MTZ 06.30.14 10-Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
_____________________________________________
Form 10-Q
_____________________________________________
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2014
Commission File Number 001-08106
_____________________________________________
MasTec, Inc.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
|
| |
Florida | 65-0829355 |
(State or Other jurisdiction of | (I.R.S. Employer |
Incorporation or Organization) | Identification No.) |
| |
800 S. Douglas Road, 12th Floor, | |
Coral Gables, FL | 33134 |
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) | (Zip Code) |
(305) 599-1800
(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No ¨
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer”, and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
| | | | |
Large accelerated filer | þ | | Non-accelerated filer | ¨ |
| | | | |
Accelerated filer | ¨ | (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company | ¨ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act.) Yes ¨ No þ
As of August 6, 2014, MasTec, Inc. had 81,808,494 shares of common stock, $0.10 par value, outstanding.
MASTEC, INC
FORM 10-Q
QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2014
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
| | |
| Page |
| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
Item 5 | Other Information | |
| | |
| |
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
| |
ITEM 1. | FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
MASTEC, INC.
CONDENSED UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| For the Three Months Ended June 30, | | For the Six Months Ended June 30, |
| 2014 | | 2013 | | 2014 | | 2013 |
Revenue | $ | 1,104,556 |
| | $ | 977,624 |
| | $ | 2,068,585 |
| | $ | 1,896,272 |
|
Costs of revenue, excluding depreciation and amortization | 950,889 |
| | 822,655 |
| | 1,791,943 |
| | 1,614,154 |
|
Depreciation and amortization | 36,755 |
| | 33,602 |
| | 70,249 |
| | 65,355 |
|
General and administrative expenses | 54,237 |
| | 51,900 |
| | 107,564 |
| | 100,785 |
|
Interest expense, net | 12,949 |
| | 11,838 |
| | 24,952 |
| | 21,883 |
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 5,624 |
|
Other (income) expense, net | (2,051 | ) | | 322 |
| | (4,007 | ) | | (504 | ) |
Income from continuing operations before income taxes | $ | 51,777 |
| | $ | 57,307 |
| | $ | 77,884 |
| | $ | 88,975 |
|
Provision for income taxes | (19,714 | ) | | (21,776 | ) | | (29,630 | ) | | (34,124 | ) |
Net income from continuing operations | $ | 32,063 |
| | $ | 35,531 |
| | $ | 48,254 |
| | $ | 54,851 |
|
Discontinued operations: | | | | | | | |
Net loss from discontinued operations (See Note 4) | $ | (149 | ) | | $ | (484 | ) | | $ | (272 | ) | | $ | (1,431 | ) |
Net income | $ | 31,914 |
| | $ | 35,047 |
| | $ | 47,982 |
| | $ | 53,420 |
|
Net (loss) income attributable to non-controlling interests | (136 | ) | | 106 |
| | (91 | ) | | 109 |
|
Net income attributable to MasTec, Inc. | $ | 32,050 |
|
| $ | 34,941 |
| | $ | 48,073 |
| | $ | 53,311 |
|
Earnings per share: (See Note 2) | | | | | | | |
Basic earnings (loss) per share: | | | | | | | |
Continuing operations | $ | 0.41 |
| | $ | 0.46 |
| | $ | 0.62 |
| | $ | 0.71 |
|
Discontinued operations | (0.00 | ) | | (0.01 | ) | | (0.00 | ) | | (0.02 | ) |
Total basic earnings per share (a) | $ | 0.41 |
| | $ | 0.46 |
| | $ | 0.62 |
| | $ | 0.70 |
|
Basic weighted average common shares outstanding | 78,269 |
| | 76,741 |
| | 77,810 |
| | 76,675 |
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per share: |
|
| |
|
| | | | |
Continuing operations | $ | 0.37 |
| | $ | 0.42 |
| | $ | 0.56 |
| | $ | 0.65 |
|
Discontinued operations | (0.00 | ) | | (0.01 | ) | | (0.00 | ) | | (0.02 | ) |
Total diluted earnings per share (a) | $ | 0.37 |
| | $ | 0.41 |
| | $ | 0.56 |
| | $ | 0.63 |
|
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding | 86,730 |
| | 84,558 |
| | 86,675 |
| | 84,337 |
|
| |
(a) | Earnings per share calculations may contain slight summation differences due to rounding. |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed unaudited consolidated financial statements.
MASTEC, INC.
CONDENSED UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(in thousands)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| For the Three Months Ended June 30, | | For the Six Months Ended June 30, |
| 2014 | | 2013 | | 2014 | | 2013 |
Net income | $ | 31,914 |
| | $ | 35,047 |
| | $ | 47,982 |
| | $ | 53,420 |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss): | | | | | | | |
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax (See Note 13) | 7,678 |
| | (5,952 | ) | | 2,343 |
| | (6,775 | ) |
Changes in value of available-for-sale securities, net of tax (See Note 13) | — |
| | (687 | ) | | — |
| | (466 | ) |
Other comprehensive income (loss) | $ | 7,678 |
| | $ | (6,639 | ) | | $ | 2,343 |
| | $ | (7,241 | ) |
Comprehensive income | $ | 39,592 |
| | $ | 28,408 |
| | $ | 50,325 |
| | $ | 46,179 |
|
Comprehensive (loss) income attributable to non-controlling interests | (136 | ) | | 106 |
| | (91 | ) | | 109 |
|
Comprehensive income attributable to MasTec, Inc. | $ | 39,728 |
| | $ | 28,302 |
| | $ | 50,416 |
| | $ | 46,070 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed unaudited consolidated financial statements.
MASTEC, INC.
CONDENSED UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
|
| | | | | | | |
| June 30, 2014 | | December 31, 2013 |
Assets | | | |
Current assets | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 15,924 |
| | $ | 22,927 |
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance | 1,288,672 |
| | 1,134,693 |
|
Inventories, net | 115,627 |
| | 70,185 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets, including discontinued operations (See Note 4) | 69,429 |
| | 79,221 |
|
Total current assets | $ | 1,489,652 |
| | $ | 1,307,026 |
|
Property and equipment, net | 618,672 |
| | 488,132 |
|
Goodwill | 983,133 |
| | 902,044 |
|
Other intangible assets, net | 230,592 |
| | 165,606 |
|
Other long-term assets, including discontinued operations (See Note 4) | 73,821 |
| | 60,390 |
|
Total assets | $ | 3,395,870 |
| | $ | 2,923,198 |
|
Liabilities and Equity | | | |
Current liabilities | | | |
Current maturities of long-term debt | $ | 76,914 |
| | $ | 51,376 |
|
Accounts payable | 494,090 |
| | 424,917 |
|
Accrued salaries and wages | 63,845 |
| | 66,455 |
|
Other accrued expenses | 69,401 |
| | 71,448 |
|
Acquisition-related contingent consideration, current | 36,479 |
| | 67,226 |
|
Billings in excess of costs and earnings | 109,805 |
| | 121,641 |
|
Other current liabilities, including discontinued operations (See Note 4) | 17,940 |
| | 26,162 |
|
Total current liabilities | $ | 868,474 |
| | $ | 829,225 |
|
Acquisition-related contingent consideration, net of current portion | 116,929 |
| | 112,370 |
|
Long-term debt | 1,088,666 |
| | 765,425 |
|
Long-term deferred tax liabilities, net | 186,538 |
| | 154,763 |
|
Other liabilities | 43,949 |
| | 40,357 |
|
Total liabilities | $ | 2,304,556 |
| | $ | 1,902,140 |
|
Commitments and contingencies (See Note 16) |
|
| |
|
|
Equity | | | |
Preferred stock, $1.00 par value: authorized shares - 5,000,000; issued and outstanding shares – none | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
Common stock, $0.10 par value: authorized shares - 145,000,000; issued shares - 87,036,192 and 86,725,372 as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively | 8,704 |
| | 8,672 |
|
Capital surplus | 776,301 |
| | 822,836 |
|
Contributed shares | 6,002 |
| | 6,002 |
|
Retained earnings | 389,937 |
| | 341,864 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | (10,943 | ) | | (13,286 | ) |
Treasury stock, at cost: 5,262,831 and 9,467,286 shares as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively | (83,385 | ) | | (150,000 | ) |
Total MasTec, Inc. shareholders’ equity | $ | 1,086,616 |
| | $ | 1,016,088 |
|
Non-controlling interests | $ | 4,698 |
| | $ | 4,970 |
|
Total equity | $ | 1,091,314 |
| | $ | 1,021,058 |
|
Total liabilities and equity | $ | 3,395,870 |
| | $ | 2,923,198 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed unaudited consolidated financial statements.
MASTEC, INC.
CONDENSED UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
|
| | | | | | | |
| For the Six Months Ended June 30, |
| 2014 | | 2013 |
Cash flows from operating activities: | | | |
Net income | $ | 47,982 |
| | $ | 53,420 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | | | |
Depreciation and amortization | 70,249 |
| | 65,355 |
|
Non-cash interest expense, including write-off of deferred financing costs on redeemed debt | 4,642 |
| | 6,036 |
|
Non-cash stock-based compensation expense | 7,480 |
| | 6,617 |
|
Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation | (3,386 | ) | | (1,462 | ) |
Provision for deferred income taxes | 11,160 |
| | 7,109 |
|
Provision for losses on construction projects, net | (978 | ) | | 1,387 |
|
Provision for losses on operating assets | 438 |
| | 2,851 |
|
(Gains) losses on sales of assets, including impairment charges on discontinued operations | (2,593 | ) | | (1,752 | ) |
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions: | | | |
Accounts receivable | (21,270 | ) | | (178,566 | ) |
Inventories | (37,140 | ) | | 17,124 |
|
Other assets, current and non-current portion | 4,655 |
| | 16,593 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | (8,916 | ) | | 14,869 |
|
Billings in excess of costs and earnings | (12,258 | ) | | 8,046 |
|
Book overdrafts | (1,355 | ) | | 7,989 |
|
Other liabilities, current and non-current portion | (3,391 | ) | | (2,759 | ) |
Net cash provided by operating activities | $ | 55,319 |
| | $ | 22,857 |
|
Cash flows (used in) provided by investing activities: | | | |
Cash paid for acquisitions, net of cash acquired | (162,901 | ) | | (120,544 | ) |
Capital expenditures | (67,566 | ) | | (57,527 | ) |
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment | 8,752 |
| | 5,123 |
|
Proceeds from other investments, net | 573 |
| | 4,931 |
|
Net cash used in investing activities | $ | (221,142 | ) | | $ | (168,017 | ) |
Cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities: | | | |
Proceeds from credit facility | 815,840 |
| | 499,666 |
|
Repayments of credit facility | (463,713 | ) | | (558,596 | ) |
Proceeds from issuance of senior notes | — |
| | 400,000 |
|
Repayment of senior notes, including convertible notes | (105,325 | ) | | (150,000 | ) |
Repayments of other borrowings | (7,220 | ) | | (18,570 | ) |
Payments of capital lease obligations | (23,023 | ) | | (21,139 | ) |
Payments of tax withholdings and proceeds from stock-based awards, net | (578 | ) | | 3,982 |
|
Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation | 3,386 |
| | 1,462 |
|
Payments of acquisition-related contingent consideration | (58,902 | ) | | (12,848 | ) |
Payments of financing costs, including call premiums on extinguishment of debt | (1,298 | ) | | (11,685 | ) |
Net cash provided by financing activities | $ | 159,167 |
| | $ | 132,272 |
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents | (6,656 | ) | | (12,888 | ) |
Net effect of currency translation on cash | (347 | ) | | (274 | ) |
Cash and cash equivalents - beginning of period | 22,927 |
| | 26,767 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents - end of period | $ | 15,924 |
| | $ | 13,605 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents of discontinued operations | $ | — |
| | $ | 310 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents of continuing operations | $ | 15,924 |
| | $ | 13,295 |
|
|
| | | | | | | |
Supplemental cash flow information: | | | |
Interest paid | $ | 20,247 |
| | $ | 17,801 |
|
Income taxes paid, net of refunds | $ | 29,901 |
| | $ | 41,625 |
|
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash information: | | | |
Equipment acquired under capital lease | $ | 44,574 |
| | $ | 56,622 |
|
Equipment acquired under financing arrangements | $ | 5,780 |
| | $ | 23,406 |
|
Value of acquisition-related contingent consideration | $ | 33,612 |
| | $ | 26,721 |
|
Value of premium shares issued for convertible notes | $ | 114,785 |
| | $ | — |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed unaudited consolidated financial statements.
MASTEC, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1 – Business, Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies
Nature of the Business
MasTec, Inc. (collectively with its subsidiaries, “MasTec” or the “Company”) is a leading infrastructure construction company operating mainly throughout North America across a range of industries. The Company’s primary activities include the engineering, building, installation, maintenance and upgrade of energy, utility and communications infrastructure, such as: petroleum and natural gas pipeline infrastructure; wireless, wireline/fiber and satellite communications; electrical utility transmission and distribution; power generation; and industrial infrastructure. MasTec’s customers are in these industries. MasTec reports its results in five reportable segments: (1) Communications; (2) Oil and Gas; (3) Electrical Transmission; (4) Power Generation and Industrial; and (5) Other. See Note 15 - Segments and Related Information.
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying condensed unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions for Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. Pursuant to these rules and regulations, certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in the annual consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP have been condensed or omitted. The accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2013 is derived from the Company’s audited financial statements as of that date. Because certain information and footnote disclosures have been condensed or omitted, these condensed unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto as of and for the year ended December 31, 2013 contained in the Company’s most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K. In management’s opinion, all normal and recurring adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented have been included. Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. Interim period operating results do not necessarily indicate the results that may be expected for any other interim period or for the full fiscal year. The Company believes that the disclosures made in these condensed unaudited consolidated financial statements are adequate to make the information not misleading.
Principles of Consolidation
The accompanying condensed unaudited consolidated financial statements include MasTec, Inc. and its subsidiaries and include the accounts of all majority owned subsidiaries over which the Company exercises control and, when applicable, entities in which the Company has a controlling financial interest. Other parties’ interests in companies for which MasTec exercises control and has a controlling financial interest are reported as non-controlling interests within equity. Net income or loss attributable to non-controlling interests is reported as a separate line item below net income. The Company’s investments in entities in which the Company does not have a controlling interest, but has the ability to exert significant influence, are accounted for using the equity method of accounting. Equity method investments are recorded as long-term assets in the condensed unaudited consolidated balance sheets. Income or loss from these investments is recorded in other income or expense, net, in the condensed unaudited consolidated statements of operations. The Company's investments in entities in which the Company does not have the ability to exert significant influence are accounted for using the cost method of accounting. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The assets and liabilities of foreign subsidiaries are translated into U.S. dollars at period-end exchange rates, with resulting translation gains or losses accumulated within other comprehensive income or loss. Revenue and expenses are translated into U.S. dollars at average rates of exchange prevailing during the applicable period. Gains or losses resulting from transactions executed in a foreign currency are included in other income or expense, net. The Company does not currently have any subsidiaries that operate in highly inflationary environments. The results of operations and financial position of any discontinued operations are aggregated and presented separately from the Company's continuing operations in the condensed unaudited consolidated financial statements for all periods presented.
Investments in Affiliates and Other Entities
In the ordinary course of business, the Company enters into various investment arrangements, which may include equity interests in business entities including contractual joint ventures or other forms of equity participation. Additionally, the Company's ordinary course investments may include financing arrangements, such as the extension of loans. Under certain of these arrangements, the Company provides infrastructure construction services to or through these equity investees and/or joint ventures. The Company's management determines whether such investments involve a variable interest entity (“VIE”) based on the characteristics of the particular entity. If management determines that the particular entity is a VIE, then management determines if the Company is the primary beneficiary of the entity and whether or not consolidation of the VIE within the Company's financial statements is required. The primary beneficiary consolidating the VIE must normally have both (i) the power to direct the activities of a VIE that most significantly affect the VIE’s economic performance and (ii) the obligation to absorb losses of the VIE or the right to receive benefits from the VIE, which, in either case, could be significant to the VIE. If management determines that the Company is the primary beneficiary of a VIE, then the VIE would be consolidated, and the other party’s equity interest in the VIE would be accounted for as a non-controlling interest. As of June 30, 2014, the Company was not the primary beneficiary of any VIE. In cases where management determines that the Company has an undivided interest in the assets, liabilities, revenues and profits of an unincorporated VIE, such amounts are consolidated on a basis proportional to MasTec’s ownership interest in the unincorporated entity.
Management Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Key estimates include: the recognition of revenue and gross profit or
loss, in particular, on long-term construction contracts, which rely upon estimates of costs to complete projects, ultimate project gross profit and the amount of contract price adjustments that are probable; allowances for doubtful accounts; accrued self-insured claims; estimated fair values of goodwill and intangible assets, acquisition-related contingent consideration, convertible debt obligations and investments in cost and equity method investees; asset lives used in computing depreciation and amortization, including amortization of intangible assets; share-based compensation; accounting for income taxes; and the estimated impact of contingencies and ongoing litigation. While management believes that such estimates are fair when considered in conjunction with the consolidated financial position and results of operations taken as a whole, actual results could differ from those estimates and such differences may be material to the condensed unaudited consolidated financial statements.
Significant Accounting Policies
Revenue Recognition
Revenues are derived from projects performed under master and other service agreements as well as from fixed price contracts for specific projects or jobs requiring the construction and installation of an entire infrastructure system or specified units within an entire infrastructure system. Revenue and related costs for master and other service agreements billed on a time and materials basis are recognized as the services are rendered. The Company also performs services under master and other service agreements on a fixed fee basis, under which MasTec furnishes specified units of service for a fixed price per unit of service and revenue is recognized as the services are rendered. Revenues from fixed price contracts provide for a fixed amount of revenue for the entire project, subject to certain additions for changed scope or specifications. Revenues from these contracts are recognized using the percentage-of-completion method. Under this method, the percentage of revenue to be recognized for a given project is measured by the percentage of costs incurred to date on the contract to the total estimated costs for the contract. Such contracts provide that the customer accept completion of progress to date and compensate the Company for services rendered, which may be measured in terms of costs incurred, units installed, hours expended or some other measure of progress.
The Company may incur costs subject to change orders, whether approved or unapproved by the customer, and/or claims related to certain contracts. Management determines the probability that such costs will be recovered based upon evidence such as engineering studies and legal opinions, past practices with the customer, specific discussions, correspondence or preliminary negotiations with the customer. The Company treats project costs as a cost of contract performance in the period incurred if it is not probable that the costs will be recovered, or defers costs and/or recognizes revenue up to the amount of the related cost if it is probable that the contract price will be adjusted and can be reliably estimated. As of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the Company had approximately $68 million and $79 million, respectively, of change orders and/or claims that had been included as contract price adjustments on certain contracts that were in the process of being negotiated in the normal course of business, including arbitration and other proceedings. These contract price adjustments represent management's best estimate of additional contract revenues that have been earned and that management believes are probable of collection. The amounts ultimately realized upon final acceptance by its customers could be higher or lower than such estimated amounts, which are primarily expected to be billed and collected within one year.
Except for adoption of the accounting pronouncement discussed below, there have been no material changes to the significant accounting policies described in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.
New Accounting Pronouncements
Accounting Standards Not Yet Adopted
In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606). The core principle of this ASU is that a company will recognize revenue when it transfers goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. In doing so, companies will need to use more judgment and make more estimates than under current guidance and will be required to disclose information about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts, including disclosure of assumptions and estimates where significant judgment has been applied. ASU 2014-09 is effective using either the retrospective or cumulative effect transition method for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2016. Early application is not permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact of this ASU on its consolidated financial statements.
In April 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-08, Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205) and Property, Plant, and Equipment (Topic 360): Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity (“ASU 2014-08”). ASU 2014-08 changes the requirements for reporting discontinued operations and requires additional disclosures about discontinued operations. Only disposals of components of an entity representing a strategic shift that has, or will have, a major effect on an entity’s operations and financial results should be reported as discontinued operations under ASU 2014-08. Examples include a disposal of a major geographical area, a major line of business, or a major equity method investment. ASU 2014-08 also requires expanded disclosures about discontinued operations and requires disclosures about individually significant dispositions that do not qualify as discontinued operations. ASU 2014-08 is effective prospectively for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2014. Early adoption is permitted only for disposals that have not been previously reported. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact of this ASU on its consolidated financial statements.
Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
In July 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-11, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force) (“ASU 2013-11”). ASU 2013-11 provides guidance on the presentation in the financial statements of an unrecognized tax benefit, or a portion of an unrecognized tax benefit, and explains that unrecognized tax benefits should be presented as a reduction to deferred tax assets for net operating loss carryforwards, similar tax losses or tax credit carryforwards. To the extent a net operating loss carryforward, similar tax loss or tax credit carryforward is not
available as of the reporting date under the tax law of the applicable jurisdiction, or the tax law of the applicable jurisdiction does not require the entity to use, and the entity does not intend to use, the deferred tax asset for such purpose, the unrecognized tax benefit should be presented in the financial statements as a liability and should not be combined with deferred tax assets. ASU 2013-11 applies to all entities that have unrecognized tax benefits when a net operating loss carryforward, similar tax loss, or tax credit carryforward exists as of the reporting date. ASU 2013-11 is effective prospectively for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013. Retrospective application is permitted. The Company adopted ASU 2013-11 as of January 1, 2014. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on the condensed unaudited consolidated financial statements.
Note 2 – Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing earnings available to MasTec’s common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share is computed by dividing earnings by the number of fully diluted shares, which includes the effect of dilutive potential issuances of common shares as determined using earnings from continuing operations. The potential issuance of common shares upon the exercise, conversion or vesting of outstanding stock options and unvested restricted share awards, as calculated under the treasury stock method, as well as shares associated with the Company’s outstanding convertible debt securities, may be dilutive.
The following table provides details underlying the Company’s earnings per share calculations for the periods indicated (in thousands): |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| For the Three Months Ended June 30, | | For the Six Months Ended June 30, |
| 2014 | | 2013 | | 2014 | | 2013 |
Net income attributable to MasTec: | | | | | | | |
Net income, continuing operations - basic (a) | $ | 32,199 |
| | $ | 35,425 |
| | $ | 48,345 |
| | $ | 54,742 |
|
Interest expense, net of tax, 2009 Convertible Notes | 68 |
| | 79 |
| | 146 |
| | 157 |
|
Net income, continuing operations - diluted | $ | 32,267 |
| | $ | 35,504 |
| | $ | 48,491 |
| | $ | 54,899 |
|
Net loss from discontinued operations - basic and diluted (a) | (149 | ) | | (484 | ) | | (272 | ) | | (1,431 | ) |
Net income attributable to MasTec - diluted | $ | 32,118 |
| | $ | 35,020 |
| | $ | 48,219 |
| | $ | 53,468 |
|
Weighted average shares outstanding: |
|
| |
|
| | | | |
Weighted average shares outstanding - basic | 78,269 |
| | 76,741 |
| | 77,810 |
| | 76,675 |
|
Dilutive common stock equivalents | 750 |
| | 776 |
| | 799 |
| | 781 |
|
Dilutive premium shares, 2011 Convertible Notes | 7,024 |
| | 6,235 |
| | 7,320 |
| | 6,075 |
|
Dilutive shares, 2009 Convertible Notes | 687 |
| | 806 |
| | 746 |
| | 806 |
|
Weighted average shares outstanding - diluted | 86,730 |
| | 84,558 |
| | 86,675 |
| | 84,337 |
|
| |
(a) | Calculated as total net income less amounts attributable to non-controlling interests. |
Outstanding Convertibles Notes - Diluted Share Impact
As of June 30, 2014, the Company had $100 million aggregate principal amount of 4.25% senior convertible notes outstanding (the "4.25% Convertible Notes"), composed of $97.0 million of 4.25% Convertible Notes issued in 2011 (the “2011 4.25% Notes”) and approximately $3.0 million of 4.25% Convertible Notes issued in 2009 (the “2009 4.25% Notes”). In June 2014, $115 million aggregate principal amount of 4.0% senior convertible notes (the "4.0% Convertible Notes") matured. Upon maturity, the 4.0% Convertible Notes were converted by the holders and the Company paid $105.3 million in cash and issued 4.2 million shares of common stock in respect of such notes. The 4.0% Convertible Notes were composed of $105.3 million of 4.0% Convertible Notes issued in 2011 (the "2011 4.0% Notes") and $9.6 million of 4.0% Convertible Notes issued in 2009 (the "2009 4.0% Notes"). The 2009 4.0% Notes and the 2009 4.25% Notes are collectively referred to as the "2009 Convertible Notes," and the 2011 4.0% Notes and the 2011 4.25% Notes are collectively referred to as the "2011 Convertible Notes." See Note 9 - Debt for additional information.
Dilutive shares associated with the 2009 Convertible Notes are attributable to the underlying principal amounts. The number of common shares issuable upon conversion of the Company’s 2009 Convertible Notes is reflected in the calculation of weighted average diluted earnings per share for the corresponding periods by application of the “if-converted” method to the extent its effect on the computation of earnings per share from continuing operations is dilutive. Under the “if-converted” method, net income from continuing operations is adjusted to add back the after-tax amount of interest recognized for the period associated with the convertible notes, and correspondingly, the convertible notes are assumed to have been converted with the resulting common shares added to the number of weighted average shares outstanding. The 2011 Convertible Notes have an optional cash settlement feature under which the Company settled the principal amount of the 2011 4.0% Notes in cash, and the Company intends to settle in cash the principal amount of the 2011 4.25% Notes. Given the Company's intention, dilutive shares associated with the 2011 Convertible Notes are derived from the premium value of the notes in excess of their principal amount, calculated using the treasury stock method. The Company refers to these shares as the "premium shares."
The 2011 4.0% Notes, which matured and were converted in June 2014, were convertible at $15.76 per share, and the 2011 4.25% Notes are convertible at $15.48 per share. The calculations underlying the number of premium shares included in the Company’s diluted share count for the periods indicated are as follows (in thousands, except per share amounts):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| As of and for the Three Months Ended June 30, | | As of and for the Six Months Ended June 30, |
| 2014 | | 2013 | | 2014 | | 2013 |
Premium Share Information: | | 2011 4.25% Notes | | 2011 4.0% Notes | | 2011 4.25% Notes | | | 2011 4.25% Notes | | 2011 4.0% Notes | | 2011 4.25% Notes |
Number of conversion shares, principal amount | | 6,268 |
| | 6,683 |
| | 6,268 |
| | | 6,268 |
| | 6,683 |
| | 6,268 |
|
Weighted average actual per share price | | $ | 37.68 |
| | $ | 30.13 |
| | $ | 30.13 |
| | | $ | 37.82 |
| | $ | 29.43 |
| | $ | 29.43 |
|
Weighted average premium value | | $ | 139,170 |
| | $ | 96,021 |
| | $ | 91,837 |
| | | $ | 140,047 |
| | $ | 91,325 |
| | $ | 87,433 |
|
Weighted average equivalent premium shares | | 3,693 |
| | 3,187 |
| | 3,048 |
| | | 3,703 |
| | 3,104 |
| | 2,971 |
|
There were 3.3 million and 3.6 million weighted average equivalent premium shares included in the Company's dilutive share calculation for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2014, respectively, related to the 2011 4.0% Notes, as calculated based on the average price per share of the Company's common stock from the beginning of the respective periods through June 15, 2014, the date of maturity. The Company's outstanding share count for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2014 also included 0.6 million and 0.3 million weighted average shares, respectively, related to the 3.6 million premium shares issued upon maturity and conversion of the 2011 4.0% Notes. In addition, there were a total of 0.6 million shares included in the Company's diluted share count for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2014 related to the 2009 4.0% Notes, which also matured and were converted in June 2014. See Note 9 - Debt.
Diluted Shares, Other Information
A total of 304,600 and 182,218 weighted average anti-dilutive common stock equivalents were not included in the Company's diluted earnings per share calculations for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2014, respectively, and a total of 123,077 and 61,878 weighted average anti-dilutive common stock equivalents were not included in the Company's diluted earnings per share calculations for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2013.
Note 3 – Acquisitions
Allocations of purchase prices for acquisitions are based on estimates of the fair value of consideration paid and of the net assets acquired and are subject to adjustment upon finalization of these fair value estimates. The Company acquired several businesses during 2013 and 2014, as discussed below and in Note 3 - Acquisitions in the notes to the Company's consolidated financial statements included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013. As of June 30, 2014, the allocations of purchase price to the fair values of tangible and intangible assets and liabilities, including the estimated values of contingent earn-out obligations and the estimated useful lives of acquired assets for certain acquisitions are provisional and remain preliminary. Management continues to assess the valuation of these items and any ultimate purchase price adjustments that may result based on the final net assets and net working capital of the acquired businesses, as prescribed in the corresponding purchase agreements.
The Company will revise its preliminary allocations for acquired businesses if new information is obtained about the facts and circumstances existing as of the date of acquisition, or for purchase price adjustments, based on the final net assets and net working capital of the acquired businesses, as prescribed in the applicable purchase agreement. Such adjustments result in the recognition of, or adjust the fair values of, acquired assets and assumed liabilities, which results in the revision of comparative prior period financial information. These measurement period adjustments are presented as if the adjustments had been taken into account as of the date of acquisition. All changes that do not qualify as measurement period adjustments are included in current period results. See table below pertaining to measurement period adjustments associated with the Company's 2013 acquisitions.
2014 Acquisitions
Pacer
Effective June 1, 2014, MasTec acquired all of the issued and outstanding equity interests of Pacer Construction Holdings Corporation and its affiliated operating companies (collectively, "Pacer"). Pacer is a western Canadian civil construction services company, headquartered in Calgary, Alberta, Canada. Pacer’s services include infrastructure construction in support of the oil and gas production, processing, mining and transportation industries. Pacer, a leading contractor in the Canadian oil sands, is expected to significantly enhance MasTec's ability to lead the development of energy infrastructure work in western Canada and take advantage of the associated rapidly expanding opportunities anticipated for energy infrastructure work in North America in the coming years. Pacer is reported within the Company's Oil and Gas segment.
The following table summarizes the preliminary estimated fair values of consideration paid and the identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of the date of acquisition (in millions):
|
| | | |
Purchase price consideration: | June 1, 2014 |
Cash | $ | 126.5 |
|
Fair value of contingent consideration (earn-out liability) | 24.3 |
|
Total consideration transferred | $ | 150.8 |
|
Identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed: | |
Current assets | $ | 118.4 |
|
Equity method investments | 3.5 |
|
Other long-term assets | 8.7 |
|
Property and equipment | 72.8 |
|
Pre-qualifications | 39.2 |
|
Finite-lived intangible assets | 19.6 |
|
Current liabilities | (48.0 | ) |
Long-term debt | (87.0 | ) |
Deferred income taxes | (29.3 | ) |
Total identifiable net assets | $ | 97.9 |
|
Goodwill | $ | 52.9 |
|
Total net assets acquired, including goodwill | $ | 150.8 |
|
The fair values and weighted average useful lives of Pacer's acquired finite-lived intangible assets as of the date of acquisition were assigned as follows:
|
| | | | | |
| Fair Value | | Weighted Average Useful Life |
Amortizing intangible assets: | (in millions) | | (in years) |
Backlog | $ | 5.4 |
| | 2 |
Non-compete agreements | 2.3 |
| | 8 |
Customer relationships | 11.9 |
| | 9 |
Total acquired amortizing intangibles | $ | 19.6 |
| | 7 |
Finite-lived intangible assets will be amortized in a manner consistent with the pattern in which the related benefits are expected to be consumed. The intangible asset related to Pacer's pre-qualifications with companies in the oil and gas industry has been assigned an indefinite life as the pre-qualifications are not expected to expire or diminish in value, and the companies to which they relate have extremely long operating histories. Goodwill arising from the acquisition represents the estimated value of Pacer's geographic presence in key high growth Canadian markets, its assembled workforce, its management team's industry-specific project management expertise and synergies expected to be achieved from the combined operations of Pacer and MasTec. The goodwill balance is not tax deductible.
The value of the current assets and property and equipment acquired and current liabilities assumed include Pacer’s undivided interest in an unincorporated VIE that provides civil construction services, and is accounted for on a proportional basis. The equity method investments include two entities that provide heavy industrial construction services. For both the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2014, revenue recognized by the Company for infrastructure construction services on behalf of these business entities totaled $1.0 million, and as of June 30, 2014, receivables from infrastructure construction services provided by Pacer, including acquired receivables, totaled $8.1 million. As of June 30, 2014, other amounts due Pacer from its equity method investees and joint venture included aggregate financing receivables of $12.1 million, of which $4.7 million was included in other current assets and $7.4 million was included in other long-term assets. In connection with these business entities, Pacer has issued performance guarantees, on a joint and several basis with its other joint venture partners or other shareholders in such entities, of approximately $225.0 million, and has approximately $35.0 million of other financial guarantees, of which the Company believes an immaterial amount is at risk as of June 30, 2014, as most of the related projects are completed, substantially completed, or on schedule with no material issues or delays anticipated. The Company believes these receivables and guarantees represent variable interests. Pacer does not have the power to control the primary activities, nor is it the primary beneficiary of, these business entities. The Company may provide financial support to these business entities in the future.
The contingent earn-out obligation is equal to 25% of the excess, if any, of Pacer’s earnings from continuing operations before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) above certain thresholds for a five-year period, as set forth in the purchase agreement, and is payable annually in cash. The fair value of the earn-out liability was estimated using an income approach and incorporates significant inputs not observable in the market. Key assumptions in the estimated valuation include the discount rate and probability-weighted EBITDA projections. The range of potential undiscounted payments that MasTec could be required to make under the earn-out arrangement is estimated to be between $0 and $63 million; however, there is no maximum earn-out payment amount.
Other 2014 Acquisitions
Effective April 1, 2014, MasTec acquired 100% of a telecommunications services firm that specializes in the installation of in-home security systems for an aggregate purchase price composed of approximately $18.1 million in cash and a five year earn-out, valued at $0.6 million as of the date of acquisition. Additionally, effective January 1, 2014, MasTec acquired 100% of a telecommunications services firm that specializes in the engineering, installation, furnishing and integration of telecommunications equipment for an aggregate purchase price composed of approximately $23.8 million in cash and a five year earn-out, valued at $8.7 million as of the date of acquisition. These companies are included in MasTec's Communications segment.
2013 Acquisitions
Big Country
Effective May 1, 2013, MasTec acquired all of the issued and outstanding interests of Big Country Energy Services, Inc. and its affiliated operating companies (collectively, "Big Country"). Big Country is a North American oil and gas pipeline and facility construction services company, headquartered in Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Other 2013 Acquisitions
Effective April 1, 2013, MasTec acquired a former subcontractor to its wireless business, which provides self-perform communications tower construction, installation, maintenance and other services in support of telecommunications infrastructure construction in the Company's Communications segment. In addition, effective August 1, 2013, MasTec acquired an electrical transmission services company, which focuses primarily on substation construction activities and is included within the Company's Electrical Transmission segment.
Measurement Period Adjustments
Measurement period adjustments associated with the Company's 2013 acquisitions have been reflected in the Company's December 31, 2013 consolidated balance sheet as follows (in millions):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
As of December 31, 2013: | | As Previously Reported | | Measurement Period Adjustments | | As Revised |
Current assets | | $ | 1,306.0 |
| | $ | 1.0 |
| | $ | 1,307.0 |
|
Goodwill | | $ | 899.4 |
| | $ | 2.6 |
| | $ | 902.0 |
|
Current liabilities | | $ | 825.5 |
| | $ | 3.7 |
| | $ | 829.2 |
|
Long-term deferred tax liabilities, net | | $ | 154.9 |
| | $ | (0.1 | ) | | $ | 154.8 |
|
Unaudited Pro Forma Information
The following unaudited supplemental pro forma financial information includes the results of operations of each of the companies acquired in 2014 and 2013 and is presented as if the acquired companies had been consolidated as of the beginning of the year immediately preceding the date of acquisition. The unaudited supplemental pro forma financial information has been provided for illustrative purposes only. The unaudited supplemental pro forma financial information does not purport to be indicative of the actual results that would have been achieved by the combined companies for the periods presented, or of the results that may be achieved by the combined companies in the future. Future results may vary significantly from the results reflected in the following unaudited supplemental pro forma financial information because of future events and transactions, as well as other factors, many of which are beyond MasTec’s control.
The unaudited supplemental pro forma financial information presented below has been prepared by adjusting the historical results of MasTec to include the historical results of the acquired businesses described above. The unaudited supplemental pro forma combined historical results were then adjusted (i) to remove one-time acquisition costs; (ii) to increase amortization expense resulting from the incremental intangible assets acquired in such acquisitions; (iii) to increase interest expense as a result of the cash consideration paid; and (iv) to reduce interest expense from the repayment of acquired debt. The unaudited supplemental pro forma financial information does not include any adjustments to reflect the impact of cost savings or other synergies that may result from these acquisitions. As noted above, the unaudited supplemental pro forma financial information does not purport to be indicative of the actual results that would have been achieved by the combined companies for the periods presented or that may be achieved by the combined companies in the future.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| For the Three Months Ended June 30, | | For the Six Months Ended June 30, |
| 2014 | | 2013 | | 2014 | | 2013 |
Pro forma financial information: | (unaudited, in millions) | | (unaudited, in millions) |
Revenue | $ | 1,161.9 |
| | $ | 1,135.9 |
| | $ | 2,186.4 |
| | $ | 2,249.9 |
|
Net income from continuing operations | $ | 33.3 |
| | $ | 37.2 |
| | $ | 47.9 |
| | $ | 64.2 |
|
Results of Businesses Acquired
Revenues and net income resulting from the year over year incremental impact of acquired businesses, which are included within the Company's consolidated results of operations for the periods indicated, are as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| For the Three Months Ended June 30, | | For the Six Months Ended June 30, |
| 2014 | | 2013 | | 2014 | | 2013 |
Year over year impact of acquired businesses: | (unaudited, in millions) | | (unaudited, in millions) |
Revenue | $ | 89.4 |
| | $ | 85.6 |
| | $ | 209.2 |
| | $ | 128.7 |
|
Net income from continuing operations | $ | 1.1 |
| | $ | 3.5 |
| | $ | 2.2 |
| | $ | 5.3 |
|
The above results do not include acquisition costs of $1.2 million and $0.8 million for the three month periods ended June 30, 2014 and June 30, 2013, respectively, and $1.5 million and $1.3 million for the six month periods ended June 30, 2014 and June 30, 2013, respectively. The above results also do not include interest expense associated with consideration paid for these acquisitions.
Note 4 – Discontinued Operations
Globetec
In 2012, the Company's board of directors approved a plan of sale for Globetec Construction, LLC ("Globetec"). Accordingly, Globetec's projects and assets are reflected as assets and liabilities of discontinued operations in the condensed unaudited consolidated balance sheets for all periods presented, and Globetec's results of operations are presented as discontinued operations in the condensed unaudited consolidated statements of operations for all periods presented. Effective August 31, 2013, the Company sold all of its membership interests in Globetec for nominal consideration and retained certain contingent assets and liabilities. As of June 30, 2014, the Company had certain outstanding surety bonds associated with Globetec, for which the work had been substantially completed. The Company believes that there was an insignificant amount at risk under these surety bonds as of June 30, 2014. The Company is not obligated and does not intend to support Globetec in the future.
The following table contains a summary of the contingent assets and liabilities associated with Globetec that were retained by the Company as of June 30, 2014 and as of December 31, 2013 (in millions):
|
| | | | | | | |
| June 30, 2014 | | December 31, 2013 |
Current assets | $ | 2.1 |
| | $ | 2.3 |
|
Long-term assets | 10.1 |
| | 10.1 |
|
Assets of discontinued operations | $ | 12.2 |
| | $ | 12.4 |
|
Current liabilities of discontinued operations | $ | 1.2 |
| | $ | 1.2 |
|
The following table presents results from discontinued operations associated with the Globetec operation for the periods indicated (in millions):
|
| | | | | | | |
| For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2013 | | For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2013 |
Revenue | $ | 6.9 |
| | $ | 13.2 |
|
Loss from operations, before tax | (0.9 | ) | | (2.1 | ) |
Impairment of assets, before tax | (0.3 | ) | | (0.3 | ) |
Income tax benefit | 0.7 |
| | 1.0 |
|
Net loss from discontinued operations | $ | (0.5 | ) | | $ | (1.4 | ) |
For the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2014, net loss from discontinued operations, which related primarily to certain contingencies, totaled $0.1 million and $0.3 million, respectively.
Note 5 - Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
The following table provides a reconciliation of changes in goodwill by reportable segment (in millions):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Communications | | Oil and Gas | | Electrical Transmission | | Power Generation and Industrial | | Total Goodwill |
Balance as of December 31, 2013 | $ | 326.8 |
| | $ | 307.7 |
| | $ | 149.9 |
| | $ | 117.6 |
| | $ | 902.0 |
|
Additions from new business combinations | 28.6 |
| | 52.9 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 81.5 |
|
Currency translation adjustments | — |
| | 0.9 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 0.9 |
|
Other adjustments | $ | (1.3 | ) | | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | (1.3 | ) |
Balance as of June 30, 2014 | $ | 354.1 |
| | $ | 361.5 |
| | $ | 149.9 |
| | $ | 117.6 |
| | $ | 983.1 |
|
The following table provides a reconciliation of changes in other intangible assets (in millions):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Other Intangible Assets |
| | Non-amortizing | | Amortizing | | |
| | Trade Names | | Pre-Qualifications | | Customer Relationships and Backlog | | Other (a) | | Total |
Gross carrying amount as of December 31, 2013 | | $ | 34.8 |
| | $ | 59.4 |
| | $ | 128.4 |
| | $ | 22.5 |
| | $ | 245.1 |
|
Accumulated amortization | | | | | | $ | (67.7 | ) | | $ | (11.8 | ) | | $ | (79.5 | ) |
Other intangible assets, net, as of December 31, 2013 | | $ | 34.8 |
| | $ | 59.4 |
| | $ | 60.7 |
| | $ | 10.7 |
| | $ | 165.6 |
|
Additions from new business combinations | | — |
| | 39.2 |
| | 32.4 |
| | 2.7 |
| | 74.3 |
|
Amortization expense | | | | | | (9.4 | ) | | (1.0 | ) | | (10.4 | ) |
Currency translation adjustments | | — |
| | 0.7 |
| | 0.3 |
| | 0.1 |
| | 1.1 |
|
Other intangible assets, net, as of June 30, 2014 | | $ | 34.8 |
| | $ | 99.3 |
| | $ | 84.0 |
| | $ | 12.5 |
| | $ | 230.6 |
|
(a) Consists principally of amortizing trade names and non-compete agreements.
Amortization expense associated with intangible assets for the three month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 totaled $5.8 million and $5.3 million, respectively. Amortization expense associated with intangible assets for the six month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 totaled $10.4 million and $9.4 million, respectively.
Note 6 – Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The Company’s financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents, accounts and notes receivable, cash collateral deposited with insurance carriers, life insurance assets, cost and equity method investments, deferred compensation plan assets and liabilities, accounts payable and other current liabilities, acquisition-related contingent consideration and debt obligations.
Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. The fair value guidance establishes a valuation hierarchy, which requires maximizing the use of observable inputs when measuring fair value. The three levels of inputs that may be used are:
Level 1 - Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2 - Observable market based inputs or other observable inputs.
Level 3 - Significant unobservable inputs that cannot be corroborated by observable market data. These values are generally determined using valuation models incorporating management’s estimates of market participant assumptions.
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
As of June 30, 2014, financial instruments required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis consisted primarily of acquisition-related contingent consideration. The fair value hierarchy requires the use of observable market data when available. In instances in which the inputs used to measure fair value fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the fair value measurement classification below has been determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. Management’s assessment of the significance of a particular item to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, including the consideration of inputs specific to the asset or liability. Acquisition-related contingent consideration measured at fair value on a recurring basis represents the estimated fair value of additional future earn-outs payable for acquisitions of businesses that closed after January 1, 2009, in accordance with U.S. GAAP ("141R contingent
consideration"). The fair value of the Company's 141R contingent consideration, which was determined using Level 3 inputs, totaled $152.4 million and $165.4 million, respectively, as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013. The fair value of 141R contingent consideration is based on management’s estimates and entity-specific assumptions and is evaluated on an on-going basis.
Additions to 141R contingent consideration from new acquisitions totaled $24.9 million and $33.6 million for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2014, respectively, and totaled $26.7 million for both the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2013. The Company paid approximately $47.0 million in connection with 141R contingent consideration for both the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2014, and paid approximately $2.0 million and $2.7 million for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2013, respectively. Foreign currency translation losses associated with 141R contingent consideration included in other comprehensive income totaled $1.7 million and $0.4 million for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2014, respectively. Foreign currency translation gains associated with 141R contingent consideration included in other comprehensive income totaled $1.4 million and $1.8 million for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2013, respectively.
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Non-Recurring Basis
Assets and liabilities recognized or disclosed at fair value on a non-recurring basis, which are initially measured at fair value, and are subsequently remeasured in the event of an impairment or other measurement event, if applicable, include items such as cost and equity method investments, goodwill, other intangible assets, long-lived assets and debt.
Carrying amounts and estimated fair values of selected financial instruments measured on a non-recurring basis as of the dates indicated were as follows (in millions):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| June 30, 2014 | | December 31, 2013 |
| Carrying Amount | | Fair Value | | Carrying Amount | | Fair Value |
4.875% Senior Notes | $ | 400.0 |
| | $ | 390.0 |
| | $ | 400.0 |
| | $ | 380.0 |
|
2009 Convertible Notes | $ | 3.0 |
| | $ | 6.0 |
| | $ | 12.6 |
| | $ | 26.6 |
|
2011 Convertible Notes | $ | 95.7 |
| | $ | 193.9 |
| | $ | 198.3 |
| | $ | 428.3 |
|
The estimated fair values of the Company’s 4.875% Senior Notes, 2009 Convertible Notes and 2011 Convertible Notes are based on quoted market prices, a Level 1 input. The Company's 4.0% Convertible Notes, composed of $105.3 million of 2011 4.0% Notes and $9.6 million of 2009 4.0% Notes, matured and were converted in June 2014. See Note 9 - Debt.
The Company accounts for certain investments using the cost or equity method of accounting. These investments had aggregate values of $19.3 million and $15.8 million as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively. The fair value of the Company's cost and equity method investments is not readily available nor has the Company estimated the fair value of these investments. The Company is not aware of any identified events or changes in circumstance that would have a significant adverse effect on the carrying value of any of its cost or equity method investments as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013.
Note 7 - Accounts Receivable, Net of Allowance
The following table provides details of accounts receivable, net of allowance, as of the dates indicated (in millions):
|
| | | | | | | |
| June 30, 2014 | | December 31, 2013 |
Contract billings | $ | 702.9 |
| | $ | 606.5 |
|
Retainage | 140.8 |
| | 159.3 |
|
Costs and earnings in excess of billings | 463.2 |
| | 384.6 |
|
Accounts receivable, gross | $ | 1,306.9 |
| | $ | 1,150.4 |
|
Less allowance for doubtful accounts | (18.2 | ) | | (15.7 | ) |
Accounts receivable, net | $ | 1,288.7 |
| | $ | 1,134.7 |
|
Provisions for doubtful accounts were $0.8 million and $2.5 million, respectively, for the six month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013.
Note 8 - Property and Equipment, Net
The following table provides details of property and equipment, net, including property and equipment held under capital leases as of the dates indicated (in millions):
|
| | | | | | | |
| June 30, 2014 | | December 31, 2013 |
Land | $ | 4.6 |
| | $ | 4.8 |
|
Buildings and leasehold improvements | 19.0 |
| | 18.0 |
|
Machinery and equipment | 879.4 |
| | 727.1 |
|
Office furniture and equipment | 114.4 |
| | 102.5 |
|
Construction in progress | 18.3 |
| | 11.0 |
|
Total property and equipment | $ | 1,035.7 |
| | $ | 863.4 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization | (417.0 | ) | | (375.3 | ) |
Property and equipment, net | $ | 618.7 |
| | $ | 488.1 |
|
Depreciation and amortization expense associated with property and equipment for the three month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 totaled $30.9 million and $28.3 million, respectively. Depreciation and amortization expense associated with property and equipment for the six month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 totaled $59.8 million and $55.9 million, respectively.
Note 9 - Debt
The following table provides details of the carrying values of debt as of the dates indicated (in millions):
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Description | | Maturity Date | | June 30, 2014 | | December 31, 2013 |
Senior secured credit facility | | October 29, 2018 | | $ | 398.4 |
| | $ | 53.0 |
|
4.875% senior notes | | March 15, 2023 | | 400.0 |
| | 400.0 |
|
2011 4.0% senior convertible notes | | June 15, 2014 | | — |
| | 103.8 |
|
2011 4.25% senior convertible notes | | December 15, 2014 | | 95.7 |
| | 94.5 |
|
2009 4.0% senior convertible notes | | June 15, 2014 | | — |
| | 9.6 |
|
2009 4.25% senior convertible notes | | December 15, 2014 | | 3.0 |
| | 3.0 |
|
Other credit facilities | | Varies | | 46.8 |
| | — |
|
Capital lease obligations, weighted average interest rate of 2.9% | | In installments through June 13, 2021 | | 169.2 |
| | 126.0 |
|
Notes payable, equipment, weighted average interest rate of 3.2% | | In installments through May 1, 2018 | | 52.5 |
| | 26.9 |
|
Total debt | | $ | 1,165.6 |
| | $ | 816.8 |
|
Less current maturities | | (76.9 | ) | | (51.4 | ) |
Long-term debt | | $ | 1,088.7 |
| | $ | 765.4 |
|
Senior Secured Credit Facility
On June 25, 2014, the Company amended its senior secured credit facility, referred to as the Credit Facility, to increase aggregate borrowing commitments from $750 million to $1 billion, add the capability to borrow in Mexican pesos in addition to Canadian dollars, and increase the maximum amount that can be borrowed in alternate currencies to $200 million from $100 million. The amended Credit Facility, which matures on October 29, 2018, retains its accordion feature that permits the Company to increase revolving commitments and/or establish additional term loan tranches in an aggregate amount of up to $250 million. As of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the Company had outstanding revolving loans under the Credit Facility of $398.4 million and $53.0 million, respectively, which accrued interest at a weighted average rate of approximately 2.64% and 2.14% per annum, respectively. Letters of credit of approximately $132.8 million and $134.8 million were issued as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively. The remaining borrowing capacity of $469.2 million and $562.1 million as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively, was available for revolving loans, or up to $317.2 million and $315.2 million, respectively, of new letters of credit. Outstanding letters of credit mature at various dates and most have automatic renewal provisions, subject to prior notice of cancellation. As of June 30, 2014, interest on issued letters of credit accrued at 0.875% per annum for performance standby letters of credit and at 1.75% per annum for financial standby letters of credit. As of December 31, 2013, interest on issued letters of credit accrued at 0.75% per annum for performance standby letters of credit and at 1.5% per annum for financial standby letters of credit. The unused facility fee was 0.35% and 0.30% as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively. The Credit Facility is guaranteed by certain subsidiaries of the Company.
For additional information regarding the Credit Facility, see Note 9 - Debt in the notes to the Company's consolidated financial statements included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 and the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on June 30, 2014.
Other Credit Facilities. During 2014, the Company entered into or assumed other credit facility arrangements to support the short-term working capital requirements of its foreign operations. As of June 30, 2014, the Company had maximum borrowing capacity totaling $70.3 million under these credit facilities, of which $11.2 million was available for letters of credit. Outstanding borrowings and issued letters of credit totaled $46.8 million and $10.5 million, respectively, as of June 30, 2014, and accrued interest at weighted average rates of 3.75% and 1.80%, respectively. The Company's other credit facilities, which have varying dates of maturity through March 3, 2015, are generally renewed on an annual basis. Outstanding borrowings under other credit facilities that are not renewed are repaid with borrowings under the Credit Facility. Accordingly, the carrying amounts of other credit facility borrowings are classified within long-term debt in the Company's condensed unaudited consolidated balance sheets as of June 30, 2014. The Company's other credit facilities are subject to customary provisions and covenants, and the Company was in compliance with all such provisions and covenants as of June 30, 2014.
Senior Convertible Notes
The 4.0% Convertible Notes, composed of $105.3 million principal amount of 2011 4.0% Notes and $9.6 million principal amount of 2009 4.0% Notes, matured and were converted in June 2014. The 2009 4.0% Notes were convertible at a rate of 63.4417 shares of MasTec common stock per $1,000 principal amount thereof, representing an initial conversion price of approximately $15.76 per share, which resulted in MasTec issuing an aggregate of 0.6 million shares of its common stock at maturity. The 2011 4.0% Notes were substantially identical to the 2009 4.0% Notes, except that the 2011 4.0% Notes had an optional physical (share), cash or combination settlement feature. In accordance with the Company's previously stated intent, it settled the principal amount of the 2011 4.0% Notes in cash, and the premium value in shares of common stock. Pursuant to the formula contained in the indenture governing the 2011 4.0% Notes, the Company issued 3.6 million shares of common stock to settle the premium value of such notes. The value of shares issued to settle the premium was $114.8 million, which was based on the closing price of the Company's common stock on the date the shares were issued. The 4.2 million aggregate shares issued in settlement of the 4.0% Convertible Notes were issued from the Company's treasury stock. See Note 13 - Equity.
Unamortized debt discount and financing costs associated with the 2011 4.25% Notes totaled $1.3 million as of June 30, 2014. Unamortized debt discount and financing costs associated with both the 2011 4.25% Notes and the 2011 4.0% Notes totaled $4.0 million as of December 31, 2013. The 4.0% Convertible Notes matured in June 2014 and the 4.25% Convertible Notes mature in December 2014. The Company settled the principal amount of the 2011 4.0% Notes with proceeds from the Credit Facility and the premium value in shares of common stock. The Company expects to settle the principal amount of its 2011 4.25% Notes on a long-term basis with proceeds from the Credit Facility, or through other sources of available funding, and the premium value in shares, and, therefore, has reflected the carrying amounts of these notes within long-term debt in the Company's condensed unaudited consolidated balance sheets.
For additional information regarding the Company's senior convertible notes, see Note 9 - Debt in the notes to the Company's consolidated financial statements included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.
Debt Guarantees and Covenants
The Company’s 4.875% Senior Notes, 2011 Convertible Notes and 2009 Convertible Notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed on an unsecured, unsubordinated, joint and several basis by certain of the Company's existing and future 100%-owned direct and indirect domestic subsidiaries that are guarantors of the Credit Facility or other outstanding indebtedness. See Note 18 - Supplemental Guarantor Condensed Unaudited Consolidating Financial Information.
MasTec was in compliance with all provisions and covenants pertaining to its outstanding debt instruments as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013.
Interest Expense, Net
The following table provides details of interest expense, net, for the periods indicated (in millions):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| For the Three Months Ended June 30, | | For the Six Months Ended June 30, |
| 2014 | | 2013 | | 2014 | | 2013 |
Interest expense: | | | | | | | |
Contractual and other interest expense | $ | 10.6 |
| | $ | 9.6 |
| | $ | 20.4 |
| | $ | 17.5 |
|
Accretion of senior convertible note discount | 1.4 |
| | 1.3 |
| | 2.8 |
| | 2.6 |
|
Amortization of deferred financing costs | 0.9 |
| | 1.0 |
| | 1.9 |
| | 2.0 |
|
Total interest expense | $ | 12.9 |
| | $ | 11.9 |
| | $ | 25.1 |
| | $ | 22.1 |
|
Interest income | (0.0 | ) | | (0.1 | ) | | (0.1 | ) | | (0.2 | ) |
Interest expense, net | $ | 12.9 |
| | $ | 11.8 |
| | $ | 25.0 |
| | $ | 21.9 |
|
Note 10 - Lease Obligations
Capital Leases
MasTec enters into agreements that provide financing for machinery and equipment, which expire on various dates. The gross amount of assets held under capital leases as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 totaled $267.2 million and $199.6 million, respectively. Assets held under capital leases, net of accumulated depreciation, totaled $200.6 million and $141.3 million as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively.
Operating Leases
In the ordinary course of business, the Company enters into non-cancelable operating leases for certain of its facility, vehicle and equipment needs, including related party leases. Rent expense relating to operating leases that have non-cancelable terms in excess of one year was approximately $17.3 million and $12.6 million for the three month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, and $33.3 million and $24.5 million for the six month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The Company also incurred expenses relating to facilities, vehicles and equipment having original terms of one year or less of approximately $40.4 million and $39.0 million for the three month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, and $88.2 million and $75.9 million for the six month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
Note 11 – Stock-Based Compensation and Other Employee Benefit Plans
The Company has certain stock-based compensation plans, under which stock options and restricted share awards are available for issuance or outstanding. Under stock-based compensation plans in effect as of June 30, 2014, there were a total of 6,226,093 shares available for grant or issuance.
Restricted Share Awards
MasTec grants restricted share awards, which are valued based on the market price of MasTec common stock on the date of grant. Total unearned compensation related to restricted share awards as of June 30, 2014 was approximately $19.9 million, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 1.3 years. The total intrinsic value, or fair value, of restricted share awards that vested, which is based on the market price on the date of vesting, was $0.2 million and $0.4 million for the three month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, and $6.0 million and $1.1 million for the six month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
|
| | | | | | |
Activity, restricted share awards: | Restricted Shares | | Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value |
Non-vested restricted shares, as of December 31, 2013 | 1,123,545 |
| | $ | 23.78 |
|
Granted | 315,614 |
| | 41.36 |
|
Vested | (145,560 | ) | | 19.82 |
|
Canceled/forfeited | (13,450 | ) | | 16.05 |
|
Non-vested restricted shares, as of June 30, 2014 | 1,280,149 |
| | $ | 28.64 |
|
Stock Options
The Company has granted options to purchase its common stock to employees and members of the Board of Directors and affiliates under various stock option plans at not less than the fair market value of the underlying stock on the date of grant. All outstanding stock options are fully vested.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Activity, stock options: | Stock Options | | Per Share Weighted Average Exercise Price | | Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (in years) | | Aggregate Intrinsic Value (a) (in millions) |
Options outstanding as of December 31, 2013 | 495,571 |
| | $ | 11.17 |
| | 1.96 | | $ | 10.7 |
|
Exercised | (210,900 | ) | | 9.97 |
| | | | |
Canceled/forfeited | — |
| | — |
| | | | |
Options outstanding as of June 30, 2014 | 284,671 |
| | $ | 12.06 |
| | 1.79 | | $ | 5.3 |
|
Options exercisable as of June 30, 2014 | 284,671 |
| | $ | 12.06 |
| | 1.79 | | $ | 5.3 |
|
| |
(a) | Amount represents the difference between the exercise price and the market price of the Company’s stock on the last trading day of the corresponding period, multiplied by the number of in-the-money options. |
The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the three month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, which is based on the difference between the exercise price and the market price of the Company’s stock at the date of exercise, was $0.2 million and $2.2 million, respectively. The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the six month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 was $6.5 million and $5.7 million, respectively.
Proceeds from options exercised during the three month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 totaled $0.1 million and $1.5 million, respectively, and totaled $0.8 million and $3.4 million for the six month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
Employee Stock Purchase Plans
The Company's employee stock purchase plans allow qualified employees to purchase MasTec, Inc. common stock at 85% of the fair market value of the common stock at the lower of (i) the date of commencement of the offering period or (ii) the last day of the exercise period, as defined in the plan documents. The fair value of purchases under the Company's employee stock purchase plans is estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing valuation model.
|
| | | | | | | |
| Six Months Ended June 30, |
Activity, employee stock purchase plan: | 2014 | | 2013 |
Cash proceeds (in millions) | $ | 1.7 |
| | $ | 5.5 |
|
Common shares issued | 62,102 |
| | 416,397 |
|
Weighted average price per share | $ | 26.90 |
| | $ | 13.10 |
|
Weighted average grant date fair value per share | $ | 6.39 |
| | $ | 5.49 |
|
Stock-Based Compensation Expense and Tax Benefits
Details of stock-based compensation expense, which is included within general and administrative expense in the condensed unaudited consolidated statement of operations, and related tax benefits for the periods indicated are as follows (in millions):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended June 30, | | Six Months Ended June 30, |
| 2014 | | 2013 | | 2014 | | 2013 |
Stock-based compensation expense | $ | 4.2 |
| | $ | 4.3 |
| | $ | 7.5 |
| | $ | 6.6 |
|
Income Tax Effects: | | | | | | | |
Income tax benefit from stock-based compensation | $ | 1.8 |
| | $ | 1.8 |
| | $ | 6.6 |
| | $ | 3.3 |
|
Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation (a) | $ | 0.1 |
| | $ | 0.8 |
| | $ | 3.4 |
| | $ | 1.5 |
|
| |
(a) | Excess tax benefits, which represent cash flows from tax deductions in excess of the recorded tax effect of compensation expense recognized for stock options exercised and vested restricted shares, are classified as financing cash flows in the Company’s condensed unaudited consolidated statements of cash flows. |
Note 12 – Other Retirement Plans
Multi-Employer Plans. Certain of MasTec’s subsidiaries contribute amounts to multi-employer pension and other multi-employer benefit plans and trusts. Contributions are generally based on fixed amounts per hour per employee for employees covered under these plans. Multi-employer plan contribution rates are determined annually and assessed on a “pay-as-you-go” basis based on union employee payrolls. Union payrolls cannot be determined for future periods because the number of union employees employed at any given time, and the plans in which they may participate, vary depending upon the location and number of ongoing projects at a given time and the need for union resources in connection with those projects. Total contributions to multi-employer plans, and the related number of employees covered by these plans, for the periods indicated ranged as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Multi-Employer Plans |
| Covered Employees | | Contributions (in millions) |
For the Three Months Ended June 30: | Low | | High | | Pension | | Post-Retirement Benefit | | Total |
2014 | 1,308 |
| | 2,167 |
| | $ | 8.0 |
| | $ | 0.8 |
| | $ | 8.8 |
|
2013 | 1,149 |
| | 2,392 |
| | $ | 7.2 |
| | $ | 1.1 |
| | $ | 8.3 |
|
For the Six Months Ended June 30: | Low | | High | | Pension | | Post-Retirement Benefit | | Total |
2014 | 1,098 |
| | 2,167 |
| | $ | 15.8 |
| | $ | 1.3 |
| | $ | 17.1 |
|
2013 | 778 |
| | 2,392 |
| | $ | 15.3 |
| | $ | 2.0 |
| | $ | 17.3 |
|
Note 13 – Equity
|
| | | | | |
Share Activity (in thousands): | Common Shares Outstanding | | Treasury Shares |
Balance as of December 31, 2013 | 77,258 |
| | 9,467 |
|
Shares issued: | | | |
Stock option exercises | 211 |
| | |
Restricted share awards | 146 |
| | |
Convertible notes, treasury stock reissuances | 4,204 |
| | (4,204 | ) |
Other shares issued, net of shares withheld for taxes | (46 | ) | | |
Balance as of June 30, 2014 | 81,773 |
| | 5,263 |
|
During the quarter ended June 30, 2014, the Company reissued a total of 4.2 million shares of its treasury stock, which had a cost basis of $66.6 million, related to the settlement of its 4.0% Convertible Notes. See Note 9 - Debt.
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
Changes in accumulated other comprehensive loss by component during the periods indicated are as follows (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| For the Six Months Ended June 30, |
| 2014 | | 2013 |
| Unrealized (Losses) Gains |
| Foreign Currency | | Other | | Total | | Foreign Currency | | Other | | Total |
Balance as of January 1 | $ | (7,998 | ) | | $ | (5,288 | ) | | $ | (13,286 | ) | | $ | (105 | ) | | $ | (5,396 | ) | | $ | (5,501 | ) |
Activity before reclassifications, net of tax | 2,343 |
| | — |
| | 2,343 |
| | (6,775 | ) | | (26 | ) | | (6,801 | ) |
Reclassifications, net of tax | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (440 | ) | | (440 | ) |
Activity, net of tax | 2,343 |
| | — |
| | 2,343 |
| | (6,775 | ) | | (466 | ) | | (7,241 | ) |
Balance as of June 30 | $ | (5,655 | ) | | $ | (5,288 | ) | | $ | (10,943 | ) | | $ | (6,880 | ) | | $ | (5,862 | ) | | $ | (12,742 | ) |
Foreign currency activity is primarily related to the Company's Canadian operations. The Company's Canadian presence has grown in recent years due to acquisitions. See Note 3 - Acquisitions.
Note 14 - Income Taxes
The Company’s consolidated tax rates on income from continuing operations for the three month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 were 38.1% and 38.0%, respectively, and for the six month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 were 38.0% and 38.4%, respectively. In determining the quarterly provision for income taxes, management uses an estimated annual effective tax rate based on forecasted annual pre-tax income, permanent tax differences, statutory tax rates and tax planning opportunities in the various jurisdictions in which the Company operates. The impact of significant discrete items is separately recognized in the quarter(s) in which they occur.
As of June 30, 2014, the Company had $6.6 million of current deferred tax assets, net, and $186.5 million of long-term deferred tax liabilities, net. As of December 31, 2013, current deferred tax assets, net, totaled $16.3 million and long-term deferred tax liabilities, net, totaled $154.8 million.
Note 15 - Segments and Related Information
Segment Discussion
MasTec presents its continuing operations in five reportable segments: (1) Communications; (2) Oil and Gas; (3) Electrical Transmission; (4) Power Generation and Industrial and (5) Other. This structure is generally focused on broad end-user markets for MasTec's labor-based construction services. All five reportable segments derive their revenues from the engineering, installation and maintenance of infrastructure, primarily in North America.
The Communications segment performs engineering, construction and maintenance of communications infrastructure primarily related to wireless and wireline/fiber communications and install-to-the-home, and to a lesser extent, infrastructure for electrical utilities. MasTec performs engineering, construction and maintenance services on oil and natural gas pipelines and processing facilities for the energy and utilities industries through its Oil and Gas segment. The Electrical Transmission segment primarily serves the energy and utility industries through the engineering, construction and maintenance of electrical transmission lines and substations. The Power Generation and Industrial segment primarily serves the
energy and utility end markets and other end markets through the installation and construction of renewable power facilities, related electrical transmission infrastructure, ethanol facilities and various types of industrial infrastructure. The Other segment primarily includes small business units that perform construction services for a variety of end markets in Mexico and elsewhere internationally.
Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) is the measure of profitability used by management to manage its segments and, accordingly, in its segment reporting. As appropriate, the Company supplements the reporting of consolidated financial information determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP with certain non-U.S. GAAP financial measures, including EBITDA. The Company believes these non-U.S. GAAP measures provide meaningful information that helps investors understand the Company's financial results and assess its prospects for future performance. The Company uses EBITDA to evaluate its performance, both internally and versus that of its peers, because it excludes certain items that may not be indicative of the Company's reportable segment results, as well as items that can vary widely across different industries or among companies within the same industry. Segment EBITDA is calculated in a manner consistent with consolidated EBITDA.
Summarized financial information for MasTec’s reportable segments is presented and reconciled to consolidated continuing operations financial information for total MasTec in the following tables (in millions):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| For the Three Months Ended June 30, | | For the Six Months Ended June 30, |
Revenue: | 2014 | | 2013 | | 2014 | | 2013 |
Communications | $ | 528.1 |
| | $ | 496.6 |
| | $ | 975.2 |
| | $ | 921.6 |
|
Oil and Gas | 365.7 |
| | 296.9 |
| | 745.5 |
| | 615.7 |
|
Electrical Transmission | 114.5 |
| | 118.6 |
| | 194.6 |
| | 203.1 |
|
Power Generation and Industrial | 94.5 |
| | 63.3 |
| | 148.8 |
| | 152.2 |
|
Other | 2.7 |
| | 3.4 |
| | 5.4 |
| | 5.7 |
|
Eliminations | (0.9 | ) | | (1.2 | ) | | (0.9 | ) | | (2.0 | ) |
Consolidated revenue | $ | 1,104.6 |
| | $ | 977.6 |
| | $ | 2,068.6 |
| | $ | 1,896.3 |
|
Revenue generated by utilities customers represented 6.3% and 6.5% of Communications segment revenue for the three month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, and 6.6% and 7.3% of Communications segment revenue for the six month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| For the Three Months Ended June 30, | | For the Six Months Ended June 30, |
EBITDA: | 2014 | | 2013 | | 2014 | | 2013 |
Communications | $ | 57.9 |
| | $ | 63.4 |
| | $ | 101.4 |
| | $ | 109.8 |
|
Oil and Gas | 35.7 |
| | 51.2 |
| | 70.6 |
| | 93.6 |
|
Electrical Transmission | 17.0 |
| | 11.5 |
| | 20.5 |
| | 14.9 |
|
Power Generation and Industrial | 4.0 |
| | (8.0 | ) | | 4.5 |
| | (8.2 | ) |
Other | 0.3 |
| | 0.4 |
| | 0.5 |
| | 0.4 |
|
Corporate | (13.4 | ) | | (15.8 | ) | | (24.4 | ) | | (34.3 | ) |
Consolidated EBITDA | $ | 101.5 |
| | $ | 102.7 |
| | $ | 173.1 |
| | $ | 176.2 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| For the Three Months Ended June 30, | | For the Six Months Ended June 30, |
Depreciation and Amortization: | 2014 | | 2013 | | 2014 | | 2013 |
Communications | $ | 10.0 |
| | $ | 9.1 |
| | $ | 19.9 |
| | $ | 17.4 |
|
Oil and Gas | 19.9 |
| | 19.0 |
| | 38.0 |
| | 37.7 |
|
Electrical Transmission | 3.9 |
| | 2.8 |
| | 6.7 |
| | 5.2 |
|
Power Generation and Industrial | 1.6 |
| | 1.7 |
| | 3.1 |
| | 3.4 |
|
Corporate | 1.4 |
| | 1.0 |
| | 2.5 |
| | 1.7 |
|
Consolidated Depreciation and Amortization | $ | 36.8 |
| | $ | 33.6 |
| | $ | 70.2 |
| | $ | 65.4 |
|
The following table presents a reconciliation of EBITDA to consolidated income from continuing operations before income taxes (in millions):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| For the Three Months Ended June 30, | | For the Six Months Ended June 30, |
EBITDA Reconciliation: | 2014 | | 2013 | | 2014 | | 2013 |
EBITDA | $ | 101.5 |
| | $ | 102.7 |
| | $ | 173.1 |
| | $ | 176.2 |
|
Less: | | | | | | | |
Interest expense, net | (12.9 | ) | | (11.8 | ) | | (25.0 | ) | | (21.9 | ) |
Depreciation and amortization | (36.8 | ) | | (33.6 | ) | | (70.2 | ) | | (65.4 | ) |
Income from continuing operations before income taxes | $ | 51.8 |
| | $ | 57.3 |
| | $ | 77.9 |
| | $ | 89.0 |
|
Foreign Operations. MasTec operates throughout North America, primarily in the U.S. and Canada, as well as in parts of Latin America. For the three month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, revenues of $990.0 million and $936.2 million, respectively, were derived from U.S. operations, and $114.6 million and $41.4 million, respectively, were derived from foreign operations, primarily in Canada. For both the six month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, revenues of $1.8 billion were derived from U.S. operations, and $240.6 million and $81.2 million, respectively, were derived from foreign operations, primarily in Canada. Long-lived assets held in the U.S. included property and equipment, net, of $495.0 million and $436.9 million as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively. Long-lived assets held in foreign countries, primarily in Canada, included property and equipment, net, of $123.7 million and $51.2 million as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively. Intangible assets and goodwill, net, of $1.0 billion as of both June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, related to businesses in the U.S. Intangible assets and goodwill, net, of $204.5 million and $92.9 million as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively, related to businesses in foreign countries, primarily in Canada.
Significant Customers
Revenue concentration information for significant customers as a percentage of total consolidated revenue was as follows:
|
| | | | | | | |
| For the Three Months Ended June 30, | | For the Six Months Ended June 30, |
| 2014 | | 2013 | | 2014 | | 2013 |
Customer: | | | | | | | |
AT&T | 25% | | 21% | | 24% | | 20% |
DIRECTV® | 12% | | 15% | | 13% | | 15% |
Enbridge, Inc. | 8% | | 9% | | 11% | | 10% |
The Company's relationship with AT&T is based upon master service agreements, other service agreements and construction/installation contracts for AT&T's wireless, wireline/fiber and home security and automation businesses. Revenue from AT&T is included in the Communications segment. The Company's relationship with DIRECTV® is based upon an agreement to provide installation and maintenance services for DIRECTV®. Revenue from DIRECTV® is included in the Communications segment. The Company's relationship with Enbridge, Inc. is based upon various construction contracts for natural gas pipelines. Revenue from Enbridge, Inc. is included in the Oil and Gas segment.
Note 16 - Commitments and Contingencies
In addition to the matters discussed below, MasTec is subject to a variety of legal cases, claims and other disputes that arise from time to time in the ordinary course of its business. MasTec cannot provide assurance that it will be successful in recovering all or any of the potential damages it has claimed or in defending claims against it. The outcome of such cases, claims and disputes, including the one set forth below, cannot be predicted with certainty and an unfavorable resolution of one or more of them could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and the trading price of its common stock.
SunLight Entities. In 2011, Power Partners MasTec, LLC., a MasTec, Inc. subsidiary (“Power Partners”), entered into engineering, procurement, and construction agreements with special purpose entities, SunLight General Somerset Solar, LLC, SunLight General Morris Solar, LLC and SunLight General Sussex Solar, LLC (collectively, the “SunLight Entities”), respectively, to perform design and construction services for three public solar projects in New Jersey located in Somerset, Morris and Sussex Counties (the “Projects”). The initial contract price of each of the Projects was, subject to adjustment, approximately as follows: Somerset ($29 million); Morris ($36 million); and Sussex ($26 million). The Projects were funded on a project finance basis, including the proceeds of municipal bonds issued by the Morris County and Somerset Improvement Authorities (collectively, the “Authorities”).
Power Partners and the SunLight Entities commenced three separate arbitration proceedings against each other to address various disputes that presently exist between the parties on the three Projects. The parties allege, among other things, breach of contract against each other. The arbitrations began in January 2014 and an award is anticipated in the third quarter of 2014. Power Partners believes it has presented meritorious support of its claims against Sunlight and, additionally, believes that it has meritorious defenses against Sunlight’s claims. Power Partners is vigorously pursuing its claims against Sunlight and vigorously defending against Sunlight’s claims.
Power Partners filed municipal liens and construction liens of approximately $50 million for the work performed but the liens were challenged by the SunLight Entities and the Authorities. In March 2014, the New Jersey appellate court found that Power Partners did not have municipal or construction liens on the proceeds of the municipal bonds, and the New Jersey Supreme Court denied Power Partner’s emergency motion to stay the adverse ruling. The Company petitioned the New Jersey Supreme Court to review the New Jersey appellate court’s adverse ruling, and, in July 2014, the New Jersey Supreme Court agreed to review the appellate court's ruling. The timing of the hearing is unknown.
Power Partners also filed a federal lawsuit in the United States District Court of New Jersey against the Authorities and the principals of the SunLight Entities in June 2013. The claims against the Authorities include violations of the New Jersey Public Works Bond Act and the New Jersey Construction Trust Fund Act, tortious interference and unjust enrichment and quantum meruit. The Authorities and the SunLight principals have filed motions to dismiss. Power Partners has filed a response to the motions to dismiss. The litigation is in the early stages.
Other Commitments and Contingencies
Leases. In the ordinary course of business, the Company enters into non-cancelable operating leases for certain of its facility, vehicle and equipment needs, including related party leases. See Note 10 - Lease Obligations.
Letters of Credit. In the ordinary course of business, the Company is required to post letters of credit for its insurance carriers, surety bond providers and in support of performance under certain contracts. Such letters of credit are generally issued by a bank or similar financial institution. The letter of credit commits the issuer to pay specified amounts to the holder of the letter of credit under certain conditions. If this were to occur, the Company would be required to reimburse the issuer of the letter of credit, which, depending upon the circumstances, could result in a charge to earnings. As of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, there were $132.8 million and $134.8 million, respectively, of letters of credit issued under the Company's Credit Facility. In addition, there were $10.5 million of letters of credit issued under other credit facilities as of June 30, 2014. See Note 9 - Debt. The Company was not aware of any material claims relating to outstanding letters of credit as of June 30, 2014 or December 31, 2013.
Performance and Payment Bonds. In the ordinary course of business, MasTec is required by certain customers to provide performance and payment bonds for some of the Company’s contractual commitments related to projects in process. These bonds provide a guarantee to the customer that the Company will perform under the terms of a contract and that the Company will pay subcontractors and vendors. If the Company fails to perform under a contract or to pay subcontractors and vendors, the customer may demand that the surety make payments or provide services under the bond. The Company must reimburse the surety for any expenses or outlays it incurs. As of June 30, 2014, the estimated cost to complete projects secured by the Company’s $0.5 billion in performance and payment bonds was $177.7 million. As of December 31, 2013, the estimated cost to complete projects secured by the Company’s $1.1 billion in performance and payment bonds was $297.1 million.
Investments in Affiliates and Other Entities. The Company holds an undivided interest in a contractual joint venture with a third party for the purpose of providing infrastructure services under certain customer contracts. Losses incurred by the joint venture are generally shared equally by the joint venture members, with members of the joint venture jointly and severally liable for all of the obligations of the joint venture. The joint venture agreement provides that each joint venturer indemnify the other parties for any liabilities incurred. Thus, it is possible that the Company could be required to pay or perform obligations in excess of its share if the other joint venturer fails or refuses to pay or perform its share of the obligations. As of June 30, 2014, the Company was not aware of any circumstances that would lead to future claims against it for material amounts. As of June 30, 2014, the Company has outstanding commitments associated with its investments in unconsolidated affiliates of approximately $3 million, which are expected to be paid in the third quarter of 2014.
Self-Insurance. MasTec maintains insurance policies for workers’ compensation, general liability and automobile liability, which are subject to per claim deductibles. The Company also maintains excess umbrella coverage. As of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, MasTec’s liability for unpaid claims and associated expenses, including incurred but not reported losses related to its workers compensation, general liability and automobile liability insurance policies, totaled $55.0 million and $50.8 million, respectively, of which $34.1 million and $31.3 million, respectively, was reflected within non-current other liabilities in the condensed unaudited consolidated balance sheets. MasTec also maintains an insurance policy with respect to employee group medical claims, which is subject to annual per employee maximum losses. MasTec’s liability for employee group medical claims as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 totaled $2.0 million and $2.1 million, respectively.
The Company is required to post letters of credit and provide cash collateral to certain of its insurance carriers and to provide surety bonds in certain states. These letters of credit amounted to $57.4 million as of both June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively. In addition, cash collateral deposited with insurance carriers, which is included in other long-term assets in the condensed unaudited consolidated balance sheets, amounted to $1.3 million and $1.4 million as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively. Outstanding surety bonds related to workers’ compensation self-insurance programs amounted to $10.9 million as of both June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013.
Employment Agreements. The Company has employment agreements with certain executives and other employees, which provide for compensation and certain other benefits and for severance payments under certain circumstances. Certain employment agreements also contain clauses that become effective upon a change of control of the Company. Upon the occurrence of any of the defined events in the various employment agreements, the Company would be obligated to pay certain amounts to the relevant employees, which vary with the level of the employees’ respective responsibility.
Collective Bargaining Agreements and Multi-Employer Plans. Certain of MasTec’s subsidiaries are party to various collective bargaining agreements with unions representing certain of their employees. The agreements require the subsidiaries party to the agreements to pay specified wages, provide certain benefits to their union employees and contribute certain amounts to multi-employer pension plans and employee
benefit trusts. The collective bargaining agreements expire at various times and have typically been renegotiated and renewed on terms similar to the ones contained in the expiring agreements.
The Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended by the Multi-Employer Pension Plan Amendments Act of 1980 (collectively, “ERISA”), which governs U.S. registered multi-employer pension plans, subjects employers to substantial liabilities in the event of the employer’s complete or partial withdrawal from, or upon termination of, such plans. Under current law regarding employers who are contributors to U.S. registered multi-employer defined benefit plans, a plan’s termination, an employer’s voluntary withdrawal from, or the mass withdrawal of all contributing employers from, an underfunded multi-employer defined benefit plan requires participating employers to make payments to the plan for their proportionate share of the multi-employer plan’s unfunded vested liabilities. Furthermore, the Pension Protection Act of 2006 added new funding rules to U.S. registered plans that are generally applicable to plan years beginning after 2007 for multi-employer plans that are classified as “endangered,” “seriously endangered,” or “critical” status. If plans in which the Company’s subsidiaries participate are in critical status, benefit reductions may apply and/or the Company could be required to make additional contributions. Based upon the information available to the Company from plan administrators as of June 30, 2014, several of the multi-employer pension plans in which it participates are underfunded and, as a result, the Company could be required to increase its contributions.
On November 15, 2011, the Company, along with other members of the Pipe Line Contractors Association (“PLCA”), voluntarily withdrew from the Central States Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund (“Central States”), a defined benefit multi-employer pension plan that is in critical status. In connection with this withdrawal, a $6.4 million withdrawal liability was established based on an estimate provided by the Central States administrator of such liability as of the date of withdrawal. The Company began paying installments towards this withdrawal liability in 2013, of which $4.8 million was outstanding as of June 30, 2014. The Company withdrew from Central States in order to mitigate its liability in connection with the plan; however, Central States has asserted that the PLCA members did not effectively withdraw in 2011 and are, therefore, responsible for a withdrawal liability that includes 2011 contribution amounts. By letter dated March 14, 2013, Central States demanded $11 million in withdrawal liability from the Company, which included 2011 contribution amounts. The Company is vigorously opposing this demand because it believes that it legally and effectively withdrew from Central States on November 15, 2011. If Central States were to prevail in its assertion that the Company withdrew after that date, then the initial amount of the Company’s withdrawal liability would increase to approximately $11 million. In addition, if Central States were to undergo a mass withdrawal, as defined by ERISA and the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, there could be additional liability. The Company currently does not have plans to withdraw from any other multi-employer pension plan.
Indemnities. The Company generally indemnifies its customers for the services it provides under its contracts, as well as other specified liabilities, which may subject the Company to indemnity claims, liabilities and related litigation. As of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the Company was not aware of any material asserted or unasserted claims in connection with these indemnity obligations.
Other Guarantees. In the ordinary course of its business, from time to time, MasTec guarantees the obligations of its subsidiaries, including obligations under certain contracts with customers, certain lease obligations and in some states, obligations in connection with obtaining contractors’ licenses. The Company has also issued performance and other guarantees in connection with its undivided interest in a contractual joint venture and certain of its equity investees. See Note 3 - Acquisitions. MasTec also generally warrants the work it performs for a one to two year period following substantial completion of a project. MasTec has not historically accrued any reserves for potential warranty claims as they have been immaterial.
Concentrations of Risk. The Company had approximately 410 customers for the six month period ended June 30, 2014. For both the three month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, the Company derived 70% of revenues from its top ten customers. For the six month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, the Company derived 69% and 68%, respectively, of revenues from its top ten customers. See Note 15 - Segments and Related Information for significant customer revenue concentration information.
Note 17 - Related Party Transactions
MasTec purchases, rents and leases equipment used in its business from a number of different vendors on a non-exclusive basis, including Cross Country Pipeline Supply, Inc. (“CCP”), in which MasTec invested $15 million for a 14.85% ownership interest in the fourth quarter of 2013. Juan Carlos Mas, who is the brother of Jorge Mas, Chairman of MasTec's Board of Directors, and Jose Mas, MasTec's Chief Executive Officer, serves as the chairman of CCP. In addition, an entity owned by the Mas family, including Jorge and Jose Mas, is a minority shareholder of CCP. MasTec paid CCP approximately $1.8 million and $2.7 million for equipment rentals, leases and servicing for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2014, respectively.
MasTec leases employees to a customer, in which Jorge Mas and Jose Mas own a minority interest. For both the three month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, MasTec charged approximately $0.2 million to this customer. For both the six month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, MasTec charged approximately $0.3 million to this customer. As of both June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, receivables of $0.1 million attributable to this arrangement were outstanding. The Company also provides satellite communication services to this customer. For the three month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, satellite communication revenues relating to this customer were approximately $0.2 million and $0.3 million, respectively. For the six month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, satellite communication revenues relating to this customer were approximately $0.5 million and $0.6 million, respectively. As of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, outstanding receivables from this arrangement totaled $0.5 million and $0.4 million, respectively.
Split Dollar and Deferred Bonus Agreements
On August 11, 2014, Jose Mas, the Company and Jorge Mas, Juan Carlos Mas and Patricia Mas, as trustees of the Jose Ramon Mas Irrevocable Trust, dated December 7, 2012 (the “trust”) entered into a split dollar life insurance agreement that replaces the prior split dollar agreement and eliminates the deferred bonus agreement with Jose Mas. Under the new split dollar agreement, MasTec is the sole owner of each of the policies subject to the agreement. The Company will make the premium payments under each of such policies. Upon the death of Jose Mas or the survivor of Jose Mas and his wife (collectively, the “insureds”) under the applicable policy, MasTec is entitled to receive a portion of the death benefit under such policy equal to the greater of (i) all premiums paid by the Company on such policy and (ii) the then cash value of such policy (excluding surrender charges or other similar charges or reductions) immediately before the triggering death. The balance of the death benefit is payable to the trust or other beneficiary designated by the trustees. In the event of the Company’s bankruptcy or dissolution, the trust shall have the assignable option to purchase any or all of the policies subject to the split dollar agreement from the Company. The purchase price for each policy shall be the greater of (x) all premiums paid by the Company on such policy or (y) the then cash value of such policy (excluding surrender charges or other similar charges or reductions). The total maximum face amount of the insurance for all policies subject to the split dollar agreement was capped at $75 million. The Company is designated as the named fiduciary under the split dollar agreement, and the policy may not be surrendered without the express written consent of the trust. The foregoing description of the split dollar agreement for Jose Mas is only a summary and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of such agreement, which is filed as Exhibit 10.2 to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
For the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2014, the Company paid less than $0.1 million in connection with the agreements for Jose Mas. For the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2013, no payments were made in connection with the agreements for Jose Mas. MasTec also has a split dollar agreement with Jorge Mas. The Company paid approximately $0.5 million in connection with this agreement for both the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2014, and paid approximately $0.1 million in connection with this agreement for both the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2013. As of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, life insurance assets associated with these agreements of $9.8 million and $10.2 million, respectively, are included within other long-term assets in the condensed unaudited consolidated balance sheets. For additional information regarding the split dollar and deferred bonus agreements with Jorge Mas, see Note 17 - Related Party Transactions in the notes to the Company's consolidated financial statements included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.
Note 18 – Supplemental Guarantor Condensed Unaudited Consolidating Financial Information
The 2011 Convertible Notes, 2009 Convertible Notes and 4.875% Senior Notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed on an unsecured, unsubordinated, joint and several basis by certain of the Company's existing and future 100%-owned direct and indirect domestic subsidiaries that are each guarantors of the Company's Credit Facility or other outstanding indebtedness (the “Guarantor Subsidiaries”). Certain subsidiaries included in the Company's Guarantor Subsidiaries, which are minor individually and in the aggregate, do not guarantee the 4.875% Senior Notes. The Company's subsidiaries organized outside of the United States and certain domestic subsidiaries (collectively, the “Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries”) do not guarantee any of these notes. A Guarantor Subsidiary's guarantee is subject to release in certain customary circumstances, including upon the sale of a majority of the capital stock or substantially all of the assets of such Subsidiary Guarantor, if such Subsidiary Guarantor's guarantee under the Company's Credit Facility and other indebtedness is released or discharged (other than due to payment under such guarantee), or when the requirements for legal defeasance are satisfied or the obligations are discharged in accordance with the related indentures.
The following supplemental financial information sets forth the condensed unaudited consolidating balance sheets and the condensed unaudited consolidating statements of operations and comprehensive income and cash flows for the parent company (MasTec, Inc.), the Guarantor Subsidiaries on a combined basis, the Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries on a combined basis and the eliminations necessary to arrive at the information for the Company as reported on a consolidated basis. Eliminations represent adjustments to eliminate investments in subsidiaries and intercompany balances and transactions between or among MasTec, Inc., the Guarantor Subsidiaries and the Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries. Investments in subsidiaries are accounted for using the equity method for this presentation.
CONDENSED UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (in millions)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2014: | MasTec, Inc. | | Guarantor Subsidiaries | | Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries | | Eliminations | | Consolidated MasTec, Inc. |
Revenue | $ | — |
| | $ | 958.3 |
| | $ | 146.4 |
| | $ | (0.1 | ) | | $ | 1,104.6 |
|
Costs of revenue, excluding depreciation and amortization | — |
| | 816.2 |
| | 134.8 |
| | (0.1 | ) | | 950.9 |
|
Depreciation and amortization | — |
| | 29.4 |
| | 7.4 |
| | — |
| | 36.8 |
|
General and administrative expenses | 0.7 |
| | 48.0 |
| | 5.5 |
| | — |
| | 54.2 |
|
Interest expense, net | — |
| | 12.3 |
| | 0.6 |
| | — |
| | 12.9 |
|
Other income, net | — |
| | (2.0 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (2.0 | ) |
(Loss) income from continuing operations before income taxes | $ | (0.7 | ) | | |