The Company completed its annual impairment test of goodwill on each of its reporting units during the fourth quarters of 2003 and 2002. As the carrying value of goodwill for each of the Company's reporting units as of October 25, 2003 and as of October 26, 2002 was less than their respective fair values, goodwill was not considered to be impaired. Fair value was determined using the same methodology employed during the initial application of SFAS No. 142.
     During February 2003, the Company acquired an additional 30% and 20% interest in its commercial and manufacturing joint ventures, respectively, located in Korea. This increased the Company's interest in the commercial and manufacturing joint ventures to 80% and 100%, respectively. The purchase price of $6.2 was first allocated to identifiable assets and liabilities based upon their respective fair values. The excess of the purchase price over the value of the identified assets and liabilities has been recorded as goodwill and is reflected in the table below.
     The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the year ended December 27, 2003 and the quarter ended March 27, 2004, are as follows:

The components of intangible assets as of March 27, 2004 and December 27, 2003 are as follows:

     Amortization expense of intangibles was $6.2 for the quarter ended March 27, 2004 and $6.5 for the same period in 2003. Estimated amortization expense of intangibles presently owned by the Company for each of the next five succeeding fiscal years is as follows:

The Company's benefit plans, which in the aggregate cover substantially all U.S. employees and employees in certain other countries, consist of defined benefit pension plans, defined contribution plans and a participatory defined benefit postretirement plan. The following table provides the components of net periodic benefit cost for the Company's defined benefit pension plans and postretirement benefit plan for the quarters ended March 27, 2004 and March 29, 2003:

     The 2003 curtailment and settlement losses in Pension Benefit Plans related to making lump-sum payments to the participants of one of the Company's non-U.S. plans which is expected to have a final settlement in 2006.

The costs associated with the Company's defined contribution plans totaled $3.8 and $3.2 for the quarters ended March 27, 2004 and March 29, 2003, respectively.

In April 2003, the Company advanced $9.3 to Control Delivery Systems (CDS), a partner in the development of implant technology for treating retinal and other back-of-the-eye diseases in which the Company has an equity interest. Such advances have been recoverable through the Company's ability to apply such amounts to future obligations due under an arrangement with CDS to provide research and development activities as to certain technologies; the achievement of certain milestones such as the completion of clinical testing, NDA filings, and FDA approvals; royalty payments; or through cash repayment by CDS. In May 2003, the Company and CDS announced a delay of up to three years in the regulatory filing for the DME indication for its proposed Retisert implant. The primary reason for the delay was the FDA's indication that it would require additional safety data before considering an application for approval for this indication. As a result, the Company reevaluated its role in the on-going development and approval process and decided to conduct and supervise directly the day-to-day development and clinical activities, after a brief transition period.
     The Company now primarily bases the recoverability of the funds advanced on the future milestones and royalties or repayment by CDS, as CDS is no longer performing research and development activity on the Company's behalf. The achievement of the milestones giving rise to the Company's payment obligations and the eventual commercialization of the product are not completely controllable by the Company and are subject to the ordinary risks associated with the development and approval of any FDA controlled product. Therefore, the Company recorded a $4.1 reserve in the second quarter of 2003 to reflect this uncertainty. During the fourth quarter of 2003, the Company renegotiated its arrangement with CDS to formalize the change in the on-going development and approval process described above and as a result received $4.0 from CDS. There were no changes in the Company's relationship or arrangement with CDS during the first quarter of 2004.

Lines of Credit The Company guarantees indebtedness of its subsidiaries under lines of credit used for working capital. Availability under such lines of credit totaled approximately $50.8 and $51.3 at March 27, 2004 and December 27, 2003, respectively. There were no outstanding balances at March 27, 2004 and December 27, 2003.

Letters of Credit The Company had outstanding standby letters of credit totaling approximately $20.2 and $20.4 at March 27, 2004 and December 27, 2003, respectively, to ensure payment of possible workers' compensation, product liability and other insurance claims. At March 27, 2004 and December 27, 2003, the Company had recorded liabilities of approximately $13.3 and $11.1, respectively, as it relates to workers' compensation, product liability and property insurance claims.

Tax Indemnifications In connection with divestitures, the Company has agreed to indemnify certain tax obligations arising out of tax audits or administrative or court proceedings relating to tax returns for any periods ending on or prior to the closing date of the respective divestiture. The Company believes that any claim would not have a material impact on the Company's financial position and, therefore, has not recorded any liabilities associated with these claims.

Environmental Indemnifications The Company has certain obligations for environmental remediation and Superfund matters related to current and former company sites. There have been no material changes to estimated future remediation costs as reflected in the Notes to Financial Statements in the Company's 2003 Form 10-K. The Company does not believe that its financial position, results of operations, and cash flows are likely to be materially affected by environmental liabilities.

Other Commitments and Contingencies The Company is involved in lawsuits, claims, investigations and proceedings, including patent, trademark, commercial and environmental matters, which are being handled and defended in the ordinary course of business as described in Note 15 - Other Matters.

Deferred Service Revenue Service revenues are derived from service contracts on surgical equipment sold to customers and are recognized over the term of the contracts while costs are recognized as incurred. Changes in the Company's deferred service revenue for the year ended December 27, 2003 and the quarter ended March 27, 2004 were as follows:

In accordance with SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, the Company records all derivative instruments on the balance sheet at their respective fair values. Changes in the fair value of derivatives are recorded each period in current income or other comprehensive income, depending on their designation as a hedge of a particular exposure.
     For instruments designated as either fair value or cash flow hedges, net interest expense of $0.2 was recognized for hedge ineffectiveness for the quarter ended March 29, 2003. Hedge ineffectiveness had no impact on net income for the quarter ended March 27, 2004.

Fair Value Hedges In August 2003, the Company issued $210.0 in concurrent offerings of notes and convertible notes. The first was a $50.0 public offering of five-year fixed-rate senior notes with a coupon rate of 5.90%. The Company simultaneously executed an interest rate swap with a notional amount of $50.0 converting the notes to a variable rate. This swap is designated as a fair value hedge and was outstanding at March 27, 2004 and at December 27, 2003. The second offering was a $160.0 placement of variable-rate convertible senior notes due in 2023, containing two embedded derivatives, a bond parity clause and a contingent interest provision. The embedded derivatives had a $0.0 fair value at March 27, 2004 and at December 27, 2003.

Cash Flow Hedges For cash flow hedge transactions, reclassifications from other comprehensive income into income were a $0.5 and $0.4 net loss for the quarters ended March 27, 2004 and March 29, 2003, respectively. As of March 27, 2004 an estimated $3.1 pre-tax net loss was expected to be reclassified into income over the next twelve months.
     In May 2002, the Company entered into a $200.0 notional amount cash flow hedge which was designated as a hedge of ten semi-annual interest payments based on the benchmark interest rate related to changes in the five-year U.S. Treasury rate in connection with the Company's forecasted debt offering of $200.0. During the fourth quarter of 2002, the hedging instrument was extended and re-designated to hedge the benchmark interest rate associated with the ten semi-annual interest payments on the forecasted borrowing. On November 18, 2002, the Company issued $150.0 of fixed-rate debt and the amount associated with the cash flow hedge was recorded to other comprehensive income and is being amortized to interest expense in the period in which interest expense related to the hedged debt is recognized. The remaining $50.0 of the cash flow hedge was re-designated to hedge the benchmark interest rate associated with the ten semi-annual interest payments on future forecasted borrowings and was settled during the first quarter of 2003. Simultaneous with the hedge settlement, the Company entered into a new $50.0 cash flow hedge, which was designated to hedge the benchmark interest rate associated with ten semi-annual interest payments on future forecasted borrowings. This $50.0 cash flow hedge was settled in July 2003 in conjunction with the Company's $50.0 public offering of five-year fixed-rate senior notes. The amount associated with the 2003 settlements was recorded to other comprehensive income and is being amortized to interest expense in the period in which interest expense related to the hedged debt is recognized.
     At March 27, 2004 and at March 29, 2003, the Company had designated foreign currency cash flow hedges with a total notional amount of $46.8 and $367.5, respectively. The decline in the contracts occurred in the third quarter of 2003 primarily due to the Company's decision to permanently invest an intercompany loan in its Europe region. This permanent investment eliminated the ongoing exposure of principal and interest payments to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates and therefore the need to hedge such exposure.

Net Investment Hedges For derivatives designated as hedging instruments to hedge foreign currency exposures of net investments in non-U.S. subsidiaries, a net after-tax gain of $0.9 and a net after-tax loss of $1.8 were included in the cumulative translation adjustment in the quarters ended March 27, 2004 and March 29, 2003, respectively. At March 27, 2004 and at December 27, 2003, the Company had designated foreign denominated intercompany loans with notional amounts of $179.4 and $180.8, respectively, as hedges of net investments in non-U.S. subsidiaries.

During 2001, the Company's Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to 2,000,000 shares of the Company's Common stock. The Company executed an agreement with a financial institution for the future purchase of such shares through one or more forward purchase transactions. Such purchases, which may have had settlement dates as long as two years, could have been settled, at the Company's election, on a physical share, net cash or net share basis. As of December 28, 2002, the Company had entered into forward purchases covering 750,000 shares. During March 2003, at the expiration of the forward purchase agreement, the Company paid $30.7 for the 750,000 shares, at an average price of $40.89 to settle its obligation. This repurchase of Common stock was recorded as treasury stock in the Company's consolidated financial statements during the quarter ended March 29, 2003.

The Company has granted stock options to its officers and non-employee directors under several stock-based compensation plans, with employee grants typically vesting ratably over three years and expiring ten years from the date of grant. Vesting is contingent upon a continued employment relationship with the Company. The Company also issues restricted stock awards to officers and other key personnel. These awards have vesting periods up to seven years with vesting criteria based on the attainment of specific performance goals such as average sales and cumulative earnings per share targets and based on continued employment until applicable vesting dates. Director option grants are made pursuant to a formula, and are vested immediately. The Company measures stock-based compensation for option grants under the provisions of Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. Accordingly, given the fixed nature of the equity instruments granted under such plans, no compensation cost has been recognized other than for restricted stock awards. Compensation expense for restricted stock grants is recorded based on applicable vesting criteria, and for those awards with performance goals as such goals are met. The Company's net income and earnings per share would have been reduced to the pro forma amounts shown in the periods below if compensation cost had been determined based on the fair value at the grant dates using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model in accordance with SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation:

A shareholder lawsuit, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of New York on April 13, 2001, is pending against the Company, and its Chief Financial Officer, Stephen C. McCluski, and former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, William M. Carpenter, and former President, Carl E. Sassano. All direct claims against Mr. McCluski have been dismissed by the Court. Additionally, certain claims against the Company and certain direct claims against Messrs. Carpenter and Sassano have been dismissed. In the plaintiffs' remaining direct and secondary claims it is alleged that the value of the Company's stock was inflated artificially by alleged false and misleading statements about expected financial results. The plaintiffs seek to represent a class of shareholders who purchased company Common stock between January 27, 2000 and August 24, 2000. On October 15, 2001, the April 13, 2001 matter was consolidated with other matters raising similar claims. The Company intends to continue defending itself vigorously against these claims. The Company cannot at this time estimate with any certainty the impact of the remaining claims on its financial position.
     The Company and its subsidiaries have been involved in several patent proceedings relating to silicone hydrogel contact lens technology, including its PureVision contact lens product line. Five of these proceedings were commenced by CIBA Vision Corporation (CIBA) and CIBA's parent company, Novartis AG (Novartis), in each case alleging that the PureVision lens product infringes CIBA's and Novartis' intellectual property. The first of these lawsuits was filed on March 8, 1999 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, followed by other lawsuits commenced in the Federal Court of Melbourne, Australia (filed on February 29, 2000), the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware (filed on May 3, 2001), the Administrative Court of Duesseldorf, Germany (filed on September 7, 2001) and the High Court in Dublin, Ireland (filed on March 11, 2003). A ruling in the Delaware matter has resulted in the Company discontinuing sale of its PureVision lenses in the U.S. until April 27, 2005. The Georgia matter involves additional CIBA U.S. patents, which expire in 2014. The trial in this matter ended on April 28, 2004. The trial in the Australia matter occurred in 2003 and a decision is expected during the first half of 2004. On September 17, 2003, the European Patent Office ruled that the Novartis patent at issue in the German and Irish suits is invalid. As a result, the parties have agreed to stay action on an earlier patent infringement ruling by the German court and the Company has resumed the sale of PureVision contact lenses in Germany. The parties have also agreed to stay the Irish proceeding as a result of the European Patent Office ruling. Novartis has appealed the European Patent Office decision. Additionally, the Company has requested that the German Patent Office cancel Novartis' German Utility Model Registration. The Company cannot at this time estimate with any certainty the impact on its financial position of the pending lawsuits described above. The Company intends to defend itself vigorously against all claims asserted by CIBA and Novartis.
     The Company has filed three related proceedings against CIBA pertaining to CIBA's Night & Day product line. Specifically, on November 6, 2001, the Company filed a patent infringement lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of New York under a patent the Company holds for hydrogel materials. CIBA has filed two motions for summary judgment in this action. The Court has heard argument on one motion and has reserved decision. The second motion has been briefed by the parties, but a motion hearing date has not been established. The Company has commenced two additional patent infringement lawsuits in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of New York. The first, commenced on July 22, 2003, relates to an additional patent the Company holds for hydrogel materials. The second, commenced on November 6, 2003, is under a manufacturing process patent held by the Company. The Company intends to pursue vigorously its claims against CIBA in these actions. The Company cannot at this time estimate with any certainty the impact on its financial position of the lawsuits filed by the Company against CIBA.
     The Company is engaged in various lawsuits, claims, investigations and proceedings including patent, trademark, commercial and environmental matters that are in the ordinary course of business. The Company cannot at this time estimate with any certainty the impact of such matters on its financial position.

Europe
Net sales during the first quarter of 2004 in the Europe segment increased to $201, an 18% increase over the same quarter in 2003. Excluding the impact of currency, net sales increased 2%. The segment experienced gains in contact lens, pharmaceuticals, cataract and vitreoretinal, and refractive net sales on a constant-currency basis. These gains were partially offset by a decline in the lens care product category.
     Contact Lens -Contact lens net sales in the Europe region rose 17% in actual dollars or 1% in constant currency compared to the prior-year first quarter, on the strength of the Company's core products. As in the Americas, growth was mainly due to the Company's SofLens66 Toric and SofLens Multi-Focal contact lenses. SofLens66 Toric lenses command a share of more than 40% of the toric market in the region. SofLens Multi-Focal lenses continue to receive very positive support from doctors and patients in Europe, with a share of close to 40% in less than a year on the market.
     Lens Care - In Europe, lens care product net sales increased 13% in the first quarter of 2004 over the same quarter in 2003, but declined 1% in constant currency, largely reflecting market trends. The Company has maintained its market leadership position in multi-purpose solutions in the region with a share of close to 40%.
     Pharmaceuticals - Pharmaceutical net sales for the Europe segment increased 18% for the quarter in actual dollars but were essentially flat with the prior-year quarter on a constant-currency basis. Sales of nutritional supplements increased significantly during the quarter, reflecting geographic expansion of the Company's lines of ocular vitamins as well as incremental sales from Retinat, a product targeting age-related macular degeneration (AMD) that contains Omega-3 fatty acids. These positive factors were essentially offset by the impact of recent pharmaceuticals pricing legislation in Germany, which has led to a dramatic decline in prescription activity and patient reimbursement levels resulting in downward pressure on sales.
     Cataract and Vitreoretinal - European cataract and vitreoretinal net sales posted increases of 20% and 5% in the quarter in actual dollars and on a constant-currency basis, respectively. Higher sales of phaco disposables and SofPort and Akreos IOLs were somewhat offset by declines for PMMA and other foldable IOLs.
     Refractive - Refractive sales in the Europe region grew 37% in the first quarter of 2004, 22% in constant currency, compared to the same 2003 quarter. Growth was due to higher laser revenues driven by continued demand for the Company's Technolas z100 laser, as well as Zyoptix system upgrades and per-procedure cards and diagnostic equipment. These increases more than offset lower revenues from service and microkeratome blades.

Interest and investment income totaled $4 for the quarter ended March 27, 2004, an increase of $2 compared to the same period in 2003. The 2004 period reflected an increase in mark-to-market gains on assets held by the Company for its nonqualified deferred compensation plan. These gains partially offset higher performance-based compensation expense included in the Company's 2004 first-quarter selling, administrative and general expenses.
     Interest expense of $12 for the quarter ended March 27, 2004 decreased $3 compared to the first quarter of 2003. During the third quarter of 2003, the Company repaid $201 of notes and replaced them with new debt. The 2004 first quarter savings was primarily associated with lower interest on this new debt issuance.
     Foreign currency net income of $1 was recognized during the first quarter ended March 27, 2004, compared to a foreign currency net loss of $2 in the same prior-year period. Higher foreign currency transaction gains contributed to the 2004 results.

Cash provided by operating activities was $19 and $30 through the first quarters of 2004 and 2003, respectively. The decrease in operating cash flow reflected the timing of vendor payments and an increase in cash payments for income taxes. Days sales outstanding (DSO) at the end of the 2004 first quarter was 81 days, the same as at the end of the comparable period in 2003. DSO was representative of the quality of the Company's accounts receivable and continued focus on asset management.

Cash used in investing activities of $19 for the first three months of 2004 primarily represented capital expenditures. During the same 2003 period, cash used in investing activities of $24 was largely attributable to capital spending of $15 and the acquisition of additional interests in the Company's Korean commercial and manufacturing joint ventures for $6 (as described in Note 6 - Accounting for Goodwill and Intangibles).

Through the first three months of 2004, there was a net cash flow use of $1 from financing activities. The 2004 period outflows consisted of $18 to repurchase 300,000 shares of the Company's Common stock at an average price of $59.46 per share (see Part II - Other Information, Item 2. Changes in Securities), $1 in net repayments of debt and $7 for dividends paid. The recent appreciation in the Company's stock price resulted in cash inflows of $25 from the exercise of stock options. During the first three months of 2003, cash used in financing activities of $43 consisted of a $31 payment in settlement of forward equity contracts as described in Note 12 - Forward Equity Contracts, $5 in repayments of debt and net repayments of notes payable and $7 for dividends paid.

The Company's total debt, consisting of short- and long-term borrowings, was $845 at the end of the first quarter of 2004, down $2 from year-end 2003 and higher than the March 2003 amount by $7. The ratio of total debt to capital was 40.7% at the end of the first quarter of 2004, 41.3% at the end of 2003, and 45.5% at the end of March 2003.
     Cash and cash equivalents totaled $561 and $431 at the end of the first quarters of 2004 and 2003, respectively, and $563 at the end of 2003.

Prior to 2003, the Company had entered into two arrangements with Variable Interest Entities (VIEs) to engage in research, development and commercialization of certain technologies. VIEs are described in Note 14 - New Accounting Guidance (FASB Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an Interpretation of ARB No. 51). The Company has an equity interest of approximately 23%, valued at $0 on its balance sheet, in a VIE that results from a strategic partnering arrangement entered into during 1999 that involves implant technology for treating retinal and other back-of-the-eye diseases. Under the original agreement, the Company remitted payments to the strategic partner for R&D activities and the achievement of certain milestones such as completion of clinical testing, NDA filings and FDA approvals. As described in Note 9 - Related Party Transaction, an anticipated delay of up to three years in U.S. regulatory filings for the Retisert drug delivery product for the diabetic macular edema indication was announced in May 2003. The Company indicated that this delay resulted in a reevaluation of its role in the ongoing development and approval process, and it had decided to conduct and supervise directly the day-to-day development and clinical activities. During the fourth quarter of 2003, the Company renegotiated its arrangement to formalize this change.
     The other arrangement consists of an equity investment of $0.2 as of March 27, 2004 and December 27, 2003 recorded as an other long-term asset, in connection with a licensing agreement signed during 2002 to develop treatments for ocular infections. During the quarter ended June 28, 2003, the Company recorded an other-than-temporary impairment charge of $1.8 based on negative earnings and cash flow trends of the licensor, and inconclusive efforts by the licensor to secure interim financing. The licensing agreement and $4 of preferred stock was cancelled in December 2003 in conjunction with the Company's decision to invest in and internally develop this ocular infection technology, which is in its early stages. As such, the Company is no longer required to remit payments to the licensor originally due upon the achievement of certain milestones.
     As a result of the renegotiation and license cancellation described above, future payments to the VIEs for R&D activities and milestone achievements over the next five years are estimated to be immaterial.
     The Company has obligations under certain guarantees, letters of credit, indemnifications and other contracts that contingently require the Company to make payments to guaranteed parties upon the occurrence of specified events. The Company believes the likelihood is remote that material payments will be required under theses contingencies, and that they do not pose potential risk to the Company's future liquidity, capital resources and results of operations. See Note 10 - Commitments and Contingencies for further descriptions and discussions regarding the Company's obligations.

Information Concerning Forward-Looking Statements Forward-looking statements include statements concerning plans, objectives, goals, projections, strategies, future events or performance, and underlying assumptions and other statements which are other than statements of historical facts. When used in this discussion, the words "anticipate", "appears", "foresee", "should", "expect", "estimate", "project", "will", "are likely" and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements contained in this report under the heading Outlook and elsewhere are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements involve predictions of future Company performance, and are thus dependent on a number of factors, which may affect the Company's performance. Where possible, specific factors that may impact performance materially have been identified in connection with specific forward-looking statements. Additional risks and uncertainties include, without limitation, general global and local economic, political and sociological conditions including, without limitation, periods of localized disease outbreak such as the SARS epidemic, and changes in such conditions, the impact of competition, seasonality and general economic conditions in the global lens and lens care, ophthalmic cataract and refractive and pharmaceutical markets where the Company's businesses compete, effects of war or terrorism, changing currency exchange rates, the general political climate existing between and within countries throughout the world, events affecting the ability of the Company to timely deliver its products to customers, including those which affect the Company's carriers' ability to perform delivery services, changing trends in practitioner and consumer preferences and tastes, changes in technology, medical developments relating to the use of the Company's products, legal proceedings initiated by or against the Company, including those related to patents and other intellectual property in the U.S. and throughout the world, the impact of Company performance on its financing costs, changes in government regulation of the Company's products and operations, changes in governmental laws and regulations relating to the import and export of products, government pricing changes and initiatives with respect to healthcare products in the U.S. and throughout the world, changes in private and regulatory schemes providing for the reimbursement of patient medical expenses, changes in the Company's credit ratings, or the cost of access to sources of liquidity, the Company's ability to maintain positive relationships with third party financing resources, the financial well-being and commercial success of key customers, development partners, and suppliers, changes in the availability of and other aspects surrounding the supply of raw materials used in the manufacture of the Company's products, changes in tax rates or policies or in rates of inflation, changes in accounting principles and the application of such principles to the Company, the performance by third parties upon whom the Company relies for the provision of goods or services, the ability of the Company to successfully execute marketing strategies, the ability of the Company to secure and maintain intellectual property protections, including patent rights, with respect to key technologies in the U.S. and throughout the world, the ability of the Company to secure and maintain copyright protections relative to its customer-valued names, trademarks, trade names and other designations in the U.S. and throughout the world, difficulties or delays in the development, laboratory and clinical testing, regulatory approval, manufacturing, release or marketing of products, the successful completion and integration of acquisitions by the Company, the successful relocation of certain manufacturing processes, the continued successful implementation of efforts in managing and reducing costs and expenses, the successful introduction and implementation of the Company's enterprise-wide information technology initiatives, including the corresponding impact on internal controls and reporting, the continued successful execution of the Company's profitability improvement plans, the effect of changes within the Company's organization, including the selection and development of the Company's management team and such other factors as are described in greater detail in the Company's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including, without limitation, its 2003 Report on Form 10-K and the Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 14, 2002.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures - As of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company's Chairman and Chief Executive Officer along with the Company's Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"). Based on such evaluation, the Company's Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and the Company's Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that as of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company's disclosure controls and procedures were effective in timely alerting them to material information relating to the Company (including its consolidated subsidiaries) required to be included in the Company's periodic filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Changes in Internal Controls - There were no changes in the Company's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company's most recently completed fiscal quarter that materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting.