UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of

the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.                )

 

 

 

 

 

OLD SECOND BANCORP, INC.

37 South River Street, Aurora, Illinois 60507

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

TO BE HELD MAY 21, 2019

TO THE STOCKHOLDERS:

The annual meeting of stockholders of Old Second Bancorp, Inc., will be held on Tuesday, May 21, 2019, at 9:00 a.m., central time, at Waubonsee Community College, 18 South River Street, Aurora, Illinois, 60506 for the following purposes:

 

The board of directors is not aware of any other business to come before the meeting.  Stockholders of record at the close of business on March 29, 2019 are the stockholders entitled to vote at the meeting and any and all adjournments or postponements of the meeting.  

Important Notice Regarding Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting:  Our 2019 proxy statement, proxy card and 2018 Annual Report to Shareholders are available free of charge online at www.oldsecond.com under “2019 Annual Meeting Materials.”

 

Aurora, Illinois

April 19, 2019

IMPORTANT: THE PROMPT RETURN OF PROXIES WILL SAVE US THE EXPENSE OF FURTHER REQUESTS FOR PROXIES TO ENSURE A QUORUM AT THE MEETING. A SELF‑ADDRESSED ENVELOPE IS ENCLOSED FOR YOUR CONVENIENCE. NO POSTAGE IS REQUIRED IF MAILED WITHIN THE UNITED STATES.

 

 

OLD SECOND BANCORP, INC.

37 South River Street, Aurora, Illinois 60507

PROXY STATEMENT

This proxy statement is furnished in connection with the solicitation by the board of directors of Old Second Bancorp, Inc., a Delaware corporation, of proxies to be voted at the annual meeting of stockholders.  This meeting is to be held at Waubonsee Community College,  18  South River Street, Aurora, Illinois, 60506, on May 21, 2019 at 9:00 a.m., central time, or at any postponements or adjournments of the meeting.  Old Second conducts full service community banking and trust business through its wholly owned subsidiary, Old Second National Bank.

A copy of our annual report for the year ended December 31, 2018, which includes audited financial statements, is enclosed.  This proxy statement was first mailed to stockholders on or about April 19, 2019.   As used in this proxy statement, the terms “Old Second,” “the Company,” “we,” “our” and “us” all refer to Old Second Bancorp, Inc., and its subsidiaries.  Additionally, the term “the Bank” refers to Old Second National Bank.

Why am I receiving this proxy statement and proxy form?

You are receiving a proxy statement and proxy form from us because on March 29, 2019, the record date for the annual meeting, you owned shares of our common stock.  This proxy statement describes the matters that will be presented for consideration by the stockholders at the annual meeting.  It also gives you information concerning these matters to assist you in making an informed decision.

When you sign the enclosed proxy form, you appoint the proxy holder as your representative at the meeting.  The proxy holder will vote your shares as you have instructed in the proxy form, ensuring that your shares will be voted whether or not you attend the meeting.  Even if you plan to attend the annual meeting, complete, sign and return your proxy form in advance of the annual meeting in case your plans change.

What matters will be voted on at the meeting?

You are being asked to vote on seven matters:

How do I vote?

A form of proxy is enclosed for use at the meeting.  If the proxy is executed and returned, it may nevertheless be revoked at any time insofar as it has not been exercised.  Stockholders attending the meeting may, on request, vote their own shares even though they have previously sent in a proxy.  Unless revoked or instructions to the contrary are contained in the proxies, the shares represented by validly executed proxies will be voted at the meeting and will be voted “FOR” the election of the nominees for director named in this proxy statement, “FOR” the say-on-pay proposal, "FOR" the "every year" frequency alternative for the say-on-frequency proposal, "FOR" approval of the 2019 Equity Incentive Plan, “FOR” the amendment to our certificate of incorporation eliminating the mandatory retirement age for directors, “FOR” the ratification of our independent registered public accounting firm, and "FOR" the adjournment proposal, and in accordance with the proxy holder’s judgement on any other business that is properly brought before the meeting.

If you want to vote in person, please come to the meeting.  We will distribute written ballots to anyone who wants to vote at the meeting.  Please note, however, that if your shares are held in the name of a broker or other fiduciary (or what is usually referred to as “street name”), you will need to arrange to obtain a proxy from the record holder in order to vote in person at the meeting.  Even if you plan to attend the annual meeting, we ask that you complete, sign and return your proxy card in advance of the annual meeting in case your plans change.

What does it mean if I receive more than one proxy form?

It means that you have multiple holdings reflected in our stock transfer records and/or in accounts with stockbrokers.  Please sign and return ALL proxy forms to ensure that all your shares are voted.

If I hold shares in the name of a broker, who votes my shares?

If you received this proxy statement from your broker, your broker should have given you instructions for directing how your broker should vote your shares.  It will then be your broker’s responsibility to vote your shares for you in the manner you direct.

Under the applicable stock exchange rule, brokers may generally vote on routine matters, but cannot vote on non‑routine matters, such as the election of directors, the say-on-pay proposal, the say-on-frequency proposal, and the 2019 Equity Incentive Plan proposal, unless they have received voting instructions from the person for whom they are holding shares.  If there is a matter presented to stockholders at the meeting and your broker does not receive instructions from you on how to vote on that matter, your broker will return the proxy card to us, indicating that he or she does not have the authority to vote on that matter.  This is generally referred to as a “broker non‑vote.”

Each of the proposals you will be asked to consider and vote upon at the annual meeting, other than the ratification of the appointment of our independent registered accountants, the proposed amendment to our certificate of incorporation eliminating the mandatory retirement age for directors, and the adjournment proposal, is considered a  non‑routine matter.  Therefore, we encourage you to provide directions to your broker as to how you want your shares voted on all matters to be brought before the 2019 annual meeting upon receipt of our proxy materials.  You should do this by carefully following the instructions your broker gives you concerning its procedures.  This ensures that your shares will be voted at the meeting.

What if I change my mind after I return my proxy card?

If you hold your shares in your own name, you may revoke your proxy and change your vote at any time before the polls close at the meeting.  You may do this by:

If you hold your shares in the name of your broker or other fiduciary and desire to revoke your proxy, you will need to contact that party to revoke your proxy.

How many shares must be represented for us to hold the annual meeting?

A majority of the shares that were outstanding and entitled to vote as of the record date must be present in person or by proxy at the meeting in order to hold the meeting and conduct business.  On March 29, 2019, the record date, there were 29,895,022 shares of common stock outstanding.  A majority of these shares must be present in person or by proxy at the meeting.

Shares are counted as present at the meeting if the stockholder either:

What happens if any nominee is unable to stand for re-election?

The board may, by resolution, provide for a lesser number of directors or designate a substitute nominee.  In the latter case, shares represented by proxies may be voted for a substitute nominee.  Proxies cannot be voted for more than four nominees.  The board has no reason to believe any nominee will be unable to stand for re-election.

What options do I have in voting on each of the proposals?

You may vote “FOR,” “AGAINST” or “ABSTAIN” on each proposal properly brought before the meeting, other than the say-on-pay frequency proposal, including the election of directors.  You may vote for “EVERY YEAR,” “EVERY TWO YEARS,” “EVERY THREE YEARS,” or “ABSTAIN” on the say-on-frequency proposal.

How many votes may I cast?

You are entitled to cast one vote for each share of stock you owned on the record date with respect to each of the proposals.  Stockholders do not have cumulative voting rights.  The proxy card included with this proxy statement indicates the number of shares owned by an account attributable to you.

What is the quorum for the annual meeting?

A majority of our outstanding shares of common stock as of the record date must be present at the meeting, either in person or by proxy, to hold the meeting and conduct business.  This is called a quorum. In determining whether we have a quorum at the annual meeting for purposes of all matters to be voted on, all votes “FOR” or “AGAINST” and all votes to “ABSTAIN” will be counted.  Shares will be counted for quorum purposes if they are represented at the meeting for any purpose other than solely to object to holding the meeting or transacting business at the meeting.  If you hold your shares in street name, your brokerage firm may vote your shares under certain circumstances.  Brokerage firms have authority under stock exchange rules to vote their customers’ unvoted shares on certain “routine” matters.  We expect that brokers will be allowed to exercise discretionary authority for beneficial owners who have not provided voting instructions ONLY with respect to Proposal 5 – the amendment of our certificate of incorporation, Proposal 6 - the ratification of Plante & Moran, PLLC as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2019, and Proposal 7 -  the adjournment proposal, but not with respect to any of the other proposals to be voted on at the annual meeting.  If you hold your shares in street name, please provide voting instructions to your bank, broker or other nominee so that your shares may be voted on all other proposals.

When a brokerage firm votes its customers’ unvoted shares on routine matters, these shares are counted for purposes of establishing a quorum to conduct business at the meeting.  If a brokerage firm indicates on a proxy that it does not have discretionary authority to vote certain shares on a particular matter, then those shares will be treated as “broker non‑votes”.  Shares represented by broker non‑votes will be counted in determining whether there is a quorum.

No notice of an adjourned meeting need be given if the time and place of the adjourned meeting are announced at the annual meeting, unless the adjournment is for more than 30 days or if, after the adjournment, a new record date is fixed for the adjourned meeting, in which case a notice of the adjourned meeting shall be given to each shareholder of

record entitled to vote at the meeting.  At an adjourned meeting, all proxies will be voted in the same manner as they would have been voted at the original convening of the annual meeting, except for any proxies that have been effectively revoked or withdrawn prior to the adjourned meeting.

 

How many votes are needed for each proposal?

Assuming a quorum is present, a majority of the shares having voting power present in person or represented by proxy must approve each proposal brought before the annual meeting other than the say-on-frequency proposal and the proposal to amend our certificate of incorporation (meaning that the number of votes cast “FOR” each proposal must exceed the number of votes cast “AGAINST” or “ABSTAIN” with respect to that proposal).  This includes the proposal regarding the election of directors in accordance with the policy of majority voting in uncontested director elections set forth in our bylaws.  The proposal to amend our certificate of incorporation must be approved by 75% of the voting power of all outstanding shares of our common stock.  With respect to the say-on-frequency proposal, the alternative receiving the highest number of votes will be considered the preference of our stockholders.

Broker non‑votes will not affect the outcome of voting on a particular proposal other than the proposal to amend our certificate of incorporation or the election of directors, but abstentions will have the effect of a vote against the applicable proposal or director.  Broker non-votes will have the effect of a vote against the proposal to amend our certificate of incorporation.

Please note that, because the say‑on‑pay and say-on-frequency votes are advisory, they will not be binding upon the board of directors or the Compensation Committee.

Where do I find the voting results of the meeting?

If available, we will announce voting results at the meeting.  The voting results will also be disclosed in a Form 8‑K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) within four business days of the meeting.  The determination of the board of directors with respect to the frequency of the say-on-pay vote also will be disclosed in a Form 8-K filed with the SEC.

PROPOSAL 1:

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Old Second’s board of directors is divided into three classes approximately equal in number, serving staggered three‑year terms.  As a result, the terms of only approximately one‑third of our board members expire at each annual meeting.  The current terms of our Class III directors will expire at this year’s annual meeting.  The terms of our Class I directors will expire at the 2020 annual meeting and the terms of our Class II directors will expire at the 2021 annual meeting.

Each proposed Class III director nominee currently serves as a Class III director.

Following a review and nomination from our Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, our board has proposed that the following Class III directors be elected as Class III directors at our 2019 annual meeting of shareholders for a term that will expire at our 2022 annual meeting and until their respective successors are duly elected and qualified.

Class III Director Nominees

 

Each Class III director nominee will be elected if the number of shares voted “FOR” the nominee constitutes a majority of the shares having voting power present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting. Accordingly, broker non‑votes will not have any effect on the outcome of voting, but abstentions will have the effect of a vote “AGAINST” the applicable nominee.

The board of directors recommends you vote your shares “FOR” each of the above Class III director nominees.

Set forth below is information concerning our other directors, whose term of office will continue after the annual meeting, including their age, year first elected or appointed as a director.

Continuing Directors

 

All directors will hold office for the terms indicated, or until their earlier death, resignation, removal or disqualification and until their respective successors are duly elected and qualified.

There are no arrangements or understandings between any of the nominees, directors or executive officers and any other person pursuant to which any of our nominees, directors or executive officers have been selected for their respective positions.

No nominee, member of the board of directors or executive officer is related to any other nominee, member of the board of directors or executive officer.

Director Experience

Biographical information regarding each of our director nominees and continuing directors is set forth below, including the particular experience, qualifications, attributes or skills that led the board to conclude that each member is qualified to serve on the board and any committee he or she serves.

Mr. Bonifas:    Mr. Bonifas is the Executive Vice President of Alarm Detection Systems, Inc., a producer and installer of alarm systems, closed circuit video systems and card access control systems, a position he has held since 2000.  We consider Mr. Bonifas to be qualified for service on the board, the Risk Committee, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Compensation Committee due to his skills and expertise acquired as a leader of a successful business and his prominence in the communities we serve. Mr. Bonifas also serves as Chairman of our Information Technology Steering committee where he uses his business expertise for cybersecurity oversight.

Mr. Collins:    Mr. Collins has served as the Vice Chairman of the Company since October 2016.  Before that, he was Vice Chairman of Talmer Bancorp, Inc., a publicly traded bank holding company, from 2011 until 2016.  He also served as a director of Talmer Bancorp, Inc. from 2010 until 2016. Mr. Collins served as Chairman and Co‑Chief Executive Officer of Lake Shore Wisconsin Corporation, a bank holding company, from 2010 until 2011, and as a founding Managing Director and Vice Chairman of The Private Bank — Chicago from 1991 until 2009.  We consider Mr. Collins to be qualified for service on the board due to his experience focused within mortgage banking and real estate opportunities among residential, multi‑family, and commercial lending.

Mr. Eccher:    Mr. Eccher has served as the Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company since 2015 and has served as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Bank since 2003. He also serves as Chief Operating Officer of the Company, a position he has held since 2007, and served as Senior Vice President and Branch Director of the Bank from 1999 until 2003.  Before that he served as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Bank of Sugar Grove from 1996 until 1999.  We consider Mr. Eccher to be qualified for service on the board due to his experience in the financial services industry and the familiarity with Old Second’s operations that he has acquired as the Chief Executive Officer and President of Old Second and Old Second National Bank.

Mr. Finn:    Mr. Finn has served as the President and Chief Executive Officer of Rush‑Copley Medical Center since 2002.  Before that, Mr. Finn served as the Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Rush‑Copley Medical Center from 1996 until 2002. We consider Mr. Finn to be a qualified candidate for service on the board and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee as Lead Director, the Information Technology Steering Committee, and the Audit Committee due to his business and financial expertise acquired as an executive at a successful local medical center, as well as his prominence in the communities we serve. We also consider Mr. Finn to be a qualified financial expert.

Mr. Kane:    Mr. Kane is a Partner of Label Printers, Inc., a printing company, a position he has held since 1977. We consider Mr. Kane to be a qualified candidate for service on the board and the Compensation Committee and the Risk Committee as Chairman, and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee due to his experience as a partner at a successful local business, his general experience in business and his prominence in the communities we serve.

Mr. Ladowicz:    Mr. Ladowicz is the former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of HeritageBanc, Inc. and Heritage Bank, where he served from 1996 until 2008, when it was acquired by Old Second.  We consider Mr. Ladowicz to be a qualified candidate for service on the board, the Audit Committee, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Compensation Committee as Chairman due to his previous experience as a chief executive officer in the financial services industry, as well as his extensive knowledge of the market areas we entered through the acquisition of HeritageBanc, Inc. in 2008.

Mr. McLean:    Mr. McLean has been a Partner with Rock Island Capital since November 2016.  Before that, Mr. McLean served as Regional President and Managing Director of Talmer Bank from 2010 until October 2016.  From 2009 until 2010, he was President and Director of Lake Shore Wisconsin Corporation. Mr. McLean was Vice Chairman of The PrivateBank, a publicly traded commercial bank headquartered in Chicago, from 1996 until 2008, and was a Managing Director of The PrivateBank from 1996 until 2001.  He also held senior commercial banking positions with

Firstar Bank and American National Bank prior to joining the PrivateBank in 1996.  We consider Mr. McLean to be a qualified candidate for service on the board and the Audit Committee and the Information Technology Steering Committee due to his previous experience in the financial industry.

Mr. Skoglund:    Mr. Skoglund serves as the Chairman of the Company and the Bank. From 1998 until 2014, Mr. Skoglund served as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company.  He also served as Chief Executive Officer of the Bank from 1996 until 2014.  We consider Mr. Skoglund to be qualified for service on the board due to his skills and experience in the financial services industry and his familiarity with the Company’s operations as our former Chief Executive Officer.

Mr. Suits:    Mr. Suits was a founding Partner of Sikich LLC, a financial services firm, from 1982 until his retirement in 2004.  We consider Mr. Suits to be a qualified candidate for service on the board and the Audit Committee as Chairman (including as the audit committee financial expert) and the Risk Committee and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee due to his skills and experience in the financial services industry and his familiarity with Old Second’s operations.

Mr. Tapscott:    Mr. Tapscott was a Partner of McGladrey LLP, an audit, tax and consulting firm, from 1991 until his retirement in 2015.  Before that, he was a Partner with Wilkes Besterfield and Co., Ltd., from 1972 until 1991. We consider Mr. Tapscott to be a qualified candidate for service on the board and the Risk Committee and the Audit Committee due to his previous experience in accounting and financial matters as a partner of McGladrey LLP and Wilkes Besterfield and Co., Ltd.

Ms. Temple Rocks:    Ms. Temple Rocks was the Managing Director of the Chicago office of Golin, a global communications agency until her retirement in 2018.  We consider Ms. Temple Rocks to be a qualified candidate for service on the board and the Compensation Committee and the Information Technology Steering Committee due to her business experience and familiarity with the greater Chicago market through her managing directorship with Golin.

Biographical Information for Executive Officers

 

Because each of Mr. Eccher and Mr. Collins also serves on our board of directors, we have provided biographical information for them above. Biographical information for each of Mr. Adams, Mr. Gottschalk and Mr. Pilmer is provided below:

Mr. Adams, age 45, joined Old Second and Old Second National Bank in May 2017 to serve as an Executive Vice President and our Chief Financial Officer.  From November 2016 until joining us, he served as Executive Vice President and Director of Corporate Development and Strategy for TCF National Bank, where he oversaw corporate development and strategy. Before that, he served as Executive Managing Director, Corporate Development, of Talmer Bancorp, Inc. from 2011 and 2016. While at Talmer, Mr. Adams was responsible for management of internal financial reporting, budgeting, mortgage bank accounting, investor relations, strategic planning and corporate development activities.  Prior to joining Talmer, Mr. Adams also held positions as Managing Director of W2 Freedom, LLC, a private investment fund manager focused on investing in community banks, and as Director of Investor Relations for Fifth Third Bancorp.

Mr. Pilmer, age 54, joined Old Second and Old Second National Bank in 1989.  He currently serves as Executive Vice President (a position he has held since 2016) and as Chief Lending Officer (a position he has held since 2008). Mr. Pilmer manages the Commercial Banking unit and has more than 25 years of experience in the Commercial Banking industry.

Mr. Gottschalk, age 57, joined Old Second and Old Second National Bank in 2001.  He currently serves as Executive Vice President, Digital Banking Services at Old Second National Bank, a position he has held since January

2019.  Prior to that, Mr. Gottschalk was Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of the Bank since 2012. From 2007 until 2012, he served as Executive Vice President of Operations of the Bank. Mr. Gottschalk has more than 35 years of banking experience, including managing Operations, Information Technology, Retail Banking and extensive experience in the ATM/Debit arena.  Before joining the Old Second team, Mr. Gottschalk held senior management positions for Old Kent Bank (Elmhurst, IL), Fifth Third Bank (Elmhurst, IL), Pinnacle Bank (Berwyn, IL) and FBOP Corporation (Oak Park, IL).  He has served on many customer advisory boards in the operations field.

 

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

General

Currently, the board of directors is made up of eleven directors, who are elected by the holders of our common stock every three years to serve staggered terms.  In accordance with our corporate governance procedures, the board does not involve itself in the day‑to‑day operations of Old Second, which is monitored by our executive officers and management.  Our directors fulfill their duties and responsibilities by attending regular meetings of the board and through committee membership, which is discussed below.

Director Attendance

The board of directors held ten regular meetings during 2018.   All of the directors attended at least 75% of these meetings and the meetings of the committees on which they served.  We typically schedule a board meeting in conjunction with our annual meeting and expect that our directors will attend our annual meeting. Last year, all of our then‑serving directors attended our annual meeting.

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

The board of directors believes that it is important to encourage the highest level of corporate ethics and responsibility.  Among other things, the board adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, which applies to all of our directors, officers and employees, as well as a procedure for allowing employees to anonymously report any problems they may detect with respect to our financial reporting.  The Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, as well as other information pertaining to our committees, corporate governance and reporting with the Securities and Exchange Commission, can be found on our website at www.oldsecond.com.  The Company will post on its website any amendments to, or waiver from, the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics as it applies to any director or officer to the extent required to be disclosed by applicable NASDAQ or SEC requirements.

Director Independence

The board of directors has standing Audit, Nominating and Corporate Governance, and Compensation Committees, each of which is made up solely of directors who are deemed to be “independent” under the rules of NASDAQ. NASDAQ’s independence rules include certain instances that will preclude a director from being deemed independent and the board reviews those requirements each year to determine a director’s status as an independent director.  The board has determined that all of the directors and nominees are “independent” as defined by the NASDAQ Stock Market, with the exception of Messrs. Eccher and Collins, each of whom has been an executive officer of the Company during the past three calendar years ended December 31, 2018.

During its review of director independence, the board considered Mr. Finn’s roles as President and Chief Executive Officer at Rush‑Copley Medical Center and Mr. Skoglund’s position as the Vice Chairman of Rush‑Copley’s board of directors.  Our board determined that this does not preclude a finding that Mr. Finn is independent under NASDAQ’s  rules because Mr. Skoglund does not serve on Rush‑Copley’s compensation committee and has recused himself from any discussions or votes that involve Mr. Finn’s salary. The board also reviewed certain transactions between Alarm Detection Systems, Inc. and the Company. Mr. Bonifas is an Executive Vice President of Alarm Detections Systems, Inc.  The board determined that Mr. Bonifas qualified as an independent director because the amounts paid by the Company to Alarm Detection Systems in 2018, which totaled approximately $214,921, were less than 5% of Alarm Detection System’s gross revenues for 2018 and because Mr. Bonifas had no interest in the transaction with the Company, except an indirect and de minimis interest as a stockholder of Alarm Detection Systems.

Actions taken by each committee of the board are reported to the full board, usually at its next meeting.  The principal responsibilities of each of the committees are described below.

Committees of the Board of Directors

Our board committees are currently composed as follows (M — member; C — chair):

 

Audit Committee

The Audit Committee assists the board in carrying out its oversight responsibilities for our financial reporting process, audit process and internal controls.  The Audit Committee is solely responsible for the pre‑approval of all required audit and non‑audit services to be provided by our independent registered public accounting firm and exercises its authority to do so in accordance with a policy that it has adopted.  The committee’s duties, responsibilities and functions are further described in its charter, which is available on our website at www.oldsecond.com, in the “Governance Documents” section under “Investor Relations.”  You can request a copy of the committee’s charter by sending a written request to the Corporate Secretary at 37 South River Street, Aurora, Illinois 60507, or by requesting via e‑mail to corporatesecretary@oldsecond.com.

The members of our Audit Committee during 2018 were Mr. Suits (who serves as Chairman), Mr. Finn, Mr. Tapscott, Mr. Ladowicz and Mr. McLean, each of whom is deemed to be an independent director under SEC Rule 10A‑3 and NASDAQ’s listing requirements.  The Audit Committee met six times in 2018.

The board has designated Mr. Suits as the “audit committee financial expert,” as such term is defined by the regulations of the SEC.  The board’s determination was based upon Mr. Suits’ level of knowledge and experience regarding financial matters and his experience as an independent financial consultant and as the founding partner of Sikich Gardner & Co., LLP, a public accounting and consulting firm.  The board believes that each of the other members of the Audit Committee possesses knowledge and experience sufficient to understand the complexities of the financial statements of Old Second. Mr. Suits met on a quarterly basis during 2018 with our independent registered public accounting firm.

To review our annual Audit Committee report, please see “Proposal 6 — Ratification of Our Independent Registered Public Accounts — Audit Committee Report.”

Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee reviews the performance of Old Second’s executive officers and establishes their compensation levels.  The committee also has the authority, among other things, to:

The committee’s duties, responsibilities and functions are described more fully in its charter, which is available on our website at www.oldsecond.com, in the “Governance Documents” section under “Investor Relations.”  You can request a copy of the committee’s charter by sending a written request to the Corporate Secretary at 37 South River Street, Aurora, Illinois 60507, or by requesting via e‑mail to corporatesecretary@oldsecond.com.

The members of our Compensation Committee during 2018 were Mr. Ladowicz (who serves as Chairman), Mr. Kane, Mr. Bonifas and Ms. Temple Rocks, each of whom is deemed to be an independent director under NASDAQ’s listing requirements.  The Compensation Committee met three times in 2018.

The Compensation Committee has the authority under its charter to select, or receive advice from, advisors (including compensation consultants).  In 2018, the committee continued its engagement of ChaseCompGroup LLC as an independent advisor to assist the committee in determining and evaluating executive compensation.  The Compensation Committee assessed the independence of ChaseCompGroup LLC taking into consideration all factors specified in NASDAQ listing standards.  Based on this assessment, the committee determined the engagement of ChaseCompGroup LLC did not raise any conflict of interest.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee reviews the qualifications of, and recommends to the board for nomination, candidates to stand for election at each annual meeting or to fill vacancies on the board as they may occur during the year.   The committee also reviews on at least an annual basis whether each director is “independent” under NASDAQ listing requirements.  Additionally, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for reviewing our policies, procedures and structure as they relate to corporate governance.  The committee’s duties, responsibilities and functions are further described in its charter, which is available on our website at www.oldsecond.com, in the “Governance Documents” section under “Investor Relations.”  You can request a copy of the committee’s charter by sending a written request to the Corporate Secretary at 37 South River Street, Aurora, Illinois 60507, or by requesting via e‑mail to corporatesecretary@oldsecond.com.

The members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee in 2018 were Mr. Finn (who serves as Chairman), Mr. Kane, Mr. Bonifas, Mr. Suits and Mr. Ladowicz, each of whom is deemed to be an independent director under NASDAQ’s listing requirements.  The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee met two times in 2018.

Director Nominations and Qualifications

In making its nominations for persons to be elected to the board of directors and included in our proxy statement, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee evaluates incumbent directors, board nominees and persons nominated by stockholders, if any.  The committee reviews each candidate in light of the criteria that we believe each director should possess.  Included in the criteria are whether each nominee: (i) meets the minimum requirements for service on the board of directors contained in our bylaws; (ii) is under the age of 70 in accordance with our certificate of incorporation (but see Proposal 5 for a proposed amendment to the certificate of incorporation regarding this criterion);  (iii) possesses the highest personal and professional ethics, integrity and values; (iv) has, in the committee’s opinion, a sufficient educational and professional background and relevant past and current employment affiliations, board affiliations and experience for service on the board; (v) has demonstrated effective leadership and sound judgment in his or her professional life; (vi) has a strong sense of service to the communities in which we serve; (vii) has exemplary management and communication skills; (viii) is free of conflicts of interest that would prevent him or her from serving on the board; (ix) will ensure that other existing and future commitments do not materially interfere with his or her service as a director; (x) will review and agree to meet the standards and duties set forth in the Company’s Code of Business Conduct and Ethics; (xi) is willing to devote sufficient time to carrying out their duties and responsibilities effectively; and (xii) is

committed to serving on the board for an extended period of time.  While we do not have a separate diversity policy, the committee does consider the diversity of its directors and nominees in terms of knowledge, experience, skills, expertise and other demographics which may contribute to the board.  The committee also evaluates potential nominees to determine if they have any conflicts of interest that may interfere with their ability to serve as effective board members and to determine whether they are “independent” in accordance with NASDAQ requirements (to ensure that at least a majority of the directors will, at all times, be independent).

The committee, when considering potential board members, will look at all of the foregoing criteria.  The various qualifications and criteria are normally considered by the committee in connection with its evaluation of who the committee will recommend as the Company’s nominees.  Generally, each incumbent director standing for re‑election should have and will have, at a minimum, attended at least 75% of board meetings during the past year and attended 75% of committee meetings of which he or she is a member.  The committee retains the ability to make exceptions to this attendance requirement as individual circumstances warrant.

All of the nominees for election as directors at the 2019 annual meeting were recommended for nomination by the committee.  The committee did not receive any formal nominations for directors from our common stockholders.

Common Stock Ownership and Retention Guidelines for Directors

In order to align the interests of board members and stockholders, we require each director to develop a significant equity stake in the company.  The Compensation Committee is responsible for monitoring compliance with these stock ownership and retention guidelines.

Non‑employee directors are expected to acquire and hold during their service as board members, shares of our common stock equal in value to at least three times the annual cash retainer for non‑employee directors.  Non‑employee directors have three years from their initial election to the board to meet the target stock ownership guidelines. Once they obtain the requisite number of shares, they are expected to continuously own sufficient shares to meet the guidelines.  The stock ownership goal will be determined by using the value of their retainers as of January 1 of each year and the average closing stock price for our common stock over the prior twelve months.

Shares that count toward meeting the stock ownership guidelines include: (i) shares owned, which include shares obtained upon exercise of options or shares purchased in the open market; (ii) shared ownership, which includes shares owned or held in trust by immediate family; and (iii) restricted stock units.  Unexercised stock options do not count toward meeting the stock ownership guidelines.  Until such time as the director reaches his or her target stock ownership, the director will be required to hold 50% of the shares of common stock received upon lapse of the restrictions, and upon exercise of stock options.  In the rare instance in which these guidelines would place a severe hardship on a director, the Compensation Committee may decide to allow an alternative stock ownership guideline that reflects the intentions of these overall guidelines and the director’s own personal circumstances.

Board Leadership Structure

The roles of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer are separate positions within our Company. Mr. Skoglund, our former Chief Executive Officer, serves as our Chairman, and Mr. Eccher serves as our Chief Executive Officer and President.  We currently separate the roles of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer in recognition of the differences between the two roles.

Our board of directors has also created the position of a “lead” independent director, who assists the board of directors in assuring effective corporate governance, and serves as chairman when the board of directors meets in independent director sessions. In 2018, our board of directors designated Mr. Finn to serve as the Company’s lead independent director.  The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee reviews this appointment annually and the full board has the opportunity to ratify the committee’s selection.

Our board of directors believes this structure is appropriate for our Company because it allows the Chief Executive Officer to focus on our strategic direction and our day‑to‑day leadership and performance, and we are also able to leverage the experience and perspective of the Chairman through his guidance to the Chief Executive Officer and his management team as well as to the board of directors.  In addition, the lead independent director, who is an

independent member of our Board, provides independent leadership within our Board that strengthens its effectiveness and oversight of our business.

Board’s Role in Risk Oversight

Risk is inherent with every business, and how well a business manages risk can ultimately determine its success.  We face a number of risks, including general economic risks, credit risks, regulatory risks, audit risks, reputational risks and others, such as the impact of competition.  Management is responsible for the day‑to‑day management of risks the Company faces, while the board, as a whole and through its committees, has responsibility for the oversight of risk management.  In its risk oversight role, the board of directors has the responsibility to satisfy itself that the risk management processes designed and implemented by management are adequate and functioning as designed.

While the full board of directors is charged with ultimate oversight responsibility for risk management, various committees of the board and members of management also have responsibilities with respect to our risk oversight.  In particular, the Risk Committee plays a large role in monitoring and assessing our financial, legal and organizational risks, and receives regular reports from the management team’s senior risk officer regarding comprehensive organizational risk as well as particular areas of concern.  The board’s Compensation Committee monitors and assesses the various risks associated with compensation policies, and oversees incentives that encourage a level of risk‑taking consistent with our overall strategy. Mr. Bonifas, the Chairman of the Information Technology Steering Committee, serves as our cybersecurity expert.  Additionally, our senior credit officer and loan review staff are directly responsible for overseeing our credit risk.

We believe that establishing the right “tone at the top” and providing for full and open communication between management and the board of directors are essential for effective risk management and oversight.  Our executive management meets regularly with our other senior officers to discuss strategy and risks facing the Company. Senior officers attend many of the board meetings, or, if not in attendance, are available to address any questions or concerns raised by the board on risk management‑related and any other matters.  Additionally, each of our board‑level committees provides regular reports to the full board and apprises the board of our comprehensive risk profile and any areas of concern.

Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions

Statement of Policy Regarding Transactions with Related Persons

Transactions by us with related parties are subject to regulatory requirements and restrictions.  These requirements and restrictions include Sections 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act (which govern certain transactions by us with our affiliates) and the Federal Reserve’s Regulation O (which governs certain loans by us to our executive officers, directors and principal shareholders).  We have also adopted policies to comply with these regulatory requirements and restrictions, including policies governing the approval of related party transactions.  Our Audit Committee reviews and approves all related person transactions between Old Second and related parties in accordance with NASDAQ’s  rules and regulations. For purposes of this review, related person transactions are those transactions required to be disclosed under applicable SEC regulations.

Banking Relationships

Certain of our executive officers and directors have, from time to time, engaged in banking transactions with Old Second National Bank and are expected to continue such relationships in the future.  All loans or other extensions of credit made by Old Second National Bank to such individuals were made in the ordinary course of business on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with unaffiliated third parties and did not involve more than the normal risk of collectability or present other unfavorable features.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

For the year ended December 31, 2018, our Compensation Committee consisted of Mr. Ladowicz, Mr. Kane, Mr. Bonifas and Ms. Temple Rocks.  No member of our Compensation Committee in 2018 was, during the last

fiscal year, an officer or employee of the Company or formerly an officer of the Company.  In addition, none has had any relationship with the Company of the type that is required to be disclosed under “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions,” except Mr. Bonifas as described above.  During 2018, none of our executive officers served as a member of the board of directors, compensation committee or other board committee performing equivalent functions of another entity that had one or more executive officers serving as a member of the board of directors or Compensation Committee of the Company.

Stockholder Communications with the Board; Nomination and Proposal Procedures

Stockholder Communications with Directors.  Our stockholders may contact any member of the board of directors, or the board as a whole, through the Corporate Secretary either in person, in writing by mail or by e‑mail to corporatesecretary@oldsecond.com.  Any such communication should indicate whether the sender is an Old Second stockholder.  The address for submitting communications to the board by mail is 37 South River Street, Aurora, Illinois 60507.  Any communication will be forwarded promptly to the board as a group or to the attention of a specified director per your request, except for communications that are primarily commercial in nature or related to an improper or irrelevant topic.

Nominations of Directors.  In order for a stockholder nominee to be considered by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee to be its nominee and included in our proxy statement, the nominating stockholder must file a written notice of the proposed director nomination with our Corporate Secretary, at the above address, at least 120 days prior to the date on which the previous year’s proxy statement was mailed to stockholders.  Nominations must include the full name and address of the proposed nominee and a brief description of the proposed nominee’s business experience for at least the previous five years and, as to the stockholder giving the notice, his or her name and address, and the class and number of shares of our capital stock owned by that stockholder.  All submissions must be accompanied by the written consent of the proposed nominee to be named as a nominee and to serve as a director if elected.  The committee may request additional information in order to make a determination as to whether to nominate the person for director.

In accordance with our Certificate of Incorporation, a stockholder may otherwise nominate a director for election to the board at an annual meeting of stockholders by giving timely notice in writing to our Corporate Secretary, at the address provided above.  To be timely, stockholder nominations must be made in writing, delivered or mailed by first class United States mail, postage prepaid, to our Corporate Secretary not fewer than 60 days nor more than 90 days prior to the anniversary date of the prior year’s annual meeting.  Each written nomination must set forth (i) the name, age, business address and residential address of the nominee; (ii) the principal occupation or employment of such person; (iii) the class and number of shares of the Company’s stock which are beneficially owned by such person on the date of such stockholder notice; and (iv) any other information relating to such person that would be required to be disclosed on Schedule 13D pursuant to Regulation 13D under the Exchange Act and pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Exchange Act.  The nominating stockholder must also provide certain information regarding his, her or itself including (a) the name and address, as they appear on the Company’s books, of such stockholder and the name and principal business or residential address of any other beneficial stockholders known by such stockholder to support the nominees; and (b) the class and number of shares of Old Second’s stock which are beneficially owned by the stockholder on the date of the stockholder notice.

In the event that a stockholder nominates an individual to serve as a director in accordance with our bylaws and the applicable federal and state laws, the Committee shall evaluate the individual to determine whether the individual satisfies the qualification criteria and determine whether the individual will be nominated by the Committee to serve on the board.

Other Stockholder Proposals.  To be considered for inclusion in our proxy statement and form of proxy relating to our 2020 annual meeting of stockholders, the proposing stockholder must file a written notice of the proposal with our Corporate Secretary, at the above address, by December 19, 2019, and must otherwise comply with the rules and regulations set forth by the Securities and Exchange Commission.

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS

AND MANAGEMENT

The following table sets forth certain information with respect to the beneficial ownership of our common stock as of March 29, 2019, by each director or nominee for director, by each named executive officer, by all of our directors, director nominees and executive officers as a group, and each stockholder known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our outstanding common stock.

Unless otherwise noted below, the address of each beneficial owner listed in the table is c/o Old Second Bancorp, Inc., 37 South River Street, Aurora, Illinois 60507.  Except as indicated by the footnotes below, we believe, based on the information furnished to us, that the persons and entities named in the tables below have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of our common stock that they beneficially own, subject to applicable community property laws.  We have based our calculation of the percentage of beneficial ownership on 29,895,022 shares of common stock outstanding as of March 29, 2019.   Beneficial ownership has been determined for this purpose in accordance with Rule 13d‑3 under the Exchange Act, under which a person is deemed to be the beneficial owner of securities if he or she has or shares voting power or investment power with respect to such securities or has the right to acquire beneficial ownership of securities within 60 days of March 29, 2019.

*Denotes ownership of less than 1%.

SECURITY 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires that our directors, executive officers and ten percent stockholders file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the Securities and Exchange Commission.  Such persons are also required to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.  Based solely on a review of the Section 16(a) reports furnished to us with respect to 2018 and written representations from our executive officers and directors, we believe that all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to each covered person were satisfied during 2018, except for a late Form 4 filed by Gary Collins on February 20,  2018 that reported dividend reinvestment transactions that occurred between September 2017 and December 2017; and a late Form 4 filed by Keith Gottschalk on January 2, 2019, that reported a sale transaction that occurred on May 11, 2018, that was inadvertently not reported by the broker.

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”) is intended to assist our shareholders in understanding our compensation programs, the philosophy underlying our compensation strategy and the fundamental elements of the compensation paid to our “named executive officers” whose 2018 compensation information is provided in the tables following this discussion.  Our named executive officers as of December 31, 2018, are noted in the following table, along with their current titles:

Introduction

Our CD&A is organized as follows:

Overview and Executive Summary

Business Overview.  The Company, through its banking subsidiary, provides lending, deposit, and trust services for businesses and individuals.  We offer competitive commercial and personal banking products and are committed to providing superior customer service.  We place a high priority on community service and are actively involved with many civic and community projects in the communities where we conduct business.  We operate in an intensely competitive and uncertain business environment.  From a business perspective, not only do we compete with numerous companies in our markets for customers, but we also compete with many different types and sizes of organizations for

senior leadership capable of executing our business strategies.  Among other challenges, our business model requires experienced leaders with banking and operational expertise who are capable of taking on high levels of personal responsibility in an ever‑evolving banking industry and economy.

Financial and Operational Performance.  During 2018, we continued our emphasis on sustaining profitability and growth as primary objectives.  Specific accomplishments in 2018 that directly impacted those objectives include:

In 2018, our Compensation Committee selected, among others, corporate performance metrics for our annual incentive plan based on our (a) adjusted net income, which excludes after-tax acquisition related costs, and was earned at 115% of target based on our 2018 adjusted net income of $36.7 million, and (b) adjusted efficiency ratio, which was earned at 110% of target based on our adjusted efficiency ratio of 58.94% at year-end 2018.  The adjusted efficiency ratio is calculated as noninterest expense, excluding OREO expenses, amortization of core deposits and acquisition related costs divided by the sum of net interest income on a fully tax equivalent basis, total noninterest income less net gains and losses on securities and includes a tax equivalent adjustment on the increase in cash surrender value of bank-owned life insurance.

Overview of Our Executive Compensation Programs.  The Company and the Bank share an executive management team, the members of which are compensated by the Bank rather than the Company.  The compensation packages of our named executive officers are determined and approved by our Compensation Committee based on their performance and roles for both the Company and the Bank.

We are committed to paying for performance.  This commitment is reflected by the significant portion of our named executive officers’ compensation that is provided through performance‑based programs.  Our executive compensation programs evolve and are adjusted over time to support the business goals of the Company and the Bank and to promote both near‑ and long‑term profitable growth.  Total compensation for each named executive officer varies with performance in achieving financial and nonfinancial objectives.

Accordingly, our executive compensation, particularly metrics for the organization’s short‑term incentive plans, focused on the following goals and accountabilities: our and the Bank’s net income growth; the Bank’s loan growth; asset‑credit quality risk reduction and a reduction in classified assets; cost savings initiatives; and specific profit center performance.  These metrics were prudently designed to contain and minimize risk while at the same time emphasizing growth and profitability.

Say‑on‑Pay.  Of the votes cast on our say-on-pay proposal at our 2018 annual meeting, 97%  voted in support of the compensation of our named executive officers.   Our board and the Compensation Committee pay careful attention to communications received from stockholders regarding executive compensation, including the non‑binding advisory vote. The Compensation Committee believes that these voting results reflect strong confidence in our board to exercise good judgement in structuring thoughtful executive compensation programs that benefit our stockholders.  We considered the result of the 2018 advisory vote on executive compensation but not for specific 2018 compensation decisions.  Based on this consideration and the other factors described in this CD&A, the Compensation Committee did not alter the policies or structure for named executives’ compensation for 2018.

Objectives of Our Compensation Program

The goal of our compensation program is to align the interests of management with those of our stockholders while minimizing undue risk‑taking.  The Compensation Committee has designed our executive compensation program in a manner that does not provide our executives with incentives to engage in business activities or other behavior that would threaten our value or the investments of our stockholders.

The executive compensation program is intended to accomplish the following objectives:

Elements of Compensation

Our named executive officers’ compensation program consists of four main components: (i) base salary, (ii) annual cash incentives,  (iii) equity awards, and (iv) additional benefits.

The Compensation Committee’s decisions regarding each of the components for the named executive officers are based in part on the Compensation Committee’s subjective judgment and take into account qualitative and quantitative factors, as discussed below.  In reviewing an executive officer’s compensation, the Compensation Committee considers and evaluates all components of the officer’s total compensation package.  This involves reviewing base salary, bonus/cash incentives, equity incentive awards, perquisites, participation in our non‑qualified executive plans, participation in our 401(k) plan and any other payments, awards or benefits that an officer earns.  Additionally, the Compensation Committee takes into consideration any amounts an executive officer is entitled to upon retirement, termination or a change‑in‑control event.

The following overview explains the structure and rationale of the elements of compensation used for 2018.

Base Salary.  The Compensation Committee believes that base compensation should offer security to each executive sufficient to maintain a stable management team and environment.  In establishing an executive officer’s initial base salary the Compensation Committee considers, among other things, the executive’s level of responsibility, prior experience, breadth of knowledge, the competitive salary practices at peer companies, internal performance objectives, education, internal pay equity, potential bonus and equity awards, level of benefits and perquisites and the tax deductibility of base salary.

The Compensation Committee reviews salaries of the named executive officers on an annual basis.  As with all of its decisions regarding compensation levels, when reviewing salaries the Compensation Committee considers the levels of all aspects and components of the officer’s compensation, including the individual’s potential bonus and equity awards as well as the level of benefits and perquisites offered.  All of these factors are considered on a subjective basis in the aggregate, and none of the factors is accorded a specific weight.

Annual Cash Incentives.  The Compensation Committee believes that annual cash incentive compensation is an integral component of our total compensation program that links executive decision‑making and performance with our annual strategic objectives.  We use this component to focus management on the achievement of corporate financial goals while considering the mitigation of any risks which may affect our overall financial performance.

On February 20, 2018, the Compensation Committee approved the Old Second Bancorp, Inc. Executive Annual Incentive Plan, which we refer to as our “Incentive Plan.” Under the Incentive Plan, as soon as practicable at the beginning of each fiscal year, the Compensation Committee, in consultation with our Chief Executive Officer, selects key performance objectives, which will be used to determine the actual incentive cash payment to be awarded to our executive officers upon the achievement of the selected performance objectives.  Generally speaking, performance targets are set so that improvement in a performance objective is necessary in order to receive any or all of the incentive award with respect to that objective.  In addition, under the Incentive Plan, in order to be eligible for a cash incentive payment with respect to a particular year, the executive must also meet the expectations of his position during such year.

Maximum incentive opportunities are capped under the Incentive Plan to avoid encouraging excessive risk‑taking and to avoid any focus on maximizing short‑term results at the expense of our long‑term soundness.

Equity Awards.  The Compensation Committee believes that senior management equity ownership effectively aligns the interests of senior management with those of our stockholders.  Accordingly, we have implemented equity‑based incentives to both encourage our management’s long‑term service and give management a more direct interest in our future success.  The equity incentive plan in effect in 2018, which was approved by our stockholders in 2014, and amended in 2016 (the “Equity Incentive Plan”), authorizes the granting of qualified stock options, non‑qualified stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units and stock appreciation rights.

All awards are at the discretion of the Compensation Committee and are generally subjective in nature.  In determining the number of equity awards to be granted to executive officers, the Compensation Committee considers individual and corporate performance goals and achievement as measured by those goals, the executive’s position and his or her ability to affect profits and stockholder value, as well as the level of awards granted to individuals with similar positions at our peer organizations.  Because of the nature of equity awards, the Compensation Committee also evaluates prior awards of stock options and restricted stock and takes into account the overall wealth accumulation of a given executive officer through such awards.

As discussed below in “Analysis of 2018 Compensation—Long-Term Equity Compensation,” in 2018, the Compensation Committee granted our named executive officers service-based restricted stock units that are subject to three-year cliff vesting.  In addition, with respect to Mr. Eccher, Mr. Adams and Mr. Collins, the Compensation Committee awarded performance-based restricted stock units subject to specified performance conditions.

Additional Benefits

Retirement Benefits.  We sponsor a tax‑qualified 401(k) savings plan and trust intended to be qualified under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code.  Virtually all employees are eligible to participate after meeting certain age and service requirements.  Eligible employees are permitted to contribute up to a dollar limit set by law. Participants can choose between several different investment options under the 401(k) plan, including shares of our common stock.

During 2018, we provided a matching contribution on elective deferrals to eligible participants in an amount equal to 100% of the first 3% of each participant’s  contributions, and 50% of the next 2% of the participant’s contributions.  There is also a profit‑sharing portion of the 401(k) plan which provides for an annual discretionary contribution to the retirement account of each employee based in part on our profitability in a given year and on each participant’s annual compensation.  The contribution amount granted each year is on a discretionary basis and there is no set formula used by the Compensation Committee. For 2018, the Compensation Committee elected not to make a discretionary profit sharing contribution.

Deferred Compensation.  We sponsor an executive deferred compensation plan (the “Executive Deferred Compensation Plan”), which provides a means for certain executives to voluntarily defer all or a portion of their salary and/or bonus, if any, without regard to the statutory limitations applicable to tax‑qualified plans, such as our 401(k) plan.  The Executive Deferred Compensation Plan provides for participant deferrals, company matching contributions and discretionary employer profit‑sharing contributions.  A company matching contribution is credited to the plan on behalf

of a participant when the participant elects to defer the maximum amount permitted under the 401(k) plan (including catch‑up contributions, if applicable) and keeps that level of deferral for the entire plan year.   The company matching contribution is an amount up to 3%, provided at least a 6% deferral was met, of the participant’s combined base salary and bonuses, less any matching contribution paid to the 401(k) plan on the participant’s behalf.  The determination of whether a profit‑sharing contribution is made and in what amount is entirely at the Compensation Committee’s discretion and there is no set formula.  Participants are permitted to make hypothetical investments with respect to their account balances.  The participants may select such hypothetical investments from an array of publicly‑traded mutual funds that are held in an insurance company separate account.  Participants may elect to receive their Executive Deferred Compensation Plan balance in a lump sum or in installments.  Participants may make a withdrawal from the plan during their employment in the event of hardship as approved by the plan’s administrator.  The plan is administered through an independent service provider. Messrs. Eccher, Collins and Gottschalk currently have account balances under the Executive Deferred Compensation Plan.

Perquisites and Other Benefits.  We provide general and customary benefit programs to executive officers and other employees.  Benefits offered to executives are intended to serve a different purpose than base salary, bonus, cash incentive and equity incentive awards.  While the benefits offered are competitive with the marketplace and help attract and retain executives, the benefits also provide financial security for employees for retirement as well as in the event of illness, disability or death.  The benefits we offer to executive officers are generally those offered to other employees with some variation to promote tax efficiency and replacement of benefit opportunities lost to regulatory limits although there are some additional perquisites that may only be offered to executive officers.  Because of the nature of the benefits offered, the Compensation Committee normally does not adjust the level of benefits offered on a year‑to‑year basis.  We will continue to offer benefits, the amount of which shall be determined from time‑to‑time in the sole discretion of the Compensation Committee.

The following table summarizes the benefits and perquisites we do and do not provide as well as identifies those employees that may be eligible to receive them:

 

It is our belief that perquisites for executive officers should be very limited in scope and value.  Due to this philosophy, we have generally provided very nominal benefits to executives that are not available to full‑time employees, and we plan to continue this approach in the future.  We do provide country club memberships to certain executives and managers in the ordinary course of business to give them the opportunity to bring in and recruit new business opportunities.  These individuals are eligible to use the club membership for their own personal use.  Additionally, we provide Messrs. Eccher, Adams, Collins and Pilmer with an automobile allowance to enable them to visit our banking locations on a regular basis as well as to call on our customers.  We have disclosed the value of all perquisites to named executive officers in the Summary Compensation Table even if they fall below the disclosure thresholds under the SEC rules.  We will continue to offer perquisites, the amount of which shall be determined from time‑to‑time in the sole discretion of the Compensation Committee.

Severance and Change in Control Arrangements

Employment Agreements and Compensation and Benefits Assurance Agreements.  Under his employment agreement, we provide Mr. Eccher with certain “double trigger” severance benefits in the event of his involuntary termination following a change in control, as well as salary continuation following certain other involuntary terminations.  We have also entered into Compensation and Benefits Assurance Agreements with each of our other named executive officers which also provide “double trigger” severance benefits in the event of a qualifying termination

following a change in control.  We believe these agreements help us recruit and retain executives with the experience, skills, knowledge and background needed to achieve our business goals and strategy.  For a detailed description of the severance and change in control benefits applicable to our named executive officers, see the discussion below under “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control.”

Acceleration of Equity Awards.  All employees, including our named executive officers, who receive equity awards under our Equity Incentive Plan will immediately vest in any unvested equity awards held by such employees upon the occurrence of a change in control if (i) the equity plan and the respective awards are not assumed by the surviving entity or (ii) the plan and the respective awards are assumed by the surviving entity but the individual is terminated without cause or resigns for good reason.  Additionally, under the terms of the Employment Agreement and Assurance Agreements noted above and described in greater detail below, all equity awards held by a named executive officer will become vested and exercisable upon a qualifying termination following a change in control.

No Tax Gross‑Ups.  We do not provide excise tax gross‑ups on benefits under any change in control provisions or other agreements.  All of our named executive officers currently have employment agreements or Compensation and Benefits Assurance Agreements that provide that in the event the officer would be subject to excise tax for any amounts payable under such agreement, the amounts to be paid will be reduced to such lesser extent that would result in no portion of such amounts being subject to excise taxes.

Compensation Process

The Compensation Committee has overall responsibility for evaluating the compensation plans, policies and programs relating to our executive officers.  Further, as required by guidance issued by the Federal Reserve and other financial institution regulatory agencies, and the SEC’s guidance regarding risk associated with compensation arrangements (each as described more fully below), the Compensation Committee is also responsible for a more expansive risk review with respect to the compensation plans, policies and programs maintained for our employees.

During 2018, the Compensation Committee convened in February and March. Mr. Ladowicz, as Chairman of the Compensation Committee, also met, as needed, with internal staff members to compile compensation information for this proxy statement.  The Compensation Committee also met in February and again in March 2019 to approve salaries, incentive plans and performance metrics for 2019, as well as approving officer incentives earned during 2018.

Role of Compensation Consultant.  The Compensation Committee’s charter gives it the authority to delegate its responsibility to members or subcommittees of the Compensation Committee.  Also, the charter gives the Compensation Committee the authority to hire outside consultants to further its objectives and responsibilities.  In prior years, the Compensation Committee has retained ChaseCompGroup LLC to provide services in connection with a review and analysis of compensation paid to our named executive officers and board of directors.  In keeping with the Compensation Committee’s philosophy of comparing our compensation with that of the competitive marketplace on an annual basis, the Compensation Committee retained ChaseCompGroup LLC in 2018 to provide an updated market analysis of our executive compensation program.

Role of Executive Officers.  The Compensation Committee relies upon the input of management, when carrying out its responsibilities in establishing executive compensation.  The Compensation Committee relies on Mr. Eccher’s input in establishing compensation for our named executive officers other than himself.  Management provides the Compensation Committee with evaluations as to employee performance, guidance on establishing performance targets and objectives and recommends salary levels and equity awards.  The Compensation Committee also consults with management on matters that are relevant to executive compensation and benefit plans where board or stockholder action is expected, including the adoption of new plans or the amendment of existing plans.  Finally, the Compensation Committee consults with our management, specifically the Bank’s Senior Risk Officer, in completing the risk review with respect to employee compensation plans.  No executive officer participates in any recommendation, discussion or decision regarding his or her own compensation.

Peer Group.  Market pay practices are one of many factors we consider in setting executive pay levels and designing compensation programs. Information on pay levels and practices is gathered from a group of publicly traded companies selected based on their business focus, scope and location of operations, size and other considerations.  The Company’s peer group of 16 financial institutions was jointly presented by ChaseCompGroup LLC and management and approved by the Compensation Committee.  The group is periodically reviewed, with changes made to reflect merger

and acquisition activity, financial situation and development, and other considerations.  The institutions included in the peer group for 2018 include:

 

Analysis of 2018 Compensation

This section describes the decisions made by the Compensation Committee with respect to the compensation for our named executive officers for 2018.

Base Salary.  We annually review the base salaries of the named executive officers to determine whether or not they will be adjusted, as described above.  The salaries for 2018, determined by the Compensation Committee at the beginning of 2018, are set forth in the Summary Compensation Table below. In determining base salary levels, we generally considered the following:

The following table details the base salary of our named executive officers for the periods presented.  In early 2019, the Compensation Committee determined the base salaries for our named executive officers for 2019.   In determining the base salaries for 2019, we considered the same general factors discussed above including the growth in our earnings, return on average assets and overall assets.

 

 

For 2019 and 2018, the Compensation Committee increased Mr. Eccher’s base salary by 6.0% and 5.0%, respectively, based on overall company and his individual performance. Mr. Adam’s base salary was increased by 4.0% and 2.75% for 2019 and 2018, respectively, due to overall company performance and successful completion of the 2018 acquisition of Greater Chicago Financial Corp.  (“GCFC”)/ABC Bank.  Mr. Collin’s base salary was increased by 2.75% in both 2019 and 2018, due to overall company performance and successful completion of the GCFC/ABC Bank acquisition.  Mr. Pilmer also received merit increases in base salary of 2.8% and 3.0% in 2019 and 2018, respectively, due primarily to commercial loan and commercial treasury management growth.

Annual Cash Incentive Payments.  As discussed above, under our Incentive Plan, the Compensation Committee, in consultation with our Chief Executive Officer, selects key performance objectives, which will be used to determine the actual incentive cash payment to be awarded to our executive officers upon the achievement of the selected performance objectives.  In addition, under the Incentive Plan, the Compensation Committee also determines each executive officer’s target incentive opportunity, expressed as a percentage of base salary.

For 2018, the Compensation Committee set the target potential incentive payment, expressed as a percentage of base salary, as follows:

 

For 2018, the Compensation Committee selected five performance objectives, as identified in the following table (and described in more detail below), and assigned a weight for each performance objective, stated as a percentage of the total target incentive payment.

The performance objectives chosen by the Compensation Committee and the assigned weight for each objective for 2018 performance were as follows:

The Compensation Committee established threshold, target and maximum performance levels and weights for each selected corporate goal.  Threshold represents the minimum level of performance at which, if achieved, a payment is earned on each corporate goal.  If performance is below the threshold level for any particular corporate goal, no payment will be earned; however, payment will be earned for other corporate objectives that are achieved at least at a threshold level of performance.  Maximum represents the maximum level of performance at which, if achieved, a maximum payment is earned on each corporate goal. If performance exceeds the maximum level for any corporate goal, no further incentive above the maximum incentive for such corporate goal is earned.  Actual performance between threshold, target and maximum performance levels will be interpolated to determine the amount of payment based on relative achievement of the corporate objectives.

How we defined each of these corporate objects is set forth below.

Adjusted Net Income Growth

Each named executive officer participating in the incentive plan had a portion of their annual incentive tied to this performance objective in 2018.   The Compensation Committee believes that our growth, as measured by our adjusted net income, is an appropriate performance measure because it focuses on our financial performance, which in turn affects stockholder value.  The Compensation Committee defined adjusted net income in 2018 as net income, excluding after-tax acquisition related costs.  The Compensation Committee defined adjusted net income in 2018 as net income, excluding adjustments to income tax expense due to deferred tax asset revaluations stemming from tax rate changes at the Federal and State levels, and the after-tax effect of acquisition related costs.

The Compensation Committee applied the following scale to determine how much of the total assigned weight for this performance objective each named executive officer could receive based on our net income:

Our adjusted net income in 2018 was $36.7 million, which resulted in adjusted net income in excess of our peer group median ROAA.  Accordingly, each named executive officer earned 115.0% of the assigned weight for this performance objective.

Loan Growth

Both Mr. Pilmer and Mr. Gottschalk had a loan growth performance objective that was measured based on achievement of 100% of 2018 budgeted loan growth over 2017.   The Compensation Committee set a threshold of 70% of budget to achieve a 50% performance measurement, and a maximum of 110% of budget to achieve 110% performance measurement. Accordingly, growth below the threshold level would result in no payment for this objective and growth above the maximum level would result in payment at the maximum level.  We did not achieve these objectives and, therefore, Mr. Pilmer and Mr. Gottschalk earned 0% of the assigned weight for this performance objective.

Mr. Pilmer had a commercial loan growth performance objective that was measured based on 2018 budgeted organic growth, excluding acquired loans, over 2017 results, as detailed in the following table.

Actual commercial loan growth was 4.10%, which was below the threshold performance level and, therefore, Mr. Pilmer earned 0% of the assigned weight for this performance objective.

Mr. Gottschalk had a retail loan growth performance objective that was measured based on 2018 budgeted organic growth, excluding acquired loans, over 2017 results, as detailed in the following table:

There was no actual retail loan growth in 2018 compared to 2017, which was below the threshold performance level and, therefore, Mr. Gottschalk earned 0% of the assigned weight for this performance objective.

Asset/Credit Quality

Mr. Eccher, Mr. Collins and Mr. Pilmer each had a performance objective related to our adjusted classified assets ratio. Management monitors a ratio of classified assets as a percent of the sum of Bank Tier 1 capital and the allowance for loan and lease losses, which is referred to as the “classified assets ratio.”  The adjusted classified assets ratio is our classified assets ratio, excluding purchased credit impaired loans, nonperforming acquired loans and acquired other real estate owned.  The Compensation Committee believes that a continued focus by these executives on our asset/credit quality will ensure that we are working toward sustainable growth and profitability.

At December 31, 2018, our adjusted classified assets ratio was 10.42%, and, therefore, Mr. Eccher, Mr. Collins and Mr. Pilmer each earned 58.05% of the assigned weight for this performance objective.

Adjusted Efficiency Ratio

The Compensation Committee believes that expense control and efficiency of operations is a goal we should continually strive for in order to provide for the best financial return for our stockholders.  Further, the Compensation Committee believes that our named executive officers are best situated to impact our efforts in this regard.  As such, Mr. Eccher, Mr. Adams, Mr. Collins and Mr. Gottschalk each had a portion of their annual incentive tied to our adjusted efficiency ratio, as noted in the following table.  For 2018, the Compensation Committee defined our adjusted efficiency ratio as our efficiency ratio, excluding after-tax acquisition related costs.

For 2018, our adjusted efficiency ratio at year‑end was 58.94% and, therefore, Mr. Eccher, Mr. Adams, Mr. Collins and Mr. Gottschalk earned 110% of their applicable assigned weight for this performance objective.

Department and Individual Performance

The Compensation Committee also set performance metrics for each executive, related to their respective departments and/or individual performance to promote the leadership and development of our various lines of business.  For 2018,  Mr. Eccher was evaluated on successful acquisition activity, assimilation of newly acquired staff, and overall cost savings realized, for which he earned 10% of a total possible 10% related to personal goals.  Mr. Adams was evaluated on Finance and Accounting Department strategies and efficiencies, and earned 8% of a possible 10%.  Mr. Collins was evaluated on successful acquisition completion, including technology integration, as well as cost savings stemming from the acquisition, and earned 10% of a possible 10% for this metric. Mr. Pilmer was evaluated on commercial treasury department income growth, commercial merchant income growth, and commercial deposit growth, and earned 7.5% of a possible 10% for these goals.  Mr. Gottschalk was evaluated on the performance of our Retail Department, including retail deposit growth and retail service charge growth, and earned 5% of a possible 15% for this metric.

Total 2018 Annual Cash Incentive Plan Awards

As outlined above, the Compensation Committee reviewed our performance and the performance of each department and executive officer, as applicable.  Based on this review, the Compensation Committee approved awards at an amount equal to an interpolated amount between the total potential threshold incentive and the total maximum incentive for each performance objective (if the threshold performance level was obtained for such objective).  Our named executive officers’ actual cash incentive awards for 2018 are noted in the table below, along with the percentage of the total target incentive each officer achieved.

 

Discretionary Cash Bonus.  In 2018, the Compensation Committee also awarded a discretionary cash bonus to each of Messrs. Eccher, Adams and Collins of $50,000 for the successful completion of our acquisition of Greater Chicago Financial Corp. and its subsidiary bank, ABC Bank, that closed on April 20, 2018. 

Long‑Term Equity Compensation. In 2018, the Compensation Committee approved equity grants for our named executive officers comprised of both performance-based restricted stock units, or PRSUs, and time-vesting restricted stock units, or TRSUs, as shown in the following table.

We granted performance-based equity awards in 2014, which had a three year performance period that ended on December 31, 2017.  In 2018, the Compensation Committee granted new PRSUs in order to provide new long-term incentives and payment for performance.

PRSUs.  Under the terms of the PRSU agreement, the PRSUs will vest annually in equal one-third increments over the three year performance period based on our achievement of performance goals determined by the Compensation Committee during the performance period at a threshold, target and maximum performance level, if the named executive officer continues to be employed with the us through the applicable performance period, with accelerated vesting in certain circumstances as described in the “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control” below.  The performance metrics selected by the Compensation Committee for the above-referenced awards are:

TRSUs.  The TRSUs are subject to three‑year cliff vesting, with accelerated vesting in certain circumstances as described in the “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control” section below.

Perquisites and Other Benefits.  While the Compensation Committee reviews and monitors the level of other compensation offered to the named executive officers, the Compensation Committee typically does not adjust the level of benefits offered on an annual basis.  The Compensation Committee does consider the benefits and perquisites offered to the named executive officers in its evaluation of the total compensation received by each.  The perquisites received by the named executive officers in 2018 are reported in the Summary Compensation Table below.  The benefits offered in 2018 to the named executive officers are expected to continue for 2019.

Regulatory Considerations

As a publicly‑traded financial institution, we must contend with several often overlapping layers of regulations when considering and implementing compensation‑related decisions.  These regulations do not set specific parameters within which compensation decisions must be made, but do require the Compensation Committee to be mindful of the risks that often go hand‑in‑hand with compensation programs designed to incentivize the achievement of better than average performance.  While the regulatory focus on risk assessment has been heightened over the last several years, the incorporation of general concepts of risk assessment into compensation decisions is not a recent development.

The Compensation Committee continues to believe in and practice a sensible approach to balancing risk‑taking and rewarding reasonable, but not necessarily easily attainable, goals and this has always been a component of its overall assessment of the compensation plans, programs and arrangements it has put in place for our named executive officers.  

The Compensation Committee believes we have adequate policies and procedures in place to balance and control any risk‑taking that may be incentivized by the employee compensation plans.  The Compensation Committee further believes that such policies and procedures will work to limit the risk that any employee would manipulate reporting earnings in an effort to enhance his or her compensation.

In making decisions about executive compensation, in addition to the above, we also consider the impact of other regulatory provisions, including: the provisions of the Internal Revenue code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), such as Code Section 162(m) that may limit the tax deductibility of certain compensation; Code Section 409A regarding nonqualified deferred compensation; and Code Section 280G regarding excise taxes and deduction limitations on golden parachute payments made in connection with a change in control.  In making decisions about executive compensation, we also consider how various elements of compensation will impact our financial results.  For example, we consider the impact of FASB ASC Topic 718, which requires us to recognize the compensation cost of grants of equity awards based upon the grant date fair value of those awards.

Code Section 162(m) generally prohibits a federal income tax deduction to public companies for compensation over $1,000,000 paid to a “covered employee.”  A “covered employee” includes (a) the Chief Executive Officer, (b) the Chief Financial Officer, (c) the three other most highly compensated executive officers, and (d) any individual who was a covered employee for any taxable year beginning after December 31, 2016.  Before 2018, we were permitted to receive a federal income tax deduction for qualifying “performance-based” compensation as defined under Code Section 162(m) without regard to this $1,000,000 limitation. However, recent U.S. tax legislation eliminated the performance-based exception. These new rules became effective starting in 2018 for us. To the extent that in 2018 or any later year, the aggregate amount of any covered employee’s salary, bonus, and amount realized from vesting of restricted stock units or other equity awards, and certain other compensation amounts that are recognized as income for federal income tax purposes by the covered employee exceeds $1,000,000 in any year, we will not be entitled to a U.S. federal income tax deduction for the amount over $1,000,000 in that year. The Compensation Committee has not adopted a formal policy regarding tax deductibility of compensation paid to our executive officers, and may determine it is appropriate to provide compensation that may exceed deductibility limits in order to recognize performance, meet market demands, retain key executives, and take into account other appropriate considerations.

Compensation‑Related Governance Policies

Insider Trading Policy

The Company has an insider trading policy that prohibits open market transactions in Company stock during the period beginning five business days prior to the end of the fiscal quarter and terminating two full business days after the public announcement of the Company’s current financial results for the most recently ended fiscal quarter or year.

 

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the foregoing CD&A with management.  Based on the Compensation Committee’s review and discussion with management, the Compensation Committee has recommended to our board of directors that the CD&A be included in this proxy statement and in Old Second’s Annual Report on Form 10‑K for the year ended December 31, 2018.

Submitted by:

Mr. John Ladowicz, Chairman

Mr. Edward Bonifas

Mr. William Kane

Ms. Patti Temple Rocks

Members of the Compensation Committee

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Summary Compensation Table

The following table sets forth information concerning the compensation of our named executive officers:

Grants of Plan‑Based Awards