Edgar Filing: GLU MOBILE INC

Large accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer

¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Smaller reporting company

Form 10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2013

¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Transition Period from to

Commission File Number 001-33368

Glu Mobile Inc.

(Exact name of the Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

Delaware

91-2143667

(State or Other Jurisdiction of

Incorporation or Organization)

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

45 Fremont Street, Suite 2800

San Francisco, California 94105

(Address of Principal Executive Offices, including Zip Code)

(415) 800-6100

(Registrant’s Telephone number, including Area Code)

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

Shares of Glu Mobile Inc. common stock, $0.0001 par value per share, outstanding as of August 5, 2013: 70,534,972.

Explanatory Note

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains restated unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and related disclosures for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and restated unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2012, which have been derived from the restated audited consolidated financial statements as of that date. Details are discussed below and in Note 1A (Restatement of Financial Statements) to the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

Restatement Background

On July 31, 2013, the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors determined, in consultation with Glu’s management and PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm (“PwC”), that the following financial statements that we previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) should no longer be relied upon: (1) the audited consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2012; (2) the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included in our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q for the quarters ended March 31, June 30 and September 30 for 2012 (including the corresponding 2011 quarterly periods contained therein); and (3) the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included in our quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2013.

While preparing our financial outlook for the third quarter and full year of 2013, our management consulted with PwC, regarding the appropriate revenue recognition methodology for a new type of online-only game – our “Games-as-a-Service” titles – that we expect to introduce in the second half of 2013. We expect that these titles will primarily be sold through smartphone digital storefronts, such as the Apple App Store, Google Play Store, Amazon App Store and others (the “Digital Storefronts”). As a result of these discussions, it was determined that revenues generated from sales to end customers through the Digital Storefronts of our existing games should have been recorded on a gross basis because, upon further review of the agreements with the Digital Storefronts, it was determined that we should be considered the principal in the sales transaction. We have therefore corrected our revenue recognition policy to record on a gross basis the revenues attributable to sales to end customers through the Digital Storefronts.

Accordingly, we restated our previously issued consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2012, and are restating our previously issued unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, to correct for the error in our presentation of smartphone revenues and cost of revenues, as well as corresponding adjustments to our deferred revenues and deferred cost of revenues. This resulted in an increase in our previously reported revenues and a corresponding identical increase in cost of revenues. This decreased our gross margin (gross profit as a percent of revenue) in each reporting period, but had no effect on gross profit, operating income/(loss), net income/(loss), cash flows or any per share amounts for any period. In addition, these changes did not change the timing of recognition of any revenues or costs among reporting periods.

A detailed discussion of the impact of the proper accounting for smartphone revenue recognition is contained in Note 1A to the notes to our audited consolidated financial statements in Part II – Item 8 of our Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 filed with the SEC concurrently herewith.

Internal Control Consideration

Our management has determined that there was a control deficiency in our internal control over financial reporting that constitutes a material weakness, as discussed in Part I — Item 4 of this report. A material weakness is a deficiency, or combination of control deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the annual or interim condensed consolidated financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. For a discussion of management’s consideration of our disclosure controls and procedures and the material weakness identified, see Part I — Item 4 included in this report.

GLU MOBILE INC.

FORM 10-Q

Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2013

TABLE OF CONTENTS


	Page
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 (Restated)		4

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2013 and the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 (Restated)		5

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2013 and the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2012		6

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2013 and June 30, 2012 (Restated)		7

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements		8

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS		26

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK		39

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES		40

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS		42

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS		42

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS		57

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES		57

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES		57

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION		57

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS		57

SIGNATURES		58

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

GLU MOBILE INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Unaudited)

(in thousands, except per share data)


	June 30, 2013			December 31, 2012
				(Restated)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	19,131		$	22,325
Accounts receivable, net		10,433			11,881
Prepaid royalties		400			—
Prepaid expenses and other		4,580			5,167

Total current assets		34,544			39,373
Property and equipment, net		4,114			5,026
Restricted cash		1,730			—
Other long-term assets		445			227
Intangible assets, net		7,772			10,889
Goodwill		19,468			19,440

Total assets	$	68,073		$	74,955

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	8,636		$	7,269
Accrued liabilities		2,138			2,124
Accrued compensation		2,778			5,989
Accrued royalties		1,759			2,781
Accrued restructuring		118			4
Deferred revenues		10,121			11,711

Total current liabilities		25,550			29,878
Other long-term liabilities		2,534			6,190

Total liabilities		28,084			36,068

Commitments and contingencies (Note 7)
Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, $0.0001 par value; 5,000 shares authorized at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012; no shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012		—			—
Common stock, $0.0001 par value: 250,000 shares authorized at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012; 70,298 and 66,022 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively		7			6
Additional paid-in capital		280,640			271,016
Accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss)		62			167
Accumulated deficit		(240,720	)		(232,302	)

Total stockholders’ equity		39,989			38,887

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	68,073		$	74,955

The accompanying Notes are an integral part of these Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

GLU MOBILE INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited)

(in thousands, except per share data)


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2013			2012			2013			2012
				(Restated)						(Restated)
Revenues	$	24,445		$	29,264		$	49,050		$	55,773
Cost of revenues:
Platform commissions, royalties and other		7,670			7,780			15,132			15,302
Amortization of intangible assets		1,078			932			2,152			1,685

Total cost of revenues		8,748			8,712			17,284			16,987

Gross profit		15,697			20,552			31,766			38,786

Operating expenses:
Research and development		11,224			15,697			22,854			30,730
Sales and marketing		5,143			4,701			10,151			9,076
General and administrative		3,852			4,556			7,771			8,922
Amortization of intangible assets		495			495			990			990
Restructuring charge		937			320			1,448			320

Total operating expenses		21,651			25,769			43,214			50,038

Loss from operations		(5,954	)		(5,217	)		(11,448	)		(11,252	)
Interest and other income/(expense), net:
Interest income		4			5			7			12
Other income/(expense), net		159			205			288			(168	)

Interest and other income/(expense), net		163			210			295			(156	)

Loss before income taxes		(5,791	)		(5,007	)		(11,153	)		(11,408	)
Income tax benefit		2,870			2,019			2,735			1,579

Net loss	$	(2,921	)	$	(2,988	)	$	(8,418	)	$	(9,829	)

Net loss per common share — basic and diluted	$	(0.04	)	$	(0.05	)	$	(0.12	)	$	(0.15	)
Weighted average common shares outstanding — basic and diluted		69,812			63,802			68,105			63,516

The accompanying Notes are an integral part of these Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

GLU MOBILE INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

(Unaudited)

(in thousands)


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2013			2012			2013			2012
Net Loss	$	(2,921	)	$	(2,988	)	$	(8,418	)	$	(9,829	)

Other comprehensive loss:
Foreign currency translation adjustments		389			(457	)		133			(296	)
Reclassification to net loss (1)		(238	)		—			(238	)		—

Other comprehensive loss		151			(457	)		(105	)		(296	)

Comprehensive loss	$	(2,770	)	$	(3,445	)	$	(8,523	)	$	(10,125	)

(1)

The reclassification to net loss relates to the write-off of cumulative translation adjustment upon substantial liquidation of the Company’s Brazilian entity and is recognized in Restructuring charge in the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated statement of operations for the three months ended June 30, 2013.

The accompanying Notes are an integral part of these Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

GLU MOBILE INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

(in thousands)


	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2013			2012
				(Restated)
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss	$	(8,418	)	$	(9,829	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation		1,392			1,118
Amortization of intangible assets		3,142			2,675
Stock-based compensation		1,981			6,874
Change in fair value of Blammo earnout		(18	)		1,031
Non-cash foreign currency remeasurement (gain)/loss		(266	)		168
Non-cash restructuring charges		244			—
Changes in allowance for doubtful accounts		24			161
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		1,336			(1,265	)
Prepaid royalties		(400	)		307
Prepaid expenses and other assets		560			(701	)
Accounts payable		1,740			(693	)
Accrued liabilities		32			(36	)
Accrued compensation		(1,565	)		(11	)
Accrued royalties		(988	)		(588	)
Deferred revenues		(1,598	)		867
Accrued restructuring charge		(45	)		(346	)
Other long-term liabilities		(2,779	)		(2,304	)

Net cash used in operating activities		(5,626	)		(2,572	)

Cash flows used in investing activities:
Purchase of property and equipment		(785	)		(1,149	)
Purchase of intangible assets		—			(5,000	)
Restricted cash		(1,730	)		—
Other investing activities		(200	)		—

Net cash used in investing activities		(2,715	)		(6,149	)

Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from exercise of warrants and issuance of common stock		4,237			150
Proceeds from exercise of stock options and ESPP		982			1,213

Net cash provided by financing activities		5,219			1,363

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash		(72	)		(322	)

Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents		(3,194	)		(7,680	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		22,325			32,212

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	19,131		$	24,532

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information
Common stock issued for property and equipment	$	189		$	—

The accompanying Notes are an integral part of these Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

GLU MOBILE INC.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(in thousands, except per share data)

Note 1—The Company, Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Glu Mobile Inc. (the “Company” or “Glu”) was incorporated in Nevada in May 2001 and reincorporated in the state of Delaware in March 2007. The Company develops and publishes a portfolio of action/adventure and casual games designed to appeal to a broad cross section of the users of smartphones and tablet devices who purchase its games through direct-to-consumer digital storefronts, such as the Apple App Store, Google Play store, Amazon Appstore, and others (“Digital Storefronts”). The Company creates games based on its own original intellectual property as well as third-party licensed brands.

The Company has incurred recurring losses from operations since inception and had an accumulated deficit of $240,720 as of June 30, 2013. For the three months ended June 30, 2013, the Company incurred a net loss of $2,921. For the six months ended June 30, 2013, the Company incurred a net loss of $8,418. The Company may incur additional operating losses and negative cash flows in the future. Failure to generate sufficient revenues, reduce spending or raise additional capital could adversely affect the Company’s ability to achieve profitability and its intended business objectives.

Principles of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) regarding interim financial reporting. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) in the United States for complete financial statements and should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 filed with the SEC on March 15, 2013, as amended by Amendment No. 1 filed with the SEC on August 9, 2013. In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, which the Company believes are necessary for a fair statement of the Company’s financial position as of June 30, 2013. and its unaudited condensed consolidated results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 (restated), respectively. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the entire year. The unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet presented as of December 31, 2012 (restated) has been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements as of that date, and the unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet presented as of June 30, 2013 has been derived from the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements as of that date.

The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.

Concentration of Credit Risk

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to a concentration of credit risk consist of cash, cash equivalents that were held in operating bank accounts and accounts receivable.

The Company derives its accounts receivable from revenues earned from customers or through Digital Storefronts located in the U.S. and other locations outside of the U.S. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers’ and the Digital Storefronts’ financial condition and currently does not require any collateral from its customers or the Digital Storefronts. The Company bases its allowance for doubtful accounts on management’s best estimate of the amount of probable credit losses in the Company’s existing accounts receivable. The Company reviews past due balances over a specified amount individually for collectability on a monthly basis and all other balances quarterly. The Company writes off accounts receivable balances against the allowance when it determines that the amount will not be recovered.

The following table summarizes the revenues from customers or aggregate purchases through Digital Storefronts that accounted for more than 10% of the Company’s revenues for the periods indicated:


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2013			2012			2013			2012
				(Restated)						(Restated)
Apple		53.3	%		41.4	%		50.4	%		42.5	%
Google		17.9			19.8			18.7			18.7

At June 30, 2013, Apple accounted for 44.4% and Medium Entertainment, which does business as PlayHaven, accounted for 11.8% of total accounts receivable. At December 31, 2012, Apple accounted for 44.3%, PlayHaven accounted for 13.2% and Google accounted for 10.8% of total accounts receivable. No other customer or Digital Storefront represented more than 10% of the Company’s total accounts receivable as of these dates.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-2, Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. This guidance requires the presentation of the effects on the line items of net income of significant amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income, but only if the item reclassified is required under U.S. GAAP to be reclassified to net income in its entirety in the same reporting period. The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2012. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, the Company adopted this guidance and reclassified the accumulated translation adjustment related to its Brazilian subsidiary out of accumulated other comprehensive income to restructuring charge in the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations upon the substantially complete liquidation of the entity.

In July 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-11, Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists. Under this guidance, an unrecognized tax benefit, or a portion of an unrecognized tax benefit, should be presented in the financial statements as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward. This guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013. This accounting guidance will not have a material impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements once adopted.

Note 1A—Restatement of Financial Statements

Restatement Background

While preparing the Company’s financial outlook for the third quarter and full year of 2013, the Company’s management consulted with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, regarding the appropriate revenue recognition methodology for a new type of online-only game – the Company’s “Games-as-a-Service” titles – that the Company expects to introduce in the second half of 2013. The Company expects that these titles will primarily be sold through Digital Storefronts. As a result of these discussions, it was determined that revenues generated from sales to end customers through the Digital Storefronts of the Company’s existing games should have been recorded on a gross basis because, upon further review of the agreements with the Digital Storefronts, it was determined that the Company should be considered the principal in the sales transaction. The Company has therefore corrected its revenue recognition policy to record on a gross basis the revenues attributable to sales to end customers through the Digital Storefronts.

Accordingly, the Company has restated its previously issued consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2012 to correct for the error in its presentation of smartphone revenues and cost of revenues, as well as corresponding adjustments to the Company’s deferred revenues and deferred cost of revenues. This resulted in an increase in the Company’s previously reported revenues and a corresponding identical increase in cost of revenues. This decreased the Company’s gross margin (gross profit as a percent of revenue) in each reporting period, but had no effect on gross profit, operating income/(loss), net income/(loss), cash flows or any per share amounts for any period. In addition, these changes did not change the timing of recognition of any revenues or costs among reporting periods.

The following table summarizes the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2012 as derived from that reported on the Company’s Form 10-K filed on March 15, 2013, compared to the restated accounts as reported on the Company’s Form 10-K/A filed on August 9, 2013:


	December 31, 2012
	As Reported		Adjustments		As Restated
Prepaid expenses and other	$	2,487	$	2,680	$	5,167
Total assets		72,275		2,680		74,955
Deferred revenues		9,031		2,680		11,711
Total liabilities		33,388		2,680		36,068
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity		72,275		2,680		74,955

The following table summarizes the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, as reported on the Company’s Form 10-Q filed on August 9, 2012, compared to the restated accounts as reported on the Company’s Form 10-K/A filed on August 9, 2013:


	Three Months Ended June 30, 2012 (unaudited)						Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 (unaudited)
	As Reported		Adjustments		As Restated		As Reported		Adjustments		As Restated
Revenues	$	23,621	$	5,643	$	29,264	$	45,165	$	10,608	$	55,773
Cost of revenues:
Platform commissions, royalties and other		2,137		5,643		7,780		4,694		10,608		15,302
Amortization of intangible assets		932		—		932		1,685		—		1,685

Total cost of revenues		3,069		5,643		8,712		6,379		10,608		16,987

Gross profit	$	20,552	$	—	$	20,552	$	38,786	$	—	$	38,786

The following table summarizes the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2012, as reported on the Company’s Form 10-Q filed on August 9, 2012, compared to the restated accounts as reported on the Company’s Form 10-K/A filed on August 9, 2013:


	Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 (unaudited)
	As Reported			Adjustments			As Restated
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effect of acquisitions:
Prepaid expenses and other assets	$	(433	)	$	(268	)	$	(701	)
Deferred revenues		599			268			867
Net cash used in operating activities		(2,572	)		—			(2,572	)

Note 2—Net Loss Per Share

The Company computes basic net loss per share by dividing its net loss for the period by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period less the weighted average unvested common shares subject to restrictions imposed by the Company.


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2013			2012			2013			2012
Net loss	$	(2,921	)	$	(2,988	)	$	(8,418	)	$	(9,829	)

Basic and diluted shares:
Weighted average common shares outstanding		69,902			64,523			68,196			64,240
Weighted average unvested common shares subject to restrictions		(90	)		(721	)		(91	)		(724	)

Weighted average shares used to compute basic and diluted net loss per share		69,812			63,802			68,105			63,516

Net loss per share — basic and diluted	$	(0.04	)	$	(0.05	)	$	(0.12	)	$	(0.15	)

The following weighted average options to purchase common stock, warrants to purchase common stock, unvested shares of common stock subject to restrictions, shares contingently issuable in connection with the Blammo earnout (as described below in Note 3 – Fair Value Measurements), and restricted stock units (“RSUs”) have been excluded from the computation of diluted net loss per share of common stock for the periods presented because including them would have had an anti-dilutive effect:


	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2013		2012		2013		2012
Warrants to purchase common stock		1,363		4,067		2,560		4,216
Unvested common shares subject to restrictions		90		721		91		724
Options to purchase common stock		10,559		10,315		10,599		9,994
Contingently issuable shares of common stock		—		—		377		—
RSUs		538		—		269		—

		12,550		15,103		13,896		14,934

Note 3—Fair Value Measurements

Fair Value Measurements

The Company accounts for fair value in accordance with ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (“ASC 820”). Fair value is defined under ASC 820 as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Valuation techniques used to measure fair value under ASC 820 must maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. The Company uses a three-tier hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows:

Level 1 - Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2 - Inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.

Level 3 - Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

The Company’s cash and cash equivalents, which were held in operating bank accounts, are classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy because they are valued using quoted market prices, broker or dealer quotations or alternative pricing sources with reasonable levels of price transparency. As of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the Company had $19,131 and $22,325, respectively, in cash and cash equivalents. In addition, the Company’s restricted cash is classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. The carrying value of accounts receivable and payables approximates fair value due to the short time to expected receipt of payment or cash.

Liabilities for Contingent Consideration

On August 1, 2011, the Company completed the acquisition of Blammo Games Inc. (“Blammo”), by entering into a Share Purchase Agreement (the “Share Purchase Agreement”) by and among the Company, Blammo and each of the owners of the outstanding share capital of Blammo (the “Sellers”). Blammo is a developer of free-to-play games for the iOS platform located in Toronto, Canada. Pursuant to the terms of the Share Purchase Agreement, the Company agreed to issue to the Sellers, in the aggregate, (i) 1,000 shares of the Company’s common stock plus (2) up to an additional 3,313 shares of the Company’s common stock (the “Additional Shares”) if Blammo achieves certain net revenue targets during the years ending March 31, 2013, March 31, 2014 and March 31, 2015.

On May 16, 2013, the Company issued 742 shares of common stock to the former Blammo shareholders based on the Net Revenue (as such term is defined in the Share Purchase Agreement) that Blammo achieved for its fiscal year ended March 31, 2013. Since the contingency related to the number of shares earned in connection with the target for the year ended March 31, 2013 was resolved and the number of shares became fixed as of March 31, 2013, the fair value of these shares as then last remeasured in the amount of $2,263 has been presented in additional paid-in capital in the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet since March 31, 2013. The fair value of this earnout expense (cumulative changes recorded through March 31, 2013) has been presented in additional paid-in capital on the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2013. The remaining Additional Shares will be issued to the Sellers if, and to the extent that, Blammo achieves certain Net Revenue performance targets as follows: (i) for fiscal 2014 (April 1, 2013 through March 31, 2014), (a) 417 Additional Shares will be issued to the Sellers if, and only in the event that, Blammo meets its Baseline Net Revenue goal for such fiscal year, and (b) up to an additional 833 Additional Shares will be issued to the Sellers to the extent that Blammo exceeds its Baseline Net Revenue goal and meets its Upside Net Revenue goal for such fiscal year, and (ii) for fiscal 2015 (April 1, 2014 through March 31, 2015), (a) no Additional Shares will be issued to the Sellers if Blammo does not meet its Baseline Net Revenue goal for such fiscal year and (b) up to 1,154 Additional Shares will be issued to the Sellers to the extent that Blammo exceeds its Baseline Net Revenue goal and meets its Upside Net Revenue goal for such fiscal year. To the extent that Blammo meets its Baseline Net Revenue goal for a fiscal year but does not meet its Upside Net Revenue goal for such fiscal year, Additional Shares will be issued to the Sellers on a straight-line basis based on the amount by which Blammo exceeded the Baseline Net Revenue goal. Blammo’s Baseline and Upside Net Revenue goals for fiscal 2014 and 2015 are as follows:


Fiscal Year	Baseline Net Revenue		Upside Net Revenue
Fiscal 2014	$	5,500	$	10,000
Fiscal 2015	$	8,500	$	15,000

Three of the five Sellers are also employees of Blammo. If any of these employee Sellers voluntarily terminates his employment with Blammo (other than because of a disability that prevents him from performing his job) or if the Company or Blammo terminates such Seller’s employment for Cause (as defined in the Share Purchase Agreement), then such Seller will be eligible to receive Additional Shares if and when such Additional Shares are earned as described above only with respect to the fiscal year in which such termination of employment occurs (and all previous fiscal years to the extent applicable), but not with respect to any Additional Shares issued in any subsequent fiscal year. In such an event, the Additional Shares that such Seller would have otherwise received will be forfeited and will not be issued by the Company or distributed to the other Sellers, but the other Sellers’ rights to receive Additional Shares will not otherwise be affected. The fair value of the contingent consideration issued to the three Sellers who are also employees of Blammo is not considered part of the purchase price, since vesting is contingent upon these employees’ continued service during the earn-out periods. The Company records the contingent consideration issued to these employees as a compensation expense over the earn-out period of one to three years. See Note 9 for further details. In accordance with ASC 805, Business Combinations, non-employee contingent consideration issued to the two Sellers who are not employees of Blammo was recorded as part of the purchase accounting and is fair valued at each subsequent reporting period. The total fair value of the non-employee contingent consideration liability has been estimated at $42 and $412 as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. During the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, the Company recorded fair value expense adjustments of $48 and $386, respectively, which represent the changes in fair value of the contingent consideration for both respective periods. During the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, the Company recorded fair value expense adjustments of $18 and $1,031, respectively, which represent the changes in fair value of the non-employee contingent consideration for both respective periods. In accordance with ASC 805, changes in the fair value of non-employee contingent consideration are recognized in general and administrative expense in the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations.

Level 3 liabilities consist of acquisition-related liabilities for contingent consideration (i.e., earnouts) related to the acquisition of Blammo. As of December 31, 2012, the Company recorded a contingent consideration liability of $2,512, of which $1,855 was recorded as a current liability in accrued compensation as settlement was less than one year. As of June 30, 2013, the Company recorded a contingent consideration liability of $258, of which $210 was recorded as a current liability in accrued compensation as settlement is less than one year. The Company uses a risk-neutral framework to estimate the probability of achieving the revenue targets set forth above for each year. The fair value of the contingent consideration was determined using a digital option, which captures the present value of the expected payment multiplied by the probability of reaching the revenue targets for each year. Key assumptions for the three months ended June 30, 2013 included a discount rate of 35.0%, volatility of 37.0%, risk-free rates of between 0.12% and 0.31% and probability-adjusted revenue levels. Key assumptions for the three months ended June 30, 2012 included a discount rate of 25.0%, volatility of 41.0%, risk free rates of between 0.18% and 0.39% and probability-adjusted revenue levels. Probability-adjusted revenue is a significant input that is not observable in the market, which ASC 820 refers to as a Level 3 input.

Note 4—Balance Sheet Components

Accounts Receivable


	June 30,			December 31,
	2013			2012
Accounts receivable	$	10,889		$	12,313
Less: Allowance for doubtful accounts		(456	)		(432	)

	$	10,433		$	11,881

Accounts receivable includes amounts billed and unbilled as of the respective balance sheet dates. The Company had no significant bad debts during the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012.

Prepaid expenses and other

Prepaid expenses and other includes platform commissions of $2,519 and $2,680 (restated) that have been deferred as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.

Property and Equipment


	June 30,			December 31,
	2013			2012
Computer equipment	$	5,974		$	6,255
Furniture and fixtures		558			566
Software		6,207			6,304
Leasehold improvements		1,376			2,227

		14,115			15,352
Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization		(10,001	)		(10,326	)

	$	4,114		$	5,026

Depreciation expense for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and June 30, 2012 was $661 and $556, respectively. Depreciation expense for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and June 30, 2012 was $1,392 and $1,118, respectively.

Other Long-Term Liabilities


	June 30,		December 31,
	2013		2012
Uncertain tax position obligations		841		3,859
Contingent earnout liability		48		657
Deferred income tax liability		664		647
Deferred rent and other		981		1,027

	$	2,534	$	6,190

Note 5—Business Combinations

GameSpy Industries, Inc.

On August 2, 2012, the Company completed the acquisition of GameSpy Industries, Inc. (“GameSpy”) pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “GameSpy Merger Agreement”) by and among the Company, Galileo Acquisition Corp., a California corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of the Company (“Galileo”), IGN Entertainment, Inc. (“IGN”) and GameSpy. GameSpy, which is based in California, provides technology and services for multiplayer and server-based gaming. The Company acquired GameSpy as part of its efforts to enhance the monetization and retention of the Company’s players by incorporating GameSpy’s technology that powers community functionality, synchronous multiplayer and asynchronous player versus player mechanics into the Company’s games.

Pursuant to the terms of the GameSpy Merger Agreement, the Company issued to IGN, as GameSpy’s sole shareholder, in exchange for all of the issued and outstanding shares of GameSpy capital stock, a total of 600 shares of the Company’s common stock, for consideration of approximately $2,796, based on the $4.66 closing price of the Company’s common stock on The NASDAQ Global Market on August 2, 2012; 90 shares of which will be held in escrow until November 2, 2013 as security to satisfy indemnification claims under the GameSpy Merger Agreement. In addition, the Company, GameSpy and IGN entered into a Transition Services Agreement, pursuant to which IGN will provide to the Company and GameSpy certain backend data center transition services related to GameSpy’s private cloud storage infrastructure for up to two years following the acquisition.

The allocation of the GameSpy purchase price was based upon valuations for certain assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The valuation was based upon calculations and valuations, and the Company’s estimates and assumptions are subject to change as the Company obtains additional information for its estimates during the respective measurement periods (up to one year from the acquisition date). The following table summarizes the fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition:


Assets acquired:
Cash	$	913
Accounts receivable, net		1,695
Property and equipment		485
Intangible assets:
Customer contract and related relationships		250
Titles, content and technology		1,300
Goodwill		1,096

Total assets acquired		5,739

Liabilities assumed:
Other accrued liabilities		(689	)
Deferred revenue		(1,684	)
Deferred tax liability		(570	)

Total liabilities acquired		(2,943	)

Net acquired assets	$	2,796

Acquisition-related intangibles included in the above table are finite-lived and are being amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated lives of two to three years, which approximates the pattern in which the economic benefits of the intangible assets are expected to be realized.

In connection with the acquisition of GameSpy, the Company recorded net deferred tax liabilities of $570, with a corresponding adjustment to goodwill. These deferred taxes were primarily related to identifiable intangible assets and net operating losses.

The Company allocated the residual value of $1,096 to goodwill. Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net tangible and intangible assets acquired. In accordance with ASC 350, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (“ASC 350”), goodwill will not be amortized but will be tested for impairment at least annually. Goodwill created as a result of the GameSpy acquisition is not deductible for tax purposes.

Valuation Methodology

The Company engaged a third-party valuation firm to aid management in its analyses of the fair value of GameSpy. All estimates, key assumptions and forecasts were either provided by or reviewed by the Company. While the Company chose to utilize a third-party valuation firm, the fair value analyses and related valuations represent the conclusions of management and not the conclusions or statements of any third party.

In the valuation of GameSpy customer contracts, these contracts were valued over their remaining terms, which included consideration of moderate anticipated renewals and is consistent with market participant considerations. These contracts were fair valued using the Multi-Period Excess Earnings (“MPEE”) method of the income approach and key assumptions used included: projected revenue and operating expenses for GameSpy’s remaining contracts, the remaining contractual period of the contracts and a discount rate of 14%. The Company valued developed technology using the replacement cost method of the cost approach and based on the perceived value that a market participant would ascribe to the GameSpy technology, which allows for hosting multi-player games on mobile devices and other platforms. Key assumptions used included fully burdened headcount spending information. As of the valuation date, the fair value of GameSpy’s deferred revenue was $1,684, which reflects the costs including hosting fees, salaries and benefits, equipment and facilities to support the contractual obligations associated with these revenues, plus a market participant margin. The deferred revenue will be recognized on a straight-line basis over 24 months.

Pro Forma Financial Information (unaudited)

Pro forma results of operations of the GameSpy acquisition have not been presented because they are not material to the Company’s condensed consolidated results of operations.

Note 6—Goodwill and Intangible Assets

Intangible Assets

The Company’s intangible assets were acquired in connection with the acquisitions of Macrospace in 2004, iFone in 2006, MIG in 2007, Superscape in 2008, Griptonite and Blammo in 2011 and GameSpy in the third quarter of 2012, as well as in connection with the purchase of the Deer Hunter trademark and brand assets from Atari, Inc. (“Atari”) in the second quarter of 2012. The carrying amounts and accumulated amortization expense of the acquired intangible assets, including the impact of foreign currency exchange translation, at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 were as follows:


		June 30, 2013							December 31, 2012
		Gross		Accumulated			Net		Gross		Accumulated			Net
		Carrying		Amortization			Carrying		Carrying		Amortization			Carrying
		Value		Expense			Value		Value		Expense			Value
		(Including		(Including			(Including		(Including		(Including			(Including
	Estimated	Impact of		Impact of			Impact of		Impact of		Impact of			Impact of
	Useful	Foreign		Foreign			Foreign		Foreign		Foreign			Foreign
	Life	Exchange)		Exchange)			Exchange)		Exchange)		Exchange)			Exchange)
Intangible assets amortized to cost of revenues:
Titles, content and technology	2 yrs	$	12,642	$	(11,670	)	$	972	$	12,781	$	(11,518	)	$	1,263
Catalogs	1 yr		1,183		(1,183	)		—		1,257		(1,257	)		—
ProvisionX Technology	6 yrs		195		(195	)		—		207		(207	)		—
Carrier contract and related relationships	5 yrs		19,710		(18,001	)		1,709		19,585		(16,421	)		3,164
Licensed content	5 yrs		2,994		(2,994	)		—		2,952		(2,952	)		—
Service provider license	9 yrs		476		(293	)		183		467		(262	)		205
Trademarks	7 yrs		5,225		(1,117	)		4,108		5,225		(760	)		4,465

			42,425		(35,453	)		6,972		42,474		(33,377	)		9,097

Other intangible assets amortized to operating expenses:
Emux Technology	6 yrs		1,262		(1,262	)		—		1,341		(1,341	)		—
Noncompete agreement	4 yrs		5,152		(4,352	)		800		5,187		(3,395	)		1,792

			6,414		(5,614	)		800		6,528		(4,736	)		1,792

Total intangibles assets subject to amortization		$	48,839	$	(41,067	)	$	7,772	$	49,002	$	(38,113	)	$	10,889

Acquisition-related intangibles included in the above table are finite-lived and are being amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated lives, which approximates the pattern in which the economic benefits of the intangible assets are realized. The Company has included amortization of acquired intangible assets directly attributable to revenue-generating activities in cost of revenues. The Company has included amortization of acquired intangible assets not directly attributable to revenue-generating activities in operating expenses. The Company acquired approximately $1,550 of intangible assets as part of the GameSpy acquisition in the third quarter of 2012.

On April 1, 2012, the Company acquired from Atari its Deer Hunter trademark and associated domain names and also took a license to the other intellectual property associated with the Deer Hunter brand for total consideration of $5,000 in cash. The license agreement pursuant to which the Company licensed the other intellectual property associated with the Deer Hunter brand has a term equal to the longer of (i) 99 years and (ii) the expiration of the copyrights in and copyrightable elements of the Deer Hunter intellectual property assets. The acquisition price has been recorded as acquired intangible assets and classified within “Trademarks” in the above table and will be amortized over the estimated useful life of seven years.

During the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, the Company recorded amortization expense in the amounts of $1,078 and $932 respectively, in cost of revenues. During the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, the Company recorded amortization expense in the amounts of $2,152 and $1,685 respectively, in cost of revenues. During the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, the Company recorded amortization expense in the amounts of $495 and $495, respectively, in operating expenses. During the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, the Company recorded amortization expense in the amounts of $990 and $990, respectively, in operating expenses.

As of June 30, 2013, the total expected future amortization related to intangible assets was as follows:


	Amortization		Amortization
	Included in		Included in		Total
	Cost of		Operating		Amortization
Period Ending December 31,	Revenues		Expenses		Expense
2013 (remaining six months)	$	2,083	$	324	$	2,407
2014		1,496		382		1,878
2015		1,020		94		1,114
2016		765		—		765
2017		714		—		714
2018 and thereafter		894		—		894

	$	6,972	$	800	$	7,772

Goodwill

The Company has goodwill attributable to its MIG, GameSpy, Blammo and Griptonite acquisitions as of June 30, 2013. The Company attributed all of the goodwill resulting from the MIG acquisition to its Asia and Pacific (“APAC”) reporting unit. The Company acquired $1,096 of goodwill during 2012 as part of the GameSpy acquisition. All of the goodwill attributable to the GameSpy, Blammo and Griptonite acquisitions has been fully assigned to the Company’s Americas reporting unit. The Company had fully impaired in prior years all goodwill allocated to its EMEA reporting unit. The goodwill allocated to the Americas reporting unit is denominated in U.S. Dollars (“USD”) and the goodwill allocated to the APAC reporting unit is denominated in Chinese Renminbi (“RMB”). As a result, the goodwill attributed to the APAC reporting unit is subject to foreign currency fluctuations.

In the valuation of the goodwill balance for Griptonite, Blammo, MIG and GameSpy, the Company gave consideration to the future economic benefits of other assets that were not individually identified or separately recognized. The acquired studio workforce for each of these acquisitions was estimated to have value, and since the acquired workforce is not individually identified or separately recognized, it was subsumed within the goodwill recognized as part of each business combination. The Company further planned to leverage its preexisting contractual relationships with Digital Storefronts to distribute new titles developed by the Griptonite and Blammo studios and the expected synergies are reflected in the value of the goodwill recognized. The Company also plans to use the GameSpy technology to enable features in its games that are designed to enhance the monetization and retention of the Company’s players, and these synergies are reflected in the value of goodwill recognized.

Goodwill by reporting unit for the periods indicated was as follows:


	June 30, 2013												December 31, 2012
	Americas			EMEA			APAC			Total			Americas			EMEA			APAC			Total
Balance as of January 1
Goodwill	$	42,946		$	25,354		$	24,251		$	92,551		$	41,915		$	25,354		$	24,220		$	91,489
Accumulated Impairment Losses		(24,871	)		(25,354	)		(22,886	)		(73,111	)		(24,871	)		(25,354	)		(19,273	)		(69,498	)

		18,075			—			1,365			19,440			17,044			—			4,947			21,991
Goodwill Acquired during the year		—			—			—			—			1,031			—			—			1,031
Effects of Foreign Currency Exchange		—			—			28			28			—			—			31			31
Impairment Losses		—			—			—			—			—			—			(3,613	)		(3,613	)

Balance as of period ended:		18,075			—			1,393			19,468			18,075			—			1,365			19,440
Goodwill		42,946			25,354			24,279			92,579			42,946			25,354			24,251			92,551
Accumulated Impairment Losses		(24,871	)		(25,354	)		(22,886	)		(73,111	)		(24,871	)		(25,354	)		(22,886	)		(73,111	)

Balance as of period ended:	$	18,075		$	—		$	1,393		$	19,468		$	18,075		$	—		$	1,365		$	19,440

In accordance with ASC 350, the Company’s goodwill is not amortized but is tested for impairment on an annual basis or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of these assets may not be recoverable. Under ASC 350, the Company performs the annual impairment review of its goodwill balance as of September 30 or more frequently if triggering events occur.

The Company evaluates qualitative factors and overall financial performance to determine whether it is necessary to perform the first step of the multiple-step goodwill test. This step is referred to as “Step 0.” Step 0 involves, among other qualitative factors, weighing the relative impact of factors that are specific to the reporting unit as well as industry and macroeconomic factors. After assessing those various factors, if it is determined that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, then the entity will need to proceed to the first step of the goodwill impairment test. ASC 350 requires a multiple-step approach to testing goodwill for impairment for each reporting unit annually, or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the fair value of a reporting unit is below its carrying amount. The first step measures for impairment by applying the fair value-based tests at the reporting unit level. The second step (if necessary) measures the amount of impairment by applying the fair value-based tests to individual assets and liabilities within each reporting unit. The fair value of the reporting units is estimated using a combination of the market approach, which utilizes comparable companies’ data, and/or the income approach, which uses discounted cash flows.

Note 7—Commitments and Contingencies

Leases

The Company leases office space under non-cancelable operating facility leases with various expiration dates through September 2020. Rent expense for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 was $791 and $647, respectively. Rent expense for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 was $1,476 and $1,247, respectively. The terms of the facility leases provide for rental payments on a graduated scale. The Company recognizes rent expense on a straight-line basis over the lease period, and has accrued for rent expense incurred but not paid. The deferred rent balance was $739 and $632 at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, and was included within other long-term liabilities.

In April 2013, the Company entered into a sublease for 29 square feet of office space for its new San Francisco headquarters. The term of the sublease began on May 23, 2013 and will expire on March 31, 2018. The Company provided the sub-landlord a letter of credit in the amount of $1,230 to secure its obligations under the lease. Cash deposited as a security to the letter of credit has been classified as restricted cash on the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2013.

In connection with the acquisition of Griptonite in 2011, the Company assumed lease obligations related to the premises located in Kirkland, Washington (the “Griptonite Lease”). The Griptonite Lease covers approximately 54 rentable square feet and initially had a term that ends on September 30, 2015; however, in August 2012, the Company and the landlord of the Griptonite Lease entered into an amendment to the Griptonite Lease that changed the termination date of the Griptonite Lease to September 30, 2013. As part of the purchase accounting adjustments for Griptonite, the Company had eliminated the existing deferred rent balance and recorded a fair value adjustment to reflect the current market value of the unfavorable operating lease commitment. The fair value of the unfavorable operating lease obligation was $106 as of June 30, 2013 and was $477 as of December 31, 2012.

In June 2013, the Company entered into a lease for 18 square feet of office space at its new location in Bellevue, Washington (the “New Griptonite Lease”). The term of the lease begins on October 1, 2013 and will expire on September 30, 2020, unless the Company exercises its right to early terminate the lease effective as of September 30, 2017. The Company provided the landlord a letter of credit in the amount of $500 to secure its obligations under the lease and this has been classified as restricted cash on the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2013. In addition, the Company has provided the landlord with a guarantee of lease to guarantee its obligations under the New Griptonite Lease.

At June 30, 2013, future minimum lease payments under non-cancelable operating leases were as follows:


	Minimum
	Operating
	Lease
Period Ending December 31,	Payments
2013 (remaining six months)	$	2,072
2014		3,871
2015		4,025
2016		3,422
2017		2,668
2018 and thereafter		1,902

	$	17,960

Minimum Guaranteed Royalties

The Company has entered into license and publishing agreements with various owners of brands and other intellectual property to develop and publish games for mobile devices. Pursuant to some of these agreements, the Company is required to pay minimum royalties or license fees over the term of the agreement regardless of actual game sales. Future minimum royalty payments as of June 30, 2013 were $290, which are due over the remaining six months of 2013.

Income Taxes

As of June 30, 2013, unrecognized tax benefits and potential interest and penalties are classified within “other long-term liabilities” on the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets. As of June 30, 2013, the settlement of the Company’s income tax liabilities could not be determined; however, the liabilities are not expected to become due within the next 12 months.

Indemnification Agreements

The Company has entered into agreements under which it indemnifies each of its officers and directors during his or her lifetime for certain events or occurrences while the officer or director is or was serving at the Company’s request in that capacity. The maximum potential amount of future payments the Company could be required to make under these indemnification agreements is unlimited; however, the Company has a director and officer insurance policy that limits its exposure and enables the Company to recover a portion of any future amounts paid. As a result of its insurance policy coverage, the Company believes the estimated fair value of these indemnification agreements is minimal. Accordingly, the Company had recorded no liabilities for these agreements as of June 30, 2013 or December 31, 2012.

In the ordinary course of its business, the Company includes standard indemnification provisions in most of its license agreements with carriers and other distributors. Pursuant to these provisions, the Company generally indemnifies these parties for losses suffered or incurred in connection with its games, including as a result of intellectual property infringement, viruses, worms and other malicious software, and legal or regulatory violations. The term of these indemnity provisions is generally perpetual after execution of the corresponding license agreement, and the maximum potential amount of future payments the Company could be required to make under these provisions is often unlimited. To date, the Company has not incurred costs to defend lawsuits or settle indemnified claims of these types. As a result, the Company believes the estimated fair value of these indemnity provisions is minimal. Accordingly, the Company had recorded no liabilities for these provisions as of June 30, 2013 or December 31, 2012.

Contingencies

From time to time, the Company is subject to various claims, complaints and legal actions in the normal course of business. The Company assesses its potential liability by analyzing specific litigation and regulatory matters using available information. The Company’s estimate of losses is developed in consultation with inside and outside counsel, which involves a subjective analysis of potential results and outcomes, assuming various combinations of appropriate litigation and settlement strategies. After taking all of the above factors into account, the Company determines whether an estimated loss from a contingency should be accrued by assessing whether a loss is deemed reasonably probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated. The Company further determines whether an estimated loss from a contingency should be disclosed by assessing whether a material loss is deemed reasonably possible. Such disclosure will include an estimate of the additional loss or range of loss or will state that an estimate cannot be made.

In April 2013, Lodsys Group, LLC, a Texas limited liability company (“Lodsys”), filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas alleging that the Company has been infringing two of Lodsys’ patents, and is seeking unspecified damages, including treble damages for willful infringement, interest, attorneys’ fees and such other costs as the Court may deem just and proper. On June 19, 2013, the Company filed an answer to Lodsys’s complaint (i) denying all of Lodsys’s claims, (ii) setting forth certain affirmative defenses to Lodsys’s claims and (iii) asserting counterclaims that the Company does not infringe the Lodsys patents and that the Lodsys patents are invalid. This action has only recently been filed and, accordingly, the Company is not in a position to assess whether any loss or adverse effect on its financial condition is probable or remote or to estimate the range of potential loss, if any.

The Company does not believe it is party to any currently pending litigation, the outcome of which is reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on its operations, financial position or liquidity. However, the ultimate outcome of any litigation is uncertain and, regardless of outcome, litigation can have an adverse impact on the Company because of defense costs, potential negative publicity, diversion of management resources and other factors.

Note 8—Stockholders’ Equity

Acquisitions

On August 2, 2012, the Company issued an aggregate of 600 shares of its common stock to IGN in connection with the Company’s acquisition of GameSpy.

See Note 5 for more information about this acquisition.

Shares issued in connection with the Blammo Earnout

On May 16, 2013, the Company issued 742 shares to the former Blammo shareholders based on the Net Revenue that Blammo achieved for its fiscal year ended March 31, 2013. The fair value of this earnout amount has been presented in additional paid-in capital on the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2013.

See Note 3 for more information about this issuance.

Warrants to Purchase Common Stock

During the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, investors exercised warrants to purchase 2,825 and 100 shares of the Company’s common stock, and the Company received gross proceeds of $4,237 and $150 in connection with these exercises.

Warrants outstanding as of June 30, 2013 were as follows:

Number

Exercise

of Shares

Price

Outstanding

Term

per

Under

Issue Date

(Years)

Share

Warrant

August 2010

1.50

1,035

See Note 14 – Subsequent Events – for additional information.

Note 9—Stock Option and Other Benefit Plans

2007 Equity Incentive Plan

In January 2007, the Company’s Board of Directors adopted, and in March 2007 the Company’s stockholders approved, the 2007 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2007 Plan”). The 2007 Plan permits the Company to grant stock options, restricted stock units, and other stock-based awards to employees, non-employee directors and consultants. In April 2013, the Company’s Board of Directors approved, and in June 2013, the Company’s stockholders approved, the amended and restated 2007 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Amended 2007 Plan”). The Amended 2007 Plan includes an increase of 7,200 shares in the aggregate number of shares of common stock authorized for issuance under the plan. It also includes a fungible share provision, pursuant to which each share that is subject to a stock-based award that is not a “full value award” (restricted stock, RSUs, or other stock-based awards where the price charged to the participant for the award is less than 100% of the fair market value) reduces the number of shares available for issuance by 1.39 shares. When a stock-based award that is not a full value award is cancelled, the underlying shares are returned to the pool of shares available for grant at a ratio of 1.39 shares for each share cancelled. As of June 30, 2013, 7,368 shares were available for future grants under the Amended 2007 Plan.

2007 Employee Stock Purchase Plan

In January 2007, the Company’s Board of Directors adopted, and in March 2007 the Company’s stockholders approved, the 2007 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “2007 Purchase Plan”). As of June 30, 2013, 1,146 shares were available for issuance under the 2007 Purchase Plan.

2008 Equity Inducement Plan

In March 2008, the Company’s Board of Directors adopted the 2008 Equity Inducement Plan (the “Inducement Plan”) to augment the shares available under its existing 2007 Plan. The Company has not sought stockholder approval for the Inducement Plan. As such, awards under the Inducement Plan are granted in accordance with NASDAQ Listing Rule 5635(c)(4) and only to persons not previously an employee or director of the Company, or following a bona fide period of non-employment, as an inducement material to such individual’s entering into employment with the Company. The Inducement Plan permits the Company to grant only nonqualified stock options. In May 2013, the Company’s Board of Directors amended the Inducement Plan to increase the number of shares available for grant by 200 shares. As of June 30, 2013, 70 shares were reserved for future grants under the Inducement Plan.

Share-Based Awards Available for Grant

The calculation of share-based awards available for grant under the Amended 2007 Plan and the Inducement Plan for the six months ended June 30, 2013 is as follows:


	Shares
	Available
Balances at December 31, 2012		1,178
Increase in authorized shares		7,400
share-based awards granted (1)		(2,999	)
share-based awards canceled (2)		1,859

Balances at June 30, 2013		7,438

(1)	Under the terms of the Amended 2007 Plan, RSUs granted on or after June 6, 2013 reduce the number of shares available for grant by 1.39 shares for each share subject to an RSU award.

(2)	RSUs granted after June 6, 2013 that are forfeited and returned to the pool of shares available for grant increase the pool by 1.39 shares for each share subject to an RSU that is forfeited.

RSUs

The Company grants RSUs to its employees under the Amended 2007 Plan. The cost of RSUs is determined using the fair value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. RSUs typically vest and are settled over approximately a four-year period with 25% of the shares vesting on or around the one-year anniversary of the grant date and the remaining shares vesting quarterly thereafter. Compensation cost is amortized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period.

RSU Activity

A summary of the Company’s RSU activity for the six months ended June 30, 2013, is as follows:


				Weighted
	Number of			Average
	Units			Grant Date
	Outstanding			Fair Value
Awarded and unvested, December 31, 2012		—		$	—
Granted		1,071			2.72
Vested		—			—
Forfeited		(70	)		2.74

Awarded and unvested, June 30, 2013		1,001		$	2.72

Restricted stock units expected to vest, June 30, 2013		699

Stock Option Activity

The following table summarizes the Company’s stock option activity for the six months ended June 30, 2013:


	Options Outstanding
				Weighted		Weighted
	Number			Average		Average		Aggregate
	of			Exercise		Contractual		Intrinsic
	Shares			Price		Term (Years)		Value
Balances at December 31, 2012		10,921		$	3.07
Options granted		1,908			2.62
Options canceled		(1,789	)		3.66
Options exercised		(320	)		1.31

Balances at June 30, 2013		10,720		$	2.94		3.94	$	2,947

Options vested and expected to vest at June 30, 2013		9,647		$	2.93		3.82	$	2,909
Options exercisable at June 30, 2013		5,302		$	2.93		3.02	$	2,427

The aggregate intrinsic value in the preceding table is calculated as the difference between the exercise price of the underlying awards and the quoted closing price of the Company’s common stock on The NASDAQ Global Market of $2.21 per share as of June 28, 2013 (the last trading day in the quarter). Consolidated net cash proceeds from option exercises were $417 and $628 for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The Company realized no significant income tax benefit from stock option exercises during the three or six months ended June 30, 2013 or 2012. As required, the Company presents excess tax benefits from the exercise of stock options, if any, as financing cash flows rather than operating cash flows.

The Company applies the fair value provisions of ASC 718, Compensation-Stock Compensation (“ASC 718”). Under ASC 718, the Company estimated the fair value of each option award on the grant date using the Black-Scholes option valuation model and the weighted average assumptions noted in the following table.


	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,
	2013			2012			2013			2012
Dividend yield		—	%		—	%		—	%		—	%
Risk-free interest rate		0.69	%		0.66	%		0.66	%		0.66	%
Expected volatility		52.2	%		69.2	%		52.6	%		69.2	%
Expected term (years)		4.00			4.00			4.00			4.00

The Company based its expected volatility on its own historic volatility and the historical volatility of a peer group of publicly traded entities. The expected term of options gave consideration to early exercises, post-vesting cancellations and the options’ six-year contractual term. The risk-free interest rate for the expected term of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury Constant Maturity Rate as of the date of grant. The weighted-average fair value of stock options granted during the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 was $1.07 and $2.22 per share, respectively.

The Company calculated employee stock-based compensation expense recognized in the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 based on awards ultimately expected to vest and reduced it for estimated forfeitures. ASC 718 requires forfeitures to be estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates

The following table summarizes the consolidated stock-based compensation expense by line items in the condensed consolidated statement of operations:


	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30,				June 30,
	2013		2012		2013		2012
Research and development	$	163	$	2,396	$	831	$	5,656
Sales and marketing		93		155		160		270
General and administrative		480		487		990		948

Total stock-based compensation expense	$	736	$	3,038	$	1,981	$	6,874

The above table includes compensation expense attributable to the contingent consideration potentially issuable to the Blammo employees who were former shareholders of Blammo, which is recorded as research and development expense over the term of the earn-out periods, since these employees are primarily employed in product development. The Company re-measures the fair value of the contingent consideration each reporting period and only records a compensation expense for the portion of the earn-out target that is likely to be achieved. In addition, the Company is exposed to potential continued fluctuations in the fair market value of the contingent consideration in each reporting period, since re-measurement is impacted by changes in the Company’s share price and the assumptions used by the Company. The Company has estimated the total fair value of this liability at $216, and $2,242 as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively; the amount as of June 30, 2013 excludes the 2013 contingent consideration earnout that was classified into additional paid-in capital. See Note 3 for further details. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, the Company recorded $214 and $27 of stock-based compensation income and expense, respectively, related to this contingent consideration. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, the Company recorded $1,874 and $4,751 of stock-based compensation expense, respectively, related to this contingent consideration.

At June 30, 2013, the Company had $1,884 of total unrecognized compensation expense, net of estimated forfeitures, related to RSUs that will be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately four years. As of June 30, 2013, the Company had $6,726 of total unrecognized compensation expense related to stock options, net of estimated forfeitures and excluding unvested Blammo stock-based contingent consideration expense, which will be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.68 years. As permitted by ASC 718, the Company has deferred the recognition of its excess tax benefit from non-qualified stock option exercises.

Note 10—Income Taxes

The Company recorded an income tax benefit of $2,870 and $2,735 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively, and an income tax benefit of $2,019 and $1,579 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, respectively, primarily related to the release of uncertain tax positions due to expiration of certain statutes of limitations in certain foreign jurisdictions, which was partially offset by foreign withholding taxes and income taxes. The income tax rates vary from the Federal and State statutory rates due to the valuation allowances on the Company’s net operating losses, foreign tax rate differences and withholding taxes.

The Company estimates its annual effective tax rate at the end of each quarterly period and records the tax effect of certain discrete items, which are unusual or occur infrequently, in the interim period in which they occur. In addition, jurisdictions with a projected loss for the year or a year-to-date loss where no tax benefit can be recognized and jurisdictions where a reliable estimate of ordinary income cannot be made are excluded from the estimated annual effective tax rate. The impact of such an exclusion could result in a higher or lower effective tax rate during a particular quarter depending on the mix and timing of actual earnings versus annual projections. The Company’s ability to use its net operating loss carryforwards and federal and state tax credit carryforwards to offset future taxable income and future taxes, respectively, may be subject to restrictions attributable to equity transactions that result in changes in ownership as defined by Internal Revenue Code Section 382.

The Company accounts for uncertain tax positions in accordance with ASC 740, Income Taxes (“ASC 740”). As of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits was $3,901 and $4,626, respectively. As of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, approximately $817 and $817, respectively, of unrecognized tax benefits, if recognized, would impact the Company’s effective tax rate. The remaining balance, if recognized, would adjust the Company’s deferred tax assets, each of which are subject to a valuation allowance. At June 30, 2013, the liability for uncertain tax positions decreased by approximately $737 due to the expiration of certain statutes of limitation in foreign jurisdictions in which the Company does business. At June 30, 2013, the Company anticipated that the liability for uncertain tax positions, excluding interest and penalties, could decrease by approximately $755 within the next twelve months due to the expiration of certain statutes of limitation in foreign jurisdictions in which the Company does business.

The Company’s policy is to recognize interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense. The Company recorded $30 and $53 of interest on uncertain tax positions during the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The Company recorded $70 and $114 of interest on uncertain tax positions during the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. During the three months ended June 30, 2013, the Company released $2,412 of interest and penalties on uncertain tax positions due to expiration of certain statutes of limitation in foreign jurisdictions in which the Company does business. As of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the Company had a liability of $56 and $2,348, respectively, related to interest and penalties for uncertain tax positions.

The Company is subject to taxation in the United States and various foreign jurisdictions. The material jurisdictions subject to examination by tax authorities are primarily the State of California, United States, United Kingdom, Canada, and China. The Company’s federal and California tax returns are open by statute for tax years 2002 and forward and could be subject to examination by the tax authorities. The statute of limitations for the Company’s 2010 and 2011 tax returns for the various entities in the United Kingdom will close in 2013. The Company’s China income tax returns are open by statute for tax years 2008 and forward.

Note 11—Segment Reporting

ASC 280, Segment Reporting (“ASC 280”), establishes standards for reporting information about operating segments. It defines operating segments as components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision-maker, or decision-making group, in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. The Company’s chief operating decision-maker is its Chief Executive Officer. The Company’s Chief Executive Officer reviews selected financial information on a geographic basis; however this information is included within one operating segment for purposes of allocating resources and evaluating financial performance.

Accordingly, the Company reports as a single reportable segment—mobile games. For purpose of enterprise-wide disclosures, a breakdown of the Company’s total sales to customers in the feature phone and smartphone markets is shown below:


	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30,				June 30,
	2013		2012		2013		2012
			(Restated)				(Restated)
	(in thousands)				(in thousands)
Feature phone	$	1,423	$	3,710	$	3,279	$	7,875
Smartphone		23,022		25,554		45,771		47,898

Revenues	$	24,445	$	29,264	$	49,050	$	55,773

For purposes of enterprise-wide disclosures, the Company attributes revenues to geographic areas based on the country in which the distributor’s, advertising service provider’s or carrier’s principal operations are located. In the case of Digital Storefronts, revenues are attributed to the geographic location where the end-user makes the purchase. The Company generates its revenues in the following geographic regions:


	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30,				June 30,
	2013		2012		2013		2012
			(Restated)				(Restated)
United States of America	$	9,921	$	16,454	$	20,945	$	31,509
Americas, excluding the USA		1,349		1,356		2,508		2,534
EMEA		5,346		5,817		10,798		11,423
APAC		7,829		5,637		14,799		10,307

	$	24,445	$	29,264	$	49,050	$	55,773

The Company attributes its long-lived assets, which primarily consist of property and equipment, to a country primarily based on the physical location of the assets. Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization, summarized by geographic location was as follows:


	June 30,		December 31,
	2013		2012
Americas	$	2,951	$	3,649
EMEA		974		1,092
APAC		189		285

	$	4,114	$	5,026

Note 12—Restructuring

Restructuring information as of June 30, 2013 was as follows:


	Restructuring
	2012 and 2013						2010			2009
	Facilities and other			Workforce			Facilities and other			Facilities and other			Total
Balance as of January 1, 2012	$	—		$	—		$	653		$	234		$	887
Charges to operations		—			1,371			—			—			1,371
Charges settled in cash		—			(1,367	)		(653	)		(234	)		(2,254	)

Balance as of December 31, 2012		—			4			—			—			4
Charges to operations		584			864			—			—			1,448
Non Cash Adjustments		(183	)		—			—			—			(183	)
Charges settled in cash		(283	)		(868	)		—			—			(1,151	)

Balance as of June 30, 2013	$	118			—		$	—		$	—		$	118

During 2009, 2010, 2012, and 2013, the Company’s management approved restructuring plans to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of its operating model and reduce operating expenses around the world. The 2012 and 2013 restructuring plans included $584 of facility-related restructuring charges related to streamlining of the Company’s facility in Kirkland, Washington, and additional costs associated with vacating the Company’s Brazil office. In addition, the Company recorded a non-cash adjustment of $238 in respect of the cumulative translation adjustment related to the Company’s Brazilian subsidiary that was reclassified to net loss upon the substantial liquidation of the entity and is recognized in restructuring charge on the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated income statement for the six months ended June 30, 2013.

Since inception of the 2012 and 2013 restructuring plans through June 30, 2013, the Company incurred $2,235 of restructuring charges relating to employee termination costs in its San Francisco, California, EMEA, APAC, Brazil and Kirkland, Washington offices. During the six months ended June 30, 2013, the Company recorded $864 of the 2012 and 2013 restructuring plan charges relating to employee termination costs in its Brazil, San Francisco, China, Kirkland, and EMEA offices.

As of June 30, 2013, the Company’s remaining restructuring liability of $118 was comprised of facility-related costs, which are expected to be fully paid down by the end of 2013. As of December 31, 2012, the Company’s remaining restructuring liability of $4 was comprised of employee termination costs.

Note 13—Related Party Transactions

Hany Nada, one of the Company’s directors, serves as one of the seven managing directors of Granite Global Ventures II L.L.C., the general partner of each of Granite Global Ventures II L.P. and GGV II Entrepreneurs Fund L.P., which together beneficially owned approximately 8.14% of the Company’s stock as of June 30, 2013. Hany Nada also serves as one of the seven managing directors of GGV Capital IV L.L.C., the general partner of each of GGV Capital IV L.P. and GGV Capital IV Entrepreneurs Fund L.P. (together, “GGV IV”). During the fourth quarter of 2012, GGV IV acquired an approximate 33.7% shareholding in Medium Entertainment, which does business as PlayHaven and Hany Nada joined PlayHaven’s Board of Directors. The Company had a preexisting relationship with PlayHaven as of the date of GGV IV’s investment in PlayHaven. For the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, the Company generated revenues of $1,204 and $1,708, respectively, from PlayHaven. For the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, the Company generated revenues of $2,497 and $2,940, respectively, from PlayHaven. As of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, PlayHaven accounted for 11.8% and 13.2%, respectively, of the Company’s total accounts receivable balance.

Note 14—Subsequent Events

On July 15, 2013, the Company and MGM Interactive Inc. entered into a warrant agreement which provides MGM the right to purchase up to 3,333 shares of the Company’s common stock (the “Warrant Shares”) at an initial exercise price of $3.00 per share (the “Warrant”), subject to adjustments for dividends, reorganizations and other common stock events. The Warrant expires on July 15, 2018.

The Warrant Shares are subject to the following vesting schedule:

(a)	333 of the Warrant Shares vested and became exercisable on July 15, 2013;

(b)

an additional 333 of the Warrant Shares will vest and become exercisable on each date on which the Company commercially releases a new mobile game (each, a “New Game”) that is based on a mutually agreed intellectual property of MGM (excluding any localizations, updates, alterations or upgrades to any previously commercially released New Game) or a sequel to a previously released New Game, subject to certain exceptions; and

(c)

an additional 1,000 of the Warrant Shares will vest and become exercisable on the date (if any) on which the Company commercially releases a new mobile game based on a mutually agreed license to the JAMES BOND intellectual property (a “Bond Title”), with an additional 1,000 of the Warrant Shares vesting and becoming exercisable on each date (if any) on which the Company commercially releases a new Bond Title or a sequel to a previous Bond Title (excluding any localizations, updates, alterations or upgrades to any previously commercially released Bond Title); provided that the Company currently does not have the right to develop any mobile game based on the JAMES BOND intellectual property and will have no right to develop any mobile game based on the JAMES BOND intellectual property until such time (if ever) as MGM and the Company negotiate terms therefor, and enter into a definitive agreement wherein MGM grants to the Company the right to develop and distribute a mobile game based upon the JAMES BOND intellectual property, and that the execution of any such agreement will be subject to any required third party approvals.

The Warrant is exercisable only for cash. If the Warrant is fully exercised, assuming no intervening adjustments, the Company will receive approximately $10,000 in proceeds. The Warrant also provides that the Company will file a registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission to register the shares of common stock that are issued upon exercise of the Warrant no later than September 13, 2013.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with (1) the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes contained elsewhere in this report and (2) the audited consolidated financial statements and related notes and the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations section, included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K/A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 9, 2013. The information in this discussion and elsewhere in this report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Such statements are based upon current expectations that involve risks and uncertainties. Any statements contained herein that are not statements of historical fact may be deemed to be forward-looking statements. For example, the words “may,” “will,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “plan,” “expect,” “intend,” “could,” “estimate,” “continue” and similar expressions or variations identify forward-looking statements.

Our actual results and the timing of certain events may differ significantly from the results discussed in the forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause such a discrepancy include, but are not limited to, those discussed elsewhere in this report, particularly in the section titled “Risk Factors” set forth in Part II, Item 1A of this report. All forward-looking statements in this report are based on information available to us as of the date hereof, and we assume no obligation to update any such forward-looking statements to reflect future events or circumstances, except as required by law.

Our Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”) includes the following sections:

•

A discussion of the recent restatement of our financial statements;

•

An Overview that discusses at a high level our operating results and some of the trends that affect our business;

•

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates that we believe are important to understanding the assumptions and judgments underlying our financial statements;

•

Recent Accounting Pronouncements;

•

Results of Operations, including a more detailed discussion of our revenues and expenses; and

•

Liquidity and Capital Resources, which discusses key aspects of our statements of cash flows, changes in our balance sheets and our financial commitments.

Restatement

As discussed in the Explanatory Note and in Note 1A to the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements, we have restated our audited financial statements and related disclosures for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2012 and corresponding quarterly periods therein, and our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and related disclosures for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012. The information presented in this MD&A reflects such restatement.

Overview

This overview provides a high-level discussion of our operating results and some of the trends that affect our business. We believe that an understanding of these trends is important to understand our financial results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, as well as our future prospects. This summary is not intended to be exhaustive, nor is it intended to be a substitute for the detailed discussion and analysis provided elsewhere in this report, including our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes.

Financial Results and Trends

Revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2013 were $24.4 million, a 16.5% decrease compared to the three months ended June 30, 2012, in which we reported revenues of $29.3 million. Revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2013 were $49.1 million, a 12.1% decrease compared to the six months ended June 30, 2012, in which we reported revenues of $55.8 million. These decreases were primarily due to decreases in revenues that we generated from our smartphone games as a result of fewer titles being released during the first half of 2013, weaker performance of existing titles and lower revenues from offers. Weaker performance of existing titles was due to the fact that we released Deer Hunter Reloaded in the second quarter of 2012, which was one of our most successful product launches to date, and we did not have any title launches in the second quarter of 2013. Additionally, revenues from offers have been negatively impacted since the beginning of the second half of 2012 when we lost the ability to make certain types of offers available to our users on the Apple platform. Our smartphone revenues decreased from $25.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012 to $23.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013, and decreased from $47.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 to $45.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013. The decreases in total revenues were also due to decreases in revenues that we generate from our feature phone games, due to the continued migration of users from feature phones to smartphone devices. Our feature phone revenues declined from $3.7 million in the three months ended June 30, 2012 to $1.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013, and declined from $7.9 million in the six months ended June 30, 2012 to $3.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013. We believe that the migration of users from feature phones to smartphone devices will continue during the remainder of 2013 and for the foreseeable future as consumers continue to upgrade their mobile phones. Accordingly, we have concentrated our product development efforts exclusively towards developing new titles for smartphones, tablets and other next-generation platforms, such as the Mac App Store, and intend to continue to devote significantly fewer resources towards selling games for feature phones.

The majority of our smartphone revenues have historically been derived from Apple’s iOS platform, which accounted for 60.7% and 57.2% of our total revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and June 30, 2012, respectively, and 58.8% and 57.4% of our total revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and June 30, 2012, respectively. We generated the majority of these iOS-related revenues through in-app purchases and sales of premium games made through the Apple App Store, which represented 53.3% and 41.4% of our total revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and June 30, 2012, respectively, and 50.4% and 42.5% of our total revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and June 30, 2012, respectively, with the balance of our iOS-related revenues generated from offers and advertisements in games distributed on the Apple App Store. In addition, we generated approximately 27.9% and 26.1% of our total revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and June 30, 2012, respectively from the Android platform and 28.6% and 24.3% of our total revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and June 30, 2012, respectively. We generated the majority of our Android-related revenues through in-app purchases and sales of premium games made through the Google Play store, which represented 17.9% and 19.8% of our total revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and June 30, 2012, respectively and 18.7% and 18.7% of our total revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and June 30, 2012, respectively, with the balance of our Android-related revenues generated from other platforms that distribute apps that run the Android operating system (e.g., the Amazon App Store). We expect the percentage of our total revenues that we derive from each of Apple and Google to increase in 2013 compared to 2012.

To increase our revenues we must continue to execute on our strategy of becoming the leading developer and publisher of free-to-play games for smartphones, tablets and other next-generation platforms. Free-to-play games are games that a player can download and play for free, but which allow players to access a variety of additional content and features for a fee and to engage with various advertisements and offers that generate revenues for us. Because our games can be downloaded and played for free, we are able to more quickly build a significantly larger customer base than we could if we charged users an upfront fee for downloading our games, which was our previous feature phone business model.

However, for us to continue to execute on our strategy, we must improve our monetization of our players. We believe that deep monetization is one of the primary areas in which we must be proficient to succeed in the mobile gaming industry in 2013 and beyond. Accordingly, we have implemented a number of measures designed to improve our game monetization. These include: (1) hiring a number of new personnel with monetization expertise, (2) including new categories of games (such as role-playing games and card battle games) in our planned 2013 product portfolio that often have higher monetization rates than our single-player focused action/adventure and casual games, and (3) including deeper “meta game” functionality in our games, by which we mean increasing the player’s ability to continue to create content or otherwise invest in the game outside the core gameplay loop, which we believe should result in increased player retention. In addition, we have continued transitioning towards becoming a games-as-a-service company, in which the majority of our future games will be only playable online. This will enable us to deliver a number of additional features in our games, such as tournaments, live events and more frequent content updates, which we believe will contribute to better monetization in our games. We plan to continue to invest in our GluOn games-as-a-service technology platform and hire additional monetization, live operations, server technology, user experience and product management personnel to support our transition to becoming a games-as-a-service company, though we expect our rate of hiring will slow dramatically after the third quarter of 2013.

We also intend to grow our revenues through our recently formed third party publishing initiative, Glu Publishing. Our Glu Publishing department is initially focusing on entering into relationships with developers of successful games in Asian markets where Glu will localize and publish those games in the United States and other non-Asian markets. We expect to commercially release approximately six third party titles by the end of 2013 and expect this number to increase in 2014. Because we expect to pay these third party developers royalties, which may include upfront license fees or non-recoupable minimum guarantees, to obtain the rights to publish their games, our gross margins are expected be lower on our revenues generated from our Glu Publishing initiative.

In addition, our revenues will continue to depend significantly on growth in the mobile games market and our ability to successfully compete against a continually increasing number of developers and the overall strength of the economy, particularly in the United States. Our revenues also depend on maintaining our continued good relationship with the digital storefront operators, primarily Apple and Google, each of whom could unilaterally alter their terms of service in ways that could harm our business. For example, Apple has, beginning in the second quarter of 2011, made several changes to its app store developer agreement relating to privacy and our ability to include certain types of third-party advertising in our games. These changes have in the past, and may in the future, negatively impact our smartphone revenues.

Our net loss in the three months ended June 30, 2013 was $2.9 million versus a net loss of $3.0 million in the three months ended June 30, 2012. This decrease in our net loss was primarily due to a $4.1 million decrease in operating expenses and an increase of $851,000 in our income tax benefit arising from the release of uncertain tax liabilities. The decrease in our operating expenses was driven by a $2.1 million decrease in stock-based compensation for Blammo shareholders since their earnout shares for Blammo’s 2013 fiscal year were earned as of March 31, 2013 and issued during the second quarter of 2013. The decrease in operating expenses was also partly due to a $2.4 million decrease in employee compensation, primarily arising from terminations of research and development personnel as a result of the restructuring in our Brazil, San Francisco, China, Kirkland, and EMEA offices, and due to lower attainment of employee bonuses in the first half of 2013. These favorable factors were partially offset by a decline in our feature phone and smartphone revenues of $4.8 million. Our net loss in the six months ended June 30, 2013 was $8.4 million versus a net loss of $9.8 million in the six months ended June 30, 2012. This decrease in our net loss was primarily due a $6.8 million decrease in operating expenses, an increase of $1.2 million in our income tax benefit due to the release of uncertain tax liabilities, and an increase of $451,000 in other income resulting from favorable foreign exchange movements in the first six months of 2013 compared to the comparable period of 2012. The decrease in our operating expenses was driven by a $4.7 million decrease in stock-based compensation for Blammo shareholders since their 2013 earnout shares were earned as of March 31, 2013 and issued during the second quarter of 2013. The decrease in operating expenses was also partly due to a $3.0 million decrease in employee compensation, primarily arising from terminations of research and development personnel as a result of the restructuring in our Brazil, San Francisco, China, Kirkland, and EMEA offices, and due to lower attainment of employee bonuses in the first half of 2013. These favorable factors were partially offset by a decline in our feature phone and smartphone revenues of $6.7 million. Our operating results were also affected by fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates of the currencies in which we incurred meaningful operating expenses (principally the British Pound Sterling, Euro, Chinese Renminbi, Brazilian Real and Russian Ruble), and our customers’ reporting currencies, which fluctuated significantly in 2012 and the first six months of 2013.

Our ability to attain and sustain profitability depends not only on our ability to grow our revenues, but also on our ability to manage our operating expenses. The largest component of our recurring expenses is personnel costs, which consist of salaries, benefits and incentive compensation, including bonuses and stock-based compensation. We increased our spending on sales and marketing initiatives in the first half of 2013 compared to the first half of 2012 in connection with the launch and promotion of our games, and we anticipate that our sales and marketing expenditures will continue to increase in absolute dollars during 2013 compared to 2012, since advertising costs in our industry have generally been rising. We expect that the restructuring measures we implemented in the fourth quarter of 2012 and first and second quarters of 2013, which primarily consisted of headcount reductions and facility streamlining in our Kirkland studio, and winding down our studio in Brazil, will enable us to hire additional games-as-a-service personnel with monetization expertise without substantially increasing our overall research and development expenses.

Cash and cash equivalents at June 30, 2013 totaled $19.1 million, a decrease of $3.2 million from the $22.3 million balance at December 31, 2012. This decrease was primarily due to $5.6 million of cash used in operations and $2.7 million of cash used in investing activities. These outflows were partially offset by $5.2 million of proceeds received from warrant exercises, option exercises, and purchases under our employee stock purchase program. We expect to have cash and cash equivalents of at least $9.0 million at December 31, 2013.

Key Operating Metrics

We manage our smartphone business by tracking various non-financial operating metrics that give us insight into user behavior in our free-to-play and premium smartphone games. The three metrics that we use most frequently are Daily Active Users (DAU), Monthly Active Users (MAU), and Average Revenue Per Daily Active User (ARPDAU). Our methodology for calculating DAU, MAU and ARPDAU may differ from the methodology used by other companies to calculate similar metrics.

DAU is the number of individuals who played a particular smartphone game – either premium or free-to-play – on a particular day. An individual who plays two different games on the same day is counted as two active users for that day when we aggregate DAU across games. In addition, an individual who plays the same game on two different devices during the same day (e.g., an iPhone and an iPad) is also counted as two active users for each such day when we average or aggregate DAU over time. Average DAU for a particular period is the average of the DAUs for each day during that period. We use DAU as a measure of player engagement with the titles that our players have downloaded.

MAU is the number of individuals who played a particular smartphone game – either premium or free-to-play – in the month for which we are calculating the metric. An individual who plays two different games in the same month is counted as two active users for that month when we aggregate MAU across games. In addition, an individual who plays the same game on two different devices during the same month (e.g., an iPhone and an iPad) is also counted as two active users for each such month when we average or aggregate MAU over time. Average MAU for a particular period is the average of the MAUs for each month during that period. We use the ratio between DAU and MAU as a measure of player retention.

ARPDAU is the total free-to-play smartphone revenue – consisting of micro-transactions, advertisements and offers – for the measurement period divided by the number of days in the measurement period divided by the DAU for the measurement period. ARPDAU reflects game monetization. Revenues for purposes of our ARPDAU calculation are our free-to-play revenues from micro-transactions and offers. Under our revenue recognition policy, we recognize these revenues over the estimated average playing period of a user, but our methodology for calculating our DAU does not align with our revenue recognition policy for micro-transactions and offers, under which we defer revenues. For example, if a title is introduced in the last month of a quarter, we defer a substantial portion of the micro-transaction and offer revenue to future months, but the entire DAU for the newly released title is included in the month of launch.

We calculate DAU, MAU and ARPDAU for only our primary distribution platforms, such as Apple’s App Store, the Google Play Store, Amazon’s Appstore and the Mac App Store; we are not able to calculate these metrics across all of our distribution channels. In addition, the platforms that we include for purposes of this calculation have changed over time, and we expect that they will continue to change as our business evolves, but we do not expect that we will adjust prior metrics to take any such additions or deletions of distribution platforms into account. We believe that calculating these metrics for only our primary distribution platforms at a given period is generally representative of the metrics for all of our distribution platforms. Moreover, we rely on the data analytics software that we incorporate into our games to calculate and report the DAU, MAU and ARPDAU of our games, and we make certain adjustments to the analytics data to address inconsistencies between the information as reported and our DAU and MAU calculation methodology.

The table below sets forth our aggregate DAU, MAU and ARPDAU for all of our then-active smartphone titles for the periods specified, followed by a qualitative discussion of the changes in these metrics. Aggregate DAU and MAU include users of both our free-to-play and premium titles, whereas aggregate ARPDAU is calculated based only on revenues from our free-to-play games. Aggregate DAU and MAU for each period presented represents the aggregate metric for the last month of the period. For example, DAU for the three months ended June 30, 2013 is aggregate daily DAU for the month of June 2013 calculated for all active smartphone free-to-play and premium titles in that month across the distribution platforms for which we calculate the metric.


	For the Three Months Ended
	2013				2012
	March 31		June 30		March 31		June 30
	(In thousands, except aggregate ARPDAU)
Aggregate DAU		3,894		2,895		3,218		3,412
Aggregate MAU		40,056		29,359		29,814		29,034
Aggregate ARPDAU	$	0.06	$	0.08	$	0.07	$	0.08

The decrease in aggregate DAU for the three months ended June 30, 2013 as compared to the same period of the prior year was primarily the result of decreased downloads related to no new free-to-play titles being launched during the three months ended June 30, 2013, compared to two new free-to-play titles launched during the three months ended June 30, 2012, including one of the most popular titles in our history, Deer Hunter Reloaded. The ratios between DAU and MAU (that is, DAU divided by MAU) decreased due to poor player retention on both our catalog of previously released titles and recently released titles that were not generating meaningful revenues; in general, increases in the ratio between DAU and MAU indicate better player retention. Our aggregate ARPDAU for the three months ended March 31, 2013, March 31, 2012, and June 30, 2012 have been restated due to our correction to gross accounting for revenues attributable to sales to end customers through digital storefronts. Our aggregate ARPDAU for the three months ended June 30, 2013 remained flat compared to the same period of the prior year due primarily to the fact that declines in the DAU of our catalogue titles have also been coupled with corresponding declines in revenues from these titles. Future increases in our aggregate DAU, MAU and ARPDAU will depend on our ability to retain current players, attract new paying players, launch new games and expand into new markets and distribution platforms.

Significant Transactions

Acquisition of GameSpy

On August 2, 2012, we completed the acquisition of GameSpy from IGN by issuing to IGN 600,000 shares of our common stock, of which 90,000 shares will be held in escrow until November 2, 2013 as security to satisfy indemnification claims.

Deer Hunter Brand Assets

On April 1, 2012, we acquired from Atari its Deer Hunter trademark and associated domain names and also took a license to the other intellectual property associated with the Deer Hunter brand for total consideration of $5.0 million in cash.

Acquisition of Blammo

On August 1, 2011, we completed the acquisition of Blammo by entering into a Share Purchase Agreement among Glu, Blammo and the owners of Blammo’s outstanding share capital (the “Sellers”). Under the Share Purchase Agreement we purchased all of the Blammo share capital, and we (1) issued to the Sellers an aggregate 1,000,000 shares of our common stock and (2) agreed to issue to the Sellers up to an aggregate of an additional 3,312,937 shares of our common stock (the “Additional Shares”) if Blammo achieves certain baseline and upside net revenue targets during the years ending March 31, 2013 (up to 909,091 Additional Shares), March 31, 2014 (up to 1,250,000 Additional Shares) and March 31, 2015 (up to 1,153,846 Additional Shares). On May 16, 2013, we issued 742,036 shares to the former Blammo shareholders based on the amount of Net Revenue that Blammo achieved for its fiscal year ended March 31, 2013.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

In connection with the error that gave rise to the restatement of our financial statements as discussed in the Explanatory Note and in Note 1A to the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements, we have corrected our Revenue Recognition (Smartphone revenue) critical accounting policy. Please see the Critical Accounting Policies section of Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in our Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2012 for more information. Other than as set forth in the preceding sentences, management believes there were no significant changes in our Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates during the three months ended June 30, 2013 as compared to the Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates disclosed in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2012 filed on August 9, 2013.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Information with respect to Recent Accounting Pronouncements may be found in Note 1 of Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in this report, which information is incorporated herein by reference.

Results of Operations

The following sections discuss and analyze the changes in the significant line items in our statements of operations for the comparison periods identified.

Comparison of the Three Months Ended June 30, 2013 and 2012

Revenues


	Three Months Ended
	June 30,
	2013		2012
			(Restated)
	(in thousands)
Feature phone	$	1,423	$	3,710
Smartphone		23,022		25,554

Revenues	$	24,445	$	29,264

Our revenues decreased $4.8 million, or 16.5%, from $29.3 million (restated) for the three months ended June 30, 2012 to $24.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013, due to a $2.5 million decline in smartphone revenues and a $2.3 million decline in feature phone revenues. See “—Overview—Financial Results and Trends” above for further details. Our smartphone revenues do not include approximately $10.1 million of revenues as of June 30, 2013 relating primarily to offers and in-app-purchases that have been deferred over the weighted average useful lives of paying users. International revenues (defined as revenues generated from distributors, advertising service providers and carriers whose principal operations are located outside the United States or, in the case of the digital storefronts, the revenues generated by end-user purchases made outside of the United Sates) increased by $1.7 million, from $12.8 million (restated) in the three months ended June 30, 2012 to $14.5 million in the three months ended June 30, 2013. This was primarily related to a $2.2 million increase in our APAC revenues, primarily related to increased revenues from Korea and China resulting from additional revenues attributable to smartphone storefronts, which was partially offset by declining revenues in EMEA and the Americas, excluding the United States. This increase in our international revenues was offset by a decrease of $6.5 million in our United States revenues, primarily related to declining feature phone and incented offer revenues.

Smartphone Revenues


	Three Months Ended
	June 30,
	2013		2012
			(Restated)
	(In thousands)
Smartphone Revenue by Type
Micro-Transactions	$	18,943	$	18,360
Advertisements		1,287		2,640
Offers		1,157		3,047
Other		1,635		1,507

Smartphone Revenues	$	23,022	$	25,554

Our smartphone revenues decreased $2.5 million, or 9.9%, from $25.6 million (restated) in the three months ended June 30, 2012 to $23.0 million in the three months ended June 30, 2013, which was primarily related to a $1.9 million decrease in our revenues from offers which have been negatively impacted since the beginning of the second half of 2012 when we lost the ability to make certain types of offers available to our users on the Apple platform, and a $1.4 million decrease in our revenues from advertisements due to reduction in our direct advertisement campaigns at the end of the fourth quarter of 2012. This decrease was partially offset by a $583,000 million increase in micro-transactions (in-app purchases). We generate our smartphone revenues from micro-transactions, advertisements or offers, and we may change the focus of our monetization efforts among these methods within a given game over the life of the title in an attempt to maximize revenue. For example, we may elect to disable advertisements within a game if we believe doing so will encourage users to play the game longer and thus increase the chance that they will make micro-transactions or complete offers, which generally result in higher revenues for us than advertisements. We rely on a very small portion of our total users for nearly all of our smartphone revenues derived from micro-transactions purchases. Since the launch of our first free-to-play titles in the fourth quarter of 2010, the percentage of unique paying users for our largest revenue-generating free-to-play games has been approximately 1%; however, in the initial period following the launch of a game, the percentage may be higher, and the percentage of unique paying users is generally lower than 1% for our less successful titles.

Cost of Revenues


	Three Months Ended
	June 30,
	2013			2012
				(Restated)
	(in thousands)
Cost of revenues:
Platform commissions, royalties and other	$	7,670		$	7,780
Amortization of intangible assets		1,078			932

Total cost of revenues	$	8,748		$	8,712

Revenues	$	24,445		$	29,264

Gross margin		64.2	%		70.2	%

Our cost of revenues remained consistent at $8.7 million in the three months ended June 30, 2012 (restated) and 2013, respectively. During the three months ended June 30, 2013, platform commission expense increased $293,000 due to a higher volume of revenue transactions through our digital storefronts, hosting fees increased $355,000 to support our free-to-play titles, and there was a $146,000 increase in amortization of intangible assets. These increases were partially offset by a $758,000 decrease in royalties associated with a decline in royalty-burdened revenues. Revenues attributable to games based upon original intellectual property increased as a percentage of revenues from 86.0% (restated) in the three months ended June 30, 2012 to 92.9% in the three months ended June 30, 2013, primarily due to our focus on developing free-to-play games for smartphones and tablets that are based on our own intellectual property. The average royalty rate that we paid on games based on licensed intellectual property, excluding royalty impairments, increased from 38.5% (restated) in the three months ended June 30, 2012 to 47.5% in the three months ended June 30, 2013, due to renewing a number of our existing licenses at higher royalty rates and higher royalty rates for distribution of certain licensed smartphone titles. Overall royalties, including impairment of prepaid royalties and guarantees, as a percentage of total revenues decreased from 5.4% (restated) in the three months ended June 30, 2012 to 3.4% in the three months ended June 30, 2013. We expect that our gross margin will decrease slightly during the remainder of 2013, as sales of games based on third-party intellectual property are expected to increase compared to 2012, in large part due to our Glu Publishing initiative.

Research and Development Expenses


	Three Months Ended
	June 30,
	2013			2012
	(in thousands)
Research and development expenses	$	11,224		$	15,697
Percentage of revenues		45.9	%		53.6	%

Our research and development expenses decreased $4.5 million, or 28.5%, from $15.7 million in the three months ended June 30 31, 2012 to $11.2 million in the three months ended June 30, 2013. The decrease in research and development costs was primarily due to a $2.1 million decrease in stock-based compensation expense related to vesting and fair value changes of the contingent consideration to employees who are former Blammo shareholders since their earnout shares for Blammo’s 2013 fiscal year were earned as of March 31, 2013 and issued during the second quarter of 2013. Salaries and benefits decreased by $661,000 as a result of the restructurings we implemented in the fourth quarter of 2012 and first half of 2013, and our research and development headcount decreased from 513 employees at June 30, 2012 to 416 employees at June 30, 2013. In addition, variable compensation costs decreased $984,000 due to lower attainment of studio bonuses in the first half of 2013. The decrease in our research and development expenses was also due to a $302,000 decrease in localization costs and a $221,000 decrease in outside service fees due to lower external developer costs incurred in the second quarter of 2013. As a percentage of revenues, research and development expenses decreased from 53.6% (restated) in the three months ended June 30, 2012 to 45.9% in the three months ended June 30, 2013. Research and development expenses included $163,000 of stock-based compensation expense in the three months ended June 30, 2013 and $2.4 million in the three months ended June 30, 2012. We anticipate that our quarterly research and development expenses will increase slightly in absolute dollars over the remainder of 2013 as we intend to continue hiring additional games-as-a-service personnel with monetization expertise, and we expect our rate of hiring will slow dramatically after the third quarter of 2013. In addition, we may also be exposed to continued fluctuations in the fair market value of the contingent consideration issued to the Blammo employee shareholders, as the fair value of the contingent consideration will be measured during each quarter until the end of the earn-out period in March 2015.

Sales and Marketing Expenses


	Three Months Ended
	June 30,
	2013			2012
	(in thousands)
Sales and marketing expenses	$	5,143		$	4,701
Percentage of revenues		21.0	%		16.1	%

Our sales and marketing expenses increased $442,000, or 9.4%, from $4.7 million in the three months ended June 30, 2012 to $5.1 million in the three months ended June 30, 2013. The increase was primarily due to an $850,000 increase in marketing promotions associated with our free-to-play games, which was partially offset by a $241,000 decrease in salaries and benefits expenses resulting from the restructuring that we undertook in our EMEA sales and marketing offices during the first half of 2013, and a $78,000 decrease in variable compensation costs due to lower attainment of employee bonuses in the second quarter of 2013. Our sales and marketing headcount decreased from 37 employees at June 30, 2012 to 32 employees at June 30, 2013. As a percentage of revenues, sales and marketing expenses increased from 16.1% (restated) in the three months ended June 30, 2012 to 21.0% in the three months ended June 30, 2013. Sales and marketing expenses included $93,000 of stock-based compensation expense in the three months ended June 30, 2013 and $155,000 in the three months ended June 30, 2012. We expect our sales and marketing expenditures to continue to increase during 2013 in absolute dollars and as a percentage of revenues in connection with the sales and marketing initiatives we intend to undertake related to the new free-to-play games that we expect to release during 2013, particularly during the fourth quarter of 2013, including games we are publishing as part of our Glu Publishing initiative.

General and Administrative Expenses


	Three Months Ended
	June 30,
	2013			2012
	(in thousands)
General and administrative expenses	$	3,852		$	4,556
Percentage of revenues		15.8	%		15.6	%

Our general and administrative expenses decreased $704,000, or 15.5%, from $4.6 million in the three months ended June 30, 2012 to $3.9 million in the three months ended June 30, 2013. The decrease in general and administrative costs was primarily due to a $433,000 million decrease in the fair market value of contingent consideration issued to the Blammo non-employee shareholders since a portion of their earnout shares were earned as of March 31, 2013 and issued during the second quarter of 2013, a decrease of $394,000 in sales and use taxes due to a one time VAT charge in the second quarter of 2012, and a $386,000 decrease in variable compensation, primarily relating to lower attainment of executive bonuses in the second quarter of 2013. Salaries and benefits expenses remained relatively flat, despite the fact that we increased our general and administrative headcount from 65 employees at June 30, 2012 to 68 employees at June 30, 2013. The decrease in general and administrative expenses was partially offset by a $371,000 increase in professional and consulting fees associated with recruiting, legal, and accounting services and a $211,000 increase in allocated facility and overhead costs. As a percentage of revenues, general and administrative expenses increased from 15.6% (restated) in the three months ended June 30, 2012 to 15.8% in the three months ended June 30, 2013. General and administrative expenses included $480,000 of stock-based compensation expense in the three months ended June 30, 2013 and $487,000 in the three months ended June 30, 2012. We anticipate that our quarterly general and administrative expenses will increase slightly in absolute dollars over the remainder of 2013. In addition, we may also be exposed to continued fluctuations in the fair market value of the contingent consideration issued to the Blammo non-employee shareholders, as the fair value of the contingent consideration will be measured during each reporting period until the end of the earn-out period in March 2015.

Other Operating Expenses

Our restructuring charge increased from $320,000 in the three months ended June 30, 2012 to $937,000 in the three months ended June 30, 2013. Our restructuring charges for the three months ended June 30, 2013 were comprised of employee termination costs in our Brazil, San Francisco, China, Kirkland, and EMEA offices, and facility-related costs related to streamlining of our facility in Kirkland, Washington and additional costs associated with vacating our Brazil office. In addition, we recorded a non-cash adjustment of $238,000 in respect of the write-off of a cumulative translation adjustment upon the substantial liquidation of our Brazilian entity, which is recognized in the Restructuring charge on our unaudited condensed consolidated statement of operations for the three months ended June 30, 2013.

Our amortization of intangible assets remained flat at $495,000 in the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2013, respectively.

Interest and Other Income/(Expense), Net

Interest and other income/(expense), net, decreased from net income of $210,000 in the three months ended June 30, 2012 to net income of $163,000 in the three months ended June 30, 2013. This decrease was primarily due to foreign currency losses related to the revaluation of certain assets and liabilities including accounts payable and accounts receivable.

Income Tax Provision

Our income tax benefit increased from $2.0 million in the three months ended June 30, 2012 to $2.9 million in the three months ended June 30, 2013. This change was primarily due to the release of uncertain tax positions in certain foreign jurisdictions due to the expiration of the statute of limitations, changes in the jurisdictions included in the anticipated effective tax rate computation and changes in pre-tax income in certain foreign entities. The provision for income taxes differs from the amount computed by applying the statutory U.S. federal rate principally due to the effect of our non-U.S. operations, non-deductible stock-based compensation expense, and change in foreign withholding taxes.

Our effective income tax rates for future periods will depend on a variety of factors, including changes in the deferred tax valuation allowance, as well as changes in our business such as intercompany transactions, any acquisitions, any changes in our international structure, any changes in the geographic location of our business functions or assets, changes in the geographic mix of our income, any changes in or termination of our agreements with tax authorities, changes in applicable accounting rules, applicable tax laws and regulations, rulings and interpretations thereof, developments in tax audit and other matters, and variations in our annual pre-tax income or loss. We incur certain tax expenses that do not decline proportionately with declines in our pre-tax consolidated income or loss. As a result, in absolute dollar terms, our tax expense will have a greater influence on our effective tax rate at lower levels of pre-tax income or loss than at higher levels. In addition, at lower levels of pre-tax income or loss, our effective tax rate will be more volatile. At June 30, 2013, we anticipated that the liability for uncertain tax positions, excluding interest and penalties, could decrease by approximately $755,000 within the next twelve months due to the expiration of certain statutes of limitation in foreign jurisdictions in which we do business.

Comparison of the Six Months Ended June 30, 2013 and 2012

Revenues


	Six Months Ended
	June 30,
	2013		2012
			(Restated)
	(in thousands)
Feature phone	$	3,279	$	7,875
Smartphone		45,771		47,898

Revenues	$	49,050	$	55,773

Our revenues decreased $6.7 million, or 12.1%, from $55.8 million (restated) for the six months ended June 30, 2012 to $49.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013, due to a $2.1 million decline in smartphone revenues and a $4.6 million decline in feature phone revenues. See “—Overview—Financial Results and Trends” above for further details. Our smartphone revenues do not include approximately $10.1 million of revenues as of June 30, 2013 relating primarily to offers and in-app-purchases that have been deferred over the weighted average useful lives of paying users. International revenues increased by $3.8 million, from $24.3 million (restated) in the six months ended June 30, 2012 to $28.1 million in the six months ended June 30, 2013. This was primarily related to a $4.5 million increase in our APAC revenues, primarily related to increased revenues from Korea and China resulting from additional revenues attributable to smartphone storefronts and OEM relationships, which was partially offset by declining revenues in EMEA and the Americas, excluding the United States. This increase in our international revenues was offset by a decrease of $10.6 million in our United States revenues, primarily related to declining feature phone and incented offer revenues.

Smartphone Revenues


	Six Months Ended
	June 30,
	2013		2012
			(Restated)
	(In thousands)
Smartphone Revenue by Type
Micro-Transactions	$	36,451	$	34,277
Advertisements		2,811		4,469
Offers		2,675		5,883
Other		3,834		3,269

Smartphone Revenues	$	45,771	$	47,898

Our smartphone revenues decreased $2.1 million, or 4.4%, from $47.9 million (restated) in the six months ended June 30, 2012 to $45.8 million in the six months ended June 30, 2013, which was primarily related to a $3.2 million decrease in our revenues from offers which have been negatively impacted since the beginning of the second half of 2012 when we lost the ability to make certain types of offers available to our users on the Apple platform, and a $1.7 million decrease in due to a reduction in our direct advertisement campaigns. This decrease was partially offset by a $2.2 million increase in micro-transactions (in-app purchases), and a $565,000 increase in premium smartphone revenues as a result of our GameSpy acquisition in third quarter of 2012.

Cost of Revenues


	Six Months Ended
	June 30,
	2013			2012
				(Restated)
	(in thousands)
Cost of revenues:
Platform commissions, royalties and other	$	15,132		$	15,302
Amortization of intangible assets		2,152			1,685

Total cost of revenues	$	17,284		$	16,987

Revenues	$	49,050		$	55,773

Gross margin		64.8	%		69.5	%

Our cost of revenues increased $297,000, or 1.7%, from $17.0 million (restated) in the six months ended June 30, 2012 to $17.3 million in the six months ended June 30, 2013. This increase was primarily due to a $802,000 increase in platform commission expense associated with a higher volume of revenue transactions through our digital storefronts, a $555,000 increase in hosting fees to support our free-to-play titles, and a $467,000 increase in amortization of intangible assets. These increases were partially offset by a $1.5 million decrease in royalties associated with a decline in royalty-burdened revenues. Revenues attributable to games based upon original intellectual property increased as a percentage of revenues from 82.2% (restated) in the six months ended June 30, 2012 to 91.1% in the six months ended June 30, 2013, primarily due to our focus on developing free-to-play games for smartphones and tablets that are based on our own intellectual property. The average royalty rate that we paid on games based on licensed intellectual property, excluding royalty impairments, increased from 34.9% (restated) in the six months ended June 30, 2012 to 44.3% in the six months ended June 30, 2013, due to renewing a number of our existing licenses at higher royalty rates and higher royalty rates for distribution of certain licensed smartphone titles. Overall royalties, including impairment of prepaid royalties and guarantees, as a percentage of total revenues decreased from 6.2% (restated) in the six months ended June 30, 2012 to 4.0% in the six months ended June 30, 2013.

Research and Development Expenses


	Six Months Ended
	June 30,
	2013			2012
	(in thousands)
Research and development expenses	$	22,854		$	30,730
Percentage of revenues		46.6	%		55.1	%

Our research and development expenses decreased $7.9 million, or 25.6%, from $30.7 million in the six months ended June 30, 2012 to $22.9 million in the six months ended June 30, 2013. The decrease in research and development costs was primarily due to a $4.7 million decrease in stock-based compensation expense related to vesting and fair value changes of the contingent consideration to employees who are former Blammo shareholders since their earnout shares for Blammo’s 2013 fiscal year were earned as of March 31, 2013 and issued during the second quarter of 2013. Salaries and benefits decreased by $593,000 as a result of the restructurings we implemented in the fourth quarter of 2012 and first half of 2013, and our research and development headcount decreased from 513 employees at June 30, 2012 to 416 employees at June 30, 2013. In addition, variable compensation costs decreased $1.3 million due to lower attainment of studio bonuses in the first half of 2013. The decrease in our research and development expenses was also due to a $347,000 decrease in localization costs and a $734,000 decrease in outside service fees due to lower external developer costs incurred in the six months ended June 30, 2013. As a percentage of revenues, research and development expenses decreased from 55.1% (restated) in the six months ended June 30, 2012 to 46.6% in the six months ended June 30, 2013. Research and development expenses included $831,000 of stock-based compensation expense in the six months ended June 30, 2013 and $5.7 million in the six months ended June 30, 2012.

Sales and Marketing Expenses


	Six Months Ended
	June 30,
	2013			2012
	(in thousands)
Sales and marketing expenses	$	10,151		$	9,076
Percentage of revenues		20.7	%		16.3	%

Our sales and marketing expenses increased $1.1 million, or 11.8%, from $9.1 million in the six months ended June 30, 2012 to $10.2 million in the six months ended June 30, 2013. The increase was primarily due to a $1.7 million increase in marketing promotions associated with our free-to-play games, which was partially offset by a $216,000 decrease in salaries and benefits expenses resulting from the restructuring that we undertook in our EMEA sales and marketing offices during the first half of 2013, and a $187,000 decrease in variable compensation costs due to lower attainment of employee bonuses in the first half of 2013. Our sales and marketing headcount decreased from 37 at June 30, 2012 to 32 at June 30, 2013. As a percentage of revenues, sales and marketing expenses increased from 16.3% (restated) in the six months ended June 30, 2012 to 20.7% in the six months ended June 30, 2013. Sales and marketing expenses included $160,000 of stock-based compensation expense in the six months ended June 30, 2013 and $270,000 in the six months ended June 30, 2012.

General and Administrative Expenses


	Six Months Ended
	June 30,
	2013			2012
	(in thousands)
General and administrative expenses	$	7,771		$	8,922
Percentage of revenues		15.8	%		16.0	%

Our general and administrative expenses decreased $1.2 million, or 12.9%, from $8.9 million in the six months ended June 30, 2012 to $7.8 million in the six months ended June 30, 2013. The decrease in general and administrative costs was primarily due to a $1.0 million decrease in the fair market value of contingent consideration issued to Blammo non-employee shareholders since a portion of their earnout shares were earned as of March 31, 2013 and issued during the second quarter of 2013, a $695,000 decrease in variable compensation, primarily relating to lower attainment of executive bonuses in the first half of 2013, and a decrease of $403,000 in sales and use taxes due to a one time VAT charge in the second quarter of 2012. Salaries and benefits expenses remained relatively flat, despite increasing our general and administrative headcount from 65 employees at June 30, 2012 to 68 employees at June 30, 2013. The decrease in general and administrative expenses was partially offset by a $640,000 increase in professional and consulting fees associated with recruiting and accounting services, and a $356,000 increase in allocated facility and overhead costs. As a percentage of revenues, general and administrative expenses decreased from 16.0% (restated) in the six months ended June 30, 2012 to 15.8% in the six months ended June 30, 2013. General and administrative expenses included $990,000 of stock-based compensation expense in the six months ended June 30, 2013 and $948,000 in the six months ended June 30, 2012.

Other Operating Expenses

Our restructuring charge increased from $320,000 in the six months ended June 30, 2012 to $1.4 million in the six months ended June 30, 2013. Our restructuring charges for the six months ended June 30, 2013 were comprised of employee termination costs in our Brazil, China, San Francisco, Kirkland, and EMEA offices, and facility-related costs related to streamlining of our facility in Kirkland, Washington and additional costs associated with vacating our Brazil office. In addition, we recorded a non-cash adjustment of $238,000 in respect of the write-off of cumulative translation adjustment upon the substantial liquidation of our Brazilian entity, which is recognized in the Restructuring charge on our unaudited condensed consolidated statement of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2013.

Our amortization of intangible assets remained flat at $990,000 in the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2013, respectively.

Interest and Other Income/(Expense), Net

Interest and other income/(expense), net, increased from net expense of $156,000 in the six months ended June 30, 2012 to net income of $295,000 in the six months ended June 30, 2013. This increase was primarily due to foreign currency gains related to the revaluation of certain assets and liabilities including accounts payable and accounts receivable.

Income Tax Provision

Our income tax benefit increased from $1.6 million in the six months ended June 30, 2012 to $2.7 million in the six months ended June 30, 2013. This change was primarily due to the release of uncertain tax positions in certain foreign jurisdictions due to the expiration of the statute of limitations, changes in the jurisdictions included in the anticipated effective tax rate computation and changes in pre-tax income in certain foreign entities.

Liquidity and Capital Resources


	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2013			2012
				(Restated)
	(in thousands)
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows Data:
Depreciation and amortization	$	4,534		$	3,793
Cash flows used in operating activities		(5,626	)		(2,572	)
Cash flows used in investing activities		(2,715	)		(6,149	)
Cash flows provided by financing activities		5,219			1,363

Since our inception, we have incurred recurring losses and negative annual cash flows from operating activities. As of June 30, 2013 we had an accumulated deficit of $240.7 million.

Operating Activities

In the six months ended June 30, 2013, net cash used in operating activities was $5.6 million, primarily due to a net loss of $8.4 million, a decrease in accrued compensation of $1.6 million due to the payment of bonuses accrued at December 31, 2012, a decrease in accrued royalties of $988,000, a decrease in deferred revenues of $1.6 million, and a decrease in non-current liabilities of $2.8 million. These amounts were partially offset by a decrease in accounts receivable of $1.3 million, an increase in accounts payable of $1.7 million, and adjustments for non-cash items, including depreciation expense of $1.4 million, amortization expense of $3.1 million, and stock-based compensation expense of $2.0 million.

In the six months ended June 30, 2012, net cash used in operating activities was $2.6 million, primarily due to a net loss of $9.8 million, a decrease in other long-term liabilities of $2.3 million due to the release of an uncertain tax provision upon expiration of the statute of limitations, an increase in accounts receivable of $1.3 million due to timing of cash collections and a decrease in accounts payable of $693,000. These amounts were partially offset by adjustments for non-cash items, including stock-based compensation expense of $6.9 million, amortization expense of $2.7 million, depreciation expense of $1.1 million and change in fair value of the Blammo earn-out of $1.0 million.

Investing Activities

In the six months ended June 30, 2013, we used $2.7 million of cash for investing activities resulting primarily from issuances of $1.7 million on our letters of credit associated with the sublease for our new San Francisco headquarters lease and the new office for our Griptonite studio, $785,000 of property and equipment purchases, and other investments of $200,000.

In the six months ended June 30, 2012, we used $6.1 million of cash for investing activities resulting primarily from $5.0 million used to purchase the Deer Hunter trademark and brand assets during the second quarter of 2012 and a $1.1 million increase in leasehold improvements, purchases of computer, server and networking equipment to support our free-to-play games and purchases of software.

Financing Activities

In the six months ended June 30, 2013, net cash provided by financing activities was $5.2 million due to proceeds received from option and warrant exercises and purchases under our employee stock purchase plan.

In the six months ended June 30, 2012, net cash provided by financing activities was $1.4 million due to proceeds received from option and warrant exercises and purchases under our employee stock purchase plan.

Sufficiency of Current Cash and Cash Equivalents

Our cash and cash equivalents were $19.1 million as of June 30, 2013. Cash and cash equivalents held outside of the U.S. in various foreign subsidiaries were $4.9 million as of June 30, 2013, most of which were held by our United Kingdom subsidiary. Under current tax laws and regulations, if cash and cash equivalents held outside the U.S. are distributed to the U.S. in the form of dividends or otherwise, we may be subject to additional U.S. income taxes and foreign withholding taxes. We have not provided deferred taxes on unremitted earnings attributable to foreign subsidiaries because these earnings are intended to be reinvested indefinitely.

We expect to fund our operations and satisfy our contractual obligations during 2013 primarily through our cash and cash equivalents and cash flows from operations. However, we expect to use cash in our operations during 2013 as we seek to grow our business. In addition, we expect to use approximately $1.8 million in the third quarter of 2013 for capital expenditures related to office moves for our corporate headquarters in San Francisco and our Kirkland, Washington studio. We believe our cash and cash equivalents and cash inflows will be sufficient to meet our anticipated cash needs for at least the next 12 months. However, our cash requirements for the next 12 months may be greater than we anticipate due to, among other reasons, revenues that are lower than we currently anticipate, greater than expected operating expenses, particularly with respect to our research and development and sales and marketing initiatives, use of cash to pay upfront license fees or minimum guarantees related to our Glu Publishing business, use of cash to pay unexpected moving-related costs, use of cash to fund our foreign operations and the impact of foreign currency rate changes, unanticipated limitations or timing restrictions on our ability to access funds that are held in our non-U.S. subsidiaries or any investments or acquisitions that we may decide to pursue.

If our cash sources are insufficient to satisfy our cash requirements or if we wish to strengthen our balance sheet, we may seek to raise additional capital, potentially pursuant to our effective universal shelf registration statement. However, we may be unable to do so on terms that are favorable to us or at all, particularly given current capital market and overall economic conditions. If we require new sources of financing but they are insufficient or unavailable, we would be required to modify our operating plans to align them with available resources, which would harm our ability to grow our business.

Contractual Obligations

The following table is a summary of our contractual obligations as of June 30, 2013:


	Payments Due by Period
	Total		Less than 1 year		1-3 Years		3-5 Years		Thereafter
	(in thousands)
Operating lease obligations	$	17,960	$	2,072	$	11,318	$	4,570	$	—
Guaranteed royalties(1)		290		290		—		—		—
Uncertain tax position obligations, including interest and penalties(2)		841		—		—		—		841
Blammo earn-out (3)		273		210		63		—		—

Total contractual obligations	$	19,364	$	2,572	$	11,381	$	4,570	$	841

(1)

We have entered into license and publishing agreements with various owners of brands and other intellectual property to develop and publish games for mobile devices. Pursuant to some of these agreements, we are required to pay minimum royalties or license fees over the term of the agreement regardless of actual game sales. Future minimum royalty payments as of June 30, 2013 were $290,000, which are due over the remaining six months of 2013.

(2)

As of June 30, 2013, unrecognized tax benefits and potential interest and penalties were classified within “other long-term liabilities” on our condensed consolidated balance sheets. As of June 30, 2013, the settlement of our income tax liabilities cannot be determined; however, the liabilities are not expected to become due within the next 12 months.

(3)	As of June 30, 2013, the contingent consideration issued to the former Blammo shareholders had a fair value of $273,000. The fair value is based on the present value of probability-adjusted revenues related to the Blammo earnout for fiscal 2014 and fiscal 2015.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

At June 30, 2013, we did not have any significant off-balance sheet arrangements requiring disclosure under Item 303(a)(4)(ii) of Regulation S-K, other than those listed in our contractual obligations table above.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

The information in this section should be read in connection with the information on financial market risk related to changes in interest rates and non-U.S. currency exchange rates in Part II, Item 7A, “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk,” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2012. Our market risk profile has not changed significantly during the first six months of 2013.

Interest Rate and Credit Risk

Our exposure to interest rate risk relates primarily to our investment portfolio and the potential losses arising from changes in interest rates.

We are potentially exposed to the impact of changes in interest rates as they affect interest earned on our investment portfolio. As of June 30, 2013, we had no short-term investments and substantially all $19.1 million of our cash and cash equivalents was held in operating bank accounts earning nominal interest. Accordingly, we do not believe that a 10% change in interest rates would have a significant impact on our interest income, operating results or liquidity related to these amounts.

The primary objectives of our investment activities are, in order of importance, to preserve principal, provide liquidity and maximize income without significantly increasing risk. We do not currently use or plan to use derivative financial instruments in our investment portfolio.

As of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, our cash and cash equivalents were maintained by financial institutions in the United States, the United Kingdom, Brazil, Canada, China, France, Hong Kong, India, Russia, Korea and our current deposits are likely in excess of insured limits.

Our accounts receivable primarily relate to revenues earned from digital storefront operators and advertising platforms. We perform ongoing credit evaluations of our customers’ and the digital storefronts’ financial condition but generally require no collateral from them. At June 30, 2013, Apple accounted for 44.4% and PlayHaven accounted for 11.8% of total accounts receivable. At December 31, 2012, Apple accounted for 44.3%, PlayHaven accounted for 13.2% and Google accounted for 10.8% of total accounts receivable.

Foreign Currency Exchange Risk

We transact business in more than 70 countries in more than 20 different currencies, and in 2012 and the first six months of 2013, some of these currencies fluctuated significantly. Our revenues are usually denominated in the functional currency of the carrier or distributor while the operating expenses of our operations outside of the United States are maintained in their local currency, with the significant operating currencies consisting of British Pound Sterling (“GBP”), Chinese Renminbi, Brazilian Real and Russian Ruble. Although recording operating expenses in the local currency of our foreign operations mitigates some of the exposure of foreign currency fluctuations, variances among the currencies of our customers and our foreign operations relative to the United States Dollar (“USD”) could have and have had a material impact on our results of operations.

Our foreign currency exchange gains and losses have been generated primarily from fluctuations in GBP versus the USD and in the Euro versus GBP. At month-end, non-functional currency-denominated accounts receivable and intercompany balances are marked to market and unrealized gains and losses are included in other income (expense), net. Translation adjustments arising from the use of differing exchange rates are included in accumulated other comprehensive income in stockholders’ equity. We have in the past experienced, and in the future expect to experience, foreign currency exchange gains and losses on our accounts receivable and intercompany receivables and payables. Foreign currency exchange gains and losses could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.

There is also additional risk if the currency is not freely or actively traded. Some currencies, such as the Chinese Renminbi, in which our Chinese operations principally transact business, are subject to limitations on conversion into other currencies, which can limit our ability to react to foreign currency devaluations.

To date, we have not engaged in exchange rate hedging activities, and we do not expect to do so in the foreseeable future.

Inflation

We do not believe that inflation has had a material effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. If our costs were to become subject to significant inflationary pressures, we might not be able to offset these higher costs fully through price increases. Our inability or failure to do so could harm our business, operating results and financial condition.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer evaluated, our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined under Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15 (e) under the Exchange Act, as of June 30, 2013. The term “disclosure controls and procedures,” as defined in Rules under the Exchange Act, means controls and other procedures of a company that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the company’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives. In addition, the design of disclosure controls and procedures must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints and that management is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the benefits of possible controls and procedures relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected.

Based on the foregoing our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of June 30, 2013 to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external reporting purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the material weakness related to the application of revenue accounting guidance as described Item 9A – Controls and Procedures – Restated under “Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting” included in our Form 10-K/A filed on August 9, 2013 also existed as of June 30, 2013. As a result, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of June 30, 2013.

A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected in a timely basis. The material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2013 related to the application of revenue accounting guidance to our smartphone revenues for sales through digital storefronts. Specifically, our controls surrounding the application of accounting guidance to smartphone revenues transactions did not operate as designed. This control deficiency resulted in the misstatement of our revenues and cost of revenues, including gross margin percentages, and the related balance sheet accounts and financial disclosures for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2012 (and the restatement of the unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements for the quarters ended March 31, June 30, and September 30 for such years) as discussed in Note 1A and Note 14 to our consolidated financial statements included in our annual report on Form 10-K/A filed on August 9, 2013.

Notwithstanding the identified material weakness, management, based on the work performed during the restatement process described in Note 1A to the unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements, has concluded that the unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are fairly stated in all material respects in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

Remediation Plan

We are in the process of remediating this material weakness by, among other things, implementing and modifying certain accounting procedures, particularly those that involve our controls surrounding the review of contractual agreements with the Digital Storefronts and new distribution channels, and assessment of other factors that contribute to the determination of whether Glu should be considered the principal in sales transactions through those channels.

Management believes the foregoing efforts will effectively remediate the material weakness. As we continue to evaluate and work to improve our internal control over financial reporting, management may execute additional measures to address potential control deficiencies or modify the remediation plan described above. Management will continue to review and make necessary changes to the overall design of our internal controls.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the three months ended June 30, 2013 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

On April 16, 2013, Lodsys Group, LLC, a Texas limited liability company (“Lodsys”), filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas alleging that we have been infringing two of Lodsys’ patents, and is seeking unspecified damages, including treble damages for willful infringement, interest, attorneys’ fees and such other costs as the Court may deem just and proper. On June 19, 2013, we filed an answer to Lodsys’s complaint (i) denying all of Lodsys’s claims, (ii) setting forth certain affirmative defenses to Lodsys’s claims and (iii) asserting counterclaims that we do not infringe the Lodsys patents and that the Lodsys patents are invalid. This action has only recently been filed and, accordingly, we are not in a position to assess whether any loss or adverse effect on its financial condition is probable or remote or to estimate the range of potential loss, if any.

In addition to the Lodsys matter described above, from time to time, we are subject to various claims, complaints and legal actions in the normal course of business. We do not believe that we are a party to any pending litigation, the outcome of which will have a material adverse effect on our operations, financial position or liquidity. However, the ultimate outcome of any litigation is uncertain and, regardless of outcome, litigation can have an adverse impact on us because of defense costs, potential negative publicity, diversion of management resources and other factors.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

Our business is subject to many risks and uncertainties, which may affect our future financial performance. If any of the events or circumstances described below occurs, our business and financial performance could be harmed, our actual results could differ materially from our expectations and the market value of our stock could decline. The risks and uncertainties discussed below are not the only ones we face. There may be additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently do not believe are material that may harm our business and financial performance. Because of the risks and uncertainties discussed below, as well as other variables affecting our operating results, past financial performance should not be considered as a reliable indicator of future performance and investors should not use historical trends to anticipate results or trends in future periods.

We have a history of net losses, may incur substantial net losses in the future and may not achieve profitability.

We have incurred significant losses since inception, including a net loss of $21.1 million in 2011, a net loss of $20.5 million in 2012 and a net loss of $8.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013. As of June 30, 2013, we had an accumulated deficit of $240.7 million. We expect our costs in 2013 to increase in absolute dollars over 2012 levels as we implement additional initiatives designed to increase revenues, such as developing games with greater complexity and higher production values, making investments related to our continued transition to becoming a games-as-a-service company, increasing the amount we spend marketing our new titles and paying upfront license fees or minimum guarantees related to our Glu Publishing business. If our revenues do not increase to offset these additional expenses, if we experience unexpected increases in operating expenses or if we are required to take additional charges related to impairments or restructurings, we will continue to incur losses and will not become profitable. In addition, our revenues increased only slightly in each of 2011 and 2012 from the preceding year, and slightly decreased in the first half of 2013 as compared to the first half of 2012. If we are unable to significantly increase our revenues or reduce our expenses, it will continue to negatively affect our operating results and our ability to achieve and sustain profitability.

We have a relatively new and evolving business model with a short operating history.

In early 2010, we changed our business model to focus on becoming a leading publisher of “free-to-play” games for smartphones, tablets and other advanced platforms. Free-to-play games are games that a player can download and play for free, but which allow players to access a variety of additional content and features for a fee and to engage with various advertisements and offers that generate revenues for us. We launched our first free-to-play titles in the fourth quarter of 2010, so we have a short history operating in this business model, which limits the experience upon which we can draw when making operating decisions. In addition, we have been transitioning towards becoming a games-as-a-service company in which the majority of our future free-to-play games will be only playable online, and we may not be successful in executing on this transition. Our efforts to develop free-to-play games and transition towards becoming a games-as-a-service company may prove unsuccessful or, even if successful, it may take more time than we anticipate to achieve significant revenues because, among other reasons:

•

we may have difficulty optimizing the monetization of our games due to our relatively limited experience creating games that include micro-transaction capabilities, advertising and offers, as well as our limited experience in offering the features that are often associated with free-to-play games published by games-as-a-service companies, such as tournaments, live events and more frequent content updates;

•

we intend to continue to develop the majority of our games based upon our own intellectual property, rather than well-known licensed brands, and we may encounter difficulties in generating sufficient consumer interest in and downloads of our games, particularly since we have had relatively limited success generating significant revenues from games based on our own intellectual property;

•

many well-funded public and private companies have released, or plan to release, free-to-play games, including those provided under the games-as-a-service model, and this competition will make it more difficult for us to differentiate our games and derive significant revenues from them;

•

free-to-play games, including those delivered as a service, have a relatively limited history, and it is unclear how popular this style of game will become or remain or its revenue potential;

•

our free-to-play strategy assumes that a large number of players will download our games because they are free and that we will then be able to effectively monetize the games; however, players may not widely download our games for a variety of reasons, including poor consumer reviews or other negative publicity, ineffective or insufficient marketing efforts, lack of sufficient community features, lack of prominent storefront featuring and the relatively large file size of some of our games—our thick-client games often utilize a significant amount of the available memory on a user’s device, and due to the inherent limitations of the smartphone platforms and telecommunications networks, which only allow applications that are less than 50 megabytes to be downloaded over a carrier’s wireless network, players must download one of our thick-client games either via a wireless Internet (wifi) connection or initially to their computer and then side-loaded to their device;

•

even if our games are widely downloaded, we may fail to retain users or optimize the monetization of these games for a variety of reasons, including poor game design or quality, lack of community features, gameplay issues such as game unavailability, long load times or an unexpected termination of the game due to data server or other technical issues, or our failure to effectively respond and adapt to changing user preferences through game updates;

•

we may have difficulty hiring the additional monetization, live operations, server technology, user experience and product management personnel that we require to support our transition to becoming a games-as-a-service company, or may face difficulties in developing our GluOn games-as-a-service technology platform and incorporating it into our products;

•

we will depend on the proper and continued functioning of our own servers and third-party infrastructure to operate our connected games that are delivered as a service;

•

the billing and provisioning capabilities of some smartphones and tablets are currently not optimized to enable users to purchase games or make in-app purchases, which make it difficult for users of these smartphones and tablets to purchase our games or make in-app purchases and could reduce our addressable market, at least in the short term; and

•

the Federal Trade Commission has indicated that it intends to review issues related to in-app purchases, particularly with respect to games that are marketed primarily to minors, and the commission might issue rules significantly restricting or even prohibiting in-app purchases or name us as a defendant in a future class-action lawsuit.

If we do not achieve a sufficient return on our investment with respect to our free-to-play business model, it will negatively affect our operating results and may require us to formulate a new business strategy.

We rely on a very small portion of our total players for nearly all of our revenues that we derive from in-app purchases.

Since our free-to-play games can be downloaded and played for free, we have succeeded in generating a significant number of game installations and significant user-base growth. However, we rely on a very small portion of our total users for nearly all of our smartphone revenues derived from in-app purchases (as opposed to advertisements and incentivized offers). Since the launch of our first free-to-play titles in the fourth quarter of 2010, the percentage of unique paying users for our largest revenue-generating free-to-play games has been approximately 1%; however, in the initial period following the launch of a game, the percentage may be higher, and the percentage of unique paying users is generally lower than 1% for our less successful titles. To significantly increase our revenues, we must either increase the number of users who make in-app purchases or increase the amount that our paying players spend in our games. We have to date encountered difficulties with game monetization (for example, developing a sufficient quantity and variety of virtual goods to enable a relatively large scale of in-app purchases by an individual user). We might not succeed in our efforts to increase the monetization rates of our users, particularly if we are unsuccessful in our transition to becoming a games-as-a-service company. If we are unable to convert non-paying players into paying players or if the average amount of revenues that we generate from our users does not increase or declines, our business may not grow, our financial results will suffer, and our stock price may decline.

We derive the majority of our revenues from Apple’s App Store and the Google Play Store, and if we are unable to maintain a good relationship with each of Apple and Google or if either of these storefronts were unavailable for any prolonged period of time, our business will suffer.

The majority of our smartphone revenues have historically been derived from Apple’s iOS platform, which accounted for 58.8% of our total revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2013 compared with 57.4% of our total revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2012. We generated the majority of these iOS-related revenues from in-app purchases and sales of premium games made through the Apple App Store, which represented 50.4% of our total revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2013 compared with 42.5% of our total revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2012, with the balance of our iOS-related revenues generated from offers and advertisements in games distributed on the Apple App Store. In addition, we generated approximately 28.6% and 24.3% of our total revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, from the Android platform. We generated the majority of our Android-related revenues from in-app purchases and sales of premium games made through the Google Play store, which represented 18.7% and 18.7% of our total revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. We believe that we have good relationships with each of Apple and Google, which has contributed to the majority of our games being featured on their storefronts when they were commercially released. If we do not continue to receive prominent featuring, users may find it more difficult to discover our games and we may not generate significant revenues from them. We may also be required to spend significantly more on marketing campaigns to generate substantial revenues on these platforms. In addition, currently neither Apple nor Google charges a publisher when it features one of their apps. If either Apple or Google were to charge publishers to feature an app, it could cause our marketing expenses to increase considerably. Accordingly, any change or deterioration in our relationship with Apple or Google could materially harm our business and likely cause our stock price to decline.

We also rely on the continued functioning of the Apple App Store and the Google Play Store. In the past these digital storefronts have been unavailable for short periods of time or experienced issues with their in-app purchasing functionality. If either of these events recurs on a prolonged basis or other similar issues arise that impact our ability to generate revenues from these storefronts, it would have a material adverse effect on our revenues and operating results. In addition, if these storefront operators fail to provide high levels of service, our end users’ ability to access our games may be interrupted or end users may not receive the virtual currency or goods for which they have paid, which may adversely affect our brand.

The operators of digital storefronts on which we publish our free-to-play games in many cases have the unilateral ability to change and interpret the terms of our contract with them.

Unlike our legacy feature phone business in which we and the wireless carrier or other distributor negotiated the business terms related to the distribution of our feature phone games, we distribute our free-to-play games through direct-to-consumer digital storefronts, for which the distribution terms and conditions are often “click through” agreements that we are not able to negotiate with the storefront operator. For example, we are subject to each of Apple’s and Google’s standard click-through terms and conditions for application developers, which govern the promotion, distribution and operation of applications, including our games, on their storefronts. Each of Apple and Google can unilaterally change their standard terms and conditions with no prior notice to us. In addition, the agreement terms can be vague and subject to changing interpretations by the storefront operator. For example, in the second quarter of 2011, Apple began prohibiting certain types of virtual currency-incented advertising offers in games sold on the Apple App Store. These offers accounted for approximately one-third of our smartphone revenues during the three months ended June 30, 2011, and our inability to subsequently use such offers negatively impacted our smartphone revenues thereafter. Most recently, Apple informed us early in the fourth quarter of 2012 that we could no longer include links to Tapjoy’s HTML5 website in our games, which has since negatively impacted our ability to generate revenue through incented offers and will likely continue to negatively impact our revenues in future periods. Any similar changes in the future that impact our revenues could materially harm our business, and we may not receive significant or any advance warning of such change. In addition, each of Apple and Google have the right to prohibit a developer from distributing its applications on its storefront if the developer violates its standard terms and conditions. If Apple or Google or any other storefront operator determines that we are violating its standard terms and conditions, by a new interpretation or otherwise or prohibits us from distributing our games on its storefront, it would materially harm our business and likely cause our stock price to significantly decline.

The markets in which we operate are highly competitive, and many of our competitors have significantly greater resources than we do.

Developing, distributing and selling mobile games is a highly competitive business, characterized by frequent product introductions and rapidly emerging new platforms, technologies and storefronts. For end users, we compete primarily on the basis of game quality, brand and customer reviews. We compete for promotional and storefront placement based on these factors, as well as our relationship with the digital storefront owner, historical performance, perception of sales potential and relationships with licensors of brands and other intellectual property. For content and brand licensors, we compete based on royalty and other economic terms, perceptions of development quality, porting abilities, speed of execution, distribution breadth and relationships with storefront owners or carriers. We also compete for experienced and talented employees.

We compete with a continually increasing number of companies, including Zynga, DeNA, Gree, Nexon and many well-funded private companies, including Kabam, King, Rovio, Storm 8/Team Lava and Supercell. We also compete for consumer spending with large companies, such as Activision, Electronic Arts (EA Mobile), Gameloft and Take-Two Interactive, whose games for smartphones and tablets are primarily premium rather than free-to-play. In addition, given the open nature of the development and distribution for smartphones and tablets, we also compete or will compete with a vast number of small companies and individuals who are able to create and launch games and other content for these devices using relatively limited resources and with relatively limited start-up time or expertise. As an example of the competition that we face, it has been estimated that more than 150,000 active games were available on Apple’s App Store as of July 31, 2013. The proliferation of titles in these open developer channels makes it difficult for us to differentiate ourselves from other developers and to compete for end users without substantially increasing our marketing expenses and development costs.

Some of our competitors and our potential competitors have one or more advantages over us, either globally or in particular geographic markets, which include:

•

significantly greater financial resources;

•

greater experience with the free-to-play games and games-as-a-service business models and more effective game monetization;

•

stronger brand and consumer recognition regionally or worldwide;

•

greater experience integrating community features into their games, operating as a games-as-a-service company and increasing the revenues derived from their users;

•

the capacity to leverage their marketing expenditures across a broader portfolio of mobile and non-mobile products;

•

larger installed customer bases from related platforms, such as console gaming or social networking websites, to which they can market and sell mobile games;

•

more substantial intellectual property of their own from which they can develop games without having to pay royalties;

•

lower labor and development costs and better overall economies of scale;

•

greater platform-specific focus, experience and expertise; and

•

broader global distribution and presence.

If we are unable to compete effectively or we are not as successful as our competitors in our target markets, our sales could decline, our margins could decline and we could lose market share, any of which would materially harm our business, operating results and financial condition.

Our financial results could vary significantly from quarter to quarter and are difficult to predict, which in turn could cause volatility in our stock price.

Our revenues and operating results could vary significantly from quarter to quarter due to a variety of factors, many of which are outside of our control. As a result, comparing our operating results on a period-to-period basis may not be meaningful. In addition, we may not be able to accurately predict our future revenues or results of operations. We base our current and future expense levels on our internal operating plans and sales forecasts, and our operating costs are to a large extent fixed. As a result, we may not be able to reduce our costs sufficiently to compensate for an unexpected shortfall in revenues, and even a small shortfall in revenues could disproportionately and adversely affect financial results for that quarter.

In addition to other risk factors discussed in this section, factors that may contribute to the variability of our quarterly results include:

•

our ability to increase the number of our paying players and the amount that each paying player spends in our games;

•

the popularity and monetization rates of our new games released during the quarter and the ability of games released in prior periods to sustain their popularity and monetization rates;

•

the number and timing of new games released by us and our competitors, particularly those games that may represent a significant portion of revenues in a quarter, which timing can be impacted by internal development delays, shifts in product strategy and how quickly Digital Storefront operators review and approve our games for commercial release;

•

changes in the prominence of storefront featuring for our games and those of our competitors;

•

fluctuations in the size and rate of growth of overall consumer demand for smartphones, tablets, games and related content;

•

changes in the mix of revenues derived from first party titles and third party titles;

•

changes in the amount of money we spend marketing our titles in a particular quarter, as well as changes in the timing of when we incur these marketing expenses within the quarter;

•

decisions by us to incur additional expenses, such as increases in research and development, or unanticipated increases in vendor-related costs, such as hosting fees;

•

the timing of successful mobile device launches;

•

the seasonality of our industry;

•

changes in accounting rules, such as those governing recognition of revenue, including the period of time over which we recognize revenue for in-app purchases of virtual currency and goods within certain of our games;

•

fluctuations in the fair market value of the contingent consideration issued to the Blammo non-employee shareholders, as the fair value of the contingent consideration will be measured during each reporting period until the end of the earn-out period in March 2015;

•

the amount and timing of charges related to any future impairments of goodwill, intangible assets, prepaid royalties and guarantees; for example, in 2011, we impaired $531,000 of certain prepaid royalties and royalty guarantees, and in 2012, we impaired $3.6 million of our goodwill related to our APAC reporting unit; and

•

macro-economic fluctuations in the United States and global economies, including those that impact discretionary consumer spending.

Consumer tastes are continually changing and are often unpredictable, and we compete for consumer discretionary spending against other forms of entertainment; if we fail to develop and publish new mobile games that achieve market acceptance, our sales would suffer.

Our business depends on developing and publishing mobile games that consumers will want to download and spend time and money playing. We must continue to invest significant resources in research and development, analytics and marketing to introduce new games and continue to update our successful free-to-play games, and we often must make decisions about these matters well in advance of product release to timely implement them. Our success depends, in part, on unpredictable and volatile factors beyond our control, including consumer preferences, competing games, new mobile platforms and the availability of other entertainment activities. If our games and related applications do not meet consumer expectations, or they are not brought to market in a timely and effective manner, our business, operating results and financial condition would be harmed. For example, we intend to include new categories of games (such as role-playing games and card battle games) in our planned 2013 product portfolio that often have higher monetization rates than our single-player focused action/adventure and casual games. We have limited experience creating these types of games, and if we do not succeed in these efforts, it will negatively impact our revenues and operating results for 2013 and beyond. Even if our games are successfully introduced and initially adopted, a failure to continue to update them with compelling content or a subsequent shift in the entertainment preferences of consumers could cause a decline in our games’ popularity that could materially reduce our revenues and harm our business, operating results and financial condition. Furthermore, we compete for the discretionary spending of consumers, who face a vast array of entertainment choices, including games played on personal computers and consoles, television, movies, sports and the Internet. If we are unable to sustain sufficient interest in our games compared to other forms of entertainment, our business and financial results would be seriously harmed.

If we do not successfully establish and maintain awareness of our brand and games, if we incur excessive expenses promoting and maintaining our brand or our games or if our games contains defects or objectionable content, our operating results and financial condition could be harmed.

We believe that establishing and maintaining our brand is critical to establishing a direct relationship with end users who purchase our products from direct-to-consumer channels and to maintaining our existing relationships with distributors and content licensors, as well as potentially developing new such relationships. Increasing awareness of our brand and recognition of our games is particularly important in connection with our strategic focus of developing games based on our own intellectual property. Our ability to promote the Glu brand and increase recognition of our games depends on our ability to develop high-quality, engaging games. If consumers, Digital Storefront owners and branded content owners do not perceive our existing games as high-quality or if we introduce new games that are not favorably received by them, then we may not succeed in building brand recognition and brand loyalty in the marketplace. In addition, globalizing and extending our brand and recognition of our games is costly and involves extensive management time to execute successfully, particularly as we expand our efforts to increase awareness of our brand and games among international consumers. Although we have significantly increased our sales and marketing expenditures in connection with the launch of our games, these efforts may not succeed in increasing awareness of our brand or the new games. If we fail to increase and maintain brand awareness and consumer recognition of our games, our potential revenues could be limited, our costs could increase and our business, operating results and financial condition could suffer.

In addition, if a game contains objectionable content, we could experience damage to our reputation and brand. The majority of our successful free-to-play games are in the action/adventure genre, and we expect that the majority of the games that we will release in 2013 will be in that category. Some of these games contain violence or other content that certain consumers may find objectionable. For example, Apple has assigned our Frontline Commando: D-Day game a 17-and-older rating due to its violence. In addition, Google required us to submit two versions of our Blood & Glory and Contract Killer: Zombies games, one of which did not depict blood. Despite these ratings and precautions, consumers may be offended by certain of our game content games and children to whom these games are not targeted may choose to play them nonetheless. In addition, one of our employees or an employee of an outside developer could include hidden features in one of our games without our knowledge, which might contain profanity, graphic violence, sexually explicit or otherwise objectionable material. If consumers believe that a game we published contains objectionable content, it could harm our brand, consumers could refuse to buy it or demand a refund, and could pressure the digital platform operators to no longer allow us to publish the game on their platforms. Similarly, if one of our games is introduced with defects or has playability issues, it could results in negative user reviews and damage our brand. These issues could be exacerbated if our customer service department does not timely and adequately address issues that our users have encountered with our games.

We have depended on a small number of games for a significant portion of our revenues in recent fiscal periods. If these games do not continue to succeed or we do not release highly successful new games, our revenues would decline.

In the mobile gaming industry, new games are frequently introduced, but a relatively small number of games account for a significant portion of industry sales. Similarly, a significant portion of our revenues comes from a limited number of games, although the games in that group have shifted over time. Our growth depends on our ability to consistently launch new games that generate significant revenues. For example, in the third quarter of 2012, we launched 11 new games, only two of which generated significant revenues, which, in part, contributed to our revenues declining from the second quarter of 2012. We have since that time failed to consistently release titles that generate significant revenues, which has resulted in our inability to grow our revenues on a quarterly basis. Developing and launching our games and providing future content updates requires us to invest significant time and resources with no guarantee that our efforts will result in significant revenues. If our new games are not successful or if we are not able to cost-effectively extend the lives of our successful games, our revenues could be limited and our business and operating results would suffer.

If we fail to maintain and enhance our capabilities for porting games to a broad array of mobile devices, particularly those utilizing the Android operating system, our revenues and financial results could suffer.

We derive the majority of our revenues from the sale of games for smartphones and tablets that utilize Apple’s iOS or Google’s Android operating systems. Unlike the Apple ecosystem in which Apple controls both the device (iPhone, iPod Touch and iPad) and the storefront (Apple’s App Store), the Android ecosystem is highly fragmented since a large number of OEMs manufacture and sell Android-based devices that run a variety of versions of the Android operating system, and there are many Android-based storefronts in addition to the Google Play Store. For us to sell our games to the widest possible audience of Android users, we must port our games to a significant portion of the more than 700 Android-based devices that are commercially available, many of which have different technical requirements. Since the number of Android-based smartphones and tablets shipped worldwide is growing significantly, it is important that we maintain and enhance our porting capabilities, which could require us to invest considerable resources in this area. These additional costs could harm our business, operating results and financial condition. In addition, we must continue to increase the efficiency of our porting processes or it may take us longer to port games to an equivalent number of devices, which would negatively impact our margins. If we fail to maintain or enhance our porting capabilities, our revenues and financial results could suffer.

We use a game development engine licensed from Unity Technologies to create many of our games. If we experience any prolonged technical issues with this engine or if we lose access to this engine for any reason, it could delay our game development efforts and cause us our financial results to fall below expectations for a quarterly or annual period, which would likely cause our stock price to decline.

We use a game development engine licensed from Unity Technologies to create many of our games, and we expect to continue to use this engine for the foreseeable future. Because we do not own this engine, we do not control its operation or maintenance. As a result, any prolonged technical issues with this engine might not be resolved quickly, despite the fact that we have contractual service level commitments from Unity. In addition, although Unity cannot terminate our agreement absent an uncured material breach of the agreement by Glu, we could lose access to this engine under certain circumstances, such as a natural disaster that impacts Unity or a bankruptcy event. If we experience any prolonged issues with regard to the operation of the Unity game development engine or if we lose access to this engine for any reason, it could delay our game development efforts and cause us to not meet revenue expectations for a quarterly or annual period, which would likely cause our stock price to decline. Further, if one of our competitors acquired Unity, the acquiring company would be less likely to renew our agreement, which could impact our game development efforts in the future, particularly with respect to sequels to games that were created on the Unity engine.

We derive a significant portion of our revenues from advertisements and offers that are incorporated into our free-to-play games through relationships with third parties. If we lose the ability to provide these advertisements and offers for any reason, or if any events occur that negatively impact the revenues we receive from these sources, it would negatively impact our operating results.

We derive revenues from our free-to-play games though in-app purchases, advertisements and offers. We incorporate advertisements and offers into our games by implementing third parties’ software development kits. We rely on these third parties to provide us with a sufficient inventory of advertisements and offers to meet the demand of our user base. If we exhaust the available inventory of these third parties, it will negatively impact our revenues. If our relationship with any of these third parties terminates for any reason, or if the commercial terms of our relationships do not continue to be renewed on favorable terms, we would need to locate and implement other third party solutions, which could negatively impact our revenues, at least in the short term. Furthermore, the revenues that we derive from advertisements and offers is subject to seasonality, as companies’ advertising budgets are generally highest during the fourth quarter and decline significantly in the first quarter of the following year, which negatively impacts our revenues in the first quarter (and conversely significantly increases our marketing expenses in the fourth quarter).

In addition, the actions of the storefront operators can also negatively impact the revenues that we generate from advertisements and offers. For example, in the second quarter of 2011, Apple began prohibiting certain types of virtual currency-incented advertising offers in games sold on the Apple App Store. These offers accounted for approximately one-third of our revenues during the three months ended September 30, 2011, and our inability to utilize such offers has negatively impacted our revenues. In addition, in the third quarter of 2012, Apple made changes to its terms and conditions that could, depending on how Apple interprets them, negatively impact the revenues we generate from third-party advertising service providers. Any similar changes in the future that impact our revenues that we generate from advertisements and offers could materially harm our business.

We have begun publishing, and intend to continue to publish games developed by third parties which will expose us to a number of potential operational and legal risks.

We have recently formed our Glu Publishing department that will initially focus on entering into relationships with developers of successful games in Asian markets where Glu will localize and publish those games in the United States and non-Asian markets. Our Glu Publishing business will expose us to a number of potential operational and legal risks. For example, we may be required to provide third party developers with upfront license fees or non-recoupable minimum guarantees in order to obtain the rights to publish their games, and we may need to spend significant money marketing these games after they have been commercially launched. If the games are not commercially successful because they do not appeal to a Western audience, because of our limited experience in publishing other developers’ games or for any other reason, it will negatively impact our operating results. In addition, if any of the third party developers with which we work have created their games by infringing another party’s intellectual property or otherwise violating their rights, or if these games violate applicable laws and regulations such as with respect to data collection and privacy, we would be exposed to potential legal risks by publishing these games.

We may need to raise additional capital or borrow funds to grow our business, and we may not be able to raise capital or borrow funds on terms acceptable to us or at all.

We expect to continue to use cash in our operations during 2013 as we seek to grow our business. In addition, we expect to use approximately $1.8 million in the third quarter of 2013 for capital expenditures related to office moves for our corporate headquarters in San Francisco and our Kirkland, Washington studio. As of June 30, 2013, we had $19.1 million of cash and cash equivalents. If our cash and cash equivalents and cash inflows are insufficient to meet our cash requirements or if we wish to strengthen our balance sheet, we will need to seek additional capital, potentially pursuant to our effective universal shelf registration statement, and we may be unable to do so on terms that are acceptable to us or at all. Equity financings would dilute our existing stockholders, particularly given our current stock price, and the holders of new securities may receive rights, preferences or privileges that are senior to those of existing stockholders. Alternatively, we may wish to enter into a credit facility or other debt arrangement, and we may be unable to procure one on terms that are acceptable to us, particularly in light of the current credit market conditions. The material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting that resulted from the restatement of our financial statements may make it more difficult for us to raise additional debt or equity capital. If we require new sources of financing but they are insufficient or unavailable, we would be required to modify our operating plans to align them with available resources, which would harm our ability to grow our business.

Our reported financial results could be adversely affected by changes in financial accounting standards or by the application of existing or future accounting standards to our business as it evolves.

Our reported financial results are impacted by the accounting policies promulgated by the accounting standards bodies and the methods, estimates and judgments that we use in applying our accounting policies. Due to recent economic events, the frequency of accounting policy changes may accelerate, including conversion to unified international accounting standards. Policies affecting software revenue recognition have affected, and could further significantly affect, the way we account for revenue. For example, the accounting for revenue derived from smartphone platforms and free-to-play games, particularly with regard to revenues generated from digital storefronts, is still evolving and, in some cases, uncertain. In particular, we were required to file an amendment to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 and our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2013 to restate or revise the financial statements contained in those reports (including for the year ended December 31, 2011) because we did not correctly apply the revenue accounting guidance to our smartphone revenues for sales through digital storefronts. (See Note 1A (Restatement of Financial Statements) for additional information about the restatement.) While we believe that we are now correctly accounting for our smartphone revenues, this is an area that continues to involve significant discussion among accounting professionals and which is not completely settled. It is possible that the relative application, interpretation and weighting of the factors that relate to whether we should be considered the principal in the sales transaction of games sold through digital storefronts may evolve, and we may in the future conclude that our accounting policy for smartphone revenues, as reflected in the restated financial statements, is incorrect, which could result in another restatement of affected financial statements. In addition, we currently defer revenues related to virtual goods and currency over the average playing period of paying users, which approximates the useful life of the transaction. While we believe our estimates are reasonable based on available game player information, we may revise such estimates in the future as our games’ operation periods change. Any adjustments arising from changes in the estimates of the lives of these virtual items would be applied prospectively on the basis that such changes are caused by new information indicating a change in the game player behavior patterns of our paying users. Any changes in our estimates of useful lives of these virtual items may result in our revenues being recognized on a basis different from prior periods’ and may cause our operating results to fluctuate. As we enhance, expand and diversify our business and product offerings, the application of existing or future financial accounting standards, particularly those relating to the way we account for our smartphone revenues, could have a significant adverse effect on our reported results although not necessarily on our cash flows.

If we are unable to maintain effective internal control over financial reporting, the accuracy and timeliness of our financial reporting may be adversely affected.

Maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting is necessary for us to produce reliable financial statements. In connection with the restatement to our unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements in this Form 10-Q discussed in Note 1A, management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, reassessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012. Based on this reassessment using the guidelines established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in 1992, management has concluded that we did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012 because of a material weakness related to the application of revenue accounting guidance to our smartphone revenues for sales through digital storefronts. This control deficiency resulted in the misstatement of our revenues and cost of revenues, including gross margin percentages, and the related balance sheet accounts and financial disclosures for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2012 (and the restatement of the unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements for the quarters ended March 31, June 30, and September 30 for such years) as discussed in Note 1A and Note 14 to our consolidated financial statements included in our annual report on Form 10-K/A filed on August 9, 2013. If we are unable to effectively remediate this material weakness or we are otherwise unable to maintain adequate internal controls for financial reporting, or if our independent registered public accounting firm is unable to express an opinion as to the effectiveness of our internal controls as required pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, it could result in another material misstatement of our financial statements that would require a restatement, investor confidence in the accuracy and timeliness of our financial reports may be impacted or the market price of our common stock could be negatively impacted.

Our acquisition activities may disrupt our ongoing business, may involve increased expenses and may present risks not contemplated at the time of the transactions.

We have acquired, and may continue to acquire, companies, products and technologies that complement our strategic direction. Acquisitions involve significant risks and uncertainties, including:

•

diversion of management time and a shift of focus from operating the businesses to issues related to integration and administration;

•

inability to successfully integrate the acquired technology and operations into our business and maintain uniform standards, controls, policies and procedures;

•

challenges retaining the key employees, customers and other business partners of the acquired business;

•

inability to realize synergies expected to result from an acquisition;

•

an impairment of acquired goodwill and other intangible assets in future periods would result in a charge to earnings in the period in which the write-down occurs;

•

the internal control environment of an acquired entity may not be consistent with our standards and may require significant time and resources to improve;

•

in the case of foreign acquisitions, the need to integrate operations across different cultures and languages and to address the particular economic, currency, political and regulatory risks associated with specific countries; and

•

liability for activities of the acquired companies before the acquisition, including violations of laws, rules and regulations, commercial disputes, tax liabilities and other known and unknown liabilities.

In addition, if we issue equity securities as consideration in an acquisition, as we did for our acquisitions of Griptonite, Blammo and GameSpy, our current stockholders’ percentage ownership and earnings per share would be diluted. For example, our Blammo acquisition agreement provides that the former Blammo shareholders may earn up to 3,312,937 shares of our common stock if Blammo achieves certain net revenue targets during the years ending March 31, 2013, March 31, 2014 and March 31, 2015; Blammo earned 742,036 shares of a possible 909,091 shares for the year ended March 31, 2013. Because acquisitions are inherently risky, our transactions may not be successful and may, in some cases, harm our operating results or financial condition.

We rely on a combination of our own servers and third party infrastructure to operate our games. If we experience any system or network failures, cyber attacks or any other interruption to our games, it could reduce our sales, increase costs or result in a loss of revenues or end users of our games.

We rely on Digital Storefronts and other third-party networks to deliver games to our customers and on their or other third parties’ billing systems to track and account for our game downloads. We also rely on our own servers and third-party infrastructure to operate our connected games, and our reliance on such third-party infrastructure will increase as we transition to becoming a games-as-a-service company. In particular, a significant portion of our game traffic is hosted by Amazon Web Services, which service provides server redundancy and uses multiple locations on various distinct power grids. Amazon may terminate its agreement with us upon 30 days’ notice. Amazon experienced a power outage during the second quarter of 2012, which affected the playability of our games for approximately one day. While this particular event did not adversely impact our business, a similar outage of a longer duration could. In addition, we use, or plan to use, GameSpy’s services and equipment for many of our games, which is subject to a transitional data center services agreement between us and IGN, GameSpy’s former parent corporation, that terminates on August 2, 2014, unless we (or, under certain circumstances, IGN) earlier terminate the agreement. Any technical problem with, cyber attack on, or loss of access to these third parties’ or our systems, servers or other technologies could result in the inability of end users to download or play our games, prevent the completion of billing for a game or result in the loss of users’ virtual currency or other in-app purchases, interfere with access to some aspects of our games or result in the theft of end-user personal information. For example, some users of our Android-based games have experienced issues receiving the virtual currency that they purchased and paid for. In addition, if virtual assets are lost, or if users do not receive their purchased virtual currency, we may be required to issue refunds, we may receive negative publicity and game ratings, we may lose users of our games, and we may become subject to regulatory investigation or class action litigation, any of which would negatively affect our business. Any of these problems could harm our reputation or cause us to lose end users or revenues or incur substantial repair costs and distract management from operating our business.

Changes in foreign exchange rates and limitations on the convertibility of foreign currencies could adversely affect our business and operating results.

We currently transact business in more than 70 countries in more than 20 different currencies, with Pounds Sterling and Euros being the primary international currencies in which we transact business. Conducting business in currencies other than U.S. Dollars subjects us to fluctuations in currency exchange rates that could have a negative impact on our reported operating results. We experienced significant fluctuations in currency exchange rates in 2011 and 2012, and expect to experience continued significant fluctuations in the future. We incur expenses for employee compensation and other operating expenses at our non-U.S. locations in the local currency, and an increasing percentage of our international revenue is from customers who pay us in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. Fluctuations in the exchange rates between the U.S. dollar and those other currencies could result in the dollar equivalent of these expenses being higher and/or the dollar equivalent of the foreign-denominated revenue being lower than would be the case if exchange rates were stable. This could have a negative impact on our operating results. To date, we have not engaged in exchange rate hedging activities, and we do not expect to do so in the foreseeable future.

We face additional risk if a currency is not freely or actively traded. Some currencies, such as the Chinese Renminbi in which our Chinese operations principally transact business, are subject to limitations on conversion into other currencies, which can limit our ability to react to rapid foreign currency devaluations and to repatriate funds to the United States should we require additional working capital.

We face added business, political, regulatory, operational, financial and economic risks as a result of our international operations and distribution, any of which could increase our costs and adversely affect our operating results.

International sales represented approximately 46.6% (restated) and 50.3% (restated) of our revenues in 2012 and 2011, respectively. To target international markets, we develop games that are customized for consumers in those markets. We have international offices located in a number of foreign countries including Canada, China, India and Russia. We expect to maintain our international presence, and we expect international sales will continue to be an important component of our revenues, particularly in APAC markets. Risks affecting our international operations include:

•

our ability to develop games that appeal to the tastes and preferences of consumers in international markets;

•

difficulties developing, staffing, and simultaneously managing a large number of varying foreign operations as a result of distance, language, and cultural differences;

•

multiple and conflicting laws and regulations, including complications due to unexpected changes in these laws and regulations;

•

our ability to develop, customize and localize games that appeal to the tastes and preferences of consumers in international markets;

•

competition from local game developers that have significant market share in certain foreign markets and a better understanding of local consumer preferences;

•

potential violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and local laws prohibiting improper payments to government officials or representatives of commercial partners;

•

regulations that could potentially affect the content of our products and their distribution, particularly in China;

•

foreign exchange controls that might prevent us from repatriating income earned in countries outside the United States, particularly China;

•

potential adverse foreign tax consequences, since due to our international operations, we must pay income tax in numerous foreign jurisdictions with complex and evolving tax laws;

•

political, economic and social instability;

•

restrictions on the export or import of technology;

•

trade and tariff restrictions and variations in tariffs, quotas, taxes and other market barriers; and

•

difficulties in enforcing intellectual property rights in certain countries.

These risks could harm our international operations, which, in turn, could materially and adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition.

If we fail to deliver our games at the same time as new mobile devices are commercially introduced, our sales may suffer.

Our business depends, in part, on the commercial introduction of new mobile devices with enhanced features, including larger, higher resolution color screens, improved audio quality, and greater processing power, memory, battery life and storage. For example, the introduction of new and more powerful versions of Apple’s iPhone and iPad and devices based on Google’s Android operating system, have helped drive the growth of the mobile games market. In addition, consumers generally purchase the majority of content, such as our games, for a new device within a few months of purchasing it. We do not control the timing of these device launches. Some manufacturers give us access to their mobile devices prior to commercial release. If one or more major manufacturers were to stop providing us access to new device models prior to commercial release, we might be unable to introduce games that are compatible with the new device when the device is first commercially released, and we might be unable to make compatible games for a substantial period following the device release. If we do not adequately build into our title plan the demand for games for a particular mobile device or experience game launch delays, we miss the opportunity to sell games when new mobile devices are shipped or our end users upgrade to a new mobile device, our revenues would likely decline and our business, operating results and financial condition would likely suffer.

Our business and growth may suffer if we are unable to hire and retain key personnel.

Our future success will depend, to a significant extent, on our ability to retain and motivate our key personnel, namely our management team, particularly Niccolo de Masi, our President and Chief Executive Officer, as well as experienced game development personnel who may experience uncertainty due to the restructurings we implemented in the fourth quarter of 2012 and first half of 2013, in which we eliminated, in the aggregate, more than 100 positions in our Kirkland, Sao Paolo and San Francisco studios. In addition, to grow our business, execute on our business strategy and replace departing employees, we must identify, hire and retain qualified personnel, particularly additional monetization, live operations, server technology, user experience and product management personnel to support our transition to becoming a games-as-a-service company. Competition for qualified management, game development and other staff can be intense. Attracting and retaining qualified personnel may be particularly difficult for us if our stock price remains relatively depressed, since individuals may elect to seek employment with other companies that they believe have better long-term prospects. Competitors have in the past and may in the future attempt to recruit our employees, and our management and key employees are not bound by agreements that could prevent them from terminating their employment at any time. In addition, we do not maintain a key-person life insurance policy on any of our officers. Our business and growth may suffer if we are unable to hire and retain key personnel.

Our business is subject to increasing governmental regulation. If we do not successfully respond to these regulations, our business may suffer.

We are subject to a number of domestic and foreign laws and regulations that affect our business. Not only are these laws constantly evolving, which could result in their being interpreted in ways that could harm our business, but legislation is also continually being introduced that may affect both the content of our products and their distribution. In the United States, for example, numerous federal and state laws have been introduced which attempt to restrict the content or distribution of games. Legislation has been adopted in several states, and proposed at the federal level, that prohibits the sale of certain games to minors. If such legislation is adopted, it could harm our business by limiting the games we are able to offer to our customers or by limiting the size of the potential market for our games. We may also be required to modify certain games or alter our marketing strategies to comply with new and possibly inconsistent regulations, which could be costly or delay the release of our games. The Federal Trade Commission has also indicated that it intends to review issues related to in-app purchases, particularly with respect to games that are marketed primarily to minors. If the Federal Trade Commission issues rules significantly restricting or even prohibiting in-app purchases, it would significantly impact our business strategy. In addition, two self-regulatory bodies in the United States (the Entertainment Software Rating Board) and the European Union ( Pan European Game Information) provide consumers with rating information on various products such as entertainment software similar to our products based on the content (for example, violence, sexually explicit content, language). Furthermore, the Chinese government has adopted measures designed to eliminate violent or obscene content in games. In response to these measures, some Chinese telecommunications operators have suspended billing their customers for certain mobile gaming platform services, including those services that do not contain offensive or unauthorized content, which could negatively impact our revenues in China. Any one or more of these factors could harm our business by limiting the products we are able to offer to our customers, by limiting the size of the potential market for our products, or by requiring costly additional differentiation between products for different territories to address varying regulations.

Furthermore, the growth and development of free-to-play gaming and the sale of virtual goods may prompt calls for more stringent consumer protection laws that may impose additional burdens on companies such as ours. We anticipate that scrutiny and regulation of our industry will increase and that we will be required to devote legal and other resources to addressing such regulation. For example, existing laws or new laws regarding the regulation of currency and banking institutions may be interpreted to cover virtual currency or goods. If that were to occur we may be required to seek licenses, authorizations or approvals from relevant regulators, the granting of which may depend on us meeting certain capital and other requirements and we may be subject to additional regulation and oversight, all of which could significantly increase our operating costs. Changes in current laws or regulations or the imposition of new laws and regulations in the United States or elsewhere regarding these activities may dampen the growth of free-to-play gaming and impair our business.

We sometimes offer our players various types of sweepstakes, giveaways and promotional opportunities, and in October 2012, we entered into a strategic relationship with Probability PLC to offer a suite of Glu-branded mobile slot games in the United Kingdom and Italy, two of which are currently offered in the United Kingdom. We intend to continue to explore opportunities with respect to real money gambling. We are subject to laws in a number of jurisdictions concerning the operation and offering of such activities and games, many of which are still evolving and could be interpreted in ways that could harm our business. Any court ruling or other governmental action that imposes liability on providers of online services could result in criminal or civil liability and could harm our business.

In addition, because our services are available worldwide, certain foreign jurisdictions and others may claim that we are required to comply with their laws, including in jurisdictions where we have no local entity, employees or infrastructure.

The laws and regulations concerning data privacy and data security are continually evolving, and our actual or perceived failure to comply with these laws and regulations could harm our business.

We are subject to federal, state and foreign laws regarding privacy and the protection of the information that we collect regarding our users, which laws are currently in a state of flux and likely to remain so for the foreseeable future. The U.S. government, including the Federal Trade Commission and the Department of Commerce, is continuing to review the need for greater regulation over collecting information concerning consumer behavior on the Internet and on mobile devices. For example, in December 2012, the Federal Trade Commission adopted amendments to the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act to strengthen privacy protections for children under age 13, which amendments became effective on July 1, 2013. In addition, the European Union has proposed reforms to its existing data protection legal framework. Various government and consumer agencies have also called for new regulation and changes in industry practices. For example, in February 2012, the California Attorney General announced a deal with Amazon, Apple, Google, Hewlett-Packard, Microsoft and Research in Motion to strengthen privacy protection for users that download third-party apps to smartphones and tablet devices. In response to developments in the interpretation and understanding of regulations such as these and guidance and inquiries from the California Attorney General, we released updates to our My Dragon and Deer Hunter Reloaded games and made changes to our games in development to make our privacy policy readily accessible to players of these games as required by the California Online Privacy Protection Act. If we do not follow existing laws and regulations, as well as the rules of the smartphone platform operators, with respect to privacy-related matters, or if consumers raise any concerns about our privacy practices, even if unfounded, it could damage our reputation and operating results.

All of our games are subject to our privacy policy and our terms of service located on our corporate website. If we fail to comply with our posted privacy policy, terms of service or privacy-related laws and regulations, including with respect to the information we collect from users of our games, it could result in proceedings against us by governmental authorities or others, which could harm our business. In addition, interpreting and applying data protection laws to the mobile gaming industry is often unclear. These laws may be interpreted and applied in conflicting ways from state to state, country to country, or region to region, and in a manner that is not consistent with our current data protection practices. Complying with these varying requirements could cause us to incur additional costs and change our business practices. Further, if we fail to adequately protect our users’ privacy and data, it could result in a loss of player confidence in our services and ultimately in a loss of users, which could adversely affect our business.

In the area of information security and data protection, many states have passed laws requiring notification to users when there is a security breach for personal data, such as the 2002 amendment to California’s Information Practices Act, or requiring the adoption of minimum information security standards that are often vaguely defined and difficult to implement. Costs to comply with these laws may increase as a result of changes in interpretation. Furthermore, any failure on our part to comply with these laws may subject us to significant liabilities.

Our stock price has fluctuated and declined significantly since our initial public offering in March 2007, and may continue to fluctuate, may not rise and may decline further.

The trading price of our common stock has fluctuated in the past and is expected to continue to fluctuate in the future, as a result of a number of factors, many of which are outside our control, such as changes in the operating performance and stock market valuations of other technology companies generally, or those in our industry in particular, such as Electronic Arts and Zynga.

In addition, The NASDAQ Global Market on which our common stock is listed has recently and in the past experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have affected the market prices of many companies, some of which appear to be unrelated or disproportionate to their operating performance. These broad market fluctuations could adversely affect the market price of our common stock. In the past, following periods of volatility in the market price of a particular company’s securities, securities class action litigation has often been brought against that company. Securities class action litigation against us could result in substantial costs and divert our management’s attention and resources.

Our facilities are located near known earthquake fault zones, and the occurrence of an earthquake or other natural disaster could damage our facilities and equipment, which could require us to curtail or cease operations.

Our principal offices are located in the San Francisco Bay Area, an area known for earthquakes. We are also vulnerable to damage from other types of disasters, including power loss, fires, explosions, floods, communications failures, terrorist attacks and similar events. If any natural or other disaster were to occur, our ability to operate our business at our facilities could be impaired.

If we do not adequately protect our intellectual property rights, it may be possible for third parties to obtain and improperly use our intellectual property and our business and operating results may be harmed.

Our intellectual property is essential to our business. We rely on a combination of copyright, trademark, trade secret and other intellectual property laws and contractual restrictions on disclosure to protect our intellectual property rights. To date, we have not sought patent protection, so, we will not be able to protect our technologies from independent invention by third parties. Despite our efforts to protect our intellectual property rights, unauthorized parties may attempt to copy or otherwise to obtain and use our technology and games, and some parties have distributed “jail broken” versions of our games where all of the content has been unlocked and made available for free. Further, some of our competitors have released games that are nearly identical to successful games released by their competitors in an effort to confuse the market and divert users from the competitor’s game to the copycat game. To the extent that these tactics are employed with respect to any of our games, it could reduce our revenues that we generate from these games. Monitoring unauthorized use of our games is difficult and costly, and we cannot be certain that the steps we have taken will prevent piracy and other unauthorized distribution and use of our technology and games, particularly in certain international jurisdictions, such as China, where the laws may not protect our intellectual property rights as fully as in the United States. In the future, we may have to litigate to enforce our intellectual property rights, which could result in substantial costs and divert our management’s attention and our resources.

In addition, although we require our third-party developers to sign agreements not to disclose or improperly use our trade secrets and acknowledging that all inventions, trade secrets, works of authorship, developments and other processes generated by them on our behalf are our property and to assign to us any ownership they may have in those works, it may still be possible for third parties to obtain and improperly use our intellectual properties without our consent. This could harm our brand, business, operating results and financial condition.

We may become involved in intellectual property disputes, which may disrupt our business and require us to pay significant damage awards.

Third parties may sue us for intellectual property infringement, or initiate proceedings to invalidate our intellectual property, which, if successful, could disrupt our business, cause us to pay significant damage awards or require us to pay licensing fees. For example, on April 16, 2013, Lodsys Group, LLC, a Texas limited liability company (“Lodsys”), filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas alleging that we have been infringing two of Lodsys’ patents, and is seeking unspecified damages, including treble damages for willful infringement, interest, attorneys’ fees and such other costs as the Court may deem just and proper. In the event of a successful claim against us, we might be enjoined from using our intellectual property or licensed intellectual property that we use in our business, we might incur significant licensing fees and we might be forced to develop alternative technologies. If we fail or are unable to develop non-infringing technology or games or to license the infringed or similar technology or games on a timely basis, we may be forced to withdraw games from the market or prevented from introducing new games. We might also incur substantial expenses in defending against third-party claims, regardless of their merit.

In addition, we use open source software in some of our games and expect to continue to use open source software in the future. We may face claims from companies that incorporate open source software into their products, claiming ownership of, or demanding release of, the source code, the open source software and/or derivative works that were developed using such software, or otherwise seeking to enforce the terms of the applicable open source license. These claims could also result in litigation, require us to purchase a costly license or require us to devote additional research and development resources to change our games, any of which would have a negative effect on our business and operating results.

We may become a party to litigation and regulatory inquiries, which could result in an unfavorable outcome and have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operation and cash flows.

We may become subject to various legal proceedings, claims and regulatory inquiries that arise out of the ordinary conduct of our business and are not yet resolved and additional claims and inquiries may arise in the future. In addition, events may give occur that give rise to a potential risk of litigation, including for example, in connection with the recent restatement of our financial information. The number and significance of regulatory inquiries have increased as our business has evolved. Any proceedings, claims or inquiries initiated by or against us, whether successful or not, may be time consuming; result in costly litigation, damage awards, consent decrees, injunctive relief or increased costs of business, require us to change our business practices or products, require significant amounts of management time, result in diversion of significant operations resources or otherwise harm of business and future financial results.

Unanticipated changes in our income tax rates or exposure to additional tax liabilities may affect our future financial results.

Our future effective income tax rates may be favorably or unfavorably affected by unanticipated changes in the valuation of our deferred tax assets and liabilities, or by changes in tax laws or their interpretation. Determining our worldwide provision for income taxes requires significant judgments. The estimation process and applicable laws are inherently uncertain, and our estimates are not binding on tax authorities. Our effective tax rate could also be adversely affected by a variety of factors, many of which are beyond our control. Recent and contemplated changes to U.S. tax laws, including limitations on a taxpayer’s ability to claim and utilize foreign tax credits and defer certain tax deductions until earnings outside of the U.S. are repatriated to the U.S., could impact the tax treatment of our foreign earnings. In addition, we are subject to the continuous examination of our income tax returns by the Internal Revenue Service and other tax authorities. We regularly assess the likelihood of adverse outcomes resulting from these examinations to determine whether or not our provision for income taxes is adequate. These continuous examinations may result in unforeseen tax-related liabilities, which may harm our future financial results.

We must charge, collect and/or pay taxes other than income taxes, such as payroll, value-added, sales and use, net worth, property and goods and services taxes, in both the U.S. and foreign jurisdiction. If tax authorities assert that we have taxable nexus in a jurisdiction, they may seek to impose past as well as future tax liability and/or penalties. Any such impositions could also cause significant administrative burdens and decrease our future sales. Moreover, state and federal legislatures have been considering various initiatives that could change our tax position regarding sales and use taxes.

Finally, as we change our international operations, adopt new products and new distribution models, implement changes to our operating structure or undertake intercompany transactions in light of changing tax laws, our tax expense could increase.

Some provisions in our certificate of incorporation and bylaws may deter third parties from seeking to acquire us.

Our certificate of incorporation and bylaws contain provisions that may make the acquisition of our company more difficult without the approval of our board of directors, including the following:

•

our board of directors is classified into three classes of directors with staggered three-year terms;

•

only our chairman of the board, our lead independent director, our chief executive officer, our president or a majority of our board of directors is authorized to call a special meeting of stockholders;

•

our stockholders are able to take action only at a meeting of stockholders and not by written consent;

•

only our board of directors and not our stockholders is able to fill vacancies on our board of directors;

•

our certificate of incorporation authorizes undesignated preferred stock, the terms of which may be established and shares of which may be issued without stockholder approval; and

•

advance notice procedures apply for stockholders to nominate candidates for election as directors or to bring matters before a meeting of stockholders.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

None.

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

None.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

None.

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

The exhibits listed on the Exhibit Index (following the Signatures section of this report) are incorporated by reference into this Item 6.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


	GLU MOBILE INC.

Date: August 9, 2013	By:	/s/ Niccolo M. de Masi
		Niccolo M. de Masi
		President and Chief Executive Officer
		(Principal Executive Officer)


Date: August 9, 2013	By:	/s/ Eric R. Ludwig
		Eric R. Ludwig
		Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
		(Principal Financial Officer)

EXHIBIT INDEX

Incorporated by Reference

Exhibit

Number

Exhibit Description

Form

File No.

Exhibit

Filing
Date

Filed
Herewith

10.01

Change of Control Severance Agreement between Glu Mobile Inc. and Matthew Ricchetti, dated April 1, 2013.

8-K

001-33368

99.01

04/05/13

10.02

Change of Control Severance Agreement between Glu Mobile Inc. and Chris Akhavan, dated as of April 22, 2013.

10.03

2008 Equity Inducement Plan, as amended and restated through May 14, 2013.

8-K

001-33368

99.01

05/17/13

10.04

Non-Employee Director Compensation Program, adopted on April 10, 2013.

8-K

001-33368

99.01

04/11/13

10.05++

Amendment No. 2 to Publisher Agreement between Glu Games Inc. and Tapjoy, Inc., dated as of May 13, 2013.

10.06

Sublease between Oracle America, Inc. and Glu Mobile Inc., dated as of April 16, 2013.

8-K

001-33368

99.01

04/22/13

10.07

Lease between Talon Portfolio Services, LLC and Griptonite, Inc., dated as of June 6, 2013.

10.08

Notice of Restricted Stock Unit Award and Restricted Stock Unit Agreement under the 2007 Equity Incentive Plan

31.01

Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a).

31.02

Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a) /15d-14(a).

32.01*

Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(b).

32.02*

Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(b).

101.INS**

XBRL Report Instance Document

101.SCH**

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

101.CAL**

XBRL Taxonomy Calculation Linkbase Document

101.LAB**

XBRL Taxonomy Label Linkbase Document

101.PRE**

XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document

101.DEF**

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

++	Certain portions of this exhibit have been omitted and have been filed separately with the SEC pursuant to a request for confidential treatment under Rule 24b-2 as promulgated under the Exchange Act.

This exhibit is not deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that Glu Mobile Inc. specifically incorporates it by reference.

Pursuant to applicable securities laws and regulations, these interactive data files are deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act, are deemed not filed for purposes of section 18 of the Exchange Act and otherwise are not subject to liability under these sections.