Unassociated Document
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,
D.C. 20549
FORM
8-K
Current
Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Date of
Report (Date Earliest Event reported) — October 19, 2009 (October 16,
2009)
MDC
PARTNERS INC.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Canada
(Jurisdiction
of Incorporation)
|
001-13718
(Commission
File Number)
|
98-0364441
(IRS
Employer Identification
No.)
|
45
Hazelton Ave., Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5R 2E3
(Address
of principal executive offices and zip code)
(416)
960-9000
(Registrant’s
Telephone Number)
Check the
appropriate box below if the Form 8−K filing is intended to simultaneously
satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following
provisions:
o
|
Written
communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR
230.425)
|
o
|
Soliciting
material pursuant to Rule 14a−12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.14a−12)
|
o
|
Pre−commencement
communications pursuant to Rule 14d−2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.14d−2(b))
|
o
|
Pre−commencement communications
pursuant to Rule 13e−4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e−
4(c))
|
|
|
|
|
Item
7.01. Regulation FD Disclosure.
On October 16, 2009, MDC Partners Inc.
( “MDC”) announced that it would be commencing a private offering
of $200 million aggregate principal amount of senior unsecured notes
due 2016 (the “Notes”). MDC is updating its disclosure under Item
7.01 of this Current Report on Form 8-K. This information, some of
which has not previously been reported, is excerpted from a confidential
offering circular disseminated in connection with the private offering on
October 19, 2009.
Debt
Financing
MDC and its material subsidiaries
expect to enter into a new $75 million senior secured revolving credit facility
(the “Facility”) with Wells Fargo Foothill, LLC, as sole agent, and a syndicate
of lenders party thereto. The Facility, together
with the proceeds from the Notes offering, is expected to replace MDC’s
existing $185 million senior secured financing agreement with Fortress Credit
Corp., as collateral agent, Wells Fargo Foothill, Inc., as administrative agent,
and a syndicate of lenders from time to time a party thereto, dated as of June
18, 2007 (the “Financing Agreement”), which was originally scheduled to mature
on June 17, 2012 and is expected to be terminated concurrently with entry into
the proposed Facility.
Borrowings under the proposed Facility
will bear interest at a rate equal to, at MDC’s option, (i) the greater of (a)
the prime lending rate as announced from time to time by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.,
and (b) the Federal Funds Rate plus 1⁄2%, (the ‘‘Base Rate’’) plus an applicable
margin or (ii) LIBOR for eurodollar deposits plus an applicable
margin. MDC expects that the initial applicable margin for borrowings
will be 3.00% in the case of Base Rate Loans and 3.25% in the case of LIBOR Rate
Loans. After the closing date of the Facility, the applicable margins
may be reduced subject to MDC attaining certain trailing twelve months EBITDA
levels. In addition, MDC is required to pay an unused revolver
fee.
Advances under the Facility may be
prepaid in whole or in part from time to time without penalty or premium (unless
in connection with the prepayment in full of the Facility). The
revolving credit facility commitment may be reduced from time to time so long as
MDC pays a prepayment premium. All obligations under the Facility
will be guaranteed by all of MDC’s present and future subsidiaries, other than
immaterial subsidiaries. The Facility will contain a number of
financial covenants that, among other things, will require MDC to maintain a
fixed charge coverage ratio not less than 1.25:1, a senior leverage ratio not
greater than 2:1, and a minimum EBITDA level of $50,000,000.
Risk
Factors
MDC
competes for clients in highly competitive industries.
MDC operates in a highly competitive
environment in an industry characterized by numerous firms of varying sizes,
with no single firm or group of firms having a dominant position in the
marketplace. MDC is, however, smaller than several of its larger
industry competitors. Competitive factors include creative
reputation, management, personal relationships, quality and reliability of
service and expertise in particular niche areas of the
marketplace. In addition, because a firm’s principal asset is its
people, barriers to entry are minimal, and relatively small firms are, on
occasion, able to take all or some portion of a client’s business from a larger
competitor.
While many of MDC’s client
relationships are long-standing, companies put their advertising and marketing
services businesses up for competitive review from time to time, including at
times when clients enter into strategic transactions. From year to year, the
identities of MDC's 10 largest customers may change, as a result
of client losses and additions and other factors; however, the
proportion of MDC's business derived from its 10 largest clients does not
vary significantly from year to year. To the extent that MDC fails to
maintain existing clients or attract new clients, MDC’s business, financial
condition and operating results may be affected in a materially adverse
manner.
The
loss of lines of credit under MDC’s Financing Agreement or the Facility, as the
case may be, could adversely affect MDC’s liquidity and MDC’s ability to
implement MDC’s acquisition strategy and fund any put options if
exercised.
As of June 30, 2009, MDC had utilized
approximately $146.3 million of the $185.0 million available under its Financing
Agreement in the form of borrowings and letters of credit. Concurrently with
this offering, MDC expects to enter into the Facility which will include a $75.0
million revolving facility, including borrowing capacity for letters of credit
in an aggregate amount not to exceed $20.0 million. MDC uses and
expects to use amounts available under the Financing Agreement or the Facility,
as the case may be, together with cash flow from operations, to fund its working
capital needs, to fund the exercise of put option obligations and to fund MDC’s
strategy of making selective acquisitions of ownership interests in entities in
the marketing communications services industry.
MDC is currently in compliance with all
of the terms and conditions of the Financing Agreement, and management believes
that MDC will be in compliance with the covenants in the Facility that will be
entered into in connection with this offering over the next twelve
months. If, however, events were to occur which result in MDC losing
all or a substantial portion of its available credit under the Financing
Agreement or the Facility, as the case may be, MDC would be required to seek
other sources of liquidity. In addition, if MDC were unable to
replace this source of liquidity, then MDC’s ability to fund its working capital
needs and any contingent obligations with respect to put options would be
materially adversely affected.
MDC
is subject to regulations that could restrict its activities or negatively
impact its revenues.
Advertising and marketing
communications businesses are subject to government regulation, both domestic
and foreign. There has been an increasing tendency in the United
States on the part of advertisers to resort to litigation and self-regulatory
bodies to challenge comparative advertising on the grounds that the advertising
is false and deceptive. For example, on October 5, 2009, the U.S.
Federal Trade Commission approved final guidance governing the use of
endorsements and testimonials in advertising, which identifies certain content
that must be included in such advertising and makes clear that endorsers may be
liable for fraudulent or misleading statements. Moreover, there has
recently been an expansion of specific rules, prohibitions, media restrictions,
labeling disclosures, and warning requirements with respect to advertising for
certain products and usage of personally identifiable information.
Representatives within government bodies, both domestic and foreign, continue to
initiate proposals to ban the advertising of specific products and to impose
taxes on or deny deductions for advertising which, if successful, may have an
adverse effect on advertising expenditures and consequently MDC’s
revenues.
The
indenture governing the Notes and the Facility governing MDC’s secured lines of
credit contain or will contain various covenants that limit MDC’s discretion in
the operation of MDC’s business.
The
indenture governing the Notes and the Facility governing MDC’s lines of credit
contain or will contain various provisions that limit MDC’s discretion in the
operation of MDC’s business by restricting MDC’s ability to:
·
|
undergo
a change in control;
|
·
|
pay
dividends and make other
distributions;
|
·
|
redeem
or repurchase MDC’s capital stock;
|
·
|
incur
additional debt and issue capital
stock;
|
·
|
consolidate,
merge or sell substantially all of MDC’s
assets;
|
·
|
enter
into certain transactions with MDC’s
affiliates;
|
·
|
make
loans, investments or advances;
|
·
|
repay
subordinated indebtedness;
|
·
|
engage
in new lines of business; and
|
·
|
enter
into sale and leaseback
transactions.
|
These
restrictions on MDC’s ability to operate MDC’s business in MDC’s discretion
could seriously harm MDC’s business by, among other things, limiting MDC’s
ability to take advantage of financing, merger and acquisition and other
corporate opportunities. The Facility is subject to various
additional covenants, including a senior leverage ratio, a fixed charge coverage
ratio and a minimum EBITDA level. Events beyond MDC’s control could
affect MDC’s ability to meet these financial tests, and MDC cannot assure you
that MDC will meet them.
MDC’s
substantial indebtedness could adversely affect MDC’s cash flow and prevent MDC
from fulfilling MDC’s obligations, including the Notes.
As of
June 30, 2009, after giving effect to the issuance of the Notes and the
application of the net proceeds from the Notes, MDC would have had $204.3
million of indebtedness. In addition, MDC expects to make additional
drawings under the Facility from time to time. MDC’s ability to pay
principal and interest on MDC’s indebtedness is dependent on the generation of
cash flow by MDC’s subsidiaries. MDC’s subsidiaries’ business may not
generate sufficient cash flow from operations to meet MDC’s debt service and
other obligations. If MDC is unable to meet MDC’s expenses and debt
service obligations, MDC may need to obtain additional debt, refinance all or a
portion of MDC’s indebtedness on or before maturity, sell assets or raise
equity. MDC may not be able to obtain additional debt, refinance any
of MDC’s indebtedness, sell assets or raise equity on commercially reasonable
terms or at all, which could cause MDC to default on MDC’s obligations and
impair MDC’s liquidity. MDC’s inability to generate sufficient cash
flow to satisfy MDC’s debt obligations, to obtain additional debt or to
refinance MDC’s obligations on commercially reasonable terms would have a
material adverse effect on MDC’s business, financial condition and results of
operations.
If MDC
cannot make scheduled payments on MDC’s debt, MDC will be in default and, as a
result, MDC’s debt holders could declare all outstanding principal and interest
to be due and payable; the lenders under the Facility could terminate their
commitments to loan MDC money and foreclose against the assets securing MDC’s
borrowings; and MDC could be forced into bankruptcy or liquidation, which could
result in your losing your investment in the Notes. MDC’s level of
indebtedness could have important consequences to you. For example it
could:
·
|
make
it more difficult for MDC to satisfy MDC’s obligations with respect to the
Notes;
|
·
|
increase
MDC’s vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry
conditions;
|
·
|
require
MDC to dedicate a substantial portion of MDC’s cash flow from operations
to payments on MDC’s indebtedness, thereby reducing the availability of
MDC’s cash flow to fund working capital and other
activities;
|
·
|
limit
MDC’s flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in MDC’s
business and the advertising industry, which may place MDC at a
competitive disadvantage compared to MDC’s competitors that have less
debt; and
|
·
|
limit,
particularly in concert with the financial and other restrictive covenants
in MDC’s indebtedness, MDC’s ability to borrow additional funds or take
other actions.
|
Strengths
and Strategies of the Company
Strengths
Proven Partnership Model
with Leading Marketing Services Agencies
MDC partners with entrepreneurial and
media-agnostic marketing services agencies across North America and Europe,
including firms such as Crispin Porter + Bogusky, kirshenbaum bond senecal +
partners, Zig, Source Marketing, VitroRobertson and Colle +
McVoy. The Company’s partnership structure creates an ongoing
alignment of interests between the parent company and the core operational
talent to drive financial performance. The perpetual partnership
model functions by (1) identifying partners with a sustainable differentiated
position in the marketplace and understanding the increasingly complex and
fragmented media landscape; (2) creating a partnership structure generally by
taking a majority ownership position and leaving a substantial minority equity
or economic ownership position in the hands of operating management to
incentivize long-term growth; (3) providing access to more financial and human
resources and leveraging the network’s scale; and (4) delivering strong
financial results. As a result of MDC’s experience in acquiring over
30 companies since MDC’s founding, MDC has developed a sound investment strategy
and best practices for integration which combine to reduce risk broadly inherent
with strategic acquisitions.
Media-Agnostic Focus with
Market Leading Exposure to Digital Advertising
MDC believes that the agency model of
the future relies on being able to provide clients with media-agnostic solutions
that navigate the increasingly fragmented media landscape by reaching MDC’s
clients’ target customers no matter where they may be. This means
being able to provide solutions leveraging digital technologies and media, in
addition to traditional media advertising such as on
television. Given this focus, digital revenues now make up 28% of
MDC’s revenue as of the second quarter of 2009, which MDC believes and according
to analyst estimates is higher than all of MDC’s direct public-company
peers. MDC’s digital capabilities not only enhance MDC’s clients’
ability to target their customers, but given that they are interactive in
nature, enable MDC to more accurately measure the effectiveness of their
marketing expenditures. Digital marketing communications services are
consuming a growing portion of marketing dollars. MDC expects to
aggressively grow digital revenue to 40% of total revenue in the next three to
five years.
High Quality Portfolio of
Clients in Diverse Industries
MDC’s clients include some of the most
notable global brands and are broadly spread across numerous
industries. MDC’s partnership structure allows MDC to work with
clients within the same business sector through MDC’s different agencies, as
well as maintain a diversified client base by sector. In the
aggregate, MDC’s top ten clients based on revenue accounted for approximately
45% and 39% of revenue in 2008 and 2007, respectively. As MDC
continues to grow, MDC expects MDC’s client base to diversify and the percentage
of MDC’s total revenue attributable to MDC’s top ten clients to
decrease. Currently, within many of MDC’s largest clients, MDC
represents multiple brands or divisions across multiple advertising and
marketing disciplines, thereby providing a further layer of
diversity.
High Free Cash Flow
Generation that Fuels Future Growth
MDC
is focused on optimizing MDC’s operations to maximize free cash flow given MDC’s
view that free cash flow is the best metric with which to improve MDC’s credit
worthiness and enhance MDC’s equity value. MDC’s business model allows MDC to
generate significant operating cash flow due to MDC’s strong operating margins,
moderate capital expenditures needs and tightly managed working capital
requirements. Additionally, MDC’s partnership platform seeks to take
advantage of MDC’s scale and is designed to potentially increase purchasing
efficiencies and centralize certain non-revenue generating business
activities.
Experienced Management Team
featuring Industry Leaders across Partnerships
MDC’s management team has a track
record of efficiently operating and managing a profitable advertising business
through economic cycles. The management team is continually seeking
to improve profitability, growth and cash flow generation. In
addition, the team has a long-standing record of executing acquisitions,
investments and integration efforts as well as recruiting and incentivizing key
talent that are the drivers of MDC’s operating businesses.
Strategies
Based on the simple premise that the
best talent will attract the most desirable clients, MDC purposefully keeps
equity in the hands of the founders and successive generations of management
through its operating philosophy of “perpetual partnership” to foster
entrepreneurial growth. MDC offers an alternative to traditional
agency networks that have rigid structures, standardized procedures, and a
geographical client focus. MDC encourages creativity, innovation, and
autonomy in its Partner firms while providing human and financial resources with
the goal of improving operating performance. While MDC is the ninth
largest advertising and marketing services firm in the world according to AdAge,
MDC believes there is opportunity to gain market share both in North America and
around the world. MDC believes that MDC can enhance MDC’s success by
implementing the following business strategies:
Emphasize Nimble,
Media-Agnostic Platform
MDC believes that MDC’s firms are
smaller and more nimble than many of the legacy agencies against which they
compete. Therefore they are able to offer an integrated
media-agnostic solution without being limited to any particular media or
marketing discipline. This means being able to provide solutions
leveraging digital technologies and media, in addition to traditional media
advertising such as on television or in print. The rise of social
media is only adding to the complexity of the advertising landscape, thereby MDC
believes making MDC’s media-agnostic approach even more
advantageous.
Continued Focus on High
Growth Digital Platforms
MDC continues to focus on ensuring that
MDC offers MDC’s clients the ability to leverage digital technologies and media
to effectively market to consumers. MDC’s business plan is to grow
digital revenues from 28% to 40% of total revenue in the next three to five
years. MDC plans to meet this goal through internal investment in
digital and social media talent, by partnering and investing with innovative
digital firms and by organically growing MDC’s existing digital
initiatives. MDC expects these digital capabilities will serve to
help MDC agencies to differentiate their respective competitive offerings and
deliver results to MDC’s clients.
Expand Margins through Lean
Corporate Overhead Structure
Through improvements in process and
investments in technology, MDC has been able to continually reduce MDC’s
corporate overhead costs even as MDC has grown MDC’s business over the last few
years. MDC plans to contain corporate expense growth to a rate lower
than the growth of MDC’s overall business, thereby providing further operating
leverage, especially as MDC moves to centralize more purchasing and other
functions. Currently, MDC provides centralized functional services,
including accounting and finance, legal services, real estate expertise,
strategic sourcing, recruitment assistance, employee benefits and executive
compensation management.
Selectively Pursue Favorable
Partnership Opportunities
Part of MDC’s growth strategy is to
pursue selective acquisitions that add to MDC’s broader capabilities and where
MDC believes MDC can help change the revenue and profit growth of the underlying
business. MDC’s partnership strategy facilitates an ongoing alignment
of interests to drive performance across the businesses and is designed to
secure agency management for the long-term and facilitate succession
planning. MDC looks for the opportunity to partner with businesses
that (1) have a sustainable competitive differentiation, (2) understand how
consumers consume influence in a digital economy, (3) have significant growth
potential with strong margins, (4) are capable management teams, (5) have an
ability to collaborate across the MDC network and (6) have a proven track record
of success. MDC believes that this disciplined approach to new
partnership opportunities given the above focus and MDC’s priority return
acquisition structure reduces the risk broadly inherent with strategic
acquisitions.
Restatement
of Selected Historical Financial Data
In accordance with the adoption of the
accounting standards relating to non-controlling interests (formerly minority
interests), income attributable to non-controlling interests has been
reclassified from a component of income (loss) from continuing operations to a
caption below net income. These new standards require that net income
(loss) be presented with and without adjustments for non-controlling
interests. These standards were adopted in January 2009 and all prior
periods have been restated to conform with the current
presentation. Accordingly income (loss) from continuing operations as
reported in the Company’s 10-K for 2004 has been adjusted from income of $6,716
to income of $15,902, for 2005 from a loss of $7,539 to income of $14,048, for
2006 from a loss of $8,312 to income of $8,403, for 2007 from a loss of $18,182
to income of $2,335 and for 2008 from income of $10,148 to income of $18,284,
reflecting the reclassification adjustment of income attributable to
non-controlling interests of $9,186, $21,587, $16,715, $20,517 and $8,136 for
2004, 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008, respectively.
MDC is
furnishing the information in this Current Report on Form 8-K to comply with
Regulation FD. Such information shall not be deemed to be “filed” for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
“Exchange Act”), or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section, and
shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any of the Company’s
filings under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act,
whether made before or after the date hereof and regardless of any general
incorporation language in such filings, except to the extent expressly set forth
by specific reference in such a filing.
Item
8.01. Other Events
Effective
October 5, 2009, the Company acquired the remaining 6% equity interest in
Crispin Porter & Bogusky LLC (“CPB”) from the minority holder. In accordance
with the terms of the underlying limited liability company agreement, the
estimated contingent purchase price of $8.5 million will be paid in future
periods beginning in April 2011. Following the closing of this transaction,
MDC’s ownership in CPB is 100%.
Proposed
Senior Unsecured Notes Offering
On
October 16, 2009, the Company issued a press release announcing its intention to
offer, in a private placement, the Notes. The Company intends to use
the net proceeds of this offering to repay the outstanding balance under and
terminate the Financing Agreement, to redeem its outstanding 8% convertible
unsecured subordinated debentures due 2010 and for general corporate
purposes. A copy of the press release is attached hereto as
Exhibit 99.1 and is incorporated herein by reference.
The information disclosed under this Item 8.01, including Exhibit
99.1, shall be deemed to be “filed” for purposes of the Exchange Act.
Item
9.01. Financial Statements and Exhibits
99.1
|
Text
of press release issued by MDC Partners Inc. on October 16, 2009,
regarding the Notes (filed
herewith).
|
Signatures
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed by the undersigned hereunto duly
authorized.
|
MDC
Partners Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Mitchell
Gendel |
|
|
|
Mitchell
Gendel |
|
|
|
General
Counsel & Corporate Secretary
|
|