( Dollar Amounts in Thousands )

May 31,

November 30,

2006

2005

Assets

Current assets

Cash and cash equivalents

$ 1,675

$ 8,386

Accounts receivable, less allowances of $ 1,172

    in 2006 and $ 1,032 in 2005

21,490

16,188

Insurance recovery receivable

4,000

5,000

Inventories

19,266

17,832

Deferred income taxes

1,621

1,621

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

2,540

672

Total current assets

50,592

49,699

Property, plant and equipment, net

21,552

15,484

Other assets

Goodwill

28,732

28,361

Other noncurrent assets

8,076

4,458

Total other assets

36,808

32,819

Total assets

$ 108,952

$ 98,002

Liabilities And Stockholders' Equity

Current liabilities

Short-term debt

$ 5,000

$ -

Accounts payable

6,914

6,760

Income taxes payable

276

266

Accrued liabilities

3,843

2,913

Current portion of long-term debt

290

290

Total current liabilities

16,323

10,229

Long-term debt

1,156

1,426

Other liabilities

1,851

-

Deferred income taxes

5,677

4,986

Stockholders' equity

Common stock, no par value, authorized

25,000,000 shares, issued 13,127,967 shares

in 2006 and 13,737,818 in 2005

44,762

44,376

Retained earnings

42,760

40,741

Treasury stock, 676,000 shares in 2006

and 2005, at cost

(3,628)

(3,628)

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

51

(128)

Total stockholders' equity

83,945

81,361

Total liabilities and stockholders' equity

$ 108,952

$ 98,002

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.

( Amounts in Thousands, Except Per Share Data )

  For the Three Months Ended

  For the Six Months Ended

    May 31,  

    May 31,  

  2006

  2005

  2006

  2005

Net sales

$ 31,884

$ 25,882

$ 57,444

$ 47,024

Cost of products sold

24,074

19,340

44,414

35,559

Gross margin

7,810

6,542

13,030

11,465

Selling, general and

  administrative expense

4,961

4,442

9,853

8,399

Income from operations

2,849

2,100

3,177

3,066

Other income ( expense ) :

Interest expense

(98)

(38)

(139)

(76)

Other income and expense, net

(2)

111

180

182

(100)

73

41

106

Income before provision for

income taxes

2,749

2,173

3,218

3,172

Provision for income taxes

1,020

851

1,199

1,243

Net income

$ 1,729

$ 1,322

$ 2,019

$ 1,929

Earnings per common share :

Basic

$ 0.13

$ 0.10

$ 0.15

$ 0.15

Diluted

$ 0.13

$ 0.10

$ 0.15

$ 0.15

Average number of common shares

  outstanding :

Basic

13,093

13,059

13,078

13,047

Diluted

13,341

13,161

13,267

13,158

Dividends per common share

$  -

$  -

$  -

$  -

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.

( Dollar Amounts in Thousands )

For the Six Months Ended

  May 31,  

2006

2005

Cash Flows From Operating Activities :

Net income

$ 2,019

$ 1,929

Adjustments to reconcile net income to 

  net cash provided by ( used in ) operating activities :

    Depreciation

1,690

1,739

    Amortization

390

232

    Deferred income taxes

320

412

    Equity-based compensation

104

-

    Asset impairment loss

200

-

    Non-cash insurance recoveries

(110)

-

    Changes in assets and liabilities, excluding
      effects of business acquisitions:

        Accounts receivable

(5,085)

(950)

        Inventories

(1,398)

(695)

        Prepaid expenses and other assets

(4,867)

(309)

        Accounts payable and accrued expenses

160

1,218

Net cash provided by ( used in ) operating activities

(6,577)

1,140

Cash Flows From Investing Activities :

  Purchase of property, plant and equipment

(5,309)

(965)

  Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment

236

-

  Payment for acquired businesses, net of cash received

  -

(10,835)

  Net cash used in investing activities

(5,073)

(11,800)

Cash Flows From Financing Activities :

Net proceeds from short-term borrowings:

5,000

-

Repayment of long-term debt

(270)

(370)

Net proceeds from issuance of common stock

282

167

Net cash provided by ( used in ) financing activities

5,012

(203)

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash

(73)

(2)

Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents

(6,711)

(10,865)

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period

8,386

17,535

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period

$ 1,675

$ 6,670

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.

Note 1 - Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and notes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, the accompanying financial statements include all adjustments which are normal, recurring and necessary to present fairly the results for the interim periods. Operating results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year.

The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Spectrum Control, Inc. and its Subsidiaries ("the Company"). All significant intercompany accounts are eliminated upon consolidation.

The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

The income tax rates utilized for interim financial statement purposes for the periods ended May 31, 2006 and 2005 are based on estimates of income and other pertinent tax matters for the entire year.

The balance sheet at November 30, 2005 has been derived from the audited financial statements at that date but does not include all of the information and notes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements.

For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Spectrum Control, Inc. and Subsidiaries annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2005.

Note 2 - Nature of Operations

The Company designs and manufactures control products and systems for the electronics industry, and has operations in the United States, Mexico, China and Germany. The Company offers a broad line of signal, power, and microwave products which are used to condition, regulate, transmit, receive, or govern electronic performance. In addition, the Company has recently added a line of sensor products. Although its products are used in many industries worldwide, the Company's largest markets are military/aerospace and telecommunications equipment.

Note 3 - Revenue Recognition and Product Warranties

Product sales are generally recorded at the time of shipment when title passes under the terms FOB shipping point. Sales of consigned inventories are recorded when the customer has taken title and assumed the risks and rewards of ownership as specified in the customer's purchase order or sales agreement. Sales to third party distributors are made under contractual agreements which allow for limited rights of return and replacement. The contractual agreements do not provide any price protection for unsold inventory held by the distributor. Service revenues are recorded when the related services are performed. Patent licensing fees are recorded when the related technology rights are transferred.

The Company's contracts and customer purchase orders do not include any customer acceptance clauses. In addition, the Company does not offer or grant any discounts. The Company's product warranties generally extend for one year, and are limited to the repair and replacement value of the product. The Company does not have any other post shipment obligations. Sales returns and warranty expense are recorded as incurred and were not material in any of the periods presented herein.

Note 4 - Equity - Based Compensation

In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised), "Share-Based Payment" ("SFAS No. 123R"), which requires all companies to measure compensation cost for all share-based payments (including employee stock options) at fair value. In April 2005, the Securities and Exchange Commission announced that it would provide a phased-in implementation process for SFAS No. 123R. As a result of this phased-in process, the provisions of SFAS No. 123R must be adopted by most public entities no later than the beginning of the first fiscal year commencing after June 15, 2005. SFAS No. 123R applies to all awards granted after the required effective date; to awards modified, repurchased, or cancelled after that date; and all nonvested options outstanding as of the effective date.

Effective December 1, 2005, the Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 123R using a modified version of prospective application. Under this transition method, compensation cost is recognized from the effective date on the portion of outstanding awards for which the requisite service has not yet been rendered. The compensation cost for these awards is determined based on their grant date fair value previously calculated for pro forma disclosures under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 148, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation - Transition and Disclosure" ("SFAS No. 148").

For the three and six month periods ended May 31, 2006, total equity-based compensation expense of $52,000 and $104,000, respectively, was included in general and administrative expense and deducted in arriving at income before income taxes. As a result, net income was reduced by $44,000 or less than $0.01 per share for the three month period ended May 31, 2006, and $87,000 or $0.01 per share for the six month period ended May 31, 2006. These amounts all relate to stock options previously granted under the Company's two stock option plans.

Prior to adopting SFAS No. 123R on December 1, 2005, the Company's equity-based employee compensation expense was accounted for under the recognition and measurement principles of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees" ("APB 25"), and related Interpretations. The exercise price of the Company's employee stock options equals the market price of the underlying stock on the date of option grant. Once granted, an option's exercise price and number of shares to be issued remain fixed throughout the option term. Accordingly, in accordance with APB 25, no equity-based compensation expense was recognized in the Company's financial statements for the periods ended May 31, 2005.

The following table illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per share if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123R to equity-based employee compensation for the periods ended May 31, 2005 (in thousands, except per share data):

The Company has two plans that provide for granting to officers, directors, employees and advisors options to purchase shares of the Company's Common Stock. Under the plans, the Company may issue non-qualified options or incentive stock options. Option prices are not less than the market price of the Company's Common Stock on the date of the grant. The options become exercisable at varying dates and generally expire five years from the date of grant. At May 31, 2006, options to purchase 988,917 shares of Common Stock were available for grant under the Company's stock option plans.

A summary of the Company's stock option activity for the six month period ended May 31, 2006 is as follows:

The following table summarizes significant ranges of outstanding and exercisable stock options at May 31, 2006:

The fair value of each option granted under the Company's stock option plans is estimated as of the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. In 2005, the weighted average fair value of options granted was $1.55 per share, based upon the following weighted average assumptions: expected volatility of 20.00%; risk free interest rate of 2.46%; expected dividend yield of 0.00%; and expected option life of five years. In 2006, no options have been granted under the Company's stock option plans.

At May 31, 2006, the total future equity-based compensation expense (determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model) related to outstanding nonvested options is expected to be recognized as follows (in thousands):

Note 5 - Inventories

Inventories by major classification are as follows (in thousands):

Inventories are presented net of aggregate inventory reserves of $2,820,000 at May 31, 2006 and $2,510,000 at November 30, 2005.

Note 6 - Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, plant and equipment by major classification are as follows (in thousands):

In fiscal year 2005, the Company's ceramic manufacturing facility in New Orleans, Louisiana, was severely damaged by Hurricane Katrina. As a result, the Company recorded a net asset impairment loss of $274,000 in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2005 (after expected insurance proceeds), and reduced the carrying value of the affected land and building to its estimated fair value of $450,000. On March 7, 2006, the Company sold the land and building at a selling price of $250,000. Accordingly, in the first quarter of fiscal 2006, the Company reduced the carrying value of the land and building to $250,000 and recorded an additional asset impairment loss of $200,000. This asset impairment loss has been included in the Company's general and administrative expense for the six month period ended May 31, 2006.

Note 7 - Goodwill

Changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the periods ended May 31, 2006 and 2005, in total and for each reportable segment, are summarized as follows (in thousands):

On October 31, 2005, the Company acquired all of the outstanding common stock of JDK Controls, Inc. ("JDK") at an aggregate cash purchase price of $4,110,000. In the first quarter of fiscal 2006, the Company finalized the allocation of this purchase price to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. As a result of this final allocation, additional goodwill of $371,000 was recorded along with a deferred income tax liability in the same amount.

Note 8 - Other Noncurrent Assets

Other noncurrent assets by major classification are as follows (in thousands):

For the three month periods ended May 31, 2006 and 2005, amortization of intangible assets was $194,000 and $130,000, respectively. For the six month periods ended May 31, 2006 and 2005, amortization of intangible assets was $390,000 and $232,000, respectively. For each of the five fiscal years ending November 30, 2010, amortization expense is expected to be as follows (in thousands):

Note 9 - Short-Term Debt

Short-term debt consists of the following (in thousands):

Note 10 - Accrued Liabilities

Accrued liabilities by major classification are as follows (in thousands):

Note 11 - Other Liabilities

Other liabilities consist of the following (in thousands):

On December 30, 2005, the Company acquired certain land and manufacturing facilities in State College, Pennsylvania. The property, which was acquired from Murata Electronics North America ("Murata"), consists of approximately 53 acres of land and 250,000 square feet of manufacturing facilities. The acquired facilities will become the design and manufacturing center for the Company's ceramic operations, replacing the ceramic operations previously conducted by the Company in New Orleans, Louisiana.

The purchase price for the acquired property consisted of: (a) $1.00, plus (b) closing costs of approximately $550,000 including realtor commissions, transfer taxes, and legal fees; plus (c) the assumption of, and indemnification of Murata against, all environmental liabilities related to the property. The acquired property has known environmental conditions that require remediation, and certain hazardous materials previously used on the property have migrated into neighboring third party areas. These environmental issues arose from the use of chlorinated organic solvents including tetrachloroethylene ("PCE") and trichloroethylene ("TCE"). As a condition to the purchase, the Company entered into an agreement with the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection ("PADEP") pursuant to which: (a) the Company agreed to remediate all known environmental conditions relating to the property to a specified industrial standard, with the Company's costs for remediating such conditions being capped at $4,000,000; (b) PADEP released Murata from further claims by Pennsylvania under specified state laws for the known environmental conditions; and (c) the Company purchased an insurance policy providing clean-up cost cap coverage (for known and unknown pollutants) with a combined coverage limit of approximately $8,200,000, and pollution legal liability coverage (for possible third party claims) with an aggregate coverage limit of $25,000,000. The total premium cost for the insurance policy, which has a 10 year term and an aggregate deductible of $650,000, was $4,623,000. The cost of the insurance will be charged to expense on a pro rata basis over the 10 year policy term.

Based upon estimates prepared by the Company's environmental consultants, a liability of $2,888,000 was recorded by the Company to cover probable future environmental expenditures related to the remediation, the cost of which is expected to be entirely covered by the insurance policy. As of May 31, 2006, remediation expenditures of $110,000 have been incurred and charged against the environmental liability, with all such expenditures being reimbursed by the insurance carrier and credited to general and administrative expense. The remaining aggregate undiscounted expenditures of $2,778,000, which are anticipated to be incurred over the next 10 years, principally consist of: (a) continued operation and monitoring of the existing on-site groundwater extraction, treatment, and recharge system; (b) implementation of a chemical oxidation system, subject to the results of a laboratory treatability study; (c) completion of soil investigations to determine the extent of potential soil contamination; (d) excavation and off-site disposal of soil containing contaminates above acceptable standards; and (e) implementation of soil vapor extraction systems in certain areas. Depending upon the results of future environmental testing and remediation actions, it is possible that the ultimate costs incurred could exceed the current aggregate estimate of $2,888,000. The Company expects such increase, if any, to be entirely covered by the insurance policy. Insurance recoveries for actual environmental remediation costs incurred are recorded when it is probable that such insurance reimbursement will be received and the related amounts are determinable.

Based on the current remediation plan developed by the Company's environmental consultants, $927,000 of the total remediation costs are expected to be incurred during the next twelve months.

Note 12 - Derivatives and Hedging Activities

From time to time, the Company enters into forward currency exchange contracts in the regular course of business to manage its exposure against foreign currency fluctuations on sales denominated in foreign currencies. The terms of these contracts are generally nine months or less.

At May 31, 2006 and 2005, the Company had no forward contracts outstanding.

Note 13 - Earnings Per Common Share

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per common share for the periods indicated:

Options to purchase 235,000 shares of Common Stock, at a weighted average exercise price of $8.67 per share, were outstanding at May 31, 2006, but were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because their inclusion would be antidilutive. At May 31, 2005, options to purchase 746,050 shares of Common Stock, at a weighted average exercise price of $8.24 per share, were similarly excluded.

Note 14 - Comprehensive Income (Loss)

The components of comprehensive income are as follows (in thousands):

The components of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) are as follows (in thousands):

Note 15 - Supplemental Cash Flow Information

Note 16 - Reportable Operating Segments

The Company was founded as a solutions-oriented company, designing and manufacturing products to suppress or eliminate electromagnetic interference ("EMI"). In recent years, the Company has broadened its focus and product lines to become a control products and systems company, providing a wide range of components and systems used to condition, regulate, transmit, receive, or govern electronic performance.

The Company's current operations are conducted in four reportable segments: signal and power integrity components; microwave components and systems; power management systems; and sensors and controls. The Company's Signal and Power Integrity Components Business designs and manufactures a broad range of products including low pass EMI filters, filter plates, filtered connectors, specialty ceramic capacitors, power entry modules, power line filters, and our motor line feed thru ("MLFT") filters. Our Microwave Components and Systems Business designs and manufactures microwave filters, waveguides, amplifiers, frequency mixers, oscillators, synthesizers, multiple channel filter banks, and related products and integrated assemblies. The Power Management Systems Business designs and manufactures breaker and fuse interface panels, custom power outlet strips, and our Smart Start power management systems. Our recently created Sensors and Controls Business designs and manufactures rotary and linear precision potentiometers and related assemblies. The reportable segments are each managed separately because they manufacture and sell distinct products with different production processes.

The Company evaluates performance and allocates resources to its reportable segments based upon numerous factors, including segment income before income taxes. The accounting policies of the reportable segments are the same as those utilized in the preparation of the Company's consolidated financial statements. However, substantially all of the Company's general and administrative expenses, and nonoperating expenses are not allocated to the Company's reportable operating segments and, accordingly, these expenses are not deducted in arriving at segment income.

Prior period amounts in the following tables have been restated to correspond with the current business segment presentation. For each period presented, the accounting policies and procedures used to determine segment income have been consistently applied. Reportable segment information for the periods ended May 31, 2006 and 2005 is as follows (in thousands):

A reconciliation of total reportable segment income to consolidated income before provision for income taxes for the periods ended May 31, 2006 and 2005 is as follows (in thousands):

Note 17 - Contingencies

The Company is subject to certain legal proceedings and claims arising in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management, the amount of any ultimate liability with respect to these actions will not materially affect the Company's consolidated financial position or results of operations.

Note 18 - Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In November 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 151, "Inventory Costs - an amendment of ARB 43, Chapter 4" ("SFAS No. 151"). SFAS No. 151 clarifies the accounting for abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs, and wasted material (spoilage) by requiring that these items be recognized as current period charges. The Statement also requires that allocation of fixed production overheads to the costs of conversion be based on the normal capacity of the production facilities. SFAS No. 151 is effective for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005.

In December 2004, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 153, "Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets - an amendment of APB Opinion No. 29" ("SFAS No. 153"). Previous guidance regarding the accounting for nonmonetary assets was based on the principle that exchanges of nonmonetary assets should be measured based on the fair value of the assets exchanged. This previous guidance, however, included certain exceptions to that principle. SFAS No. 153 amends APB Opinion No. 29 to eliminate the exception for nonmonetary exchanges of similar productive assets and replaces it with a general exception for exchanges of nonmonetary assets that do not have commercial substance. A nonmonetary exchange has commercial substance if the future cash flows of the entity are expected to change significantly as a result of the exchange. The provisions of SFAS No. 153 are generally effective for nonmonetary asset exchanges occurring in fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2005.

The Company's adoption of SFAS No. 151 and SFAS No. 153 did not have a material impact on its financial position or results of operations.

In May 2005, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 154, "Accounting Changes and Error Corrections - a replacement of APB Opinion No. 20 and FASB Statement No. 3" ("SFAS No. 154"). SFAS No. 154 changes the requirements for the accounting and reporting of a change in accounting principle. The Statement requires retrospective application to prior periods' financial statements of changes in accounting principle, unless it is impracticable to determine either the period-specific effects or the cumulative effect of the change. In addition, the Statement also requires that a change in depreciation or amortization for long-lived assets be accounted for as a change in accounting estimate effected by a change in accounting principle. The provisions of SFAS No. 154 are generally effective for accounting changes and corrections of errors made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005.

In February 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 155, "Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments - an amendment of FASB Statements No. 133 and 140" ("SFAS No. 155"). Among other changes, SFAS No. 155 eliminates the exemption from applying FASB Statement No. 133 to interests in securitized financial assets so that similar instruments are accounted for similarly regardless of the form of the instruments. SFAS No. 155 is effective for all financial instruments acquired or issued after the beginning of an entity's first fiscal year that begins after September 15, 2006.

The Company does not expect the adoption of SFAS No.154 and SFAS No. 155 to have a material impact on its financial position or results of operations.

The following discussion and analysis may be understood more fully by reference to the consolidated financial statements, notes to the consolidated financial statements, and management's discussion and analysis contained in the Spectrum Control, Inc. and Subsidiaries annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2005. All references to "we", "us", "our", or the "Company" in the following discussion and analysis mean Spectrum Control, Inc. and its Subsidiaries.

Company Profile 

We were founded as a solutions-oriented company, designing and manufacturing products to suppress or eliminate electromagnetic interference ("EMI"). In recent years, we broadened our focus and product lines to become a control products and systems company, providing a wide range of components and systems used to condition, regulate, transmit, receive, or govern electronic performance. Although our components and systems are used in many industries worldwide, our largest markets are military/aerospace and telecommunications equipment which represented 42.0% and 39.0%, respectively, of our fiscal 2005 sales. Military/aerospace applications for our products include missile defense systems, smart weapons and munitions, secure communications, simulation equipment, and avionic upgrades. In telecommunications, our products are used in numerous systems including wireless base stations, broadband switching equipment, global positioning systems, and optical networks. Automotive represents an emerging market for our products, with significant applications in DC motors, telematics, and electronic safety controls. Other markets for our products include medical instrumentation, industrial equipment, computers, and storage devices.

Our operations are currently conducted in four reportable segments: signal and power integrity components; microwave components and systems; power management systems; and sensors and controls. Our Signal and Power Integrity Components Business designs and manufactures a broad range of products including low pass EMI filters, filter plates, filtered connectors, specialty ceramic capacitors, power entry modules, power line filters, and our motor line feed thru ("MLFT") filters. Our Microwave Components and Systems Business designs and manufactures microwave filters, waveguides, amplifiers, frequency mixers, oscillators, synthesizers, multiple channel filter banks, and related products and integrated assemblies. The Power Management Systems Business designs and manufactures breaker and fuse interface panels, custom power outlet strips, and our Smart Start power management systems. Our recently created Sensors and Controls Business designs and manufactures rotary and linear precision potentiometers and related assemblies.

Acquisition 

On October 31, 2005, we acquired all of the outstanding common stock of JDK Controls, Inc. ("JDK"). JDK, based in Grass Valley, California, designs and manufactures precision co-molded conductive plastic potentiometers and assemblies. JDK's products are used in various commercial, aerospace and military markets, with major applications in medical and meteorological instruments, animatronics and robotics, aircraft flap position actuators, cockpit instrumentation, missile programs, military vehicles, fighter aircraft, and various automotive controls. The aggregate cash purchase price for JDK was $4.1 million.

For the acquisition of JDK, the purchase price was entirely funded through our available cash reserves. The results of operations of the acquired business have been included in the accompanying financial statements since the acquisition date. Accordingly, our consolidated net sales for the three and six month periods ended May 31, 2006 include JDK net sales of $2.0 million and $3.8 million, respectively. For operating segment purposes, JDK is reported within our newly created Sensors and Controls business segment.

Forward-Looking Information 

The following discussion includes certain "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the federal securities laws, including statements regarding: (1) our expected ability to resume manufacturing of ceramic capacitors, (2) our belief as to future market conditions and operating margins, (3) our anticipated capital expenditures, and (4) our expected future operating requirements and financing needs. The words "believe", "expect", "anticipate" and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties which could cause actual results to differ materially from historical results or those anticipated. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include those discussed in "Risk Factors That May Affect Future Results", as well as those discussed elsewhere herein. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements.

Executive Summary 

During the second quarter of fiscal 2006, our sales increased by $6.0 million or 23.2% from the same period last year. Sales of our microwave products grew by $3.3 million, as demand for these components and systems in military/aerospace applications remains particularly strong. Sales in the current quarter also include $2.0 million for sensor and control products, arising from our recent acquisition of JDK. Sales of our signal and power integrity products increased by $1.4 million from a year ago. This increase reflects improved overall market conditions throughout the passive electronic components industry, as well as fewer shortages of ceramic components from third party vendors. Sales of our power management systems decreased slightly during the current quarter, as certain telecommunications equipment customers reduced or delayed their shipment requirements.

In the second quarter of 2006, our gross margin was 24.5% of sales compared to 25.3% for the same quarter last year. The decrease in gross margin percentage primarily reflects higher material costs from purchasing ceramic components from third party suppliers. Since late August of 2005, when Hurricane Katrina severely damaged our ceramic manufacturing plant in New Orleans, Louisiana, we have been purchasing certain ceramic capacitors from outside vendors. These ceramic components are an essential element of our signal integrity/EMI filter products. In December 2005, we acquired a ceramic manufacturing facility in State College, Pennsylvania. The acquired facility will become the design and manufacturing center for our ceramic operations, replacing the operations previously conducted in New Orleans. We currently expect full production in the new facility to commence during the fourth quarter of this fiscal year. Until full production is achieved, we will continue to purchase ceramic components from third party suppliers. In the current quarter, with greater sales volume being partially offset by higher material costs, we generated net income of $1.7 million or 13 cents per share, versus $1.3 million or 10 cents per share for the comparable quarter of 2005.

Net cash used in operating activities amounted to $6.6 million during the first half of fiscal 2006, compared to $1.1 million of net operating cash generated for the same period a year ago. With sales volume and production requirements increasing late in the current quarter, accounts receivable and inventories increased in the first six months of 2006 by $5.1 million and $1.4 million, respectively. Operating cash flow in 2006 also reflects the payment of a ten year insurance premium in the amount of $4.6 million. The related insurance policy provides environmental clean-up cost cap coverage and pollution legal liability coverage for our newly acquired State College facility.

Results of Operations 

The following table sets forth certain financial data, as a percentage of net sales, for the three and six months ended May 31, 2006 and 2005:

The following table sets forth the Company's net sales by reportable operating segments for the three and six months ended May 31, 2006 and 2005 (in thousands):

Net Sales 

Our net sales increased by $6.0 million during the period, with consolidated net sales of $31.9 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2006 and $25.9 million in the comparable quarter of 2005. Sales of our microwave components and systems amounted to $13.4 million in the current quarter, an increase of $3.3 million from the same period last year. Although our microwave products are used in numerous industries and applications, sales in the military/aerospace sector were particularly strong in the current quarter. Sales of our power management systems were $1.5 million during the second quarter of 2006, a decrease of $661,000 from the first quarter of 2005. This decrease primarily reflects reduced shipment requirements for certain telecommunication equipment customers. Sales of our sensors and controls amounted to $2.0 million in the current quarter, reflecting our recent acquisition of JDK.

Sales of our signal and power integrity products were $15.0 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2006, up $1.4 million from the same period a year ago. Since late August of 2005, when Hurricane Katrina severely damaged our ceramic manufacturing plant in New Orleans, Louisiana, we have had to purchase certain ceramic components from third party suppliers. Despite the cooperation and efforts of these ceramic subcontractors, we experienced certain delays in meeting our ceramic capacitor needs in the fourth quarter of 2005 and the first quarter of 2006. In the current quarter, although shortages of certain ceramic components still exist, the overall supply of ceramic components from outside vendors significantly increased. The enhanced availability of these ceramic components, which are an essential element of our EMI filter products, enabled us to attain higher shipment levels for our signal integrity component products. To address our ongoing ceramic components needs and to re-establish our own ceramic manufacturing capabilities, we acquired in December 2005 a ceramic manufacturing facility in State College, Pennsylvania. The acquired facility will become the design and manufacturing center for our ceramic operations, replacing the operations previously conducted in New Orleans. We currently expect full production in the new facility to commence during the fourth quarter of this fiscal year. Until full production is achieved, we will continue to purchase certain ceramic capacitors from third party suppliers. Delivery delays by these outside suppliers could have a negative impact on our signal integrity components business during the third quarter of fiscal 2006.

Total customer orders received in the second quarter of fiscal 2006 amounted to $34.2 million, up $7.1 million or 26.2% from the comparable period of 2005. At May 31, 2006, our sales order backlog was $51.3 million, compared to $47.2 million at November 30, 2005.

Overall, average selling prices remained relatively stable throughout all of our product lines.

Gross Margin 

In the second quarter of 2006, gross margin was $7.8 million or 24.5% of sales compared to $6.5 million or 25.3% of sales for the same quarter last year. The decrease in gross margin, as a percentage of sales, principally reflects higher material costs from procuring ceramic components from third party suppliers. Total material costs amounted to $9.7 million or 30.4% of sales in the second quarter of 2006, compared to $6.9 million or 26.6% of sales for the same period last year. Until significant production levels are achieved at our new State College ceramic manufacturing facility, we expect material costs to continue to exceed historical levels. During the third quarter of fiscal 2006, price increases by our ceramic subcontractors could also have a negative impact on the gross margin of our signal integrity components business. In the second quarter of fiscal 2006, labor costs were $3.5 million or 10.9% of sales, compared to $2.9 million or 11.2% of sales a year ago. The decrease in labor costs, as a percentage of sales, primarily arose from changes in sales mix. Aggregate manufacturing overhead costs were $10.9 million or 34.2% of sales in 2006, versus $9.5 million or 36.9% of sales in 2005. The decline in manufacturing overhead costs, as a percentage of sales, reflects greater efficiencies from higher sales volume and the leveraging of certain fixed operating expenses.

Selling, General and Administrative Expense 

Selling, general and administrative expense was $5.0 million or 15.6% of sales in the second quarter of fiscal 2006 compared to $4.4 million or 17.2% of sales for the second quarter last year. This increase of $519,000 primarily reflects additional general and administrative expense, including the following: (1) Facility costs and pre-production start-up expenses of $193,000 associated with our new State College facility, and (2) $52,000 of equity-based compensation expense from our adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised), "Share-Based Payment" ("SFAS No. 123 R"). The balance of the 2006 increase in general and administrative expense reflects additional expenditures for professional services associated with our compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and other expenses related to our increased business levels.

Interest Expense 

During the current quarter, in order to support the capital requirements associated with the start-up of our new State College facility and the working capital requirements from our increased business activity, we borrowed under our revolving line of credit. In the second quarter of fiscal 2006, interest expense from short-term borrowings amounted to $62,000, with weighted average borrowings of $4.1 million and a weighted average interest rate of 5.98%.

Other Income and Expense 

We hold numerous United States and foreign patents relating to polymer multilayer ("PML") technology. We realized license fee income of $62,000 in the second quarter of fiscal 2005 upon the granting of PML technology licenses. Although these licenses, as well as other licenses previously granted, require certain royalties to be paid to us upon the sale of products utilizing PML technology, it is not known what commercial value, if any, these patents and related licenses may have. No license fees or royalties were received in the second quarter of 2006.

Investment income of $8,000 in 2006 and $52,000 in 2005 was realized from temporary cash investments.

Six Months 2006 Versus Six Months 2005

Net Sales 

For the first half of fiscal 2006, our net sales increased by $10.4 million or 22.2%, with consolidated sales of $57.4 million in 2006 and $47.0 million in 2005. Of this $10.4 million increase, $3.8 million relates to our recent acquisition of JDK. Sales of our microwave components and systems grew by $6.2 million in the current period, principally reflecting increased shipments for products used in numerous military applications. Sales of our power management systems remained relatively stable throughout the period, with shipments of $3.4 million in 2006 and $3.5 million in 2005. These advanced systems are used in various infrastructure equipment including wireless base stations, optical networks, IT hubs, data centers, and certain military applications. Sales of our signal and power integrity products were $26.4 million in the first six months of fiscal 2006, up $542,000 from the same period last year. During the first half of fiscal 2005, product sales for this business segment were negatively impacted by the overall weak market conditions in the passive electronic components industry. Since the first half of last year, market conditions throughout the industry have demonstrated signs of improvement.

Total customer orders received in the first half of fiscal 2006 amounted to $62.9 million, up $14.1 million or 28.7% from the first half of fiscal 2005.

Gross Margin 

For the first six months of fiscal 2006, gross margin was $13.0 million or 22.7% of sales. In the first six months of fiscal 2005, gross margin was $11.5 million or 24.4% of sales. The decrease in grow margin, as a percentage of sales, principally reflects greater material costs from purchasing ceramic components from outside vendors. Total material costs amounted to $17.4 million or 30.3% of sales in the first half of fiscal 2006, compared to $12.8 million of 27.2% of sales for the same period of 2005. As a percentage of sales, labor costs remained stable throughout the period. In the first six months of fiscal 2006, total labor costs were $6.4 million or 11.1% of sales, compared to $5.3 million or 11.1% of sales for the first six months of last fiscal year. Aggregate manufacturing overhead costs were $20.6 million or 35.9% of sales in 2006, versus $17.5 million or 37.3% of sales in 2005. The decrease in manufacturing overhead costs, as a percentage of sales, primarily reflects improved operating efficiencies and the impact of leveraging certain fixed overhead costs over greater sales volume.

Selling, General and Administrative Expense 

Selling, general and administrative expense was $9.9 million or 17.2% of sales in the first half of fiscal 2006, compared to $8.4 million or 17.9% of sales for the same period last year. This increase of $1.5 million principally reflects additional general and administrative expense, including the following: (1) Pre-production start-up costs and environmental liability insurance expense of $270,000 associated with our newly acquired State College facility, (2) An asset impairment loss of $200,000 for the writedown, to fair value and subsequent sale of our former ceramic manufacturing facility in New Orleans, (3) $178,000 of expenses associated with the final clean-up of our New Orleans facility from the damage inflicted by Hurricane Katrina, and (4) $104,000 of equity-based compensation expense from our adoption of SFAS No. 123 R. The balance of the 2006 increase in general and administrative expense reflects additional expenditures for professional services associated with our compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and other expenses related to our greater business activity.

Interest Expense 

During the first half of fiscal 2006, interest expense was $139,000, up $63,000 from the first half of fiscal 2005. This increase primarily reflects our 2006 short-term borrowings. For the first six months of fiscal 2006, interest expense on borrowings under our revolving line of credit amounted to $69,000, with weighted average borrowings of $2.4 million and a weighted average interest rate of 5.88%. For the first six months of fiscal 2005, no borrowings were outstanding under our line of credit.

Income Taxes 

Our effective income tax rate was 37.3% in 2006 and 39.2% in 2005, compared to an applicable statutory federal and state income tax rate of approximately 40.0%. Differences between the effective tax rate and statutory income tax rate principally arise from state tax provisions and foreign income tax rates.

Risk Factors That May Affect Future Results 

In fiscal year 2005, approximately 39.0% of our sales were to customers in the telecommunications industry. Our three largest telecom customers, original equipment manufacturers of telecommunications equipment, represented 10.0% of our total consolidated net sales in 2005. Several years ago, the telecommunications equipment industry experienced a severe slowdown. Recently, market conditions in the industry have demonstrated improvement, but overall market trends and forecasts remain unpredictable. If the current market conditions deteriorate, it will have a material negative impact on our future operating performance.

Military aircraft and naval vessels generally contain extensive communication equipment, electronic countermeasure equipment for defense against enemy weapons, smart weapons and munitions, and radar systems. We provide low pass filters, multisection assemblies, and various microwave components and integrated assemblies to major equipment manufacturers for installation into these systems. We also provide various EMI filtered arrays and filtered connectors to aerospace manufacturers for use in commercial applications such as point to point telemetry and avionic upgrades. In fiscal 2005, military/aerospace sales were approximately 42.0% of our consolidated sales. Demand for military/aerospace products may be impacted by numerous economic, technological and political factors. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that sales to such customers will not decrease in the future. In addition, our results of operations may be negatively affected in the future by a variety of other factors including: time delays and cost overages in commencing ceramic capacitor manufacturing at our new State College facilities; cost increases and delivery delays for ceramic capacitors purchased from third party suppliers; changes in the availability of other raw materials; competitive pricing pressures; new technologies which decrease the demand for our products; new product offerings by our competitors; product cost changes; changes in the overall economic climate; cancellation of existing customer order backlog; unanticipated impairment of assets; difficulties in integrating acquired businesses and product lines; and changes in product mix.

Liquidity, Capital Resources and Financial Condition 

We maintain a domestic line of credit with our principal lending institution, PNC Bank, N.A. of Erie, Pennsylvania (the "Bank"), in the aggregate amount of $25.0 million, with an additional $10.0 million expansion feature. Borrowings under the line of credit are secured by substantially all of our tangible and intangible personal property, and bear interest at rates below the prevailing prime rate. At May 31, 2006, $5.0 million was outstanding under this line of credit arrangement. The line of credit agreement contains certain covenants, the most restrictive of which require us to maintain designated minimum levels of net worth and profitability, and impose certain restrictions on us regarding additional indebtedness. At May 31, 2006, we were in compliance with all debt covenants. The current line of credit agreement expires in December 2010. Our ability to borrow in the future under this credit facility is dependent on our ongoing compliance with the restrictive covenants. Whether we continue to comply with these covenants is largely dependent on our ability to attain certain levels of operating performance and profitability in the future, for which there can be no assurance.

Our wholly-owned German subsidiary maintains an unsecured Euro line of credit with a German financial institution aggregating approximately $1.3 million (Euro 1.0 million). At May 31, 2006, no borrowings were outstanding under this line of credit. Future borrowings, if any, will bear interest at rates below the prevailing prime rate and will be payable upon demand.

At May 31, 2006, we had net working capital of $34.3 million, compared to $39.5 million at November 30, 2005. At May 31, 2006, current assets were 3.10 times current liabilities, compared to 4.86 at the end of fiscal 2005. The reduction in our working capital and current ratio principally reflects the cash requirements associated with the acquisition of land, building and equipment in connection with our new ceramic manufacturing facility in State College, Pennsylvania. As a result of this activity, our total capital expenditures amounted to $5.3 million in the first half of fiscal 2006 and our other noncurrent assets increased by $4.0 million. At May 31, 2006, we had not entered into any material commitments for additional capital expenditures.

We have adopted a stock repurchase program. Under this program, we may repurchase up to $6.0 million of the Company's outstanding Common Stock. Acquired shares are to be purchased in the open market or through privately negotiated transactions at prevailing market prices. Funding for these repurchases is expected to come from available cash reserves and borrowings under our revolving line of credit facilities. The amount and timing of the shares repurchased are based on our ongoing assessment of the Company's capital structure, liquidity, and the market price of the Company's Common Stock. The repurchased shares are held as treasury stock. During the first six months of fiscal 2006, no shares were purchased. Since the adoption of the stock repurchase program, 676,000 shares have been repurchased at a total cost of $3.6 million.

As of May 31, 2006, our obligations and firm commitments are as follows (in thousands):

Current financial resources, including working capital and existing lines of credit, and anticipated funds from operations are expected to be sufficient to meet operating cash requirements throughout the next twelve months, including scheduled long-term debt repayment, lease commitments, planned capital equipment expenditures and possible stock repurchases. There can be no assurance, however, that unplanned capital replacement or other future events will not require us to seek additional debt or equity financing and, if so required, that it will be available on terms acceptable to us.

Net cash used in operating activities amounted to $6.6 million during the first six months of fiscal 2006, compared to $1.1 million of net operating cash generated for the same period a year ago. With sales volume and production requirements increasing late in the current quarter, accounts receivable and inventories increased in 2006 by $5.1 million and $1.4 million, respectively. Operating cash flow in 2006 also reflects the payment of a ten year insurance premium in the amount of $4.6 million. The related insurance policy provides environmental clean-up cost cap coverage and pollution legal liability coverage for our newly acquired State College facility.

At May 31, 2006, the aggregate carrying value of goodwill was $28.7 million or 26.4% of our total assets and 34.2% of our total stockholders' equity. This amount includes approximately $1.9 million of goodwill recognized in connection with our acquisition of JDK. On an annual basis, and when there is reason to suspect that the carrying value of goodwill has been diminished or impaired, goodwill must be tested for impairment and a writedown of the asset may be necessary. We have performed the required tests and we have determined that no goodwill impairment losses need be recognized in any of the periods presented herein.

Environmental Matters 

On December 30, 2005, we acquired certain land and ceramic manufacturing facilities in State College, Pennsylvania. The property, which was acquired from Murata Electronics North America ("Murata"), consists of approximately 53 acres of land and 250,000 square feet of manufacturing facilities.

The purchase price for the acquired property consisted of: (a) $1.00, plus (b) closing costs of approximately $550,000 including realtor commissions, transfer taxes, and legal fees; plus (c) the assumption of, and indemnification of Murata against, all environmental liabilities related to the property. The acquired property has known environmental conditions that require remediation, and certain hazardous materials previously used on the property have migrated into neighboring third party areas. These environmental issues arose from the use of chlorinated organic solvents including tetrachloroethylene ("PCE") and trichloroethylene ("TCE"). As a condition to the purchase, we entered into an agreement with the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection ("PADEP") pursuant to which: (a) we agreed to remediate all known environmental conditions relating to the property to a specified industrial standard, with our costs for remediating such conditions being capped at $4.0 million; (b) PADEP released Murata from further claims by Pennsylvania under specified state laws for the known environmental conditions; and (c) we purchased an insurance policy providing clean-up cost cap coverage (for known and unknown pollutants) with a combined coverage limit of approximately $8.2 million, and pollution legal liability coverage (for possible third party claims) with an aggregate coverage limit of $25.0 million. The total premium cost for the insurance policy, which has a 10 year term and an aggregate deductible of $650,000, was $4.6 million. The cost of the insurance will be charged to expense on a pro rata basis over the 10 year policy term.

Based upon estimates prepared by our environmental consultants, we recorded a liability of $2.9 million to cover probable future environmental expenditures related to the remediation, the cost of which is expected to be entirely covered by the insurance policy. These aggregate undiscounted expenditures, which are anticipated to be incurred over the next 10 years, principally consist of: (a) continued operation and monitoring of the existing on-site groundwater extraction, treatment, and recharge system; (b) implementation of a chemical oxidation system, subject to the results of a laboratory treatability study; (c) completion of soil investigations to determine the extent of potential soil contamination; (d) excavation and off-site disposal of soil containing contaminates above acceptable standards; and (e) implementation of soil vapor extraction systems in certain areas. Depending upon the results of future environmental testing and remediation actions, it is possible that the ultimate costs incurred could exceed the current aggregate estimate of $2.9 million. We expect such increase, if any, to be entirely covered by the insurance policy. Insurance recoveries for actual environmental remediation costs incurred will be recorded when it is probable that such insurance reimbursement will be received and the related amounts are determinable. As of May 31, 2006, remediation expenditures of $110,000 have been incurred and charged against the environmental liability, with all such expenditures being reimbursed by the insurance carrier.

Based on the current remediation plan developed by our environmental consultants, $927,000 of the total remediation costs is expected to be incurred during the next twelve months.

Critical Accounting Policies 

The methods, estimates and judgments we use in applying our most critical accounting policies have a significant impact on the results we report in our financial statements. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has defined the most critical accounting policies as the ones that are most important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results, and require us to make our most difficult and subjective judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates of matters that are inherently uncertain. Based on this definition, we believe our most critical accounting policies relate to the valuation and carrying amounts of accounts receivable, inventories, long-lived assets, and deferred tax assets.

We evaluate the collectibility of our accounts receivable based on a combination of factors including an assessment of the customer's financial condition and the length of time a receivable is past due. At May 31, 2006, our allowance for doubtful accounts was $1.2 million, or 5.2% of our aggregate accounts receivable. In determining the adequacy of this allowance, we have assumed that market conditions in the telecommunications equipment industry will stabilize or continue to improve throughout fiscal 2006. If this improvement does not occur, or if market conditions deteriorate, our customers may not be able to meet their financial obligations to us. Accordingly, our estimate of the recoverability of amounts due us could be reduced by a material amount.

At May 31, 2006, we had recorded inventory reserves in the aggregate amount of $2.8 million for excess and slow-moving items. In determining the adequacy of these reserves, we considered numerous factors including current customer forecasts and estimated usage. Should these forecasts and estimates change due to market, technological or other factors, the net realizable value of our inventories may be materially less than our current carrying values.

We review goodwill for possible impairment at least annually. Impairment losses are recognized when the implied fair value of goodwill is less than its carrying value. The implied fair value of goodwill is contingent upon many factors, including estimates of future discounted operating cash flows. Long-lived assets other than goodwill are reviewed for impairment whenever indicators of possible impairment exist. Impairments are recognized when the expected future operating cash flows derived from such assets are less than their carrying values. Other than certain losses associated with Hurricane Katrina, no impairment losses have been recognized in any of the periods presented herein. However, our future cash flow expectations assume that market conditions throughout the telecommunications equipment industry will improve in subsequent years. If long-term market conditions do not improve, our long-lived assets may become materially impaired.

We record valuation allowances to reduce deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not that some portion of the asset may not be realized. Presently, we believe that all deferred tax assets will more likely than not be realized and a valuation allowance is not required. We evaluate the need for valuation allowances on a regular basis and make adjustments as needed. These adjustments, when made, may have a materially negative impact on our financial statements.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements 

In November 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 151, "Inventory Costs - an amendment of ARB 43, Chapter 4" ("SFAS No. 151"). SFAS No. 151 clarifies the accounting for abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs, and wasted material (spoilage) by requiring that these items be recognized as current period charges. The Statement also requires that allocation of fixed production overheads to the costs of conversion be based on the normal capacity of the production facilities. SFAS No. 151 is effective for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005.

In December 2004, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 153, "Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets - an amendment of APB Opinion No. 29" ("SFAS No. 153"). Previous guidance regarding the accounting for nonmonetary assets was based on the principle that exchanges of nonmonetary assets should be measured based on the fair value of the assets exchanged. This previous guidance, however, included certain exceptions to that principle. SFAS No. 153 amends APB Opinion No. 29 to eliminate the exception for nonmonetary exchanges of similar productive assets and replaces it with a general exception for exchanges of nonmonetary assets that do not have commercial substance. A nonmonetary exchange has commercial substance if the future cash flows of the entity are expected to change significantly as a result of the exchange. The provisions of SFAS No. 153 are generally effective for nonmonetary asset exchanges occurring in fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2005.

Our adoption of SFAS No. 151 and SFAS No. 153 did not have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In May 2005, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 154, "Accounting Changes and Error Corrections - a replacement of APB Opinion No. 20 and FASB Statement No. 3" ("SFAS No. 154"). SFAS No. 154 changes the requirements for the accounting and reporting of a change in accounting principle. The Statement requires retrospective application to prior periods' financial statements of changes in accounting principle, unless it is impracticable to determine either the period-specific effects or the cumulative effect of the change. In addition, the Statement also requires that a change in depreciation or amortization for long-lived assets be accounted for as a change in accounting estimate effected by a change in accounting principle. The provisions of SFAS No. 154 are generally effective for accounting changes and corrections of errors made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005.

In February 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 155, "Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments - an amendment of FASB Statements No. 133 and 140" ("SFAS No. 155"). Among other changes, SFAS No. 155 eliminates the exemption from applying FASB Statement No. 133 to interests in securitized financial assets so that similar instruments are accounted for similarly regardless of the form of the instruments. SFAS No. 155 is effective for all financial instruments acquired or issued after the beginning of an entity's first fiscal year that begins after September 15, 2006.

We do not expect the adoption of SFAS No.154 and SFAS No. 155 to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

Item 3.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Foreign Currency 

Certain of our European sales and related selling expenses are denominated in Euros, British Pounds Sterling, and other local currencies. In addition, certain of our operating expenses are denominated in Mexican Pesos and Chinese Yuan. As a result, fluctuations in currency exchange rates may affect our operating results and cash flows. To manage our exposure to the Euro and British Pound Sterling, we occasionally enter into forward currency exchange contracts. At May 31, 2006, no forward currency exchange contracts were outstanding. For each of the periods presented herein, currency exchange rate gains and losses were not material.

Interest Rate Exposure 

We have market risk exposure relating to possible fluctuations in interest rates. From time to time, we utilize interest rate swap agreements to minimize the risks and costs associated with variable rate debt. We do not enter into derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. The interest rate swap agreements are entered into with major financial institutions thereby minimizing the risk of credit loss. At May 31, 2006, no interest rate swap agreements were outstanding.

Item 4.  Controls and Procedures

(a)  Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have reviewed and evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rules 13a-14 (c) and 15d-14 (c). Based on their review and evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the Company's disclosure controls and procedures are adequate and effective to ensure that material information relating to the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries are made known to them by others within those entities in a timely manner, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report on Form 10-Q was being prepared, and that no changes are required at this time.

(b)  Change in Internal Controls

There were no changes in the Company's internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect the Company's internal controls during the quarter ended May 31, 2006, or any significant deficiencies or material weaknesses in such internal controls requiring corrective actions. As a result, no corrective actions were taken.

Item 1A.  Risk Factors

The Company is exposed to certain risk factors that may affect future operating and financial results. In addition to the risk factors discussed within this quarterly report Form 10-Q, significant risk factors are described in the Company's most recently filed annual report on Form 10-K. There have been no significant changes in the Company's risk factors since November 30, 2005.

Item 4.  Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

The Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the Company was held on April 3, 2006 at the Bel-Aire Clarion Hotel and Conference Center, 2800 West Eighth Street, Erie, Pennsylvania at 9:00 A.M. All proposals as described in the Company's Proxy Statement dated March 3, 2006 were approved. Below are details of the matters voted upon at the meeting.

Proposal 1 - Election of Directors

Elections were held for three (3) directors to serve until the 2009 Annual Meeting. The results of the votes are as follows:

Proposal 2 - Amendment to Stock Option Plan

The 1996 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan (the "Plan") was amended by the Board of Directors in September 2005, subject to approval by the shareholders. The only change to the Plan was to authorize the grant to each non-employee Director, effective November 1, 2005, options to purchase 24,000 shares. These options were granted in lieu of the options scheduled to be issued under the Plan in fiscal years 2006 and 2007. The results of the votes are as follows:

Proposal 3 - Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Upon recommendation of the Audit Committee, the Board of Directors resolved to appoint Ernst & Young LLP as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending November 30, 2006, subject only to ratification by the shareholders. The results of the votes are as follows:

Item 6.  Exhibits and Reports

CERTIFICATION

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, NW
Washington, DC 20549

In accordance with the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), each of the undersigned hereby certifies that: 

  this Current Report on Form 10-Q of Spectrum Control, Inc. for the period ended May 31, 2006, (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o (d)); and 

  the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Spectrum Control, Inc. 

Dated as of this 30th day of June 2006.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Spectrum Control, Inc. and will be retained by Spectrum Control, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.