRS.
Sale, Exchange or Other Disposition
Generally, a non-United States holder will not be subject to
U.S. federal income tax on gain realized upon the sale,
exchange or other disposition of our Class A Common Shares
unless (i) such non-United States holder is an individual
present in the United States for 183 days or more in the
taxable year of the sale, exchange or other disposition and
certain other conditions are met, (ii) the gain is
effectively connected with such non-United States holders
conduct of a trade or business in the United States and, where a
tax treaty provides, the gain is attributable to a
U.S. permanent establishment of such non-United States
holder, or (iii) we are or have been a U.S. real
property holding corporation for U.S. federal income
tax purposes at any time during the shorter of the five-year
period preceding such sale, exchange or other disposition or the
period that such non-United States holder held our Class A
Common Shares, or the Applicable Period.
We do not believe that we have been, are currently or are likely
to be a U.S. real property holding corporation for
U.S. federal income tax purposes. If we were to become a
U.S. real property holding corporation, so long as our
common shares are regularly traded on an established securities
market and continue to be traded, a non-United States holder
would be subject to U.S. federal income tax on any gain
from the sale, exchange or other disposition of Class A
Common Shares only if such non-United States holder actually or
constructively owned, during the Applicable Period, more than 5%
of our Class A Common Shares.
Special rules may apply to non-United States holders, such as
controlled foreign corporations, passive foreign investment
companies and corporations that accumulate earnings to avoid
federal income tax, that are subject to special treatment under
the Code. These entities should consult their own tax advisors
to determine the U.S. federal, state, local and other tax
consequences that may be relevant to them.
Federal Estate Tax
Common stock owned or treated as owned by an individual who is a
non-United States holder at the time of his or her death
generally will be included in the individuals gross estate
for U.S. federal estate tax purposes and may be subject to
U.S. federal estate tax unless an applicable estate tax
treaty provides otherwise.
Information Reporting and Backup Withholding Tax
Information reporting may apply to payments made to a non-United
States holder on or with respect to our Class A Common
Shares. Backup withholding tax (at the then-applicable rate) may
also apply to payments made to a non-United States holder on or
with respect to our Class A Common Shares, unless the
non-United States holder certifies as to its status as a
non-United States holder under penalties of perjury or otherwise
establishes an exemption, and certain other conditions are
satisfied. Backup withholding is not an additional tax. Any
amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules from a
payment to a non-United States holder will be allowed as a
refund or a credit against such non-United States holders
U.S. federal income tax liability, provided that the
required information is timely furnished to the IRS.
97
PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION
This prospectus relates to up
to of
our Class A Common Shares that Retail Ventures may deliver
in the event that Retail Ventures elects to settle the PIES that
it is offering by means of a separate prospectus by delivery of
our Class A Common Shares. Retail Ventures may acquire some
or all of these Class A Common Shares in exchange for
Class B Common Shares that it currently owns pursuant to
the exchange agreement. Under the terms of the PIES, Retail
Ventures will have an obligation to deliver on
September 15, 2011, which is the maturity date of the PIES,
a maximum
of of
our Class A Common Shares, subject to anti-dilution
provisions provided for in the indenture governing the PIES,
unless Retail Ventures elects to deliver cash in lieu thereof
pursuant to the PIES. We have been advised by Retail Ventures
that it may deliver the Class A Common Shares at an earlier
date if this delivery obligation is accelerated in connection
with certain events of default.
To the extent that the underwriter in the offering of the PIES
by Retail Ventures exercises its option to purchase additional
PIES in full, this prospectus will relate to up to an
additional Class A
Common Shares.
We have been advised by Retail Ventures that, on the maturity
date or any earlier date on which Retail Ventures shall be
obligated to deliver our Class A Common Shares in exchange
for the PIES (which we refer to as an exchange
date), it will deliver with respect to each $50 in
principal amount of PIES, a number of Class A Common Shares
equal to an exchange ratio calculated as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
If the applicable market value (as defined in the indenture
governing the PIES) of our Class A Common Shares is equal
to or greater than the threshold appreciation price of
$ ,
which is % above the initial price
of
$ ,
the exchange ratio will
be Class A
Common Shares. |
|
|
|
If the applicable market value of our Class A Common Shares
is less than the threshold appreciation price but greater than
the initial price, the exchange ratio will be equal to $50
divided by the applicable market value, which is
between and Class A
Common Shares. |
|
|
|
If the applicable market value of our Class A Common Shares
is less than or equal to the initial price, the exchange ratio
will
be Class A
Common Shares. |
Applicable market value, when used with respect to
our Class A Common Shares, is generally defined in the
indenture governing the PIES as (1) the average of the
volume weighted average prices per DSW Class A Common Share
during the 20 consecutive trading day period ending on the
third trading day immediately preceding the exchange date, with
respect to the maturity date of the PIES and (2) the
10 consecutive trading day period ending on the day
immediately preceding the acceleration date, with respect to an
acceleration date relating to the PIES.
We have been further advised by Retail Ventures that it will
initially pledge to the holders of the
PIES of
our Class B Common Shares held by Retail Ventures pursuant
to the terms of a collateral agreement between Retail Ventures
and HSBC Bank USA, National Association, as collateral agent.
This pledge will secure Retail Ventures obligations to
deliver our Class A Common Shares upon any exchange date
under the terms of the PIES. In connection with the offering of
the PIES and the pledge of the Class B Common Shares to
secure Retail Ventures obligations under the PIES, Retail
Ventures will deliver an exchange request to us, acknowledged by
us, pursuant the terms of an exchange agreement that we entered
into with Retail Ventures. Pursuant to this exchange request,
upon surrender of the Class B Common Shares pledged by
Retail Ventures and held by the collateral agent, accompanied by
a notice from the collateral agent in the form prescribed in
Retail Ventures exchange request, we will
(a) immediately issue the requisite number of Class A
Common Shares in exchange for an equal number of the
Class B Common Shares subject to the collateral agreement
and (b) deposit them in the collateral account.
Lock-up
Agreements
We are a party to the underwriting agreement entered into
between Retail Ventures and Lehman Brothers Inc., as underwriter
for the offering of the PIES by Retail Ventures. Pursuant to the
terms of that agreement,
98
we and each of our directors and executive officers, as well as
Retail Ventures and its directors and executive officers and
SSC, have agreed that, unless we receive the prior written
consent of Lehman Brothers Inc., as the underwriter for the
offering of the PIES, we and they will not directly or
indirectly offer, pledge, announce the intention to sell, sell,
contract to sell, sell an option or contract to purchase,
purchase any option or contract to sell, grant any option, right
or warrant to purchase, or otherwise transfer or dispose of any
of our Class A Common Shares or any securities which may be
converted into or exchanged for any of our Class A Common
Shares or enter into any swap or other agreement that transfers,
in whole or in part, any of the economic consequences of
ownership of any of our Class A Common Shares for a period
of 90 days from the date of this prospectus, other than
pursuant to our equity incentive plans. However, SSC may
transfer the warrants issued by Retail Ventures and held by it
as of the date of this prospectus without the prior written
consent of Lehman Brothers Inc. These warrants are exercisable
at the option of the holder into either Retail Ventures Common
Shares or into DSW Class A Common Shares held by Retail
Ventures. In addition, pursuant to the exchange agreement with
Retail Ventures, we may issue Class A Common Shares to
Retail Ventures in exchange for Class B Common Shares held
by Retailed Ventures and Retail Ventures may transfer such
Class A Common Shares upon exercise of warrants for
Class A Common Shares of DSW by SSC, Cerberus, Millennium
or their permitted transferees.
The 90-day restricted
period described in the preceding paragraph will be extended if:
|
|
|
|
|
during the last 17 days of the
90-day restricted
period we or Retail Ventures issue an earnings release or
announce material news or a material event relating to us
occurs; or |
|
|
|
prior to the expiration of the
90-day restricted
period, we or Retail Ventures announce that we will release
earnings results during the
16-day period beginning
on the last day of the
90-day period, |
in which case the restrictions described in the preceding
paragraph will continue to apply until the expiration of the
18-day period beginning
on the issuance of the earnings release or the announcement of
the material news or the occurrence of a material event, unless
such extension is waived in writing by Lehman Brothers Inc.
Price Stabilization and Short Positions
Lehman Brothers Inc., as underwriter for the offering of the
PIES, may engage in short sales and purchases to cover short
sales, stabilizing transactions or purchases for the purpose of
pegging, fixing or maintaining the price of the PIES and our
Class A Common Shares in accordance with Regulation M
under the Exchange Act:
|
|
|
|
|
A short sale position involves a sale by the underwriter for the
offering of the PIES in excess of the number of PIES the
underwriter is obligated to purchase in the offering, which
creates a short position. The short position may be either a
covered short position or a naked short position. In a covered
short position, the number of PIES involved in the sales made by
the underwriter is not greater than the number of PIES that it
may purchase with its option to purchase additional PIES. In a
naked short position, the number of PIES involved is greater
than the number of PIES that it may purchase with its option to
purchase additional PIES. The underwriter may close out any
short position by either exercising its option and/or purchasing
PIES in the open market. In determining the source of PIES to
close out the short position, the underwriter will consider,
among other things, the price of PIES available for purchase in
the open market as compared to the price at which it may
purchase PIES through its option. If the underwriter sells more
PIES than could be covered by its option, a naked short
position, the position can only be closed out by buying PIES in
the open market. A naked short position is more likely to be
created if the underwriter is concerned that there could be
downward pressure on the price of the PIES in the open market
after pricing that could adversely affect investors who purchase
in the offering. |
|
|
|
Stabilizing transactions permit bids to purchase the underlying
security so long as the stabilizing bids do not exceed a
specified maximum. These stabilizing transactions may have the
effect of raising or maintaining the market price of the PIES or
our Class A Common Shares or preventing or retarding a |
99
|
|
|
|
|
decline in the market price of the PIES or our Class A
Common Shares. As a result, the price of the PIES or of our
Class A Common Shares may be higher than the price that
might otherwise exist in the open market. These transactions may
be effected on the NYSE or otherwise, and, if commenced, may be
discontinued at any time. |
Neither we nor the underwriter make any representations or
prediction as to the direction or magnitude of any effect that
the transactions described above may have on the price of the
PIES or our Class A Common Shares. In addition, neither we
nor the underwriter make representations that Lehman Brothers
Inc. will engage in these stabilizing transactions or that any
transaction, once commenced, will not be discontinued without
notice.
Electronic Distributions
This prospectus and the accompanying prospectus relating to the
offering of the PIES in electronic format may be made available
on the Internet site or through other online services maintained
by the underwriter for the offering of the PIES or by its
affiliates. In these cases, prospective investors in the PIES
may view offering terms online and prospective investors in the
PIES may be allowed to place orders online. The underwriter for
the offering of the PIES may agree with Retail Ventures to
allocate a specific number of PIES for sale to online brokerage
account holders. Any such allocation for online distributions
will be made by the underwriter on the same basis as other
allocations.
Other than this prospectus and the accompanying prospectus
relating to the offering of the PIES in electronic format, the
information on any underwriter web site and any information
contained in any other web site maintained by the underwriter is
not a part of this prospectus, has not been approved and/or
endorsed by us or the underwriter in its capacity as underwriter
and should not be relied upon by investors.
Indemnification
Pursuant to the underwriting agreement with the underwriter for
the offering of the PIES, we have agreed to indemnify the
underwriter against certain liabilities, including liabilities
under the Securities Act of 1933 and liabilities arising from
breaches of certain representations and warranties made by us
contained in the underwriting agreement, and to contribute to
payments that the underwriter may be required to make for these
liabilities.
Other Relationships
From time to time, Lehman Brothers Inc. and its affiliates have
directly and indirectly provided investment and/or commercial
banking services to us and Retail Ventures, for which they have
received customary compensation and expense reimbursement,
including, but not limited to, Lehman Brothers Inc.s
provision in June 2005 of financial advisory services to Retail
Ventures in connection with the restructuring of Retail
Ventures existing indebtedness. Lehman Brothers Inc. also
acted as lead managing underwriter of the initial public
offering of our Class A Common Shares, which was completed
in July 2005.
Lehman Brothers Inc. and its affiliates may directly or
indirectly provide investment and/or commercial banking services
to us in the future, for which we expect to pay them customary
compensation and expense reimbursement.
Expenses
Retail Ventures will pay the expenses associated with its offer
of our Class A Common Shares, including listing fees, if
any, printing fees and legal and accounting expenses. Retail
Ventures has informed us that it expects the expenses associated
with the offering of the PIES and our Class A Common Shares
deliverable upon exchange of the PIES to be approximately
$2.4 million.
100
United Kingdom Legal Matters
This document is only being distributed to and is only directed
at (i) persons who are outside the United Kingdom or
(ii) to investment professionals falling within
Article 19(5) of the Financial Services and Markets Act
2000 (Financial Promotion) Order 2005 (the Order) or
(iii) high net worth entities, and other persons to whom it
may lawfully be communicated, falling within
Article 49(2)(a) to (e) of the Order (all such persons
together being referred to as relevant persons). The
PIES and our Class A Common Shares are only available to,
and any invitation, offer or agreement to subscribe, purchase or
otherwise acquire such PIES or our Class A Common Shares
will be engaged in only with, relevant persons. Any person who
is not a relevant person should not act or rely on this document
or any of its contents.
Lehman Brothers Inc. has represented and agreed that:
|
|
|
1. it has only communicated or caused to be communicated
and will only communicate or cause to be communicated an
invitation or inducement to engage in investment activity
(within the meaning of Section 21 of the Financial Services
and Markets Act 2000 or FSMA) received by it in connection with
the issue or sale of the PIES or our Class A Common Shares
in circumstances in which Section 21(1) of the FSMA does
not apply to us, and |
|
|
2. it has complied with, and will comply with all
applicable provisions of the FSMA with respect to anything done
by it in relation to the PIES or our Class A Common Shares
in, from or otherwise involving the United Kingdom. |
European Economic Area
To the extent that the offer of the PIES or our Class A
Common Shares is made in any Member State of the European
Economic Area that has implemented the Prospectus Directive
before the date of publication of a prospectus in relation to
the PIES or our Class A Common Shares which has been
approved by the competent authority in the Member State in
accordance with the Prospectus Directive (or, where appropriate,
published in accordance with the Prospectus Directive and
notified to the competent authority in the Member State in
accordance with the Prospectus Directive), the offer (including
any offer pursuant to this document) is only addressed to
qualified investors in that Member State within the meaning of
the Prospectus Directive or has been or will be made otherwise
in circumstances that do not require us to publish a prospectus
pursuant to the Prospectus Directive.
In relation to each Member State of the European Economic Area
which has implemented the Prospectus Directive (each, a
Relevant Member State), the underwriter has
represented and agreed that with effect from and including the
date on which the Prospectus Directive is implemented in that
Relevant Member State (the Relevant Implementation
Date) it has not made and will not make an offer of PIES
or our Class A Common Shares to the public in that Relevant
Member State prior to the publication of a prospectus in
relation to the PIES or our Class A Common Shares which has
been approved by the competent authority in that Relevant Member
State or, where appropriate, approved in another Relevant Member
State and notified to the competent authority in that Relevant
Member State, all in accordance with the Prospectus Directive,
except that it may, with effect from and including the Relevant
Implementation Date, make an offer of PIES or of our
Class A Common Shares to the public in that Relevant Member
State at any time.
|
|
|
1. to legal entities which are authorized or regulated to
operate in the financial markets or, if not so authorized or
regulated, whose corporate purpose is solely to invest in
securities, |
|
|
2. to any legal entity which has two or more of (1) an
average of at least 250 employees during the last financial
year; (2) a total balance sheet of more than
43,000,000 and
(3) an annual net turnover of more than
50,000,000, as
shown in its last annual or consolidated accounts, or |
|
|
3. in any other circumstances which do not require the
publication by us of a prospectus pursuant to Article 3 of
the Prospectus Directive. |
For the purposes of this provision, the expression an
offer of PIES or of our Class A Common Shares to the
public in relation to any PIES or our Class A Common
Shares in any Relevant Member State means
101
the communication in any form and by any means of sufficient
information on the terms of the offer and the PIES or our
Class A Common Shares to be offered so as to enable an
investor to decide to purchase or subscribe for the PIES or our
Class A Common Shares, as the same may be varied in that
Member State by any measure implementing the Prospectus
Directive in that Member State and the expression
Prospectus Directive means Directive 2003/71/ EC and
includes any relevant implementing measure in each Relevant
Member State.
In relation to each Relevant Member State, each purchaser of
PIES (other than the underwriter) will be deemed to have
represented, acknowledged and agreed that it will not make an
offer of PIES or of our Class A Common Shares to the public
in any Relevant Member State, except that it may, with effect
from and including the date on which the Prospectus Directive is
implemented in that Relevant Member State, make an offer of PIES
or of our Class A Common Shares to the public in that
Relevant Member State at any time in any circumstances which do
not require the publication by us of a prospectus pursuant to
Article 3 of the Prospectus Directive, provided that such
purchaser agrees that it has not and will not make an offer of
any PIES or of our Class A Common Shares in reliance or
purported reliance on Article 3(2)(b) of the Prospectus
Directive. For the purposes of this provision, the expression an
offer of PIES or of our Class A Common Shares to the
public in relation to any PIES or our Class A Common
Shares in any Relevant Member State has the same meaning as in
the preceding paragraph.
102
LEGAL MATTERS
DSW is represented by Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher &
Flom LLP, New York, New York and Vorys, Sater,
Seymour & Pease LLP, Columbus, Ohio, and the
underwriter for the offering of the PIES by Retail Ventures is
represented by Debevoise & Plimpton LLP, New York, New
York. The validity of the Class A Common Shares offered in
this offering upon exchange of the PIES will be passed upon for
DSW by Vorys, Sater, Seymour & Pease LLP, Columbus,
Ohio.
EXPERTS
The financial statements as of January 28, 2006 and
January 29, 2005, and for each of the three years in the
period ended January 28, 2006 included in this prospectus
and the related financial statement schedule included elsewhere
in the registration statement have been audited by
Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public
accounting firm, as stated in their reports appearing herein and
elsewhere in the registration statement, and have been so
included in reliance upon the reports of such firm given upon
their authority as experts in accounting and auditing.
WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
We have filed with the SEC a registration statement on
Form S-1, as
amended by a registration statement on Form
S-3, under the
Securities Act with respect to the Class A Common Shares
offered by this prospectus. This prospectus, filed as part of
the registration statement, does not contain all the information
set forth in the registration statement and its exhibits and
schedules, portions of which have been omitted as permitted by
the rules and regulations of the SEC. For further information
about us and our Class A Common Shares, we refer you to the
registration statement and to its exhibits and schedules. With
respect to statements in this prospectus about the contents of
any contract, agreement or other document, in each instance, we
refer you to the copy of such contract, agreement or document
filed as an exhibit to the registration statement, and each such
statement is qualified in all respects by reference to the
document to which it refers. Anyone may inspect the registration
statement and its exhibits and schedules without charge at the
public reference facilities the SEC maintains at 100 F Street,
N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. You may obtain copies of all
or any part of these materials from the SEC upon the payment of
certain fees prescribed by the SEC. You may obtain further
information about the operation of the SECs Public
Reference Room by calling the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC
also maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy and
information statements and other information regarding issuers
that file with the SEC. The website address is
http://www.sec.gov. In addition, you may obtain information
about us at the offices of the NYSE, 20 Broad Street, New
York, New York 10005.
We are subject to the informational requirements of the Exchange
Act and are required to file reports, proxy statements and other
information with the SEC. You are able to inspect and copy these
reports, proxy statements and other information at the public
reference facilities maintained by the SEC at the address noted
above. You also are able to obtain copies of this material from
the Public Reference Room of the SEC as described above, or
inspect them without charge at the SECs website. We intend
to furnish our shareholders with annual reports containing
consolidated financial statements audited by an independent
accounting firm.
INCORPORATION OF CERTAIN INFORMATION BY REFERENCE
The Securities and Exchange Commission allows
incorporation by reference into this prospectus of
information that DSW files with the Securities and Exchange
Commission. This permits DSW to disclose important information
to you by referencing these filed documents. Any information
referenced in this way is considered part of this prospectus,
and any information filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission subsequent to the date of this prospectus and prior
to the termination of the offering will automatically be
103
deemed to be incorporated by reference into this prospectus. We
incorporate by reference the following documents that have been
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission:
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended January 28, 2006 filed April 13,
2006; |
|
|
|
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended April 29, 2006 filed June 8, 2006; |
|
|
|
Current Reports on
Form 8-K as filed
on April 11, 2006 (which does not include information
deemed furnished), June 5, 2006 and
July 13, 2006; |
|
|
|
Proxy Statement filed May 12, 2006 for the Annual Meeting
of Shareholders held on June 14, 2006; and |
|
|
|
All documents filed by us pursuant to Section 13(a), 13(c),
14 and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
after the date of this prospectus. |
We will provide without charge to each person to whom a copy of
this prospectus has been delivered, upon the written or oral
request of such person, a copy of any or all of the documents
referred to above which have been or may be incorporated by
reference herein (other than exhibits to such documents unless
such exhibits are specifically incorporated by reference in such
documents). Requests for such copies should be directed to: DSW
Inc., 4150 East 5th Avenue, Columbus, Ohio 43219,
(614) 237-7100, Attn: William L. Jordan.
104
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
F-2 |
|
|
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-3 |
|
|
|
|
F-4 |
|
|
|
|
F-5 |
|
|
|
|
F-6 |
|
|
|
|
F-7 |
|
|
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-23 |
|
|
|
|
F-24 |
|
|
|
|
F-25 |
|
|
|
|
F-26 |
|
|
|
|
F-27 |
|
F-1
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Board of Directors and Shareholders
DSW Inc.
Columbus, Ohio 43219
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
DSW Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary (the
Company) as of January 28, 2006 and
January 29, 2005, and the related consolidated statements
of income, shareholders equity, and cash flows for each of
the three years ended January 28, 2006, January 29,
2005, and January 31, 2004. These consolidated financial
statements are the responsibility of the Companys
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the
financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to
have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal
control over financial reporting. Our audits included
consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a
basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the
circumstances but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion
on the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An
audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements, assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating
the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that
our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of DSW
Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary as of January 28,
2006, and January 29, 2005, and the results of their
operations and their cash flows for each of the three years
ended January 28, 2006, January 29, 2005, and
January 31, 2004, in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America.
|
|
|
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP |
Columbus, Ohio
April 12, 2006
F-2
DSW INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 28, | |
|
January 29, | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands, except share | |
|
|
amounts) | |
ASSETS |
Cash and equivalents
|
|
$ |
124,759 |
|
|
$ |
8,339 |
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
4,039 |
|
|
|
2,291 |
|
Receivables from related parties
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
216,698 |
|
|
|
208,015 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets
|
|
|
13,981 |
|
|
|
8,940 |
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
18,591 |
|
|
|
20,261 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
378,117 |
|
|
|
247,846 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advances to affiliates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,676 |
|
Property and equipment at cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Furniture, fixtures and equipment
|
|
|
100,483 |
|
|
|
81,605 |
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
74,841 |
|
|
|
70,936 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property and equipment
|
|
|
175,324 |
|
|
|
152,541 |
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(79,403 |
) |
|
|
(62,485 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment net
|
|
|
95,921 |
|
|
|
90,056 |
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
25,899 |
|
|
|
25,899 |
|
Tradenames and other intangibles, net
|
|
|
6,216 |
|
|
|
7,079 |
|
Deferred income taxes and other assets
|
|
|
1,562 |
|
|
|
881 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
507,715 |
|
|
$ |
395,437 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
Accounts payable
|
|
$ |
78,889 |
|
|
$ |
72,073 |
|
Accounts payable to related parties
|
|
|
6,631 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
Accrued expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
9,933 |
|
|
|
6,804 |
|
|
Taxes
|
|
|
9,557 |
|
|
|
12,560 |
|
|
Accrued advertising
|
|
|
8,586 |
|
|
|
4,958 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
25,993 |
|
|
|
12,485 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
139,589 |
|
|
|
108,927 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term obligations, net of current maturities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,000 |
|
Other noncurrent liabilities
|
|
|
63,410 |
|
|
|
52,684 |
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A Common Shares, no par value; 170,000,000
authorized; 16,190,088 and none issued and outstanding,
respectively
|
|
|
281,119 |
|
|
|
|
|
Class B Common Shares, no par value; 100,000,000
authorized; 27,702,667 and 27,702,667 issued and outstanding,
respectively
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101,442 |
|
Preferred Shares, no par value; 100,000,000 authorized; no
shares issued or outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
26,007 |
|
|
|
77,384 |
|
Deferred compensation
|
|
|
(2,410 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
304,716 |
|
|
|
178,826 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$ |
507,715 |
|
|
$ |
395,437 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying Notes are an integral part of the Consolidated
Financial Statements.
F-3
DSW INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
Years Ended January 28, 2006, January 29, 2005 and
January 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 28, | |
|
January 29, | |
|
January 31, | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts) | |
Net sales
|
|
|
1,144,061 |
|
|
|
961,089 |
|
|
|
791,348 |
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
(828,342 |
) |
|
|
(690,878 |
) |
|
|
(588,421 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
315,719 |
|
|
|
270,211 |
|
|
|
202,927 |
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
(245,607 |
) |
|
|
(214,102 |
) |
|
|
(174,874 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit
|
|
|
70,112 |
|
|
|
56,109 |
|
|
|
28,053 |
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-related parties
|
|
|
(914 |
) |
|
|
(2,734 |
) |
|
|
(2,739 |
) |
|
Related parties
|
|
|
(6,591 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before income taxes
|
|
|
62,607 |
|
|
|
53,375 |
|
|
|
25,314 |
|
Income tax provision
|
|
|
(25,426 |
) |
|
|
(18,420 |
) |
|
|
(10,507 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
37,181 |
|
|
|
34,955 |
|
|
|
14,807 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
1.00 |
|
|
$ |
1.26 |
|
|
$ |
0.53 |
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$ |
1.00 |
|
|
$ |
1.26 |
|
|
$ |
0.53 |
|
Shares used in per share calculations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
37,219 |
|
|
|
27,703 |
|
|
|
27,703 |
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
37,347 |
|
|
|
27,703 |
|
|
|
27,703 |
|
The accompanying Notes are an integral part of the Consolidated
Financial Statements.
F-4
DSW INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A | |
|
Class B | |
|
Class A | |
|
Class B | |
|
|
|
Deferred | |
|
|
|
|
Common | |
|
Common | |
|
Common | |
|
Common | |
|
Retained | |
|
Compensation | |
|
|
|
|
Shares | |
|
Shares | |
|
Shares | |
|
Shares | |
|
Earnings | |
|
Expense | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Balance, February 1, 2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,703 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
101,442 |
|
|
$ |
27,622 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
129,064 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,807 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,807 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, January 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,703 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
101,442 |
|
|
$ |
42,429 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
143,871 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,955 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,955 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, January 29, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,703 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
101,442 |
|
|
$ |
77,384 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
178,826 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sale of stock
|
|
|
16,172 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
277,963 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
277,963 |
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,181 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,181 |
|
Dividend to parent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(101,442 |
) |
|
|
(88,558 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(190,000 |
) |
Restricted stock units granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,686 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(2,686 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Amortization of deferred compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
276 |
|
|
|
276 |
|
Stock units granted
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
447 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
447 |
|
Exercise of stock options
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, January 28, 2006
|
|
|
16,190 |
|
|
|
27,703 |
|
|
$ |
281,119 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
26,007 |
|
|
$ |
(2,410 |
) |
|
$ |
304,716 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying Notes are an integral part of the Consolidated
Financial Statements.
F-5
DSW INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Years Ended January 28, 2006, January 29, 2005 and
January 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 28, | |
|
January 29, | |
|
January 31, | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
37,181 |
|
|
$ |
34,955 |
|
|
$ |
14,807 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
19,444 |
|
|
|
18,275 |
|
|
|
15,478 |
|
Amortization of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
613 |
|
|
|
469 |
|
|
|
479 |
|
Amortization of deferred compensation expense
|
|
|
276 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
2,084 |
|
|
|
(7,813 |
) |
|
|
26 |
|
Loss on disposal of assets
|
|
|
691 |
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
585 |
|
Impairment Charges
|
|
|
234 |
|
|
|
833 |
|
|
|
|
|
Grants of director stock units
|
|
|
447 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in working capital, assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(1,748 |
) |
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
2,965 |
|
|
Accounts receivable from related parties
|
|
|
(49 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
(8,683 |
) |
|
|
(57,996 |
) |
|
|
(8,907 |
) |
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets
|
|
|
(5,815 |
) |
|
|
(338 |
) |
|
|
(641 |
) |
|
Advances to/from affiliates
|
|
|
23,676 |
|
|
|
(22,236 |
) |
|
|
20,574 |
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
13,207 |
|
|
|
19,502 |
|
|
|
(9,209 |
) |
|
Proceeds from lease incentives
|
|
|
10,781 |
|
|
|
11,509 |
|
|
|
6,394 |
|
|
Other noncurrent liabilities
|
|
|
(419 |
) |
|
|
3,026 |
|
|
|
386 |
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
17,337 |
|
|
|
15,019 |
|
|
|
1,973 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
109,257 |
|
|
|
15,313 |
|
|
|
44,910 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for property and equipment
|
|
|
(25,344 |
) |
|
|
(33,949 |
) |
|
|
(22,110 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of assets
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(25,253 |
) |
|
|
(33,912 |
) |
|
|
(22,110 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments on capital lease obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(138 |
) |
|
|
(205 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of stock
|
|
|
277,963 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payment of note to parent
|
|
|
(190,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in revolving credit facility
|
|
|
(55,000 |
) |
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
(19,000 |
) |
Debt issuance costs
|
|
|
(570 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided (used in) by financing activities
|
|
|
32,416 |
|
|
|
19,862 |
|
|
|
(19,205 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and equivalents
|
|
|
116,420 |
|
|
|
1,263 |
|
|
|
3,595 |
|
Cash and equivalents, beginning of period
|
|
|
8,339 |
|
|
|
7,076 |
|
|
|
3,481 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and equivalents, end of period
|
|
$ |
124,759 |
|
|
$ |
8,339 |
|
|
$ |
7,076 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying Notes are an integral part of the Consolidated
Financial Statements.
F-6
DSW INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years Ended January 28, 2006, January 29, 2005 and
January 31, 2004
|
|
1. |
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES |
Business Operations DSW Inc.
(DSW) and its wholly-owned subsidiary, DSW Shoe
Warehouse, Inc. (DSWSW), are herein referred to
collectively as DSW or the Company. Prior to December 2004, DSW
was a wholly-owned subsidiary of Value City Department Stores,
Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Retail Ventures, Inc.
(RVI). In December 2004, RVI completed a corporate
reorganization whereby Value City Department Stores, Inc. merged
with and into Value City Department Stores, LLC (Value
City), another wholly-owned subsidiary of RVI. In turn,
Value City transferred all of the issued and outstanding shares
of DSW to RVI in exchange for a promissory note. On
June 29, 2005, DSW commenced an initial public offering
(IPO) that closed on July 5, 2005. DSW is
listed on the New York Stock Exchange trading under the symbol
DSW.
DSW operates in two segments and sells better-branded footwear
in both. DSW stores also sell accessories. As of
January 28, 2006, DSW operated a total of 199 stores
located throughout the United States as one segment. These DSW
stores offer a wide selection of brand name and designer dress,
casual and athletic footwear for men and women. During the years
ended January 28, 2006, January 29, 2005, and
January 31, 2004, DSW opened 29, 31, and 16 new DSW
stores, respectively, and, during the year ended
January 28, 2006, we re-categorized two DSW/ Filenes
Basement combination locations from the DSW segment to the
leased segment.
DSW also operates leased shoe departments for three
non-affiliated retailers and one affiliated retailer in our
leased department segment. We entered into supply agreements to
merchandise the non-affiliated shoe departments in Stein Mart,
Gordmans and Frugal Fannies stores as of July 2002, June
2004 and September 2003, respectively. We have operated leased
shoe departments for Filenes Basement, a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Retail Ventures, since its acquisition by Retail
Ventures in March 2000. Effective as of January 30, 2005,
we updated and reaffirmed our contractual arrangement with
Filenes Basement. We own the merchandise, record sales of
merchandise net of returns and sales tax, own the fixtures
(except for Filenes Basement) and provide supervisory
assistance in these covered locations. Stein Mart, Gordmans,
Frugal Fannies and Filenes Basement provide the
sales associates. We pay a percentage of net sales as rent. As
of January 28, 2006, we supplied merchandise to 157 Stein
Mart stores, 55 Gordmans stores, one Frugal Fannies, and
25 Filenes Basement stores.
Fiscal Year The Companys fiscal year
ends on the Saturday nearest January 31. Fiscal years 2005, 2004
and 2003 consist of 52 weeks. Unless otherwise stated,
references to years in this report relate to fiscal years rather
than calendar years.
Use of Estimates The preparation of financial
statements in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America requires management to
make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts
of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets
and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and
reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting
period. Significant estimates are required as a part of
inventory valuation, depreciation, amortization, recoverability
of long-lived assets and establishing reserves for
self-insurance. Although these estimates are based on
managements knowledge of current events and actions it may
undertake in the future, actual results could differ from these
estimates.
Financial Instruments The following
assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class
of financial instruments:
|
|
|
Cash and Equivalents Cash and equivalents
represent cash, highly liquid investments with original
maturities of three months or less at the date of purchase and
credit card receivables, which generally settle within three
days. The carrying amounts approximate fair value. |
F-7
DSW INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
Accounts Receivable Accounts receivable are
classified as current assets because the average collection
period is generally less than one year. The carrying amount
approximates fair value because of the relatively short average
maturity of the instruments and no significant change in
interest rates. |
|
|
Long-Term Debt The carrying amount
approximates fair value as a result of the variable rate-based
borrowings. |
Concentration of Credit Risk Financial
instruments, which principally subject the Company to
concentration of credit risk, consist of cash and cash
equivalents. The Company invests excess cash when available
through financial institutions in overnight investments. At
times, such amounts may be in excess of FDIC insurance limits.
Concentration of Vendor Risk During fiscal
2005, taking into account industry consolidation, merchandise
supplied to the Company by three key vendors accounted for
approximately 22% of net sales.
Inventories Merchandise inventories are
stated at the lower of cost, determined using the
first-in, first-out
basis, or market, using the retail inventory method. The retail
method is widely used in the retail industry due to its
practicality. Under the retail inventory method, the valuation
of inventories at cost and the resulting gross profits are
calculated by applying a calculated cost to retail ratio to the
retail value of inventories. The cost of the inventory reflected
on the balance sheet is decreased by charges to cost of sales at
the time the retail value of the inventory is lowered through
the use of markdowns. Hence, earnings are negatively impacted as
the merchandise is marked down prior to sale. Reserves to value
inventory at the lower of cost or market were $19.2 million
and $14.2 million at the end of fiscal years 2005 and 2004,
respectively.
Inherent in the calculation of inventories are certain
significant management judgments and estimates, including
setting the original merchandise retail value or mark-on,
markups of initial prices established, reductions in prices due
to customers perception of value (known as markdowns), and
estimates of losses between physical inventory counts, or
shrinkage, which combined with the averaging process within the
retail method, can significantly impact the ending inventory
valuation at cost and the resulting gross profit.
Vendor Allowances Vendor allowances include
allowances, rebates and cooperative advertising funds received
from vendors. The amount of these funds is determined for each
fiscal year and the majority is based on various quantitative
contract terms. Amounts expected to be received from vendors
relating to the purchase of merchandise inventories are
recognized as a reduction of cost of goods sold as the
merchandise is sold. Amounts that represent a reimbursement of
costs incurred, such as advertising, are recorded as a reduction
to the related expense in the period that the related expense is
incurred. On an annual basis, the Company confirms earned
allowances with vendors to determine the amounts are recorded in
accordance with the terms of the contract. At January 28,
2006 and January 29, 2005, the Company had a vendor
allowance balance of less than $100,000.
Property and Equipment Property and equipment
are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation determined by
the straight-line method over the expected useful lives of the
assets. Assets held under capital leases and related obligations
are recorded initially at the lower of fair market value or the
present value of the minimum lease payments. The straight-line
method is used to amortize such capitalized costs over the
lesser of the expected useful life of the asset or the life of
the lease. Leasehold improvements are amortized under the
straight-line method over the lesser of the initial lease term
or the expected useful life (10 years). The estimated
useful lives of furniture, fixtures and equipment are 3 to
10 years.
Asset Impairment and Long-Lived Assets The
Company periodically evaluates the carrying amount of its
long-lived assets, primarily property and equipment, and finite
life intangible assets when events and circumstances warrant
such a review to ascertain if any assets have been impaired. The
carrying amount of a long-lived asset is considered impaired
when the carrying value of the asset exceeds the expected future
cash flows from the asset. The Company reviews are conducted
down at the lowest identifiable level, which
F-8
DSW INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
include a store. The impairment loss recognized is the excess of
the carrying value of the asset over its fair value, estimated
on discounted cash flow. Should an impairment loss be realized,
it will be included in cost of sales. The Company expensed
$0.2 million and $0.8 million in fiscal 2005 and 2004,
respectively, of identified store assets where the recorded
value could not be supported by future cash flows. The
impairment charge was recorded within the DSW stores segment.
The amount of impairment losses recorded during fiscal 2003 was
immaterial to the financial statements.
Goodwill Goodwill represents the excess cost
over the estimated fair values of net assets including
identifiable intangible assets of businesses acquired. Goodwill
is tested for impairment at least annually. The Company, as a
result of adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (SFAS) No. 142, Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets, no longer records goodwill amortization.
All of the Companys goodwill relates to the DSW stores
segment.
Tradenames and Other Intangible Assets
Tradenames and other intangible assets are comprised of values
assigned to names the Company acquired and leases acquired. The
accumulated amortization for these assets is $6.7 million
and $5.8 million at January 28, 2006 and
January 29, 2005, respectively. The asset value and
accumulated amortization of intangible assets is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 28, | |
|
January 29, | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Tradenames:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Asset
|
|
$ |
12,750 |
|
|
$ |
12,750 |
|
|
Accumulated amortization
|
|
|
(6,587 |
) |
|
|
(5,738 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
6,163 |
|
|
|
7,012 |
|
|
Useful life
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
Favorable leases:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Asset
|
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
140 |
|
|
Accumulated amortization
|
|
|
(87 |
) |
|
|
(73 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
Useful life
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
Tradenames and other intangible assets net
|
|
$ |
6,216 |
|
|
$ |
7,079 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate amortization expense for the current and each of the
five succeeding years is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year |
|
(In thousands) | |
|
|
| |
2005
|
|
$ |
864 |
|
2006
|
|
$ |
861 |
|
2007
|
|
$ |
854 |
|
2008
|
|
$ |
854 |
|
2009
|
|
$ |
854 |
|
2010
|
|
$ |
854 |
|
Income Taxes Income taxes are accounted for
using the asset and liability method. Under this method,
deferred income taxes arise from temporary differences between
the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their reported
amounts in the financial statements. A valuation allowance is
established against deferred tax assets when it is more likely
than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets
will not be realized. As of January 28, 2006, and
January 29, 2005, the Company did not have any income tax
valuation allowances.
F-9
DSW INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Deferred Rent Many of the Companys
operating leases contain predetermined fixed increases of the
minimum rental rate during the initial lease term. For these
leases the Company recognizes the related rental expense on a
straight-line basis and records the difference between the
amount charged to expense and the rent paid as deferred rent and
begins amortizing such deferred rent upon the delivery of the
lease location by the lessor. The amounts included in the other
noncurrent liabilities caption were $22.6 million and
$16.7 million, at January 28, 2006 and
January 29, 2005, respectively.
Tenant Allowances The Company receives cash
allowances from landlords, which are deferred and amortized on a
straight-line basis over the life of the lease as a reduction of
rent expense. These allowances are included in the caption other
noncurrent liabilities and were $40.5 million and
$35.0 million, at January 28, 2006 and
January 29, 2005, respectively.
Sales and Revenue Recognition Sales of
merchandise are net of returns and exclude sales tax. Revenues
from our retail operations are recognized at the later of point
of sale or delivery of goods to the customer. Revenue from gift
cards is deferred and the revenue is recognized upon redemption
of the gift card.
As of January 28, 2006, the Company supplies footwear,
under supply arrangements, to 25 Filenes Basement stores
and 213 locations for other non-related retailers in the United
States of America. Sales for these leased supply locations are
net of returns and sales tax, as tracked by the lessor, and are
included in net sales and represent 10.5%, 9.4% and 8.9% of
total net sales for fiscal 2005, 2004, and 2003, respectively.
Cost of Sales Cost of sales includes the cost
of merchandise, distribution and warehousing (including
depreciation), store occupancy (excluding depreciation),
permanent and point of sale reductions, markdowns and shrinkage
provision.
Warehousing costs are comprised of labor, benefits and other
labor-related costs associated with the operations of the
warehouse, which are primarily payroll-related taxes and
benefits. The non-labor costs associated with the warehouse
include rent, depreciation, insurance, utilities and maintenance
and other operating costs that are passed to the Company from
the landlord. Distribution costs include the transportation of
merchandise to the warehouse and from the warehouse to the
stores. Store occupancy costs include rent, utilities, repairs,
maintenance, insurance and janitorial costs and other costs
associated with licenses and occupancy-related taxes, which are
primarily real estate taxes passed to the Company by the
landlords.
Operating Expenses Operating expenses include
expenses related to store selling, store management and store
payroll costs, advertising, leased shoe department operations,
store depreciation and amortization, pre-opening advertising and
other pre-opening costs (which are expensed as incurred),
corporate expenses for buying services, information services,
depreciation expense for corporate cost centers, marketing,
insurance, legal, finance, outside professional services,
allocable costs from our parent and other corporate related
departments, and benefits for associates and related payroll
taxes. Corporate level expenses are primarily attributable to
operations at our corporate offices in Columbus, Ohio.
Customer Loyalty Program The Company
maintains a customer loyalty program for its DSW operations in
which customers receive a future discount on qualifying
purchases in exchange for marketing information. The
Reward Your Style is designed to promote customer
awareness and loyalty and provide the Company with the ability
to communicate with its customers. Upon reaching the spending
levels, customers may redeem these discounts on a future
purchase. Generally these future discounts must be redeemed
within six months. The Company accrues the estimated costs of
the anticipated redemptions of the discount earned at the time
of the initial purchase and charges such costs to operating
expenses based on historical experience. The estimates of the
costs associated with the loyalty program require the Company to
make assumptions related to customer purchase levels and
redemption rates. The accrued liability as of January 28,
2006 and January 29, 2005 was $8.3 million and
$4.5 million, respectively.
F-10
DSW INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Pre-Opening Costs Pre-opening costs
associated with opening or remodeling of stores are expensed as
incurred. Pre-opening costs expensed were $7.7 million,
$10.8 million and $5.1 million for fiscal 2005, 2004,
and 2003, respectively.
Advertising Expense The cost of advertising
is expensed as incurred or when the advertising first takes
place. Advertising costs were $38.0 million,
$39.3 million and $36.4 million in fiscal 2005, 2004,
and 2003, respectively.
Earnings Per Share (EPS) Basic
earnings per share are based on net income and a simple weighted
average of Class A and Class B common shares and
directors stock units outstanding, calculated using the treasury
stock method. Diluted earnings per share reflect the potential
dilution of Class A common shares related to outstanding
stock options and restricted stock units. The numerator for the
diluted earnings per share calculation is net income. The
denominator is the weighted average diluted shares outstanding.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
|
January 28, | |
|
January 29, | |
|
January 31, | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Weighted average shares outstanding
|
|
|
37,219 |
|
|
|
27,703 |
|
|
|
27,703 |
|
Assumed exercise of dilutive stock options
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock units
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of shares for computation of dilutive earnings per share
|
|
|
37,347 |
|
|
|
27,703 |
|
|
|
27,703 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the fiscal year ended January 28, 2006, all potentially
issuable shares from the exercise of stock options were
dilutive. For the fiscal years ended January 29, 2005 and
January 31, 2004, there were no potentially dilutive
instruments outstanding.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements The
Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
periodically issues SFAS, some of which require implementation
by a date falling within or after the close of the fiscal year.
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123
(revised 2004) (SFAS No. 123R),
Share-Based Payment. This statement revised
SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation, and requires companies to expense the value of
employee stock options and similar awards. The effective date of
this standard is interim and annual periods beginning after
June 15, 2005. In April 2005, the SEC delayed the
compliance date for SFAS 123R until the beginning of the
Companys fiscal year 2006. No stock options or similar
awards were granted by the Company during fiscal 2004 and prior.
The Company will utilize the modified prospective method of
adoption. The Company expects that the impact of adoption of
SFAS 123R to the Companys results of operations will
be similar, on an annualized basis, to the pro forma disclosures
presented in Note 3 below.
In November 2005, the FASB issued FIN 47, Accounting for
Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations,
(FIN 47) which clarified the term
conditional asset retirement obligation as used in
FASB Statement No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement
Obligations. Conditional asset retirement obligation refers
to a legal obligation to perform an asset retirement activity in
which the timing and/or method of settlement are dependent on a
future event that may or may not be within the control of the
entity. While the timing and/or method of settlement is unknown,
the obligation to perform the asset retirement obligation is
unconditional. FIN 47 requires that the fair value of the
asset retirement activity be recorded when it can be reasonably
estimated. The adoption of FIN 47 during the fourth quarter
of fiscal 2005 did not have a material impact on our financial
position or results of operations.
F-11
DSW INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
2. |
INITIAL PUBLIC OFFERING |
On July 5, 2005, DSW completed its IPO of 14,062,500
Class A common shares. In connection with this offering,
DSW granted an option to the underwriters to purchase up to an
additional 2,109,375 Class A common shares to cover
over-allotments, which option was exercised in full by the
underwriters and also closed on July 5, 2005. DSW sold
16,171,875 Class A common shares raising net proceeds of
$285.8 million, net of the underwriters commission
and before expenses of approximately $7.8 million. DSW used
the net proceeds of the offering to repay $196.6 million of
intercompany indebtedness, including interest, owed to RVI and
for working capital and general corporate purposes, including
the paying down of $20 million outstanding on Value
Citys old secured revolving credit facility and
$10 million intercompany advance. The 410.09 common shares
of DSW held by RVI outstanding at January 29, 2005 were
changed to 27,702,667 Class B common shares. It is the
27,702,667 Class B common shares which are being used in
the prior periods calculation of earnings per share.
Subsequent to the IPO, the transactions between DSW and RVI and
its other subsidiaries are settled in accordance with a shared
services agreement and resulted in the advances from affiliates
being classified as a current payable. At January 28, 2006,
Retail Ventures owned approximately 63.1% of DSWs
outstanding Common Shares, representing approximately 93.2% of
the combined voting power of DSWs outstanding Common
Shares.
|
|
3. |
STOCK BASED COMPENSATION |
DSW has various stock-based employee compensation plans. DSW
accounts for those plans in accordance with Accounting
Principles Board Opinion (APB) No. 25,
Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and
related interpretations. Accordingly, no stock-based employee
compensation cost has been recognized for the fixed stock option
plans, as the exercise price of the options equals the market
price of the stock on the grant date. The following table
illustrates the effect on net income and income per share if DSW
had applied the fair value recognition of Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123,
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
|
January 28, | |
|
January 29, | |
|
January 31, | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts) | |
Net income, as reported
|
|
$ |
37,181 |
|
|
$ |
34,955 |
|
|
$ |
14,807 |
|
Add: Stock-based employee compensation expense included in
reported net income, net of tax
|
|
|
167 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation expense
determined under the fair value based method for all awards, net
of tax
|
|
|
(1,212 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net income
|
|
$ |
36,136 |
|
|
$ |
34,955 |
|
|
$ |
14,807 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic as reported
|
|
$ |
1.00 |
|
|
$ |
1.26 |
|
|
$ |
0.53 |
|
Diluted as reported
|
|
$ |
1.00 |
|
|
$ |
1.26 |
|
|
$ |
0.53 |
|
Basic pro forma
|
|
$ |
0.97 |
|
|
$ |
1.26 |
|
|
$ |
0.53 |
|
Diluted pro forma
|
|
$ |
0.97 |
|
|
$ |
1.26 |
|
|
$ |
0.53 |
|
To determine the pro forma amounts, the fair value of each stock
option has been estimated on the date of grant using the
Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted
average assumptions used for grants in the fiscal year 2005:
expected volatility of 42.3%; dividend yield of 0.0%; risk-free
interest rate of 4.1%; and expected lives of 5.0 years. The
weighted average fair value of options granted in the fiscal
year 2005 was $8.43. There were no options granted prior to
fiscal 2005. Pro forma disclosures may not be representative of
the actual results to be expected in future years.
F-12
DSW INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
4. |
RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS |
The Company purchases merchandise from Value City and other
affiliates of Schottenstein Stores Corporation
(SSC). Purchases from affiliates were immaterial in
fiscal 2005, fiscal 2004 and fiscal 2003.
The Company also leases certain store and warehouse locations
owned by SSC as described in Note 5.
Accounts receivable from and payable to affiliates principally
result from commercial transactions with entities owned or
controlled by SSC or intercompany transactions with SSC.
Settlement of affiliate receivables and payables are in the form
of cash. These transactions settle normally in 30 to
60 days. Amounts receivable or payable to SSC or its
affiliates at January 28, 2006 and January 29, 2005
were immaterial.
The Company shares certain personnel, administrative and service
costs with SSC and its affiliates. The costs of providing these
services are allocated among the Company, SSC and its affiliates
without a premium. The allocated amounts are not significant.
SSC does not charge the Company for general corporate management
services. In the opinion of the Company and SSC management, the
aforementioned charges are reasonable.
The Company participated in SSCs self-insurance program
for general liability, casualty loss and certain state
workers compensation programs, which participation ended
in fiscal 2003. While the Company no longer participates in the
program, it continues to remain responsible for liabilities it
incurred under the program. The Company expensed an immaterial
amount in fiscal 2005 and 2004 and $0.2 million in fiscal
2003, respectively, for such program. Estimates for self-insured
programs are determined by independent actuaries based on
actuarial assumptions, which incorporate historical incurred
claims and incurred but not reported (IBNR) claims.
Through the shared services agreement with RVI and in the
ordinary course of business, the Company has received various
services provided by RVI or its subsidiaries, including import
administration, risk management, human resources, information
technology, tax, financial services and payroll, as well as
other corporate services. RVI has also provided the Company with
the services of a number of its executives and employees. The
financial statements include allocations by RVI of its costs
related to these services. These costs allocations have been
determined on a basis that the Company and RVI consider to be
reasonable reflections of the use of services provided or the
benefit received to the Company. These allocations totaled
$17.3 million, $29.5 million and $24.4 million in
fiscal 2005, fiscal 2004 and fiscal 2003, respectively. In
addition, the Company has entered into agreements with various
subsidiaries of RVI to supply all of their shoe inventories. The
net balance of these transactions is reflected within the
balance sheets as advances to affiliates. See
Notes 5, 6, and 8 for additional related party
disclosures.
The Company leases stores and warehouses under various
arrangements with related and unrelated parties. Such leases
expire through 2024 and in most cases provide for renewal
options. Generally, the Company is required to pay base rent,
real estate taxes, maintenance, insurance and contingent rentals
based on sales in excess of specified levels.
As of January 28, 2006, the Company leased or had other
agreements with 15 store locations owned by SSC or affiliates of
SSC, and one warehouse facility for an annual minimum rent of
$7.7 million and additional contingent rents based on
aggregate sales in excess of specified sales for the store
locations. Under supply agreements to Filenes Basement
stores and other non-related retailers, the Company pays
contingent rents based on sales.
F-13
DSW INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Future minimum lease payments required under the aforementioned
leases, exclusive of real estate taxes, insurance and
maintenance costs, at January 28, 2006 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Leases | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Unrelated | |
|
|
Fiscal Year |
|
Total | |
|
Party | |
|
Related Party | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
2006
|
|
$ |
91,666 |
|
|
$ |
83,258 |
|
|
$ |
8,408 |
|
2007
|
|
|
92,768 |
|
|
|
84,122 |
|
|
|
8,646 |
|
2008
|
|
|
91,260 |
|
|
|
82,376 |
|
|
|
8,884 |
|
2009
|
|
|
89,199 |
|
|
|
80,387 |
|
|
|
8,812 |
|
2010
|
|
|
84,671 |
|
|
|
76,304 |
|
|
|
8,367 |
|
Future years
|
|
|
354,758 |
|
|
|
302,020 |
|
|
|
52,738 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total minimum lease payments
|
|
$ |
804,322 |
|
|
$ |
708,467 |
|
|
$ |
95,855 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The composition of rental expense is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 28, | |
|
January 29, | |
|
January 31, | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Minimum rentals:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrelated parties
|
|
$ |
73,189 |
|
|
$ |
63,172 |
|
|
$ |
52,326 |
|
|
Related parties
|
|
|
7,683 |
|
|
|
6,152 |
|
|
|
6,011 |
|
Contingent rentals:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrelated parties
|
|
|
17,331 |
|
|
|
13,692 |
|
|
|
10,785 |
|
|
Related parties
|
|
|
10,778 |
|
|
|
6,931 |
|
|
|
5,796 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
108,981 |
|
|
$ |
89,947 |
|
|
$ |
74,918 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At January 28, 2006 and January 29, 2005, the Company
had no capital leases.
Long-term obligations consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 28, | |
|
January 29, | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Revolving credit facility (long-term)
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
55,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Letters of credit outstanding
|
|
$ |
13,577 |
|
|
$ |
14,854 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Availability under revolving credit facility
|
|
$ |
136,423 |
|
|
$ |
108,544 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DSW $150 Million Credit Facility
Simultaneously with the amendment and restatement of the
revolving credit facility described below and the Companys
initial public offering, the Company entered into a new
$150 million secured revolving credit facility with a term
of five years. Under this facility, the Company and its
subsidiary, DSWSW, are named as co-borrowers. The facility has
borrowing base restrictions and provides for borrowings at
variable interest rates based on LIBOR, the prime rate and the
Federal Funds effective rate, plus a margin. The Companys
obligations under the secured revolving credit facility are
secured by a lien on substantially all of its and its
subsidiarys personal property and a pledge of its shares
of DSWSW. In addition, the secured revolving credit facility
contains usual and customary
F-14
DSW INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
restrictive covenants relating to the management and the
operation of the business. These covenants will, among other
things, restrict the Companys ability to grant liens on
its assets, incur additional indebtedness, open or close stores,
pay cash dividends and redeem its stock, enter into transactions
with affiliates and merge or consolidate with another entity. In
addition, if at any time the Company utilizes over 90% of its
borrowing capacity under the facility, the Company must comply
with a fixed charge coverage ratio test set forth in the
facility documents.
Credit Facilities Which DSW Is No Longer
Obligated At January 29, 2005, the
Companys direct parent, RVI and its subsidiaries, had an
aggregate $525.0 million of financing that consisted of
three separate credit facilities (collectively, the Credit
Facilities): (i) a $350.0 million revolving
credit facility (subsequently increased to $425 million)
(the Revolving Loan), (ii) two
$50.0 million term loan facilities provided equally by
Cerberus Partners, L.P. and SSC (the Term Loans),
and (iii) an amended and restated $75.0 million senior
subordinated convertible term loan facility, initially entered
into by RVI and its subsidiaries on March 15, 2000, which
is held equally by Cerberus Partners, L.P. and SSC (the
Convertible Loan). The Company was a co-borrower
under the Revolving Loan and the Term Loans, and was a guarantor
under the Convertible Loan. The Company, the other co-borrowers
and the guarantors were jointly and severally liable under the
Revolving Loan and the Term Loans. All of the Credit Facilities
were guaranteed by RVI. The Company is no longer a party to
these Credit Facilities.
The Company has reflected in the historical financial statements
its direct obligations under the Revolving Loan as it relates to
the borrowings thereunder. The Term Loans and Convertible Loan
are not reflected on the Companys financial statements as
they are recorded on consolidated financial statements of RVI.
These Credit Facilities are also subject to an Intercreditor
Agreement which provides for an established order of payment of
obligations from the proceeds of collateral upon default (the
Intercreditor Agreement).
Under the Revolving Loan, the borrowing base formula applicable
to the Company was based on the value of the Companys
inventory and accounts receivable. Primary security for the
Revolving Loan was provided in part by a first priority lien on
all of the inventory and accounts receivable of the Company and
other borrowers thereunder, as well as certain notes and payment
intangibles. Subject to the Intercreditor Agreement, the
Revolving Loan also had the substantial equivalent of a second
priority-perfected security interest in all of the first
priority collateral securing the Term Loans. Interest on
borrowings under the Revolving Loan was calculated at the
banks base rate plus 0% to 0.5%, or at the Eurodollar
offer rate plus 2.00% to 2.75%, depending upon the level of
average excess availability that the Company and the other
borrowers maintain. The interest rate on borrowings under the
Revolving Loan was 4.7% and 3.2% at January 29, 2005 and
January 31, 2004, respectively. DSW is no longer a party to
this credit facility. At January 29, 2005, the outstanding
borrowings for the Company and RVI and their affiliates under
the Credit Facilities were: Revolving Loan, $140.0 million;
Term Loans, $100.0 million; and Convertible Loan,
$75.0 million.
The weighted average interest rate on borrowings under the
Companys Credit Facilities during fiscal years 2005, 2004
and 2003, and the dividend notes issued and repaid during fiscal
2005 to RVI was 8.5%, 3.6% and 3.3% respectively. The total
interest expense was $8.9 million, $2.7 million and
$2.7 million and included fees, such as commitment and line
of credit fees, of $0.2 million, $0.5 million and
$0.6 million for fiscal 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
F-15
DSW INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The provision for income taxes consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 28, | |
|
January 29, | |
|
January 31, | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Current:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$ |
18,891 |
|
|
$ |
21,438 |
|
|
$ |
8,711 |
|
|
State and local
|
|
|
4,451 |
|
|
|
4,803 |
|
|
|
1,770 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,342 |
|
|
|
26,241 |
|
|
|
10,481 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
(1,110 |
) |
|
|
(6,843 |
) |
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
State and local
|
|
|
3,194 |
|
|
|
(978 |
) |
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,084 |
|
|
|
(7,821 |
) |
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
$ |
25,426 |
|
|
$ |
18,420 |
|
|
$ |
10,507 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A reconciliation of the expected income taxes based upon the
statutory rate is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 28, | |
|
January 29, | |
|
January 31, | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Income tax expense at federal statutory rate
|
|
$ |
21,912 |
|
|
$ |
18,681 |
|
|
$ |
8,860 |
|
State and local taxes-net
|
|
|
2,800 |
|
|
|
2,538 |
|
|
|
1,188 |
|
Non-deductible amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
298 |
|
Work opportunity tax credit net
|
|
|
(292 |
) |
|
|
(119 |
) |
|
|
(131 |
) |
State tax deferred tax asset write-off of commercial activity tax
|
|
|
1,574 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Officer compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
169 |
|
Meals and entertainment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
201 |
|
|
|
123 |
|
Non-deductible expenses and other
|
|
|
(568 |
) |
|
|
(2,881 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
25,426 |
|
|
$ |
18,420 |
|
|
$ |
10,507 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-16
DSW INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The components of the net deferred tax asset are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 28, | |
|
January 29, | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basis differences in inventory
|
|
$ |
2,592 |
|
|
$ |
5,418 |
|
|
Basis differences in property and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
859 |
|
|
Tenant allowance
|
|
|
887 |
|
|
|
1,406 |
|
|
State and local tax NOLs
|
|
|
1,381 |
|
|
|
5,043 |
|
|
Alternative Minimum Tax credit carryforward
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,634 |
|
|
Accrued rent
|
|
|
8,034 |
|
|
|
7,042 |
|
|
Workers compensation
|
|
|
1,163 |
|
|
|
1,443 |
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
6,949 |
|
|
|
3,708 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
963 |
|
|
|
3,640 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,969 |
|
|
|
30,193 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,785 |
) |
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
(2,662 |
) |
|
|
(2,569 |
) |
|
Accrued bonus
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,336 |
) |
|
Basis differences in property and equipment
|
|
|
(1,080 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
State and local taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,192 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,742 |
) |
|
|
(9,882 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net
|
|
$ |
18,227 |
|
|
$ |
20,311 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The net deferred tax asset is recorded in the Companys
balance sheet as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 28, | |
|
January 29, | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Current deferred tax asset
|
|
$ |
18,591 |
|
|
$ |
20,261 |
|
Non-current deferred tax (liability) asset
|
|
|
(364 |
) |
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net
|
|
$ |
18,227 |
|
|
$ |
20,311 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior to the completion of its initial public offering, the
Company filed a consolidated federal income tax return with RVI
and its other subsidiaries. The allocation of the RVI current
consolidated federal income tax to its subsidiaries historically
was in accordance with SFAS No. 109, Accounting for
Income Taxes. RVI used the parent company down
approach in allocating the consolidated amount of current and
deferred tax expense to its subsidiaries. For the current fiscal
year the Company will file its own tax return for the stub
period subsequent to the initial public offering.
The net operating loss deferred tax assets consist of a state
and local component. These net operating losses are available to
reduce state and local taxable income for the fiscal years 2006
to 2023.
F-17
DSW INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Company participates in a 401(k) Plan (the Plan)
through the shared services agreement with RVI. Employees who
attain age twenty-one are eligible to defer compensation as of
the first day of the month following 60 days of employment
and may contribute up to thirty percent of their compensation to
the Plan, on a pre-tax basis, subject to Internal Revenue
Service limitations. As of the first day of the month following
an employees completion of one year of service as defined
under the terms of the Plan, the Company matches employee
deferrals into the Plan, 100% on the first 3% of eligible
compensation deferred and 50% on the next 2% of eligible
compensation deferred. Additionally, the Company may contribute
a discretionary profit sharing amount to the Plan each year. The
Company incurred costs associated with the 401(k) Plan of
$1.1 million, $0.7 million, and $0.9 million for
fiscal years 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
The Company has a 2005 Equity Incentive Plan that provides for
the issuance of equity awards to purchase up to 4,600,000 common
shares, including stock options and restricted stock units to
management, key employees of the Company and affiliates,
consultants as defined, and directors of the Company. Options
generally vest 20% per year on a cumulative basis. Options
granted under the 2005 Equity Incentive Plan generally remain
exercisable for a period of ten years from the date of grant.
Prior to fiscal 2005, the Company did not have a stock option
plan or any equity units outstanding.
In 2005, the Company issued 17,000 stock units to directors who
are not employees of the Company or RVI. Stock units will be
automatically granted to each director who is not an employee of
the Company or Retail Ventures on the date of each annual
meeting of the shareholders for the purpose of electing
directors. The number of stock units granted to each
non-employee director is calculated by dividing one-half of
their annual retainer (excluding any amount paid for service as
the chair of a board committee) by the fair market value of a
share of DSW stock on the date of the meeting. In addition, each
director eligible to receive compensation for board service may
elect to have the cash portion of their compensation paid in the
form of restricted stock units. Stock units granted to
non-employee directors vest and are settled upon the director
terminating service from the board. Stock units granted to
directors which are not subject to forfeiture are considered to
be outstanding for the purposes of computing basic earnings per
share.
In addition, the Company granted 131,000 restricted stock units
to employees during fiscal 2005. Restricted stock units
generally cliff vest at the end of four years. Restricted stock
units granted to employees that are subject to the risk of
forfeiture are not included in the computation of basic earnings
per share.
The following table summarizes the Companys stock option
plan and related per share Weighted Average Exercise Prices
(WAEP) (shares in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 28, 2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Shares | |
|
WAEP | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Outstanding beginning of year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
937 |
|
|
$ |
19.53 |
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
19.00 |
|
Canceled
|
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
19.00 |
|
Outstanding end of year
|
|
|
914 |
|
|
$ |
19.54 |
|
Options exercisable end of year
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
$ |
19.00 |
|
Shares available for additional grants
|
|
|
3,536 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-18
DSW INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table summarizes information about stock options
outstanding as of January 28, 2006 (shares in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining | |
|
|
|
Options Exercisable | |
|
|
|
|
Contract | |
|
|
|
| |
Range of Exercise Prices |
|
Shares | |
|
Life | |
|
WAEP | |
|
Shares | |
|
WAEP | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
$19.00 - $20.00
|
|
|
829 |
|
|
|
9 years |
|
|
$ |
19.00 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
$ |
19.00 |
|
$20.01 - $25.00
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
10 years |
|
|
$ |
24.52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$25.01 - $30.00
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
10 years |
|
|
$ |
26.84 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10. |
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES |
As previously reported, on March 8, 2005 RVI announced that
it had learned of the theft of credit card and other purchase
information from a portion of the Companys customers. On
April 18, 2005, RVI issued the findings from its
investigation into the theft. The theft covered transaction
information involving approximately 1.4 million credit
cards and data from transactions involving approximately 96,000
checks.
DSW and RVI contacted and continue to cooperate with law
enforcement and other authorities with regard to this matter.
The Company is involved in several legal proceedings arising out
of this incident, which seek unspecified monetary damages,
credit monitoring and other relief. After consultation with
counsel, the Company believes that the damages arising out of
these legal proceedings will not exceed the reserves the Company
currently has recorded.
In connection with this matter, the Company entered into a
consent order with the Federal Trade Commission
(FTC), which has jurisdiction over consumer
protection matters. The FTC published the final order on
March 14, 2006, and copies of the complaint and consent
order are available from the FTCs Web site at
http://www.ftc.gov and also from the FTCs Consumer
Response Center, Room 130, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.,
Washington, D.C. 20580.
The Company has not admitted any wrongdoing or that the facts
alleged in the FTCs proposed unfairness complaint are
true. Under the consent order, the Company will pay no fine or
damages. The Company has agreed, however, to maintain a
comprehensive information security program and to undergo a
biannual assessment of such program by an independent third
party.
There can be no assurance that there will not be additional
proceedings or claims brought against the Company in the future.
The Company has contested and will continue to vigorously
contest the claims made against it and will continue to explore
its defenses and possible claims against others.
The Company estimates that the potential exposure for losses
related to this theft including exposure under currently pending
proceedings, ranges from approximately $6.5 million to
approximately $9.5 million. Because of many factors,
including the early development of information regarding the
theft and recoverability under insurance policies, there is no
amount in the estimated range that represents a better estimate
than any other amount in the range. Therefore, in accordance
with Financial Accounting Standard No. 5, Accounting for
Contingencies, the Company has accrued a charge to
operations in the first quarter of fiscal 2005 equal to the low
end of the range set forth above. As the situation develops and
more information becomes available, the amount of the reserve
may increase or decrease accordingly. The amount of any such
change may be material. At January 28, 2006, the balance of
the reserve was $4.8 million.
Although difficult to quantify, since the announcement of the
theft, the Company has not discerned any material negative
effect on sales trends it believes is attributable to the theft.
However, this may not be indicative of the long-term
developments regarding this matter.
F-19
DSW INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Company is involved in various legal proceedings that are
incidental to the conduct of its business. The Company estimates
the range of liability related to pending litigation where the
amount and range of loss can be estimated. The Company records
its best estimate of a loss when the loss is considered
probable. Where a liability is probable and there is a range of
estimated loss, the Company records the most likely estimated
liability related to the claim. In the opinion of management,
the amount of any liability with respect to these proceedings
will not be material. As additional information becomes
available, the Company will assess the potential liability
related to its pending litigation and revises the estimates.
Revisions in our estimates and potential liability could
materially impact the Companys results of operations.
The Company is managed in two operating segments: DSW owned
stores and leased departments. All of the operations are located
in the United States. The Company has identified such segments
based on internal management reporting and management
responsibilities and measures segment profit as gross profit,
which is defined as net sales less cost of sales. The tables
below present segment information (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leased | |
|
|
|
|
DSWStores | |
|
Departments | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
As of January 28, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$ |
1,023,501 |
|
|
$ |
120,560 |
|
|
$ |
1,144,061 |
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
298,082 |
|
|
|
17,637 |
|
|
|
315,719 |
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
25,379 |
|
|
|
158 |
|
|
|
25,537 |
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
479,364 |
|
|
|
28,351 |
|
|
|
507,715 |
|
As of January 29, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$ |
870,692 |
|
|
$ |
90,397 |
|
|
$ |
961,089 |
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
256,159 |
|
|
|
14,052 |
|
|
|
270,211 |
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
32,633 |
|
|
|
1,342 |
|
|
|
33,975 |
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
376,997 |
|
|
|
18,440 |
|
|
|
395,437 |
|
As of January 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$ |
720,635 |
|
|
$ |
70,713 |
|
|
$ |
791,348 |
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
193,600 |
|
|
|
9,327 |
|
|
|
202,927 |
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
19,384 |
|
|
|
2,940 |
|
|
|
22,324 |
|
F-20
DSW INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
12. |
QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thirteen Weeks Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
|
April 30, | |
|
July 30, | |
|
October 29, | |
|
January 28, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands except per share data) | |
Net sales
|
|
$ |
281,806 |
|
|
$ |
276,211 |
|
|
$ |
302,240 |
|
|
$ |
283,804 |
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
(199,008 |
) |
|
|
(199,848 |
) |
|
|
(219,221 |
) |
|
|
(210,265 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
82,798 |
|
|
|
76,363 |
|
|
|
83,019 |
|
|
|
73,539 |
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
(67,745 |
) |
|
|
(55,675 |
) |
|
|
(65,292 |
) |
|
|
(56,895 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit
|
|
|
15,053 |
|
|
|
20,688 |
|
|
|
17,727 |
|
|
|
16,644 |
|
Interest (expense) income, net:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-related
|
|
|
(849 |
) |
|
|
(1,092 |
) |
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
879 |
|
|
Related parties
|
|
|
(2,672 |
) |
|
|
(3,920 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
11,532 |
|
|
|
15,676 |
|
|
|
17,876 |
|
|
|
17,523 |
|
Income taxes expense
|
|
|
(4,552 |
) |
|
|
(6,425 |
) |
|
|
(6,965 |
) |
|
|
(7,484 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
6,980 |
|
|
$ |
9,251 |
|
|
$ |
10,911 |
|
|
$ |
10,039 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share(1):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thirteen Weeks Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
|
May 1, | |
|
July 31, | |
|
October 30, | |
|
January 29, | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands except per share data) | |
Net sales
|
|
$ |
232,559 |
|
|
$ |
234,403 |
|
|
$ |
262,444 |
|
|
$ |
231,683 |
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
(164,972 |
) |
|
|
(167,464 |
) |
|
|
(184,991 |
) |
|
|
(173,451 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
67,587 |
|
|
|
66,939 |
|
|
|
77,453 |
|
|
|
58,232 |
|
Operating Expenses
|
|
|
(53,782 |
) |
|
|
(51,305 |
) |
|
|
(60,664 |
) |
|
|
(48,351 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit
|
|
|
13,805 |
|
|
|
15,634 |
|
|
|
16,789 |
|
|
|
9,881 |
|
Interest expense, net:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-related
|
|
|
(726 |
) |
|
|
(745 |
) |
|
|
(989 |
) |
|
|
(274 |
) |
|
Related parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
13,079 |
|
|
|
14,889 |
|
|
|
15,800 |
|
|
|
9,607 |
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
(5,263 |
) |
|
|
(5,992 |
) |
|
|
(6,358 |
) |
|
|
(807 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
7,816 |
|
|
$ |
8,897 |
|
|
$ |
9,442 |
|
|
$ |
8,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted earnings per share(1)
|
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
|
$ |
0.32 |
|
|
$ |
0.34 |
|
|
$ |
0.32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
The earnings per share calculations for each quarter are based
upon the applicable weighted average shares outstanding for each
period and may not necessarily be equal to the full year share
amount. |
F-21
DSW INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
13. |
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 28, | |
|
January 29, | |
|
January 31, | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Cash paid during the period for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-related parties
|
|
$ |
1,985 |
|
|
$ |
2,138 |
|
|
$ |
2,121 |
|
Related parties
|
|
|
6,591 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
14,649 |
|
|
|
3,998 |
|
|
|
898 |
|
Noncash investing and operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in accounts payable due to asset purchases
|
|
|
193 |
|
|
|
381 |
|
|
|
214 |
|
F-22
DSW INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 29, | |
|
January 28, | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands, except | |
|
|
share amounts) | |
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
ASSETS |
Cash and equivalents
|
|
$ |
159,288 |
|
|
$ |
124,759 |
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
4,144 |
|
|
|
4,039 |
|
Receivables from related parties
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
Inventories
|
|
|
225,183 |
|
|
|
216,698 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets
|
|
|
12,230 |
|
|
|
13,981 |
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
18,648 |
|
|
|
18,591 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
419,505 |
|
|
|
378,117 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
95,188 |
|
|
|
95,921 |
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
25,899 |
|
|
|
25,899 |
|
Tradenames and other intangibles, net
|
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
|
6,216 |
|
Deferred income taxes and other assets
|
|
|
1,882 |
|
|
|
1,562 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
548,474 |
|
|
$ |
507,715 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
Accounts payable
|
|
$ |
96,072 |
|
|
$ |
78,889 |
|
Accounts payable to related parties
|
|
|
4,761 |
|
|
|
6,631 |
|
Accrued expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
4,373 |
|
|
|
9,933 |
|
|
Taxes
|
|
|
21,016 |
|
|
|
9,557 |
|
|
Advertising
|
|
|
10,215 |
|
|
|
8,586 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
24,645 |
|
|
|
25,993 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
161,082 |
|
|
|
139,589 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other noncurrent liabilities
|
|
|
64,215 |
|
|
|
63,410 |
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A Common Shares, no par value; 170,000,000
authorized; 16,198,528 and 16,190,088 issued and outstanding,
respectively
|
|
|
279,651 |
|
|
|
281,119 |
|
Class B Common Shares, no par value; 100,000,000
authorized; 27,702,667 and 27,702,667 issued and outstanding,
respectively
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Shares, no par value; 100,000,000 authorized; no
shares issued or outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
43,526 |
|
|
|
26,007 |
|
Deferred compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,410 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
323,177 |
|
|
|
304,716 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$ |
548,474 |
|
|
$ |
507,715 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying Notes are an integral part of the Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-23
DSW INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
|
April 29, | |
|
April 30, | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands, | |
|
|
except share and | |
|
|
per share amounts) | |
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
Net sales
|
|
$ |
316,487 |
|
|
$ |
281,806 |
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
(223,200 |
) |
|
|
(199,008 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
93,287 |
|
|
|
82,798 |
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
(65,398 |
) |
|
|
(67,745 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit
|
|
|
27,889 |
|
|
|
15,053 |
|
Interest income (expense), net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-related parties
|
|
|
1,324 |
|
|
|
(849 |
) |
|
Related parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,672 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before income taxes
|
|
|
29,213 |
|
|
|
11,532 |
|
Income tax provision
|
|
|
(11,694 |
) |
|
|
(4,552 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
17,519 |
|
|
$ |
6,980 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
Shares used in per share calculations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
43,896 |
|
|
|
27,703 |
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
44,144 |
|
|
|
27,703 |
|
The accompanying Notes are an integral part of the Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-24
DSW INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS
EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A | |
|
Class B | |
|
Class A | |
|
Class B | |
|
|
|
Deferred | |
|
|
|
|
Common | |
|
Common | |
|
Common | |
|
Common | |
|
Retained | |
|
Compensation | |
|
|
|
|
Shares | |
|
Shares | |
|
Shares | |
|
Shares | |
|
Earnings | |
|
Expense | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
|
|
(unaudited) | |
Balance, January 29, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,703 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
101,442 |
|
|
$ |
77,384 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
178,826 |
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,980 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,980 |
|
Dividend to parent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(101,442 |
) |
|
|
(63,558 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(165,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, April 30, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,703 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
20,806 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
20,806 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, January 28, 2006
|
|
|
16,190 |
|
|
|
27,703 |
|
|
$ |
281,119 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
26,007 |
|
|
$ |
(2,410 |
) |
|
$ |
304,716 |
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,519 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,519 |
|
Reclassification of unamortized deferred compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,410 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,410 |
|
|
|
|
|
Stock units granted
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
Exercise of stock options
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
152 |
|
Tax benefit related to stock options exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
Stock based compensation expense, before related tax effects
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
741 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
741 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, April 29, 2006
|
|
|
16,199 |
|
|
|
27,703 |
|
|
$ |
279,651 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
43,526 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
323,177 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying Notes are an integral part of the Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-25
DSW INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
|
April 29, | |
|
April 30, | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
17,519 |
|
|
$ |
6,980 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
4,901 |
|
|
|
4,719 |
|
Amortization of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
98 |
|
Stock based compensation expense
|
|
|
741 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
(217 |
) |
|
|
(3,213 |
) |
Loss on disposal of assets
|
|
|
319 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
Grants of director stock units
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
Change in working capital, assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(105 |
) |
|
|
(774 |
) |
|
Accounts receivable from related parties
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
(8,485 |
) |
|
|
(20,071 |
) |
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets
|
|
|
1,561 |
|
|
|
(5,136 |
) |
|
Advances to/from affiliates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,325 |
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
14,973 |
|
|
|
9,636 |
|
|
Proceeds from lease incentives
|
|
|
1,624 |
|
|
|
1,828 |
|
|
Other noncurrent liabilities
|
|
|
(819 |
) |
|
|
632 |
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
6,141 |
|
|
|
6,752 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
38,234 |
|
|
|
25,790 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(3,892 |
) |
|
|
(5,315 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(3,892 |
) |
|
|
(5,315 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in revolving credit facility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,000 |
) |
Debt issuance costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(96 |
) |
Proceeds from exercise of stock options
|
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
|
|
Tax benefit related to stock options exercised
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
(15,096 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and equivalents
|
|
|
34,529 |
|
|
|
5,379 |
|
Cash and equivalents, beginning of period
|
|
|
124,759 |
|
|
|
8,339 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and equivalents, end of period
|
|
$ |
159,288 |
|
|
$ |
13,718 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying Notes are an integral part of the Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-26
DSW INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
DSW Inc. (DSW) and its wholly-owned subsidiary, DSW
Shoe Warehouse, Inc. (DSWSW), are herein referred to
collectively as DSW or the Company. Prior to December 2004, DSW
was a wholly-owned subsidiary of Value City Department Stores,
Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Retail Ventures, Inc.
(RVI or Retail Ventures). In December
2004, RVI completed a corporate reorganization whereby Value
City Department Stores, Inc. merged with and into Value City
Department Stores LLC (Value City), another
wholly-owned subsidiary of RVI. In turn, Value City transferred
all of the issued and outstanding shares of DSW to RVI in
exchange for a promissory note. On June 29, 2005, DSW
commenced an initial public offering (IPO) that
closed on July 5, 2005. DSWs Class A common
stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange trading under the
symbol DSW.
DSW operates in two segments and sells better-branded footwear
in both. DSW stores also sell accessories. As of April 29,
2006, DSW operated a total of 204 stores located throughout the
United States as one segment. These DSW stores offer a wide
selection of brand name and designer dress, casual and athletic
footwear for men and women. DSW also operates leased shoe
departments for three non-affiliated retailers and one
affiliated retailer in our leased department segment. DSW
entered into supply agreements to merchandise the non-affiliated
shoe departments in Stein Mart, Inc. (Stein Mart),
Gordmans, Inc. (Gordmans) and Frugal Fannies
Fashion Warehouse (Frugal Fannies) as of July
2002, June 2004 and September 2003, respectively. DSW has
operated leased shoe departments for Filenes Basement,
Inc. (Filenes Basement), a wholly-owned
subsidiary of RVI, since its acquisition by RVI in March 2000.
Effective as of January 30, 2005, we updated and reaffirmed
our contractual arrangement with Filenes Basement. DSW
owns the merchandise, records sales of merchandise net of
returns and sales tax, owns the fixtures (except for
Filenes Basement) and provides supervisory assistance in
these covered locations. Stein Mart, Gordmans, Frugal
Fannies and Filenes Basement provide the sales
associates. DSW pays a percentage of net sales as rent. As of
April 29, 2006, DSW supplied 158 leased departments for
Stein Mart, 57 for Gordmans, 25 for Filenes Basement and
one for Frugal Fannies.
DSW opened five new DSW stores during the three months ended
April 29, 2006 and seven new DSW stores during the three
months ended April 30, 2005. In addition, during the three
months ended April 30, 2005, DSW re-categorized two DSW
stores as leased departments.
|
|
2. |
INITIAL PUBLIC OFFERING |
On July 5, 2005, DSW closed on its IPO of 16,171,875
Class A Common Shares raising net proceeds of
$285.8 million, net of the underwriters commission
and before expenses of approximately $7.8 million. DSW used
the net proceeds of the offering to repay $196.6 million of
intercompany indebtedness, including interest, owed to RVI and
for working capital and general corporate purposes, including
the paying down of $20 million outstanding on RVIs
old secured revolving credit facility and $10 million
intercompany advance. The 410.09 common shares of DSW held by
RVI outstanding at January 29, 2005 were changed to
27,702,667 Class B Common Shares. It is the 27,702,667
Class B Common Shares which are being used in the prior
periods calculation of earnings per share. Subsequent to
the IPO, the transactions between DSW and RVI and its other
subsidiaries are settled in accordance with a shared services
agreement and resulted in the advances from affiliates being
classified as a current receivable or payable, as appropriate.
At April 29, 2006, Retail Ventures owned approximately
63.1% of DSWs outstanding Common Shares, representing
approximately 93.2% of the combined voting power of DSWs
outstanding Common Shares.
F-27
DSW INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(UNAUDITED)
The accompanying unaudited interim financial statements should
be read in conjunction with the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on
April 13, 2006 (the 2005 Annual Report).
In the opinion of management, the unaudited interim financial
statements reflect all adjustments, consisting of normal
recurring adjustments, which are necessary to present fairly the
consolidated financial position and results of operations for
the periods presented.
|
|
4. |
ADOPTION OF ACCOUNTING STANDARDS |
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
periodically issues Statements of Financial Accounting Standards
(SFAS), some of which require implementation by a
date falling within or after the close of the fiscal year.
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123
(revised 2004) Share-Based Payment
(SFAS No. 123R). This statement
revised SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation, (SFAS No. 123) and
requires a fair value measurement of all stock-based payments to
employees, including grants of employee stock options, and
recognition of those expenses in the statements of operations.
SFAS No. 123R establishes standards for the accounting
for transactions in which an entity exchanges its equity
instruments for goods and services and focuses on accounting for
transactions in which an entity obtains employee services in
share-based payment transactions. In addition,
SFAS No. 123R requires the recognition of compensation
expense over the period during which an employee is required to
provide service in exchange for an award. The effective date of
this standard was originally established to be interim and
annual periods beginning after June 15, 2005.
In April 2005, the SEC delayed the compliance date for
SFAS No. 123R until the beginning of DSWs 2006
fiscal year. Effective January 29, 2006, the Company
adopted SFAS No. 123R. The impact of adoption to the
Companys results of operations is presented in Note 5.
FASB Statement No. 154, Accounting Changes and Error
Corrections a replacement of APB Opinion No. 20
and FASB Statement No. 3
(SFAS No. 154) was issued in May 2005.
SFAS No. 154 changes the requirements for the
accounting for and reporting of a change in accounting
principle. SFAS No. 154 is effective for accounting
changes and corrections of errors made in fiscal years beginning
after December 15, 2005. The adoption of this new
pronouncement in fiscal 2006 was not material to the
Companys financial condition, results of operations or
cash flows.
|
|
5. |
STOCK BASED COMPENSATION |
The Company has a 2005 Equity Incentive Plan that provides for
the issuance of equity awards to purchase up to 4,600,000 common
shares, including stock options and restricted stock units to
management, key employees of the Company and affiliates,
consultants (as defined in the plan), and directors of the
Company. Options generally vest 20% per year on a
cumulative basis. Options granted under the 2005 Equity
Incentive Plan generally remain exercisable for a period of ten
years from the date of grant. Prior to fiscal 2005, the Company
did not have a stock option plan or any equity units outstanding.
On January 29, 2006, DSW adopted the fair value recognition
provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) SFAS No. 123R relating to its stock-based
compensation plans. Prior to January 29, 2006, DSW had
accounted for stock-based compensation in accordance with APB
No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,
and related interpretations. In accordance with APB 25,
compensation expense for
F-28
DSW INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(UNAUDITED)
employee stock options was generally not recognized for options
granted that had an exercise price equal to the market value of
the underlying common shares on the date of grant.
Under the modified prospective method of
SFAS No. 123R, compensation expense was recognized
during the three months ended April 29, 2006, for all
unvested stock options, based on the grant date fair value
estimated in accordance with the original provisions of
SFAS No. 123, and for all stock based payments granted
after January 29, 2006, based on the grant date fair value
estimated in accordance with the provisions of
SFAS No. 123R. Stock-based compensation expense was
recorded in operating expenses in the condensed consolidated
statement of income. The Companys financial results for
the prior periods have not been restated.
During the three months ended April 29, 2006, the Company
recorded stock based compensation expense of approximately
$0.7 million.
Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123R, the Company
presented all tax benefits of deductions resulting from the
exercise of stock options as operating cash flows in the
condensed consolidated statement of cash flows.
SFAS No. 123R requires the cash flows resulting from
the tax benefits resulting from tax deductions in excess of
compensation expense recognized for those options (excess tax
benefits) to be classified as financing cash flows.
Consistent with the valuation method used for the disclosure
only provisions of SFAS No. 123, the Company uses the
Black-Scholes option-pricing model to value stock-based
compensation expense. This model assumes that the estimated fair
value of options is amortized over the options vesting
periods and the compensation costs would be included in
operating expenses in the condensed consolidated statement of
income.
Forfeitures are estimated at the grant date based on historical
rates of the parent companys stock option activity and
reduce the compensation expense recognized. The expected term of
options granted is derived from historical data of the parent
companys stock options due to the limited historical data
on the DSW stock activity and was five years for the three
months ended April 29, 2006. The risk-free interest rate is
based on the yield for U.S. Treasury securities with a
remaining life equal to the five year expected term of the
options at the grant date. Expected volatility is based on the
historical volatility of the DSW common shares combined with the
historical volatility of four similar companies common
shares, due to the relative short historical trading history of
the DSW common shares. The expected volatility used for the
three months ended April 29, 2006 was 42.62%. The expected
dividend yield curve is zero, which is based on the
Companys intention of not declaring dividends to
shareholders combined with the limitations on declaring
dividends as set forth in the Companys credit facility.
The weighted-average fair value of each option granted for the
three months ended April 29, 2006 was $13.24 per share.
F-29
DSW INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(UNAUDITED)
The following table summarizes the Companys stock option
plans and related Weighted Average Exercise Prices
(WAEP) for the three months ended April 29,
2006 (in thousands, except WAEP amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average | |
|
Aggregate | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining | |
|
Intrinsic | |
|
|
Shares | |
|
WAEP | |
|
Contract Life | |
|
Value | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Outstanding beginning of period
|
|
|
914 |
|
|
$ |
19.54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
29.76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
19.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(36 |
) |
|
|
19.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding end of period
|
|
|
977 |
|
|
$ |
20.68 |
|
|
|
9 years |
|
|
$ |
10,380 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable end of period
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
$ |
19.00 |
|
|
|
9 years |
|
|
$ |
541 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares available for additional grants
|
|
|
3,465 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The aggregate intrinsic value is calculated as the amount by
which the fair value of the underlying common shares exceeds the
option exercise price. The total intrinsic value of options
exercised during the three months ended April 29, 2006 was
$0.1 million.
As of April 29, 2006, the total compensation cost related
to nonvested options not yet recognized was approximately
$3.1 million with a weighted average expense recognition
period remaining of 4.3 years. The total fair value of
options that vested during the three months ended April 29,
2006 was $0.2 million.
The following table summarizes information about options
outstanding as of April 29, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding | |
|
Options Exercisable | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract | |
|
|
|
|
Range of Exercise Prices |
|
Shares | |
|
Life | |
|
WAEP | |
|
Shares | |
|
WAEP | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
$19.00 - $20.00
|
|
|
785,900 |
|
|
|
9 years |
|
|
$ |
19.00 |
|
|
|
44,000 |
|
|
$ |
19.00 |
|
$20.01 - $25.00
|
|
|
73,300 |
|
|
|
10 years |
|
|
$ |
24.52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$25.01 - $30.00
|
|
|
56,300 |
|
|
|
10 years |
|
|
$ |
27.57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$30.01 - $32.00
|
|
|
61,900 |
|
|
|
10 years |
|
|
$ |
31.21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company granted approximately 131,000 restricted stock units
to employees during fiscal 2005. Restricted stock units
generally cliff vest at the end of four years and expire ten
years from the grant date. Restricted stock units granted to
employees that are subject to the risk of forfeiture are not
included in the computation of basic earnings per share.
Compensation cost is measured at fair value on the grant date
and recorded over the vesting period. Fair value is determined
by multiplying the number of units granted by the grant date
market price. DSW did not award any restricted stock units
during the three months ended April 29, 2006 and no
restricted stock units vested or were forfeited during the
quarter. The weighted average fair value of the nonvested
restricted stock units at the beginning and the end of the
period was $20.46 per unit. The total aggregate intrinsic
value of nonvested restricted stock units at April 29, 2006
was $4.1 million and the weighted average remaining
contractual life was nine years. As of April 29, 2006, the
total compensation cost related to nonvested
F-30
DSW INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(UNAUDITED)
restricted stock units not yet recognized was approximately
$2.2 million with a weighted average expense recognition
period remaining of 3.0 years.
In 2005, the Company issued approximately 17,000 stock units to
directors who are not employees of the Company or Retail
Ventures. Stock units will be automatically granted to each
director who is not an employee of the Company or Retail
Ventures on the date of each annual meeting of the shareholders
for the purpose of electing directors. The number of stock units
granted to each non-employee director is calculated by dividing
one-half of their annual retainer (excluding any amount paid for
service as the chair of a board committee) by the fair market
value of a share of DSW stock on the date of the meeting. In
addition, each director eligible to receive compensation for
board service may elect to have the cash portion of their
compensation paid in the form of restricted stock units. Stock
units granted to non-employee directors vest immediately and are
settled upon the director terminating service from the board.
Stock units granted to directors which are not subject to
forfeiture are considered to be outstanding for the purposes of
computing basic earnings per share.
Basic earnings per share are based on net income and a simple
weighted average of Class A and Class B Common Shares
and directors stock units outstanding. Diluted earnings per
share reflect the potential dilution of Class A Common
Shares related to outstanding stock options and restricted stock
units. The numerator for the diluted earnings per share
calculation is net income. The denominator is the weighted
average diluted shares outstanding.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
|
April 29, | |
|
April 30, | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Weighted average shares outstanding
|
|
|
43,896 |
|
|
|
27,703 |
|
Assumed exercise of dilutive stock options
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
|
|
Assumed exercise of dilutive restricted stock units
|
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of shares for computation of dilutive earnings per share
|
|
|
44,144 |
|
|
|
27,703 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended April 29, 2006, all potentially
dilutive stock options were dilutive. For the three months ended
April 30, 2005, there were no potentially dilutive
instruments outstanding.
|
|
|
DSW $150 Million Credit Facility |
In July 2005, upon the consummation of DSWs IPO, RVI and
the lenders thereunder amended or terminated the existing credit
facilities and other debt obligations of Value City and its
other affiliates, including certain facilities under which DSW
had rights and obligations as a co-borrower and co-guarantor and
released DSW and DSWSW from their obligations as co-borrowers
and co-guarantors. At the same time, DSW entered into a new
$150 million secured revolving credit facility with a term
of five years.
Under this new facility, DSW and DSWSW are named as
co-borrowers. The new secured revolving credit facility has
borrowing base restrictions and provides for borrowings at
variable interest rates based on London Interbank Offered Rate
(LIBOR), the prime rate and the Federal Funds
effective rate, plus a margin. DSWs obligations under its
new secured revolving credit facility are collateralized by a
lien on
F-31
DSW INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(UNAUDITED)
substantially all of DSWs and its subsidiarys
personal property and a pledge of all of its shares of DSWSW. In
addition, this facility contains usual and customary restrictive
covenants relating to DSWs management and the operation of
its business. These covenants, among other things, restrict
DSWs ability to grant liens on its assets, incur
additional indebtedness, open or close stores, pay cash
dividends and redeem its stock, enter into transactions with
affiliates and merge or consolidate with another entity. In
addition, if at any time DSW utilizes over 90% of its borrowing
capacity under this facility, it must comply with a fixed charge
coverage ratio test set forth in the facility documents. At
April 29, 2006 and January 28, 2006, DSW had no
balance outstanding and was in compliance with the terms of the
secured revolving credit facility.
Credit Facilities Under Which DSW is No Longer
Obligated In March 2005, DSW and RVI and certain
of their affiliates increased the ceiling under their
then-existing revolving credit facility from $350 million
to $425 million. The increase of $75 million to the
revolving credit facility was accomplished by amendment under
substantially the same terms as the then-existing revolving
credit agreement.
In March 2005, DSW declared a dividend and issued an
intercompany note to RVI in the amount of $165 million. The
indebtedness evidenced by this note was scheduled to mature in
March 2020 and bore interest at a rate equal to LIBOR, plus
850 basis points per year.
In May 2005, DSW declared an additional dividend and issued an
intercompany note to RVI in the amount of $25 million. The
indebtedness evidenced by this note was scheduled to mature in
May 2020 and bore interest at a rate equal to LIBOR, plus
950 basis points per year.
In July 2005, subsequent to the IPO, DSW prepaid in full,
without penalty, the principal balance of both the
$165 million and $25 million dividend notes, plus
accrued interest of approximately $6.6 million.
The Company is managed in two operating segments: DSW owned
stores and leased departments. All of the operations are located
in the United States. The Company has identified such segments
based on internal management reporting and management
responsibilities and measures segment profit as gross profit,
which is defined as net sales less cost of sales. The tables
below present segment information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DSW | |
|
Leased | |
|
|
|
|
Stores | |
|
Departments | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Three months ended April 29, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$ |
283,813 |
|
|
$ |
32,674 |
|
|
$ |
316,487 |
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
87,187 |
|
|
|
6,100 |
|
|
|
93,287 |
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
4,115 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
4,232 |
|
As of April 29, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
521,873 |
|
|
|
26,601 |
|
|
|
548,474 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DSW | |
|
Leased | |
|
|
|
|
Stores | |
|
Departments | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Three months ended April 30, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$ |
251,310 |
|
|
$ |
30,496 |
|
|
$ |
281,806 |
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
77,743 |
|
|
|
5,055 |
|
|
|
82,798 |
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
5,465 |
|
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
5,579 |
|
As of January 28, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
479,364 |
|
|
|
28,351 |
|
|
|
507,715 |
|
F-32
DSW INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
9. |
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
|
April 29, | |
|
April 30, | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Cash paid during the period for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest to non-related parties
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
1,021 |
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
$ |
2,605 |
|
|
$ |
494 |
|
Noncash investing and operating activities
Changes in accounts payable due to asset purchases
|
|
$ |
340 |
|
|
$ |
264 |
|
|
|
10. |
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES |
As previously reported, on March 8, 2005 RVI announced that
it had learned of the theft of credit card and other purchase
information from a portion of the Companys customers. On
April 18, 2005, RVI issued the findings from its
investigation into the theft. The theft covered transaction
information involving approximately 1.4 million credit
cards and data from transactions involving approximately 96,000
checks.
DSW and RVI contacted and continue to cooperate with law
enforcement and other authorities with regard to this matter.
The Company is involved in several legal proceedings arising out
of this incident, including four putative class action lawsuits,
which seek unspecified monetary damages, credit monitoring and
other relief.
In connection with this matter, DSW entered into a consent order
with the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), which has
jurisdiction over consumer protection matters. The FTC published
the final order on March 14, 2006, and copies of the
complaint and consent order are available from the FTCs
Web site at http://www.ftc.gov and also from the FTCs
Consumer Response Center, Room 130, 600 Pennsylvania
Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20580.
DSW has not admitted any wrongdoing or that the facts alleged in
the FTCs proposed unfairness complaint are true. Under the
consent order, DSW will pay no fine or damages. DSW has agreed,
however, to maintain a comprehensive information security
program and to undergo a biannual assessment of such program by
an independent third party.
There can be no assurance that there will not be additional
proceedings or claims brought against the Company in the future.
The Company has contested and will continue to vigorously
contest the claims made against it and will continue to explore
its defenses and possible claims against others.
The Company estimates that the potential exposure for losses
related to this theft, including exposure under currently
pending proceedings, range from approximately $6.5 million
to approximately $9.5 million. Because of many factors,
including the early development of information regarding the
theft and recoverability under insurance policies, there is no
amount in the estimated range that represents a better estimate
than any other amount in the range. Therefore, in accordance
with Financial Accounting Standard No. 5, Accounting for
Contingencies, the Company has accrued a charge to
operations in the first quarter of fiscal 2005 equal to the low
end of the range set forth above, or $6.5 million. As the
situation develops and more information becomes available, the
amount of the reserve may increase or decrease accordingly. The
amount of any such change may be material. As of April 29,
2006, the remaining balance of the associated accrual for
potential exposure was $4.6 million.
F-33
DSW INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(UNAUDITED)
Although difficult to quantify, since the announcement of the
theft, the Company has not discerned any material negative
effect on sales trends it believes is attributable to the theft.
However, this may not be indicative of the long-term
developments regarding this matter.
The Company is involved in various other legal proceedings that
are incidental to the conduct of its business. The Company
estimates the range of liability related to pending litigation
where the amount and range of loss can be estimated. The Company
records its best estimate of a loss when the loss is considered
probable. Where a liability is probable and there is a range of
estimated loss, the Company records the minimum estimated
liability related to the claim. In the opinion of management,
the amount of any liability with respect to these legal
proceedings will not be material. As additional information
becomes available, the Company assesses the potential liability
related to its pending litigation and revises the estimates.
Revisions in the Companys estimates and potential
liability could materially impact its results of operations and
financial condition.
On May 30, 2006, the Company entered into an Amended and
Restated Supply Agreement (the Agreement) to supply
shoes to Stein Mart. Under the terms of the Agreement, the
Company will be the exclusive supplier of shoes (the
Merchandise) to all Stein Mart stores that have shoe
departments. As of April 29, 2006, the Company supplied
Merchandise to 158 Stein Mart stores. The Company will own the
Merchandise until the Merchandise is sold to the customer. The
Company will receive a percentage of the net revenue generated
from the sale of the Merchandise consistent with the previous
agreement as now amended. The Agreement terminates on
December 31, 2009, but will automatically extend for
another three years in the event that neither party gives notice
of its intent not to renew.
F-34
Class A Common Shares
PROSPECTUS
,
2006
PART II
INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS
|
|
Item 14. |
Other Expenses of Issuance and Distribution |
The following table sets forth the estimated fees and expenses
(except for the Securities and Exchange Commission registration
fee, the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. filing
fee and the NYSE, Inc. listing fee) payable by the selling
shareholder in connection with the registration of the
Class A Common Shares:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities and Exchange Commission registration fee
|
|
$ |
|
|
National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. filing fee
|
|
$ |
|
|
NYSE listing fee
|
|
$ |
|
|
Printing and engraving costs
|
|
$ |
200,000 |
* |
Legal fees and expenses
|
|
$ |
1,835,000 |
* |
Accountants fees and expenses
|
|
$ |
100,000 |
* |
Blue sky qualification fees and expenses
|
|
$ |
30,000 |
* |
Miscellaneous
|
|
$ |
205,000 |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
2,438,906 |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
Represents total estimated costs and expenses payable by Retail
Ventures associated with the offering of the PIES and our
Class A Common Shares deliverable upon exchange of the PIES. |
|
|
Item 15. |
Indemnification of Directors and Officers |
Ohio Law
Pursuant to Section 1701.13(E) of the Ohio Revised Code, an
Ohio corporation is permitted to indemnify directors, officers
and other persons under certain circumstances. In some
circumstances, an Ohio corporation is required to indemnify
directors and officers.
An Ohio corporation is required to indemnify a director or
officer against expenses actually and reasonably incurred to the
extent that the director or officer is successful in defending a
lawsuit brought against him or her by reason of the fact that
the director or officer is or was a director or officer of the
corporation.
If a director or officer is not successful in an action brought
against the director or officer, he or she still may be
indemnified under certain circumstances. In actions brought
against a director or officer by any person (other than the
corporation or on behalf of the corporation), the defendant
director or officer may be indemnified for expenses, judgments,
fines and amounts paid in settlement if it is determined that
the defendant was acting in good faith, in a manner he
reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best
interests of the corporation, and in a criminal proceeding, that
he or she had no reasonable cause to believe his or her conduct
was unlawful. The determination of whether to indemnify an
unsuccessful director or officer may be made by any of the
following: (i) a majority vote of a quorum of disinterested
directors; (ii) independent legal counsel; (iii) the
shareholders; or (iv) a court of competent jurisdiction.
If a director or officer is not successful in an action brought
by or on behalf of the corporation against the director or
officer, the defendant director or officer may be indemnified
only for expenses if it is determined that the defendant was
acting in good faith and in a manner he reasonably believed to
be in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation.
In an action brought by or behalf of the corporation, if the
director or officer is adjudged to be liable for negligence or
misconduct, no indemnification for expenses is permitted unless
authorized by court order. Similarly, if a director is not
successful in an action brought by or on behalf of the
corporation against a director where the only liability asserted
is for authorizing unlawful
II-1
loans, dividends, distributions or purchase of the
corporations own shares, no indemnification for expenses
is permitted under the statute.
Unless otherwise provided in the articles or regulation of a
corporation and unless the only liability asserted against a
director is for authorizing unlawful loans, dividends,
distributions or purchase of the corporations own shares,
directors (but not any other person) are entitled to mandatory
advancement of expenses incurred in defending any action,
including derivative actions, brought against the director,
provided that the director agrees to cooperate with the
corporation concerning the matter and to repay the amount
advanced if it is proved by clear and convincing evidence that
his or her act or failure to act was done with deliberate intent
to cause injury to the corporation or with reckless disregard to
the corporations best interests.
Pursuant to Ohio law, a director is not liable for monetary
damages unless it is proved by clear and convincing evidence in
a court of competent jurisdiction that his or her action or
failure to act involved an act or omission undertaken with
deliberate intent to cause injury to the corporation or
undertaken with reckless disregard for the best interests of the
corporation. There is, however, no comparable provision limiting
the liability of officers, employees or agents of a corporation.
The statutory right of indemnification is not exclusive in Ohio,
and a corporation may, among other things, grant rights to
indemnification under the corporations articles, code of
regulation or agreements. Ohio corporations are also
specifically authorized to procure insurance against any
liability that may be asserted against directors and officers,
whether or not the corporation would have the power to indemnify
such officials.
Code of Regulations
Article Five of the registrants code of regulations
contains certain indemnification provisions adopted pursuant to
authority contained in Section 1701.13(E) of the Ohio
Revised Code.
The registrants code of regulations provides for the
indemnification of every person who was or is a party or is
threatened to be made a party to, or is or was involved or is
threatened to be involved in, any threatened, pending or
completed action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal,
arbitrative, administrative or investigative, by reason of the
fact that such person is or was a director or officer of the
corporation or is or was serving at the request of the
corporation as a director, trustee, officer, partner, member or
manager, of another corporation, limited liability company,
partnership, joint venture, trust, employee benefit plan or
other enterprise, against all expenses, judgments, fines, excise
taxes assessed with respect to an employee benefit plan,
penalties and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably
incurred by such person in connection with any proceeding, if he
or she acted in good faith and in a manner in which he or she
reasonably believed to be in and not opposed to the best
interests of the corporation, and, with respect to any criminal
proceeding, he or she did not have reasonable cause to believe
that his or her conduct was unlawful.
In addition, the registrants code of regulations provides
that the registrant shall not provide indemnification for any
person (i) in such persons capacity as a director of
the registrant in respect of any claim issue or matter asserted
in a proceeding by or in the right of the corporation as to
which such person shall have been adjudged liable to the
registrant for an act or omission undertaken by such person with
deliberate intent to cause injury to the corporation or with
reckless disregard for the registrants best interests,
(ii) in such persons capacity other than that of a
director of the registrant in respect of any claim, issue or
matter asserted in a proceeding by or in light of the registrant
as to which the indemnitee shall have been adjudged to be liable
to the corporation for negligence or misconduct, or
(iii) in any proceeding by or in the right of the
corporation in which the only liability asserted relates to the
authorization of unlawful loans, dividends, distributions or
repurchase of the registrants own shares, absent a court
order.
Indemnification Agreements
We have entered into indemnification agreements with our
directors and executive officers. Pursuant to the
indemnification agreements, we agreed to indemnify an indemnitee
to the greatest extent permitted by
II-2
Ohio law as set forth above and in its code of regulations.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, an indemnitee will not be
entitled to indemnification under the indemnification agreement:
|
|
|
|
|
with respect to any claim brought or made by an indemnitee in a
proceeding, unless the bringing or making of such claim has been
approved or ratified by the board of directors; provided,
however, that the foregoing does not apply to any claim brought
or made by an indemnitee to enforce a right of an indemnitee
under the indemnification agreement; |
|
|
|
for expenses incurred by an indemnitee with respect to any
action instituted by or in the name of DSW against the
indemnitee, if and to the extent that a court of competent
jurisdiction declares or otherwise determines in a final,
unappealable judgment that each of the material defenses
asserted by such indemnitee was made in bad faith or was
frivolous; |
|
|
|
for expenses and other liabilities arising from the purchase and
sale by an indemnitee of securities in violation of
Section 16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, or any similar state or successor statute; and |
|
|
|
for expenses and other liabilities if and to the extent that a
court of competent jurisdiction declares or otherwise determines
in a final, unappealable judgment that DSW is prohibited by
applicable law from making such indemnification payment or that
such indemnification payment is otherwise unlawful. |
Insurance
In addition, we provide insurance coverage to our directors and
officers against certain liabilities which might be incurred by
them in such capacity. Such insurance coverage is provided
through the shared services agreement with Retail Ventures.
Reference is also made to the Underwriting Agreement filed as
Exhibit 1.1 to this Registration Statement for information
concerning the underwriters obligation to indemnify us and
our officers and directors in certain circumstances.
|
|
Item 16. |
Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules |
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
|
|
|
|
1 |
.1 |
|
Form of Underwriting Agreement. |
|
3 |
.1 |
|
Amended Articles of Incorporation of the registrant.* |
|
3 |
.2 |
|
Amended and Restated Code of Regulations of the registrant.* |
|
4 |
.1 |
|
Specimen Class A Common Shares certificate. |
|
4 |
.2 |
|
Second Amended and Restated Registration Rights Agreement, dated
as of July 5, 2005, by and among Retail Ventures, Inc.,
Cerberus Partners, L.P., Schottenstein Stores Corporation and
Back Bay Funding LLC. Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.2 to Retail Ventures Form 8-K (file
no. 1-10767) filed July 11, 2005. |
|
4 |
.3 |
|
Exchange Agreement, dated July 5, 2005, by and between
Retail Ventures, Inc. and DSW Inc. Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.4 to Retail Ventures Form 8-K (file
no. 1-10767) filed July 11, 2005. |
|
4 |
.4 |
|
Amended Common Stock Purchase Warrant issued by Retail Ventures,
Inc. to Cerberus Partners, L.P. Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.1 to Retail Ventures Form 8-K (file
no. 1-10767) filed October 19, 2005. |
|
4 |
.5 |
|
Amended Common Stock Purchase Warrant issued by Retail Ventures,
Inc. to Schottenstein Stores Corporation. Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Retail Ventures
Form 8-K (file no. 1-10767) filed October 19,
2005. |
|
4 |
.6 |
|
Form of Conversion Warrant issued by Retail Ventures, Inc. to
Cerberus Partners, L.P. and Schottenstein Stores Corporation.
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Form 8-K
(file no. 1-10767) filed July 11, 2005. |
II-3
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
|
|
|
|
4 |
.7 |
|
Form of Term Loan Warrant issued by Retail Ventures, Inc. to
Millennium Partners, L.P. Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.1 to Retail Ventures Form 10-Q (file
no. 1-10767) filed December 8, 2005. |
|
5 |
.1 |
|
Opinion of Vorys, Sater, Seymour and Pease LLP. |
|
10 |
.1 |
|
Corporate Services Agreement, dated June 12, 2002, between
Retail Ventures and Schottenstein Stores Corporation.
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to Retail
Ventures Form 10-Q (file no. 1-10767) filed
June 18, 2002. |
|
10 |
.1.1 |
|
Amendment to Corporate Services Agreement, dated July 5,
2005, among Retail Ventures, Schottenstein Stores Corporation
and Schottenstein Management Company, together with Side Letter
Agreement, dated July 5, 2005, among Schottenstein Stores
Corporation, Retail Ventures, Inc., Schottenstein Management
Company and DSW Inc. related thereto. Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 5 to Retail Ventures Form 8-K (file
no. 1-10767) filed July 11, 2005. |
|
10 |
.2 |
|
Employment Agreement, dated March 4, 2005, between Deborah
L. Ferrée and DSW Inc.**# |
|
10 |
.3 |
|
Employment Agreement, dated June 1, 2005, between Peter Z.
Horvath and DSW Inc.**# |
|
10 |
.4 |
|
Employment Agreement, dated June 1, 2005, between Douglas
J. Probst and DSW Inc.**# |
|
10 |
.5 |
|
Employment Agreement, dated December 1, 2005, between Kevin
Lonergan and DSW Inc. Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Form 8-K filed
January 24, 2006.# |
|
10 |
.6 |
|
Employment Agreement, dated June 26, 2005, between Derek
Ungless and DSW Inc.*# |
|
10 |
.7 |
|
Summary of Director Compensation.*# |
|
10 |
.11 |
|
Loan and Security Agreement, between DSW Inc. and DSW Shoe
Warehouse, Inc., as the Borrowers, and National City Business
Credit, Inc., as Administrative Agent and Collateral Agent for
the Revolving Credit Lenders.* |
|
10 |
.15 |
|
Lease, dated March 22, 2000, by and between East Fifth
Avenue, LLC, an affiliate of Schottenstein Stores Corporation,
as landlord, and Shonac, as tenant, re: warehouse facility and
corporate headquarters. Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.60 to Retail Ventures Form 10-K (file
no. 1-10767) filed April 28, 2000. |
|
10 |
.16 |
|
Form of Common Stock Purchase Warrants (with respect to the
stock of Retail Ventures) issued to Cerberus Partners, L.P. and
Schottenstein Stores Corporation. Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.5 to Retail Ventures Form 10-Q (file
no. 1-10767) filed June 18, 2002. |
|
10 |
.17 |
|
Form of Conversion Warrant to be issued by Retail Ventures to
Schottenstein Stores Corporation and Cerberus Partners, L.P.** |
|
10 |
.23 |
|
DSW Inc. 2005 Equity Incentive Plan.*# |
|
10 |
.23.1 |
|
Form of Restricted Stock Units Award Agreement for Employees.**# |
|
10 |
.23.2 |
|
Form of Stock Units for automatic grants to non-employee
directors.**# |
|
10 |
.23.3 |
|
Form of Stock Units for conversion of non-employee
directors cash retainer.**# |
|
10 |
.23.4 |
|
Form of Non-Employee Directors Cash Retainer Deferral
Election Form.**# |
|
10 |
.23.5 |
|
Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Award Agreement for
Consultants.**# |
|
10 |
.23.6 |
|
Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Award Agreement for
Employees.**# |
|
10 |
.24 |
|
DSW Inc. 2005 Cash Incentive Compensation Plan.*# |
|
10 |
.25 |
|
Master Separation Agreement, dated July 5, 2005, between
Retail Ventures, Inc. and DSW. Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to Retail Ventures Form 8-K (file
no. 1-10767) filed July 11, 2005. |
|
10 |
.26 |
|
Shared Services Agreement, dated as of January 30, 2005,
between Retail Ventures, Inc. and DSW. Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.2 to Retail Ventures Form 8-K
(file no. 1-10767) filed July 11, 2005. |
|
10 |
.27 |
|
Tax Separation Agreement, dated July 5, 2005, among Retail
Ventures, Inc. and its affiliates and DSW Inc. and its
affiliates. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to
Retail Ventures Form 8-K (file no. 1-10767)
filed July 11, 2005. |
II-4
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
|
|
|
|
10 |
.28 |
|
Supply Agreement, effective as of January 30, 2005, between
Filenes Basement and DSW. Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.6 to Retail Ventures Form 8-K (file
no. 1-10767) filed July 11, 2005. |
|
10 |
.29 |
|
Lease, dated August 30, 2002, by and between Jubilee
Limited Partnership, an affiliate of Schottenstein Stores
Corporation, and Shonac Corporation, re: Troy, MI DSW store.
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.44 to Retail
Ventures Form 10-K (file no. 1-10767) filed
April 29, 2004. |
|
10 |
.29.1 |
|
Assignment and Assumption Agreement, dated October 23,
2002, between Shonac Corporation, as assignor, and DSW Shoe
Warehouse, Inc., as assignee re: Troy, MI DSW store.
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.29.1 to Retail
Ventures Form 10-K/A (file no. 1-10767) filed
May 12, 2005. |
|
10 |
.30 |
|
Lease, dated October 8, 2003, by and between Jubilee
Limited Partnership, an affiliate of Schottenstein Stores
Corporation, and Shonac Corporation, re: Denton, TX DSW store.
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.46 to Retail
Ventures Form 10-K (file no. 1-10767) filed
April 29, 2004. |
|
10 |
.30.1 |
|
Assignment and Assumption Agreement, dated December 18,
2003 between Shonac Corporation, as assignor, and DSW Shoe
Warehouse, Inc., as assignee re: Denton, TX DSW store.
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.30.1 to Retail
Ventures Form 10-K/A (file no. 1-10767) filed
May 12, 2005. |
|
10 |
.31 |
|
Lease, dated October 28, 2003, by and between JLP-RICHMOND
LLC, an affiliate of Schottenstein Stores Corporation, and
Shonac Corporation, re: Richmond, VA DSW store. Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.47 to Retail Ventures
Form 10-K (file no. 1-10767) filed April 29, 2004. |
|
10 |
.31.1 |
|
Assignment and Assumption Agreement, dated December 18,
2003 between Shonac Corporation, as assignor, and DSW Shoe
Warehouse, Inc., as assignee re: Richmond, VA DSW store.
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.31.1 to Retail
Ventures Form 10-K/A (file no. 1-10767) filed
May 12, 2005. |
|
10 |
.32 |
|
Lease, dated May 2000, by and between Jubilee-Richmond LLC, an
affiliate of Schottenstein Stores Corporation, and DSW Shoe
Warehouse, Inc. (as assignee of Shonac Corporation), re: Glen
Allen, VA DSW store. Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.49 to Retail Ventures Form 10-K (file
no. 1- 10767) filed April 14, 2005. |
|
10 |
.33 |
|
Lease, dated February 28, 2001, by and between
Jubilee-Springdale, LLC, an affiliate of Schottenstein Stores
Corporation, and Shonac Corporation d/b/a DSW Shoe Warehouse,
re: Springdale, OH DSW store. Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.50 to Retail Ventures Form 10-K (file
no. 1- 10767) filed April 14, 2005. |
|
10 |
.33.1 |
|
Assignment and Assumption Agreement, dated May 11, 2001,
between Shonac Corporation, as assignor, and DSW Shoe Warehouse,
Inc., as assignee re: Springdale, OH DSW store. Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.50.1, to Retail Ventures
Form 10-K/A (file no. 1-10767) filed May 12, 2005. |
|
10 |
.34 |
|
Agreement of Lease, dated 1997, between Shoppes of Beavercreek
Ltd., an affiliate of Schottenstein Stores Corporation, and
Shonac corporation (assignee of Schottenstein Stores Corporation
d/b/a Value City Furniture through Assignment of Tenants
Leasehold Interest and Amendment No. 1 to Agreement of
Lease, dated February 28, 2001), re: Beavercreek, OH DSW
store. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.51 to Retail
Ventures Form 10-K (file no. 1-10767) filed
April 14, 2005. |
|
10 |
.34.1 |
|
Assignment and Assumption Agreement, dated May 11, 2001,
between Shonac Corporation, as assignor, and DSW Shoe Warehouse,
Inc., as assignee re: Beavercreek, OH DSW store. Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.51.1 to Retail Ventures
Form 10-K/A (file no. 1-10767) filed May 12, 2005. |
|
10 |
.35 |
|
Lease, dated February 28, 2001, by and between
JLP-Chesapeake, LLC, an affiliate of Schottenstein Stores
Corporation, and Shonac Corporation, re: Chesapeake, VA DSW
store. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.52 to Retail
Ventures Form 10-K (file no. 1-10767) filed
April 14, 2005. |
II-5
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
|
|
|
|
10 |
.35.1 |
|
Assignment and Assumption Agreement, dated May 11, 2001,
between Shonac Corporation, as assignor, and DSW Shoe Warehouse,
Inc., as assignee re: Chesapeake, VA DSW store. Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.52.1 to Retail Ventures
Form 10-K/A (file no. 1-10767) filed May 12, 2005. |
|
10 |
.36 |
|
Ground Lease Agreement, dated April 30, 2002, by and
between Polaris Mall, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,
and Schottenstein Stores Corporation-Polaris LLC, an affiliate
of Schottenstein Stores Corporation, as modified by Sublease
Agreement, dated April 30, 2002, by and between
Schottenstein Stores Corporation-Polaris LLC, as sublessor, and
DSW Shoe Warehouse, Inc., as sublessee (assignee of Shonac
Corporation), re: Columbus, OH (Polaris) DSW store. Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.53 to Retail Ventures
Form 10-K (file no. 1-10767) filed April 14, 2005. |
|
10 |
.36.1 |
|
Assignment and Assumption Agreement, dated August 6, 2002,
between Shonac Corporation, as assignor, and DSW Shoe Warehouse,
Inc., as assignee, re: Columbus, OH (Polaris) DSW store.
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.53.1 to Retail
Ventures Form 10-K/A (file no. 1-10767) filed
May 12, 2005. |
|
10 |
.37 |
|
Lease, dated August 30, 2002, by and between JLP-Cary, LLC,
an affiliate of Schottenstein Stores Corporation, and Shonac
Corporation, re: Cary, NC DSW store. Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.54 to Retail Ventures Form 10-K
(file no. 1-10767) filed April 14, 2005. |
|
10 |
.37.1 |
|
Assignment and Assumption Agreement, dated October 23,
2002, between Shonac Corporation, as assignor, and DSW Shoe
Warehouse, Inc., as assignee, re: Cary, NC DSW store.
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.54.1 to Retail
Ventures Form 10-K/A (file No. 1-10767) filed
May 12, 2005. |
|
10 |
.38 |
|
Lease, dated August 30, 2002, by and between JLP-Madison,
LLC, an affiliate of Schottenstein Stores Corporation, and
Shonac Corporation, re: Madison, TN DSW store. Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.55 to Retail Ventures
Form 10-K (file no. 1-10767) filed April 14, 2005. |
|
10 |
.38.1 |
|
Assignment and Assumption Agreement, dated October 23,
2002, between Shonac Corporation, as assignor, and DSW Shoe
Warehouse, Inc., as assignee, re: Madison, TN DSW store.
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.55.1 to Retail
Ventures Form 10-K/A (file no. 1-10767) filed
May 12, 2005. |
|
10 |
.39 |
|
Sublease, dated May 2000, by and between Schottenstein Stores
Corporation, as sublessor, and Shonac Corporation d/b/a DSW Shoe
Warehouse, Inc., as sublessee, re: Pittsburgh, PA DSW store.
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.48 to Retail
Ventures Form 10-K (file no. 1-10767) filed
April 14, 2005. |
|
10 |
.39.1 |
|
Assignment and Assumption Agreement, dated January 8, 2001,
between Shonac Corporation, as assignor, and DSW Shoe Warehouse,
Inc. as assignee, re: Pittsburgh, PA DSW store. Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.48.1 to Retail Ventures
Form 10-K/A (file no. 1-10767) filed May 12, 2005. |
|
10 |
.40 |
|
Lease, dated September 24, 2004, by and between K&S
Maple Hill Mall, L.P., an affiliate of Schottenstein Stores
Corporation, and Shonac Corporation, re: Kalamazoo, MI DSW
store. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.58 to Retail
Ventures Form 10-K (file no. 1-10767) filed
April 14, 2005. |
|
10 |
.40.1 |
|
Assignment and Assumption Agreement, dated February 28,
2005, between Shonac Corporation, as assignor, and DSW Shoe
Warehouse, Inc., as assignee, re: Kalamazoo, MI DSW store.
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.58.1 to Retail
Ventures Form 10-K/A (file no. 1-10767) filed
May 12, 2005. |
|
10 |
.41 |
|
Lease, dated November 2004, by and between KSK Scottsdale Mall,
L.P., an affiliate of Schottenstein Stores Corporation, and
Shonac Corporation, re: South Bend, IN DSW store. Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.59 to Retail Ventures
Form 10-K (file no. 1-10767) filed April 14, 2005. |
|
10 |
.41.1 |
|
Assignment and Assumption Agreement, dated March 18, 2005,
between Shonac Corporation, as assignor, and DSW Shoe Warehouse,
Inc., as assignee, re: South Bend, IN DSW store. Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.59.1 to Retail Ventures
Form 10-K/A (file no. 1-10767) filed May 12, 2005. |
II-6
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
|
|
|
|
10 |
.42 |
|
Sublease Agreement, dated June 12, 2000, by and between
Jubilee Limited Partnership, an affiliate of Schottenstein
Stores Corporation, and Shonac Corporation, re: Fairfax, VA DSW
store.** |
|
10 |
.42.1 |
|
Assignment and Assumption Agreement, dated January 8, 2001,
between Shonac Corporation, as assignor, and DSW Shoe Warehouse,
Inc., as assignee, re: Fairfax, VA DSW store.** |
|
10 |
.43 |
|
Lease, dated March 1, 1994, between Jubilee Limited
Partnership, an affiliate of Schottenstein Stores Corporation,
and Value City Department Stores, Inc., as modified by First
Lease Modification, dated November 1, 1994, re:
Merrilville, IN DSW store. Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.44 to Retail Ventures Form 10-K (file
no. 1-10767) filed April 14, 2005.** |
|
10 |
.43.1 |
|
License Agreement, dated August 30, 2002, by and between
Value City Department Stores, Inc. and Shonac Corporation, re:
Merrillville, IN DSW store.** |
|
10 |
.44 |
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement between DSW Inc. and its
officers and directors.** |
|
10 |
.45 |
|
Agreement of Lease, dated April 7, 2006, by and between
JLP-Harvard Park, LLC, an affiliate of Schottenstein Stores
Corporation, and DSW Inc., re: Chagrin Highlands, Warrendale,
Ohio DSW store.* |
|
10 |
.46 |
|
Amended and Restated Supply Agreement between DSW Inc. and
SteinMart, Inc. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1
to DSWs Form 8-K (file no. 1-32545) filed
June 5, 2006. |
|
10 |
.47 |
|
Employment Agreement, dated July 13, 2006, between Harris
Mustafa and DSW Inc. Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to DSWs Form 8-K (file no.
001-32545) filed July 13, 2006.# |
|
21 |
.1 |
|
List of Subsidiaries.* |
|
23 |
.1 |
|
Consent and Report on Financial Statement Schedule of
Deloitte & Touche LLP.*** |
|
23 |
.2 |
|
Consent of Vorys, Sater, Seymour and Pease LLP (included in
Exhibit 5.1). |
|
24 |
.1 |
|
Powers of Attorney. |
|
|
|
|
* |
Previously filed as the same Exhibit Number to DSWs
Form 10-K filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 13,
2006. |
|
|
|
|
** |
Previously filed as the same Exhibit Number to DSWs
Form S-1 filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 14,
2005 and amended on May 9, 2005, June 7, 2005,
June 15, 2005 and June 29, 2005, and incorporated
herein by reference. |
|
|
|
|
# |
Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement. |
II-7
B. Financial Statement Schedules
SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULE
DSW INC.
SCHEDULE II-VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Column A |
|
Column B | |
|
Column C | |
|
Column D | |
|
Column E | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Balance at | |
|
Charge to | |
|
Charges to | |
|
|
|
Balance | |
|
|
Beginning | |
|
Costs and | |
|
Other | |
|
|
|
at End of | |
Description |
|
of Period | |
|
Expenses | |
|
Accounts | |
|
Deductions | |
|
Period | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Allowance deduction from asset to which it applies:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory Reserve:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1/31/2004
|
|
$ |
11,389 |
|
|
$ |
3,730 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,614 |
|
|
$ |
11,505 |
|
|
1/29/2005
|
|
|
11,505 |
|
|
|
2,697 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,202 |
|
|
1/28/2006
|
|
|
14,202 |
|
|
|
5,548 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
533 |
|
|
|
19,217 |
|
Allowance for Sales Returns:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1/31/2004
|
|
|
619 |
|
|
|
786 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,405 |
|
|
1/29/2005
|
|
|
1,405 |
|
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
1,472 |
|
|
1/28/2006
|
|
|
1,472 |
|
|
|
1,394 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,294 |
|
|
|
1,572 |
|
Store Closing Reserve:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1/31/2004
|
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
1,249 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
574 |
|
|
|
803 |
|
|
1/29/2005
|
|
|
803 |
|
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
400 |
|
|
|
532 |
|
|
1/28/2006
|
|
|
532 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
282 |
|
Schedules not listed above are omitted because of the absence of
the conditions under which they are required or because the
required information is included in the Consolidated Financial
Statements or notes thereto.
(1) The undersigned Registrant hereby undertakes that, for
purposes of determining any liability under the Securities Act
of 1933, each filing of the Registrants annual report
pursuant to section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (and, where applicable, each filing of an
employee benefit plans annual report pursuant to section
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) that is
incorporated by reference in the registration statement shall be
deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the
securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities
at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide
offering thereof.
(2) Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising
under the Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to directors,
officers and controlling persons of the Registrant pursuant to
the provisions described in Item 15 herein, or otherwise,
the Registrant has been advised that in the opinion of the
Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is
against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act of 1933
and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for
indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment
by the Registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director,
officer or controlling person of the registrant in the
successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is
asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in
connection with the securities being registered, the Registrant
will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been
settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of
appropriate
II-8
jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is
against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act of 1933
and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.
(3) The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes to deliver
or cause to be delivered with the prospectus, to each person to
whom the prospectus is sent or given, the latest annual report
to security holders that is incorporated by reference in the
prospectus and furnished pursuant to and meeting the
requirements of
Rule 14a-3 or
Rule 14c-3 under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and, where interim
financial information required to be presented by Article 3
of Regulation S-X
are not set forth in the prospectus, to deliver, or cause to be
delivered to each person to whom the prospectus is sent or
given, the latest quarterly report that is specifically
incorporated by reference in the prospectus to provide such
interim financial information.
(4) The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes that:
|
|
|
(a) For purposes of determining any liability under the
Securities Act of 1933, the information omitted from the form of
prospectus filed as part of this registration statement in
reliance upon Rule 430A and contained in a form of
prospectus filed by the registrant pursuant to
Rule 424(b)(1) or (4) or 497(h) under the Securities
Act shall be deemed to be part of this registration statement as
of the time it was declared effective. |
|
|
(b) For the purpose of determining any liability under the
Securities Act of 1933, each post-effective amendment that
contains a form of prospectus shall be deemed to be a new
registration statement relating to the securities offered
therein, and this offering of such securities at that time shall
be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof. |
II-9
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the
registrant has duly caused this Registration Statement on
Form S-3 to be
signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized, in the City of Columbus, State of Ohio, on
August 4, 2006.
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Douglas J. Probst |
|
|
|
|
Title: |
Executive Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, this Registration Statement has been signed below by
the following persons in the capacities indicated on
August 4, 2006:
|
|
|
Signature |
|
Title |
|
|
|
|
*
Jay
L. Schottenstein |
|
Chairman of the Board of Directors and
Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) |
|
/s/ Douglas J. Probst
Douglas
J. Probst |
|
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
(Principal Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer) |
|
*
Carolee
Friedlander |
|
Director |
|
*
Philip
B. Miller |
|
Director |
|
*
James
D. Robbins |
|
Director |
|
*
Harvey
L. Sonnenberg |
|
Director |
|
*
Allan
J. Tanenbaum |
|
Director |
|
*
Heywood
Wilansky |
|
Director |
|
*By: /s/ Douglas J. Probst
Douglas
J. Probst
Attorney-in-fact |
|
|
II-10
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
|
|
|
|
1 |
.1 |
|
Form of Underwriting Agreement. |
|
3 |
.1 |
|
Amended Articles of Incorporation of the registrant.* |
|
3 |
.2 |
|
Amended and Restated Code of Regulations of the registrant.* |
|
4 |
.1 |
|
Specimen Class A Common Shares certificate. |
|
4 |
.2 |
|
Second Amended and Restated Registration Rights Agreement, dated
as of July 5, 2005, by and among Retail Ventures, Inc.,
Cerberus Partners, L.P., Schottenstein Stores Corporation and
Back Bay Funding LLC. Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.2 to Retail Ventures Form 8-K (file
no. 1-10767) filed July 11, 2005. |
|
4 |
.3 |
|
Exchange Agreement, dated July 5, 2005, by and between
Retail Ventures, Inc. and DSW Inc. Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.4 to Retail Ventures Form 8-K (file
no. 1-10767) filed July 11, 2005. |
|
4 |
.4 |
|
Amended Common Stock Purchase Warrant issued by Retail Ventures,
Inc. to Cerberus Partners, L.P. Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.1 to Retail Ventures Form 8-K (file
no. 1-10767) filed October 19, 2005. |
|
4 |
.5 |
|
Amended Common Stock Purchase Warrant issued by Retail Ventures,
Inc. to Schottenstein Stores Corporation. Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Retail Ventures
Form 8-K (file no. 1-10767) filed October 19,
2005. |
|
4 |
.6 |
|
Form of Conversion Warrant issued by Retail Ventures, Inc. to
Cerberus Partners, L.P. and Schottenstein Stores Corporation.
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Form 8-K
(file no. 1-10767) filed July 11, 2005. |
|
4 |
.7 |
|
Form of Term Loan Warrant issued by Retail Ventures, Inc. to
Millennium Partners, L.P. Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.1 to Retail Ventures Form 10-Q (file
no. 1-10767) filed December 8, 2005. |
|
5 |
.1 |
|
Opinion of Vorys, Sater, Seymour and Pease LLP. |
|
10 |
.1 |
|
Corporate Services Agreement, dated June 12, 2002, between
Retail Ventures and Schottenstein Stores Corporation.
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to Retail
Ventures Form 10-Q (file no. 1-10767) filed
June 18, 2002. |
|
10 |
.1.1 |
|
Amendment to Corporate Services Agreement, dated July 5,
2005, among Retail Ventures, Schottenstein Stores Corporation
and Schottenstein Management Company, together with Side Letter
Agreement, dated July 5, 2005, among Schottenstein Stores
Corporation, Retail Ventures, Inc., Schottenstein Management
Company and DSW Inc. related thereto. Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 5 to Retail Ventures Form 8-K (file
no. 1-10767) filed July 11, 2005. |
|
10 |
.2 |
|
Employment Agreement, dated March 4, 2005, between Deborah
L. Ferrée and DSW Inc.**# |
|
10 |
.3 |
|
Employment Agreement, dated June 1, 2005, between Peter Z.
Horvath and DSW Inc.**# |
|
10 |
.4 |
|
Employment Agreement, dated June 1, 2005, between Douglas
J. Probst and DSW Inc.**# |
|
10 |
.5 |
|
Employment Agreement, dated December 1, 2005, between Kevin
Lonergan and DSW Inc. Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Form 8-K filed
January 24, 2006.# |
|
10 |
.6 |
|
Employment Agreement, dated June 26, 2005, between Derek
Ungless and DSW Inc.*# |
|
10 |
.7 |
|
Summary of Director Compensation.*# |
|
10 |
.11 |
|
Loan and Security Agreement, between DSW Inc. and DSW Shoe
Warehouse, Inc., as the Borrowers, and National City Business
Credit, Inc., as Administrative Agent and Collateral Agent for
the Revolving Credit Lenders.* |
|
10 |
.15 |
|
Lease, dated March 22, 2000, by and between East Fifth
Avenue, LLC, an affiliate of Schottenstein Stores Corporation,
as landlord, and Shonac, as tenant, re: warehouse facility and
corporate headquarters. Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.60 to Retail Ventures Form 10-K (file
no. 1-10767) filed April 28, 2000. |
|
10 |
.16 |
|
Form of Common Stock Purchase Warrants (with respect to the
stock of Retail Ventures) issued to Cerberus Partners, L.P. and
Schottenstein Stores Corporation. Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.5 to Retail Ventures Form 10-Q (file
no. 1-10767) filed June 18, 2002. |
|
10 |
.17 |
|
Form of Conversion Warrant to be issued by Retail Ventures to
Schottenstein Stores Corporation and Cerberus Partners, L.P.** |
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
|
|
|
|
10 |
.23 |
|
DSW Inc. 2005 Equity Incentive Plan.*# |
|
10 |
.23.1 |
|
Form of Restricted Stock Units Award Agreement for Employees.**# |
|
10 |
.23.2 |
|
Form of Stock Units for automatic grants to non-employee
directors.**# |
|
10 |
.23.3 |
|
Form of Stock Units for conversion of non-employee
directors cash retainer.**# |
|
10 |
.23.4 |
|
Form of Non-Employee Directors Cash Retainer Deferral
Election Form.**# |
|
10 |
.23.5 |
|
Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Award Agreement for
Consultants.**# |
|
10 |
.23.6 |
|
Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Award Agreement for
Employees.**# |
|
10 |
.24 |
|
DSW Inc. 2005 Cash Incentive Compensation Plan.*# |
|
10 |
.25 |
|
Master Separation Agreement, dated July 5, 2005, between
Retail Ventures, Inc. and DSW. Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to Retail Ventures Form 8-K (file
no. 1-10767) filed July 11, 2005. |
|
10 |
.26 |
|
Shared Services Agreement, dated as of January 30, 2005,
between Retail Ventures, Inc. and DSW. Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.2 to Retail Ventures Form 8-K
(file no. 1-10767) filed July 11, 2005. |
|
10 |
.27 |
|
Tax Separation Agreement, dated July 5, 2005, among Retail
Ventures, Inc. and its affiliates and DSW Inc. and its
affiliates. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to
Retail Ventures Form 8-K (file no. 1-10767)
filed July 11, 2005. |
|
10 |
.28 |
|
Supply Agreement, effective as of January 30, 2005, between
Filenes Basement and DSW. Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.6 to Retail Ventures Form 8-K (file
no. 1-10767) filed July 11, 2005. |
|
10 |
.29 |
|
Lease, dated August 30, 2002, by and between Jubilee
Limited Partnership, an affiliate of Schottenstein Stores
Corporation, and Shonac Corporation, re: Troy, MI DSW store.
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.44 to Retail
Ventures Form 10-K (file no. 1-10767) filed
April 29, 2004. |
|
10 |
.29.1 |
|
Assignment and Assumption Agreement, dated October 23,
2002, between Shonac Corporation, as assignor, and DSW Shoe
Warehouse, Inc., as assignee re: Troy, MI DSW store.
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.29.1 to Retail
Ventures Form 10-K/A (file no. 1-10767) filed
May 12, 2005. |
|
10 |
.30 |
|
Lease, dated October 8, 2003, by and between Jubilee
Limited Partnership, an affiliate of Schottenstein Stores
Corporation, and Shonac Corporation, re: Denton, TX DSW store.
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.46 to Retail
Ventures Form 10-K (file no. 1-10767) filed
April 29, 2004. |
|
10 |
.30.1 |
|
Assignment and Assumption Agreement, dated December 18,
2003 between Shonac Corporation, as assignor, and DSW Shoe
Warehouse, Inc., as assignee re: Denton, TX DSW store.
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.30.1 to Retail
Ventures Form 10-K/A (file no. 1-10767) filed
May 12, 2005. |
|
10 |
.31 |
|
Lease, dated October 28, 2003, by and between JLP-RICHMOND
LLC, an affiliate of Schottenstein Stores Corporation, and
Shonac Corporation, re: Richmond, VA DSW store. Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.47 to Retail Ventures
Form 10-K (file no. 1-10767) filed April 29, 2004. |
|
10 |
.31.1 |
|
Assignment and Assumption Agreement, dated December 18,
2003 between Shonac Corporation, as assignor, and DSW Shoe
Warehouse, Inc., as assignee re: Richmond, VA DSW store.
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.31.1 to Retail
Ventures Form 10-K/A (file no. 1-10767) filed
May 12, 2005. |
|
10 |
.32 |
|
Lease, dated May 2000, by and between Jubilee-Richmond LLC, an
affiliate of Schottenstein Stores Corporation, and DSW Shoe
Warehouse, Inc. (as assignee of Shonac Corporation), re: Glen
Allen, VA DSW store. Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.49 to Retail Ventures Form 10-K (file
no. 1-10767) filed April 14, 2005. |
|
10 |
.33 |
|
Lease, dated February 28, 2001, by and between
Jubilee-Springdale, LLC, an affiliate of Schottenstein Stores
Corporation, and Shonac Corporation d/b/a DSW Shoe Warehouse,
re: Springdale, OH DSW store. Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.50 to Retail Ventures Form 10-K (file
no. 1-10767) filed April 14, 2005. |
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
|
|
|
|
10 |
.33.1 |
|
Assignment and Assumption Agreement, dated May 11, 2001,
between Shonac Corporation, as assignor, and DSW Shoe Warehouse,
Inc., as assignee re: Springdale, OH DSW store. Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.50.1, to Retail Ventures
Form 10-K/A (file no. 1-10767) filed May 12, 2005. |
|
10 |
.34 |
|
Agreement of Lease, dated 1997, between Shoppes of Beavercreek
Ltd., an affiliate of Schottenstein Stores Corporation, and
Shonac corporation (assignee of Schottenstein Stores Corporation
d/b/a Value City Furniture through Assignment of Tenants
Leasehold Interest and Amendment No. 1 to Agreement of
Lease, dated February 28, 2001), re: Beavercreek, OH DSW
store. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.51 to Retail
Ventures Form 10-K (file no. 1-10767) filed
April 14, 2005. |
|
10 |
.34.1 |
|
Assignment and Assumption Agreement, dated May 11, 2001,
between Shonac Corporation, as assignor, and DSW Shoe Warehouse,
Inc., as assignee re: Beavercreek, OH DSW store. Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.51.1 to Retail Ventures
Form 10-K/A (file no. 1-10767) filed May 12, 2005. |
|
10 |
.35 |
|
Lease, dated February 28, 2001, by and between
JLP-Chesapeake, LLC, an affiliate of Schottenstein Stores
Corporation, and Shonac Corporation, re: Chesapeake, VA DSW
store. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.52 to Retail
Ventures Form 10-K (file no. 1-10767) filed
April 14, 2005. |
|
10 |
.35.1 |
|
Assignment and Assumption Agreement, dated May 11, 2001,
between Shonac Corporation, as assignor, and DSW Shoe Warehouse,
Inc., as assignee re: Chesapeake, VA DSW store. Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.52.1 to Retail Ventures
Form 10-K/A (file no. 1-10767) filed May 12, 2005. |
|
10 |
.36 |
|
Ground Lease Agreement, dated April 30, 2002, by and
between Polaris Mall, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,
and Schottenstein Stores Corporation-Polaris LLC, an affiliate
of Schottenstein Stores Corporation, as modified by Sublease
Agreement, dated April 30, 2002, by and between
Schottenstein Stores Corporation-Polaris LLC, as sublessor, and
DSW Shoe Warehouse, Inc., as sublessee (assignee of Shonac
Corporation), re: Columbus, OH (Polaris) DSW store. Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.53 to Retail Ventures
Form 10-K (file no. 1-10767) filed April 14, 2005. |
|
10 |
.36.1 |
|
Assignment and Assumption Agreement, dated August 6, 2002,
between Shonac Corporation, as assignor, and DSW Shoe Warehouse,
Inc., as assignee, re: Columbus, OH (Polaris) DSW store.
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.53.1 to Retail
Ventures Form 10-K/A (file no. 1-10767) filed
May 12, 2005. |
|
10 |
.37 |
|
Lease, dated August 30, 2002, by and between JLP-Cary, LLC,
an affiliate of Schottenstein Stores Corporation, and Shonac
Corporation, re: Cary, NC DSW store. Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.54 to Retail Ventures Form 10-K
(file no. 1-10767) filed April 14, 2005. |
|
10 |
.37.1 |
|
Assignment and Assumption Agreement, dated October 23,
2002, between Shonac Corporation, as assignor, and DSW Shoe
Warehouse, Inc., as assignee, re: Cary, NC DSW store.
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.54.1 to Retail
Ventures Form 10-K/A (file No. 1-10767) filed
May 12, 2005. |
|
10 |
.38 |
|
Lease, dated August 30, 2002, by and between JLP-Madison,
LLC, an affiliate of Schottenstein Stores Corporation, and
Shonac Corporation, re: Madison, TN DSW store. Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.55 to Retail Ventures
Form 10-K (file no. 1-10767) filed April 14, 2005. |
|
10 |
.38.1 |
|
Assignment and Assumption Agreement, dated October 23,
2002, between Shonac Corporation, as assignor, and DSW Shoe
Warehouse, Inc., as assignee, re: Madison, TN DSW store.
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.55.1 to Retail
Ventures Form 10-K/A (file no. 1-10767) filed
May 12, 2005. |
|
10 |
.39 |
|
Sublease, dated May 2000, by and between Schottenstein Stores
Corporation, as sublessor, and Shonac Corporation d/b/a DSW Shoe
Warehouse, Inc., as sublessee, re: Pittsburgh, PA DSW store.
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.48 to Retail
Ventures Form 10-K (file no. 1-10767) filed
April 14, 2005. |
|
10 |
.39.1 |
|
Assignment and Assumption Agreement, dated January 8, 2001,
between Shonac Corporation, as assignor, and DSW Shoe Warehouse,
Inc. as assignee, re: Pittsburgh, PA DSW store. Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.48.1 to Retail Ventures
Form 10-K/A (file no. 1-10767) filed May 12, 2005. |
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
|
|
|
|
10 |
.40 |
|
Lease, dated September 24, 2004, by and between K&S
Maple Hill Mall, L.P., an affiliate of Schottenstein Stores
Corporation, and Shonac Corporation, re: Kalamazoo, MI DSW
store. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.58 to Retail
Ventures Form 10-K (file no. 1-10767) filed
April 14, 2005. |
|
10 |
.40.1 |
|
Assignment and Assumption Agreement, dated February 28,
2005, between Shonac Corporation, as assignor, and DSW Shoe
Warehouse, Inc., as assignee, re: Kalamazoo, MI DSW store.
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.58.1 to Retail
Ventures Form 10-K/A (file no. 1-10767) filed
May 12, 2005. |
|
10 |
.41 |
|
Lease, dated November 2004, by and between KSK Scottsdale Mall,
L.P., an affiliate of Schottenstein Stores Corporation, and
Shonac Corporation, re: South Bend, IN DSW store. Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.59 to Retail Ventures
Form 10-K (file no. 1-10767) filed April 14, 2005. |
|
10 |
.41.1 |
|
Assignment and Assumption Agreement, dated March 18, 2005,
between Shonac Corporation, as assignor, and DSW Shoe Warehouse,
Inc., as assignee, re: South Bend, IN DSW store. Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.59.1 to Retail Ventures
Form 10-K/A (file no. 1-10767) filed May 12, 2005. |
|
10 |
.42 |
|
Sublease Agreement, dated June 12, 2000, by and between
Jubilee Limited Partnership, an affiliate of Schottenstein
Stores Corporation, and Shonac Corporation, re: Fairfax, VA DSW
store.** |
|
10 |
.42.1 |
|
Assignment and Assumption Agreement, dated January 8, 2001,
between Shonac Corporation, as assignor, and DSW Shoe Warehouse,
Inc., as assignee, re: Fairfax, VA DSW store.** |
|
10 |
.43 |
|
Lease, dated March 1, 1994, between Jubilee Limited
Partnership, an affiliate of Schottenstein Stores Corporation,
and Value City Department Stores, Inc., as modified by First
Lease Modification, dated November 1, 1994, re:
Merrilville, IN DSW store. Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.44 to Retail Ventures Form 10-K (file
no. 1-10767) filed April 14, 2005.** |
|
10 |
.43.1 |
|
License Agreement, dated August 30, 2002, by and between
Value City Department Stores, Inc. and Shonac Corporation, re:
Merrillville, IN DSW store.** |
|
10 |
.44 |
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement between DSW Inc. and its
officers and directors.** |
|
10 |
.45 |
|
Agreement of Lease, dated April 7, 2006, by and between
JLP-Harvard Park, LLC, an affiliate of Schottenstein Stores
Corporation, and DSW Inc., re: Chagrin Highlands, Warrendale,
Ohio DSW store.* |
|
10 |
.46 |
|
Amended and Restated Supply Agreement between DSW Inc. and Stein
Mart, Inc. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to
DSWs Form 8-K (file no. 1-32545) filed
June 5, 2006. |
|
10 |
.47 |
|
Employment Agreement, dated July 13, 2006, between Harris
Mustafa and DSW Inc. Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to DSWs Form 8-K (file no.
001-32545) filed July 13, 2006.# |
|
21 |
.1 |
|
List of Subsidiaries.* |
|
23 |
.1 |
|
Consent and Report on Financial Statement Schedule of
Deloitte & Touche LLP.*** |
|
23 |
.2 |
|
Consent of Vorys, Sater, Seymour and Pease LLP (included in
Exhibit 5.1). |
|
24 |
.1 |
|
Powers of Attorney. |
|
|
|
|
* |
Previously filed as the same Exhibit Number to DSWs
Form 10-K filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 13,
2006. |
|
|
|
|
** |
Previously filed as the same Exhibit Number to DSWs
Form S-1 filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 14,
2005 and amended on May 9, 2005, June 7, 2005,
June 15, 2005 and June 29, 2005, and incorporated
herein by reference. |
|
|
|
|
# |
Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement. |