First Farmers Form 10-Q

 

 

 

 

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C.  20549

 

FORM 10-Q

(Mark one)

[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2014.

or

[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the transition period from _______________ to _______________________

 

Commission File Numbers: 000-10972

 

First Farmers and Merchants Corporation

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

Tennessee

62-1148660

(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

 

 

816 South Garden Street

 

Columbia, Tennessee

38402-1148

(Address of principal executive offices) 

(Zip Code)

 

 

931-388-3145

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

 

 

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

             

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.               []Yes             [ X ] No

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  [X]Yes  [  ] No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer [    ]

Accelerated filer [ X ]

Non-accelerated filer [    ] (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) 

Smaller reporting company [    ]

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). [ ] Yes [X] No

 

As of May 5, 2014, the registrant had 4,981,999 shares of common stock outstanding.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

 


 

 

 

 

 

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 

 

Item 1. Financial Statements.

 

 

The following unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of the Registrant are included in this Report:

 

Condensed consolidated balance sheets – March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013.

 

Condensed consolidated statements of income - For the three months ended March 31, 2014 and March 31, 2013.

 

Condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive income - For the three months ended March 31, 2014 and March 31, 2013.

 

Condensed consolidated statements of cash flows - For the three months ended March 31, 2014 and March 31, 2013.

 

Selected notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

FIRST FARMERS AND MERCHANTS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

March 31,

December 31,

2014

2013

 

(Dollars in Thousands Except Share and Per Share Data)

(unaudited)

 

(1)

ASSETS

Cash and due from banks

 $

27,056 

 $

20,391 

Interest-bearing deposits

27,539 

25,167 

Federal funds sold

14,400 

9,850 

              Total cash and cash equivalents

68,995 

55,408 

Securities:

Available-for-sale (amortized cost $351,800

and $346,892 as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively)

339,504 

329,714 

Held-to-maturity (fair market value $27,583

and $28,595 as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively)

26,912 

27,839 

          Total securities

366,416 

357,553 

Loans, net of deferred fees

620,457 

606,766 

     Allowance for loan and lease losses

(8,621)

(8,595)

          Net loans

611,836 

598,171 

Bank premises and equipment, net

24,767 

24,868 

Other real estate owned

1,062 

1,438 

Bank owned life insurance

26,153 

25,867 

Goodwill

9,018 

9,018 

Deferred tax asset

             9,016

10,905 

Other assets

10,902 

10,605 

 

          TOTAL ASSETS

 $

1,128,165 

 

 $

1,093,833 

LIABILITIES

Deposits

     Noninterest-bearing

 $

186,110 

 $

179,823 

     Interest-bearing

800,064 

777,514 

          Total deposits

986,174 

957,337 

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase

20,060 

18,095 

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

14,941 

15,728 

 

           TOTAL LIABILITIES

1,021,175 

 

991,160 

SHAREHOLDERS'

Common stock - $10 par value per share, 8,000,000 shares

EQUITY

        authorized; 4,981,999 and 5,021,012 shares issued

        and outstanding as of  March 31, 2014 and

        December 31, 2013, respectively

49,820 

50,210 

Retained earnings

63,045 

61,369 

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

(5,970)

(9,001)

TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY BEFORE NONCONTROLLING INTEREST - PREFERRED STOCK OF SUBSIDIARY

106,895 

102,578 

Noncontrolling interest - preferred stock of subsidiary

95 

95 

TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY

106,990 

102,673 

        TOTAL LIABILITIES AND

 

           SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY

 $

1,128,165 

 

 $

1,093,833 

(1) Derived from audited financial statements.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

 

 

 

3

 

 


 

 

 

FIRST FARMERS AND MERCHANTS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

Three Months Ended March 31,

 

(Unaudited) (Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)

2014

2013

INTEREST AND

Interest and fees on loans

 $

6,936 

$                 6,962 

DIVIDEND

Income on investment securities

INCOME

     Taxable interest

1,354 

1,437 

     Exempt from federal income tax

679 

746 

     Dividends

73 

78 

 

          Total interest income

9,042 

9,223 

INTEREST

Interest on deposits

604 

735 

EXPENSE

Interest on other borrowings

16 

99 

          Total interest expense

620 

834 

Net interest income

8,422 

8,389 

Provision for loan and lease losses

 

Net interest income after provision

8,422 

8,389 

NONINTEREST

     Gain on loans sold

36 

179 

INCOME

     Trust department income

670 

596 

 

     Service fees on deposit accounts

1,520 

1,565 

     Brokerage fees

104 

107 

     Earnings on bank owned life insurance

111 

87 

     Gain on sale of securities

45 

823 

     Gain (loss) on foreclosed property

(139)

     Other noninterest income

159 

111 

 

          Total noninterest income

2,651 

3,329 

NONINTEREST

Salaries and employee benefits

4,521 

4,472 

EXPENSE

Net occupancy expense

467 

523 

Depreciation expense

360 

380 

Data processing expense

588 

544 

Legal and professional fees

228 

183 

Stationary and office supplies

70 

74 

Advertising and promotions

328 

253 

FDIC insurance premium expense

129 

186 

Other real estate expense

21 

Other noninterest expense

1,400 

1,469 

          Total noninterest expenses

8,098 

8,105 

Income before provision for income taxes

2,975 

3,613 

 

Provision for income taxes

713 

557 

Net income before noncontrolling interest - dividends on preferred stock of subsidiary

2,262 

3,056 

Noncontrolling interest-dividends on preferred stock subsidiary

 

                                 Net income for common shareholders

 $

2,262 

 $

3,056 

PER SHARE

Weighted Average Shares Outstanding

5,017,789 

5,178,759 

 

 

 $

0.45 

 $

0.59 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

 

 

4

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

FIRST FARMERS AND MERCHANTS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(unaudited) dollars in thousands

Three Months Ended

 

March 31,

 

2014

2013

 

 

Net Income

 $          

2,262

 $          

3,056

 

 

Comprehensive Loss

 

Unrealized depreciation on available-for-sale securities, net of taxes of $1,897 and $1,020 for 2014 and 2013, respectively

              3,030

           (1,629)

 

Less:  reclassification adjustment for realized gain included in net income, net of taxes of $17 and $317, for 2014 and 2013, respectively

                  (28)

              (506)

 

Change in unfunded portion of postretirement benefit obligations, net of taxes of  $18, $29 , for 2014 and 2013 respectively

                    29

                (47)

 

 

 

 

Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

              3,031

           (2,182)

 

 

Comprehensive Income (Loss)

              5,293

                874

 

Less:  comprehensive income attributable to the noncontrolling interest

                     -  

                   -  

 

Total Comprehensive Income

 $           

5,293

 $          

   874

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5

 


 

FIRST FARMERS AND MERCHANTS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(unaudited)

(Dollars in Thousands)

 

Three Months Ended March 31,

 

 

2014

2013

OPERATING

Net income available for common shareholders

 $

2,262

 $

3,056

ACTIVITIES

   Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided

   by (used in) operating activities:

       Provision for loan losses

-

       Provision for depreciation and amortization of

       premises and equipment

360 380

       Deferred tax expense

(67) (212)

       Net securities gains

(45) (823)

       Gains on loans sold

(36) (179)

       Proceeds from sale of mortgage loans held for sale

1,217 10,156

       Funding of mortgage loans held for sale

(1,109) (10,301)

      (Gain) loss on other real estate owned

(6) 139

      Gain on sale of assets

- 16

      Amortization of investment security premiums,

   

       net of accretion of discounts

247 339

     Increase in cash surrender value of life insurance contracts

(111) (87)

     (Increase) decrease in:

   

       Other assets

(311) (492)

     Increase (decrease) in:

   

       Other liabilities

1,124 (676)

               Total adjustments

1,263 (1,740)

 

               Net cash provided by operating activities

3.525 1,316

INVESTING

Proceeds from sales of available-for-sale securities

754 72,447

ACTIVITIES

Proceeds from maturities and calls of available-for-sale securities

8,514 16,629

Proceeds from maturities and calls of held-to-maturity securities

925 765

Purchases of investment securities

   

      available-for-sale

(14,376) (129,012)

Net (increase) decrease in loans

(13,665) (4,765)
  Purchase of bank owned life insurance (175) -

Proceeds from sale of other real estate owned

376 287
  Proceeds from sale of assets - (486)

Purchases of premises and equipment

(259) (57)

 

               Net cash used in investing activities

(17,906) (44,192)

FINANCING

Net increase in deposits

28,837 30,655

ACTIVITIES

Net increase (decrease) in securities sold under agreements to repurchase

1,965 1,698

Payments to FHLB borrowings

- (7,000)

Repurchase of common stock

(976) (1,028)

Cash dividends paid on common stock

(1,858) -

 

               Net cash provided by financing activities

27,968 24,325

Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

13,587 (18,551)

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

55,408 70,396

 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

 $

68,995

 $

51,845

Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information

Cash paid during the period for:expenses

       Interest on deposits and borrowed funds

 $

693 

 $

780

       Income taxes

137

(201)

Loans to facilitate sale of other real estate owned

- 1,760

 

Real estate acquired in settlement of loans

- 42

     The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

 

 

 

 

 

6

        

 


 

 

 

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

 

NOTE 1 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

 

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments that are, in the opinion of management of First Farmers and Merchants Corporation (the “Corporation”), necessary to fairly present the financial position, results of operations and cash flows of the Corporation.  Those adjustments consist only of normal recurring adjustments.

           

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements are presented in accordance with the requirements of Form 10-Q and consequently do not include all of the disclosures normally required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America or those normally made in the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K.  Accordingly, the reader of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q should refer to the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 for further information in this regard.  The condensed consolidated balance sheet of the Corporation as of December 31, 2013 has been derived from the audited consolidated balance sheet of the Corporation as of that date.  The results of operations for the period are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.

 

Reclassifications:  Certain reclassifications considered to be immaterial have been made in the prior year condensed consolidated financial statements to conform to current year presentation.  These reclassifications had no effect on net income.

 

NOTE 2 –ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (“AOCI”) BY COMPONENT

 

            Amounts reclassified from AOCI and the affected line items in the statements of income during the periods ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, were as follows (dollars in thousands):

 

Amounts Reclassified from AOCI

Affected Line Item in the

March 31, 2014

March 31, 2013

Statements of Income

Unrealized gains  on available-for-sale securities

 $

45 

 $

823 

Realized gain on sale of securities

45 

823 

Total reclassified amount before tax and noncontrolling interest

(17)

(317)

Tax expense

 $

28 

 $

506 

Net reclassified amount  

Amortization of defined benefit pension items

   Actuarial losses

$

  (47)

$

(47)

                         (47)

(47)

Total reclassified amount before tax

18 

Tax benefit

 $

                    (29)

 $

(47)

Net reclassified amount  

Total reclassifications out of AOCI

 $

        (1)

 $

459 

 

               

 

 

 

7

 

 


 

 

 

 

                The components of accumulated other comprehensive income, included in shareholder’s equity, are as follows (dollars in thousands):

March 31, 2014

December 31, 2013

Net unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities

 $

(12,296)

(17,178)

Net actuarial gain on unfunded portion of postretirement benefit obligation

2,588 

2,542 

(9,708)

(14,636)

Tax effect

3,738 

5,635 

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

 $

(5,970)

 $

(9,001)

 

 

NOTE 3 – FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

 

The fair value of an asset or liability is the price that would be received to sell that asset or paid to transfer that liability in an orderly transaction occurring in the principal market (or most advantageous market in the absence of a principal market) for such asset or liability. Fair value measurement must maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs.  In estimating fair value, the Corporation utilizes valuation techniques that are consistent with the market approach, the income approach and/or the cost approach. Such valuation techniques are consistently applied. Inputs to valuation techniques include the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” (“ASC Topic 820”) establishes a fair value hierarchy for valuation inputs that gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. The fair value hierarchy is as follows:

 

 

 

 

Transfers between levels of the fair value hierarchy are recognized on the actual date of the event or circumstances that caused the transfer, which generally coincides with the Corporation’s monthly and/or quarterly valuation process.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8

 

 


 

 

 

 

The following table summarizes financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, and by the level within the fair value hierarchy utilized to measure fair value (dollars in thousands):

 

 

 

Assets  measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of March 31, 2014

Available-For-Sale Securities

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Total

    U.S. Government agencies

 $

-

 $

109,467

 $

 -

 $

109,467

    U.S. government sponsored agency mortgage backed securities

                       -

             165,986

                          -

          165,986

    States and political subdivisions

                       -

               44,360

                          -

            44,360

    Corporate bonds

                       -

               19,691

                          -

            19,691

    Total assets at fair value

 $

 -

 $

339,504

 $

-

 $

339,504

Assets  measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2013

Available-For-Sale Securities

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Total

    U.S. Government agencies

 $

-

 $

105,072

 $

-

 $

105,072

    U.S. government sponsored agency mortgage backed securities

                       -

             157,423

                          -

          157,423

    States and political subdivisions

                       -

               46,337

                          -

            46,337

    Corporate bonds

                       -

               20,882

                          -

            20,882

    Total assets at fair value

 $

-

 $

329,714

 $

 -

 $

329,714

 

 

Below is a description of the valuation methodologies and inputs used for assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis and recognized in the accompanying balance sheets, as well as the general classification of such assets pursuant to the valuation hierarchy.  There were no significant changes in the valuation techniques during the three months ended March 31, 2014. 

 

Available-for-Sale Securities

 

Where quoted market prices are available in an active market, securities are classified within Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy.  If quoted market prices are not available, the Corporation obtains fair value measurements from an independent pricing service, such as Interactive Data, which utilizes pricing models to determine fair value measurement.  The Corporation reviews the pricing quarterly to verify the reasonableness of the pricing.  The fair value measurements consider observable data that may include dealer quotes, market spreads, cash flows, the U.S. Treasury yield curve, live trading levels, trade execution data, market consensus prepayment speeds, credit information and the bond’s terms and conditions, among other factors.  U.S. government agencies, state and political subdivisions, U.S. government sponsored agency mortgage-backed securities and corporate bonds are classified as Level 2 inputs.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

9

 

 


 

 

 

 

Nonrecurring Measurements

 

The following table summarizes financial assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, by the level within the fair value hierarchy utilized to measure fair value (dollars in thousands):

 

March 31, 2014

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Total

    Impaired loans (collateral-dependent)

 $

-

 $

-

 $

4,136

 $

3,507

    Other real estate owned

                 -

                 -

                 -

                 -

December 31, 2013

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Total

    Impaired loans (collateral-dependent)

 $

-

 $

-

 $

2,214

 $

2,214

    Other real estate owned

                 -

                 -

            208

            208

 

Impaired Loans (Collateral Dependent)

 

The estimated fair value of collateral-dependent impaired loans is based on the appraised fair value of the collateral, less estimated cost to sell.  Collateral-dependent impaired loans are classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.

 

The Corporation considers the appraisal or evaluation as the starting point for determining fair value and then considers other factors and events that may affect the fair value.  Appraisals of the collateral underlying collateral-dependent loans are obtained when the loan is determined to be collateral-dependent and subsequently as deemed necessary by the Chief Credit Officer.  Appraisals are reviewed for accuracy and consistency by the Chief Credit Officer.  Appraisers are selected from the list of approved appraisers maintained by management.  The appraised values are reduced by discounts to consider lack of marketability and estimated cost to sell if repayment or satisfaction of the loan is dependent on the sale of the collateral.  These discounts and estimates are developed by the Chief Credit Officer by comparison to historical results.  Fair value adjustments for collateral-dependent impaired loans for each of the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 were $1,104 and $48, respectively, and $79 for the year ended December 31, 2013.

 

            Loans considered impaired under ASC 310-35, “Impairment of a Loan,” are loans for which, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Corporation will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement.  Impaired loans are subject to nonrecurring fair value adjustments to reflect (1) subsequent partial write-downs that are based on the observable market price or current appraised value of the collateral or (2) changes in the specific reserve.

 

Other Real Estate Owned

 

Other real estate owned (“OREO”) is initially recorded at fair value at the time of acquisition, as determined by independent appraisal or evaluation by the Corporation, less costs to sell when the real estate is acquired in settlement of loans.  Quarterly evaluations of OREO are performed to determine if there has been any subsequent decline in the value of OREO properties.  Estimated fair value of OREO is based on appraisals or evaluations, less costs to sell.  OREO is classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.  OREO assets are subject to nonrecurring fair value adjustments to reflect subsequent partial write-downs that are based on the observable market price or current appraised value of the collateral.  There were no fair value adjustments for OREO for the three months ended March 31, 2014.  Fair value adjustments for OREO for the three months ended March 31, 2013 were $250, and $395 for the year ended December 31, 2013.

            Appraisals of OREO are obtained when the real estate is acquired and subsequently as deemed necessary by the Chief Credit Officer.  Appraisals are required annually and reviewed for accuracy and consistency by the Chief Credit Officer.  The appraised values are reduced by discounts to consider lack of marketability and estimated cost to sell.  Appraisers are selected from the list of approved appraisers maintained by management.

 

10

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

Unobservable (Level 3) Inputs

 

The following table presents quantitative information about unobservable inputs used in nonrecurring Level 3 fair value measurements (dollars in thousands):

Fair Value at March 31, 2014

Valuation Technique(s)

Unobservable Input

Range (Weighted Average)

Impaired loans (collateral-dependent)

 $             4,136

 Market comparable properties

 Marketability discount

     5.0-37.0%
(35%)

Other real estate owned

 $                     -

 Market comparable properties

 Marketability discount

N/A

 

 

Fair Value at December 31, 2013

Valuation Technique(s)

Unobservable Input

Range (Weighted Average)

Impaired loans (collateral-dependent)

 $           2,414

 Market comparable properties

 Marketability discount

 5.0% - 10.0% (7%)

Other real estate/assets owned

 $              208

 Market comparable properties

 Marketability discount

 5.0% - 10.0% (7%)

 

            ASC Topic 825, “Financial Instruments,” requires disclosure of the fair value of financial assets and liabilities, including those financial assets and liabilities that are not measured and reported at fair value on a recurring basis or non-recurring basis.

 

            The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instruments for which it was practicable to estimate that value:

 

Cash and due from banks – The carrying amount approximates fair value.

 

Interest bearing deposits in other banks – The carrying amount approximates fair value.

 

Federal Home Loan Bank stock – The carrying value of Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) stock approximates fair value based on the redemption provisions of the FHLB.

 

Federal Reserve Bank stock – The carrying value of Federal Reserve Bank stock approximates fair value based on the redemption provisions of the Federal Reserve Bank.

 

Federal funds sold – The carrying amount approximates fair value.

 

Securities available for sale – The carrying amount approximates fair value.

 

Securities held-to-maturity – Fair values are based on quoted market prices, if available.  If a quoted price is not available, fair value is estimated using quoted prices for similar securities.  The fair value estimate is provided to management from a third party using modeling assumptions specific to each type of security that are reviewed and approved by management.  Quarterly sampling of fair values provided by additional third parties supplement the fair value review process.

 

Loans held for sale – The fair value is predetermined at origination based on sale price.

 

 

 11

 

 


 

 

 

 

Loans (net of the allowance for loan and leases losses) – The fair value of fixed rate loans and variable rate mortgage loans is estimated by discounting the future cash flows using current rates at which similar loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings and for the same remaining maturities.  For other variable rate loans, the carrying amount approximates fair value.

  

Accrued interest receivable – The carrying amount approximates fair value.

 

Deposits – The fair value of fixed maturity time deposits is estimated by discounting the future cash flows using the rates currently offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities.  For deposits including demand deposits, savings accounts, NOW accounts and certain money market accounts, the carrying value approximates fair value.

 

Repurchase agreements – The fair value is estimated by discounting future cash flows using current rates.

 

Advances from FHLB – The fair value of these fixed-maturity advances is estimated by discounting future cash flows using rates currently offered for advances of similar remaining maturities.

 

Accrued interest payable – The carrying amount approximates fair value.

 

Commitments to extend credit and letters of credit – The fair value of commitments to originate loans is estimated using the fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and the present creditworthiness of the counterparties.  For fixed-rate loan commitments, fair value also considers the difference between current levels of interest rates and the committed rates.  The fair values of letters of credit and lines of credit are based on fees currently charged for similar agreements or on the estimated cost to terminate or otherwise settle the obligations with the counterparties at the reporting date.  The fair values of these commitments are not material.

 

The following table presents estimated fair values of the Corporation’s financial instruments as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, and indicates the level within the fair value hierarchy of the valuation techniques (dollars in thousands):

 

 

 

Fair Value Measurements at March 31, 2014 Using

 

Carrying
Amount

Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical Assets (
Level 1)

Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs (Level 2)

Significant
Unobservable Inputs  
(Level 3)

Financial assets

      Cash and due from banks

 $

27,056 

 $

27,056 

 $

 $

      Interest-bearing deposits in other banks

27,539 

27,539 

      Federal funds sold

14,400 

14,400 

      Federal Home Loan Bank and Federal Reserve Bank stock

3,879 

                   -

3,879

      Securities available-for-sale

339,504 

339,504 

      Securities held-to-maturity

26,912 

27,583 

      Loans held for sale

249 

                        -

249

      Loans, net

611,836 

617,175 

      Accrued interest receivable

4,692 

4,692 

Financial liabilities

      Non-interest bearing deposits

186,110 

186,110 

     Interest bearing deposits

800,064 

-

                 801,042

      Repurchase agreements

20,060 

20,060 

      Accrued interest payable

590 

590 

Off-balance sheet credit related instruments:

      Commitments to extend credit

 

 

 

12

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2013 Using

 

Carrying
Amount

Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)

Significant
Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2)

Significant
Unobservable Inputs  
(Level 3)

Financial assets

      Cash and due from banks

 $

20,391 

 $

20,391 

 $

 $

      Interest-bearing deposits in other banks

25,167 

25,167 

      Federal funds sold

9,850 

9,850 

      Federal Home Loan Bank and Federal Reserve Bank stock

3,879 

                   - 

                             3,879

      Securities available-for-sale

329,714 

329,714 

      Securities held-to-maturity

27,839 

28,595 

      Loans held for sale

327 

                       - 

                             327

      Loans, net

598,171 

607,113 

      Accrued interest receivable

4,183 

4,183 

Financial liabilities

      Non-interest bearing deposits

179,823 

179,823 

     Interest bearing deposits

777,514 

-

                 779,224

      Repurchase agreements

18,095 

18,095 

      Accrued interest payable

663 

663 

Off-balance sheet credit related instruments:

      Commitments to extend credit

 

 

NOTE 4SECURITIES

 

            The amortized cost and estimated fair value of securities at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 were as follows (dollars in thousands):

Amortized

Gross Unrealized

Fair

March 31, 2014

Cost

Gains

Losses

Value

Available-for-sale securities

    U.S. Government agencies

 $

115,385

 $

-

 $

5,918

 $

109,467

    U.S. Government sponsored agency mortgage backed securities

        174,058

             52

          8,124

    165,986

    States and political subdivisions

          42,814

        1,626

               80

        44,360

    Corporate bonds

          19,543

           224

               76

        19,691

$

351,800

 $

 1,902

 $

14,198

 $

339,504

Held-to-maturity securities

       

    States and political subdivisions

 $

26,912

 $

671

 $

-

$

     27,583

Amortized

Gross Unrealized

Fair

December 31, 2013

Cost

Gains

Losses

Value

Available-for-sale securities

    U.S. Government agencies

$

112,863

 $

-

 $

7,791

 $

105,072

    U.S. Government sponsored agency mortgage backed securities

        168,045

             27

        10,649

      157,423

    States and political subdivisions

          45,237

        1,240

             140

        46,337

    Corporate bonds

          20,747

           280

             145

        20,882

$

346,892

 $

1,547

 $

18,725

 $

 329,714

Held-to-maturity securities

       

    States and political subdivisions

$

27,839

 $

756

 $

-

 $

28,595

           

13

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

            Certain investments in debt securities are reported in the financial statements at an amount less than their historical cost.  Total fair value of these investments at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 was $280,885 and $269,691, which was 77% and 75%, respectively, of the Corporation’s available-for-sale and held-to-maturity investment portfolio.  The Corporation evaluates its investment portfolio on a quarterly basis for impairment.  The analysis performed as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 indicated that all impairment was considered temporary, market driven due primarily to fluctuations in market interest rates and not credit-related.

 

            The following table shows the Corporation’s investments’ gross unrealized losses and fair value of the Corporation’s investments with unrealized losses that were not deemed to be other-than-temporarily impaired, aggregated by investment class and length of time that individual securities had been in a continuous unrealized loss position at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 (dollars in thousands):

 

Less than 12 months

12 months or Greater

Total

March 31, 2014

Fair

Unrealized

Fair

Unrealized

Fair

Unrealized

Type of Security

Value

Losses

Value

 

Losses

Value

Losses

    US Government agencies

 $

104,727

 $

5,658

 $

4,740  

 $

260

 $

109,467

 $

5,918

    US Government sponsored agency mortgage

       backed securities

      117,344

           5,285

        44,269

           2,839

    161,613

           8,124

    States and political subdivisions

          2,205

                72

             228

                  8

        2,433

                80

    Corporate bonds

          4,924

                41

          2,448

                35

        7,372

                76

 $

229,200

 $

11,056

 $

51,685

 

 

 $

3,142

 $

 280,885

 $

14,198

December 31, 2013

Less than 12 months

12 months or Greater

Total

Fair

Unrealized

Fair

Unrealized

Fair

Unrealized

Type of Security

Value

Losses

Value

 

Losses

Value

Losses

    US Government agencies

 $

100,533

 $

7,330

 $

4,539  

 $

461

 $

105,072

 $

7,791

    US Government sponsored agency mortgage

       backed securities

      144,134

         10,073

          8,698

              576

    152,832

         10,649

    States and political subdivisions

          2,615

              140

                 -

                   -

        2,615

              140

    Corporate bonds

          8,590

              121

             582

                24

        9,172

              145

 $

255,872

 $

17,664

 $

 13,819

 

 

 $

1,061

 $

269,691

 $

18,725

 

The amortized cost and fair value of available-for-sale securities and held-to-maturity securities at March 31, 2014, by contractual maturity, are shown below (dollars in thousands).  Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because issuers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.

Available for Sale

Held to Maturity

March 31, 2014

Amortized

Estimated

Amortized

Estimated

Cost

Fair Value

Cost

Fair Value

Within one year

 $

3,795 

 $

3,845 

 $

4,082 

 $

4,176 

One to five years

28,044 

28,213 

6,098 

6,285 

Five to ten years

132,136 

127,015 

15,625 

15,991 

After ten years

13,767 

14,445 

1,107 

1,131 

Mortgage-backed securities

174,058 

165,986 

Total

 $

                351,800 

 $

339,504 

 $

26,912 

 $

27,583 

 

The carrying value of securities pledged as collateral to secure public deposits and for other purposes was $221,524 at March 31, 2014 and $210,494 at December 31, 2013.

 

The book value of securities sold under agreements to repurchase amounted to $34,976 at March 31, 2014 and $34,978 at December 31, 2013.

 

14

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross gains of $45 and $823 resulting from sales of available-for-sale securities were realized for the three month periods ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

 

NOTE 5LOANS

 

            The following table presents the Corporation’s loans by class as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 (dollars in thousands):

March 31, 2014

December 31, 2013

Commercial

Commercial and industrial

 $

90,319 

 $

94,702 

Non-farm, nonresidential real estate

176,016 

176,213 

Construction and development

40,819 

29,938 

Commercial loans secured by real estate

31,739 

26,940 

Other commercial

24,838 

26,582 

Total commercial

363,731 

354,375 

Residential

Consumer loans

10,171 

10,957 

Single family residential

218,183 

213,763 

Other retail

28,372 

27,671 

Total residential and consumer

256,726 

252,391 

Total gross loans

 $

620,457 

 $

606,766 

 

The amount of capitalized fees and costs under ASC 310-20, included in the above loan totals were $824 and $831 at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013.

 

Loan Origination/Risk Management. The Corporation has certain lending policies and procedures in place that are designed to maximize loan income within an acceptable level of credit risk. Management reviews and approves these policies and procedures on a regular basis. A reporting system supplements the review process by providing management with frequent reports related to loan production, loan quality, concentrations of credit, loan delinquencies and non-performing and potential problem loans. Diversification in the loan portfolio is a means of managing risk associated with fluctuations in economic conditions.

 

Commercial and industrial loans are underwritten after evaluating and understanding a borrower’s ability to operate profitably and expand its business prudently. Underwriting standards are designed to promote relationship banking rather than transactional banking. Once it is determined that the borrower’s management possesses sound ethics and solid business acumen, the Corporation’s management examines current and projected cash flows to determine the ability of the borrower to repay their obligations as agreed. Commercial and industrial loans are primarily made based on the identified cash flows of the borrower and secondarily on the underlying collateral provided by the borrower. The cash flows of borrowers, however, may not be as expected and the collateral securing these loans may fluctuate in value. Most commercial and industrial loans are secured by the assets being financed or other business assets such as accounts receivable or inventory and may incorporate a personal guarantee; however, some short-term loans may be made on an unsecured basis. In the case of loans secured by accounts receivable, the availability of funds for the repayment of these loans may be substantially dependent on the ability of the borrower to collect amounts due from its customers.

 

 

 

15

 

 


 

 

 

 

Commercial real estate loans are subject to underwriting standards and processes similar to commercial and industrial loans, in addition to those of real estate loans. These loans are viewed primarily as loans secured by real estate. Commercial real estate lending typically involves higher loan principal amounts and the repayment of these loans is generally largely dependent on the successful operation of the property securing the loan or the business conducted on the property securing the loan. Commercial real estate loans may be more adversely affected by conditions in the real estate markets or in the general economy. Management monitors and evaluates commercial real estate loans based on collateral, geography and risk grade criteria. As a general rule, the Corporation avoids financing single-purpose projects unless other underwriting factors are present to help mitigate risk. The Corporation also utilizes third-party experts to provide insight and guidance about economic conditions and trends affecting market areas it serves. In addition, management tracks the level of owner-occupied commercial real estate loans versus non-owner occupied loans. At March 31, 2014, approximately half of the outstanding principal balance of the Corporation’s commercial real estate loans was secured by owner-occupied properties. 

 

With respect to loans to developers and builders (construction and development) that are secured by non-owner occupied properties that the Corporation may originate from time to time, the Corporation generally requires the borrower to have had an existing relationship with the Corporation and have a proven record of success. Construction loans are underwritten utilizing feasibility studies, independent appraisal reviews, sensitivity analysis of absorption and lease rates and financial analysis of the developers and property owners. Construction loans are generally based upon estimates of costs and value associated with the complete project. These estimates may be inaccurate. Construction loans often involve the disbursement of substantial funds with repayment substantially dependent on the success of the ultimate project. Sources of repayment for these types of loans may be pre-committed permanent loans from approved long-term lenders, sales of developed property or an interim loan commitment from the Corporation until permanent financing is obtained. These loans are closely monitored by on-site inspections and are considered to have higher risks than other real estate loans because of their ultimate repayment being sensitive to interest rate changes, governmental regulation of real property, general economic conditions and the availability of long-term financing.

 

The Corporation originates consumer retail loans utilizing a computer-based credit scoring analysis to supplement the underwriting process. To monitor and manage consumer retail loan risk, policies and procedures are developed and modified, as needed, jointly by line and staff personnel. This activity, coupled with relatively small loan amounts that are spread across many individual borrowers, minimizes risk. Additionally, trend and outlook reports are reviewed by management on a regular basis. Underwriting standards for home equity loans are heavily influenced by statutory requirements, which include, but are not limited to, a maximum loan-to-value percentage of 80%, collection remedies, the number of such loans a borrower can have at one time and documentation requirements.

 

The Corporation contracts with a third party vendor to perform loan reviews.  The Corporation reviews and validates the credit risk program on an annual basis. Results of these reviews are presented to management.  The loan review process complements and reinforces the risk identification and assessment decisions made by lenders and credit personnel, as well as the Corporation’s policies and procedures.

 

A concentration of credit occurs when obligations, direct or indirect, of the same or affiliated interests represent 15% or more of the Corporation's capital structure. The Board of Directors recognizes that the Corporation's geographic market area imposes some limitations regarding loan diversification if the Corporation is to perform the function for which it has been chartered. Specifically, lending to qualified borrowers within the Corporation's market area will naturally cause concentrations of real estate loans in the primary communities served by the Corporation and loans to employees of major employers in the area.

 

All closed-end commercial loans (excluding loans secured by real estate) are charged off no later than 90 days delinquent.  If a loan is considered uncollectable, it is charged off earlier than 90 days delinquent.  When a commercial loan secured by real estate is past due, a current assessment of the value of the real estate is made.  If the balance of the loan exceeds the fair value of the property, the loan is placed on nonaccrual with a specific reserve equal to the difference between book value and fair value assigned to the credit until such time as the property has been foreclosed.  When the foreclosed property has been legally assigned to the Corporation, a charge-off is taken with the remaining balance, reflecting the fair value less estimated costs to sell, transferred to other real estate owned. 

 

            All closed-end consumer loans (excluding conventional 1-4 family residential loans and installment and revolving loans secured by real estate) are charged off no later than 120 days (five monthly payments) delinquent.  If a loan is considered uncollectable, it is charged off earlier than 120 days delinquent.  For conventional 1-4 family residential loans and installment and revolving loans secured by real estate, when a loan is 90 days past due, a current assessment of the value of the real estate is made.  If the balance of the loan exceeds the fair value of the property, the loan is placed on nonaccrual and foreclosure proceedings are initiated.  When the foreclosed property has been legally assigned to the Corporation, a charge-off is taken with the remaining balance reflecting the fair value less estimated costs to sell transferred to other real estate owned.

 

 

16

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

             Non-Accrual and Past Due Loans.  Loans are considered past due if the required principal and interest payments have not been received as of the date such payments were due. Loans are placed on non-accrual status when (i) principal or interest has been in default for a period of 90 days or more or (ii) full payment of principal and interest is not expected. Loans may be placed on non-accrual status regardless of whether or not such loans are considered past due. When interest accrual is discontinued, all unpaid accrued interest is reversed. Interest income on non-accrual loans is recognized only to the extent that cash payments are received in excess of principal due. A loan may be returned to accrual status when all the principal and interest amounts contractually due are brought current and future principal and interest amounts contractually due are reasonably assured, which is typically evidenced by a sustained period (three to six months) of repayment performance by the borrower.  The Corporation had no loans that were 90 days or more past due that was not included in nonaccrual loans as of March 31, 2014.

 

             The following tables provide details regarding the aging of the Corporation’s loan portfolio as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 (dollars in thousands):

 

March 31, 2014

30 - 89 Days past
due

90 Days and
greater Past Due

Total past due

Current

Total loans

Retail

  Consumer

 $

76 

 $

 $

76 

 $

10,095 

 $

10,171 

  Single family residential

2,927 

102 

3,029 

 

          215,154 

              218,183 

  Other retail

                           344 

                          349 

 

28,023 

                28,372 

Retail total

 $

3,347 

 $

107 

 $

3,454 

 $

         253,272 

 $

256,726 

Commercial

  Commercial and industrial

 $

                     765 

 $

                  1,313 

 $

                  2,078 

 $

            88,241 

 $

90,319 

  Non-farm, non-residential real estate

484 

24 

508 

175,508 

176,016 

  Construction and development

- -

40,819 

40,819 

  Commercial loans secured by real estate

65 

176 

241 

                 31,498 

                31,739 

  All other commercial

                            -

                        1,210 

1,210 

23,628 

                24,838 

Commercial total

 

                   1,314 

 

                  2,723 

 $

                 4,037 

 $

         359,694 

 $

363,731 

Total

 $

                  4,661 

 $

                  2,830 

 $

                 7,491 

 $

         612,966 

 $

620,457 

December 31, 2013

30 - 89 Days Past
Due

Greater Than 90
Days Past Due

Total Past Dues

Current

Total Loans

Retail

  Consumer loans

 $

182 

 $

 $

185 

 $

10,772 

 $

10,957 

  Single family residential

3,805 

83 

3,876 

209,887 

213,763 

  Other retail

319 

28 

359 

27,312 

27,671 

Retail Total

 $

4,306 

 $

114 

 $

4,420 

 $

247,971 

 $

252,391 

Commercial

  Commercial and industrial

 $

428 

 $

1,328 

 $

1,756 

 $

92,946 

 $

94,702 

  Non-farm, non-residential real estate

393 

393 

175,820 

176,213 

  Construction and development

28 

28 

29,910 

29,938 

  Commercial loans secured by real estate

38 

178 

216 

26,724 

26,940 

  Other commercial

1,249 

1,249 

25,333 

26,582 

Commercial total

 $

859 

 $

2,783 

 $

3,642 

 $

350,733 

 $

354,375 

Total

 $

5,165 

 $

2,897 

 $

8,062 

 $

598,704 

 $

606,766 

 

 

 

 

 

17

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The following tables summarize the impaired loans by loan type as of March 31, 2014, December 31, 2013 and March 31, 2013 (dollars in thousands):

March 31, 2014

Unpaid
Contractual
Principal Balance

Recorded
Investment
With No
Allowance

Recorded
Investment
With
Allowance

Total
Recorded
Investment

Related
Allowance

Average
Recorded
Investment
Year To
Date

Interest
Received

Interest
Accrued

Commercial

Commercial and industrial

 $

3,222 

 $

2,602 

 $

 $

2,602 

 $

 $

2,720 

 $

19 

 $

46 

Non-farm, non-residential real estate

7,136 

894 

5,727 

6,621 

1,364 

6,681 

88 

92 

Construction and development

391 

391 

391 

437 

Other commercial

2,020 

1,652 

176 

1,828 

43 

1,865 

31 

32 

Commercial total

12,769 

5,539 

5,903 

11,442 

1,407 

11,703 

144 

176 

Retail

Single family residential

1,767 

737 

736 

1,473 

194 

1,482 

22 

24 

Retail total

1,767

737 

736 

1,473 

194 

1,482 

22 

24 

Total

 $

14,536 

 $

6,276 

 $

6,639 

 $

12,915 

 $

1,601 

 $

13,184 

 $

166 

 $

200 

December 31, 2013

Unpaid
Contractual
Principal Balance

Recorded
Investment
With No
Allowance

Recorded
Investment
With
Allowance

Total
Recorded
Investment

Related
Allowance

Average
Recorded
Investment Year
To Date

Interest
Received

Interest
Accrued

Commercial

Commercial and industrial

 $

2,190 

 $

1,338 

 $

234 

 $

1,572 

 $

16 

 $

1,620 

 $

23 

 $

134 

Non-farm, non-residential real estate

3,236 

1,155

1,551 

2,706 

282 

2,819 

157 

168 

Construction and development

461 

461 

461 

44 

556 

30 

30 

Other commercial

3,834 

3,310 

178 

3,488 

3,704 

225 

241 

Commercial total

9,721 

6,264 

1,963 

8,227 

342 

8,699 

435 

573 

Retail

Single family residential

1,121 

568 

419 

987 

118 

1,044 

52 

55 

Other retail

11 

11 

11 

11 

11 

 

 

Retail total

1,132 

568 

430 

998 

129 

1,055 

52 

55 

Total

 $

10,853 

 $

6,832 

 $

2,393 

 $

9,225 

 $

471 

 $

9,754 

 $

487 

 $

628 

March 31, 2013

Unpaid
Contractual
Principal Balance

Recorded
 Investment
With No
Allowance

Recorded
Investment
With
Allowance

Total
Recorded
Investment

Related
Allowance

Average
Recorded
Investment Year
To Date

Interest
Received

Interest
Accrued

Commercial

Commercial and industrial

 $

2,311 

 $

416 

 $

1,305 

 $

1,721 

 $

120 

 $

1,727 

 $

 $

134 

Non-farm, non-residential real estate

2,804 

2,348 

2,348 

2,393 

32 

128 

Construction and development

842 

188 

653 

841 

147 

841 

30 

Other commercial

3,845 

3,846 

3,846 

3,856 

37 

240 

Commercial total

9,802 

6,798 

1,958 

8,756 

267 

8,817 

84 

532 

Retail

Single family residential

2,111 

826 

918 

1,744 

227 

1,768 

29 

314 

Retail total

2,111 

826 

918 

1,744 

227 

1,768 

29 

314 

Total

 $

11,913 

 $

7,624 

 $

2,876 

 $

10,500 

 $

494 

 $

10,585 

 $

113 

 $

846 

 

 

18

 

 


 

 

 

 

The following table summarizes the nonaccrual loans by loan type as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 (dollars in thousands):

March 31, 2014

December 31, 2013

Retail

Consumer

 $

22 

 $

21 

Single family residential

1,508 

1,667 

  Retail total

1,530 

1,688 

Commercial

Commercial and industrial

 $

1,622 

 $

1,649 

Nonfarm, nonresidential

5,138 

737 

Construction and development

68 

Commercial real estate

176 

Other commercial

1,233 

1,248 

  Commercial total

8,169 

3,708 

Total

 $

9,699 

 $

5,396 

 

               

Impaired Loans.  Loans are considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable the Corporation will be unable to collect all amounts due in accordance with the original contractual terms of the loan agreement, including scheduled principal and interest payments. Impairment is evaluated in total for smaller-balance loans of a similar nature and on an individual loan basis for other loans. If a loan is impaired, a specific valuation allowance is allocated, if necessary, so that the loan is reported net, at the present value of estimated future cash flows using the loan’s existing rate or at the fair value of collateral if repayment is expected solely from the collateral. Interest payments on impaired loans are typically applied to principal unless collectability of the principal amount is reasonably assured, in which case interest is recognized on a cash basis. Impaired loans, or portions thereof, are charged off when deemed uncollectible. 

 

Troubled Debt Restructurings.  Included in certain categories of impaired loans are certain loans that have been modified in a troubled debt restructuring where economic concessions have been granted to borrowers who have experienced financial difficulties.  These concessions typically result from our loss mitigation activities and could include reductions in the interest rate, payment extensions, forgiveness of principal, forbearance or other actions.  Modifications of terms for our loans and their inclusion as troubled debt restructurings are based on individual facts and circumstances.  Loan modifications that are included as troubled debt restructurings may involve either an increase or reduction of the interest rate, extension of the term of the loan, or deferral of principal or interest payments, regardless of the period of the modification.  All of the loans identified as troubled debt restructuring were modified as a result of financial stress of the borrower.  In order to determine if a borrower is experiencing financial difficulty, an evaluation is performed to determine the probability that the borrower will be in payment default on any of its debt in the foreseeable future with the modification.  This evaluation is performed under the Corporation’s internal underwriting policy.

           

When the Corporation modifies loans in a troubled debt restructuring, the Corporation evaluates any possible impairment similar to other impaired loans based on the present value of expected future cash flows, discounted at the contractual interest rate of the original loan or lease agreement, or use the current fair value of the collateral, less selling costs for collateral dependent loans. If the Corporation determines that the value of the modified loan is less than the recorded investment in the loan, impairment is recognized through an allowance estimate or a charge-off to the allowance.  In periods subsequent to modification, the Corporation evaluates all troubled debt restructuring, including those that have payment defaults, for possible impairment and recognize impairment through the allowance.

 

 

During the three months ended March 31, 2014, there were no loans modified in troubled debt restructurings, where economic concessions were granted to borrowers consisting of reductions in the interest rates, payment extensions, forgiveness of principal, and forbearances.  In addition, there were no troubled debt restructuring loans that subsequently defaulted during the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 and year ended December 31, 2013. 

 

 

 

19

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

Presented below, segregated by class of loans, are troubled debt restructurings that occurred during the three months ended March 31, 2013 and the year ended December 31, 2013 (dollars in thousands):

 

 

Year Ended December 31, 2013

Post-

Modification

Net Charge-offs

Number of

Outstanding

Resulting from

(dollars in thousands)

Loans

Balance

Modifications

Retail:

  Consumer

                 3

$                 

8

$

-

  Single family residential

3

167

6

Total trouble debt restructurings

                 6

$

175

 $

6

 

 

Year Ended March 31, 2013

Post-

Modification

Net Charge-offs

Number of

Outstanding

Resulting from

(dollars in thousands)

Loans

Balance

Modifications

Retail:

  Single family residential

                 1

$

  130

                          -

 

Loans retain their accrual status at the time of their modification.  As a result, if a loan is on non-accrual status at the time it is modified, it stays as non-accrual status, and if a loan is on accrual status at the time of the modification, it generally stays on accrual status.  Commercial and consumer loans modified in a troubled debt restructuring are closely monitored for delinquency as an early indicator of possible future default.  If loans modified in a troubled debt restructuring subsequently default, the Corporation evaluates the loan for possible further impairment.  The allowance for loan and lease losses (“ALLL”) may be increased, adjustments may be made in the allocation of the allowance or partial charge-offs may be taken to further write-down the carrying value of the loan.  The Corporation considers a loan in default when it is 90 days or more past due and still accruing or transferred to nonaccrual status. 

 

Credit Quality Indicators. As part of the ongoing monitoring of the credit quality of the Corporation’s loan portfolio, management tracks certain credit quality indicators including trends related to (i) the weighted-average risk grade of commercial loans, (ii) the level of classified commercial loans, (iii) net charge-offs, (iv) non-performing loans  and (v) the general economic conditions in the State of Tennessee.

 

The Corporation uses a risk grading matrix to assign a risk grade to each of its commercial loans.  Loans are graded on a scale of 1 through 8.  A description of the general characteristics of the eight risk grades is as follows:

Risk Rating 1              Minimal Risk

 

General Characteristics:

 

20

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

Risk Rating 2             Modest Risk

 

General Characteristics:

Risk Rating 3             Average Risk

 

General Characteristics:

Risk Rating 4              Acceptable Risk

 

General Characteristics:

21

 

 


 

 

 

Risk Rating 5              Pass / Watch 

 

General Characteristics:

 

Loans considered for this risk rating require a heightened level of supervision. 

 

A) Transitional, Event Driven – This category of risk rated 5 loans captures responses to early warning signals from a relationship and, therefore, signifies a specific, event-driven, transitional credit grade. The event is generally something unplanned or unexpected such as a death, a disaster, the loss of a major client, product line, or key employee; divorce, or health condition of the owner or key management person. This category may be used in transitional upgrades as well as transitional downgrades of credit relationships.  Under these criteria, this category necessitates a plan of action to either upgrade the credit to a “Pass” rating (i.e., Risk Rating 1-4), downgrade the credit to a criticized asset, or exit the relationship within six months.

 

B) Ongoing Supervision Warranted - This category may also be utilized to identify loans having inherent characteristics which warrant more than the normal level of supervision.  Loans meeting these criteria may include larger, more complex loans with unusual structures.  Loans, which, due to structure or nature of the collateral require above average servicing, may also be considered for this risk rating.  Unlike other criteria listed previously for this category, these particular characteristics tend not to be one-time or transitional in nature; therefore, these loans may be expected to remain in this risk rating category longer than six months.  A loan might remain in this risk rating category for its life or until the characteristic warranting the rating can be eliminated or effectively mitigated.

 

22

 

 


 

 

 

 

Risk Rating 6              Special Mention

 

A special mention asset has potential weaknesses that deserve management’s close attention. If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for the asset or in the institution’s credit position at some future date. Special mention assets are not adversely classified and do not expose an institution to sufficient risk to warrant adverse classification.

 

General Characteristics:

 

Risk Rating 7             Substandard

 

A substandard asset is inadequately protected by the current sound worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. Assets so classified must have a well-defined weakness, or weaknesses, that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. They are characterized by the distinct possibility that the Corporation will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected.

 

General Characteristics:

 

 

 

 

23

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Risk Rating 8       Doubtful

 

An asset classified as doubtful has all the weaknesses inherent in one classified substandard with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values, highly questionable and improbable.

 

General Characteristics:

 

The following tables present risk grades and classified loans by class of commercial loan in the Corporation’s portfolios as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 (dollars in thousands):

 

 

 

24

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

March 31, 2014

Commercial Loan Portfolio:  Credit risk profile by internally assigned grade

Commercial & Industrial

Non-Farm, Non-Residential
Real Estate Loans

Construction & Development

Commercial Loans Secured
by Residential R/E

All Other
Commercial Loans

Commercial
Loan Totals

  Pass

 $

87,146 

 $

166,383 

 $

40,428 

 $

                     31,328 

 $

               23,451 

 $

348,736 

  Special Mention

811 

3,944 

177 

4,932 

  Substandard

1,287 

5,689 

391 

                                411 

-

7,778 

  Doubtful

1,075 

1,210 

2,285 

TOTALS

 $

             90,319 

 $

176,016 

 $

40,819 

 $

31,739 

 $

24,838 

 $

363,731 

Retail Loan Portfolio:  Credit risk profiles based on delinquency status classification

Consumer Loans

Single-Family
Residential**

All Other
Retail Loans

Retail Loan Totals

  Performing

 $

             10,149 

 $

215,284 

 $

28,367 

 $

253,800 

  Non-performing*

22 

                            2,899 

                            2,926 

TOTALS

 $

             10,171 

 $

                   218,183 

 $

               28,372 

 $

256,726 

*Loans are classified as non-performing loans and are automatically placed on non-accrual status once they reach 90 days past due.  For the purposes of this calculation, all loans rated at or below Substandard  (RR7) are classified as non-performing.

     

**Single-family residential loans includes first mortgages, closed-end second mortgages, residential construction loans, and home equity lines of credit (HELOC's).

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2013

Commercial Loan Portfolio:  Credit risk profile by internally assigned grade

Commercial & Industrial

Non-Farm, Non-Residential Real Estate Loans

Construction & Development

Commercial Loans Secured by Residential R/E

All Other Commercial Loans

Commercial Loan Totals

  Pass

 $

92,155 

 $

170,585 

 $

29,463 

 $

26,516 

 $

24,131 

 $

342,850 

  Special Mention

836 

3,883 

179 

4,898 

  Substandard

635 

1,745 

475 

424 

1,023 

4,302 

  Doubtful

1,076 

1,249 

2,325 

TOTALS

 $

94,702 

 $

176,213 

 $

29,938 

 $

26,940 

 $

26,582 

 $

354,375 

Retail Loan Portfolio:  Credit risk profiles based on delinquency status classification

Consumer Loans

Single-Family Residential**

All Other Retail Loans

Retail Loan Totals

  Performing

 $

10,936 

 $

212,096 

 $

27,643 

 $

250,675 

  Non-performing*

21 

1,667 

28 

1,716 

TOTALS

 $

10,957 

 $

213,763 

 $

27,671 

 $

252,391 

*Loans are classified as non-performing loans and are automatically placed on non-accrual status once they reach 90 days past due.  For the purposes of this calculation, all loans rated at or below Substandard (RR7) are classified as non-performing.

**Single-family residential loans includes first mortgages, closed-end second mortgages, residential construction loans, and home equity lines of credit (HELOC's).

 

 

Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses. The ALLL is a reserve established through a provision for loan losses charged to expense, which represents management’s best estimate of probable losses that have been incurred within the existing portfolio of loans. The allowance, in the judgment of management, is necessary to reserve for estimated loan losses and risks inherent in the loan portfolio. The Corporation’s ALLL methodology includes allowance allocations calculated in accordance with ASC Topic 310, “Receivables” (“ASC Topic 310”), and allowance allocations calculated in accordance with ASC Topic 450, “Contingencies” (“ASC Topic 450”).  Accordingly, the methodology is based on historical loss experience by type of credit and internal risk grade, specific homogeneous risk pools and specific loss allocations, with adjustments for current events and conditions. The Corporation’s process for determining the appropriate level of the ALLL is designed to account for credit deterioration as it occurs. The provision for loan losses reflects loan quality trends, including the levels of and trends related to non-accrual loans, past due loans, potential problem loans, criticized loans and net charge-offs or recoveries, among other factors. The provision for loan losses also reflects the totality of actions taken on all loans for a particular period.  Therefore, the amount of the provision reflects not only the necessary increases in the ALLL related to newly identified criticized loans, but it also reflects actions taken related to other loans including, among other things, any necessary increases or decreases in required allowances for specific loans or loan pools. 

 

The level of the allowance reflects management’s continuing evaluation of industry concentrations, specific credit risks, loan loss experience, current loan portfolio quality, present economic, political and regulatory conditions and unidentified losses inherent in the current loan portfolio. Portions of the allowance may be allocated for specific credits; however, the entire allowance is available for any credit that, in management’s judgment, should be charged off. While management utilizes its best judgment and information available, the ultimate adequacy of the allowance is dependent upon a variety of factors beyond the Corporation’s control, including, among other things, the performance of the Corporation’s loan portfolio, the economy, and changes in interest.

 

25

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Corporation’s ALLL consists of three elements: (i) specific valuation allowances determined in accordance with ASC Topic 310 based on probable losses on specific loans; (ii) historical valuation allowances determined in accordance with ASC Topic 450 based on historical loan loss experience for loans with similar characteristics and trends, adjusted, as necessary, to reflect the impact of current conditions; and (iii) general valuation allowances determined in accordance with ASC Topic 450 based on general economic conditions and other qualitative risk factors both internal and external to the Corporation. 

 

The allowances established for probable losses on specific loans are based on a regular analysis and evaluation of problem loans. Loans are classified based on an internal credit risk grading process that evaluates, among other things: (i) the obligor’s ability to repay; (ii) the underlying collateral, if any; and (iii) the economic environment and industry in which the borrower operates. This analysis is performed at the relationship manager level for all commercial loans. When

a loan has an assigned risk rating of 8 (Doubtful) or higher, a special assets officer analyzes the loan to determine whether the loan is impaired and, if impaired, the need to specifically allocate a portion of the ALLL to the loan. Specific valuation allowances are determined by analyzing the borrower’s ability to repay amounts owed, collateral deficiencies, the relative risk grade of the loan and economic conditions affecting the borrower’s industry, among other things.

 

Historical valuation allowances are calculated based on the historical loss experience of specific types of loans and the internal risk grade of such loans at the time they were charged-off. The Corporation calculates historical loss ratios for pools of similar loans with similar characteristics based on the proportion of actual charge-offs experienced to the total population of loans in the pool. The historical loss ratios are updated quarterly based on actual charge-off experience.  A historical valuation allowance is established for each pool of similar loans based upon the product of the historical loss ratio and average balance of the loans in the pool. The Corporation’s pools of similar loans include similarly risk-graded groups of commercial and industrial loans, commercial real estate loans, consumer real estate loans and consumer and other loans.

           

The components of the general valuation allowance include (i) the additional reserves allocated to specific loan portfolio segments as a result of applying an environmental risk adjustment factor to the base historical loss allocation and (ii) the additional reserves that are not allocated to specific loan portfolio segments including allocations for groups of similar loans with risk characteristics that exceed certain concentration limits established by management.

 

There is an inherent imprecision in calculating the specific portion of the ALLL.  Therefore, a factor has been added to the allocation of each of the identified segments of the loan portfolio to account for the imprecision.

 

            Included in the general valuation allowances are allocations for groups of similar loans with risk characteristics that exceed certain concentration limits established by management. Concentration risk limits have been established, among other things, for certain industry concentrations, large balance and highly leveraged credit relationships that exceed specified risk grades, and loans originated with policy exceptions that exceed specified risk grades.

 

The ALLL is maintained at a level considered adequate to provide for the losses that can be reasonably anticipated.  Management’s periodic evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance is based on the Corporation’s past loan loss experience, known and inherent risks in the portfolio, adverse situations that may affect the borrower’s ability to repay, the estimated value of any underlying collateral, composition of the loan portfolio, current economic conditions and other relevant factors.  This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires material estimates that may be susceptible to change. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

26

 

 


 

 

 

 

The following tables summarize the allocation in the ALLL by loan segment for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and March 31, 2013 and the year ended December 31, 2013 (dollars in thousands): 

 

Residential

Consumer and

Commercial

Real Estate

Other Retail

Totals

Beginning ALLL balance - 12/31/13

 $

7,359 

 $

1,084 

 $

152 

 $

8,595 

  Less: Charge-offs

  Add: Recoveries

14 

11 

26 

  Add: Provisions

Ending ALLL balance - 3/31/14

 $

7,373 

 $

1,085 

 $

163 

 $

8,621 

Residential

Consumer and

Commercial

Real Estate

Other Retail

Totals

Beginning ALLL balance - 12/31/12

 $

7,528 

 $

1,109 

 $

172 

 $

8,809 

  Less: Charge-offs

(144)

(12)

(14)

(170)

  Add: Recoveries

10 

18 

  Add: Provisions

(54)

46 

Ending ALLL balance - 3/31/13

 $

7,340 

 $

1,143 

 $

174 

 $

8,657 

Residential

Consumer and

Commercial

Real Estate

Other Retail

Totals

Beginning ALLL balance - 1/1/13

 $

7,528 

 $

1,109 

 $

172 

 $

8,809 

  Less: Charge-offs

(222)

(27)

(49)

(298)

  Add: Recoveries

53 

29 

84 

  Add: Provisions

Ending ALLL balance - 12/31/13

 $

7,359 

 $

1,084 

 $

152 

 $

8,595 

 

The following tables detail the amount of the ALLL allocated to each portfolio segment as of March 31, 2014, December 31, 2013 and March 31, 2013, disaggregated on the basis of the Corporation’s impairment methodology (dollars in thousands):

Residential

Consumer and

March 31, 2014

Commercial

Real Estate

Other Retail

Totals

Loans individually evaluated for impairment

 $

1,407 

 $

194 

 $

 $

1,601 

Loans collectively evaluated for impairment

5,966 

891 

163 

7,020 

Total

 $

7,373 

 $

1,085 

 $

163 

 $

8,621 

Residential

Consumer and

December 31, 2013

Commercial

Real Estate

Other Retail

Totals

Loans individually evaluated for impairment

 $

342 

 $

118 

 $

11 

 $

471 

Loans collectively evaluated for impairment

7,017 

966 

141 

8,124 

Total

 $

7,359 

 $

1,084 

 $

152 

 $

8,595 

Residential

Consumer and

March 31, 2013

Commercial

Real Estate

Other Retail

Totals

Loans individually evaluated for impairment

 $

267 

 $

227 

 $

 $

494 

Loans collectively evaluated for impairment

7,073 

916 

174 

8,163 

Total

7,340

1,143

174

8,657

 

 

27

 

 


 

 

 

 

The following tables show loans related to each balance in the ALLL by portfolio segment and disaggregated on the basis of the Corporation’s impairment methodology (dollars in thousands):

 

Residential

Consumer and

March 31, 2014

Commercial

Real Estate

Other Retail

Totals

Loans individually evaluated for impairment

 $

11,442

 $

1,473

 $

-

 $

12,915

Loans collectively evaluated for impairment

              352,289

              216,710

                38,543

              607,542

Ending Balance

 $

363,731

 $

218,183

 $

38,543

 $

620,457

`

Residential

Consumer and

December 31, 2013

Commercial

Real Estate

Other Retail

Totals

Loans individually evaluated for impairment

 $

 8,227

 $

987

 $

11

 $

9,225

Loans collectively evaluated for impairment

              346,148

              212,776

                38,617

              597,541

Ending Balance

 $

354,375

 $

213,763

 $

38,628

 $

606,766

Residential

Consumer and

March 31, 2013

Commercial

Real Estate

Other Retail

Totals

Loans individually evaluated for impairment

 $

 8,756

 $

 1,744

 $

 -

 $

10,500

Loans collectively evaluated for impairment

              335,012

              212,907

                15,144

              563,063

Ending Balance

 $

343,768

 $

214,651

 $

15,144

 $

573,563

 

 

NOTE 6BORROWED FUNDS

 

The Corporation has a Cash Management Advance Line of Credit Agreement (the “CMA”), dated June 21, 2010, with the FHLB.  The CMA is a component of the Blanket Agreement.  The purpose of the CMA is to assist with short-term liquidity management.  Under the terms of the CMA, the Corporation may borrow a maximum of $40 million, selecting a variable rate of interest for up to 90 days or a fixed rate for a maximum of 30 days.  There were no borrowings outstanding under the CMA as of March 31, 2014 or December 31, 2013.

 

NOTE 7 – POST-RETIREMENT BENEFIT PLAN

(dollars in thousands)

Three months ended

March 31, 2014

March 31, 2013

Service cost

 $

                                             8 

 $

35 

Interest cost

                                                 28

73 

Amortization of net gain

   47

(47) 

Net periodic pension cost

 $

                                          83 

 $

61

 

 

The Corporation contributed $37 and $107 to the plan for the three month periods ending March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

 

NOTE 8RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

 

ASU 2014-04, “Troubled Debt Restructurings by Creditors (Topic 310).” ASU 2014-04 applies to all creditors who obtain physical possession (resulting from an in substance repossession or foreclosure) of residential real estate property collateralizing a consumer mortgage loan in satisfaction of a receivable. The update requires interim and annual disclosure of both (1) the amount of foreclosed residential real estate property held by the creditor and (2) the recorded investment in consumer mortgage loans collateralized by residential real estate property that are in the process of foreclosure according to local requirements of the applicable jurisdiction.  ASU 2014-04 is effective for public business entities for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2014 and is not expected to have a significant impact on the Corporation’s financial statements. 

 

 

 

28

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ASU 2014-08, “Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205) and Property, Plant, and Equipment (Topic 360):  Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity.”  The amendments in the Update affect an entity that has either of the following:  (1) a component of an entity that either is disposed of or meets the criteria in paragraph 205-20-45-1E to be classified as held for sale or (2) a business or nonprofit activity that, on acquisition, meets the criteria in paragraph 205-20-45-1E to be classified as held for sale.  ASU 2014-08 is effective in the first quarter of 2015 for public companies with calendar year ends and is not expected to have a significant impact on the Corporation’s financial statements.

 

 

 

 

29


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Item 2.  Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

 

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

 

Certain statements contained in this report may not be based on historical facts and are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). These forward-looking statements may be identified by, among other things, the use of forward-looking terminology such as “could,” “would,” “expect,” “believe,” “intend,”  “may,” “will,” “can,” or “should” or future or conditional verb tenses, and variations or  negatives of such terms.  These forward-looking statements include, without limitation, those relating to the Corporation’s valuation methodologies, contributions to the Corporation’s post-retirement benefit plan and returns on the plan’s assets, characterization of accrual and non-accrual loans, concessions granted for troubled debt restructurings, impairment of securities, repayment of loans, loan portfolio concentrations, fair value of impaired loans, satisfaction of capital adequacy requirements,  risk rating classifications of loans, calculation of our ALLL, adequacy of traditional sources of cash generated from operating activities to meet liquidity needs, the impact of various factors on net interest income, the realization of deferred income tax assets, and the impact of remediation efforts concerning internal control over financial reporting.  We caution you not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements in this report because results could differ materially from those anticipated due to a variety of factors.  These factors include, but are not limited to, conditions in the financial market, liquidity, the sufficiency of our ALLL, economic conditions in the communities in the State of Tennesseewhere the Corporation does business, the impact of government regulation and supervision, interest rate risk, including changes in monetary policy and fluctuating interest rates, the Corporation’s ability to attract and retain key personnel, competition from other financial services providers, recent legislation and regulations impacting service fees, the Corporation’s ability to pay dividends, the availability of additional capital on favorable terms, the Corporation’s ability to adapt its products and services to evolving industry standards and consumer preferences, security breaches and other disruptions and other factors detailed from time to time in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). We undertake no obligation to update these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances that occur after the date of this report.

 

All dollar amounts in this report, other than share and per-share amounts, are in thousands unless otherwise noted.

 

EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW

 

At March 31, 2014, the consolidated total assets of the Corporation were $1,128,165, its consolidated gross loans were $620,457, its total deposits were $986,174 and its total shareholders’ equity was $106,990.  The Corporation’s loan portfolio at March 31, 2014 reflected an increase of $13,691, or 2.3%, compared to December 31, 2013.  Total deposits increased $28,837, or 3.0%, and shareholders’ equity increased by 4.2% during the first three months of 2014. 

 

Securities

 

Available-for-sale securities are an integral part of the asset/liability management process of the Corporation.  Accordingly, they represent an important source of liquidity available to fund loans and accommodate asset reallocation strategies dictated by changes in the Corporation’s operating and tax plans, shifting yield spread relationships and changes in configuration of the yield curve.  At March 31, 2014, the Corporation's investment securities portfolio had $339,504 of available-for-sale securities, which are valued at fair market value, and $26,912 of held-to-maturity securities, which are valued at cost on the balance sheet. These compare to $329,714 of available-for-sale securities and $27,839 of held-to-maturity securities as of December 31, 2013. 

 

Loans and Loan Losses

 

 

The loan portfolio is the largest component of earning assets for the Corporation and, consequently, provides the largest amount of revenue for the Corporation.  The loan portfolio also contains the highest exposure to risk as a result of the possibility of unexpected deterioration in the credit quality of borrowers.  When analyzing potential loans, management of the Corporation assesses both interest rate objectives and credit quality objectives in determining whether to make a given loan and the appropriate pricing for that loan.  All loans are expected to be repaid from cash flow or proceeds from the sale of selected assets of the borrowers.  Collateral requirements for the loan portfolio are based on credit evaluation of the borrowers.  The goal of the Corporation is to diversify loans to avoid a concentration of credit in a specific industry, person, entity, product, service, or any area vulnerable to a tax law change or an economic event.

 

(dollars in thousands)

30

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loan volume increased in the first quarter of 2014, with total loans increasing by $13,691, or 2.3% during the three-month period.  Commercial loans increased by $9,356, or 2.6%, in the first quarter, and the retail portfolio decreased by $4,335, or 1.7%.  At $620,457, total loans outstanding increased by $46,894, or 8.2%, at March 31, 2014 compared to March 31, 2013.  Loan demand has shown an improvement during the three months ended March 31, 2014, especially in the mortgage portfolio.  

 

Loans identified with losses by management are promptly charged off. Furthermore, consumer loan accounts are charged off automatically based on regulatory requirements.

 

The ALLL is a reserve established through a provision for loan losses charged to expense, which represents management’s best estimate of probable losses that have been incurred within the existing portfolio of loans. The allowance, in the judgment of management, is necessary to reserve for estimated loan losses and risks inherent in the loan portfolio. The Corporation’s ALLL methodology includes allowance allocations calculated in accordance with ASC Topic 310 and  ASC Topic 450.  Accordingly, the methodology is based on historical loss experience by type of credit and internal risk grade, specific homogeneous risk pools and specific loss allocations, with adjustments for current events and conditions. The Corporation’s process for determining the appropriate level of the ALLL is designed to account for credit deterioration as it occurs. The provision for loan losses reflects loan quality trends, including the levels of and trends related to non-accrual loans, past due loans, potential problem loans, classified and criticized loans and net charge-offs or recoveries, among other factors. The provision for loan losses also reflects the totality of actions taken on all loans for a particular period. In other words, the amount of the provision reflects not only the necessary increases in the ALLL related to newly identified criticized loans, but it also reflects actions taken related to other loans including, among other things, any necessary increases or decreases in required allowances for specific loans or loan pools. See Note 5 - Loans in the accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report for further details regarding the Corporation’s methodology for estimating the appropriate level of the ALLL.

 

Collectability.  A formal process is in place to enhance control over the underwriting of loans and to monitor loan collectability.  This process includes education and training of personnel about the Corporation's loan policies and procedures, assignment of credit analysts to support lenders, timely identification of loans with adverse characteristics, control of corrective actions and objective monitoring of loan reviews.  The Special Assets Department of the Corporation identifies and monitors assets that need special attention.  At March 31, 2014, this process identified loans totaling $4,932 that were classified as other assets especially mentioned compared to loans totaling $4,898 at December 31, 2013.  Loans totaling $7,778 were classified as substandard at March 31, 2014, compared to loans totaling $4,302 at December 31, 2013.  Loans totaling $2,285 were classified as doubtful at March 31, 2014, compared to loans totaling $2,325 at December 31, 2013.

 

             Loans having a recorded  balance of $12,915 and $ 9,225 at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively, have been identified as impaired.  Nonaccrual loans amounting to $9,699 and $5,396 at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively, were not accruing interest.  The large increase in impaired and nonaccrual loans is primarily related to one commercial real estate credit with an outstanding balance of approximately $4.4 million in which events occurred to cause the loan to be downgraded during the quarter, as management concluded the timing and amounts of future cash flows cannot be reasonably estimated.  A specific reserve of approximately $1.1 million was applied to this loan.  Interest received on nonaccrual loans during the first quarter of 2014 was $123, compared to $113 over the same period in 2013. 

           

 

 

(dollars in thousands)

31

 

 

 

 

Deposits

 

            The Corporation does not have any foreign offices and all deposits are serviced in its 18 domestic offices.  The Corporation’s average deposits increased 2.8% during the first three months of 2014 compared to an increase of 5.7% in the first three months of 2013.  Average total noninterest-bearing deposits were 18.3% of total deposits at March 31, 2014, contributing to the Corporation’s low cost of deposits, compared to 17.6% at December 31, 2013.

 

Regulatory Requirements for Capital

 

The Corporation and First Farmers and Merchants Bank, the Corporation’s sole direct subsidiary (the “Bank”), are subject to federal regulatory capital adequacy standards.  Failure to meet capital adequacy requirements could result in certain mandatory, and possibly additional discretionary, actions by regulators that could have a direct material adverse effect on the financial condition of the Corporation and the Bank.  Federal regulations require the Corporation and the Bank to meet specific capital adequacy guidelines that involve quantitative measures of assets, liabilities and certain off-balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices.  The capital classification is also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings and other factors.

 

            Under federal regulatory standards, to be “well-capitalized,” the Corporation’s and the Bank’s Tier 1 Risk-Based Capital Ratio (ratio of Tier 1 Capital to risk-weighted assets) must be at least 6%, its Total Risk-Based Capital Ratio (ratio of total capital to risk-weighted assets) must be at least 10%, and its Tier 1 Leverage Capital Ratio (ratio of Tier 1 Capital to average assets) must be at least 5%.  Equity capital (net of certain adjustments for intangible assets and investments in non-consolidated subsidiaries and certain classes of preferred stock) and other certain equity like instruments are considered Tier 1 Capital.  Tier 2 Capital consists of core capital plus supplementary or temporary capital such as subordinated debt, some types of preferred stock, and a defined percentage of the ALLL.

 

            As of March 31, 2014, the Bank’s Tier 1 Risk-Based Capital Ratio, Total Risk-Based Capital Ratio and Tier 1 Leverage Capital Ratios were 13.9%, 15.1%, and 9.2%, respectively, compared to 13.8%, 15.0%, and 9.1% at December 31, 2013. At March 31, 2014, the Corporation’s Tier 1 Risk-Based Capital Ratio, Total Risk-Based Capital Ratio and Tier 1 Leverage Capital Ratios were 14.2%, 15.4% and 9.4%, respectively, compared to 14.1%, 15.3%, and 9.4% at December 31, 2013.  Management believes, as of March 31, 2014, that the Corporation and the Bank each met all capital adequacy requirements to which they are subject.

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

            Most of the capital needs of the Corporation historically have been met with retained earnings.

 

            The Corporation and the Bank are subject to Tennessee statutes and regulations that impose restrictions on the amount of dividends that may be declared.  Furthermore, any dividend payments are subject to the continuing ability of the Corporation to maintain its compliance with minimum federal regulatory capital requirements and to retain its characterization under federal regulations as a “well-capitalized” institution.  The Corporation’s Board of Directors has adopted a liquidity policy that outlines specific liquidity target balances.  Compliance with this policy is reviewed quarterly by the Corporation’s Asset/Liability Committee and results are reported to the Corporation’s Board of Directors.

 

The Corporation’s formal asset and liability management process is used to manage interest rate risk and assist management in maintaining reasonable stability in the gross interest margin as a result of changes in the level of interest rates and/or the spread relationships among interest rates.  The Corporation uses an earnings simulation model to evaluate the impact of different interest rate scenarios on the gross margin.  Each quarter, the Corporation’s Asset/Liability Committee monitors the relationship of rate sensitive earning assets to rate sensitive interest-bearing liabilities (interest rate sensitivity), which is the principal factor in determining the effect that fluctuating interest rates will have on future net interest income.  Rate sensitive earning assets and interest bearing liabilities are financial instruments that can be repriced to current market rates within a defined time period.

 

 

 

(dollars in thousands)

32

 
 

 

 

 

Management believes that the Corporation’s traditional sources of cash generated from operating activities are adequate to meet the liquidity needs for normal ongoing operations; however, the Corporation also has access to additional liquidity, if necessary, through additional advances from the FHLB or the CMA with the FHLB. The borrowings from the FHLB have been used generally for investment strategies to enhance the Corporation’s portfolio. At March 31, 2014, the Corporation had $69,000 in borrowing capacity. 

 

 

Critical Accounting Policies

 

The accounting principles the Corporation follows and the methods of applying these principles conform with GAAP and with general practices within the banking industry.  In connection with the application of those principles, the Corporation’s management has made judgments and estimates that with respect to the determination of the ALLL and the recognition of deferred income tax assets, have been critical to the determination of the Corporation’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows. 

 

Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses

 

           The Corporation’s management assesses the adequacy of the ALLL prior to the end of each month and prepares a more formal review quarterly to assess the risk in the Corporation's loan portfolio.  This assessment includes procedures to estimate the allowance and test the adequacy and appropriateness of the resulting balance.  The ALLL represents calculated amounts for specifically identified credit exposure and exposures readily predictable by historical or comparative experience.  Even though this calculation considers specific credits, the entire allowance is available to absorb any credit losses.

 

           These calculated amounts are determined by assessing loans identified as not in compliance with loan agreements.  These loans are generally in two different risk groups.  One group is unique loans (commercial loans, including those loans considered impaired).  The second group consists of pools of homogenous loans (generally retail and mortgage loans).  The calculation for unique loans is based primarily on risk rating grades assigned to each of these loans as a result of the Corporation’s loan management and review processes.  Each risk-rating grade is assigned a loss ratio, which is determined based on the experience of management, discussions with banking regulators and the independent loan review process.  The amount allocated for an impaired loan is based on estimated cash flows discounted at the loan’s original effective interest rate or the underlying collateral value.  Historical data, including actual loss experience on specific types of homogenous loans, is used to allocate amounts for loans or groups of loans meeting the specified criteria.  Management has implemented procedures that give more detailed historical data by category of retail and consumer credit and performance characteristics to broaden the analysis and improve monitoring of potential credit risk.

 

           Criteria considered and processes utilized in evaluating the adequacy of the ALLL are:

 

           In assessing the adequacy of the ALLL, the risk characteristics of the entire loan portfolio are evaluated.  This process includes the judgment of the Corporation’s management, input from independent loan reviews and reviews that may have been conducted by Corporation regulators as part of their usual examination process.

 

 

 

 

(dollars in thousands)

33

 
 

 

 

Results of Operations

 

Total interest income for the three months ended March 31, 2014 was $9,042 compared to $9,223 for the three months ended March 31, 2013.  Interest and fees earned on loans and investments are the primary components of total interest income.  Interest and fees earned on loans were $6,936, a decrease of $26 during the three months ended March 31, 2014 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2013.  The lower interest rates for loans were the primary reason for the lower interest income.  Interest earned on investment securities and other earning assets was $2,106, a decrease of $155, or 6.9%, during the three months ended March 31, 2014 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2013.  The decrease in interest earned on investment securities is primarily the result of the call or maturity of several higher yielding municipal bonds in the first quarter of 2014.

 

            Total interest expense in the three months ended March 31, 2014 was $620, a decrease of $214, or 25.7%, compared to the three months ended March 31, 2013.  The lower interest rates for certificates of deposits and public funds during the first quarter of 2014 were the primary reason for the lower expense.  As a policy, budgeted financial goals are monitored on a quarterly basis by the Corporation’s Asset/Liability Committee, which reviews the actual dollar change in net interest income for different interest rate movements.  A negative dollar change in net interest income for a 12-month and 24-month period of less than 10.0% of net interest income given a 100 to 200 basis point shift in interest rates is considered an acceptable rate risk position.  The rate risk analysis for the 24-month period beginning April 1, 2014 and ending March 31, 2016 showed a worst-case potential change to net interest income, in the very unlikely event of a negative 100 basis point shift in interest rates, of 9.1%, or a decrease in net interest income of $3.0 million by the end of the period.

 

            Net interest income of the Corporation on a fully taxable equivalent basis is influenced primarily by changes in:

(1)          the volume and mix of earning assets and sources of funding;

(2)          market rates of interest; and

(3)          income tax rates.

 

            The impact of some of these factors can be controlled by management policies and actions.  External factors also can have a significant impact on changes in net interest income from one period to another.  Some examples of such factors are:

(1)          the strength of credit demands by customers;

(2)          Federal Reserve Board monetary policy; and

(3)          fiscal and debt management policies of the federal government, including changes in tax laws.

 

            The net interest margin, on a tax equivalent basis, at March 31, 2014, December, 31, 2013 and March 31, 2013, was 3.49%, 3.66% and 3.56%, respectively.  The decline during the first three months of 2014 was due, in part, to lower yields on earnings assets.

 

            Overall, the Corporation has experienced declining charge-offs and improved credit quality ratios.  As such, no additions were made to the provision for loan losses in the first quarter of 2014 and in the first quarter of 2013. 

 

            Noninterest income was $2,651, a decrease of $678, or 20.4%, during the three months ended March 31, 2014 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2013.  The gain on sales of securities for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 was $45 and $823, respectively, which accounted for the majority of the decrease in noninterest income over the three-month period.

 

            Noninterest expense, excluding the provision for loan losses, was $8,098 in the three months ended March 31, 2014, decrease of $7, or ..01%, as compared to noninterest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2013

           

Net income for the three months ended March 31, 2014 was $2,262 compared to $3,056 for the three months ended March 31, 2013.  The Corporation earned $0.45 per share for the three months ended in March 31, 2014, compared to $0.59 per share for the three months ended March 31, 2013.  The decrease is mostly due to a decrease in noninterest income.

(dollars in thousands)

34

 
 

 

 

 

 

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

 

The Corporation is a party to financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers.  These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit and stand-by letters of credit.  These instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit risk in excess of the amount recognized in the balance sheet.  The contract or notional amounts of those instruments reflect the extent of involvement the Corporation has in those financial instruments.  Loan commitments are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is not a violation of any condition established in the loan commitment contract.  Stand-by letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Corporation to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party.  Those guarantees are primarily issued to support public and private borrowing arrangements, including commercial paper, bond financing and similar transactions.  The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in making a loan.

 

The total outstanding balance of loan commitments and stand-by letters of credit in the normal course of business at March 31, 2014 were $125,243 and $8,712, respectively.

 

At March 31, 2014, the Corporation and the Bank did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements other than commitments to extend credit and stand-by letters of credit.

 

Item 3.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

 

During the three months ended March 31, 2014, there were no material changes in the quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk presented in the Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.

 

Item 4.  Controls and Procedures.

 

(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.  The Corporation, with the participation of its management, including the Corporation’s Chief Executive Officer and  Treasurer (principal financial officer), carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15e and 15d-15e under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this report.  Based upon that evaluation and as of the end of the period covered by this report, the Corporation’s Chief Executive Officer and Treasurer (principal financial officer) concluded that the Corporation’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective in ensuring that information required to be disclosed in its reports that the Corporation files or submits to the SEC under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported on a timely basis.

 

(b) Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.  There has been no change in the Corporation's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the first quarter of 2014 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(dollars in thousands)

35

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

 

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

 

There have been no material changes in the risk factors previously disclosed in the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.

 

Item 2.  Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

 

The following table provides information regarding purchases of the Corporation’s common stock made by the Corporation during the first quarter of 2014:

 

CORPORATION’S PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Period

Total Number of Shares Purchased

Average Price Paid per Share

Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs

Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs

January 1 – January 31, 2014

––

––

––

––

February 1 – February 28, 2014

––  

––

––

––

March 1 – March 31, 2014

 

  39,013*

 

$25.00

––

––

Total

39,013*

$25.00

––

––

         *Purchased through negotiated transactions with several third-party sellers.

 

 Item 6.  Exhibits.

 

EXHIBIT

 

NUMBER

DESCRIPTION

3.1

Charter. (1)

3.2

Articles of Amendment to Charter. (1)

3.3

Second Amended and Restated By-laws. (2)

10.1

Employment Agreement.

31.1

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer of First Farmers and Merchants Corporation Pursuant to Rule 13a-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2

Certification of the Treasurer (principal financial officer) of First Farmers and Merchants Corporation Pursuant to Rule 13a-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Treasurer (principal financial officer) of First Farmers and Merchants Corporation Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

101.INS

XBRL Instance Document.

101.SCH

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.

101.CAL

XBRL Taxonomy Calculation Linkbase Document.

(dollars in thousands)

36

 

 


101.DEF           

XBRL Taxonomy Definition Linkbase Document.
101.LAB           XBRL Taxonomy Label Linkbase Document.

101.PRE           

XBRL Taxonomy Presentation Linkbase Document.
   

 

                              

(1)  Incorporated by reference from the First Farmers and Merchants Corporation Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 7, 2004 (File Number 000-10972).

(2)  Incorporated by reference from the First Farmers and Merchants Corporation Annual Report on Form 10-K, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 15, 2011 (File Number 000-10972).

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(dollars in thousands)

37


 


 

 

 

 

SIGNATURES

 

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 

 

 

 

FIRST FARMERS AND MERCHANTS CORPORATION

(Registrant)

 

 

 

 

Date             May 9, 2014                                 

                     /s/ T. Randy Stevens                               

 

T. Randy Stevens, Chief Executive Officer

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Date             May 9, 2014                                

             /s/ Patricia P. Bearden                                      
 

Patricia P. Bearden, Treasurer (principal financial officer and principal accounting officer)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(dollars in thousands)

37


 


 

 

 

 

 

EXHIBIT

 

NUMBER

DESCRIPTION

3.1

Charter. (1)

3.2

Articles of Amendment to Charter. (1)

3.3

Second Amended and Restated By-laws. (2)

10.1

Employment Agreement.

31.1

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer of First Farmers and Merchants Corporation Pursuant to Rule 13a-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2

Certification of the Treasurer (principal financial officer) of First Farmers and Merchants Corporation Pursuant to Rule 13a-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Treasurer (principal financial officer) of First Farmers and Merchants Corporation Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

101.INS

XBRL Instance Document.

101.SCH

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.

101.CAL

XBRL Taxonomy Calculation Linkbase Document.

101.DEF           

XBRL Taxonomy Definition Linkbase Document.
101.LAB           XBRL Taxonomy Label Linkbase Document.

101.PRE           

XBRL Taxonomy Presentation Linkbase Document.
   

 

                              

(1)  Incorporated by reference from the First Farmers and Merchants Corporation Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 7, 2004 (File Number 000-10972).

(2)  Incorporated by reference from the First Farmers and Merchants Corporation Annual Report on Form 10-K, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 15, 2011 (File Number 000-10972).

 

(dollars in thousands)

38