UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
x |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
|
|
For the Quarter Ended June 30, 2008 |
||
|
|
|
or |
||
|
|
|
o |
|
Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 1-8472
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware |
|
94-1109521 |
(State of Incorporation) |
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
Two Stamford Plaza
281 Tresser Boulevard
Stamford, Connecticut 06901-3238
(Address of principal executive offices and zip code)
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (203) 969-0666
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer, and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer x |
|
Accelerated filer o |
|
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o |
|
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No ý
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrants classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
Class |
|
Outstanding at July 28, 2008 |
COMMON STOCK |
|
96,144,878 |
HEXCEL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
1
ITEM 1. Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Hexcel Corporation and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
||||
(In millions, except per share data) |
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
||
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
19.3 |
|
$ |
28.1 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
245.4 |
|
192.8 |
|
||
Inventories, net |
|
207.7 |
|
179.4 |
|
||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
47.7 |
|
34.7 |
|
||
Total current assets |
|
520.1 |
|
435.0 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Property, plant and equipment |
|
954.4 |
|
858.8 |
|
||
Less accumulated depreciation |
|
(436.8 |
) |
(415.7 |
) |
||
Net property, plant and equipment |
|
517.6 |
|
443.1 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Goodwill and intangible assets, net |
|
57.1 |
|
56.8 |
|
||
Investments in affiliated companies |
|
20.0 |
|
17.5 |
|
||
Deferred tax assets |
|
83.0 |
|
88.7 |
|
||
Other assets |
|
20.0 |
|
19.4 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,217.8 |
|
$ |
1,060.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Notes payable and current maturities of capital lease obligations |
|
$ |
1.7 |
|
$ |
0.4 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
143.8 |
|
144.2 |
|
||
Accrued liabilities |
|
87.1 |
|
99.7 |
|
||
Total current liabilities |
|
232.6 |
|
244.3 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Long-term notes payable and capital lease obligations |
|
393.8 |
|
315.5 |
|
||
Other non-current liabilities |
|
89.3 |
|
73.1 |
|
||
Total liabilities |
|
715.7 |
|
632.9 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 200.0 shares authorized, 98.0 and 97.6 shares issued at June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively |
|
1.0 |
|
1.0 |
|
||
Additional paid-in capital |
|
523.6 |
|
513.3 |
|
||
Accumulated deficit |
|
(47.6 |
) |
(97.4 |
) |
||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
48.3 |
|
32.6 |
|
||
|
|
525.3 |
|
449.5 |
|
||
Less Treasury stock, at cost, 1.9 shares and 1.8 shares at June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively |
|
(23.2 |
) |
(21.9 |
) |
||
Total stockholders equity |
|
502.1 |
|
427.6 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
1,217.8 |
|
$ |
1,060.5 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
2
Hexcel Corporation and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
||||||||||
|
|
Quarter Ended June 30, |
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
||||||||
(In millions, except per share data) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net sales |
|
$ |
359.5 |
|
$ |
289.8 |
|
$ |
704.0 |
|
$ |
572.4 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
283.4 |
|
219.4 |
|
547.8 |
|
430.5 |
|
||||
Gross margin |
|
76.1 |
|
70.4 |
|
156.2 |
|
141.9 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
30.0 |
|
27.4 |
|
62.0 |
|
58.4 |
|
||||
Research and technology expenses |
|
8.0 |
|
8.5 |
|
16.5 |
|
18.0 |
|
||||
Business consolidation and restructuring expenses |
|
1.2 |
|
0.5 |
|
1.8 |
|
1.6 |
|
||||
Other operating expenses |
|
7.6 |
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
|
||||
Operating income |
|
29.3 |
|
34.0 |
|
65.7 |
|
63.9 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Interest expense, net |
|
5.9 |
|
6.0 |
|
10.9 |
|
11.7 |
|
||||
Non-operating expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
||||
Income from continuing operations before income taxes, equity in earnings and discontinued operations |
|
23.4 |
|
28.0 |
|
54.8 |
|
51.8 |
|
||||
(Benefit) Provision for income taxes |
|
(2.0 |
) |
11.9 |
|
7.5 |
|
21.9 |
|
||||
Income from continuing operations before equity in earnings and discontinued operations |
|
25.4 |
|
16.1 |
|
47.3 |
|
29.9 |
|
||||
Equity in earnings of affiliated companies, net of tax |
|
1.3 |
|
1.4 |
|
2.6 |
|
2.4 |
|
||||
Net income from continuing operations |
|
26.7 |
|
17.5 |
|
49.9 |
|
32.3 |
|
||||
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
|
|
(8.7 |
) |
|
|
(6.8 |
) |
||||
Gain on sale of discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.8 |
|
||||
Net income |
|
$ |
26.7 |
|
$ |
8.8 |
|
$ |
49.9 |
|
$ |
32.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Basic net income (loss) per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
$ |
0.52 |
|
$ |
0.34 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
(0.09 |
) |
|
|
|
|
||||
Net income |
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
$ |
0.52 |
|
$ |
0.34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Diluted net income (loss) per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
$ |
0.51 |
|
$ |
0.33 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
(0.09 |
) |
|
|
|
|
||||
Net income |
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
$ |
0.51 |
|
$ |
0.33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Basic |
|
96.2 |
|
94.4 |
|
96.2 |
|
94.4 |
|
||||
Diluted |
|
97.8 |
|
96.3 |
|
97.8 |
|
96.3 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
Hexcel Corporation and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
||||
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
||||
(In millions) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash flows from operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
49.9 |
|
$ |
32.3 |
|
Reconciliation to net cash provided by (used for) operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
22.4 |
|
19.6 |
|
||
Amortization of debt discount and deferred financing costs |
|
0.8 |
|
0.9 |
|
||
Deferred income taxes |
|
(3.5 |
) |
14.6 |
|
||
Business consolidation and restructuring expenses |
|
1.8 |
|
1.6 |
|
||
Business consolidation and restructuring payments |
|
(3.2 |
) |
(8.6 |
) |
||
Equity in earnings of affiliated companies |
|
(2.6 |
) |
(2.4 |
) |
||
Share-based compensation |
|
6.9 |
|
6.7 |
|
||
Excess tax benefits on share-based compensation |
|
(1.0 |
) |
(3.1 |
) |
||
Loss on early retirement of debt |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Increase in accounts receivable |
|
(42.9 |
) |
(19.6 |
) |
||
Increase in inventories |
|
(20.9 |
) |
(14.2 |
) |
||
Decrease in prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
1.9 |
|
0.3 |
|
||
(Decrease) increase in accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
(21.9 |
) |
8.8 |
|
||
Changes in other non-current assets and long-term liabilities |
|
6.8 |
|
(10.3 |
) |
||
Net cash provided by (used for) operating activities continuing operations |
|
(5.5 |
) |
27.0 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash flows from investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Capital expenditures |
|
(86.2 |
) |
(46.0 |
) |
||
Net proceeds from sale of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
25.0 |
|
||
Investment in affiliated companies |
|
|
|
(2.1 |
) |
||
Net cash (used for) investing activities continuing operations |
|
(86.2 |
) |
(23.1 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash flows from financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Proceeds from senior secured credit facility term C loan |
|
79.6 |
|
|
|
||
Proceeds from senior secured credit facility revolver, net |
|
|
|
28.0 |
|
||
Repayments of senior secured credit facility term B loan |
|
|
|
(36.2 |
) |
||
Repayments on capital lease obligations and other debt, net |
|
(0.2 |
) |
(0.2 |
) |
||
Activity under stock plans, including excess tax benefits on stock-based compensation |
|
1.8 |
|
7.6 |
|
||
Net cash provided by (used for) financing activities continuing operations |
|
81.2 |
|
(0.8 |
) |
||
Net cash provided by operating activities, discontinued operations |
|
|
|
7.9 |
|
||
Net cash used for investing activities, discontinued operations |
|
|
|
(1.6 |
) |
||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
|
1.7 |
|
0.9 |
|
||
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
(8.8 |
) |
10.3 |
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
28.1 |
|
25.7 |
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
19.3 |
|
$ |
36.0 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
HEXCEL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
Note 1 Significant Accounting Policies
In these notes, the terms Hexcel, we, us, or our mean Hexcel Corporation and subsidiary companies. The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements are those of Hexcel Corporation. Refer to Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 for a discussion of our significant accounting policies.
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared from the unaudited records of Hexcel pursuant to rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) for interim financial information. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements have been omitted pursuant to rules and regulations of the SEC.
In the opinion of management, the condensed consolidated financial statements include all normal recurring adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods presented. The condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2007 was derived from the audited 2007 consolidated balance sheet. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of results expected for any other interim period or for the full year. The information included in this Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with Managements Discussion and Analysis and the financial statements and notes thereto included in the Hexcel Corporations 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Certain prior period amounts in the condensed consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes have been reclassified to conform to the 2008 presentation.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations (SFAS 141(R)), which replaces SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations. SFAS 141(R) retains the underlying concepts of SFAS 141 in that all business combinations are still required to be accounted for at fair value under the acquisition method of accounting but SFAS 141(R) changed the application of the acquisition method in a number of significant aspects. SFAS 141(R) is effective on a prospective basis for all business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual period subsequent to December 15, 2008, with the exception of the accounting for valuation allowances on deferred taxes and acquired tax contingencies. SFAS 141(R) amends SFAS 109 such that adjustments made to valuation allowances on deferred taxes and acquired tax contingencies associated with acquisitions that closed prior to the effective date of SFAS 141(R) would also apply the provisions of SFAS 141(R). Early adoption is not permitted. The effect of adopting this new statement will depend on future acquisitions.
In December 2007, the FASB issued Financial Accounting Standards No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statementsan amendment of ARB No. 51. This statement is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2008, with earlier adoption prohibited. This statement requires the recognition of a noncontrolling interest (minority interest) as equity in the consolidated financial statements and separate from the parents equity. The amount of net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest will be included in consolidated net income on the face of the income statement. It also amends certain of ARB No. 51s consolidation procedures for consistency with the requirements of SFAS 141(R). This statement also includes expanded disclosure requirements regarding the interests of the parent and its noncontrolling interest. We are currently evaluating this new statement and anticipate that the statement will not have a significant impact on the reporting of our results of operations.
5
In March 2008, the FASB issued Statement No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activitiesan amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 (SFAS 161). SFAS 161 requires entities that utilize derivative instruments to provide qualitative disclosures about their objectives and strategies for using such instruments, as well as any details of credit-risk-related contingent features contained within derivatives. SFAS 161 also requires entities to disclose additional information about the amounts and location of derivatives located within the financial statements, how the provisions of SFAS 133 has been applied, and the impact that hedges have on an entitys financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. SFAS 161 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008, with early application encouraged. We are currently evaluating the impact that this new statement will have on our financial statements.
(In millions) |
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
||
Raw materials |
|
$ |
92.8 |
|
$ |
86.6 |
|
Work in progress |
|
62.8 |
|
45.4 |
|
||
Finished goods |
|
71.5 |
|
66.9 |
|
||
Total inventories, gross |
|
$ |
227.1 |
|
$ |
198.9 |
|
Inventory allowances |
|
(19.4 |
) |
(19.5 |
) |
||
Total inventories, net |
|
$ |
207.7 |
|
$ |
179.4 |
|
Note 3 Retirement and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans
We maintain qualified and nonqualified defined benefit retirement plans covering certain current and former U.S. and European employees, retirement savings plans covering eligible U.S. employees and certain postretirement health care and life insurance benefit plans covering eligible U.S. retirees. We also participate in a union sponsored multi-employer pension plan covering certain U.S. employees with union affiliations. In December 2006, our Board of Directors voted to terminate the U.S. qualified defined benefit plan as of April 1, 2007. As of June 30, 2008 we have settled all U.S. qualified defined benefit plan pension obligations. Refer to our 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information regarding these plans.
Defined Benefit Retirement Plans
Net Periodic Benefit Costs
Net periodic benefit costs of our defined benefit retirement plans for the quarters and six-months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 were as follows:
|
|
Quarter Ended June 30, |
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
||||||||
(In millions) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
||||
U.S. Qualified and Nonqualified Defined Benefit Retirement Plans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Service cost |
|
$ |
0.4 |
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
$ |
0.8 |
|
$ |
0.5 |
|
Interest cost |
|
0.2 |
|
0.5 |
|
0.5 |
|
1.0 |
|
||||
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
||||
Net amortization and deferral |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
||||
Sub-total |
|
0.6 |
|
0.9 |
|
1.3 |
|
1.9 |
|
||||
Curtailment and settlement loss |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
2.7 |
|
0.8 |
|
||||
Net periodic benefit cost |
|
$ |
0.6 |
|
$ |
1.5 |
|
$ |
4.0 |
|
$ |
2.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
European Defined Benefit Retirement Plans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Service cost |
|
$ |
1.0 |
|
$ |
0.9 |
|
$ |
2.1 |
|
$ |
1.8 |
|
Interest cost |
|
1.9 |
|
1.7 |
|
3.8 |
|
3.4 |
|
||||
Expected return on plan assets |
|
(2.1 |
) |
(1.9 |
) |
(4.2 |
) |
(3.8 |
) |
||||
Net amortization and deferral |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
(0.1 |
) |
0.4 |
|
||||
Net periodic benefit cost |
|
$ |
0.8 |
|
$ |
0.9 |
|
$ |
1.6 |
|
$ |
1.8 |
|
6
Contributions
We contributed $0.8 million and $1.7 million to our U.S. qualified and nonqualified defined benefit retirement plans during the second quarters of 2008 and 2007, respectively. Contributions were $7.5 million and $2.0 million for the six-months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Of the total contributed during 2008, $7.1 million was for final settlement of the U.S. qualified plans remaining benefit obligations, bringing the total contribution for final settlement to $10.4 million. We recorded a pre-tax loss of $2.7 million during the six months ended June 30, 2008 on the final settlement, bringing the total U.S. qualified plan settlement loss to $12.1 million.
We generally fund our U.S. non-qualified defined benefit retirement plans when benefit payments are incurred. Under the provisions of these non-qualified plans, we expect to contribute $1.0 million in 2008 to cover unfunded benefits. We contributed $0.3 million to our U.S. non-qualified defined benefit retirement plans during the 2007 fiscal year. Accrued benefit costs for the U.S. non-qualified defined benefit retirement plans as of June 30, 2008 were $15.7 million, of which $1.0 million is included within accrued liabilities and $14.7 million is included within other non-current liabilities. Accrued benefit costs for the U.S. qualified and non-qualified defined benefit retirement plans as of December 31, 2007 were $21.7 million, of which $7.8 million is included within current accrued liabilities and $13.9 million is included within other non-current liabilities.
In addition, we contributed $1.4 million and $0.7 million to our European defined benefit retirement plans in the second quarters of 2008 and 2007, respectively. Total contributions were $2.2 million and $1.3 million for the six-months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Meeting governing requirements, we plan to contribute approximately $2.8 million during 2008 to our European plans. We contributed $4.5 million to our European plans during the 2007 fiscal year. Accrued benefit costs for the European defined benefit retirement plans as of June 30, 2008 were $18.2 million, of which $2.8 million is included within accrued liabilities and $15.4 million is included within other non-current liabilities. Accrued benefit costs for the European defined benefit retirement plans as of December 31, 2007 were $11.7 million which is included within other non-current liabilities.
Postretirement Health Care and Life Insurance Benefit Plans
Net periodic benefit costs of our postretirement health care and life insurance benefit plans were $0.1 million, consisting of interest costs for both second quarters of 2008 and 2007. For the six-months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, net periodic postretirement benefit costs were $0.2 million and $0.3 million, respectively. In connection with our postretirement plans , we contributed $0.4million and $0.3 million during the second quarters of 2008 and 2007, respectively and $0.6 million during both six-months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007. We periodically fund our postretirement plans to pay covered expenses as they are incurred. Under the provisions of these postretirement plans, we expect to contribute approximately $1.3 million in 2008 to cover unfunded benefits. We contributed $0.8 million to our postretirement plans during the 2007 fiscal year. Accrued benefit costs for the postretirement plans as of June 30, 2008 were $11.3 million, of which $1.3 million is included within accrued liabilities and $10.0 million is included within other non-current liabilities. Accrued benefit costs for the postretirement plans as of December 31, 2007 were $11.4 million, of which $1.3 million were included with current liabilities.
7
Note 4 - Business Consolidation and Restructuring Programs
The Companys current restructuring activities are minimal. Reserves associated with the remaining restructuring programs include certain expected severance payments associated with 2001 and 2006 reorganizations. Costs associated with the closure of our Livermore facility are for remediation and preparation of the property for sale, which are expensed as incurred. The aggregate business consolidation and restructuring liabilities as of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, consisted of the following:
(In millions) |
|
Employee |
|
Facility & |
|
Total |
|
|||
Balance as of December 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
3.1 |
|
$ |
0.3 |
|
$ |
3.4 |
|
Business consolidation and restructuring expenses |
|
0.1 |
|
0.5 |
|
0.6 |
|
|||
Cash expenditures |
|
(0.9 |
) |
(0.6 |
) |
(1.5 |
) |
|||
Currency translation adjustments |
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|||
Balance as of March 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
2.5 |
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
$ |
2.7 |
|
Business consolidation and restructuring expenses |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
1.2 |
|
|||
Cash expenditures |
|
(0.4 |
) |
(1.3 |
) |
(1.7 |
) |
|||
Currency translation adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Balance as of June 30, 2008 |
|
$ |
2.1 |
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
$ |
2.2 |
|
Note 5 - Notes Payable and Capital Lease Obligations
(In millions) |
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
||
Senior secured credit facility - term B loan due 2012 |
|
87.5 |
|
87.5 |
|
||
Senior secured credit facility - term C loan due 2012 |
|
79.6 |
|
|
|
||
European credit and overdraft facilities |
|
|
|
|
|
||
6.75% senior subordinated notes due 2015 |
|
225.0 |
|
225.0 |
|
||
Total notes payable |
|
392.1 |
|
312.5 |
|
||
Capital lease obligations |
|
3.4 |
|
3.4 |
|
||
Total notes payable and capital lease obligations |
|
$ |
395.5 |
|
$ |
315.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Notes payable and current maturities of long-term liabilities |
|
$ |
1.7 |
|
$ |
0.4 |
|
Long-term notes payable and capital lease obligations, less current maturities |
|
393.8 |
|
315.5 |
|
||
Total notes payable and capital lease obligations |
|
$ |
395.5 |
|
$ |
315.9 |
|
On May 30, 2008, Hexcel Corporation and its lenders entered into the second amendment to its Senior Secured Credit Facility pursuant to which Hexcel borrowed $80 million of additional term loans designated as term C loans. The net proceeds were used to pay down the revolving loan balance under the credit facility to restore availability under the revolver. All other terms of the credit facility, including the collateral package, subsidiary guarantees and financial and other covenants, remain unchanged.
The term C loans under the facility mature on April 1, 2012, one month after maturity of the existing terms loans under the credit facility. Principal payments on the new term loans are due quarterly in similar proportion to the existing term loans, with substantially all of the principal due in the second half of 2011 and the first half of 2012. Any voluntary or mandatory prepayments of term loans by Hexcel will be applied pro rata among the previously existing term loans and the new term loans. The interest rate for the new term loans is based on LIBOR plus a margin, and was determined based on current market pricing. In accordance with the terms of the credit facility regarding the borrowing of additional loans, the interest rate margin on the existing term loans was increased as well, to a level slightly below that of the new term loans.
Term loan B borrowings under the Senior Secured Credit Facility bear interest at a floating rate based on the agents defined prime rate plus a margin that can vary from 0.875% to 1.125% or LIBOR plus a margin that can vary from 1.875% to 2.125%. Term loan C borrowings under the Senior Secured Credit Facility bear
8
interest at a floating rate based on the agents defined prime rate plus a margin that can vary from 1.25% to 1.50% or LIBOR plus a margin that can vary from 2.25% to 2.50%. Revolving loan borrowings under the Senior Secured Credit Facility bear interest at a floating rate based on either the agents defined prime rate plus a margin that can vary from 0.25% to 1.00%, or LIBOR plus a margin that can vary from 1.25% to 2.00%. The margin in effect for a borrowing at any given time depends on our consolidated leverage ratio. The weighted average interest rate for the actual borrowings on the Senior Secured Credit Facility was 4.67% for the quarter ended June 30, 2008. Borrowings made under the LIBOR option during the quarter ended June 30, 2008 were made at interest rates ranging from 3.875% to 5.1875%.
In accordance with the terms of the Senior Secured Credit Facility, we are required to maintain a minimum interest coverage ratio of 4.00 (based on the ratio of EBITDA, as defined in the credit agreement, to interest expense) and may not exceed a maximum leverage ratio of 3.00 (based on the ratio of total debt to EBITDA) throughout the term of the Senior Secured Credit Facility. The Senior Secured Credit Facility also contains limitations on, among other things, incurring debt, granting liens, making investments, making restricted payments (including dividends), making capital expenditures, entering into transactions with affiliates and prepaying subordinated debt. In addition, the Senior Secured Credit Facility contains other terms and conditions such as customary representations and warranties, additional covenants and customary events of default.
The Senior Secured Credit Facility permits us to issue letters of credit up to an aggregate amount of $40.0 million. Any outstanding letters of credit reduce the amount available for borrowing under the revolving loan. As of June 30, 2008, we had issued letters of credit totaling $13.5 million under the Senior Secured Credit Facility. The Company had no letters of credit outstanding outside the Senior Secured Credit Facility as of June 30, 2008. Total undrawn availability under the Senior Secured Credit Facility as of June 30, 2008 was $111.5 million.
6.75% Senior Subordinated Notes, due 2015
The senior subordinated notes are unsecured senior subordinated obligations of Hexcel Corporation. Interest accrues at the rate of 6.75% per annum and is payable semi-annually in arrears on February 1 and August 1, beginning on August 1, 2005. The senior subordinated notes mature on February 1, 2015. We may not redeem the senior subordinated notes prior to February 1, 2010. We will have the option to redeem all or a portion of the senior subordinated notes at any time during the one-year period beginning February 1, 2010 at 103.375% of principal plus accrued and unpaid interest. This percentage decreases to 102.25% for the one-year period beginning February 1, 2011, to 101.125% for the one-year period beginning February 1, 2012 and to 100.0% any time on or after February 1, 2013. In the event of a change of control (as defined in the indenture), we are generally required to make an offer to all note holders to purchase all outstanding senior subordinated notes at 101% of the principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest.
The indenture contains various customary covenants including, but not limited to, restrictions on incurring debt, making restricted payments (including dividends), the use of proceeds from certain asset dispositions, entering into transactions with affiliates, and merging or selling all or substantially all of our assets. The indenture also contains many other customary terms and conditions, including customary events of default, some of which are subject to grace and notice periods.
Note 6 - Derivative Financial Instruments
In September 2006, we entered into a cross-currency interest rate swap agreement to hedge a portion of our net Euro investment in Hexcel France SA. To the extent it is effective, gains and losses are recorded as an offset in the cumulative translation account, the same account in which translation gains and losses on the investment in Hexcel France SA are recorded. All other changes, including any difference in current interest, are excluded from the assessment of effectiveness and are thereby included in operating income as a component of interest expense. The impact to interest expense for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2008 was a net
9
increase of $0.9 million and a net reduction of $0.1 million, respectively. This agreement has a notional value of $63.4 million, a term of five years, and is scheduled to mature on September 20, 2011. We receive interest in U.S. dollars quarterly and pay interest in Euros on the same day. U.S. interest is based on the three month LIBOR rate. Euro interest is based on the three month EURIBOR. The fair value of the swap at June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 was a liability of $15.1 million and $10.6 million, respectively. The fair value at June 30, 2008 was estimated under the provisions of SFAS 157.
A number of our European subsidiaries are exposed to the impact of exchange rate volatility between the U.S. dollar and the subsidiaries functional currencies, being either the Euro or the British Pound Sterling. We entered into contracts to exchange U.S. dollars for Euros and British Pound Sterling through 2010. The aggregate notional amount of these contracts was $92.5 million at June 30, 2008. The purpose of these contracts is to hedge a portion of the forecasted transactions of European subsidiaries under long-term sales contracts with certain customers. These contracts are expected to provide us with a more balanced matching of future cash receipts and expenditures by currency, thereby reducing our exposure to fluctuations in currency exchange rates. We exclude the forward points from the effectiveness assessment. For the quarters and six-months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, hedge ineffectiveness was immaterial.
The change in fair value of our foreign currency forward exchange contracts under hedge designations recorded within accumulated other comprehensive income for the quarters and six-months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 was as follows:
|
|
Quarter Ended June 30, |
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
||||||||
(In millions) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
||||
Unrealized gains at beginning of period |
|
$ |
4.7 |
|
$ |
3.4 |
|
$ |
3.2 |
|
$ |
3.9 |
|
(Gains) Losses reclassified to net sales |
|
(0.9 |
) |
(0.9 |
) |
(1.8 |
) |
(1.7 |
) |
||||
(Decrease) increase in fair value |
|
(0.1 |
) |
0.8 |
|
2.3 |
|
1.1 |
|
||||
Unrealized gains at end of period |
|
$ |
3.7 |
|
$ |
3.3 |
|
$ |
3.7 |
|
$ |
3.3 |
|
As of June 30, 2008, unrealized gains recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax, total $4.0 million, of which $3.2 million are expected to be reclassified into earnings over the next twelve months as the hedged sales are recorded.
Note 7 Other Expense
During the second quarter of 2008, the Company increased it environmental accruals for the Lodi, New Jersey site by $7.6 million due to new information that more fully identified the extent of the required remediation, as further discussed in Note 15 to the condensed consolidated financial statements. During the first quarter of 2008, in connection with the termination of our U.S. Qualified Defined Benefit Retirement Plan, as described in Note 3 to the condensed consolidated financial statements, we recorded expense of $2.7 million for the settlement of pension obligations.
Note 8 Income Taxes
The income tax provision, for the second quarter and six months of 2008, includes a benefit for the reinstatement of $14.7 million and $17.2 million, respectively, of U.S. deferred tax assets which had previously been written off. The reinstatement of the deferred tax assets was the result of the implementation of tax planning strategies which increased our ability to utilize certain U.S. net operating loss carryforwards previously limited under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code. The amount of allowable net operating losses available was limited following a change in ownership in 2003. The tax strategies involved a change in the Companys approach to measuring the value of the Company for use in the calculation of limitations on the NOLs and capitalization of certain research and development expenses under an IRC Section 59(e)
10
election. This election effectively converts pre-change of control limited NOLs into post change of control unlimited NOLs.
In addition, primarily as a result of the elimination of our U.S. defined pension plan, a $3.6 million tax provision (previously included in other comprehensive income) was recognized in the second quarter. Excluding these benefits, the effective tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2008 was 38.5%, as compared to the effective tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2007 from continuing operations of 42.0%.
Note 9 Discontinued Operations
On February 28, 2007, we completed the sale of our European Architectural business. The Architectural business sold included the design, manufacturing and selling activities and the related property, plant and equipment and working capital. Net cash proceeds from the sale were $25.0 million, resulting in a net after-tax gain of $6.5 million, including a loss of $0.3 million recorded in the third quarter of 2007. In accordance with the provisions of SFAS 144, the operations of the Architectural business, including the net after-tax gain on the sale, have been reported as a discontinued operation in our accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements.
Revenues associated with the Architectural business were $4.4 million for the six-months ended June 30, 2007. Pre-tax income associated with the discontinued operation was $10.8 million (including a pre-tax gain on the sale of the business of $10.5 million) for the six-months ended June 30, 2007.
11
Note 10 - Net Income per Common Share
|
|
Quarter Ended June 30, |
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
||||||||
(In millions, except per share data) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Basic net income per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
26.7 |
|
$ |
17.5 |
|
$ |
49.9 |
|
$ |
32.3 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
(8.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
||||
Net income |
|
$ |
26.7 |
|
$ |
8.8 |
|
$ |
49.9 |
|
$ |
32.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
96.2 |
|
94.4 |
|
96.2 |
|
94.4 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net income from continuing operations per common share |
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
$ |
0.52 |
|
$ |
0.34 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations per common share |
|
|
|
(0.09 |
) |
|
|
|
|
||||
Basic net income per common share |
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
$ |
0.52 |
|
$ |
0.34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Diluted net income per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
26.7 |
|
$ |
17.5 |
|
$ |
49.9 |
|
$ |
32.3 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
(8.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
||||
Net income |
|
$ |
26.7 |
|
$ |
8.8 |
|
$ |
49.9 |
|
$ |
32.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding Basic |
|
96.2 |
|
94.4 |
|
96.2 |
|
94.4 |
|
||||
Plus incremental shares from assumed conversions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Restricted stock units |
|
0.3 |
|
0.3 |
|
0.3 |
|
0.4 |
|
||||
Stock options |
|
1.3 |
|
1.6 |
|
1.3 |
|
1.5 |
|
||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding Dilutive |
|
97.8 |
|
96.3 |
|
97.8 |
|
96.3 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net income from continuing operations per common share |
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
$ |
0.51 |
|
$ |
0.33 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations per common share |
|
|
|
(0.09 |
) |
|
|
|
|
||||
Diluted net income per common share |
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
$ |
0.51 |
|
$ |
0.33 |
|
Total shares underlying stock options of 0.5 million and 0.7 million were excluded from the computation of diluted net income per share for both the quarter and six-months ended June 30, 2008 and June 30, 2007, respectively, as they were anti-dilutive.
Note 11 - Comprehensive Income
Comprehensive income represents net income and other gains and losses affecting stockholders equity that are not reflected in the condensed consolidated statements of operations. The components of comprehensive income for the quarters and six-months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 were as follows:
|
|
Quarter Ended June 30, |
|
Six-Months Ended June 30, |
|
||||||||
(In millions) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
||||
Net income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
26.7 |
|
$ |
17.5 |
|
$ |
49.9 |
|
$ |
32.3 |
|
Currency translation adjustments |
|
0.6 |
|
2.1 |
|
9.8 |
|
3.6 |
|
||||
Pension and other postretirement obligations |
|
3.7 |
|
0.4 |
|
5.7 |
|
0.8 |
|
||||
Net unrealized (losses) gains on financial instruments |
|
(1.2 |
) |
(0.2 |
) |
0.2 |
|
(0.9 |
) |
||||
Comprehensive income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
29.8 |
|
$ |
19.8 |
|
$ |
65.6 |
|
$ |
35.8 |
|
12
Note 12 Investments in Affiliated Companies
We have equity ownership investments in two Asian joint ventures. In connection therewith, we have considered the accounting and disclosure requirements of FASB Interpretation No. 46R, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, and believe that these investments would be considered variable interest entities. However, we also believe that we are not the primary beneficiary of such entities, and therefore, are not required to consolidate these entities.
BHA Aero Composite Parts Co., Ltd.
In 1999, Hexcel, Boeing International Holdings, Ltd. (Boeing International) and China Aviation Industry Corporation I (AVIC) formed a joint venture, BHA Aero Composite Parts Co., Ltd. (BHA Aero). This joint venture is located in Tianjin, China, and manufactures composite parts for secondary structures and interior applications for commercial aircraft. Our ownership interest was 40.48% as of June 30, 2008 and 2007. On July 18, 2008 we sold our interest in BHA Aero as further described in Note 16 to the condensed consolidated financial statements - Subsequent Event.
Asian Composites Manufacturing Sdn. Bhd.
In 1999, we formed another joint venture, Asian Composites Manufacturing Sdn. Bhd. (Asian Composites), with Boeing Worldwide Operations Limited, Sime Link Sdn. Bhd., and Malaysia Helicopter Services Bhd. (now known as Naluri Berhad), to manufacture composite parts for secondary structures for commercial aircraft. Our initial ownership interest in this joint venture, which is located in Alor Setar, Malaysia, was 25%. During the first quarter of 2007 we paid $2.1 million to increase our ownership interest to 33.33%.
Note 13 Fair Value Measurements
Effective January 1, 2008, we adopted the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Statement No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157), for financial assets and liabilities. This statement defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands the related disclosure requirements. The statement indicates, among other things, that a fair value measurement assumes a transaction to sell an asset or transfer a liability occurs in the principal market for the asset or liability or, in the absence of a principal market, the most advantageous market for the asset or liability. In accordance with FASB Staff Positions (FSP) 157-2, we will defer adoption of SFAS 157 for all nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except those that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis, until January 1, 2009. The company is currently assessing the impact of SFAS 157 for nonfinancial assets and liabilities on our consolidated financial position and results of operations.
In order to increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements, SFAS No. 157 establishes a hierarchy for observable and unobservable inputs used to measure fair value into three broad levels, which are described below:
· Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for assets or liabilities. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to Level 1 inputs.
· Level 2: Observable prices that are based on inputs not quoted on active markets, but corroborated by market data.
· Level 3: Unobservable inputs are used when little or no market data is available. The fair value hierarchy gives the lowest priority to Level 3 inputs.
13
In determining fair value, the Company utilizes valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs to the extent possible as well as considers counterparty credit risk in its assessment of fair value.
For derivative assets and liabilities that utilize Level 2 inputs we prepare estimates of future cash flows of our derivatives, which are discounted to a net present value. The estimated cash flows and the discount factors used in the valuation model are based on observable inputs, and incorporate non-performance risk (the credit standing of the counterparty when the derivative is in a net asset position, and the credit standing of Hexcel when the derivative is in a net liability position). Below is a summary of valuation techniques for all Level 2 financial assets and liabilities:
· Cross-Currency interest rate swap derivative liabilities valued using LIBOR and EURIBOR yield curves at the reporting date. Counterparties to these contracts are highly rated financial institutions none of which experienced any significant downgrades in the three months ended June 30, 2008 that would reduce the receivable amount owed, if any, to the Company.
· Foreign exchange derivative assets and liabilities valued using quoted forward foreign exchange prices at the reporting date. Counterparties to these contracts are highly rated financial institutions none of which experienced any significant downgrades in the three months ended June 30, 2008 that would reduce the receivable amount owed, if any, to the Company.
· Money market funds considered available-for-sale, and classified as cash equivalents. The adoption of SFAS 157 does not have a material effect on these investments.
The following table presents assets and liabilities measured at fair value at June 30, 2008:
(In millions) |
|
June 30, |
|
Fair Value Measurements at June 30, 2008 |
|
||||||||
Description |
|
2008 |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Money market funds |
|
$ |
9.8 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
9.8 |
|
$ |
|
|
Foreign currency exchange contracts |
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
||||
Total assets |
|
$ |
13.5 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
13.5 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Foreign currency exchange contracts |
|
$ |
0.8 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
0.8 |
|
$ |
|
|
Cross-currency interest rate swaps |
|
15.1 |
|
|
|
15.1 |
|
|
|
||||
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
15.9 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
15.9 |
|
$ |
|
|
Note 14 - Segment Information
The financial results for our operating segments are prepared using a management approach, which is consistent with the basis and manner in which we internally segregate financial information for the purpose of assisting in making internal operating decisions. We evaluate the performance of our operating segments based on operating income, and generally account for intersegment sales based on arms length prices. Corporate and certain other expenses are not allocated to the operating segments, except to the extent that the expense can be directly attributable to the business segment.
14
Financial information for our business segments for the quarters and six-months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 is as follows:
|
|
Unaudited |
|
||||||||||
(In millions) |
|
Composite |
|
Engineered |
|
Corporate |
|
Total |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Second Quarter 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net sales to external customers: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Commercial aerospace |
|
$ |
148.1 |
|
$ |
50.6 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
198.7 |
|
Industrial |
|
84.7 |
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
85.8 |
|
||||
Space and defense |
|
59.7 |
|
15.3 |
|
|
|
75.0 |
|
||||
Net sales to external customers |
|
292.5 |
|
67.0 |
|
|
|
359.5 |
|
||||
Intersegment sales |
|
10.8 |
|
|
|
(10.8 |
) |
|
|
||||
Total sales |
|
303.3 |
|
67.0 |
|
(10.8 |
) |
359.5 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Operating income (a) |
|
39.7 |
|
8.0 |
|
(18.4 |
) |
29.3 |
|
||||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
10.3 |
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
11.4 |
|
||||
Business consolidation and restructuring expenses |
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
||||
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
0.6 |
|
0.1 |
|
1.0 |
|
1.7 |
|
||||
Capital expenditures |
|
40.9 |
|
0.7 |
|
0.7 |
|
42.3 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Second Quarter 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net sales to external customers: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Commercial aerospace |
|
$ |
110.7 |
|
$ |
44.0 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
154.7 |
|
Industrial |
|
75.6 |
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
75.9 |
|
||||
Space and defense |
|
45.6 |
|
13.6 |
|
|
|
59.2 |
|
||||
Net sales to external customers |
|
231.9 |
|
57.9 |
|
|
|
289.8 |
|
||||
Intersegment sales |
|
8.4 |
|
0.9 |
|
(9.3 |
) |
|
|
||||
Total sales |
|
240.3 |
|
58.8 |
|
(9.3 |
) |
289.8 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Operating income |
|
38.2 |
|
5.1 |
|
(9.3 |
) |
34.0 |
|
||||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
9.0 |
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
9.9 |
|
||||
Business consolidation and restructuring expenses |
|
(0.2 |
) |
0.7 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
||||
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
0.9 |
|
0.2 |
|
0.8 |
|
1.9 |
|
||||
Capital expenditures |
|
29.0 |
|
0.8 |
|
0.7 |
|
30.5 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Six Months Ended June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net sales to external customers: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Commercial aerospace |
|
$ |
291.7 |
|
$ |
98.9 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
390.6 |
|
Industrial |
|
161.7 |
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
164.1 |
|
||||
Space and defense |
|
117.0 |
|
32.3 |
|
|
|
149.3 |
|
||||
Net sales to external customers |
|
570.4 |
|
133.6 |
|
|
|
704.0 |
|
||||
Intersegment sales |
|
21.9 |
|
0.3 |
|
(22.2 |
) |
|
|
||||
Total sales |
|
592.3 |
|
133.9 |
|
(22.2 |
) |
704.0 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Operating income (a) |
|
84.1 |
|
16.1 |
|
(34.5 |
) |
65.7 |
|
||||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
20.2 |
|
2.1 |
|
0.1 |
|
22.4 |
|
||||
Business consolidation and restructuring expenses |
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
||||
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
1.7 |
|
0.3 |
|
4.9 |
|
6.9 |
|
||||
Capital expenditures |
|
83.2 |
|
1.3 |
|
1.7 |
|
86.2 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Six Months Ended June 30, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net sales to external customers: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Commercial aerospace |
|
$ |
214.9 |
|
$ |
83.8 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
298.7 |
|
Industrial |
|
149.3 |
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
150.0 |
|
||||
Space and defense |
|
97.9 |
|
25.8 |
|
|
|
123.7 |
|
||||
Net sales to external customers |
|
462.1 |
|
110.3 |
|
|
|
572.4 |
|
||||
Intersegment sales |
|
18.3 |
|
1.7 |
|
(20.0 |
) |
|
|
||||
Total sales |
|
480.4 |
|
112.0 |
|
(20.0 |
) |
572.4 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Operating income |
|
75.1 |
|
10.0 |
|
(21.2 |
) |
63.9 |
|
||||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
17.6 |
|
1.9 |
|
0.1 |
|
19.6 |
|
||||
Business consolidation and restructuring expenses |
|
1.2 |
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
||||
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
2.5 |
|
0.5 |
|
3.7 |
|
6.7 |
|
||||
Capital expenditures |
|
43.2 |
|
1.3 |
|
1.5 |
|
46.0 |
|
15
The carrying amount of goodwill and intangible assets by segment is as follows:
(In millions) |
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
||
Composite Materials |
|
$ |
41.1 |
|
$ |
40.8 |
|
Engineered Products |
|
16.0 |
|
16.0 |
|
||
Goodwill and intangible assets |
|
$ |
57.1 |
|
$ |
56.8 |
|
We are involved in litigation, investigations and claims arising out of the normal conduct of our business, including those relating to commercial transactions, environmental, employment, and health and safety matters. We estimate and accrue our liabilities resulting from such matters based on a variety of factors, including the stage of the proceeding; potential settlement value; assessments by internal and external counsel; and assessments by environmental engineers and consultants of potential environmental liabilities and remediation costs. Such estimates are not discounted to reflect the time value of money due to the uncertainty in estimating the timing of the expenditures, which may extend over several years.
While it is impossible to ascertain the ultimate legal and financial liability with respect to certain contingent liabilities and claims, we believe, based upon our examination of currently available information, our experience to date, and advice from legal counsel, that the individual and aggregate liabilities resulting from the ultimate resolution of these contingent matters, after taking into consideration our existing insurance coverage and amounts already provided for, will not have a material adverse impact on our consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash flows.
Environmental Claims and Proceedings
We are subject to various U.S. and international federal, state and local environmental, and health and safety laws and regulations. We are also subject to liabilities arising under the Federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA or Superfund), the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act, the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, and similar state and international laws and regulations that impose responsibility for the control, remediation and abatement of air, water and soil pollutants and the manufacturing, storage, handling and disposal of hazardous substances and waste.
In 1986, the Company sold its manufacturing facility in Lodi, New Jersey. Under the sale agreement, we retained the obligation to remediate the Lodi site. In 1998 we reacquired the land to facilitate the remediation effort. Previously we agreed to a cleanup plan for the site with the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, and are now performing remediation under that agreement. In the quarter, we updated our cost estimate for remediation based on a simulation model. A number of factors were updated in the model the most prominent of which were further development of information about site contamination and managements judgement extending the expected duration of the remediation process. This resulted in a forecasted range of $7.9 million to $11.5 million in remediation costs. As no point within the range is a more probable outcome than any other point, the Company recorded the lower end of the expected range, which resulted in an increase in the accrual for Lodi remediation of $7.6 million.
16
As of June 30, 2008, our aggregate environmental related accruals were $10.4 million, of which $3.1 million was included in accrued liabilities, with the remainder included in other non-current liabilities. As related to certain of our environmental matters, the accrual was estimated at the low end of a range of possible outcomes since no amount within the range is a better estimate than any other amount. If we had accrued for these matters at the high end of the range of possible outcomes, our accrual would have been $4.9 million higher. These accruals can change significantly from period to period due to such factors as additional information on the nature or extent of contamination, the methods of remediation required, changes in the apportionment of costs among responsible parties and other actions by governmental agencies or private parties, or the impact, if any, of being named in a new matter.
Environmental remediation spending charged directly to our reserve balance for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2008 was $0.9 and $1.5 million, respectively. In addition, our operating costs relating to environmental compliance charged directly to expense for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 were $2.8 million. Capital expenditures for environmental matters approximated $1.9 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2008.
Other Proceedings
Hercules Indemnity Claim
Hercules Incorporated (Hercules) was one of our co-defendants in certain previously disclosed antitrust lawsuits relating to carbon fiber, carbon fiber industrial fabrics and carbon fiber prepreg. As previously disclosed, Hercules filed an action against us in New York state court seeking a declaratory judgment that, pursuant to a 1996 Sale and Purchase Agreement (whereby we acquired the carbon fiber and prepreg assets of Hercules), we were required to indemnify Hercules for its settlements in the antitrust lawsuits and for any liability claims that may be asserted by any of the opt-outs from those suits. On April 30, 2007, the New York court, on summary judgment, dismissed the indemnity counts in Hercules complaint. On February 7, 2008, the Appellate Division unanimously affirmed the lower courts judgment. Hercules has filed a request that the Court of Appeals in New York review this ruling. Hercules also claimed that Hexcel failed to cooperate with Hercules defense in the antitrust cases; this claim was not part of the motion for summary judgment but has since been withdrawn by Hercules.
Hercules also notified the Company of two other antitrust liabilities for which it seeks indemnification under the 1996 Sale and Purchase Agreement: (i) Hercules has been sued by Cytec Industries Inc. in both Federal and California courts for an unspecified amount of antitrust damages in connection with Cytecs purchases of carbon fiber products from Hercules and certain other defendants that were named in the antitrust lawsuits (Cytec was a co-defendant in these lawsuits); and (ii) Hercules has entered into an amicable settlement with The Boeing Company and Hitco Inc (both of which were opt-outs) to settle similar antitrust claims for $3.8 million. These additional indemnity claims were not in front of the New York court, but if the summary judgment is affirmed by the New York Court of Appeals they should be invalid. In July 2008, we were advised that Cytecs Federal case against Hercules was dismissed with prejudice although Cytec is appealing that decision. The Company is not in a position to predict the outcome of the New York lawsuit with Hercules, but will continue to defend it vigorously. We have not recorded a reserve related to this matter.
17
Product Warranty
We provide for an estimated amount of product warranty expense at the time revenue is recognized. This estimated amount is provided by product and based on historical warranty experience. In addition, we periodically review our warranty accrual and record any adjustments as deemed appropriate. Warranty expense for the quarter and six-months ended June 30, 2008, and accrued warranty cost, included in accrued liabilities in the condensed consolidated balance sheets at June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, was as follows:
(In millions) |
|
Product |
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
2.9 |
|
Warranty expense |
|
0.9 |
|
|
Deductions and other |
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
Balance as of March 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
3.5 |
|
Warranty expense |
|
0.7 |
|
|
Deductions and other |
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
Balance as of June 30, 2008 |
|
$ |
3.8 |
|
On July 18, 2008, the Company completed the sale of its 40.48% interest in BHA Aero Composite Parts Co., Ltd. (BHA Aero) to the Boeing Company. BHA Aero is located in Tianjin, China, and specializes in producing composite secondary structures and interior parts for the aerospace industry. The Company received cash proceeds (before taxes) in the amount of $22.3 million and will record an after tax gain on the sale of approximately $12 million in the third quarter of 2008. The existing supply and material procurement agreements among BHA, Boeing and Hexcel were affirmed and reflect continued long term work commitments by Boeing that will ensure Hexcel assembly of BHA components for Boeing as well as the supply of Hexcel materials to BHA.
18
ITEM 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Hexcel Corporation and its subsidiaries, is a leading advanced composites company. We develop, manufacture, and market lightweight, high-performance composites, including carbon fibers, reinforcements, prepregs, honeycomb, matrix systems, adhesives and composite structures, for use in commercial aerospace, space and defense and industrial applications. Our products are used in a wide variety of end applications, such as commercial and military aircraft, space launch vehicles and satellites, wind turbine blades, automotive and a wide variety of recreational equipment.
We serve international markets through manufacturing facilities and sales offices located in the United States and Europe, and through sales representation offices located in Asia, Australia and South America. We also hold a 33.33% interest in Asian Composites Manufacturing Sdn. Bhd., located in Malaysia, which manufactures composite structures for commercial aerospace. On July 18, 2008, the Company completed the sale of its 40.48% interest in BHA Aero Composite Parts Co., Ltd. (BHA ) to the Boeing Company (see footnote 16 to the condensed consolidated financial statements for further discussion).
Hexcel has two segments, Composite Materials and Engineered Products. The Composite Materials segment manufactures and markets carbon fibers, fabrics and specialty reinforcements, prepregs, structural adhesives, honeycomb, composite panels, molding compounds, polyurethane systems, gel coats and laminates that are incorporated into many applications, including military and commercial aircraft, rotorcraft, wind turbine blades and recreational products. The Engineered Products segment manufactures and markets composite structures and precision machined honeycomb parts for use in the aerospace industry. Composite structures are manufactured from a variety of composite and other materials, including prepregs, honeycomb, structural adhesives and advanced molding materials, using such manufacturing processes as autoclave processing, multi-axis numerically controlled machining, heat forming, compression molding and other composite manufacturing techniques.
Despite the abundance of bad economic news, demand for our products remains robust as does our outlook. In recent years we have embarked on ambitious capacity expansion plans. These include increasing our carbon fiber nameplate capacity from 5.5 million lbs in 2006 to 16 million lbs by 2010 (including a new greenfield site in Spain); building new prepreg facilities near Airbus Germany and Airbus France; a new glass prepreg plant in China for wind energy; and lastly we just announced a new glass prepreg plant in Colorado for the emerging North America wind turbine market. Each of our new European facilities has demonstrated their capability to achieve the required technical standards and we have now moved to the customer qualification stage, with our new prepreg system for the Airbus A350 using Hexcel carbon fiber being a priority. The China plant is scheduled to be operational in October and is expected to rapidly reach its targeted utilization in the second quarter of 2009. Our Colorado plant should begin production in the second half of 2009.
In addition to these activities, in the future we will also need capacity expansions to support the new A350 program. We previously announced, in the second quarter, that we will be supplying carbon fiber prepregs for major primary structures on the new A350, an award that could generate $4-5 billion of revenue over the life of its contract the largest contract in our history.
In 2007, Hexcel successfully concluded the sale of a significant portion of our previously reported Reinforcements segment. In order to take full advantage of the many growing applications for advanced composite materials, we decided to narrow our focus and consolidate our activities around our carbon fiber, reinforcements for composites, honeycomb, matrix and engineered products product lines. In 2007, we completed the combination of our Reinforcements activities related to advanced composites with our previously reported Composites and Structures segments as a single organization. We successfully concluded the reorganization during 2007, with the divesture of our European Architectural business and the U.S. electronics, ballistics and general industrial (EBGI) product lines.
19
Second Quarter and Six-Months Results
|
|
Quarter Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
Six-Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
||||||||
(In millions, except per share data) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
% Change |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
% Change |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net sales |
|
$ |
359.5 |
|
$ |
289.8 |
|
24.1 |
% |
$ |
704.0 |
|
$ |
572.4 |
|
23.0 |
% |
Operating income |
|
29.3 |
|
34.0 |
|
(13.8 |
)% |
65.7 |
|
63.9 |
|
2.8 |
% |
||||
Net income |
|
26.7 |
|
17.5 |
|
52.6 |
% |
49.9 |
|
32.3 |
|
54.5 |
% |
||||
Diluted net income per common share |
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
|
$ |
0.51 |
|
$ |
0.33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Non-GAAP measures: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Adjusted operating income |
|
$ |
38.1 |
|
$ |
34.5 |
|
10.4 |
% |
$ |
77.8 |
|
$ |
65.5 |
|
18.8 |
% |
As a percentage of net sales |
|
10.6 |
% |
11.9 |
% |
|
|
11.1 |
% |
11.4 |
% |
|
|
||||
Adjusted net income |
|
$ |
20.3 |
|
$ |
17.5 |
|
16.0 |
% |
$ |
42.7 |
|
$ |
32.3 |
|
32.2 |
% |
Adjusted diluted earnings per share from continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
|
$ |
0.44 |
|
$ |
0.33 |
|
|
|
The Companys performance measurements include operating income adjusted for non-recurring operating expenses and business consolidation and restructuring expenses, and net income adjusted for non-recurring expenses, both of which are non-GAAP measures. Management believes these non-GAAP measurements are meaningful to investors because they provide a view of Hexcel with respect to ongoing operating results. Non-recurring items represent significant charges or credits that are important to an understanding of Hexcels overall operating results in the periods presented. Such non-GAAP measurements are not recognized in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and should not be viewed as an alternative to GAAP measures of performance. The following is reconciliation from GAAP to non-GAAP amounts.
|
|
Quarter Ended June 30, |
|
Six-Months Ended June 30, |
|
||||||||
(In millions, except per share data) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Operating income |
|
$ |
29.3 |
|
$ |
34.0 |
|
$ |
65.7 |
|
$ |
63.9 |
|
Business consolidation & restructuring expense |
|
1.2 |
|
0.5 |
|
1.8 |
|
1.6 |
|
||||
Environmental Expense (1) |
|
7.6 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
|
|
|
||||
Pension Settlement Expense |
|
|
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
||||
Adjusted operating income |
|
$ |
38.1 |
|
$ |
34.5 |
|
$ |
77.8 |
|
$ |
65.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net income |
|
$ |
26.7 |
|
$ |
17.5 |
|
$ |
49.9 |
|
$ |
32.3 |
|
Tax adjustments (2) |
|
(11.1 |
) |
|
|
(13.6 |
) |
|
|
||||
Environmental Expense (net of tax) |
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
||||
Pension Settlement Expense (net of tax) |
|
|
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
||||
Adjusted net income |
|
$ |
20.3 |
|
$ |
17.5 |
|
$ |
42.7 |
|
$ |
32.3 |
|
(1) Second Quarter of 2008 Environmental Expense adjustment relates to an increase to the estimated remediation costs for the Lodi site, a former fine chemical business located in New Jersey.
(2) The second quarter of 2008 tax adjustments include $11.1 million in net benefit primarily related to the reinstatement of U.S. deferred tax assets which had been previously written off. The six months ended June 30, 2008 includes a total of $13.6 million.
20
Net Sales
Net sales for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 were 24.1% higher than the second quarter of 2007 and 17.5% higher on a constant currency basis. Net sales for the six months ended June 30, 2008 were 23.0% higher than the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 16.7% higher on a constant currency basis.
The following table summarizes net sales to third-party customers by segment and end market for the quarters and six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively:
|
|
Quarter Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
Six-Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
||||||||
(In millions) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
% Change |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
% Change |
|
||||
Consolidated Net Sales |
|
$ |
359.5 |
|
$ |
289.8 |
|
24.1 |
% |
$ |
704.0 |
|
$ |
572.4 |
|
23.0 |
% |
Commercial Aerospace |
|
198.7 |
|
154.7 |
|
28.5 |
% |
390.6 |
|
298.7 |
|
30.8 |
% |
||||
Industrial |
|
85.8 |
|
75.9 |
|
13.1 |
% |
164.1 |
|
150.0 |
|
9.4 |
% |
||||
Space & Defense |
|
75.0 |
|
59.2 |
|
26.6 |
% |
149.3 |
|
123.7 |
|
20.7 |
% |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Composite Materials |
|
$ |
292.5 |
|
$ |
231.9 |
|
26.1 |
% |
$ |
570.4 |
|
$ |
462.1 |
|
23.5 |
% |
Commercial Aerospace |
|
148.1 |
|
110.7 |
|
33.9 |
% |
291.7 |
|
214.8 |
|
35.8 |
% |
||||
Industrial |
|
84.7 |
|
75.6 |
|
12.1 |
% |
161.7 |
|
149.3 |
|
8.3 |
% |
||||
Space & Defense |
|
59.7 |
|
45.6 |
|
30.7 |
% |
117.0 |
|
98.0 |
|
19.4 |
% |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Engineered Products |
|
$ |
67.0 |
|
$ |
57.9 |
|
15.9 |
% |
$ |
133.6 |
|
$ |
110.3 |
|
21.1 |
% |
Commercial Aerospace |
|
50.6 |
|
44.0 |
|
15.0 |
% |
98.9 |
|
83.9 |
|
17.9 |
% |
||||
Industrial |
|
1.1 |
|
0.3 |
|
258.6 |
% |
2.4 |
|
0.7 |
|
282.7 |
% |
||||
Space & Defense |
|
15.3 |
|
13.6 |
|
13.0 |
% |
32.3 |
|
25.7 |
|
25.4 |
% |
Commercial Aerospace: Net sales increased $44.0 million, or 28.5% (25.1% on a constant currency basis), to $198.7 million for the second quarter of 2008. Sales to Airbus and its subcontractors grew over 30% for the second quarter in a row in year over year comparisons. Sales to Boeing and its subcontractors increased about 12% over the second quarter of 2007, even though B787 sales were dampened as customers reduced their requirements to align themselves with the programs delay. Additionally, sales to other commercial aerospace which includes a wide range of aircraft producers as a group were up over 25% for the sixth consecutive quarter as both regional jets and turboprop build rates have been strong. The impact of foreign exchange rates contributed $4.2 million to commercial aerospace sales in the second quarter.
Net sales for the six months ended June 30, 2008 increased $91.9 million or 30.8% (27.3% on a constant currency basis) to $390.6 million over the six months ended June 30, 2007. The sales growth was broad based, reflecting increased aircraft production by both Airbus and Boeing, as well as regional aircraft and business jet manufacturers. The impact of foreign exchange rates contributed $8.2 million to commercial aerospace sales in the six months ended June 30, 2008.
Industrial: Net sales increased $9.9 million, or 13.1% (0.5% on a constant currency basis), to $85.8 million for the second quarter of 2008. Industrial sales were impacted by favorable foreign currency translation of $9.5 million during the quarter. Industrial market consists primarily of wind energy but also includes recreation, auto and other industrial sub-markets. Demand within the wind market remained strong during the quarter, however industrial sales other than wind energy were again impacted by capacity constraints and portfolio pruning to meet strong aerospace sales. While our current wind business is primarily in Europe, we are in the process of adding manufacturing capacity in China to meet regional growth. This capacity should be available for production starting in the fourth quarter of 2008. In addition, we have announced that we are adding manufacturing capacity in Colorado to serve the emerging North America wind turbine blade manufacturing capacity.
Net sales for the six months ended June 30, 2008 increased $14.1 million or 9.4% (a decrease of 2.1% on
21
a constant currency basis) to $164.1 million. The industrial market was impacted by favorable foreign currency translation of $17.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008. Year to date wind energy revenue maintains its mid-teens growth, on a constant-currency basis. Strong sales performance in wind energy markets was more than offset by weaker sales from capacity constraints and soft winter recreation sales in the other industrial markets.
Space & Defense: Net sales increased $15.8 million or 26.6% (21.5% on a constant currency basis) to $75.0 million for the second quarter of 2008. The impact of foreign exchange rates contributed $2.5 million to Space & Defense sales in the second quarter. The growth was across a wide range of programs, led again by the continued strength in global rotorcraft sales and growth in European military aircraft such as the A400M program.
Net sales for the six months ended June 30, 2008 increased $25.6 million, or 20.7% (16.0% on a constant currency basis) to $149.3 million. The impact of foreign exchange rates contributed $5.0 million to commercial aerospace sales in the six months ended June 30, 2008.
Gross Margin
|
|
Quarter Ended June 30, |
|
% |
|
Six-Months Ended June 30, |
|
% |
|
||||||||
(In millions) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Change |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Change |
|
||||
Gross margin |
|
$ |
76.1 |
|
$ |
70.4 |
|
8.1 |
% |
$ |
156.2 |
|
$ |
141.9 |
|
10.0 |
% |
Percentage of sales |
|
21.2 |
% |
24.3 |
% |
|
|
22.2 |
% |
24.8 |
% |
|
|
||||
The increase in gross margin for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 of $5.7 million resulted primarily from higher sales volume. The benefits of higher volume were offset by the impact of start-up activities associated with new facilities in Spain, France, Germany and China (about 200 basis points), exchange rates (about 110 basis points) and the impact of rising oil costs on certain commodity materials, utility and freight rates (about 100 basis points). We aim to have our new European facilities at least cover their costs in the second half of this year, and China next year. Depreciation and amortization expense, included in cost of sales during the quarter increased $1.5 million to $10.2 million.
The increase in gross margin for the six months ended June 30, 2008 of $14.3 million resulted primarily from higher sales volume. The benefits of higher volume were also offset by the factors discussed above. The first half impact of exchange rates was about 130 basis points. The impact of start-up costs and rising oil costs were less pronounced in the first quarter than the second quarter. Depreciation and amortization expense, included in cost of sales for the six months increased $2.6 million to $20.0 million from the same period in 2007.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses (SG&A)
|
|
Quarter Ended June 30, |
|
% |
|
Six-Months Ended June 30, |
|
% |
|
||||||||
(In millions) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Change |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Change |
|
||||
SG&A expense |
|
$ |
30.0 |
|
$ |
27.4 |
|
9.4 |
% |
$ |
62.0 |
|
$ |
58.4 |
|
6.1 |
% |
Percentage of sales |
|
8.3 |
% |
9.5 |
% |
|
|
8.8 |
% |
10.2 |
% |
|
|
||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased $2.6 million and $3.6 for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2008 respectively. Over two thirds of the increase for both the quarter and six months is due to exchange rates. SG&A expenses as a percentage of sales decreased for both the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2008 primarily reflecting the increase in sales volumes during the quarter without an associated significant increase in expense.
22
Research and Technology Expenses (R&T)
|
|
Quarter Ended June 30, |
|
% |
|
Six-Months Ended June 30, |
|
% |
|
||||||||
(In millions) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Change |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Change |
|
||||
R&T expense |