Investment
Office
|
(916) 795-3400
phone (916) 796-2842 fax
|
www.calpers.ca.gov
|
Time
period
ending
3/31/2009
|
Hospitality
Properties
Trust
(HPT)
|
Russell
1000
Index
|
Relative
Return
Russell
1000
Index
|
Real
Estate
Russell
1000
GICS
Industry
Peer
Index
|
Relative
Return
Russell
1000
GICS
Industry
Peer
Index
|
5
years
|
-56.5%
|
-20.7%
|
-35.8%
|
-20.2%
|
-36.3%
|
3
years
|
-59.7%
|
-34.7%
|
-25.0%
|
-43.0%
|
-16.7%
|
1
year
|
-57.9%
|
-38.3%
|
-19.6%
|
-50.8%
|
-7.1%
|
|
·
|
Seek
shareowner approval to remove its classified board
structure
|
|
·
|
Grant
shareowners the right to amend the
bylaws
|
|
·
|
Seek
shareowner approval to remove its supermajority voting
requirements
|
|
·
|
Grant
shareowners the right to act by written consent or to call special
meetings
|
|
·
|
Seek
shareowner approval for its poison
pill
|
|
·
|
Allow
shareowner ratification of its
auditor
|
|
·
|
Harvard
Professor Lucian Bebchuk and associates published a study which found that
companies with staggered boards, poison pills, supermajority voting
requirements (for mergers and charter amendments), and limitations to
shareowner bylaw amendments deliver less shareowner value than those
companies that do not have such measures in place. At this time, Hospitality Properties
currently employs five of the six entrenchment
provisions. See “What Matters in Corporate Governance”
by Lucian Bebchuk, Alma Cohen and Allen Ferrrell, Harvard Law School,
Discussion Paper No. 491 revised
03/2005.
|