SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-K/A
(Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-K)
(Mark One)
ý ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 [FEE REQUIRED]
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED MAY 29, 2005
Commission File Number 0-12611
AULT INCORPORATED
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
MINNESOTA |
|
41-0842932 |
(State or other jurisdiction of |
|
(IRS Employer Identification Number) |
incorporation or organization) |
|
|
|
|
|
7105 Northland Terrace, Brooklyn Park, MN 55428-1028 |
||
Address of principal executive offices |
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (763) 592-1900
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Common Stock, No Par Value
(Title of Class)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
YES ý NO o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendments to this Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2).
YES o NO ý
The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was approximately $8,070,000 based upon the closing price of the Companys common stock on the NASDAQ National Market on September 13, 2005, multiplied by the number of outstanding shares of the Company held by persons other than officers, directors and 10% or more shareholders referred to in the Security Ownership of Principal Shareholders and Management table referred to under Item 12 herein.
On December 12, 2005, there were outstanding 4,861,192 shares of the Registrants common stock.
The Form 10-K/A consists of 71 pages. The Exhibit Index is located on page 65.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the act). YES o NO ý
AULT INCORPORATED
FORM 10-K/A
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED MAY 29, 2005
This Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A (Form 10-K/A) to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended May 29, 2005, initially filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) on October 7, 2005, (Original Filing) reflects a restatement of the consolidated financial statements of Ault Incorporated (the Company) for the year ended May 29, 2005 and May 30, 2004, as discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements. The determination to restate these financial statements and other financial information was made as a result of managements identification of accounting errors at the Companys China subsidiary related to unrecorded payables. The adjustments totaled $248,000 for the year ended May 30, 2004 and increased the Companys net loss applicable to common shareholders to ($5,793,646) from ($5,545,646) as originally reported, and totaled $342,385 for the year ended May 29, 2005 and increased the Companys net loss applicable to common shareholders to ($5,472,302) from ($5,129,917) as originally reported. Further information on the restatement adjustments can be found on Note 1 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
This Form 10-K/A amends and restates Items 6, 7, 8 and 9A of Part II and Item 15 of Part IV of the Original Filing. In addition, pursuant to the rules of the SEC, Item 15 of Part IV of the Original Filing has been amended to contain an updated consent of the Companys independent registered public accounting firm and currently dated certifications from the Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as required by Sections 302 and 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley act of 2002.
PART I
(a) General Development of Business
Ault Incorporated (herein Ault or the Company) was incorporated under the laws of the State of Minnesota in 1961. The Company designs, manufactures, and markets power conversion products and is a leading domestic supplier of such products to original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) of data communications equipment, telecommunications equipment, portable medical devices and equipment as well as scanning and printing equipment and industrial equipment.
On July 16, 2002, the Company purchased a portion of the operating assets of the Power General division of Nidec America Corporation. The Power General division developed, manufactured, and sold high-efficiency DC/DC converters and custom power supplies at various power levels up to 1200 watts under the Power General brand name. Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, the Company paid the Seller $366,000 in cash and issued $2,074,000 face amount of the Companys newly created Series B 7% Convertible Preferred Stock, no par value (the Preferred Stock). Further information regarding this acquisition is contained in Note 15 of the Notes to Financial Statements under Item 8 herein. Since the acquisition of the Power General division significant time and resources have been expended integrating the Massachusetts engineering group and internal power supply line into Aults existing processes and team structure. As planned, production of Power Generals open-frame AC-DC power supplies and the DC/DC converters was transferred from Massachusetts to Aults existing facilities in Asia. In addition, through training provided to Aults field sales organization worldwide, Aults customers and prospects are familiar with the additional products and design engineering capabilities provided by this acquisition.
On July 17, 2003, the Company announced the consolidation of its manufacturing operations. The consolidation includes the closing of its Minneapolis production operations, eliminating approximately 40 jobs in assembly, equipment maintenance, procurement and administrative support and the integration of production into Aults other manufacturing plants. Aults engineering, documentation, safety certification/reliability, sales, marketing and administrative services will remain at the Minneapolis headquarters facility. The consolidation was implemented to reduce expenses, improve cash flow and return the Company to profitability. The savings have been approximately $1.3 million on an annual basis.
2
On May 20, 2005, the Company completed the sale of its wholly owned subsidiary, Ault Korea Corporation (Ault Korea), to JEC Korea Co., Ltd. for $3.7 million. The agreement includes the receipt of $1,472,000 in cash and a secured note in the amount of $2,250,000. The sale includes all assets and liabilities of Ault Korea Corporation and the use of the Ault Korea name in Korea for a period of three years. Ault Korea includes the property in Seoul, South Korea and approximately 110 employees. As part of the terms of the agreement, JEC has the rights to sell power conversion products in Korea while Ault will have rights to sell the same power conversion products throughout the rest of the world. Prior to this transaction, JEC was a supplier of Ault, but otherwise no material relationship existed between Ault and JEC, or their respective affiliates, directors or officers, or any associates of their directors and officers. The transaction resulted in a loss of approximately $2,442,000, principally the result of the Company forgiving an intercompany note in the amount of approximately $2.3 million.
On May 27, 2005, the Company completed the sale of its Minneapolis headquarter building (64,000 square feet) and land to Dane Industries Inc. for $3.85 million. The gross proceeds of $3.85 million was used to pay off the mortgage balance of $2,509,000 and $255,000 of transaction expenses, which included the realtors commissions, leaving net cash proceeds of $1,086,000 for the Company. The transaction resulted in a loss of approximately $137,000. Prior to this transaction, no material relationship existed between Ault and Dane, or their respective affiliates, directors or officers, or any associates of their directors and officers. Related to this sales transaction, Ault entered into an agreement to lease a portion (13,313 square feet) of its headquarter building for a period of twenty-seven months with a monthly rent payment of $18,860.
During June 2005, the Company became aware of accounting errors in its China operations that affected fiscal year 2004 and the first three quarters of fiscal 2005. As a result of these errors, the loss applicable to common stockholders was underreported by $593,000 in fiscal year 2004 and underreported by $425,000 in the first three quarters of fiscal year 2005.
The sale of the Korean subsidiary has required the Company to adjust the financial statements to treat the Korean subsidiary as discontinued operations.
The Company maintains a website at www.aultinc.com. The annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and periodic reports on Form 8-K (and any amendments to these reports) are available free of charge on the website as soon as reasonably practical after the reports are filed with the SEC. To obtain copies of these reports, go to www. http://www.aultinc.com.
(b) Financial Information About Industry Segments
The Company operates in only one industry segment - the manufacture and sale of power conversion devices.
(c) Narrative Description of the Business
Aults power conversion products are used to adapt alternating current (AC) to provide a source of power at various levels up to more than one kilowatt of continuous power for a wide variety of electronic equipment. A significant amount of the Companys products are located outside the equipment they power as a wall plug-in or as in-line components. Both of these styles are generally referred to as external power conversion products. A smaller percentage of the Companys products are located inside the equipment they power and are generally known as internal power conversion devices. Each product configuration, external and internal, offers distinct advantages to the OEM buyer. Internal power products are more generally accepted among design engineers across all segments of the electronic original equipment market (EOEM). Internal power has traditionally been the norm in product design and, in terms of range, it provides greater latitude especially in applications beyond 100 watts. External power still ranks as a high growth area in the power supply industry due to the increasing emphasis on smaller and portable products that perform increasingly sophisticated functions. Aults business strategy is to offer OEMs in these markets an expanding line of high-quality power conversion products, diverse design engineering expertise and customized customer services.
(1) Products
Aults product line includes internal AC/DC and DC/DC switching power supplies, DC/DC converters, DC mobile adapters and four major categories of external power conversion products: switching power supplies, linear power supplies, transformers and battery chargers. The Companys broad range of power conversion products --- ranging from 1 watt to more than 1 kilowatt --- are capable of providing power at most output levels that OEMs require.
3
The Companys design and application engineers work closely with customers to ensure that these products are customized to meet each OEM customers unique power conversion needs.
The following table summarizes the proportion of sales of each of the Companys five major product categories for its last three fiscal years ended May 29, 2005:
Sale of Products by Category
as a Percentage of Total Sales
|
|
Years Ended |
|
||||
Product Type |
|
May 29, |
|
May 30, |
|
June 1, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Switching Power Supplies |
|
69 |
% |
59 |
% |
54 |
% |
Linear Power Supplies |
|
16 |
|
25 |
|
30 |
|
Transformers |
|
3 |
|
5 |
|
6 |
|
Battery Chargers |
|
7 |
|
7 |
|
7 |
|
DC/DC Converters |
|
5 |
|
4 |
|
3 |
|
Total |
|
100 |
% |
100 |
% |
100 |
% |
Power Supplies. The Companys traditional power supplies provide all power conversion elements for electronic equipment in power outputs ranging from 1 to 1200 watts. The majority of the Companys products contain a component level transformer, which reduces the voltage level, as well as other circuitry and components, which convert alternating current (AC) to direct current (DC) and, in most cases, maintain voltage within specific limits.
Internal and External Switching Power Supplies. The Company believes the market for switching power supplies in the 1-500 watt range is generally the fastest growing segment of the overall power supply industry. For internals, switching power supplies are efficient and easily modified to meet an OEMs specific footprint and power requirements. In externals, switching power supplies use switching transistors to convert power from AC to DC and are more energy efficient, smaller and lighter in weight than linear units with comparable power outputs. The applications in which these internal and external products are currently used include telecommunications (wireless, wire line, cellular), data communications (networking, broadband modem, Power over Ethernet, routers, hubs, switches), computer and related peripherals, medical equipment, microprocessor controlled systems, printing and scanning equipment, security systems, automatic teller terminals, test equipment, multiplexers, digital cameras and point of sale equipment.
Most of the Companys internal and external switching power supplies incorporate a universal input ranging from 90 to 265 volts AC. This universal input means that the power supplies can be used in virtually any country for applications such as local area networks (LANs), printers and fiber optic links. The Company has also designed medical grade switching power supplies with similar universal input ranges.
Linear Power Supplies. Linear power supplies are larger and generally less expensive than switching power supplies because their design is based on technology employing steel laminations with windings of copper wire rather than switching transistors. Linear power supplies tend to be used when the wattage output required is relatively low. Ault manufactures linear power supplies that provide up to 12 watts of regulated power and 25 watts of unregulated power. The Companys linear power supplies are used in a variety of applications including modems, telecommunications products, local area networks, microprocessor controlled systems, test equipment and multiplexers.
Transformers. The Company manufactures a wide variety of wall plug-in transformers as part of its full range of power conversion products. Transformers are used primarily in applications where OEMs desire to remove heat, electromagnetic interference and weight from electronic equipment, while incorporating the rest of the power conversion system within the product. These products reduce AC voltage from approximately 110 volts (230 volts in some countries) down to lower voltages that range from 5 to 60 volts AC. The Companys product line also includes highly customized transformers that operate within stringent power output tolerances, features that are not offered by most of the Companys competitors. The Companys transformers are utilized in a broad spectrum of applications including modems, telephone sets, multimedia products and scanners.
4
Battery Chargers. Ault has been an innovator in battery charging technology since the early 1980s. Ault specializes in providing custom designed, advanced solutions for manufacturers of portable and battery powered equipment. Applications for the Companys battery chargers include medical devices, mobile telecom devices, notebook computers, global positioning equipment and radio frequency communications products.
The Companys products serve the entire range of widely used battery chemistries such as nickel cadmium, sealed lead acid, gel cell and nickel-metal hydride. In addition, the Company has developed battery chargers for the particular requirements of newer battery chemistries such as zinc air, lithium ion and lithium polymer. The Company is committed to supporting these new emerging chemistries and to developing battery charger products to be introduced as these new battery chemistries become commercially accepted.
The Company sells primarily smart battery chargers as distinguished from trickle chargers. Smart charger products use integrated circuits to control various charging characteristics while allowing for fast charge time and extended battery life. Trickle charging is typically used for slow (8 to 10 hours) charging and/or standby battery maintenance.
The Company believes that the demand for high-quality battery chargers will continue to increase to accommodate the growing sophistication of portable electronic equipment.
High-Efficiency and High-Density DC/DC Converters. The addition of DC/DC converters to the Companys product offering was in response to customer requests for on-the-board power solutions and Aults strategy to fulfill the total solution approach as a preferred supplier to valued OEM customers. In fiscal 2003, as part of the Power General product offering, Ault acquired a line of DC/DC converters and seasoned engineers who have developed new, innovative high-density quarter-brick and eighth-brick designs. These products provide Ault with a wide range of converter options to meet the needs of OEMs using distributed power architecture in their next generation and new electronic product designs. In fiscal 2002, Ault signed a private label agreement with a third party manufacturer for distribution of high-efficiency DC/DC converters. The agreement was in-place for fiscal 2002, 2003 and part of fiscal 2004. Since the agreement was subject to an annual review by each party, Ault decided to terminate the agreement during the second quarter of fiscal year 2005 due to a lack of sales activity.
Mobile Products. In late 2002, the Company expanded its product offering to include a line of mobile products for powering laptop computers in a broad range of field and service applications. The product focus is on mobile adapters in a single and dual output with a primary sales focus on laptop OEMs and value-added resellers (VARs). The Company anticipates nearly 65% of the market to be field and service applications in the business travel, insurance, trucking and delivery industries. The remainder of the applications is in emergency fire, police and medical services (20%); military and government (10%); and a small percentage in miscellaneous uses (5%). The product family, known as Transport, was introduced in fiscal 2003. The TR75 (75watts) is a single output mobile adapter that has generated approximately $380,000 in revenue. The next models in the product family are the TR100 (up to 100 watts) and the TR120 (up to 120 watts) in a same footprint as the TR75. These products will power the next generation of laptop computers that require 90, 100 or 120 watts.
(2) Markets and Customers
The Companys marketing efforts are directed primarily toward OEMs producing non-consumer electronic equipment for broadband modems, wireless and wire line telecommunications product, networking, Power over Ethernet, as well as industrial and retail data acquisition. These markets are characterized by trends toward smaller, portable products capable of performing increasingly sophisticated functions, as well as intense competitive pressure to rapidly introduce new products and product enhancements. Based on its expertise to tailor a broad range of products to meet customer requirements, the Company believes it is well positioned to serve the needs of its OEM customers as they respond to these trends and competitive factors.
Historically, the most significant market for the Companys products has been OEMs of telecommunications/data communications equipment (broadband modems, wireless and wire line); in fiscal 2005 sales in this market represented approximately 39% of net sales. The Companys products power cable and ADSL modems, network termination equipment (devices which interface between telephone network and the customers PBX or other
5
telephone system), line conditioning equipment (devices which prepare telephone lines for the transmission of computer generated data), Wi-Fi and Power over Ethernet applications and various items of equipment ancillary to business telephones, including speaker phones, automatic dialers, caller identification units and alpha numeric displays, low to medium speed PC modems and multiplexers (equipment which enables the simultaneous transmission of multiple channels of information over the same telephone line).
In fiscal 2004, the telecommunications industry overall began to rebound as OEMs began launching new projects/designs and had the need to replenish existing product inventory that had been slow-moving over the past two years. A couple of telecommunication segments have been particularly strong: wireless and networking. There are new applications such as broadband wireless routers and wireless Ethernet devices that require cost-effective switching power supplies in the 12-32 watt range. The Company introduced a family of single-port Power-over-Ethernet power supplies that combine power through integrated RJ45 jacks as well as data over a single CAT 5 Ethernet cable. Two versions of the product are available: one that is 100% compliant to the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) 802.3af standard that addresses Power over Ethernet requirements. A second version in the PW130 family is available to power OEM devices that are not compliant to the standard. Both versions can be sold as a standard product or be modified to suit specific requirements.
Approximately 33% of net sales in fiscal 2005 were to OEMs of portable medical equipment such as infusion pumps, patient monitoring systems, apnea monitors, and portable terminals for patient history input diagnostics.
In fiscal 2005 approximately 17% of the Companys net sales were to OEMs in the industrial market segment that includes digital cameras, load survey equipment, industrial lighting, outdoor and specialty lighting as well as power tools, metal detectors and GPS equipment. The remaining 11% of the Companys net sales were to OEMs of computers and computer peripherals such as digitizers, printers, plotters, portable terminals, point of sale scanners and optical character readers, LAN hardware and multimedia speakers for computer applications.
The Company has worked diligently to support the growth of sales through our network of regional, national and international distributors. In fiscal 2005, approximately 36% of the Companys net sales were to our distributors and their broad base of customers. While the specific percentages per market segment are not available, the Companys distributors target the same market segments as those outlined above. (I.e. the data communications/telecommunications segment ranks at the top of their market mix as well).
(3) Design Engineering and Product Development
Design engineering teams at the Companys facilities in the United States and the Peoples Republic of China are responsible for developing new power conversion products and customizing existing products to meet customer needs. The Company also utilizes the significant engineering resources of its Asian subcontractors for the development of products targeted for subcontract manufacturing. The Companys product development activities are divided equally between developing products to satisfy customer needs and new products based upon anticipated customer needs and market trends. New product development opportunities are evaluated based upon criteria such as global market potential, return on investment and technological advantages. The Company believes that its collaborative efforts with customers, combined with its forward-looking concern for power technology and market trends, have enabled it to gain a reputation as a leading innovator in the development of new power conversion products.
(4) Sales and Distribution
The Company markets its products primarily in the U.S. and Canada through a network of 17 manufacturer representatives employing approximately 120 salespersons, each of whom represents, in addition to Aults products, several different but complementary product lines of other manufacturers. The Company also sells through four national distributor organizations, which employ over 1,000 salespersons, and 13 regional distributors, which employ over 75 salespersons. The Company selects representatives based upon their industry knowledge as well as account expertise with products that are synergistic with the Companys products. Individual salespersons are trained, mentored and technically assisted by the Companys application engineers and other sales administration staff. Any reduction in the efforts of these manufacturer representatives or distributors could adversely affect the Companys business and operating results.
6
The Company begins the sales process by identifying a potential customer or market; researching the target or potential customers total business, product and strategic needs; and then preparing a total solution proposal that includes engineering, product development, safety agency approvals, logistics and project development processes, coordinating pilot runs and assisting OEMs with their product introductions.
The Company focuses its selling efforts primarily on OEMs in the U.S. and Canada. However, many of the larger OEM customers of the Company manufacture and sell their products globally. As a result, the Company has extended its presence to markets throughout the world. The Companys sales in the Pacific Rim are primarily to customers in China.
The Company markets its products in Europe through a network of distributors who are managed through the Companys customer team located in Minnesota and in Maryland. In the Pacific Rim, the Company markets its products through direct sales teams located in Shanghai, Peoples Republic of China.
(5) Safety Agency Certification
The power conversion system is potentially the most hazardous element in most electronic equipment because the power supply modifies standard power to a level appropriate for such equipment. Virtually all of the Companys customers require that the power conversion products supplied by the Company meet or exceed established international safety and quality standards, since many of the Companys products are used in conjunction with equipment that is distributed throughout the world. In response to these customer requirements, the vast majority of the Companys products are designed and manufactured in accordance with certification requirements of many safety agencies, including Underwriters Laboratories Incorporated (UL) in the United States; the Canadian Standards Association (CSA) in Canada; Technischer Uberwachungs-Verein (TUV) in Germany; the British Approval Board for Telecommunication (BABT) in the United Kingdom; the International Electrotechnical Committee (IEC), a European standards organization and (CE) a standard for the European Community. In addition, some of the Companys products have also received Japanese Ministry of International Trade and Industry (MITI) approval. For certain safety applications, the Companys products conform to FCC Class B requirements, which regulate the levels of electronic magnetic interference that may be emitted by electronic equipment. Unlike most of its competitors, the Company is a certified test laboratory for UL, CSA and TUV and is able to conduct most certification tests at its Minneapolis headquarters. This procedure reduces the time required to obtain safety certifications.
(6) Competition
The Company competes primarily with various manufacturers of external power conversion products. The industry is highly fragmented, with manufacturers generally focusing their marketing on specific segments. The Company has experienced strong competition from Taiwanese-based manufacturers principally on price. Many of these competitors have a smaller presence in the external conversion market than the Company, although several are engaged in more than one business and have significantly greater financial resources.
No single company dominates the overall external power conversion product market, and the Companys competitors vary depending upon the particular power conversion product category. The companies with which Ault competes most directly in each of its major product categories are: Leader Electronics, Inc. and Golden Pacific Electronics, Inc. for transformers; Dee Van Enterprise Co., Ltd., Friwo, and EMC, Inc. for linear power supplies; GlobTek, Inc., Condor and Phihong Enterprise Co., Ltd. for switching power supplies; and Friwo, Phihong and Anam for battery chargers.
The Company competes on the basis of the quality and performance of its products, the breadth of its product line, customer service, and dependability in meeting delivery schedules, design engineering services, and price. The Company believes it is currently one of a small number of companies that design, manufacture and obtain certifying agency approvals for the full range of internal and external power conversion devices, which OEMs consider in designing their electronic product.
The Company provides a total solution approach to the OEMs entire power conversion product needs (under 1 kilowatt) through its commitment to reliable partnerships and its delivery of high quality products supported by solution-oriented design engineering. The manufacturing facility in China, and arrangements with subcontract
7
manufacturers in China and Thailand enable the Company to compete effectively when price is the primary consideration.
Internal power conversion products continue to be used for most electronic equipment, and as a result the Company experiences competition from numerous OEMs and independent suppliers offering internal products. With the trend toward lower power requirements in portable electronic equipment and with the increasing availability of smaller, competitively priced internal switching power supplies, certain customers of the Company may choose to return to internal power supplies in place of the external power conversion products they currently purchase. In response to this issue, the Company is now well positioned to service the power requirements of its customers, whether internal or external, as a result of the Power General acquisition. This acquisition not only provided the engineering expertise to design internal power supplies, but also has expanded the Companys product offering significantly to include a line of AC/DC and DC/DC switching power supplies and DC/DC converters. The Company competes with a number of manufacturers of internal AC/DC power supplies, including Astec, Power-One, GlobTek, Condor and Delta Electronics.
The Company competes with a broad range of manufacturers in the DC/DC converter market. The industry is fragmented, with manufacturers concentrating their sales and marketing on specific customer requirements in specific markets. The Companys primary competitors are Synqor, Power-One, Ericsson, Artesyn, and Galaxy. In the past 12 months, all of the key players in the DC/DC market have introduced models in the isolated, high-efficiency eighth-brick and quarter-brick models. The largest single market segment for the sale of these high-efficiency models is telecommunications. To date, no single competitor dominates the DC/DC market in terms of market share.
The estimated size of the mobile products market in North America is $55-$65 million. The major competitors, Targus, Lind and Mobility, specialize in this market segment. These three companies dominate the market with combined revenues of approximately $47 million. The rest of the market includes smaller companies with limited sales to a handful of key customers.
(7) Manufacturing and Sources of Supply
The Companys manufacturing operations consist of assembly and integration of electronic components to meet product specifications and design requirements for a variety of power conversion applications. Manufacturing of the Companys products is located at the Companys facilities in Xianghe, China, and at subcontract manufacturers in four facilities in China and Thailand.
As discussed above, the Company discontinued its Minneapolis manufacturing operations beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2004, moving this production to its other manufacturing plants, primarily China. The consolidation included the closing of its Minneapolis production operations, with the headquarters location continuing to provide engineering, safety certification, reliability testing, sales, marketing and administrative services for its global customers. Aults headquarters will continue to provide prototypes and engineering builds as part of its engineering support services.
Electronic components and raw materials used in the Companys products are generally available from a large number of suppliers, although from time to time shortages of particular items are experienced.
Quality and reliability are emphasized in both the design and manufacture of the Companys products. This emphasis is reflected in the ISO 9001 certification of the Companys Minneapolis facility in 1991 and its China facility in 1998. The Company tests 100% of its finished products against its own and the customers specifications, and then ships the products in custom-engineered protective packaging to minimize any damage during shipment.
The Company has subcontract manufacturing arrangements with two business partners in Thailand and two in China. The Company does not have long-term commitments with its subcontractors and the subcontractors build product for the Company pursuant to individual purchase orders. Either party may terminate the arrangements at any time. The product that is manufactured by the subcontractors is not specific to that subcontractor. The product could be produced by one of the other subcontractors or a company owned facility. Currently the subcontractors account for less than 15% of the current years revenue. The Company selects its subcontract manufacturers based upon their ability to manufacture high-quality products, the sufficiency of their engineering capabilities to support products being manufactured; and their ability to meet required delivery times.
8
(8) Significant Customers: Backlog
The Company sells its products to over 400 customers, and it is the Companys objective to maintain a diversified customer base to avoid, where practicable, dependence upon a single customer. In fiscal 2005, 2004, and 2003, no customers accounted for more than 10% of sales.
The Companys order backlog at May 29, 2005 totaled $9,678,000 compared to $10,027,000 at May 30, 2004. The order backlog represents sales for approximately 14 weeks.
The Company enters into buying commitments and other scheduling agreements with certain customers. For its larger customers, these agreements allow for order increases and decreases within scheduled limits and include cancellation charges for completed and in-process products and procured materials. Most products are shipped within 4 to 10 weeks of an order.
(9) Warranties
The Company provides up to a three-year parts and labor warranty against defects in materials or workmanship on all of its products. Servicing and repairs are conducted at the Companys facilities in Minneapolis. The Companys warranty expenses have not been significant.
(10) Patents
The Company holds no significant patents.
(11) Seasonality
In the past three years, sales of the Company have not reflected seasonality.
(12) Employees
As of August 11, 2005, the Company employed approximately 577 full-time employees. Listed below is a breakdown by geographic area:
|
|
China |
|
US |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manufacturing |
|
400 |
|
5 |
|
405 |
|
Engineering |
|
48 |
|
31 |
|
79 |
|
Marketing |
|
8 |
|
17 |
|
25 |
|
General and Administrative |
|
58 |
|
10 |
|
68 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
514 |
|
63 |
|
577 |
|
None of the Companys employees are represented by a labor organization, and the Company has never experienced a work stoppage or interruption due to a labor dispute. Management believes that its relations with its employees are good.
(13) Executive Officers of the Registrant
Certain information with respect to the executive officers of the Company is set forth:
Name |
|
Age |
|
Position |
|
Officer Since |
|
Frederick M. Green |
|
62 |
|
President and Chief Executive Officer and Director |
|
1980 |
|
Xiaodong Wang |
|
47 |
|
Vice President Asia Pacific |
|
2000 |
|
Gregory L. Harris |
|
52 |
|
Vice President Business Development |
|
1988 |
|
William J. Birmingham |
|
64 |
|
Interim Chief Financial Officer |
|
2005 |
|
9
(14) Working Capital
With almost all of the Companys products manufactured in China, Korea and Thailand, and shipped to customers around the world, principally over the ocean by boat, it can take four to seven weeks for product shipments to reach customers. Generally, the Company invoices customers shortly after the product has been shipped from the Asian manufacturing location. The long shipping schedule results in delays in customer payments of invoices and increases the amount of account receivables that are ineligible as part of the borrowing base on the credit line facility with the bank.
(15) Risk Factors
The following risk factors are relevant to an understanding of the Companys business:
The Company recently received a delisting notice from Nasdaq and there can be no assurance that the Companys securities will continue to be listed on Nasdaq. On September 15, 2005, the Company received a notice from Nasdaq that because the Companys annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 29, 2005 has not been filed, the Company is subject to delisting. On September 27, 2005 Nasdaq advised the Company that because its stockholders equity dropped below the $10 million threshold, another grounds for delisting exists. The Company has appealed the delisting notice and believes that it will be able to maintain compliance with Nasdaq listing requirements, but continued listing is subject to a hearing before a Nasdaq Qualifications Panel, and there can be no assurance that the Panel will permit the Companys securities to continue to be listed.
The Company has experienced material weaknesses in its internal controls. The Company has recently experienced material weaknesses in its internal controls related to its Ault China subsidiaries, and related to its warehouse arrangements with third parties. These weaknesses in controls resulted in certain adjustments to the Companys financial statements. The Company has undertaken a remediation program to address these weaknesses, but there can be no assurance that the Company may not suffer additional material weaknesses and adjustments or restatements to its financial statements.
The electronic equipment market is characterized by rapidly changing technology and shorter product life cycles. The Companys future success will continue to depend upon its ability to enhance its current products and to develop new products that keep pace with technological developments and respond to changes in customer requirements. Any failure by the Company to respond adequately to technological changes and customer requirements or any significant delay in new product introductions could have a material adverse effect on the Companys business and results of operations. In addition, there can be no assurance that new products to be developed by the Company will achieve market acceptance. See Business-Design Engineering and Product Development.
The Companys financial results are influenced by a number of factors. The Companys financial results are subject to fluctuation due to various factors, including general business cycles in the Companys markets, the mix of products sold, the stage of each product in its life cycle and the rate and cost of development of new products. In addition, component and material costs, the timing of orders from and shipments of products to customers and deferral or cancellation of orders from major customers could adversely affect financial results.
The Companys reliance on outside contractors reduces its control over quality and delivery schedules. The Company currently depends on third parties located in foreign countries for a significant portion of the manufacture and assembly of certain of its products. While the Company takes an active role in overseeing quality control with its third-party manufacturers, the failure by one or more of these subcontractors to deliver quality products or to deliver products in a timely manner could have a material adverse effect on the Companys operations. In addition, the Companys third-party manufacturing arrangements are short term in nature and could be terminated with little or no notice. If this happened, the Company would be compelled to seek alternative sources to manufacture certain of its products. There can be no assurance that any such attempts by the Company would result in suitable arrangements with new third-party manufacturers. See Manufacturing and Sources of Supply.
10
The Companys success depends in part upon the continued services of many of its highly skilled personnel involved in management, engineering and sales, and upon its ability to attract and retain additional highly qualified employees. The loss of service of any of these key personnel could have a material adverse effect on the Company. The Company does not have key-person life insurance on any of its employees. In addition, the Companys future success will depend on the ability of its officers and key employees to successfully manage the Company for growth and profitability and to attract, retain, motivate and effectively utilize the team approach to manage its employees.
While the Company actively trains and technically assists the individual sales representatives representing its products, a reduction in the sales efforts by the current manufacturer representatives and distributors or termination of their relationships with Ault could adversely affect the sales and operations. The Company markets and sells products primarily through independent manufacturer representatives and distributors that are not under its direct control. The Company employs a limited number of internal sales personnel.
To satisfy customer demand and to obtain greater purchasing discounts, the Company carries increased inventory levels of certain items. The Companys financial results may be adversely affected when inventory exceeds anticipated demand. Carrying additional inventory levels also increases the risk of loss due to obsolescence. Gross margin can be adversely affected by increases in costs of raw materials. There can be no assurance that raw material cost increases or the cost of carrying increased finished goods inventory will not have a material adverse effect on the financial results.
A prolonged reduction in demand for the Companys products will continue to impact the financial success. In fiscal year 2002, sales declined in large part due to a substantial downturn in sales to the telecommunications and data communications markets. Sales to these markets stabilized in fiscal 2003 and fiscal 2004 with modest growth in fiscal 2005. A decline of the telecommunications and data communications markets would adversely affect the Companys results.
The financing agreements contain covenants with which the Company may not be able to comply. The Company has entered into a financing agreement that contains financial covenants. These covenants require, that the Company, among other things, maintain a minimum working capital base, and also impose certain limitations on additional capital expenditures and the payment of dividends. The Company believes the covenants are achievable based on the expected operating results. Its ability to comply with financial covenants depends upon future operating performance. And, future-operating performance depends, in part, on general industry conditions and other factors beyond the Companys control. If the Company were unable to obtain a waiver or amendment from the lender on its credit facility on reasonable terms, the credit facility could be accelerated and the entire balance could be due. The default interest rate would rise to prime plus 5%. Availability under the facility is based on the Companys accounts receivables. Historically, the balance has fluctuated between $2.3 and $2.6 million. If the balance were accelerated and the interest rate rose to the default rate, the Company would be required to secure an alternative credit facility or capital. There can be no assurance that a replacement for the revolving credit facility could be obtained at all, or on terms favorable to the Company. A failure to obtain a replacement facility would have a material adverse effect on the Company.
Civil unrest, labor disruptions, or acts of aggression could impede the Companys ability to operate in foreign locations and would have a material adverse effect on future business and consequently, the operating results. Manufacturing is conducted at the Companys facilities in China and through manufacturing relationships in the Peoples Republic of China (China), Korea and Thailand. While this Pacific Rim manufacturing strategy enables the Company to compete worldwide against other suppliers of external power conversion products, it also involves risks. While, its manufacturing operations in China, Korea and Thailand have not been affected by labor disruptions, civil unrest or political instability, the risk of civil unrest and political instability is present in each of these countries.
(d) Financial Information About Foreign and Domestic Operations and Export Sales
Export sales in fiscal year 2005 represented 15.7% of the Companys gross sales, most of which were to OEMs in Europe and Canada. For other financial information about foreign and domestic operations and export sales including the
11
amount of export sales for the last 3 years, refer to Note 13 - Segment Information and Foreign Operations under notes to consolidated financial statements.
The Company leases approximately 13,000 square feet of office space in its former headquarters facility in Brooklyn Park, a suburb of Minneapolis, Minnesota.
The Company leases a 10,500-square-foot office in Norwood, Massachusetts.
Ault China Corporation owns and occupies a 40,000 square foot facility in the Province of Xianghe in China. The land use rights expire in 2050.
Ault Shanghai Corporation leases a 9,000-square-foot facility in Shanghai, China.
Management considers all of the Companys properties to be well maintained, and together with subcontract arrangements in China and Thailand, adequate for all Company functions, including manufacturing requirements.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
No material litigation or other claims are presently pending against the Company.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
Not applicable.
12
PART II.
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANTS COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
(a) Market Information
Ault common shares are traded on the NASDAQ market under the symbol AULT. The following table presents the range of closing bid prices for the Companys common stock on the NASDAQ Market for fiscal 2005 and 2004. The Company recently received a delisting notice from NASDAQ and there can be no assurance that the Companys securities will continue to trade on NASDAQ.
|
|
Fiscal 2005 |
|
Fiscal 2004 |
|
||||
|
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
Quarter |
|
High |
|
Low |
|
High |
|
Low |
|
1st |
|
3.100 |
|
2.350 |
|
2.310 |
|
1.860 |
|
2nd |
|
3.580 |
|
2.570 |
|
2.990 |
|
2.000 |
|
3rd |
|
3.570 |
|
2.410 |
|
3.760 |
|
2.300 |
|
4th |
|
2.580 |
|
1.890 |
|
3.770 |
|
2.800 |
|
(b) Holders
As of September 1, 2005 there were 266 shareholders of record for the Companys common stock. This number of record stockholders does not include beneficial owners of common stock whose shares are held of record by Depository Trust under the name CEDE & Co.
(c) Dividends
Ault has not paid cash dividends on its common shares, and the present policy of its Board of Directors is to retain any earnings for use in the business. The Board of Directors does not anticipate paying cash dividends on its common shares in the foreseeable future. The Company is obligated to pay dividends on its outstanding 7% Convertible Preferred Stock. See Note 9 of the Notes to Financial Statements under Item 9 herein.
(d) Other Information Regarding Equity Compensation Plans
|
|
(a) |
|
(b) |
|
(c) |
|
|
Plan Category |
|
Number of shares of |
|
Weighted- |
|
Number of shares of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1986 Stock Plan |
|
122,500 |
|
$ |
5.638 |
|
|
|
1996 Stock Plan |
|
1,143,126 |
|
5.021 |
|
203,775 |
|
|
Employee Stock Purchase Plan |
|
6,003 |
|
2.040 |
|
68,193 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) The Company does not have individual compensation arrangements involving the granting of options warrants and rights.
(2) During the past three fiscal years, the Company has not sold its securities except pursuant to registration statements under the Securities Act of 1933.
13
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL SUMMARY
(Amounts in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)
|
|
YEARS ENDED |
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
Restated |
|
Restated |
|
June 1, |
|
June 2, |
|
June 3, |
|
|||||
Net sales |
|
$ |
37,216 |
|
$ |
35,361 |
|
$ |
35,996 |
|
$ |
36,080 |
|
$ |
78,231 |
|
Gross profit |
|
9,797 |
|
7,925 |
|
6,895 |
|
6,474 |
|
16,824 |
|
|||||
Operating expenses |
|
12,003 |
|
13,249 |
|
14,069 |
|
10,338 |
|
12,702 |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Operating income (loss) |
|
(2,206 |
) |
(5,324 |
) |
(7,174 |
) |
(3,864 |
) |
4,122 |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Nonoperating income (expense) |
|
(518 |
) |
(415 |
) |
(284 |
) |
(127 |
) |
(188 |
) |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
(2,724 |
) |
(5,739 |
) |
(7,458 |
) |
(3,991 |
) |
3,934 |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
8 |
|
60 |
|
(340 |
) |
(819 |
) |
1,355 |
|
|||||
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(50 |
) |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
(2,732 |
) |
(5,799 |
) |
(7,118 |
) |
(3,172 |
) |
2,529 |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Discontinued operations |
|
(2,595 |
) |
150 |
|
(446 |
) |
(392 |
) |
(333 |
) |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Income (loss) |
|
(5,327 |
) |
(5,649 |
) |
(7,564 |
) |
(3,564 |
) |
2,196 |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Redeemable convertible preferred stock dividends |
|
(145 |
) |
(145 |
) |
(128 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net income (loss) applicable to common stockholders |
|
$ |
(5,472 |
) |
$ |
(5,794 |
) |
$ |
(7,692 |
) |
$ |
(3,564 |
) |
$ |
2,196 |
|
Net income (loss) per share from continuing operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Basic |
|
$ |
(0.61 |
) |
$ |
(1.27 |
) |
$ |
(1.58 |
) |
$ |
(0.70 |
) |
$ |
0.56 |
|
Diluted |
|
(0.61 |
) |
(1.27 |
) |
(1.58 |
) |
(0.70 |
) |
0.54 |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total assets |
|
$ |
16,807 |
|
$ |
29,835 |
|
$ |
33,065 |
|
$ |
36,697 |
|
$ |
43,457 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
2,375 |
|
6,126 |
|
8,427 |
|
7,298 |
|
6,524 |
|
|||||
Working capital |
|
5,266 |
|
5,429 |
|
8,431 |
|
14,084 |
|
17,840 |
|
|||||
Long-term debt, less current maturities |
|
0 |
|
2,313 |
|
2,483 |
|
2,754 |
|
3,035 |
|
|||||
Stockholders equity |
|
7,360 |
|
11,689 |
|
17,319 |
|
24,753 |
|
28,129 |
|
(1) The years have been adjusted to reflect the Companys Korean subsidiary as discontinued operations.
(2) See Note 1 to financial statements for restatement information.
(3) The 2004 results include exit costs of $2,064.
(4) The 2003 results include a goodwill impairment charge of $1,153.
(5) The 2001 results include a noncash, pretax cumulative effect of accounting change related to the adoption of Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101 of $77 expense ($50 after tax, or $0.01 per share). The 2001 results include 53 weeks of activity.
14
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITIONS AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
This amended Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended May 29, 2005, amends and restates financial statements and related financial information for the fiscal year ended May 30, 2004 and May 29, 2005. The determination to restate these financial statements and other financial information was made as a result of the Companys identification of accounting errors at the Companys China subsidiary related to unrecorded liabilities. Further information on the restatement can be found in Note 1 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
Critical Accounting Policies
The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based on our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of our financial statements. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
Critical accounting policies are defined as those that involve significant judgments and uncertainties and potentially result in materially different results under different assumptions and conditions. Application of these policies is particularly important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations. We believe the accounting policies described below meet these characteristics. Our significant accounting policies are more fully described in the notes to the consolidated financial statements included in this annual report on Form 10-K.
Revenue Recognition The Companys policy is to recognize revenue for product sales when title transfers and risk of loss has passed to the customer, which is generally upon acceptance of the product by the overseas freight carrier. The Companys policies comply with the guidance provided by Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104, Revenue Recognition, issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission. Judgments are required in evaluating the credit worthiness of our customers. Credit is not extended to customers and revenue is not recognized until the Company has determined that the risk of uncollectibility is minimal.
Inventory Valuation Inventory is written down for estimated surplus and discontinued inventory items. The amount of the write-down is determined by analyzing historical and projected sales information, plans for discontinued products and other factors. Changes in sales volumes due to unexpected economic or competitive conditions are among the factors that would result in materially different amounts for this item.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts An allowance is established for estimated uncollectible accounts receivable. The required allowance is determined by reviewing customer accounts and making estimates of amounts that may be uncollectible. Factors considered in determining the amount of the reserve include the age of the receivable, the financial condition of the customer, general business, economic and political conditions, and other relevant facts and circumstances. Unexpected changes in the aforementioned factors would result in materially different amounts for this item.
Product Warranties The Companys products are sold with warranty provisions that require it to remedy deficiencies in quality or performance over a specified period of time, up to 36 months, at no cost to the Companys customers. The Companys policy is to establish warranty reserves at levels that represent its estimate of the costs that will be incurred to fulfill those warranty requirements at the time that revenue is recognized. The Company believes that its recorded liabilities are adequate to cover its future cost of materials, and overhead for the servicing of its products sold through that date. If there is an actual product failure, or material or service delivery costs differ from the Companys estimates, its warranty liability would need to be revised accordingly.
Deferred Taxes Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized using enacted tax rates for the effect of temporary differences between the book and tax basis of recorded assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance if it is likely that some portion or the entire deferred tax asset will not be realized. Based upon prior taxable income and estimates of future taxable income, the Company has determined that it is likely that the net deferred tax asset will not be realized in the future. Thus a full valuation allowance has been established. If actual taxable income
15
varies from these estimates, the Company may be required to change the valuation allowance against the deferred tax assets resulting in a change in income tax benefit, which will be recorded in the consolidated statement of operations.
The financial statements have been prepared on a going-concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company sustained net losses applicable to common stockholders of $5,472,302 (restated) in 2005 and $5,793,646 (restated) in 2004 and at May 29, 2005 had an accumulated deficit of $14,041,346 (restated). The Company generated $1,480,000 of cash from operating activities in 2005. In May 2005 the Company sold its Korean subsidiary and its Minneapolis headquarter building. The sale of the Korean subsidiary resulted in the receipt of cash from JEC Korea Co., Ltd. of $1,472,039 and a secured note for $2,250,000. The sale of the Minneapolis headquarter building resulted in the receipt of cash from Dane Industries Inc. of $3,850,000, of which $2,509,203 was used to pay the mortgage. During May 2005 the Company paid off the bank debt in the United States and at May 29, 2005 the Companys bank debt was $289,628, all applicable to its China operations. The Company continues to have a $7,000,000 line-of-credit agreement with Wells Fargo Bank in Minneapolis that runs through December 4, 2006.
Based on available funds, current plans and business conditions, management believes the Companys available cash and amounts generated from operations and bank borrowings, will be sufficient to meet the Companys cash requirements for the next twelve months and in the foreseeable future. The assumptions underlying this belief include, among other things, that there will be no material adverse developments in the business or market in general. There can be no assurances however that those assumed events will occur. If managements plans are not achieved, there may be further negative effects on the results of operations and cash flows, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company.
The following table summarizes the Companys working capital position at May 29, 2005 and May 30, 2004:
(US Dollars in Thousands) |
|
May 29, 2005 |
|
May 30, 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Working capital |
|
5,266 |
|
5,429 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
2,191 |
|
837 |
|
Cash provided by (used in) operations |
|
1,480 |
|
(950 |
) |
Unutilized bank credit facility |
|
3,357 |
|
1,489 |
|
At May 29, 2005, the Company had current assets of $12,638,522 and current liabilities of $7,372,718 representing working capital of $5,265,804 (restated) and a current ratio of 1.7. This represents a decrease in working capital of $163,000 from $5,429,000 (restated) at May 30, 2004. The Company relies on its credit facilities as sources of working capital to support normal growth in revenue, capital expenditures and attainment of profit goals. The Company has not committed to any material capital expenditures as of May 29, 2005.
Cash and Investments: At May 29, 2005, the Company had cash and securities totaling $2,191,000, up from $837,000 at May 30, 2004. The increase in cash was principally due to the cash receipts from the sale of the Korean subsidiary and the Minneapolis headquarters building.
Credit Facility: The Company maintains a credit facility with Wells Fargo Bank N.A., which is an asset-based credit facility of $7,000,000, secured by all company assets. The borrowing base is eligible trade receivables. At May 29, 2005 there were no borrowings compared to borrowings of $1,965,000 at May 30, 2004. The financing agreement contains financial covenants. These covenants require the Company, among other things, to maintain a minimum capital/equity base, and also impose certain limitations on additional capital expenditures and the payment of dividends. At the end of fiscal 2005, the Companys actual net book worth and income before taxes did not meet the minimum of the credit agreement. The minimum net book worth covenant was $13,809,000 and the minimum income before taxes covenant was a loss of $573,000. The Company has received a waiver and amendment for these covenants. Following the August 31, 2005 waiver, the Company believes the provisions imposed by this credit agreement are achievable based on the Companys expected operating results for the next year.
16
Operations: Operations provided $1,480,000 of cash during fiscal 2005 due principally to the following activities: (1) the loss, net of non-cash charges for: depreciation of $518,000, loss on the sale of Minneapolis headquarters building of $137,000, loss on the sale of Korean subsidiary of $2,442,000 and an increase in the provision for bad debts on trade receivables of $490,000 used cash of $1,740,000 (restated); (2) net changes of current assets and current liabilities provided $2,749,000 (restated) of cash, and (3) the discontinued Korean operation provided $470,000 of cash.
Investing Activities: Proceeds from the sale of the Korean subsidiary and Minneapolis headquarters building less amounts spent for tooling and test equipment provided $4,523,000 of cash.
Financing Activities: Financing activities used cash of $4,648,000, with repayments for bank borrowings of $1,965,000 and principal payments on long-term debt of $2,483,000, principally the mortgage debt on the Minneapolis building, representing the major financing activities for the year.
Effect of Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Fluctuations: The effect of translating the Chinese financial statements, which were prepared in Chinese Yuan (Yuan) to U.S. Dollars, had minimal effect on cash for the year.
Recent Events During June 2005 the Company became aware of accounting errors in its China operations that resulted in an understatement of the loss applicable to common stockholders of $593,000 for fiscal year 2004 and $425,000 for the first three quarters of fiscal year 2005 compared to results that were originally reported. The sale of the Companys Korean subsidiary in May 2005, required adjustments to the financial statements to present Korean operations as discontinued operations.
In December 2005, the Company became aware of additional accounting errors in its China operations that resulted in an understatement of the loss applicable to common stockholders of $248,000 for fiscal 2004 and $342,385 for fiscal 2005 compared to the results that were originally reported.
|
|
Restated |
|
Restated |
|
Increase |
|
Increase |
|
|||
($000) |
|
Fiscal 2005 |
|
Fiscal 2004 |
|
Amount |
|
Percent |
|
|||
Net Sales |
|
$ |
37,216 |
|
$ |
35,361 |
|
$ |
1,855 |
|
5 |
% |
Operating Loss |
|
$ |
(2,206 |
) |
$ |
(5,324 |
) |
$ |
3,118 |
|
59 |
% |
Net sales were $37,216,000 for fiscal 2005, up 5% from fiscal 2004 of $35,361,000. During fiscal year 2005 the Company saw a growth in the number of medical equipment customers and the start of a recovery in business activity in the data communications area.
The gross profit margin was 26.3% (restated) for fiscal 2005 compared to 22.4% (restated) for fiscal 2004. The improvement in gross profit margin is partially due to lower production costs in China compared to U.S. manufacturing, which was discontinued in the early months of fiscal year 2004. The consolidation of manufacturing operations to Asian locations has started to produce some efficiencies and cost savings during fiscal year 2005 that were not enjoyed in the early quarters of fiscal year 2004, of approximately $650,000.
Operating expenses, in total, decreased to $12,003,000 during fiscal 2005, down from $13,249,000 in fiscal 2004, which included $2,064,000 of exit costs, which did not repeat in fiscal 2005. During fiscal 2005 general and administrative costs were $5,642,000 compared to $4,769,000 in the previous fiscal year. Some of the more significant expense increases in general and administrative expenses during fiscal 2005 included outside consultants for the start of Sarbanes-
17
Oxley compliance of $210,000, one years severance pay and related taxes for the former general manager of the Korean subsidiary of $164,000 and an increase to the bad debt allowance of $490,000.
The Companys order backlog at May 29, 2005 was $9,678,000, down 3.5% from May 30, 2004 of $10,027,000.
Interest expenses were $407,000 during fiscal 2005, about the same as the $411,000 in fiscal 2004. Other expenses of $111,000 during fiscal 2005, included the $137,000 loss on sale of the Minneapolis headquarter building.
CASH FLOWS FOR FISCAL 2004
Operations: Operations used $950,000 of cash during fiscal 2004 due principally to the following activities: (1) the loss, net of non-cash charges for: depreciation of $872,000, and asset impairment of $1,742,000 used cash of $3,034,000 (restated); (2) net changes of current assets and current liabilities provided $1,685,000 (restated) of cash, and (3) the discontinued Korean operation provided $375,000 of cash.
Investing Activities: The purchase of tooling and test equipment used $322,000 of cash, including $9,000 from discontinued operations.
Financing Activities: Net bank borrowings provided $1,965,000 of cash and repayments on long-term debt used $270,000. Discontinued Korean operations used $507,000 of cash, principally repayments on the credit facility.
Effect of Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Fluctuations: The effect was minimal on cash for the year.
Fiscal Year Ended May 30, 2004
|
|
Restated |
|
|
|
Increase / |
|
(Decrease) |
|
|||
($000) |
|
Fiscal 2004 |
|
Fiscal 2003 |
|
Amount |
|
Percent |
|
|||
Net Sales |
|
$ |
35,361 |
|
$ |
35,996 |
|
$ |
(635 |
) |
(2 |
)% |
Operating Loss |
|
$ |
(5,324 |
) |
$ |
(7,174 |
) |
$ |
1,850 |
|
26 |
% |
Net sales were $35,361,000 for fiscal 2004, down 2% from $35,996,000 for fiscal 2003. The Korean subsidiary, which has been treated as discontinued operations and excluded from the above revenue figures, had a sales increase of $4,265,000 in fiscal 2004 compared to fiscal 2003.
The gross profit margin was 22.4% (restated) for fiscal 2004, compared to 19.2% for fiscal 2003. The gross profit margin in fiscal 2004 increased $797,000 from cost reductions related to the exit of manufacturing activities in Minneapolis, reduced by inventory write-downs of $545,000 for such exit. Increased business volume in North America contributed approximately $311,000 to fiscal 2004 gross profit margins. Fiscal 2003 gross margins were adversely affected by $740,000 from the acquisition of Power General.
Operating expenses decreased to $13,249,000 in fiscal 2004, compared to $14,069,000 in fiscal 2003. The fiscal year 2003 had a goodwill impairment charge of $1,153,000, which did not repeat in fiscal 2004. The fiscal 2004 operating expenses include $2,064,000 of exit costs related to the discontinuance of manufacturing activities in Minneapolis. Severance pay for employees affected by this exit is included in the $2,064,000 amount.
The Companys order backlog at May 30, 2004 was $10,027,000 compared to $13,850,000 at June 1, 2003. The backlog decrease is principally the result of many customers ordering on a just in time basis.
Increased bank debt during fiscal 2004, compared to fiscal 2003 resulted in interest expense of $411,000 for fiscal 2004, compared to $264,000 in fiscal 2003.
18
Revenue from the U.S., from each foreign country that is a source of significant revenue, and from all other foreign countries as a group are as follows:
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended |
|
Fiscal Year Ended |
|
||
|
|
May 29, 2005 |
|
May 30, 2004 |
|
||
|
|
($000) |
|
($000) |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
U.S. |
|
$ |
27,062 |
|
$ |
26,702 |
|
China |
|
4,305 |
|
3,567 |
|
||
Canada |
|
1,281 |
|
1,182 |
|
||
Ireland |
|
1,533 |
|
983 |
|
||
Belgium |
|
97 |
|
22 |
|
||
Other Foreign |
|
2,938 |
|
2,905 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total |
|
$ |
37,216 |
|
$ |
35,361 |
|
The Company considers a country to be the geographic source of revenue if it has contractual obligations, including obligation to pay for trade receivable invoices.
Products manufactured by the Companys Chinese subsidiaries comprise a large portion of total sales. The Company will experience normal valuation changes as the Chinese currency fluctuates. The effect of translating the Chinese financial statements had minimal effect for the year.
From time to time, in reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), in press releases, and in other communications to shareholders or the investing public, the Company may make forward-looking statements concerning possible or anticipated future results of operations or business developments that are typically preceded by the words believes, expects, anticipates, intends or similar expressions. For such forward-looking statements, the Company claims the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Shareholders and the investing public should understand that such forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties which could cause results or developments to differ significantly from those indicated in the forward-looking statements. Such risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, the overall level of sales by original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) in the telecommunications, data communications, medical and other markets; buying patterns of the Companys existing and prospective customers; the impact of new products introduced by competitors; delays in new product introductions; higher than expected expense related to sales and new marketing initiatives; availability of adequate supplies of raw materials and components; dependence on outside contractors; reliance on third-party distribution; unanticipated expenses related to integration of manufacturing and personnel from acquisitions, such as the acquisition of the Power General assets; dependence on foreign manufacturing and other operations; and other risks affecting the Companys target markets generally.
19
The following table summarizes the Companys contractual obligations and commercial commitments as of May 29, 2005 (in thousands):
Payments due by Period
|
|
Total |
|
1 Year |
|
2 Years |
|
3 Years |
|
After 3 Years |
|
||||
Contractual Obligations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Long-term debt |
|
$ |
290 |
|
290 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
|||
Operating leases |
|
1,079 |
|
444 |
|
435 |
|
200 |
|
0 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Total Contractual Obligations |
|
$ |
1,369 |
|
$ |
734 |
|
$ |
435 |
|
$ |
200 |
|
0 |
|
In June 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) approved for issuance SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. SFAS No. 142 requires that upon adoption, amortization of goodwill will cease and instead, the carrying value of goodwill will be evaluated for impairment on an annual basis. In fiscal 2002 the amortization expense was $100,000. On June 3, 2002, the Company adopted SFAS No. 142, and the initial impairment test was performed and it was determined that there was no goodwill impairment on June 3, 2002. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003, the annual goodwill impairment test was performed and the fair value of the Company was assessed to determine whether goodwill carried was impaired and the extent of such impairment. After performing this evaluation it was evident that impairment of goodwill had occurred because of a decline in revenues for the fourth quarter compared to forecasted revenues, as well as a significant increase in the fourth quarter loss compared to forecast. The Company did not perform an impairment test prior to the fourth quarter as there wasnt an event that had occurred or circumstances had changed in such a manner to warrant an impairment test prior to the fourth quarter. Accordingly, an impairment charge of $1,153,153 was recorded in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003.
The Company experiences foreign currency gains and losses, which are reflected in the financial statements, due to the strengthening and weakening of the U.S. Dollar against currencies of the Companys foreign subsidiaries. To date, the effect of translating the Chinese financial statements, which were prepared in Chinese Yuan to U.S. Dollars, has had minimal effect on the Companys financial position. There are no assurances that future results will not be significantly affected by future exchange rates between the Chinese Yuan and U.S. Dollar.
The Company has bank borrowing facilities which have variable interest rate terms. For every $1,000,000 of bank debt, an interest rate increase of 1% would result in $10,000 of additional expense.
20
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTAL DATA
(a) Financial Statements |
|
|
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Grant Thornton LLP |
|
|
|
|
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Deloitte Anjin LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Deloitte & Touche LLP |
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets, May 29, 2005 and May 30, 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations, Years Ended May 29, 2005, May 30, 2004, and June 1, 2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Equity, Years Ended May 29, 2005, May 30, 2004, and June 1, 2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, Years Ended May 29, 2005, May 30, 2004, and June 1, 2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
|
|
|
|
(b) Supplemental Financial Information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarterly Financial Data |
|
21
Stockholders and Board of Directors
Ault Incorporated and Subsidiaries
We have audited the consolidated balance sheets of Ault Incorporated and subsidiaries (a Minnesota corporation) as of May 29, 2005 and May 30, 2004, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders equity, and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We did not audit the 2004 financial statements of the Ault Korea Corporation, a wholly-owned subsidiary, which statements (presented as discontinued operations) reflect total assets and revenues constituting 46 percent and 22 percent, respectively, of the related consolidated totals as of and for the year ended May 30, 2004. Those statements were audited by other auditors whose report has been furnished to us, and our opinion, insofar as it relates to the 2004 amounts included for the Ault Korea Corporation is based solely on the report of the other auditors.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall consolidated financial statement presentation. We believe our audits and the report of other auditors provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, based on our audits and the report of other auditors, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Ault Incorporated and subsidiaries as of May 29, 2005 and May 31, 2004, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
As discussed in Note 1, the consolidated financial statements have been restated.
Our audits were conducted for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole. The accompanying Schedule II of Ault Incorporated and subsidiaries is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic consolidated financial statements. This schedule has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the 2005 and 2004 audits of the basic consolidated financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole.
Grant Thornton LLP
Minneapolis, Minnesota
December 19, 2005
22
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Shareholder of
Ault Korea Corporation
We have audited the balance sheet of Ault Korea Corporation (the Company) as of April 30, 2004, and the related statements of income, stockholders equity and cash flows for the year then ended (all expressed in Korean won, none of which are presented herein). These financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of April 30, 2004, and the results of its operations, and its cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
As described in Note 6 to the financial statements, the Company sells a substantial portion of its finished goods to and purchases raw materials from related parties. For the year ended April 30, 2004, sales to related parties totaled ₩7,438 million and purchases from related parties totaled ₩993 million. As of April 30 2004, the related accounts receivable were ₩2,398 million and the related accounts payable, including long-term accounts payable, were ₩5,215 million. In addition, as of April 30, 2004, loans provided to related parties were ₩163 million.
Deloitte Anjin LLC
Seoul, Republic of Korea
June 1, 2004
23
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Stockholders and Board of Directors
Ault Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Minneapolis, Minnesota
We have audited the accompanying consolidated statement of operations, stockholders equity, and cash flows of Ault Incorporated and Subsidiaries (the Company) for the fiscal year ended June 1, 2003. Our audit also included the information for the fiscal year ended June 1, 2003, in the financial statement schedule listed in the index as Item 15.(2). These consolidated financial statements and the financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the results of operations and cash flows of Ault Incorporated and Subsidiaries for the fiscal year ended June 1, 2003, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein for the fiscal year ended June 1, 2003
Deloitte & Touche LLP
Minneapolis, Minnesota
August 18, 2003 (October 4, 2005, as to the
information in Note 2
for the year ended June 1, 2003)
24
MAY 29, 2005 AND MAY 30, 2004
|
|
Restated |
|
Restated |
|
||
|
|
May 29, |
|
May 30, |
|
||
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
CURRENT ASSETS: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
2,191,422 |
|
$ |
836,827 |
|
Trade receivables, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $781,000 in 2005; $291,000 in 2004 |
|
5,766,027 |
|
5,902,849 |
|
||
Inventories |
|
3,377,431 |
|
4,898,167 |
|
||
Note receivable for sale of Korean operations current portion |
|
562,500 |
|
0 |
|
||
Prepaid and other expenses |
|
741,142 |
|
946,131 |
|
||
Assets related to discontinued operations |
|
0 |
|
6,401,010 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total current assets |
|
12,638,522 |
|
18,984,984 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Land |
|
0 |
|
728,827 |
|
||
Building and leasehold improvements |
|
763,856 |
|
4,058,852 |
|
||
Machinery and equipment |
|
5,313,815 |
|
5,585,855 |
|
||
Office furniture and equipment |
|
344,406 |
|
402,713 |
|
||
Data processing/computer equipment |
|
1,629,681 |
|
1,450,937 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total property, plant and equipment |
|
8,051,758 |
|
12,227,184 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Less accumulated depreciation |
|
5,676,816 |
|
6,101,074 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net property, plant and equipment |
|
2,374,942 |
|
6,126,110 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
OTHER ASSETS |
|
105,694 |
|
145,913 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
NOTE RECEIVABLE FROM SALE OF KOREAN OPERATIONS |
|
1,687,500 |
|
0 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
NON-CURRENT ASSETS RELATED TO DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS |
|
0 |
|
4,578,284 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
TOTAL ASSETS |
|
$ |
16,806,658 |
|
$ |
29,835,291 |
|
SEE NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
25
MAY 29, 2005 AND MAY 30, 2004
|
|
Restated |
|
Restated |
|
||
|
|
May 29, |
|
May 30, |
|
||
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
CURRENT LIABILITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Notes payable to bank |
|
$ |
0 |
|
$ |
1,965,464 |
|
Current maturities of long-term debt |
|
289,628 |
|
459,969 |
|
||
Accounts payable |
|
5,482,478 |
|
4,162,782 |
|
||
Accrued compensation |
|
978,192 |
|
776,561 |
|
||
Accrued commissions |
|
272,103 |
|
280,794 |
|
||
Other |
|
350,317 |
|
486,981 |
|
||
Liabilities related to discontinued operations |
|
0 |
|
5,423,447 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total current liabilities |
|
7,372,718 |
|
13,555,998 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
LONG-TERM DEBT, less current maturities |
|
0 |
|
2,312,892 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES RELATED TO DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS |
|
0 |
|
203,465 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
REDEEMABLE
CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK |
|
2,074,000 |
|
2,074,000 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Preferred stock, no par value; authorized 1,000,000 shares; none issued |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
||
Common stock, no par value; authorized 10,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 4,806,116 shares in 2005; 4,705,083 shares in 2004 |
|
21,390,135 |
|
21,172,717 |
|
||
Notes receivable arising from the sale of common stock |
|
(44,227 |
) |
(45,000 |
) |
||
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
55,378 |
|
(869,737 |
) |
||
Accumulated deficit |
|
(14,041,346 |
) |
(8,569,044 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total stockholders equity |
|
7,359,940 |
|
11,688,936 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
$ |
16,806,658 |
|
$ |
29,835,291 |
|
SEE NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
26
AULT INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
YEARS ENDED MAY 29, 2005, MAY 30, 2004, AND JUNE 1, 2003
|
|
Restated |
|
Restated |
|
|
|
|||
|
|
May 29, 2005 |
|
May 30, 2004 |
|
June 1, 2003 |
|
|||
NET SALES |
|
$ |
37,215,509 |
|
$ |
35,360,584 |
|
$ |
35,995,845 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
COST OF GOODS SOLD |
|
27,419,309 |
|
27,436,047 |
|
29,100,551 |
|
|||
Gross profit |
|
9,796,200 |
|
7,924,537 |
|
6,895,294 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
OPERATING EXPENSES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Marketing |
|
3,366,104 |
|
3,359,864 |
|
4,148,850 |
|
|||
Design engineering |
|
2,994,967 |
|
3,056,132 |
|
3,711,085 |
|
|||
General and administrative |
|
5,641,570 |
|
4,768,967 |
|
5,056,230 |
|
|||
Exit costs |
|
0 |
|
2,063,998 |
|
0 |
|
|||
Goodwill impairment |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
1,153,153 |
|
|||
|
|
12,002,641 |
|
13,248,961 |
|
14,069,318 |
|
|||
OPERATING LOSS |
|
(2,206,441 |
) |
(5,324,424 |
) |
(7,174,024 |
) |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Interest expense |
|
(407,167 |
) |
(411,472 |
) |
(264,569 |
) |
|||
Interest income |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
24,894 |
|
|||
Other |
|
(110,905 |
) |
(3,188 |
) |
(43,894 |
) |
|||
|
|
(518,072 |
) |
(414,660 |
) |
(283,569 |
) |
|||
LOSS BEFORE INCOME TAXES |
|
(2,724,513 |
) |
(5,739,084 |
) |
(7,457,593 |
) |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
INCOME TAX EXPENSE (BENEFIT) |
|
7,534 |
|
59,989 |
|
(340,200 |
) |
|||
LOSS FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS |
|
(2,732,047 |
) |
(5,799,073 |
) |
(7,117,393 |
) |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Income (loss), from Korean operations net of tax benefit of $13,127 in 2004 |
|
(153,075 |
) |
150,607 |
|
(446,438 |
) |
|||
Loss from sale of Korean operations |
|
(2,442,000 |
) |
0 |
|
0 |
|
|||
NET LOSS |
|
(5,327,122 |
) |
(5,648,466 |
) |
(7,563,831 |
) |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
REDEEMABLE CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
STOCK DIVIDENDS |
|
(145,180 |
) |
(145,180 |
) |
(128,242 |
) |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
NET LOSS APPLICABLE TO COMMON |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
STOCKHOLDERS |
|
$ |
(5,472,302 |
) |
$ |
(5,793,646 |
) |
$ |
(7,692,073 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
NET BASIC AND DILUTED LOSS PER COMMON SHARE: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
From continuing operations |
|
$ |
(0.61 |
) |
$ |
(1.27 |
) |
$ |
(1.58 |
) |
From discontinued operations |
|
$ |
(0.54 |
) |
$ |
0.03 |
|
$ |
(0.09 |
) |
Net basic and diluted loss per common share |
|
$ |
(1.15 |
) |
$ |
(1.24 |
) |
$ |
(1.67 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Weighted average common shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Basic |
|
4,776,075 |
|
4,679,570 |
|
4,596,882 |
|
|||
Diluted |
|
4,776,075 |
|
4,679,570 |
|
4,596,882 |
|
SEE NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes |
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivable |
|
Retained |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
from Sale |
|
Earnings/ |
|
Comprehensive |
|
Total |
|
|||||
|
|
Common Stock |
|
of Common |
|
Accumulated |
|
Income |
|
Stockholders |
|
|||||||
|
|
Shares |
|
Amount |
|
Stock |
|
Deficit |
|
(Loss) |
|
Equity |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
BALANCE AT JUNE 2, 2002 |
|
4,563,610 |
|
$ |
20,857,629 |
|
$ |
(100,000 |
) |
$ |
4,916,675 |
|
$ |
(921,572 |
) |
$ |
24,752,732 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Comprehensive loss: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,692,073 |
) |
|
|
(7,692,073 |
) |
|||||
Net change in foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,122 |
|
35,122 |
|
|||||
Total comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,656,951 |
) |
|||||
Issuance of 33,712 shares of common stock in accordance with stock purchase plan and stock option plan |
|
33,712 |
|
59,648 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,648 |
|
|||||
Write-off of stock receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
55,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
55,000 |
|
|||||
Issuance of 51,177 shares of common stock in accordance with redeemable preferred stock |
|
51,177 |
|
108,885 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
108,885 |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
BALANCE AT JUNE 1, 2003 |
|
4,648,499 |
|
21,026,162 |
|
(45,000 |
) |
(2,775,398 |
) |
(886,450 |
) |
17,319,314 |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Comprehensive loss: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net loss (restated) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,648,466 |
) |
|
|
(5,648,466 |
) |
|||||
Net change in foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,713 |
|
16,713 |
|
|||||
Total comprehensive loss (restated) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,631,753 |
) |
|||||
Issuance of 1,000 shares of common stock in accordance with stock purchase plan and stock option plan |
|
1,000 |
|
1,375 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,375 |
|
|||||
Issuance of 55,584 shares of common stock in accordance with redeemable preferred stock |
|
55,584 |
|
145,180 |
|
|
|
(145,180 |
) |
|
|
0 |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
BALANCE AT MAY 30, 2004 (restated) |
|
4,705,083 |
|
21,172,717 |
|
(45,000 |
) |
(8,569,044 |
) |
(869,737 |
) |
11,688,936 |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Comprehensive loss: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net loss (restated) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,327,122 |
) |
|
|
(5,327,122 |
) |
|||||
Net change in foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
925,115 |
|
925,115 |
|
|||||
Total comprehensive loss (restated) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,402,007 |
) |
|||||
Issuance of 48,875 shares of common stock in accordance with stock purchase plan and stock option plan |
|
48,875 |
|
72,238 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72,238 |
|
|||||
Issuance of 52,158 shares of common stock in accordance with redeemable preferred stock |
|
52,158 |
|
145,180 |
|
|
|
(145,180 |
) |
|
|
0 |
|
|||||
Payment of stock receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
773 |
|
|
|
|
|
773 |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
BALANCE AT MAY 29, 2005 (restated) |
|
4,806,116 |
|
$ |
21,390,135 |
|
$ |
(44,227 |
) |
$ |
(14,041,346 |
) |
$ |
55,378 |
|
$ |
7,359,940 |
|
SEE NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
28
AULT INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
Restated |
|
Restated |
|
|
|
|||
|
|
May 29, |
|
May 30, |
|
June 1, |
|
|||
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
|||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Net loss |
|
$ |
(5,327,122 |
) |
$ |
(5,648,466 |
) |
$ |
(7,563,831 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Depreciation |
|
517,990 |
|
872,276 |
|
721,439 |
|
|||
Asset impairment |
|
|
|
1,742,470 |
|
|
|
|||
Loss from the sale of headquarter building |
|
136,736 |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Loss from the sale of Korean subsidiary |
|
2,442,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
490,000 |
|
24,000 |
|
95,000 |
|
|||
Goodwill impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
1,153,153 |
|
|||
Deferred taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
(1,242 |
) |
|||
Change in assets and liabilities, net of effect of acquisition: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
(Increase) decrease in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Trade receivables |
|
(353,089 |
) |
109,640 |
|
(192,202 |
) |
|||
Inventories |
|
1,480,840 |
|
1,711,061 |
|
(431,072 |
) |
|||
Prepaid and other expenses |
|
246,088 |
|
(278,617 |
) |
63,357 |
|
|||
Increase (decrease) in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Accounts payable |
|
1,319,541 |
|
(87,604 |
) |
1,610,609 |
|
|||
Accrued expenses |
|
56,258 |
|
230,353 |
|
365,748 |
|
|||
Income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
582,450 |
|
|||
Discontinued operations |
|
470,453 |
|
375,207 |
|
540,519 |
|
|||
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
|
1,479,695 |
|
(949,680 |
) |
(3,056,072 |
) |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Purchase of property and equipment |
|
(347,055 |
) |
(313,571 |
) |
(253,006 |
) |
|||
Power General acquisition, net of cash acquired |
|
|
|
|
|
(366,000 |
) |
|||
Proceeds from sale of Korean subsidiary |
|
1,472,039 |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Proceeds from sale of headquarter building |
|
3,443,489 |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Discontinued operations |
|
(45,442 |
) |
(8,791 |
) |
(19,861 |
) |
|||
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
4,523,031 |
|
(322,362 |
) |
(638,867 |
) |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Net borrowings (payments) on revolving credit agreement |
|
(1,965,464 |
) |
1,965,464 |
|
289,607 |
|
|||
Write-off of notes receivable arising from the sale of common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
55,000 |
|
|||
Payment of notes receivable arising from the sale of common stock |
|
773 |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Proceeds from issuance of common stock |
|
72,238 |
|
1,375 |
|
59,648 |
|
|||
Principal payments on long-term borrowings |
|
(2,483,254 |
) |
(270,493 |
) |
(281,507 |
) |
|||
Discontinued operations |
|
(272,463 |
) |
(507,428 |
) |
|
|
|||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
(4,648,170 |
) |
1,188,918 |
|
122,748 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
EFFECT OF FOREIGN CURRENCY EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH |
|
39 |
|
(20 |
) |
(612 |
) |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
|
1,354,595 |
|
(83,144 |
) |
(3,572,803 |
) |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF YEAR |
|
836,827 |
|
919,971 |
|
4,492,774 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF YEAR |
|
$ |
2,191,422 |
|
$ |
836,827 |
|
$ |
919,971 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
NON-CASH TRANSACTION: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Issuance of redeemable convertible preferred stock to acquire Power General |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
2,074,000 |
|
Issuance of common stock to pay preferred stock dividends |
|
145,180 |
|
145,180 |
|
108,885 |
|
|||
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Cash payments for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Interest |
|
407,167 |
|
606,516 |
|
434,714 |
|
|||
Taxes |
|
|
|
46,862 |
|
|
|
SEE NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
29
1. NATURE OF BUSINESS, LIQUIDITY, AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Nature of Business - Ault Incorporated and Subsidiaries (Ault or the Company) operate in one business segment which includes the design, manufacturing, and marketing of power conversion products, principally to original equipment manufacturers of data communications equipment, microcomputers and related peripherals, telecommunications equipment, and portable medical equipment. Sales are to customers worldwide, and credit is granted based upon the credit policies of the Company.
Restatement The consolidated financial statements as of and for the fiscal years ended May 29, 2005 and May 30, 2004 were restated as a result of the Companys identification of accounting errors at the Companys China subsidiary related to unrecorded liabilities. The accounting errors resulted in a misstatement in accounts payables, current liabilities, accumulated deficit, total shareholders equity, cost of goods sold, gross profit, operating loss, loss before taxes, net loss, net loss applicable to common stockholders, and net loss per share. There were also related adjustments to the Companys consolidated statement of cash flows and consolidated statement of stockholders equity.
Effects on Consolidated Balance Sheet
as of May 29, 2005
|
|
As previously |
|
|
|
||
|
|
reported |
|
As restated |
|
||
Accounts Payable |
|
$ |
4,892,093 |
|
$ |
5,482,478 |
|
Total current liabilities |
|
6,782,333 |
|
7,372,718 |
|
||
Accumulated deficit |
|
(13,450,961 |
) |
(14,041,346 |
) |
||
Total stockholders equity |
|
7,950,325 |
|
7,359,940 |
|
||
Effects on Consolidated Statement of
Operations for fiscal year-ended May 29, 2005
|
|
As previously |
|
|
|
||
|
|
reported |
|
As restated |
|
||
Cost of goods sold |
|
$ |
27,076,924 |
|
$ |
27,419,309 |
|
Gross profit |
|
10,138,585 |
|
9,796,200 |
|
||
Operating loss |
|
(1,864,056 |
) |
(2,206,441 |
) |
||
Loss before income taxes |
|
(2,382,128 |
) |
(2,724,513 |
) |
||
Net loss |
|
(4,984,737 |
) |
(5,327,122 |
) |
||
Net loss applicable to common stockholders |
|
(5,129,917 |
) |
(5,472,302 |
) |
||
Net loss per share basic |
|
(1.07 |
) |
(1.15 |
) |
||
Net loss per share diluted |
|
(1.07 |
) |
(1.15 |
) |
||
Effects on Consolidated Balance Sheet
as of May 30, 2004
|
|
As previously |
|
|
|
||
|
|
reported |
|
As restated |
|
||
Accounts Payable |
|
$ |
3,914,782 |
|
$ |
4,162,782 |
|
Total current liabilities |
|
13,307,998 |
|
13,555,998 |
|
||
Accumulated deficit |
|
(8,321,044 |
) |
(8,569,044 |
) |
||
Total stockholders equity |
|
11,936,936 |
|
11,688,936 |
|
||
30
Effects on Consolidated Statement of
Operations for fiscal year-ended May 30, 2004
|
|
As previously |
|
|
|
||
|
|
reported |
|
As restated |
|
||
Cost of goods sold |
|
$ |
27,188,047 |
|
$ |
27,436,047 |
|
Gross profit |
|
8,172,537 |
|
7,924,537 |
|
||
Operating loss |
|
(5,076,424 |
) |
(5,324,424 |
) |
||
Loss before income taxes |
|
(5,491,084 |
) |
(5,739,084 |
) |
||
Net loss |
|
(5,400,466 |
) |
(5,648,466 |
) |
||
Net loss applicable to common stockholders |
|
(5,545,646 |
) |
(5,793,646 |
) |
||
Net loss per share basic |
|
(1.19 |
) |
(1.24 |
) |
||
Net loss per share diluted |
|
(1.19 |
) |
(1.24 |
) |
||
Liquidity The financial statements have been prepared on a going-concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company sustained net losses applicable to common stockholders of $5,472,302 (restated) in 2005 and $5,793,646 (restated) in 2004 and at May 29, 2005 had an accumulated deficit of $14,041,346 (restated). The Company generated $1,480,000 of cash from operating activities in 2005. In May 2005 the Company sold its Korean subsidiary and its Minneapolis headquarter building. The sale of the Korean subsidiary resulted in the receipt of cash from JEC Korea Co., Ltd. of $1,472,039 and a secured note for $2,250,000. The gross proceeds of $3.85 million from the sale of the Minneapolis headquarter building was used to pay off the mortgage balance of $2,509,000 and $255,000 of transaction expenses, which included the realtors commissions, leaving net cash proceeds of $1,086,000 for the Company. During May 2005 the Company paid off the bank debt in the United States and at May 29, 2005 the Companys bank debt was $289,628, all applicable to its China operations. The Company continues to have a $7,000,000 line-of-credit agreement with Wells Fargo Bank in Minneapolis that runs through December 4, 2006.
Based on available funds, current plans and business conditions management believes that the Companys available cash, borrowings and amounts generated from operations, will be sufficient to meet the Companys cash requirements for the next 12 months. The assumptions underlying this belief include, among other things, that there will be no material adverse developments in the business or market in general. There can be no assurances however that those assumed events will occur. If managements plans are not achieved, there may be further negative effects on the results of operations and cash flows, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company.
A summary of the Companys significant accounting policies follows:
Principles of Consolidation - The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Ault Incorporated and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All intercompany transactions have been eliminated. The foreign currency translation adjustment represents the translation into United States dollars of the Companys investment in the net assets of its foreign subsidiaries.
Fiscal Year - The Company operates on a 52 to 53-week fiscal year. The fiscal years for the financial statements presented end on May 29, 2005, May 30, 2004, and June 1, 2003. All years presented contain 52 weeks. The Companys foreign subsidiaries have an April 30 fiscal year-end, and the Company consolidates the subsidiaries for financial reporting purposes on a one-month lag basis to facilitate timely and accurate consolidation and in order to meet financial reporting deadlines of the Company.
31
Cash and Cash Equivalents - The Company maintains its cash in bank deposit accounts which, at times, may exceed federally insured limits. The Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts. The Company considers all highly liquid financial instruments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Cash equivalents consist primarily of short-term commercial paper. The Company maintained cash at various financial institutions located in China totaling $545,362 and $553,807 at May 29, 2005 and May 30, 2004.
Accounts Receivable - The Company grants credit to customers in the normal course of business, but generally does not require collateral or any other security to support amounts due. Management performs on-going credit evaluations of customers based on financial position, past history, the customers current ability to pay its obligation to the Company, and the condition of the general economy and the industry as a whole. The Company maintains allowances for potential credit losses which, when realized, have generally been within management expectations. The Company writes-off accounts receivable when they become uncollectible, and payments subsequently received on such receivables are credited to the allowance for doubtful accounts.
Inventories - Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out) or market. Inventories include material, labor, and manufacturing overhead.
Depreciation - Depreciation is based on the estimated useful lives of the individual assets and is calculated on the straight-line method for financial reporting and accelerated methods for tax purposes. The estimated useful lives are as follows:
|
|
Years |
|
|
|
|
|
Building |
|
36 |
|
Machinery and equipment |
|
3-10 |
|
Office furniture and equipment |
|
5-15 |
|
Data processing equipment |
|
3-5 |
|
Leasehold improvement |
|
Lease term |
|
Financial Instruments - The fair value of the long-term debt is estimated based on the use of discounted cash flow analysis using interest rates for the same or similar debt offered to the Company having the same or similar remaining maturities and collateral requirements. Management estimates the carrying value of the long-term debt approximates fair value. All other financial instruments approximate fair value because of the short-term nature of these instruments.
Revenue Recognition - The Company recognizes revenue at the shipping point for sales to customers located within the Companys or subsidiaries country of domicile. For sales to customers outside of the Companys or subsidiaries country of domicile, the Company recognizes revenue at the time risk of ownership passes. All of the Companys product held by distributors are stocked for OEMs and the sales terms are noncancelable, and nonreturnable. Payment terms for distributors are no different than other customers, 0.5% 10 net 30.
Freight - Customer billings for freight are included in sales, and the freight costs are included in costs of sales.
Design Engineering - Design engineering costs are those incurred for research, design, and development of new products and redesign of existing products. These costs are expensed as incurred.
32
Advertising Expense - The Company expenses advertising costs as incurred. Advertising expenses of approximately $13,000, $129,000, and $76,000 were charged to operations during the years ended May 29, 2005, May 30, 2004, and June 1, 2003, respectively.
Stock Compensation - The Companys 1986 and 1996 stock option plans have reserved 600,000 and 1,500,000 common shares, for issuance under qualified and nonqualified stock options for its key employees and directors. Option prices are determined by the market value of the stock at the time the option was granted. Options become exercisable as determined at the date of grant by a committee of the Board of Directors. Options expire ten years after the date of grant unless an earlier expiration date is set at the time of grant.
The intrinsic value method is used to value the stock option grants to employees and directors. No compensation cost has been recognized for the stock option plans, as all options have been issued with exercised prices at or above fair value. Had compensation cost for the Companys stock option plans been determined based on the fair value at the grant date for awards in 2005, 2004, and 2003, the Companys net loss and net loss per share would have changed to the pro forma amounts indicated below:
|
|
Restated |
|
Restated |
|
|
|
|||
|
|
May 29, |
|
May 30, |
|
June 1, |
|
|||
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
|||
Net loss applicable to common stockholders: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
As reported |
|
$ |
(5,472,302 |
) |
$ |
(5,793,646 |
) |
$ |
(7,692,073 |
) |
Pro forma |
|
(5,678,259 |
) |
(6,054,664 |
) |
(8,092,340 |
) |
|||
Per share, basic, as reported |
|
(1.15 |
) |
(1.24 |
) |
(1.67 |
) |
|||
Per share, diluted, as reported |
|
(1.15 |
) |
(1.24 |
) |
(1.67 |
) |
|||
Per share, basic, pro forma |
|
(1.19 |
) |
(1.29 |
) |
(1.76 |
) |
|||
Per share, diluted, pro forma |
|
(1.19 |
) |
(1.29 |
) |
(1.76 |
) |
|||
The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions used for grants in 2005, 2004, and 2003:
|
|
May 29, |
|
May 30, |
|
June 1, |
|
|||
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Expected dividend yields |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Expected stock price volatility |
|
68.95 |
% |
71.01 |
% |
73.63 |
% |
|||
Risk-free interest rate |
|
3.33 |
% |
2.77 |
% |
2.01 |
% |
|||
Expected life of options |
|
7.29 years |
|
7.48 years |
|
7.55 years |
|
|||
33
Long-Lived Assets - The Company reviews its long-lived assets annually to determine potential impairment by comparing the carrying value of the long-lived assets outstanding with estimated future undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use of the assets, including cash flows from disposition. Should the sum of the expected future undiscounted cash flows be less than the carrying value, the Company would recognize an impairment loss. An impairment loss would be measured by comparing the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair value of the long-lived assets and intangibles. To date, management has determined that no impairment of long-lived assets exists.
Net Loss per Share - Basic net loss per share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted loss per share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period adjusted by common share equivalents related to stock options and warrants. Options to purchase 1,265,626, 1,187,826, and 1,093,426, shares of common stock were outstanding at the fiscal years ended May 29, 2005, May 30, 2004, and June 1, 2003, but were excluded from the computation of common stock equivalents because they were anti-dilutive.
The following table reflects the calculation of basic and diluted net loss per share:
|
|
Restated |
|
Restated |
|
|
|
||||
|
|
May 29, |
|
May 30, |
|
June 1, |
|
||||
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Numerator - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net loss applicable to common stockholders |
|
$ |
(5,472,302 |
) |
$ |
(5,793,646 |
) |
$ |
(7,692,073 |
) |
|
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Basic - weighted-average shares outstanding |
|
4,776,075 |
|
4,679,570 |
|
4,596,882 |
|
||||
Effect of dilutive shares: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Stock options outstanding and employee stock purchase plan |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
||||
Diluted - weighted-average shares outstanding |
|
4,776,075 |
|
4,679,570 |
|
4,596,882 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Basic net loss per share |
|
$ |
(1.15 |
) |
$ |
(1.24 |
) |
$ |
(1.67 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Diluted net loss per share |
|
$ |
(1.15 |
) |
$ |
(1.24 |
) |
$ |
(1.67 |
) |
|
The numerator for net loss for continuing operations includes loss from continuing operations and preferred stock dividends.
Use of Estimates - The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Comprehensive Loss - The Companys fiscal 2005 comprehensive loss consists of net loss and foreign currency translation adjustments.
Foreign Currency Translation - The Companys international subsidiaries have United States dollars as their functional currency. Specific transactions that are denominated in the foreign currency are translated at the current exchange rate.
34
2. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
On May 20, 2005, the Company completed the sale of its wholly owned subsidiary, Ault Korea Corporation (Ault Korea), to JEC Korea Co., Ltd (JEC) for $3.7 million. The agreement includes the receipt of $1,472,000 in cash and a secured note in the amount of $2,250,000. The transaction resulted in a loss of approximately $2,442,000 and the reclassification of the Korean subsidiary activity as discontinued operations for all periods presented.
The sale includes all assets and liabilities of Ault Korea Corporation and the use of the Ault Korea name in Korea for a period of three years. Ault Korea includes the property in Seoul, South Korea and approximately 110 employees. As part of the terms of the agreement, JEC has the rights to sell power conversion products in Korea while Ault will have rights to sell the same power conversion products throughout the rest of the world. Prior to this transaction, JEC was a supplier of Ault, but otherwise no material relationship existed between Ault and JEC, or their respective affiliates, directors or officers, or any associates of their directors and officers.
The secured note receivable is scheduled to be paid in four equal installments of $562,500 in December 2005, June 2006, December 2006 and the final installment in June 2007.
Revenues and results of operations for the Korean subsidiary for the most recent three fiscal years include the following:
|
|
Year Ended |
|
Year Ended |
|
Year Ended |
|
||||
|
|
May 29, 2005 |
|
May 30, 2004 |
|
June 1, 2003 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net Sales |
|
$ |
12, 973.692 |
|
$ |
9,748,493 |
|
$ |
5,483,165 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations |
|
$ |
(153,075 |
) |
$ |
150,607 |
|
$ |
(446,438 |
) |
|
The balance sheet information of discontinued operations includes the following:
|
|
May 30, 2004 |
|
|
Current Assets related to Discontinued Operations: |
|
|
|
|
Cash |
|
$ |
221,339 |
|
Accounts Receivable |
|
2,496,526 |
|
|
Inventories |
|
3,245,461 |
|
|
Prepaid and Other Expenses |
|
437,684 |
|
|
Total Current Assets |
|
$ |
6,401,010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Current Assets Related to Discontinued Operations: |
|
|
|
|
Property, Plant and Equipment, net |
|
$ |
4,546,432 |
|
Other Assets |
|
31,852 |
|
|
Total Non-Current Assets |
|
$ |
4,578,284 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities Related to Discontinued Operations: |
|
|
|
|
Notes Payable to Bank |
|
$ |
2,685,003 |
|
Accounts Payable |
|
2,350,260 |
|
|
Accrued Compensation |
|
388,184 |
|
|
Total Current Liabilities |
|
$ |
5,423,447 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Current Liabilities Related to Discontinued Operations: |
|
|
|
|
Other Long-Term Liabilities |
|
$ |
203,465 |
|
35
3. INVENTORIES
The components of inventory are as follows:
|
|
May 29, |
|
May 30, |
|
||
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Raw materials |
|
$ |
1,701,154 |
|
$ |
2,870,393 |
|
Work-in-process |
|
513,986 |
|
115,847 |
|
||
Finished goods |
|
1,162,291 |
|
1,911,927 |
|
||
|
|
$ |
3,377,431 |
|
$ |
4,898,167 |
|
The Company offers its customers a three-year warranty on products. Warranty expense is estimated at the time revenue is recognized and is determined by calculating the historical relationship between sales and warranty costs and applying the calculation to the current periods sales. Based on warranty repair costs and the rate of return, the Company periodically reviews and adjusts its warranty accrual. Actual repair costs are offset against the reserve. The following table shows the activity for the Companys warranty accrual (in thousands):
|
|
May 29, |
|
May 30, |
|
||
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||
Beginning Balance |
|
$ |
125 |
|
$ |
134 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Charges and Costs Accrued |
|
113 |
|
14 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Less Repair Costs Incurred |
|
(104 |
) |
(23 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Ending Balance |
|
$ |
134 |
|
$ |
125 |
|
5. FINANCING ARRANGEMENT AND LONG-TERM DEBT
Financing Arrangement - The Company has a financing agreement, which includes a $7,000,000 revolving line-of-credit agreement through December 4, 2006. Interest on advances is at the prime rate plus 2% (prime plus 5% default rate). The rate at May 29, 2005 was 8.00% and on May 30, 2004 the rate was 6.00%. All advances are due on demand and are collateralized by all assets of the Company. The availability of the line is based on the outstanding receivables of the Company; the amount available at May 29, 2005 was $3,357,000. There was nothing outstanding on this line-of-credit at May 29, 2005. The Companys financing agreement contains financial covenants. These covenants require the Company, among other things, to maintain a minimum capital base, and also impose certain limitations on additional capital expenditures and the payment of dividends. At the end of fiscal 2005, the Companys actual net book worth and income before taxes did not meet the minimum of the credit agreement. The Company received a waiver and amendment for these covenants. Following the August 2005 waiver, the Company believes the provisions imposed by this credit agreement are achievable based on the Companys expected operating results for the next year.
36
Long-Term Debt
|
|
May 29, |
|
May 30, |
|
||
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
5.3% uncollateralized term loan to bank, due in January 2006 |
|
$ |
289,628 |
|
$ |
289,607 |
|
8.05% term loan to financing company, paid in full in May 2005 |
|
|
|
2,465,062 |
|
||
7.94% term loan to bank, paid in full in September 2004 |
|
|
|
18,192 |
|
||
Total |
|
289,628 |
|
2,772,861 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Less current maturities |
|
289,628 |
|
459,969 |
|
||
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
2,312,892 |
|
On July 17, 2003, the Company announced the consolidation of its manufacturing operations. The consolidation included the closing of its Minneapolis production operations, eliminating approximately 40 jobs in assembly, equipment maintenance, procurement and administrative support and the integration of production into Aults other manufacturing plants. The consolidation was completed at the end of February 2004. Aults engineering, documentation, safety certification/reliability, sales, marketing and administrative services remain at the Minneapolis headquarters facility. The consolidation was implemented to reduce expenses, improve cash flow and help return the Company to profitability.
As a result of these decisions, the Company recorded charges in fiscal year 2004 of $301,000, for severance related to workforce reductions of approximately 40 employees, $1,743,000 for asset impairment write down, $545,000 for obsolete inventory, and $20,000 related to other costs associated with the restructuring. Costs of $15,000 related to the restructuring were paid in fiscal 2005.
37
A summary of the restructuring activity during the year ending May 29, 2005 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
Current Period |
|
|
|
Restructuring |
|
||||
|
|
Balance at |
|
Restructuring |
|
Paid/ |
|
Liabilities at |
|
||||
|
|
May 31, 2004 |
|
Charges |
|
Expensed |
|
May 29, 2005 |
|
||||
Employee termination costs |
|
$ |
15,000 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
15,000 |
|
$ |
|
|
Pretax income (loss) for domestic and foreign operations was as follows:
|
|
Restated |
|
Restated |
|
|
|
||||
|
|
May 29, |
|
May 30, |
|
June 1, |
|
||||
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Domestic |
|
$ |
(3,712,746 |
) |
$ |
(4,607,298 |
) |
$ |
(6,549,516 |
) |
|
Foreign |
|
(1,606,842 |
) |
(981,179 |
) |
(1,354,515 |
) |
||||
Total |
|
$ |
(5,319,588 |
) |
$ |
(5,588,477 |
) |
$ |
(7,904,031 |
) |
|
The components of the provision (benefit) for income taxes are as follows:
|
|
May 29, |
|
May 30, |
|
June 1, |
|
||||
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
||||
Current: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Domestic |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
(340,200 |
) |
|
Foreign |
|
1,167 |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
State |
|
6,367 |
|
59,989 |
|
|
|
||||
Deferred |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
$ |
7,534 |
|
$ |
59,989 |
|
$ |
(340,200 |
) |
|
The income tax provision (benefit) differs from the amount of income tax determined by applying the U.S. federal income tax rate to pretax income for the fiscal years ended May 29, 2005, May 30, 2004, and June 1, 2003, due to the following:
|
|
Restated |
|
Restated |
|
|
|
||||
|
|
May 29, |
|
May 30, |
|
June 1, |
|
||||
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Computed expected tax provision (benefit) |
|
$ |
(1,862,000 |
) |
$ |
(1,956,000 |
) |
$ |
(2,687,000 |
) |
|
Increase (decrease) in income taxes resulting from: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Nondeductible expenses |
|
10,000 |
|
5,000 |
|
4,888 |
|
||||
State income taxes, net of federal benefit |
|
(123,000 |
) |
(123,000 |
) |
59,000 |
|
||||
Foreign taxes |
|
18,000 |
|
(20,000 |
) |
|
|
||||
Current year R&D tax credits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Foreign losses not benefited |
|
682,440 |
|
378,382 |
|
|
|
||||
Change in valuation allowance |
|
1,258,000 |
|
1,363,088 |
|
2,282,912 |
|
||||
Change in foreign tax rate on deferreds |
|
|
|
41,718 |
|
|
|
||||
Other |
|
24,094 |
|
370,801 |
|
|
|
||||
|
|
$ |
7,534 |
|
$ |
59,989 |
|
$ |
(340,200 |
) |
|
38
Net deferred taxes consist of the following components:
|
|
May 29, |
|
May 30, |
|
||
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||
Deferred tax assets (liabilities): |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Current deferred taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
$ |
206,000 |
|
$ |
106,000 |
|
Inventory reserve |
|
166,000 |
|
144,000 |
|
||
Accrued vacation |
|
106,000 |
|
61,000 |
|
||
Accrued warranty |
|
49,000 |
|
45,000 |
|
||
Inventory capitalization |
|
2,000 |
|
2,000 |
|
||
Imputed interest |
|
|
|
77,000 |
|
||
Valuation allowance |
|
(529,000 |
) |
(435,000 |
) |
||
Total current deferred taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Long-term deferred taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Goodwill deductible for tax |
|
357,000 |
|
384,000 |
|
||
Equipment and leasehold improvements |
|
212,000 |
|
396,000 |
|
||
Tax credit carryforwards and other |
|
8,000 |
|
|
|
||
Federal NOL carryforwards |
|
3,959,000 |
|
2,592,000 |
|
||
Foreign deferred tax asset |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Foreign deferred liability |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Valuation allowance |
|
(4,536,000 |
) |
(3,372,000 |
) |
||
Total long-term deferred taxes |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
The Company has net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $10,846,000 as of May 29, 2005, with various expiration dates through 2023. Based on prior taxable income and estimates of future taxable income, the Company has determined that it is likely that the net deferred tax asset will not be fully realized in the future. Thus a full valuation allowance has been established.
401(k) Employer Match Plan - The Company has a 401(k) plan covering substantially all U.S. employees. The Company is required to match 25% of the employees first 6% of contributions and may make additional contributions to the plan to the extent authorized by the Board of Directors. The contribution amounts charged to operating expenses in the fiscal years ended May 29, 2005, May 30, 2004, and June 1, 2003 approximated $46,000, $55,000, and $58,000, respectively.
Stock Purchase Plan - The Company maintains a stock purchase plan in which up to 200,000 shares of common stock may be purchased by employees. The purchase price is equal to the lesser of 85% of the fair market value of the shares on the date the phase commences or 85% of the fair market value of the shares on the termination date of the phase. Each phase is one year from the commencement date of a phase. There were 23,212, and 25,875 shares purchased under this plan during the fiscal years ended June 1, 2003, and May 29, 2005, respectively. No shares were purchased under the plan during the year ended May 30, 2004 due to the phase ending on May 31, 2004.
39
In July 2002, in connection with the purchase of certain assets and liabilities of Power General, the Company issued 2,074 shares of redeemable 7% convertible preferred stock at $1,000 face value. The preferred stock is convertible into common stock at the holders option at a conversion price of $4.25 principal amount of preferred stock for each share and has a mandatory redemption of one-third of the outstanding shares of unconverted preferred stock on July 16, 2006, one-half of the remaining outstanding shares on July 16, 2007, and the remaining outstanding shares on July 16, 2008. The dividends on the preferred stock are cumulative and payable quarterly beginning October 15, 2002, and can be paid in cash; however, during the first three years the Company can pay dividends in shares of common stock in lieu of cash based on the fair market value of the common stock at the time the dividends are declared. In fiscal 2005 the Company declared dividends of $145,180, which have been paid with 52,158 shares of common stock. In fiscal 2004 the Company declared dividends of $145,180, which have been paid with 55,584 shares of common stock. In fiscal 2003 the Company declared dividends of $128,242, of which $108,885 have been paid with 51,177 shares of common stock. The preferred stock has a preference in liquidation over common stock. In the event of liquidation or winding up of the Company, the preferred stockholders will receive an amount equal to $1,000 per share plus any unpaid dividends accrued through the date of such event.
10. STOCK OPTION PLAN
Information relating to all outstanding options as of May 29, 2005, May 30, 2004, and June 1, 2003 is as follows:
|
|
May 29, |
|
May 30, |
|
June 1, |
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Average |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
|
Exercise |
|
|||
|
|
Shares |
|
Price |
|
Shares |
|
Price |
|
Shares |
|
Price |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Options outstanding at beginning of year |
|
1,187,826 |
|
$ |
5.18 |
|
1,093,426 |
|
$ |
5.43 |
|
978,926 |
|
$ |
5.70 |
|
Options exercised |
|
(23,000 |
) |
1.23 |
|
(1,000 |
) |
1.38 |
|
(10,500 |
) |
2.32 |
|
|||
Options expired |
|
(1,000 |
) |
2.13 |
|
(1,000 |
) |
1.38 |
|
(13,000 |
) |
4.00 |
|
|||
Options granted |
|
101,800 |
|
2.99 |
|
96,400 |
|
2.34 |
|
138,000 |
|
3.11 |
|
|||
Options outstanding at end of year |
|
1,265,626 |
|
$ |
5.08 |
|
1,187,826 |
|
$ |
5.18 |
|
1,093,426 |
|
$ |
5.43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Options exercisable at end of year |
|
1,106,828 |
|
$ |
5.40 |
|
1,030,526 |
|
$ |
5.46 |
|
905,176 |
|
$ |
5.58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Weighted-average fair value of options granted during the year |
|
|
|
$ |
2.10 |
|
|
|
$ |
1.72 |
|
|
|
$ |
1.94 |
|
40
The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding at May 29, 2005:
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding |
|
Options Exercisable |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
Number |
|
Average |
|
Weighted- |
|
Number |
|
Weighted- |
|
|||||||
Range of |
|
Outstanding |
|
Remaining |
|
Average |
|
Exercisable |
|
Average |
|
|||||||
Exercise |
|
at May 29, |
|
Contractual |
|
Exercise |
|
at May 29, |
|
Exercise |
|
|||||||
Prices |
|
2005 |
|
Life (Years) |
|
Price |
|
2005 |
|
Price |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
$ |
1.19 |
- |
$ |
1.72 |
|
|
0 |
|
0.0 |
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
0 |
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
1.73 |
- |
2.58 |
|
|
141,400 |
|
2.5 |
|
2.31 |
|
100,200 |
|
2.32 |
|
||||
2.59 |
- |
3.45 |
|
|
236,800 |
|
3.4 |
|
3.07 |
|
119,202 |
|
3.12 |
|
||||
3.46 |
- |
4.31 |
|
|
218,124 |
|
3.4 |
|
3.78 |
|
218,124 |
|
3.78 |
|
||||
4.32 |
- |
5.17 |
|
|
10,000 |
|
3.3 |
|
5.06 |
|
10,000 |
|
5.06 |
|
||||
5.18 |
- |
6.03 |
|
|
278,800 |
|
4.9 |
|
5.82 |
|
278,800 |
|
5.82 |
|
||||
6.04 |
- |
6.90 |
|
|
62,918 |
|
1.9 |
|
6.52 |
|
62,918 |
|
6.52 |
|
||||
6.91 |
- |
7.76 |
|
|
197,000 |
|
3.6 |
|
7.38 |
|
197,000 |
|
7.38 |
|
||||
7.77 |
- |
8.63 |
|
|
120,584 |
|
2.5 |
|
8.44 |
|
120,584 |
|
8.44 |
|
||||
$ |
1.19 |
- |
$ |
8.63 |
|
|
1,265,626 |
|
3.5 |
|
$ |
5.08 |
|
1,106,828 |
|
$ |
5.40 |
|
11. STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
The Board of Directors is empowered to establish and to designate classes and series of preferred shares and to set the terms of such shares, including terms with respect to redemption, dividends, liquidation, conversion, and voting rights. The Restated Articles of Incorporation provide that the preferred shares are senior to the common shares with respect to dividends and liquidation.
The Company has a shareholders rights plan - under which, a Class A, Junior Participating Preferred Stock with no par value was created. In addition, a dividend of one right was declared for each share of common stock at an exercise price of $36 per right and a redemption price of $0.001 per right. Each right is equal to a right to purchase one one-hundredth of a share of the Class A, Junior Participating Preferred Stock. 100,000 shares of preferred stock are reserved for the exercise of the rights. No rights were exercised during the years ended May 29, 2005, May 30, 2004, and June 1, 2003.
The Company has notes receivable from certain officers of the Company arising from the sale of common stock recorded as an offset to stockholders equity. During 2003, the Company wrote off $55,000 of such notes as compensation expense.
41
12. COMMITMENT AND CONTINGENCIES
Operating Leases - The Company leases certain facilities under operating leases through March 2008. In addition, certain equipment and motor vehicles are leased under operating leases with terms of approximately 36 months.
During May 2005, the Company entered into an agreement for the sale of its headquarter building in Brooklyn Park, Minnesota and the leaseback of a part of that building. The lease is for a twenty-seven month period, and is classified as an operating lease.
Approximate minimum annual rental commitments at May 29, 2005 are as follows:
2006 |
|
$ |
444,000 |
|
2007 |
|
435,000 |
|
|
2008 |
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,079,000 |
|
Total rental expense for the fiscal years ended May 29, 2005, May 30, 2004, and June 1, 2003 was approximately $217,000, $227,000, and $393,000 respectively.
13. SEGMENT INFORMATION AND FOREIGN OPERATIONS
The Company conducts its business within one reportable segment: the power conversion product industry. Manufacturing of the Companys products are performed at the Companys former Korean subsidiary, the Chinese subsidiaries, and certain nonaffiliated companies in China and Thailand. A summary of the Companys revenues, net income, and identifiable assets by geographic area is presented below:
|
|
Restated |
|
Restated |
|
|
|
||||
|
|
May 29, |
|
May 30, |
|
June 1, |
|
||||
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
||||
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Domestic operations |
|
$ |
33,944,131 |
|
$ |
32,385,149 |
|
$ |
31,009,020 |
|
|
Asian operations - customers |
|
3,271,378 |
|
2,975,435 |
|
4,986,825 |
|
||||
Asian operations - parent |
|
10,406,081 |
|
7,356,824 |
|
3,123,908 |
|
||||
Eliminations |
|
(10,406,081 |
) |
(7,356,824 |
) |
(3,123,908 |
) |
||||
Consolidated |
|
$ |
37,215,509 |
|
$ |
35,360,584 |
|
$ |
35,995,845 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Net income (loss) applicable to common stockholder: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Domestic operations |
|
$ |
(3,864,293 |
) |
$ |
(4,812,467 |
) |
$ |
(6,337,558 |
) |
|
Asian operations |
|
(1,454,938 |
) |
(1,133,986 |
) |
(908,077 |
) |
||||
Discontinued Operations |
|
(153,074 |
) |
150,607 |
|
(446,438 |
) |
||||
Eliminations |
|
3 |
|
2,200 |
|
|
|
||||
Consolidated |
|
$ |
(5,472,302 |
) |
$ |
(5,793,646 |
) |
$ |
(7,692,073 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Identifiable assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Domestic operations |
|
$ |
13,653,449 |
|
$ |
23,547,646 |
|
$ |
27,823,792 |
|
|
Asian operations |
|
8,293,724 |
|
9,083,004 |
|
7,380,047 |
|
||||
Discontinued Operations |
|
|
|
13,922,280 |
|
13,838,483 |
|
||||
Eliminations |
|
(5,140,515 |
) |
(16,717,639 |
) |
(15,977,405 |
) |
||||
Consolidated |
|
$ |
16,806,658 |
|
$ |
29,835,291 |
|
$ |
33,064,917 |
|
|
42
|
|
May 29, |
|
May 30, |
|
June 1, |
|
||||
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
||||
Long-lived assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Domestic operations |
|
$ |
300,984 |
|
$ |
4,176,751 |
|
$ |
6,493,373 |
|
|
Foreign operations |
|
2,073,958 |
|
1,949,359 |
|
1,933,912 |
|
||||
Consolidated |
|
$ |
2,374,942 |
|
$ |
6,126,110 |
|
$ |
8,427,285 |
|
|
Sales from the subsidiary to the parent company are based upon profit margins, which represent competitive pricing of similar products.
Export Sales - The Company also had foreign export sales amounting to 15.7%, 14.4%, and 12.1% of total sales for the fiscal years ended May 29, 2005, May 30, 2004, and June 1, 2003, respectively.
Other Foreign Production - In addition to the manufacturing done by the Asian subsidiaries, the Company has subcontracting agreements for the purchase of finished assemblies from certain manufacturers in China and Thailand. Total purchases under these agreements were approximately $4,288,000, $5,243,000, and $5,918,000 for the fiscal years ended May 29, 2005, May 30, 2004, and June 1, 2003, respectively.
The Company had no customers with revenues or accounts receivable of more than 10% of the total during the fiscal years ended May 29, 2005. May 30, 2004 and June 1, 2003
On July 16, 2002, the Company purchased a portion of the operating assets of the Power General division of Nidec America Corporation. The Power General division developed, manufactured, and sold high-efficiency DC/DC converters and custom power supplies at various power levels up to 1200 watts under the Power General brand name. Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, the Company paid the seller $366,000 in cash and issued $2,074,000 face amount of the Companys newly created Series B 7% Convertible Preferred Stock, no par value (the Preferred Stock). The Preferred Stock issued to seller is convertible into 488,000 shares of the Companys common stock. The Company has filed a registration statement covering the shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of the Preferred Stock with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur if the Preferred Stock was converted into common stock of the Company during reported periods. The Preferred Stock was excluded from Diluted EPS in the current year as the effect of its inclusion would be antidilutive. The Company has maintained Power Generals engineering group in Massachusetts and has moved Power Generals manufacturing operations and related functions to the Companys other facilities in Asia.
43
The total cost of the acquisition was $2,559,278 and was accounted for under the purchase method of accounting. Accordingly, the acquired assets and liabilities assumed have been recorded at their respective fair values as of the date of acquisition. The results of operations of the acquired business is included in the financial statements since the date of the acquisition. The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed from Nidec on the date of the acquisition:
Inventories |
|
$ |
1,048,675 |
|
Property and equipment |
|
1,634,971 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired |
|
2,683,646 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
124,368 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired |
|
$ |
2,559,278 |
|
Pro-forma results of the Company, assuming the acquisition had been made at the beginning of each period presented, are (in thousands, except per share data):
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
|
|
June 1, |
|
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
36,365 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Loss |
|
(7,899 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock Dividends |
|
146 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Loss Applicable to Common Stockholders |
|
$ |
(8,045 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Basic Loss Per Share |
|
$ |
(1.75 |
) |
Diluted Loss Per Share |
|
$ |
(1.75 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Common and equivalent shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
4,597 |
|
|
Diluted |
|
4,597 |
|
44
Accounting errors discovered in the Companys China operations increased the loss applicable to common stockholders by $593,000 for fiscal year 2004 and $425,000 for the first three quarters of fiscal year 2005 compared to results that were originally reported. The sale of the Companys Korean subsidiary in May 2005, required adjustments to the financial statements to present Korean operations as discontinued operations.
During the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2005, the Company recorded adjustments and accounting entries that increased the loss applicable to common stockholders by $3,328,000. The loss on the sale of the Korean subsidiary was approximately $2,442,000 and the loss on the sale of the Minneapolis headquarters building was $137,000. The value of accounts receivable and inventories for Aults China operations was reduced by $198,000 and $427,000 respectively. The value of inventories in the United States was reduced by $124,000.
QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA
(Unaudited)
(Amounts in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)
|
|
FISCAL QUARTERS |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
1ST |
|
2ND |
|
3RD |
|
4TH |
|
|||||
Fiscal Year 2005 as restated: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Sales |
|
$ |
10,336 |
|
$ |
8,225 |
|
$ |
8,941 |
|
$ |
9,714 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Gross Profit |
|
2,675 |
|
2,309 |
|
2,674 |
|
2,138 |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Loss From Continuing Operations |
|
(205 |
) |
(649 |
) |
(449 |
) |
(1,429 |
) |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Loss From Discontinued Operations |
|
36 |
|
(5 |
) |
(177 |
) |
(2,449 |
) |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Loss Applicable to Common Stockholders |
|
(205 |
) |
(690 |
) |
(662 |
) |
(3,915 |
) |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Loss Per Share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Basic |
|
(0.04 |
) |
(0.14 |
) |
(0.14 |
) |
(0.83 |
) |
|||||
Diluted |
|
(0.04 |
) |
(0.14 |
) |
(0.14 |
) |
(0.83 |
) |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Fiscal Year 2005 as reported: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Sales |
|
$ |
10,336 |
|
$ |
8,225 |
|
$ |
8,941 |
|
$ |
9,714 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Gross Profit |
|
2,761 |
|
2,395 |
|
2,759 |
|
2,223 |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Loss From Continuing Operations |
|
(119 |
) |
(563 |
) |
(364 |
) |
(1,344 |
) |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Income (Loss) From Discontinued Operations |
|
36 |
|
(5 |
) |
(177 |
) |
(2,449 |
) |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Loss Applicable to Common Stockholders |
|
(119 |
) |
(604 |
) |
(577 |
) |
(3,830 |
) |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Loss Per Share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Basic |
|
(0.02 |
) |
(0.13 |
) |
(0.13 |
) |
(0.79 |
) |
|||||
Diluted |
|
(0.02 |
) |
(0.13 |
) |
(0.13 |
) |
(0.79 |
) |
|||||
45
|
|
FISCAL QUARTERS |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
1ST |
|
2ND |
|
3RD |
|
4TH |
|
|||||
Fiscal Year 2004 as restated: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Sales |
|
$ |
8,430 |
|
$ |
8,769 |
|
$ |
8,600 |
|
$ |
9,562 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Gross Profit |
|
1,803 |
|
2,238 |
|
1,479 |
|
2,405 |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Loss From Continuing Operations |
|
(1,230 |
) |
(781 |
) |
(3,270 |
) |
(518 |
) |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Income (loss) From Discontinued Operations |
|
61 |
|
(11 |
) |
12 |
|
89 |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Loss Applicable to Common Stockholders |
|
(1,205 |
) |
(828 |
) |
(3,295 |
) |
(466 |
) |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Loss Per Share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Basic |
|
(0.26 |
) |
(0.18 |
) |
(0.70 |
) |
(0.10 |
) |
|||||
Diluted |
|
(0.26 |
) |
(0.18 |
) |
(0.70 |
) |
(0.10 |
) |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Fiscal Year 2004 as reported: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Sales |
|
$ |
8,430 |
|
$ |
8,769 |
|
$ |
8,600 |
|
$ |
9,562 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Gross Profit |
|
1,865 |
|
2,300 |
|
1,541 |
|
2,467 |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Loss From Continuing Operations |
|
(1,168 |
) |
(719 |
) |
(3,208 |
) |
(456 |
) |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Income (loss) From Discontinued Operations |
|
61 |
|
(11 |
) |
12 |
|
89 |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Loss Applicable to Common Stockholders |
|
(1,143 |
) |
(766 |
) |
(3,233 |
) |
(404 |
) |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Loss Per Share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Basic |
|
(0.25 |
) |
(0.16 |
) |
(0.69 |
) |
(0.09 |
) |
|||||
Diluted |
|
(0.25 |
) |
(0.16 |
) |
(0.69 |
) |
(0.09 |
) |
|||||
46
On December 16, 2005, SL Industries, Inc., a New Jersey corporation (SL Industries), Lakers Acquisition Corp., a Minnesota corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of SL Industries (Purchaser), and Ault Incorporated, a Minnesota corporation (Ault or the Company), entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the Merger Agreement).
Pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement, Purchaser will commence a tender offer (the Offer) for all of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock, no par value per share (the Company Common Stock), of Ault, including associated preferred stock rights (the Rights and together with the Company Common Stock, the Shares and each share thereof, a Share), at a price equal to $2.90 per Share net to the seller in cash (or any higher price per Share paid in the Offer) (the Offer Price), without interest (and subject to applicable withholding taxes). The Offer commenced on December 23, 2005. Upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement, following a successful completion of the Offer, Purchaser will be merged with and into Ault with Ault surviving the merger as a wholly owned subsidiary of SL Industries (the Merger). In the Merger, each Share (other than Shares owned by SL Industries, Purchaser, or shareholders, if any, who have perfected statutory dissenters rights under Minnesota law) will be converted into the right to receive the Offer Price, without interest (and subject to applicable withholding taxes).
47
ITEM 8 (b). SUPPLEMENTARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Not Applicable.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
Not Applicable
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Management, with the participation of the principal executive officer and principal financial officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of the disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in rules 13a-15(e) and 15d 15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as of the end of the period covered by this annual report. Subject to the matters discussed below, management has concluded that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures are not effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Company files under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC and that the disclosure controls are also not effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the Companys Exchange Act reports is accumulated and communicated to management, including the chief executive officer and chief financial officer to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
A material weakness is a control deficiency, or combination of control deficiencies, that results in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected. As of May 29, 2005, the Company did not maintain effective controls relating to transactions at its China subsidiary related to inventory build-up and relief, reconciliation of intercompany accounts and the recording of all payables.
In connection with its audit of the Companys consolidated financial statements for the year ended May 30, 2004, Grant Thornton LLP (Grant Thornton), the Companys independent registered public accounting firm, advised the Audit Committee and management of internal control matters with respect to certain inventory transactions that they considered to be a material weakness as that term is defined under standards established by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). The Company considered these matters in connection with the year-end closing process and the preparation of the May 29, 2005 consolidated financial statements included in this Form 10-K. In response to the observations made by Grant Thornton, the Company will implement certain enhancements to its internal controls and procedures, which it believes address the matters raised by Grant Thornton.
China Subsidiary
The Company did not maintain effective controls over the preparation of and independent review of accounts at the China subsidiary. The Company has concluded that these control deficiencies constitute material weaknesses.
Remediation of Material Weaknesses Related to China Subsidiary
Management has taken, or is in the process of taking the following steps with respect to the control deficiencies at its China subsidiary:
The transfer of a seasoned accountant with experience in Asian operations who will be headquartered in Minneapolis, and will be the primary liaison with our China accounting staff and operations.
Commencement of a training program to upgrade the skill sets of our China accounting staff.
48
The hiring of an experienced China-based controller to coordinate all financial reporting, monthly physical inventory counts and verification and also be a part of the weekly conference calls with all of our operations to improve communications.
Management believes that implementation of these actions will remediate the material weaknesses described above.
Warehouse Control Deficiencies
In a cost-cutting effort in the third quarter of fiscal 2004, the Company closed down a manufacturing facility in Minneapolis and terminated a third party warehouse facility in Ireland. As part of the shutdown of the manufacturing in December 2003, certain personnel were terminated prior to the disposition of inventory at the location. The Companys haste in cost elimination resulted in having insufficient staffing to control the disposition of the inventory. This was found to be a weakness of $25,569 in the counting of inventory that was discovered during the course of the audit by the Companys external auditors. This should have been recorded in the third quarter.
In addition to the manufacturing shut-down, the Company also closed a third party warehouse facility to cut costs in January 2004. This too resulted in the terminations of personnel whose responsibilities including monitoring third party warehousing of customer stock inventory. Approximately $57,581 of inventory was not adequately tracked. This error was also discovered in the course of the audit, and should have been recorded in the third quarter. Taken together the manufacturing and third party warehouse control deficiencies resulted in an adjustment of $83,150, which should have been recorded in the third quarter. This $83,150 adjustment was extrapolated over the Companys entire inventory, which resulted in a total adjustment of $279,987. The Company believes that this adjustment is not material.
In connection with its audit of the Companys consolidated financial statements for the year ended May 30, 2004, Grant Thornton LLP (Grant Thornton), the Companys independent registered public accounting firm, advised the Companys audit committee and management that the adjustments described with respect to inventory constituted a material weakness as that term is defined under standards established by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). In response to the observations made by Grant Thornton, the Company will implement certain enhancements to its internal controls and procedures that the Company believes will address the matters raised by Grant Thornton.
Specifically, if the Company determines to enter into any future third party warehouse agreement, the Company will make sure that is has devoted adequate resources for necessary preventative and detective controls. The third party warehouse will have a weekly reconciliation between the inventory in the warehouse and the Companys inventory system. The head of sales and the head of finance will review this reconciliation. On a quarterly basis, the Company will physically count the inventory.
Similarly, before the Company closes another manufacturing location, the Company will make sure there are adequate resources in place for necessary preventative and detective controls. If the Company closes a manufacturing location, it will have the necessary resources to maintain a cycle count system until the disposition of the inventory is complete. Also there will be a physical inventory of the inventory before the end of each quarter until the disposition of the inventory is complete.
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
Not Applicable.
49
PART III.
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
The Companys Board of Directors is presently comprised of seven directors:
|
|
|
|
Director |
Name and (Age) |
|
Principal Occupation and Other Directorships |
|
Since |
|
|
|
|
|
Carol A. Barnett (40) |
|
Vice President, Medtronic, Inc., Gastroenterology-Urology; Neurological Marketing and Business Development Director, Medtronic; from 1998 to 2000, Neurological Marketing Manager, Medtronic, Inc. |
|
2001 |
|
|
|
|
|
Brian T. Chang (46) |
|
Chief Executive Officer, Pacific Investment Partners, January 2004 to present; Vice Chairman Taian Pacific Gas Manufacturing since January 2004; Chairman, Taian Pacific Gas Manufacturing Company from 2001 to 2004; From 2001 to 2002, Vice President, Alliance Capital; from 1994 to 2000, President, Pacific Investment and Consulting. |
|
2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
John Colwell, Jr. (47) |
|
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Web Label; from 1997 to 2000, President, Colwell Industries. Mr. Colwell has twenty years of experience as a senior executive that includes relevant experience actively supervising financial and accounting officers at companies of similar or larger size than Ault. |
|
2000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Frederick M. Green (62) |
|
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company; Director, Communications Systems, Inc. (telecommunications). |
|
1979 |
|
|
|
|
|
John G. Kassakian (62) |
|
Professor of Electrical Engineering and Director, Laboratory for Electromagnetic and Electronic Systems, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Director, American Power Conversion |
|
1984 |
|
|
|
|
|
David J. Larkin (65) |
|
Management Consultant since 1995; Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, Jostens, Inc. in 1998 and 1999. |
|
1998 |
|
|
|
|
|
Marvonia Pearson Walker (47) |
|
Vice President, AT&Ts Georgia Community Relations and High Speed Computer Networking Director through June 2004; from December 1999 to September 2000, Marketing Director, AT&T. |
|
2001 |
50
Certain information with respect to the executive officers of the Company is set forth:
Name and (Age) |
|
Position |
|
Officer Since |
|
|
|
|
|
Frederick M. Green (62) |
|
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director |
|
1980 |
|
|
|
|
|
Gregory L. Harris (52) |
|
Vice President Business Development |
|
1988 |
|
|
|
|
|
Xiaodong Wang (47) |
|
Vice President Asia Pacific |
|
2000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Donald L. Henry (49) |
|
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (1) |
|
1999 |
|
|
|
|
|
William J. Birmingham (64) |
|
Interim Chief Financial Officer (2) |
|
2005 |
(1) Mr. Henry resigned from the Company on July 29, 2005.
(2) Mr. Birmingham joined the Company on August 1, 2005. From March 2000 through April 2005 Mr. Birmingham served as Vice President of Finance for Harvey Vogel Manufacturing Company, a privately held metal stamping business with annual revenues of $21 million.
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires the Companys directors and executive officers, and persons who own more than 10% of a registered class of the Companys equity securities, to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of common stock and other equity securities of the Company. These insiders are required by Securities and Exchange Commission regulations to furnish the Company with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file, including Forms 3, 4 and 5. To the Companys knowledge, and based solely on review of the copies of such reports furnished to the Company and written representations that no other reports were required, all required Section 16(a) filings applicable to directors, executive officers and greater than 10% shareholders in fiscal 2005 were timely filed.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The following table shows, for fiscal years ended May 29, 2005, May 30, 2004, and June 1, 2003, the cash compensation paid by the Company, as well as certain other compensation paid or accrued for these years, to Frederick M. Green, the Companys President and Chief Executive Officer, and to certain other most highly compensated executive officers of the Company (together with Mr. Green, the Named Executive Officers) whose total cash compensation exceeded $100,000 during fiscal year 2005 in all capacities in which they served:
51
Summary Compensation Table
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term Comp. |
|
|
|
||
|
|
Fiscal |
|
Annual Cash |
|
Securities |
|
All Other |
|
||
Name and Position |
|
Year |
|
Compensation (1) |
|
Underlying Options (2) |
|
Compensation |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Frederick M. Green |
|
2005 |
|
$ |
307,732 |
|
12,500 |
|
$ |
4,022 |
(3) |
President and Chief |
|
2004 |
|
313,811 |
|
12,500 |
|
5,021 |
(3) |
||
Executive Officer |
|
2003 |
|
292,218 |
|
20,000 |
|
4,800 |
(3) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Gregory L. Harris |
|
2005 |
|
$ |
174,157 |
|
8,000 |
|
$ |
3,419 |
(4) |
Vice President |
|
2004 |
|
174,157 |
|
8,000 |
|
3,447 |
(4) |
||
Business Development |
|
2003 |
|
165,942 |
|
12,000 |
|
3,368 |
(4) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Xiaodong Wang |
|
2005 |
|
$ |
171,435 |
|
8,000 |
|
$ |
3,755 |
(5) |
Vice President |
|
2004 |
|
163,969 |
|
8,000 |
|
3,845 |
(5) |
||
Asia Pacific |
|
2003 |
|
162,679 |
|
12,000 |
|
3,707 |
(5) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Donald L. Henry |
|
2005 |
|
$ |
164,290 |
|
8,000 |
|
$ |
3,177 |
(6)(7) |
Vice President and Chief |
|
2004 |
|
164,433 |
|
8,000 |
|
3,755 |
(6) |
||
Financial Officer |
|
2003 |
|
156,541 |
|
12,000 |
|
3,845 |
(6) |
(1) Represents base compensation paid to the named executives; includes bonuses for fiscal 2005 and 2004.
(2) Reflects the number of shares that may be purchased pursuant to options granted in the year indicated.
(3) Reflects 401(k) matching contributions of $2,368, $2,960 and $2,876 under the Companys Profit Sharing and Retirement Plan in 2005, 2004 and 2003 respectively, and the payment of $1,654, $2,061 and $1,924 for life insurance premiums in 2005, 2004 and 2003 respectively.
(4) Reflects 401(k) matching contributions of $1,847, $1,875 and $1,911 under the Companys Profit Sharing and Retirement Plan in 2005, 2004 and 2003 respectively, and the payment of $1,572, $1,572 and $1,457 for life insurance premiums in 2005, 2004 and 2003 respectively.
(5) Reflects 401(k) matching contributions of $2,249, $2,339 and $2,285 under the Companys Profit Sharing and Retirement Plan in 2005, 2004 and 2003 respectively, and payments of $1,506, $1,506 and $1,422 for life insurance premiums in 2005, 2004 and 2003 respectively.
(6) Reflects 401(k) matching contributions of $1,670, $2,077 and $1,023 under the Companys Profit Sharing and Retirement Plan in 2005, 2004 and 2003 respectively, and payment of $1,507, $1,507 and $1,421 for life insurance premiums in 2005, 2004 and 2003 respectively.
(7) Mr. Henry received a severance payment of $78,270 on September 1, 2005. The severance payment is over and above the amounts listed in the annual cash compensation table.
52
The following table contains information concerning grants of stock options to the Named Executive Officers during the fiscal year ended May 29, 2005:
|
|
Number of |
|
Percent of |
|
Exercise |
|
Expiration |
|
Potential Realizable |
|
|||||
|
|
Granted |
|
In Fiscal Year |
|
Per Share |
|
Date |
|
5% |
|
10% |
|
|||
Frederick M. Green |
|
12,500 |
|
13.92 |
% |
$ |
2.99 |
|
7/22/2009 |
|
$ |
10,326 |
|
$ |
22,817 |
|
Gregory L. Harris |
|
8,000 |
|
8.91 |
% |
2.99 |
|
7/22/2009 |
|
6,608 |
|
14,603 |
|
|||
Xiaodong Wang |
|
8,000 |
|
8.91 |
% |
2.99 |
|
7/22/2009 |
|
6,608 |
|
14,603 |
|
|||
Donald L. Henry |
|
8,000 |
|
8.91 |
% |
2.99 |
|
7/22/2009 |
|
6,608 |
|
14,603 |
|
|||
The following table sets forth information with respect to the Named Executive Officers concerning exercise of options and employee stock purchase plan activity during the fiscal year ended May 29, 2005, and unexercised options held as of May 29, 2005. The closing price of $2.25 per share of the Companys Common Stock on May 27, 2005, the last trading day for the fiscal year ended May 29, 2005, was below all the grant exercise prices of all options outstanding as of May 29, 2005.
|
|
Shares |
|
Value (1) |
|
Number of Securities |
|
|||
|
|
On Exercise |
|
Realized |
|
Exercisable |
|
Unexercisable |
|
|
Frederick M. Green |
|
11,167 |
|
$ |
11,601 |
|
269,375 |
|
20,625 |
|
Gregory L. Harris |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
112,500 |
|
13,000 |
|
|
Xiaodong Wang |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
30,000 |
|
13,000 |
|
|
Donald L. Henry |
|
9,208 |
|
10,129 |
|
52,500 |
|
13,000 |
|
|
(1) Value is the difference between the exercise price of the option and the closing price of the shares on the date of exercise.
53
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation in Compensation Decisions
The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors administers our executive compensation programs. The Committee is currently composed of independent, non-employee directors, none of whom was at any time during the past fiscal year an officer or employee of the Company, was formerly an officer of the Company or any of its subsidiaries, or had any employment relationship with the Company.
Mr. Green, the Companys Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, participated in the deliberations of the Compensation Committee regarding executive compensation that occurred during fiscal 2005, but did not take part in deliberations regarding his own compensation. Mr. Greens participation in the deliberations of the Compensation Committee included providing information on the performance of other employees and advisory recommendations regarding the appropriate levels of compensation for the Companys officers.
Change in Control Severance Pay Plan
Senior Management Change in Control Severance Plan. In August 1998, the Board of Directors approved the Senior Management Change in Control Severance Plan (the Severance Plan) that provides certain benefits to executive officers and senior management employees in the event of a termination of employment other than for cause or good reason in the 18-month period following a change in control. There are nine eligible employees under the Severance Plan. The Board adopted the Severance Plan to assist the Company in recruiting and retaining senior employees, assure continuity of executive officers upon a change in control, and ease the transition to new employment for executive officers and senior management that are terminated as a result of a change in control.
Summary of Severance Benefits. Eligible employees are entitled to severance benefits if employment is terminated within 18 months of a change in control for reasons other than death, for cause or for a good reason. Severance benefits are also due if a termination occurs prior to a change in control if the termination of employment is a condition to the change in control transaction, or otherwise insisted upon by a party to the change in control transaction. Employees eligible for the Severance Plan consist of selected executive officers and senior management level employees. Severance benefits include: (i) a lump sum cash payment of one time or two times the employees annual base salary plus the bonus that would be payable in the year of termination, (ii) continued or substantially equivalent health, dental, vision, life, disability and other benefits for the employee and dependents for one year plus 30% of base salary in outplacement counseling, or an additional 15% of the lump sum payment in lieu thereof, (iii) additional payments to cover any excise taxes due on account of payments under the Severance Plan and (iv) indemnification and advancement of expenses for any claims arising from the eligible participants service to the Company subject to applicable law. Mr. Green, Mr. Harris and Mr. Wang are eligible for two times annual base salary and bonus, all other eligible employees are entitled to one-times annual base salary and bonus
Summary of key definitions. The Severance Plan defines termination for cause which would disqualify a participant from severance as: (i) gross misconduct materially and demonstrably injurious to the Company, (ii) willful and continued failure by the employee to perform substantially his or her duties after a demand for performance by the Board of Directors unless excused by incapacity caused by mental or physical illness, or (iii) conviction of willfully engaging in illegal conduct constituting a felony or gross misdemeanor which is materially and demonstrably injurious to the Company or which impairs the employees ability to do his or her duties. A good reason permitting an eligible employee to terminate employment and receive severance benefits is defined as: (i) an adverse change in the employees status or position as an executive officer or senior management employee, (ii) a reduction in base salary, (iii) the failure to continue a material benefit plan, (iv) requiring the eligible employee to be based more than 25 miles from his or her officer prior to the change in control or (v) the failure of the successor company to assent to honoring the Severance Plan. A change in control under the Severance Plan is defined as: (i) a sale of all or substantially all assets of the Company, (ii) approval by shareholders of a plan to liquidate or dissolve the Company, (iii) a person
54
acquiring more than 20% but less than 50% of the Companys Common Stock without prior Board approval, (iv) a merger in which the Company is owner of at least 50% but not more than 80% of the surviving company unless pre-approved the Companys Board of Directors, (v) a change in Board of Directors such that the directors prior to the change in control do not constitute a majority of the Board or (vi) a change in control required to be disclosed under the Exchange Act.
The Compensation Committee is composed exclusively of non-employee members of the Companys Board of Directors who qualify as independent directors under the listing rules of Nasdaq. The Committee determines cash compensation for the Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers, based on qualitative and quantitative measures of performance, and makes recommendations to the Board for approval. The Committee also determines stock option awards under the Companys Stock Option Plan.
Executive Officer Compensation Policy
The Committees policy is to provide executive compensation that is externally competitive at the various professional levels. Application of the policy utilizes retrospective quantitative criteria, as well as qualitative evaluation of individual initiatives and achievements. It is also the Committees policy to encourage and recognize strategic actions that position the Company to better compete in its markets for enhanced operational results in the longer term. As a result of these factors, the actual change in compensation for any particular executive officer for a particular year may not necessarily reflect operational results of the preceding year. The Company utilizes independently conducted market surveys to obtain comparative compensation data that it uses to assess and make changes to compensation program for the Companys senior executives.
Compensation Elements
Compensation currently paid to the Companys executive officers principally consists of three elements: base salary, incentive compensation and annual stock option awards.
Salary. The base salary of the Companys executive officers is generally established by reference to base salaries paid to executives in similar positions with similar responsibilities based on publicly available compensation surveys. Base salaries of all executive officers are reviewed at the beginning of each fiscal year, although adjustments, if any, to base salary are implemented throughout the fiscal year beginning on the anniversary date of each executives date of employment. During the fiscal year ended May 29, 2005 the Committee did not make any changes to the base compensation of the Companys executive officers in effect for the prior fiscal year, except that the annual base compensation of Mr. Wang was increased by approximately $8,000 to reflect increased responsibilities. The Committee regards base compensation paid to the Companys executive officers as reasonable in relation to published information regarding compensation of executives with similar responsibilities.
Incentive Compensation. The Companys executive officers participate in an incentive compensation program based upon the Company reaching defined revenue and income targets established at the beginning of the fiscal year. Because of the level of the Companys fiscal 2005 revenues in comparison to targets set at the beginning of the fiscal year, under this program each executive officer, other than Mr. Henry, is due to received cash incentive compensation equal to 2.5% of his fiscal 2005 base salary, or $15,942 in the aggregate.
Options/Stock Based Compensation. Stock options are generally awarded at the beginning of each fiscal year under stock option plans approved by the Companys shareholders. Options are granted at an exercise price that is equal to the fair market value of a common share on the date of the grant. The Committee believes that stock ownership by management derived from granting of stock options is beneficial because it aligns the interests of executives with the interests of shareholders. It serves to further encourage superior management performance and specifically motivates executives to remain focused on factors that enhance the market value of the Companys common stock. At the beginning of fiscal year 2005, the Committee granted stock
55
options to purchase 36,500 shares of common stock to executive officers, which represented approximately 41% of the total options granted to all officers and key employees.
Chief Executive Officer Compensation
Frederick M. Green, the Companys President and Chief Executive Officer, is evaluated by the same factors applicable to the evaluation of other executive officers, as described above, and participates in the same executive compensation plans provided to the other senior executives. The Compensation Committee did not make any adjustment to Mr. Greens base salary in fiscal 2005. Following the completion of fiscal 2005, because of the level of the Companys fiscal 2005 revenues in comparison to targets set at the beginning of the fiscal year, Mr. Green will receive cash incentive compensation of $7,330, which represents 2.5% of his fiscal 2005 base salary, under the incentive compensation applicable to all executive officers for fiscal year 2005. Mr. Green was also awarded stock options to acquire 12,500 shares of Company common stock at the beginning of fiscal year 2005. The Committee regards Mr. Greens compensation as reasonable in relation to published information on compensation of executives with similar responsibilities.
Submitted by the Compensation Committee of the Companys Board of Directors:
David J. Larkin, Chair |
John Colwell, Jr. |
Marvonia Pearson Walker |
Members of the Board who are not otherwise employed by the Company receive, at the time of election or reelection to the Board, an option to purchase 2,000 shares of the Companys common stock at a purchase price equal to the fair market value of the Companys common stock on the date of such election or reelection. In addition, each non-employee member of the Board of Directors is also paid an annual fee of $4,000, plus $500 for each Board meeting or Board committee meeting attended.
56
STOCK PERFORMANCE GRAPH
The Securities and Exchange Commission requires the Company to include a line graph presenting comparative cumulative, five-year shareholder returns on an indexed basis with a broad market index and either a nationally-recognized industry standard or an index of peer companies selected by the Company. The Company has chosen the Nasdaq Market Index (U.S. Companies) as its broad market index and the S&P 500 Electrical Components & Equipment Index as its peer-group index. The graph below compares the cumulative total return of the Companys Common Stock over the last five years, assuming a $100 investmrnt on the last business day of fiscal year 2000.
|
|
Base |
|
INDEXED RETURNS |
|
||||||||
Company / Index |
|
5/28/00 |
|
6/3/01 |
|
6/2/02 |
|
6/1/03 |
|
5/30/04 |
|
5/29/05 |
|
AULT INC |
|
100 |
|
100.87 |
|
84.52 |
|
33.91 |
|
51.83 |
|
41.74 |
|
NASDAQ MARKET INDEX (U.S.) |
|
100 |
|
67.14 |
|
50.73 |
|
50.41 |
|
62.63 |
|
65.44 |
|
S&P 500 ELECTRICAL COMPONENTS & EQUIPMENT |
|
100 |
|
95.39 |
|
88.18 |
|
82.18 |
|
102.82 |
|
127.16 |
|
57
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.
The following table provides information as of September 1, 2005 concerning the beneficial ownership of the Companys Common Stock by (i) all shareholders known to the Company to hold five percent or more of the Common Stock of the Company (ii) each of the Companys directors, nominees to the Board of Directors, and each of the named executive officers and (iii) all directors and executive officers of the Company as a group. Unless otherwise indicated, all beneficial owners have sole voting and investment power over shares held.
|
|
Shares |
|
Percent of |
|
Beneficial Owner |
|
Beneficially Owned (1) |
|
Class |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Skiritai Capital LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
388 Market Street, Suite 700 |
|
|
|
|
|
San Francisco, CA 94111 |
|
692,882 |
(2) |
14.25 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nidec America Corporation |
|
|
|
|
|
318 Industrial Lane |
|
|
|
|
|
Torrington, CT 06790 |
|
488,000 |
(3) |
9.12 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Royce & Associates, LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
1414 Avenue of the Americas |
|
|
|
|
|
New York, NY 10019 |
|
478,500 |
(4) |
9.84 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fifth Third Bancorp |
|
|
|
|
|
Fifth Third Center |
|
|
|
|
|
Cincinnati, OH 45263 |
|
364,820 |
(5) |
7.50 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dimensional Fund Advisors Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
1299 Ocean Avenue, 11th Floor |
|
|
|
|
|
Santa Monica, CA 90401 |
|
312,292 |
(6) |
6.42 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Frederick M. Green |
|
379,142 |
(7) |
7.12 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
William J. Birmingham |
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carol A. Barnett |
|
7,667 |
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brian T. Chang |
|
2,667 |
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John Colwell, Jr. |
|
6,667 |
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John G. Kassakian |
|
25,667 |
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David J. Larkin |
|
15,667 |
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marvonia Pearson Walker |
|
6,667 |
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gregory L. Harris |
|
132,828 |
|
2.49 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Xiaodong Wang |
|
30,000 |
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Directors & Officers as a group (10 persons) |
|
606,972 |
|
11.40 |
% |
* Indicates less than one percent.
58
(1) For each director and all officers and directors as a group, share and percent ownership information reflects the following number of shares of Common Stock that may be purchased pursuant to stock options that are exercisable as of May 29, 2005: Mr. Green, 269,375 shares; Mr. Birmingham, no shares; Ms. Barnett, 6,667 shares; Mr. Chang, 2,667 shares; Mr. Colwell, 6,667 shares; Mr. Kassakian, 14,667; Mr. Larkin, 10,667; Ms. Pearson Walker, 6,667; Mr. Harris, 112,500; Mr. Wang, 30,000; and all directors and officers as a group, 459,877 shares.
(2) Based on the Schedule 13 G filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 11, 2005.
(3) Based on the Schedule 13 G filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 24, 2002, the most recent public filing available. The 488,000 shares reported represent shares that are immediately issuable upon conversion of 2,074 shares of Series B convertible Preferred Stock of the Company. Nidec Corporation, the parent company of Nidec America Corporation, is also deemed to beneficially own such shares.
(4) Based on Schedule 13 G filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 22, 2005.
(5) Based on Schedule 13 G filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 14, 2005.
(6) Based on Schedule 13 G filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 9, 2005.
(7) Includes 3,357 shares owned by Mr. Greens spouse.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Not Applicable.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
The following schedule is a summary of fees billed to the Company by Grant Thornton for fiscal 2005 and fiscal 2004 and Deloitte & Touche for the first two quarters of fiscal 2004.
|
|
Fiscal 2005 |
|
Fiscal 2004 |
|
|||||
Fee Category |
|
Grant Thornton |
|
Grant Thornton |
|
Deloitte & Touche |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Audit Fees |
|
$ |
157,720 |
|
$ |
101,052 |
|
$ |
86,645 |
|
Audit-Related Fees |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
13,125 |
|
|||
Tax Fees |
|
15,533 |
|
8,330 |
|
17,200 |
|
|||
All Other Fees |
|
3,166 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Total Fees |
|
$ |
176,419 |
|
$ |
109,382 |
|
$ |
116,970 |
|
Audit Committee Pre-approval Policies and Procedures
The Audit Committee pre-approves all audit and permissible non-audit services provided by the independent auditors on a case-by-case basis. In connection with the approval of the annual audit services and related fees, the audit committee also pre-approves certain audit-related fees relating to the independent auditor responding to and researching technical accounting questions and other matters related to the financial statements under audit. All of the services provided by the Companys independent auditors during fiscal 2004 and 2005, including services related to the audit-related fees and tax fees, have been approved by the audit committee under its pre-approval process.
59
PART IV.
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT, SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON 8-K
(1) The following financial statements are included in Part II, Item 8:
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Grant Thornton LLP |
|
|
|
|
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Deloitte Anjin LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Deloitte & Touche LLP |
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Financial Statements |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheets, May 29, 2005 and May 30, 2004. |
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended May 29, 2005, May 30, 2004 and June 1, 2003. |
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Equity for the Years Ended May 29, 2005, May 30, 2004 and June 1, 2003. |
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended May 29, 2005, May 30, 2004 and June 1, 2003. |
|
|
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
|
(2) The following financial statement schedule for the years ended May 29, 2005, May 30, 2004 and June 1, 2003 is submitted herein following the signature page of this report.
|
Schedule II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts |
|
All other Schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or the required information is shown in the financial statements or notes thereto.
(3) Exhibits
(a) The Exhibits required pursuant to Item 601 of Regulation S-K to be filed with this report or incorporated by reference are listed in the Exhibit Index, which follows the Financial Statement Schedules.
(b) Reports on Form 8-K filed during the three months ended May 29, 2005. The Company filed Form 8-K on March 29, 2005 reporting under Item 2.02 results for the quarter ended February 27, 2005; the Company filed on May 25, 2005 under Item 2.01 announcing the completion of the sale of the Companys wholly owned subsidiary in South Korea; the Company filed Form 8-K on June 2, 2005 under Item 1.01 announcing the lease of 13,313 square feet of office space in its former Minneapolis headquarter building and under Item 2.01 announced the completion of the sale of its Minneapolis headquarter building to Dane Industries Inc.
60
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Ault Incorporated has duly caused Amendment No. 1 to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
AULT INCORPORATED
/s/ Frederick M. Green |
|
|
Frederick M. Green |
|
|
|
January 9, 2006 |
|
Frederick M. Green |
|
|
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director |
|
61
*******************************************************************
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-K/A
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
OF
AULT INCORPORATED
FOR
YEAR ENDED MAY 29, 2005
*******************************************************************
FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
*******************************************************************
62
AULT INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
Years Ended May 29, 2005, May 30, 2004, and June 1, 2003
|
|
Balance at |
|
Charged to |
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
||||
|
|
Beginning |
|
Costs and |
|
|
|
End of |
|
||||
|
|
of Period |
|
Expenses |
|
Deductions |
|
Period |
|
||||
Year ended May 29, 2005: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
$ |
291,000 |
|
$ |
510,000 |
|
$ |
20,000 |
(a) |
$ |
781,000 |
|
Reserve for warranties |
|
125,000 |
|
113,000 |
|
104,000 |
|
134,000 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Year ended May 30, 2004: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
315,000 |
|
17,000 |
|
41,000 |
(a) |
291,000 |
|
||||
Reserve for warranties |
|
134,000 |
|
14,000 |
|
23,000 |
|
125,000 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Year ended June 1, 2003: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
320,000 |
|
45,000 |
|
50,000 |
(a) |
315,000 |
|
||||
Reserve for warranties |
|
113,000 |
|
193,000 |
|
172,000 |
|
134,000 |
|
||||
(a) Represents charge-off of accounts receivable, net of recoveries.
63
*******************************************************************
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-K/A
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
OF
AULT INCORPORATED
FOR
YEAR ENDED MAY 29, 2005
*******************************************************************
EXHIBITS
*******************************************************************
64
AULT INCORPORATED
EXHIBIT INDEX TO
FORM 10-K/A FOR THE YEAR ENDED
May 29, 2005
Required Registration S-K
Exhibit Items
SK Item |
|
Title of Documents |
|
Location |
|
|
|
|
|
3(a) |
|
Restated Articles of Incorporation, as amended |
|
Filed as Exhibit 3(a) to Form 10-K for fiscal 1988 and incorporated herein by reference |
|
|
|
|
|
3(b) |
|
Bylaws, as amended |
|
Filed as Exhibit 3(b) to Registration Statement No. 2-85224 and incorporated herein by reference |
|
|
|
|
|
3(c) |
|
Amendment to Articles of Incorporation |
|
Filed as Exhibit 3(c) to Form 10-K for fiscal 1999 and incorporated herein by reference |
|
|
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
Rights Agreement |
|
Filed electronically on Form 8-K for March 1996 and incorporated herein by reference |
|
|
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
Management Incentive Compensation Plan |
|
Filed as Exhibit 10(b) to Registration Statement 2-85224 and incorporated herein by reference |
|
|
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
1986 Employee Stock Option Plan |
|
Filed as Exhibit 10(c) to Form 10-K for fiscal 1987 and incorporated herein by reference |
|
|
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
Employee Stock Purchase Plan |
|
Filed electronically. Commission File #333-4609 and herein incorporated by reference |
|
|
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
1986 Employee Stock Option Plan, Amended |
|
Filed electronically. Commission File #333-4609 and herein incorporated by reference |
|
|
|
|
|
10.5 |
|
1996 Employee Stock Option Plan |
|
Filed electronically. Commission File #333-4609 and herein incorporated by reference |
|
|
|
|
|
10.6 |
|
1998 Senior Management Change in Control Severance Plan |
|
Filed as Exhibit 10.6 to Form 10-K/A for fiscal 2004 and incorporated herein by reference |
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
Subsidiary of Registrant |
|
Filed as Exhibit 21 to Form 10-K for fiscal 1997 and incorporated herein by reference |
|
|
|
|
|
23.1 |
|
Consent of Independent Auditors |
|
Filed herewith at page 64 |
|
|
|
|
|
23.2 |
|
Consent of Independent Auditors |
|
Filed herewith at page 65 |
|
|
|
|
|
23.3 |
|
Consent of Independent Auditors |
|
Filed herewith at page 66 |
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 of the Exchange Act). |
|
Filed herewith at page 67 |
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 of the Exchange Act). |
|
Filed herewith at page 68 |
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
|
Certifications pursuant Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350). |
|
Filed herewith at page 69 |
Pursuant to provisions of Item 601(b)(A)(iii)(a) of Regulation S-K, copies of instruments defining the rights of holders of long-term debt of the Company are not being filed and in lieu thereof, Company agrees to furnish copies thereof to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.
65